Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Transfixed
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best transsexual site for those that want to see transsexuals with women.
It’s a newer site, all the scenes have up to 4K downloads.
Only 31 scenes currently, 4 more in the Transgressive series and the updates are twice per month.
The highest production values I have seen on a transsexual site.
Take your choice, the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. Truly defining site in that sense.
Videos and photos can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The small size is the most noticeable, but it is a newer site and is becoming consistent with the updates.
Some camerawork gets lost when there are more than two people in the scene. That can be a problem when the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best way to start this is with my last con. It is also one of the pros in direct relation. The transsexuals performing on this site are as pretty as any I have seen. You know you are watching pretty transsexuals when you have to stream the video before downloading, just to see which ones are the transsexuals and which ones are the females. There is one with well-known pornstar Liv Revamped and she even gets lost in the blurring of gender lines. One of the transsexuals in that scene is one of the few transsexual models I know by name, Jessy Dubai. At first glance, the preview screens for these scenes look like lesbian scenes. I don’t think it’s offensive to say, I have watched scenes from this site and been surprised to see one is a female, that one is a transsexual. Very impressive and there are the production values. It is one of the weaknesses of the transsexual genre. A lot of the transsexual scenes have no story. There is little dialogue, and the scenes are just plain. It makes me feel like the selling point is just the fact it’s a transsexual.
The scenes on Transfixed are often in the 40+ minute range, with some even being over an hour. There is a star power in these scenes that I don’t see much on transsexual sites. One of my favorite scenes features one of the most popular female models in porn – Adriana Chechik. It also has Natalie Mars, a Milf transsexual and Khloe Kay, who I believe could pass for a woman, but is a transsexual.
There is a small series of scenes released as Transfixed but listed as Transgressive Films. There are four of those scenes. Those are transsexuals with men. The Transfixed scenes are more focused on women with transsexuals. The 31 scenes are all available to download in 160p mobile, up to 4K. It is, at least in my experience, the first transsexual site I have seen that goes this far with their scenes (production values, costumes, stories). There are also subtitles available on some scenes. The ones with subtitles have those available in English, Spanish, German, French, Dutch, Italian and Portuguese. They are making this site so good, there isn’t even much to nitpick them about. The scenes are sexy, erotic, interesting, kinky and I would go as far as saying – a site like this, could bring transsexual porn more into the mainstream. I have said before I believe transsexuals with women is the way to the mainstream. As a female, I don’t have a problem with watching transsexuals, but I am sure there are men that wouldn’t feel comfortable watching transsexuals. By putting the transsexuals with women, it still makes the scene a dick going in a pussy. No way would I dare try and explain the psychology of that. I look at it on the most basic level of it maintains a level of familiarity for straight males.
The scenes can be downloaded as can small picture zips. Those have 30-50 pictures in each. Those are high resolution photos, but probably wouldn’t be a selling point. They are updating twice per month. The update rate had slowed but has been picking up over the last few months. One thing I will mention that I try to mention in any transsexual review is the types of scenes. The one thing they do not have are solo scenes. Those are usually my favorite, but I do believe that’s because transsexuals with female scenes are so scarce. Once you give me transsexuals with women with this high of production values, a story, the high quality, you have my attention. It’s a site I have the best wishes for. There is definitely a market for transsexuals with women and that market is, women, then becoming women showing their boyfriends or husbands the porn they like. Instead of it being the husband or boyfriend showing their wife or girlfriend the porn they like. I see a lot of tags on hardcore scenes that say, “female friendly”. These scenes, as transsexual scenes, should have a tag that says, “male friendly”. It would score even higher if they had even 50-60 scenes total. I have watched each and every scene from this site more than a few times each. I will end by saying I nearly listed the Transgressive scenes as a con. Those feel like they’re messing with a good thing they have going with the Transfixed scenes. I can see how it could all come together in the future. There are a few sites now that do that with straight male, straight female, transsexual. If that’s the angle, I believe they could pull it off. |
|
02-09-22 06:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Immoral Live
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No download limits
Part of very large Blowpass Network of five sites
Inexpensive because of the Pornusers discount
Porno Dan is a fun guy to watch with a great personality
Beautiful quality 4K downloads that are very fast
Filmed live so it has a feel to it that makes it very real |
| Cons: |
Doesn't seem like something to complain about, but the site is so large. It feels like it should be a separate site.
Camerawork is a little off at times. Probably due to the live part. |
| Bottom Line: |
When we talk about unusual porn, we often pay a site a compliment by saying it is unique. We sometimes also say more unique or most unique. That does not really make much sense to me, but I don’t know what word to use to describe this site. Immoral Live is not immoral in my book and I did not have a chance to see any of the updates when they were live.
When talking about porn in general, unique means the sex act is rare, maybe even taboo or extreme. Here the sex is not all that crazy, but it is fun. The unique part is how it gets there.
The main guy here is Porno Dan, a reasonably good looking guy with a very average dick. By porn standards, he is not much. Most porn studs are better looking, bigger, and full of themselves. He is a stark contrast as he is just a regular guy with a style that makes for the most unique natural porn. He laughs, he jokes, he makes the women relax and really knows how to turn the charm on. Make a woman laugh and you are 90% of the way to great sex in real life or in porn. He does not expect them to do anything he does not do. He eats pussy as well as the most ardent lesbian, with gusto like it is his last meal, and he eats ass too if that helps. His style allows the women to let out that sexual side, that part of them that even pornstars don’t often show. Instead of directing, they have ownership of the action. He motivates them, he does not order them, let alone micromanage them. I have seen them say no, or say do her now or I need a break. Other sites should take note and imitate what works well here.
The site has been around for a very long time and many different approaches to porn have been tried. From 2011 to 2014 he had a single pornstar per update where he used a wheel of fortune to see what sex was going to happen. It was called The Wheel of Debauchery and it was both playful and hot. My favorites were the updates with Nicole Aniston and the one with Sara Vandella. You had the chance to see two pornstars and their personalities like never before.
More recently I was impressed by a few scenes with hot Latinas Serina Gomez and Amy Amor. They did every sex act I can imagine without being downright degrading and did their scenes like they enacting the dreams of their lifetimes. It came across as exactly what they were in the mood to do sexually.
Most of the stars on the site are well known American pornstars of several different races, many I recognized as leading names in the industry. A few were European as I recognized Lady Dee who is a staple if you have ever joined any European sites.
I found the site very easy to use. There are nearly 2300 videos and that leads me to a con that is more of a pro. I want more. I want a new update every day. I want more hours in the day so I can have time for all the great quality scenes available here. Lately the updates are several a month, but not on an exact and predictable schedule. In January there were six. Dan is not in every scene and I want every scene to have him in it. He is now in an age range where he is older, grayer and oh so much more sexy.
When you log in, you can select from among the five in the Blowpass Network. As you can guess from the name, the other sites focus on blowjobs for the most part. As far as I am concerned, I joined for this site and the others are top quality extras. I can honestly rate this two thumbs up and say I love it. |
|
02-09-22 06:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Next Door Male
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen!
There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo.
Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips.
A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine.
The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation?
You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those.
More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows) |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me.
The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common.
The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars?
If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites. |
|
12-08-21 02:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. |
| Cons: |
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. |
| Bottom Line: |
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. |
|
04-06-21 02:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
30
|
Girls Out West
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Australian porn with I think all amateurs.
1,051 models and they vary in looks, body size, shape, hairy, shaven, very unique site in that regard.
At the time of the review, 4/29, 2020, they have 4,358 scenes and 2,692 photo sets.
Easy sign-up and cancel with Epoch.
Six new videos per week and 1 new photo set per week.
Deep advanced search that gives you over 100 tags/actions to filter.
Blend of solo, lesbian and boy/girl scenes.
Behind the scenes videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
As appealing as their blend of models are, I also would think at least some of those models would be unappealing to some. Especially those against hairy.
Boy/girl section is much smaller than lesbian or solo with only 252 boy/girl scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I figured I went outside my comfort zone for long enough. I enjoy these sites with amateurs, models with imperfections, models that probably would not be called models by some people. One of the first things I noticed is the scenes have a fun feeling to them. I do not get the feeling these models are under immense pressure like you see on some sites. I also do not feel like many of these young women are very shy, either.
I think the pros give a good overview of how much content this site has, and I didn’t know any of the models by name. Is it a pro or con that you’re probably going to need to stay on as a member for more than a month? It gives me the feeling it would be a good site to join for a year even. They have over a decade of consistent updating.
Before I go much further into the bottom line, I do want to go back to that first con. As a female, I don’t think I’m as critical of models looks as most guys are, but even saying that I would say there are 15-20% of these models that I didn’t find attractive. The other side of that is you’re going to find models that are very attractive, and you’ve never heard of them.
Most of the content here is what I would call female-friendly. It’s not softcore solo or lesbian. These are real women masturbating and as we all know when us non-porn stars masturbate; we are going for the fastest orgasm. It does lend itself to more expressive, more vocal, would sloppy be a negative word to use? I don’t mean it as such. I just mean this isn’t the masturbation you’re used to seeing on a major site. The lesbian scenes go from looking like real lesbians having sex with each other to the more playful lesbian scenes where the women look inexperienced.
You’re going to get random settings which I enjoy in porn. The solo scenes might be on an exam table, in a garage, on the bed, on the floor, in a cubicle, dinner table, outdoors and everywhere I think sex is possible.
The video quality is very good. They have 4K going back to 2017 and unless I missed something, all video scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p. This includes remastering some of their “classic” scenes.
The boy/girl scenes are more inconsistent. It seems like some of the couples are possibly real couples, while others aren’t quite as interested in each other.
As a whole, this site does it a lot right. There are amateurs that are doing a good job of looking like pros. Some excellent solo videos and they explore a lot of fetishes from peeing to squirting to possibly the biggest collection of hairy models (body hair). I will have to join it again in the future. That could be its biggest con. It’s a lot of content to take in over one month. |
|
04-29-20 01:16am
Replies (1)
|
Review
31
|
Wow Girls
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The flagship site of the Wow sites, includes Wow Porn (not updating, see review), Wow Girls and All Fine Girls.
I think as a collective these might be the prettiest models I've seen on a site or network.
Almost 5,600 films and they update on average 1 photo set or video per day across the 3 sites.
Around 5,500 photo sets and they downloadable in zips.
I mentioned it on the Wow Porn review, this content is harder than most of these soft-hardcore sites, there's quite a bit of anal content for example. According to the tags there are nearly 600 anal films, that just sounds like a lot for a network like this. |
| Cons: |
Two pre-checked cross-sales blend right in with the background when signing up.
Here's a funny one, couldn't they are least throw an average looking woman in? These models are so pretty.
The one navigation issue I have noticed is when you hit the back button, you have to click on "latest" to get back where you were at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had this site recommended to me as someone that is a big fan of Nubiles. The content here is a little more hardcore than Nubiles, but it's not going to find its way to Evil Angel anytime soon. You get a good blend of pretty, very pretty and too pretty models here. Even the guys are nice-looking, few if any are much bigger than average size in dick size and they make believable couples with the young female models.
The amount of content is very impressive for a site I had never heard of. When you add the photos and films together there's over 11,000. I would have a model count, but there's no efficient or realistic way to count them as they're listed alphabetical and the letter A has 27 pages.
That one navigational glitch needs to be fixed. If you're looking at a photo set and click back instead of taking you back to where you were at in the photo galleries it takes you back to top of the page and for some reason it will change what site you were looking at. They have boxes for All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn. It won't even be close to what I was looking at before I hit the back button.
The rest of the navigation is simple to use. There's probably something I'm looking over like a "back to your content" link. My favorite scenes are the all-girl scenes with more than 2. It will probably always be a believable fantasy for me, a former college sorority girl at a religious school, to believe there are sororities having 3+ girl orgies instead of scripture studies. If it's not true, please, don't tell me.
The videos are very good quality. I just am not technical enough to break down these options like 60 frames per second, 30 frames per second, they have some scenes with 4K, I download 720 or 1080, mostly depending on file size since I just have a laptop and one external hard drive. I have to be selective on what I download.
The three sites seem to differ only a little. All Fine Girls seems to be about 80% hardcore, including some threesomes. Wow Girls is similar with a high percentage of boy/girl scenes with solo scenes blended in. Then, Wow Porn, the one that is no longer updating has more lesbian scenes.
It's a very nice package of sites, excellent quality and I'm going to say top 3 prettiest model group on any site.
I like it so much I might choose to join it for a year instead of Nubiles. |
|
12-02-19 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
32
|
ALS Scan
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A variation of solo-based sites with some extreme insertions, outdoor scenes and cute girls.
Some of the models make me feel old, but that is okay. The models on this site are slim, few maybe none have implants and they do seem to enjoy themselves.
The site has improved by leaps and bounds in how it works. I was a member here many years ago. It used to be hard to find anything. It now is one of the simplest sites to use.
Most of the models have more than one scene or photoset. There are 424 models total with nearly 3,000 videos and over 3,000 photosets. I like when a site does this instead of having a new model in every scene.
The impromptu lesbian scenes are my favorite lesbian scenes I have seen. |
| Cons: |
The sign-up and entrance as a new member could be easier. You have a whole page of other sites the Met-Art network offers to pick as add-on sites. There is a link to bypass it, but it is one line of text compared to 8 or more large photos for the other sites.
The staff selection picks are on here just like on Sex Art and they are the same scenes. You have to pay extra for those. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined ALS Scan, I thought ALS was the name of the producer of the content. ALS means All Ladies Shaved.
The content is mostly solo. My favorite scenes on here are the ones with more than one person, but the other person or multiple people are not fully interacting. Those scenes give you the feeling the model just decided to masturbate even with clothed people sitting around her. It is a very basic idea, but it is not basic once it enters the viewer's mind.
I even watch the behind the scenes -- scenes. Unlike most behind the scenes videos, ALS shows every step of their filming. There are many that show the assistant (female) touching the model a little more than needed. It gives more of a look into the model's personality and even shows how much she likes being touched even if not in a porn scene.
I would guess the producer added those behind the scenes videos with extra touching with the plan of one day having a behind the scenes video to turn into a full blown porn scene. If they did not plan that they probably claim they did since it does happen.
There's something different about seeing an assistant ask if she can kiss the model that adds a lot to all of their scenes. It makes me wonder how much of this extracurricular activity goes on in all porn. My thinking is not often. You can see and feel that the ALS models are giving genuine, horny performances. I want to apply for the head baby oil applier! ALS might not even realize the female fantasy they are creating for women viewers. I know I would be a lot more likely to rub baby oil all over a cute, nude woman than jumping right into a lesbian scene.
I am not usually a person that views pictures or downloads them, but one of my very first internet searches for porn -- about 15 years ago, brought up a photo set from ALS Scan. They have some of the most natural and unaltered photos. Their outdoor photosets are life-like. You can download the photosets in zip files.
The videos can be as simple as a woman masturbating on the bed to masturbating by the pool. They use various items including those from gynecology and what I consider extreme dildos, but those are not as common here as on sites labeled as extreme penetration. You will also see some fisting. It does not appeal to me, but like the extreme dildos, it is not that common.
The videos can be downloaded from 270p up to 4K. I tried to get a count on the amount of 4K videos, but received a page that said, "Page not found". The option to see only 4K videos seems to be broken or missing. In my browsing, I have seen 4K labeled videos back as far as 2015. The quality of their videos is very good.
My favorite scenes are the impromptu lesbian scenes, the casting scenes and the ones with the non-participating clothed people visible. I don't like feeling like the only one watching the model.
A month is never enough. I usually join it for 3 months at a time. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I have used. I stream the behind the scenes ones to check for any extra action in them. I would recommend it to anyone looking for fun, believable solo scenes with added bonuses of lesbian and even a few group scenes. I have no comment on the male with female scenes. There are not many of them. I haven't watched any of them. Those seem out of place on this site. |
|
08-05-19 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As technically impressive transsexual site as you will ever find.
Unlimited video downloads and photoset downloads.
The videos have offered 4K downloads for nearly 6 years.
Even though the older videos have a lower resolution, they’re not poor.
One of the best sites for solo transsexuals
You can register through Paypal |
| Cons: |
Grooby seems to hold the rights to a lot of transsexual sites. This creates numerous problems I noticed.
Prices are outrageous in 2023 – nearly $40 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
Grooby is undoubtedly the biggest name in transsexual porn.The main problems that come from that are: Seemingly created their own supply and demand pricing. Can separate traanssexuals into more niches (Asian, Black, etc) to require the member to join multiple high priced sites just to see the different races of models. And if you’re like me and want to join multiple sites each month, you’re going to be spending near or even over $100 for 3 Grooby sites even if they give you a discount.
Business Philosophy aside, Grooby delivers exactly what they offer. Real, very attractive transsexuals masturbating and having sex. I like to use Nubiles.net in my comparisons to sites of other genres. Grooby is 99% like Nubiles. On paper, in numbers, in technical comparisons, very few if any sites can compete with them, but the action in the videos does not live up to the high standard the presentation creates. You also are getting standard porn – even if it is transsexuals. Nothing here is pushing the boundaries or moving the transsexual genre forward.
The good news is very few porn fans really care that much about those things. The bad news is the ones who do are usually reviewers. Only Nubiles.net calls for a review this objective. I have to look at Grooby as a site that the average member has never visited before joining. Like it’s their first ever porn site membership and they (the member) is without biases. When you view ths Grooby site that way it’s easily a 95 or higher. When you add subjectivity to the review, the score drops down to the low 80s. It’s just not that entertaining to someone who has joined over 100 sites.
They have provided 4K downloads for nearly 6 years and most everything else can be downloaded in HD. There are no download limits and the photosets are probably the highest quality transsexual photos I have seen. It’s just there are some missing elements I’m used to like some level of sexual tension (good kind). Instead, I’m just loaded down with tons of content that is mostly generic.
The action is either transsexual hardcore sex or solo. There’s not much variety there. Likewise, because Grooby has so many other sites, there’s not much difference in how the models look (race).
For me, this site or several combined Grooby sites could easily approach the 100 score, but just like with Nubiles.net there’s a little something extra that is missing. I’m going with a middle ground between 100 and 85 of 93. If you’re new to the site and porn in general, I could see you scoring it 98-100. |
|
04-12-23 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good bisexual men site; maybe the best I have seen.
It’s a big site for the niche. It has 214 scenes. It updates with sex scenes 4-6 times per month. They also have some behind the scenes – scenes. Those are a complete waste for me.
Very attractive male and female models. I think that is the big difference I see in this site than I see in most bisexual male sites.
Videos are downloadable. There are pictures, but it looks like to me you have to download one picture at a time. I don’t see a zip option. Those are just screenshots. Everything is up to 1080p.
My personal favorite part of bisexual male sites is a big part of this site. I will have to explain that. It has to do with the pairings and how the scenes play out. I will start the bottom line with that.
Easy site to use. I used a gift card and received 23 days of membership. The pricing on this site is fairly expensive. Everybody gets a gift card they have no use for. I had one |
| Cons: |
The oldest scenes are not even from this site. Those scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck. Some of those are not bisexual. Some are a man with woman, some are a man with man, no threesomes in those oldest scenes. It’s a small amount.
The price shows as $29.95. It also shows as $39.95. I felt much safer using a gift card.
I think they own a penis pill company and maybe even their own lube line. You get ads for those, and the scenes even include the products. Am I watching porn or an infomercial? |
| Bottom Line: |
The pro I talked about being my favorite part of a bisexual male site is some of these sites try to do too much. My favorite part is when the two guys are doing things to each other while the female watches and masturbates. It can be the other way, too. One of the men doing things with the female. The other man watching and masturbating. You can show all that in a camera view without needing any tricks. This site does that better than any of this niche that I have been a member of. That’s a major pro and a big part of my score. I know that even straight orgy or group sex scenes have the problems of showing everything that’s going on, too.
I believe the attractiveness of these models is rare in this niche. A lot of these bisexual men sites have an older, not as attractive female with the two guys that looked like they showed up for a gay scene. Someone decided to add the older, unattractive woman. This is the only niche I know of that has that problem. On this site, the men are masculine, athletic, handsome, nice bodies. The females look like models you would see on any mainstream porn site. I watch these scenes and feel like I’m really watching 2 men and a female doing something they always wanted to try. There is an excitement. An enjoyment even that you don’t usually see in bisexual men porn. That is why the first paragraph explained one masturbates while the other two have sex. I do not like when they try to get too complicated. Having one of the guys having sex with the woman while the other guy is trying to have sex with the man, all at the same time. They do a very good job of making the three people seem into each other. Not just into the person they are directly with. You would have to watch various bisexual male scenes to see what I’m describing.
I really don’t know what to say about the pricing. It started at $29.95 and that was coming from a promo for $9.95. I was going to join it either way. I clicked to input my payment and it went up to $39.95. I backed back out to the gift card section. The trade-in price was equal to $29.95. I had a $25 gift card. They gave me 23 days. I thought this site was owned by the people that own Adult Time. That is where I first saw the scenes from the site. Adult Time has maybe a dozen of these scenes. I really liked those. That’s what led me to join. Be aware of the pricing. If you have an aunt that insists on buying you a gift card for the holidays from a store that you don’t have a location with 1,500 miles, there is the easy way to join this site.
The scene numbers are not misleading. From my count, it looks like 8 Behind the Scenes videos and those were all released over the last few months. I will explain why I don’t like those. This niche is not one you hear about a lot in real life. I know it happens. It’s just not something that’s common. I need the certain level of fantasy involved in watching the scenes. Those Behind the Scenes videos remove that fantasy. I will even defend the site; they are not using those to replace updates. The updates are still the same as the months that they didn’t have Behind the Scenes videos.
The sex is very good. It’s not for everyone. I do believe this is the niche for aiming at women. I don’t know how I would feel about being in a M/M/F scene, but for watching, it’s a lot better for me than watching gay male porn. Adding the female is the major difference. At times, some of the scenes disappoint me. The newest current scene is one of those. The female has minimal sex in it. She does a little. It’s more her watching and even directing the guys. I hope they’re going in that direction. That’s just going to turn these scenes into gay male porn. Overall, they do a good job of mixing the action up between the genders. This most recent scene, the female is really pretty. I need to be convinced these two guys are into women. She would be the type that I have trouble believing real bisexual men wouldn’t be into. The download options are basic, but very good. You can download 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p on all the scenes. There’s more to like than to dislike. I downloaded nearly all the scenes. It’s a site you should look into if you have any interest at all in bisexual male porn. I’m going to say it’s the best I have seen of bisexual men. |
|
02-09-22 06:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Deeper
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the hottest, sexiest sites I have ever been a member of.
The realization that passionate sex does not require effort. That just means the actors on this site do not seem to be acting.
The quality is very high. Up to 4K on all videos.
There’s some BDSM and minor bondage. It sneaks up on you.
Updates weekly, there are 233 scenes – currently.
Models I either haven’t noticed before or they weren’t as good in the scenes I saw them in as they are on this site. That is very important to this review.
Exhaustive tagging system. |
| Cons: |
There is a 25 scene download per week limit. It sounds low, but I haven’t hit it and have been a member for 6 weeks.
Some people may think is too artsy for hardcore. If it is artsy, it’s the most hardcore artsy porn I have seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
A funny way to start this is to say 116 of the scenes have the “spooning” tag. The tags are entertaining. I usually would not give a graphic description of a scene, but it turned me on that much. The guy is covered with tattoos, which I’m not against, but it’s not a favorite either. The female is a pretty blonde. He rips her shirt open and starts groping her chest. In between gropes there are kisses. The female does a Emmy-award worthy (based on porn standards) performance of acting like she is offended, but intrigued. They end up on the bed. He is behind her, still clothed, they are kissing over her shoulder. He has his hand down her panties. She is rubbing over his jeans. They stand up, he pulls his dick out and there’s pre-cum. This is a pro porn star that was so aroused he was nearing premature ejaculation. All of the scenes are not that good. Nearly all are better than what I’m used to.
There is a darker vibe to the scenes. I would even say moodiness. The first thing I thought was I bet they spend a lot of money on these scenes. The setting is different in nearly every scene. I do wonder on the negative side of it if they’re maybe going too deep. This is from one of the pros I listed. I have never heard of or seen Maitland Ward. She has 14 scenes on this site. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a porn model with je nais sais quoi until Maitland Ward in those 14 scenes. It seems like she is getting what the site is going for. Most of the biggest stars are on this site like Emily Willis and Kenzie Reeves. Even the guys are well known with Mick Blue and Manuel Ferrara. Somehow this Maitland Ward stands out. If you give this site a try, be sure to look up her scenes. She’s not the prettiest model on the site.
As much as I compliment the tagging system it is filled with overlap. Anything with more than 2 people is listed as group sex. Even though they have threesome tags. It says there are 65 group sex scenes. Most of those are standard threesomes. I did laugh when I saw the spooning tag. They are going for passionate and erotic. I wouldn’t say it’s the most passionate or erotic porn I have seen, but I would say it may be the most erotic and passionate, hardcore porn I have seen. A lot of the scenes make me look at the producers of other porn sites and say, “This is how you do it.” There is a dual penetration scene with little Chloe Cherry and she looks like she loves it. I’m going to take a shot in the dark and say most of these male models are established, older and I believe they understand what the site is going for. I never thought I would say that.
The way the site is setup is for success. There are 233 scenes. Weekly updates. The videos can be downloaded from 160p to 4K. Those are options are on all 233 scenes. The photos are very crisp and nice to look at. You can download those in zips at above-average quality. It is hard to fault anything specific with the site. People are going to say the download limit of 25 scenes per week is a problem. It’s nothing the content is doing wrong. I could see how some may believe there is a repetitiveness. If you like the content, you’re going to welcome repetitiveness.
It's a site I will definitely return to. I am on my second month. I joined it on the holiday promos and let it recur. It has been pointed out. If you join, the 25 scenes per week download limit, starts the day you join. There’s no carryover. You have 7 days to download 25 scenes. It then starts over at 0 and you have 7 days to download another 25. I first started out picking out the 25 scenes I wanted to download. By the end of the first month there were more than 100 scenes total I wanted to download. I will probably have about 170 of the scenes before this month of the subscription ends. That is a different download limit, and you need to be aware that it’s reset every 8th day. They are making sure you come back often. I don’t see anything disappointing about the site for anyone. I have noticed they use something porn usually lacks. They take an otherwise innocent action, like the guy exposing one of the woman’s boobs and make it very dirty. On the other hand, they take something like the dual penetration scene with Chloe Cherry and make it seem acceptable and normal. Very good site. I like it a lot. If they had more scenes. I would join it for a year. |
|
02-09-22 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Mature.nl
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Expansive site that features mature women and their sexual playmates.
One of the biggest sites I know of.
Not only is it updating, but even updates multiple times on some days.
As broad of a selection of niches as I have seen.
Downloadable videos and pictures.
There is high effort in every possible way. |
| Cons: |
The price might put some off, but shouldn't.
Older video quality isn't as good. |
| Bottom Line: |
I consider myself a fan of older/younger porn and this site is one of the best at that niche. I like that it's not just older women doing all the seducing. You will also see younger women with older men. Though I can't say whether the younger woman or older man is responsible for the seduction.
This site excels in ways I believe are overlooked in porn nowadays. The vague pro of there is high effort in every possible way is about that. The production is excellent, there's enough story and explanation to make you feel like every scene isn't the same. There are details including the settings and even outfits. I would go as far as saying in a good way, it's artistic. Sure, if you just want the nudity and sex action, that's here but if you want more, you will get it from these scenes.
The sexual action is very good as well. The ages of the participants really are only numbers. You will notice the experience showing and it makes for some of the most interesting and involving porn I have watched. That's my way of saying, we all could probably learn a new trick or two from the videos.
The site has nearly 9,000 videos and they update as much as any site I have been a member of. The broad amount of niches adds a lot of value too. Personally, I like the seduction scenes the most, especially when it's an older woman seducing a younger woman. That's not a niche we see a lot of, though there are a few sites that do it. I don't think any do it as well as this site.
The navigation is good, but I believe the nature of the site makes it a little more difficult to navigate. I have never been good at keeping up with models and this site is so large, it's not any easier to know which to watch. It does make this site hard for a one month membership. You're going to need some time just to find what you're most interested in and even then, you'll likely find yourself distracted.
There is the con of the older video quality not being as good as the newer, but I think that's to be expected and is understood. The majority of the videos are available in full HD 1080p.and look great. The price is a bit steep, but if you're like me, you don't find a lot of sites you're that interested in. This one keeps my interest and I see no reason to think that's going to change.
With the size of the site being larger than some entire networks and updates coming consistently, I see it as a good value. It helps that the content is high quality and it too, is consistently good. There's hardly ever a wasted update. I would even say they have scenes that surprise me with the different twists and turns the stories take. I consider this one of the better sites I've joined and it reminds me of why I first became interested in pay porn sites. |
|
11-11-24 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Porn World
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s the DDF network rebranded and complicated
Downloads are included in the price
The TBP discount is great!
It navigates like a complicated version of DDF Network, you get used to it
The quality is top notch
House of Taboo content is here
Also includes Legal Porno scenes |
| Cons: |
The navigation earns a spot here too. At first, it took me at least two weeks to get used to the navigation.
The Legal Porno content requires tokens |
| Bottom Line: |
DDF was one of my all-time favorite networks. It was one of the first hardcore pornsites I joined. But back then, I only joined 1byDay and paid a premium price for the one site. All the 1byDay content is available on Porn World and I have to say, it’s still as good as I remember.
I want to say all the DDF content is here, but I can’t say that. There is a lot of it. Around 15,000 scenes. I do believe a few points should be taken off the score for the more complicated site, Porn World’s navigation. It’s not a dealbreaker, not even close. But I was fairly frustrated the first few times I logged in and searched directly for a scene I remembered, only to not find what I was looking for. With that said, a little time and a lot of paying attention has made the navigation good, not great.
The DDF sites I remember the most were: OnebyDay, Hot Legs and Feet, Only Blowjob and DDF Busty. The DDF network, in its early days, was my pick for the best value in porn. It’s still up there and the TBP $14.95 discount makes it even better. It advertises as $44.95 to me.
The videos and picture quality are still in-line with the DDF standards and the models are gorgeous, even still a little glamorous as DDF was known for. There are still updates as well and with a 15,000+ scene catalog, it’s one of the most impressive networks you will see.
Legal Porno also has their content on Porn World and I will admit, there are some scenes from them that caught my eye and made me consider paying for tokens to download. In the past, I probably would have found the Legal Porno content to be frustrating, since it’s taking up space in my vision and not available without paying more for, but enough sites have turned to the pay per view method, it’s just becoming common and I have accepted that.
You receive one of the best mixes of niches and genres with this network. It’s still a show of what a brilliant producer, director and photographer Denys Defrancesco was. His work is up there with the top names in porn history and even with the frustrating navigation, you at least know you’re going to get great content in your search.
This site also would be good for those that miss the 2000s era of porn.
I will confirm that from the best I can tell, all the House of Taboo content is available on Porn World. DDF stepped so far out of his zone with House of Taboo, but it was easily one of the best BDSM sites on the internet. I have downloaded quite a bit of its content from Porn World and consider that content, alone – to make me happy. It’s worth checking out if you’re into the idea of BDSM but back out when you see the “scary” parts. DDF produced BDSM with class and respect. That’s how I feel about his content. And it’s why this is a very highly recommended join. |
|
07-09-24 12:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s hard to call this site underrated, but it really is.
Sister-site to I Feel Myself and Beautiful Agony
Photocentric site that does have some videos, too
You can download the photos and videos
Pretty, amateur models
Big site that’s old enough to be legal (over 20 years) |
| Cons: |
I am sure one reason it’s not as popular as it should be is the focus on photos
Models are not only amateur, but also natural and that means some are hairy |
| Bottom Line: |
I mentioned this site being underrated based on no new member reviews in over 10 years. I remember reading the reviews that are still here, back in 2010 or so. I was a fan of I Feel Myself and that led to me giving I Shot Myself a try. Now that I think of it, I wouldn’t be surprised if the name of the site possibly has turned people away. I do remember when we would say self-shot picture instead of selfies.
For me, this is one of those sites that’s polarizing to the general porn loving population. That’s where I’m going to draw a line. Being a member has made me curious about the possibility of a site like this one, being relevant in 2023. Would there be a market for a site like this one? I have always heard and even experienced, to an extent, the cyclical nature of porn, but when we’re usually discussing something being cyclical, technology isn’t a major part of that. In this case, technology is not a major part of it, it’s the bottom line (sorry, had to do it).
It’s clear to us that are old enough to remember early 2000s porn that pictures were preferred in the late 90s, early 2000s. The file sizes were much more acceptable and doable with even dial-up internet. See the question it leaves us with? Did pictures fail against videos just because people wanted newer technology or do people find videos to be superior quality? The twist to this is I just think people have become more desensitized to sex and some will argue, more open, to sex in general.
I’m glad I’m just reviewing this site and not trying to figure out any kind of truth in why pictures lost popularity. This site hasn’t changed much and I can see why some would complain about that. Then again, it still does exactly what it says it’s going to do. It offers real, amateur models posing nude and pleasuring themselves. The pictures you can download are excellent quality and you’re not going to see many “dumb photographer” photos. There’s more realism and believability from these photos than you’ll see on the professional photography sites.
Models are typically young (18-24), but not 100%. The site is based out of Australia and I personally, have liked every Australian porn site I’ve joined. There is a difference between the culture these models are from compared to US and UK/Euro models. The models show real enjoyment in being naked and in front of a camera. You really can’t find much to complain about. There are nearly 1,000 videos and 12,000 photo zips.
Everything about the site is different than what you’re used to from a porn site and while that can be a negative, it also can be a positive if you take the time to enjoy the content. |
|
12-12-23 09:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s included when you join Exploited College Girls and vice-versa.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level) |
| Cons: |
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models. |
| Bottom Line: |
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both. |
|
05-11-22 04:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Vivid
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Much improved user-experience with this great studio’s website.
The search now allows you to search by DVD title and all results show up. Previous versions of the search would split the DVDs up.
Story driven-porn and it’s a near requirement to download each scene from each DVD or you may miss something.
7,048 scenes with no new updates since January 2020, but this is a site I don’t believe the updates are critical to.
Sexy stories, themes, outfits, settings, it has everything I’m usually complaining about other sites not having.
You can randomly download the older DVDs with confidence. That’s how good the classic DVDs are.
Even started adding transsexual content with 78 transsexual scenes mixed in. |
| Cons: |
I am not the most technologically-gifted person, but will note their classic DVD scenes claim to be HD, but I don’t see it. Those have the black fill-in boxes around the video. The classic DVD scenes do look good for the time period those come from.
Still no way to download a full DVD instead of scene by scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn’t know a lot about Vivid until joining Porn Users and noticed a few members talking about the classic scenes. After looking into it, I was not only impressed, I found myself loving every DVD I watched from Vivid. The newer DVDs are good and are 1080p, but the best ones, in my experience, are 2005 and back. It looks like Vivid was at the top of the porn industry and were shooting a style of porn I really enjoy. There is a con with the inability to download the entire DVDs as one file. The older scenes are meant to be watched together. Some of those scenes are only 5-6 minutes but include parts of the story. If they could combine everything from each DVD into one file, I would score the site even higher. As it is, you have to download the scenes separately then either drag and drop them all to play in a row or try to merge them yourself. I use the drag and drop method and find I have to use a different media player than my regular one to get the best results.
These videos are hard to describe as scenes. There is a story and while it’s not that great of a story or that interesting, it shows what dialogue, build-up, maybe a little tension, adds to porn. At least for me. There are also complete series of DVDs that follow the same theme. If you find one you like, you will likely like every DVD from that series. I believe the one I knew of was, “Where the Boys Aren’t”. I remember hearing a few of the big name female pornstars received their big boosts in their careers from that series.
My favorite part of these scenes is the sex. Go figure. They gave me a story, a theme and outfits. I believe those all make the sex parts better. The classic scenes are not like the porn we see today. There is sex that looks like sex, not the sex-Olympics or the let’s see how many positions we can squeeze into a 22 minute scene. Didn’t Prince have a song about that? These scenes look like people having enjoyable sex. More modern porn, gonzo-style, sets out to show 5-6 positions per scene. Vivid’s scenes set out to show the men and women staying in the position that is feeling the best. You see more chemistry between the stars and it just seems more enjoyable to watch and for them to perform.
Fixing the search is a major plus. Previously, you could search for a DVD by name and would get 4 scenes show up. Those would be scene 2, scene 4, scene 5 and scene 8. Whatever they did to remedy it, it worked. You now get all the parts listed in a row for easy download. With the download button on the screen preview, it’s even easier. I did notice the classic scenes show 360p, 720p and 1080p downloads. The 1080p doesn’t look any better than the 720p and is twice the size. I’m not for sure why. The screen is surrounded by black boxes/borders that fill the resolution in. The good new is these are as clear as I’ve seen the classic scenes. It’s worth going back and downloading any classic scenes you have just to get the improved quality. It should be a site everyone joins that gets tired of the porn lacking creativity, humor, clothes, chemistry, story and dialogue. Maybe my favorite part about the scenes – every cumshot isn’t a facial. Lots of body cumshots in the classic scenes. |
|
02-09-22 06:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous European models in solo and lesbian scenes.
Video updates 2-3 times per week and has 1,965 videos on it.
Photos update every 5 days and there are 3,208 photo sets.
Photo sets and videos are downloadable and there are no download restrictions.
Very easy to use site with sections/tabs for videos, photos, models.
There are 1,042 models and they include most of the biggest European stars of all-time. |
| Cons: |
While easy to use, there could be a better tagging system (there is not one) and a better way to separate solo/lesbian (there is not one).
Too many behind the scenes videos. In recent months, they have averaged 2 BTS videos for every 3 sex videos.
There used to be hardcore scenes on here, but I haven't found any. |
| Bottom Line: |
The content here is as hot as I've found when talking about lesbian porn. There is more kissing, more touching, more of everything considered foreplay than on most lesbian sites. There could be a question if this should be listed as a lesbian site as there are solo scenes (mostly in the past). The newer content is almost exclusively lesbian.
My favorite part of Viv Thomas at the current time is the return of some of the models that were around when I first started watching porn online (around 2006). Sandra Shine is producing some of the scenes and recently had a cameo in a scene with the very featured Liv Revamped. Blue Angel has also been in recent scenes. It's fun for me since I'm similar age to those two and remember watching their scenes over a decade ago. There are even cameos by Eve Angel and Viv Thomas.
The sex features some of the best camerawork as you can clearly see the tongues licking and sucking on clits, nipples, and twirling in each other's mouth. I feel like I've been missing out on this content. I had forgot about this site.
The navigation is very easy to use, but it doesn't give you any filtering/sorting options by category. The only sorting options are top rated, 4K, most viewed and most favorited. You have to scroll through to find solo for example. A filter to remove behind the scenes videos would be a good start too.
The video quality is excellent with 4K being available on the last 2 years (consistently) and up to 5 years (some scenes have 4K some don't), there's 720p and 1080p back until 2009. Which is a con I'm going to mention, but didn't list. In the scenes/videos section they only show videos back to 2014. Anything before then, you have to find them by going to the model's page and pulling them up from there. This is concerning for me since I don't know if the video count includes all the ones not listed in the scenes/videos or if it does.
That is my only major deduction from the site's score. I think it would be difficult for a person new to the site to find what they're looking for and as mentioned earlier, the hardcore scenes seem to be gone.
Looking beyond that if you like lesbian, panties, women kissing, women having passionate (looks rough in lesbian porn) sex with each other this is one of the best sites for it. |
|
11-25-19 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is in its 16th year of operation. There are 2,213 models. One is as cute as the next.
Innocence lost before your eyes. My favorite part of this site are the shy and sweet models.
Minimal tattoos, implants or other body modifications.
Non-extreme masturbation.
Video quality is superb, but I wish the photo sets were more vivid in colors.
I have been an on-again, off-again member for 10 years. I like that they have not made any drastic changes. |
| Cons: |
It would not hurt to have more body types. Just because they are barely legal teens does not mean they have to all be slim.
More outdoor sets would be a welcome change.
Maybe have some of the willing models to go more extreme with their masturbation |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles.net was the first porn site I joined. I sign up for 3 months each year. This is my 10th year.
It first captured my attention with its name. A former employer was said to hire only "nubile employees". As a former sex recluse the innocence of the models, their shyness and the non-extreme masturbation kept me around as a member.
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman or relationship with a woman, but I would consider it with some of the models on Nubiles. It is non-intimidating pornography. I would not group it with sites like Met-Art, but it is closer to Met-Art than a hardcore site.
My only disappointment with the site is the inclusion of hardcore content. The hardcore scenes are not like hardcore porn we usually see, but why even risk losing your established niche?
I think with the site now operating as part of the Nubiles Porn network they should only have solo scenes on Nubiles.net.
The site updates as much as entire networks. There are 2 photo set updates per day and 2 videos per day. If you catch a sale price you can have access to the whole network for around $10-$15.
The models are almost all slender. I would like to see chubby, shy, innocent models too. I have noticed sites like to create an image of what fits a type of model. They do get stuck on trying to stay within the image.
The video quality only needs work if you require 4K. I consider their videos some of the crispest and highest quality available. My complaint about the picture colors is splitting hairs. I prefer warm colors in photos. I am sure others prefer cooler colors like Nubiles uses. Most do not know the difference!
The site offers more than 13,000 video or photo sets. The videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. The photos can be downloaded in zip files.
The models range from amateurs you will not see anywhere else to early-career pros. There is a focus on natural. Tattoos have become more common in recent years, but are not required like some sites. Implants are not common; neither is too much make-up or formal clothing.
I believe it is one of the best values in pay porn. You also receive access to Nubiles Porn. A network including various niches. I would join Nubiles.net with or without the network access. |
|
06-03-19 12:10am
Replies (12)
|
Review
46
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As a huge fan of story-driven porn, I have chosen to pass up on this site before now. The dark, gritty, nature of the scenes are both a pro and con.
The artistic value of these scenes is quite high, but once you go into artistic, you really need to live up to the “title” of the painting, unless you’re going for abstract.
There are 378 scenes. The updates are spaced out, but very consistent. You should expect 5-6 updates per month.
As much as I want to applaud the writing and storytelling in the scenes, this reminds me a lot of older porn plots that I have seen from studios like Vivid. It could be those scenes are so far in the past, now, that a younger generation hasn’t experienced those plots. It is good storytelling for porn.
All video downloads have at least 1080p, with the majority having 4K.
The scenes are long, the quality is high, there’s a story, very attractive models. |
| Cons: |
My number one con is an easy one. A lot of these plots are not even new in porn. The earliest porn I watched had some of these plots. Especially the ones that’s go into religion. There’s stepfamily porn on here. I can’t be as positive about that part of the site as others have been. Now, I have to look at the precursor Pretty Dirty to see if changes were made.
This will be a con I don’t think I have seen in a porn review. Poor casting. If you’re going to have a scene about a psychiatrist, at least make sure the person playing the psychiatrist is not a very well-known porn star |
| Bottom Line: |
This was only my second time joining Adult Time. The first time I was just so overwhelmed with it that I didn’t see a lot of what the network had. I joined the year offer last month. I do find a lot of interest in written erotica. My thoughts before the last few weeks, about Pure Taboo, was that I would either love it or hate it. I don’t hate it. I don’t love it either. They can have all the credit for making a dark, gritty, atmosphere, excellent lighting for the scenes, to set the tone. This site is a good example for why most porn companies don’t try to be this story-driven. If you’re going to have humans playing out the story, they are going to need to be very good actors and actresses. A lot of the actors and actresses in these scenes are well-known. I recognize at least 75% of the names. That is why I didn’t review this site the time I was on it before. I felt like I would be too critical of the site that’s trying to at least give us a story.
There are 378 scenes. The update schedule can be a little confusing. There is 5-7 day gap between some scenes, then they will release two scenes in four days. It works out, currently, to 5-6 scenes per month. I have to say my taste in porn must not be too bad. The best scene I have watched so far is Clinical Trial featuring Danny Mountain and Kira Noir. It just so happened to be nominated for a 2020 best AVN scene. That scene, at its roots, is just another doctor takes advantage of female patient scene which we have seen for years in porn. But it is told in the story of the scene, she is an athlete and I know there were some abuse stories that came out about a sports doctor abusing the young athletes. I think they are leaning on that being the taboo. They are using stories that are either known or are familiar to our brains.
I believe the mood, the lighting, the language, the roughness, adds to the taboo nature of the scenes. Because these are just niches, we have seen many times before in porn. Their production values are increasing the taboo-level. None of that is a really a complaint. I really enjoy story-driven porn. You end up in porn with one of two scenarios. You either get repetitive plot story-driven porn or you get no stories, repetitive porn. I will take the story side even it’s repetitive. I will give them credit for creating moods that makes the scenes feel more uncomfortable and tense. I have been looking at Pretty Dirty which is explained to be the precursor to Pure Taboo. I will review it separately. I see a lot of differences between the sites.
the easiest way to describe the scenes on the site is to say you’re going to be put into a scenario and plot meant to make you uncomfortable. That this should not be happening. I would give them a B+ for that. It really should be lower, maybe a C, but I am considering they must create stories their actors and actresses can act out believably. Just some of what I noticed as stories/taboos I have seen in the past. There is a scene called, “Blind Surprise” where there is a blind person in the scene. I don’t think she is blind. She is acting it. One of the very first porn movies I watched. It was before internet porn. Was about a blind man with a woman. He was questioning his sexuality since he could not see. I still remember this because I thought it was so wrong when I watched it. She fingered his butthole to see how he liked that. Then, she had sex with him to see if he liked that better. That scene had to be 1970s or maybe 80s. It was on a tape my dad had. I know as well as anyone that creative ideas are rarely new. On the other hand, if you come into this site expecting something very taboo, you’re not going to get it.
It's a very good site for what it is. It’s one of the sites that makes me glad I bought the year subscription. Hopefully, they keep on with what they are doing and improving it. The scenes are very long. There are not as many 4K videos on this site as there are on other Adult Time sites. I don’t know if time/filesize is a factor in that. All the newer scenes do have 4k. I think if you’re on this specific site for 4K, you may have missed the point. This is a weird recommendation. See it as the site that gives you reason to join Adult Time for a year. There’s a lot of potential on this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Story-driven porn that I do believe represented the precursor for the better-known Pure Taboo.
There are 206 scenes. There are no more updates. It has its importance, though.
All scenes have from mobile resolution to 1080p downloads. No 4K.
Generally attractive male and female models. Derrick Pierce is one of my favorite male models and he has several scenes on this site.
It is, in my opinion, more hardcore than Pure Taboo and less reliant on atmosphere.
The site works very well and is easy to use. |
| Cons: |
Less time in the scenes would seem to point to less story, but I believe it’s the less atmosphere that is causing the shorter scenes. The actions show the darker side of this site. I list that as a con because there’s obviously a reason they switched to the style of Pure Taboo, which isn’t as physically dominant. Could be a pro for you, could be a con.
No updates, but I remember a time that I joined Pure Taboo when it first came out. I thought it was going to include Adult Time. It didn’t. It only included Pretty Dirty. It feels like there is a reason they don’t want the Pretty Dirty content grouped with the Pure Taboo content. |
| Bottom Line: |
My feeling here could be a very simple feeling. I believe Pretty Dirty was pushing boundaries that were maybe too risky to push. One thing I haven’t seen talked about with this site is 80 of the 206 scenes are behind the scenes, scenes. You really only get 126 porn scenes. The scenes are generally shorter than on Pure Taboo. There is less lighting and atmosphere in the scenes. It’s going to cause me to feel different emotions towards the scenes. Whereas I believe Pure Taboo creates an uncomfortable setting, then has more standard sex that isn’t that hardcore. Pretty dirty lets the action and sex make you uncomfortable. The part I also notice is the feature type scenes that they seemed to be building their site with. The one that stands out the most is the Indirect Relations series. It is directed by Bree Mills and Craven Moorehead. Two names I am familiar with. The scenes like that one, to me, are where a site like this needs to be at. That scene is very emotional, and I wonder if it crossed lines. If it was too much? It is about a father that was having sex with his daughter which led to his divorce. It’s not stepdaughter. The story grows or sinks into the dad soliciting a prostitute, a drug addict and his daughter, for an orgy. That’s really pushing boundaries. That’s all made worse by the dad being a cop. When you get into a topic that taboo and controversial, you are reliant on the viewer having the open-mind and understanding it’s acting. I believe porn directors and producers should make that clear. Is it their choice to not go that far or are they being limited? I didn’t freak out watching out. I understood that it was fantasy.
With the part being said about the 80 behind the scenes, scenes. You are only getting 126 porn scenes. Most of these scenes are like Pure Taboo except without the atmosphere. I could see people being split 50/50 on which site/style they like better. I think I like Pretty Dirty’s style better. There’s a lot to be said for certain actions in porn need atmosphere, story and build-up, while others need none of those. I don’t know that this hardcore, taboo content needs a lot of stories. The more story there is the more likely holes in the plot starts to develop. I’m not a huge hardcore porn fan. I do really like these scenes.
The models are all very attractive. I even believe that could play a part in my interest in the scenes. This is the main goal I was looking for. Do I see a reason for the content to switch from Pretty Dirty to Pure Taboo? No. Which makes me think it was something out of their control. The taboo types are similar. The sex is similar. The one thing I really notice is the lighting. Pure Taboo is more artistic, while Pretty Dirty is more raw. You do get both sites so you can like one or other better or love both of them. I feel like both sites push some boundaries in 2022. Even though the plots are not that different than porn for 20-40 years ago. I believe the years of constant gonzo porn with no plot has made these scenes more interesting to people. Just don’t forget your imagination when watching these scenes and listening to the plot. This is not really a complaint. There is casting problems here, too. The scene with Derrick Pierce and Aaliyah Love, is one of the sexiest, but worst cast scenes I have seen. Derrick and another man grab Aaliyah and the other man restrains Aaliyah’s husband while Derrick has sex with her. She tries to make it believable that she doesn’t want it, but she is such a cute, spunky model, it just fails on believability. There were 3 parts she smiles and laughs in while her “husband” is trying to fight to get to her to save her. There are scenes on Pure Taboo with the same problem. They’re either going to have to be more playful of sites or stop putting playful actresses in these scenes. It’s definitely worth checking out. |
|
02-09-22 06:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
Summer Sinners
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outdoor, group, orgy, exhibitionism, voyeurism, a little bit of everything except what you expect from regular porn.
Attractive male and female models including some well-known pornstars. The rest, I think, are amateurs with futures in porn.
Such a diverse site: Scenes in the ocean, pool, backyard, kitchen table while someone watches. Major points for switching things up.
Excellent video quality with some scenes having 4K, the rest have up to 1080p and are all downloadable.
Downloadable photo sets add a lot to the scenes with multiple people.
Very believable and realistic sex. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are not long enough. It does look like they are going for realism with some of the guys unable to make it to 10 minutes before orgasm.
Not much story to the scenes. The length of the scenes show this. It’s like the scenes started before the filming started and the filming focuses on the sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Adult Prime network was recommended to me by another Porn User member and I have to say – I’m impressed. This is one of the sites from it and it’s one of the best – though on the smaller side – sites I have been a member of in recent months, maybe even years.
The premise of this site’s content is it’s “all about sun, sea and sex, watch these crazy men and women on vacation and go wild.” That sums up the story for every scene. It feels very real. This doesn’t make me think there’s a casting director and producer trying to create something sexy. It is more of a site that gives me the feeling of young men and women just having spontaneous fun and lots of sex.
There are known pornstars on this site including Mea Malone and Amirah Adara, just to name a few in the newest scene. This is probably as close as you’re going to get to true exhibitionism porn even though it looks to be in a controlled environment.
It’s rare for me to say the sex is a major plus, but that’s the case on this site. These people look like they have been waiting all day to have sex and go at it like the doomsday clock is ticking down – got to get just one more orgasm! It makes the sex really stand out compared to most porn sites. The word organic sounds funny in porn, but that is the feeling on Summer Sinners.
There are currently 66 scenes with two new updates per month. All of the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p and 1080p or streamed in those as well. Some of the scenes also have 4K downloads. The photos are a nice addition and can be downloaded as well.
What looks like realistic and believable sex also leads to realistic and believably short scenes. That is kind of a con. The ability to make these scenes look spontaneous could even qualify as a con. If there are more than 2-4 people in the scene, the camera has to switch from couple to couple and sometimes the couples are not even close to each other in proximity. The combination of these possible cons is the biggest downside to the site for me. Not only are the cameras moving from couple to couple, but some scenes are even daytime (sunlight) during the first 7-8 minutes then goes to evening (dusk) for the final 7-8 minutes of the scene. That’s a little disappointing. There are 8-10 people in the scene and it’s clearly filmed over a 12 hour period – why only a 15 minute scene? If these scenes were in the 30-60 minute range, this site would score even higher with me. By the end of the outdoor group scenes there’s a feeling that I didn’t even see what all happened between each couple.
There could be another slight problem depending on the viewer. There is a mixture of languages being spoken. Subtitles would help a lot. Some of the models (male and female) speak English, others don’t and some speak English, but you can tell it’s not their native language. There’s a lot of laughing and funny things being said which I believe would add to the scenes if I knew what was being said.
It’s still a very good site just for the varied settings. The indoor scenes are often better just because you don’t get the moving around of cameras. The sex, indoor and outdoor, front door and back door (more fitting?) is very believable. There is a lot of playfulness in the scenes and I do get the feeling these models are having fun. It’s enjoyable to watch. I just wish the scenes were longer and I understood the different languages being spoken. I hope my score isn’t too high based on subjectivity of finally seeing porn that looks people having fun and sex at the same time. It tops the feeling of “this is supposed to be romantic and dull” or “this is supposed to be rough and unpleasant for the woman” and hits a sweet spot of having fun and sex. |
|
10-19-21 01:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that was recommended to me by PU member mbaya and it's exactly what I was looking for. More softcore, dancing, stripping and teasing.
New videos are added every two days.
The number of videos is more than 1300. Each one is around 10 minutes.
The models have sexy English accents
Pictures for nearly every scene.
There are no download limits. |
| Cons: |
For the most part, the stripping only goes to nude. I would like to see a little more down there.
Doesn’t come with any other sites. I have been a member for two months now and am starting to feel like there needs to be more or slightly different content. Like it could evolve into more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I sometimes feel frustrated as a porn fan. I haven't gone outside my comfortable box much. Some of the most hardcore sites are still turn-offs for me. I tried some sites more focused on photos and those left me feeling like I needed more. It's like I'm going through porn puberty! This site was recommended to me and I really like the site.
What I got from this site was a lot of teasing, softcore stripping videos. There were a few things that attracted me to them and to the site. I like the idea of getting my man all hot and bothered by how sexy I can be when I show him just enough to get his FULL attention.
The women are about my age or a little younger as they were nearly all between 25 and 35. They seemed very comfortable with their bodies, although many were not so perfect. This was just like me too. I liked that they talked in very sexy ways while they slowly stripped, mostly while dancing. Some were not very good dancers, just like me. There was something else here that I have never seen before. When they talked to the viewer, they were asking him to show their cock and stroke it. I found it worked for me too. I would love to try this kind of dirty talk on my man to see his reaction.
Mostly I understood the women who spoke in English accents that I found very sexy. It seemed to add a nice touch of class. I kept waiting on one to ask if I wanted a spot of tea. The outfits such as nurse, stewardess, tennis player etc. made the scenes better as they seemed like there was some roleplay. Being a former Catholic schoolgirl, I still have the odd fetish of seeing women in schoolgirl outfits and they have those here.
I also found it enjoyable in a personal way as five models were named Katy, Kate, Katie or some variation. They could be me!
The site has more than 1300 updates and adds new ones about every two days.
I found the site easy to use and a lot of fun. It at least made me feel like it did more than the photo softcore sites and didn't make me cringe like some of the hardcore sites did. I really like it and would like it even more if they worked in a handjob, tease, CFNM twist. |
|
01-06-20 06:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Wow Porn
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly pretty models, some soft content, some harder.
Very high quality video specs including some videos with 4K and 60 frames per second.
Over 1,100 films, all are downloadable with no restrictions.
Over 700 photo sets, downloadable in zip files.
The boy/girl hardcore scenes are quite explicit compared to other softer hardcore scenes.
Production quality gives this site and its content a major boost. The hardcore scenes show this most with excellent close-up camerawork and focused cumshots.
Very easy to use site with tags along the margin and tabs for films, galleries and the girls. |
| Cons: |
It had two pre-checked cross-sales on sign-up and I nearly missed both of them.
I think it's a common con in this genre/niche combination, some scenes have the it factor, others just are kind of boring.
It looks like it stopped updating in early October 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't think I would ever write a review that started out talking about how well the site works. But I am going to. Down the left side margin are the tags, across the top are "films", "galleries (photos)" and "The Girls". It's very simple to use. If this was a small site I wouldn't be as impressed, but this site has over 1,000 scenes and it's this well organized.
That offsets the pre-checked cross-sales. I guess you can't have everything go right with a site.
The models here remind me a lot of models on the Met-Art type sites, thin, young, slender, very cute, some look a little more seasoned and pretty and even a few have tattoos, which surprised me, but isn't a negative.
There are three types of scenes here. Solo, lesbian and boy/girl. It's another rare comment for me to make in a review, the camerawork adds a lot to these scenes. I think it is most apparent on the cumshots. Most of these female models don't look like the type that are into having cum splattered across their face or on their bodies, but the camerawork shows it in full detail.
A bonus for me was I thought I only got this site and Wow Girls with my membership. Once inside the members area I also have access to All Fine Girls. I'm going to double up with a review of Wow Girls as I think these sites are important to each other.
There are just over 1,100 films and 700 photo sets. The films can be confusing if you look at the options too much. I just download the one I prefer and don't pay much attention to the details. They have scenes with 60 frames per second. I'm not technical enough to know what difference that makes and I watched one to see if I could see a difference, but couldn't.
I got the feeling as I was viewing the 3 different sites that this one has just kind of been merged into the other two, Wow Girls and All Fine Girls since they're all be offering as a package. I wanted to review this one separately to show it has stopped updating, but the other two and the network as a whole are still updating. It's a good site if you like sites like X-Art and Sex Art with maybe a little more harder content. All of the models, male and female are easy on the eyes too. Recommended as part of the network or even by itself. |
|
12-02-19 09:05pm
Replies (0)
|
|
