Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Transfixed
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best transsexual site for those that want to see transsexuals with women.
It’s a newer site, all the scenes have up to 4K downloads.
Only 31 scenes currently, 4 more in the Transgressive series and the updates are twice per month.
The highest production values I have seen on a transsexual site.
Take your choice, the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. Truly defining site in that sense.
Videos and photos can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The small size is the most noticeable, but it is a newer site and is becoming consistent with the updates.
Some camerawork gets lost when there are more than two people in the scene. That can be a problem when the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best way to start this is with my last con. It is also one of the pros in direct relation. The transsexuals performing on this site are as pretty as any I have seen. You know you are watching pretty transsexuals when you have to stream the video before downloading, just to see which ones are the transsexuals and which ones are the females. There is one with well-known pornstar Liv Revamped and she even gets lost in the blurring of gender lines. One of the transsexuals in that scene is one of the few transsexual models I know by name, Jessy Dubai. At first glance, the preview screens for these scenes look like lesbian scenes. I don’t think it’s offensive to say, I have watched scenes from this site and been surprised to see one is a female, that one is a transsexual. Very impressive and there are the production values. It is one of the weaknesses of the transsexual genre. A lot of the transsexual scenes have no story. There is little dialogue, and the scenes are just plain. It makes me feel like the selling point is just the fact it’s a transsexual.
The scenes on Transfixed are often in the 40+ minute range, with some even being over an hour. There is a star power in these scenes that I don’t see much on transsexual sites. One of my favorite scenes features one of the most popular female models in porn – Adriana Chechik. It also has Natalie Mars, a Milf transsexual and Khloe Kay, who I believe could pass for a woman, but is a transsexual.
There is a small series of scenes released as Transfixed but listed as Transgressive Films. There are four of those scenes. Those are transsexuals with men. The Transfixed scenes are more focused on women with transsexuals. The 31 scenes are all available to download in 160p mobile, up to 4K. It is, at least in my experience, the first transsexual site I have seen that goes this far with their scenes (production values, costumes, stories). There are also subtitles available on some scenes. The ones with subtitles have those available in English, Spanish, German, French, Dutch, Italian and Portuguese. They are making this site so good, there isn’t even much to nitpick them about. The scenes are sexy, erotic, interesting, kinky and I would go as far as saying – a site like this, could bring transsexual porn more into the mainstream. I have said before I believe transsexuals with women is the way to the mainstream. As a female, I don’t have a problem with watching transsexuals, but I am sure there are men that wouldn’t feel comfortable watching transsexuals. By putting the transsexuals with women, it still makes the scene a dick going in a pussy. No way would I dare try and explain the psychology of that. I look at it on the most basic level of it maintains a level of familiarity for straight males.
The scenes can be downloaded as can small picture zips. Those have 30-50 pictures in each. Those are high resolution photos, but probably wouldn’t be a selling point. They are updating twice per month. The update rate had slowed but has been picking up over the last few months. One thing I will mention that I try to mention in any transsexual review is the types of scenes. The one thing they do not have are solo scenes. Those are usually my favorite, but I do believe that’s because transsexuals with female scenes are so scarce. Once you give me transsexuals with women with this high of production values, a story, the high quality, you have my attention. It’s a site I have the best wishes for. There is definitely a market for transsexuals with women and that market is, women, then becoming women showing their boyfriends or husbands the porn they like. Instead of it being the husband or boyfriend showing their wife or girlfriend the porn they like. I see a lot of tags on hardcore scenes that say, “female friendly”. These scenes, as transsexual scenes, should have a tag that says, “male friendly”. It would score even higher if they had even 50-60 scenes total. I have watched each and every scene from this site more than a few times each. I will end by saying I nearly listed the Transgressive scenes as a con. Those feel like they’re messing with a good thing they have going with the Transfixed scenes. I can see how it could all come together in the future. There are a few sites now that do that with straight male, straight female, transsexual. If that’s the angle, I believe they could pull it off. |
|
02-09-22 06:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
True Anal
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready |
| Cons: |
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
I didn't like much about this site. |
|
08-10-21 03:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
153
|
Trystan Bull
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. |
| Cons: |
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? |
| Bottom Line: |
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. |
|
12-08-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
154
|
TS Playground
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality transsexual site that makes joining Evil Angel more likely.
921 scenes with a new update every 5 days.
Ran by Gamma, has all the video download options you would expect starting at 160p up to 4K, easy join and cancellation too.
A lot of solo scenes, but see con
Pictures included and can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
When I use their filter for “solo” it only shows 23 solo scenes on the site. Just looking at the site, I can count over 50 on the first page of the site.
That I’ve found, they do not have any transsexual with women scenes. For some reason, I like bi and gay scenes, but don’t like the transsexual with men scenes.
You won’t find a story in these scenes even if you make one up, it will disappear. |
| Bottom Line: |
I read a few reviews about this site and another transsexual site on Evil Angel called Transsexual Angel which has over 1,200 scenes. That’s a combined 2,000+ scenes. Most of the content on Evil Angel does not appeal to me even if I have had a few drinks. I do, however, like transsexual solo and transsexual with women.
The scenes do not offer a lot to work with. There are solo scenes and there are transsexual with males scenes. The solo scenes are not going to expand your appreciation for theatrical art. The scenes show the transsexual lightly teasing. I do think there is a humor factor since some of the transsexual models don’t seem to know they are on a site with transsexual in the name. They tease around like they are going to surprise you when their penis flips out of their panties.They then masturbate, cum and the scene is over. The scenes with transsexuals with men are not much deeper. It’s a transsexual having sex with a man with no story and they cum and it’s over.
For me, I enjoy the solo scenes and don’t mind that they go by fast. I do think there should be a mention about the looks. Most of these transsexuals could pass as women. I haven’t seen many ladyboys or the smaller, usually Asian transsexuals, but outside of a few, these transsexuals are made up enough and have the right demeanor to pass as women.
The site is on Evil Angel’s network and is owned by Gamma. That is a positive in my eyes. The billing is easy, the cancellation could be a little easier (just requires more info than other billers) and the features are very typical of the other Gamma sites. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p, 360p, 240p and 160p. I have seen a few scenes with 4K, but it is not very common. The picture sets are not what you get from sites that focus on pictures, but they are downloadable in zips as well. There is a listed 300GB download limit per day, but I’m almost positive I’ll probably not hit that in a month.
The Transsexual Angel site does have less solo scenes and does have scenes with transsexuals having sex with women. They also have added a new site called Pansexual X that goes into transsexual, bisexual men and those maybe interested in these transsexual sites would be interested in it too.
I don’t get much out of the Evil Angel membership except these transsexual and bisexual scenes. It’s a little more hardcore than my tastes allow me to bite into. I do recommend joining for the transsexual and bisexual content if you are into those. This is a site with a large amount of those genres and are downloadable in high quality. |
|
07-14-21 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
Ultra Films
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The fourth site included when you join the Wow Girls network. A person could argue that any of these sites are the best of the four.
With over 400 videos and around 1,000 photo sets it looks like this site just replaced the updates on Wow Porn.
Updates with 3 videos per week and 5 photo sets per week.
Because the site is newer (late 2017 when launched), those of you who love the high technical quality are going to be very pleased with this site.
The site, though “separate” from the Wow network works exactly the same as the Wow sites and is very easy to use.
One of the few groups of sites I would join for a year. |
| Cons: |
This is going to be the most difficult part of the review. I am going to say they need more ethnic diversity in the models.
They could integrate Ultra Films with the Wow network, as it is, you not only have to sign-in with a different password, you also have to choose a different screenname. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site separates itself is technical quality. Every single video on the site has 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. That’s over 400 videos. The option to download with 60 frames per second instead of 30 frames per second is available on close to 390 of the scenes. Unless you’re looking for the 6K videos, there is nothing possible to even complain about on Ultra Films. They are giving you the highest quality industry-standard downloads with the option of 30 or 60 frames per second on 95% of the scenes. Usually one of the easiest cons to use on any site is “the older content is not of as high quality”, can’t do that on Ultra Films.
They have 151 models on Ultra Films and nearly all are very attractive. There are hardcore scenes that, at least to me, seem more hardcore than the ones on the Wow sites. The update schedule is excellent with 3 videos and 5 photo sets per week. I feel like sending them an email and asking if they could at least screw something up. You really could complain about the model diversity. I even took the time to look through the 151 models just to give an idea of what I’m “complaining” about. I’m going to say 12 of the 151 could maybe pass as non “white” and it would be pushing it on all 12 of them. One of the ones I know is on here is Apolonia Lapiedra and I do know she is from Spain. That’s as ethnically diverse as you’re going to get on this site. The other complaint about Ultra Films not being integrated into the Wow network, actually has an advantage. On the Wow network you really can’t search the models down to one of the three sites. It shows models from all 3 sites. On Ultra Films, the model list just shows the models on Ultra Films.
I believe, besides the technical quality, the focus on their top models really helps Ultra Films. Stefanie Moon who seems to be very popular has 11 videos and 19 photo sets just on Ultra Films. You can even look at the total numbers from the site compared to the amount of models and see what I mean. There are roughly 1,500 videos and photo sets combined, there are only 151 models, that’s an average of 10 videos/photo sets per model, but it’s not that high. There are several popular models who only have 3 videos and 3 photo sets. They do have a group that’s more in that range of 20+ videos/photo sets combined. I prefer that and it was something I believe made me lose some interest in Nubiles. I like seeing a lot of content of each model instead of seeing a lot of models with just a little content of each.
This review puts me in a hard situation of trying to figure out which of these four sites deserves the highest score. Quantity is never going to be the deciding factor for me. Even if I had the time and hard drive space, I do not and would not want a site’s entire collection of content on my PC. It makes me wonder if Ultra Films is the best of these for me. It’s probably going to lead me to tying two and the other two will just be a point or two less. I think if you’re a porn fan and you haven’t tried this network out you don’t know what you’re missing. |
|
08-10-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
156
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it..
In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have.
There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download.
There are 1,217 models.
The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K.
It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles
The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed. |
| Cons: |
I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed.
It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling. |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre.
The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion.
There are roughly 5-6 updates per week.
During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has
Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one.
Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t.
The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel!
I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision?
In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable.
A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site. |
|
02-13-24 09:57pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
158
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site. |
|
02-08-23 06:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous European models in solo and lesbian scenes.
Video updates 2-3 times per week and has 1,965 videos on it.
Photos update every 5 days and there are 3,208 photo sets.
Photo sets and videos are downloadable and there are no download restrictions.
Very easy to use site with sections/tabs for videos, photos, models.
There are 1,042 models and they include most of the biggest European stars of all-time. |
| Cons: |
While easy to use, there could be a better tagging system (there is not one) and a better way to separate solo/lesbian (there is not one).
Too many behind the scenes videos. In recent months, they have averaged 2 BTS videos for every 3 sex videos.
There used to be hardcore scenes on here, but I haven't found any. |
| Bottom Line: |
The content here is as hot as I've found when talking about lesbian porn. There is more kissing, more touching, more of everything considered foreplay than on most lesbian sites. There could be a question if this should be listed as a lesbian site as there are solo scenes (mostly in the past). The newer content is almost exclusively lesbian.
My favorite part of Viv Thomas at the current time is the return of some of the models that were around when I first started watching porn online (around 2006). Sandra Shine is producing some of the scenes and recently had a cameo in a scene with the very featured Liv Revamped. Blue Angel has also been in recent scenes. It's fun for me since I'm similar age to those two and remember watching their scenes over a decade ago. There are even cameos by Eve Angel and Viv Thomas.
The sex features some of the best camerawork as you can clearly see the tongues licking and sucking on clits, nipples, and twirling in each other's mouth. I feel like I've been missing out on this content. I had forgot about this site.
The navigation is very easy to use, but it doesn't give you any filtering/sorting options by category. The only sorting options are top rated, 4K, most viewed and most favorited. You have to scroll through to find solo for example. A filter to remove behind the scenes videos would be a good start too.
The video quality is excellent with 4K being available on the last 2 years (consistently) and up to 5 years (some scenes have 4K some don't), there's 720p and 1080p back until 2009. Which is a con I'm going to mention, but didn't list. In the scenes/videos section they only show videos back to 2014. Anything before then, you have to find them by going to the model's page and pulling them up from there. This is concerning for me since I don't know if the video count includes all the ones not listed in the scenes/videos or if it does.
That is my only major deduction from the site's score. I think it would be difficult for a person new to the site to find what they're looking for and as mentioned earlier, the hardcore scenes seem to be gone.
Looking beyond that if you like lesbian, panties, women kissing, women having passionate (looks rough in lesbian porn) sex with each other this is one of the best sites for it. |
|
11-25-19 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
Vivid
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Much improved user-experience with this great studio’s website.
The search now allows you to search by DVD title and all results show up. Previous versions of the search would split the DVDs up.
Story driven-porn and it’s a near requirement to download each scene from each DVD or you may miss something.
7,048 scenes with no new updates since January 2020, but this is a site I don’t believe the updates are critical to.
Sexy stories, themes, outfits, settings, it has everything I’m usually complaining about other sites not having.
You can randomly download the older DVDs with confidence. That’s how good the classic DVDs are.
Even started adding transsexual content with 78 transsexual scenes mixed in. |
| Cons: |
I am not the most technologically-gifted person, but will note their classic DVD scenes claim to be HD, but I don’t see it. Those have the black fill-in boxes around the video. The classic DVD scenes do look good for the time period those come from.
Still no way to download a full DVD instead of scene by scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn’t know a lot about Vivid until joining Porn Users and noticed a few members talking about the classic scenes. After looking into it, I was not only impressed, I found myself loving every DVD I watched from Vivid. The newer DVDs are good and are 1080p, but the best ones, in my experience, are 2005 and back. It looks like Vivid was at the top of the porn industry and were shooting a style of porn I really enjoy. There is a con with the inability to download the entire DVDs as one file. The older scenes are meant to be watched together. Some of those scenes are only 5-6 minutes but include parts of the story. If they could combine everything from each DVD into one file, I would score the site even higher. As it is, you have to download the scenes separately then either drag and drop them all to play in a row or try to merge them yourself. I use the drag and drop method and find I have to use a different media player than my regular one to get the best results.
These videos are hard to describe as scenes. There is a story and while it’s not that great of a story or that interesting, it shows what dialogue, build-up, maybe a little tension, adds to porn. At least for me. There are also complete series of DVDs that follow the same theme. If you find one you like, you will likely like every DVD from that series. I believe the one I knew of was, “Where the Boys Aren’t”. I remember hearing a few of the big name female pornstars received their big boosts in their careers from that series.
My favorite part of these scenes is the sex. Go figure. They gave me a story, a theme and outfits. I believe those all make the sex parts better. The classic scenes are not like the porn we see today. There is sex that looks like sex, not the sex-Olympics or the let’s see how many positions we can squeeze into a 22 minute scene. Didn’t Prince have a song about that? These scenes look like people having enjoyable sex. More modern porn, gonzo-style, sets out to show 5-6 positions per scene. Vivid’s scenes set out to show the men and women staying in the position that is feeling the best. You see more chemistry between the stars and it just seems more enjoyable to watch and for them to perform.
Fixing the search is a major plus. Previously, you could search for a DVD by name and would get 4 scenes show up. Those would be scene 2, scene 4, scene 5 and scene 8. Whatever they did to remedy it, it worked. You now get all the parts listed in a row for easy download. With the download button on the screen preview, it’s even easier. I did notice the classic scenes show 360p, 720p and 1080p downloads. The 1080p doesn’t look any better than the 720p and is twice the size. I’m not for sure why. The screen is surrounded by black boxes/borders that fill the resolution in. The good new is these are as clear as I’ve seen the classic scenes. It’s worth going back and downloading any classic scenes you have just to get the improved quality. It should be a site everyone joins that gets tired of the porn lacking creativity, humor, clothes, chemistry, story and dialogue. Maybe my favorite part about the scenes – every cumshot isn’t a facial. Lots of body cumshots in the classic scenes. |
|
02-09-22 06:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Wank It Now
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of very few sites or networks that use jerk off instruction.
The focus is on softcore teasing. The appeal is to your imagination as well as your eyes. For the most part, I was left wanting to see more.
Many of the models are gorgeous.
Fast download speeds, close to my max.
The recent videos can be downloaded in 4K. |
| Cons: |
The site is extremely softcore. Even when the models are nude it is rarely explicit. For some this may be a plus.
If this is not to your taste, you may get tired of this as scenes on each site are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
This review is for the entire five sites in the Wank It Now network. The link to join all five is on the bottom of the join page as the link for just an individual site is the default. For the price of joining two sites, you can get all five. A common theme in all five is that of jerk off instruction. There are not many sites that have much of that, but this network is that in spades. The women are UK nude models that I have seen on other sites and some are pornstars. Much of the appeal is that they are talking to you directly in hot and quite sexy accents. They sound very classy and so are their outfits. Sometimes it is roleplay such as being an interviewer, a student, stripper, secret pornstar, roommate, doctor, or a nurse, but the possibilities are seemingly endless. The scenarios are highly creative and are up there in quality with the best sites of any type.
Wank It Now is the anchor site and is the single biggest one. It has updates every day and sometimes there are more than one. There are about 5100 videos and 3500 photosets. The models usually get nude and even occasionally explicit by the end of the videos. This site was most definitely my favorite of the five.
Bopping Babes has models dancing and stripping. However the scenes are sometimes not to full nude and sometimes topless is all you get. Updates are about once a week. There are more than 1500 videos and 1100 photosets. This was my second most favorite site. I think this site is hot enough for an update every day.
Upskirt Jerk and Downblouse Jerk are not listed on Pornusers. They combine JOI with views upskirt or downblouse. For both a new update is added every day. There are over 2300 videos and photosets on one and on the other 2700 videos and photosets.
Lingerie Tales The focus is on sexy women in lingerie reading sexy stories. This has been an archive site since July 2017. There are 168 videos and photosets.
Across the network, some models I recognize from other nude sites and some are well known UK pornstars. I few I recognized and like a lot are Kayla Louise, Cherry Blush, Kiki Menaj, Natalia Forrest, Amy Latina, Hanna Shaw, Holly Kiss, Kate-Ann, Lola Gatsby, and Stella Cox. I can’t tell you that any of the others are amateurs or not, but the variety in age, although most are 25 to 40, body type, hair color and ethnicities surprised me.
Two of the most prolific models on the network are Asian Natalia Forrest and Ebony model Kayla Louise. Both are so pretty that if each had their own sites I would gladly join. The most popular models have a lot more updates, so the site must be paying attention to fan favorites. Many of the models are on more than one network site.
Inexplicably, there are advertising offers to join on the members’ pages. I feel that is annoying and unnecessary as they should know I am already a member. There were four download choices and 4K was the best. Videos can be streamed on a mobile device as well and are 640x360. You can search by most recent, models name, your favorites. There is a dropdown box for tags, but many of the choices are not on the site. Incredibly, they have one for male pegging and one for blowbang as examples. This site has zero sex of any kind. A suggestion I would like to offer is that they should offer scenes with two women, even if not with lesbian sex. Photo sets are zipdownloadable and have only one choice. The most recent update had 24 landscapes taken from the 4K videos. Each individual site has a download limit of 200 videos. This resets every 24 hours and I never hit the limit. When I got close to it, I simply logged in to another of the sites. You have as choices for billing using CCBill or Epoch. Both are trusted and reliable icons in the business. Pornusers does not offer a discount, but the network and its individual sites frequently offer discounts.
This network is close to perfect if you are looking for a great lineup of softcore scenes with great looking models. Although I would have preferred a bit more nude and explicit, this is a great network that I recommend to fans of JOI as well as hot visuals. |
|
11-07-21 09:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
162
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I wish I tried before I did (3 weeks ago). Softcore, glamour, realistic masturbation and the models are gorgeous and various adjectives based on their personality (cute, sexy, seductive, pretty, etc).
The videos have 4K on the newer videos and there are multiple download resolutions available.
The pictures will turn you into a picture fan. Besides the large amount and an obvious preference towards releasing picture sets (around 4 times as many photo sets as videos), the resolution of the pictures is the highest I have seen.
The models are so diverse on this site. The different races, ethnic groups, the personalities, it’s my experience that sites like this have slender, white models (like me). On this site, the models present a mix of everything.
I liked the small preview I saw on other sites enough that I just joined the year membership. It helps that there are nearly daily updates and so much back catalog to go through.
My new favorite site of all genres. |
| Cons: |
Someone please fix the neverending scrolling page or at least offer a desktop version of the site. I lose my place when going through the older scenes. Before I can get back to where I was at, I see another model I want to check out, then forget where I was at.
This is a good con to have. The pictures are so big, I can tell you if the models shave their pubic hair or wax. It could be a con for some people. These pictures give a very personal, up close and personal view of these models in full nudity. |
| Bottom Line: |
I considered this site at least 10 times. I kept getting it confused with one of the similar sites. I also had been trying to evolve my porn interests beyond softcore. That experiment is only going okay. Seeing the more graphic porn had pushed me away a little from the softcore sites I first joined like Nubiles. Forget bisexuality, porn has bipolarity. The models are either teasing too much or they’re taking way too much. The middle ground seems to be clouded with boring sex that looks like sex I had the last time I had sex. They’re getting paid to go through the motions?
I guess I signed up for their emails. I received a year offer back around New Years. It was what I viewed as a very good price. I looked up some previews and decided to give it a year membership try. I meant to join it 2-3 years ago. I’m making up for lost time with the year membership. My first impression was a little negative. I do not like the constant scrolling sites. They do offer tabs that help. There are tabs for Models, Galleries, Films and Stories. As an erotica author in my spare time. I thought the stories would be erotica stories. Those look more like extra pictures, more personal pictures. One shows pictures of a model eating and she has her bra half off. It shows more of the models’ personality.
The tabs allowed me to focus more on the content. The constant scrolling is still there, but it’s not as bad when you can split everything up. I have tried counting the photo sets and videos. The scrolling page just is not very friendly to counting. I do know they have updated around 6 times per week since early January. There’s close to 3,000 photo sets. The videos are closer to 600. The videos try not to be a focus, similar to Met Art, but the videos are really good – unlike Met Art. Everything about this site impresses me except that scrolling part. The blend of races and ethnicity. There are pale, redheaded gingers like me. There are darker toned exotic looking women from Asia and maybe South America. I want to say, this is the porn I was looking for 3 years ago! I think it’s one of the few sites I knew about but hadn’t joined.
The photos are varied in setting. That is what I am basing my thoughts on of where these models are from. There are lush, almost jungle-looking areas. I don’t think you need the videos with this porn. The models are very capable of expressing their feelings and emotions in the pictures. I believe that is something we lose in videos. That’s when they have to act. You don’t even see that on the videos from this site. The videos are very natural. The models look like maybe being fully nude and spreading in photos wasn’t quite enough for them. They want to see how they look on video, in action, using those bodyparts. The videos have at least some touching up to orgasmic masturbation. I don’t know the logic behind it. I could maybe think about the mental side of it. This is what these scenes remind me of: The models look like someone said to them, “Be yourself, you’re very pretty, you have a great body, express that to my camera.” And they do. There is no feeling of “you have to take 16 dicks in the next 13 minutes, oh yeah, look sexy if you can.” Try this site out and see if you don’t notice the difference. There is a more personal feeling to the content. Like the model is making love to the camera. I’m not really old enough, maybe I should say, I didn’t have access to porn during the pre-internet days. Maybe I missed the memo that said porn should be sexy and it should show how horny women are.
That answers all the world’s problems! We need these young, gorgeous women to show how horny they are. We probably wouldn’t have near as many of the gender problems we have.
The site is easily my new favorite. I am sure it could become repetitive, thanks mostly to that scrolling problem. I don’t believe the content will be repetitive. We are seeing a different personality from each model on this site. I hated the old interviews on porn sites. They all had the same questions, “What age did you lose your virginity?” Ask her what she likes to do to attract a man or woman. This site and this content show the young woman answering that question. Best site I have ever been a member of. I am looking into the lifetime deal. I don’t even need to say it’s recommended. |
|
02-09-22 07:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
163
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
An exceptionally large library of high quality videos and photosets.
Supports download managers.
Several updates per day.
The site is well laid out and easy to use. |
| Cons: |
4K videos are not an option, but there are multiple download options.
Uses tags, but there are not enough of them.
The site says about 90 per cent are amateurs. This can also be a plus for some members.
Some of the women have too much body hair. Also, some of the models are not attractive in my opinion.
There is no discount. This is a premium niche site with a premium price tag.
Not part of a network. It is part of the Gamma family of sites, but a membership does not give you access to any other site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Although there are some sex scenes, both lesbian and boy/girl, We Are Hairy is primarily devoted to solo masturbation by women who are not professional porn stars. Some scenes are interviews and others feature stripping and putting on a sexy show. This is a contrast with most photography sites that have videos. On those, the videos are generally very artistic rather than erotic in their basic nature. We Are Hairy also has excellent photo sets, but the major theme here is women enjoying being seen as hot exhibitionists. You can see the women getting into the action and in many scenes the women visibly get moist. These are mostly non professionals who see this as a chance to fulfill the fantasy of being seen as sexy. I like the interviews as well as the solo shows as the models are as much into it as any viewer.
Another theme that takes center stage here is masturbation. Sometimes the models use fingers, toys, and at other times they use household objects, such as vegetables or brushes. The orgasms seem to be quite genuine. Between squirting and the looks on their faces, I enjoyed what I saw. The models are rather diverse as there are women here of many different ages and body types. Most of the models are Russian. The older models seem to get the most pleasure from doing the scenes. In some scenes the models get into giving the viewer jerkoff instruction, JOI, but that is not universal or even as much as I would prefer.
Some models probably don’t speak English and that detracts from the chance to get to know them better. I did feel that the more ordinary looking, the chubby and especially the older models tried a lot harder in their scenes. I had the impression that they appreciated the opportunity to be seen as sex objects. There is not much here that you would find on a site that uses an approach of making the models look glamorous. I saw little use of makeup, the women have imperfections and in general appear to be women who you would not expect to be on any porn site.
The choice of ordinary homes as the set is remarkable. Combined with the fact that most of the women wear ordinary clothing makes them seem all the more accessible and relatable as well. The layout is very easy to use even if this is your first time on a pornsite. You can easily find the new videos and photo sets that are added on a daily basis.
You can search for other scenes by the same model, or even by the same director. There are tags that enable you to find blondes, brunettes or those with red hair or dyed other colors. You can search by breast size, by video resolution, by the type of clothing or by the size of the photos or the degree that they are hairy. I must mention though that I would prefer a way to find the videos that were sexy shows as they were in the minority. You can find masturbation videos quite easily, but there should be a tag for non masturbation ones.
You have the ability to rate and leave comments on the models, can vote yes or no to adding new ones and can preview new updates as they post a schedule. There are three quality options for the latest videos. There is lacking a 4K option as the best is 1920x1080p, Full High Definition. You have the option to create a custom zip file for just the photos you select. I liked the progression from clothed to nude to explicit. There are about 8100 HD videos and photo sets. The site adds two videos and two photosets per day. Downloads were fast and easy. The files are small as the videos are generally under fifteen minutes. I found no download limits.
An obvious negative is that the site may not have broad appeal. Many porn fans prefer models that are shaved or at least trimmed. On We Are Hairy, many of the models are not just hairy down there, but have body hair as well. In some cases, more hair does not equal more attractive. If you enjoy seeing unglamorous women showing their exhibitionist side, this site has a lot to offer. This is a very large premium site in an uncommon niche and commands a premium price. |
|
10-19-21 01:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Wow Girls
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Back to my comfort zone of innocence porn with very pretty young ladies.
The site is huge with 2,250 photo sets and 1,140 videos..
I do not know this for sure, but I believe their quality on their videos has to be close to industry-leading, though not a selling point for me.
Tagging system is useful and does seem to be accurate.
The site includes access to Wow Porn, All Fine Girls and Ultra Films, all are very good sites.
There are roughly 3 video updates and 5 photo updates per week just on Wow Girls.
Uses Vendo as the biller.
Navigation is simple and easy to use, even switching between the sites. |
| Cons: |
There isn’t much to complain about so I will complain that the bonus site Ultra Films requires a separate login. I feel so petty which should be a compliment to the site.
I do believe the male/female scenes could be better. Most sites with young women in this age range do have problems with creating realistic hardcore scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This group of sites passed my previous favorite, Nubiles, though I gave them a con on the sexual action, it is overall more realistic and “sexy” than most sites with models in this age range. The best part of that is they do not focus on male/female scenes. There are solo scenes, lesbian scenes and even threesome plus scenes. The models are consistently in that 7-9 range score on that “on a scale of 1-10 in looks”. It is one of the most impressive groups of models I have seen.
They go beyond just giving you pretty and sexy young women to look at. Their quality includes some I didn’t even know existed like 6K videos. The regular newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. There also is an option to choose whether you want 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second. This is all getting complicated and confusing. I can’t tell a big difference between the different frame rates. They also have around 50-60 of their newer videos with 6K downloads.
The quality doesn’t stop on the videos. Their picture sets have four download options: 4000px, 2000px, 1000px and Original. The Original option photos are 5760x3240 in resolution and are some of the best looking pictures I have seen.
The tagging system is surprisingly helpful. I usually do not use the tagging system on sites. There is always a question of how accurate those are. Maybe it’s just that they don’t really have any bad photo sets or videos and I don’t notice the accuracy or inaccuracy?
The scenes are kind of formulaic which can be seen by the running time of the videos. You will rarely see a video over 30 minutes, even if there are as many as 6 or 8 people in the scene. That is not something to really complain about, but these are very much produced and directed scenes that are not going to make you think there’s much spontaneity. I assume with females and males in this younger age range there needs to be direction and the scenes are at least mostly all over 20 minutes.
I do enjoy the solo scenes the most, especially the longer ones, with some being in the 25 minute range, though I do believe that does show how directed the multiple person scenes are. There just isn’t much to complain about and I believe my score shows that. This site, to me, is near perfect. If I was going to change anything I would extend the length of the scenes with more than one person in them. I will review the other sites that come with it as I believe there is enough difference between them to explain it. |
|
08-10-21 04:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Wow Girls
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The flagship site of the Wow sites, includes Wow Porn (not updating, see review), Wow Girls and All Fine Girls.
I think as a collective these might be the prettiest models I've seen on a site or network.
Almost 5,600 films and they update on average 1 photo set or video per day across the 3 sites.
Around 5,500 photo sets and they downloadable in zips.
I mentioned it on the Wow Porn review, this content is harder than most of these soft-hardcore sites, there's quite a bit of anal content for example. According to the tags there are nearly 600 anal films, that just sounds like a lot for a network like this. |
| Cons: |
Two pre-checked cross-sales blend right in with the background when signing up.
Here's a funny one, couldn't they are least throw an average looking woman in? These models are so pretty.
The one navigation issue I have noticed is when you hit the back button, you have to click on "latest" to get back where you were at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had this site recommended to me as someone that is a big fan of Nubiles. The content here is a little more hardcore than Nubiles, but it's not going to find its way to Evil Angel anytime soon. You get a good blend of pretty, very pretty and too pretty models here. Even the guys are nice-looking, few if any are much bigger than average size in dick size and they make believable couples with the young female models.
The amount of content is very impressive for a site I had never heard of. When you add the photos and films together there's over 11,000. I would have a model count, but there's no efficient or realistic way to count them as they're listed alphabetical and the letter A has 27 pages.
That one navigational glitch needs to be fixed. If you're looking at a photo set and click back instead of taking you back to where you were at in the photo galleries it takes you back to top of the page and for some reason it will change what site you were looking at. They have boxes for All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn. It won't even be close to what I was looking at before I hit the back button.
The rest of the navigation is simple to use. There's probably something I'm looking over like a "back to your content" link. My favorite scenes are the all-girl scenes with more than 2. It will probably always be a believable fantasy for me, a former college sorority girl at a religious school, to believe there are sororities having 3+ girl orgies instead of scripture studies. If it's not true, please, don't tell me.
The videos are very good quality. I just am not technical enough to break down these options like 60 frames per second, 30 frames per second, they have some scenes with 4K, I download 720 or 1080, mostly depending on file size since I just have a laptop and one external hard drive. I have to be selective on what I download.
The three sites seem to differ only a little. All Fine Girls seems to be about 80% hardcore, including some threesomes. Wow Girls is similar with a high percentage of boy/girl scenes with solo scenes blended in. Then, Wow Porn, the one that is no longer updating has more lesbian scenes.
It's a very nice package of sites, excellent quality and I'm going to say top 3 prettiest model group on any site.
I like it so much I might choose to join it for a year instead of Nubiles. |
|
12-02-19 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
166
|
Wow Porn
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The smallest and only no longer updating site of the Wow group of sites, it’s still a very good site.
Surprisingly, you’ll see a lot of these videos with the 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second download option. Also 4K is common.
The site has just over 400 videos and around 700 photo sets. All are downloadable.
The models, just like on their other sites, are nearly all very attractive young women.
The scenes on this site are typically longer than on the other two Wow sites, with many going well over 30 minutes.
The overall action here is a little more hardcore than All Fine Girls and quite a bit more hardcore than on Wow Girls. |
| Cons: |
The last update was in 2019.
The photo sets due to stopping updates in 2019, do not have a download option that is comparable to the newer photo sets on Wow Girls and All Fine Girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only real complaint you’re going to hear from me about this site (by itself) is it’s not updating. The content on it -- is to me, more consistent and even hardcore than the other two Wow sites, even though I’m not a traditional hardcore porn fan. It’s just a matter of the execution of the scene and I believe on Wow Porn the producers, actors and actresses had better chemistry going than on either of the other sites. It really does make me question if there’s a problem with models having trouble performing within direction limits. These scenes are longer and you see a little more going on in each scene than on the other two sites, possibly communication between the actresses and actors. The content fits more in the “unscripted” style of hardcore porn. Even though, for some reason, there are solo scenes on Wow Porn too. The hardcore scenes on this site are some of my favorite hardcore scenes. Depending on how you look at that it could be a major compliment or it could just be expected. I don’t really like the mainstream, rough hardcore and you won’t see that on Wow Porn. It hits a middle ground between rough hardcore and heartcore with a little of each.
Though the site isn’t updating any longer it still has a respectable amount of content with 400 videos and 700 photo sets. The video quality surprised me. I thought since they stopped updating in 2019, the video quality would still be good, but of their 400 videos nearly 150 have 4K download option. The oldest scenes on the site have 540p, 720p and 1080p download options. There’s no dropoff in overall quality. I consider 1080p to be the standard even though I usually only download the 720p. The only dropoff is in the pictures, but it is not a major dropoff.
You will get used to using the site between their three sites. You can switch to just look for scenes on Wow Porn or to just Wow Girls or to just All Fine Girls. It’s a very intuitive site, one of the best I have used. I do think people should be sure to check this site out. The first few times I was a member, I skipped this site based on reading it isn’t updating. It is really as good if not better than the other two when it comes to the hardcore male/female scenes. The models do seem to be shared between the three sites so you’re getting very pretty models. I do not think there are any download limits. If there are, I haven’t hit them. Some of the files are very large, even on Wow Porn. A 4K 60 frames per second scene is 5.5 GB for one scene. I do believe that is part of the reason I can’t get my 4K monitor to work properly. I just can’t see using up that much space per scene.
This is a site you shouldn’t miss out on if you join Wow Girls or All Fine Girls. And if you’re a fan of the younger women look, there’s no way you should miss out on any of these sites. These are my current favorite sites and I lean towards softcore to more respectable hardcore. |
|
08-10-21 04:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Wow Porn
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly pretty models, some soft content, some harder.
Very high quality video specs including some videos with 4K and 60 frames per second.
Over 1,100 films, all are downloadable with no restrictions.
Over 700 photo sets, downloadable in zip files.
The boy/girl hardcore scenes are quite explicit compared to other softer hardcore scenes.
Production quality gives this site and its content a major boost. The hardcore scenes show this most with excellent close-up camerawork and focused cumshots.
Very easy to use site with tags along the margin and tabs for films, galleries and the girls. |
| Cons: |
It had two pre-checked cross-sales on sign-up and I nearly missed both of them.
I think it's a common con in this genre/niche combination, some scenes have the it factor, others just are kind of boring.
It looks like it stopped updating in early October 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't think I would ever write a review that started out talking about how well the site works. But I am going to. Down the left side margin are the tags, across the top are "films", "galleries (photos)" and "The Girls". It's very simple to use. If this was a small site I wouldn't be as impressed, but this site has over 1,000 scenes and it's this well organized.
That offsets the pre-checked cross-sales. I guess you can't have everything go right with a site.
The models here remind me a lot of models on the Met-Art type sites, thin, young, slender, very cute, some look a little more seasoned and pretty and even a few have tattoos, which surprised me, but isn't a negative.
There are three types of scenes here. Solo, lesbian and boy/girl. It's another rare comment for me to make in a review, the camerawork adds a lot to these scenes. I think it is most apparent on the cumshots. Most of these female models don't look like the type that are into having cum splattered across their face or on their bodies, but the camerawork shows it in full detail.
A bonus for me was I thought I only got this site and Wow Girls with my membership. Once inside the members area I also have access to All Fine Girls. I'm going to double up with a review of Wow Girls as I think these sites are important to each other.
There are just over 1,100 films and 700 photo sets. The films can be confusing if you look at the options too much. I just download the one I prefer and don't pay much attention to the details. They have scenes with 60 frames per second. I'm not technical enough to know what difference that makes and I watched one to see if I could see a difference, but couldn't.
I got the feeling as I was viewing the 3 different sites that this one has just kind of been merged into the other two, Wow Girls and All Fine Girls since they're all be offering as a package. I wanted to review this one separately to show it has stopped updating, but the other two and the network as a whole are still updating. It's a good site if you like sites like X-Art and Sex Art with maybe a little more harder content. All of the models, male and female are easy on the eyes too. Recommended as part of the network or even by itself. |
|
12-02-19 09:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
XFeeds
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content. |
|
09-18-23 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very unique concept for porn, lesbian interracial.
I have never found another site devoted to this.
Many of the scenes are 2 on 1, black on white or white on black.
A site in the Dogfart Network of 23 interracial sex sites
You can search by site or by the whole network
Some scenes focus on older/younger or large size differences. Early scenes are verbal domination. |
| Cons: |
Irregular updates, only seven this year
Only 93 videos despite the fact that the oldest one is from 2007
Too overproduced and the models too scripted. See below. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Dogfart Network has 23 interracial sites. In porn that means black men and white women. The site called Zebra Girls is most unique in porn, I think, as it is only white and black women. I would like for there to be a few scenes with women of other races, but porn is never perfect and often just not that imaginative either. I have found a scene here or there of interracial lesbian content on the internet, but I am not aware of any other site focused exclusively on this.
The oldest scenes are of light verbal domination, but come across as more playful than as BDSM. I thought most of these were not to be taken seriously, but more as a fantasy geared at men. The more recent scenes are a bit more complex and have a little story, but this is still not a typical soft lesbian site. They use tongues both on their partner’s pussy as well as sometimes the tongues go a bit farther back into their ass. Like many lesbian sites that are aimed at men, there is also a bit of toy play as well as tribbing.
The production values are really excellent with great lighting, makeup work, costumes and in general the women here look as well as I have seen models anywhere. What seems to me is that there is not much passion or chemistry, whichever term you prefer, and the models are doing what they are told. I like porn that is a bit less scripted and more whatever the models are into. I would like to see the producer step away and give the women a bit of freedom to do whatever the genuinely feel. I can’t be sure, but I fear the producer thinks that lesbian sex at its best is what men see as a fantasy. I have spoken to a few real life lesbians and they tell me that their sex is not so perfect or so polished. It is a lot more spontaneous and has a lot more unplanned variety. They don't put makeup on before sex either.
One thing I really liked is that there are many scenes that are 2 on 1, both white on black as well as black on white. This can lead to scenes where the idea for the scene starts out as ordinary, but it quickly becomes one where two of the women initiate the sex with the third being a sex object. The possibilities are many as in the scene I describe next, my favorite of all of them.
I saw the contrast between the models as one of color, sometimes of size and occasionally even a theme of older/younger. A good example of a difference of size focus is the scene with two very large black women, Victoria Cakes and Jayden Starr. The manager of the women’s clothing store is mini sized Lexi Lore. She looks half the size of either of these two women maybe even smaller, but seeing her paired with both of them was a sight that appealed to my imagination. When Lexi started “booty worship” it was enough for me to do what comes naturally.
The site seems almost a forgotten one in a large network as the updates are about once every two months. This year there have been seven and that is about the rate the site has been growing since it started in 2007. The earliest videos predate High Definition. Using the site is easy and you can search by site or by network. At 93 scenes it was enough to get me to like the site, but more would be better of course. |
|
10-19-21 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
|
