Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs. |
| Cons: |
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche. |
|
09-10-19 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Next Door Buddies
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. |
| Cons: |
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. |
|
12-08-21 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Brasil Bimbos
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Included in Adult Prime network
Updates once a week
Many dark and exotic looking full bodied Latinas.
Nice tags for easy searching
Four streaming and download options that include 4k |
| Cons: |
Small site with only 25 videos. Every download uses the same file name.
No scene description or subtitles. The videos are in Portuguese.
There are no photos
Condoms, either a pro or a con depending on how you look at it |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never watched porn made in any country in Latin America, so I was not sure what to expect. I thought porn was about seeing beautiful bodies going at it, so how different could it be? The first thing that I noticed was that there were no scene descriptions or any kind of subtitles. They spoke Portuguese and the models fit stereotypes that are sometimes comparable to those in American porn. The men were generally very muscular, very tattooed and most had their hair cut in ways you don’t see in porn made here. Jhoony Gab has ten scenes and has blue hair. Higor Silva has four scenes and in some has blue hair. Oscar Luz is in six scenes, so I guess these guys are pros not amateurs. These three guys are in 20 scenes out of the 25 on the site and one of those is a lesbian four way.
Most of the women have a mixed race, mostly black look and their bodies can only be called voluptuous and hourglass. Not at all thin, they have larger sized breasts and hips. Most have tan lines from wearing bikinis. Brazil is well known for their beaches and if I went there, I would hope to see women like these.
They are what you might expect from Brazilians who have a reputation for having big butts, however one model is an exception. Indians have a diaspora that includes a lot of places, but I never expected to see one on a Brazilian porn site. Indian women are known for being large breasted, but Sumaya Ganesha is not. She does not have a big butt either. She was named after the Hindu God Ganesha, you know the one with the head of an elephant. He is thought to bring good luck, but we are the lucky ones to see her in her two videos. She has a tattoo of Ganesha on her upper right arm.
In a scene labeled as Autoridade Maxima, in English Full Authority, her guy has sex with Sumaya using a condom. I see no problem with that, as I am not sure if they have the rigorous testing for porn performers that we have in the United States. When he is ready, the condom comes off and he cums in her mouth. Is that safe for her? Although the scene has no subtitles or explanation, he has a badge and handcuffs. She handcuffs him to the bed frame and he does oral sex on her until she cums. Her orgasm seems very genuine too. I have never seen a man in porn go down on a woman except as foreplay. Considering that In most American heterosexual porn the woman’s need are generally ignored, the fact that he does that AFTER he cums is a refreshing surprise.
I thought the prettiest model was Lunna Real, who has a young vibrant look in her videos and wears braces. She has two scenes and in one she just devours his cock and makes him cum inside her mouth. She loved it, it looked unscripted and spontaneous that she made him cum in her mouth. The other was a lesbian four way pussy licking orgy where she clearly was the star of the scene. She should be signed up by a major US or European porn producer and I could see her becoming a big star. Such enthusiasm needs to be rewarded.
In most cases the men are darker than the women. However, I am not sure if that is planned. The sets are generally rooms in a modern house, but not the rich looking mansions you often see in US porn. It is hard to say what the basic premise is in each scene as you don’t know what they are saying. Clearly this is not your dull standard two people in a hotel room and they just go at it. A typical scene starts with her looking at her phone sitting on a deck or she is taking a bath. He walks in and they talk for a few seconds and then they are like animals in heat. The cum shots generally were external and In nearly every scene the woman is boringly passive. In a few scenes he cums inside, or he jerks himself off onto her. I want to see the woman making him cum and enjoying it.
The site has tags that work well and the videos can be streamed as well as downloaded in four options including 4K. Downloads were fast enough and are added once a week. One thing missing is photo sets. I don’t care about that, but if you do, there is a way. If you use VLC player you can create screenshots. If you want to create custom clips of just certain parts, the site has this as a feature.
One video had a few seconds of the gorgeous coastline. A suggestion for future scenes is that if they showed more of that beautiful Brazilian scenery, it would make the scenes better. How about some scenes open with her on the beach in a bikini, then she goes inside and finds a man there? Maybe one masturbating?
I think the site has potential, but only time will tell. With only 25 videos it needs to grow. I think as part of a large network it is worth checking out. |
|
11-07-21 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
4K CFNM
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All the videos are available in 4K as well as High Definition
Comes with Adult Prime Network of over 75 studios
The network has no download limits
Nice variety of CFNM scenarios
The downloads were fast
The younger models, both male and female, were very attractive |
| Cons: |
Only 34 videos are available
You never know when updates will be posted |
| Bottom Line: |
I like Clothed Female with Naked Male as a porn theme as the men are there as the object of desire for women. I will check out any site like this, but unfortunately there just aren’t all that many.
The level of variety you do find here is surprisingly refreshing as well as diverse. I found older men with younger women, older women with younger men, outdoor as well as indoor scenes, two on one, even one with five women and one guy, mild bdsm, although one that I found impossible to watch was Ball Busting with Gunther, BBW women, and even a few where the guy was so old and ugly that it stretched my ability to believe it could be true. I can’t explain one in particular that got to me and was my favorite. I guess it was the contrast of two gorgeous young ladies being so enthusiastic with a guy like that.
The sex was for the most part the women blowing the guys, which is commonly what you see a lot of in CFNM. In a few scenes a second or third woman walks in and accidentally sees the action. Many of these scenes had a woman who was watching and masturbating to the action, who then later got in on it. I could see that happening in real life and would like more of that in all porn today, not just CFNM. It adds a touch of believability and is something that I think most women would find an improvement.
The tags for searching does give results over the whole network, not just this site. If you do a search under CFNM , you get some that are not here, giving a total of 58. If you want to search for more videos of the same female star you can, but the guys are not named. The downloads were fast and there were three options, one of course was 4K and another High Definition. The site did not have download limits as you might guess for only so few videos, but the network did not have any limits either.
The site Is rather small and it is hard to tell where its future is. It has been updated nine times so far this year, six in 2020, and 19 in 2019. I don’t have any serious negatives except that the site has only 34 videos. As much as this site was enjoyable, it was just not big enough by itself. The network though is huge with over 75 studios and there are several other older/younger sites if those appeal to you. |
|
10-19-21 12:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly polished, glam with a story, porn.
Includes access to 3 other sites, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Very high quality and production quality, reminds me a little of the Met-Art sites.
Cliched stories are better than no stories.
Videos are downloadable in 9 different resolutions, starting with 160p and going up to 4K. Maybe I will ask Santa for a 4K monitor this year? The oldest scenes have up to 1080p.
Updates once a week and has 319 scenes on it. |
| Cons: |
It would seem like pictures would be important to a site like this, but the photo sets are limited in number of photos but they do have downloads (corrected error, missed the button).
I have noticed with these softer "hardcore" sites, sometimes the action just falls very flat. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think I'm still earning my porn rookie badge. I joined this site thinking it was a standalone site. To my surprise, those other 3 sites come with it and as a whole, it's a very good deal.
The content here is like reading an erotica book that your neighbor's wife authored. That's not really a bad thing, maybe she's the next Anais Nin? The stories were a selling point for me, but I probably expected too much.
As an example from the newer scenes. Featuring the gorgeous Vina Sky, her boyfriend broke up with her via text message. She calls her best male friend for a shoulder to cry on and realizes she's been in love with the best friend the whole time. Doesn't that contradict the heartbreak she has? She ended up with the guy she's really in love with.
So, maybe your neighbor's wife isn't the next Anais Nin, after all. It's still better than no story. The scenes are very serious feeling. There's not a lot of feeling of raw emotions or passion. It's not bad, but it just seems a little stale like a two day old doughnut.
There's very little variation in the scenes. Most are male/female, there are some solo and lesbian scenes, but in my opinion, not enough of either of those. I think with this narrow of a niche there should be a near equal balance in solo (fantasizing), lesbian (fantasizing and real), male/female (real). It would add more of a connected feel to the scenes.
The quality of the videos are excellent, but I'm not going to compliment the settings too much. It looks like all these couples and people rented the same hotel room. They must have blew the budget on those stories.
I streamed most of these scenes which isn't the best sign. A few are worth downloading, but most of them started feeling repetitive.
I don't understand why they don't have more pictures. I'm not a picture collector or downloader, but I can usually look at the pictures and combine them with what I see in the video to make more of a connection to the scene.
It's good, what I would call safe porn. It's not going to make you think you're witnessing a revolution in porn, but it's good enough to get off to, a time or two. I do think with the 3 other sites combined as a 4 site network it's a very good deal. I'm going to review the opposite site from their network just to show a completely different experience. |
|
11-04-19 09:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
Social Glamour
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models.
Current Halloween promo for $14.99
Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty.
I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star.
Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400.
Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. |
| Cons: |
Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019.
Not near as much nudity as I expected.
Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background.
40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that.
We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?"
It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site.
I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn.
I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan...
Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris.
All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range.
The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless.
I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it.
The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes.
A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around.
I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p.
I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me.
It also hasn't updated in 7 months.
There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. |
|
10-28-19 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Trystan Bull
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. |
| Cons: |
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? |
| Bottom Line: |
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. |
|
12-08-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Manko 88
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncensored Asian/Japanese porn that is quite good.
Small site with only 30 scenes, but it does get two updates per month.
Some of the scenes are really outstanding including in length and depth of the scene (see cons).
Video quality is excellent with up to 1080p on all videos, all are downloadable.
Downloadable zipped photos that are of high quality 2700x4000
Some threesomes and outdoor scenes too. |
| Cons: |
The scenes greatly vary in length and how interesting the scene is. The longest scene is 67 minutes and five are over 60 minutes, but there are others in the 15 minute range. The depth of the scenes (kinkiness and actions) varies because of this.
One of the first times I’ve watched Asian/Japanese porn and have to say this needs subtitles. One of the scenes is called, “Mother-in-law hungry for cock”. There is so much dialogue going on in the scene, but I have no idea what is being said. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is worth a look for those interested in Japanese porn without the censoring. All of the males in these scenes are not Japanese. I have an interest in Japanese porn from reading reviews about how creative it is and how much of it relies on a story. That clearly is happening in some of these scenes, but without even a basic knowledge of Japanese, I have to just go by the context of actions. I do believe this is going to sticking point for me with this site. While each scene is titled and tells me what the scene is about, there’s not even a synopsis. All of the scenes have the same synopsis that tells you what to expect from Manko88, not the scene itself.
There are only 30 scenes, but there are 2 updates per month and each update comes with a video and photos. The videos and photos are downloadable and from what I can tell it is unlimited. Something that has held back my interest in Japanese and Asian porn is the use of creampies. Based on the very good user features, the niches dropdown box says 23 of these 30 scenes have creampies. I am sure creampies are common in real sex – Covid has me in a drought, but I don’t get the use of creampies in porn. This is performance sex not husband and wife trying to make a baby sex. Cumshots are and always have been one of my favorite parts of porn.
The video quality is good enough though I don’t see any with 4K. They do offer 540p, 720p and 1080p. Which is good enough for me, but maybe not for those wanting 4K. The pictures are 2700x4000, I am not technological enough to know if that is telling me they have the cameras to make 4K videos, but that’s not a dealbreaker for me.
Some of the scenes, like the mother-in-law hungry for cock have what looks to be a sexy story. The son-in-law has the mother-in-law’s panties and is sniffing them. The mother-in-law sees him from a short distance, but out of his sight and starts masturbating watching him sniff her panties. I don’t need the talking to get that part. It then turns to dialogue and turns into sex. There’s so much being said that would either add or take away from this scene, but it’s gibberish to me. I do like the site and the longer scenes. There seems to be quite a lot of taboo going on in these scenes. I would even say a few are more extreme like a black man helping his Asian male friend get his girlfriend off with an array of Magic Wands, threesome sex and what I wouldn’t expect from a Japanese site.
There are cutesy scenes with the pretty Asian models wearing cat or bunny ears (I’m from Chicago, I don’t know animal ears). There are scenes with the female models nude in public. One of the female model having a guy use a dildo on her in the car while driving around which leads to a blowjob and cum in the mouth. There’s a lot going on here that I like, but I really get the feeling this could be even better if I had the slightest clue what they’re talking about. I like the site overall, there’s good video and photo quality and no censoring. I did try a Japanese site with censoring a few months ago and couldn’t even review it. I’m not porn-adapted enough to get around the censor mosaic. This site fixes that problem. It is worth keeping an eye on. If there was more balance from scene to scene, at the very least a synopsis explaining everything or subtitles, this site would score really high for me. It still is considering I have no idea what’s going on besides the sex. |
|
10-19-21 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the Dogfart Network of 23 Interracial sites
Updates once a week
You can rate each scene.
Four download options. The best is Full High Definition
The site has some of the hottest black men in porn
Some of the best natural chemistry I have ever seen
More than 1000 videos |
| Cons: |
Costs extra for download option for 4K
Older scenes are not in HD |
| Bottom Line: |
In my opinion, interracial sex pairs those of any two races, however, in porn it generally means black men and white women. This site has that, but not only blond women, but also white women of all hair colors, as well as black men with Latinas and also Asians. The site also touches on a few specific niches, such as large men and petite women, as well as some scenes are older/younger. Some scenes are gangbangs. The contrasts are often sharply drawn and very striking to the eye. I saw a scene with Cindy Starfall, who is tiny at 4’10 and whose partner Mandingo has a 12” penis. Seeing it in her mouth was just incredible and oh so memorable. I love contrast in porn and this is about as good as it gets in my opinion.
In most porn today, the women have the star power and are the major focus. Let’s face it, the guys are pretty much interchangeable. In some porn, they don’t even get billing and you never get to know as much as even their names. In some types of porn, for example, Point of View, you may never even get to see their faces.
The guys on this site include major black male models. Some are so well known for their scenes that they even have their own websites. This site has a lot of stars that have a large following, such as the legendary Lexington Steele, Sean Michaels, Prince Yahshua, Wesley Pipes, Shane Diesel, and Mandingo. These men are very, very dark and have penises that can only be described as huge, maybe even the biggest in porn. I don’t think they make condoms this size. If you read pornstar interviews, the female models often mention these guys as among their favorites to work with as they are kind as well as considerate sex symbols for many women. These female models are seasoned professionals who are among the most popular. I have seen them before on other sites, but I feel that here many of them have their best scenes. I don’t know if it is the size or the color of these guys, or maybe both, but something works well here. One of my favorite scenes, for example, stars Cindy Starfall, who has some of the best Jerk Off Encouragement as well as overall sexy talk in her oral sex videos. On this site her face just simply lights up from the first glimpse at these penises and their size. Suddenly the talkative becomes speechless. She must have seen quite a few penises in her life and she should know an outstanding one when she sees it. A few of the stars that I really like are also here, such as Esperanza Del Horno, Eva Angelina and Gina Valentina.
There is a chemistry in these scenes that is a hallmark of interracial porn. I think that both the men and women are on their best behavior and give performances that show how they feel about making these scenes. Far too much porn is repetitive and by the numbers dull, but these come across as the performers finding a natural attraction. I personally don’t care that much that they are of different races, but I do care a lot that the models look like they love doing this kind of sex scene.
It is mentioned on the site that they have won numerous XBIZ and AVN awards, the porn version of the Academy Awards. These are given by their peers in the industry and show how well made the scenes are. You see an attention to detail that is outstanding, from the makeup, to the camerawork, to the lighting and of course the direction. I don’t know if there are classes for learning how to make good porn, but these videos would be great as teaching tools.
The sex itself is straight to the point and there is no real storyline. Mostly what you get are more like simple scenarios such as going to visit your boyfriend. He is not home but his brother is. The woman is a stripper at a bachelor party. The woman is interviewing men for a job as her bodyguard. Many of the scenes are three ways, many four ways and some are even more. The site is easy to use, with one new update per week. There are no download limits mentioned and I did not hit any. There are an incredible more than 1000 videos and photosets, but the frosting on the cake is the access to the rest of the Dogfart Network. You have a similar site, but age focused, called Blacks on Cougars, an interracial lesbian site Zebra Girls, two gay interracial sites as well as a few sites that are rare in porn, featuring black women and white men. |
|
10-19-21 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Bums Bus
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Lets Doe It Network
Uses a trusted biller
The site has 134 videos.
Sometimes silly but still fun.
Attractive stars that I am not familiar with |
| Cons: |
Needs more subtitles
Download limit of 100 videos per month for the network
Has not updated in almost three years |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never been a member of a site that is not in English, so I was not too sure what to expect. Well, sex is not about talking, so I kept an open mind. As part of the Lets Doe it Network, I joined for a few sites that seemed promising, but this was not one I had thought about, to be honest.
Some of the videos have subtitles and it was not hard to imagine that the scenes where there were none were probably very similar. The guys joke, kid around and in general act silly, like college students on a break. The videos even have a feel of being produced by amateurs. Your average scene shows them driving around in Berlin, looking for women to entice into either showing some skin or, if they are really lucky, she has sex in the van. The showing the skin idea was that they would offer money to see her breasts.
When I was a college student, I felt college guys were not very mature. Now, I felt the introductory parts were like a film about the college guys themselves and the women were to be seen as conquests. Because the videos were overly long, I found that I skipped ahead to the sex parts as that is what I was there for. I thought the scenes were rehearsed and not spontaneous and it was hard to imagine myself as the woman. The scenes that started off in public were just ok. My two favorite scenes had the tables turned and had a woman cruising the streets for guys to pick up. Although I could never do that myself, it was a fun fantasy that I could relate to.
I don’t know anything about German porn, so I don’t know if the women were amateurs or pros. The guys were about average looking and seemed to be of about average size down there. The cumshots were ok, not huge or anything exciting to watch.
The site is easy enough to use and there is a tag system for searching. There is a monthly limit of 100 videos for the network. They have 134 videos but when you see the download limit of 100 per month, I prefer to keep those from the other network sites as opposed to these here. For me the other big negative is that the site has not updated in nearly three years. I would not join for this site alone. But, the rest of the network is an astounding value. |
|
10-19-21 12:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
Joy Mii
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A pretty porn site where the models are all pretty and have a natural look.
Smaller than I expected with only 193 models, but they are 193 very pretty models.
720 video scenes and for some reason, 719 photo sets. All are downloadable and excellent quality.
I think it's important to stress how pretty and natural the models on here are. I haven't seen any implants and if there's tattoos, I've just missed them.
They have solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes.
Updates twice a week.
It has been around for a long time. I guess it's why I expected it to be a bigger site, but this could go into quality over quantity. |
| Cons: |
I didn't realize this is a softer hardcore site. A lot of the scenes in this softer hardcore genre just come off as generic to me and that is just an opinion.
It needs more variety. The scenes have these gorgeous models in them and it's like they're the sexy part and the sex is just the bonus.
The scenes are just straight to the point and short. Some are less than 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My pros/cons might look like I don't like this site, but it's not true. This is a good, very straightforward porn site with some really gorgeous models in hardcore action.
The site has been around for almost 10 years, so they have only averaged about 70 videos and 70 photo sets per year. What I find myself running into here is I find I model I really like and they only have a couple scenes of her, while other models have 10+ scenes. That is subjective to my taste, but it doesn't help me enjoy the site.
These are all professional models as far as I can tell. They look familiar and there are even a few big name models.
They have 350 male/female scenes and some of those are threesomes. The other 370 scenes are lesbian or solo. There's no way to separate the solo from lesbian scenes.
The navigation for the site works well except that they list solo and lesbian together. The model list isn't the most friendly, it is a vertical scrolling page with one model per section. Clicking on any model brings up a list of her scenes and photo sets.
The video quality is one of the brighter spots for the site. All videos have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 270p all in .MP4 and a 720p .WMV version. The streaming player works very well.
The photo sets have three downloadable versions, quickview 534x800, collector's edition 800x1200 and poster size 6000x4000. That's a big difference and the file sizes show it. The first two were 8-12 MB each, the poster size is 400 MB. These are photo sets, but they could pass for screen captures as they are from a video scene.
I would compare the site to Sex Art, X-Art, and just about any site with the word Art in it.
Whether my tone has sounded negative or not shouldn't go against the site. I am just a little disappointed in what I was expecting. It not a bad site, but I also don't think it's a great site. |
|
11-26-19 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Sex Art
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost. |
| Cons: |
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
It lingers way too close to cheesy for me. |
|
07-16-19 01:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
142
|
BJ Raw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I was first introduced to by Adult Time. It is “raw” blowjobs.
Not a big site but does have 62 scenes and most are long considering the niche is limited. It updates once per week.
If you like women rimming men this site has that in nearly, if not every, scene.
Video download quality is up to 4K with multiple options.
Pretty models, that is one part that surprised me for this niche.
The guys are well above average endowment and the women put every inch to full use. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a few blowjob-focused sites in the past and keep thinking there will be more than just regular suck, to and from head movements and there is, it’s rimming. Which I am not into. They could easily add a different variation in some of the scenes.
Anything I say is going to come off as “being too critical”. Are there not enough scenes of sucking, to and from movements and rimming? There’s more that leads me to try sites like this one. Maybe they don’t realize this is going to become repetitive? |
| Bottom Line: |
I admittedly get frustrated with sites like this one. The video quality is very good. Besides 4K, they have 1080p and 360p. They also have downloadable photo zips that are pretty good. Those resolution options may not even please some people. The newer scenes replaced one of the two versions of 1080p with 4K. The oldest scenes have 1080p in two bitrates, then falls all the way to 360p. Am I thinking too much? They have the 720p for streaming. I don’t see the point of having 360p if you’re not going to have 720p. It says mobile, but my cellphone is 1080p.
The frustration is more about the content. These scenes are about several things. One, to show how pretty the woman’s face is. It’s very close to a POV-style video. The second part is to show what the woman will do besides blowjob. There’s ball sucking, ball licking and probably deepest rimming I have seen. The models’ pretty face isn’t near as pretty with two balls on her forehead and a mound of body hair wrapping around her face. That’s mostly what you will see during that part. She then switches to blowjob and shows how far she can go before gagging. The women are good at blowjobs. The biggest compliment I can pay the man or men, is that there’s a constant erection and it’s above average.
The scenes are longer than I am used to in this niche. Some are around 30 minutes even. That’s a long time to watch a woman bury her face and stretch her throat. I have been told many times in my profession, not to complain, unless I have a solution. It’s pretty easy on this site. Does no one in porn use edging the dick? Does no one use vibrators on the frenulum of the dick? Add some teasing, do something different. You could tell me the name of the site is BJ Raw, I should expect blowjobs. There’s as much rimming and playing with the balls as blowjobs. I like this niche. I would like to see it try and advance a little. I won’t name the Blowjob site, I first encountered with this niche, but it has 20 times the scenes this site has and has the woman doing as much as these women do. This site looks like it’s trying to be a niche site that draws people from a certain fetish into it. They’re not doing anything that different than any other full hardcore site. I do believe they could change that.
There are only around 60 scenes, but it is updating weekly, and the models are generally very pretty. The settings are better than you get in normal porn scenes. It moves around throughout the scene. The setting can even start outside then move indoors. It feels like they are going in the right direction, but they turn back around and just do what is expected. If anything about porn has worn on me, it is the feeling that I am watching the producer’s fantasy. That’s fine if I am, but I shouldn’t be paying for someone else’s fantasy. Switch it up a little. I would recommend watching it on Adult Time. I did take the upgrade offer to it. I have a year subscription to Adult Time. They seem to send me these partner offers about once or twice a month. I should have looked more into the actual BJ Raw site before agreeing to join it. I had one of those turn out to be a very good separate site.
This one is not bad. It is repetitive. One of my most watched niches is this one. I like seeing the nude man. It just doesn’t do enough to make me see the word “raw”. I thought each scene would have some variation. I don’t know how men feel about this part. I noticed it in a lot of these scenes. The female twerking. I’m as tired of that as seeing the same 3 actions happening in blowjobs. I’m giving it what I would call a slightly below average score. There is a lot more they could be doing with nearly 30 minutes per video. Maybe someone will get a laugh out of this. I felt like pushing the woman’s head back while she was doing the rimming and saying, “I think it’s clean enough!” Spit, polish and shine. |
|
03-08-22 05:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Southern Sins
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The name of the site threw me off course. This is an Australian site.
Some really good voyeur-style scenes.
The site has 43 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Here’s you a pro/con depending on the person, pubic hair and hair in other places too which I will go into.
There are photo sets that are downloadable and high quality, but only 32 of those.
Video quality is very good, but no 4K. |
| Cons: |
The pubic hair probably isn’t a turn-off for most, but there’s body hair I have read others complain about – underarm on the women.
Scenes are way too short and there are behind the scenes videos mixed in. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first things I thought when checking this site out was Atlanta (my sometimes home), Miami (wish it was my full-time home) and I was thinking like an American – not to mention, stereotyping. I was expecting a site based on stepfamily porn from southern states. I am a regular user of Australian sites like Abby Winters and Girls Out West. I don’t know why the Southern name is in there. I didn’t study much geography.
My first thought when looking at the models was there are some really pretty models on here. One that really stood out to me is one I know from other Australian sites – Ruby Valentine, she’s one of my favorites even. I don’t know if I have just missed it on other sites, but she has full, black, underarm hair on this site. I am not going to say that’s a turn-off for me, but will say it’s not a turn-on for me either. Being of fair-complexion, I don’t have a lot of body hair and it’s just not something I’m used to seeing on women. I don’t mind her pubic hair at all. I believe pubic hair on darker complected models is sexy.
That seems to be the basis of the site. It says it showcases people celebrating themselves and life. There are some interesting scenes I have never seen on other sites or if I have, those other sites made the scenes look contrived. For example, there is a scene titled, “Yoga Lesson” and it’s 6-7 women outdoors, nude, doing yoga. Where it kind of falls flat is there’s no sex at all in it. It looks like 6-7 real women just doing naked yoga in the wilderness. Is there a big market for “porn” like that? I get the part that says this could be a fantasy for someone to walk up on a group of nude women doing yoga, but they are seriously doing yoga and not just doing it for preparation for an all-out, wild orgy.
The solo scenes are probably my favorite scenes on this site, aided by Ruby Valentine being in a couple of those. I watched the behind the scenes videos just to see if maybe those were the BTS videos that are interesting. I’m going on the side of personal preference, I didn’t find those very interesting, no more than I would a Netflix documentary on new-age therapy. Maybe the variation in scenes offers some value and interest? There are scenes (I typed sins) with voyeurism, but just a few. One of the niches I would like to see more of has a scene of it on this site. A guy standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. I really believe that’s a niche that is way underused in porn. It could even be a woman standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. That’s an element I don’t think porn producers these days think about. Us that are watching it are like the person standing at the door. I would make a whole site of that niche.
I do think the site is worth checking out especially if either of these parts interest you – Ruby Valentine (she has 5 solo scenes on here that are all great) or hairy porn interests you. Maybe that should be called “natural” porn? Seems more marketable to me. The sex is believable. The videos can be downloaded at 540p, 720p and 1080p. The photo sets can be downloaded as well, but I do believe if Ruby Valentine and hairy doesn’t interest you, you may not like this site as much as I do. |
|
10-19-21 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female. |
| Cons: |
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me. |
|
04-26-20 02:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
146
|
James Deen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc... |
| Cons: |
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better. |
|
04-25-20 09:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
147
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month. |
| Cons: |
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views. |
|
02-17-20 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Teenrs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Teen network that includes 5 (small) sites featuring a specific niche on each site.
It's different, I really thought I was going to have buyer's remorse, but the scenes are quite good and I ended up liking it.
Unless I am counting wrong, I'm counting 145 scenes on the entire network of 5 sites, but want to add, I downloaded 50 of the scenes.
Videos have 540p, 720p and 1080p options, there are screencaps, but I haven't found a way to download them.
Most of the videos are long, averaging 45 minutes each and most involve more than two people. |
| Cons: |
Four of the five sites haven't updated since 2016 and the one that is updating, hasn't updated since November 20th, 2019 (more than two weeks ago).
There are good ideas here, there's creativity, why stop producing this content?
It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to pick a favorite niche in porn it would be CFNM. They have a site here called CFNM 18. I knew it was going to be a small site, but didn't know how small. It has 14 scenes on it. They are all very good scenes and will be saved with my other CFNM videos from other sites, they are creative, they scenes are long with a couple lasting over an hour and they're exactly what I like in CFNM. The last update was in 2016.
I also like the sites where games are played, strip poker type games, the various naked twister type games and they have a site called Spicy Roulette. I was looking forward to see what they could do to make a roulette wheel sexy and there's 12 scenes on it. These scenes are good, they are fun, and these are major group sex scenes which I really don't see a lot of anymore. The scenes on Spicy Roulette feature as many as 3 males and 5 females, you'll have two or three women riding the men and two of the women tribbing in the distance. Very sexy scenes.
They have a site called My Dr. Feelgood, which is the medical niche and it's one I like. It has 10 scenes on it. These are good and again, very long scenes in the 45 minutes range. It just feels like someone had a busy year in 2016 and decided to stop filming porn.
Next is 18Dom, which is a pretty sad attempt at domination porn as 18 year old female models are "dominating" men. The scenes are not bad or believable. The models in all of the scenes on this network are very pretty and like the other sites I've listed so far, this one has long videos in the 30 minute range. The domination is about as believable as the number of scenes I'm going to say, it has 13 scenes on it. These kind of remind me of CFNM scenes except the models end up nude. It's mostly soft "physical violence" like a 90 pound woman forcing the man down.
The last site in the network is Club Exclusive and it is the one that updated on November 20, 2019, it has nearly 100 scenes on it, but there's something to note here. These scenes have the Club Sweetheart watermark on them so they are from Club Sweethearts, they're pretty good scenes overall, there's creativity, some even have a CFNM type feel to them, there are handjobs, even a couple go into the strip games, so I guess it works as a good way to preview Club Sweethearts.
The other four sites are generally better than it as you can tell those sites had a lot of thought put into their scenes. If those first four sites had around 50 scenes on each, I would score this network very high, but instead, I got around 50 scenes total and nearly all came from those first 4 sites. All wasn't lost as I've joined a few sites where I don't download anything.
If those 4 niche sites interest you and you find a good deal like I did, it might be worth it to join and grab the scenes from those sites. If those niches don't interest you, I don't think you're going to be too happy or impressed with this tiny network. I felt like an 80 is a fair score just based on the content on those first 4 sites being very good. |
|
12-02-19 11:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
149
|
Bi Maxx
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Male, male, female bisexual scenes, groups and orgies.
It's a narrow niche that usually fails to deliver, but Bi Maxx is the best I've seen of the niche.
Over 350 scenes, I can't give an exact number as will be explained in the first con.
Standard for the times, 480p, 720p and 1080p options to download.
The best looking models (male and female) you will see in MMF bisexual scenes.
Includes access to Sinx's sample videos from more than 20 sites. |
| Cons: |
Bi Maxx was easy to navigate the last time I was on it (2016). It's now filled with the most confusing navigation I've seen on a site.
No update schedule, I didn't download any videos from here in 2016, so I don't know how new these scenes are.
Expensive €29.99, about $32 in USD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bi Maxx offers a niche that could be confusing to some porn fans. Usually when we hear of a bisexual threesome we think of two women with a man, but Bi Maxx has two men with a woman. There's a unique, but also formulaic feel to these scenes. I'm not a porn producer, but I would think you have to get a certain amount of time with the woman having sex with one or both men, time with the men having sex with each other, role (top and bottom) being flipped and there's the confusion of who is going to take the cumshots.
Bi Maxx has a distinct advantage over the two other bisexual men sites I know of, they are owned by the same company that owns Tainster. They have full access to a stable of beautiful female models and many of them appear in these scenes.
I know looks are subjective, but most bisexual male scenes have an average looking female in them. Some of the females in these scenes could easily be A-list European models. I have reviewed several Tainster sites and one thing all have in common is the acting ability. These females seem to be very aroused by watching two men have sex with each other. It's not uncommon in this niche to see women that look bored or even uninterested.
The video quality is very good. There are photo sets too.
Then, the problems start. Sinx is either the new owner of the Tainster sites or it's just a name Tainster is using to signify a change in direction. They have videos (usually 5-20) from other paysites that have no direct connection to them or the content you bought.
The very first time I joined "Tainster" it was called EroMax, Bi Maxx was included with the sites that you now get with a Tainster membership. Now, Bi Maxx has been removed from Tainster and requires a second membership.
You click videos and see the typical porn site page with 15-20 videos, click a button to see more, click a number to go to the next page and you find yourself with several hundred scenes. The confusion returns. There is a section called "channels" it has what to me are 48 DVDs or themed series. These have between 2-4 scenes on each one. I can't tell if these are the same scenes on the videos page. It shows one picture. There's two naked guys and a naked woman, many of them don't show their faces and they don't list their names.
Want some more confusion? When you click on one to view it, it says you have to pay $2.99 to view it. This is a complete mess. The Tainster site works well enough on Sinx, but Bi Maxx seems to be their version of a money pit. Have we reached that part of porn's era where supply and demand will control the pricing of rare niches?
More so than the Tainster videos, these videos being European filmed and featuring European actors and actresses show a major problem with the language barrier.
If a man and woman are having sex you really don't need a story to understand why they are having sex. Even a man, female and female. Then, you watch these scenes and one of the men looks like he's not into it. Why? I can't understand what he says. The acting is good enough in all scenes Tainster films to make it where you can read body language. Could they maybe put subtitles? Or explain what the channels section is for?
One last part on the channels section. They are named just like the Bi Maxx scenes, like, "Bisex Party: Always bet on Bi" but I have to pay extra for those? I'm giving it an 80 for the quality of models, filming and feeling I could give it a 60 for being so damned confusing. |
|
10-14-19 09:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
XFeeds
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content. |
|
09-18-23 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
|
