Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Horny Hostel
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-The Horny Hostel site is called a channel in the Lets Doe It network.
I do not believe that there is a separate Horny Hostel site that exists apart from the Let's Doe It network.
-Membership in the Horny Hostel channel gives you access to the entire LetsDoeIt network: there are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. There are currently 17 channels in the network you get access to.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.95/month (recurring).
-Some of the ads for discounted memberships for other porn sites are worth considering.
-The Lets Doe It network content is exclusive.
-There is a "skip intro" hot link where you can skip the promo intro to each video.
-Choice of definition from 240p-1080p for streaming and download. |
Cons: |
-Small channel. Only 28 videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-There is a 100 monthly download limit for the network. Since I don't download a lot, that doesn't bother me. But if you are into heavy collecting, the monthly limit might affect you. Because the network has over 100 videos that are worth saving, in my opinion. |
Bottom Line: |
A hostel used to be a low-priced accommodation where you could rent a bed in a dormitory. Sometimes that would also include a bathroom (usually shared), maybe a lounge and/or kitchen.
I've seen the Hostel movie, where hostels are used to torture and kill tourists.
The Horny Hostel is different: the channel features young girls who encounter studs who do all kinds of sex. Peeping toms, anal fucking, straight sex, whatever.
They present the videos as reality porn, where you are supposed to be watching the girl and guy meet and have instant sex, but the video includes some frames that supposed to show a video camera clicking away to record the action. The reality aspect and the video camera frames are wasted on me, since I don't believe this is reality video--and most reality shows are scripted, and are really fake-reality anyway.
The channel (Horny Hostel) and the network use a lot of European models and stunt cocks, so when they do speak, the accents give a bit of flavor to the dialogue.
Except that most of the dialogue is "Oooohhhhh, aaahhhhhhhh, yesssssssss, oooohh, ah-ah-ah-ah," anyway, which is easy to understand.
This is a small channel: only 28 videos. But the videos are high quality.
And you also get access to the entire Lets Doe It network.
I have access through a LetsDoeIt membership, and I see a notice at the Horny Hostel channel that says I have 100 downloads available. That means 100 downloads for the network, not 100 downloads for each channel.
The Best Porn states there are 15 sites included with membership in Horny Hostel.
But the correct number is 17 channels (Lets Doe It calls its sites channel instead of sites. I don't know if there is a difference between a site and channel.)
The videos at Horny Hostel and many of the other channels in the network are premium videos: many models that range from attractive to lovely or even beautiful. The sets are nice, not cheap. The technical factors are good to excellent: lighting, sound control, good camera-work (nicely focused, etc.).
My favorite channel is The White Boxxx, where they take lovely models and present them as gorgeous creatures who provide a glamcore approach to porn.
Even though Horny Hostel is a small channel of only 28 videos, it's a nice addition to the Lets Doe It network. Proving a different approach to porn. The White Boxxx presents a glamcore approach to porn, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures who are showcased in beautiful sex. Horny Hostel is less glamorous, more gritty, where the sex is hard and fast, and less time is spent on any preliminaries of lovemaking: it's just sex and hard fucking, with a raw feel to it.
Giving the Horny Hostel channel a score of 85. |
|
11-10-19 04:59pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
102
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Simple setup. Most of the plots are older guy gets seduced by young girls.
-The site was added to the Nubile Films around late 2019, as a bonus site.
-PU offers a discounted price of $19.94/month.
-Login and member pages are secure.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot. |
Cons: |
-Although the site was a bonus site added to Nubile Films in late 2019, it stopped updating in January 2020.
-The site follows the same plots as Jays POV.
-The visuals of the video are usually clear, with nice colors. But the videos use a POV setup, and the camera can be slightly shaky. Jay should hire a professional videographer to shoot these videos. |
Bottom Line: |
Site theme is horny teens who fuck their step fathers or step brothers. So this is faux incest, where you're supposed to experience the excitement of watching taboo sex. The big plus is the girls are usually good-looking teens. A minor negative is the stunt cock is usually Jay, who can get irritating after watching him get seduced time after time. That ploy gets old fast. Would like to see some different stunt cocks, for a different take on the plot.
The site only has 67 videos. So it's a very small site. And the last update was in January 2020.
If you enjoy the videos, you can find simiilar videos at Jays POV (a channel at Adult Time).
The colors of the videos are clear and crisp, but the camera work can be jittery at times. This is POV.
As a free add-on to Nubile Films, it's worth checking the site out.
Two things impress me about the site.
I'm not a fan of POV. I prefer traditional camera-work that gives you a more stable, comprehensive view of the action.
However, some of the girls are really cute. And POV can make it seem like you're watching the action right on top of the girl. It's inches away from that lovely feminine flesh. Boobs, pussy, ass.
And as many of these videos keep reminding you, it's not really sex between blood relatives. It's only sex between step-relatives. So it's not real incest, but faux incest.
Giving the site a score of 79.
The main cons are:
-It's an archive site. No updates since January 2020.
-It's a small site. Only 67 videos. |
|
10-06-21 12:08am
Replies (2)
|
Review
103
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-I want to thank Wraith0711 for posting a comment that Nubile Films now includes 2 bonus sites:
That Sitcom Show and Hot Crazy Mess.
He's one of those detailed-people who examine a site to see what it has to offer.
I wasn't aware that the bonus sites were added, until he posted the comment.
-I should also thank exotics4me for pointing out that the 2 bonus sites added to Nubile Films were probably added around 2-3 months ago.
-PU discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $29.98/month.
But there is a yearly price of $99.95.
However, if you join through Nubile Films, they have a current discount of $84/year.
Nubile Films also has a current discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/month.
So join through Nubile Films, and save a few dollars, if you're going to be around for more than 1 month.
-Login and member pages are https.
-The models are mainly slender white teens, with some black and latina models. There is even at least one Asian model (Lulu Chu). |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
They don't list the nationality of the models. The models are mainly cute to very attractive. A lot of young honey bunnies that are fucking hot.
-These girls are cute to really cute. Lily Rader, Audrey Grace, Alex Blake, Piper June, Riley Star, Britney Light, Dolly Leigh are just a few of the young teens that grace these videos.
-Videos have a plot to set up the sex. But not a lot of thought is really put into the plot. It's really thin. And the models are not really actors. Except some of the models are so cute it doesn't matter: either they are better actors than I thought, or they are so attractive you're looking at their face and body so hard you're not paying much attention to what they're saying.
-The screenshots download in a zip.
-There is a good description of the plot/action for each video.
-You can tag videos with a favorite label, and save them in a favorites group.
-A lot of the models are petite, around 5' or so. That just adds to their cuteness. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. 67 videos total. Plus matching photosets for each video.
-Last update was 2020-01-03.
That's a shame, because some of these girls are really cute, and I would love to see even more cute girls added. That's probably the biggest con of the site, no more updates.
-The camera is poor POV. The guy holding the camera does not hold it steady, it can move around, which is distracting and irritating.
They should have hired a professional shoot the video. It would have made a nice improvement.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Very little model information. Age, height, country. figure measurements, that's it.
-The video plot descriptions are very detailed, which is good. But reading the descriptions, you start to see the same plot points being repeated. They run out of fresh ideas, and just use the same stories. But since the girls are so cute, you can more or less ignore the plots, and feast on the girls, who can be sweet and sexy and hot as hell.
-Sometimes when they shoot outdoors, the random noise level can be quite high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
-Last video posted 2020-01-03.
-67 videos.
-67 matching photosets.
-Video runtime 20 to 30 minutes.
-Videos can be downloaded in definitions from 270 through 1080p.
-Photosets run around 35 photos per set.
-Each photo is 1920x1080px.
They indicate the photos are screen shots, but they are good quality. I assume there is some excellent software that converts a video into a photoset, because the quality of each screenshot is far superior to what the screenshots were from 10 or 15 years ago.
I examine the photos in a photoset, and I couldn't tell they were screenshots. Most of the photos were very nice. I wish a some of the photos per set were slightly more focused, better definition, because some of these girls are really cute, but many of the screenshots look like real photos. And the screenshots are focused on the action, centered, not just random screenshots that have heads or parts of the body randomly cut off out of the photo.
The photosets are worth keeping.
Maybe I'm just tired at looking at the MetArt and other high quality glamour site photosets, but I am getting slightly bored with many of their recent models. Perhaps it's just me. But the girls at this Hot Crazy Mess site were much more appealing, that I even liked their photosets more than what I like at MetArt. Two different types of content: MetArt is mainly young women, late teens or twenties. Strictly softcore. Glamour-style photos. The girls at Hot Crazy Mess at mainly cute teens doing hardcore sex.
The Hot Crazy Mess models are more desirable than the models at MetArt because they generate more heat.
Britney Light, in the video, "Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1", is a cute young teen. 19 years old. Extremely cute. Soft, tender voice. She's so fuckable. Not an elegant way of putting it, but it's the God damn truth. At least in this video, she is hot and wet and luscious. Not like a porn star, but like a sweet young thing you'd like to pound on for a few hours. If you had the strength and endurance.
Porn is fantasy, but that's what this model makes me think. And quite a few other models at this site.
Whereas, many of the models at MetArt, although absolutely gorgeous, have lately left me cold. Maybe I need to take a break from porn, but the girls at Hot Crazy Mess are really attractive, which I appreciate. That I can find something to like a lot.
Kyler Quinn, in a video at the site titled: "Fuck Thy Neighbor - S5:E6", comes across as a sweet young teen (her age is listed as 20) who broke up with her boyfriend who was cheating on her. So she meets a new neighbor and has sex with him as a rebound fuck.
I don't know what it is: the vibes from these videos are like these are sweet young things, who are having problems, and they are using sex to help with the pain. They are sweet, innocent, not sluts, not porn stars (fantasy, again, remember), who just want to share a moment in time with another human being.
I just enjoy the videos a lot. It's a different vibe, a different atmosphere from glamour or heartcore or gonzo, but a reality-based slice of life where the sweet young thing has a problem, and she is having sex to reduce her pain.
I don't know why, but the videos just appeal to me.
(The models are attractive young women, and the videos are well shot--apart from the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.)
Ella Cruz is another adorable teen model.
I mean, this site has a bunch of lovely teen models, that are just fascinating to watch.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
Pros:
-Fine looking, attractive young models. Could be girl next door types, except they are attractive to very attractive. Not porn sluts.
-Excellent video quality, except for the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.
-Nice sets. But when they shoot outdoors, the noise level can be quite high.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY: |
|
04-21-20 10:38am
Replies (4)
|
Review
104
|
Hot Wife XXX
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. A large network with over 7500 scenes.
-Large site. 506 videos.
-One-year membership is only $60. Low price for a quality site and network.
-Navigation is easy. Can switch between network sites easily, without needing to re-login.
-Nice search engine. You can search within a site, or within the network. Search by model's name, etc.
-You can add videos to your favorite list.
-Can comment on each video. |
Cons: |
-I think the cons are basically minor. This is a nice site, a nice network.
-You have 506 videos. Most of the videos are sex videos. But some (a minor percentage) are interviews of the models. Some members might think the model interviews are boring. But I thought it was a chance to see the models talk a bit about themselves. The models answer questions about how they got into porn, how long they've been in porn, a tiny bit about themselves. Many of the models state they've only been in porn for less than one year.
-The site theme seems dated. Maybe I'm jaded, but the story-line of a woman having sex with someone not her husband does not add a lot of excitement to the plot.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Most videos don't have many comments by members. And the comments I've read are mostly not worth reading. |
Bottom Line: |
HotwifeXXX features wives who get off on sex outside of their marriage. Who believes that in today's world, if you get married, your partner won't cheat on you?
Maybe I've been watching too much porn to believe that sex outside of marriage will send you straight to hell.
But these videos show women women having sex with strangers. The sex can be with a guy or a girl. So girl-girl sex could be an extra thrill. I mean, if you have sex outside of marriage, according to the bible, you could be stoned to death. And if a married woman has sex with a woman, that's double grounds for stoning to death.
The videos often portray the husband allowing his wife to have sex with someone else. I guess that not only does the wife get a thrill from illicit sex, but the husband also gets a thrill from knowing his wife enjoys sex with other people.
This site teaches you that people have many perversions.
So joining the site will broaden your mind.
There is a photoset that accompanies each sex video (but not the interview videos).
The photoset has about 151 photos.
The photos are good quality (not low-quality screenshots).
So if you like the model and the sex video, you can collect the photosets.
The photoset zip file downloads with the name of the model, but you need to manually add the title of the video, the date posted, and the site.
The zip file comes in only one definition, which is large.
Photos are 5760x3840.
Each photo is around 5 MB.
With around 151 photos per set, the average photoset takes up 768 MB, which is a lot of space.
So I recommend only keeping the sets you really enjoy.
Video runtime for the sex videos run 20 to 40 minutes.
Each video comes with a short text file that is supposed to tell you the plot.
I don't think the writers that are supposed to summarize the plot bother to watch the videos.
The writer knows that a girl is supposed to have sex, so he makes up a story about a girl having sex. The story doesn't match the video's plot.
The written text file story often has details that aren't shown or told in the voice-over that plays with the video.
So the short text file summary is worthless.
The sex videos are well videotaped, nice colors, nice settings, the models are usually very attractive, but the writers that are supposed to summarize the video plot make up their own stories, instead of watching the videos.
I guess they are bored with porn, and don't want to spend the time it takes to watch these videos.
The staff that run the site should check that the text stories match the plot of the video.
It should be very easy for the text writers to read the script of the video, and make a summary.
Based on the quality of the videos, which have excellent technical features (good settings, nice colors for the film, attractive models), and the choices for downloading or streaming the videos, plus the low membership cost ($60/year), I highly recommend the site and the network. |
|
03-04-22 01:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-The main draw for the site is the cute models. These are Eastern European girls, mainly late teens or early 20s.
Slender, white girls, that Russia is famous for flooding the internet porn sites with. If you're familiar with Russian teen porn, you've seen many of these girls featured at other porn sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content. The videos are original to the site.
-Can switch between sites easily. |
Cons: |
-The videos seem washed out. I don't like the skin-tones of the models. Maybe if I had more control over my monitor features I could slightly correct the colors, but it really detracts from the attractiveness of the models.
-The videos are not clearly dated.
-I believe the site stopped updating years ago. Before then, the update rate was very slow or erratic.
-Little or no information on the models.
-The text description of the video is worthless. Did the writer even bother to watch the video before writing the description? |
Bottom Line: |
I wish I could rate the site higher. But the lack of updates (I think the site stopped updating years ago), and the washed out colors of the videos, combine to make this site a wasted opportunity of showcasing attractive young models.
u
The site has 297 videos, which is a large amount, considering how slowly the site updated while it was still active.
One interesting fact is going back to the earliest videos at the site, and watching how young some of these Russian stunt cocks look. You've seen these same Russian stunt cocks hundreds or thousands of times if you're into Russian teen porn, and it just strikes me how the Russian stunt cocks can last for years in the business, while the lovely young teen models get used up within a few years.
Maybe it' just me, but I watch these videos with the attitude of an observer: there's no heat or passion from the videos, just young teen flesh on display that should be arousing, but is not. Maybe I'm getting older (I'm in my 70s), and porn doesn't do it for me any more. Except I do respond to some videos at better sites, or to lovely softcore images at Metart or other sites.
This site lacks heat or much to interest me. Maybe someone else will find it more appealing to their tastes. |
|
07-12-23 09:00am
Replies (3)
|
Review
106
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the 1 Pass for All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all 35 sites in the network.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Large site. 272 videos (plus matching screencap sets).
-The main draw is how cute to fucking attractive these teen models are.
-The models are slender, white European girls, mostly late teens, or very early twenties.
-The models are often perky, and are eager and willing to fuck. This makes you wonder why they chose the site title "I Fucked Her Finally", since none of the girls are reluctant sex partners: they start sucking a dick, or having sex, at the drop of a hat. But you need a title for a site, and that's what they came up with.
-Also, there are tons of virgins at the site and network (in someone's imagination, obviously). So a virgin adds extra spice to your imagination, and a little reluctance is normal in a virgin. So the title refers obliquely to the virginal aspect of these cute teens. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-For the last few years, the download definition choices for a video are 360p through 2160p.
The videos from years ago had a max definition of 720p or 1080p, depending on when they were posted.
-Can view the screen cap sets from a zipped downloaded file, or the online slide show player.
Can set the timer for the slide show player from 5 seconds to 25 seconds intervals.
-There are hot links at the bottom of the home page to porn sites. Hit a link, and it opens a page of Rabbits Reviews. Cross advertising?
-You can add videos to a favorites list.
CONS(START OF):
-Very slow update rate. Usually 1 new video per month, but some months, might get no videos, or very rarely, 3 videos.
-No posting date for most videos. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Only the most recent videos will have a posting date shown on the "Recent Updates" page.
-The screen cap sets are screen caps: poor quality screen caps. A shame, since many of these models are cute to lovely, and deserve better treatment.
-Customer support is by email. There seems to be a telephone number, but I don't know how to use it: +44 20 3289 2048. Is that a telephone number? I'm guessing that is a European phone number, but I've never called Europe by phone, don't know how.
-You can rate the videos. But most videos have only 2 or 3 votes(ratings), which seems strange. This site (and the network) have been around for over 10 years now.
-The camera-work can be spotty. And the sound control is poor. I'm playing a video, and I'm wondering who's making noise outside of my house. Then I pause the video, and I realize the noises are coming from the fucking video. You're watching a girl masturbating, so where the fuck are the noises coming from? Poor sound control, that's the answer.
-The name of the model in each video needs to be more prominently displayed. You have to search the text description of the video to see if the name of the model is listed. Otherwise, you have no idea who the model is.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
There are 272 videos (and matching screen cap sets) at the site.
Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes.
The matching screen cap sets go from 60 to 200 screen caps.
Watching these videos is an educational process. You learn that "Dah" means yes in Russian. This is the favorite expression a teen girl screams when she is getting fucked in her pussy or her ass.
The site focuses on slender white teen girls who love to suck cock, or take it up their pussy or ass. The girls are more vocal at this site than at 18 Virgin Sex. Maybe because they're no longer virgins?
The main selling point of the site (and network) is the good looking teen girls.
These girls are fresh, lovely, adorable, you just want to scoop them up and fuck their brains out. They aren't sluts: they just seem so cute and innocent, but they are full of hardcore passion.
The videos at the site are a guy and a girl having sex. Or maybe it's two guys and one girl having sex. The sex is bread-and-butter, sort of plain, not over the top. But what makes the videos worth watching is how attractive some of these girls are.
But not much effort is put into making these girls glamorous or presenting them to look their best: the girls are young and attractive, with little make-up, no fancy costumes, just OK sets. It's the girls themselves that are attractive.
And the truth is that the site does not present them as attractively as possible.
I'm looking at Olivia Grace, a cute young teenager, and I don't even recognize her.
She seems familiar, I think maybe I've seen her before.
Actually, I've seen her at many different porn sites, for many years now.
But in this video, "Clothed dude gets deep into naked babe's holes", at the I Fucked Her Finally site, I barely recognize her from the large-sized screen cap shot. She is nowhere near as cute or lovely as she is often seen. And the video itself is not clear and crisp images. The sound track is full of random noises: Olivia Grace is walking around in a large bedroom, just walking, and the sound track is full of random noises. Then you hear her breathing, and you realize the sound is turned way up, to magnify each sound in the almost-empty room.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. The girls are mainly attractive, but the videos suffer from poor technical production, and the screencaps are screencaps, not real photographs.
If the videos had better production values, and the screen cap sets were real photos, the site would have more value. Because the girls are cute teens. |
|
12-07-21 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
James Deen
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Currently a special discounted price of $60 for the first year. Renews at $29.95/month.
So be sure to cancel before your membership renews.
Note: Be sure to join through the Full Porn Network site, which has the $60 for the first year discount. If you join through the James Deen site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will pay much higher prices, even with a PU discount.
-Part of the Full Porn Network. You get access to 18 different sites. The James Deen site is probably the most famous site in the network.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You get a new video every 3 or 4 days.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to enter your login details. Just go to the site, and you are automatically logged in.
-Login details are simple: your username is your email address. You can choose your password.
-I'm not gay. But if I were gay, just looking at the colorful thumbnail of James Deen, with his wide-open smile, his (CONTINUED) |
Cons: |
bright blue eyes, his incredibly handsome face, and his slender body, would make me cream my pants. And his two-thumbs up gesture, showing how much he appreciates life, would be enough to give me a double orgasm.
-The model listing has nice, oversized thumbnails of the models and stunt cocks. The only problem is there are so many ads on each page, that there is only room for 16 thumbnails per page, so you have to click through 56 pages to see all the models and stunt cocks at the James Deen site. That's a lot of clicking.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Site and network have plenty of ads. You get a page of ads when you first log in, before you get to the member's area. Then you have ads on every page in the member's area.
-Because each page has so many ads (ads for sites included in the Full Porn Network and ads for other competing sites), there is very little room for thumbnails showing you the content from the James Deen site. (CONTINUED) |
Bottom Line: |
You have to click through a lot of pages to find the videos that belong to the James Deen site.
I don't think I've ever seen a site with so many ads per page.
-The thumbnails of the models (and stunt cocks) are not flattering to the models. Some of these models are attractive women at other sites, but not here. The site treats the models like meat, and makes no effort to portray them attractively.
-The selection of models is porn star lite. Most of the models look like trailer trash, except that people living in trailers probably look cleaner and more attractive than the trailer-trash models at the James Deen site. I like my models to be young and pretty, and the model selection is a real turnoff for me.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The Full Porn Network covers the following niches:
anal, fetish, trans, bdsm, rough sex, hardcore, role play, high definition, 4k UHD, romance, reality, teens, milf.
The James Deen site videos feature rough sex.
James Deen, the star of the site, has an amazing story.
He started in porn in 2004 when he was 18.
All he wanted to do was to have some fun. To meet some girls.
By 2012-02-02 he had starred in over 4,000 porn videos, and was the youngest person to win the porn "Male Performer of the Year" award.
What's so astounding is that, in spite of the massive female fanbase who adore him, he's just an "aw-shucks, regular guy", with curly brown hair and bright blue eyes who doesn't understand why he's so famous and lovable.
"I have no idea," Deen said. "I really, really have no clue."
I think of James Deen, growing up in a log cabin in Pasadena, an upscale community in Los Angeles County.
He claims that he first became interested in porn when he was in kindergarten and found an old porn magazine.
"I picked it up and I'm like, 'Oh my God, this is the cool, this is awesome,'" he said. "It was this weird moment that I will always remember where I was like, this is what I want to be when I grow up. I want to do this."
This story reminds me of Abraham Lincoln, who also grew up poor in the backwoods of Kentucky, and yet he rose to become the 16th president of the United States.
Deen is a humble man, just as Lincoln was.
"I don't market myself at all, I really don't," Deen said. "I just kind of be me."
And yet, they are both recognized as great men in their professions.
Imagine, if you will, if Deen, instead of reading an old porn magazine when he was five years old, had, instead, read a copy of the US Constitution, that he might have become the son to President Donald Trump, and carried on his adopted father's political career. Deen might have even married Ivanka Trump, and founded his own political dynasty.
Deen has the humbleness, the greatness, to make America great again.
That is why I watch Deen's porn videos with bated breath: Deen is a younger version of Donald Trump. And with every thrust of his vibrant cock into the willing pussy or ass of his sex partners, he proves that women love to be abused and treated roughly.
In 2015, several women, including his ex-girlfriend Stoya, said they were sexually abused by Deen. Stoya claimed that Deen raped her, and ignored her using the safe word telling him to stop.
Deen denied all these allegations as defamatory. He says he respects women and their civil liberties.
Deen, like Donald Trump, is a champion of women's rights.
Although these attacks by women in 2015 might have destroyed Deen's porn career, he was able to deny all accusations of illegal conduct and claim he was baffled by the accusations.
Basically, James Deen is an American porn superstar who loves women and treats them with the respect they deserve.
Bottom line summary:
What do you get at the James Deen site?
Rough sex, where unattractive models are fucked up the pussy and ass, slapped and spit on, arms twisted behind their backs to make them moan in pain. Treating women like they should be treated, because men are the dominant creatures who enjoy abusing these cunts. James Deen is the master of bringing his artistic vision of women to the screen: And the women love him for it, as they moan and groan and gag on the thick cocks jammed down their throats.
There is a disclaimer at the start of each video that states:
"The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposed only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safer sex."
The notice is legal boilerplate, that is meant to protect the site. It's a common joke that many models have been abused on site, with no attention paid to the boilerplate claims. The models in the videos are called sluts, whores, bitches. Because this is gonzo porn, and the models have to be treated with the respect they deserve.
CONTINUED IN REPLY |
|
11-29-20 12:14am
Replies (1)
|
Review
108
|
Jay's POV
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Adult Time network.
-Site has 138 videos.
-The selection of models is first-rate: cute young teens and 20-year-old models.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-Customer support is first rate: 24/7 live chat, telephone, email.
-Videos are available for streaming and download in your choice of definition: 288p through 2160p.
-Members are allowed to comment, favorite videos, models, photosets. They leave negative comments on the site, unlike some sites that remove negative comments.
-There is a brief text description of the video, and the tags do a good job describing the action. |
Cons: |
-Navigation is the main con. There's so much content at the network (over 50,000 videos and almost as many photosets), that it's difficult to find the content that appeals to you.
That's good and bad: good, that you can find a lot of good to excellent hardcore videos; bad, because there will be a lot of content that doesn't fit your tastes.
-I wish there was a model listing for each individual channel, instead of a network model listing. You have over 13,500 models at the network. So the model listing is not helpful finding what models are included in a particular channel. I mean, you click on a model's thumbnail, it will show you what sites she appears in. But I want a simple listing of the models that appear at each channel. |
Bottom Line: |
-Jay is the role model of the father I always wanted to be:
He cares about his step-daughters.
When he catches them taking nude selfies on their phones, he tells them how concerned he is about their welfare. What if some pervert posts the pictures on the internet? The innocent girls' lives would be ruined.
Also, even though he admits he's not their real father, he says he has to know whether they are taking birth control pills: after all, you don't want a bunch of naked bastards running through the house without proper supervision.
Jay is a man I can really admire.
Also, Jay turns out to be a man with a sex drive.
He can often be found on his bed wanking off to the pictures of his naked step-daughters.
They are step-daughters, so it's not real incest.
In some states, a step-father may not legally have sex with his step-daughter, even if the sex was consensual. It's still called incest.
But in Jays POV, he believes that a little romance between a step-father and a step-daughter can bring them closer together.
Jay is a man who appreciates that step-daughters are often younger than the women he's married, so that adds freshness and spice to the sex.
Jay has a say in his household. He's not trying to take the place of their real dad, but he needs to be involved in the lives of his step-daughters. So if a step-daughter has any questions on sex, how to give a blow job, or whether anal sex is better than vaginal sex, Jay is the man to ask.
Jay is also willing to demonstrate his experience with his step-daughters, especially if they are young and cute and attractive.
Some of his step-daughters are unsure about Jay's rules, but Jay is such a smooth talker, that he soon convinces even the most uncertain girls that he is the man in charge.
Jay has practical advice for his girls: don't go by the videos you see on the internet.
They often give erroneous ideas about sex.
Sex should be between two warm, loving partners. Jay is a warm, loving partner.
Guys like Jay like their sex slow. Slow to start, then he can start pounding away as soon as the girl is warmed up.
Since Jay is married to their mothers, the sex between Jay and the girls is a secret because Jay doesn't want any problems with the women he married.
In conclusion, Jays POV is a teaching aid for people who want to marry women with step-daughters.
First, make sure it's legal to have sex with your step-daughter in the state you're living in.
Second, make sure you pick a woman with an attractive daughter. There's no sense fucking an unattractive step-daughter.
Third, tell the girl you're doing it for her own good. You want to teach her the joys of sex.
Much better than an inexperienced teen boy who doesn't know how to handle a young woman.
Be firm, be autoritative.
The step-daughter will learn valuable life lessons, while you get the benefit of teaching a young pussy how to fuck.
A classic win-win for everyone.
And if the mother does find out, tell her you did it for the daughter's sake.
Jays POV is an excellent site.
It gives you valuable life lessons on how to treat your stepdaughters.
The videos are clear and crisp, and the step-daughter models are young and attractive.
And once Jay gets into bed with them, due to Jay's coaching, they are soon able to give expert blowjobs. And to fuck like bitches in heat.
Be like Jay, and make sure when selecting a wife, that the stepdaughter is young, cute, and will fill your afternoons with sinful sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
That's due to Jay being the pervert I always wanted to be, and for filming his experiences in such clear, crisp videos with these lovely young pussies. |
|
04-08-21 01:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Jim Slip
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Adult Prime network. A teen-oriented network that has lots of really cute young teens.
-Watch anywhere. Watch anytime. You can watch on your desktop, tablet, cell phone, TV, Smart TV.
-Adult Prime has a live chat channel with lots of models. Also, there is a free live sex show given once a week, I think. Mary Rock and Jason are the stars.
-Jim Slip's wife, Lara, is an excellent camera-woman. Her videos are excellent, even when filming outdoors. Side note: I recently reviewed a site, Tricky Agent, where the camera-work was so shit the videos were un-watchable. It's a pleasure to watch quality videos that have correct focus and aren't so herky-jerky.
-I enjoy the public page of adult prime. It features a large-sized photo of a scene right out of a museum, except it's a porno scene, for sinfulxxx.com. But the vibe is that the network will give you content that's prime quality. |
Cons: |
-I think any cons are minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Prices are in Euros. So you might pay a conversion fee.
-Captcha required for login. But captcha is easy to solve.
-Some videos only seem to have a 720p definition. For both streaming and downloading.
-People who hold a grudge against England for the Revolutionary War might be offended (joke).
We won that war. |
Bottom Line: |
The Jim Slip site features Jim Slip having sex with young cuties. The punchline is that the scenes are filmed by Jim Slip's wife. They have an open relationship, where Jim is free (and encouraged) to fuck young girls. And his wife enjoys getting fucked by other men. The Jim Slip site been around since 2002.
So the site features old-young. Old is Jim, young is the cuties he gets to fuck.
There is added flavor, since Jim is British. That adds an element of class to the sex.
The Jim Slip site is a nice change from your ordinary porn site. It's reality porn, but a more real porn than most reality porn sites. It features a old man who loves going out and fucking cute young girls.
You watch a video of Jim Slip talking with a girl, bringing her to a hotel room, giving her directions of what to do, the vibe is very different from Pierre Woodman. Woodman enjoys hurting his models, forcing them into intense sex which he tries to portray as fun for both parties. So if Woodman can shove his prick up the girl's ass, or pee on her, it's all good clean fun, as far as he's concerned. Woodman also enjoys slapping a girl and ramming his cock down a girl's throat, to make her gag. Whether the girl knew what she was getting into before it happens is doubtful.
Jim Slip is a more relaxed kind of sex. He treats his models with respect. No rough sex.
This is a large site. 765 videos.
The videos are shot in different European locations. London, and different European countries, such as Hungary,
The models are not all British. But they mainly speak English, often with a cute accent.
Jim Slip has an informal, easy manner.
And Jim Slip is a real person.
What I mean is, even though he's in his 40's or 50's or whatever, his cock is real, it's not on steroids or viagra, so when he's getting sucked off, or sticking his cock into the girl's pussy, it's not like he's a stunt cock, but a real person who's having his fun. A very different vibe from most porn videos. At least for me.
Note: I'm not saying that Jim Slip is a regular guy. He's a porn star, and his wife is also a porn star. And they are married in real life. The videos are somewhat scripted: For legal reasons, they would need to have forms filled out before they started shooting. The girl has agreed to be filmed, and agreed to the sex, before they start shooting.
I'm not saying the Woodman videos are terrible. But the mindset is different. Woodman uses and abuses his models. He would claim otherwise. But that's bullshit.
The Jim Slip videos are a nice change of pace from most porn I've seen. I think he's found a way to satisfy his craving for young pussy, and to make it pay. So more power to him.
I know the Jim Slip videos are porn. But when I watch them, I think it's more like a curious video than a porn video. Watching Jim Slip come onscreen in his green and blue patterned stockings, dressed in a white shirt and stroking his penis while a cute young woman settles onto his lap to get fucked, it's not erotic, it's more like I'm you're watching an instructional video that isn't very sexy, from high school. But that's just me. Old-young is not my niche.
Giving the Jim Slip site a score of 83. If you're into old guy-younger woman, the site offers a lot of content. Filmed with good technical qualities.
I think the Jim Slip site is interesting. It seems different from most porn sites I've seen. The British flavor and the tone of the site gives it interest.
However, my two favorite sites at Adult Prime, by far, are Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire: They are more traditional porn, and do a great job filming some lovely cuties. |
|
04-19-22 05:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Jizz Bomb
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to the entire network.
There are no premium sites in the network that require an extra payment.
-Low membership price. The list price is $30/month, $120/year. But during holiday specials, they often offer $14.95/month, $60/year memberships.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads, as far as I can tell. No extra payment is required for downloading privileges.
-Multiple definitions for streaming and downloads.
-Compatible with tablets, desktops, etc.
-Zip file for photosets. The photos in a photoset are real photos, as far as I can tell. Nicely framed, quality photos with good technical qualities (lighting, colors, nice sets). Average about 130+ photos per photoset.
-Good download speeds. I average around 3-3.5 MB/sec.
-Content is exclusive. |
Cons: |
-They only have one definition for the photoset zip file. It's the high definition size, and it takes a lot of storage space.
A single photo is around 3 MB, so a photoset is around 400 MB, which is huge.
The high definition sets at Metart, one of the finest softcore sites on the internet, have photos that are around 1 MB, so I don't know why the photo size at New Sensations are so large. New Sensations is more video focused versus photos, so it's just sloppy to have photo size so large.
-Navigation is sloppy. You want to list the videos at a single site, like Jizz Bomb, and instead of a simple listing of the Jizz Bomb videos, you get a mix of videos from different sites.
-Search is poor. You enter a model's name, you might get zero hits, even though the model has videos at the site and network. Or else you might get a bunch of miscellaneous models that have no connection to the model's name. Fucking worthless search. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(continued):
-Many of the videos don't have a watermark identifying which site they belong to.
They might have a watermark that shows "New Sensations", the network. Or no watermark at all.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(start of):
Some PU members feel the site and network is too bread and butter sex. They want more variety.
I think the site (and network) give you a nice selection of hardcore videos (and photosets) covering different niches.
The models are mainly attractive. A lot of teen and 20-something models. Mostly white.
The site theme is facials and cum shots.
I think site navigation is poor. There are supposed to be 12 sites in the network, plus some other categories that are not sites. But the content is not organized clearly. Many times, there is no watermark to show which site a video belongs to. So how do you count the number of videos a site has? Or the update rate? I haven't figured that out yet.
And how do you find all the content that a particular model has at the site and network? That can be a problem, because the search engine is worthless. And the model page for a particular model, if you can find it, might only list some of her content at the network.
However, there are lots of very attractive young models at the network.
And the membership price is cheap, if you join on a special discount.
So it's worth looking over the content to see if there are videos and photosets that appeal to you.
I've found enough videos and photosets at the network that make this a worthwhile join.
That's me.
Other PU members have stated that the site (and network) is too plain vanilla for them to re-join.
But I think the site is worth a score of 80.
Even if I don't know what the site contents are.
Because I've found enough videos at the network that appeal to me. |
|
04-12-23 08:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Jizz Bomb
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. None of the sites require a premium membership.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
-The production and technical qualities of most videos is good to excellent: Nice sets, good to excellent lighting, colors, sound control, steady camera-work that is focused and well shot.
-The quality of the models is good to very good: a lot of cute or attractive or very nice-looking models. The models are late teens or early 20s.
-They normally try to have some plot to the videos. The acting is above average. The dialog is OK, which is better than the dialog of many porn sites. You don't have to cringe while watching these videos from the stupid acting or stupid plot or dialog: This isn't cinematic quality porn, but it's better quality than many hardcore porn sites. |
Cons: |
-Navigation can be tricky. You select the Jizz Bomb site, and the videos that load are all New Sensations network videos. Not only Jizz Bomb videos.
There's supposed to be a way to list the Jizz Bomb videos by date posted, but that system doesn't work. The chronological listing system works for most New Sensations sites, but not at Jizz Bomb. There isn't even the format that is supposed to give you the chonological listing.
There's a format to get an alphabetical listing of videos at Jizz Bomb. But the system doesn't bring up Jizz Bomb videos: it seems to give you a listing of New Sensations videos from different sites in the network.
Part of the problem is that a Jizz Bomb video is not watermarked as a Jizz Bomb video. Instead, it's watermarked as a New Sensations video. And there's often no text description on the page that categorizes the site the video belongs to.
So for many videos, you're left guessing what site the video belongs to. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Some Family XXX have a Family XXX watermark on their videos, but most network videos only have the "New Sensations" watermark. And most videos don't clearly have an external text listing that identifies which site they belong to.
-They use a limited number of stunt cocks in the videos. The models change frequently, for the different videos, but the stunt cocks normally appear in lots of the New Sensations videos.
-It appears the site stopped updating years ago. Since I can't get a chronological listing, I can't tell when the updates stopped.
-The earliest videos were only offered in 480p. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p.
Later still, they offered 4K. But I don't think there are any 4K videos offered at the Jizz Bomb site, because the site probably stopped updating before they offered 4K at the network. That's a guess, because I don't know when they stopped updating at this site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I think the site theme is heavy sex finishing with the stunt cock exploding his cum over the girl. At least, that's what the idea is supposed to be, from the site title. But after watching a number of videos from the site (or what I think are Jizz Bomb videos), the amount of cum the stunt cock sprays varies. You do get a money shot, where the stunt cock comes, but the amount can be tiny. Don't expect to see guys spraying tons of cum over a girl's body: face, ass, pussy, whatever. That's what the site title implies, but it's not what you get: you get tiny amounts of cum, or maybe a normal amount of cum. On average, you can expect a small amount of cum, but lots of saliva from the girl spitting and licking and sucking on the stunt guy's cock.
Also, dial down your expectations of heavy sex. There is sex, but it's more bread and butter sex, not really over the top. To watch over-the-top sex, a better site would be Teen Fidelity, which often has very energetic sex in plot-driven porn.
Navigation is poor. I don't know how to get a listing of Jizz Bomb videos. And if I watch a video, I often can't tell which site the video is supposed to belong to. Many or most videos only have the New Sensations watermark, not the watermark of the site they belong to. And there's no text description, or tags, or anything to indicate what site many videos belong to.
Years ago, there was a much better system of listing the Jizz Bomb videos: by both posting date and alphabetically.
I even wrote a review on the Jizz Bomb site on 02-07-19. At that time the site software gave a much better indication of what videos (and photosets) belonged to the jizz bomb site. But recently, I can't find any listing of videos that belong to Jizz Bomb.
I think the best site on the network is the Family XXX site.
Normally, I'm not a fan of fake incest sites, which is sex between step relatives.
Fake incest can add to the sexual tension of the video. And at Family XXX, they do a better job than most step-incest sites: the plots aren't as phony.
Especially the Amber Moore video titled "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite".
I don't think Amber Moore is the most beautiful model at the site or network, but this video really works: an attractive young woman, seducing her step-father.
The technical features are good to excellent: nice sets, lovely girl, simple but believable plot, good acting, good sex, not a lot of over-the-top moaning and groaning, fine lighting and camera-work: This is one of the better videos at the network.
I'm giving Jizz Bomb a score of 80. That's mainly because I don't know what the site is. But because you have access to the New Sensations network, and probably hundreds of videos are supposed to be belong to the Jizz Bomb site, I figure the site deserves a good rating.
Even if I can't tell what videos belong to the site. |
|
04-03-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Joy Mii
(0)
94.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-The content is exclusive.
-You get the Joymii site included with a membership in the Adult Time network.
-Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today, with a massive collection of hardcore porn for a reasonable price. Covering a wide variety of niches, including male gay porn that they are trying to grow.
-The main attraction of the Joymii site was the lovely models. There are many sites that feature extremely attractive models, and Joymii used to be a premium site that featured glamcore-style porn of lovely young women.
-You can watch a trailer for the video, or the full video. |
Cons: |
-Navigation could be improved. They really need to make finding the content of each Adult Time site easier to list and find.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Downloading privilege is reserved for an annual membership, not for monthly memberships.
But a member writes that if you talk to customer service, not only can you get downloading privileges with a monthly membership, but if you're lucky, you can get your monthly membership cost reduced.
-I think the quality of the models at Joymii has gone down in recent years. They aren't quite as selective about the models for physical beauty. Just my opinion. |
Bottom Line: |
Joymii is now a part of Adult Time. So you get Joymii included with a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites.
Joymii used to be a premium stand-alone site that was worth joining. But with its inclusion in the Adult Time network, you now get Joymii for free, with an Adult Time membership.
The only downside is that Adult Time is mainly a video site. Yes, you get photosets included in Adult Time, but the main effort is on the videos: the photosets are basically an after-thought.
-Joymii Adult Time photosets often have around 39 or less photos per set, while the original set Joymii set usually numbered around 60 to 80 photos.
-The original Joymii site offered 3 or 4 definitions to view and download photosets. The Adult Time version only has one definition to view or download.
It's a shame they have reduced the number of photos per set and the choice of definitions. Because the models at Joymii used to be lovely glamour girls, and the original photosets were definitely worth collecting in your choice of definition.
But aside from the devaluation of the Joymii photosets that were folding into the Adult Time network, you still get the entire Joymii catalog of videos. The videos are high quality: high production values, a wonderful selection of lovely young models from 18+ years old.
The videos mainly feature glamour-style boy-girl sex, girl-girl sex, female masturbation.
Videos count is 922.
Videos run about 30 minutes.
Videos can stream or download in definitions from 288p thru 2160p.
The models are a mix of US and European girls.
The production values are high quality: they use a lot of outdoor scenes of glamourous places and indoor scenes are of high quality buildings. With great lighting and vivid colors.
I'm giving the site a score of 94.
You get a large number of high quality hardcore videos, most of them featuring attractive young models.
You also get access to the full Adult Time network, which is one of the best bargains in porn today. |
|
09-11-22 08:45pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
113
|
Kinky Family
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Dirty Flix network.
-Many of the models used are young teens. Many of them are cute or attractive.
-Verotel is the default billing processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but when I had a problem once, Verotel was quick to respond and solve it.
-PU has a link to a discounted membership price of $60/year. Or $15 for the first month.
-Most videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p for streaming.
For the last few years, there is a 4K option for video downloads.
-There is photoset of each video, that can be streamed or downloaded. |
Cons: |
-The last update to the network was Feb 22, 2022. The last update to the site was Feb 11, 2022. Site updates are always slower than network updates, but it looks like the site and the network might have stopped updates.
Until recently, the site gave 2 or 3 updates per month. But it's been 44 days since the last site update. And 33 days since the last network update.
-Regular membership price to Dirty Flix is $120/year. But you can often find a holiday special for $60/year. PU has a link to the Kinky Family site for $60/year membership.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https" in front of the address bar, you get a secure login, less chance of being hacked. (A tip from PU member exotics4me)
-Ads on every member page. Again, standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are more like a set of screencaps. There is one definition for the zip file, and the photosets are not worth collecting. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The mechanism for playing a slideshow online is primitive. Much better to download the zip file and use your computer's program to play the slideshow. Except most photosets are low quality screen caps that are not worth viewing.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Kinky Family focuses on what I call fake incest: sex between step-relatives, which is one of the more popular niches in the last few years.
I don't know why people think sex between step-relatives is thrilling or perverted, but I guess that most people have a legal bent that wants to criminalize sex, because sex is dirty and illegal and let's make whoopee and fuck over as many people as we can. That's always a fun thing to do.
You sit on a curb and smoke a cigarette, and a guard or cop can accuse you of loitering.
And tell you to move on. That's true, even if it's still legal to smoke in that area.
The site has 144 movies.
All the movies feature late teen, early 20s models.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
The plots are girls fucking with their step-brothers, or their step-fathers. The plots are thin, but the girls are attractive. So who cares if the dialog might be trite, the situations unrealistic. These girls are fucking attractive.
You watch these videos, and your body responds.
Kamryn Jayde, Ellie Idol, Paris White, etc.
Ellie Eilish is named "Ellie Idol" at this site, and her age is given as 33 for the video posted Feb 10, 2020.
My guess is that Ellie Eilish is being confused with some other model.
The video was posted Feb 10, 2020, when Ellie Eilish was 18 or 19.
Ellie Eilish is an American model/porn actress, who first appeared in porn in Nov 2019 at FTVgirls.com, and has since appeared at over 25 other sites.
A cute girl, slender, white, expressive face, puts on a great show. She's one of the better actresses in porn. No matter how stupid the plot or dialog, she comes across as a young teen with issues, and you believe her, she establishes an instant connection, you feel for her, and God, you wish it was you pounding away on that slim, tender young body.
Porn is fantasy. And she draws you into that fantasy.
I'm saying the videos are good to great. That's not because of the stupid plots. But the models are young and attractive. The video style is fake reality porn, but it works. Because you focus on the girls. And their bodies. And the videos can make you horny. Which is the purpose of porn.
Bottom line: This is a large site. 144 movies. It's not updating currently. So that's a negative. And the stupid plots are a negative. But the girls are attractive, and the sex is what I call bread-and-butter, which means you get a mixture of pussy licking, cock sucking, vaginal sex. The taboo of fake-incest is supposed to add heat to the scenes. Step-brother fucking his step-sister, step-father fucking his step-daughter.
So if you are into teen porn, and can ignore the stupid plots, this site (and network) is a worthwhile join.
The $60/year membership price is a bonus. |
|
03-27-22 06:20pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
114
|
Lesbian X
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is easy. The site and network are laid out sensibly, so you can browse the entire site and network.
-You can watch videos in 0.5 speed, normal speed, 2x speed, and 4x speed. Seems like a gimmick to me, because watching in normal speed seems like the normal thing to watch. You can slow the speed down to 0.5 speed, if you want to examine some highlights, but I've never done this yet.
-The site (and network) uses a glamour style approach: the models are usually attractive to very attractive, the settings are expensive, the girls are putting on a show for you, the audience, and they look into the camera to invite you to watch and enjoy their performance. So there's a voyeuristic element to the videos.
-The videos are professionally shot: crystal clear images, good colors and good sound control, nice sets, the models wear skimpy lingerie that reveals their curves. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Videos are offered in 288p through 1080p. The last few years to newer videos have a 4K option.
-The accompanying photosets are real photos, and run around 150 photos per set.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The performance of the models is stylized. I much prefer the less-stylized performance of the models at the Wow network, which seems less artificial, more realistic. Or the more natural style of the Teen Mega World videos, which is less of a show, but more natural. I think the models at the Wow network, or the Teen Mega World network, are getting off more often during the sex, versus the models at Lesbian X, which are putting on a show, but it's fake sex, and I doubt the models are getting off very often.
-The model page has links to the model's videos, but no personal stats or history on the model. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is the lesbian site in the X Empire network.
-You get 169 videos at the site, with matching photosets.
-Most of the videos are of 2 girls having sex. There are some videos with 3 or more girls, but that is the minority.
If you catch a holiday discount, you can join for $60/year, streaming only. Download memberships cost more.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is bread-and-butter, not over the top calithenics. Which is good, except that the sex seems to be by the numbers, staged, without much real passion. So in spite of the attractive models, and the nudity and hardcore sex, the site doesn't hold my interest. And I get bored with the videos fast. I much prefer the lesbian sex at the Wow network, where the sex seems more real.
I'm giving the site a score of 83. You get access to the Lesbian X site, and the other 4 sites in the network. The videos are professionally shot, with crystal clear images and excellent colors, but the videos lack passion, and get boring fast.
The site is trying to create an erotic, glamourous image of lesbian sex, but it just doesn't work. Wow network and even Teen Mega World, which are going for a more natural approach to sex, works much better. Those networks present videos that are more natural, with sex you can watch and enjoy more believably.
I have nothing against glamourous sex: X-Art used to be a great site with lovely models, great videos and photosets that emphasized the glamour aspects of sex, before the site ran into financial problems. But Lesbian X is a disappointment for me, in spite of the attractive models and the good technical qualities of the videos. |
|
11-29-22 02:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Lesbian X
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-The site is part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
So you get access to 5 sites with your membership.
-The good-quality photosets have a zip file.
-There are model indexes: one for the network, a different index for each individual site.
-The model's page has links to her videos.
-There is a cheaper streaming membership. Downloads require a more expensive membership.
-Videos come with lots of tags describing the video. They have a text description of the video that's so brief it's worthless.
For example, the complete text description for a Scarlit Scandal video is: "Scarlit Scandal loves her ass spanked while she's being fucked and Jax Slayher makes sure to turn Scarlit's cheeks red as he plunges his piece deep into her pussy." The tags do a much better job describing the video.
-Members can add comments on the model's page. Useless, except for fans wanting to show their appreciation of the model. |
Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-No information for the models (except for a generic name).
-Ads on member pages. Easy to ignore, because they are placed at the bottom of the page.
-Most of the models at the site are White, but there are a few Black, Asian, and Latina models. |
Bottom Line: |
The site is based on real life events (I read that from a motion picture, but it adds meaning to the sex shown in these videos: think of your sister, your mother, your grandmother, exploding with lust when they are with the women of their dreams.)
The site theme is lesbian sex.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is young teens and MILFs, so you get a mix of young teens and attractive older women.
The site has 140 videos.
Videos have your choice of definition from 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years back for the newer posted videos. Before that, the highest resolution was 1080p.
You can stream the full video, or a trailer for video.
There is an accompanying photoset for each video.
Photosets range from 99 photos to over 400 photos.
The soundtrack for many of the videos is an overpowering music beat. Either turn the volume down, or mute the volume and put on the song "I Want To Know What Love Is" by Foreigner, to heighten the mood. That song is a much better background than the canned music in these lesbian videos.
The videos are standard lesbian videos: lots of kissing, licking, sucking, stroking, some use of toys. The models are surprisingly clean: not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of models with over-large breast implants. The sets and costumes are nice.
I thought the lesbian videos were pretty much plain vanilla: although the models are making lots of noises to show excitement, the videos lack real heat. I've seen some videos at Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi or other sites that had real heat. That I thought were arousing.
Lesbian X is a different approach where the performers are acting more naturally. However, when I say they are acting more naturally, what I mean is that these models are role-playing for cash, there's little or no real passion. In spite of the moans and groans and squirting.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The site doesn't impress me much.
Although the models are clean and attractive, the models at other sites can be more attractive.
The update rate is slow and irregular: There have been 9 new videos in the last 12 months.
The content is exclusive.
Navigation is easy.
But there's little that's exciting to watch at this site. |
|
04-22-21 10:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-A network of primarily European sites. Two of the sites, The White Boxxx and A Girl Knows, are excellent glamcore sites. The White Boxxx has some of the finest glamcore videos on the internet, where they make an art of presenting attractive models in crystal clear videos.
-There's no limit on streaming the videos or photosets.
-You can download unlimited photosets. But see the CONS section why the photosets are not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-The models at some of their sites are stunning. Really gorgeous. |
Cons: |
-The video definition maxes out at 1080p, which is suprising for a glamcore network. Many porn sites started offering 4K videos years ago.
-Almost all videos have an accompanying photoset. But the photosets are not worth collecting. The photosets are tiny, around 10-13 photos per set. I have no idea why the photosets have such a small amount of photos. Seems like a wasted opportunity, when you consider how attractive many of these models are.
-There is a limit of 100 video downloads per month for the entire network.
-There is also a limit of 4 videos per day.
-You only get around 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are still updating. Most of the network sites stopped updating years ago. |
Bottom Line: |
The network covers different niches. The White Boxxx features girl/boy sex and some threesomes. A Girl Knows is a lesbian site. Both of those sites are high quality glamcore, with top-notch production values. The videos at The White Boxxx are the finest glamcore hardcore porn I've seen on the internet: the models are uniformly gorgeous (they are attractive to begin with, and every effort is made to present them looking as beautiful as possible). The settings are in a white room with one or two models and a stunt cock. The theme is sensuous hardcore. The photography (I really mean videography, but it's so crisp, clear and vivid you realize you are watching moving images) is top-notch. This isn't story-driven sex, the plot is minimal, but you are watching a premium product at The White Boxxx, the crown jewel of the Lets Doe It network
However, the value of the network is constantly going down. And since the price is not getting any less expensive, there's less reason to join the network.
-A few years ago you had access to over 40 different sites. Then they split the network into different networks, each requiring a separate membership. The Lets Doe It network has 18 sites.
-As time goes on, they keep putting limits on the members.
They started limiting downloads to 100 videos per month for the network. Before then, there were no limits.
Now they have an additional limit of 4 videos per day.
-Due to covid, the last few years the updates for the network have decreased.
They are now updating with 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network. They used to give far more updates.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are updating. The other 14 sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
Inflation is everywhere. But it's stupid to keep paying the same price to get less porn, when there are so many great bargains in porn.
So I finally wised up, and will cancel my membership. |
|
06-26-22 11:13pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
117
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Exclusive content.
-This is an excellent glamour network with lots of lovely models. The selection of models ranges from merely attractive to fucking gorgeous. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they made an art form of taking attractive girls and presenting them as lovely as any movie star at her premiere. They use expensive sets, erotic lingerie, wonderful lighting, and smooth, professional videos that emphasize how lovely these models are.
-The background music at The White Boxxx is usually soft. Background music at other sites in the network can be loud, jarring. Meant to add some excitement to the video, but I find loud music to be distracting, and need to turn the volume down to make it less annoying.
-Runtime is around 20 - 30 minutes for a video.
-Some of the featured models include:
Agatha Vega, Anna ReyAriela Donovan, Arya Fae, Freya Mayer, Jessica Spielberg, Julia Red, Kenna James, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lola Myluv, Lovita Fate, Lucy Li. |
Cons: |
-Flash page of ads before you get into the members area.
Even after you hit the link, "Continue to members area", what opens, instead of a members area page, is another ad. Do these people understand English, or are they so focused on selling they think you're going to going to sign up for a site instead of wanting to view content you already paid for?
-Of course, there are also ads on every member page. What a suprise.
-Some of the ads are "Limited time offer". And there is a clock ticking down the time the offer is still valid. I don't have enough excitement in my life. This adds to the thrill, watching the ad before it expires. (Sarcasm). However, the ad starts with 19 hours 59 minutes. So I have plenty of time to think over the offer before it expires. However, I already have a membership in Nubiles Porn, so the ad is wasted on me.
-They've reduced the time limit that logs you out of the network. Minor annoyance, since it's easy to log back in, |
Bottom Line: |
CONS CONTINUED:
and you get to see the flash page of ads again, before you can navigate to the members area.
-It gets boring watching the same intro section of each video that showcases the network, time after time, so there's a link that lets you skip the intro.
-The sex can be slow and sensual at the start, because they are trying to create erotic content, a visual feast. But the girls are so lovely, scenes can lack heat. Some scenes at Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, Teen Fidelity just have greater impact. But for pure visual splendor of the models, the settings, The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-There is a monthly limit of 100 video downloads for the network.
-A personal issue: a lot of the lovely models have tattoos. Some of the models have large tattoos that cover a lot of their body. I'm not a fan of tattoos. Think they distract from the model's beauty.
-Photo sets are tiny. Around 6 to 10 photos per set. The photos are from the accompanying video. These lovely models deserve more photos in a set. The photo sets are basically a wasted opportunity of these girls.
-All videos are offered in 240p through 1080p. Which is suprising for a glamcore network. Competing sites started offering 4K definition in 2015 or 2016.
-Network update rate is slow, about 10 to 14 new videos per month.
-Navigation can be clunky. You hit the back button, and you can be logged out of the site. Or you're still in the site, but you've lost your place in the site listing (you have to use clicks to get back the page you were viewing).
-Most sites don't update.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE:
Lets Doe It network has 17 sites:
The different sites are meant to offer different porn themes:
The White Boxxx-333 scenes, the star of the network, is pure glamcore porn, one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. Lovely models, videotaped in lush sets, excellent lighting that highlights the beauty of the models, expensive costumes.
A girl knows-200 scenes, a glamcore lesbian site.
Her Limit-151 scenes, a hardcore site featuring aggressive sex that pushes the models to the limit.
Horny Hostel-54 scenes, sex in a hostel.
Xchimera-35 scenes, fantasy sex that is supposed to be taboo. There were 35 scenes in Jan 2020. Then they supposedly updated the site in 2020 with 7 more scenes, but the count remained at 35. My guess is they did not update the site, just changed the posting date of 7 scenes to 2020. Which seems deceptive.
Scam Angels-50 scenes. Girls have sex with rich guys, then blackmail them.
Bitches Abroad-100 scenes. Girls travelling to different countries have sex with local studs.
Porno Acadamie-36 scenes. High school girls have sex in France.
Bums Bus-134 scenes. German girls have sex with guys who drive a van. An acquired taste. The van drivers are jerks who think they are really cool.
XXX Shades-124 scenes. Sex that is supposed to be erotic, based on the Fifty Shades of Grey movies.
Doe Projects-36 scenes. Pilots for possible series.
Relaxxxed-130 scenes. Massage videos.
Kinky In-Laws-30 scenes. Faux incest with step-families.
My Naughty Album-70 scenes. Sex between a model and her photographer in a photoshoot.
Bums Buero-53 scenes. Office sex.
Quest for Orgasm-80 scenes. Girl solo masturbation.
Bums Besuch-27 scenes. German fans get to have sex with porn stars.
Most of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
The network update rate is low: maybe 10+ videos in a month.
There are lots of really attractive models featured at the sites. And the videos, for the most part, are crystal clear images. The best sites are The White Boxxx, a great glamcore site. A Girl Knows, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit, extreme sex site, Horny Hostel, sex in a hostel, Bitches Abroad, where girls travelling to a foreign country hook up with a local stud, XXX Shades, where there's an element of BDSM, all have some worthwhile videos to watch. Mainly because the girls are so attractive.
Because of the slow update rate, because most sites are not updating, the 100 video download limit per month, I'm giving the network a score of 85.
If they increase the update rate, once the covid infection has passed, remove the 100 video/month download limit, improve the navigation, increase the time before you're logged out, decrease the amount of ads, the score would improve.
All these negatives mean the score is in the 80's range, where it used to be in the 90's.
They are making the network harder to use, for no reason that I can tell. |
|
05-30-21 01:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-An outstanding glamcore network. Many of the models range from attractive to freaking lovely.
-The White Boxxx channel, part of the network, is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
Not only are the models lovely, but the sets and makeup and costumes and filming techniques combine to make the models as lovely and glamourous as possible. Most models that appear at this channel are at their loveliest, and look better by far than at most other porn site appearances.
-The network has 17 channels. Some are archive channels that no longer update. But the best ones do update, especially The White Boxxx.
-Contents are exclusive.
-The network has all the trimmings of a high quality glamcore network:
-The videos can be streamed and downloaded in low, medium and high quality.
-Each video has a intro section, which can be skipped when streaming.
-The videos can be streamed in regular or slow motion.
-The videos and photo sets have multiple choices of definition. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The search covers the entire network, instead of a single channel.
-You can vote to like, dislike or choose as favorite.
-Can also comment on each video or photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. Especially when I consider the value of The White Boxxx channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The photo sets are tiny. Average 10 photos per set. Some of the models are gorgeous, and deserve a full gallery to feature their beauty.
-The search could be better. If you enter a model's name, such as Lena Reif, it returns all instances of any model with the name of Lena, instead of just instances of Lena Reif.
-This is a nit-pick. The White Boxxx videos focus on such high quality glamcore that the videos lose a little steam. They are great in visual quality and eroticism, but lack the impact of the Porn Fidelity, Teen Fidelity videos, which are high quality gonzo porn (I don't know if gonzo porn is the right term, because the Porn Fidelity/Teen |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Fidelityporn can be raw and powerful).
-Some of the channels are archive, that haven't updated in years.
-A nit-pick. Although you can vote to like or dislike a video or photo set, all I've seen are likes.
Not a single dislike of a video or photo set. Which seems unlikely.
-A nit-pick. Bottom of member page has a few small ads. Easily ignored.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Maybe I'm biased, but a few scenes from The White Boxxx channel are worth at least one month's membership price.
The first video I watched at the network was "Sensual threesome sex with a lucky guy".
This is at The White Boxxx, with Lena Reif, Shona River and Lutro (Lutro is the stunt cock).
Posted 2018-11-30.
For high quality glamcore sex, it doesn't get any better.
Watching Lena Reif's breasts swaying in lovely motion is truly poetry in motion.
Lena Reif, attractive face, lovely body, a wet dream come true.
And Shona River is a luscious babe, as well.
Except compared to Lena Reif, nobody compares to Lena Reif, great face, fantastic body, Lena Reif can put on a show that is priceless.
Network stats:
Number of channels: 17
Number of videos: 1,481
Number of photo sets: 1,468
Number of photos per photo set: 10
Bottom line update:
I am blown away by The White Boxxx channel of this network. I think it's the finest example of high quality glamcore porn on the internet. The models are georgeous, they are shown in expensive sets that highlight their beauty. The emphasis in on eroticism rather than sex, although the sex is hardcore.
There are defintely other channels in the network worth checking out.
And plenty of lovely or attractive models throughout the network.
But the crown jewel of the network is The White Boxxx channel.
I've giving the network a score of 95.
Join for a month, to sample their wares.
To see if a longer membership is to your taste.
I've joined the network for over 1 year now. |
|
03-17-20 03:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Lez Cuties is an educational site. It teaches you that no matter how cute a girl might be, no matter how young they are, you have to determine if they have lez tendencies before you get involved with them. Otherwise, if they turn out to be lezzies, you can get your heart broken.
However, if you're broad-minded, and don't mind sharing, you can get two or more cuties in your bed for the price of one. (Ha-ha. Get the joke: broad-minded.)
-The site title is appropriate. Most of the models are young and attractive: Lizzi Vogue (aka Lizi Vogue, Liz Vogue, Vika K, Pola, Kristin A, Wendy), Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, Geisha Kyd, etc. The list goes on and on. You need a porn site encyclopedia to keep track of the names these porn stars are known by, as well as the sites they appear at.
-As a site included in Adult Time, you get all the bells and whistles the network offers: Multiple definitions for streaming. Multiple definitions for downloads. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Read a review about the Adult Time network to get a full list of the many advantages of an Adult Time membership.
-The technical features of the videos are first rate: crystal clear videos, excellent lighting, good colors and sound control, expensive sets.
-Although many or most of the models are European, the videos are mainly in English.
-The site updates with 2 new videos per month. And if you want more lez content, there are plenty more lez sites in the Adult Time network, as well as lez content mixed in with the straight content in non-lez sites.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot. And there are tags that also define the video action. So you get a good idea of the plot (what little there is of a plot) from the text description and the tags.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are minor. Adult Time is probably the best bargain in paid porn today. You get a wide variety of niches, with over 55,000 hardcore videos of good quality, for a low price. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a one-year membership. The normal monthly membership is streaming only. But exotics4me has written that if you contact customer service, they might offer you a monthly membership with streaming and downloading privileges, at a reduced price.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Navigation could be improved. The network has so much content, it's hard to get a listing of the content for each site. You need time and patience to find the content that fits your tastes.
-It's easy to get distracted while searching the content. Too many good looking models, too many sites that might appeal to you, get in the way of searching any one site. Maybe I'm weak minded, but I get distracted easily.
-The model page for a model has links to her videos at the network, but no bio or other information on the model.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Lez Cuties is part of 21 Naturals, which is part of 21 Sextury, which is part of Adult Time. So you get access to the entire Adult Time network.
The site title is apt: the models are almost all young, cute girls.
They do throw in some older models for variety of age and plot. But the older models are also attractive.
The site has 518 videos.
"Till Next Time", a Lez Cuties video posted 2022-03-24, features Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd. Geisha Kyd has a boyfriend. You can tell right off the bat that Alexa Flexy and Bonnie Dolce are dyed-in-the-wool lesbians, because they are kissing each other a lot.
When Geisha Kyd drops by their house, bringing a new boyfriend, Alexa and Bonnie make them welcome. However, Geisha and Bonnie start kissing, right in front of the boyfriend, who smiles with embarrasment. Then Geisha says to her boyfriend that she's sorry, but it will have to be another time. And the boyfriend leaves.
This is why I said that before you get involved with a lez, make sure she will invite you to participate in any parties with her girlfriends. The guy is probably forced to masturbate by himself while the three girls are having sex.
Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd are 3 really cute young girls. And they're really into each other. Bonnie doesn't want the boyfriend joining in, it's strictly girly sex today.
The boyfriend could have made the sex more interesting, if he was the take-charge type of guy.
But he's a wimp, who disappears when Geisha tells him to leave. And the 3 girls start making out.
So lots of kissing, caressing, pussy licking, finger-fucking,
Good, clean fun.
The three models are absolutely adorable.
Very pretty faces, great bodies.
And the sex is slow, gentle, the noises the models make are soft, not over-the-top, which is more realistic than fake screaming because someone is touching their breast or pussy.
So this is a fine to very fine scene.
Any quibbles about the video? Alexa Flexy has medium sized breasts. But they are so firm, even when they are being kissed, they don't move naturally. They're probably implants. I mean breast tissue is mainly fat, not muscle, so medium or large breasts, if natural, will jiggle. Flexy's breasts don't jiggle: they are not overly large, and her breasts are nice-looking, but I'm not a fan of breast implants. That's my personal preference. Many people enjoy medium or large breasts, and don't mind implants.
However, I discovered why they didn't need Geisha's boyfriend. During the sex, Alexa grabs a large plastic dildo, and uses it on Bonny's pussy. The boyfriend didn't have a cock as large as the dildo. The dildo might be plastic, instead of warm flesh, but these lezzies know how to use a dildo better than the wimpy boyfriend could use his cock. And then Geisha uses a tiny vibrator to use on Bonny while Bonny's pussy is getting fucked by Alexa. So the moans and groans get louder.
If you have an alpha male, like James Deen, who could take charge and use these women, then the women would probably have gone along with Deen. But the boyfriend was, apparently, a mild guy who put up no fuss when he was dismissed.
The moral of the story is: if you find your girlfriend is a carpet muncher, make sure she knows you're the boss man, and that you will be included in any flings she might have.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Access to the Adult Time network makes joining this site a winning proposition. Adult Time has a huge number of really fine videos. The problem is finding the ones that will appeal to you. So you need time and patience to slog through the content, but there are, in addition to the good videos, some really fine videos that will make you glad you joined the network. And the Lez Cuties site has some very attractive models. |
|
04-22-22 11:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
Love Hairy
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation.
-Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition.
-The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price.
-The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face.
-Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service.
-Excellent search engine.
-Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Nice photo player for streaming photosets. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information.
CONS(START OF):
-Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network.
-There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic. |
Bottom Line: |
The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair.
The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area.
Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean.
Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured.
A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair.
Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit.
Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive.
And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women.
The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both.
1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers.
With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography.
If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous.
You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here.
Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive.
This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact.
Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily.
This is complicated.
Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle.
Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times.
I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership.
I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses.
Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site.
And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription.
End of story.
Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site.
You have hundreds of lovely young women.
You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work.
You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly.
I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate.
WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche.
The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive. |
|
03-23-21 07:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
121
|
Make Him Cuckold
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. A teen oriented site. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
-Many of the models at the site and network are cute teens. I know I keep writing that there are lots of cute teens at many of these porn sites, but visit these sites, and see what you think: Michelle Can, Vika Lita, Dolce Vita, etc., these girls are cute and sexy. |
Cons: |
-If your login is not secure (no https in the address bar), just add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for a secure login.
-Then, if your member pages are not secure, do the same: add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for secure pages. Otherwise, your ISP will have a record of the pages you visit. Police can use your internet browsing records against you in court.
https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/
-Archive site. Last video was added Jul 3, 2019. Before that, 1 or 2 videos were added per year. So the site never got much attention.
-The biller I used was Verotel. Not as easy as CCBill. You have to use your credit card # and expiration date of the card to communicate with Verotel, instead of your login details or other data. |
Bottom Line: |
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in 2019.
Site has 63 videos, with matching photosets.
The latest videos have a 4K option.
But even the earliest videos have a desktop and 1080p versions.
Along with a matching photoset for each video.
The photosets run around 80 to 100 photos per set.
-Young Courtesans is probably the best known site in the network. That is a fine site that has a simple plot that is easily filmed: a young girl needs money, so she has sex with a guy. The premise is simple but believable. Many of the models at the site are attractive, and the videos are professionally filmed: Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
I'm including Young Courtesans because it's my favorite site in the network. But recently they seem to have ignored the basic theme and are just adding any sex encounter for a young teen model, instead of the premise of sex for cash. Not a major defect, but the current theme seems to be a young girl having sex, instead of a young girl trading sex for money. When the Young Courtesan site first started out, they made it clear in the video the girl was trading sex for money, and it added a bit of meaning to the video.
The difference seems slight, but if you watch the older videos at Young Courtesans, and the newer ones, the newer videos lack impact or meaning beyond a horny girl having sex with a guy. With a courtesan, you expect a bit of eroticism or flavor beyond basic sex.
Although the site theme of revenge porn seems like it would be difficult to film, the site videos do a surprisingly good job with the premise. The plot is basically simple: the girl finds her boyfriend/husband is cheating on her and then she fucks some other guy and forces her partner to watch. It's not stupid comedy, but a nice hardcore sex video. The attractive models are a bonus. If they used the same plot at Pure Taboo (a site in Adult Time), the production values would be higher, the film more glossy, but this site gives you a cheaper but watchable version of revenge porn.
"Fucking in front of cuffed bf" with Vika Lita is surprisingly effective.
For one, Vika Lita (aka Belinda, Callie, Lizzy, Melissandra, Thalia D, Vialika) is a very attractive girl.
And she puts on a fine show fucking some guy in front of her tied-up boyfriend.
Actually, watching these videos, they put more thought into the videos than is first apparent.
In one video, you think the wife finds out her husband is cheating, and she has revenge sex with a friend. But at the end of the video, it turns out the wife and the husband were role playing, and he enjoys watching his wife get fucked by other men. Wich ads an unexpected twist to the plot.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
It's an archive site, no longer updating.
An even though I think they do an okay job with the site theme of revenge porn, I personally think Young Courtesans is a better site because the idea of a young courtesan is more enjoyable than watching revenge porn. |
|
06-25-22 10:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
Met Art X
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating.
Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models.
Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn. |
|
08-10-22 06:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
123
|
Met Art X
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Part of the Metart network. Excellent layout, easy navigation, all the bells and whistles of a first-rate glamour site.
-The quality of the models is the gold or platinum standard: lovely young women in their late teens or twenties.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Daily updates.
-Photosets go up to 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-Customer support is 24/7 by email. (No phone or live chat support.)
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-There is a blog, where you have a small photo (or very large-sized thumbnail) of different models, with a link to an erotic short story. The photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely young models, with a bit of erotic fiction to get you off.
-There are trailers for the videos, to give you a preview of the video.
-But the photosets and videos also have extensive tags, to describe them, that you can use for searching for content that interests you.
-No DRM. But most sites have stopped using DRM many years ago. |
Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-If you're not a site member, you can buy individual photosets and videos. But that is expensive, and a one-month membership would be a cheaper option.
-PU discount to the site membership, $20/month, or $100/yearly. But sometimes you can find a holiday special for a lower price.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a first-rate glamour site that showcases lovely young women masturbating. The women are are absolutely lovely.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members complain that almost all the models are slender, white, teen-or-early twenty models. They want more diversity in age, body type, race, whatever.
-The site favors girls with natural attributes. Some PU members (some people will always complain, no matter what happens) want girls with tattoos, implants, piercings, harder edge to the sex, for variety.
Note: if a girl does have tattoos, the site usually erases them with photoshop in the photosets. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-No bonus sites included. You get the Metartx site, and access to the live chat shows, which is standard for any Metart network site. But I'm not into live chat shows, too afraid I will get hooked and start spending serious money on these shows.
-The model index lists a few stats for the model, but almost no bio data:
The stats given include: eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, pubic hair style(shaved, trimmed, natural), ethnicity.
-The canned music at the start of the videos is annoying. Better if they deleted the music track.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: beautiful girls masturbating. You can think of this site as Metart (which is mainly softcore) with orgasm. Metart is mainly solo girl content, although there are sets with two or more girls. But it's strictly softcore.
Metartx is mainly solo girls masturbating. Some sets and videos have 2 girls. Masturbation could be considered mid-core or hardcore, depending on who you talk to.
Site stats:
Videos: 1,019
Video runtime: 10-20 minutes
Photosets: 830
Models: 306
Photographers: 40
The main draw to the site is how fucking lovely the models are.
And that the girls are masturbating, instead of the softcore solo action of nude modelling at Metart.
This site is what Playboy should have developed. Instead, Playboy magazine stopped their print magazine, and Playboy today is mainly a brand name that is remembered for its past glory from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.
I'm a sucker for lovely young women. And if they put on a show while mastubating, that only makes it better. Over time, since there is little or no plot, the sex can lose its impact.
But the girls are so lovely, the photography and videos shot with high quality film, nice settings: the girls are not just lovely, but adorable .
You get beautiful girls naked. The action is not rough or over-the-top, but sensual. You could say it's couple-friendly, but solo friendly, as well. Although the perfect solution would be for Metart X to send samples of these models to your home to see if they really match the fantasies they create in your mind.
Basically, as I already stated, Metart X focuses on solo girls masturbating. So it's a more erotic, more sensual site than Metart, with many of the same fine models. Many of the bells and whistles of a top-tier glamor site. A one-month membership is definitely worth your while at $20, or a cheaper membership if you can catch one on a holiday discount.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because the girls are so lovely, the quality of the videos and photosets is outstanding, and the site is easy to use. |
|
03-23-21 11:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
MetArt
(0)
98.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of. |
Cons: |
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video. |
Bottom Line: |
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet. |
|
01-10-24 08:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet.
-The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers.
-Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items.
-Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content. |
Cons: |
The cons are basically minor.
-Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it.
-I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets.
-Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity. |
Bottom Line: |
MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed.
It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet.
Site stats:
Films: 1,839
Galleries: 23,019
Models: 3,878
Photographers: 291
MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation.
During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month.
Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price.
MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems.
If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt.
It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined. |
|
09-08-21 08:38am
Replies (1)
|
|