Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Alternative, tattooed, rebellious, sounds like my college years, except for the tattooed part.
This is a large site with 1,544 scenes but take note: It has not updated since mid-November 2021. That is two months. It was averaging two scenes per month. There have been none over the last 2 months. I don’t know if the site is now dead or not.
The newer scenes can be downloaded in 4K.
If you like hardcore porn, you will probably like this site a lot. Including hardcore lesbian scenes. Which is unique to me. You don’t see really hardcore lesbian scenes on a regular basis.
Bondage, BSDM, gags are all featured in different scenes. |
Cons: |
It’s not updating. That is a newer problem. The last update was on November 14, 2021. I have kept up with this site for several years. I wouldn’t be surprised if it starts updating again. They seemed to be going through some changes with the types of scenes. Maybe it’s just temporary?
I believe the lesbian scenes really stand out as good. The rest of it is going to push a lot of boundaries for people. It’s quite hardcore and rough. |
Bottom Line: |
My original interest site was based on the fact that I was kind of alternative, rebellious young woman in college. I never did get into the tattoos. I think the star of the site, Joanna Angel, is really sexy. I had enough reason to like the site and keep up with it. I won’t talk too much more about the sudden stoppage of updates. If/when it changes, I will update the review or post a comment. Right now, it has been over 2 months since the last update. There was a change going on. The site adopted a theme of having 3-4 scenes that followed a similar story. I believe overall, the site is a definitive hit or miss site. I don’t believe there’s much middle ground for porn fans. If you dislike tattoos, the site is pretty much out for you. If you don’t like hardcore porn, the site is pretty much out for you. They’ve not found a happy medium. The lesbian scenes are even much more hardcore than we expect from two or three women.
The quality is there. They have up to 4K downloads. It’s not as hardcore or polarizing as Kink Network. It’s close. You have to throw in the tattoos. The majority of the newer scenes do take a more BDSM, bondage, gags, whips style approach. I believe that is hit or miss. I don’t mean the person swinging the whip. I really like the lesbian scenes on this site. The reason is, I have never had a lesbian encounter and there’s a part of me that believes this more hardcore style is what it would really be like. I’m not at liberty to discuss psychological and therapy topics. I do know there is a certain level of physicality in lesbian relationships. That and Joanna Dark keeps my interest on this site.
Some of the lesbian parts I have noticed: There seems to be real sub/dom tension between the women. Some of these women are not regular porn stars. I haven’t ever seen some of them on any site. The lack of an established role leads to very intense sex. It’s as if each one is trying to establish their dominance over the other. They do not leave out the parts you would expect from a lesbian scene. There is passionate kissing. You can see the escalation of emotions. The women’s bodies even react how their bodies should, between hard nipples and very wet lower regions. There is a realness there. It is why I don’t like BDSM between a male and female. Physically, the likelihood of a female being dominant over a male is just not that likely. If he’s an establish sub and likes that role. That more understandable, but it loses that tension. Someone needs to make a purely lesbian site where neither woman is the established dominant one. That is something porn lacks.
That is the strong point of the site for me. It’s enough reason to keep up with the site. I do have problems with believability in porn. Having a site where I can see and feel the tension, it fixes the believability problem.
The rest of the scenes are standard harder than normal hardcore. I’m surprised how long some of the scenes are. The people are going at it at a fevered pitch. They’re lasting 40 minutes. As a viewer, I believe that loses some of the enjoyment. It becomes punishing to watch. That is the hit or miss aspect for me. Hopefully, the site will return to updating. It is not the first time the site has had a layoff. They were shooting some scenes as self-shot to avoid the Covid restrictions. It could be anything has delayed the current updates. My recommendation is based on my own experience. If you can find certain styles of scenes on this site that, do it for you, it’s a really good site. I don’t think anyone will like all the styles of scenes. Maybe takes a little patience. |
|
02-09-22 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Very good site that shows one fetish leads to another then another.
The female models are very attractive and were my initial interest in the site. The guys are pretty good, too, including some I have heard of which is unusual for me.
662 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Videos and photos and downloadable. Videos up to 4K.
Nice, sexy, sensual feeling to the scenes.
Most scenes are long at least 30 minutes. |
Cons: |
The older scenes do not have the high-quality videos or photos.
The name could hurt the site, it’s a lot more than foot fetish. |
Bottom Line: |
I don’t really have any set fetishes I adhere to. I just like fetishes. The flow of fetishes usually finds at least one or two I like in each scene. The foot fetish is not one I’m very familiar with as far as in practice of. I don’t see me offering to give a guy a footjob. Most of the scenes get that action in each scene, but that leads to that flow I talked about. There are blowjobs, vaginal, anal, and that is for me, a good, broad-reaching fetish site. It had its basis fetish with foot but doesn’t stay there. That could be a con for some.
The size of the site is a bonus. Unless you have a problem with lower video quality. The oldest scenes are from 2005 and those only have up to 540p downloads. One thing I want to mention is the high quality of not only the newer scenes videos, but also of the picture sets. As someone that started my interest in online porn through Nubiles, I am used to having high quality videos and photo sets. This site’s photo sets have 150-200 photos in each. The photos sets can be downloaded in zips and the newer ones have photos that are 6700x4200 resolution and crystal clear besides the occasional blurry out of focus shot. The newer videos have all the download resolutions from 160p to 4K. There is a glamourous feeling to this site, and I believe the sensual nature of the foot fetish makes that happen.
The scenes are lacking in the story department, but it’s not hard to create stories in your head for these scenes. You have to think if a woman is willing to wrap her feet around a guy’s dick, that’s the story! It is the secretive advantage of fetish content. The males and female seem to really be into this fetish.
I really like this site and am surprised I am just now discovering it. I may have to look more into this foot fetish content. It seems it sets a softer, gentler tone to the scenes. Maybe it’s because the women are in more control, even? That is not to say this is softcore. Some of these scenes are as hardcore as the anal-fetish sites are. Even at that, some of the scenes, around 70, have anal in them. This fetish is being used properly and well. It’s giving me a reason to believe these actors and actresses are so turned on by exploring their foot fetish, it is lowering their inhibitions towards other fetishes. Not being a fetishist, but knowing fetishists, that does seem to be the real-life appeal of fetishes. The models are also a major bonus. I would recommend the site without hesitation. It covers nearly all major niches thanks to starting each scene with something as unattractive and useless (except for walking) foot. Very enjoyable and entertaining site with impressive quality. |
|
02-09-22 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
Low Art Films
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
A studio that I remember joining the site of in 2011. It’s worth looking into.
A mostly lesbian site with some of the biggest names in scenes that most people don’t even know exist.
Good download options considering all of this was released in 2010-2012. All of the scenes have 160p up to 720p.
Getting the chance to see some models before their fame or rise. London Keyes stands out most. Her lesbian scene with Nika Noir is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen.
There are some male/female scenes.
What you’re looking at most is this was the first steps to porn like we see on Pure Taboo, the lighting, the colors, they are changing moods with the colors. They need a Porn History class in college. If Art History qualifies as college credit, why not porn history? |
Cons: |
It's a small site and it’s not going to update ever again. It only has 82 scenes, but I admit, I have downloaded 62 of them.
I wonder if other sites have ever looked into this style of filming. This site could even be confusing for people. Heavy on the glam, but there’s some BDSM in it. |
Bottom Line: |
I didn’t list is a pro or con. This site, from what I remember, was going to feature mostly Asian women. It was going to be “interracial” with one of the women (lesbian scenes) being Asian. Times have changed, I don’t really know why this site stopped. Some of the names of models: Charmane Star, Yuri Luv, Sea J. Raw, Puma Swede who is one of the most attractive, athletically built models. Jayden James who I know was on top of the porn world at one time. Capri Anderson. Shyla Jennings. Capri Cavanni. London Keyes. There is even a male/female scene between Asa Akira and Mr. Marcus. Faye Reagan. Reagan Reese. The scene I remember the most is Alexis Amore and Nikki Rhodes with Mexican-inspired Día de los Muertos makeup. This was one of the sites that someone had a vision about. Maybe it didn’t catch on with the consumer. There is almost nothing to fault in these scenes. I do believe Fame Digital maybe bought it out.
The models are top of the shelf for that time period. The only real facts you need is there are 82 of these scenes that someone gave up on way too soon. I wouldn’t be surprised to know the scenes were busting the budget. The whole idea with these scenes goes into the lighting, the colors, it creates a mood in the viewer. They were already trying too hard at that point. This makes me think of what Bree Mills was producing 12 years ago. It blends so many niches.
There are a few solo scenes. Most of the scenes are lesbian. There are some male/female. You’re not expecting to see light water torture of Jayden Jaymes and Nick Manning during a hardcore scene. It’s here, though. There’s a lot of cosplay. There is bondage. And the best part, the lesbian scenes are as close as I think you can get to calling lesbian porn – hardcore. Rough rubbing and fingering. I had a membership recently to Kink and this looks like Kink meets glam. The scenes are very hardcore. I never expect that from a site with Art in the name, but it is Low Art. I believe the name even tells they were trying too hard. There’s a lot of use of oils on the bodies. The rooms they are in look like a mixture of a Soho Penthouse, a gothic dungeon, a million dollar mansion, a Japanese home and a rundown, dilapidated industrial building. I do think a site like this probably inspired some sites that we rate very highly these days. They were doing the creativity. There’s not a lot of stories in the scenes. Adding the quality of the models makes this a site someone like me will download 62 of 82 videos from. Even though I like solo porn. I don’t really like the solo scenes on this site. There’s clearly something going on in these scenes. The solo women should have been in the scenes with couples having sex and masturbating there.
The download quality is not bad. You can download up to 720p on all the scenes. I'm trying to recollect more about this site from my memory. The first 6 scenes have a title. The rest do not. Those were titled, “Janine and Jessica Dirty Desires”. That is Jessica Jaymes and Janine Lindemulder. It does look like the site was first focusing on them. It then shifted to more Asian models. There is even a very spirited solo scene of Sasha Grey in the old, industrial building setting. I consider this one of my best finds. It is also on Adult Time. That may be the advantage to joining Adult Time for a long period of time. I have had time to go through it more.
The last scene they made was one that worked the lights and colors, I thought, the best they had done. Maybe they didn’t get a big response to it and thought that’s the best they had and gave up. It’s Charmane Star and Yuri Luv. The lighting is soft, one background panel is a bright orange, heavy contrast there. Charmane and Yuri have a lot of face make-up on especially around the eyes. Charmane’s is a brighter red. Yuri’s is a muted blue. Someone was really trying to show the contrast. Very happy to have found this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
Austin Wilde
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Very attractive, masculine-look, gay solo model.
There are only 18 solo scenes, but they do something on this site that I do enjoy and that is two guys masturbating together. Surely that really happens?
Good download quality with most of the scenes having up to 1080p
A total of 114 scenes, some of the gay sex scenes on this are good. I’m shocked by how my back arch some of these guys have.
The pictures are downloadable, but I would only say they are okay. |
Cons: |
I was pretty sure I had this figured out. Solo gay models are listed as solo because they are in all the scenes on their site which makes it a solo model focused site, right? Not really. This one is advertised as solo masturbation. But only 1/6 of the scenes are solo masturbation.
Nearly half the scenes are “on the set” which I know from female porn sites, are usually called, “behind the scenes”. It does cut the amount of sex scenes down some. |
Bottom Line: |
If there was going to be one of these solo gay models, I really wanted to be a solo masturbation model, Austin Wilde was it. He’s very handsome, he doesn’t have a too masculine look, but he looks like an athlete. He has a little bit of a rugged look. And his solo scenes are very good. I don’t know if he is that greatly endowed or if it’s where he’s so athletic looking. I know a lot about size perception. You figure this stuff out when you watch enough men masturbating in porn.
The gay sex scenes are some of the better ones on this network, at least for me. I think the whole attraction to the site is Austin Wilde. It doesn’t seem to matter whether he’s in the top or bottom role, he's almost always erect. That plays a big part in enjoying a sex scene that you really can’t even fantasize being in. I don’t know how these scenes would be viewed by gay men. I have learned a lot though I am not for sure porn fans are the best or most qualified teachers. Austin does everything. He takes anal, he gives anal, he takes oral, he gives oral. And I would say he seems to be the last “gay” of these solo models but I’m going to guess I am wrong.
His solo scenes are very good. This is how I believe a man masturbates. He’s not too preoccupied with looking good while doing it. He doesn’t spend as much time trying to show his body off. I don’t think he is that large in endowment, but I could be wrong. He’s kind of hard to tell how big his build is. He reminds me a little of Vin Diesel. I think for a female viewer there’s a good chance for the physical attraction. And he’s not as dominant acting as his build says he could be. I believe he is one of the more entertaining male models to watch masturbate. This is one of the ones I would definitely recommend for straight women. I want to believe he is well-liked by straight women and gay men. It’s just too bad there’s not more solo scenes of him. The video quality is very good. Maybe the first 10-12 scenes only have 480p downloads. The rest have up to 1080p and his scenes are a little longer. I noticed several go over 20 minutes. I liked the one a lot, but I don’t know where else to find content of him. I would like to see him in bisexual scenes with another man and a woman. |
|
12-08-21 02:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Strange bedfellows, they say: bisexual, straight, gay, hardcore, solo, guy with a guy, then with the other guy’s girl. I like it.
Not as much solo as I would like, but around 1/3 of the 323 scenes are solo. It is advertised as solo. Solo men sites are difficult to find, it’s hard not to use the word hard in a review of masturbating hard dicks.
There are pictures you can download in a zip, but only 25-50 per zip and look like screenshots.
Around 175 of the scenes have at 720p and most of those also have 1080p downloads, look for the con.
The site works well but could use more tags and search features.
Cody, himself, is very attractive, it’s hit or miss on the other guys, though the women are almost all very pretty. |
Cons: |
Around 150 of the scenes top out at 480p or 540p on video downloads. This site has been around a long time.
Another con that extends from a pro – the navigation can be frustrating. The tags are just not useful.
No longer updating. |
Bottom Line: |
The star attraction is Cody Cummings. He’s a masculine, gay, bisexual, straight male performer. And he does all those on this site. That means there are gay scenes with Cody and another guy or guys. There are bisexual scenes with Cody, another guy and a female. There are straight scenes where Cody has sex with a female and there are the scenes for us straight women – where Cody plays with himself and lets us watch. I don’t consider the scenes with women to be directed at straight women. Those are a lot like any hardcore male/female scene you can see on any site.
There is the feeling they could have done more with stories and how the scenes work together. One scene has two parts: In the first part, Cody has sex with a male. In the second part, Cody has sex with a female. It wants you to see this as the male and female being a couple and they’re having an affair on each other with Cody, but they don’t put the story together. It leaves it like these are separate scenes with very little relation to each other.
This is an older site than I realized. Nearly half of the scenes only offer 480p or 540p downloads. The other half have the HD formats at 720p and 1080p. The content doesn’t look old. I don’t know if this site normally only offers streaming (it was an option when signing up), but my membership includes downloading. The photos are not much to talk about. They are downloadable, there are not many in each set and they’re from the videos. Cody is attractive enough he should have better quality pictures and more pictures, especially of his solo scenes.
The main theme here is Cody Cummings and what looks like his sexual adventures. He does a good job of selling his preference in each video. He’s very believable in the straight scenes and solo scenes. At times, the scenes with other guys, he doesn’t seem quite as into it, but he doesn’t underperform either. There are no more updates and there are no 4K or higher videos. I think if you’re joining this site you’re doing so just because of your interest in Cody Cummings. None of the other models, including the females, really do that much. It’s very much Cody-centric. I guess that is the whole purpose of a solo model site. Just don’t expect the solo model part to be the dominant action you’re going to see. I was expecting 100% solo scenes. Overall, I’m not disappointed. It is very difficult to find a masculine, male model who masturbates on camera. He’s very good at that and should be where soon to be stars start learning the trade. I don’t know if he is kind of a pioneer in solo male porn. It’s a good site, overall. |
|
12-03-21 08:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Lets Go Bi
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Probably my favorite niche, bisexual men with a woman.
All videos have 4K downloads.
Only 43 scenes, but two updates per month have it growing it fast enough.
Photo zips for all scenes, downloadable and 2700x4000 resolution.
Little bit of everything mixed in these scenes like gay couple meets bisexual couple.
Some very attractive female models. I will go into that in the bottom line as I think it’s very important to this niche. |
Cons: |
Scenes are not long enough as seen by a couple of the orgy scenes split into two parts. It’s like they can only record 30 minutes at a time.
Enough cheesiness in some of these scenes to make a sandwich. Guys giving the thumbs up over another guy giving them a blowjob? No idea what they’re saying or even what language they are speaking. |
Bottom Line: |
I’m going to start this with my explanation for the need of at least one very attractive female in a bisexual men scene. Somewhere in a woman’s mind, we all like to think if we walked up on two gay or bisexual men having sex, their attraction to us would make them stop and include us. It’s similar to the thinking behind women who try to “turn” gay men to straight. I believe adding a very attractive woman to these scenes makes it more believable. The reality of most of these scenes is these are gay men. You can maybe see where I’m going with that? These gay men see this very attractive woman, carnal desires take over and they just have to try her out. There is a bisexual, 2 part orgy on this site that has multiple very attractive women in it. It makes you think the other way too. Would a straight man be willing to do something sexual with another man if it meant he would get to have to have sex with this beautiful woman? That’s why I like bisexual porn so much. It gives me something to think about and wonder if it really happened would the straight guy lose his inhibitions or would the gay guys become bisexual for that beautiful woman?
This site does a really good job of presenting such scenarios. Some of the scenes are not that good. It’s clearly porn and those two gay guys are willing to have sex with the woman for the paycheck. It’s the other scenes that makes a site like this very appealing to me. This studio does seem to specialize in these harder to find niches. To show an example of how broad some of these scenes reach, one of the orgy scenes has these tags: Blowjob, cumshot, handjob, big tits, anal, small tits, mature, bbw, granny and rimjob. It’s just a mixture that to me is highly unpredictable IF put in this situation in real life.
The site has 43 videos and 43 photo sets. The downloads on the videos have the 4K option on every video. Those also have the 540p, 720p, 1080p download options as well. The photo zip downloads have 2700x4000 photos and are interesting to look at. You see things you don’t notice in the video, especially the scenes with more than 4 people in them. As much as I like and appreciate sites like this, I don’t know if there’s a very big market for it. I’m not even for sure if the gay market is really into adding a female to the scene or a whole room of females. I don’t even know if it appeals to that many females. It is one of my favorite niches and maybe is my favorite when it comes to hardcore sex porn. I do want to add some of the cheesiness of the male actors is almost unforgivable. Really, a thumbs up for getting a blowjob from another man? Pretty sure you gave him a thumbs up when you didn’t stop him.
If one thing could be improved it is the masculinity of the males. Most of these men are effeminate, even the big, muscular ones and I think that does hurt the fantasy unless the woman is very attractive. I don’t know these models by their given names, but one of the females, she is in a couple of the scenes needs to be in every scene. I will also mention I like the way the orgy scenes setup. It’s usually everyone sitting together, one starts touching one, and it works its way into orgy instead of everyone just getting naked and having sex. It gives the feeling of some of the people needed enticement to join in and I like that. Very good site for those into bisexual men scenes and I want to say this one could reach a little further with a lot of pretty female models.
Top |
|
10-19-21 01:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
An exceptionally large library of high quality videos and photosets.
Supports download managers.
Several updates per day.
The site is well laid out and easy to use. |
Cons: |
4K videos are not an option, but there are multiple download options.
Uses tags, but there are not enough of them.
The site says about 90 per cent are amateurs. This can also be a plus for some members.
Some of the women have too much body hair. Also, some of the models are not attractive in my opinion.
There is no discount. This is a premium niche site with a premium price tag.
Not part of a network. It is part of the Gamma family of sites, but a membership does not give you access to any other site. |
Bottom Line: |
Although there are some sex scenes, both lesbian and boy/girl, We Are Hairy is primarily devoted to solo masturbation by women who are not professional porn stars. Some scenes are interviews and others feature stripping and putting on a sexy show. This is a contrast with most photography sites that have videos. On those, the videos are generally very artistic rather than erotic in their basic nature. We Are Hairy also has excellent photo sets, but the major theme here is women enjoying being seen as hot exhibitionists. You can see the women getting into the action and in many scenes the women visibly get moist. These are mostly non professionals who see this as a chance to fulfill the fantasy of being seen as sexy. I like the interviews as well as the solo shows as the models are as much into it as any viewer.
Another theme that takes center stage here is masturbation. Sometimes the models use fingers, toys, and at other times they use household objects, such as vegetables or brushes. The orgasms seem to be quite genuine. Between squirting and the looks on their faces, I enjoyed what I saw. The models are rather diverse as there are women here of many different ages and body types. Most of the models are Russian. The older models seem to get the most pleasure from doing the scenes. In some scenes the models get into giving the viewer jerkoff instruction, JOI, but that is not universal or even as much as I would prefer.
Some models probably don’t speak English and that detracts from the chance to get to know them better. I did feel that the more ordinary looking, the chubby and especially the older models tried a lot harder in their scenes. I had the impression that they appreciated the opportunity to be seen as sex objects. There is not much here that you would find on a site that uses an approach of making the models look glamorous. I saw little use of makeup, the women have imperfections and in general appear to be women who you would not expect to be on any porn site.
The choice of ordinary homes as the set is remarkable. Combined with the fact that most of the women wear ordinary clothing makes them seem all the more accessible and relatable as well. The layout is very easy to use even if this is your first time on a pornsite. You can easily find the new videos and photo sets that are added on a daily basis.
You can search for other scenes by the same model, or even by the same director. There are tags that enable you to find blondes, brunettes or those with red hair or dyed other colors. You can search by breast size, by video resolution, by the type of clothing or by the size of the photos or the degree that they are hairy. I must mention though that I would prefer a way to find the videos that were sexy shows as they were in the minority. You can find masturbation videos quite easily, but there should be a tag for non masturbation ones.
You have the ability to rate and leave comments on the models, can vote yes or no to adding new ones and can preview new updates as they post a schedule. There are three quality options for the latest videos. There is lacking a 4K option as the best is 1920x1080p, Full High Definition. You have the option to create a custom zip file for just the photos you select. I liked the progression from clothed to nude to explicit. There are about 8100 HD videos and photo sets. The site adds two videos and two photosets per day. Downloads were fast and easy. The files are small as the videos are generally under fifteen minutes. I found no download limits.
An obvious negative is that the site may not have broad appeal. Many porn fans prefer models that are shaved or at least trimmed. On We Are Hairy, many of the models are not just hairy down there, but have body hair as well. In some cases, more hair does not equal more attractive. If you enjoy seeing unglamorous women showing their exhibitionist side, this site has a lot to offer. This is a very large premium site in an uncommon niche and commands a premium price. |
|
10-19-21 01:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Genuine Sin
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
A-List American pornstars, both male and female
Ability to add comments, mark favorites and rate scenes.
All scenes are at least Full HD
Broad appeal to men, women and couples.
132 videos can be found here.
Great sensual sex scenes
Many female empowerment fantasies |
Cons: |
4K Is not an option. The best is full HD
Irregular updates. Most recently only one a month
No discount, not even for joining the two sister sites, MixedX and Girls Fuck Girls |
Bottom Line: |
Sometimes I imagine I am with a boyfriend and we meet a nice couple. I wonder if they would watch while we have sex? Maybe they would go for swapping? Maybe a female friend and I might stumble on a couple we know, who are going at it? Maybe I meet a guy and I just want to be in charge and get what I want from him. Sometimes I have a fantasy about sex at work or the gym.
These and much more that I might, but probably would not do in real life, are on the site Genuine Sin. Many of the scenes are older woman/younger guy and some are also older woman with a much younger woman. There are lots of foursomes, scenes with three couples and women doing edging on their man. This is a teasing kind of blow job, where the guy is forced to wait until his woman feels he is ready. In these scenes, the woman starts by orally going after her man who is wearing underwear. She starts by erotically kissing him down there through his underwear, even before she takes his underwear off. Teasing and stopping causes a huge cumshot, which is really important to me in a well done porn scene. I love the idea of female sexual empowerment, stirring my imagination with more than just nice bodies and sex. This site delivers that and more. There are scenes that are interracial black on white, white on black and even a lesbian scene with Asian and white.
The guys are well built and good looking. These are not monster cocks but instead are ones I could imagine actually having enjoyable sex with. The guys are polite and respectful, unlike the men on many other sites. No tough guys, no slapping, choking or forced sex. They are there to please these women and that they do well. For the most part, the cum shots are external, clear and easy to focus on. You see the women getting out the very last drop of cum. Usually there is a delighted, playful look on the women's faces. In many scenes, they lick the cum off their bodies or even off their fingers.
The older women are experienced American MILF age stars that know what they want and make sure they get it. The young ladies are pretty and fresh faced, eager to explore new sexual experiences and push their boundaries. The Latinas on this site are outstanding, however my favorite here is India Summer, a total pro who does sex scenes in a way that you just have to see. I wish I had half her enthusiasm and energy. Even though I am not lesbian, she sure is tempting. She could teach me anytime. To give you an idea of what the site is like, she has four scenes. One is a two couple scene called Kinky Swingers Extreme Sex Party, another is Double Penetrated In Front of Friends who are a nicely dressed couple who only watch, another a mild BDSM scene called The Submission of India Summer, and the fourth is with a black man and is called India Summer Is A Milf BBC Addict.
There are more than 130 videos and the site has been updating at only about one new scene a month. It used to be much more frequent, so I hope it is not stopping. The videos don’t come in 4K, but the best quality is a very satisfying full HD. The downloads were fast enough, so no complaints there. As a site it is pretty easy to figure out and there are tags to help you search.
The same ownership has two other sites, MixedX and Girls Who Fuck Girls. There is no offer of a discount for either or both of these. |
|
10-19-21 12:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Women playing the male role.
Some of the scenes are very erotic and show chemistry between the male and female.
They have 464 scenes, but haven't been updated in over a year.
I don’t know what the percentages would be, I would think this niche appeals to both men and women -- especially in fantasies.
Attractive female models, the males are mostly attractive, but some of the contraptions they use as props make them less attractive.
Everything is downloadable with no limits. |
Cons: |
Some of the scenes are just too graphic for me.
The props and way they set some of the scenes up make them uninteresting, unappealing before the scene even starts. |
Bottom Line: |
This is the site I am rating highest on Kink’s network. There are some scenes that I couldn’t make 5 minutes into the scene. If you have watched the horror movie Saw, some of the contraptions and props on this site are reminiscent of Saw. There are metal jaw openers on the men, their mouths stretched to the point that it looks like their teeth are going to fall out. This is why I haven’t found most BDSM sites appealing. Why is the man stuck in that metal mask? There are actions I would rather not see and will list a few for others so they know what they’re getting into. There are scenes with ropes tied around the man’s testicles, tied around the man’s penis and they pull the ropes. There are (never thought I would see this) scenes of women double fisting the anus of the man. Just so it’s known, I also wouldn’t want to see a scene of a man or woman double fisting the anus of a woman. For me, that drives those scenes into a very narrow niche of viewers. Different strokes for different folks, but that just seems like a way to turn more people away than bring them in.
There are scenes that give a completely different feel and view. A woman with a strap-on using it to peg the man while kissing him, while also giving him a handjob, these scenes are some of my favorites. It’s an uncomfortable position for a male, but he’s willing to get the added perks. This seems like something I could see a married couple doing after 10 years of marriage and looking to spice things up.
The scenes I enjoyed the most are the ones where the woman pegs the man, then gives him her vaginal sex. There’s something there that I don’t believe the porn industry has ever figured out. When watching porn as fantasy, we like to put ourselves in the position of one of the stars. By showing the male doing something he probably wouldn’t be comfortable with (getting pegged), to then the female giving him what he wants -- vaginal sex, there’s a chemistry built there even though it is likely manufactured chemistry due to the script. I believe there’s a market for those scenes, a large market even.
The site isn’t that large considering they aren’t updating it. It has 464 scenes with a lot of the scenes I preferred being older ones. It does seem like they started out on the extreme end of hardcore BDSM, it then softened to the scenes I described, and the newer content is a rough mix of BDSM with the scene style I described. All of the scenes I downloaded are 720p. It was the highest download option available and some of those were in the early years of the site. So, while you can’t get 4K or 1080p, you can download 720p on all scenes. I enjoyed the site overall. I don’t think I will join Kink again unless I find another site I like on it. I am adding this as a note about the network as I believe it’s very important to know. The network itself is releasing daily updates. But they are nearly 50/50 gay/straight. I believe that’s important since it means they are releasing more scenes on their Kink Men sites than they were the last time I was a member of it, but only half of the updates on the main Kink site are straight. I could see that being a positive for some and a negative for others.
Divine Bitches is good if you have the time to go through the scenes and find ones that fit what you like to see. I believe if you downloaded 10 random scenes and showed them to me, I would probably like 4 out of the 10. That’s not a bad ratio and I think the uniqueness of the other scenes I do like makes up for it. |
|
06-09-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
Sex Art
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day. |
Cons: |
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short. |
Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene. |
|
04-06-21 02:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
86
|
Club Bang Boys
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Network of 5 gay sites that has some appeal for women.
Currently has 696 scenes and averages 2 updates per week.
Videos and photos are downloadable with no limits.
Navigation is handled through tags.
Group scenes which I think are better than the one on one, but not better than the solo.
Includes access to a large streaming network. |
Cons: |
Still not enough solo scenes, not in relative comparison to the total number of scenes.
Sites seem to change focus. Gay Public Hardcore has most of the solo scenes on it, but the scenes leading up to the solo scenes are two guys in public. The solo scenes are not that public.
No model list, I have noticed most guys that are in solo scenes have other solo scenes on gay sites. There are also no model names on the scenes. |
Bottom Line: |
I saw several solo videos from this network while streaming videos. I probably should have checked further into how many solo scenes they have as the number is under 30, but they are good. The guys for the most part are handsome and fit except for the strange masked man who appears in numerous scenes. I do think the masked man kind of fits the whole feel here since there is no model list and there are no model names on any of the scenes. The one guy you know is the masked man.
The five sites are: Gay Public Hardcore, All Barebacked, Bareback Boy Bangers, Boys Club for Men and Gay Bang Boy.
This is maybe the 5th or 6th site I have joined that are considered “gay” sites, but it the first I have seen with orgies. The site Gay Bang Boy has scenes with as many as 10 or more men in each scene. This has its pluses, since I like to see men masturbating, the ones not directly involved in the sex are usually standing around masturbating. Some are guys just masturbating together. The only problem with these scenes is there are masked men. The masked man referred to earlier wears a black mask that covers his face. The masked men in these orgy scenes are more like Halloween masks. It is just a little strange.
They have 696 scenes with 2 updates per week. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are more like screen captures and can be downloaded too.
Besides the orgies surprising me, a lot of these orgies have men that look 18-21 and some that look over 50. It kind of reminds me of Party Hardcore except they’re in a house with no women. The camera does get lost at times and tries to show too many of the men at one time. It is still is new to me see all-male orgies.
The other sites, Bareback Boy Banging, has some group (5 or less), threesomes and some male/male. It seems like adding more than just two guys makes these scenes more arousing to me – a female.
The site, All Barebacked, is small and hasn’t updated in 2 years, male/male scenes with one threesome. These scenes are a little on the rougher side.
The last, Boys Club for Men, is a blend of young/old and group, a few of these scenes are very good, the five guys in a spa scene is one of the better gay scenes I have watched.
All in all, it’s one of the better “gay” sites I have joined that also at least caters somewhat to women. |
|
04-28-20 09:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
European models being coerced (probably not) into going back to an apartment to have sex.
Started out as Reality Kings initial step into the world of European porn.
Gorgeous, AAA European models with many major Euro stars.
Site has 812 scenes on it.
Streaming player works well with little to no buffering.
If taking the download upgrade the videos are mostly 720p or 1080p (HD) |
Cons: |
Stopped updating on December 27, 2018
Downloads cost extra ($14.95 per month)
Not as much story or talking as other RK scenes since some of the models don’t speak English. |
Bottom Line: |
My initial interest in porn was on European models. Sites like Nubiles, Sapphic Erotica, Club Seventeen were really all I joined for several years. I had always wanted to join this site to see the usually softcore European models in reality themed, hardcore sex.
The site’s older scenes stand out as there are more known stars and the scenes had more of a story or at least dialogue. Some of the scenes are lacking so much in story, the model just walks in the apartment, sits down, takes her clothes off and the sex or masturbation starts. Some start in a car where they (Reality Kings) are driving the model to the apartment and you do get some car action from flashing to blowjobs.
The site stopped updating at the end of 2018, but it had a nice run with 812 scenes and is one of those sites if you like the content you might download 200-300 of the scenes. There’s not as much playfulness in these scenes as the other Reality King scenes but depending on the viewer that could be a positive or a negative. The sex in these scenes is average to above average in quality. I do think these are the prettiest and closest to natural models on Reality Kings.
If you choose to upgrade to the download package there are plenty of HD videos 1080p and 720p to download, but no 4K. The photo sets are also worth downloading if you’re into photos as this content is 100% exclusive and can’t be found anywhere else. If you don’t choose to upgrade to downloads you can still use their very good streaming player.
One thing I have noticed is the scenes are not quite as hardcore as the hardcore scenes on Reality King’s other sites. A lot of these European stars were not known for male/female scenes. There are also some girl/girl scenes and solo as well. It's a good site if you ever wondered how your favorite European models would do in hardcore scenes. So far, it has been my favorite site on the Reality Kings network. |
|
01-27-20 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a good collection of videos too.
Currently has 1,622 models
9,036 photo sets and 755 videos.
The videos are better than I expected them to be, while there's no full masturbation, there is light masturbation and full views of the models bodies.
Averages a photo update each day and a video update once per week. |
Cons: |
Music in videos takes away the moaning -- if there is any moaning.
Site layout seems to have been changed. There is a button to go back to the old website style. The new or current style isn't real good to use with Edge Beta browser as the streaming player's function buttons are covered by the videographer's name and you click it when trying to fast forward, taking you to the videographer's page and stopping your video. |
Bottom Line: |
I decided to review Joymii and Femjoy at the same time as I got the sites confused, having a Adult Time account makes it more confusing since both are on Adult Time now in very limited sample sizes. I joined both Femjoy and Joymii as standalone sites not with Adult Time access.
I'm not a big picture collector, but this is my second time on Femjoy and I really like their photos. Their biggest size is 6000x4000 or vice versa and they are incredibly crisp photos for that large resolution.
The models are your regular European teen models, you do see some variety in body shapes and sizes, but in general, these are slim or slender models and they are nearly all very pretty. The videos are better than most artsy sites and they do show full pussy spreads and buttholes. You even get some rubbing, light touching and that helps keep this site's content out of the too softcore grouping.
There is nothing close to a balance of videos and photos as the photos near 10,000 sets while the videos haven't even reached 1,000. All are downloadable and there's no limits from as far as I can tell.
It's a good site, I like it better than Joymii which I believe is probably ran by the same company and if not they are very similar. I prefer these solo scenes when on the softer side of porn.
The video options are 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p, 270p. Their content dates all the way back to 2005. There are some models here with tattoos, but they are minimal and don't distract.
I do think if you are interested in this site it should be more for the photos than videos, even though I recommend streaming a few of the videos. I think they could be seen as fetish videos with the pretty women naked, touching themselves lightly, their natural arousal and positioning causing their pussies to open, but then again, I could see just about anyone saying the videos are too softcore.
A few site layout issues aside, it's a very good site overall and should make any photo collector happy. The photo sets are often more explicit than the videos. |
|
11-26-19 12:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Tainster
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
I find this to be one of the most complete and unique networks available -- now including bonus content from Sinx.
15 websites included plus the Sinx bonus content.
The most niche-driven network I have been a member of.
Website works well, layout is easy to find what you're looking for and everything on the site makes sense.
Extremely creative scenes that at times seem to be too creative and become confusing. |
Cons: |
No model list
No dates on content or listed update schedules
No real explanation of what Sinx is, you have access to 10-20 scenes from sites owned by other companies. You can sign up for more for another $20. |
Bottom Line: |
I'm going to start out with a list of sites you receive with Tainster.
Fully Clothed Sex
Fully Clothed Pissing
Tyrannized
Mad Sex Party
Party Hardcore
Leony April
All WAM
Slime Wave
My Fetish
Orgasmatics
Cum Squad
Pee Squad
Pissing in Action
Pornstars at Home
Swinging Pornstars
That are very different sites.
They add the bonus Sinx content which has scenes from - French Fuck Friends, Real Agent, UK Fuck Friends, Asian Sex Diary, Lil Miss Arab, Worldwide Wanking, Trike Patrol, Tuk Tuk Patrol, three different German sites, retro, gonzo and fetish.
That's the part that gets confusing. Some of these scenes you can watch and download. Some you have to pay $3.95 each or $7.95 for the whole niche.
As varied as Tainster's sites are you would think they wouldn't add more to their network to confuse you.
These sites -- in my opinion -- have either lost content from the past or they've combined scenes.
Their promos have also changed. I originally went to sign up with a $9.95 per month promo. The best deal it would give me was 23.99 Euro.
The best sites on the network, for me, are Fully Clothed Sex, Fully Clothed Pissing and Slime Wave. Each of these focus on the women models in business type clothes and they're either getting their clothes were from cum, piss or someone throwing water on them. It's a little more fetish-based than I normally would go for, but the production values are very good even without subtitles.
More than anything this feels like European porn. It doesn't have the personality of a lot of American porn, but it has a higher level of eroticism. The My Fetish site is an easy to overlook one and maybe it should be. The scenes seem to be the fetish of someone we don't know and that doesn't really tell us what the fetish is. These scenes to include people having sex in public with other, dressed people sitting around.
Comparing it to my past subscriptions to Tainster, I have to admit, I don't prefer this new version. Some of the bonus content is good, but the majority of it has to be bought and I'm confident they have removed anywhere from 100-200 scenes from each of their sites. It is still worth a membership, but your expectations should be tempered by the knowledge of knowing things have changed.
With no update schedule and no dated content it does kind of feel like they are not updating any of the sites. One of the newest updates doesn't have any HD options, not 720p, not 1080p, while the 6 previous scenes had both 720p and 1080p. As a whole it is a good network for those into kinkier content, but I won't be sticking around for more than a month. By the way, the biller canceled fast and with no problems even though I had not heard of them before. |
|
09-16-19 09:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Slime Wave
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
I thought I would hate it, but I think I love it. Extremely erotic site with fake dicks and fake cum.
Gloryhole setup on most scenes, some do not, makes the fake dick seem less fake.
The performances by the women!
Watching something that looks disgusting becoming sexy is erotic to me.
Most of the scenes have the model in clothes making the ensuing mess even more messy and fun to watch. |
Cons: |
It's a small site, only 170 scenes, but I haven't watched a bad one yet.
The multiple women scenes gets too confusing, fake dicks, fake cum, slime blasting, four women, the ones with one woman gives a more focused view.
No dates on scenes, they have added one new scene to this site in the last 2 weeks. |
Bottom Line: |
In a lot of ways this might be my most excited review. I have seen WAM (wet and messy) porn and fake dick, fake cum scenes, but this site takes it to a whole other level.
The women, the camerawork of focusing right where they need to focus, the slime (fake cum) dripping off the model's face, down to her thigh, sliding up to her pussy lips, it's some of the most erotic porn I have ever watched.
These models should not be this excited should they? The fake dick squirts them at high impact, anywhere from 5-10 times in one scene. The aiming of the fake cum adds to it. In one scene, the blast of fake cum hits the model's clit at full impact. She looks like she's in orgasmic bliss.
The scenes have no story to them. It's just like a random gloryhole scene. The first few scenes I watched I had to look twice to see that those are dildos. The cum or slime blast let's you know for sure. Some of the models are covered head to toe in slime by the end of the scenes. They love every blast of it.
Maybe I feel a little biased. The first one I watched was probably the best scene on the site. The model with a skirt and hose on, rubbed the slime on her pussy and as she was doing it, a second blast hit her in the mouth. It is like these models are channeling their inner beliefs these are real men all cumming for them.
The videos are clear even the 720p ones. They have 1080p too. The pictures add a new element of showing the fast action frame by frame.
I'm not curious if other sites exist that do this on this high of a level. I watched one years ago and the women were giggling at the fake cum. Maybe it's the European models that are more convincing?
This is a hard site to recommend to others, but it does come with access to Tainster and a selection of videos from Sinx. I would have been happy with just this site. That's how much I like this content.
If you can look over the fake dicks and fake cum to watch sexy women in usually tight clothes, get soaked with slime, it really is worth a try. |
|
09-02-19 10:28pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
91
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment. |
Cons: |
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake. |
Bottom Line: |
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there. |
|
07-01-19 12:59am
Replies (11)
|
Review
92
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians
Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines
Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each
It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site
The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre
Downloadable videos are up to 4K |
Cons: |
In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has
Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying |
Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman.
Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!”
Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable.
That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey.
Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single.
As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded.
It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. |
|
07-09-23 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
93
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
High quality site for dual penetration fans.
Very high percentage of attractive models.
Newer scenes have up to 4K
Great photosets with high quality and downloadable zips.
658 scenes with 2 new updates per month.
These models make this look sexy and erotic. |
Cons: |
Older scenes have a drop in quality. The site has been around since 2005.
Not much story, dialogue or subtitles. Communication is usually just moans.
Very professional, may be too glossy for some. |
Bottom Line: |
European porn seems to be more my favorite. I usually wouldn’t be into a dual penetration site, but with the attractiveness of the female models, and the willingness, enjoyment and nothing too punishing, I really like this site.
The last con is maybe the reason I like the site. Even though the subject matter is of a more hardcore nature, these are pro models and nearly all seem acclimated to doing this type of porn. The models look like they should be on solo glamour sites. It’s a good time to mention the pictures can be downloaded in zips, average of 100 per set and those are 4200x6800 resolution. It’s just an overall feeling of professionalism from the looks of the models to the quality of the content. The videos can be downloaded from mobile to 4K on the newer ones with every option between those resolutions available. The oldest scenes only have 540p as the largest download resolution, but I doubt I will even reach that far back in the site. With 658 scenes and 2 scenes per month it is easy to download 50-100 of the new scenes with the crisp, high-quality video.
I will always mention this since I do prefer a story. There’s just not much story. Two naked guys, a naked woman, three holes counting mouth, two hard dicks, that’s the extent of the story of most of the scenes. The settings are even professional. The colors in the scenes are warm and even bright. I don’t know if it’s just something I have started to notice, but it looks like these models are so used to doing these scenes, they don’t need to talk at all. I believe that’s part of the professional side of it. I would like to see more dialogue. How do two men ask a woman if she wants to have a dual penetration sex scene with them? The scenes are long enough with most averaging in the 30 minute range.
I do think this style of porn probably has two crowds. The one that likes the opposite of this style of dual penetration, where it’s rougher and more of the males controlling the sex. This site does a very good job of convincing me the female is the one controlling the action, the pace, and these models are pretty enough to make that believable. I admit that I am probably stereotyping. I usually don’t think of really pretty, supermodel looking models being in dual penetration porn. Most of these women are just that. They are top of the line looking models. They’re even dressed nicely to start the scenes. Their hair is perfectly done and their makeup. In a way, that kind of makes this porn weird. The woman ends the scene looking like she did at the beginning. Did she even have sex with those two guys? I probably need more exposure to porn like this to really say that this site is as good as it seems to be to me. I’m not used to seeing models this comfortable with 2 dicks in them. I believe they could take a few more. Check it out before joined based on this review. It’s really good to me. Fans of this genre may say it’s too soft or not rough enough. |
|
02-09-22 06:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Part of five site network , Blowpass. There are four large blow job sites in it
Inexpensive to join
Mostly older women and younger men. Mostly experienced pornstars that have years in the industry.
Great bodies and professional performances and the guys fit the theme
As of today, there are 560 videos available |
Cons: |
Can be repetitious as there is not a lot of variety you can do with a focus on blow jobs.
It is hard to tell when it will update. January had none, but December had four
The oldest videos are not Full High Definition. |
Bottom Line: |
The same sex act can get boring rather quickly. The better sites have to have more going for them than just the obvious. I feel that Mommy Blows Best is one of the better blowjob sites because it has much that appeals to my imagination.
The age of the women here is MILF, not necessarily a family relationship like stepmother. There are scenes with a stepmother and a stepson, but there are also scenes with a stepdaughter and her boyfriend. Around fifteen scenes have the two women together in a lesson to show the young lady how to do it properly. These were some of my favorites out of all the 560 or so that the site has.
Being older, the women have a confidence level that younger porn models just don’t have. These are mostly, if not all, pornstars that have been around in the industry since they were young. For them a great blow job is second nature and can do a hot scene with ease. Sometimes the scenes can seem repetitive as a result, but then again the site has a deeper appeal to many fetishes. Being older, they can be identified with by showing that sexy side of all women that comes out as we reach our second sexual peak. Teens show enthusiasm, but MILFs have the hormones and have the benefit of experience, but in spades. Being older and more confident, we know what we like and what we need. The women on this site see men as sexy conquests to be there for our pleasure and enjoyment. Younger men who are not so experienced or jaded from a lot of sex can be attractive. Older women and younger men is a fetish that can be appreciated by women of all ages. This may be an unlikely pairing in real life, but as a porn fantasy it is fun to watch.
Older women are filled out and have bodies that may not be the perfect ones if you prefer thin models. Some of these models are quite, let’s say voluptuous, full figured and very real. Big breasts are to be found everywhere and a few are unfortunately enhanced ones. This body shape works well as for those with a uniform fetish. Sexy housewife or office workers in short skirts and pantyhose, teachers that are well dressed in less revealing clothes that emphasize their shape, all work well for me. Nicely done hair and makeup, a blouse that is too tight, and just the right shoes and you have my attention.
Mostly the scenes involve a kind of power and age difference. Teacher and student, boss with employee, nurse and patient, landlord and tenant are just a few attention grabbers. The age difference makes for hot older and younger. The guys seem to be surprised as well as flattered, not entitled, when the women are interested in them.
A few of the guys are black men, but really only a few. The women are the real stars here and some are Asian, or Black, but nearly all of the stars are white. There are lots of big names from the past when they were younger and some I have never seen before and wish I had.
I see in the oldest videos that there is a male star that is in nearly every video way back then. They give his name as Jack H. I have heard of him, but have never seen him, as he is from before my time. I heard he used to have his own site, something very few male performers can say. He seems to be a good looking, very nice guy, well endowed even by porn standards and his cumshots are a joy to watch. His name is Jack Hammer, and I like his toolbox. I just wish the video quality had been better back then.
The sets are mostly indoors in a kitchen or dining room, or in an office. The sets enhance heat in the scenes and are just beautiful. The downloads are fast and the 4K quality quite impressive. Not only are there 560 videos, a rather large number, the other sites in the network are mostly excellent blowjobs as well. |
|
02-09-22 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
95
|
Granddadz
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
The oldest videos are from a site called Beauty and the Senior
Comes with the super network Adult Prime
The site has 143 videos
Newer updates include 4K as an option
Navigation is good for a network.
Good price for all the content you get. |
Cons: |
There is no predictable schedule for updates and only four videos have been added so far in 2021
When the erection doesn't remove the wrinkles |
Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in older men/younger women porn for a few years now. When I lost my hard drive a while back, I also lost scenes from one of my favorite sites, Beauty and The Senior. I recently discovered those scenes on a site called Granddadz. One thing I loved about those videos was that they had a bit of a story that appeals to the imagination. The most unlikely things would happen.
In one memorable scene, an older man sleeping on a bed, completely nude. A great looking young lady spies on him through an open window. She is so overcome with sexual emotion that she comes inside, strips and enters his bed. She is so turned on that she devours his penis as if she was having her last meal and wakes him up in the process. In many other scenes you see the man doing very ordinary things, like sitting on a bench in the park, reading or watching a game on television. The young lady initiates the sex, which I can see as a total fantasy as the man might imagine it happening to him. From the woman’s point of view I see it as a woman sees what she likes and is turned on by using a man as a sex object. Compared to most porn, this a stark role reversal that makes me feel I could have this as a fantasy. Older men are grateful, polite and respectful and that is not common in porn.
For the most part, the women are much better looking than is common for older/younger porn. Some of the guys I have seen on other sites. Most of the cum shots are oral, but that is true for older/younger porn in general. Older guys need a lot of oral stimulation in order to perform.
There are 143 videos on the site and the oldest are from 2014. Those are in very sharp looking High Definition. More recently 4K videos are available as well and there are 51 of those. It is hard to tell if this site will grow as this year in 2021 as only four new videos came online.
This is one of the channels on Adult Prime, which has more than 75. If you are into older younger as a type of porn they do have a few other sites besides this one. Grandmams is a rare type of site in that older women are paired with younger guys. There are 199 videos and a new one has been added once a week. There is another site called Family Screw with 56 videos. In these the parings are also older/younger, but in a fantasy family. Many of these scenes are groups. OldieX has 504 videos and is still updating. |
|
10-19-21 12:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
The White Boxxx
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Labor day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Comes with other 17 Lets Doe it sites
Almost 350 visually stunning and hot scenes
Updates are once a week
Many of the prettiest pornstars there are
Great production values, the videos look great
Uses tags for easy searching, but searching is across the network |
Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos across the network
More hot videos than I can handle.
Sometimes I am feeling so naughty because I wish I was one of these women |
Bottom Line: |
When I think of couple friendly porn, this is the kind of site I imagine. These are videos any couple I can think of would feel comfortable sharing. The sex is unrushed, slow and just so sensual. The scenes progress in heat until the couples build to a climax and so do, I right along with them.
Many of the videos focus on the woman and what she wants and needs sexually. She is seen as empowered and sexually liberated. In many scenes she is so seductive that her man finds her irresistible. A big reason is that these women tease their guys, a fantasy I often have. In many scenes the foreplay includes a vibrator and a lot of hot kissing and other attention from her man.
One of my favorite scenes stars Rebecca Volpetti and Lutro. It is called “My Insatiable Girlfriend”. I was feeling a bit warm just reading the title. She ties him to a bed and takes advantage of him. He is there just to please her. In another scene the same two models are shown as he is not interested, so she teases him by fingering herself. She uses a vibrator while he is “punished” by being forced to watch her masturbate. That would teach any man the uselessness of ignoring a woman in heat. After these two scenes I have become a big fan hers. She also has a few great lesbian scenes that I wish I had a chance to be in. I have never been with a woman, but she is so tempting I could imagine what it would be like with her.
Every scene is a professional production and the attention to detail is very enjoyable. Hair, makeup, setting, lighting, and the camerawork are just so well done that I feel this site is one that others should imitate. I see that the network has won numerous industry awards over the years, such as best paysite, best network , best lesbian and best hardcore sites.
I would say that I recognize a few of the stars, both male and female, and that they are some of the best looking in the industry. The site uses tags, but the results are for the whole network, not just the one site. The download limit of 100 scenes per month is also across the network. On this site alone, there are nearly 350 videos, so that has to be a negative. Now that I think of it, this could also be a compliment as that means there are too many quality videos that are worthy of being downloaded.
There is a Labor day sale going on right now and at $10 for a month for the whole network, that is a deal I could not refuse. |
|
09-05-21 06:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Kink University
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Comes with the Kink Network
Unique concept. This is the only site I ever heard of that explains the concepts behind BDSM porn.
Great lineup of porn talent.
A lot of model diversity.
Uses tag system for searching.
High production values |
Cons: |
This site stopped updating in 2016.
The best quality is HD, not full HD or 4K |
Bottom Line: |
I wouldn't call my overall experience on the Kink Network a favorite. I had to dig through the whips, ball gags, spiked walls, jump over vats of fire and dodge the men in black rubber masks just to find a few sites I liked on the entire network. This one stood out, if nothing more, than a unique site with a premise I haven't seen used on many sites. I really don't know of any other sites that do it.
Kink University describes itself as a place to learn BDSM technical skills and theories. Each video update is a seminar on a specific sex or BDSM topic. This is a channel on Kink, well known for its BDSM specialty. With 112 lessons, this is a great place to learn everything you always wanted to learn about sex and how scenes are made. It is great for advice on topics that you may want to learn about. The teacher and director is Danarama.
Some themes that are covered are, of course, bondage related such as hoods, straitjackets, suspension techniques, collaring, flogging, device bondage, caning, pegging, sensory deprivation, clothespins, humiliation and ropes. There is even a video introduction to BDSM.
Some of the topics are sexual such as dildos, handjobs, lesbian sex, toys, medical play, rimming, bisexual sex MMF, oral sex taste test, titty fucking, pornstar sex hacks and secret tricks, foot worship, how to have a threesome, erotic shaving, edging-orgasm control and denial for maximum climax, how to make her squirt, strap on sex-vaginal, anal and oral, fisting, anal sex, dominant oral sex, blowjobs and deep throat, finger banging and g spot mastery, cunnilingus, dirty talk, and pussy fisting.
The site itself is easy to navigate. It uses a very helpful tag system to help you find your favorite topics. Unfortunately, you cannot tag the videos as your favorites. The downloads were fairly fast and the files not that large by today’s standards, as the best quality is HD. When these were new updates, these were state of the art. There are a few screenshots for each update, but not real photosets.
Considering these are lessons, it would have been very helpful to have a transcript for each lesson. This way you can review the lesson without being distracted by the engaging visuals. The teacher/director is not very animated either. He gives the facts, but his voice is sometimes a bit too monotone for my taste.
Other than that the videos are very complete and the topics very interesting. Personally, I got a lot out of the BDSM lessons. The large number of sex lesson videos fascinated me and are well worth the price of admission. Some of those things I have done in real life and many others are featured in porn scenes that I like. If you want to see a guide to pegging a guy, they have a great one here. You too can become an expert or maybe just pretend to be one. It is a shame they don’t offer certificates for class excellence.
In this university you enjoy the classes and can practice the lessons at home with a partner. That can make for some exciting homework. You will want to be prepared in case of a surprise quiz. |
|
08-10-21 03:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Catalina Cruz
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
My first try at an interactive porn site, I like it, but there are some downfalls.
I don't have a very good knowledge of Catalina, but she is still doing live cam shows on this site and that's something I really hadn't experienced.
I wouldn't want to guess at her age, but she is an older model, she is still very attractive and is very good on the cam shows.
Includes hundreds of her videos as well, but streaming only.
33 other sites are included each of a different model and these also have many videos and photo sets to view/stream with no downloads.
Accidentally clicked pay by Paypal and it said my card was declined, I didn't input a card or make it to the Paypal screen. It redirected me to Epoch which wasn't the original biller.
Subjective as it is, she has one of the prettiest pussies I have seen. |
Cons: |
There's no downloads anywhere. None of the bonus sites have them. You can't download photos either.
The site is cluttered. It has 8 ads in the right margin and there's a section for Catalina's content plus all 33 included sites are shown too. Maybe the most cluttered screen I've seen.
Have to sign in on each of the 33 bonus sites. |
Bottom Line: |
I'm still trying different types of sites and saw this advertised as an interactive site since you can email Catalina, you get access to her Snapchat, which I didn't have and she does live cam shows where she sometimes masturbates, sometimes she is more teasing in them.
I'm giving the site a higher score than I probably would most sites without downloads. It introduced me to the live cam show and I have a membership to Cherry Pimps, where they have live cam shows too and you can download them. I just usually miss the Cherry Pimps ones.
As someone that is sure I'm not a lesbian, I found the oddest attraction to Catalina's pussy. She just looks pretty, fake boobs notwithstanding and she seems like a genuine person.
The content is the normal or common kind. Cam shows are fully nude, some are a little more showy and sexual than others. I would imagine a person's mood would change from day to date. The videos are like any porn you can get from any site. There's nothing that stands out about it.
I would like to see more cam shows, the next one is 2/29, the following one after that is 3/8. They do keep an archive of previous cam shows too.
I do think the amount of content helps it a lot except in the cluttered department. Catalina has around 700 videos in her archive and you get another 33 sites.
I don't have as much of a problem with the no downloads part as some do. Most of this content wouldn't be content I would download. I just stream a scene or two at a time and I don't know if that's a negative or positive. It doesn't make me think I wish I could download this and watch it some more.
Of the other 33 sites, I found several I liked including Sienna West, Brooke Banner and the site Licensed to Blow.
Even though the site is cluttered it is easy to navigate since they stuffed everything onto one page. I don't know how big of a deal that is about having her Snapchat. I avoid anything social media-looking as my job has policies against social media.
I did notice the newer webcam shows and videos are 4K, some are Virtual Reality, so it does look like they spend a lot of time and I assume money on making these shows top-notch.
It's a pleasant change for me. She's friendly and talks to those watching her webcam shows. She seems to really enjoy showing her body and she looks like she's having fun. Maybe that's something I have missed in a lot of porn I've watched? The live shows give you more of a feeling that she wants to be there and took time out of her day to get naked for the viewers.
I think if you're a downloader you won't be happy with this site. If you can see it as something you don't see everyday in porn, and just enjoy it in the moment with streaming, it's a good site to join. The Porn Users price also made the no downloads a lot easier to swallow. |
|
02-25-20 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
99
|
Milking Table
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Part of Fantasy Massage network of six massage themed sites.
Comes with access to Adult Time, which has over 56,000 videos
There are no download limits
The women range from innocent barely legal to MILFs who know what they like.
The site was easy to use and the streaming player works without needing to buffer. I like to stream scenes before downloading them. |
Cons: |
No longer updating as of February of 2016.
One thing I noticed was there are a lot of tattooed models on here if that's a problem for you. |
Bottom Line: |
Milking Table is no longer updating and that is a shame as I found it deserving of my time and attention. I found 112 videos of men getting massaged and women helping them with hand and blowjobs.
What I liked best is the way the cum shots were shown as a reward for the women, who were visibly excited by what they were doing and what they were about to get. The pretty models seemed to enjoy the scenes even more than the lucky guys. The scenes generally start with the couple talking, but not a real story. She next helps herself and her guy with a good slow stroking hand job, then some oral loving. What happens next is something I have not seen on another site. He lays down on a massage table with his nice very hard cock sticking down through a hole in it. She is stroking and sucking his cock, but you don’t see his face. Instead the focus is on her look of pleasure as she is enjoying him as an object of her desire. As a reward she gets a nice cum shot in her mouth or on her face. I love to watch men cumming, especially big amounts. For me seeing that creamy filling shooting out is always the best part in a porn scene.
The models varied as you see some that are innocent and barely legal and some that are into their thirties and even forties. The younger models were fun to watch. What I liked even more was that I could easily see myself as one of these older women, doing what they were doing.
My biggest complaint is that there were so few videos. However, you also get Adult Time with over 56,000 videos of many different kinds of sex action. For massage content, you get this site as well as the six sites of the Fantasy Massage network. It's a site worth looking into if you find yourself bored with Adult Time's regular content. This is close to being CFNM porn with the models keeping at least some of their clothes on throughout most of the scenes. |
|
01-06-20 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
86.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Looks like a site has been forgotten. Sexy, teasing, “I think” amateurs.
There are nearly 700 models and most look new to me.
Downloadable movies and picture sets.
It’s a large site with over 6,000 picture sets and videos. It updates daily.
Movies can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Good site for straight or curious women with nothing close to “offensive” happening. |
Cons: |
This site has been around a long time. I used to think it was a stream-only site. I believe Nubiles used to advertise for it and the launch date coincides with my first time joining Nubiles in 2009. The site’s name may be the biggest con. It doesn’t sound like porn. Sounds like a video game or your weird aunt’s soup recipe.
There’s not a lot of explicit nudity. There’s plenty of nudity, it’s just not gynecological. |
Bottom Line: |
I’m not going to be that critical of the content as I found it quite good. I am going to be critical of their marketing. I have heard of this site for more than 10 years, but never joined it. I don’t even think I ever looked at a preview. It’s a really good site. It reminds me of a photo site, kind of artsy, but they do stress there isn’t much makeup. They’re not going for glamour. It’s women next door and that’s not girls, because some of these females are probably in their 40s. If not, don’t say anything, so I don’t have to name which ones look 40s to me. There is a little bit of hesitancy on my part. This is a large site, but it has been around since 2009. I’m a little hesitant and dare I say – gunshy, after reviewing a site awhile back and finding out they recycled the entire site from old updates. This one has new updates everyday and that’s either really impressive or someone is slipping one over on me. An update everyday after being open for 13 years deserves some credit.
What you mostly get with this site is women dressed normally and doing normal things. I think it’s normal for young, pretty women to strip in the shower. That sounds strange. I don’t know anyone that takes showers in their clothes. A site like this, to me, appeals to straight women. Especially those of us that are nearing middle-age. Some of these women could teach a thing or two about being sexy. It’s not weighed down by she needs to get naked and masturbate or have sex. I believe when you give a woman the job of being sexy without sex, you get her best sexy show. She knows she has to make it count.
The question becomes is that porn? Good question. I think it is. A lot of the stripping is in panties, thongs, and it’s not stripping for stripping class. It’s stripping for arousing someone else or teasing. I just don’t think it adds up to the current porn we see. That doesn’t help my questioning of if the content is potentially recycled. It really fuels it. I haven’t seen porn like this since the first sites I joined around 2009-2010. I do apologize to them if I am talking too much about recycling. I hope it could help others interested in the site. That also should be mentioned, I don’t see any 4K scenes. That’s porn’s fault for trying to establish 4K as the standard. Now, anytime I don’t see 4K scenes, I start to wonder if the scenes are older and re-released.
The models are really hit or miss for me. I do believe they are going to be a major part of how you feel about this site. Some, Naomi Moon, comes to mind, are knockouts. While some, I won’t name them, look like the woman that delivered my groceries. That’s a big disparity between models. I will mention that Naomi Moon’s bio on the site definitely tells that it’s new content. She is from Ukraine and the bio says Ukraine is in news for “other” reasons. I wish someone else was a member or could explain why this site does not feel like a 2022 site. Maybe their webmaster knows? I know the more teasing nature of the content could be giving me the older feel from older sites. The styles of clothing could be from poorer countries than what I’m used to. That is what makes the site interesting to me, but I still can’t say it's the porn part that makes it interesting.
The teasing is cute, though some of these women look older than me and I would hope if they’re older than me they know better than to waste their time and years on teasing. I like Yassa Mare’s content a lot.
I believe it takes more to impress without full nudity than it does to impress with full nudity and 7 men having their way with you. I really can’t say who I would recommend this content to. Those that like normal woman? That is what I feel like I’m looking at. It makes women like Naomi Moon really stand out on the site. It’s mostly just normal, fun, women stripping and looking pretty. I don’t know who that would be recommended to. Maybe that’s why the site isn’t well-known? I will say if these normal women were willing to do masturbation, I think it would be a real winner site. They look more like the women that buy the 5 inch dildo AND lube. Innocence is not age-related, it’s experience-related.
I think I’ve talked myself into understanding what’s going on with this site. It’s like it has never progressed and they’re just doing what they’ve always done. I would really consider trying to progress this some. You have women in wet shirts looking at the camera like, “My shirt is wet!” Guys in 2022 would say, “Did you spill your drink?” The nipples showing would just go over their head. You have to be more blunt ladies! I like the site and will return to it. |
|
05-11-22 04:11am
Replies (0)
|
|