Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Hard X
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The hardcore site from Empire X, it's one of the better hardcore sites I've been a member of.
Very attractive models for a hardcore site.
Update schedule isn't clear, but they had 8 new scenes in October. There are 661 scenes total.
They have 9 resolutions to download the videos in, ranging from 160p to 4K, the older scenes have 1080p as the max.
Nice photo sets with zip downloads. |
| Cons: |
There's still a feeling of repetitiveness in the scenes.
I don't know if it's a concern, but they went 11 days between the most recent update and the previous one, October 25th and November 5th. |
| Bottom Line: |
I felt the combination of reviewing their softer EroticaX site and this one, the harder HardX site would be an interesting way to compare the sites and styles.
I'm not a huge hardcore fan, but I do like the hardcore on HardX, is it because it has a softer edge to it? I don't think so. Maybe it's the high production quality?
They don't stray too far from their formula on their other sites. They focus on three main themes. The male/female scene, the male/male/female scene and the blowbang type scene where one woman gives blowjobs to multiple guys (more than 5 usually).
The threesome scenes are some of the best threesomes I have seen. You usually get the feeling in a threesome there's too much going on to really show it all, but they do feature dual penetration in most of their threesomes (anal and vaginal) not anal/vaginal and oral. Most of the women seem to really enjoy these scenes which is rare in my experience of viewing threesomes where the women usually look like a deer in headlights.
The blowbang scenes are good even if you do wonder if the woman's mouth gets tired. That's what we practice for when we're doing all that talking!
The male/female scenes seem a lot like the content on EroticaX, which I didn't like as well. There's still not a lot of variation in the setting. Someone with a white couch and white bedroom set is not going to be happy.
There are 661 scenes on this site which is double that of EroticaX and I have downloaded quite a bit more from HardX, the scoring difference between the two might not have been enough. I might have to lower EroticaX's score to show how much more I like HardX.
The navigation and tags work as well as they've marked them. I really don't know how much those tags can be trusted to be accurate. I haven't seen a mention of white couch and it's in every scene.
I think this site would be good enough to join EmpireX just for this site. It's very good overall and I have downloaded nearly 100 scenes from it, most are threesomes.
I do think it's impressive that they get so many very pretty models to be in these hard scenes. I would call it the best reason to join EmpireX, but overall, I do believe they should work on mixing the settings up a little, other than that it's a great deal for all you get. |
|
11-04-19 10:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of porn’s most marketed stars … Joanna Angel
Alternative, goth, tatted, all apply to nearly every scene on Joana’s sites
There are 237 videos to download
Site’s navigation is straightforward and simple
Very hardcore in some of the scenes
Some of the videos even have 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no picture zip downloads
Joanna isn’t in every scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I first was introduced to Joanna Angel’s content on the Gamma-owned Burning Angel. There are lots of reasons for me to like her. She’s about the same size I am. She hasn’t succumbed to plastic surgery. She’s around 40 and she’s never wanted to fit in. I don’t know if her success in porn shows popularity or she’s just that good of a performer. She is one of the most prolific female porn stars as well.
This site is very much a solo site about Joanna, but there are friends or guests too. The sex varies from heavy tease (my favorite) to all out hardcore sex (my least favorite). Joanna, despite her tiny frame, shows the strength and power of a confident woman. She does it without having to rely on stories and plots to show her strength.
The videos are mostly downloadable in 1080p and 720p, but there are some that can be downloaded in 4K.
There are picture sets, but those are not downloadable. The site is a back to the basics type site. There are four filters to separate the content. You have scenes, pornstars, tags and shop.
That is even simpler for me. I’m not interested in the friends or other pornstars. The tags aren’t helpful to me and I don’t think I’m interested in anything from the shop.
Joanna shows off some of her skills including tease and denial of a guy, not for sure if that’s her husband (he’s a pornstar) or not. The scenes with Joanna have near perfect chemistry and good tension. I had the same feeling with Burning Angel scenes as scenes from this solo site. If Joanna isn’t in the scene, I’m not interested in it.
There are no bonuses or extra content. You just get Joanna’s site and nothing else. I’m okay with that, but I think I’ve shown I’m a huge fan of Joanna.
She is considered one of the most important models of alt porn and is considered one of the pioneers of the genre. All while looking 25-30, when she’s really 40+. I take every scene she is in as her chance to impress the viewer. I don’t think she’s let anyone down very much. This site is required for those that are Joanna Angel fans. I would even say it’s better than Burning Angel, if you’re just in it for the Joanna content. |
|
06-11-23 03:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Joined along with their site Girl Girl
Very good hardcore site
Easy to use and navigate
4K downloads on newer videos and 1080p or 720p also
Zip downloadable photo sets
Huge site with regular updates still coming |
| Cons: |
Hardcore sites usually bore me and this one did as well.
I mainly joined this to get access to Girl Girl.
Most if not all of the models are pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was joining Girl Girl and received an offer to add Jules Jordan. Both are owned and operated by the same company. It was a good deal for the two sites.
Jules Jordan content is similar to most hardcore sites and DVDs. There are some scenes with stories and plots, but nothing groundbreaking. The site’s biggest selling point is hardcore porn that’s not too hardcore and violent. I do know this can be a pro or con depending on the person: Nearly all or all of the models are pros. The reason I consider that a con is if you’ve been a member of other hardcore sites like Evil Angel, Backed, Tushy etc, the scenes here feature most of the same models and the action isn’t much different. The flip side of that is you do have pros performing and that means good performances (for porn). Personally, I prefer amateur models, especially females, but I knew what I was getting when I joined this site so I won’t deduct any points.
Their technical side is impressive with 4K downloads on all new scenes and even the older ones have 720p and/or 1080p, Their above average quality picture sets can be downloaded in zip files. The site packs in the quantity with over 10,000 scenes on over 2,500 DVDs. The videos are high quality in technical quality and the action is above average for a hardcore site.
You may want more from your hardcore scenes. The stories and plots are limited in scope and are usually just based on the niche (anal, oral, etc). The site is easy to use considering how big it is and the navigation works well.
Besides having over 10,000 scenes they have regular updates still coming in. I would list no bonus content as a con, but with the bundle I received, Girl Girl was included and I found it to be one of the best lesbian sites I’ve ever joined. They could work on adding some variety and improving storylines, but that’s not a big deal – in my opinion – to hardcore fans, which I am not.
I will compare it directly to Evil Angel and say I prefer the Jules Jordan hardcore scenes. But Jules Jordan doesn’t offer the variety of niches Evil Angel has. It’s a recommended site for hardcore fans. Just don’t expect anything amateur or homemade. |
|
01-10-23 02:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
54
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn.
More than 20 sites included.
Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models.
The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche.
Newer videos are downloadable in 4K
Nearly daily update across the network. |
| Cons: |
When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress!
The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter.
The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too.
The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act.
Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex.
The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting.
With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. |
|
11-28-22 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Strokies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site.
Weekly update
575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks.
Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p.
Downloads are unlimited and included in membership.
Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me.
Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. |
| Bottom Line: |
Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body.
It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from.
The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important.
I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads.
The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me.
I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. |
|
07-11-22 09:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Every angle of massage porn is covered on the 7 “channels” or “sites” in this network.
Currently has 2,265 scenes across the network and updates 6-7 times per month.
Scenes are longer than average and it’s because of the massage part.
Based on the tags just about everything is covered from ball licking to pussy licking.
Last few years downloadable videos have 4K.
Pretty models, but the uniforms are kind of annoying for me. |
| Cons: |
Either have to pay extra, luck into a promo or join for a year to get downloads.
Some of the sites are not updating. It is only a problem based on the sites representing different niches in the massage genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with a listing of the 7 different sites/channels with the scene number in parenthesis: Nuru Massage (674), All Girl Massage (638), Massage Parlor (314), Soapy Massage (241), Fantasy Massage (183), Milking Table (112) and Tricky Spa (103). These are the ones still updating: All Girl Massage and Nuru Massage. That does cause a problem with the niches and video download quality. Three of the sites have not been updated since 2019: Tricky Spa, Soapy Massage, Milking Table and Massage Parlor. Those each represented different niches and none of those have 4K scenes.
Though it is not listed as one of the sites/channels, they do have Family Sex Massage as well. It also isn’t updating and is grouped into the Fantasy Massage site. It does seem like they were trying to do too many different niches and just started giving up on all of them. There is good news on the download quality, other than the oldest scenes, most have at least 720p and 1080p. The bad news for me is the oldest scenes are from Soapy Massage and I really like that one. Some of those only have 480p as the highest download option.
The update schedule is good with 6-7 updates per month, but we run into a new conundrum. Since Nuru and All Girl Massage are the only sites updating, Nuru chooses to start the females in a uniform (hospital-type scrubs) and it looks like the same room and location. What probably wouldn’t be that noticeable, becomes noticeable since every other update is from Nuru Message. It’s one of the things I noticed. Soapy Massage is more of a handjob-type site and that niche is a favorite of mine. But it hasn’t updated in many years. They should try something new that brings in the niches they are no longer producing any scenes of. I don’t think they realized or cared to notice they eliminated their own variance. It makes the newer scenes seem repetitive.
The models are pretty. The male models, this made me laugh a little. The first hardcore porn I remember seeing had Evan Stone in it. He is in one of the scenes that was just released 3 months ago. He is nearing 60. It is one of the examples of them trying some story. It seems Evan is Gia Derza’s landlord. It is a very good scene once I got over the shock of seeing a man that I remember seeing in a porn scene from 2002. There’s not a lot of story in the scenes. I do think that hurts this genre. Is everyone just signing up for massages? At least that one, had Evan coming to collect the rent, it turned Gia giving him a massage. That is also the problem with the uniforms.
The site or network is better than I may be making it sound. One thing I really like about these scenes is there are different types of cumshots. There are facials, swallowing and on the body. That is maybe a female thing. I like seeing the different types of cumming and don’t dislike any. I do like that they do the different types. As I scan through putting the final touches on this review, I can’t help but notice there are even scenes on All Girl Massage with the uniform on one of the females. I get that they are going for authentic, but when the scenes don’t do much to stand out from the pack, then you add the same uniforms, it does become repetitive. My score shows that I do like it. They just need to add more depth. I do like the use of the massage oils. It makes the sex look messier. One of the tags caught my attention. I don’t think I have seen it before. That is Body Sliding with 561 scenes featuring body sliding. Also in the tags, is one that I think is worth pointing out, only 1,594 of the 2,265 scenes have the “Massage” tag. I think they have a non-porn definition of massage. I haven’t seen a scene on here without massaging of some kind. |
|
03-08-22 05:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Taboo Heat
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A standalone site that has a large selection of their content on Adult Time. This review is of the standalone site and will note the number of scenes can be viewed/downloaded with an Adult Time account.
It is nice to know so many porn stars are related by marriage.
The scenes are fun. The actors and actresses in these scenes seem to have a lot of experience playing these roles. I even think a lot of what is fun, is just tongue-in-cheek humor from the actors and actresses. It looks like they are trying to make each other laugh. That was bound to happen in this niche.
The standalone version has 178 scenes. I don’t know about this update schedule. Based on their dates, it has updated 14 times in January, today is the 23rd. On Adult Time, you can view and download 68 of the scenes. I joined it because I liked the 68 scenes on Adult Time.
Very long, story-themed |
| Cons: |
It has been done to death. I do think that two sites excel at the niche, this one and Family Strokes. That could push people away.
The not perfect female models in some of the scenes. There are some chubby women in this as stepmoms. I see it as a positive. If you’re just watching porn for the looks and visual arousal, this may not be the best site for you, especially considering the long scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I watched a faux stepfamily porn scene, I wasn’t for sure how I felt about it. I don’t have a stepfamily. That does put the burden on the story, the dialogue, the explanations, the actor and actresses being believable in their roles. I mean no offense to the porn industry or models. That is really asking more than a lot of porn models (male and female) are capable of doing. She can deepthroat an 11 inch dick. She doesn’t need to be able to act. Or she has the perfect body, who cares if she can make me believe that is her stepbrother? That’s a part of porn niches I believe is vastly overlooked. I was watching the scenes on Adult Time and it had a special promo to join Taboo Heat’s standalone site. I have had mostly good experiences with standalone sites produced by major sites. One of my favorites, as mentioned above, Family Stokes, is from Team Skeet. Know that in advance. If you are seeing the Taboo Heat scenes on Adult Time, you are not even seeing half of the scenes Taboo Heat has. If you like those on Adult Time, it’s a definite upgrade that you will want to take. This is very creative and fun porn.
This is also a good break from typical porn. The variations of models. I would like to see more races. I think in stepfamily, real-life situations, you have more interracial. You do get stepmoms that looks like they could be stepmoms. One that I was really impressed with is Cory Chase. She seems to be everybody’s stepmom! She is pretty, she looks to be early 40s and in excellent shape. I would think that’s a common age range for a stepmother of young adults. This site does that better than any of the stepfamily sites I have seen. There is enough believable age difference (in appearance, maybe not in real life), to make me believe these stepmoms are that horny.
On the standalone site, you have access to 178 scenes. I’m going to take an educated guess when I say this. If you like Cory Chase, you will love this site. It almost seems like this is or was her own site. She is in 169 of the scenes. The pro I listed as humor was based on that. She’s everybody’s stepmom. That makes all the others everyone’s stepsibling. I have joined some sites later (thanks to Christmas deals), that made me feel like the sites take themselves way too seriously. This site doesn’t. It reminds me of one of those B-level reality shows. You can’t help but keep watching it. You can get a taste of it on Adult Time. I will say again if you like the Adult Time scenes from this site it should be no question that you’re going to join this standalone site. I joined it without knowing if it had that many more scenes. It has 110 more. That was definitely worth to me. There are cute, younger stepdaughters. Mostly cute, younger stepsons. The update schedule hasn’t been manipulated. It looks like they are releasing a scene every other day on average. I don’t know if they maybe had a vault of the scenes stored up and ready to go. At their current pace they will have over 240 new scenes just this year.
All of the 178 scenes have the full complement of download options from 160p to 4K and there are a total of 8 download resolutions. I find the 720 or 1080 are best for me. These scenes are long. The photos are not going to compete with the studios known for photos. Most only have 15-30 photos in them.
I think the model list on the standalone site gives an idea that you better like Cory Chase. There are only 26 females in the 178 scenes. There are a few other “stepmoms” that I kind of think they need to work in some more. I don’t know if there’s a risk of overexposure of Cory Chase. You are going to question how she has this many stepchildren. The stories, the dialogue is very good. Cory probably should be a mainstream actress. Which is why I am guessing they use her in so many scenes on this site.
Very little to complain about unless you just have trouble believing one woman has this many stepchildren. Considering how good her performances are, she may convince me of how she ended up with so many stepchildren. There is the ending question of does a site like this help or hurt Adult Time? It’s obviously their site. Would they benefit more by having it in full on Adult Time? Probably not in the short-term. Maybe that is why there are so many updates. I do believe Adult Time is risking cannibalizing itself. I did get it on a Christmas special as an add-on. It would still be worth the full price if you like the content. I just don’t know about long-term. Really good site, probably the best, if you are into the stepfamily porn niche and like Cory Chase. If you like all those there is no reason for you to hesitate in joining it. |
|
02-09-22 07:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
Only Teen Blowjobs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
You get all five sites of the Blowpass Network
Pornusers has a discount
Lots of very pretty teens
Huge site with 729 videos and photosets
Older men/younger women are common
4K is available on the newest videos |
| Cons: |
Still getting into repetitive.
Do the women not want more in the scenes? |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the most common porn scenes are ones where a newcomer gives a blowjob to a lucky guy. Every day, women show up at porn studios hoping for a chance to become the next big star. Many get the chance to try their skills on a site like this. You get a lot of fresh faces that have first and in some cases, even their only scenes here. For some they may make a few more videos, but for many they get the honor of being on the site that advertises itself as “The freshest teens in porn”.
The site tries to capitalize on that in a few ways. One is dressing them in a way that creates a feeling of youth. The site says only 18 and 19 year olds. I think these may not all be teens and some look like they are in their twenties. You see them in cut off shorts very often, some are done up in pigtails and some wear revealing tops that seem like an invitation for sex.
To play up the youth factor, they do things we think of as young. They eat cereal, play video games, use cell phones and seem to be someone you could possibly know. They need to borrow a car or money, get help with homework, get out of trouble they caused, do homework with a boyfriend, do babysitting , text while sucking, need their computer fixed , take a selfie while sucking, and the list grows as do the guys. In one scene that I loved, Kenzie Reeves is a cam girl and her boyfriend walks in. A customer gives a tip to give her boyfriend a blowjob on cam. Scenes like this keep the site fresh and modern. It feels like today.
One of the fetishes here is a family one. Her partner is her stepdad or her stepbrother. A great scene I loved had Sloan Harper and Logan Long paired. She is his stepsister and a lesbian, to make things complicated. She owes him fifty dollars and the guy slowly and teasingly “negotiate” a blow job as payment. By the end she is fingering herself to an orgasm as her comes on her. Yikes, that was hot. She is with her father’s friend in some cases. In a few scenes, she even gets revenge on her ex-boyfriend. No matter how they get to the sex, her guy is a little older by a few years. In most of the scenes, I think the age difference is about five to ten years.
Being American models, the models are mostly white, but also Asian, Latinas and black. I loved scenes with the Asian women as I think they give the best blow jobs on camera, maybe in real life too. Lulu Chu is simply great in a scene where she is doing homework with her boyfriend and they take a break. In another she wants some cereal but her boyfriend drank the milk. She knows where she can get some more without a trip to the store.
The guys are ok, but not the biggest or the best. They are just there and that is not really a criticism as the ladies are and should be the stars. They have the skills in many cases and in others they don’t, but that natural enthusiasm kicks in. Some of them for sure use up a whole day’s worth of calories. Who needs the gym to stay fit if your boyfriend wants a blowjob?
With a large archive of 729 videos and photosets, there is plenty to see here. This year there has been only on new update, but December had three. You also get three other blowjob sites as well as immoral Live, a site that is one of my all time favorites. |
|
02-09-22 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Jeff's Models
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequently updating BBW site that intrigued me.
Large site (no pun intended) with 913 scenes and updates 3 times per week.
Will need a further explanation from me based on my body size, but it’s enjoyable to see full-figured women enjoying themselves sexually and men that enjoy sex with them.
Each scene comes with a video and photo set. The videos are downloadable as are the photo sets.
Navigation is simple and works. There are 237 female models on the site.
Really enjoyed the lesbian scenes and threesomes. Many preconceived notions are shattered, especially about flexibility. |
| Cons: |
You will see this in my summary/bottom line, I look at a site like this as one with a chance to create a positive view of different body types and sizes, therefore, some of the scenes could be named better than they are. Will give examples in the summary.
The disheartening feeling I feel towards myself for thinking I should expect less than stellar performances from these ladies. They will surprise you if you believe that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have heard that at least some attention, whether negative or positive, is better in marketing than no attention. I wouldn’t have heard of this site if not for the recent comments, here on PU, left about it and can’t say I ever thought about watching BBW porn before this.
Not to go too far into my personal life, but I have talked about it a little in my reviews and am not ashamed to even joke about it. I’m only 5’1” and weigh between 98 and 110 pounds. I’m the joke all the boys liked to make in high school, “The carpenter’s dream: Flat on both sides and ready to be nailed.” It’s no surprise, I can relate and connect mentally and emotionally to women in the BBW category. The first thing to know is there is no way I know any of these models or if they are pros. I haven’t watched BBW porn before. This is all new to me.
My con about the naming of the scenes is possibly my therapist-side showing. This is a chance to give BBW models a positive image, but some of the scene titles just make me wonder if the image boost even matters to the site. It should since it would create more interest from potential members. Like most porn sites, the person naming the scenes believes they’re going to one day be a literary visionary with titled like, “Plumpers Behind Closed Doors” and “Sizable Sapphic Scenario” and maybe those do lend themselves more to the creative and catchy sounding titles, but those are offset with, “Fat and Fucked Up the Butt” and “She’s Fat and Loves to Fuck”. It just seems like something like, “Amazing Amber Loves to Fuck” would be better since these models already have a potential image problem with viewers. Add some enticement, not take away.
That is a minor gripe, but hopefully is one they can think about and use. It’s not going to cost anything extra to try and be a little more positive with titles for scenes. The site updates an impressive 3 times per week and with each of those updates containing a video and photo set there is plenty here to keep you busy. I was surprised to see the site has 913 scenes. Is BBW porn just not marketed at all? I’m thinking as a skinny woman there’s probably a static, built-in crowd/audience for BBW porn like there is for skinny. The videos can be downloaded and I haven’t seen anything about a limit. The oldest scenes on the site include a HD 720p download option and the newest scenes offer 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. The photo set downloads have pictures with a resolution of 2000x3000 and are quite flattering. These are not screenshots from the videos. These are photos that have the ladies posing, smiling, twirling their hair and just being pretty.
I want to give the males in the scenes credit for their “believable” love of BBW models, but come on guys, you’re overacting in some of these scenes. I don’t expect an Oscar-worthy performance, but your overacting takes away from your sincerity. The guy in the newest scenes is an older man (sorry if that’s not true) and he does a good job of making me and the models feel like he loves their curves, touching, kissing, feeling, squeezing, he’s very good for this genre of porn.
The sex is standard-fare by porn standards. The content filter is very good for helping you find your preferences. Nearly 100 of the scenes feature anal sex. I wish they had more of the lesbian scenes, but like I said, the man in the newer scenes seems to really be enjoying himself, so he’s probably keeping all the action for himself. I do find that the filter isn’t completely accurate. I can show that this easily. Searching in the filter for gangbang produces one scene titled, “The Biggest Bang”. Looking at the scenes I downloaded, there is one titled, “A Star is Gangbanged” Maybe it’s just one missed scene/tag, but the easy navigation makes it relatively easy to see all the previews of the 900+ scenes.
I don’t believe this site will or maybe even should appeal to everyone. It is nice to see that the BBW niche covers quite a range of “bigger” women sizes. Some don’t look much bigger than what we would call average to chubby, while others are obviously big-boned and genetically larger framed. The sex is as believable as any hardcore site and there’s no humiliation or insults. It’s fun, happy, porn. These scenes are of a good length (around 30 minutes) and feature some interviewing, talking and questions in some of the scenes. It’s a good reminder that sexy is not a one-size fits all word. Some of these women exude confidence and it’s quite empowering watching them perform. |
|
11-07-21 09:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Wank It Now
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of very few sites or networks that use jerk off instruction.
The focus is on softcore teasing. The appeal is to your imagination as well as your eyes. For the most part, I was left wanting to see more.
Many of the models are gorgeous.
Fast download speeds, close to my max.
The recent videos can be downloaded in 4K. |
| Cons: |
The site is extremely softcore. Even when the models are nude it is rarely explicit. For some this may be a plus.
If this is not to your taste, you may get tired of this as scenes on each site are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
This review is for the entire five sites in the Wank It Now network. The link to join all five is on the bottom of the join page as the link for just an individual site is the default. For the price of joining two sites, you can get all five. A common theme in all five is that of jerk off instruction. There are not many sites that have much of that, but this network is that in spades. The women are UK nude models that I have seen on other sites and some are pornstars. Much of the appeal is that they are talking to you directly in hot and quite sexy accents. They sound very classy and so are their outfits. Sometimes it is roleplay such as being an interviewer, a student, stripper, secret pornstar, roommate, doctor, or a nurse, but the possibilities are seemingly endless. The scenarios are highly creative and are up there in quality with the best sites of any type.
Wank It Now is the anchor site and is the single biggest one. It has updates every day and sometimes there are more than one. There are about 5100 videos and 3500 photosets. The models usually get nude and even occasionally explicit by the end of the videos. This site was most definitely my favorite of the five.
Bopping Babes has models dancing and stripping. However the scenes are sometimes not to full nude and sometimes topless is all you get. Updates are about once a week. There are more than 1500 videos and 1100 photosets. This was my second most favorite site. I think this site is hot enough for an update every day.
Upskirt Jerk and Downblouse Jerk are not listed on Pornusers. They combine JOI with views upskirt or downblouse. For both a new update is added every day. There are over 2300 videos and photosets on one and on the other 2700 videos and photosets.
Lingerie Tales The focus is on sexy women in lingerie reading sexy stories. This has been an archive site since July 2017. There are 168 videos and photosets.
Across the network, some models I recognize from other nude sites and some are well known UK pornstars. I few I recognized and like a lot are Kayla Louise, Cherry Blush, Kiki Menaj, Natalia Forrest, Amy Latina, Hanna Shaw, Holly Kiss, Kate-Ann, Lola Gatsby, and Stella Cox. I can’t tell you that any of the others are amateurs or not, but the variety in age, although most are 25 to 40, body type, hair color and ethnicities surprised me.
Two of the most prolific models on the network are Asian Natalia Forrest and Ebony model Kayla Louise. Both are so pretty that if each had their own sites I would gladly join. The most popular models have a lot more updates, so the site must be paying attention to fan favorites. Many of the models are on more than one network site.
Inexplicably, there are advertising offers to join on the members’ pages. I feel that is annoying and unnecessary as they should know I am already a member. There were four download choices and 4K was the best. Videos can be streamed on a mobile device as well and are 640x360. You can search by most recent, models name, your favorites. There is a dropdown box for tags, but many of the choices are not on the site. Incredibly, they have one for male pegging and one for blowbang as examples. This site has zero sex of any kind. A suggestion I would like to offer is that they should offer scenes with two women, even if not with lesbian sex. Photo sets are zipdownloadable and have only one choice. The most recent update had 24 landscapes taken from the 4K videos. Each individual site has a download limit of 200 videos. This resets every 24 hours and I never hit the limit. When I got close to it, I simply logged in to another of the sites. You have as choices for billing using CCBill or Epoch. Both are trusted and reliable icons in the business. Pornusers does not offer a discount, but the network and its individual sites frequently offer discounts.
This network is close to perfect if you are looking for a great lineup of softcore scenes with great looking models. Although I would have preferred a bit more nude and explicit, this is a great network that I recommend to fans of JOI as well as hot visuals. |
|
11-07-21 09:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
Cuckoldest
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
We’re getting a twist of multiple niches on this site.
There are only 24 scenes, but all come in up to 4K downloads and it is some of the most unique porn I have seen.
One update per month, but this content is so different, I’m surprised they can even get an update per month.
The photo zips are downloadable and are worth at least looking at. I believe those add to how different this content is.
Mostly attractive (maybe) models, both male and female. They need a transsexual in here!
Comes with the excellent Adult Prime network, thank you to the Porn User members that recommended this network to me. |
| Cons: |
If I listed all the potential cons we would be here awhile. I’m just going to say the uniqueness, the different from the norm, may not go over well with all porn fans.
The fact this site will get looked over based on stereotypes. I wish the scenes were longer too. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is going to be fun. Do you like older/younger porn? It’s here. That includes older women with younger men, older men with younger women and what else? Younger men with older men. And more? A threesome between a younger man and middle-aged woman with a grandpa giving both of them oral. At the very least, you should at least look the site up and look at the scenes. I’m not positive on this, but I don’t think any of these models/actors are pros, but they could be. A couple of the younger guys are in a lot of the scenes. I don’t want to make fun of this style of porn by saying it’s like circus porn, but I mean that as a compliment. Over here we have a 70 year old man removing the 28 year old guy’s dick from the 45 year old woman’s pussy and sucking it. The pictures give you the advantage of not having to do a double take. I really like this. I have no idea what’s going to happen. The 60 year old woman is giving the 28 year old guy a blowjob while her 72 year old husband watches. The 72 year old husband stands up. You’re stuck right there trying to figure out what he’s going to do. He walks over to the 28 year old man, spreads his butt cheeks and gives him a rimjob while his wife is giving the 28 year old man a blowjob.
This is what I imagine regular porn was like for people in the 1960s and 1970s. He stuck it where? Is it for everyone? No. Let me say no again. It is creative, it is different, it is rolling up several taboo niches into one scene and doing a good job at it. Being a therapist, I know that a lot of this content will be off-putting to “straight” men. Being a therapist, I also know a lot of straight men at least think about these situations even if they wouldn’t admit it to anyone except their therapist. I do believe there is a market for content like this. I feel harsh saying what I’m about to say. I believe they need to focus on younger women if they really want to reach a broad market. It’s just my opinion, women viewers are often attracted to the hard dick of the man. His age doesn’t matter. I believe male and female viewers are more attracted to the pretty faces and bodies of younger women. I do get that the theme goes into a couple and the older men need an older woman with them to make that more believable, but it’s porn.
I do, however, really like what they’re going for on this site and it’s not going to end with this site. You are getting straight sex and bisexual men in one site. I once heard it’s an attempt to remove the demonizing of gay and bisexual men out of porn scenes that include hetero sex. I do believe that is becoming more common. For years, a threesome meant two bisexual women with a man. This site is doing the opposite of two bisexual men with a woman. They do a good (poor) job of making one of the guys look “shocked” when the other man starts doing things to him, but I enjoyed it. None of these scenes are long, I believe all are under 30 minutes with most in the 20 minute range.
It’s a nice change of pace. They also have excellent video and photo quality. I see it as a much bigger step in the right direction of creating new niches in porn compared to stepfamily. I kind of like this, you never know what’s getting ready to happen style of porn. Good for them for trying to blend mainstream (hetero) with non-mainstream (bisexual male) porn. |
|
10-19-21 01:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
TS Playground
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality transsexual site that makes joining Evil Angel more likely.
921 scenes with a new update every 5 days.
Ran by Gamma, has all the video download options you would expect starting at 160p up to 4K, easy join and cancellation too.
A lot of solo scenes, but see con
Pictures included and can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
When I use their filter for “solo” it only shows 23 solo scenes on the site. Just looking at the site, I can count over 50 on the first page of the site.
That I’ve found, they do not have any transsexual with women scenes. For some reason, I like bi and gay scenes, but don’t like the transsexual with men scenes.
You won’t find a story in these scenes even if you make one up, it will disappear. |
| Bottom Line: |
I read a few reviews about this site and another transsexual site on Evil Angel called Transsexual Angel which has over 1,200 scenes. That’s a combined 2,000+ scenes. Most of the content on Evil Angel does not appeal to me even if I have had a few drinks. I do, however, like transsexual solo and transsexual with women.
The scenes do not offer a lot to work with. There are solo scenes and there are transsexual with males scenes. The solo scenes are not going to expand your appreciation for theatrical art. The scenes show the transsexual lightly teasing. I do think there is a humor factor since some of the transsexual models don’t seem to know they are on a site with transsexual in the name. They tease around like they are going to surprise you when their penis flips out of their panties.They then masturbate, cum and the scene is over. The scenes with transsexuals with men are not much deeper. It’s a transsexual having sex with a man with no story and they cum and it’s over.
For me, I enjoy the solo scenes and don’t mind that they go by fast. I do think there should be a mention about the looks. Most of these transsexuals could pass as women. I haven’t seen many ladyboys or the smaller, usually Asian transsexuals, but outside of a few, these transsexuals are made up enough and have the right demeanor to pass as women.
The site is on Evil Angel’s network and is owned by Gamma. That is a positive in my eyes. The billing is easy, the cancellation could be a little easier (just requires more info than other billers) and the features are very typical of the other Gamma sites. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p, 360p, 240p and 160p. I have seen a few scenes with 4K, but it is not very common. The picture sets are not what you get from sites that focus on pictures, but they are downloadable in zips as well. There is a listed 300GB download limit per day, but I’m almost positive I’ll probably not hit that in a month.
The Transsexual Angel site does have less solo scenes and does have scenes with transsexuals having sex with women. They also have added a new site called Pansexual X that goes into transsexual, bisexual men and those maybe interested in these transsexual sites would be interested in it too.
I don’t get much out of the Evil Angel membership except these transsexual and bisexual scenes. It’s a little more hardcore than my tastes allow me to bite into. I do recommend joining for the transsexual and bisexual content if you are into those. This is a site with a large amount of those genres and are downloadable in high quality. |
|
07-14-21 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It was the first porn site I joined, and the first porn site I reviewed, still a favorite but not without reservations.
There are 2,529 models on Nubiles.net.
Includes a network, Nubiles Porn, with 16 sites.
The site primarily focuses on solo content of young (or young looking) models, with some lesbian and male/female content.
Everything included is high quality (pictures, videos) and as far as I know the downloads are unlimited.
The biller is CCBill, there was an unchecked cross-sale to Nubiles Films. |
| Cons: |
This is a technical con, you’re most-likely going to join through Nubiles Porn. Of their banner list of sites there is no listing for Nubiles.net, the best site they have. Look at it however you want.
The excess of “new” sites they have includes quite a few you do not get access to without joining separately.
The advertisements for not only their other sites, but other sites too. When you sign-in, it’s an advertisement page that you have to scroll to the bottom of to get to Nubiles.net or Nubiles Porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
The old saying goes, “Absence makes the heart grow fonder”. I can see that in some ways with my first visit to Nubiles in 2 years, but I also can say there’s a reason I wasn’t a member over the last 2 years.
The quality of the site has never been up for question. They run a great site with multiple weekly updates (it’s not as consistent as it used to be), their videos cover everything except 4K, starting at 270p and going up to 1080p. Their pictures even rival the top photography porn sites. The site is easy to use (once you get the ad page out of the way) and the models give you a blend of precarious and innocent to curious and going wild. It’s typically what I would expect from women in this age range. And there are over 2,500 of those models.
There is a staleness that creeps in every few months of being a member. The male/female scenes they have are just as well not watched. Those are as cookie-cutter and rudimentary as any I have seen.
None of this is really a surprise to me. I first joined Nubiles in 2009. It was the very first porn site I paid to join. I believe the content they are producing now is very similar to the 2009 content. There’s not a dropoff. It’s just there’s not any real improvements either. If you considered it perfect in 2009, you could still consider it perfect. I just don’t. I don’t even know if I considered it perfect in 2009. I considered it watchable. Porn was new to me. I grew up in Catholic schools and Nubiles was, possibly insultative for me to say -- a “nice” porn site. Not nice in the “great” way, but in the “safe” way.
As the years passed, new “bonus” sites started showing up on Nubiles, and to show how well I remember 2009, there were two bonus sites with it back then. I don’t remember the names, one was a Spring Break site and one with a solo model site who was also featured on Nubiles named Katrina. Those are still accessible with your membership, I do believe, if you can find them. Things then changed to Nubiles Porn, an entire network of Nubiles sites. I won’t even try to come up with an explanation for why they don’t show Nubiles.net included.
The content is still 2009. And maybe that’s what they’re going for. I once had a professor who made the comment, “Being a professor of freshmen college Algebra is great, each year a new group of 18 year old young women are delivered to my classroom. It’s like I never age.” Hopefully, his dark humor didn’t ruin the point.
Nubiles for what it is still delivers. They have some of the cutest, sexiest, most innocent, most believable, new, fresh models. Most of the scenes are solo teasing that evolve into masturbation. It’s a tried and true formula that has worked for nearly 20 years. The question becomes -- when do you or I start to feel like we’ve been here hundreds of times before? That has made Nubiles polarizing to me. It shouldn’t hurt the view of the site especially to new or newer members. I spent years as a member. I do believe the multiple sites, the sister “network” Nubile Films, the around 10 standalone “premium” sites they have released helps in that polarizing feeling. It’s the feeling of Nubiles.net is their site to start at. They include the 15 or 16 bonus sites in Nubiles Porn and you can try those which offer at least slightly different niches and genres. You’re then enticed to try Nubiles Films. If you like some of the Nubiles Film content you’ll give the premium standalone sites a try. Still worth a join and a short stay, but just doesn’t have the staying power for more than 3 months at a time for me. |
|
07-14-21 02:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
For my money, the best of the Met-Art sites.
1,183 models, 1,143 videos and 2,691 photo sets.
Videos and photos are downloadable. No restrictions.
8 video updates and 8 photo set updates per month.
Themes with many of the scenes, whether they're believable is a different question.
Includes girl/girl scenes too. |
| Cons: |
I have seen a few of the scenes on other sites in the Met Art network.
The naming of the scenes can be confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Life Erotic is like what most softer sites seem to be going for when they step outside the softcore realm. There's light BDSM, masturbation with objects (heels, corn on the cob, various insertions), there's wax play, a few scenes in October even used fake blood for Halloween themed scenes. There's more creativity here and I like it. One thing you might be surprised by is the amount of close-ups in masturbation. Some are close enough to see the clits getting harder/swollen. The models are almost all very attractive and there's over 1,000 of them. They seem to be trying to break away from being a photo focused site even though their total numbers show more than double the photo sets as videos, the updates are including an equal amount of videos as photo sets.
The video quality on the newer videos go up to 4K and go down to 260p with 5 options between those including 720p and 1080p. Adding themes, not really stories, to the scenes adds a more interesting twist to these scenes. Some of it seems forced like a woman masturbating with a heel. The blood scenes, even the hot wax scenes seem to be something they're not completely comfortable filming, but they are a welcome change to the formulaic world of harder softcore porn.
This site would be a great choice for those that like harder masturbation. There's a lot of dripping, creamy, orgasms, very fast fingering, use of extreme objects and even suction pumps. It does a really good job of separating itself from other softcore masturbation sites by -- in my opinion -- showing how women really masturbate. There's not a lot of artsy points in it, but speaking for myself, there's not a lot artistic about my masturbating so I can relate more to this content.
My biggest complaint is the naming of the scenes. They will have one with the model's name or action and a number like Pumping Hard 2, you find other scenes by the model and there's Afternoon Fantasy 2. I'm going to try and put that together that they have a series called Pumping Hard and there are other parts featuring other models doing a similar action (suction) and it's not scenes being split into parts.
With that being my only real complaint, it shows why I really like this site and nearly all of its content. |
|
12-08-19 08:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Family Strokes
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite of the stepfamily sites. It's a Team Skeet premium site and does not include Team Skeet.
They have 246 scenes and add an average of 2 scenes per week. There is no update schedule. They will sometimes release 3-4 scenes in a week then go two weeks with no new updates, but it balances out to 7-8 new scenes per month.
Enjoyable scenes that are funny, sexy and play to a lot of taboo situations.
I have been a member on it twice and kept the membership 3 months each time. My downloading time is limited (thanks, stupid job). By the end of this membership, I will have downloaded every scene.
Doesn't stick to a gender dominant role like many of these taboo sites do. Some scenes are aunts "not really" as they point out, seducing nephews and others are uncles or stepdads seducing nieces and stepdaughters. Isn't even age dominant, as it's sometimes the younger one seducing the older one. |
| Cons: |
These Team Skeet premium sites are almost all excellent, but they don't have model lists that just show the models on that site. It shows all their content on all Team Skeet sites.
The storylines, enjoyable and fun, can be more unbelievable than the fake family angles. |
| Bottom Line: |
The taboo this site creates is not as high as many stepfamily sites. Most of the actors and actresses would be more believable if they didn't have scripted actions and words. There is one where the stepfather walks into a room his stepdaughter is in. He's holding his towel on with his erection. The stepdaughter giggles and says, "Nice towel rack". If you're missing the humor there, she's not even bothered that her stepfather walked into her bedroom with an erection.
You get the cliched lines like, "Is that for me?" and my favorite, when the erect dick shows itself and the daughter, niece, aunt, stepmom jumps back like she has no idea what it is. I am put off by rough and violent porn so this silly, cliched and funny porn is a much more welcome style for me.
You won't likely have a complaint about any of the models looks, bodies or action. These models on the Team Skeet premium sites seem to be the top-level of their models, the scenes are long and even though 246 scenes isn't a lot, it is for this type or premium content and these sites are relatively inexpensive.
A few examples of what to expect from the scenes here: My Stepdaughter the Escort, the stepfather hires an escort, meets her at the hotel and surprise, it's his stepdaughter. Under the Table Footplay, as the stepdaughter plays footsie with her stepdad's dick under the kitchen table while the mom is sitting there. On that one, they could make it so serious that it could be believable, but instead they have the stepdaughter smiling and twirling her hair while staring at the stepfather and ignoring her mom.
They also do parodies. I think it's one of their most popular scenes and it was just released a few weeks ago of The Addams Family, with the whole main cast of the old television show/movies getting in on a family orgy. They have a Family Guy scene that features the human look-a-like cast members of the popular animated show having an orgy.
The scenes all clock in at around or over 30 minutes each. There are photos and screencaps for each scene along with the video and all are downloadable. These premium sites have one distinct advantage and that is the navigation. Everything is easy to find.
The only people I wouldn't recommend the site to are those that need a believable stepfamily story. These are fantasy scenes. The lowest rated scenes on the site are the ones where they have tried to go more serious. Those are in the 70-80% liked range, while the silly, playful ones are almost all over 90% liked.
Very enjoyable site and one I will continue to come back to every 6 months. |
|
11-18-19 11:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
67
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly hardcore network in the Nubiles family of sites.
Most of the scenes are very unique and interesting.
A little over 1,200 scenes with photos, all are downloadable.
Updates every other day.
Model list, different site tabs, it all makes navigating this network much easier than you would expect.
Bills with CCBill |
| Cons: |
There's a lot of imbalance. Some sites on here, the niches they cover are very interesting, other ones feel just like any other softer hardcore site.
I still feel like Nubiles.net is better than all these sites combined. I'm not trying to compare them, I just think Nubiles.net captures the Nubile feeling, while this is more like a hardcore site that's trying to go away from the tried and true forum Nubiles.net established. |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit, I am a sucker for the "family" porn and they have a couple of those sites on here Stepsiblings Caught, Daddy's Lil Angel and Family Pies. I like the porn with stories more than the gonzo style. Or else I just feel like two people showed up, picked a check up and got naked. I want and even need a scene to convince me this is really happening and it's not because they're being paid.
Nubiles Porn does a good job of that most of the time. There are more sites, really just niches, in this network that I like than ones I don't like. Detention Girls reminds me of every lesbian porn I first saw when I first discovered porn. Who knew "Women in jail" a search topic for a research paper would bring up a porn site?
I think if there's one strong criticism it is that they don't let the scenes play out enough. There are exceptions and that's what hurts. There's a scene on Nubiles Porn called, "My Sexy Girlfriend S12 E:7" that is really great. The model is self-shooting herself in the car, teasing her boyfriend and they even make sure to have her film in portrait view which is one of the most annoying things a person can do, but it adds to the realism. This teasing and flirting takes up nearly half the scene and it makes it very believable. Other scenes start with the woman on the bed naked and the guy walks in the room naked. They don't even say hi.
The video quality is very good at up to 1080p and they offer something I like, they have a 720p version in mp4 and WMV, I can't see the difference in them and the WMV version is usually 200-300 MB less in size. The photos like nubiles.net are very crisp and clear and downloadable.
They have just over 850 models and some of what I would call the top level of teen models.
There are quite a few niches here including two in the petite niche and you also get access to Nubiles.net, which to me is the best teen site on the internet.
I got this membership during the Halloween deals and didn't expect to get Nubiles.net with it, but it does come with it. For whatever reason they don't list it on the Nubiles Porn page, you just have to type in nubiles.net and enter you login again. It think when it's all combined it's still the best deal I've found in porn. |
|
11-04-19 11:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
Team Skeet
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good network if you follow one step: Click "show my content" in the left margin. It removes all the locked content.
My biggest interest was Innocent High. As a former Catholic schoolgirl, I have something of a fetish towards schoolgirl content.
They have 3,551 scenes available with the standard Team Skeet membership. If you were to update to all their upgrade sites it would add another 1,500 scenes.
The scenes I have watched stuck to the main theme of each site. That could be a con too.
The video quality goes from 360p up to 1080p, no 4K that I can see.
The picture sets are downloadable.
The girls on here are mostly really cute/pretty. The guys are guys I see on other sites.
Epoch is the biller. |
| Cons: |
They really could do something with the navigation. If you click "show my content" it takes away all the locked content. But, if you look at their sites, they have 47, there's no way to know which ones you have access to. I recognize a few of them as standalone sites like Family Strokes. They even have a filter on the sites, but not one for "show my sites".
I'm with some of the others, why not just offer all the sites in one package and even raise the price? I can't imagine what the price would be to add those sites as an upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High was one of the first porn sites I was interested in. I spent the majority of my teen years wearing schoolgirl outfits and I really believe it has a sexual effect on the wearer. Those scenes are good, but they could be a lot better.
I won't say the content has a generic feel to it, but it kind of does. What I mean by that is it feels like they film a scene, pull the model out of the clothes, stick another model in the clothes and do it again.
Their site Family Strokes is really entertaining. It's kind of silly and it has a lot more personality than some of the sites included with Team Skeet. I would say I would be willing to pay $49 for all of their sites. If anyone knows how much that upgrade is, please let me know.
The Stepsibilings site is the best of their newer sites that come with the Team Skeet standard membership. All of the sites have some good scenes on them, but you have to click on them and see if you need to upgrade.
The video quality is very good as is the streaming player. It's one of the better streaming players I have used.
I don't like focusing so much of the review on the negative of the navigation, but it does make the site very hard to use. Once you click on "Show my content", you have no other options except to scroll through 3,500 scenes.
I am a fan of CFNM and they have a CFNM site on here. It's not the standard CFNM style content. It's one on one and usually ends in sex.
Here are the sites from the top 10 sites they have that are included in the basic membership:
Exxxtra Small, Teen Pies, Teen Curves, Innocent High, Stepsiblings, I'm going to stop here for an important part. Those are in the top 10 of their listed sites. That means you receive 5 of their top 10 sites with a standard membership.
After those, there's only one upgrade site in the next 10. You receive 14 of the top 20.
While I was going through those results, I did notice an upgrade button and it says if you choose the upgrade you are charged annually. That makes it not as likely to interest me. I would be better off just joining each of the upgrade sites I am interested in for one month at $10 each.
I wouldn't be interested in their upgrade sites if they had poor content. They have some really fun and sexy content. I have enjoyed it so far and think I will make a list of the sites they list as upgrades and just join one each month.
This is a mostly teen network. There are some MILF sites on it, but even those have a teen in them. I like it as much or better than the other American networks I have joined. Good, fun network and I guess I should give them a nice word for not charging the upgrades automatically like other sites do. I have clicked on multiple upgrades and there is a green button that says "upgrade now". They're at least fair with it. |
|
10-08-19 01:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A fetish-dominated site on a network that keeps changing.
The scenes often feature full sex from start to finish in full clothes. You can learn some sneaky tips for making it work in clothes.
The women on here are beautiful. It has a heavy emphasis on Eastern European women. The guys are okay, a few are not much to look at.
There is a lot of content on just this site within this niche. They also have a site called, Fully Clothed Pissing. It looks like they film the pissing part either before or after the sex scene. It is usually the same models in the same clothes.
I think it's a niche that women are really into -- cum on clothes, they have a lot of scenes with the cumshot going on the woman's skirt, her pants and it's one of the selling points for me. |
| Cons: |
Tainster is the network, but it is now in a network called SINX. It adds more content than just Tainster, but it also comes with a lesser known biller.
Some of the guys are just ugly and I don't think it would be a subjective opinion. I'm not that picky.
No dates on the videos. The only way you can tell the newer ones is by the video resolution offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
Tainster has had a lot of changes over the last 10 years. It was one of the first networks I joined. It was known as Eromaxx back then. The switch to Tainster didn't change anything. This switch to SINX shows a lot of videos from other sites that are upsells. It does let you select a site like Fully Clothed Sex and just see the content from it.
These scenes have been a turn-on for me since my first porn experiences. The cum on clothes just seems like something everyone that has had sex has experienced at least once -- and these women love it.
The site works as well as it did under Tainster. The scenes are lined up and I think, from looking at them, they are in order of newest to oldest. What I don't know is if they are releasing new scenes or what their update schedule is if there even is one.
The most recent 286 scenes have "Full HD" 1080p downloading option. That is where it can be confusing. I went as far as their last page of videos and 4 of the 8 have Full HD 1080p. Some of the videos on the "newer" pages don't have Full HD 1080p. The ones with Full HD option offer 720p and 360p as well. There are pictures with every video.
Some of these scenes are a fantasizer's dream come true. Office girls using dildos on each other through the tear in their hose. The "boss" man seducing a young interviewing model into sex with his penis out of the front of his pants, her panties slid over and on top of him.
This is one site that I don't think amateurs would be good at. These models -- though, I only know some by name -- are pros, and they seem to have real fetishes involving these scenarios.
The total amount of scenes is 362. Reading the The Best Porn review from 2015, there were over 400 scenes. This site has been around since 2003. Seeing that none of the scenes look very old, I have to wonder if they've just removed a lot of their older, lower-quality content?
The lower number doesn't hurt it, in my opinion, I would rather have 300 scenes in high quality than 600 with half the scenes in poor quality.
One of the fetishes they do well and a lot on this site is a man/woman having sex while a woman watches and masturbates. Having them all in clothes makes that even better. There are a lot of fetishes being touched on in this site. You have pantyhose, panties, upskirts and voyeuristic watchers.
You do have access to all of the Tainster sites including Party Hardcore and the aforementioned Fully Clothed Pissing. I'm not into pissing scenes, but they do add to the Fully Clothed Sex scenes as you are seeing the same people, in the same clothing, doing something different and kinky.
I won't score it too high just because the missing dates and no update schedule makes me wonder if the site is dead and they're using it is an archive site. If it is, it is still worth it for those with those clothing fetishes. |
|
08-20-19 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
70
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very fun older/younger site with sort of an identity crisis.
There are 470 scenes, the updates haven’t updated since August 2021.
Newer scenes have 4K downloads.
Most of the females look young and cute, fitting the role well.
Most of the males look older, some are chubby and fit their role well.
Very good downloadable picture sets that focus on the female in a more teasing, glamorous way. |
| Cons: |
Some of the grandpas look similar age to the “teens”. I use my imagination, but only then can barely see a 10 year difference.
No new updates and older scenes are lower resolution quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Older/younger porn is usually fun for me. I am not for sure why. I don’t recognize most of these older men. Usually, the older/younger genre has known, established porn stars in the male roles. These older guys don’t even use a last name. That raises the sexy factor for me. He must have got so excited about the scene he forgot to write his last name down.
As someone that started my interest in online porn through the site Nubiles, a lot of the females on this site remind me of the types of models Nubiles has. That’s a plus for me. Most of these models look like legitimate 24 years old and younger models. I believe those fit into the “teen” category. There are slim figures, small boobs and the older men look happy just to get to touch these young women.
There is a negative in the use of males that look at most 35. I don’t even watch those scenes unless the female is really cute. There are females on here that look like the makeup person tried to add makeup to make them look younger. I know that sounds backwards, but we are talking pink blush on the cheeks which I believe tries to make a woman look younger. It doesn’t really work and if those women really are in the 18-24 age group, the makeup person needs to stop with the makeup. A few of these females look to be in their late 20s, while the guy in those scenes looks mid-30s. That’s pushing my imagination’s limit. What would be the age difference needed? I think you need to at least show a 30-40 year old difference. I can work with a 20 year difference, even.
This is a large site for this genre with 470 scenes. The updates did stop about 5 months ago. Hopefully, they’re not ending the site’s updates and just maybe taking a Covid break. This is very enjoyable older/younger porn. The pictures add another element with those focusing on the female model and have as many as 150 photos each.
The clothing, settings, productive values, are very good for this genre. The really older men wear everything from lounge clothes to overalls, while the “teens” wear cute outfits that make the scenes more believable. I do believe that is part of the problem with the scenes that have the younger guys. Most are dressed in suits. It looks more like extramarital office sex. Porn niches are now hurting each other! It’s a good site. I would recommend it for fans of older/younger. |
|
02-09-22 06:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Beautiful Agony
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I can just imagine the first time someone thought, “I think I’ll record my face during orgasm”. The premise of Beautiful Agony was born that day.
It is as realistic and genuine as a site can be.
You’re going to get some of the best scenes you’ve ever seen, but as is the nature of amateur self-submitted, some are not worth even watching.
It's one of the only sites I have been a member of that makes me feel like nothing really matters except the performance.
Sometimes I think, the thoughts going through my mind when watching these scenes, would make some great porn scenes!
It's a great alternative to the overproduced hardcore, overacted “story” porn. |
| Cons: |
Just about all the pros could be reversed into cons. This is truly a site that is it what it is.
There could always be improvements in amateur sites, but at least for me, that’s a big part of the charm of a site like this. |
| Bottom Line: |
Try imagining an attractive woman telling you she’s going to masturbate and record her face during it. Would that intrigue or interest you? Does it excite you? Does it sound too tame? All those questions are ones someone joining Beautiful Agony, should ask themselves before joining. I do believe this is a site that has a core audience sticking with them for months, even years. It’s a very specific niche and that makes it a narrow-niche site.
I tell myself that and wonder just how much or how many people are really just into the moment of the climax? I would think those into female solo videos would be into this niche. I don’t know if someone into hardcore or even porn with a plot would even like this niche a little. The plot of every scene is the same. The woman is going to masturbate, writhe on the bed or whatever surface she’s on, moan, but there’s a good chance you’re not going to see the explicit penetration or stroking. I say all that like hardcore porn and porn with a plot doesn’t eventually lead to an ending with climaxes.
This pulls together the strongest points of Beautiful Agony. If a scene doesn’t seem as good as others, it’s likely the model just didn’t time her expressions right, which tells us how real it is. I remember hearing about one female pornstar who didn’t like the camera to show her face during orgasm. It was on a hardcore site. She said she made some of the weirdest, strangest faces during orgasm.
Beautiful Agony has a dichotomy for a name. And their content lives up or even down to the title. There’s no airbrushing or editing. It might not be as hot and sexy as an overproduced site, but it’s real and there’s no way to fake it.
They have around 15,000 videos of various lengths and some of the videos are very short. As I mentioned earlier, I’m not for sure the technical quality really matters with this style of porn. If you cleaned up some of the videos, had better camerawork, better sound and lighting, it very well could take away from the “in the moment” style of porn they are going for.
I do think this site is relatively easy to recommend to others, but only because it hits on some rather underfilled niches like voyeurism, not produced or scripted and it’s all amateur models. A lot of people like each of those niches. Beautiful Agony gives you a little bit of each of them.
It's a very good join, especially if you’re new to it, and they update enough for me to come back and join every year. I guess you could say you wish they would include their other sites, I Shot Myself and I Feel Myself, but I believe that would be too much to offer. The sites are close to one of a kind. |
|
03-13-24 12:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
72
|
BoyFun
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes |
| Cons: |
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models |
| Bottom Line: |
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women. |
|
08-07-23 10:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
Slayed
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn
Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads
Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price.
Pretty and sexy models
Scenes are fun and have good production
Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem.
The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned.
The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two.
There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle.
With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. |
|
11-06-22 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
75
|
Girlsway
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a lesbian-themed network of five themed sites or series or niches. These niches and sub-niches and genres and sub-genres are starting to become confusing.
As a network it has 2,062 scenes with downloads and downloadable pictures.
The famous and highly-respected Bree Mills produces at least some of this content. I will have some comments on that.
The videos have a lot going for them with up to 4K on the newer ones and most of the scenes have a story.
There are subtitles available for the scenes with female models that do not speak English. I think the scenes that are not English are okay for me, to just stream. It’s hard to watch a porn scene while reading what is being said.
A lot of normal niches are explored on this network: Older/younger being a major one. |
| Cons: |
I just think some of the scenes try too hard to not be porn. That is a downside of having Bree Mills. There are expectations.
It doesn’t matter how good the story is if the models cannot convey the feelings and emotions needed for the story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Who to blame? The producer/writer or porn? That is the only big negative I took from these scenes. I don’t know if porn itself causes the writer to have to limit their stories, which would also include the models’ acting ability. The scenes that I just didn’t get into had a common feeling of the story either tried too much or didn’t even try. That’s probably unfair to judge by. It is a very good network if you like lesbian porn. The stories vary when it comes to quality. From the obvious ones like two friends going to Yoga class, in a woman’s house. Maybe porn does limit that?
The models are all pretty or at least above average. I do believe any blame should be placed on porn. You get scenes that are inconsistent. Some of the stories are ones I watched videos of ten years ago with the same story. That must be it. There is a time period that once passed clears the memory of that story. That is, I believe, the limitation of porn. The scenes that they seem to put the most marketing into are the best ones. I really liked the “Schooled” scene with Brooklyn Gray, Sheena Ryder and Serena Siren, that’s a tongue twister, which is fittingly, on a lesbian site.
The first thing I will point out that I like are the scenes with more than 2 women. They have a lot of 3 or more women scenes. They also have a lot of older women with younger women scenes. I believe that is probably the most realistic fantasy a straight woman has about lesbian sex. I believe we all had that one teacher that was really pretty and was very nice to us. That is a tough part of making lesbian porn. It had to appeal to either straight men or straight women. I do see the majority of the scenes as aimed at men. I was impressed by Casey Calvert. She has a scene called, “Grand Opening” which needed to be a lesbian scene with that name. It has 3 other models in it. It follows the script of the older woman is teaching the younger ones to have lesbian sex.
The network doesn’t specifically call itself a network, but it does have 5 different niches/series. I believe they even limit themselves with trying to follow a set theme. The network has over 2,000 scenes and it is updating at least 10 times per month. There is good value. There is not an avoidance of those repeated stories. I have seen so many porn scenes, lesbian and straight, with the paying off the debt story.
You do get pictures and those are downloadable. Those do look like stills from the videos. A scene that I thought looked really good before watching it, to find it, it wasn’t that good is Every Woman’s Born Different. It has everything going for it except the models don’t seem to be that much into it. I wasn’t familiar with any of the three models in it and it showed. I don’t know a lot of models, but the scene felt like one experienced model with two models shooting their first scene. I did find a humorous discussion about the scenes. The older woman is supposed to be the stepmother to both of the younger female models. Someone asked the question of how that is possible. That would require one of the daughters to be the mom’s real daughter. I didn’t even pick up on that until I read the comments, but that goes into what I’m talking about with the stories. Trying so hard to make the stepfamily niche, then losing all believability in the process, even though the scene is very serious about itself.
The majority of scenes are very good. You just can’t tell based on who is in the scene. You have to jump from one scene to another trying to find one that doesn’t have an overbearing story that the models clearly cannot act out. I’m still going to score it good, but I don’t know if I’m just seeing reality that porn is better as a fantasy. |
|
03-08-22 05:12pm
Replies (0)
|
|
