Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Pride Studios
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that. |
|
12-08-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
Next Door Raw
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones. |
| Cons: |
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me. |
| Bottom Line: |
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea. |
|
12-08-21 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
153
|
Black Meat White Feet
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great download speeds that are at my maximum.
Comes with 23 high quality interracial sites on the Dogfart Network
The combination of two unusual niches, interracial porn and foot porn makes for a rare, maybe even unique site.
Uses Epoch as a biller and you can pay with Paypal, as well as any of 100 gift cards.
Easy site navigation and excellent download speeds.
PU has a discount |
| Cons: |
A small site with only 56 updates.
4K costs extra per scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
We on Pornusers have very few reviews for foot focused porn sites. The scenes have a variety of sex acts, including oral, vaginal and anal. However, the scenes use the female model’s feet for foreplay, as a break from other sex acts, as well as for the cumshots.
The scenarios vary and use themes that are common on other pornsites. A good example is a recent update where a mother, Kay Carter, and her stepdaughter Percy Sires, are the female talent. The mother teaches her stepdaughter how to be sexy with her feet. The male stars are black and well hung, of course. Prince Yashua is one of the most prolific of male black pornstars and he is accompanied by Donny Sins as the recipients of the female attention. The premise here is that the stepdaughter got into a car accident and does not have the money to pay for the repairs to the other car. Her stepmother makes a deal for foot sex in this fantasy scene.
This site has many big name American pornstars such as Aidra Fox, Kenzie Reeves, Shona River, Brooklyn Chase, Riley Reid, Casey Calvert, Veruca James, Chastity Lynn, Kagney Lynn Karter, Eva Angelina, Remy LaCroix, Darcy Tyler, and Giselle Leon. The male models are some of the best black male stars in the business. Leading the group is Rico Strong with 11 scenes, Brian Pumper with 9, JonJon with 8, and Prince Yashua with 6. All of them are simply huge down there and the contrast in color with the white models is striking.
The video download choices are Full HD 1920x1080, 10,000 kbps and 30 frames per second, HD 1280x720 4600 kbps and 30 frames per second, Medium at 768x432 and Small at 688x384. Despite 4K being mentioned in other reviews as available for an extra fee, I saw no mention of this on the site. A recent photoset had 243 photos, 3000x2003 and there is a mix of portrait photos and landscape screenshots.
One criticism I feel is valid is that there are only 56 videos, despite the fact that the site has existed since 2011. That is not much for a ten year old site. In the past few years, it has hardly updated at all. So far in 2021 there are only two. In all of 2020 there were only four. Often sites die and go archive when models are difficult to find. I am no expert, but I can’t imagine models being unwilling to do a site that focuses on feet. The scenes are pretty much sex that you find on most sites and are not extreme. This is far from circus porn that would wear out a female model.
The site navigation is easy and is very logical. You can search by model, by site, by network or by tags. I found the download speeds to be at about the maximum my computer is capable of.
Pornusers has a discount for a monthly join. Epoch is the biller and it is one of the best you can use. Through them, you can pay with Paypal, as well as using your choice of about 100 gift cards.
Between a nice discount and the network having a huge archive, I recommend that this site is worth checking out if you are into feet as sex objects. |
|
10-19-21 12:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
154
|
POV Blowjobs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As far as I am willing to go into the world of messy, rough porn. A large POV blowjob site.
Surprising to me, 674 scenes, remove around 40 if you don’t count behind the scenes.
It’s part of the Evil Angel network. I tried to find a few more sites to review from it, but can’t stomach most of them.
Some really pretty women. Why does that surprise me?
Good video quality with more than half of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads.
Downloadable picture zips, but some of the sets only have 10 or less pictures. |
| Cons: |
This does not remind me of a blowjob site. It’s more like a throat culture site, very messy, harsh, I won’t say degrading since the women seem to enjoy it.
No longer updating, but it is a very large site.
One of my most hated acts in porn: Having the guy cum into a glass for the women to drink it. It reminds me of when Rocky drinks the raw eggs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I pushed every boundary I have with these reviews this month. I tried Anal Acrobats, but couldn’t even make it through the trailers of the videos to review it. This one is typical of Evil Angel and some of it’s not terribly disgusting or offensive, but some of it is. I am going to review it as objectively as I can without bringing too much of my disgust into the review.
The majority of the 674 scenes are one woman with one man and those are not that bad. It’s the scenes with more than one man that I found hard to watch. Maybe I should even say, if you are against very hardcore porn, heavy slobbering, running eyeshadow and eyeliner, gagging noises, you might want to stay away from this site.
This is a legitimate complaint that has nothing to do with the disgusting parts. I don’t see how this is POV. Especially when it’s more than one man. There’s one camera and five men. I’m not even for sure where POV for a blowjob should be recorded from.
The most surprising part to me was how many very attractive women there are on the site. I even saw one scene here with the very pretty Anissa Kate. The scenes are very simplistic. Man gets naked, the woman opens her mouth and the man gives her a throat culture with his penis. I really believe if they spent more time working on making it a true POV site, instead of seeing how close they could come to choking the woman to death, it would be a good site. Which is me being objective. I’m saying if you don’t mind the sounds, the gagging, you might like this site a lot. The part that made me at least suffer through watching the scenes was how much the women seem to enjoy it. There is a little more to the scenes than just blowjobs. Many of the female models masturbate while giving the blowjob. I would even recommend it for those who have favorite mainstream female porn stars. You will be surprised when you see her on this site. |
|
08-11-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
156
|
Love Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. |
| Cons: |
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. |
|
12-08-19 08:47pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
157
|
All Wam
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site. |
|
09-10-19 12:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
158
|
21 Naturals
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with only one on one male/female scenes.
Scenes are broken up by niche/name, they are 21 Naturals, 21 Erotic Anal and 21 Foot Art.
Attractive male and female models.
Production values are above average unless you consider story part of the production values.
There are 4K downloads over the last year and 1080p prior to those.
I have not seen a tattoo or a set of implants on the site.
917 scenes, but they haven't updated since January 2019. |
| Cons: |
This type of porn is very dull and plain to me.
The scene titles make you believe there is a story going on, but if there is it is well-hidden.
Now that Adult Time has taken over there is no way to search just for models on 21 Natural. If you go to a model's page it shows you all of her content on all of the Adult Time sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site reminds me of Sex Art. The models are very attractive. The settings are nice and fit the modern vibe of the content. That seems to be where they stopped.
Sites like these are hard to review and hard to be too critical of or too enthusiastic about. They do a good job of sticking to their naturals theme, but the scenes lack everything except sex. Maybe they were going for natural equals no stories -- just sex?
I'm not for sure how hard it is to find someone to write a little story with dialogue? The stories seem to be based on that is a man, that is a woman, they are horny, watch them have sex.
The quality of camerawork, lighting and person that opens the window to let natural wind in are all very high and consistent. The closest they come to a story are in the 21 Foot Art scenes.
They have 917 scenes, but their updates seemed to just stop for no reason. Between December 1st, 2018 and the first week of January 2019, they had 16 scenes, then those updates stopped.
You can download in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes of the last year have 4K or 2160p. The streaming video is 720p at least to my monitor that is what it looks like.
They have picture sets for download.
It feels like they are getting everything right except the content. The positions even look the same from scene to scene as is the order of the sexual positions. It is why I felt the foot scenes added to the content. It at least breaks the monotony of following a set order of positions.
For me, between this site, Sex Art and X-Art, I have realized porn is not supposed to be romantic. Scenes like these strengthen the theories about sex being lust. There is little feeling of lust in the scenes. I will try to avoid scenes like these from now on. That is a subjective opinion. If you already know you like this type of porn then you will probably like this site. |
|
07-29-19 08:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
159
|
Marcus Mojo
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut.
There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy.
I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn.
Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag.
The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body.
The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads. |
| Cons: |
Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem.
No longer updating (has gay porn died?)
Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing.
I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads.
The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym.
A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene.
A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with.
This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them. |
|
12-03-21 08:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
Petite HD Porn
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Petite models in hardcore male/female and lesbian scenes.
221 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
All content is high quality with up to 1080p offered on all videos.
Joining and canceling is easy with CCBill.
Navigation is simple, but not without problems. |
| Cons: |
Being a petite woman, I enjoy the petite niche in porn, but the problems I mentioned in the pros is starting to make this site confusing.
Advertisements that aren’t terribly obtrusive, but are still there.
Updates come, but with the aforementioned confusion it can make the updates confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has several positives going for it. The models are cute and pretty. The lesbian scenes are pretty good. The male/female scenes are hit or miss. The video quality is a plus unless you want 4K. The photo sets are very good and can be downloaded in zips. There is one problem that showed up over the last few months. They (Petite HD Porn) decided to number their scenes as seasons and episodes, similar to a television show. One scene will be S(season): 20, E(pisode): 4, the next release S20, E5. It always seems like a good idea until this happens. Of the newest 5 releases, two are listed as “New Season”. One is S22 E1 (sounds like a new season). The other, that is more recently released is S2 E1. And it’s listed as a new season just like season 22 is listed as a new season. Is the content being recycled? The 3 newest updates include two from season 2. This group of sites is not known for this kind of sloppiness.
The site is still a good site. Some of the male/female seasons are very good, as good as you will see on more known hardcore sites. The pretty models are usually into the sex, but if you’re here for a story there’s not much going on there. Why name the scenes, give them seasons and episodes then leave the story off?
There are 221 scenes, the updates are not even close to consistent. Currently, there was an update last on June 24, then June 21, before that was May 16, before that was March 14 and before that one -- February 9th. The last time I was a member here they were updating once a week during the peak of Covid. It’s one of those sites that you may enjoy, but you’re not going to be missing anything by skipping it. It does carry over the feeling that Nubiles tried too hard to do too much with a network to couple with Nubiles.net (which wasn’t needed) and then the premium standalone sites and a second network. The video quality is good with up to 1080p downloads. The photos and downloadable zips are there. It comes with a 15 or 16 site network, I really believe that’s an 18 site network, but I can’t remember the names of the other sites they don’t list. It’s at least cheap and uses CCBill for easy cancellation. The cross-sales when I joined were not checked.
It just feels like they could do a lot more with this site and their entire group of sites and networks and they may be as long as you join all the sites separately and pay a separate price for each. Just by itself, I couldn’t recommend this site, as a part of the Nubiles Porn network it’s worth taking a look at it. |
|
07-14-21 02:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Canadian hardcore porn network that I received an email promo from.
22 sites included, some are very small.
232 models with some of most unique tags I have seen for models.
A little over 750 main scenes, around 280 bonus scenes.
Some of the scenes have photos and they are downloadable, but contain 20-25 photos in the ones I've looked at.
I think there's a theme or story connecting one scene to another and it's why there are bonus scenes, but the navigation isn't helping me out any. |
| Cons: |
Kind of heavy on the ads. There's a large one at the top, one on the bottom of the main page. Once inside the videos or updates page, there's a large one right in the middle of the content.
There is a listing for bonus sites. It is in French with no English option and I would rather not risk signing in with my login details since I don't know what it says.
Got me with a pre-checked sign-up to a site I had never heard of and that was in all French. I was able to cancel it instantly and only lost $2.95 for it, but what is it with the French-only sites? |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the sites I joined in the past since me a special promo for this Pegas Productions network and it looked interesting.
And it is interesting. The models from the best I can tell are amateurs. The sites or categories included are:
3 Way Porn, Banging Family, Blow Me POV, Chic and Chix, Cutie Pussies, Fun Size Teens, Fresh and Innocent, Inked Gurlz, JizzOrama, Kummalot, Let's Fuck Outside, Lezzie BFF, Lust Eden, Nasty Rookies, Samantha Ardente, Sexy Knockers, Shake the Snake, Sly Masseur, Spice My Sex Life, Straight in the Ass and TranniesRus.
I can't figure out if each site has a story going on from scene to scene or if these are DVDs that are split into parts or what.
Their site Inked Gurlz reminds me a lot of Burning Angel and AltErotica.
The rest of the sites seem just like each one is just a niche and they're calling it a site. The site has been around for over 10 years, but only has around 800 scenes.
I would rate most of the scenes as average scenes. Most of the women look like amateurs and are mostly cute types. The guys look like professional wrestlers.
I watched some of the more specific scenes like, "Shit! My Stepdaughter is a stripper!" The scene starts with the stepdad in the stepdaughter's room looking in her nightstand. He finds sparkly, shiny clothes and says, "Shit! My daughter-in-law is a stripper!" That's not a typo or mistake by me. The scene says "stepdaughter", the script of the scene is "daughter-in-law". The father-in-law, who looks as young as the daughter-in-law, walks around mumbling about wait until my son finds out about this. The daughter-in-law comes in, seduces him and has sex with him.
That is really poor production standards. First, the mistake with the naming of the scene and role of the female. Then, the dad talking about how upset his son is going to be, has sex with her and she's not even attractive.
It's a disappointing site for me. The older videos are in poor quality even though it says they are HD. As mentioned, several options take you to pages in French, they got me with a cross sale that I still haven't seen and it was of a movie site in French. I found a few scenes I liked. The newer ones are 1080p. The bonus scenes from watching a few look to be BTS and nearly all dialogue is in French. There is a cameraman talking in most of these scenes. The actors in the scene are talking, laughing and I'm wondering what they're even saying.
Those unique tags for the models might even explain some of the frustration. Here is how they have their models tagged and separated - Fruity & Spicy, Light and Flexible, Young and Delicate, Bodied and Curvy, Aromatic and Alluring, Vibrant and Zesty. It is a porn site or a coffee and pastry house?
I think it could be a good site, but as it is, it's only okay. |
|
10-29-19 01:22am
Replies (3)
|
Review
162
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Artistic, solo porn of natural looking models.
Photo update every 3 days, video update every 6 days.
It's believable masturbation porn. I think that's the big selling point.
Videos are explicit in showing the masturbation and the photo sets are also full show of spreads. Both are downloadable.
227 videos, 1,047 photo sets and 212 models.
Easy cancellation, bills through echst.net, but the cancellation process is right in your account. |
| Cons: |
The scenes most likely have an audience for this type of porn, but it's not really that interesting to me.
The scenes are very repetitive.
No purpose, story or reason for these women to be masturbating, it just feels contrived. |
| Bottom Line: |
Give credit to the marketing department. With a name like Eternal Desire it sounds like there might be something really exciting going on. Instead, it's a group of almost all white, young, models masturbating on a bed. It reminds me a little of I Feel Myself without the hotness factor.
The scenes have almost nothing varying between scenes. There is explicit masturbation, but there's a feeling of this is exactly how I used to masturbate when I lived with my parents and didn't want to risk getting caught. I'm not for sure that translates well into porn.
The amount of content is okay with 227 videos and 1,047 photo sets, but those are even on what I'm going to call "the quiet side". If you look at picture 1 then look at the last picture in the set there's very little difference. I need progression in my porn!
The models are pretty enough. Most could easily pass as girl next door types. Which is where I think the videos fail. They could have at least had the girls be more playful, teasing, it's instead like watching a selfish porn scene where the model is just into touching herself and not playing to the camera.
The quality of the videos is good, they have 4K on all videos over the last year or so, before that 1080p was standard and those resolutions go down to small mobile sizes.
I think this sums up my feelings about it. I got most excited for the scenes that had clothed women in the preview. Even if it's just a pair of tights. I keep feeling the word "selfish" when looking at the scenes. I had the same feeling about I Feel Myself. So, that could just me and something I don't like.
The lack of variation in what happens in the scene (masturbation and that's all), no girl/girl scenes, I just can't get into this porn. Most of the models settle into one masturbation position (on knees, on back) and stay there for the whole scene.
The girl next door type models is a plus, but that asks why have them nude to start the scene? The girl next door isn't likely walking around outside in full nudity. At least the quality is high and I think for the right person this site could be a lot better for them than it was me. |
|
12-06-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
163
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good network that used to be great
Nearly all models are attractive
Easily searchable and overall navigation
A good mix of niches
You can almost always find a cheap promo price |
| Cons: |
Download limit of 25 videos per month
Picture sets are mediocre
A lot of the sites I remember from this network are no longer on this network |
| Bottom Line: |
I can remember joining Lets Doe It back when it was first being advertised. It was very good, even great. Possibly one of the most diverse networks in porn. Then they decided to split it up and moved 13 of the sites to Amateur Euro. That was bad enough, but then they decided to operate with download limits. I am almost positive, at one time, the download limit was 100 per month. It’s now 25.
I joined Lets Doe It just a few weeks ago for a very low promo price. I have visited the site 4 times and downloaded nothing. I believe download limits do that to a member’s interest. Instead of looking at videos and thinking about which ones you like and want to download, you end up looking at videos with the thinking of “eliminating” some so you won’t hit the download limit.
Lets Doe It’s potential was very high, but they have not improved their photo sets and it’s just starting to feel like a downward spiral.
The models are still very attractive, but the lack of stories in the videos, mediocre picture sets and restrictive download limits just saps a lot of the energy as a member.
I would like to say there’s still something great going on at Lets Do It, but I find it difficult to say that. If you find a model you like or a niche you like, you have to start focusing on not downloading too many videos. For what it’s worth, their other network, Amateur Euro has completely fallen off with no updates. Lets Do It at least does still update.
The videos can be downloaded in HD quality and are good enough. Other than those allowed 25 downloads, there’s just not much else to interest me. I doubt I will download any of the videos now and can say unless something improves, there’s little to no reason for me to return as a member. Your experience with the site may be better than mine. My score for it is partially based in the potential.
I do believe they could right the ship with a few changes, maybe even just raise the download limit to 50 or 100. I don’t remember their download limits being as restrictive as they are now and back when Lets Doe It first started, there were no download limits. If downloading doesn’t interest you then you can adjust the score accordingly. Otherwise, this is at best, an average network. |
|
11-07-23 12:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are 114 scenes, not a small site, but not impressive either
Easy to use search by tags
Can join using Paypal as well as many giftcards
Interesting looking camsite that I did not checkout
Rare porn that focuses on a single pregnant model, who sometimes adds a friend to the scene |
| Cons: |
No High Definition content, of course no 4K either
No Pornusers discount so this is expensive for the quality
Not adding new scenes
No model interaction
Too many ads on members’ pages |
| Bottom Line: |
A lot has changed for the better since this site was new. There are many porn fans who like interracial porn, but it is hardly rare or taboo any longer. I like porn with black men and I can enjoy seeing their cocks in action. However, I did not like seeing black men being stereotyped as thugs and the idea that black men all have huge cocks is not true. I also did not like that the white women were portrayed as cheating on their white boyfriends or husbands. One description I read was calling them lame ass white boys with tiny wieners or even worse, when compared to black men they have erectile dysfunction.
Ruth Blackwell is pregnant in most, but not all of the scenes. Pregnant porn is rather a theme with limited appeal to most porn fans I would imagine, as not much Is produced. I was uncomfortable with even the idea. She states that she wants child support from the presumably black father, but has no idea which of many he may be. The site describes her as she’s evil, she’s mean, she is the black cock queen. I don’t need to say I did not like much about this site.
The site does not have any High Definition videos, not a single one. In 2021 that makes this behind the times and by quite a lot. In my opinion, the scenes were barely watchable. The sex itself was rather standard and to the point. There is oral and vaginal, but for good reason nothing more extreme. Many of the scenes have another woman with her and her guy. Mostly these are blond white women, but I did see a few Asians and even a black woman, Alexis Silver. The woman who was the hottest was Kelly Wells, who was a major star years ago. In many of these scenes it is stated that her partner woman was trying to get pregnant in the scene. Another goal was to get the partner woman converted to preferring black men.
As a site, it was laid out well and easy to use. Searching is easy. It says there are live webcams featuring the models, but that leads to a link that goes nowhere. On the left side of the page, there is advertising for a cam site, called Dogfartlive, which I recognized as Streammate. I did not try it. I felt there was too much advertising for it, to the point that it was distracting. The site states that there will be updates, but the quality makes me think of porn from before 2010. There is zero model interaction too. No way to contact her, chat, make a request, nothing.
For the price, I expected a lot more from a site. |
|
10-19-21 12:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Lingerie Tales
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Zipped and downloadable photo sets.
You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads.
Uses a tag system for searching.
Pretty UK women with sexy accents
The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill
The site has 168 videos and photosets. |
| Cons: |
Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos.
Nude, but not as explicit as I might like. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way.
I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually.
You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me.
I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo?
There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site.
The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early. |
|
08-10-21 03:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
She's Brand New
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. |
|
03-10-21 01:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
09-30-19 11:11pm (Update History)
Reason: Graded it on streaming abilities, original review was more frustrated with their lie on their join page.
|
| Pros: |
Network of 6 sites, a fitness site, a massage site, a MILF site, a hardcore site and two lesbian sites.
The content looks very good, but I was tricked by a promotional offer from them. I can't download anything.
There are 471 models on the network with most looking like pros.
The download options for videos show 360p to 1080p
They have photo sets that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The join screen said unlimited downloads. Once inside, it told me I had to pay $14.95 to download. Anyone could go to the site right now, click join and you will see the unlimited downloads banner with no asterisk or fine print.
It looks like most of it is very normal porn. The promo showed fitness scenes that looked like group environments, but the scenes on the site don't look that way. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to rewrite this bottom line. I still am upset by the promotion of unlimited downloads only to find out they come at an extra charge.
I will give a basic overview of what you get. You can stream the videos and look at the photos.
Dane Jones is a standard hardcore site with 698 scenes, it updates 3 times per week.
Lesbea is a standard lesbian site with 600 scenes, it updates 1-2 times per week, 6 updates in September.
Massage Rooms has both scenarios of massages, men massaging women, women massaging men and sex. It has 528 scenes and updated 6 times in September.
MomXXX is a MILF site with straight sex and lesbian sex, it only updated twice in September.
Fitness Rooms is an exercise and exercise clothing fetish hardcore site. It has 163 scenes and updated twice in September.
Girlfriends is a lesbian site, more college-type age models and has 204 scenes. It updated 3 times in September.
The download options are 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p, you have to pay $14.95 for them. I feel like I'm writing a repeat review of Mofos. There's good quality content here. The Girlfriends site is really good.
There are hardly no ads in the member's area. The site works well, you can browse by site or by network update. You can browse by model. They have an excellent tagging system. Everything is in place for a top-tier site except telling you that you get unlimited downloads then saying you have to pay $14.95 for them.
I felt like Mofos might be worth paying the extra for on the downloads, but this Sexy Hub site doesn't feel like it is. This feels like a site that should be around $15 and it should include downloads.
I've developed a frustrated feeling with these sites. I'm not even a regular downloading type member, but I have noticed most Porn User members are. It does say in the TBP review that downloads cost extra, but it said unlimited downloads on the join page.
To add to this, I went through the cancel by chat process and it took nearly 25 minutes. The rep asked me why I was canceling. I told him/her I was going out of town and didn't want to forget it. The rep then told me they found an expired promo they would let me have for $72 a year. I thanked them, but told them I would rather not join long-term. They disconnected the chat. A few minutes later I received a cancellation email. I will try to avoid joining sites with this biller from now on. |
|
09-30-19 10:06pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
168
|
Barbie Cummings
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge black dicks, most described as more than a foot long
Barbie is cute and very playful |
| Cons: |
Too expensive and PU does not have a discount
TBP had a review in 2014 that showed 27 video. It still does. Not updating
The best quality is Standard Definition. The site is probably from before 2010.
Only visually boring internal cumshots
The scene descriptions are uncomfortably borderline racist. Definitely stereotypical.
No interactons with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. |
| Bottom Line: |
The preview says she is he queen of the black guy creampie. The site says it has 30 videos, there are 27, and is adding updates regularly and it is a dead site. Unfortunately when looking at the low quality content, all you see is in Standard Definition. By my guess, that would mean this was actively updating before 2010. The video count is far too few and it says they were all added in 2021.
So who is Barb Cummings? She is an attractive thin blond American model who was on several sites before getting one just for herself. Here, she comes across well and has a hot personality. The premise is that her father taught her to hate black men. Out of pure spite, she wants to go in the complete opposite direction and have a black baby. Did I leave out that her goal is to show her getting pregnant on camera? In many scene descriptions she says she is disappointed with yet another pregnancy test. So on to another two or three black men to try again. She describes her partners in very stereotypical ways. In many cases the reason she is with so many guys at once is that they would not do the scene if they had to pay child support. Many possible fathers, no 18 year monetary commitment. In two scenes she has pornstar Gia Paloma help her.
With pregnancy a goal, she has managed to find a way to do scenes that have a unique theme for porn. However, as a woman, I want to see cum shots. These are all internals. In a few scenes you see the cum dripping out, but that does nothing for me. It does zero to get her pregnant either. On the other hand the black guys are really dark and huge. She describes them as footlongs and even more. I don’t think that is literally accurate, but they do look really large.
The downloads were fast, the site uses tags for searching and you also get a photoset for each video. There are no interactions with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. The site is what you see and you should never expect any updates or other changes.
I could not resist and I cheated and looked her up online. Years ago she was pulled over for speeding and gave the trooper a blow job to get out of it. She recorded it all, posted it online and he lost his job. She was married from before this site was active and had a white baby with her white husband. It was just a way to get noticed. If you find her fantasy to be hot you can try out this site. |
|
10-19-21 12:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
True Anal
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready |
| Cons: |
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
I didn't like much about this site. |
|
08-10-21 03:22am
Replies (0)
|
|
