Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : KayTBuffs (0)

Feedback:   All (171)  |   Reviews (153)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (18) Other:   Replies Received (48)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 76-100 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 Leg Sex (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of my first attractions to porn. Pretty and cute models Leg and foot fetishists will be happy Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options. Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus). Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. Cons: It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn. Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. Bottom Line: The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to. Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene. The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex. The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea, The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website. The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog, I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches. I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership. I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content. The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease. I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. 03-07-23  07:45pm Replies (0) Review 77 Lets Go Bi (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Probably my favorite niche, bisexual men with a woman. All videos have 4K downloads. Only 43 scenes, but two updates per month have it growing it fast enough. Photo zips for all scenes, downloadable and 2700x4000 resolution. Little bit of everything mixed in these scenes like gay couple meets bisexual couple. Some very attractive female models. I will go into that in the bottom line as I think it’s very important to this niche. Cons: Scenes are not long enough as seen by a couple of the orgy scenes split into two parts. It’s like they can only record 30 minutes at a time. Enough cheesiness in some of these scenes to make a sandwich. Guys giving the thumbs up over another guy giving them a blowjob? No idea what they’re saying or even what language they are speaking. Bottom Line: I’m going to start this with my explanation for the need of at least one very attractive female in a bisexual men scene. Somewhere in a woman’s mind, we all like to think if we walked up on two gay or bisexual men having sex, their attraction to us would make them stop and include us. It’s similar to the thinking behind women who try to “turn” gay men to straight. I believe adding a very attractive woman to these scenes makes it more believable. The reality of most of these scenes is these are gay men. You can maybe see where I’m going with that? These gay men see this very attractive woman, carnal desires take over and they just have to try her out. There is a bisexual, 2 part orgy on this site that has multiple very attractive women in it. It makes you think the other way too. Would a straight man be willing to do something sexual with another man if it meant he would get to have to have sex with this beautiful woman? That’s why I like bisexual porn so much. It gives me something to think about and wonder if it really happened would the straight guy lose his inhibitions or would the gay guys become bisexual for that beautiful woman? This site does a really good job of presenting such scenarios. Some of the scenes are not that good. It’s clearly porn and those two gay guys are willing to have sex with the woman for the paycheck. It’s the other scenes that makes a site like this very appealing to me. This studio does seem to specialize in these harder to find niches. To show an example of how broad some of these scenes reach, one of the orgy scenes has these tags: Blowjob, cumshot, handjob, big tits, anal, small tits, mature, bbw, granny and rimjob. It’s just a mixture that to me is highly unpredictable IF put in this situation in real life. The site has 43 videos and 43 photo sets. The downloads on the videos have the 4K option on every video. Those also have the 540p, 720p, 1080p download options as well. The photo zip downloads have 2700x4000 photos and are interesting to look at. You see things you don’t notice in the video, especially the scenes with more than 4 people in them. As much as I like and appreciate sites like this, I don’t know if there’s a very big market for it. I’m not even for sure if the gay market is really into adding a female to the scene or a whole room of females. I don’t even know if it appeals to that many females. It is one of my favorite niches and maybe is my favorite when it comes to hardcore sex porn. I do want to add some of the cheesiness of the male actors is almost unforgivable. Really, a thumbs up for getting a blowjob from another man? Pretty sure you gave him a thumbs up when you didn’t stop him. If one thing could be improved it is the masculinity of the males. Most of these men are effeminate, even the big, muscular ones and I think that does hurt the fantasy unless the woman is very attractive. I don’t know these models by their given names, but one of the females, she is in a couple of the scenes needs to be in every scene. I will also mention I like the way the orgy scenes setup. It’s usually everyone sitting together, one starts touching one, and it works its way into orgy instead of everyone just getting naked and having sex. It gives the feeling of some of the people needed enticement to join in and I like that. Very good site for those into bisexual men scenes and I want to say this one could reach a little further with a lot of pretty female models. Top 10-19-21  01:27pm Replies (0) Review 78 LetsDoeIt (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good network that used to be great Nearly all models are attractive Easily searchable and overall navigation A good mix of niches You can almost always find a cheap promo price Cons: Download limit of 25 videos per month Picture sets are mediocre A lot of the sites I remember from this network are no longer on this network Bottom Line: I can remember joining Lets Doe It back when it was first being advertised. It was very good, even great. Possibly one of the most diverse networks in porn. Then they decided to split it up and moved 13 of the sites to Amateur Euro. That was bad enough, but then they decided to operate with download limits. I am almost positive, at one time, the download limit was 100 per month. It’s now 25. I joined Lets Doe It just a few weeks ago for a very low promo price. I have visited the site 4 times and downloaded nothing. I believe download limits do that to a member’s interest. Instead of looking at videos and thinking about which ones you like and want to download, you end up looking at videos with the thinking of “eliminating” some so you won’t hit the download limit. Lets Doe It’s potential was very high, but they have not improved their photo sets and it’s just starting to feel like a downward spiral. The models are still very attractive, but the lack of stories in the videos, mediocre picture sets and restrictive download limits just saps a lot of the energy as a member. I would like to say there’s still something great going on at Lets Do It, but I find it difficult to say that. If you find a model you like or a niche you like, you have to start focusing on not downloading too many videos. For what it’s worth, their other network, Amateur Euro has completely fallen off with no updates. Lets Do It at least does still update. The videos can be downloaded in HD quality and are good enough. Other than those allowed 25 downloads, there’s just not much else to interest me. I doubt I will download any of the videos now and can say unless something improves, there’s little to no reason for me to return as a member. Your experience with the site may be better than mine. My score for it is partially based in the potential. I do believe they could right the ship with a few changes, maybe even just raise the download limit to 50 or 100. I don’t remember their download limits being as restrictive as they are now and back when Lets Doe It first started, there were no download limits. If downloading doesn’t interest you then you can adjust the score accordingly. Otherwise, this is at best, an average network. 11-07-23  12:26pm Replies (0) Review 79 Lez Cuties (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Cute, playful, fun lesbian scenes. Site updates twice per month and currently has 510 scenes. All models are pretty or cute or a combination. Most are young and slim to medium build. Alternating settings in the scenes breaks up what is a formulaic product. Newest videos have downloads up to 4K. Picture sets are also high quality and downloadable. The tags are useful (basic) and non-confusing like many sites use. Cons: It is formulaic. The scenes last nearly the same amount of time from scene to scene. You see most of the same positions from scene to scene. The different settings at least present a hurdle to work around. Not much dialogue and what dialogue there is, I can’t understand. Bottom Line: The site is very appealing to my eyes. The models are young, cute and pretty. It’s softcore to regular lesbian content. Lots of kissing, touching, giggling, some sex and the models are just as happy when the scenes end as they were when the scenes started. The first site I ever joined was Nubiles. This site reminds me of the lesbian scenes on Nubiles. I feel like, as a few other PU reviewers have stated, I am starting to get too used to this style or porn. It is still good and can’t deny the models are some of the prettiest/cutest I have seen on a porn site, but I believe like a person that marries just for looks, what is left once you’re used to the looks? I don’t think this site is one directly aimed at lesbians or even bicurious women. It’s more about the eye candy. There are double or triple (threesome scenes) the pretty, naked, sexual young women on your screen than usual. I shouldn’t say the dialogue is absent. Some of the models do speak English and these are their known words, “Yeah, yeah, oh fuck, yeah, yeah, just like that, yeah, yeah”. I call that not understandable since I am not there and not feeling it. This is a site that has been around a long time. The newer scenes do feature some women that speak that 7-word English vocabulary. The point of that is lesbian porn has improved greatly on even sites related to this one. It’s because the models are more descriptive in their language. Having never been with a woman. I do not know what it takes to make me say yes, yes, oh fuck. I believe this is an example of a site directed more at men. Where just watching these sexy, young women, get naked and roll around with each other IS enough. It still works for me, but I do think they need to improve the interaction between the models. As I mentioned the site has been around look enough to have 510 scenes and to still be producing two updates per month. The videos have up to 4K. The age of the site is important in relation to the quality of the videos. There was a slowdown of updates on this site from the early to mid-2010s. The scenes during that time have 480p, 540p and 1080p. While the newer scenes have 9 download options. The scenes from before the slowdown top out at only 540p for downloads. Based on the number of pages, that looks like about 50% of the scenes only have up to 540p. I am not going to be that hard on the site. The newest scenes with the high quality downloads still equal in or around 250 and the only real flaw with those is the formulaic feeling. If you’re more into it for just seeing pretty, sexy women, you won’t notice the formulaic parts. Good site that I believe has to improve in the dialogue to keep up with the newer lesbian sites. 02-09-22  06:47am Replies (0) Review 80 Lingerie Tales (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: All videos can be downloaded in 4K Zipped and downloadable photo sets. You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads. Uses a tag system for searching. Pretty UK women with sexy accents The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill The site has 168 videos and photosets. Cons: Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos. Nude, but not as explicit as I might like. Bottom Line: The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way. I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me. I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo? There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site. The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early. 08-10-21  03:31am Replies (0) Review 81 Lost Bets Games (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Unique, interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes dumb, game sex scenes. All amateurs and all exclusive. Updates once per week, currently has 576 scenes on it. Payment Processor is CCBill. Wide variety of models by race and body type. Covers solo, lesbian, male/female, group niches. Doesn't feel staged. Cons: Scenes can drag on before you get to the action. There will definitely be some models (male and female) that everyone isn't attracted to. I see it as a plus. It adds to the authenticity. No photos of any kind. Bottom Line: I joined this site after seeing a clip from it on a tube site. It's very straightforward. All games played have the strip basis. They have multiple games they play using everyday household objects to regular toys. It's like a modern take on strip poker. They mix it up by making you wonder if the loser is really the loser (guy has to give a beautiful amateur woman oral sex), they have fun in the scenes and you can see that. A lot of the models are shy and you can see the nervousness of having to take their clothes off. It just gives a good feeling of they are enjoying it even if it's embarrassing. I'm sure you could see similar games being played in dorm rooms, at adult parties and that makes this content fun for me. I could see myself getting stuck playing one of these games with a group of friends. The video quality for an amateur site is excellent. No 4K, but they have 1080p going back to January 2014, the scenes prior to those have 720p. It is disappointing that they have no photos. There's really nothing to the navigation since the scenes all have the same basis. The titles usually tell what game is being played. There are rock/paper/scissors scenes, scenes with a light duty taser directly pressed against the other person's pussy or dick and even the board game Battleship. What I really like about it is they don't adhere to a very demanding strict order from scene to scene. Some scenes, the loser has to masturbate in front of the other or others. Sometimes that leads to more, sometimes everyone masturbates, you don't get the feeling you've seen every scene after watching one. I think that might be the most important trait for a site like this. The game part can become slow and dragging at times. One scene, the device they were using seemed to stop working and they had to improvise. Knowing that you might see something different as the game progresses keeps me watching. I enjoy the ones where it's a believably innocent young woman and she looks so embarrassed to drop her bra. You will even see blushes. There's no pressure from a demanding producer. It comes off as that rare organic porn. The masturbation, sex, group or solo or couple is good. I wonder how well some of these models know each other. They at times seem very comfortable with each other and at other times they look like they can't believe they got themselves "into this mess". There aren't many of these types of sites with 100% amateurs and that helps the score too. Many amateur sites have an amateur female and pro or seasoned male. Here you get all amateurs and part of the enjoyment is watching how quickly they (men and women) get aroused. I like this site a lot as my score shows, but I could see it being frustrating for others that are impatient. I like to try and "play along" with the pace of the scene and find this a very stimulating erotic experience if you do it that way. 11-25-19  09:49pm Replies (0) Review 82 Love Hairy (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A site with 469 "hairy" models More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos. 1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable. Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails". The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. Cons: The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn. While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months. Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. Bottom Line: I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes. I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways. I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years? The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas. The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. 12-08-19  08:47pm Replies (6) Review 83 Low Art Films (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: A studio that I remember joining the site of in 2011. It’s worth looking into. A mostly lesbian site with some of the biggest names in scenes that most people don’t even know exist. Good download options considering all of this was released in 2010-2012. All of the scenes have 160p up to 720p. Getting the chance to see some models before their fame or rise. London Keyes stands out most. Her lesbian scene with Nika Noir is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen. There are some male/female scenes. What you’re looking at most is this was the first steps to porn like we see on Pure Taboo, the lighting, the colors, they are changing moods with the colors. They need a Porn History class in college. If Art History qualifies as college credit, why not porn history? Cons: It's a small site and it’s not going to update ever again. It only has 82 scenes, but I admit, I have downloaded 62 of them. I wonder if other sites have ever looked into this style of filming. This site could even be confusing for people. Heavy on the glam, but there’s some BDSM in it. Bottom Line: I didn’t list is a pro or con. This site, from what I remember, was going to feature mostly Asian women. It was going to be “interracial” with one of the women (lesbian scenes) being Asian. Times have changed, I don’t really know why this site stopped. Some of the names of models: Charmane Star, Yuri Luv, Sea J. Raw, Puma Swede who is one of the most attractive, athletically built models. Jayden James who I know was on top of the porn world at one time. Capri Anderson. Shyla Jennings. Capri Cavanni. London Keyes. There is even a male/female scene between Asa Akira and Mr. Marcus. Faye Reagan. Reagan Reese. The scene I remember the most is Alexis Amore and Nikki Rhodes with Mexican-inspired Día de los Muertos makeup. This was one of the sites that someone had a vision about. Maybe it didn’t catch on with the consumer. There is almost nothing to fault in these scenes. I do believe Fame Digital maybe bought it out. The models are top of the shelf for that time period. The only real facts you need is there are 82 of these scenes that someone gave up on way too soon. I wouldn’t be surprised to know the scenes were busting the budget. The whole idea with these scenes goes into the lighting, the colors, it creates a mood in the viewer. They were already trying too hard at that point. This makes me think of what Bree Mills was producing 12 years ago. It blends so many niches. There are a few solo scenes. Most of the scenes are lesbian. There are some male/female. You’re not expecting to see light water torture of Jayden Jaymes and Nick Manning during a hardcore scene. It’s here, though. There’s a lot of cosplay. There is bondage. And the best part, the lesbian scenes are as close as I think you can get to calling lesbian porn – hardcore. Rough rubbing and fingering. I had a membership recently to Kink and this looks like Kink meets glam. The scenes are very hardcore. I never expect that from a site with Art in the name, but it is Low Art. I believe the name even tells they were trying too hard. There’s a lot of use of oils on the bodies. The rooms they are in look like a mixture of a Soho Penthouse, a gothic dungeon, a million dollar mansion, a Japanese home and a rundown, dilapidated industrial building. I do think a site like this probably inspired some sites that we rate very highly these days. They were doing the creativity. There’s not a lot of stories in the scenes. Adding the quality of the models makes this a site someone like me will download 62 of 82 videos from. Even though I like solo porn. I don’t really like the solo scenes on this site. There’s clearly something going on in these scenes. The solo women should have been in the scenes with couples having sex and masturbating there. The download quality is not bad. You can download up to 720p on all the scenes. I'm trying to recollect more about this site from my memory. The first 6 scenes have a title. The rest do not. Those were titled, “Janine and Jessica Dirty Desires”. That is Jessica Jaymes and Janine Lindemulder. It does look like the site was first focusing on them. It then shifted to more Asian models. There is even a very spirited solo scene of Sasha Grey in the old, industrial building setting. I consider this one of my best finds. It is also on Adult Time. That may be the advantage to joining Adult Time for a long period of time. I have had time to go through it more. The last scene they made was one that worked the lights and colors, I thought, the best they had done. Maybe they didn’t get a big response to it and thought that’s the best they had and gave up. It’s Charmane Star and Yuri Luv. The lighting is soft, one background panel is a bright orange, heavy contrast there. Charmane and Yuri have a lot of face make-up on especially around the eyes. Charmane’s is a brighter red. Yuri’s is a muted blue. Someone was really trying to show the contrast. Very happy to have found this site. 02-09-22  06:30am Replies (0) Review 84 Manko 88 (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Uncensored Asian/Japanese porn that is quite good. Small site with only 30 scenes, but it does get two updates per month. Some of the scenes are really outstanding including in length and depth of the scene (see cons). Video quality is excellent with up to 1080p on all videos, all are downloadable. Downloadable zipped photos that are of high quality 2700x4000 Some threesomes and outdoor scenes too. Cons: The scenes greatly vary in length and how interesting the scene is. The longest scene is 67 minutes and five are over 60 minutes, but there are others in the 15 minute range. The depth of the scenes (kinkiness and actions) varies because of this. One of the first times I’ve watched Asian/Japanese porn and have to say this needs subtitles. One of the scenes is called, “Mother-in-law hungry for cock”. There is so much dialogue going on in the scene, but I have no idea what is being said. Bottom Line: This site is worth a look for those interested in Japanese porn without the censoring. All of the males in these scenes are not Japanese. I have an interest in Japanese porn from reading reviews about how creative it is and how much of it relies on a story. That clearly is happening in some of these scenes, but without even a basic knowledge of Japanese, I have to just go by the context of actions. I do believe this is going to sticking point for me with this site. While each scene is titled and tells me what the scene is about, there’s not even a synopsis. All of the scenes have the same synopsis that tells you what to expect from Manko88, not the scene itself. There are only 30 scenes, but there are 2 updates per month and each update comes with a video and photos. The videos and photos are downloadable and from what I can tell it is unlimited. Something that has held back my interest in Japanese and Asian porn is the use of creampies. Based on the very good user features, the niches dropdown box says 23 of these 30 scenes have creampies. I am sure creampies are common in real sex – Covid has me in a drought, but I don’t get the use of creampies in porn. This is performance sex not husband and wife trying to make a baby sex. Cumshots are and always have been one of my favorite parts of porn. The video quality is good enough though I don’t see any with 4K. They do offer 540p, 720p and 1080p. Which is good enough for me, but maybe not for those wanting 4K. The pictures are 2700x4000, I am not technological enough to know if that is telling me they have the cameras to make 4K videos, but that’s not a dealbreaker for me. Some of the scenes, like the mother-in-law hungry for cock have what looks to be a sexy story. The son-in-law has the mother-in-law’s panties and is sniffing them. The mother-in-law sees him from a short distance, but out of his sight and starts masturbating watching him sniff her panties. I don’t need the talking to get that part. It then turns to dialogue and turns into sex. There’s so much being said that would either add or take away from this scene, but it’s gibberish to me. I do like the site and the longer scenes. There seems to be quite a lot of taboo going on in these scenes. I would even say a few are more extreme like a black man helping his Asian male friend get his girlfriend off with an array of Magic Wands, threesome sex and what I wouldn’t expect from a Japanese site. There are cutesy scenes with the pretty Asian models wearing cat or bunny ears (I’m from Chicago, I don’t know animal ears). There are scenes with the female models nude in public. One of the female model having a guy use a dildo on her in the car while driving around which leads to a blowjob and cum in the mouth. There’s a lot going on here that I like, but I really get the feeling this could be even better if I had the slightest clue what they’re talking about. I like the site overall, there’s good video and photo quality and no censoring. I did try a Japanese site with censoring a few months ago and couldn’t even review it. I’m not porn-adapted enough to get around the censor mosaic. This site fixes that problem. It is worth keeping an eye on. If there was more balance from scene to scene, at the very least a synopsis explaining everything or subtitles, this site would score really high for me. It still is considering I have no idea what’s going on besides the sex. 10-19-21  01:16pm Replies (0) Review 85 Mano Job (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of the more impressive niche (handjob, semi-blow, tease, cumshot) sites I have been on. A lot of content, close to 900 videos, each with a photoset too. They stray away from the handjob action in believable progression (little oral, grinding ass on, between the boobs). Great customer service. I made a mistake on my signup and they had it fixed in less than 30 minutes. Includes access to 2 other sites (Mr. POV, The Dick Suckers) and has 20 scenes from Amateur Allure as a bonus. Simple to use site. Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races. Cons: The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content. I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about. Bottom Line: This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing. The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent. The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche. The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total. I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me. The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models. The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites. The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases. They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other. This will go into my very short list of favorite sites. 08-19-19  10:30pm Replies (0) Review 86 Marcus Mojo (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut. There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy. I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn. Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag. The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body. The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads. Cons: Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem. No longer updating (has gay porn died?) Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue. Bottom Line: To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing. I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads. The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym. A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene. A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with. This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them. 12-03-21  08:22pm Replies (0) Review 87 Mature.nl (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Expansive site that features mature women and their sexual playmates. One of the biggest sites I know of. Not only is it updating, but even updates multiple times on some days. As broad of a selection of niches as I have seen. Downloadable videos and pictures. There is high effort in every possible way. Cons: The price might put some off, but shouldn't. Older video quality isn't as good. Bottom Line: I consider myself a fan of older/younger porn and this site is one of the best at that niche. I like that it's not just older women doing all the seducing. You will also see younger women with older men. Though I can't say whether the younger woman or older man is responsible for the seduction. This site excels in ways I believe are overlooked in porn nowadays. The vague pro of there is high effort in every possible way is about that. The production is excellent, there's enough story and explanation to make you feel like every scene isn't the same. There are details including the settings and even outfits. I would go as far as saying in a good way, it's artistic. Sure, if you just want the nudity and sex action, that's here but if you want more, you will get it from these scenes. The sexual action is very good as well. The ages of the participants really are only numbers. You will notice the experience showing and it makes for some of the most interesting and involving porn I have watched. That's my way of saying, we all could probably learn a new trick or two from the videos. The site has nearly 9,000 videos and they update as much as any site I have been a member of. The broad amount of niches adds a lot of value too. Personally, I like the seduction scenes the most, especially when it's an older woman seducing a younger woman. That's not a niche we see a lot of, though there are a few sites that do it. I don't think any do it as well as this site. The navigation is good, but I believe the nature of the site makes it a little more difficult to navigate. I have never been good at keeping up with models and this site is so large, it's not any easier to know which to watch. It does make this site hard for a one month membership. You're going to need some time just to find what you're most interested in and even then, you'll likely find yourself distracted. There is the con of the older video quality not being as good as the newer, but I think that's to be expected and is understood. The majority of the videos are available in full HD 1080p.and look great. The price is a bit steep, but if you're like me, you don't find a lot of sites you're that interested in. This one keeps my interest and I see no reason to think that's going to change. With the size of the site being larger than some entire networks and updates coming consistently, I see it as a good value. It helps that the content is high quality and it too, is consistently good. There's hardly ever a wasted update. I would even say they have scenes that surprise me with the different twists and turns the stories take. I consider this one of the better sites I've joined and it reminds me of why I first became interested in pay porn sites. 11-11-24  08:35am Replies (0) Review 88 Men Over 30 (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very large gay site that has some very large men on it. The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month. Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos. Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men. I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005. Newer scenes have up to 4K Cons: As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged. Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it. Oldest scenes are only 480p. Bottom Line: I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women. The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good. The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them! This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. 12-08-21  03:57am Replies (0) Review 89 Met Art X (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else. 308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women. They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets. They update daily with either a video or photo set. Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell. Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. Cons: Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen. If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. Bottom Line: There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be. I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X. The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel. My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn. That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female. It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. 04-06-21  02:19am Replies (0) Review 90 MetArt (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site. There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you. The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in. The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed. They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets. Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. Cons: It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con. Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. Bottom Line: What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year. What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling. I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body. The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it. The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. 04-06-21  02:21am Replies (1) Review 91 Mike's Apartment (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: European models being coerced (probably not) into going back to an apartment to have sex. Started out as Reality Kings initial step into the world of European porn. Gorgeous, AAA European models with many major Euro stars. Site has 812 scenes on it. Streaming player works well with little to no buffering. If taking the download upgrade the videos are mostly 720p or 1080p (HD) Cons: Stopped updating on December 27, 2018 Downloads cost extra ($14.95 per month) Not as much story or talking as other RK scenes since some of the models don’t speak English. Bottom Line: My initial interest in porn was on European models. Sites like Nubiles, Sapphic Erotica, Club Seventeen were really all I joined for several years. I had always wanted to join this site to see the usually softcore European models in reality themed, hardcore sex. The site’s older scenes stand out as there are more known stars and the scenes had more of a story or at least dialogue. Some of the scenes are lacking so much in story, the model just walks in the apartment, sits down, takes her clothes off and the sex or masturbation starts. Some start in a car where they (Reality Kings) are driving the model to the apartment and you do get some car action from flashing to blowjobs. The site stopped updating at the end of 2018, but it had a nice run with 812 scenes and is one of those sites if you like the content you might download 200-300 of the scenes. There’s not as much playfulness in these scenes as the other Reality King scenes but depending on the viewer that could be a positive or a negative. The sex in these scenes is average to above average in quality. I do think these are the prettiest and closest to natural models on Reality Kings. If you choose to upgrade to the download package there are plenty of HD videos 1080p and 720p to download, but no 4K. The photo sets are also worth downloading if you’re into photos as this content is 100% exclusive and can’t be found anywhere else. If you don’t choose to upgrade to downloads you can still use their very good streaming player. One thing I have noticed is the scenes are not quite as hardcore as the hardcore scenes on Reality King’s other sites. A lot of these European stars were not known for male/female scenes. There are also some girl/girl scenes and solo as well. It's a good site if you ever wondered how your favorite European models would do in hardcore scenes. So far, it has been my favorite site on the Reality Kings network. 01-27-20  07:39pm Replies (0) Review 92 MILF Hunter (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site. 815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video. If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p. Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control. Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup. If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. Cons: Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets. Too much clutter, ads, upsells Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. Bottom Line: Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot. Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations. I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. 01-27-20  07:32pm Replies (0) Review 93 Milking Table (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Part of Fantasy Massage network of six massage themed sites. Comes with access to Adult Time, which has over 56,000 videos There are no download limits The women range from innocent barely legal to MILFs who know what they like. The site was easy to use and the streaming player works without needing to buffer. I like to stream scenes before downloading them. Cons: No longer updating as of February of 2016. One thing I noticed was there are a lot of tattooed models on here if that's a problem for you. Bottom Line: Milking Table is no longer updating and that is a shame as I found it deserving of my time and attention. I found 112 videos of men getting massaged and women helping them with hand and blowjobs. What I liked best is the way the cum shots were shown as a reward for the women, who were visibly excited by what they were doing and what they were about to get. The pretty models seemed to enjoy the scenes even more than the lucky guys. The scenes generally start with the couple talking, but not a real story. She next helps herself and her guy with a good slow stroking hand job, then some oral loving. What happens next is something I have not seen on another site. He lays down on a massage table with his nice very hard cock sticking down through a hole in it. She is stroking and sucking his cock, but you don’t see his face. Instead the focus is on her look of pleasure as she is enjoying him as an object of her desire. As a reward she gets a nice cum shot in her mouth or on her face. I love to watch men cumming, especially big amounts. For me seeing that creamy filling shooting out is always the best part in a porn scene. The models varied as you see some that are innocent and barely legal and some that are into their thirties and even forties. The younger models were fun to watch. What I liked even more was that I could easily see myself as one of these older women, doing what they were doing. My biggest complaint is that there were so few videos. However, you also get Adult Time with over 56,000 videos of many different kinds of sex action. For massage content, you get this site as well as the six sites of the Fantasy Massage network. It's a site worth looking into if you find yourself bored with Adult Time's regular content. This is close to being CFNM porn with the models keeping at least some of their clothes on throughout most of the scenes. 01-06-20  06:36pm Replies (0) Review 94 Mixed X (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: No downloading or streaming limits A lot of good acting and great camerawork Brief biography and photo for every model Updates with one new scene per week Segpay is a biller with a good reputation. Cons: Almost 70 videos No other sites or bonuses are included Stops and hiccups too much while streaming Disappointing download speeds Bottom Line: If you just look at the types of sex in the scenes, you may think that the site is just a mixture without a focus. The sex is mostly anal, interracial and lesbian. However, this site is more than a collection of sex acts. The site describes itself as featuring the art of cinematic handheld porn. You may think that it is one of those sites that is all about sex art. As I discovered, this is far from being a standard porn site. MixedX opened months ago in October of 2020 and Hungarian veteran porn model Christina Shine is the star here. She has 19 videos and photo sets. She is very sensual in her scenes and makes them very memorable. Both her acting skills as well as her pure genuine enjoyment of the sex are on display here. She does mostly interracial scenes with very dark, very large black men, very rare in Eastern European porn. I could not take my eyes off the color contrast. She has a unique style that makes the scenes work well for both men and even more for women. Couples could love the raw eroticism as this is porn with a story that is done well. For me what makes her scenes sizzle are the interactions and chemistry with her male costars. Women can see her and identify with how she feels. Men can see some really hot sex that is a feast for the eyes. On the site there are 23 scenes labeled as XFlix Originals. These are some of the best examples I have seen of hot camerawork. When I think of a handheld camera, I think shaky and amateur. Not on this site. The cinematography is an essential part of the visual appeal. There are also 15 story driven videos that are labeled as from Adam and Eve TV and star American models. I loved that there are a few with Elsa Jean and Cherie DeVille as well as Hungarian pornstars Amirah Adara and Nesty. The site itself is easy to use and has a good tag system. The download options are full HD as the best. Some videos are labeled as 4K, but don’t have the specifications. They seem to be just full HD. The photos can be downloaded in two different qualities. The link that says photos are those taken from the videos. I don’t understand why there is no option to also join the sister sites, Genuine Sin or Girls Fuck Girls. I would like to see a network price for all three. This is a site that delivers hot scenes and will be an even better value as it grows. 09-05-21  07:01pm Replies (0) Review 95 Mommy Blows Best (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Part of five site network , Blowpass. There are four large blow job sites in it Inexpensive to join Mostly older women and younger men. Mostly experienced pornstars that have years in the industry. Great bodies and professional performances and the guys fit the theme As of today, there are 560 videos available Cons: Can be repetitious as there is not a lot of variety you can do with a focus on blow jobs. It is hard to tell when it will update. January had none, but December had four The oldest videos are not Full High Definition. Bottom Line: The same sex act can get boring rather quickly. The better sites have to have more going for them than just the obvious. I feel that Mommy Blows Best is one of the better blowjob sites because it has much that appeals to my imagination. The age of the women here is MILF, not necessarily a family relationship like stepmother. There are scenes with a stepmother and a stepson, but there are also scenes with a stepdaughter and her boyfriend. Around fifteen scenes have the two women together in a lesson to show the young lady how to do it properly. These were some of my favorites out of all the 560 or so that the site has. Being older, the women have a confidence level that younger porn models just don’t have. These are mostly, if not all, pornstars that have been around in the industry since they were young. For them a great blow job is second nature and can do a hot scene with ease. Sometimes the scenes can seem repetitive as a result, but then again the site has a deeper appeal to many fetishes. Being older, they can be identified with by showing that sexy side of all women that comes out as we reach our second sexual peak. Teens show enthusiasm, but MILFs have the hormones and have the benefit of experience, but in spades. Being older and more confident, we know what we like and what we need. The women on this site see men as sexy conquests to be there for our pleasure and enjoyment. Younger men who are not so experienced or jaded from a lot of sex can be attractive. Older women and younger men is a fetish that can be appreciated by women of all ages. This may be an unlikely pairing in real life, but as a porn fantasy it is fun to watch. Older women are filled out and have bodies that may not be the perfect ones if you prefer thin models. Some of these models are quite, let’s say voluptuous, full figured and very real. Big breasts are to be found everywhere and a few are unfortunately enhanced ones. This body shape works well as for those with a uniform fetish. Sexy housewife or office workers in short skirts and pantyhose, teachers that are well dressed in less revealing clothes that emphasize their shape, all work well for me. Nicely done hair and makeup, a blouse that is too tight, and just the right shoes and you have my attention. Mostly the scenes involve a kind of power and age difference. Teacher and student, boss with employee, nurse and patient, landlord and tenant are just a few attention grabbers. The age difference makes for hot older and younger. The guys seem to be surprised as well as flattered, not entitled, when the women are interested in them. A few of the guys are black men, but really only a few. The women are the real stars here and some are Asian, or Black, but nearly all of the stars are white. There are lots of big names from the past when they were younger and some I have never seen before and wish I had. I see in the oldest videos that there is a male star that is in nearly every video way back then. They give his name as Jack H. I have heard of him, but have never seen him, as he is from before my time. I heard he used to have his own site, something very few male performers can say. He seems to be a good looking, very nice guy, well endowed even by porn standards and his cumshots are a joy to watch. His name is Jack Hammer, and I like his toolbox. I just wish the video quality had been better back then. The sets are mostly indoors in a kitchen or dining room, or in an office. The sets enhance heat in the scenes and are just beautiful. The downloads are fast and the 4K quality quite impressive. Not only are there 560 videos, a rather large number, the other sites in the network are mostly excellent blowjobs as well. 02-09-22  06:09am Replies (0) Review 96 Mommy's Girl (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre Downloadable videos are up to 4K Cons: In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying Bottom Line: I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman. Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!” Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable. That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey. Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single. As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded. It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. 07-09-23  07:35pm Replies (0) Review 97 Mother Fucker XXX (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: A blend of older/younger and cuckolding. Large site with 914 scenes, but no longer updating. Good quality downloads on close to half of the scenes. Some rare videos that I used to have under different names. That could be a big positive with this site. Nearly all niches of straight porn are covered. Cons: Not for sure I agree with the name of the site. There are some scenes that are much older women. Some are just younger women. There’s nothing holding the theme together. I believe all these scenes come from DVDs. About half of the scenes max out at 480p download. I downloaded some. They look okay if it’s a scene you want. The navigation is not very good. It’s because of the misleading title and tags. Bottom Line: This site caught my eye with some DVDs that I used to have. Those are named differently on this site. The previous versions I had were titled, “Screw My Wife”. On this site those are titled, “Lifestyles of the Cuckold”. I always liked those scenes. If you’re not familiar with those. The older man that is in every scene is what made me recognize the scenes. I don’t know his name, but he is an older, bald man. He gets a little involved in some scenes. The main part of the scenes is a more endowed man having sex with a wife while the husband watches. This older, bald man just sits there and watches too. That was my main reason for even looking at this site. I wanted those and downloaded the near 30 scenes they have just from that series. Looking further into the site, I noticed there’s no real connection with the theme. There are some older women with younger men scenes. I did not like those very much. I believe that older/younger porn interest is in older men with younger women or older women with younger women. I do not see the excitement from the younger men about having sex with older women. One of the series title tells a lot about the content. It is titled, “I was eighteen, fifty years ago”. Yeah, that’s not too sexy to even watch. There are others that are a little better, the “We wanna gang bang your mom”. It is better. There are even fucking machines scenes on this site. The models are not that old. Maybe 25-30? I think it's just a site where DVDs have been thrown together as series. I can’t say it’s terrible or that bad. I did download around 50 scenes from it. I don’t even see how the cuckolding scenes fit the theme. Those are gorgeous top-shelf models. I do like the cuckold niche. There is pegging. The women look the same age as the men. Even those gangbang ones, those models look similar age as the men. Once you get through those everything else seems to be just standard porn. There is interracial and I’m positive the male model is similar age. There is content here that is probably hard to find unless you join a site like Videobox, which I have no interest in trying to sift through. I did notice a series called, “Raunchy Redheads”. I am a natural redhead. We don’t get enough coverage in porn. I checked those out, those are okay, same feeling as the other scenes. One of the female models in the redhead scenes looks maybe 19. The video quality is the only other part to talk about. The scenes from 2010 and before are all 480p. The scenes after 2010, have mobile up to 1080p. It’s a good site to look at once or twice. The part I found funny. The older women on this site are really older. That’s not “mother” porn age. That’s granny. Take it for what it is. You may find some scenes you have misplaced. There are over 900 scenes. I would recommend it for those that like pegging and cuckolding. They have a good selection of those. I know neither of those niches are abundant. 02-09-22  06:26am Replies (0) Review 98 My MILFz (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: All 85 videos can be downloaded in HD Updates are twice a month Part of huge network that includes over 75 studios Epoch is the biller Cons: Not much age difference between the models Search not just for this site, but whole network Just nitpicking, but only six lesbian scenes Bottom Line: MILF refers to an age of about 25 to maybe 40. Actually I have even seen stars older than that called MILFs. I guess it means stars that are not young and not really ready to be called older. I am in that age range myself. I don’t think that I am young and innocent any longer and that does not bother me at all. I feel women get sexier as they get more confident with age. When I logged onto the site, I found that the men were close to the age of the women more often than not. Even when the differences are noticeable, the scenes don’t play up the age difference much. I found a few scenes where it was a pairing of student with teacher or with the principal. Mostly though, it was not important. This is not a site that can be called older/younger. Besides those scenes, there were a few that had a concept, such as maid and boss. In those the age difference was not the center of the video. There were a few things that I rather liked about the site. The first is that nearly all scenes are of models from the UK. I love those accents and admit a Brit with an accent makes me pay attention. Many of the guys are good looking, as well as nicely dressed and groomed. I could go for that. Many of the women looked slutty, which works for me as a porn fantasy. In contrast though, in some scenes the women were dressed in a very feminine manner with nice dresses or skirts, nylons, pretty panties etc. Most of the sex was interesting and kept me watching. However, I feel no scene is ok without a great cumshot. Most of these were externals and I prefer those to internal ones. The guys were above average in size compared to guys in real life, but by porn standards nothing special. They got the job done. Even the internal scenes had an unusual focus when the women put their fingers inside and scooped out some cum. There were only six lesbian scenes out of the 85 on the site. I thought they were at best just ok. I did see one lesbian four way, but the other scenes were all one on one, both the lesbian scenes as well as the boy/girl. There were a few scenes with black women and also a few with very dark black men with white women. The black men were nicely built down there and the women appreciated that. If I had to sum up the sex parts, it was a better than ok site with a few quite hot videos. The quality was good at High Definition as the best on offer and this comes with a huge network. 10-19-21  12:37pm Replies (0) Review 99 Next Door Buddies (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme. Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it. Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips. Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women. Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. Cons: Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys. Scenes are repetitive. Bottom Line: I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it! The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex. The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. 12-08-21  02:22am Replies (0) Review 100 Next Door Casting (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses. There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex. The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads. The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos. Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women. Cons: I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested. One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper. Bottom Line: This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part. The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about. The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex. the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones. I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked. 12-08-21  02:25am Replies (0) Shown : 76-100 of 169 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.34 seconds.