Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some really great classic DVD scenes.
Nostalgia is replacing my interest in newer porn. So many of these models are ones I forgot about.
Very large site with 1,203 scenes.
It should appeal to collectors and those that started watching porn in the earlier years of internet porn.
You get Adult Time with it. There’s plenty more porn to look at.
Captures more of the spirit of porn that first interested me in porn. |
| Cons: |
The video quality is not good. It looks like these scenes are all from SD DVDs, 480p is the top option for downloads. I still think nostalgia and the action makes up for it.
It stopped updating in 2019 but was updating regularly and I don’t know why they didn’t improve the quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Start it off with blame Vivid Classics for taking me back to a simpler time in porn’s history. Who needs gimmicks, domination and fetishes when you can have two very pretty, young, European women using a strap-on with each other? I was expecting the scenes to be in better quality. The Vivid Classics are and it on the same network. I can see the age of these scenes. There’s one with a young Silvia Saint. The ones I remembered are the Girl on Girl scenes. Some of the models look like maybe South American amateurs. Those are very good scenes. I can get by the video quality if the scene is good enough.
I do remember being a member of Silverstone DVD as a standalone site around 2010. I started out with Nubiles and DVD porn was very popular at the time. I would join the different studio sites instead of trying to punish myself with the large DVD sites. I do remember how much I liked these scenes. I thought the studio was long gone. I didn’t even realize it’s on Adult Time.
You get 1,203 scenes. The lesbian scenes are the best ones on the site. One of the first female pornstars I felt attraction to, which scared me – was Dee Baker. She has some scenes on this site including the one I remember well with Jeanie Rivers. This porn is as “dirty” as the porn we are seeing more of these days. Dee rims Jeanie, much more passionate lesbian scenes than the newer scenes have on most site. I don’t know what it says for me when I say I’m not a lesbian, but I really like passionate lesbian porn. It’s not all lesbian. There are straight scenes. Over 500 anal scenes. Most of the performers are well-known porn greats.
It's probably not going to blow you away, but if you like younger women, the smaller, slimmer women like were more common 10 years ago in porn, you will find some scenes on this site that you like. One DVD that I remember so well from this site, the Twins Collection that has the looks to be real twins. The two young, very pretty black twins. That is a niche I remember porn trying to get going about 10-15 years ago. Those DVDs are on here. Those show me something as well. If you like black women and South American women, there are a lot on this site. I know that guys have complained about not enough diversity in models. I nearly downloaded as much from this site as I did Vivid. I’ve still not hit that download limit, but these scenes, being 480p are not very big. Most are around 200 MB each.
Where does nostalgia fit in to today’s world? I like it. The people look like they are having fun. And having orgasms, the women are cute, the guys are masculine. I think everyone should at least watch a scene or two from it just to see the differences between new porn and the classic porn. Half of these scenes have anal, but none of those are hard to watch. That tells me it’s a difference in how the models act. Both male and female. This is equal porn. Most of these men stay out of the camera except the important, needed part. Their enjoyment and pleasure seem to come from how attractive the females are. That’s a lost concept in porn today. Not much reason to check the site anymore after this time, but plenty of reason to if you haven’t. It also shows what porn snobs we have become. We will watch low entertainment value porn in exchange for 2180 pixel videos. |
|
02-09-22 06:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
Samuel O'Toole
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name!
121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together.
Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution.
Pictures that can be downloaded.
Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots. |
| Cons: |
No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women?
There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too.
The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too. |
| Bottom Line: |
Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance.
I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex.
The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved.
The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys. |
|
12-08-21 02:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
103
|
Mixed X
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No downloading or streaming limits
A lot of good acting and great camerawork
Brief biography and photo for every model
Updates with one new scene per week
Segpay is a biller with a good reputation. |
| Cons: |
Almost 70 videos
No other sites or bonuses are included
Stops and hiccups too much while streaming
Disappointing download speeds |
| Bottom Line: |
If you just look at the types of sex in the scenes, you may think that the site is just a mixture without a focus. The sex is mostly anal, interracial and lesbian. However, this site is more than a collection of sex acts. The site describes itself as featuring the art of cinematic handheld porn. You may think that it is one of those sites that is all about sex art. As I discovered, this is far from being a standard porn site.
MixedX opened months ago in October of 2020 and Hungarian veteran porn model Christina Shine is the star here. She has 19 videos and photo sets. She is very sensual in her scenes and makes them very memorable. Both her acting skills as well as her pure genuine enjoyment of the sex are on display here. She does mostly interracial scenes with very dark, very large black men, very rare in Eastern European porn. I could not take my eyes off the color contrast. She has a unique style that makes the scenes work well for both men and even more for women. Couples could love the raw eroticism as this is porn with a story that is done well. For me what makes her scenes sizzle are the interactions and chemistry with her male costars. Women can see her and identify with how she feels. Men can see some really hot sex that is a feast for the eyes.
On the site there are 23 scenes labeled as XFlix Originals. These are some of the best examples I have seen of hot camerawork. When I think of a handheld camera, I think shaky and amateur. Not on this site. The cinematography is an essential part of the visual appeal. There are also 15 story driven videos that are labeled as from Adam and Eve TV and star American models. I loved that there are a few with Elsa Jean and Cherie DeVille as well as Hungarian pornstars Amirah Adara and Nesty. The site itself is easy to use and has a good tag system. The download options are full HD as the best. Some videos are labeled as 4K, but don’t have the specifications. They seem to be just full HD. The photos can be downloaded in two different qualities. The link that says photos are those taken from the videos.
I don’t understand why there is no option to also join the sister sites, Genuine Sin or Girls Fuck Girls. I would like to see a network price for all three. This is a site that delivers hot scenes and will be an even better value as it grows. |
|
09-05-21 07:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
Her Limit
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly anal scenes, many with rimming. There are 161 scenes on the site.
Comes with the LetsDoeIt network of seventeen sites.
I joined through Segpay. You can also use Paypal.
Updates every week.
A lot of anal sex and many scenes have female on male rimming.
Both the men and the women are very enthusiastic. They really burn those calories here.
I rarely watch the interviews on sites, but these were worth watching. |
| Cons: |
Seemingly endless advertising that makes very cluttered web pages.
Two pre-checked cross sales when you first sign up. It is easy to miss them as they are not where you expect to find them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of the site refers to the fact that these are professional pornstars that are trying to push the limit of what they have done before sexually. Mostly what they do here is anal sex that is a bit harder than we generally see in anal porn. Many, but hardly all of the scenes are black men with large dark black cocks with white European women. The chemistry and enthusiasm are huge selling points. The female on male rimming on this site is some of the best I have ever seen. The women seemed to like the challenge in doing such hard and enthusiastic anal sex. The guys, well they were big enough that I can see the reason the sex was pushing her limits.
Each scene starts with an interview. Although the models are from many different countries, including the United States and Latin America, most are from Eastern Europe. For many this is the first time I have witnessed them speaking English. They generally have the help of a translator and their English is limited and not fluent. However, you get some insight into their personalities and what they like sexually. Their answers to the questions do not sound rehearsed and I appreciate that.
I saw others here have commented that the site is very sluggish to load and that made me think there was something wrong with my computer. Download speeds were quite variable and unpredictable. After loading several pages I was logged out and had to get back in while losing the page I was looking at.
You have the ability to save scenes as favorites, can vote up or down and can leave comments. There is an excellent sorting system of 55 categories and 336 tags. You can also sort the videos by newest, most viewed and most popular. The site is cluttered with ads. After you log in you get a page with ads before you get to the first member’s webpage. When you reach it, It also has ads. When you first sign up you have to uncheck two cross sells that are easy to miss as they are on the opposite side of the page from where you are entering information. There are four video download options and 1080p Is the best. I wish the site had 4K as an option. In contrast the only photo options 1920x1080 screenshots. The most recent set was only 16 photos.
Updates to the site are posted every week. Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeit network. In total you get seventeen sites that have a total of close to 1700 high quality HD scenes. |
|
08-10-21 03:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
Dyked
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the better lesbian sites I have joined.
Very good production values and the scenes have an added touch of creativity to them.
Only 74 scenes, but I have downloaded nearly all 74.
Varied scenarios unlike a lot of lesbian sites that stick with a soft background, in the bed.
All videos have 1080p option.
Included photo sets and screencaps. All videos, screencaps and videos are downloadable.
Billing through Epoch or Paypal with Epoch. I had a slight problem with Paypal with Epoch and will explain below. |
| Cons: |
The scenes could be longer, have more story, they have a good lesbian site here and they should keep trying to improve it. It could be one of the very best if they did.
I had a major problem with the billing and it's why I've had the account for 3 months. I don't think it's the site's fault.
How many pretty and cute girls getting naked can you watch before it gets boring? |
| Bottom Line: |
The billing problem, in my opinion, was either Paypal or Epoch's fault. When I signed up for the site through Paypal, I received an email confirming it. I didn't read over it. When it came time to cancel, I went back to welcome email and there's no information in it. No login info, no member ID, and no way to cancel it on Epoch. I sent Epoch an email and they said it was a common problem. The billing is being listed as charged to Epoch Customer Service instead of to the porn site. They were able to find my information based on the Paypal transaction ID. I won't be using Paypal to pay for porn again until that gets fixed.
This site was promoted to me as a Team Skeet Premium site. I have really enjoyed their premium sites and it was a big reason I joined it. Instead, as soon as I joined it said I had access to all of Team Skeet. I'm not including any of that in my review as I believe Dyked is an excellent lesbian site.
Most lesbian sites I have joined are very soft, very lovey, even soft. Dyked takes a different approach. There are scenes with two dominatrix females whipping the teen lesbians into having lesbian sex. There are gym scenes. The almost overdone video game geek girl lesbian scenes. There are scenes with more than 2 girls, hardcore strapon scenes that are rough and a little bit of everything. There's rarely of feeling of love or passion, but there's a feeling of very high lust.
The models are all attractive. They only have 74 scenes, and the update schedule doesn't give me much hope for long term growth. They have 3 updates some months, 0 updates some months and 2 in other months.
The video quality is very good with 1080p, 720p and 576p, 480p and 360p available. The photo sets and screen captures are downloadable and some of those are even better than the videos.
There's a good blend of playful, silly, rough, lots of tribbing/scissoring, and unless you get tired of watching pretty girls naked there's not much to complain about. Believe it or not, as a non-lesbian, I do sometimes get tired of watching pretty girls naked!
The scenes are generally fun and light-hearted, there are stepfamily scenes mixed in too. I would recommend it by itself as a site for those into lesbian scenes that don't follow the typical formula of lesbian scenes so it's a definite recommend with the added Team Skeet network. |
|
01-13-20 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
106
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unique, interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes dumb, game sex scenes.
All amateurs and all exclusive.
Updates once per week, currently has 576 scenes on it.
Payment Processor is CCBill.
Wide variety of models by race and body type.
Covers solo, lesbian, male/female, group niches.
Doesn't feel staged. |
| Cons: |
Scenes can drag on before you get to the action.
There will definitely be some models (male and female) that everyone isn't attracted to. I see it as a plus. It adds to the authenticity.
No photos of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site after seeing a clip from it on a tube site. It's very straightforward. All games played have the strip basis. They have multiple games they play using everyday household objects to regular toys. It's like a modern take on strip poker. They mix it up by making you wonder if the loser is really the loser (guy has to give a beautiful amateur woman oral sex), they have fun in the scenes and you can see that. A lot of the models are shy and you can see the nervousness of having to take their clothes off. It just gives a good feeling of they are enjoying it even if it's embarrassing. I'm sure you could see similar games being played in dorm rooms, at adult parties and that makes this content fun for me. I could see myself getting stuck playing one of these games with a group of friends.
The video quality for an amateur site is excellent. No 4K, but they have 1080p going back to January 2014, the scenes prior to those have 720p. It is disappointing that they have no photos.
There's really nothing to the navigation since the scenes all have the same basis. The titles usually tell what game is being played. There are rock/paper/scissors scenes, scenes with a light duty taser directly pressed against the other person's pussy or dick and even the board game Battleship.
What I really like about it is they don't adhere to a very demanding strict order from scene to scene. Some scenes, the loser has to masturbate in front of the other or others. Sometimes that leads to more, sometimes everyone masturbates, you don't get the feeling you've seen every scene after watching one. I think that might be the most important trait for a site like this. The game part can become slow and dragging at times. One scene, the device they were using seemed to stop working and they had to improvise. Knowing that you might see something different as the game progresses keeps me watching. I enjoy the ones where it's a believably innocent young woman and she looks so embarrassed to drop her bra. You will even see blushes. There's no pressure from a demanding producer. It comes off as that rare organic porn.
The masturbation, sex, group or solo or couple is good. I wonder how well some of these models know each other. They at times seem very comfortable with each other and at other times they look like they can't believe they got themselves "into this mess". There aren't many of these types of sites with 100% amateurs and that helps the score too. Many amateur sites have an amateur female and pro or seasoned male. Here you get all amateurs and part of the enjoyment is watching how quickly they (men and women) get aroused. I like this site a lot as my score shows, but I could see it being frustrating for others that are impatient. I like to try and "play along" with the pace of the scene and find this a very stimulating erotic experience if you do it that way. |
|
11-25-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
Next Door Male
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Still continues to be one of the best solo men sites around.
Male models are amateurs or were when filmed.
Great network for straight women and gay men.
I don’t know if this is something recent, but the network is now owned by Gamma.
Very good quality videos and pictures. You can also download all you want.
Over 500 scenes of male solo porn is a big collection, but only to first time members. |
| Cons: |
No updates, which is now making 500 scenes seem like not that many scenes.
Solo male porn is starting to become stale to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was one of my highest, if not, highest rated gay/solo men networks. All the good parts are still there, but the bad parts are being accentuated. It’s quite possibly the most basic concept in porn. A guy sits down or stands, takes his pants off and masturbates. There is nothing really wrong with it. It’s just, in my last review of this network, I mentioned the lack of plot or story, was wearing on me, but due to the network having so many solo scenes, I looked over the overall effort.
I also noted in my 2021 review, the network dropped from nearly 1,000 scenes down to 550 or so. They haven’t added much if any to their collection. In 2021, I was new to the network and impressed with such a large collection of solo male porn, but in late 2024, the large collection is maybe medium or average.
The videos are downloadable as are the photos. Both are unlimited downloads and the videos go up to HD level, while the pictures are good quality and downloadable as zip files.
Now, we are in 2024 and the excitement of finding such a large collection of solo male scenes has worn off. I’m taking a different view of the network. We have this average sized collection, especially considering it claims to have over 20 sites on it and the scenes are flat out boring and dull. I have enough experience watching female solo porn to say, I think female solo porn can get away with unexciting models and performances. If the model is pretty enough and has a nice body, maybe nothing else is needed? The models on Next Door Male are very attractive, most are muscular or masculine, maybe is a better word. But, they’re also boring, repetitive and saying the same things, if they even talk at all.
The most obvious recommendation is for people that have never joined it. You will at least get around 600 videos of solo men. I’m a two time member and while there are scenes I either missed or didn’t notice, I can’t say I’m going to be downloading anything from the network.
I will add for reference: I have not been as into male solo porn as I used to be. It’s one reason I rejoined this network. It was one of my highest rated. I wanted to see if I’m just getting tired of the niche or if it’s just the lack of progression in the niche.
It’s still as good of a collection of solo, masculine men, you will likely find on the internet. I used to not mind that the scenes were plotless and had minimal dialouge, but I do expect more now.
The way I am going to score this is to say for me, the network would be lucky to score 75, but since we are reviewing for potential members, I will still give it an 85. That is 9 points lower than I scored it in 2021. Gamma’s involvement in the network isn’t even noticeable unless you’ve joined other Gamma sites and seen the pop-up that offers a promo. Take it, it’s a good one and includes downloads. |
|
10-08-24 09:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Crash Pad Series
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that fits unique and different from the mainstream.
Currently 345 scenes
Models are mostly amateur based on my knowledge of models. A few look familiar.
It’s nice to have Epoch as the biller since I wasn’t familiar with this site.
The Behind-the-Scenes videos are really interesting and have closed captioning and subtitles over the last 5 years.
A lot of variety in models which will be the first con as well. |
| Cons: |
Heavier built, tattoos, piercings, these models are more like everyday women, and I know that can be a con for some porn fans.
Overall video quality could be improved. Some of the newer scenes have 4K. A lot only have 360p. And each video only has one download option.
No dates or tags on the scenes. It’s hard to keep up with the various niches they cover without tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found a couple of sites by this company. They won some awards in the earlier part of 2005 for best dyke films. They had a Crash Pad in San Francisco that people would crash in and have sex. That’s more interesting to me than showing up at a studio to have sex for 18 minutes and 12 seconds. I was just looking for something different. I knew that likely wouldn’t turn out perfect.
It didn’t. But it turned out good enough. The main selling point here for me is the authentic sex and real people. Even real emotions. With that comes the reality of not everyone will find all of these models attractive.
The site itself could use some updates. If there are tags, I have not found them. It’s even kind of difficult to get started. I clicked through a few tabs just trying to find the scenes. I have been on a few sites like this one. There’s a learning curve that you will pick up and think it wasn’t that big of a deal once you figure it out. The search engine could be better, but I’m not for sure how. As I don’t know these models and wouldn’t know what to search for. You’re going to have to click and scan through to see if scenes or models catch your eye. I was originally concerned that there are no downloads, but there are. It’s just you only get one download option, and it can range from 360p to 4K. That fits the words needs updating. I don’t have a 4K monitor so 4K files are overkill for me. And 360p doesn’t look that good on any monitor.
Besides the need for updating, the site does a lot right including one of the broadest varieties of performers and niches I have seen. They have bi, trans, the specified “queer” content and it directed by Shine Louise Houston. That is something that could push some away as this does fall under feminist porn. I don’t consider myself a feminist even though I am a female in a male-dominated field. I’ve never really felt the need or desire to be a feminist. I do think that’s a risky word to label yourself with in a field like porn that has half a century steeped in male dominance. Some of the wording could make the site more difficult to understand. Femme, Boi, stud, it’s more than a switch to a different porn site. It’s more like you step into a whole other world.
The site has won a lot of awards and been nominated for others. I am counting 20 they have won or been nominated for. The realistic action is a big part of that. There’s no real fluff like you see in mainstream porn or the that couldn’t be further from realistic mainstream “reality porn”.
I do recognize several models especially Daisy Ducati who is one of my favorites from Kink. That is where several of the models are featured over on the Kink Network. I do wish they did a little more with the user features. Better video quality and tags would make a huge difference. I believe that a lot of sites like this one are as much aimed at mobile users as PC users. I can use either but do prefer PC. Some of the files are even named Ipad. I don’t think that’s a good plan. Why not give the better resolution that works on mobile and PC instead of the lower resolution that is hardly watchable on the PC?
I’m kind of torn on it. The quality of the action is really good. Your feelings about the attractiveness of the models will be subjective. That’s why I believe better user features would have improved everything. It's worth looking into if you’re looking for something different. If they improved the site’s features, I would be more likely to recommend it to everyone. I know how porn fans are. |
|
06-04-22 11:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
110
|
Hot Guys Fuck
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The brother/sister(?) site of Bi Guys Fuck. Will need more description to describe the site.
Attractive males and female models. Mostly one on one action.
Large site, but most of the scenes have two videos, one is a behind the scenes. It makes the site seem bigger than it is.
I thought about listing this as the #1 pro. If you join with a gift card it’s cheaper. I used a $17 gift card and received 25 days, that’s 68 cents per day. They offer two paid memberships that are $30 and $40 for 30 days or $1 or $1.33 per day.
Gay men should check this out as well as bisexual men. And maybe women, even though it’s listed as for women porn. |
| Cons: |
The site is glitchy. I clicked join and it took me to the “secret menu”. I clicked join again and it took me to advertisement for their penis pills. I finally got to a join page and joined with a gift card. I don’t trust a site with this many issues.
Don’t stone me for this, but this site is no more directed at women than any other porn site. These seem to be gay and bisexual men. Calling these guys “hot” makes me think it’s aimed at gay men. Most of these guys are not masculine or big, muscular guys. These men are more in the “twink” category. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this after enjoying Bi Guys Fuck last month. Some of the first scenes on Bi Guys Fuck are from Hot Guys Fuck. They have the watermark. That is easily the feeling I get from these scenes. One of the things this site advertises is the men get as much camera time as the women. I don’t know what porn they have been watching, but that’s fairly common unless it’s POV. I will even say the men get too much camera time on this site. Maybe during the cumshot or the moment of penetration. Those are views women like to see. Showing the guy’s face midway through the scene isn’t doing anything for me. I have watched a lot of solo female porn. I don’t even like when the camera focuses on the woman’s face during the scene. I’m paying for porn not headshots.
This is very much a gay/bisexual male site. The sex is as good and believable as most porn sites. You know from watching the scenes that these men are medicated. Every scene has an advertisement for their penis pills. You do get to see very erect men and large cumshots, but when the men are presented as the “eye candy” it kind of removes the interest. I’m not into “pretty” guys. Gay men are. It may say “for women”, but it’s not for me. I’m a traditional woman. I’m nearing 40 and I have known a lot of gay men and watched a lot of gay porn. I wonder if Bi Guys Fuck maybe hurts my view of Hot Guys Fuck. On Bi Guys Fuck it’s normal for the scene to be split into multiple downloads. One of the downloads will be the guys together while the woman watches and masturbates. The other will be one or both guys taking turns with the woman. That is what these scenes remind me of.
There is padding in the site size. There are 2-3 updates per week. One is a behind the scenes video. Maybe those would be more interesting, except, those are 2-3 minutes long. They get 1-2 questions. Those are released as a new update. It’s only updating with a new sex scene every 7-8 days. That’s still not bad. I’m going to say something that I felt while watching multiple scenes from this site. A lot of the guys are prettier than the women and the guys are not that pretty. There are some pretty women on this site, but there is reality in if you put a less physically attractive person with another person, there’s a chance the other person will look more attractive than they really are. I see that in some of these scenes. I do believe everyone on the site is attractive. That would be a 5-6 on a 10 scale. Only a few of the women even reach an 8. They do have those women in more scenes than one.
The videos, from what I am seeing, do not have 4K. Bi Guys Fuck also didn’t have 4K. I don’t have a problem with that. They do have 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are several parts to this site that are going to make most people feel like there’s a hollowness to the site and content. Besides the constant advertising of their penis pills. They also have a “secret menu”. Members are the only people that can see it. It’s just the same thing as the regular scenes. They hype the “someone returns!” Why even do that? It’s gimmicky-feeling. Would I be wrong in saying young gay men are really into surprises and the dramatic return of a favorite? I say that knowing my best friend is a gay man. He has been my friend for 28 years. I know when he was younger, he was very dramatic and he loved surprises. It’s an eh for me.
Even with what I’m going to call a negative sounding review, the site is good, the sex scenes are good. But when half the scenes are useless behind the scenes videos. Every scene has an advertisement to start it about penis pills. I have to go to the secret menu to find more behind the scenes videos. I don’t care about HIS personality or his hobbies. How much longer will women be subjected to these stupid stereotypes? That doesn’t hurt the site that much for me, but I believe for a more obsessive person, it could be really annoying. If they dropped the ads, removed the secret menu and put the behind the scenes videos in their own section, it would be a near 95 site. Instead, there are nearly 800 scenes and what you find out is they didn’t do these behind the scenes videos in their earlier days. What they have done consistently is make sure to show the guy’s butthole. I will also mention the scenes that are two guys with a female, the guys can’t quit looking at each other, their smiles, their dicks, their buttholes. I am going to give it an 85 with major reservations. They have a good site that could be great. |
|
03-08-22 05:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, playful, fun lesbian scenes.
Site updates twice per month and currently has 510 scenes.
All models are pretty or cute or a combination. Most are young and slim to medium build.
Alternating settings in the scenes breaks up what is a formulaic product.
Newest videos have downloads up to 4K. Picture sets are also high quality and downloadable.
The tags are useful (basic) and non-confusing like many sites use. |
| Cons: |
It is formulaic. The scenes last nearly the same amount of time from scene to scene. You see most of the same positions from scene to scene. The different settings at least present a hurdle to work around.
Not much dialogue and what dialogue there is, I can’t understand. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is very appealing to my eyes. The models are young, cute and pretty. It’s softcore to regular lesbian content. Lots of kissing, touching, giggling, some sex and the models are just as happy when the scenes end as they were when the scenes started.
The first site I ever joined was Nubiles. This site reminds me of the lesbian scenes on Nubiles. I feel like, as a few other PU reviewers have stated, I am starting to get too used to this style or porn. It is still good and can’t deny the models are some of the prettiest/cutest I have seen on a porn site, but I believe like a person that marries just for looks, what is left once you’re used to the looks?
I don’t think this site is one directly aimed at lesbians or even bicurious women. It’s more about the eye candy. There are double or triple (threesome scenes) the pretty, naked, sexual young women on your screen than usual. I shouldn’t say the dialogue is absent. Some of the models do speak English and these are their known words, “Yeah, yeah, oh fuck, yeah, yeah, just like that, yeah, yeah”. I call that not understandable since I am not there and not feeling it. This is a site that has been around a long time. The newer scenes do feature some women that speak that 7-word English vocabulary. The point of that is lesbian porn has improved greatly on even sites related to this one. It’s because the models are more descriptive in their language. Having never been with a woman. I do not know what it takes to make me say yes, yes, oh fuck. I believe this is an example of a site directed more at men. Where just watching these sexy, young women, get naked and roll around with each other IS enough. It still works for me, but I do think they need to improve the interaction between the models.
As I mentioned the site has been around look enough to have 510 scenes and to still be producing two updates per month. The videos have up to 4K. The age of the site is important in relation to the quality of the videos. There was a slowdown of updates on this site from the early to mid-2010s. The scenes during that time have 480p, 540p and 1080p. While the newer scenes have 9 download options. The scenes from before the slowdown top out at only 540p for downloads. Based on the number of pages, that looks like about 50% of the scenes only have up to 540p. I am not going to be that hard on the site. The newest scenes with the high quality downloads still equal in or around 250 and the only real flaw with those is the formulaic feeling. If you’re more into it for just seeing pretty, sexy women, you won’t notice the formulaic parts.
Good site that I believe has to improve in the dialogue to keep up with the newer lesbian sites. |
|
02-09-22 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Mother Fucker XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A blend of older/younger and cuckolding.
Large site with 914 scenes, but no longer updating.
Good quality downloads on close to half of the scenes.
Some rare videos that I used to have under different names. That could be a big positive with this site.
Nearly all niches of straight porn are covered. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure I agree with the name of the site. There are some scenes that are much older women. Some are just younger women. There’s nothing holding the theme together.
I believe all these scenes come from DVDs. About half of the scenes max out at 480p download. I downloaded some. They look okay if it’s a scene you want.
The navigation is not very good. It’s because of the misleading title and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site caught my eye with some DVDs that I used to have. Those are named differently on this site. The previous versions I had were titled, “Screw My Wife”. On this site those are titled, “Lifestyles of the Cuckold”. I always liked those scenes. If you’re not familiar with those. The older man that is in every scene is what made me recognize the scenes. I don’t know his name, but he is an older, bald man. He gets a little involved in some scenes. The main part of the scenes is a more endowed man having sex with a wife while the husband watches. This older, bald man just sits there and watches too. That was my main reason for even looking at this site. I wanted those and downloaded the near 30 scenes they have just from that series.
Looking further into the site, I noticed there’s no real connection with the theme. There are some older women with younger men scenes. I did not like those very much. I believe that older/younger porn interest is in older men with younger women or older women with younger women. I do not see the excitement from the younger men about having sex with older women. One of the series title tells a lot about the content. It is titled, “I was eighteen, fifty years ago”. Yeah, that’s not too sexy to even watch. There are others that are a little better, the “We wanna gang bang your mom”. It is better.
There are even fucking machines scenes on this site. The models are not that old. Maybe 25-30? I think it's just a site where DVDs have been thrown together as series. I can’t say it’s terrible or that bad. I did download around 50 scenes from it. I don’t even see how the cuckolding scenes fit the theme. Those are gorgeous top-shelf models. I do like the cuckold niche. There is pegging. The women look the same age as the men. Even those gangbang ones, those models look similar age as the men.
Once you get through those everything else seems to be just standard porn. There is interracial and I’m positive the male model is similar age. There is content here that is probably hard to find unless you join a site like Videobox, which I have no interest in trying to sift through. I did notice a series called, “Raunchy Redheads”. I am a natural redhead. We don’t get enough coverage in porn. I checked those out, those are okay, same feeling as the other scenes. One of the female models in the redhead scenes looks maybe 19. The video quality is the only other part to talk about. The scenes from 2010 and before are all 480p. The scenes after 2010, have mobile up to 1080p. It’s a good site to look at once or twice. The part I found funny. The older women on this site are really older. That’s not “mother” porn age. That’s granny. Take it for what it is. You may find some scenes you have misplaced. There are over 900 scenes. I would recommend it for those that like pegging and cuckolding. They have a good selection of those. I know neither of those niches are abundant. |
|
02-09-22 06:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
Next Door Casting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked. |
|
12-08-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
Group Banged
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, which is good for a site that has rare videos
Over 140 videos and photo sets in the archives
Uses tags for searching
Download speeds were ok, not the best I have ever encountered.
Navigation works as it should. |
| Cons: |
I don’t speak German and they need subtitles
Many of the women are not much to look at and the guys are not either
The file names are not unique or helpful |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a bit different from the ones I usually join. The Adult Prime Network has many sites I found interesting and this was not one I was thinking about when I signed up.
My taste in porn is for the women to be attractive, but not necessarily the most beautiful I have ever seen. They just have to be real and have a quality that makes them relatable. I like good looking guys with nice bodies. They don’t have to be carved statues either. I like sex to be energetic, but not a freak show. This site says they use 100% amateurs, and that would work for me.
The site is in German, so I was never any too sure what they all were saying. But, this is porn and models speak with their bodies. I should be able to turn the sound off and still be turned on. I have never joined a German site, but some of these models are not amateurs. My guess was that if the scene description had their name, there must be a reason. Sure enough, if you do a Google search they do actually have pornstars. Mostly they are better looking than the models in the other scenes.
But this is a site specializing in huge gangbangs. Imagine 20, even 30 guys banging a woman. Maybe even more if there are two women involved. The sex is often intense and the scenes long. Some are so long that I can’t call this anything less than a test of sexual endurance. I have to admire the women for doing these scenes, but how many models would be willing to do them? I suspect very few and I think that is why the standard for the attractiveness of the models is low. Many are overweight, a bit over the hill by porn standards, and in general not the best looking. Don’t get me started on the guys. These are not exactly pornstars either. They are not fit, often don’t get hard and many of them have dicks so small that, well you can use your imagination as to what I would say. Many of the guys wear a mask. I understand, but that is not great porn.
What the guys need is a bit of organizing. When they are not in the action, they sit on chairs, stand on the side or in the back. They stroke themselves to stay hard, but mostly it just ain’t happening. What they need is what I once heard called is fluffers. These are women who stay offscreen, and help the guys stay hard. Now that is a job I can have a fantasy about. Hmm. The guys don’t use condoms, but I don’t like them anyway. However in scenes like these I keep thinking about that. If twelve guys just came in her pussy, would you think you should too, without a condom?
Mostly the cumshots are external though and that is ok. I like to see men cumming and the possibilities are great for some interesting scenes. If 30 guys cum, some of that just has to be worth watching. I also liked that many of the models wore stockings or nylons.
As a site, I found it annoying that the videos did not have unique names. Calling a scene 1080p_fullcomplete is not ok. On the other hand there are three options to download and stream videos and the best is Full High Definition. You can make your own clip and the site has 96 already made for you. This way you can skip most of a long video and just focus on a section. I found watching them in a loop to be the way to go, or should I say cum. You also can download photosets or make a slide show. Mostly they are screen shots and the sets have large numbers of photos. I saw one that had 156 and they were a nice 4000x2667.
It was hard to follow all action with so much going on, but I found these videos hit and miss. Some had parts I could watch over and over and some scenes just don’t do it for me. |
|
11-07-21 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Sinful Raw
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting, episodic porn site that is in its very early stages.
The scenes are very professional with high production values.
All videos include a 4K download option, but there are currently only 16 scenes.
It’s updating twice a week and will say the scenes are long enough and good enough to at least show the potential this site has.
There are downloadable photo zips as well those should not overlooked. The resolution is 2700x4000 and there are excellent lighting effects that show up more in the photos than in the videos.
The scenes have added elements of added kink to them, like cloth masks, orgies and I’m going to say what the site reminds me of – Pure Taboo. |
| Cons: |
I believe a person could get confused with the titling of the scenes. There’s part 1, part 2, part 3 of each titled scene.
I don’t know a lot of pro models, but know most of these. This is the downside to a professional site. There are models, especially males, that I remember seeing in porn over 15 years ago like Erik Everhard. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a lot of potential. Whether they reach that potential is going to be questionable. The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The photos can be downloaded and are 2700x4000 resolution. The photos are some of the best I have seen and it’s because the scenes all have a dark feel to them. The photos use lighting to highlight the areas you want to see. It feels like the site is produced by someone who has a lot of experience watching good porn and they’re trying to follow in those footsteps. It does lead to some problems.
I have very little experience with porn before 2010, especially hardcore porn, but I recognize these actors/models. One scene is Barbie Sins and Erik Everhard. I know I have seen scenes with Erik Everhard in scenes from the late 1990s. I’m not saying there’s a problem with that, but I have learned in my time watching porn that the longtime pros just don’t appeal that much to me.
Since this is episodic porn (that’s what happens when you use the same title and put an ascending number after each scene), I can say I don’t see much connection between the scenes of the same title. There is Dirty Thirty, Dirty Thirty 2 and Dirty Thirty 3. The first one is a professional businesswoman who is out of town on business and seduces the bellhop at the hotel while talking to her husband on the phone. Dirty Thirty 2 is a professional businesswoman who hires a male prostitute (Erik Everhard) to do for her what her husband can’t. Part 3 is similar in theme, the woman plays the role of an escort finder (pimp?) and brings in her top male performer to satisfy a woman and he does so in less time than the woman paid for, so the female pimp has sex with him too.
There are some interesting takes on the ways these scenes play out including a 3 part called Mine For A Moment. They even have one 3 part series titled Rock, Paper, Scissors. The newest series they have is listed as the First Sinful Orgy. This is where you see the positive of professional work. There are 9 people in one of those orgy scenes and you can see all 9 of them at various points in the video.
The size of the site with only two updates per month definitely doesn’t help, but depending on the viewer, I believe they will either love these scenes or not even be interested. There are tattoos, implants and I do think that comes from the professional part of the site. These are mostly well-known porn stars maybe taking a different approach to their porn. There is another part to like and not to like. Nearly all of the scenes are 27-30 minutes long. That’s the professional part again. I do understand, as an author myself, plot, crescendo and ending are all important and need to be timed perfectly. That’s in a book. I don’t know if it translates as well in video, especially porn.
I’m going to say something I rarely say and that is I don’t find most of these women very attractive. I know others do. I recognize nearly every name, but we are going into subjective preferences.
The orgy scene which has made up the 4 newest scenes does give me the feeling of potential. Maybe they started out with known pros they knew they could count on to give consistent performances to show the developing story and plot in the scenes. That does make me believe it has potential. My personal advice would be to pull away from those veterans of porn and put some newer talent in the scenes. It reminds me of when I watch another Will Smith movie. He’s a great actor and has a great personality, but it’s another Will Smith movie. The 4 scenes of the orgy has a lot of females and males I’m not THAT familiar with. I recognize a few, but most are new to me. There is a lot of playing on the emotions of cheating, betraying, even a little cuckolding. I like it and will keep checking back on it. I believe they’re on the right track. |
|
10-19-21 01:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very unique concept for porn, lesbian interracial.
I have never found another site devoted to this.
Many of the scenes are 2 on 1, black on white or white on black.
A site in the Dogfart Network of 23 interracial sex sites
You can search by site or by the whole network
Some scenes focus on older/younger or large size differences. Early scenes are verbal domination. |
| Cons: |
Irregular updates, only seven this year
Only 93 videos despite the fact that the oldest one is from 2007
Too overproduced and the models too scripted. See below. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Dogfart Network has 23 interracial sites. In porn that means black men and white women. The site called Zebra Girls is most unique in porn, I think, as it is only white and black women. I would like for there to be a few scenes with women of other races, but porn is never perfect and often just not that imaginative either. I have found a scene here or there of interracial lesbian content on the internet, but I am not aware of any other site focused exclusively on this.
The oldest scenes are of light verbal domination, but come across as more playful than as BDSM. I thought most of these were not to be taken seriously, but more as a fantasy geared at men. The more recent scenes are a bit more complex and have a little story, but this is still not a typical soft lesbian site. They use tongues both on their partner’s pussy as well as sometimes the tongues go a bit farther back into their ass. Like many lesbian sites that are aimed at men, there is also a bit of toy play as well as tribbing.
The production values are really excellent with great lighting, makeup work, costumes and in general the women here look as well as I have seen models anywhere. What seems to me is that there is not much passion or chemistry, whichever term you prefer, and the models are doing what they are told. I like porn that is a bit less scripted and more whatever the models are into. I would like to see the producer step away and give the women a bit of freedom to do whatever the genuinely feel. I can’t be sure, but I fear the producer thinks that lesbian sex at its best is what men see as a fantasy. I have spoken to a few real life lesbians and they tell me that their sex is not so perfect or so polished. It is a lot more spontaneous and has a lot more unplanned variety. They don't put makeup on before sex either.
One thing I really liked is that there are many scenes that are 2 on 1, both white on black as well as black on white. This can lead to scenes where the idea for the scene starts out as ordinary, but it quickly becomes one where two of the women initiate the sex with the third being a sex object. The possibilities are many as in the scene I describe next, my favorite of all of them.
I saw the contrast between the models as one of color, sometimes of size and occasionally even a theme of older/younger. A good example of a difference of size focus is the scene with two very large black women, Victoria Cakes and Jayden Starr. The manager of the women’s clothing store is mini sized Lexi Lore. She looks half the size of either of these two women maybe even smaller, but seeing her paired with both of them was a sight that appealed to my imagination. When Lexi started “booty worship” it was enough for me to do what comes naturally.
The site seems almost a forgotten one in a large network as the updates are about once every two months. This year there have been seven and that is about the rate the site has been growing since it started in 2007. The earliest videos predate High Definition. Using the site is easy and you can search by site or by network. At 93 scenes it was enough to get me to like the site, but more would be better of course. |
|
10-19-21 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
117
|
Girls Fuck Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Billed by Segpay which is very safe to use.
Inexpensive at only $14.95
Mostly American pornstars that I like
Links to discounts for other sites
Professional camera work and directing |
| Cons: |
It has not updated since May.
Only 35 videos
Only three download options and the best is Full HD
There are tags for searching for what you like
Does not come with other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the fact that there are only 35 videos and there may never be another update, I really like this site. Although I have never been with a woman sexually, I find the idea very appealing. I find most lesbian porn sites are not to my taste with a lot of overacting and fake moaning. In those mainstream sites, the production values are low and the appeal to women is nonexistent. In contrast you find here that the actual sex is very realistic and a joy to watch, with nice production values. Instead of the ordinary quality you see In most porn, these scenes look like they were made by video professionals. A few even have simple, but interesting special effects. The scenes are explicit but not overdone sleazy. There is a lot of licking, toy play, scissoring, fingering, strap on play, pussy shaving and even the use of a sex machine by the two women.
I recognized many of the models as they are Americans known for lesbian sex on other sites. The younger models are fresh with enthusiasm and seem to really enjoy the scenes. These younger models are portrayed as innocently exploring sexuality either with other young models or with older more experienced women. Some themes portrayed here are college age schoolgirls enjoying each other, sorority members getting it on, boss with younger employee, babysitter with mother. This gives the scenes an appeal that is using a uniform fetish, a college fetish, older/younger lesbian as well as dominant/submissive roleplay as there is also some light BDSM. The most popular scene is Girls Naughty Naked Night Out, which is a four way. Four young ladies of college age go to a strip club, where they laughingly enjoy seeing a stripper on a pole. They give her tips, but she does not strip or get in on the fun once it starts. What you see are women in short skirts, well made up, who are going out for fun as none have a date that night. This sounds like a fantasy I might have, or was something I might have done when I was younger. They come across as a group of good friends who know each other well. I could imagine myself having been in that group, getting giggly and silly along with them. This is porn that captures my imagination and is not just made to satisfy men’s fantasies about imaginary lesbian encounters. They do what comes naturally as a result of having been friends first. You can see the action evolving as the heat builds. They got hot and then I got hot. What could be better than that?
My only complaints include a minor one. When you open a page on the site, the video starts on autoplay. If you want faster downloading you have to turn it off. A much more serious matter is that the site appears to not be updating any longer. With 35 videos, I would appreciate a lot more. I want to ask if they have any plans to keep the site actively growing, but the only customer service links were for billing problems. What you do get is well worth joining for. |
|
09-05-21 06:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the Lets Doe it Network of sites
Irregular updates, but they are about one every two weeks.
Uses tags for easy searching
Four choices for video downloading. Full HD is the best
More than 200 scenes
Really gorgeous models made up to look their best
Great production values with a few small visual special effects such as fading in and out |
| Cons: |
Limit of 100 downloads each month
Too many ads after you log in |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never had a lesbian experience and don’t identify as one, but this site gave me reason to wonder. As a woman, I can enjoy watching orgasms, both male and female. I love men’s bodies, but women’s bodies have so many interesting parts, not just the one. What I saw on this site was just amazing. It may be the hottest girl/girl site I have ever been a member of.
The models are naturally beautiful without even trying. The site has them perfectly made up and they wear clothes that look great on them too. The women are a combination of classy and erotic. They do things like brush their hair, change outfits and have non erotic fun with each other as part of the prelude to the scene. They stare into each other’s eyes and turn each other on even before they touch one another. Presex erotic kissing is done well in every scene. These women are very feminine, unrushed, gentle and sensuous. For the most part, there is an attempt at a story, but not all that much. At least there is a logical progression into the sex, which is more than most porn has. The ages range from about 18 to 30, from naïve and exploring sexuality, to knowing exactly what each other would like. I believe that only another woman can know exactly how to please a woman to the max. Sometimes there is mutual masturbation, fingering, scissoring, the use of toys, strapons, and vibrators, but mostly there is a lot of slow erotic licking down there. The scenes easily shift from seductive to very explicit. These women are really into these scenes or they are better actresses than I think they are.
Some of the setups include roommates, step sisters and best friends. They know each other and then the action builds on that. What is missing though is that they don’t talk to each other. I am sure it is because they don’t speak English, or at least not well. They have subtitles in some scenes, but tone of voice and choice of words could have been very erotic. Sexy, playful talk turns us girls on. There are many outdoor sets and there are a few pool parties. There are also many indoor scenes in elegant places we could only dream about. The locations are an important part in making the scenes into a girl’s fantasy. I could easily imagine these women are on a once on a lifetime vacation. The camerawork, editing and general production values are some of the best I have ever seen on a porn site. I feel like I should be watching them in a movie theater. I can see watching these scenes with a partner or two and we would both get turned on together.
Mostly these are one on one scenes. Despite the range of ages, the pairings don’t play to that. There are a few solo masturbation scenes, but not many. There is a sprinkling of three ways and even a four way. As a site, it was easy to use and there are over 200 videos in the library. there is a download limit of 100 scenes per month, more than you can download them all in a monthly subscription. It also comes with a nice network, lets Doe It, but this is the only girl/girl site in it. |
|
09-05-21 06:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
Quest For Orgasm
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017 |
| Bottom Line: |
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. |
|
09-05-21 06:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
121
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gaping site that focuses on anal sex (not a favorite mine)
They have 863 scenes. It updates twice per month.
Video downloads do vary with some scenes being old, but the newer ones have up to 4K.
Downloadable videos and picture zips (as long as you pay for the subscription with downloads)
Very pretty models, not exactly the type of models I expect in anal porn. Most are European. |
| Cons: |
It is subjective, I am not a big fan of anal porn, but if you can do more with it than just 25 minutes of anal pounding, it will at least interest me. I find a lot of anal sites, the scenes, come off as punishing. This one doesn’t give me that feeling.
There’s not much variety. That goes for the style of scene, the looks of the models, the body types, the settings. There’s a lot of sameness from scene to scene.
It’s anal porn, that’s all the story you need and get. I’m just being honest, not sarcastic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will give this site some credit. I usually do not like anal porn sites. I am halfway through a year subscription to Adult Time and am working my way through the sites. This one is acceptable enough anal porn. I want to put laugh out loud. The models are very pretty. Most of my early interest in porn was Nubiles. I am familiar with the European models. Most of the anal sites I see today are American. You have the, am I going too far, brutality of the punishing anal scene? It’s not me condemning it. It’s me questioning if the producers of this type of porn only does what my last con said? You just don’t get a lot of story or build-up or lead-in. It is something I believe porn producers have to start thinking about. It is why I am going to give this site some credit but am also going to talk about the problem I have with this genre and how it is filmed or produced/directed/written. One of the newer scenes is a gorgeous woman named Jayla De Angelis. She is swimming nude; she goes up to her balcony and is masturbating. The neighbor is watching and he’s masturbating. She’s giving him a blowjob by 4 minutes in. Between the 4-minute mark and 10-minute mark, there’s some blowjob, then anal for the last 15 minutes. It seems lazy. I know women that have anal sex with their husband or boyfriends. I have never heard one say, after 9 minutes foreplay, he jumped right in her butt. The bigger picture to what I am saying is, I think the anal focus, plays to such a large fetish for so many men, it lets the producers/directors/writers, just cruise control through the scene.
This site at least has some non-anal content. It will turn to anal before the scene is over and that’s why I am at least giving it some credit. They have another site that is called 21 Erotic Anal. It has 267 scenes on it and I like those. That is figuring into my review of this site specifically, it does look like the producers of Asshole Fever realized to try a more erotic, sensual version of the site with 21 Erotic Anal. I just wished there was something separating foreplay straight to anal.
If you add the 267 scenes on 21 Erotic Anal, you end up with 1,130 scenes, when adding those to the 863 scenes on Asshole Fever. You are going to have to go through those and find the ones that you like. I think the anal genre is geared directly at those that love anal sex. If that’s you, you may love all these scenes. There are good download options from 160p to 4K on the last few years. Before that, HD with 720p and 1080p as the highest options. I can recognize the quality of the scenes. It just depends on if I’m being completely subjective or objective. It’s a good site for what it is. |
|
02-09-22 06:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
Men Over 30
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K |
| Cons: |
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. |
|
12-08-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
123
|
Sweethearts Classics
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before
Tags for searching
Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites
Adding scenes once a week
Uses Epoch as a biller |
| Cons: |
All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality.
The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest.
Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative.
Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet.
The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used.
I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement.
In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy. |
|
10-19-21 01:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
My MILFz
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All 85 videos can be downloaded in HD
Updates are twice a month
Part of huge network that includes over 75 studios
Epoch is the biller |
| Cons: |
Not much age difference between the models
Search not just for this site, but whole network
Just nitpicking, but only six lesbian scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
MILF refers to an age of about 25 to maybe 40. Actually I have even seen stars older than that called MILFs. I guess it means stars that are not young and not really ready to be called older. I am in that age range myself. I don’t think that I am young and innocent any longer and that does not bother me at all. I feel women get sexier as they get more confident with age.
When I logged onto the site, I found that the men were close to the age of the women more often than not. Even when the differences are noticeable, the scenes don’t play up the age difference much. I found a few scenes where it was a pairing of student with teacher or with the principal. Mostly though, it was not important. This is not a site that can be called older/younger. Besides those scenes, there were a few that had a concept, such as maid and boss. In those the age difference was not the center of the video.
There were a few things that I rather liked about the site. The first is that nearly all scenes are of models from the UK. I love those accents and admit a Brit with an accent makes me pay attention. Many of the guys are good looking, as well as nicely dressed and groomed. I could go for that. Many of the women looked slutty, which works for me as a porn fantasy. In contrast though, in some scenes the women were dressed in a very feminine manner with nice dresses or skirts, nylons, pretty panties etc.
Most of the sex was interesting and kept me watching. However, I feel no scene is ok without a great cumshot. Most of these were externals and I prefer those to internal ones. The guys were above average in size compared to guys in real life, but by porn standards nothing special. They got the job done. Even the internal scenes had an unusual focus when the women put their fingers inside and scooped out some cum.
There were only six lesbian scenes out of the 85 on the site. I thought they were at best just ok. I did see one lesbian four way, but the other scenes were all one on one, both the lesbian scenes as well as the boy/girl. There were a few scenes with black women and also a few with very dark black men with white women. The black men were nicely built down there and the women appreciated that.
If I had to sum up the sex parts, it was a better than ok site with a few quite hot videos. The quality was good at High Definition as the best on offer and this comes with a huge network. |
|
10-19-21 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
|
