Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : KayTBuffs (0)

Feedback:   All (171)  |   Reviews (153)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (18) Other:   Replies Received (48)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 126-150 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 126 Sapphix (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: This network is so good; it’s overwhelming Includes Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush Unlimited downloads of videos and picture zips Almost unlimited amount of very pretty models It has an extensive set of tags to search from The three sites combined have around 3,000 scenes Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming. Cons: It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing. I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface Bottom Line: I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder. Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me! The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action. The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year. The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation. Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good. I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix. 10-11-23  07:18am Replies (0) Review 127 Sapphix (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Includes 3 female-centric sites, Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush. A total of 2,400 scenes. These include a video and high-quality photo set. You may download all. They have 1,150 of the prettiest women I have ever laid my eyes on. Billing company changes, I sometimes get Rocketgate, sometimes Epoch, both are easy to use and cancel. Video quality on Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink is excellent. Tagging system is one of the best in the business. Sapphic Erotica has group scenes, always at least 2 women and Give Me Pink is always solo. Cons: Fist Flush has not been updated since 2018 and only has 77 scenes on it, the content they have is good, but if you're only joining for it know ahead of time it's not being updated. There's some serious gay for pay going on, some of the scenes feel like neither woman wants to be there. Bottom Line: When Sapphix was created it was one of the greatest days in female-centric porn. You get the archive site Fist Flush for those into the rougher fisting (only girls, no guys), you get Sapphic Erotica, one of the greatest lesbian sites ever created and you get Give Me Pink, a solo, but hardcore solo site. The video quality and options are as good as any site I have seen. Sapphic Erotica has been offering 4K downloads on every scene since October 2015. If you don't want 4K they also offer 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They have been offering 1080p since 2007! Give Me Pink has been offering 4K downloads since November 2015 and those also come with 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They too have been offering 1080p since 2007. Fist Flush's few newer updates offer 4K and all of their past scenes have 1080p, 720p and 540p. Each scene includes a photo set that is up to 3000 resolution. These can be downloaded as zip files. Gay for pay does hamper some of the scenes, but I would estimate it at less than 15% of the scenes. Most of the scenes on Sapphic Erotica are believable enough to make a girl wonder about the talk of bi-curious. Give Me Pink could be a little much for some as there are extreme insertions, but I have noticed those are in the older scenes. The newer scenes are more standard "hard masturbation". Fist Flush is a site about fisting. I'm not really into this scenes myself -- they even have anal fisting. It does offer a varied selection from scene to scene, the kissable, lovable, innocent tribbing of the cute, pretty and even beautiful lesbians on Sapphic Erotica, the harder masturbation of the Give Me Pink girls and the whole fist of Fist Flush. The tagging system here is really incredible. As many as you want can be used at one time. It starts with Categories - here you have anal, kissing, 69 and 26 other choices. Now you get Locations - They have living room, outdoors, pool and 9 other locations. Next is Face Type - baby face, slutty, butch and 6 more types of faces Bringing Ethnicity in now - Exotic, Hispanic, Caucasian and Black How about Hair Color - redhead, brunette, blonde and 3 more Need more for hair fetishes, Hair Style - short, long-curly, long-straight and 4 more Can't forget those sexy Eyes - blue, grey, brown and green What about the body art - tattoos, piercings, branding and glasses Like some Pubic Hair - shaved, trimmed, hairy Can't forget the pussy/labia type - small, medium, meat curtains (really?), big clit Ethnicity wasn't enough, Skin Tone - light, medium, dark, tan-lines Thought they forgot the Breasts - natural, flat, floppy, fake, perky, large, teardrop, medium But don't forget the Butt - thick, bubble butt, apple, average and flat What good are those without Body Type - athletic, curvy, MILF, petite, tall, barely legal and more Who needs Clothes - costume, bikini, jeans, hot pants, dress, heels, sneakers, fully naked(invisible clothes?), leggings, hose, stockings, pajamas and more. Last is the site - Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink, Fist Flush You can go through all those options and mark everyone you want to see and it will filter down to the scenes with everything you marked. I think it's why I like the site so much. There is no guessing. You can literally select what you want to see and it will be there. Sapphic Erotica has 1,798 scenes, Give Me Pink has 391 scenes, Fist Flush has 77 scenes and they do have interviews, but there are only 59 of those. In my opinion, they have the best all-around experience in porn -- the quality, the quantity, the excellent tagging system and the quality of models. 10-14-19  08:51pm Replies (1) Review 128 Say Uncle (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network. Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited. Video download quality goes up to 1080p It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen Cons: The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn Bottom Line: I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too. Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view. I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic. The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included. I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes. This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks. 08-07-23  10:53am Replies (0) Review 129 Sex Art (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive. They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive. There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short. They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos. All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits. Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day. Cons: They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few. The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short. Bottom Line: Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes. That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes. There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit). I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it. I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene. 04-06-21  02:24am Replies (0) Review 130 Sex Art (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation. Male and female models are very attractive. The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand. Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos. The site updates each day. Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost. Cons: Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in. I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one. Bottom Line: I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that. It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it. A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn. The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other. The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into. They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money. I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates. It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off. The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes. These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions." That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too. It lingers way too close to cheesy for me. 07-16-19  01:19am Replies (1) Review 131 Sexy Hub (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 09-30-19  11:11pm  (Update History) Reason: Graded it on streaming abilities, original review was more frustrated with their lie on their join page. Pros: Network of 6 sites, a fitness site, a massage site, a MILF site, a hardcore site and two lesbian sites. The content looks very good, but I was tricked by a promotional offer from them. I can't download anything. There are 471 models on the network with most looking like pros. The download options for videos show 360p to 1080p They have photo sets that can be downloaded. Cons: The join screen said unlimited downloads. Once inside, it told me I had to pay $14.95 to download. Anyone could go to the site right now, click join and you will see the unlimited downloads banner with no asterisk or fine print. It looks like most of it is very normal porn. The promo showed fitness scenes that looked like group environments, but the scenes on the site don't look that way. Bottom Line: I decided to rewrite this bottom line. I still am upset by the promotion of unlimited downloads only to find out they come at an extra charge. I will give a basic overview of what you get. You can stream the videos and look at the photos. Dane Jones is a standard hardcore site with 698 scenes, it updates 3 times per week. Lesbea is a standard lesbian site with 600 scenes, it updates 1-2 times per week, 6 updates in September. Massage Rooms has both scenarios of massages, men massaging women, women massaging men and sex. It has 528 scenes and updated 6 times in September. MomXXX is a MILF site with straight sex and lesbian sex, it only updated twice in September. Fitness Rooms is an exercise and exercise clothing fetish hardcore site. It has 163 scenes and updated twice in September. Girlfriends is a lesbian site, more college-type age models and has 204 scenes. It updated 3 times in September. The download options are 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p, you have to pay $14.95 for them. I feel like I'm writing a repeat review of Mofos. There's good quality content here. The Girlfriends site is really good. There are hardly no ads in the member's area. The site works well, you can browse by site or by network update. You can browse by model. They have an excellent tagging system. Everything is in place for a top-tier site except telling you that you get unlimited downloads then saying you have to pay $14.95 for them. I felt like Mofos might be worth paying the extra for on the downloads, but this Sexy Hub site doesn't feel like it is. This feels like a site that should be around $15 and it should include downloads. I've developed a frustrated feeling with these sites. I'm not even a regular downloading type member, but I have noticed most Porn User members are. It does say in the TBP review that downloads cost extra, but it said unlimited downloads on the join page. To add to this, I went through the cancel by chat process and it took nearly 25 minutes. The rep asked me why I was canceling. I told him/her I was going out of town and didn't want to forget it. The rep then told me they found an expired promo they would let me have for $72 a year. I thanked them, but told them I would rather not join long-term. They disconnected the chat. A few minutes later I received a cancellation email. I will try to avoid joining sites with this biller from now on. 09-30-19  10:06pm Replies (1) Review 132 She's Brand New (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene. Pretty women, some variety as well. The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot. They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month. Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. Cons: This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading. No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size. I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) Bottom Line: I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too. This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution. Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive. The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others. All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. 03-10-21  01:13am Replies (0) Review 133 Silverstone DVD (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Some really great classic DVD scenes. Nostalgia is replacing my interest in newer porn. So many of these models are ones I forgot about. Very large site with 1,203 scenes. It should appeal to collectors and those that started watching porn in the earlier years of internet porn. You get Adult Time with it. There’s plenty more porn to look at. Captures more of the spirit of porn that first interested me in porn. Cons: The video quality is not good. It looks like these scenes are all from SD DVDs, 480p is the top option for downloads. I still think nostalgia and the action makes up for it. It stopped updating in 2019 but was updating regularly and I don’t know why they didn’t improve the quality. Bottom Line: Start it off with blame Vivid Classics for taking me back to a simpler time in porn’s history. Who needs gimmicks, domination and fetishes when you can have two very pretty, young, European women using a strap-on with each other? I was expecting the scenes to be in better quality. The Vivid Classics are and it on the same network. I can see the age of these scenes. There’s one with a young Silvia Saint. The ones I remembered are the Girl on Girl scenes. Some of the models look like maybe South American amateurs. Those are very good scenes. I can get by the video quality if the scene is good enough. I do remember being a member of Silverstone DVD as a standalone site around 2010. I started out with Nubiles and DVD porn was very popular at the time. I would join the different studio sites instead of trying to punish myself with the large DVD sites. I do remember how much I liked these scenes. I thought the studio was long gone. I didn’t even realize it’s on Adult Time. You get 1,203 scenes. The lesbian scenes are the best ones on the site. One of the first female pornstars I felt attraction to, which scared me – was Dee Baker. She has some scenes on this site including the one I remember well with Jeanie Rivers. This porn is as “dirty” as the porn we are seeing more of these days. Dee rims Jeanie, much more passionate lesbian scenes than the newer scenes have on most site. I don’t know what it says for me when I say I’m not a lesbian, but I really like passionate lesbian porn. It’s not all lesbian. There are straight scenes. Over 500 anal scenes. Most of the performers are well-known porn greats. It's probably not going to blow you away, but if you like younger women, the smaller, slimmer women like were more common 10 years ago in porn, you will find some scenes on this site that you like. One DVD that I remember so well from this site, the Twins Collection that has the looks to be real twins. The two young, very pretty black twins. That is a niche I remember porn trying to get going about 10-15 years ago. Those DVDs are on here. Those show me something as well. If you like black women and South American women, there are a lot on this site. I know that guys have complained about not enough diversity in models. I nearly downloaded as much from this site as I did Vivid. I’ve still not hit that download limit, but these scenes, being 480p are not very big. Most are around 200 MB each. Where does nostalgia fit in to today’s world? I like it. The people look like they are having fun. And having orgasms, the women are cute, the guys are masculine. I think everyone should at least watch a scene or two from it just to see the differences between new porn and the classic porn. Half of these scenes have anal, but none of those are hard to watch. That tells me it’s a difference in how the models act. Both male and female. This is equal porn. Most of these men stay out of the camera except the important, needed part. Their enjoyment and pleasure seem to come from how attractive the females are. That’s a lost concept in porn today. Not much reason to check the site anymore after this time, but plenty of reason to if you haven’t. It also shows what porn snobs we have become. We will watch low entertainment value porn in exchange for 2180 pixel videos. 02-09-22  06:28am Replies (0) Review 134 Sinful Raw (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: An interesting, episodic porn site that is in its very early stages. The scenes are very professional with high production values. All videos include a 4K download option, but there are currently only 16 scenes. It’s updating twice a week and will say the scenes are long enough and good enough to at least show the potential this site has. There are downloadable photo zips as well those should not overlooked. The resolution is 2700x4000 and there are excellent lighting effects that show up more in the photos than in the videos. The scenes have added elements of added kink to them, like cloth masks, orgies and I’m going to say what the site reminds me of – Pure Taboo. Cons: I believe a person could get confused with the titling of the scenes. There’s part 1, part 2, part 3 of each titled scene. I don’t know a lot of pro models, but know most of these. This is the downside to a professional site. There are models, especially males, that I remember seeing in porn over 15 years ago like Erik Everhard. Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential. Whether they reach that potential is going to be questionable. The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The photos can be downloaded and are 2700x4000 resolution. The photos are some of the best I have seen and it’s because the scenes all have a dark feel to them. The photos use lighting to highlight the areas you want to see. It feels like the site is produced by someone who has a lot of experience watching good porn and they’re trying to follow in those footsteps. It does lead to some problems. I have very little experience with porn before 2010, especially hardcore porn, but I recognize these actors/models. One scene is Barbie Sins and Erik Everhard. I know I have seen scenes with Erik Everhard in scenes from the late 1990s. I’m not saying there’s a problem with that, but I have learned in my time watching porn that the longtime pros just don’t appeal that much to me. Since this is episodic porn (that’s what happens when you use the same title and put an ascending number after each scene), I can say I don’t see much connection between the scenes of the same title. There is Dirty Thirty, Dirty Thirty 2 and Dirty Thirty 3. The first one is a professional businesswoman who is out of town on business and seduces the bellhop at the hotel while talking to her husband on the phone. Dirty Thirty 2 is a professional businesswoman who hires a male prostitute (Erik Everhard) to do for her what her husband can’t. Part 3 is similar in theme, the woman plays the role of an escort finder (pimp?) and brings in her top male performer to satisfy a woman and he does so in less time than the woman paid for, so the female pimp has sex with him too. There are some interesting takes on the ways these scenes play out including a 3 part called Mine For A Moment. They even have one 3 part series titled Rock, Paper, Scissors. The newest series they have is listed as the First Sinful Orgy. This is where you see the positive of professional work. There are 9 people in one of those orgy scenes and you can see all 9 of them at various points in the video. The size of the site with only two updates per month definitely doesn’t help, but depending on the viewer, I believe they will either love these scenes or not even be interested. There are tattoos, implants and I do think that comes from the professional part of the site. These are mostly well-known porn stars maybe taking a different approach to their porn. There is another part to like and not to like. Nearly all of the scenes are 27-30 minutes long. That’s the professional part again. I do understand, as an author myself, plot, crescendo and ending are all important and need to be timed perfectly. That’s in a book. I don’t know if it translates as well in video, especially porn. I’m going to say something I rarely say and that is I don’t find most of these women very attractive. I know others do. I recognize nearly every name, but we are going into subjective preferences. The orgy scene which has made up the 4 newest scenes does give me the feeling of potential. Maybe they started out with known pros they knew they could count on to give consistent performances to show the developing story and plot in the scenes. That does make me believe it has potential. My personal advice would be to pull away from those veterans of porn and put some newer talent in the scenes. It reminds me of when I watch another Will Smith movie. He’s a great actor and has a great personality, but it’s another Will Smith movie. The 4 scenes of the orgy has a lot of females and males I’m not THAT familiar with. I recognize a few, but most are new to me. There is a lot of playing on the emotions of cheating, betraying, even a little cuckolding. I like it and will keep checking back on it. I believe they’re on the right track. 10-19-21  01:22pm Replies (0) Review 135 Slayed (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price. Pretty and sexy models Scenes are fun and have good production Updates weekly Cons: There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem. The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. Bottom Line: I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned. The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two. There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle. With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. 11-06-22  06:27pm Replies (0) Review 136 Slime Wave (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I thought I would hate it, but I think I love it. Extremely erotic site with fake dicks and fake cum. Gloryhole setup on most scenes, some do not, makes the fake dick seem less fake. The performances by the women! Watching something that looks disgusting becoming sexy is erotic to me. Most of the scenes have the model in clothes making the ensuing mess even more messy and fun to watch. Cons: It's a small site, only 170 scenes, but I haven't watched a bad one yet. The multiple women scenes gets too confusing, fake dicks, fake cum, slime blasting, four women, the ones with one woman gives a more focused view. No dates on scenes, they have added one new scene to this site in the last 2 weeks. Bottom Line: In a lot of ways this might be my most excited review. I have seen WAM (wet and messy) porn and fake dick, fake cum scenes, but this site takes it to a whole other level. The women, the camerawork of focusing right where they need to focus, the slime (fake cum) dripping off the model's face, down to her thigh, sliding up to her pussy lips, it's some of the most erotic porn I have ever watched. These models should not be this excited should they? The fake dick squirts them at high impact, anywhere from 5-10 times in one scene. The aiming of the fake cum adds to it. In one scene, the blast of fake cum hits the model's clit at full impact. She looks like she's in orgasmic bliss. The scenes have no story to them. It's just like a random gloryhole scene. The first few scenes I watched I had to look twice to see that those are dildos. The cum or slime blast let's you know for sure. Some of the models are covered head to toe in slime by the end of the scenes. They love every blast of it. Maybe I feel a little biased. The first one I watched was probably the best scene on the site. The model with a skirt and hose on, rubbed the slime on her pussy and as she was doing it, a second blast hit her in the mouth. It is like these models are channeling their inner beliefs these are real men all cumming for them. The videos are clear even the 720p ones. They have 1080p too. The pictures add a new element of showing the fast action frame by frame. I'm not curious if other sites exist that do this on this high of a level. I watched one years ago and the women were giggling at the fake cum. Maybe it's the European models that are more convincing? This is a hard site to recommend to others, but it does come with access to Tainster and a selection of videos from Sinx. I would have been happy with just this site. That's how much I like this content. If you can look over the fake dicks and fake cum to watch sexy women in usually tight clothes, get soaked with slime, it really is worth a try. 09-02-19  10:28pm Replies (1) Review 137 Social Glamour (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models. Current Halloween promo for $14.99 Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty. I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star. Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400. Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. Cons: Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019. Not near as much nudity as I expected. Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background. 40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. Bottom Line: I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that. We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?" It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site. I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn. I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan... Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris. All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range. The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless. I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it. The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes. A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around. I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p. I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me. It also hasn't updated in 7 months. There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. 10-28-19  11:02pm Replies (0) Review 138 Southern Sins (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: The name of the site threw me off course. This is an Australian site. Some really good voyeur-style scenes. The site has 43 scenes and is updating twice per month. Here’s you a pro/con depending on the person, pubic hair and hair in other places too which I will go into. There are photo sets that are downloadable and high quality, but only 32 of those. Video quality is very good, but no 4K. Cons: The pubic hair probably isn’t a turn-off for most, but there’s body hair I have read others complain about – underarm on the women. Scenes are way too short and there are behind the scenes videos mixed in. Bottom Line: One of the first things I thought when checking this site out was Atlanta (my sometimes home), Miami (wish it was my full-time home) and I was thinking like an American – not to mention, stereotyping. I was expecting a site based on stepfamily porn from southern states. I am a regular user of Australian sites like Abby Winters and Girls Out West. I don’t know why the Southern name is in there. I didn’t study much geography. My first thought when looking at the models was there are some really pretty models on here. One that really stood out to me is one I know from other Australian sites – Ruby Valentine, she’s one of my favorites even. I don’t know if I have just missed it on other sites, but she has full, black, underarm hair on this site. I am not going to say that’s a turn-off for me, but will say it’s not a turn-on for me either. Being of fair-complexion, I don’t have a lot of body hair and it’s just not something I’m used to seeing on women. I don’t mind her pubic hair at all. I believe pubic hair on darker complected models is sexy. That seems to be the basis of the site. It says it showcases people celebrating themselves and life. There are some interesting scenes I have never seen on other sites or if I have, those other sites made the scenes look contrived. For example, there is a scene titled, “Yoga Lesson” and it’s 6-7 women outdoors, nude, doing yoga. Where it kind of falls flat is there’s no sex at all in it. It looks like 6-7 real women just doing naked yoga in the wilderness. Is there a big market for “porn” like that? I get the part that says this could be a fantasy for someone to walk up on a group of nude women doing yoga, but they are seriously doing yoga and not just doing it for preparation for an all-out, wild orgy. The solo scenes are probably my favorite scenes on this site, aided by Ruby Valentine being in a couple of those. I watched the behind the scenes videos just to see if maybe those were the BTS videos that are interesting. I’m going on the side of personal preference, I didn’t find those very interesting, no more than I would a Netflix documentary on new-age therapy. Maybe the variation in scenes offers some value and interest? There are scenes (I typed sins) with voyeurism, but just a few. One of the niches I would like to see more of has a scene of it on this site. A guy standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. I really believe that’s a niche that is way underused in porn. It could even be a woman standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. That’s an element I don’t think porn producers these days think about. Us that are watching it are like the person standing at the door. I would make a whole site of that niche. I do think the site is worth checking out especially if either of these parts interest you – Ruby Valentine (she has 5 solo scenes on here that are all great) or hairy porn interests you. Maybe that should be called “natural” porn? Seems more marketable to me. The sex is believable. The videos can be downloaded at 540p, 720p and 1080p. The photo sets can be downloaded as well, but I do believe if Ruby Valentine and hairy doesn’t interest you, you may not like this site as much as I do. 10-19-21  01:19pm Replies (0) Review 139 Strokies (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site. Weekly update 575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks. Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p. Downloads are unlimited and included in membership. Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. Cons: Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me. Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. Bottom Line: Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body. It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from. The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important. I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads. The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me. I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. 07-11-22  09:10pm Replies (0) Review 140 Summer Sinners (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Outdoor, group, orgy, exhibitionism, voyeurism, a little bit of everything except what you expect from regular porn. Attractive male and female models including some well-known pornstars. The rest, I think, are amateurs with futures in porn. Such a diverse site: Scenes in the ocean, pool, backyard, kitchen table while someone watches. Major points for switching things up. Excellent video quality with some scenes having 4K, the rest have up to 1080p and are all downloadable. Downloadable photo sets add a lot to the scenes with multiple people. Very believable and realistic sex. Cons: Scenes are not long enough. It does look like they are going for realism with some of the guys unable to make it to 10 minutes before orgasm. Not much story to the scenes. The length of the scenes show this. It’s like the scenes started before the filming started and the filming focuses on the sex. Bottom Line: The Adult Prime network was recommended to me by another Porn User member and I have to say – I’m impressed. This is one of the sites from it and it’s one of the best – though on the smaller side – sites I have been a member of in recent months, maybe even years. The premise of this site’s content is it’s “all about sun, sea and sex, watch these crazy men and women on vacation and go wild.” That sums up the story for every scene. It feels very real. This doesn’t make me think there’s a casting director and producer trying to create something sexy. It is more of a site that gives me the feeling of young men and women just having spontaneous fun and lots of sex. There are known pornstars on this site including Mea Malone and Amirah Adara, just to name a few in the newest scene. This is probably as close as you’re going to get to true exhibitionism porn even though it looks to be in a controlled environment. It’s rare for me to say the sex is a major plus, but that’s the case on this site. These people look like they have been waiting all day to have sex and go at it like the doomsday clock is ticking down – got to get just one more orgasm! It makes the sex really stand out compared to most porn sites. The word organic sounds funny in porn, but that is the feeling on Summer Sinners. There are currently 66 scenes with two new updates per month. All of the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p and 1080p or streamed in those as well. Some of the scenes also have 4K downloads. The photos are a nice addition and can be downloaded as well. What looks like realistic and believable sex also leads to realistic and believably short scenes. That is kind of a con. The ability to make these scenes look spontaneous could even qualify as a con. If there are more than 2-4 people in the scene, the camera has to switch from couple to couple and sometimes the couples are not even close to each other in proximity. The combination of these possible cons is the biggest downside to the site for me. Not only are the cameras moving from couple to couple, but some scenes are even daytime (sunlight) during the first 7-8 minutes then goes to evening (dusk) for the final 7-8 minutes of the scene. That’s a little disappointing. There are 8-10 people in the scene and it’s clearly filmed over a 12 hour period – why only a 15 minute scene? If these scenes were in the 30-60 minute range, this site would score even higher with me. By the end of the outdoor group scenes there’s a feeling that I didn’t even see what all happened between each couple. There could be another slight problem depending on the viewer. There is a mixture of languages being spoken. Subtitles would help a lot. Some of the models (male and female) speak English, others don’t and some speak English, but you can tell it’s not their native language. There’s a lot of laughing and funny things being said which I believe would add to the scenes if I knew what was being said. It’s still a very good site just for the varied settings. The indoor scenes are often better just because you don’t get the moving around of cameras. The sex, indoor and outdoor, front door and back door (more fitting?) is very believable. There is a lot of playfulness in the scenes and I do get the feeling these models are having fun. It’s enjoyable to watch. I just wish the scenes were longer and I understood the different languages being spoken. I hope my score isn’t too high based on subjectivity of finally seeing porn that looks people having fun and sex at the same time. It tops the feeling of “this is supposed to be romantic and dull” or “this is supposed to be rough and unpleasant for the woman” and hits a sweet spot of having fun and sex. 10-19-21  01:30pm Replies (0) Review 141 Sweethearts Classics (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before Tags for searching Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites Adding scenes once a week Uses Epoch as a biller Cons: All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality. The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives. Bottom Line: This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest. Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative. Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet. The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used. I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement. In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy. 10-19-21  01:10pm Replies (0) Review 142 Taboo Heat (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A standalone site that has a large selection of their content on Adult Time. This review is of the standalone site and will note the number of scenes can be viewed/downloaded with an Adult Time account. It is nice to know so many porn stars are related by marriage. The scenes are fun. The actors and actresses in these scenes seem to have a lot of experience playing these roles. I even think a lot of what is fun, is just tongue-in-cheek humor from the actors and actresses. It looks like they are trying to make each other laugh. That was bound to happen in this niche. The standalone version has 178 scenes. I don’t know about this update schedule. Based on their dates, it has updated 14 times in January, today is the 23rd. On Adult Time, you can view and download 68 of the scenes. I joined it because I liked the 68 scenes on Adult Time. Very long, story-themed Cons: It has been done to death. I do think that two sites excel at the niche, this one and Family Strokes. That could push people away. The not perfect female models in some of the scenes. There are some chubby women in this as stepmoms. I see it as a positive. If you’re just watching porn for the looks and visual arousal, this may not be the best site for you, especially considering the long scenes. Bottom Line: The first time I watched a faux stepfamily porn scene, I wasn’t for sure how I felt about it. I don’t have a stepfamily. That does put the burden on the story, the dialogue, the explanations, the actor and actresses being believable in their roles. I mean no offense to the porn industry or models. That is really asking more than a lot of porn models (male and female) are capable of doing. She can deepthroat an 11 inch dick. She doesn’t need to be able to act. Or she has the perfect body, who cares if she can make me believe that is her stepbrother? That’s a part of porn niches I believe is vastly overlooked. I was watching the scenes on Adult Time and it had a special promo to join Taboo Heat’s standalone site. I have had mostly good experiences with standalone sites produced by major sites. One of my favorites, as mentioned above, Family Stokes, is from Team Skeet. Know that in advance. If you are seeing the Taboo Heat scenes on Adult Time, you are not even seeing half of the scenes Taboo Heat has. If you like those on Adult Time, it’s a definite upgrade that you will want to take. This is very creative and fun porn. This is also a good break from typical porn. The variations of models. I would like to see more races. I think in stepfamily, real-life situations, you have more interracial. You do get stepmoms that looks like they could be stepmoms. One that I was really impressed with is Cory Chase. She seems to be everybody’s stepmom! She is pretty, she looks to be early 40s and in excellent shape. I would think that’s a common age range for a stepmother of young adults. This site does that better than any of the stepfamily sites I have seen. There is enough believable age difference (in appearance, maybe not in real life), to make me believe these stepmoms are that horny. On the standalone site, you have access to 178 scenes. I’m going to take an educated guess when I say this. If you like Cory Chase, you will love this site. It almost seems like this is or was her own site. She is in 169 of the scenes. The pro I listed as humor was based on that. She’s everybody’s stepmom. That makes all the others everyone’s stepsibling. I have joined some sites later (thanks to Christmas deals), that made me feel like the sites take themselves way too seriously. This site doesn’t. It reminds me of one of those B-level reality shows. You can’t help but keep watching it. You can get a taste of it on Adult Time. I will say again if you like the Adult Time scenes from this site it should be no question that you’re going to join this standalone site. I joined it without knowing if it had that many more scenes. It has 110 more. That was definitely worth to me. There are cute, younger stepdaughters. Mostly cute, younger stepsons. The update schedule hasn’t been manipulated. It looks like they are releasing a scene every other day on average. I don’t know if they maybe had a vault of the scenes stored up and ready to go. At their current pace they will have over 240 new scenes just this year. All of the 178 scenes have the full complement of download options from 160p to 4K and there are a total of 8 download resolutions. I find the 720 or 1080 are best for me. These scenes are long. The photos are not going to compete with the studios known for photos. Most only have 15-30 photos in them. I think the model list on the standalone site gives an idea that you better like Cory Chase. There are only 26 females in the 178 scenes. There are a few other “stepmoms” that I kind of think they need to work in some more. I don’t know if there’s a risk of overexposure of Cory Chase. You are going to question how she has this many stepchildren. The stories, the dialogue is very good. Cory probably should be a mainstream actress. Which is why I am guessing they use her in so many scenes on this site. Very little to complain about unless you just have trouble believing one woman has this many stepchildren. Considering how good her performances are, she may convince me of how she ended up with so many stepchildren. There is the ending question of does a site like this help or hurt Adult Time? It’s obviously their site. Would they benefit more by having it in full on Adult Time? Probably not in the short-term. Maybe that is why there are so many updates. I do believe Adult Time is risking cannibalizing itself. I did get it on a Christmas special as an add-on. It would still be worth the full price if you like the content. I just don’t know about long-term. Really good site, probably the best, if you are into the stepfamily porn niche and like Cory Chase. If you like all those there is no reason for you to hesitate in joining it. 02-09-22  07:01am Replies (0) Review 143 Tainster (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I find this to be one of the most complete and unique networks available -- now including bonus content from Sinx. 15 websites included plus the Sinx bonus content. The most niche-driven network I have been a member of. Website works well, layout is easy to find what you're looking for and everything on the site makes sense. Extremely creative scenes that at times seem to be too creative and become confusing. Cons: No model list No dates on content or listed update schedules No real explanation of what Sinx is, you have access to 10-20 scenes from sites owned by other companies. You can sign up for more for another $20. Bottom Line: I'm going to start out with a list of sites you receive with Tainster. Fully Clothed Sex Fully Clothed Pissing Tyrannized Mad Sex Party Party Hardcore Leony April All WAM Slime Wave My Fetish Orgasmatics Cum Squad Pee Squad Pissing in Action Pornstars at Home Swinging Pornstars That are very different sites. They add the bonus Sinx content which has scenes from - French Fuck Friends, Real Agent, UK Fuck Friends, Asian Sex Diary, Lil Miss Arab, Worldwide Wanking, Trike Patrol, Tuk Tuk Patrol, three different German sites, retro, gonzo and fetish. That's the part that gets confusing. Some of these scenes you can watch and download. Some you have to pay $3.95 each or $7.95 for the whole niche. As varied as Tainster's sites are you would think they wouldn't add more to their network to confuse you. These sites -- in my opinion -- have either lost content from the past or they've combined scenes. Their promos have also changed. I originally went to sign up with a $9.95 per month promo. The best deal it would give me was 23.99 Euro. The best sites on the network, for me, are Fully Clothed Sex, Fully Clothed Pissing and Slime Wave. Each of these focus on the women models in business type clothes and they're either getting their clothes were from cum, piss or someone throwing water on them. It's a little more fetish-based than I normally would go for, but the production values are very good even without subtitles. More than anything this feels like European porn. It doesn't have the personality of a lot of American porn, but it has a higher level of eroticism. The My Fetish site is an easy to overlook one and maybe it should be. The scenes seem to be the fetish of someone we don't know and that doesn't really tell us what the fetish is. These scenes to include people having sex in public with other, dressed people sitting around. Comparing it to my past subscriptions to Tainster, I have to admit, I don't prefer this new version. Some of the bonus content is good, but the majority of it has to be bought and I'm confident they have removed anywhere from 100-200 scenes from each of their sites. It is still worth a membership, but your expectations should be tempered by the knowledge of knowing things have changed. With no update schedule and no dated content it does kind of feel like they are not updating any of the sites. One of the newest updates doesn't have any HD options, not 720p, not 1080p, while the 6 previous scenes had both 720p and 1080p. As a whole it is a good network for those into kinkier content, but I won't be sticking around for more than a month. By the way, the biller canceled fast and with no problems even though I had not heard of them before. 09-16-19  09:06pm Replies (0) Review 144 Team Skeet (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very good network if you follow one step: Click "show my content" in the left margin. It removes all the locked content. My biggest interest was Innocent High. As a former Catholic schoolgirl, I have something of a fetish towards schoolgirl content. They have 3,551 scenes available with the standard Team Skeet membership. If you were to update to all their upgrade sites it would add another 1,500 scenes. The scenes I have watched stuck to the main theme of each site. That could be a con too. The video quality goes from 360p up to 1080p, no 4K that I can see. The picture sets are downloadable. The girls on here are mostly really cute/pretty. The guys are guys I see on other sites. Epoch is the biller. Cons: They really could do something with the navigation. If you click "show my content" it takes away all the locked content. But, if you look at their sites, they have 47, there's no way to know which ones you have access to. I recognize a few of them as standalone sites like Family Strokes. They even have a filter on the sites, but not one for "show my sites". I'm with some of the others, why not just offer all the sites in one package and even raise the price? I can't imagine what the price would be to add those sites as an upgrade. Bottom Line: Innocent High was one of the first porn sites I was interested in. I spent the majority of my teen years wearing schoolgirl outfits and I really believe it has a sexual effect on the wearer. Those scenes are good, but they could be a lot better. I won't say the content has a generic feel to it, but it kind of does. What I mean by that is it feels like they film a scene, pull the model out of the clothes, stick another model in the clothes and do it again. Their site Family Strokes is really entertaining. It's kind of silly and it has a lot more personality than some of the sites included with Team Skeet. I would say I would be willing to pay $49 for all of their sites. If anyone knows how much that upgrade is, please let me know. The Stepsibilings site is the best of their newer sites that come with the Team Skeet standard membership. All of the sites have some good scenes on them, but you have to click on them and see if you need to upgrade. The video quality is very good as is the streaming player. It's one of the better streaming players I have used. I don't like focusing so much of the review on the negative of the navigation, but it does make the site very hard to use. Once you click on "Show my content", you have no other options except to scroll through 3,500 scenes. I am a fan of CFNM and they have a CFNM site on here. It's not the standard CFNM style content. It's one on one and usually ends in sex. Here are the sites from the top 10 sites they have that are included in the basic membership: Exxxtra Small, Teen Pies, Teen Curves, Innocent High, Stepsiblings, I'm going to stop here for an important part. Those are in the top 10 of their listed sites. That means you receive 5 of their top 10 sites with a standard membership. After those, there's only one upgrade site in the next 10. You receive 14 of the top 20. While I was going through those results, I did notice an upgrade button and it says if you choose the upgrade you are charged annually. That makes it not as likely to interest me. I would be better off just joining each of the upgrade sites I am interested in for one month at $10 each. I wouldn't be interested in their upgrade sites if they had poor content. They have some really fun and sexy content. I have enjoyed it so far and think I will make a list of the sites they list as upgrades and just join one each month. This is a mostly teen network. There are some MILF sites on it, but even those have a teen in them. I like it as much or better than the other American networks I have joined. Good, fun network and I guess I should give them a nice word for not charging the upgrades automatically like other sites do. I have clicked on multiple upgrades and there is a green button that says "upgrade now". They're at least fair with it. 10-08-19  01:32am Replies (0) Review 145 Teen Mega World (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn. More than 20 sites included. Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models. The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche. Newer videos are downloadable in 4K Nearly daily update across the network. Cons: When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress! The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. Bottom Line: This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter. The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too. The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act. Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex. The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting. With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. 11-28-22  02:13pm Replies (0) Review 146 Teenrs (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Teen network that includes 5 (small) sites featuring a specific niche on each site. It's different, I really thought I was going to have buyer's remorse, but the scenes are quite good and I ended up liking it. Unless I am counting wrong, I'm counting 145 scenes on the entire network of 5 sites, but want to add, I downloaded 50 of the scenes. Videos have 540p, 720p and 1080p options, there are screencaps, but I haven't found a way to download them. Most of the videos are long, averaging 45 minutes each and most involve more than two people. Cons: Four of the five sites haven't updated since 2016 and the one that is updating, hasn't updated since November 20th, 2019 (more than two weeks ago). There are good ideas here, there's creativity, why stop producing this content? It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price. Bottom Line: If I had to pick a favorite niche in porn it would be CFNM. They have a site here called CFNM 18. I knew it was going to be a small site, but didn't know how small. It has 14 scenes on it. They are all very good scenes and will be saved with my other CFNM videos from other sites, they are creative, they scenes are long with a couple lasting over an hour and they're exactly what I like in CFNM. The last update was in 2016. I also like the sites where games are played, strip poker type games, the various naked twister type games and they have a site called Spicy Roulette. I was looking forward to see what they could do to make a roulette wheel sexy and there's 12 scenes on it. These scenes are good, they are fun, and these are major group sex scenes which I really don't see a lot of anymore. The scenes on Spicy Roulette feature as many as 3 males and 5 females, you'll have two or three women riding the men and two of the women tribbing in the distance. Very sexy scenes. They have a site called My Dr. Feelgood, which is the medical niche and it's one I like. It has 10 scenes on it. These are good and again, very long scenes in the 45 minutes range. It just feels like someone had a busy year in 2016 and decided to stop filming porn. Next is 18Dom, which is a pretty sad attempt at domination porn as 18 year old female models are "dominating" men. The scenes are not bad or believable. The models in all of the scenes on this network are very pretty and like the other sites I've listed so far, this one has long videos in the 30 minute range. The domination is about as believable as the number of scenes I'm going to say, it has 13 scenes on it. These kind of remind me of CFNM scenes except the models end up nude. It's mostly soft "physical violence" like a 90 pound woman forcing the man down. The last site in the network is Club Exclusive and it is the one that updated on November 20, 2019, it has nearly 100 scenes on it, but there's something to note here. These scenes have the Club Sweetheart watermark on them so they are from Club Sweethearts, they're pretty good scenes overall, there's creativity, some even have a CFNM type feel to them, there are handjobs, even a couple go into the strip games, so I guess it works as a good way to preview Club Sweethearts. The other four sites are generally better than it as you can tell those sites had a lot of thought put into their scenes. If those first four sites had around 50 scenes on each, I would score this network very high, but instead, I got around 50 scenes total and nearly all came from those first 4 sites. All wasn't lost as I've joined a few sites where I don't download anything. If those 4 niche sites interest you and you find a good deal like I did, it might be worth it to join and grab the scenes from those sites. If those niches don't interest you, I don't think you're going to be too happy or impressed with this tiny network. I felt like an 80 is a fair score just based on the content on those first 4 sites being very good. 12-02-19  11:57pm Replies (2) Review 147 The Life Erotic (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I thought for sure, one of my highest rated sites would stumble some, but it’s not happening. I try not to be too focused on body types, but I have been slim and “undeveloped” my whole adult life. The majority of models on TLE are slim and not “blessed” in the chest. I can relate to these women and learn from them. The site is huge and you can almost always find promos; just be sure it’s not streaming-only. Updates have been 2-3 videos per week and 2-3 picture sets a week. The site has just over 3,000 picture sets and just over 1,500 videos Tags, search, are all near perfect Cons: Back to my enjoyment of slim models. That could be a con for some of you. I can’t really complain much about update frequency, but I do think this site used to update more than now. Bottom Line: I hadn’t been a member of The Life Erotic for nearly 3 years. The last time I reviewed it, I gave it a 97. There’s good and bad news. The site hasn’t changed much since then and easily earns an upper 90s score. But if you didn’t like the site before, you probably won’t like it now. The scenes are masturbation, solo. The picture sets are a lot like what you would expect from a Met Art owned site. That means large resolution and mostly pretty poses that accentuate the models’ natural beauty. The site really is huge and still updating. The numbers are above in the pros. My first porn site I joined was Nubiles and a part of me still prefers picture sets and videos of pretty/cute models masturbating for the camera. That helps The Life Erotic a lot. The porn you’ll find on The Life Erotic is not as tame as most softcore sites. It’s even quite hardcore – for masturbation scenes. I have jointed all the Met-Art owned sites including the Met Art Network, but I still have to say, I think The Life Erotic is the best of the entire group. Met Art does still photography near perfect. Met Art X is good solo masturbation porn. Sex Art is great story-based hardcore male/female porn. The Life Erotic takes a little of the best from each of those and combines them into one site. One of the most recent scenes even shows the depth of the scenes. It has one of my favorites, Paloma, she is bound with tape and a gag in her mouth. She dances around even with the tape on her. She lowers herself towards a chair that has a big dildo strapped to it. She teases the dildo and herself until it’s inside her and she’s riding it. That’s not what I usually expect from a solo masturbation site. The scenes are really top-notch and the production is great. The scenes aren’t typically long, but are usually long enough that you don’t feel like they’re rushing through, but also doesn’t make you think the scenes are too drawn out. These feel like real masturbation sessions. The video quality downloads are HD and 4K. The pictures are downloadable in zips and that I know of, there is no download limit. If you have used any of the Met-Art sites the navigation will be familiar to you. The tags are great as is the search. The model list is helpful as well. There’s hardly nothing to call a con, other than if you don’t like the models. It’s a site I would even call “special”. It won’t be another 3 years before I join again. This should be a 2-3 time join per year for me. 04-09-24  06:11pm Replies (0) Review 148 The Life Erotic (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: My de facto favorite site by Met Art. They have 1,227 models and they are of different looks, ages and builds. There are 1,264 videos and 2,813 photo sets. Thankfully, the archive of content is bigger here than most of their sites, they are only updating The Life Erotic every 4-5 days. All videos and photo sets can be downloaded and I can confirm as much as possible there’s no download limit. I have about 80% of the content from the site. Something you do not see as much on the Met Art sites is rubber/latex clothing, it adds an edgy feel to what can seem like a clinical group of sites. 174 of the scenes are lesbian including some group. The rest are solo. Cons: It doesn’t feel like a con in 2021 since so many sites are no longer even updating, but I wish they could speed the updates up a little. As it is, you can expect 7-8 updates per month. They don’t have as many lesbian scenes these days. I don’t know if that’s a byproduct of Covid or not, but it’s also not a deathblow con. Bottom Line: In my recent trip through the world of Met Art, I have realized a lot of sites are happy (meaning the majority of their customers are too) with sticking with a tried and tested formula. The Life Erotic is Met Art’s Henry David Thoreau’s man who who marches to the drum he hears no matter how far away. It’s still mostly just women masturbating or the 174 lesbian scenes, but the mold is broken here. It’s not a criticism of Met Art or their sites. The models are gorgeous, young, very fit, some even look a little skinny and that’s coming from someone who was under 100 pounds last year. The Life Erotic’s newest update even shows a perfect example of what I mean. It’s the former superstar European model Blue Angel. My first memberships to porn sites included 21 Sextury which had a solo Blue Angel site on it, she was a young, slender model back then. She’s now in her 30s, has filled out more and no longer looks like the innocent flower waiting to be crushed by the porn industry. One thing I normally would not talk about as a positive or negative on a porn site are the descriptions of the scenes, but the descriptions on The Life Erotic tell some perteinent information like this new Blue Angel scene is produced by another former superstar European model Sandra Shine, who I know also produces some on at least one other site. It makes every scene, especially the newer ones, worth looking at, reading the descriptions of and surprisingly adds a lot to the content. I do believe this is the most explicit of the Met Art sites unless you count ALS Scan and I think they are about equal. The site is large with a combined 4,000 plus videos and photo sets. All can be downloaded in high quality and there are no limits. You also will get the broader range of model types on this site. I believe the update schedule is somewhere in the middle ground since it’s hard to to complain about a site updating every 4 days when most sites are not currently updating at all, but most of the Met Art sites are updating daily. If the update schedule was better the score would be a little higher, there’s not much room to go up. They do score extra points for being more creative than any of the other Met Art sites except maybe Sex Art which may be too creative at times. The masturbation on The Life Erotic is more “erotic” to me. It could be the models are a little older than the other Met Art sites, it could be their outfits which sometimes include crotchless bodysuits and masks. This is not going to be meant how it sounds. There’s more meat on the bones here and that has nothing to do with the models’ builds. There’s more to the content. This is easily one of my favorite sites. It’s so high on my sites I was planning on just joining it and ALS Scan which I like almost as much as The Life Erotic, but there was a special offer for the entire Met Art network and I took it. I’m not surprised The Life Erotic and ALS Scan are still my favorite two sites on that network. The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p all are mp4 files and they also offer a WMV and DivX download. I know what WMV is, but really don’t know what the DivX is or why it’s offered. The photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes. The biggest sizes are over 4000x2600. It’s very close to a perfect site for me and I think it earns a “seriously underrated” mention. The only thing I would change besides speeding up the updates is I would maybe push the envelope a little more with some light bondage. They have the outfits on for it. 04-06-21  02:28am Replies (0) Review 149 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: For my money, the best of the Met-Art sites. 1,183 models, 1,143 videos and 2,691 photo sets. Videos and photos are downloadable. No restrictions. 8 video updates and 8 photo set updates per month. Themes with many of the scenes, whether they're believable is a different question. Includes girl/girl scenes too. Cons: I have seen a few of the scenes on other sites in the Met Art network. The naming of the scenes can be confusing. Bottom Line: The Life Erotic is like what most softer sites seem to be going for when they step outside the softcore realm. There's light BDSM, masturbation with objects (heels, corn on the cob, various insertions), there's wax play, a few scenes in October even used fake blood for Halloween themed scenes. There's more creativity here and I like it. One thing you might be surprised by is the amount of close-ups in masturbation. Some are close enough to see the clits getting harder/swollen. The models are almost all very attractive and there's over 1,000 of them. They seem to be trying to break away from being a photo focused site even though their total numbers show more than double the photo sets as videos, the updates are including an equal amount of videos as photo sets. The video quality on the newer videos go up to 4K and go down to 260p with 5 options between those including 720p and 1080p. Adding themes, not really stories, to the scenes adds a more interesting twist to these scenes. Some of it seems forced like a woman masturbating with a heel. The blood scenes, even the hot wax scenes seem to be something they're not completely comfortable filming, but they are a welcome change to the formulaic world of harder softcore porn. This site would be a great choice for those that like harder masturbation. There's a lot of dripping, creamy, orgasms, very fast fingering, use of extreme objects and even suction pumps. It does a really good job of separating itself from other softcore masturbation sites by -- in my opinion -- showing how women really masturbate. There's not a lot of artsy points in it, but speaking for myself, there's not a lot artistic about my masturbating so I can relate more to this content. My biggest complaint is the naming of the scenes. They will have one with the model's name or action and a number like Pumping Hard 2, you find other scenes by the model and there's Afternoon Fantasy 2. I'm going to try and put that together that they have a series called Pumping Hard and there are other parts featuring other models doing a similar action (suction) and it's not scenes being split into parts. With that being my only real complaint, it shows why I really like this site and nearly all of its content. 12-08-19  08:41pm Replies (0) Review 150 The White Boxxx (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Labor day Sale price of $9.94 for a month Comes with other 17 Lets Doe it sites Almost 350 visually stunning and hot scenes Updates are once a week Many of the prettiest pornstars there are Great production values, the videos look great Uses tags for easy searching, but searching is across the network Cons: Monthly download limit of 100 videos across the network More hot videos than I can handle. Sometimes I am feeling so naughty because I wish I was one of these women Bottom Line: When I think of couple friendly porn, this is the kind of site I imagine. These are videos any couple I can think of would feel comfortable sharing. The sex is unrushed, slow and just so sensual. The scenes progress in heat until the couples build to a climax and so do, I right along with them. Many of the videos focus on the woman and what she wants and needs sexually. She is seen as empowered and sexually liberated. In many scenes she is so seductive that her man finds her irresistible. A big reason is that these women tease their guys, a fantasy I often have. In many scenes the foreplay includes a vibrator and a lot of hot kissing and other attention from her man. One of my favorite scenes stars Rebecca Volpetti and Lutro. It is called “My Insatiable Girlfriend”. I was feeling a bit warm just reading the title. She ties him to a bed and takes advantage of him. He is there just to please her. In another scene the same two models are shown as he is not interested, so she teases him by fingering herself. She uses a vibrator while he is “punished” by being forced to watch her masturbate. That would teach any man the uselessness of ignoring a woman in heat. After these two scenes I have become a big fan hers. She also has a few great lesbian scenes that I wish I had a chance to be in. I have never been with a woman, but she is so tempting I could imagine what it would be like with her. Every scene is a professional production and the attention to detail is very enjoyable. Hair, makeup, setting, lighting, and the camerawork are just so well done that I feel this site is one that others should imitate. I see that the network has won numerous industry awards over the years, such as best paysite, best network , best lesbian and best hardcore sites. I would say that I recognize a few of the stars, both male and female, and that they are some of the best looking in the industry. The site uses tags, but the results are for the whole network, not just the one site. The download limit of 100 scenes per month is also across the network. On this site alone, there are nearly 350 videos, so that has to be a negative. Now that I think of it, this could also be a compliment as that means there are too many quality videos that are worthy of being downloaded. There is a Labor day sale going on right now and at $10 for a month for the whole network, that is a deal I could not refuse. 09-05-21  06:51pm Replies (0) Shown : 126-150 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.34 seconds.