Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 FTV Girls (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 01-04-10  04:52pm  (Update History) Reason: Comments from webmaster caused me to rethink a few negative or neutral statements. Pros: - Beautiful women - Many amateurs and ‘first-timers’ - An opportunity to see some porn stars ‘before they were stars’ - Newer files have an HD option - Decent download speeds - Huge site, with apparently regular updates - Public nudity / exhibitionism Please note - my intention is to review only the public nudity part of this site - there are many other general reviews that cover the site more completely Cons: - The set-ups are all essentially the same – gets repetitive - Scenes are broken up into several files - Every file opens with a brief title screen which is VERY annoying when linking multiple files - Expensive - Very little variety in the type of model (not a con if you like this type of model though) Bottom Line: This is my first review of a site that I probably shouldn’t have joined, but I’ll be objective. I have no real interest in solo-girl masturbation sites. All my other reviews are of sites that I had an interest in. The reason I joined was for the advertised public nudity. My review will focus primarily on that for anyone who has the same interest. As other reviewers have noted, there is a lack of variety with the models. For people like me who like FTV Girls’ taste in models, this isn’t an issue, but for those who like some variety this may be a negative. There is a lack of variety is scene set-up too. Most models start outside with a little flashing and then move indoors for some masturbation. Some models are more playful and do more outdoor flashing and some outdoor masturbation too. My reason for joining FTV Girls was because it appeared that there was a lot of public nudity. This is an under-served niche and though the site was not something I’d join otherwise, I joined to see the public stuff. The public stuff is certainly there in quantity. Most of the models do some public flashing. As a public nudity site (and I realize that this isn’t specifically such) this is pretty tame, but well within industry norms for U.S. sites. Obviously all the models will have differing levels of daring when it comes to public nudity. A few are quite daring, a few won’t do it, and the majority do some. For most models, the extent of their public flashing isn’t all that public – they dress in skimpy clothes and flash for the camera on side streets and empty parks. A few – very few – are as daring as the best of the public nudity sites on the web. Many of the public nudity scenes are shot in the same area, which might lead one to presume that they are staged and have the support of the property owners. If you presume that, please take note of the webmaster’s comments below: these scenes are not staged. In my opinion, having the outdoor scenes as spontaneous as this is the essence of a good public nudity site. One thing that would normally be a big negative for me is actually a positive here. The scenes are broken down into several smaller files. I normally despise that, but if all you’re looking for is the public stuff, that works out in your favor. One added thing that is DEFINITELY a negative is that at the beginning of every file there is a title screen. When you link several clips the action gets interrupted by a two-second title screen every few minutes. The site really needs to think about fixing this. Surely a watermark is enough to identify your material. If you’re a fan of public nudity and have run through the sites that specialize in that, FTV Girls is worth a look. There is a lot of material here, and it is well done too. Public nudity (done in the U.S.) isn’t well served, and FTV Girls adds some quality stuff to the available material. 12-31-09  09:01am Replies (5) Review 102 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 240 videos - Streaming and downloads available - Updates with one video per week - Pics offered (with zips) - File names use the model’s name - Male talent knows their role - Excellent selection of lesser-known models - Simple but effective site design - Supports download managers Cons: - Only one file type for download (wmv) - Model name usually only includes her first name - Only one anal scene - Files added after May 2, 2009 start streaming when you open the link (make sure your sound is turned down!) - Odd process won’t allow you to browse the site while downloading anything – you get a message that the server is down for maintenance - No search function but can browse by model name and categories (tags) - Not much variety - Site name doesn’t give clue of the specific niche Bottom Line: Fucked Hard 18 is a single themed site, the theme being massages that end in sex. I learned I had an interest in this niche when I was a member of Massage Creep and have been looking for good massage sites since then. Thankfully several PU members recommended this site because the site name gives no indication of the theme. The site started on December 29, 2008 and now has 240 videos posted. The site updates by adding one new video a week. For those who prefer files other than wmv format, you’re out of luck. That’s all they offer for downloads. Streaming is also available. The files changed as of May 2, 2009. Prior to that there is only one resolution offered, 640x480 @1200 kb/s. After that date two resolutions are offered for downloads, 1260x720 @ 3200kb/s and 1000x564 @1600kb/s. Streaming is unchanged. All files use wmv codec 9 and play at 30fps. Subjectively, both versions look good. One word of caution for the post-May 2009 videos – selecting the link opens to a new page (as happens with the pre-May videos too) and when the page loads the video starts streaming. This is a pet peeve of mine as it hogs bandwidth and can be an unpleasant surprise for anyone who forgets to turn their speakers off. Webmasters: please don’t do this! All scenes run from approximately 35 mins to just under an hour. A potential problem with single-themed sites like this is that the scenes can be repetitive. That criticism can be directed at FH18 because the only thing that changes in the scenes is the girl. The setup is pretty much identical in every scene: the camera opens on a long view of a massage table, the girl walks in, usually by the camera so we can see her ass, she sits on the table and waits for the masseur to come in. He comes in, they introduce themselves. The setup is that she has been selected for a free massage because they are filming a training video. The girl gets naked, gets on the table and the massage begins. One thing I really like is that the masseur (who is the same in all the scenes) uses lots of oil. One aspect of the scenes that I wish was different is what happens before the sex starts. I think Massage Creep does the setup better. MC has the masseur introduce himself to the girl and then he leaves the room while the girl gets undressed and slips under a sheet on the table. The camera acts as sort of a Peeping Tom while this is going on and the masseur peeks in too. Then the massage starts and it is played straight for a while before it becomes sexualized. With FH18 the masseur is in the room as the girl undresses and gets on the table. The massage quickly becomes sexualized with the masseur deliberately going for the naughty bits very quickly. There is almost no variety in the scenes. There is only one anal scene, one lesbian scene, and one or two scenes with two girls. Model types are almost exclusively young, petite and natural. There are a few ‘enhanced’ girls, but not that many, and only a few sport a lot of ink. Two things take this site from ordinary to extraordinary: 1) The models are stunning. The models are mostly ‘porn stars’ in that most of them have a listing on IAFD, but they aren’t ‘big’ stars in that they usually only have a handful of titles to their credit. Some A-listers do appear. While I like most of the A-listers, it is refreshing to see some models that I don’t know. (One beef is that while the site uses the model name in the scene name, they only use her first name. That can be frustrating with some obscure models with relatively common stage names like ‘Amber’ or ‘Natalie.’ I’d prefer her full name so I can source more if I want.) 2) The male talent and crew know how to make good porn. The guy in the scene does an excellent job of never getting in the way or trying to upstage the girl. The cameraman and male talent clearly understand that the scene is about the girl, not the guy. They both do their best to show the girl off. Many other websites could learn a lesson from these guys. Pictures are available, but this isn’t a picture site so they are really just an afterthought. Zips are available. Resolutions on newer pics are good at 996x1500. The site itself is simple, but it doesn’t need to be complex. There are multiple pages of scenes and you can sort by model and categories. There are four bonus sites and several ‘DVD’ sites offered with the membership but those are streaming only. One annoyance is that you can’t browse the site while downloading. Attempting to do so gives you a blank screen with a message that the server is down for service. Overall, this is a site that is really better than I expected. The single theme and the lack of variety would suggest a lower score, but the amazing models and the site’s ability to show them off to their best without the guy ever upstaging the girl pushes the site beyond the average. I highly recommend this site. 01-08-12  08:13am Replies (0) Review 103 Gag Factor (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of a network (five sites in total) - I only paid $13.95 when I joined through Jerkoff Zone (but read that review before you decide on whether this is a good way for you to join) - Pics available - Free Download Manager works well - Updates (one scene per week) - Streaming available - Downloads available - Supports download managers (no obvious time-out issues) - Bills through CCBill Cons: - Not great value for the full membership price ($29.95) - Low quality videos for newer uploads - Very low quality videos for older uploads - Scenes aren’t associated with the DVD title and number - No zips for pics - Only one video file option - A lot of overlap with other JM Productions sites - No search function - Very basic layout Bottom Line: I joined this site because it was offered to me at a discount when I joined Jerkoff Zone. Both are from the porn studio JM Productions (JMP). I don’t know if this is a standard offer, but even at the discounted price the site isn’t a great value so I wouldn’t recommend paying full price. If you’re not familiar with JMP or Gag Factor, think of Facial Abuse or Max Hardcore turned down to 9. It’s still very rough, but not as rough as Max or FA. The series uses well known porn models and face fucks them. There is lots of gagging, runny noses and eyes and general unpleasantness. At least the guys aren’t as misogynistic as the ones at Facial Abuse. JMP made about 30 volumes of the Gag Factor series and most of those had about 10 scenes in them. The site has most of what was produced, with a total of just under 340 scenes. 29 of the scenes are BTS material. I can’t fault the site for lack of material (though I do wish JMP brought that thoroughness to other series’ offered online). What I can fault JMP for is the lack of quality in the material. The newest scenes are posted in one version only – wmv at 640x480 and 2100kbps. This resolution has been available since February 2008, which means that about one-third of the scenes are in this ‘high’ res format. In 2008 this resolution wouldn’t have been impressive, and it certainly isn’t now. What that also means, then, is that two-thirds of the scenes are only available in resolutions lower than the ‘high res’ files now being offered. Many of the oldest scenes are available at 320x240 with 360kbps. By today’s standards, these are virtually unwatchable. I doubt that they were state-of-the-art when they were posted in 2003. A lesser complaint is the very basic layout of the site. The main member page is one long page with all the scenes listed. You get basic information on the scene and one small thumbnail. You get the star name, number of pics in the set, length of the video and the date the scene was added. What you don’t get is the volume number from the series for those looking to catalogue the scenes that way. With each scene description there is a link that takes you to a separate page. From there you can see and download the pictures (no zips are available) and stream or download the video. More recent videos have only the option of downloading the full video, while older postings have that and the option to break it down into segments. There is no search function, but since the site itself is relatively small and the niche is narrow there really is no need for one. The pictures aren’t stellar in quality with a resolution of 750x500. That holds for the oldest and newest pics on the site. The number of pics per scene varies but ranges between 20 and 70 with the average in the 50s. A membership here gives you free access to four other JMP sites, but that isn’t obvious right away. From Gag Factor you get access to two sites, and it’s only when you go to one of those that you see access to two further sites. The extra sites are: • American Bukkake – scenes from American Bukkake, American Gokkun, Lesbian Bukkake and Reverse Bukkake series’ • Hardcore Fuck Machines – scenes from Fuck Machines series • Overstuffed Holes – scenes from Over Stuffed series • Ghetto Swarm – scenes from White Trash Whore series The additional sites don’t merit a full review each, but I will post some specific details as a comment on each site’s page here. One problem with these sites is that there is some overlap with the main JMP site, Jerkoff Zone. The same scene may be posted twice but in vastly different qualities. But since the scenes aren’t easily associated with the DVD title and volume it is difficult to know this before you download anything. What that means is that you’ll likely download duplicates of several scenes and delete the lowest resolution. I can’t fault the site for the quantity because it appears they’ve made a lot of their Gag Factor scenes available here. But as a stand-alone site 300 scenes isn’t a lot, and not worth $30. The bigger problem, as I noted in my review of Jerkoff Zone, is that the site just doesn’t live up to the standard that I expected from JMP. JMP stuff may not be for everyone, but what they do, they do it well. And the website doesn’t do it any justice. This site, even with the add-ons isn’t a good value for the full price. It’s not a lot better at the discounted price either. So unless you’re a huge JMP fan and are looking for an obscure scene that you can’t get elsewhere, I’d stay away. It bothers me to say that too, because I like JMP and would love to see them offer a great product at a decent price that would allow them to continue making great product. Their intended market must be elsewhere, because they aren’t looking for it on the internet. 09-26-11  04:23am Replies (2) Review 104 GameLink Video On Demand (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: - Large selection of DVDs, many not available on typical membership-type sites – TBP says there are near 17,000 DVDs - Good, but not great, search function - Wide variety of themes and niches available - Excellent selection of “classic” porn (please note that I consider ‘classic’ to be 80s and 90s) - Wide choice of how to access the DVD Cons: - This is not a traditional DVD porn site – it can get very expensive - Poor value if compared against a DVD site like Videobox - DRM on everything - Not all download/stream options are available for all files - Download speeds are okay, but slower than some competitors Bottom Line: Part of me figures that most PUs have no interest in VOD sites, but then the sensible part of me figures that several good ones exist so someone has to be using them, and maybe a lot of people are like me and can tolerate DRM to see some DVDs that aren’t available elsewhere. For many titles, a VOD site is the only way to get it online. Gamelink is HUGE, like most VOD sites. TPB says that they have close to 17,000 titles available for some form of viewing. Some of those titles are only available for purchase through the mail, but those don’t appear to be too common. The search function on Gamelink is good, but it isn’t as detailed as some competitors, like Adult DVD Empire. The feature that seems to be lacking is the ability to do a multi-layered search. You can do a search for Tammi Ann or a search for LBO Entertainment, for example, but you can’t search Tammi Ann in LBO titles only. Not a deal breaker… One aspect of Gamelink that is both good and bad is that most DVDs have several options available for viewing. You can buy minutes based on a package, you can stream the videos, or you can download them for a set rental period – usually 7 and 30 days. The bad part of this is that not all titles have all options available. I found several titles that I wanted to see but these were only available through streaming. I’m not a fan of streaming so I avoid these if I can. For downloads, most are available as a WMP file, but some have an option of DivX. Some only offer DivX. The quality of the WMP downloads is decent, but certainly not HD. I can’t speak for the DivX quality because I refuse to download a file manager and player just for a couple of videos. Download speeds are less than I’ve seen at other VOD sites, and are about 400kb/sec. Pricing varies quite a bit, likely on supply and demand. A hot title is naturally going to command a higher price. One thing that really bugs me about VOD sites (all of them, not just this one) is that they are inconsistent with formats and prices. I’m not certain, but my guess is that this is the studio’s fault and not the VOD site. I suspect that if these sites had the choice they’d make all titles available in all formats at a lower price. My guess is that if a studio only wants their material streamed and demands a high price, then the VOD site has little room to negotiate. It ends up being a bad deal for us PUs. But… other people than me have to use VOD sites too otherwise they wouldn’t be here. I’m pretty anal about my porn collection (pun intended) and I like being able to find and watch titles from my personal ‘golden age’ of porn, from the mid 80s to the mid 90s. For all their faults (and for a collector there are a lot of those) VOD sites help fill a void. Gamelink is certainly one of the better VODs that I use regularly and if you’re looking for a must-see title from any era I’d recommend trying them. 08-01-10  07:17am Replies (2) Review 105 German Goo Girls (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique style - Unusual niche - Almost 800 DVDs available to stream or download - Updates with a new DVD approximately every two weeks - Wide mix of models (age and body type) - Casting and BTS videos Cons: - Bills through a questionable biller - Can’t download individual scenes - Some of the models aren't particularly attractive - Inconsistent (but mostly slow) download speeds - Outdated site design - Some failed downloads Bottom Line: WARNING!!! This site bills through Centrobill, a biller that many of us here, me included, have had problems with in the past. The complaint is that memberships very difficult to cancel. I first started the cancellation process five days ago and have yet to be successful. You should note that our fellow PU member ‘jook’ reported that he had no issues cancelling a membership to a different site that also uses this biller. It seems that the combination of this site and this biller causes problems. If you want to join this site use a pre-paid credit card and have insufficient balance on it when your renewal comes. I’m sure that most porn collectors know German Goo Girls whether or not they have any interest in the niche. The videos feature elements of hardcore sex, (vaginal and occasionally anal), bukkake, gokkun, cum play, snowballing, piss play, piss drinking and analingus. Many of the downloadable DVDs have two or three ‘scenes’ on them and each scene features one, two, or more rarely, three women taking on multiple men. The scenes are shot in the GGG studio where black is the primary colour but the lighting still makes the action visible. It’s hard to peg this porn into a particular niche since it straddles so many, but suffice it to say that this is extreme hardcore. The DVDs on the site fall into two broad categories, older and newer. Obviously there are technical differences but the older DVDs tend to lean more towards traditional bukkake or gokkun where the newer ones have more variety and seem to have more sex too. There is also a whole series of “Best Of” and “casting” DVDs. Some may criticize that there are too many best of DVDs when there could be more actual DVDs but I like ‘best of’ in this context. While most of the models are German there are some well-known Eastern European and Russian models who make appearances. Ages range from 18 to likely 40-ish and physical appearances vary a lot too. That variety is good news for people who like a specific body type or ‘older’ women. The site only allows downloads of complete DVDs rather than breaking each one down into scenes. I downloaded many DVDs where I wanted a scene with a specific model but also had to take a scene or two I’ll likely never watch. GGG has been around since 1997 though the oldest videos on the site were uploaded in 2003. There is no production date given so I don’t know those. The site does appear to update with a new DVD being added approximately every two weeks. There are currently about 780 DVDs on the site. I have no information as to whether or not the site is affiliated with John Thompson, the GGG creator. Part of me hopes it isn't because the porn is badly let down by some serious problems with the site. The site itself has the look and feel of one designed 10-15 years ago. It isn't difficult to use or illogically laid out but its design has been surpassed by most other sites years ago. Download speeds are inconsistent here. I regularly hit maximum download speeds on other porn sites of 40MB/s. On rare occasions here I saw speeds of about 20MB/s. It was much more common to see speeds below 10MB/s. But by far the most common speeds I saw were 2MB/s or lower. I tried on different days and at different times of the day over the time I used the membership but on average the speeds were less than a tenth of what I get with other sites There isn't much consistency with scene resolutions either. Every DVD on the site lists availability in 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 852x480 but those don’t always line up with what the actual file is, especially with the older videos. It’s best to think of the options as high, medium and low. The file size is listed so you can make a good guess as to the resolution based on that and the DVD length. I downloaded a few 1080p and they have a low bitrate of 4000kb/s but they look pretty good. I mostly downloaded the 720p files (2700kb/s) and found that some of those get a bit pixilated at times. The site seems to allow download managers but I didn’t queue-up any scenes simply because the download times for a 1GB file could take more than 20 minutes. I also had some issues with downloads failing in the middle of downloading. Someone here recommended Legal Porno as a substitute for GGG. While the style of porn is quite different this suggestion has some merit: LP is extreme and features EE and Russian models but it also has a modern site, good download speeds and a good billing reputation. My recommendation for GGG is very limited: if you collect specific scenes or are a fan of this specific niche then you still may want to join knowing the site’s serious flaws. And if you do join and Centrobill is your biller, use a pre-paid card. For most porn collectors though, the combination of an outdated website, relatively low resolution scenes, frequently abysmal download speeds and a biller with a bad reputation probably make this site best to avoid. 02-26-18  04:31pm Replies (0) Review 106 GF Leaks (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large network - Six themed sites - Network had been streaming-only but now allows downloads of everything. - Supports download managers - Fast download speeds - Good mix of known and relatively unknown models - Can sort scenes in several ways - TBP discount Cons: - Low file resolutions on most files - Updates slowly - Not much anal Bottom Line: I had considered joining this network several times in the past but I was always put off by the fact that for a long time it was streaming-only. The network has since changed their business model and now offers downloads of everything. The network is made up of six distinct sites and they offer one portal where everything is listed. The sites are: • Black GFs, 297 scenes, two updates per month • Crazy Asian GFs 55 scenes, one update per month (though there are longer gaps too) • Crazy College GFs 47scenes, unsure of updates. There was one added in May 2017 but the next recent update is 2015 • Dare Dorm 171 scenes, one update per month • GF Revenge 479 scenes, weekly updates • Horny Birds 16 scenes last updated August 2012 There really isn't a uniform theme through the whole network though if you were looking for one it might be the wacky adventures that young and sexy women can get up to. Obviously Black GFs and Crazy Asian GFs have the theme of black or Asian models in them. Crazy College GFs follows the reality-based theme and narrows it a bit because it has a lot of scenes that have an element of public nudity and/or sex. There are scenes in public parks, libraries and parked cars. Dare Dorm is also easily figured out: it focuses on the goings-on in dorm rooms with multiple couples having fun. There is a mix of b/g and g/g scenes. GF Revenge doesn’t necessarily live up to the title, but that’s not a bad thing. These are mostly standard-fare b/g porn scenes. Horny Birds has a loose theme on what groups of sexy women can get up to when they’re in the mood to play. Think of a group of women hiring a male stripper and you’ll get the idea of what this site offers. The network allows download managers and I found downloads to be fast and reliable. I didn’t encounter any download limits. The network permits sorting by the site name (which narrows the theme) but it also uses categories and tags to help find what you want. You can also sort by model. And speaking of models, the network offers a good mix of known porn stars and lesser-known models. If the site has a serious flaw it is definitely file resolutions. Even as recently as a year ago files might only be available in SD. Newer files do offer HD options but the network really was late making them available. If you’re really fussy about getting high-quality HD scenes then you may be disappointed. In many cases the highest resolution available is only 768x432 (1500 kbps). Another common resolution that tops the choices is 1024x576 (3000 kbps). Most newer files offer at least a 720 option with files at 1280x720 and bitrates that vary from 2000 to 4000 kbps. A majority of the latest uploads are now also offering 1920x1080 with a 10,000kbps bitrate. Framerates vary between 23 and 30 fps. It’s fair to say that these file specs weren’t up to usual industry standards even when they were originally uploaded. (I wonder if this is a result of the site having been streaming-only where lower resolutions are more common.) This may or may not be important for any prospective members but I was only able to find one anal scene on the whole network and that one wasn’t well shot. This seems odd in that anal is a common and popular niche. Anal isn't even listed as a tag or category. The bottom line is that most of the porn offered here is aimed right at the middle of mainstream hardcore. I like the fact that the network is spiced up a bit with some public nudity and sex and Dare Dorm scenes are often zany and a lot of fun to watch. Any prospective member needs to go in aware that most of the scenes are only available in relatively low resolutions. But if you can accept those lower resolutions you will have access to a lot of porn and when you factor in a solid TBP discount the value of the site is greatly increased. I doubt that I’ll add this to my list of sites to rejoin but I am glad that I signed up for a month. 09-04-17  04:23pm Replies (0) Review 107 Girls Do Porn (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - True amateurs - Many stunning young models - Nearly 300 scenes - Multiple viewing options - Fast downloads - Bill through reputable billers Cons: - Terrible site design - Expensive if you want HD - No model names or info - No unique identifiers for scenes - Site defaults back to page one - Better porn options are available Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. It’s a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site it’s how not to design a webpage. The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the model’s face as she kneels in front of him. There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I can’t be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week. The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24” monitor and 50” TV. Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but I’ll hit the highlights: • The models aren't named and there is no biography given • The scenes have no unique identifier at all. I’ve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but I’ve never seen any unique information for a scene. • Scenes can’t be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once. • Only eight anal scenes. The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because I’m happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and ‘deleted’ scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes. The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily. The site had some of the fastest download speeds that I’ve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I don’t think there is) it’s high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it. So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws you’ll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely won’t rejoin and here’s something I’ve never done in a review before; I’ll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls. 08-03-15  06:00am Replies (4) Review 108 Girls Rimming (0) 90.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Excellent site in an under-served niche - Beautiful models - Rimming isn't just an add-on - Site is updating and growing - Mix of oral and sex scenes - Allows download managers - Multiple download options - Bills through CCBill Cons: - Small site - Updates are irregular - No TBP discount offered Bottom Line: Girl-on-guy rimming is a favourite niche of mine and whole sites dedicated to it are rare. There are some, but most of those have stopped updating regularly. So when I saw Girls Rimming go live a while ago I immediately signed up and I was very glad that did. One of the many things I like about the site is that the rimming really takes centre stage with all the scenes. A lot of the scenes are just oral with a long time spent on the rimming. Some of the scenes have sex and a few have anal sex too. But in all of the scenes the rimming is really showcased: it isn't just an add-on to a sex scene. The scenes definitely live up to the site’s title. Many current porn scenes have some f-on-m rimming (Mike Adriano and Mick Blue have a lot of it, for example) but those are mostly just add-ons to a hardcore scene and the camera angles are often poor. That isn't the case here: the rimming takes centre stage and the positions and camera angles allow the rimming to be on full display. The site currently has 29 scenes available but it should be noted that five of those are compilations from the other scenes and one is a BTS scene from the others. Ordinarily I might criticize a small site for having compilations but I think they really work well here because the compilations also focus on the rimming. The compilations are each a collection of different rimming styles. There is face-sitting, spitting, milking, ass-licking and deep-tongue. The BTS scene is also fun to watch and adds value to the site. The models appear to be mostly Czech though most of them are well-known pornstars (Nesty, for example) and most, if not all of them, speak English. Many of the models appear in multiple scenes, some being in as many as eight scenes. (Though many of the scenes have multiple models in them.) The scenes are all pretty short (they are mostly rimming after all). Many are around 10-12 minutes long with the occasional scene hitting 20 minutes. Because of that, the file sizes are reasonable. The update schedule is a bit irregular. There is often a new scene added weekly but sometimes there are two weeks between updates. The scenes are all available in five resolutions (all MP4): 144p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I download the 1080p files since the file sizes aren't unreasonably large. Those come in at 1920x1080, 8000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on both a 24” monitor and a 50” TV. I used a download manager and had no problems. But with file sizes on even the 1080p stuff coming in well under 1GB I wouldn’t have expected the links to time out anyway. I get download speeds that are on par with all the major sites. The site bills through CCBill so you can join with confidence knowing that your credit card information is safe and that cancelling will be easy. The site currently doesn’t offer a TBP discount but as of today (April 1, 2017) there is a pop-up discount offer right on the site. They are offering a 50% discount of $15. I have no idea how long that will be offered. My advice is that this is a great deal. The bottom line (ugh… no pun was intended…) is that if you like girl-on-guy rimming you really should check out this site. This is easily the best dedicated rimming site that I’ve seen in a long time. For those of you who join soon (as of April 1, 2017) there is a great discount offered on the site. I highly recommend this site to anyone who shares this interest. 04-01-17  03:02pm Replies (2) Review 109 Gloryhole Secrets (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 192 videos - 3 new scenes added per week - Allows download managers - Many scenes have two videos – one standard and one POV - Mostly amateurs but a few known faces Cons: - Some of the amateur models aren't up to usual porn expectations (though some may consider that a good thing) Bottom Line: Glory Hole Secrets looks a lot like the other dedicated glory hole site, Glory Hole Swallow. Where Swallow goes into actual adult theatres Secrets appears to have a purpose-built room for taping. I prefer the added raunchiness of the actual theatre but this site is hot too. Being a glory hole site means the scenes are all predictable: the model answers a few questions and then gets to work on the dicks that come through holes in the wall on either side of her. Most of the models get naked or nearly naked and in a few scenes the model bends over and gets fucked too. Most of the cumshots are oral and most of the models swallow. There is a ‘cumshot counter’ that pops up briefly with every pop shot so you can keep track if you’re so inclined. (I like this, but GH Swallow does it better by leaving the counter up all the time from the first pop shot to the end of the scene. GH Secrets only leaves it up for a few seconds while the guy is coming.) The site is fairly large with 192 scenes available and three new scenes being added each week. That update schedule is ambitious and will cause the site to grow fairly quickly and if you have an interest in this niche it might be worth a recurring membership. The site relies mostly on unknown amateurs and that can be good or bad. Many of the models aren't A-list hot but if you like your porn with more natural women getting nasty then you’ll like this. The looks, body types and ages of the models vary here so there is likely something for most tastes. There are options for how you view a scene. There is HD and SD streaming and downloads are available in 1920x1080 (6000kb/s), 1280x720 (3500kb/s) 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones. All the downloads are in MP4 format. For having relatively low bitrates both the 1080p and 720p files look good. I had no problem using a download manager. One feature of the site that I quite like is the option to download more than one version of the same scene. This isn't an option with all scenes, it would be the minority that offer this, but you can get the standard view with the cameraman standing near the model and recording and you can get a POV view with a camera located about eye level above the glory hole. The site layout is simple and effective and gives the option to sort the scenes in several ways. You can also sort by model too. No matter how you sort the scenes there is only one thumbnail on which to make a decision to check it out or not. With amateur models that’s important to me because the thumbnail may not be the best representation. The thumbnail may be a pretty face but she has triple-D breasts which I’m not interested in. This can be solved by clicking on the photo link for each scene to get a better look at the model. I’d prefer to see a better thumbnail of the models though. As I noted above, photos are available. I wouldn’t call this a photo site but they do offer high quality photos for those who are interested. You can download a zip of photos in 1920x1080 resolution or view them as singles in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720. Membership gives access to two sites, this and POV Wars (that site is unique and deserves its own review). I’d definitely recommend this site for fans of the niche. The site is well laid out, there is plenty of material here to make it a good value and the scenes look good and have some heat to them. It’s a decent value and if you like this kind of porn you should really check it out. 04-05-15  05:03pm Replies (6) Review 110 Gloryhole Swallow (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 195 exclusive scenes - Many true amateurs - Among the most realistic sites around - Great site for fans of oral, cum play and swallowing - Simple and effective layout - Multiple download options - Supports download managers - No download limits - Broad range of models - Excellent camerawork and lighting given the conditions - Excellent choices in editing - Updates weekly Cons: - Limited thumbnails of model - Broad range of models means you’ll see some you don’t like Bottom Line: I look for objectivity in a review, and I strive to provide the same when I write reviews, but sometimes a site comes along that makes it tough for me to do that. ‘Heat’ in a scene is definitely subjective, and in this case, for me, the heat isn’t just turned up to eleven, it’s turned up to ‘insane.’ I think my monitor was about to catch fire. I wouldn’t normally join a gloryhole site, but I’ve been trying to collect as many scenes by a beautiful young and relatively obscure model named Claire. She’s not done much, and she looks like a pretty girl-next-door type, so I was surprised to see her doing something like this. She has four scenes on the site and at least one of them is already a favorite. But to my surprise, I was hooked on this site after watching a few scenes. For me, the heat comes from the realism. I recently started joining casting sites, where the premise that an unsuspecting model comes in for some information on the adult business and ends up trying out. Obviously, in a world with legal requirements for ID these scenes are staged. But here, while they are still staged, there is an element of realism that I’ve never seen before. While the female obviously needs to be properly documented, the males can be a lot more anonymous. It doesn’t strain credibility to think that a model could be brought into a video booth and guys would stick their dicks in for some oral. To add to the chances that these aren’t fully staged, the site’s FAQ page has contact information for anyone who’d like to have their penis star in a video. Some scenes have a bit of a setup with an interview, but others don’t. The action takes place inside a booth where the model services between five and ten men, sometimes more. In most scenes there is cum-play and swallowing. Some scenes have vaginal sex, a few have some anal, and several have two girls. The average length of the scenes is around 35 minutes, but some last over an hour. Speaking of the girls, there is a broad range of looks. There are some that are young and beautiful, some heavily tattooed and pierced, some BBW, some MILF. The upside is that there is likely some here for every taste. The downside is that you might see some models that you don’t like. Unlike most casting sites, I can’t find much information on many of these models, which may means they’re true amateurs. With a video booth as your set it would be easy to have poorly shot videos. That doesn’t happen here: the videos are well lighted and shot. The cameraman obviously knows what he’s doing. With scenes like these the editor might be tempted to cut lots of dead air out and keep the action flowing. That doesn’t happen here. First, there isn’t a lot of dead air, and second, the editor’s choices keep the realism and heat up. Bad editing could ruin the site, but the good editing they have adds a lot to it. There are currently 195 scenes uploaded, but maybe 20 of those are two-part scenes so that reduces the number a bit. The site updates with one new scene added per week. All the scenes offer some choice in how you view it. Streaming is available, but only at a fairly low res. Downloads are MP4 only and usually offer 480x270, 960x540 and 1920x1080. I downloaded the 1080 when they were available and those come in at that resolution with a bitrate around 5000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good. On some videos the highest is 960x540 but those are rare. Others here have reported a daily limit. I downloaded a lot in a few days and never hit any limit, so that may be gone. I used a download manager to queue scenes and had no issues with that. The download speed was always the maximum that my manager will allow. The site has a simple design, but since it focuses on one niche it doesn’t need to be more complex. You can sort by update and model, there is a search function and each scene has tags. One minor flaw is that there are limited thumbnails of the models so you can’t really tell if you want the scene. That’s not a big deal since you can open the photos and see more. There are photos, but I can’t speak to them. This really is a video site. One innovation in most scenes is an unobtrusive ‘cumshot counter” in the lower left of the screen that counts off a running total of satisfied customers. I like it and miss it on the scenes where it isn’t used. As with any niche site, there’s no sense in joining if you don’t like the niche. But here there are several covered: oral, cum-play, swallowing and multiple shots. If you like any of those, you might like this site. If you do join you’ll get a lot of unique and exclusive scenes on a simple but effective site and those scenes are well shot and edited. You’ll get all this for a very fair price making this a great value. Not only do I recommend it, I’ll be a regular there myself. 03-10-14  03:43pm Replies (3) Review 111 Group Sex Games (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Long scenes - Mix of indoor and outdoor scenes - Mix of American and Eastern European/Russian models - Unique exclusive content - Fun to watch - ‘Bonus’ streaming scenes from other sites Cons: - Download speeds vary but tend to be lower than average - No TBP discount - Huge file sizes on some downloads - Some non-English scenes with subtitles Bottom Line: The title of this site isn’t misleading. The scenes are all about games that lead to group sex. The games can be obvious, like strip poker but they are also innovative with various dice games, croquet, volleyball, etc. Most of the scenes spend a lot of time on the games before the sex begins. There may be challenges or dares with clothes being removed well before any sex happens. As the games progress the dares become more daring and fondling or even oral sex can happen briefly. Overall the scenes have a fun atmosphere and the games part of the scenes can be interesting to watch – for a while at least. One convention used in many of the scenes is an animated card is held up so the viewer can see what the dare or challenge is. While most of the group sex involves men and women there are several scenes with only women. One detail that should be noted early in any review is that many of the scenes here are quite different from ‘regular’ porn in one important way: they are loooong. I’m not saying that this is good or bad; I’m just stating it as a fact. There are some scenes here that are over four hours long. The average scene length is probably around two hours. This should give some indication as to how much time they spend on the games that lead up to the sex. To be fair though, the games quickly progress into sexual situations including nudity and touching so it isn’t like you have to wait three hours to see anything happen. The scenes certainly look to be exclusive, and that fact combined with the overall uniqueness of them makes this an interesting choice for a membership. The production values on the scenes are excellent. I had no issues with the camera work, the lighting, the sound or the editing. Many of the scenes are shot outdoors and they were great too, which can be a bit of a challenge. Obviously with scenes averaging two hours that means that file sizes can be large. There are 720p scenes here that are in excess of 10GB. Downloading from this site is only for people who like this niche a lot, who have no concerns about file sizes and who have a fast internet connection. Most of the models who appear on the site are well known porn models. TBP lists the site as being in the European niche but approximately a third of the scenes (and perhaps more) feature American models. All of the scenes with American models are, obviously, in English. Many of the scenes with non-American models use English but it isn’t uncommon to have the scene subtitled in English. I don’t find that this detracts from the scenes in any significant way. The site currently has 126 scenes uploaded. This number may appear low at first when you look at the site because on each page there are 40 scene thumbnails. But many of the scenes are ‘bonus’ scenes from other sites. The bonus material is streaming only. There are currently 86 bonus scenes from sites such as Archangel, German Goo Girls, Perfect Gonzo, Porndoe Premium, Groupbanged.com and Jim Slip. (I recently had a membership at GGG and the file resolutions here are actually better than I could download on their own site.) TBP noted that at the time of their review the site was updating with one new exclusive scene every two weeks. I don’t know if this will continue, but the update schedule has improved with the past few months bringing a new exclusive scene every week. The exclusive scenes are available to be streamed or downloaded. Those are both available in three resolutions – 540p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 720p scenes and those have a 7000kb/s bitrate and 30fps. I downloaded one 1080p scene to check the specs and those have a 9000kb/s bitrate and 25fps. I used a download manager to queue the scenes and had no issues using it. I didn’t have any links time out on me – bet… given the file sizes I also didn’t queue many scenes at one time. I found download speeds to be the same as I get on other porn sites. The price of the site is $27 USD which is on par with most adult sites. Unfortunately there is no TBP/PU discount. The primary biller is VXS Billing, a biller I have used in the past. While I’d prefer a more well known biller they do have an online form for cancellation and I don’t expect any issues on cancelling. As with any niche site giving it a broad recommendation is difficult. If you like playful scenes with a sexy setup followed by some steamy group sex then this is a site you should check out. If you prefer to skip ahead to the action on all the scenes you watch then this site may not be the best choice for you. For what the site has I think it offers a very good value and if you’ve been sitting on the fence over a membership you should give it a try. 07-10-18  08:35am Replies (5) Review 112 Happy Naked Teen Girls (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Beautiful models - Solo, lesbian - Great site for people both video and photo collectors - Photos are zipped - Videos and photos are excellent quality - Options for videos and photos - Supports download managers Cons: - Not sure if the site is updating - Some photo sets are zipped into multiple files - Often a wide size difference between HD and mid-level videos - Music can be obtrusive in videos Bottom Line: I don’t normally subscribe to soft sites like this but with a chance to expand my collection of Maryjane Johnson and Claire material I couldn’t pass up the opportunity. It should be obvious with the word ‘Teen’ in the title that the site features beautiful and youthful models. Most of them are quite petite and there aren’t many tattoos and there are no fake breasts. If you like petite and natural teen models you should consider taking a look at this site. The site is quite soft with the scenes being solo and girl/girl. There is some toy play and some scenes are shot outdoors. I don’t normally collect a lot of solo and girl/girl stuff and I found that a lot of the girl/girl stuff was even softer than I’m used to. It seems that a lot of these models might be just ‘gay for pay’ as there wasn’t a lot of interaction. I have to confess that this increased the heat for me though. One advantage this site has is that it really offers good value for both video and photo collectors. The site doesn’t trade off one for the other as is usually the case for sites. I’m not normally a photo collector but with the beautiful models and the high quality photos I downloaded a lot. There are currently 121 videos ranging from 5 to 40 minutes long. Videos are offered in 3 choices – HD, mid-range and ‘portable device.’ I’d normally download the HD but there was often a wide chasm in size between HD and medium. There are some HD files here that top out at over 10GB. That’s too much hard drive space for something that is only a peripheral interest so in some cases I opted for the mid-range. The HD files are 1920x1080 with bitrates from 8,000 to 25,000. They look great – crisp and sharp. The mid-range files are 1228x690 3000kb/s. They look good too so they’re worth the reduced file size. One (possibly subjective) flaw in the videos is that the music dubbed in can be loud enough to be obtrusive. Especially with a g/g scene the sounds the models make are often drowned out by the music. There are 210 photo sets available with 70 to 400+ pics per set. The sets are zipped, though in some cases there are multiple zips. In one case there were 9 zipped files that had to be downloaded to get the full set. The photos are 5616x3744 and look good. There is a lower resolution available though I didn’t download those. This may be nitpicking, but in sets requiring multiple downloads I encountered a few cases where the same file name was used twice. This is definitely nitpicking, but I found some sets to be out of sequence. A model may be reclining on a bed with panties on, followed by several with the panties off, followed by the panties on, followed by the panties being removed. Yes, I’m a bit anal that way… There’s one important question that I can’t answer: since the updates aren’t dated I can’t say if the site is updating or not. If I figure that out I’ll update that information. There is no search function but one really isn't needed. There are tabs for sorting between videos and photos and there is a tab to sort by model. The site supports download managers and I had no issues in queuing up downloads. This was probably a one-time membership for me. I joined specifically to get video and photos for two models and one of those has left the industry so there is no hope of getting more of her. The site is quite good and the videos and photos they have are very high quality. If you like this type of model in solo and soft lesbian scenes then it’s certainly worth looking at this site as a possible membership. I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it but I likely won’t be back. 11-30-14  07:34am Replies (4) Review 113 Hard X (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - New studio site - Affiliated with Open Life and Erotica X - All scenes directed by Mason - Supports download managers - Many choices for viewing scenes - TBP / PU discount - Several ‘firsts’ Cons: - Small site for now - Videos aren’t associated with the DVDs they appear in Bottom Line: Hard X is both a new studio and new website that features videos from the studio. The studio (and site) feature scenes directed by Mason, formerly from the Elegant Angel studio. It’s also a sister site to Mason’s other studio/site Erotica X. Obviously the scenes at Hard X have a much harder edge than those at Erotica X. In my opinion, Mason is one of the best directors in the business. She brings a unique feel to her scenes and brings out the best in her performers. One of the reasons I’ve been waiting impatiently for this site to go live was that Mason has brought a number of ‘firsts’ here. I’m a big fan of anal scenes and Hard X made a (justifiably) big deal over the first anal scenes for Maddy O’Reilly and Annika Albrite. The site promises more in the future too. I’ll deal with the major negative element first, since it will likely be a deal-breaker for some potential members. Because the studio is new they don’t have a big catalogue yet, so the site is small too. There are currently only 30 scenes available. Since the site only launched last week I can’t verify an update schedule, though the site itself has an ‘upcoming’ tab and that shows a new scene being added per week. Yes, I know that seems slow, but this is a new studio and they don’t have a lot to offer yet. A potential member will have to make his or her own decision on value, but with the TBP / PU discount I think this is a great value. I think that this isn’t ‘commodity porn’ but is unique and uses A-list models in scenes with high production values. I like to think of sites like this (and Erotica X too) as high-end steakhouses in a world of greasy buffets. (And yes, I realize that my analogy is unflattering.) TBP reports that the site also offers a full 2-day trial. This would be an incredible value for someone who just wanted to check out what the site has to offer. The other negative is probably more subjective, but when I’m on a studio site I prefer that the videos be grouped by DVD title or capable of being sorted that way. For some reason, Hard X doesn’t do that. I hope as the site grows they add a “DVD” tab. The site is well laid out with four scene per page, each with one large screenshot and two smaller ones. The scenes are titled with the model’s name in the title. There are tags for specific niches and the model’s name is a tag too. Each scene opens into its own page where you have all of the same information and brief description of the scene too. As with all Open Life sites, there are a range of options for viewing and downloading the scenes. Streaming is available in seven resolutions ranging from 160p to 1080p. Downloads are available in WMV format (160p, 240p, 360p and 480p) and MP4 format (160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p). I downloaded the 720p and those are 1080x720 at 4800kb/s and 29fps. They look crisp and show no pixilation. Those files are, on average, about 1.3GB in size. I had no problems using a download manager to queue up the scenes I wanted. There were no unreasonable time-outs on the links and my downloads hit and sustained the maximum speed that my manager allows (11mb/s). The bottom line is that I highly recommend that you check this site out of you like hardcore porn with a slightly rough edge. This contrasts well with its sister site where the hardcore is softer and more couples-oriented. The site offers some excellent porn with some of the biggest names in adult these days. The site is well organized and logical. There are lots of options for viewing or downloading the scene too. When you add it up and apply the TBP discount I think this is a great value. As the site grows, it will become an even better value. 03-29-14  10:40am Replies (5) Review 114 Hardcore Doorway (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Small network with a couple of unique sites - Some HD scenes - Photos offered in some scenes - Photos offered as singles and zips - Streaming available - Options available for downloads - Good mix of known and amateur models - TBP / PU discount Cons: - Three of the ‘sites’ can’t really be considered as such - Only one (or maybe two) sites MAY be updating - Some scenes don’t support download managers - Older scenes are sub-par quality - May be a bit too misogynistic for some Bottom Line: Hardcore Doorway is a small network of ten sites. Most of those sites are relatively small and three of them don’t really deserve to be called sites. Most of the sites haven’t updated in years and the most recent updates cause me to question whether the entire network is dead. The good news, however, is that some of the material is pretty good if it happens to be the kind of thing you’re into. This network is the one of two affiliated networks, the other being Adult Doorway. AD may be better known since it happens to be home to one of the most abusive, misogynistic sites on the ‘net”: Facial Abuse. The sites on Hardcore Doorway use the same male talent, the same sets and many of the same models, so it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise that much of the material here is pretty extreme. This is definitely NOT porn for everyone. The site is made up of ten sites, but I’d only apply that label to seven of those. These are (including some current details): • Sperm Suckers: 258 scenes, last updated three weeks ago • Latina Abuse: 135 scenes, last updated almost three months ago • Amateur Throats: 26 scenes, last updated almost two years ago • Anal Recruiters: 33 scenes, last updated about two and a half years ago • Huge Rubber Dicks: 20 scenes, last updated about three and a half years ago • Lesbians Love Sex: 46 scenes, last updated almost four years ago • Sexy Suck Jobs: 26 scenes, last updated almost four years ago So it appears that only Sperm Suckers may be updating. The earlier updates were posted about once a week so I can’t be sure if they’ve stopped given that the latest scene is now three weeks old. It is also possible that Latina Abuse is updating. The update schedule there is sporadic with past updates being posted as frequently as one every three weeks and sometimes just once every five weeks or so. I think it’s fair to say that the others are now dead. The remaining three ‘sites’ are: • Monster Cock Madness: 16 scenes • Fuck Me POV: 11 scenes • Her First Porn: 27 scenes The last update for each of these ‘sites’ was four and half years ago. The reason I don’t think these should be considered sites is because they offer limited scenes, those scenes are not exclusive, there is no scene information available, the scenes are only available as a series of small (20MB +/-) clips and they’ve obviously been abandoned. I think given the fact that only two sites MAY be updating it is fair to say that no one should join this network expecting to stick around for a while to get more updates. So the question then becomes is this network worth a membership at all? Obviously the answer to this question will be different depending on what you look for in a site, but given that the material on the seven main sites is fairly rare (rough, hardcore anal with lots of genuine creampies and oral cum-play, for examples) and appears to be unique a membership here can be pretty good value, especially if you factor in the $20 price offered to TBP / PU members. All of the sites (excluding the three non-sites as noted above) use the same simple but effective layout. There are 20 scene links per page in each of the sites and those links open into a separate page where you can stream or download the video. Streaming is in one resolution only, but the latest scenes do offer a lot of choice for downloads. WMV files are offered in 720x480, 640x480 and 320x240. There is usually an option for low-ish quality MPEG and MOV files too. In many of the newer scenes there is at least 720p offered and in a lot of scenes there is 720 and 1080p on offer. The 1080p comes in at 1080x720 at 5000kb/s and 30fps. Each scene is also broken down into smaller clips if that happens to be your preference. Photos are available as singles and zips and they are pretty good at 1440x960. Other minor issues are that some of the files wouldn’t queue up for downloading with a manager. But others would queue up. I have no explanation for this and can’t say exactly how many files fall into either camp. The other problem I had was that I fairly frequently got kicked off the site and had to log in again. Both of these are minor, but still frustrating. (Additionally, I always had to log in through the site I joined even though the network join in page was identical AND the network provided me with a link to sign in through the network. That was frustrating until I figured it out.) So is this site worth the membership? My answer is a tentative yes. Tentative because there are few updates and much of the older material is low resolution, but on the plus side this is porn you won’t find elsewhere, and it is definitely some of the hardest stuff available. Add in the discounted price and I think this network is worth a look even if only for a one-time membership. 01-03-13  06:34pm Replies (3) Review 115 Hardcore Gang Bang (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Rare niche - Coupled with Bound Gang Bangs - Membership gives you discounts to other Kink sites - Many A-list models - 59 scenes - Updates weekly - Usual well-done Kink.com site - Supports download managers - Streaming and downloads - Choices for file type and resolution Cons: - Not for the faint of heart, probably among the most extreme sites on the internet - Female model name should be more prominent Bottom Line: Let me start with a few of caveats: • This is probably one of the most extreme hardcore sites on the internet. Consider this a “may not be suitable for all audiences” warning. • Many of the scenes use a r@ape fantasy as the scenario. I say this for two reasons, first to warn potential members of this fact, and second to tell people that I had an email chat with Khan and while he okayed describing the scenes in this way he said that using the actual word could cause problems for this site so if you’re commenting DO NOT USE THE WORD lest you incur the wrath of Khan. • Each scene, regardless of the scene set-up, has an interview with the model both before and after the scene. The initial interview CLEARLY shows that the model will be shooting the scene fully informed of what the scene will entail and fully consents to it and that there is a safe word in use. The concluding interview makes it clear that the model had nothing occur that she did not fully consent to. In all the interviews I watched the models reported that they enjoyed the scene. In all my years of buying porn online this is possibly the most extreme hardcore site I’ve ever joined. Other Kink sites come close, but the use of a particular scenario in many of the scenes is what put this over the top. A membership here is definitely not for everybody. Unlike a lot of other Kink sites, this one does use a scene setup. There is a storyline that plays out at the beginning. What I mean that is with sites like Device Bondage and The Training of O, which can be quite intense, there is really no scene setup. A model does a shoot and that’s it. Here, there is a story and much more often than not that story involves some sort of force by a group of men against a woman. No matter how you slice it, most of the scenes here involve simulated r@pe. If you think you’d be offended by that, and I’m sure a lot of people would be, then don’t subscribe. Apart from the setup, the entire scene tends to follow the script with lots of slapping, spitting and generally rough sex. If done wrong, these scenes could likely cause some problems for Kink, but each scene has an interview with the model both before and after the scene where it is made clear that model knows what she’s getting into and then the post-scene interview confirms that. There is no mistaking that this is pure fantasy. Speaking of the models, one thing that struck me about the site, and it likely speaks to Kink’s good reputation in the business, are the number of A-list porn models who appear here. With material this extreme you’d think that only the hardest of the hardcore or fetish models would be here, but that isn’t the case. Models like Chastity Lynn, Casey Calvert and Tara Lynn Foxx are here. Sure, they aren’t exactly wallflowers but I am still pleasantly surprised to see them here. There are currently 59 scenes uploaded with a new one being added each week. Most of the scenes last about an hour, with some exceeding that. As with all other Kink sites, they get the technical stuff right. The site is well laid out and the user can change how the site looks by selecting how much information will be displayed on the main page. One minor quibble is that with each scene the entire cast is credited. I have no problem with that, but the female should be given top billing in all cases. Sometimes you have to read through several names before you get to the female model. I buy porn to see the women. The men are just props. Streaming and downloads are both available, and Kink offers a broad range of choices. There are four streaming resolution options available. Downloads are available in WMV or MP4 with each format being available in five resolutions. I downloaded the MP4 HD option which is 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. (For comparison, “large” comes in at 960x540 at 1500kb/s and “medium” is 640x480 at 825 kb/s.) If you can spare the space it is definitely worth it to download the HD files. They are large though, with the average being 2GB. Videos are also available as clips if you have a slow connection or only want one specific part of a scene. The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out with five or more scenes in the queue. To add more value to this membership, it includes a membership to Bound Gangbangs. BGB stopped updating in August 2012. A member explained here explained that this was due to billers being uncomfortable with the content so in order to save it the models were no longer to be bound. There are 93 scenes that are pretty much like what you’ll find on HCG but with the models in bondage while it happens. Obviously the audience for this material is limited, but if you like this extreme porn (with full consent from the model) this is an excellent choice in a rare niche. I’m not aware of any other sites like this, but if there are some, I’m betting that this is better than the others. 01-12-14  09:07am Replies (11) Review 116 HD Porn (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - 472 scenes - 215 HD scenes (exclusive) - 257 SD (non-exclusive) - Photos and screenshots available - Pics in zips - Screenshots not available in hi-res or as zips - SD scenes have photos only in 683x1024 - Supports download managers - $4.95 2-day trial - Bills through DHD Cons: - Limited (and inaccurate) navigation - Many non-exclusive, non-HD scenes Bottom Line: This is my second review of this site, the first being about a year ago. The site continues to grow, having added approximately one scene per week for the last year now giving them a total of 472 scenes. That number is a bit misleading since they continue to add some SD video as well. The good news is that in the past year the number of HD scenes has grown a lot faster than the number of SD scenes. If there is a serious drawback, it isn’t the resolution but the fact that the SD scenes (and some of the HD scenes) aren’t exclusive so if you already have a large collection you’re bound to see some repeats. Navigation is simple, but on a site this size there isn’t any real need for complex navigation. You can sort the exclusive/mostly HD stuff from the non-exclusive SD scenes. The search function is limited too, which may not be bad in a site this size, but it is also inaccurate. I used the ‘category’ function to sort for anal scenes and discovered that a number of them weren’t sorted in to the category search. Video quality is very good on the HD scenes. The HD scenes are 1280x720 while the SD scenes are in either 720x480 or 640x480 depending on when they were added, the older ones being the lower resolution. This site made me an HD convert last time and there’s been no turning back. I don’t normally collect photos but I did download a lot from this site. There are photos and screenshots available for most scenes. The photos are available in ‘hi-res’ (683x1024) and ‘ultra-high-res’ (1366x2048) for the HD scenes and just the ‘hi-res’ for the SD scenes. Only the photos (not the screenshots) are available as a zip, and a quirk is that when you download the zip the folder of photos is buried about 10 folders deep. And once you click through all the folders you’ll see that you have both resolutions of photos with only a minor name difference, so you’ll need to do a bit of editing. The last time I had a membership here I complained that the download speed was slow. I don’t remember what I was getting then, but using Free Download Manager now and a 15MB/s fiberop connection the speeds are much better. I get 2MB/s, but I may have that capped in FDM. One advantage to this site is that they do offer a 2-day full trial for $4.95 and they do offer the ability to see what they have to offer without a membership, so you can browse the site and may decide that you can get everything you want for the trial membership. And with the biller being DHD you can have confidence that you’ll be able to cancel your membership easily. That makes the site an exceptional value. If you’re new to the site, it might be better to go for the full membership as it does have a lot more to offer than you can get in 2 days. HD Porn continues to grow and offer some great exclusive HD scenes for a fair monthly price. I’d recommend it for anyone looking for HD video. 06-14-11  08:42am Replies (2) Review 117 HD Porn (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 417 scenes offered - 172 scenes are HD and exclusive content - 245 are regular-definition and not exclusive - Some A-list stars appear in the exclusive material - All the models are exceptionally good looking - Some variety in body types (some large breasts, some perfect… I mean smaller…) - Some variety in scenes (some lesbian, some solo, some anal) - Updates every second day - Good search functions - Decent download speeds (but could be better - below 1MB/s) - Photos and screenshots available - Photos available by zip and singles - Options available for the HD scenes (HD, 720x405 and 640x360) Cons: - Site is a bit small for now, but still offers good value for the monthly fee - Streaming starts immediately on the scene page – turn your speakers off to avoid alerting those around you - Download speeds could be improved - Most models only have one scene on the site, which is a bit of a negative when you find a new girl you like Bottom Line: I’m new to the world of HD porn (the material I mean). To be honest, I never really understood what the buzz was about. Watching regular-quality videos on my PC or laptop seemed fine. But then when I took a membership to HD Porn and watched the scenes as I downloaded them I became a convert. The quality difference between HD and regular is hard to believe until you see it. Of course there’s a cost: storage space is used up at a much faster pace. HD Porn is a well laid-out site that is easy to navigate. Once you’re inside you are immediately presented with a series of search and sorting functions at the top of the page with the recent uploads laid out beneath from newest to older. One the main page there is also an easy way to sort the HD scenes from the regular-def scenes. One big advantage to HD Porn is that the HD scenes are exclusive content. Apart from being HD, these scenes are well lighted, edited and shot. I don’t know who does the technical work, but they know what they’re doing. This isn’t a guy with a decent HD camera making porn scenes in his mom’s basement in L.A. Another obvious advantage to the high quality of the sites is the high quality of the women. Several A-list porn stars appear here in the exclusive material, such as Lexi Belle and Bree Olsen. Most of the HD material, though, is with newer girls, some of whom I’ve never heard of, though they are all exceptionally good looking and aren’t shy in front of the camera. (I suspect that most of them are Eastern European, though many of them don’t even appear on IAFD.) The majority of the scenes on HD Porn are low-def scenes and are non-exclusive. I can’t really fault the site for this since it must be expensive to produce such high-quality material. Having all exclusive HD material probably wouldn’t be feasible at this point – the site would be too small to attract monthly memberships. One problem with the non-HD scenes is that there is no obvious way to determine where the scene is from until you download it, and then the only way is to hold the mouse pointer over it and the title is listed in the file properties. So if you’re a big collector of DVD porn from sites like Video Box, you may be disappointed to learn that instead of getting a new scene with a favorite star you have a duplicate of one you already have. One solution to that ‘problem’ is that when you select a scene it opens to a page where the scene starts streaming right away. This is a bit of a bother if you don’t really want to stream the video – I think the streaming option should be there, but not set automatically. The bottom line is that this is a very good site. The monthly price is good value for 172-and-growing exclusive content HD scenes. The non-exclusive scenes are an added value. The site is easy to navigate and offers choices for downloads and some photos too for those PUers who like those. 06-09-10  03:53pm Replies (5) Review 118 Her Limit (0) 80.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Medium-sized site (134 scenes) - Aggressive, enthusiastic sex - Top models - Lots of anal sex (if you are into that) - Lots of rimming (if you are into that) - Updates regularly - Exclusive scenes - Great TBP/PU discount - Interviews with models - Bills through a reputable biller - Supports download managers - Part of the Lets Doe It network Cons: - Download limit of 100 videos per month - May be too rough for members who joined the network and not this site specifically - Lots of ads - Hard-to-notice pre-checked cross-sales (two of them) Bottom Line: Given the audience here at Porn Users, I’m probably not writing anything that they aren’t aware of, but the title of this site comes from the concept of a “limitâ€� in rough sex and BDSM. Given that this site caters to rough sex I’m confident in saying that the title indicates that the models are taken to, and in some case past, their personal limits. Having said that, I’m not suggesting that the model’s limits haven’t been respected. This is not a true BDSM site as one would find, for example, at Kink.com. The scenes often begin with an interview which is unusual for Eastern European sites, presumably because of language issues. While some of the models struggle with English and some use a translator, the interviews still give some insight into the model’s personality and motivations. Given the nature of the site, the interviews usually delve into what the model’s limits are. Interestingly, in many cases the model is really looking forward to having her limits pushed a bit. For fans of anal scenes there will be a lot to like here because most of the scenes feature this. However, for someone joining an Eastern European site with rough sex, anal sex is to be expected. I’ll get this out of the way now, but many of the scenes also feature female-on-male rimming. I’m a big fan of this so I consider it a plus but for people who don’t like it, it might be a negative. For fans like me, the rimming here is very well done. Another common element to most of the scenes is that while this sex can be deemed rough, it is also energetic and enthusiastic. Whether it’s a combination of acting and reality, the models all seem to be having a lot of fun here. While the site features predominantly Eastern European models, it is fair to say that these are all A-list. It really is a who’s who of top EE models. Given that the site features rough (and usually anal) sex, it won’t be a surprise that most of the models here also have scenes on sites that feature extremely rough sex such as Legal Porno. While I don’t generally collect scenes with many Eastern European models, there are several who I download everything I can. Many of these models are present here. I am always open to discovering new models and this site gave me that opportunity. I think I’m going to add Linda LeClair to my list because the scene she has here is intense. There are currently 134 scenes available and the site continues to grow with a new scene being added every two weeks. I found the scenes to have good production values and a professional feel to them. The site itself is logical and easy to use. It uses common porn tags to help users sort for what they are looking for. There are 55 categories and 336 tags so there should be something here to help every subscriber. You can also sort scenes by newest, most popular and most viewed. A subscriber can save scenes as favourites and can vote on them. There are four video download options, 1080p, 6000 kbps (30 FPS), 480p, 360p and 240p. There is no 4K option for downloads. Photos are available but they are quite limited. The only photo option is 1920x1080 and those are screenshots. Many of the sets are quite small, with the most recent set, for example, only having 16 photos. This site is part of the Let’s Doe It network which has 17 sites. Oddly, while Her Limit features rough sex, the rest of the network is much softer than this. This may mean that some subscribers avoid Her Limit altogether or people who join specifically to get the rough scenes may be disappointed with the remainder of the network. In total, the network has approximately 1600 scenes. The site is cluttered with ads. After you log in you get a page with ads before you get to the first member’s webpage. When you reach it, there are more ads. A caution too – when you first sign up, you have to uncheck two cross sells that are easy to miss as they are on the opposite side of the page from where you are entering information. Be careful! Others here have commented that the site is very sluggish to load. I found download speeds were quite variable and unpredictable. After loading several pages, I was logged out and had to get back in while losing the page I was looking at. The site does support download managers. There is a reported download limit of 100 scenes per month. I didn’t hit that limit so I can’t confirm it. I’m no fan of limits but I think I could live with this one as it is somewhat reasonable though it should be raised. While the site, and network, I have some flaws, there is still a lot of good to be found here. If you are into rough sex videos then you will like this specific site. If you are also into more sensual videos then you will find a lot of value in the rest of the network as well. When you add in the 50% TBP/PU discount it makes for a much better value. Even with the relatively minor flaws I highly recommend this site. 02-04-21  07:51am Replies (0) Review 119 Hogtied (0) 98.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge collection (approximately 840 scenes) - Top quality material - Very innovative - Excellent customer service - Excellent value for money* - Beautiful models - Models are a good mix of known, unknown and fetish - Multiple download options - Photos available (with zips) - Download speeds are great - Supports download managers - Membership gives discounts to other Kink sites *I know that there are complaints that there is no ‘network’ access. I agree, but fully understand why not. The material is so well done that it must cost a fortune to produce the unique material for so many sites. Cons: There really are no cons. This is likely the best (excluding other Kink sites) BDSM site you can find on the internet. And to make it better, it is a great value too. In my opinion, it would a great value at twice the price. Bottom Line: As big of a fan of Kink.com sites as I am, I can’t believe that I never took a membership to Hogtied before. This is the site that started the Kink empire way back in 1998. Peter Acworth started this site shooting scenes out of his apartment and eventually progressed through a series of locations until buying the San Francisco Armories a few years back. You can see that transition as the scenes progress. Even though this was the beginnings of Kink, the business model that they continue to use is already in place: the shoots are very well done, and the videos and photos meet, and probably exceed industry standards. Sure, the 1998 videos aren’t up to 2011 standards, but to expect that is unreasonable. What is noticeable, however, is that there are sites today that barely achieve the technical abilities that Hogtied did in 1998. Another interesting thing to note in this walk through Kink history is how the seeds of several other Kink sites were sowed here first. Water Bondage obviously has its roots here, and you could easily argue that sites like Device Bondage and Public Disgrace do too. As it is a walk through history, the initial scenes are fairly tame and feature unknown models and use little plot. Eventually the scenes shot at the Armories become BDSM spectacles, many times with a plot too. An interesting side note is the models. At first, they appear to be largely unknown models, maybe girls dabbling in adult picking up some extra cash. They then go through a phase where some well-known A-list porn stars not normally known for doing fetish work show up. The more recent scenes tend to feature models well known in the fetish world. Models like Amber Rayne, Dana DeArmond and Madison Young. The premise is simple and hasn’t really changed much – with the exception of some plot-based scenes: the model is tied up and sexually tormented. Sex occurs, but not often. If you want sex in every scene, see another child of this site: Sex and Submission. As simple as the premise is, it works. If you watch a lot of it, it can seem repetitive, but lay off for a while and the innovation becomes apparent again. Technically, as with all other Kink sites, they are excellent. Videos are offered in multiple formats to suit your wants and capabilities. Photos are available too, with zips on offer. Download speeds are good and managers are supported. The bottom line is that this is another excellent site from Kink. It is huge, offering well over 800 scenes, many of which are nearly an hour long. The average scene is probably closer to 30 minutes, especially on the newer scenes where the intensity is pretty high. If BDSM is your thing, you owe it to yourself to get a membership here. One bit of advice: if you’ve not done so before, create an account at Kink. It’s easy and free and you will get email offers for excellent deals. When you’re a member to one site, you get a discount on others. 05-26-11  03:46am Replies (10) Review 120 Holed (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A-list, 18-22 models - High production values - Logical site, easy to use - Updates weekly - Many download and streaming option - Photos available - Supports download managers Cons: - Small site (16 scenes) - No TBP/PU discount - Lots of upsells within the site Bottom Line: When you have a site whose tagline is “deep/anal/buttplay” you can be assured that I’ll be a member. As the tagline says, this site is 100% anal. Holed is affiliated with the Porn Pros network so the site and scenes have that feel to it. The models are all young (18-22), usually petite and are mostly the lineup of A-list models in porn today who do anal scenes. The scenes themselves have very little plot or setup. I prefer some tension be created before the sex starts but with the overall quality of the scenes I can cut them a little slack. The site offers their porn in a variety of ways that will be sure to satisfy almost anyone. Streaming is available in either SD or HD. A trailer is available too. When it comes to downloads there are lots of options: four MP4 resolutions (4K – 2160p, 1080p, 720p, 480p), one MPG format (480p) and one WMV file (720p). The 4K scenes are 3840x2160 with bitrates that differ between scenes though the lowest I saw in those was 15,000kb/s. The 1080p scenes are 1920x1080 and they also have different bitrates depending on the scene. I saw bitrates from 10,000 to 25,000 kb/s. Framerates on all the scenes is either 23 or 59fps. With specs like that you’d expect the scenes to be crisp and sharp and you’d be right. At least with the higher resolution as I didn’t dip into the low resolution downloads. Photos are also available (in a zip) and those are 1500x1125. This really isn't a photo site so it isn't a surprise that the photo quality isn't class-leading like the videos are. The site has a few downsides, the biggest being its size: as of today there are only 16 videos available. The site will continue to grow as it is updating but with only one new scene added per week it’ll take a while for this site to become a good value at the full price. And speaking of price, there is no TBP/PU discount so you’ll have to pay the full fee of $30USD to join. Some may balk at that but I still think that given the quality of what’s on offer it is still worthwhile to join. A minor negative is shared with other Porn Pros sites and that is the large number of ads and upsells when you’re on the site. Most of them can be easily ignored and I will say that I actually liked that for each scene there was a listing of other scenes on the network starring that model. I had no trouble using a download manager and download speeds were what I’d see on comparable sites. The bottom line? While there will be a lot of people who disagree with me on this, I’d much rather pay for quality rather than quantity and Holed certainly delivers on quality. Objectively the production values are excellent and the site is well laid out and easy to use. Subjectively you get blistering scenes from some of the hottest anal queens in the business today. If you like A-list, young and petite models engaging in some vigorous anal sex than you really should consider a membership here. Not that Holed would listen to me, but they could improve things in the short-term by offering a TBP/PU discount at least until the site grows more. 10-03-16  09:38am Replies (1) Review 121 Hookup Hotshot (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: - 299 scenes - New scene added weekly - 145 BTS scenes - Hot models in provocative clothes - Some unusual sex acts - Effective use of tags for finding what interests you - Bills through a reputable and trustworthy biller - Multiple download and streaming resolutions - 4K video available (for downloads only) - Many scenes have both photos and screencaps - Fast and stable download/streaming Cons: - Not for every taste Bottom Line: Hookup Hotshot continues to impress. I’ve been a fan since the site started back in 2015 and it continues to deliver amazing porn with some of the hottest models working today. With rare exceptions, I keep a membership and look forward to getting a new scene every week. The premise of the site has evolved a bit over the years but it is mostly the same. The idea is that the male talent, Bryan, who also owns the site, uses a phone app to connect with women for sex. While that premise is still part of the site, it’s much less so now. If you are familiar with HUHS, you will recall that most of the scenes started with the model outdoors in an alley posing and taking photos of herself for Bryan. In the last year, Bryan must have moved because the scenes are shot in a different house and the opening shots are no longer outdoors in an alley. Something that is unchanged since my first two reviews of this site is the fact that it is still a relatively narrow niche and likely won’t appeal to everyone. The models tend to be in their late teens and early 20s and most of them are petite. They are dressed in outfits that are girly and slutty at the same time. Adding to the atmosphere of dominance and submission in the scenes is the fact that the model refers to Bryan as either Daddy or Mr. Gozzling. For those who aren’t familiar with HUHS, while the scenes do have a distinct power imbalance, they aren’t misogynistic. There are no elements of BDSM here. The sex is rough but the models aren’t badly treated. From a real-life perspective, the fact that many models come back for repeat shoots must speak to the site’s reputation. From its early days, HUHS was known for featuring some extreme acts such as vomiting and golden showers. While the site continues to feature these, it should be noted that most scenes don’t have this. While the HUHS formula has changed a bit over the years, it has had a set formula pretty much from its beginning. The model starts by posing in the living room, Bryan joins her for some kissing and groping, the model is undressed and fingered and eventually she squats down for Bryan to “revealâ€� his cock. All the standard positions are used and are interspersed with lots of oral, including face-fucking. Most of the scenes feature rimming and finish with a facial. I like this formula because if I’m looking for a specific position or act, I know where to find it in each scene. As I’ve said many times in the past, if a formula works, why change it? The videos are available for downloading in resolutions ranging from 480p to 4K. HUHS adopted 4K from the beginning so all scenes have that option. The bit rate on the 4K scenes is approximately 13,000 kb/s. The videos are also available in streaming with the same specs as the downloads with one exception: there is no 4K option available. There are currently 299 scenes available on the site, with a small handful of these being compilations. While the site has had a few hiccups in the past, it updates with a new scene each week. For fans of BTS material, HUHS is a great resource. There are currently 145 BTS scenes available. These scenes can feature pre-scene and post-scene interviews as well as the model trying on wardrobe and posing for photos, all while being interviewed about herself. Photo collectors should also be satisfied as well since many of the newer scenes offer both photos and screencaps. Older scenes used to have many photos but these seem to have been dropped with many of those scenes having fewer than 20 available. Newer scenes, however, have hundreds of photos available. These are available as both singles and zips. The site has gone back to using tags extensively. This makes it easier to find things that you enjoy watching. Download speeds have improved with speeds are on par and often even faster than what I’m used to with similar sites. Obviously, your own Internet connection will play a big role in this. Potential subscribers should note that the pandemic hit HUHS hard and they stopped uploading new scenes for about a year. For those of us who had memberships when this was happening it was a disappointment, but for those who are new to the site it’s still a large site with lots to offer. Had I not mentioned it, you might not have even noticed the gap in scenes which was filled in with BTS footage. If you like gonzo porn with a bit of a rough edge and featuring 18-22-year-old models in sexy clothes, then you owe it to yourself to check out HUHS. I’ve been a member here almost since the site began and they consistently deliver incendiary scenes. There are multiple membership options and the site bills through Epoch, an established and trustworthy builder. The site is easy to use with the download and streaming speeds being fast and stable. While not for everyone, if you are mildly intrigued by my description of the site then make sure to check it out. 06-06-22  11:54am Replies (2) Review 122 Hookup Hotshot (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique site (Dom/sub, DDLG) - Exclusive scenes - 166 scenes - Updates weekly - Long scenes (some over 90 minutes) - Download limit is changed to a much more reasonable 20 scenes per month - Now bills through Epoch Cons: - No meaningful search function or tags (some keywords used in older scenes) - Download speeds are slower than average Bottom Line: I read my older review and realized that both the site and the porn available have changed and it merits a new review. As with a lot of sites, this isn’t for everyone. The sex here is rougher than you’ll find at other sites. While the site doesn’t bill itself as a Dom/sub site it is in a sub-niche of that. The site plays off of a ‘Dominant Daddy / Little Girl’ (DDLG) theme so most of the models are just over 18 and petite. Most of the scenes have the models dressed in the DDLG theme too and that’s further played up by the models calling the male talent ‘Daddy.’ Most of the models are A-list porn stars though there are a few who are relative unknowns. There are even a couple of first scenes and first anals. There are a couple of MILF scenes but, in my opinion, those don’t really fit here. As rough as the sex may have been from the beginning it has become even rougher in the past 18 months. The site owner/director/male talent, Bryan Gozzling, is active on another forum and it seems that he’s listened to member’s comments. The overall feel of the scenes has remained the same but there are some notable differences between the older scenes and the current ones. Each scene still starts off at Bryan and the model text each other using the Hookup Hotshot app. They arrange to meet for sex. The girl arrives at Bryan’s house and the scenes usually start with fingering and some oral on the model. The sex includes rough oral with face fucking. There are many scenes where the model spits up a lot of saliva. Some of the most notable changes that seem to be member driven are that while f-on-m rimming did occur occasionally in the older scenes it is now in probably 80% of the newer scenes. For those of us who are fans of rimming, Bryan takes it to a new level by having the model ‘make out’ with his ass. The model kisses and gently licks Bryan’s ass before being allowed to really dive in. There are some really passionate rimmers on the site. Another major change is that people have requested more peeing scenes and Bryan has been delivering. The older scenes occasionally had peeing in them but approximately 25% of the new ones have it. In most peeing scenes there is some swallowing. The final major change is probably the most controversial. HUHS members active on the site forum and on other porn forums seemed to really want to see more puking from throat fucking. Some of the older scenes had this too but it is more frequent now. The scenes are available in four resolutions: 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I get the 1080p files and those come in at a 3500kb/s bitrate. (4K are 6000 and 720 are 4000.) There are currently 166 scenes and while there isn’t a set update schedule a new scene is added sometime each week. There are photo sets available with the scenes too. Those are available as singles or as a zip and include both posed photos and screenshots. Back when I first reviewed the site it had an unreasonable download limit. For a while the limit was gone and while there is a limit again at least it’s reasonable at 20 scenes per month. That will still be an issue for someone joining for the first time and wanting to download a lot but it isn’t an issue for someone who joins regularly or has a recurring membership. The scenes can be labelled as exclusive even though Bryan also releases some of them through Evil Angel as well. But since EA also packages them as DVDs they are edited to remove the bits that would attract the religious police. It’s my preference to download the scenes from the actual site so I get all the nastiness. This site frequently draws comparisons with Max Hardcore but I think that while there are some similarities the comparison is wrong. Sure, the look is the same and the sex is rough but there are more differences. Max had his models dress young to play young. He went to jail for that. Bryan’s site deals with the DDLG sub-genre of D/s play. Yes, there is more than a nuance difference. With Max the sex was rough and bordered on non-consensual. With Bryan the models really seem to enjoy the scenes. There are a couple of negatives. One is that there really isn’t a meaningful search function. Older scenes had tags but newer ones don’t so searching for a specific thing will be an issue. The other is that download speeds tend to be lower than those I get elsewhere. I don’t have issues with using a download manager though. While the site doesn’t offer a discount the monthly fee is only $20 which I think is an amazing value for so many exclusive scenes in a rare niche. The bottom line is that while this site isn’t for everyone, anyone into the DDLG niche, rough sex, peeing and other non-standard sex acts will probably like this site. I highly recommend having a look. And since the site now bills through Epoch you can join worry-free. 11-21-18  05:08pm Replies (11) Review 123 Hookup Hotshot (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: - 46 Scenes and growing - Updates weekly - Five-day full trial - A-list porn stars - Good production values - Bills through CC Bill Cons: - Small site - Low download limit - More of a streaming site Bottom Line: Writing an objective review of this site will be difficult for me because since I first joined it four months ago it has become my favorite site and Bryan Gozzling, the director, star and presumably, site owner, is currently my favorite director. Maybe an explanation of my interest in this site will help readers decide if this site is worth considering a membership. Uttering the name Max Hardcore isn't done in polite company but whatever Max became, in his heyday he pushed boundaries and made some amazing porn. Yes, in his later years he became nasty and his porn was degrading solely for the purpose of being degrading. I say that because I think Bryan Gozzling is the spiritual successor to the best of what Max Hardcore used to be: edgy, rough (but consensual), playful and fun. If your only memories of Max is in his later years then be assured that Gozzling isn’t like that. The scenes all follow the same setup: Bryan is texting with a girl on a dating site and she comes over to his house for sex. The models are all known porn stars and are all young (18-19) and they’re dressed in girly clothes and accessories to accentuate their youth. All are petite and natural but many have tattoos. There is a good preview available so you can see all the models and make your own choice if they’re to your liking. Many of the scenes have a brief shot of the girl walking in public dressed like that. The production values are great for a site that’s small and doesn’t appear to be affiliated with a larger network. The lighting and editing are good. (A personal preference of mine is less editing than is used here. I prefer to see the stars swap into different positions but here there is an edit and the scene switches to the new position. I’ll concede that since the sex is fairly rough the model may need a break though.) The sex is definitely not for those who prefer couples porn: it is rough and hard. There is face-fucking and often f-on-m rimming. Gozzling seems to be into spit play and when his face-fucking causes a lot of spit he’ll usually scoop it up and rub it over the girl’s body and face. Anal sex happens in about a quarter of the scenes. With the rough sex and spit play the girls end up pretty messy at the end of the scene for the facial. The average scene length is about an hour though there are some that stretch longer than that. The site currently has 46 scenes available and updates with the addition of one scene per week. Recently Gozzling added a BTS scene but that wasn’t counted as an update. My preference would be to see more BTS scenes added. The site’s major flaw is that it has a pretty harsh download limit. You can only download five scenes per month. And it appears that the scenes are only available for streaming for a while as well. Currently the newest scene available for download is about a month old. The downloads are available in at least three resolutions: 480p, 720p and 1080p. Many are also available in 4K. The streaming is available in those same resolutions. Bitrates for the downloads are a bit lower than I’d like to see with the best coming in at 5,500kb/s. Many come in as low as 2,200kb/s. The good news is that however the scenes are encoded they aren't pixilated as you might expect at these low bitrates. While the download limit is big issue and a likely deal-breaker for many, it is a step in the right direction. Back when I initially joined four months ago no downloads were allowed. Maybe as the site gets more established Gozzling will allow more downloads. Photos are available too, but only as singles. But to be fair, this really isn't a photo site. Download managers work but with only five downloads per month available this really doesn’t add anything. There isn't a TBP discount listed but when I rejoined I did so through TBP and the regular price is listed as $30 with a discount price of $15. If TBP hasn’t flagged this as a discount then I’m guessing that the $15 price is available to everyone. And without downloads readily available, $15 is a more realistic price. (And maybe a solution in the future will be a two-tiered subscription with unlimited downloads being available.) I once joined through the trial and can confirm that it’s a full trial though I don’t know how downloads are permitted in the trial. One thing to note is that Gozzling has recently signed on to Evil Angel and has several titles there now. The EA scenes are from his HH site so that may be an option for downloads too. I definitely recommend this site to anyone who likes this kind of porn. The models are hot, the scenes are well shot (if a little over-edited), the sex is intense and the site is easy to use. If it wasn’t for the download limit I’d score this site much higher, definitely in the mid-90s. This is a site I’ll stay with for a long time. 03-19-16  09:23am Replies (12) Review 124 Hot Crazy Mess (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Nubiles family - A-list models - Plot-based scenes - Conventional B/G porn - Streaming and downloads in five resolutions each - Screenshots available - Logical site, options to sort and search scenes - 56 scenes (currently) - Updates weekly Cons: - 100% POV, and not great POV either - Not part of the Nubiles Network - Some ads, but not overly obtrusive Bottom Line: Hot Crazy Mess is a relatively new addition to the Nubiles family of sites. Unfortunately, it isn’t part of the larger Nubile networks but is a stand-alone site. However, thanks to a generous 50% TBP/PU discount the site still offers great value. HCM offers fairly generic porn – but I don’t mean that in a negative way. There are obviously porn sites that serve specific niches that exist on the fringes but a vast majority of porn watchers and collectors still prefer mainstream scenes. While these are mainstream scenes they do all have a common theme, namely the plot has the female models perhaps making some bad choices. All of the scenes are plot-based and those plots follow the overall theme set by the site name. Interestingly, the site has made a choice to include a brief description of the plot set up at the beginning of each scene. Personally, I like to this approach. While the plots are all based around the loose theme of the female model making some bad choices (snooping on a family member’s laptop, attempting to steal a dog from an ex-boyfriend or cheating on a boyfriend with his best friend, for example) the most common plot theme on the site revolves around the step-siblings (there are some step-daughter/step-father scenes too). I guess that’s just low-hanging fruit for porn these days. But, it’s a niche that I quite like even though I know there are others who avoid it. As with most plot-based porn the plot is merely there to get the scene started. Martin Scorsese isn’t writing scripts for this or other sites. Once the thin veneer of plot is set the scene simply becomes fairly generic B/G porn. This isn’t a criticism of the site and shouldn’t be read as such. I prefer a bit of a plot, especially one that explains why the two people are getting together and creates some sexual tension between them. HCM delivers on these expectations. As with all other Nubiles sites the models don’t have a huge amount of variety. This is absolutely not a problem for me since I join their sites specifically to see scenes with younger, petite models. It’s also worth noting that most of the models here would be considered A-list. They are the who’s who of young, petite porn stars active today. One bit of good news is that there is some variety in that there are some scenes featuring Asian and Black models. Those scenes still make up only a minority but they do appear more frequently than on other competitive sites. There are currently 56 videos uploaded and a new one is added each week. Both streaming and downloads are available in five resolutions (480×270, 644x360, 960x540, 1280×720 and 1920x1080). Bitrates are good and the scenes look good with no pixilation or stuttering. Frame rates are 30fps. There is also a “theatre modeâ€� and while I tried that I can’t really determine what it’s value is. But it is reasonable to say that whether you prefer streaming or downloads there is something for everyone. The site is logically laid out, which isn’t too hard to do with a new and relatively small site. The scenes can be sorted by upload date and model. There are also tags to help you drill down further into anything specific. There are some ads at the beginning as you login and some at the bottom of each page but they aren’t overly obtrusive. Screenshots are also available as singles or as zips. Those come in at 1920×1080. I had no issues using a download manager to queue up the scenes I wanted to download. I also found that download speeds were on par with similar sites meaning that they were quite fast. I didn’t encounter any throttling or download limits. The only serious negative I found (and this may be partly subjective) is that the scenes are all shot in POV. I’m not a big fan of this style but I can live with it as long as it is well done. Unfortunately, this isn’t well done. I found that in all scenes there is a lot of camera shake and the cameraman, who is also engaged in sex, sometimes moves and loses the shot. I’m sure shooting good POV is very difficult so it seems to me that the remedy is to have a cameraman shoot the scene. This could be a big improvement for the site. A minor negative is that it would be nice if it was part of the Nubiles network but I can certainly understand why it isn’t. Besides, the discount offered makes this an excellent value. The bottom line is that while this is generally pretty middle-of-the-road porn it’s very good middle-of-the-road porn and it aims right into a big part of the market. Unless you are looking for an unconventional niche you will likely be happy with a membership at the site. This site is well worth considering if you like young, petite models in (mildly) plot-based porn scenes. Just be aware that all the scenes are POV and have a lot of camera shake and other issues involving the cameraman doing two important things at the same time. 10-23-19  03:38pm Replies (0) Review 125 Hotkinkyjo (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Nothing else quite like it - Pushes the boundaries on extreme insertions - Very rare male on female anal fisting - Exclusive material - Photos and Videos - Resolutions on even mid-grade videos look great - Updates regularly Cons: - Streaming only - true HD stutters a lot even with a high-speed connection - Insertions only – no actual sex - Expensive for what’s offered Bottom Line: First, please let me introduce you to an 800lb. gorilla in the room because readers will definitely notice it: yes, this is an EXTREME site. It isn’t for everyone. Heck, I’m pretty sure that a lot of it isn’t even for me, and I’m a fan of extreme anal stuff. So, readers, please remember that even if you don’t like this niche, I’m wearing my reviewer’s hat as much as my pervert’s hat, so please keep the comments civil. The other 800lb. gorilla in the room is the fact that the site offers no downloads at all. That goes for photos and videos. The site explains and justifies that by noting the risk of piracy if we, people who actively support pay sites, are allowed to keep what we see. I have no doubt that piracy is probably the biggest problem in the online porn industry today and I’m sure it hurts small sites like this much more than big sites, but I am not convinced that penalizing supportive paying customers is the solution. I really hope that the site re-thinks this policy. Hot Kinky Jo is an attractive Russian model who speaks good English and appears to be in her mid-20s. She’s petite and has looks more common in mainstream porn rather than the often rough, hard look of a model who pushes the limits in extreme fetish porn. According to an interview she gave to Jay Sin in Anal Acrobats she got her start doing webcam work and discovered she has a particular ‘talent’ for being able to insert large objects into her ass. I’m not sure if there is such a title, but if there is then Jo deserves to be labeled the Queen of Extreme Anal Insertions. In fact, I suspect that if the title comes with a crown then she could easily insert that into her bum. The videos all feature some sort of extreme anal play. There are solo scenes where Jo anally fists herself, scenes where she uses huge dildos in her ass, including one where she takes more of a horse-dick dildo than would seem possible. There are scenes where she is with one or more women where there is more extreme insertion and usually female on female anal fisting. There are even a few scenes with male on female anal fisting. I’m not aware of any other site that offers this. In several scenes Jo actually takes more than one fist in her: three go in during one scene. I warned you that this was extreme stuff. One thing you will not see is actual anal sex, but that isn’t the theme here anyway. One niche that the site promotes is prolapse or “rosebud” porn. I am most definitely NOT a fan of this and I know this sounds weird, but I have no stomach for prolapse stuff in the middle of a fisting video. The site is very small, which is likely because it’s so new. There are only 17 videos and 15 photo shoots available as of this writing. To make matters worse, the videos are short, all coming in at just under eight minutes long. But I’m guessing that if you’re having your ass fisted, eight minutes could seem like an eternity… The photo sets all have 100+ photos. Many of the photos shoots appear to be shot at the same time as the videos. The site, which only began last month, currently updates every two or three days. Video updates seem more frequent than photo updates. I can’t give full specs on the videos or photos because I don’t know how to do that for streams. The videos are offered in three resolutions, low (1.5MB/s), medium (5)MB/s) and HD (10MB/s). I have a 60MB/s fibre op connection and I found the HD stuff unwatchable due to stuttering and long and frequent buffering delays. But when the HD stuff played, it did look good. The medium looks excellent too and didn’t suffer the same problems. The photos also offer three resolutions. Both videos and pictures open into a viewer on the page. I really can’t give much more technical detail because I don’t normally use streaming. Not that this is relevant, but this site is the first I’ve noticed that uses the new “xxx” top-level domain. Until I noticed that I couldn’t figure out why I couldn’t find the site by simply googling “hotkinkyjo.” I’ll usually base a recommendation on value. And for me, cost is only one factor in deciding on value. Given the uniqueness of this site I’d normally be willing to say it provides decent value even though it costs $30 per month and only has a small amount of material. But – and this is only my opinion – the lack of downloads means I just can’t recommend this. Until they offer downloads I won’t be back and I’d only recommend the site to someone who really likes this niche and understands that it is streaming only. 07-23-12  05:49pm Replies (4) Shown : 101-125 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.