Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Girls Fuck Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Billed by Segpay which is very safe to use.
Inexpensive at only $14.95
Mostly American pornstars that I like
Links to discounts for other sites
Professional camera work and directing |
| Cons: |
It has not updated since May.
Only 35 videos
Only three download options and the best is Full HD
There are tags for searching for what you like
Does not come with other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the fact that there are only 35 videos and there may never be another update, I really like this site. Although I have never been with a woman sexually, I find the idea very appealing. I find most lesbian porn sites are not to my taste with a lot of overacting and fake moaning. In those mainstream sites, the production values are low and the appeal to women is nonexistent. In contrast you find here that the actual sex is very realistic and a joy to watch, with nice production values. Instead of the ordinary quality you see In most porn, these scenes look like they were made by video professionals. A few even have simple, but interesting special effects. The scenes are explicit but not overdone sleazy. There is a lot of licking, toy play, scissoring, fingering, strap on play, pussy shaving and even the use of a sex machine by the two women.
I recognized many of the models as they are Americans known for lesbian sex on other sites. The younger models are fresh with enthusiasm and seem to really enjoy the scenes. These younger models are portrayed as innocently exploring sexuality either with other young models or with older more experienced women. Some themes portrayed here are college age schoolgirls enjoying each other, sorority members getting it on, boss with younger employee, babysitter with mother. This gives the scenes an appeal that is using a uniform fetish, a college fetish, older/younger lesbian as well as dominant/submissive roleplay as there is also some light BDSM. The most popular scene is Girls Naughty Naked Night Out, which is a four way. Four young ladies of college age go to a strip club, where they laughingly enjoy seeing a stripper on a pole. They give her tips, but she does not strip or get in on the fun once it starts. What you see are women in short skirts, well made up, who are going out for fun as none have a date that night. This sounds like a fantasy I might have, or was something I might have done when I was younger. They come across as a group of good friends who know each other well. I could imagine myself having been in that group, getting giggly and silly along with them. This is porn that captures my imagination and is not just made to satisfy men’s fantasies about imaginary lesbian encounters. They do what comes naturally as a result of having been friends first. You can see the action evolving as the heat builds. They got hot and then I got hot. What could be better than that?
My only complaints include a minor one. When you open a page on the site, the video starts on autoplay. If you want faster downloading you have to turn it off. A much more serious matter is that the site appears to not be updating any longer. With 35 videos, I would appreciate a lot more. I want to ask if they have any plans to keep the site actively growing, but the only customer service links were for billing problems. What you do get is well worth joining for. |
|
09-05-21 06:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the Lets Doe it Network of sites
Irregular updates, but they are about one every two weeks.
Uses tags for easy searching
Four choices for video downloading. Full HD is the best
More than 200 scenes
Really gorgeous models made up to look their best
Great production values with a few small visual special effects such as fading in and out |
| Cons: |
Limit of 100 downloads each month
Too many ads after you log in |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never had a lesbian experience and don’t identify as one, but this site gave me reason to wonder. As a woman, I can enjoy watching orgasms, both male and female. I love men’s bodies, but women’s bodies have so many interesting parts, not just the one. What I saw on this site was just amazing. It may be the hottest girl/girl site I have ever been a member of.
The models are naturally beautiful without even trying. The site has them perfectly made up and they wear clothes that look great on them too. The women are a combination of classy and erotic. They do things like brush their hair, change outfits and have non erotic fun with each other as part of the prelude to the scene. They stare into each other’s eyes and turn each other on even before they touch one another. Presex erotic kissing is done well in every scene. These women are very feminine, unrushed, gentle and sensuous. For the most part, there is an attempt at a story, but not all that much. At least there is a logical progression into the sex, which is more than most porn has. The ages range from about 18 to 30, from naïve and exploring sexuality, to knowing exactly what each other would like. I believe that only another woman can know exactly how to please a woman to the max. Sometimes there is mutual masturbation, fingering, scissoring, the use of toys, strapons, and vibrators, but mostly there is a lot of slow erotic licking down there. The scenes easily shift from seductive to very explicit. These women are really into these scenes or they are better actresses than I think they are.
Some of the setups include roommates, step sisters and best friends. They know each other and then the action builds on that. What is missing though is that they don’t talk to each other. I am sure it is because they don’t speak English, or at least not well. They have subtitles in some scenes, but tone of voice and choice of words could have been very erotic. Sexy, playful talk turns us girls on. There are many outdoor sets and there are a few pool parties. There are also many indoor scenes in elegant places we could only dream about. The locations are an important part in making the scenes into a girl’s fantasy. I could easily imagine these women are on a once on a lifetime vacation. The camerawork, editing and general production values are some of the best I have ever seen on a porn site. I feel like I should be watching them in a movie theater. I can see watching these scenes with a partner or two and we would both get turned on together.
Mostly these are one on one scenes. Despite the range of ages, the pairings don’t play to that. There are a few solo masturbation scenes, but not many. There is a sprinkling of three ways and even a four way. As a site, it was easy to use and there are over 200 videos in the library. there is a download limit of 100 scenes per month, more than you can download them all in a monthly subscription. It also comes with a nice network, lets Doe It, but this is the only girl/girl site in it. |
|
09-05-21 06:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
103
|
The White Boxxx
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Labor day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Comes with other 17 Lets Doe it sites
Almost 350 visually stunning and hot scenes
Updates are once a week
Many of the prettiest pornstars there are
Great production values, the videos look great
Uses tags for easy searching, but searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos across the network
More hot videos than I can handle.
Sometimes I am feeling so naughty because I wish I was one of these women |
| Bottom Line: |
When I think of couple friendly porn, this is the kind of site I imagine. These are videos any couple I can think of would feel comfortable sharing. The sex is unrushed, slow and just so sensual. The scenes progress in heat until the couples build to a climax and so do, I right along with them.
Many of the videos focus on the woman and what she wants and needs sexually. She is seen as empowered and sexually liberated. In many scenes she is so seductive that her man finds her irresistible. A big reason is that these women tease their guys, a fantasy I often have. In many scenes the foreplay includes a vibrator and a lot of hot kissing and other attention from her man.
One of my favorite scenes stars Rebecca Volpetti and Lutro. It is called “My Insatiable Girlfriend”. I was feeling a bit warm just reading the title. She ties him to a bed and takes advantage of him. He is there just to please her. In another scene the same two models are shown as he is not interested, so she teases him by fingering herself. She uses a vibrator while he is “punished” by being forced to watch her masturbate. That would teach any man the uselessness of ignoring a woman in heat. After these two scenes I have become a big fan hers. She also has a few great lesbian scenes that I wish I had a chance to be in. I have never been with a woman, but she is so tempting I could imagine what it would be like with her.
Every scene is a professional production and the attention to detail is very enjoyable. Hair, makeup, setting, lighting, and the camerawork are just so well done that I feel this site is one that others should imitate. I see that the network has won numerous industry awards over the years, such as best paysite, best network , best lesbian and best hardcore sites.
I would say that I recognize a few of the stars, both male and female, and that they are some of the best looking in the industry. The site uses tags, but the results are for the whole network, not just the one site. The download limit of 100 scenes per month is also across the network. On this site alone, there are nearly 350 videos, so that has to be a negative. Now that I think of it, this could also be a compliment as that means there are too many quality videos that are worthy of being downloaded.
There is a Labor day sale going on right now and at $10 for a month for the whole network, that is a deal I could not refuse. |
|
09-05-21 06:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
Quest For Orgasm
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017 |
| Bottom Line: |
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. |
|
09-05-21 06:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
POV Blowjobs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As far as I am willing to go into the world of messy, rough porn. A large POV blowjob site.
Surprising to me, 674 scenes, remove around 40 if you don’t count behind the scenes.
It’s part of the Evil Angel network. I tried to find a few more sites to review from it, but can’t stomach most of them.
Some really pretty women. Why does that surprise me?
Good video quality with more than half of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads.
Downloadable picture zips, but some of the sets only have 10 or less pictures. |
| Cons: |
This does not remind me of a blowjob site. It’s more like a throat culture site, very messy, harsh, I won’t say degrading since the women seem to enjoy it.
No longer updating, but it is a very large site.
One of my most hated acts in porn: Having the guy cum into a glass for the women to drink it. It reminds me of when Rocky drinks the raw eggs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I pushed every boundary I have with these reviews this month. I tried Anal Acrobats, but couldn’t even make it through the trailers of the videos to review it. This one is typical of Evil Angel and some of it’s not terribly disgusting or offensive, but some of it is. I am going to review it as objectively as I can without bringing too much of my disgust into the review.
The majority of the 674 scenes are one woman with one man and those are not that bad. It’s the scenes with more than one man that I found hard to watch. Maybe I should even say, if you are against very hardcore porn, heavy slobbering, running eyeshadow and eyeliner, gagging noises, you might want to stay away from this site.
This is a legitimate complaint that has nothing to do with the disgusting parts. I don’t see how this is POV. Especially when it’s more than one man. There’s one camera and five men. I’m not even for sure where POV for a blowjob should be recorded from.
The most surprising part to me was how many very attractive women there are on the site. I even saw one scene here with the very pretty Anissa Kate. The scenes are very simplistic. Man gets naked, the woman opens her mouth and the man gives her a throat culture with his penis. I really believe if they spent more time working on making it a true POV site, instead of seeing how close they could come to choking the woman to death, it would be a good site. Which is me being objective. I’m saying if you don’t mind the sounds, the gagging, you might like this site a lot. The part that made me at least suffer through watching the scenes was how much the women seem to enjoy it. There is a little more to the scenes than just blowjobs. Many of the female models masturbate while giving the blowjob. I would even recommend it for those who have favorite mainstream female porn stars. You will be surprised when you see her on this site. |
|
08-11-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
106
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Glamour porn, young women and men with more of a focus on videos.
Videos update once per week, picture sets were being released several times a month but after only 2 photo sets in July 2021, there have been none so far in August and it is the 10th of August.
Though it is just an opinion, I believe the hardcore scenes on this site, are better than the hardcore scenes on their sister siter Wow Girls.
Though the quality is not quite as high as Wow Girls (6K) videos, All Fine Girls does have 4K videos.
The site, like Wow Girls, is quite large. There are 2,400 videos and around 2,850 photo sets. All are downloadable.
The models are some of the prettiest I have seen with one exception, there isn’t a lot of ethnic diversity. |
| Cons: |
The slower, current, picture set update rate is concerning.
The older videos only have a 480p download option. |
| Bottom Line: |
You do get this site with Wow Girls, but I know there was a time when the sites were not included together. I have no reason to believe they will return to splitting the sites up, but it is interesting to look at the differences in the two sites. It does look like Wow Girls is considered the flagship site with it having higher video resolution options and more consistent updates. But All Fine Girls, in my opinion, is superior in the hardcore content. While Wow Girls excels at the solo scenes. Both sites are about equal on lesbian scenes.
The first difference you will notice is All Fine Girls does not have the 6K video option. That is not a problem for me. I can’t get my 4K monitor to work properly all the time and end up putting it on 1080p. All Fine Girls also doesn’t have as many scenes with the 30 or 60 frames per second option on the videos. The scenes do have a lower resolution than Wow Girls offers on their newest scenes. All Fine Girls has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K download options. To my surprise, the scenes on All Fine Girls are not any longer in length, and often are shorter than the Wow Girls scenes. That causes a real question in my brain. Are All Fine Girls more impressive hardcore scenes more impressive because the male and female are more into it? These are younger women and younger men. It’s possible the shorter scenes can’t be avoided if the males are getting aroused too fast.
The biggest disparity in the numbers I noticed is in the amount of hardcore scenes. All Fine Girls has over 900 hardcore scenes, while Wow Girls only has around 450 hardcore scenes. There are also some threesomes with males and females. It looks like All Fine Girls was likely the more hardcore version of Wow Girls at one point.
The photo sets could be disappointing just because they have nearly stopped releasing any new ones. The photo download options are 4000px, 2000px, 1000px and Original. The Original option here on All Fine Girls has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution. That is a concern if they are stopping or even slowing the release of these very good picture sets. I will mention one complaint about the photo downloads. The download links for each picture set it at the bottom of the page, you have to insta-scroll to the bottom to get through the 100-150 pictures before getting to the download links. I don’t understand why those links are not at the top of each picture set.
In my head, I believe I like All Fine Girls better than Wow Girls, but it’s not a real concern since you get both with one membership, but is worth mentioning. If All Fine Girls keeps slowing down the release of photo sets my opinion may change. |
|
08-10-21 04:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
Wow Girls
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Back to my comfort zone of innocence porn with very pretty young ladies.
The site is huge with 2,250 photo sets and 1,140 videos..
I do not know this for sure, but I believe their quality on their videos has to be close to industry-leading, though not a selling point for me.
Tagging system is useful and does seem to be accurate.
The site includes access to Wow Porn, All Fine Girls and Ultra Films, all are very good sites.
There are roughly 3 video updates and 5 photo updates per week just on Wow Girls.
Uses Vendo as the biller.
Navigation is simple and easy to use, even switching between the sites. |
| Cons: |
There isn’t much to complain about so I will complain that the bonus site Ultra Films requires a separate login. I feel so petty which should be a compliment to the site.
I do believe the male/female scenes could be better. Most sites with young women in this age range do have problems with creating realistic hardcore scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This group of sites passed my previous favorite, Nubiles, though I gave them a con on the sexual action, it is overall more realistic and “sexy” than most sites with models in this age range. The best part of that is they do not focus on male/female scenes. There are solo scenes, lesbian scenes and even threesome plus scenes. The models are consistently in that 7-9 range score on that “on a scale of 1-10 in looks”. It is one of the most impressive groups of models I have seen.
They go beyond just giving you pretty and sexy young women to look at. Their quality includes some I didn’t even know existed like 6K videos. The regular newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. There also is an option to choose whether you want 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second. This is all getting complicated and confusing. I can’t tell a big difference between the different frame rates. They also have around 50-60 of their newer videos with 6K downloads.
The quality doesn’t stop on the videos. Their picture sets have four download options: 4000px, 2000px, 1000px and Original. The Original option photos are 5760x3240 in resolution and are some of the best looking pictures I have seen.
The tagging system is surprisingly helpful. I usually do not use the tagging system on sites. There is always a question of how accurate those are. Maybe it’s just that they don’t really have any bad photo sets or videos and I don’t notice the accuracy or inaccuracy?
The scenes are kind of formulaic which can be seen by the running time of the videos. You will rarely see a video over 30 minutes, even if there are as many as 6 or 8 people in the scene. That is not something to really complain about, but these are very much produced and directed scenes that are not going to make you think there’s much spontaneity. I assume with females and males in this younger age range there needs to be direction and the scenes are at least mostly all over 20 minutes.
I do enjoy the solo scenes the most, especially the longer ones, with some being in the 25 minute range, though I do believe that does show how directed the multiple person scenes are. There just isn’t much to complain about and I believe my score shows that. This site, to me, is near perfect. If I was going to change anything I would extend the length of the scenes with more than one person in them. I will review the other sites that come with it as I believe there is enough difference between them to explain it. |
|
08-10-21 04:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
Wow Porn
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The smallest and only no longer updating site of the Wow group of sites, it’s still a very good site.
Surprisingly, you’ll see a lot of these videos with the 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second download option. Also 4K is common.
The site has just over 400 videos and around 700 photo sets. All are downloadable.
The models, just like on their other sites, are nearly all very attractive young women.
The scenes on this site are typically longer than on the other two Wow sites, with many going well over 30 minutes.
The overall action here is a little more hardcore than All Fine Girls and quite a bit more hardcore than on Wow Girls. |
| Cons: |
The last update was in 2019.
The photo sets due to stopping updates in 2019, do not have a download option that is comparable to the newer photo sets on Wow Girls and All Fine Girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only real complaint you’re going to hear from me about this site (by itself) is it’s not updating. The content on it -- is to me, more consistent and even hardcore than the other two Wow sites, even though I’m not a traditional hardcore porn fan. It’s just a matter of the execution of the scene and I believe on Wow Porn the producers, actors and actresses had better chemistry going than on either of the other sites. It really does make me question if there’s a problem with models having trouble performing within direction limits. These scenes are longer and you see a little more going on in each scene than on the other two sites, possibly communication between the actresses and actors. The content fits more in the “unscripted” style of hardcore porn. Even though, for some reason, there are solo scenes on Wow Porn too. The hardcore scenes on this site are some of my favorite hardcore scenes. Depending on how you look at that it could be a major compliment or it could just be expected. I don’t really like the mainstream, rough hardcore and you won’t see that on Wow Porn. It hits a middle ground between rough hardcore and heartcore with a little of each.
Though the site isn’t updating any longer it still has a respectable amount of content with 400 videos and 700 photo sets. The video quality surprised me. I thought since they stopped updating in 2019, the video quality would still be good, but of their 400 videos nearly 150 have 4K download option. The oldest scenes on the site have 540p, 720p and 1080p download options. There’s no dropoff in overall quality. I consider 1080p to be the standard even though I usually only download the 720p. The only dropoff is in the pictures, but it is not a major dropoff.
You will get used to using the site between their three sites. You can switch to just look for scenes on Wow Porn or to just Wow Girls or to just All Fine Girls. It’s a very intuitive site, one of the best I have used. I do think people should be sure to check this site out. The first few times I was a member, I skipped this site based on reading it isn’t updating. It is really as good if not better than the other two when it comes to the hardcore male/female scenes. The models do seem to be shared between the three sites so you’re getting very pretty models. I do not think there are any download limits. If there are, I haven’t hit them. Some of the files are very large, even on Wow Porn. A 4K 60 frames per second scene is 5.5 GB for one scene. I do believe that is part of the reason I can’t get my 4K monitor to work properly. I just can’t see using up that much space per scene.
This is a site you shouldn’t miss out on if you join Wow Girls or All Fine Girls. And if you’re a fan of the younger women look, there’s no way you should miss out on any of these sites. These are my current favorite sites and I lean towards softcore to more respectable hardcore. |
|
08-10-21 04:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Ultra Films
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The fourth site included when you join the Wow Girls network. A person could argue that any of these sites are the best of the four.
With over 400 videos and around 1,000 photo sets it looks like this site just replaced the updates on Wow Porn.
Updates with 3 videos per week and 5 photo sets per week.
Because the site is newer (late 2017 when launched), those of you who love the high technical quality are going to be very pleased with this site.
The site, though “separate” from the Wow network works exactly the same as the Wow sites and is very easy to use.
One of the few groups of sites I would join for a year. |
| Cons: |
This is going to be the most difficult part of the review. I am going to say they need more ethnic diversity in the models.
They could integrate Ultra Films with the Wow network, as it is, you not only have to sign-in with a different password, you also have to choose a different screenname. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site separates itself is technical quality. Every single video on the site has 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. That’s over 400 videos. The option to download with 60 frames per second instead of 30 frames per second is available on close to 390 of the scenes. Unless you’re looking for the 6K videos, there is nothing possible to even complain about on Ultra Films. They are giving you the highest quality industry-standard downloads with the option of 30 or 60 frames per second on 95% of the scenes. Usually one of the easiest cons to use on any site is “the older content is not of as high quality”, can’t do that on Ultra Films.
They have 151 models on Ultra Films and nearly all are very attractive. There are hardcore scenes that, at least to me, seem more hardcore than the ones on the Wow sites. The update schedule is excellent with 3 videos and 5 photo sets per week. I feel like sending them an email and asking if they could at least screw something up. You really could complain about the model diversity. I even took the time to look through the 151 models just to give an idea of what I’m “complaining” about. I’m going to say 12 of the 151 could maybe pass as non “white” and it would be pushing it on all 12 of them. One of the ones I know is on here is Apolonia Lapiedra and I do know she is from Spain. That’s as ethnically diverse as you’re going to get on this site. The other complaint about Ultra Films not being integrated into the Wow network, actually has an advantage. On the Wow network you really can’t search the models down to one of the three sites. It shows models from all 3 sites. On Ultra Films, the model list just shows the models on Ultra Films.
I believe, besides the technical quality, the focus on their top models really helps Ultra Films. Stefanie Moon who seems to be very popular has 11 videos and 19 photo sets just on Ultra Films. You can even look at the total numbers from the site compared to the amount of models and see what I mean. There are roughly 1,500 videos and photo sets combined, there are only 151 models, that’s an average of 10 videos/photo sets per model, but it’s not that high. There are several popular models who only have 3 videos and 3 photo sets. They do have a group that’s more in that range of 20+ videos/photo sets combined. I prefer that and it was something I believe made me lose some interest in Nubiles. I like seeing a lot of content of each model instead of seeing a lot of models with just a little content of each.
This review puts me in a hard situation of trying to figure out which of these four sites deserves the highest score. Quantity is never going to be the deciding factor for me. Even if I had the time and hard drive space, I do not and would not want a site’s entire collection of content on my PC. It makes me wonder if Ultra Films is the best of these for me. It’s probably going to lead me to tying two and the other two will just be a point or two less. I think if you’re a porn fan and you haven’t tried this network out you don’t know what you’re missing. |
|
08-10-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Her Limit
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly anal scenes, many with rimming. There are 161 scenes on the site.
Comes with the LetsDoeIt network of seventeen sites.
I joined through Segpay. You can also use Paypal.
Updates every week.
A lot of anal sex and many scenes have female on male rimming.
Both the men and the women are very enthusiastic. They really burn those calories here.
I rarely watch the interviews on sites, but these were worth watching. |
| Cons: |
Seemingly endless advertising that makes very cluttered web pages.
Two pre-checked cross sales when you first sign up. It is easy to miss them as they are not where you expect to find them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of the site refers to the fact that these are professional pornstars that are trying to push the limit of what they have done before sexually. Mostly what they do here is anal sex that is a bit harder than we generally see in anal porn. Many, but hardly all of the scenes are black men with large dark black cocks with white European women. The chemistry and enthusiasm are huge selling points. The female on male rimming on this site is some of the best I have ever seen. The women seemed to like the challenge in doing such hard and enthusiastic anal sex. The guys, well they were big enough that I can see the reason the sex was pushing her limits.
Each scene starts with an interview. Although the models are from many different countries, including the United States and Latin America, most are from Eastern Europe. For many this is the first time I have witnessed them speaking English. They generally have the help of a translator and their English is limited and not fluent. However, you get some insight into their personalities and what they like sexually. Their answers to the questions do not sound rehearsed and I appreciate that.
I saw others here have commented that the site is very sluggish to load and that made me think there was something wrong with my computer. Download speeds were quite variable and unpredictable. After loading several pages I was logged out and had to get back in while losing the page I was looking at.
You have the ability to save scenes as favorites, can vote up or down and can leave comments. There is an excellent sorting system of 55 categories and 336 tags. You can also sort the videos by newest, most viewed and most popular. The site is cluttered with ads. After you log in you get a page with ads before you get to the first member’s webpage. When you reach it, It also has ads. When you first sign up you have to uncheck two cross sells that are easy to miss as they are on the opposite side of the page from where you are entering information. There are four video download options and 1080p Is the best. I wish the site had 4K as an option. In contrast the only photo options 1920x1080 screenshots. The most recent set was only 16 photos.
Updates to the site are posted every week. Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeit network. In total you get seventeen sites that have a total of close to 1700 high quality HD scenes. |
|
08-10-21 03:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Kink University
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the Kink Network
Unique concept. This is the only site I ever heard of that explains the concepts behind BDSM porn.
Great lineup of porn talent.
A lot of model diversity.
Uses tag system for searching.
High production values |
| Cons: |
This site stopped updating in 2016.
The best quality is HD, not full HD or 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
I wouldn't call my overall experience on the Kink Network a favorite. I had to dig through the whips, ball gags, spiked walls, jump over vats of fire and dodge the men in black rubber masks just to find a few sites I liked on the entire network. This one stood out, if nothing more, than a unique site with a premise I haven't seen used on many sites. I really don't know of any other sites that do it.
Kink University describes itself as a place to learn BDSM technical skills and theories. Each video update is a seminar on a specific sex or BDSM topic. This is a channel on Kink, well known for its BDSM specialty. With 112 lessons, this is a great place to learn everything you always wanted to learn about sex and how scenes are made. It is great for advice on topics that you may want to learn about. The teacher and director is Danarama.
Some themes that are covered are, of course, bondage related such as hoods, straitjackets, suspension techniques, collaring, flogging, device bondage, caning, pegging, sensory deprivation, clothespins, humiliation and ropes. There is even a video introduction to BDSM.
Some of the topics are sexual such as dildos, handjobs, lesbian sex, toys, medical play, rimming, bisexual sex MMF, oral sex taste test, titty fucking, pornstar sex hacks and secret tricks, foot worship, how to have a threesome, erotic shaving, edging-orgasm control and denial for maximum climax, how to make her squirt, strap on sex-vaginal, anal and oral, fisting, anal sex, dominant oral sex, blowjobs and deep throat, finger banging and g spot mastery, cunnilingus, dirty talk, and pussy fisting.
The site itself is easy to navigate. It uses a very helpful tag system to help you find your favorite topics. Unfortunately, you cannot tag the videos as your favorites. The downloads were fairly fast and the files not that large by today’s standards, as the best quality is HD. When these were new updates, these were state of the art. There are a few screenshots for each update, but not real photosets.
Considering these are lessons, it would have been very helpful to have a transcript for each lesson. This way you can review the lesson without being distracted by the engaging visuals. The teacher/director is not very animated either. He gives the facts, but his voice is sometimes a bit too monotone for my taste.
Other than that the videos are very complete and the topics very interesting. Personally, I got a lot out of the BDSM lessons. The large number of sex lesson videos fascinated me and are well worth the price of admission. Some of those things I have done in real life and many others are featured in porn scenes that I like. If you want to see a guide to pegging a guy, they have a great one here. You too can become an expert or maybe just pretend to be one. It is a shame they don’t offer certificates for class excellence.
In this university you enjoy the classes and can practice the lessons at home with a partner. That can make for some exciting homework. You will want to be prepared in case of a surprise quiz. |
|
08-10-21 03:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Lingerie Tales
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Zipped and downloadable photo sets.
You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads.
Uses a tag system for searching.
Pretty UK women with sexy accents
The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill
The site has 168 videos and photosets. |
| Cons: |
Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos.
Nude, but not as explicit as I might like. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way.
I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually.
You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me.
I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo?
There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site.
The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early. |
|
08-10-21 03:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
True Anal
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready |
| Cons: |
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
I didn't like much about this site. |
|
08-10-21 03:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
TS Playground
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality transsexual site that makes joining Evil Angel more likely.
921 scenes with a new update every 5 days.
Ran by Gamma, has all the video download options you would expect starting at 160p up to 4K, easy join and cancellation too.
A lot of solo scenes, but see con
Pictures included and can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
When I use their filter for “solo” it only shows 23 solo scenes on the site. Just looking at the site, I can count over 50 on the first page of the site.
That I’ve found, they do not have any transsexual with women scenes. For some reason, I like bi and gay scenes, but don’t like the transsexual with men scenes.
You won’t find a story in these scenes even if you make one up, it will disappear. |
| Bottom Line: |
I read a few reviews about this site and another transsexual site on Evil Angel called Transsexual Angel which has over 1,200 scenes. That’s a combined 2,000+ scenes. Most of the content on Evil Angel does not appeal to me even if I have had a few drinks. I do, however, like transsexual solo and transsexual with women.
The scenes do not offer a lot to work with. There are solo scenes and there are transsexual with males scenes. The solo scenes are not going to expand your appreciation for theatrical art. The scenes show the transsexual lightly teasing. I do think there is a humor factor since some of the transsexual models don’t seem to know they are on a site with transsexual in the name. They tease around like they are going to surprise you when their penis flips out of their panties.They then masturbate, cum and the scene is over. The scenes with transsexuals with men are not much deeper. It’s a transsexual having sex with a man with no story and they cum and it’s over.
For me, I enjoy the solo scenes and don’t mind that they go by fast. I do think there should be a mention about the looks. Most of these transsexuals could pass as women. I haven’t seen many ladyboys or the smaller, usually Asian transsexuals, but outside of a few, these transsexuals are made up enough and have the right demeanor to pass as women.
The site is on Evil Angel’s network and is owned by Gamma. That is a positive in my eyes. The billing is easy, the cancellation could be a little easier (just requires more info than other billers) and the features are very typical of the other Gamma sites. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p, 360p, 240p and 160p. I have seen a few scenes with 4K, but it is not very common. The picture sets are not what you get from sites that focus on pictures, but they are downloadable in zips as well. There is a listed 300GB download limit per day, but I’m almost positive I’ll probably not hit that in a month.
The Transsexual Angel site does have less solo scenes and does have scenes with transsexuals having sex with women. They also have added a new site called Pansexual X that goes into transsexual, bisexual men and those maybe interested in these transsexual sites would be interested in it too.
I don’t get much out of the Evil Angel membership except these transsexual and bisexual scenes. It’s a little more hardcore than my tastes allow me to bite into. I do recommend joining for the transsexual and bisexual content if you are into those. This is a site with a large amount of those genres and are downloadable in high quality. |
|
07-14-21 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It was the first porn site I joined, and the first porn site I reviewed, still a favorite but not without reservations.
There are 2,529 models on Nubiles.net.
Includes a network, Nubiles Porn, with 16 sites.
The site primarily focuses on solo content of young (or young looking) models, with some lesbian and male/female content.
Everything included is high quality (pictures, videos) and as far as I know the downloads are unlimited.
The biller is CCBill, there was an unchecked cross-sale to Nubiles Films. |
| Cons: |
This is a technical con, you’re most-likely going to join through Nubiles Porn. Of their banner list of sites there is no listing for Nubiles.net, the best site they have. Look at it however you want.
The excess of “new” sites they have includes quite a few you do not get access to without joining separately.
The advertisements for not only their other sites, but other sites too. When you sign-in, it’s an advertisement page that you have to scroll to the bottom of to get to Nubiles.net or Nubiles Porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
The old saying goes, “Absence makes the heart grow fonder”. I can see that in some ways with my first visit to Nubiles in 2 years, but I also can say there’s a reason I wasn’t a member over the last 2 years.
The quality of the site has never been up for question. They run a great site with multiple weekly updates (it’s not as consistent as it used to be), their videos cover everything except 4K, starting at 270p and going up to 1080p. Their pictures even rival the top photography porn sites. The site is easy to use (once you get the ad page out of the way) and the models give you a blend of precarious and innocent to curious and going wild. It’s typically what I would expect from women in this age range. And there are over 2,500 of those models.
There is a staleness that creeps in every few months of being a member. The male/female scenes they have are just as well not watched. Those are as cookie-cutter and rudimentary as any I have seen.
None of this is really a surprise to me. I first joined Nubiles in 2009. It was the very first porn site I paid to join. I believe the content they are producing now is very similar to the 2009 content. There’s not a dropoff. It’s just there’s not any real improvements either. If you considered it perfect in 2009, you could still consider it perfect. I just don’t. I don’t even know if I considered it perfect in 2009. I considered it watchable. Porn was new to me. I grew up in Catholic schools and Nubiles was, possibly insultative for me to say -- a “nice” porn site. Not nice in the “great” way, but in the “safe” way.
As the years passed, new “bonus” sites started showing up on Nubiles, and to show how well I remember 2009, there were two bonus sites with it back then. I don’t remember the names, one was a Spring Break site and one with a solo model site who was also featured on Nubiles named Katrina. Those are still accessible with your membership, I do believe, if you can find them. Things then changed to Nubiles Porn, an entire network of Nubiles sites. I won’t even try to come up with an explanation for why they don’t show Nubiles.net included.
The content is still 2009. And maybe that’s what they’re going for. I once had a professor who made the comment, “Being a professor of freshmen college Algebra is great, each year a new group of 18 year old young women are delivered to my classroom. It’s like I never age.” Hopefully, his dark humor didn’t ruin the point.
Nubiles for what it is still delivers. They have some of the cutest, sexiest, most innocent, most believable, new, fresh models. Most of the scenes are solo teasing that evolve into masturbation. It’s a tried and true formula that has worked for nearly 20 years. The question becomes -- when do you or I start to feel like we’ve been here hundreds of times before? That has made Nubiles polarizing to me. It shouldn’t hurt the view of the site especially to new or newer members. I spent years as a member. I do believe the multiple sites, the sister “network” Nubile Films, the around 10 standalone “premium” sites they have released helps in that polarizing feeling. It’s the feeling of Nubiles.net is their site to start at. They include the 15 or 16 bonus sites in Nubiles Porn and you can try those which offer at least slightly different niches and genres. You’re then enticed to try Nubiles Films. If you like some of the Nubiles Film content you’ll give the premium standalone sites a try. Still worth a join and a short stay, but just doesn’t have the staying power for more than 3 months at a time for me. |
|
07-14-21 02:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
Petite HD Porn
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Petite models in hardcore male/female and lesbian scenes.
221 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
All content is high quality with up to 1080p offered on all videos.
Joining and canceling is easy with CCBill.
Navigation is simple, but not without problems. |
| Cons: |
Being a petite woman, I enjoy the petite niche in porn, but the problems I mentioned in the pros is starting to make this site confusing.
Advertisements that aren’t terribly obtrusive, but are still there.
Updates come, but with the aforementioned confusion it can make the updates confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has several positives going for it. The models are cute and pretty. The lesbian scenes are pretty good. The male/female scenes are hit or miss. The video quality is a plus unless you want 4K. The photo sets are very good and can be downloaded in zips. There is one problem that showed up over the last few months. They (Petite HD Porn) decided to number their scenes as seasons and episodes, similar to a television show. One scene will be S(season): 20, E(pisode): 4, the next release S20, E5. It always seems like a good idea until this happens. Of the newest 5 releases, two are listed as “New Season”. One is S22 E1 (sounds like a new season). The other, that is more recently released is S2 E1. And it’s listed as a new season just like season 22 is listed as a new season. Is the content being recycled? The 3 newest updates include two from season 2. This group of sites is not known for this kind of sloppiness.
The site is still a good site. Some of the male/female seasons are very good, as good as you will see on more known hardcore sites. The pretty models are usually into the sex, but if you’re here for a story there’s not much going on there. Why name the scenes, give them seasons and episodes then leave the story off?
There are 221 scenes, the updates are not even close to consistent. Currently, there was an update last on June 24, then June 21, before that was May 16, before that was March 14 and before that one -- February 9th. The last time I was a member here they were updating once a week during the peak of Covid. It’s one of those sites that you may enjoy, but you’re not going to be missing anything by skipping it. It does carry over the feeling that Nubiles tried too hard to do too much with a network to couple with Nubiles.net (which wasn’t needed) and then the premium standalone sites and a second network. The video quality is good with up to 1080p downloads. The photos and downloadable zips are there. It comes with a 15 or 16 site network, I really believe that’s an 18 site network, but I can’t remember the names of the other sites they don’t list. It’s at least cheap and uses CCBill for easy cancellation. The cross-sales when I joined were not checked.
It just feels like they could do a lot more with this site and their entire group of sites and networks and they may be as long as you join all the sites separately and pay a separate price for each. Just by itself, I couldn’t recommend this site, as a part of the Nubiles Porn network it’s worth taking a look at it. |
|
07-14-21 02:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
117
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women playing the male role.
Some of the scenes are very erotic and show chemistry between the male and female.
They have 464 scenes, but haven't been updated in over a year.
I don’t know what the percentages would be, I would think this niche appeals to both men and women -- especially in fantasies.
Attractive female models, the males are mostly attractive, but some of the contraptions they use as props make them less attractive.
Everything is downloadable with no limits. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are just too graphic for me.
The props and way they set some of the scenes up make them uninteresting, unappealing before the scene even starts. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the site I am rating highest on Kink’s network. There are some scenes that I couldn’t make 5 minutes into the scene. If you have watched the horror movie Saw, some of the contraptions and props on this site are reminiscent of Saw. There are metal jaw openers on the men, their mouths stretched to the point that it looks like their teeth are going to fall out. This is why I haven’t found most BDSM sites appealing. Why is the man stuck in that metal mask? There are actions I would rather not see and will list a few for others so they know what they’re getting into. There are scenes with ropes tied around the man’s testicles, tied around the man’s penis and they pull the ropes. There are (never thought I would see this) scenes of women double fisting the anus of the man. Just so it’s known, I also wouldn’t want to see a scene of a man or woman double fisting the anus of a woman. For me, that drives those scenes into a very narrow niche of viewers. Different strokes for different folks, but that just seems like a way to turn more people away than bring them in.
There are scenes that give a completely different feel and view. A woman with a strap-on using it to peg the man while kissing him, while also giving him a handjob, these scenes are some of my favorites. It’s an uncomfortable position for a male, but he’s willing to get the added perks. This seems like something I could see a married couple doing after 10 years of marriage and looking to spice things up.
The scenes I enjoyed the most are the ones where the woman pegs the man, then gives him her vaginal sex. There’s something there that I don’t believe the porn industry has ever figured out. When watching porn as fantasy, we like to put ourselves in the position of one of the stars. By showing the male doing something he probably wouldn’t be comfortable with (getting pegged), to then the female giving him what he wants -- vaginal sex, there’s a chemistry built there even though it is likely manufactured chemistry due to the script. I believe there’s a market for those scenes, a large market even.
The site isn’t that large considering they aren’t updating it. It has 464 scenes with a lot of the scenes I preferred being older ones. It does seem like they started out on the extreme end of hardcore BDSM, it then softened to the scenes I described, and the newer content is a rough mix of BDSM with the scene style I described. All of the scenes I downloaded are 720p. It was the highest download option available and some of those were in the early years of the site. So, while you can’t get 4K or 1080p, you can download 720p on all scenes. I enjoyed the site overall. I don’t think I will join Kink again unless I find another site I like on it. I am adding this as a note about the network as I believe it’s very important to know. The network itself is releasing daily updates. But they are nearly 50/50 gay/straight. I believe that’s important since it means they are releasing more scenes on their Kink Men sites than they were the last time I was a member of it, but only half of the updates on the main Kink site are straight. I could see that being a positive for some and a negative for others.
Divine Bitches is good if you have the time to go through the scenes and find ones that fit what you like to see. I believe if you downloaded 10 random scenes and showed them to me, I would probably like 4 out of the 10. That’s not a bad ratio and I think the uniqueness of the other scenes I do like makes up for it. |
|
06-09-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
119
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My de facto favorite site by Met Art.
They have 1,227 models and they are of different looks, ages and builds.
There are 1,264 videos and 2,813 photo sets.
Thankfully, the archive of content is bigger here than most of their sites, they are only updating The Life Erotic every 4-5 days.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded and I can confirm as much as possible there’s no download limit. I have about 80% of the content from the site.
Something you do not see as much on the Met Art sites is rubber/latex clothing, it adds an edgy feel to what can seem like a clinical group of sites.
174 of the scenes are lesbian including some group. The rest are solo. |
| Cons: |
It doesn’t feel like a con in 2021 since so many sites are no longer even updating, but I wish they could speed the updates up a little. As it is, you can expect 7-8 updates per month.
They don’t have as many lesbian scenes these days. I don’t know if that’s a byproduct of Covid or not, but it’s also not a deathblow con. |
| Bottom Line: |
In my recent trip through the world of Met Art, I have realized a lot of sites are happy (meaning the majority of their customers are too) with sticking with a tried and tested formula. The Life Erotic is Met Art’s Henry David Thoreau’s man who who marches to the drum he hears no matter how far away. It’s still mostly just women masturbating or the 174 lesbian scenes, but the mold is broken here. It’s not a criticism of Met Art or their sites. The models are gorgeous, young, very fit, some even look a little skinny and that’s coming from someone who was under 100 pounds last year. The Life Erotic’s newest update even shows a perfect example of what I mean. It’s the former superstar European model Blue Angel. My first memberships to porn sites included 21 Sextury which had a solo Blue Angel site on it, she was a young, slender model back then. She’s now in her 30s, has filled out more and no longer looks like the innocent flower waiting to be crushed by the porn industry.
One thing I normally would not talk about as a positive or negative on a porn site are the descriptions of the scenes, but the descriptions on The Life Erotic tell some perteinent information like this new Blue Angel scene is produced by another former superstar European model Sandra Shine, who I know also produces some on at least one other site. It makes every scene, especially the newer ones, worth looking at, reading the descriptions of and surprisingly adds a lot to the content. I do believe this is the most explicit of the Met Art sites unless you count ALS Scan and I think they are about equal.
The site is large with a combined 4,000 plus videos and photo sets. All can be downloaded in high quality and there are no limits. You also will get the broader range of model types on this site. I believe the update schedule is somewhere in the middle ground since it’s hard to to complain about a site updating every 4 days when most sites are not currently updating at all, but most of the Met Art sites are updating daily. If the update schedule was better the score would be a little higher, there’s not much room to go up.
They do score extra points for being more creative than any of the other Met Art sites except maybe Sex Art which may be too creative at times. The masturbation on The Life Erotic is more “erotic” to me. It could be the models are a little older than the other Met Art sites, it could be their outfits which sometimes include crotchless bodysuits and masks. This is not going to be meant how it sounds. There’s more meat on the bones here and that has nothing to do with the models’ builds. There’s more to the content. This is easily one of my favorite sites.
It’s so high on my sites I was planning on just joining it and ALS Scan which I like almost as much as The Life Erotic, but there was a special offer for the entire Met Art network and I took it. I’m not surprised The Life Erotic and ALS Scan are still my favorite two sites on that network.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p all are mp4 files and they also offer a WMV and DivX download. I know what WMV is, but really don’t know what the DivX is or why it’s offered. The photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes. The biggest sizes are over 4000x2600.
It’s very close to a perfect site for me and I think it earns a “seriously underrated” mention. The only thing I would change besides speeding up the updates is I would maybe push the envelope a little more with some light bondage. They have the outfits on for it. |
|
04-06-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
ALS Scan
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, slim, pretty models doing all sorts of things to themselves.
464 models on the site and these are mostly pro if not all pro models. I don’t know a lot of models by name, but recognize most of these.
There are an incredible 3,250 videos and 3,494 photo sets.
They are averaging an update per day, these do alternate between photo set update one day, video the next and they are not of the same model.
The videos and photo sets are downloadable and I have not seen anything about limits.
The quality of the videos and photos is very good. |
| Cons: |
These young women look more like I do and there does not seem to be a break in slim, small boobs, small butts, they are also all shaved.
It is an older site and you can see a difference in the performance quality by the models. It is not a big difference, but if you watch an older scene it seems better than the newer scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I strayed too far from my comfort zone last month. While I do not consider myself a lesbian or bicurious even; I do enjoy watching women masturbate. I believe it is a deep fantasy in my head they can see me too. The scenes on here change a lot if you scan through the years. Most of the newer scenes are fingering, small the average size dildo, standard vibrator or the wand-type vibrator. The older scenes are more explicit and you see more fisting, larger dildos and the models -- in my opinion -- pushing themselves to their limits. It is not really a complaint. It is just a difference I notice.
The women are mostly all attractive, cute ones, some are very pretty, some are gorgeous. Can I imagine this is what I looked like nearly 20 years ago? There are some lesbian scenes and I wish there were more. The lesbian scenes on here are very good. I did as other reviewers mentioned and checked out the island vacation videos. I would pay for a site with just those type of scenes on it. Those are excellent.
This site is a technological wonder in its quality. The photos I have downloaded have all been at a minimum of 4000 plus x 2500 plus, with some being even bigger. The picture quality is good enough to impress me and I am not usually into pictures. The models make the picture sets good. They seem to all be into teasing and being playful, then turning to a dirtier, naughtier side later in the sets. One of my all-time favorite sites -- Nubiles, could take a few lessons in photographing young women from this site.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p and separate WMV and DIVX/AVI versions too. I believe the photo sets are consistently better than the videos. The videos are much better than the softcore sites I am used to, but I am thinking this -- young, slim, small boobs, small butt, all shaved, combined with just solo masturbation makes the videos seem similar. They do have some solo videos where they do more with the way the scenes play out, but it was -- again, in my opinion, better in the older scenes. I have the same complaints with the other top softcore sites too.
The site is huge. There is no way I could go through all this content in a month. Combining photo sets with videos puts the total number at over 6,700. This is one of those sites I would not complain about if they were not updating.
The Behind the Scenes videos helps that video number out, but this goes back to the photo sets being as good as the videos. The Behind the Scenes videos are as good as the regular videos. You can tell this site cares about their quality and the models enjoying themselves. It shows even more in those Behind the Scenes videos.
This site really impresses me, but I would like to see more lesbian scenes and more of those vacation scenes. Something else I really liked about it is most of the models have a lot of scenes/photo sets. I believe that shows best by looking at the total number of models at 464 with 3,200 videos and 3,400 photo sets. Some of the models have more than 10 videos and 10 photo sets on here. It is interesting to me to watch how the models change from scene to scene. I do not think they film all the scenes of each model on the same day or in a week even. It looks more like they bring models back months, even years later and you can see how much the model has progressed in her confidence. One of my favorite sites. I will have to watch for a year special on this one. |
|
04-06-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
121
|
Sex Art
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day. |
| Cons: |
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene. |
|
04-06-21 02:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. |
| Cons: |
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. |
| Bottom Line: |
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. |
|
04-06-21 02:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
123
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
125
|
She's Brand New
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. |
|
03-10-21 01:13am
Replies (0)
|
|
