Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : KayTBuffs (0)

Feedback:   All (171)  |   Reviews (153)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (18) Other:   Replies Received (48)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 Next Door Male (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Still continues to be one of the best solo men sites around. Male models are amateurs or were when filmed. Great network for straight women and gay men. I don’t know if this is something recent, but the network is now owned by Gamma. Very good quality videos and pictures. You can also download all you want. Over 500 scenes of male solo porn is a big collection, but only to first time members. Cons: No updates, which is now making 500 scenes seem like not that many scenes. Solo male porn is starting to become stale to me. Bottom Line: This was one of my highest, if not, highest rated gay/solo men networks. All the good parts are still there, but the bad parts are being accentuated. It’s quite possibly the most basic concept in porn. A guy sits down or stands, takes his pants off and masturbates. There is nothing really wrong with it. It’s just, in my last review of this network, I mentioned the lack of plot or story, was wearing on me, but due to the network having so many solo scenes, I looked over the overall effort. I also noted in my 2021 review, the network dropped from nearly 1,000 scenes down to 550 or so. They haven’t added much if any to their collection. In 2021, I was new to the network and impressed with such a large collection of solo male porn, but in late 2024, the large collection is maybe medium or average. The videos are downloadable as are the photos. Both are unlimited downloads and the videos go up to HD level, while the pictures are good quality and downloadable as zip files. Now, we are in 2024 and the excitement of finding such a large collection of solo male scenes has worn off. I’m taking a different view of the network. We have this average sized collection, especially considering it claims to have over 20 sites on it and the scenes are flat out boring and dull. I have enough experience watching female solo porn to say, I think female solo porn can get away with unexciting models and performances. If the model is pretty enough and has a nice body, maybe nothing else is needed? The models on Next Door Male are very attractive, most are muscular or masculine, maybe is a better word. But, they’re also boring, repetitive and saying the same things, if they even talk at all. The most obvious recommendation is for people that have never joined it. You will at least get around 600 videos of solo men. I’m a two time member and while there are scenes I either missed or didn’t notice, I can’t say I’m going to be downloading anything from the network. I will add for reference: I have not been as into male solo porn as I used to be. It’s one reason I rejoined this network. It was one of my highest rated. I wanted to see if I’m just getting tired of the niche or if it’s just the lack of progression in the niche. It’s still as good of a collection of solo, masculine men, you will likely find on the internet. I used to not mind that the scenes were plotless and had minimal dialouge, but I do expect more now. The way I am going to score this is to say for me, the network would be lucky to score 75, but since we are reviewing for potential members, I will still give it an 85. That is 9 points lower than I scored it in 2021. Gamma’s involvement in the network isn’t even noticeable unless you’ve joined other Gamma sites and seen the pop-up that offers a promo. Take it, it’s a good one and includes downloads. 10-08-24  09:44pm Replies (0) Review 102 Next Door Male (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen! There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo. Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips. A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine. The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation? You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about. Cons: It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those. More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows) Bottom Line: I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me. The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common. The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars? If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites. 12-08-21  02:40am Replies (0) Review 103 Next Door Raw (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies. Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it. Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads. The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones. Cons: The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn. The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really? Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me. Bottom Line: More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals. The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died. These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea. 12-08-21  02:35am Replies (0) Review 104 Next Door Studios (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Large network of gay sites 16 sites included with the network. Newer videos have 4K downloads. Unlimited downloads including photo set zips. Over 8,000 videos and photo sets. Still updating weekly Cons: Several sites are no longer updating If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. Bottom Line: Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required. It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn. I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site. The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies. It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular. The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular. Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. 11-28-22  02:15pm Replies (0) Review 105 Nubiles Porn (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Mostly hardcore network in the Nubiles family of sites. Most of the scenes are very unique and interesting. A little over 1,200 scenes with photos, all are downloadable. Updates every other day. Model list, different site tabs, it all makes navigating this network much easier than you would expect. Bills with CCBill Cons: There's a lot of imbalance. Some sites on here, the niches they cover are very interesting, other ones feel just like any other softer hardcore site. I still feel like Nubiles.net is better than all these sites combined. I'm not trying to compare them, I just think Nubiles.net captures the Nubile feeling, while this is more like a hardcore site that's trying to go away from the tried and true forum Nubiles.net established. Bottom Line: I admit, I am a sucker for the "family" porn and they have a couple of those sites on here Stepsiblings Caught, Daddy's Lil Angel and Family Pies. I like the porn with stories more than the gonzo style. Or else I just feel like two people showed up, picked a check up and got naked. I want and even need a scene to convince me this is really happening and it's not because they're being paid. Nubiles Porn does a good job of that most of the time. There are more sites, really just niches, in this network that I like than ones I don't like. Detention Girls reminds me of every lesbian porn I first saw when I first discovered porn. Who knew "Women in jail" a search topic for a research paper would bring up a porn site? I think if there's one strong criticism it is that they don't let the scenes play out enough. There are exceptions and that's what hurts. There's a scene on Nubiles Porn called, "My Sexy Girlfriend S12 E:7" that is really great. The model is self-shooting herself in the car, teasing her boyfriend and they even make sure to have her film in portrait view which is one of the most annoying things a person can do, but it adds to the realism. This teasing and flirting takes up nearly half the scene and it makes it very believable. Other scenes start with the woman on the bed naked and the guy walks in the room naked. They don't even say hi. The video quality is very good at up to 1080p and they offer something I like, they have a 720p version in mp4 and WMV, I can't see the difference in them and the WMV version is usually 200-300 MB less in size. The photos like nubiles.net are very crisp and clear and downloadable. They have just over 850 models and some of what I would call the top level of teen models. There are quite a few niches here including two in the petite niche and you also get access to Nubiles.net, which to me is the best teen site on the internet. I got this membership during the Halloween deals and didn't expect to get Nubiles.net with it, but it does come with it. For whatever reason they don't list it on the Nubiles Porn page, you just have to type in nubiles.net and enter you login again. It think when it's all combined it's still the best deal I've found in porn. 11-04-19  11:57pm Replies (0) Review 106 Nubiles.net (0) 98.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Cutest models ever! Extremely high quality photos and videos Navigation is simple Tags, model search, model list, every possible way to find whar you like No download limits A site you could spend months on and still only be scratching the surface Cons: My biggest con is very simple – inconsistency in performances Network access adds value, but more so in quantity and niches. Bottom Line: Nubiles was the very first porn paysite I ever joined. I loved the softness of the content. It was a perfect site for me, a conservatively raised private school girl who was more curious about porn than I was open-minded about sexuality. Many of the older scenes now were newer scenes back when I first joined and what a critic sees as too softcore for current porn standards, was pushing all my boundaries. I loved the content. I was being gifted a view of other young women finding their sexuality. The fact it's a filmed video never really registered with me. My own narrow-mindedness towards sex was causing me to view these softcore scenes as young women experimenting with themselves sexually. Nubiles still captures that innocence. It's us viewers dealing with oversaturation of porn and desensitized minds seeing the innocence as a negative. Many of the models are undoubtedly on camera for the first time in their young lives and with each step we add, we add another first for the models. First time being nude on camera. First time masturbating for a camera. I myself have been critical of Nubiles, but with this membership, I'm realizing the content is just as hot now as it was ten plus years ago, but it's my mind now expecting more. Nubiles.net is a simple site with a simple concept. They have the cutest collection of models. They show these adorable models experiencing their first time sharing their sexuality on camera. If that sounds great, you will love the content! The best part is there are no problems to report. The pictures come downloadable in zips. The videos are downloadable with multiple resolutions being available. There are no download limits. The navigation is as simple or complicated as you want it to be. There are tags. A model list and you can type in a search. Things have changed since the first time I joined Nubiles.net. You now receive an entire network with Nubiles.net. The other network sites give some.variety to the Nubiles.net content. Most of the content on Nubiles is solo-based. The network adds hardcore content. I can fully see and understand the value the network adds. With that said, the network does not help or hurt my opinion of nubiles.net. If I get bored with the solo scenes, it is nice to be able to find hardcore ones, but for me, it creates the situation I started this review out with. It starts to desensitize you towards the solo content. That is not as negative as it may sound. It is me saying I think Nubiles.net is fine on its own. When I first started joining paysites, solo and softcore porn sites were the majority. Now, with hardcore and more and more extreme porn sites, softcore and solo has become its own little special niche. Years of now watching gaping asses and triple penetrations reminds me just masturbating on camera is as much for some of these younger models than gaping asses is for the more experienced models. I just needed that perspective again and am really happy to say Nubiles is easily one of the best porn sites I have joined. 12-07-24  03:26pm Replies (0) Review 107 Nubiles.net (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: It was the first porn site I joined, and the first porn site I reviewed, still a favorite but not without reservations. There are 2,529 models on Nubiles.net. Includes a network, Nubiles Porn, with 16 sites. The site primarily focuses on solo content of young (or young looking) models, with some lesbian and male/female content. Everything included is high quality (pictures, videos) and as far as I know the downloads are unlimited. The biller is CCBill, there was an unchecked cross-sale to Nubiles Films. Cons: This is a technical con, you’re most-likely going to join through Nubiles Porn. Of their banner list of sites there is no listing for Nubiles.net, the best site they have. Look at it however you want. The excess of “new” sites they have includes quite a few you do not get access to without joining separately. The advertisements for not only their other sites, but other sites too. When you sign-in, it’s an advertisement page that you have to scroll to the bottom of to get to Nubiles.net or Nubiles Porn. Bottom Line: The old saying goes, “Absence makes the heart grow fonder”. I can see that in some ways with my first visit to Nubiles in 2 years, but I also can say there’s a reason I wasn’t a member over the last 2 years. The quality of the site has never been up for question. They run a great site with multiple weekly updates (it’s not as consistent as it used to be), their videos cover everything except 4K, starting at 270p and going up to 1080p. Their pictures even rival the top photography porn sites. The site is easy to use (once you get the ad page out of the way) and the models give you a blend of precarious and innocent to curious and going wild. It’s typically what I would expect from women in this age range. And there are over 2,500 of those models. There is a staleness that creeps in every few months of being a member. The male/female scenes they have are just as well not watched. Those are as cookie-cutter and rudimentary as any I have seen. None of this is really a surprise to me. I first joined Nubiles in 2009. It was the very first porn site I paid to join. I believe the content they are producing now is very similar to the 2009 content. There’s not a dropoff. It’s just there’s not any real improvements either. If you considered it perfect in 2009, you could still consider it perfect. I just don’t. I don’t even know if I considered it perfect in 2009. I considered it watchable. Porn was new to me. I grew up in Catholic schools and Nubiles was, possibly insultative for me to say -- a “nice” porn site. Not nice in the “great” way, but in the “safe” way. As the years passed, new “bonus” sites started showing up on Nubiles, and to show how well I remember 2009, there were two bonus sites with it back then. I don’t remember the names, one was a Spring Break site and one with a solo model site who was also featured on Nubiles named Katrina. Those are still accessible with your membership, I do believe, if you can find them. Things then changed to Nubiles Porn, an entire network of Nubiles sites. I won’t even try to come up with an explanation for why they don’t show Nubiles.net included. The content is still 2009. And maybe that’s what they’re going for. I once had a professor who made the comment, “Being a professor of freshmen college Algebra is great, each year a new group of 18 year old young women are delivered to my classroom. It’s like I never age.” Hopefully, his dark humor didn’t ruin the point. Nubiles for what it is still delivers. They have some of the cutest, sexiest, most innocent, most believable, new, fresh models. Most of the scenes are solo teasing that evolve into masturbation. It’s a tried and true formula that has worked for nearly 20 years. The question becomes -- when do you or I start to feel like we’ve been here hundreds of times before? That has made Nubiles polarizing to me. It shouldn’t hurt the view of the site especially to new or newer members. I spent years as a member. I do believe the multiple sites, the sister “network” Nubile Films, the around 10 standalone “premium” sites they have released helps in that polarizing feeling. It’s the feeling of Nubiles.net is their site to start at. They include the 15 or 16 bonus sites in Nubiles Porn and you can try those which offer at least slightly different niches and genres. You’re then enticed to try Nubiles Films. If you like some of the Nubiles Film content you’ll give the premium standalone sites a try. Still worth a join and a short stay, but just doesn’t have the staying power for more than 3 months at a time for me. 07-14-21  02:05am Replies (0) Review 108 Nubiles.net (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: This site is in its 16th year of operation. There are 2,213 models. One is as cute as the next. Innocence lost before your eyes. My favorite part of this site are the shy and sweet models. Minimal tattoos, implants or other body modifications. Non-extreme masturbation. Video quality is superb, but I wish the photo sets were more vivid in colors. I have been an on-again, off-again member for 10 years. I like that they have not made any drastic changes. Cons: It would not hurt to have more body types. Just because they are barely legal teens does not mean they have to all be slim. More outdoor sets would be a welcome change. Maybe have some of the willing models to go more extreme with their masturbation Bottom Line: Nubiles.net was the first porn site I joined. I sign up for 3 months each year. This is my 10th year. It first captured my attention with its name. A former employer was said to hire only "nubile employees". As a former sex recluse the innocence of the models, their shyness and the non-extreme masturbation kept me around as a member. I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman or relationship with a woman, but I would consider it with some of the models on Nubiles. It is non-intimidating pornography. I would not group it with sites like Met-Art, but it is closer to Met-Art than a hardcore site. My only disappointment with the site is the inclusion of hardcore content. The hardcore scenes are not like hardcore porn we usually see, but why even risk losing your established niche? I think with the site now operating as part of the Nubiles Porn network they should only have solo scenes on Nubiles.net. The site updates as much as entire networks. There are 2 photo set updates per day and 2 videos per day. If you catch a sale price you can have access to the whole network for around $10-$15. The models are almost all slender. I would like to see chubby, shy, innocent models too. I have noticed sites like to create an image of what fits a type of model. They do get stuck on trying to stay within the image. The video quality only needs work if you require 4K. I consider their videos some of the crispest and highest quality available. My complaint about the picture colors is splitting hairs. I prefer warm colors in photos. I am sure others prefer cooler colors like Nubiles uses. Most do not know the difference! The site offers more than 13,000 video or photo sets. The videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. The photos can be downloaded in zip files. The models range from amateurs you will not see anywhere else to early-career pros. There is a focus on natural. Tattoos have become more common in recent years, but are not required like some sites. Implants are not common; neither is too much make-up or formal clothing. I believe it is one of the best values in pay porn. You also receive access to Nubiles Porn. A network including various niches. I would join Nubiles.net with or without the network access. 06-03-19  12:10am Replies (12) Review 109 Oldje (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: There is no pun intended when I say Oldje passes the test of time. Premium quality porn in the old and young niche. All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Most have 1080p and the newer scenes have 4K. Three sites are included: Class Nudes, Class 3some and Class Blowjobs. The scenes are genuinely fun. I’m guessing because of the possible limitations the males have, there’s not a lot of directing going on and it makes the content seem more authentic. Cons: My biggest con is I would rather have Oldje 3Some as a bonus site than the three Class sites. There probably should be more user options, but being a longtime porn user, those aren’t that important to me. Bottom Line: Oldje really does pass the test of time. It’s not easy or that common for any pornsite to do that these days. I can’t count the number of times I’ve throught a site was the best of its class, only to go back and view the content, a few months later and think, “Ok, it’s good, but not as great as I originally thought.” Oldje doesn’t have that problem. It is as good as I remember it being. The scenes do try and include something of a story, but how much story do these types of scenes need? You have a senior citizen male with at least one cute, pretty, young woman, likely under 30. I think the scene happening is the story or the dream of the older man – and possibly even the naughty dream of the young woman. The only thing that could hurt these scenes would be terrible performances by either male or female, but I haven’t even seen a bad performance from any of the models of either gender. Oldje is doing something right and you can see it in the performance quality. I think the females know and understand the possible limitations the males may have and the female can make that less clear to the viewing audience. A novel idea, let the female control the performance in a porn scene! This site has very high quality videos. It’s not as common in this niche as it is in Lesbian, Hardcore or even Pro Amateur. Oldje doesn’t have any of those old scenes that make you say, “The older content is poor quality”. All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Up until a year or so ago, I didn’t download anything over 720p due to space concerns. You also will see a lot of 1080p file downloads of the videos and there are even 4K downloads. The models attractiveness is going to be subjective. The males are older, often chubby, and wouldn’t fit in a scene on most popular pornsites. The females look similar to what you will find on most Euro sites. Slim to medium build, very young looking and often, very excitable. I’m going to guess they have the dreams or fantasies of being able to turn on an older man enough for him to fully perform and finish sexually. I’m even going to say I believe it’s why these scenes are so good. There’s a chemistry you’re not usually thinking about in porn. I’m sure the older men want to be able to turn on these younger women to be able to feel like they still have it and the females are likely thinking the older male has had quite a few sexy women in their life and want to be the one or one of the ones he remembers most. My only con that I believe is a valid complaint is Oldje has a sister site called Oldje 3Some, it’s really good though small. The sites that come with an Oldje subscription, Class Nudes, Class Blowjobs and Class 3Some, are good, not great sites and I personally would rather have Oldje 3Some, instead, if you want Oldje 3Some, you have to join it in a different subscription from Oldje. If the two Oldje sites were paired together, it would be a near perfect site. As it is, Oldje is still the best young and old niche site I’ve been a member of. 06-11-24  08:12am Replies (0) Review 110 Only Teen Blowjobs (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: You get all five sites of the Blowpass Network Pornusers has a discount Lots of very pretty teens Huge site with 729 videos and photosets Older men/younger women are common 4K is available on the newest videos Cons: Still getting into repetitive. Do the women not want more in the scenes? Bottom Line: Some of the most common porn scenes are ones where a newcomer gives a blowjob to a lucky guy. Every day, women show up at porn studios hoping for a chance to become the next big star. Many get the chance to try their skills on a site like this. You get a lot of fresh faces that have first and in some cases, even their only scenes here. For some they may make a few more videos, but for many they get the honor of being on the site that advertises itself as “The freshest teens in porn”. The site tries to capitalize on that in a few ways. One is dressing them in a way that creates a feeling of youth. The site says only 18 and 19 year olds. I think these may not all be teens and some look like they are in their twenties. You see them in cut off shorts very often, some are done up in pigtails and some wear revealing tops that seem like an invitation for sex. To play up the youth factor, they do things we think of as young. They eat cereal, play video games, use cell phones and seem to be someone you could possibly know. They need to borrow a car or money, get help with homework, get out of trouble they caused, do homework with a boyfriend, do babysitting , text while sucking, need their computer fixed , take a selfie while sucking, and the list grows as do the guys. In one scene that I loved, Kenzie Reeves is a cam girl and her boyfriend walks in. A customer gives a tip to give her boyfriend a blowjob on cam. Scenes like this keep the site fresh and modern. It feels like today. One of the fetishes here is a family one. Her partner is her stepdad or her stepbrother. A great scene I loved had Sloan Harper and Logan Long paired. She is his stepsister and a lesbian, to make things complicated. She owes him fifty dollars and the guy slowly and teasingly “negotiate” a blow job as payment. By the end she is fingering herself to an orgasm as her comes on her. Yikes, that was hot. She is with her father’s friend in some cases. In a few scenes, she even gets revenge on her ex-boyfriend. No matter how they get to the sex, her guy is a little older by a few years. In most of the scenes, I think the age difference is about five to ten years. Being American models, the models are mostly white, but also Asian, Latinas and black. I loved scenes with the Asian women as I think they give the best blow jobs on camera, maybe in real life too. Lulu Chu is simply great in a scene where she is doing homework with her boyfriend and they take a break. In another she wants some cereal but her boyfriend drank the milk. She knows where she can get some more without a trip to the store. The guys are ok, but not the biggest or the best. They are just there and that is not really a criticism as the ladies are and should be the stars. They have the skills in many cases and in others they don’t, but that natural enthusiasm kicks in. Some of them for sure use up a whole day’s worth of calories. Who needs the gym to stay fit if your boyfriend wants a blowjob? With a large archive of 729 videos and photosets, there is plenty to see here. This year there has been only on new update, but December had three. You also get three other blowjob sites as well as immoral Live, a site that is one of my all time favorites. 02-09-22  06:14am Replies (0) Review 111 Party Hardcore (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women. As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models. Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles. That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth. Most of the guys are attractive. The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs. Cons: The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene. The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with. In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic. Same venues. Bottom Line: If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse. I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes. They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos. The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17". Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option. The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive. I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating. It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining. The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to? I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these. It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche. 09-10-19  01:14am Replies (0) Review 112 Pegas Productions (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years. Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me. Comes with 15 other sites. Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads. Weekly updates. Down to Earth, women next door types. Cons: I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed. No 4K Bottom Line: Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are. This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style. The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy. Of the other sites, I recommend these: Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure. The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. 11-26-22  05:56pm Replies (0) Review 113 Pegas Productions (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Canadian hardcore porn network that I received an email promo from. 22 sites included, some are very small. 232 models with some of most unique tags I have seen for models. A little over 750 main scenes, around 280 bonus scenes. Some of the scenes have photos and they are downloadable, but contain 20-25 photos in the ones I've looked at. I think there's a theme or story connecting one scene to another and it's why there are bonus scenes, but the navigation isn't helping me out any. Cons: Kind of heavy on the ads. There's a large one at the top, one on the bottom of the main page. Once inside the videos or updates page, there's a large one right in the middle of the content. There is a listing for bonus sites. It is in French with no English option and I would rather not risk signing in with my login details since I don't know what it says. Got me with a pre-checked sign-up to a site I had never heard of and that was in all French. I was able to cancel it instantly and only lost $2.95 for it, but what is it with the French-only sites? Bottom Line: One of the sites I joined in the past since me a special promo for this Pegas Productions network and it looked interesting. And it is interesting. The models from the best I can tell are amateurs. The sites or categories included are: 3 Way Porn, Banging Family, Blow Me POV, Chic and Chix, Cutie Pussies, Fun Size Teens, Fresh and Innocent, Inked Gurlz, JizzOrama, Kummalot, Let's Fuck Outside, Lezzie BFF, Lust Eden, Nasty Rookies, Samantha Ardente, Sexy Knockers, Shake the Snake, Sly Masseur, Spice My Sex Life, Straight in the Ass and TranniesRus. I can't figure out if each site has a story going on from scene to scene or if these are DVDs that are split into parts or what. Their site Inked Gurlz reminds me a lot of Burning Angel and AltErotica. The rest of the sites seem just like each one is just a niche and they're calling it a site. The site has been around for over 10 years, but only has around 800 scenes. I would rate most of the scenes as average scenes. Most of the women look like amateurs and are mostly cute types. The guys look like professional wrestlers. I watched some of the more specific scenes like, "Shit! My Stepdaughter is a stripper!" The scene starts with the stepdad in the stepdaughter's room looking in her nightstand. He finds sparkly, shiny clothes and says, "Shit! My daughter-in-law is a stripper!" That's not a typo or mistake by me. The scene says "stepdaughter", the script of the scene is "daughter-in-law". The father-in-law, who looks as young as the daughter-in-law, walks around mumbling about wait until my son finds out about this. The daughter-in-law comes in, seduces him and has sex with him. That is really poor production standards. First, the mistake with the naming of the scene and role of the female. Then, the dad talking about how upset his son is going to be, has sex with her and she's not even attractive. It's a disappointing site for me. The older videos are in poor quality even though it says they are HD. As mentioned, several options take you to pages in French, they got me with a cross sale that I still haven't seen and it was of a movie site in French. I found a few scenes I liked. The newer ones are 1080p. The bonus scenes from watching a few look to be BTS and nearly all dialogue is in French. There is a cameraman talking in most of these scenes. The actors in the scene are talking, laughing and I'm wondering what they're even saying. Those unique tags for the models might even explain some of the frustration. Here is how they have their models tagged and separated - Fruity & Spicy, Light and Flexible, Young and Delicate, Bodied and Curvy, Aromatic and Alluring, Vibrant and Zesty. It is a porn site or a coffee and pastry house? I think it could be a good site, but as it is, it's only okay. 10-29-19  01:22am Replies (3) Review 114 Perv Therapy (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy. Around 40 scenes. Includes access to 4 other sites. *Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly). Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads, Easy cancel through Epoch Cons: I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny. Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. Bottom Line: Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex. With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color. You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites. What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea. That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. 11-28-22  02:17pm Replies (0) Review 115 Petite HD Porn (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Petite models in hardcore male/female and lesbian scenes. 221 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. All content is high quality with up to 1080p offered on all videos. Joining and canceling is easy with CCBill. Navigation is simple, but not without problems. Cons: Being a petite woman, I enjoy the petite niche in porn, but the problems I mentioned in the pros is starting to make this site confusing. Advertisements that aren’t terribly obtrusive, but are still there. Updates come, but with the aforementioned confusion it can make the updates confusing. Bottom Line: This site has several positives going for it. The models are cute and pretty. The lesbian scenes are pretty good. The male/female scenes are hit or miss. The video quality is a plus unless you want 4K. The photo sets are very good and can be downloaded in zips. There is one problem that showed up over the last few months. They (Petite HD Porn) decided to number their scenes as seasons and episodes, similar to a television show. One scene will be S(season): 20, E(pisode): 4, the next release S20, E5. It always seems like a good idea until this happens. Of the newest 5 releases, two are listed as “New Season”. One is S22 E1 (sounds like a new season). The other, that is more recently released is S2 E1. And it’s listed as a new season just like season 22 is listed as a new season. Is the content being recycled? The 3 newest updates include two from season 2. This group of sites is not known for this kind of sloppiness. The site is still a good site. Some of the male/female seasons are very good, as good as you will see on more known hardcore sites. The pretty models are usually into the sex, but if you’re here for a story there’s not much going on there. Why name the scenes, give them seasons and episodes then leave the story off? There are 221 scenes, the updates are not even close to consistent. Currently, there was an update last on June 24, then June 21, before that was May 16, before that was March 14 and before that one -- February 9th. The last time I was a member here they were updating once a week during the peak of Covid. It’s one of those sites that you may enjoy, but you’re not going to be missing anything by skipping it. It does carry over the feeling that Nubiles tried too hard to do too much with a network to couple with Nubiles.net (which wasn’t needed) and then the premium standalone sites and a second network. The video quality is good with up to 1080p downloads. The photos and downloadable zips are there. It comes with a 15 or 16 site network, I really believe that’s an 18 site network, but I can’t remember the names of the other sites they don’t list. It’s at least cheap and uses CCBill for easy cancellation. The cross-sales when I joined were not checked. It just feels like they could do a lot more with this site and their entire group of sites and networks and they may be as long as you join all the sites separately and pay a separate price for each. Just by itself, I couldn’t recommend this site, as a part of the Nubiles Porn network it’s worth taking a look at it. 07-14-21  02:03am Replies (0) Review 116 Pink Label (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes. There are educational and instructional videos too. Most scenes have subtitles or captions. Epoch is the biller. Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. Cons: A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes. No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating. No downloads Bottom Line: This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find. I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see. They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that. They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling. I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman. Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals? That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. 06-08-22  03:18am Replies (0) Review 117 Porn World (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: It’s the DDF network rebranded and complicated Downloads are included in the price The TBP discount is great! It navigates like a complicated version of DDF Network, you get used to it The quality is top notch House of Taboo content is here Also includes Legal Porno scenes Cons: The navigation earns a spot here too. At first, it took me at least two weeks to get used to the navigation. The Legal Porno content requires tokens Bottom Line: DDF was one of my all-time favorite networks. It was one of the first hardcore pornsites I joined. But back then, I only joined 1byDay and paid a premium price for the one site. All the 1byDay content is available on Porn World and I have to say, it’s still as good as I remember. I want to say all the DDF content is here, but I can’t say that. There is a lot of it. Around 15,000 scenes. I do believe a few points should be taken off the score for the more complicated site, Porn World’s navigation. It’s not a dealbreaker, not even close. But I was fairly frustrated the first few times I logged in and searched directly for a scene I remembered, only to not find what I was looking for. With that said, a little time and a lot of paying attention has made the navigation good, not great. The DDF sites I remember the most were: OnebyDay, Hot Legs and Feet, Only Blowjob and DDF Busty. The DDF network, in its early days, was my pick for the best value in porn. It’s still up there and the TBP $14.95 discount makes it even better. It advertises as $44.95 to me. The videos and picture quality are still in-line with the DDF standards and the models are gorgeous, even still a little glamorous as DDF was known for. There are still updates as well and with a 15,000+ scene catalog, it’s one of the most impressive networks you will see. Legal Porno also has their content on Porn World and I will admit, there are some scenes from them that caught my eye and made me consider paying for tokens to download. In the past, I probably would have found the Legal Porno content to be frustrating, since it’s taking up space in my vision and not available without paying more for, but enough sites have turned to the pay per view method, it’s just becoming common and I have accepted that. You receive one of the best mixes of niches and genres with this network. It’s still a show of what a brilliant producer, director and photographer Denys Defrancesco was. His work is up there with the top names in porn history and even with the frustrating navigation, you at least know you’re going to get great content in your search. This site also would be good for those that miss the 2000s era of porn. I will confirm that from the best I can tell, all the House of Taboo content is available on Porn World. DDF stepped so far out of his zone with House of Taboo, but it was easily one of the best BDSM sites on the internet. I have downloaded quite a bit of its content from Porn World and consider that content, alone – to make me happy. It’s worth checking out if you’re into the idea of BDSM but back out when you see the “scary” parts. DDF produced BDSM with class and respect. That’s how I feel about his content. And it’s why this is a very highly recommended join. 07-09-24  12:58pm Replies (0) Review 118 POV Blowjobs (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: As far as I am willing to go into the world of messy, rough porn. A large POV blowjob site. Surprising to me, 674 scenes, remove around 40 if you don’t count behind the scenes. It’s part of the Evil Angel network. I tried to find a few more sites to review from it, but can’t stomach most of them. Some really pretty women. Why does that surprise me? Good video quality with more than half of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads. Downloadable picture zips, but some of the sets only have 10 or less pictures. Cons: This does not remind me of a blowjob site. It’s more like a throat culture site, very messy, harsh, I won’t say degrading since the women seem to enjoy it. No longer updating, but it is a very large site. One of my most hated acts in porn: Having the guy cum into a glass for the women to drink it. It reminds me of when Rocky drinks the raw eggs. Bottom Line: I believe I pushed every boundary I have with these reviews this month. I tried Anal Acrobats, but couldn’t even make it through the trailers of the videos to review it. This one is typical of Evil Angel and some of it’s not terribly disgusting or offensive, but some of it is. I am going to review it as objectively as I can without bringing too much of my disgust into the review. The majority of the 674 scenes are one woman with one man and those are not that bad. It’s the scenes with more than one man that I found hard to watch. Maybe I should even say, if you are against very hardcore porn, heavy slobbering, running eyeshadow and eyeliner, gagging noises, you might want to stay away from this site. This is a legitimate complaint that has nothing to do with the disgusting parts. I don’t see how this is POV. Especially when it’s more than one man. There’s one camera and five men. I’m not even for sure where POV for a blowjob should be recorded from. The most surprising part to me was how many very attractive women there are on the site. I even saw one scene here with the very pretty Anissa Kate. The scenes are very simplistic. Man gets naked, the woman opens her mouth and the man gives her a throat culture with his penis. I really believe if they spent more time working on making it a true POV site, instead of seeing how close they could come to choking the woman to death, it would be a good site. Which is me being objective. I’m saying if you don’t mind the sounds, the gagging, you might like this site a lot. The part that made me at least suffer through watching the scenes was how much the women seem to enjoy it. There is a little more to the scenes than just blowjobs. Many of the female models masturbate while giving the blowjob. I would even recommend it for those who have favorite mainstream female porn stars. You will be surprised when you see her on this site. 08-11-21  05:07am Replies (0) Review 119 Pretty Dirty (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Story-driven porn that I do believe represented the precursor for the better-known Pure Taboo. There are 206 scenes. There are no more updates. It has its importance, though. All scenes have from mobile resolution to 1080p downloads. No 4K. Generally attractive male and female models. Derrick Pierce is one of my favorite male models and he has several scenes on this site. It is, in my opinion, more hardcore than Pure Taboo and less reliant on atmosphere. The site works very well and is easy to use. Cons: Less time in the scenes would seem to point to less story, but I believe it’s the less atmosphere that is causing the shorter scenes. The actions show the darker side of this site. I list that as a con because there’s obviously a reason they switched to the style of Pure Taboo, which isn’t as physically dominant. Could be a pro for you, could be a con. No updates, but I remember a time that I joined Pure Taboo when it first came out. I thought it was going to include Adult Time. It didn’t. It only included Pretty Dirty. It feels like there is a reason they don’t want the Pretty Dirty content grouped with the Pure Taboo content. Bottom Line: My feeling here could be a very simple feeling. I believe Pretty Dirty was pushing boundaries that were maybe too risky to push. One thing I haven’t seen talked about with this site is 80 of the 206 scenes are behind the scenes, scenes. You really only get 126 porn scenes. The scenes are generally shorter than on Pure Taboo. There is less lighting and atmosphere in the scenes. It’s going to cause me to feel different emotions towards the scenes. Whereas I believe Pure Taboo creates an uncomfortable setting, then has more standard sex that isn’t that hardcore. Pretty dirty lets the action and sex make you uncomfortable. The part I also notice is the feature type scenes that they seemed to be building their site with. The one that stands out the most is the Indirect Relations series. It is directed by Bree Mills and Craven Moorehead. Two names I am familiar with. The scenes like that one, to me, are where a site like this needs to be at. That scene is very emotional, and I wonder if it crossed lines. If it was too much? It is about a father that was having sex with his daughter which led to his divorce. It’s not stepdaughter. The story grows or sinks into the dad soliciting a prostitute, a drug addict and his daughter, for an orgy. That’s really pushing boundaries. That’s all made worse by the dad being a cop. When you get into a topic that taboo and controversial, you are reliant on the viewer having the open-mind and understanding it’s acting. I believe porn directors and producers should make that clear. Is it their choice to not go that far or are they being limited? I didn’t freak out watching out. I understood that it was fantasy. With the part being said about the 80 behind the scenes, scenes. You are only getting 126 porn scenes. Most of these scenes are like Pure Taboo except without the atmosphere. I could see people being split 50/50 on which site/style they like better. I think I like Pretty Dirty’s style better. There’s a lot to be said for certain actions in porn need atmosphere, story and build-up, while others need none of those. I don’t know that this hardcore, taboo content needs a lot of stories. The more story there is the more likely holes in the plot starts to develop. I’m not a huge hardcore porn fan. I do really like these scenes. The models are all very attractive. I even believe that could play a part in my interest in the scenes. This is the main goal I was looking for. Do I see a reason for the content to switch from Pretty Dirty to Pure Taboo? No. Which makes me think it was something out of their control. The taboo types are similar. The sex is similar. The one thing I really notice is the lighting. Pure Taboo is more artistic, while Pretty Dirty is more raw. You do get both sites so you can like one or other better or love both of them. I feel like both sites push some boundaries in 2022. Even though the plots are not that different than porn for 20-40 years ago. I believe the years of constant gonzo porn with no plot has made these scenes more interesting to people. Just don’t forget your imagination when watching these scenes and listening to the plot. This is not really a complaint. There is casting problems here, too. The scene with Derrick Pierce and Aaliyah Love, is one of the sexiest, but worst cast scenes I have seen. Derrick and another man grab Aaliyah and the other man restrains Aaliyah’s husband while Derrick has sex with her. She tries to make it believable that she doesn’t want it, but she is such a cute, spunky model, it just fails on believability. There were 3 parts she smiles and laughs in while her “husband” is trying to fight to get to her to save her. There are scenes on Pure Taboo with the same problem. They’re either going to have to be more playful of sites or stop putting playful actresses in these scenes. It’s definitely worth checking out. 02-09-22  06:50am Replies (0) Review 120 Pride Studios (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A large gay network of 11 sites. The network averages 3-4 updates per week. As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models. The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads. There are pictures that can be downloaded. Cons: Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say. Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network. Bottom Line: I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn. The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex. They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it. The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn. Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women. I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that. 12-08-21  03:54am Replies (0) Review 121 Pure Taboo (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: As a huge fan of story-driven porn, I have chosen to pass up on this site before now. The dark, gritty, nature of the scenes are both a pro and con. The artistic value of these scenes is quite high, but once you go into artistic, you really need to live up to the “title” of the painting, unless you’re going for abstract. There are 378 scenes. The updates are spaced out, but very consistent. You should expect 5-6 updates per month. As much as I want to applaud the writing and storytelling in the scenes, this reminds me a lot of older porn plots that I have seen from studios like Vivid. It could be those scenes are so far in the past, now, that a younger generation hasn’t experienced those plots. It is good storytelling for porn. All video downloads have at least 1080p, with the majority having 4K. The scenes are long, the quality is high, there’s a story, very attractive models. Cons: My number one con is an easy one. A lot of these plots are not even new in porn. The earliest porn I watched had some of these plots. Especially the ones that’s go into religion. There’s stepfamily porn on here. I can’t be as positive about that part of the site as others have been. Now, I have to look at the precursor Pretty Dirty to see if changes were made. This will be a con I don’t think I have seen in a porn review. Poor casting. If you’re going to have a scene about a psychiatrist, at least make sure the person playing the psychiatrist is not a very well-known porn star Bottom Line: This was only my second time joining Adult Time. The first time I was just so overwhelmed with it that I didn’t see a lot of what the network had. I joined the year offer last month. I do find a lot of interest in written erotica. My thoughts before the last few weeks, about Pure Taboo, was that I would either love it or hate it. I don’t hate it. I don’t love it either. They can have all the credit for making a dark, gritty, atmosphere, excellent lighting for the scenes, to set the tone. This site is a good example for why most porn companies don’t try to be this story-driven. If you’re going to have humans playing out the story, they are going to need to be very good actors and actresses. A lot of the actors and actresses in these scenes are well-known. I recognize at least 75% of the names. That is why I didn’t review this site the time I was on it before. I felt like I would be too critical of the site that’s trying to at least give us a story. There are 378 scenes. The update schedule can be a little confusing. There is 5-7 day gap between some scenes, then they will release two scenes in four days. It works out, currently, to 5-6 scenes per month. I have to say my taste in porn must not be too bad. The best scene I have watched so far is Clinical Trial featuring Danny Mountain and Kira Noir. It just so happened to be nominated for a 2020 best AVN scene. That scene, at its roots, is just another doctor takes advantage of female patient scene which we have seen for years in porn. But it is told in the story of the scene, she is an athlete and I know there were some abuse stories that came out about a sports doctor abusing the young athletes. I think they are leaning on that being the taboo. They are using stories that are either known or are familiar to our brains. I believe the mood, the lighting, the language, the roughness, adds to the taboo nature of the scenes. Because these are just niches, we have seen many times before in porn. Their production values are increasing the taboo-level. None of that is a really a complaint. I really enjoy story-driven porn. You end up in porn with one of two scenarios. You either get repetitive plot story-driven porn or you get no stories, repetitive porn. I will take the story side even it’s repetitive. I will give them credit for creating moods that makes the scenes feel more uncomfortable and tense. I have been looking at Pretty Dirty which is explained to be the precursor to Pure Taboo. I will review it separately. I see a lot of differences between the sites. the easiest way to describe the scenes on the site is to say you’re going to be put into a scenario and plot meant to make you uncomfortable. That this should not be happening. I would give them a B+ for that. It really should be lower, maybe a C, but I am considering they must create stories their actors and actresses can act out believably. Just some of what I noticed as stories/taboos I have seen in the past. There is a scene called, “Blind Surprise” where there is a blind person in the scene. I don’t think she is blind. She is acting it. One of the very first porn movies I watched. It was before internet porn. Was about a blind man with a woman. He was questioning his sexuality since he could not see. I still remember this because I thought it was so wrong when I watched it. She fingered his butthole to see how he liked that. Then, she had sex with him to see if he liked that better. That scene had to be 1970s or maybe 80s. It was on a tape my dad had. I know as well as anyone that creative ideas are rarely new. On the other hand, if you come into this site expecting something very taboo, you’re not going to get it. It's a very good site for what it is. It’s one of the sites that makes me glad I bought the year subscription. Hopefully, they keep on with what they are doing and improving it. The scenes are very long. There are not as many 4K videos on this site as there are on other Adult Time sites. I don’t know if time/filesize is a factor in that. All the newer scenes do have 4k. I think if you’re on this specific site for 4K, you may have missed the point. This is a weird recommendation. See it as the site that gives you reason to join Adult Time for a year. There’s a lot of potential on this site. 02-09-22  06:55am Replies (0) Review 122 Quest For Orgasm (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Comes with Lets Doe It Network Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs Highest quality production values Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network Cons: Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole Only 80 scenes Has not updated since September 2017 Bottom Line: For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how. The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved. The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos. The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago. This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. 09-05-21  06:48pm Replies (0) Review 123 Ruth Blackwell (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: There are 114 scenes, not a small site, but not impressive either Easy to use search by tags Can join using Paypal as well as many giftcards Interesting looking camsite that I did not checkout Rare porn that focuses on a single pregnant model, who sometimes adds a friend to the scene Cons: No High Definition content, of course no 4K either No Pornusers discount so this is expensive for the quality Not adding new scenes No model interaction Too many ads on members’ pages Bottom Line: A lot has changed for the better since this site was new. There are many porn fans who like interracial porn, but it is hardly rare or taboo any longer. I like porn with black men and I can enjoy seeing their cocks in action. However, I did not like seeing black men being stereotyped as thugs and the idea that black men all have huge cocks is not true. I also did not like that the white women were portrayed as cheating on their white boyfriends or husbands. One description I read was calling them lame ass white boys with tiny wieners or even worse, when compared to black men they have erectile dysfunction. Ruth Blackwell is pregnant in most, but not all of the scenes. Pregnant porn is rather a theme with limited appeal to most porn fans I would imagine, as not much Is produced. I was uncomfortable with even the idea. She states that she wants child support from the presumably black father, but has no idea which of many he may be. The site describes her as she’s evil, she’s mean, she is the black cock queen. I don’t need to say I did not like much about this site. The site does not have any High Definition videos, not a single one. In 2021 that makes this behind the times and by quite a lot. In my opinion, the scenes were barely watchable. The sex itself was rather standard and to the point. There is oral and vaginal, but for good reason nothing more extreme. Many of the scenes have another woman with her and her guy. Mostly these are blond white women, but I did see a few Asians and even a black woman, Alexis Silver. The woman who was the hottest was Kelly Wells, who was a major star years ago. In many of these scenes it is stated that her partner woman was trying to get pregnant in the scene. Another goal was to get the partner woman converted to preferring black men. As a site, it was laid out well and easy to use. Searching is easy. It says there are live webcams featuring the models, but that leads to a link that goes nowhere. On the left side of the page, there is advertising for a cam site, called Dogfartlive, which I recognized as Streammate. I did not try it. I felt there was too much advertising for it, to the point that it was distracting. The site states that there will be updates, but the quality makes me think of porn from before 2010. There is zero model interaction too. No way to contact her, chat, make a request, nothing. For the price, I expected a lot more from a site. 10-19-21  12:29pm Replies (0) Review 124 Samuel O'Toole (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name! 121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together. Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution. Pictures that can be downloaded. Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots. Cons: No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women? There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too. The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too. Bottom Line: Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance. I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex. The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved. The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys. 12-08-21  02:32am Replies (0) Review 125 Sapphic Erotica (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: The site that started my interest in lesbian porn and it's still at the top of the lesbian site list Quality is near unmatched, very crisp and clear video downloads and outstanding quality photosets to download. The other quality is high too. That's the believability and quality of the action. If these women are not really into lesbian scenes, they are damn good actresses What was the old tagline? Pretty girls doing it right? Sounds right to me and explains the majority of their content. Lots of tags and good searching capabilities One of the few sites that can win me over without much talking, the models' mouths are usually full of something or something else Cons: There is no story! That's usually a deathblow for me, a dealbreaker, but see above, pretty girls doing it right. That's all the story I need. May not be enough for you. How about the dumbest con ever? The women are too attractive. You know half the people that watch the scenes say, "there's no way she's into women!" Which is what makes it great to me. I like fantasies. Bottom Line: You know a site is really strong when it comes with a network and the network doesn't even get mentioned in the pros. Sapphic Erotica is now part of the Sapphix network along with Fist Flush and Give Me Pink. Making it one of the best networks. Unlike most networks, Sapphix has Sapphic Erotica as the breadwinner and Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as support or bonus sites. Sapphic Erotica has been around longer than I have been watching online porn and I'm not that young. And knowing this will make a few of the other Porn Users laugh, I thought Sapphic Erotica was too hardcore back when I first got into porn. That didn't last for very long. And I'm glad it didn't. Sapphic Erotica was one of the first sites that made me feel real sexual attraction to women, even though, I have never even tried sex with women. The content ranges from deep, passionate kissing and grinding tribbing to strap ons and more hardcore acts. It works perfectly for fantasies since you know, in fantasies, sex is never boring or repetitive. Which is a major compliment to Sapphic Erotica. Even if the scenes are repetitive, it's a good repetitive and it's some of the highest quality, technical and in action, porn available. I can compare the scenes to other top lesbian sites like Mommy's Girl on Adult Time, but I don't think those scenes are near as good as these scenes. Stories are a great part of porn when done right. I'm not for sure lesbian porn has a good plot or storyline available. Let it be two attractive women testing each other out that turns into a torrid romp of wild sex. The best part of the tags is the inclusion of positions involved in each scene. If you like 69, there's a tag for it and for every other lesbian niche position you can think of. The models are almost all European. When I first started joining porn sites, European porn was on top of the porn world and this site shows why. The models, many of them, are 9s or 10s. I have seen individual lesbian scenes on other sites that were better. I have seen lesbian scenes that were more hardcore, but I don't know of a lesbian site with this much consistent quality, action and technical quality. The network is just a bonus, I didn't want to use "cherry on top", as the sites Fist Flush and Give Me Pink are two of the better sites from their respective niches. Fist Flush is a site focused on young women fisting each other and it's relatively extreme compared to other fisting sites. Give Me Pink is a site that once was one of the top solo sites. Pretty women, doing extreme things to their body and high quality close up camerawork. If you get your eye too close, you might get pink ... eye, sorry, couldn't resist. I just don't think you're going to find a site like Sapphic Erotica in 2024. It stands so far and above its competition. 08-13-24  09:54pm Replies (0) Shown : 101-125 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.33 seconds.