Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Filthy POV
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site is streaming only. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has both unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading (if you have downloading privileges with your membership in Adult Time).
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site content is supposed to be exclusive. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has some content from other sites mixed in, so it's not entirely exclusive.
-All scenes are available in 360p SD through 1080p. And they are now offering 4K definition for people with ultra-high definition monitors.
-Some scenes might have a plot that adds to the interest: A brother might blackmail his stepsister into having sex. However, many of the videos at the Filthy POV channel seem to have the plot cut out, and the scenes start with off with hardcore sex, with no buildup. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Some videos have an accompanying phtoset. But the photoset is poor-quality screen shots: poor lighting, cheap sets, a limited number of screen shots per set. Not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
-Photosets average around 15 screenshots per set.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average. The site is going for a trailer-trash vibe, not presenting the models as attractive women, but as sluts who are getting banged.
-There is no text description of a video.
-There are no tags to describe or define the video.
-Little to none model info. |
| Bottom Line: |
124 videos currently.
Video runtime is from 10 to 20 minutes. My guess is that they've edited the original videos to cut out the build-up to the sex, and start many of the videos with the sex scenes. Which is both good and bad: good, for fans who want to skip the buildup and view the hardcore sex. Bad, because the the buildup could give meaning to the sex.
Without the plot build-up, the scene is just two or more bodies having sex, with very little meaning.
You have Dixie Lynn, Sofie Reyez, Karah Brooke, Jocelyn Stone, Melody Marks, cute or attractive girls, sucking cock, but there's no basis for the sex, and it gets boring fast.
I much prefer the Jays POV channel in Adult Time, which makes an effort of selecting cute teen models, and also includes a plot build-up where the stunt cock seduces the girls into having sex, or the girl seduces the guy.
The sets and costumes at Jays POV are nicer, not trying for the trailer trash vibe.
The lighting and colors of the videos at Jays POV are brighter, and the girls look so much better.
Filthy POV is a channel in the Adult Time network.
It's also a standalone site.
I'm writing about the Filthy POV channel in the Adult Time network.
Which apparently has a lot of the video content found in the separate Filthy POV site.
Note: some of the videos that are listed under the Filthy POV channel are originally from other sites.
A few from FilthyKings, RoccoSiffredi, Spizzo.com.
But most of the content is from the FilthyPOV site.
Most of the models are white, but you get some latina, some black.
Most of the models are probably in their twenties, but you get some teens, some grannies.
These models are not selected for their looks, unless you consider trailer trash as the target look.
You get a wide variety of themes in this channel, and a wide variety of female performers.
The overall theme is trailer trash: slutty models, young and old, who are showing the dirty side of sex.
Fake incest: step-relations having sex. Teen and twenty-something models having sex with young and older guys. Grannies. Lots of models with tats. Cuckold. Punishment. Blowjobs. Anal. Oversized titties. Whatever.
The models are basically shown as sluts who like their sex down and dirty.
No attempt is made to make the models attractive or glamorous.
There are a few cute teen models in the catalog who seem to have wandered into the site by mistake, but
they show they belong in this site because they have fake-incest with their step family or show other perversions.
If you're into dirty sex, perverted sex, then you can watch in 4K video, which should satisfy connoisseurs of raw hardcore porn.
I'm giving the Filthy POV channel a score of 78. I don't appreciate the trailer-trash vibe of the site.
I don't like the editing that cuts out the build-up to the sex.
I like my models to be young and attractive, and the models at this site are basically a much less attractive group of women than the Jays POV models.
The plots at Jays POV site can be repetitious, but the models are yummy, and the sets and lighting are clean.
The sets at Filthy POV are cheap, the models are presented at sluts, the lighting is dim. |
|
06-23-21 07:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
First Anal Date
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos. |
| Cons: |
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
The Wow sites, Teen Mega World, X-Art, are far superior, and worth paying a little extra for, over First Anal Date and its network.
Normally, I try to put more information in the bottom line.
But I covered most of the points in the cons sections.
I would not recommend joining this site. |
|
08-13-20 02:26am
Replies (5)
|
Review
78
|
First BGG
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network.
-They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting.
The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls,
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content.
-The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos.
-The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images.
-Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive. |
| Cons: |
-If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network.
However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site.
-I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network.
I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month.
2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos.
2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos.
So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month.
The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month.
Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc.
-Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it.
-The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy.
Site stats:
videos: 121
photo sets: 121
As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful.
What I like about the site and network:
The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex.
The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos.
This is not a glam site or network.
The network started around 2005.
The site (First BGG) started around 2011.
The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites.
Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included
sites.
For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p.
The upgrades included:
With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.)
Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control.
The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality.
The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material.
First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network.
If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower.
But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets. |
|
03-17-20 10:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
79
|
Four Finger Club
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120.
-New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing.
-A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive.
-You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition.
-Content is exclusive. |
| Cons: |
-Last update was in February 2021.
-A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area.
-Ads on every member page.
-The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat.
-Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos.
-A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme is lesbians having sex.
I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants.
Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot.
Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours.
Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off.
Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX.
Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show.
Some of the videos have really attractive women.
And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017.
Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site.
And many of the videos are definitely worth watching.
You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you.
The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining.
I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you.
But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership. |
|
03-25-22 09:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Fresh Outta High School
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network.
-Membership in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network, for no additional charge.
-Membership in the network gives you unlimited downloads and unlimited streaming.
-The videos at the network are mainly professionally shot: clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control, nice costumes (mainly normal street clothes). |
| Cons: |
-Erratic update rate.
-Ads on every member page, take away from the useful screen content.
-Popup window of ads also hides part of the screen.
-Navigation is poor. Hard to get a simple listing of the videos at the Fresh Outta High School site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think the site (and network) is a worthwhile join at $60/year, if you can find it listed for a holiday special.
That's the price I joined for.
But lately, I've seen prices of $95.45/year on a holiday special, or even $149.95/year.
Which is a ripp-off, in my opinion. There are far better sites at those price points: better navigation, better quality content, a wider selection of models.
The content at Fresh Outta High School (and the New Sensations Network) is good quality hardcore porn, but there are better networks that will give you not only a wider selection of high quality porn, a more extensive selection of models, and content that is easier to use. In both the softcore and hardcore areas.
New Sensations has been around for over 20 years.
They've created a large amount of exclusive content: over 7,000 scenes, over 2,500 porn stars, with sites covering different niches.
But the internet is vast, and has thousands of competing sites for porn.
I would not put New Sensations, or the Fresh Outta High School site, as one of the stars of the internet.
But for a low membership price, I think it's worth sampling. And maybe even a longer join, if you enjoy the site (and network). |
|
11-08-23 04:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Fresh Outta High School
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network, a low cost ($60/year) network of quality videos and photosets.
-The short text description of the video is a fine summary of the plot.
-Easy to switch between the sites in the network.
-I don't know why, but looking at the nice-sized thumbnails of the models laying on their backs, or crouching with their ass sticking up in the air, is enough to give you a hard-on, even before you get to the video. Some of these teen models are fucking attractive.
-Watching these videos is a wonderful guide on how to treat young women. Be a man and be strong, so you can give her the hardest cock she's ever tasted, and ram it deep into her tight young holes.
-The good-looking models are always so enthusiastic and verbal about the joys of fucking. Possibly a little over-the-top, but it gives me hope that I can find some cuties to satisfy my needs.
-The school uniforms the girls wear (plaid skirt, white blouse), brings back memories of the Catholic school girls. |
| Cons: |
-You find a video at New Sensations network, it's not immediately apparent which site the video belongs to.
-The title of the site is "FreshOuttaHighSchool". But some models look like in their early 20s. You graduate from high school at 17 or 18.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-I don't think the plots are 100% accurate to real-life situations. In the videos, lovely young girls are always coming on to older men to satisfy their sexual urges. In real life, it seems to me that young girls are not always so willing and able to have sex without some urging on the part of the male partners.
-Very little information is given about the models. You get a nice, extra-large thumbnail of the model to see what she looks like, but no bio or personal data other than height and measurements (height-chest-hips).
-Maybe it's my slow wifi connection, but the video streaming was spotty, with lots of pauses while streaming videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish some of the cuties would make more than one appearance at the site. Riley Reid, Bailey Brooke, and other cuties deserve to be showcased more often, so we can appreciate their lovely bodies and fine acting skills.
-The default file name lists the model, but you need to add the date posted, site, and any other data you need.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site is a nice addition to the New Sensations network.
The site theme is young girls having sex. Often with older men. The older men are usually hesitant to have sex with the girls. The girls are young and attractive, so I don't know why the older men are so hesitant.
Also, the young girls are uniformly cute or attractive, but they are also so horny, that as soon as the men touch them, the girls start moaning and screaming and shouting they are going to come. Is that the way it happens in real life?
Enquiring minds want to know: are the videos at New Sensations teaching us to behave properly in the real world, or are these videos fantasies from perverted male minds?
I was brought up to believe we should always give the benefit of the doubt to people, when there is a question of honor. So I think that New Sensations is giving us videos that will teach us to behave honorably towards women, to give women what they've always secretly craved: a good, stiff cock right where it counts.
The older videos have 720p and 1080p definitions for streaming and downloading, but 4K was not introduced until 2018.
The streaming have 2 choices for bit rates.
The older downloads might only have 1 choice for bit rates.
But many downloads have multiple choices for bit rates, for each definition offered.
The videos and photosets have fine technical qualities and are a pleasure to watch: nice sets, excellent colors and lighting, professional camera-work, attractive models, good sound control, etc.
The main factor, after checking to see that the videos are good technical quality, is how cute or attractive are the models.
The models at FreshOuttaHighSchool (and at New Sensations network) are scrumptious.
There are plenty of models to drool over.
Cute, attractive, lovely, there are plenty of good-looking young women that should appeal to you.
The main selling points of the site:
-low membership price: $60/year.
-high quality videos and photosets.
-access to the New Sensations network, of 7,500+ scenes.
-Thousands of A-list pornstars that are attractive.
-Easy site and network navigation.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. |
|
03-05-22 06:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Warning: if you are going to join the Teen Mega World network, I strongly recommend that you join through the Teen Mega World network site. And not through one of the satellite sites.
The reason is simple: If you join through the Teen Mega World site directly, your search for a model's content returns her content at the entire network.
But if you join through one of the satellite sites, your search for a model's content is limited to her content at the site you joined with.
This means, finding what the model's content at other sites would be a difficult, time-consuming effort.
And that recommdation is worth the entire review, by itself.
The network did an update several years ago, where they changed the search engine to:
if you join through TMW site directly, your search covers the entire network.
if you join through one of the TMW network sites, your search is limited to the site you joined through. |
| Cons: |
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So, unless you are willing to spend hours trying to find what sites the model has content at, and then trying to access that content, which would involve logging to the site, then clicking through the thumbnail pages to find the page (or pages) where her content was listed, most of the content at TMW would be unavailable, because it takes too much time and effort to find it.
I find it amazing that no PU members have complained about the limited search at the TMW satellite sites over the last few years.
Maybe it's because few members have joined the TMW sites, or have written reviews about the TMW sites, in the last few years.
TMW has been kind enough to give me a separate membership to TMW, because of the navigation difficulties I am describing, with my Teen Sex Movs membership.
I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs, which I've kept for a few years now.
But my search with the Teen Sex Movs membership is limited to that site, does not cover the TMW network. |
| Bottom Line: |
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So if you want to find content at the site you have opened, you can't use the search: you have to page through the thumbnails of the site videos. Using the search will only return content from your join site, even when you have opened up a different site to explore.
I am puzzled why no other PU members have commented on the search problems at the TMW sites.
Because the search problems started years ago, and have never been fixed.
PROS(START OF):
Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network (also known as TMW).
The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite hardcore networks.
Most of the teen models are real teens (when they start out).
The average model is cute or attractive. And they have some teens that are more than just attractive: they are lovely to beautiful.
-Video definitions offered in multiple definitions, including 4K (UHD).
-Can stream or download, with no limits.
-Easy to switch between sites in the network.
-You get access to the entire network with a subscription to any one of the sites. But you should join through the TMW site itself, for search and access to the content. Otherwise, finding the content of specific models would be a time-consuming task.
-You get access to over 30 sites with a join to any site in the network, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-The network has over 5,000 videos, and over 2,000 models.
-Cons
-If you join through one of the network sites other than the main TMW site itself, your search only returns content from the site you joined through. That applies even when you open a different site in the network (you are still logged in to your join site).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The site only updates one new video per month. However, the network updates every 1 or 2 days.
-Vendo is the billing agent. This is a proprietary biller. But I've joined many times using this biller, and never had a problem.
BOTTOM LINE:
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is limited to the site you join through.
If you join through the main TMW site itself, your search covers the entire network.
Thus, if you join through a satellite site, you will not be able to find the content of any model except at your join site.
That means:
1. You won't know what content the model has at the network.
2. Even if you spend the time to search for which sites in the network have that model's content, accessing the content is a time-consuming task: because you have to open each specific site itself, and then page through the thumbnail listings to find where her content is listed, and then bring up the video or photoset.
3. On the other hand, if you join through the main TMW site, the search lists the model's content for the entire network, with hot links to her content. So it's easy to find--and access--her content.
Bottom line: If you join through the main TMW site itself, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 93. Because it's then easy to find and access the content of each model.
But if you join through Fuck Studies, or one of the TMW satellite sites, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 70.
Because, unless you write to the TMW support staff, and they give you a free TMW site membership, it's too time-consuming to find or access the content at the network.
The TMW network is one of my favorite networks for hardcore teen porn.
But I believe the network is shooting itself in the foot with the limited search at its satellite sites. I believe they have lost a lot of customer business because of the poor search function.
They need to re-write the network code, to allow each site to have a search that covers the entire network.
A membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
But since the search is limited to your join site, actually finding what the content includes, and then trying to access the content you want to view, is a time-consuming task.
Unless you have joined through the main TMW site itself.
I've said that TMW is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
That is because the models are real teens.
And they mainly range from attractive to very attractive.
The girls put on a show where they appear to really enjoy getting off.
So it's a pleasure watching these videos.
And each video has a matching photo set, that is nice quality.
(I assume the photo sets were made from some software program, but the photos are good quality:
nice focus, nicely centered, good lighting, etc.)
So, I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you get access to the entire network, with unlimited streaming and downloading.
But if you are unlucky enough to join through one of the satellite sites, it would be a massive task to find the content at the network.
Unless you ask their support team for a membership to the TMW site itself, which is what I've done for the last few years. |
|
10-31-19 09:42am
Replies (4)
|
Review
83
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex. |
| Cons: |
-The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos. |
|
06-21-22 06:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU lists the membership price at $59.95/month, with a PU discount of $39.99/month recurring.
Or a 1 year membership for $119.88.
I found a holiday discount of $59.95 for the first year. So if you want to join the network, or one of its sites, I suggest waiting for a holiday discount, since it's so much cheaper.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The network includes about 20 different sites. The most famous one is JamesDeen.com, because James Deen has made a name for himself as a porn star.
-There is a large amount of hardcore videos at the network. Some videos available in 4K, most are available in 1080p and lower definitions.
-Content is exclusive.
-If cookies are enabled, you don't have to enter your login details, you are automatically entered into the site once you click on the "login" link.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy to use slide-show program for viewing photosets.
-Photosets have 2 choices of definition for a zip file: 1024p and 1600p. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photoset default filename includes the model's name, title of the set, and file definition.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Sometimes your login details fail to work. You have to try to get new login details, or play around with your old login details hoping it will get you into the network.
-Rocketgate is the default biller. I think CCBill or Famesupport are easier to deal with.
-I don't believe I got a confirming email on my membership. Which creates problems. Especially if the site does not recognize your login details. Rocketgate, the default biller, does not seem very responsive about confirming your membership, even though they were the biller I used to join, and I sent them my name, email address, the last four digits of my credit card I used to join, and the amount and date of my join.
-The photosets are shot by a professional photographer: so the photos are real photos and not screencaps. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
The photos are well lit. But the photos fail to emphasize the physical beauty of the models (even when some of the models are naturally attractive). Riley Reid is attractive, but her photosets present her as a plain-looking girl. Chloe Cherry comes across a litte better. Chloe can be a fine-looking model, but I don't want to save any of her photosets: I want a model to be attractive, or seductive, or somebody I can fantasize about fucking. But the photosets of Chloe are not appealing. I'd rather look at photos of the meat hanging in a butcher's shop, which, while not sexual, can be interesting because I know the meat can be transformed into a delicious meal. Looking at Chloe's photos, I get turned off by her skin tones, by how un-attractive she appears.
And that's for the good looking models, who are in the minority of models.
The majority of the site models are plain to unattractive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The network gives you access to about 20 different porn sites. The most famous site is JamesDeen.com, because he's made a name for himself as a porn star. There's some controvery about James Deen: he's been accused of abuse by some of his sex partners. Deen claims he's innocent and can't understand why women would complain about his rough treatment of them during sex. He's just a simple, innocent guy who enjoys slapping women, spitting on them, twisting their arms to make them moan, and showing sluts that he's the master who controls these cunts with his powerful cock. And he smiles a lot, which shows he's just a good old boy from Pasadena, California.
The network features rough sex. A lot of anal sex. The models are usually called sluts, and treated as pieces of meat. Women are to be used and abused, because men are dominant creatures.
The models are sluts: So you get lots of tattoos and implants.
Even the cute models come across as trailer trash whores.
I enjoy softcore and hardcore. But this network doesn't appeal to me. Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, two competing sites, are much more interesting and enjoyable. For one thing, Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film features more attractive models. Some of the sex scenes at Rocco and Devils Film can be intriguing. And hot.
Whereas the full porn network scenes focus on rough sex, anal sex, treating the women like pieces of meat.
There is a channel called "Sex Games". It appears to be an adult animation channel, where you can play with cartoon figures and fap (masturbate).
Edit: My mistake. The "Sex Games" link, although placed at the top of the page as a normal channel, is actually a separate site, and not part of the Full Porn Network.
The reason I'm leaving it in this review is the "Sex Games" site appears to be very impressive.
A lot of thought and skilled technical knowledge went into making the site.
Joining that site is free.
I recommend checking it out.
Although free porn sites are not reviewed at the PU site, the free site seems intriguing.
dirtyfapgame.com is the sex game site I have mentioned.
I wish there were more hours in a day, because the questions they ask of your thoughts and desires, and the quality of the cartoon images, is just amazing at dirtyfapgame. I haven't joined the site yet, but I hope to join soon.
Getting back to Full Porn Network:
This is personal taste, but the vibe of the network does not appeal to me:
I want young girls who look attractive, and seem to enjoy sex.
The theme of the network is rough sex, anal sex, treating girls and women as sluts who should be abused, because men are dominant creatures, and girls are happiest when you spit on them, force them into painful and uncomfortable positions, slap them around, all in the nature of treating women as they secretly desire.
So if you fantasize about rough sex, anal sex, then the network might be appealing.
Especially if you can get a holiday special for around $60 for the first year.
Otherwise, the PU discounts are OK, but way too high for my budget. |
|
01-25-21 06:43am
Replies (2)
|
Review
85
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership.
-Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option.
-Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download.
-There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small.
-Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site. |
| Cons: |
-As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache.
-The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date.
-The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive.
-The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are plenty of lesbian sites online.
I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good.
You have some very attractive young models.
You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types.
They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much.
Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie.
Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn. |
|
09-08-21 08:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
86
|
Girls Next Door Abused
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Content is exclusive.
-The site (and network) is laid out to make navigation simple. You can easily find the video content of the site
-No site timeout that I can find. You can leave the site inactive for hours, and will still be logged in. Perfect for guys who forget what they are logged into (Joke. PU members are self-aware, and watch their porn closely.)
-In the last year, they added secure login to the site/network. In the last month, they made the member pages secure (https).
-The videos were shot in the US, so the models speak English. Which helps to show how these macho studs enjoy humiliating these girls. |
| Cons: |
-Do not join the site through the site itself. You will be paying a high price.
$29.95/month, or $50 for 3 months.
Join through the 18Videoz site, where the fee is $60/year. Or $15/month.
The 18Videoz membership includes The Girls Next Door Abused site, plus access to 17 more sites.
-The main con is this is an archive site. The site stopped updating in 2012 or earlier.
A PU member in 2008 reported that the site had stopped updating, but was changing the content posting dates to give the impression that content was newly added.
-Ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They need to do an update of the public page advertising the site.
The photos/thumbnails are washed out images, with poor colors, images that are not clear and crisp.
The public page is the first thing a person sees when looking at the site.
They need to sell the site, not show an old tired page that has been out of date for many years. |
| Bottom Line: |
Because this is an archive site, with old content, the videos and screenshots are low quality. The photography is poor, the lighting is poor, the colors are poor, the sets are cheap, the definition is low compared to what most porn sites offer.
The only value this site offers is a reminder of the early days of porn. And what producers could get away with.
The site theme is treating girls like trash: get your rocks off with these girls, lie to them, humiliate them, and show them what a macho stud you are before pushing them out the door.
Site contents: 48 videos.
Runtime is 20 to 33 minutes.
There is a montage of screenshots for each video, but no way to view the individual screenshots online, or to download the screenshot set. The hot link for online viewing of the screenshots has disappeared, and the hot link for downloading a zip file for the screenshots has disappeared. And tech support pays no attention to such minor defects.
I'm giving the site a score of 65. Most of the archive sites in this network stopped updating 5 or more years ago, and the quality of the videos is poor: low definition, cheap sets, poor lighting, low technical production values, etc. There are some sites in the network that are still updating, and the videos at those sites are much higher quality. Also, there are a number of cute models at these other sites.
This is a personal opinion, but I don't enjoy watching videos of macho studs fucking young girls and then humiliating them for being stupid enough to have sex with them. It doesn't make me feel smarter or more macho. |
|
08-09-21 08:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Girls Only Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Note: I said I was a member of the site for over 1 year. That's because I was a member of Nubile Films for over one year, which is the main site of what I will call the Nubile Films network. The Girls Only Porn site is a recent bonus to the Nubile Films site.
Or you could say, technically, I've only been a member of Girls Only Porn for a few months.
PROS(START OF):
-Girls Only Porn is the newest addition to the Nubile Films network. Nubile Films used to be a standalone site, with no extra sites. But recently they've been adding new sites to the membership. Hot Crazy Mess and The Sitcom Show were the first two sites added. But recently they added Girls Only Porn site.
-Username is your email address.
-Can choose your own password.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Can join with credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit.
-They are having a special of $84/year recently. I have no idea how long that special discount will last. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Girls Only Porn is a good addition to the Nubile Films network. It's quality lesbian porn. The Nubile Films site is also a quality porn site, with excellent, quality porn that is crystal clear video, excellent technical features, streaming and downloading in 270p through 4K,
-Each video has a photoset.
-Photosets average around 38 photos per set. The photos are screen caps, but excellent quality, you can't tell the difference between these screencaps and real photos.
-The photoset downloads in a zip file that is only one definition: 3840x2160px.
The photoset downloads with the name of the scene, but you need to add the model names, date posted, site.
-Number of videos at site = 368.
The site videos go back to August 2012. So the site has been around a long time. But it's only recently that it was added as a bonus site to the Nubile Films site. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
As a large lesbian site addition to Nubile Films, it's fine choice.
The first posted videos, from August 2012, go from 270p through 1080p.
The site started posting 4K videos in Oct 2020, so the 4K videos are a recent addition, and in the minority.
But 1080p is more than good enough for most PU members, I believe. Especially since the site started off offering the 1080p definition way back in 2012.
One of the strengths of the Girls Only Porn site is the level of attractiveness of the models: these girls are attractive to gorgeous:
A quote from Rabbits Reviews on the Nubile Films site: "If you love beautiful all-natural teens, this collection of outstanding porn scenes will be like a wet dream come true."
That quote applies equally to the Girls Only Porn site.
CONS(START OF):
-I believe the cons are minor.
I really like the site. I prefer b-g action, but for a lesbian site, this is excellent.
The videos are clear and crisp.
They update with 1, 2 or 3 new videos per month. The update rate could be improved, made more standardized.
But the models are cute to gorgeous.
And the navigation is so easy, it's like a dream compared to the Adult Time network, which is a jumbled mess.
BOTTOM LINE
The main attraction is the access to Nubile Films, but the Girls Only Porn is a fine addition. There are two other bonus sites you get access to: Hot Crazy Mess and That Sitcom Show.
That Sitcom Show is an archive site, last update was 2019-09-20.
The site videos are parodies of TV shows.
They are supposed to be funny, but I found the videos boring.
The other bonus site is Hot Crazy Mess.
That is also an archive site, with the last posted video on 2020-01-03.
The models at Hot Crazy Mess are mainly cute to very attractive.
And the videos are fine: It's a shame they stopped updating this site, because the site was much better than That Sitcom Show videos.
Giving the Girls Only Porn a score of 90.
Because the models are attractive young teens.
Because the videos are crystal clear (all videos go up to 1080p, the last few months the videos go up to 4K).
Easy navigation.
Very good options for streaming and downloading.
And because you get access to Nubile Films, which is an excellent porn site with outstanding models and professionally shot videos. |
|
02-01-21 04:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Girls Under Arrest is a series or channel on the Adult Time network. Membership in the Girls Under Arrest channel gives you access to the rest of the Adult Time network, and vice versa.
-PU has a discounted price for the first month of of $14.05, recurring at $29.95/month.
-Porn sites are constantly looking for a new idea to make thier content seem fresh and appealing.
This site features young girls who have problems with the law.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that captures the action. There is a zip file for the photoset, and also for the video.
-The channel has all the features of the Adult Time network:
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can stream or download the videos in multiple definitions: from 160p through 1080p.
-Video runtime is from 28 to 44 minutes.
-Videos have a matching photoset that is zipped. Around 35 photos per photoset. |
| Cons: |
-The major con is this is a small site: only 11 videos.
-The site is an archive site. Started 2018-08, last update 2019-04.
-The videos are shot POV style. Which allows for dark scenes, poor lighting, shifty camera angles, poor focus on the models because the models are moving and the camera-operator has to jiggle the cameria to follow the action.
-The photosets have a zip file, but only one definition for the zip file.
-Photosets download with a default generic numbered file name, that should be renamed if you want to know who the models are, what the scene represents.
-But the truth is, these photosets are not worth keeping. Although the video definitions range from 160p through 1080, the value of the videos is poor. Unless you enjoy watching cops abusing young girls into blowjobs and harsh fucking, in dimly lighted videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
I respect the law, and know that law enforcement officers are among the finest, bravest citizens in our great country.
I can re-count some instances of where my family inter-acted with the law and was able to see how wonderful police officers can be.
I live in a condo association. Sometimes the US mailmen make a mistake and delive a piece of mail to wrong mail box.
I brought a piece of mail to my neighbor, and told him it was his mail, delivered to my mail box.
This was a strong, good-looking cop.
He kept his right hand in his pocket the entire time I spoke with him, instead of shaking hands with me. Did he have a small gun in his pocket, in case I was a criminal?
Better safe than sorry.
I'm an older man, now in my 70s, in poor health, so I don't think I'm much of a threat.
But the cop kept his hand in his right pocket the entire time I was at his door.
Also, he asked me where I got his mail.
Implying that maybe I stole it, which would be a federal crime.
My explanation that the mail delivery people sometimes put mail into the wrong box didn't seem to impress him.
And he was right to be suspicous. I could have jimmied his mail box and stolen the letter. Even though I didn't open it, I could have been using the letter as a trick to become friendly with him, as the beginning of a scam.
Cops are taught to be suspicous of people. My action of bringing him a piece of his mail could have been a setup for some crime.
Did he thank me for giving him the mail envelope?
No.
He took it, and shut the door.
No thank you.
Another time, I saw the inside light on his truck parked on his driveway was on, and the truck was empty.
I knocked on his door, told him the inside light on his truck was on.
He went out and turned off the light.
No thank you.
No sense of appreciation.
I guess I was lucky he didn't arrest me for coming onto his property.
Maybe he could have shot me, as a dangerous suspect, if he was having a bad day or wanted to blow off steam.
A different time I was walking for exercise in my neighborhood.
Two cops stopped me, asked what I was doing.
I told them I was walking for exercise. I'm almost 70 at the time, not a big or threatening guy.
They asked me if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no.
Then they asked me if I was off of probation. I said no.
They asked me what my job was, I said I was retired. They asked what my job was before I retired. I gave them my wallet, to show that I lived one street over from the current location. That might have been a mistake, because I didn't ask before I reached for the wallet in my back pocket. They could have shot me for reaching for a weapon.
The asked me a few more questions, and let me go.
This was around 2:30 PM, broad daylight. There was no curfew or law against walking on public sidewalks.
You read in the paper where cops shoot unarmed people, sometimes killing them, because the suspect seems dangerous and the cops need to protect themselves.
This happens a lot, because in United States, cops are rarely punished for killing an unarmed suspect. What is a suspect? A suspect is anyone a cop encounters who is not a cop wearing a cop uniform with a badge and gun.
The motto of the police where I live is "To protect and to serve". But I've never felt served or protected when I meet a cop. A cop is an authority figure, with a gun, and if you don't do exactly what he says, you need to have a lawyer with you, or the cop's right are more powerful than your rights. That's on a practical basis.
Many years ago, back in the 1970s, I was walking down a public street, on my way to a black college library.
A cop pulled his car in front of me, I stopped walking, the cop got out of the car, asked me where I was going, I told him I was going to the library. He told me to lean my hands on the car, and ran his hands over my body. Then he said he hadn't searched me. I didn't say anything. He told me to get into the car, I did, and he drove me to the library. It was a black community college library. I'm white. He talked to someone, and told me I could never go back to the library again.
The public library was a few miles away. The black college library was within a few blocks from where I lived. But I never went back to the black college library.
What could I do? Hire a lawyer, which costs money, so I can go the library that is closest to me?
I had very little money. A cop tells you something, you do it.
It's not worth being arrested for going to a black college library.
I have no criminal record. Except for some traffic tickets. But if a cop tells you to do something, the smart thing to do is to say "Yes, sir" and do it. Anything else can you can get into trouble.
Anyway, this site doesn't get into the real nitty gritty of dealing with cops.
This site features actors playing good ol' boy cops who are looking for kicks and maybe a little sex on the side.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY: |
|
04-18-20 10:04am
Replies (8)
|
Review
89
|
Girlsway
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Girlsway is part of the Adult Time network. So you get a massive amount of porn of many niches with a sub to Girlsway.
-The level of attractiveness of the models at Girlsway is excellent.
-With a yearly sub, you basically get unlimited downloading privileges. Yes, there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads, but unless you're downloading 4K videos, I doubt that would bother you.
The yearly sub costs $89 with a PU discount (if you join through Adult Time directly, using the PU link), but there are holiday specials where the price is even lower. For the amount of porn you can access at the network, that is bargain.
-You can stream videos online in your choice of definition from 288p through 4K. There is no streaming limit that I am aware of.
-The download options (if included in your sub) are 160p through 4K.
-The videos are professionally shot, so you get excellent quality lighting, colors, sound control, clarity, focus. |
| Cons: |
-Monthly subs don't usually include download privileges. A yearly sub is I what I would recommend.
-Navigation can be tricky. You have so much content stuffed into the Girlsway channel, and the network, that it can be hard to find the content that appeals to you.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They tweak the network to make it better, but some of the tweaks make the network harder to use. For example, they now require passwords to be 8 characters or more, must contain 1 digit, 1 uppercase, 1 lowercase and 1 special character. I had the same working password for over 4 years, until I was blocked from the network and had to choose a new password that met the new specs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway is an excellent lesbian site.
The models are uniformly attractive. The plots are simple where the characters experience simple relationship problems and find happiness with either a new partner or a current partner. This is basically soft lesbian love (very little force, no harsh sex, no cruelty or over-the-top sexual athletics. Instead, you get soft words, touches, caresses, lots of kisses. So the genre would be softcore romantic porn, if there is such a genre.
I'm a sucker for attractive models. So I enjoy watching Hazel Moore and Kenna James and other young women find some relief and happiness from the world's problems. Especially Kenna James, who has some daddy issues, and wants to get pregnant by her stepfather in another Adult Time channel, yet is able to find love and happiness with attractive women in the Girlsway channel. Being a porn model means you have to be able to switch sides as your needs arise.
If you're a romantic and enjoy watching attractive women having sex with each other, I think Girlsway is an excellent channel in the Adult Time network.
And you have access to a multitude of other niches in the Adult Time network, with over 60,000 hardcore videos and hundreds of different channels available. |
|
02-07-23 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Girlsway
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Girls Way is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it exists as a separate network by itself any more. Therefore, you get access to the entire Adult Time network.
-Customer service is 24/7. Telephone, email, live chat. I recommend live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response. Live chat answers within a few minutes.
-The main reason to join Girls Way is because of how attractive many of the models are.
Some of the featured models include Dillion Harper, Karlee Grey, August Ames, Eliza Ibarra, Kenzie Reeves, Gianna Dior, Carter Cruise.
-There is a fine model listing which has small thumbnails of the models. The thumbnails are clear, but I wish they were larger, because a lot of the girls are really cute.
-The model page for each individual model has links to her content at the channel and network. Clicking on the hot link brings up the video you selected. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a text description for each individual video. The video tags can be sparse, but the text description gives you a great idea of the plot of the video.
-Photo set for each video. Zip file for the photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is a great channel in the Adult Time network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-There are supposed to be trailers for each video. I can't play any of the trailers. Don't know if this is due to my PC, or the network server. However, there is a fine text description of each video, that tells you what the action is. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Girls Way is a lesbian site. Most of the models are teens or early twenties, but you do get some older women as well, playing the "Mommy" role or the "older woman" role.
The site/channel features story-driven lesbian porn. Tribbing, pussy licking, squirting, toys, there's a mix of lesbian action. I enjoy the innocent teens seduced by other teens and older women, especially when the innocent teen puts on a good show.
Many of the teen girls are fucking cute. I know they're supposed to be lesbians, but watching these girls in action, playing tender young things, I want to throw them on the floor and fuck their brains out. Gabbie Carter, large juicy breasts, firm ass, yes, she's a porn star, but she seems like a sweet young thing you could take home to your parents (parents who don't watch porn, obviously).
One of the benefits of the Adult Time network is it has over 200 channels. Many of the channels are a sampling of other fine porn sites: Sexart, Femjoy, Joymii, Club Sweethearts, Viv Thomas, Bare Maidens, etc. Look through the sample channel to see if the content is to your taste, and if the original site is worth a join.
Adult Time updates multiple times each day. Girls Way updates about 11 or 12 times per month, which is fast, considering that you have over 200 different channels in the Adult Time network.
I'm giving Girls Way a score of 93. Mostly because you have access to Adult Time, one of the finest bargains in porn today. But Girls Way is one of the better channels in the Adult Time network, with a large amount of really attractive models that are worth watching in action. |
|
11-28-21 05:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
Girlsway
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-This review is based on the Adult Time channel of Girlsway.
In this review, if I write "Girlsway", I am referring to the Adult Time channel of Girlsway.
There is also a separate Girlsway site.
The thebestporn review of the Girlsway site, Facts Updated: 09-05-19, states that the Girlsway site has 1,684+ Scenes.
The Adult Girlsway channel, on 10-19-19, shows videos: 1,711.
So I would assume that the Girlsway channel is a fair sample of the Girlsway site videos.
There is a zip file for the photo set, based on each video. The number of photos per set averages around 71.
The thebestporn review of the Girlsway site, facts updated: 09-05-19, states that the Girlsway site photosets average 120 pics.
Therefore, for any purists, who want to only read a review based on the original/current Girlsway site, you can stop reading this review now.
If you haven't already stopped reading the review. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-The customer support service with FameSupport is excellent. One of the best customer support teams I've ever used. Not only are they 24/7, but there is a live chat that is 24/7, and the support member answers your chat within a few minutes. I used to think the MetArt support was one of the finest support teams, because they usually answered emails within a few hours. But with online chat, the FameSupport is even faster. And the FameSupport team has answered my questions with courtesy, honesty, and intelligence.
-Your choice of download definition: 160 - 2160p. 2160p is also called 4K, or UHD.
-Your choice of streaming definition: 288 - 2160p.
-You can stream/download the full video or a trailer for the video.
-There is a text description that does an excellent job summarizing the plot/action.
See the first reply to this review to see a sample text description of a video from the Girlsway channel. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
The description is almost like a very brief porn story.
Actually, if you have a monitor that is capable of split screen, you can read the text description while playing a slide show of the photo set. Or, even better, use two monitors, one for the photo set, one for the text description. It would be a home-version of a porn play.
-There is an active member comment section, that gives opinions about the videos. Sometimes the Girlsway staff will chime in with information and personal viewpoints about a video or the comments on the video. The staff comments indicate the Girlsway staff are interested in producing a quality product, and are keeping a watchful eye on the site and on members' opinions.
-They tag (categorize) their videos with the basic elements of the video:
A sample from a video shows:
Categories
Big Tits Member Fantasy Threesome Natural Tits Fingering Teen MILF & Mature Pussy Licking Hairy Facesitting Step Mom Family Roleplay Tribbing Lesbian Step Daughter
-Content is exclusive (but a purist could argue that since this is an Adult Time Girlsway channel, and there is a separate Girlsway site, the content is not exclusive.)
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The biller is FameAid, a proprietary biller. Normally I prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've had several memberships using FameAid, and never had a problem.
-The site indicates there are 35 pictures in each photo set, but when you download the zip file, you will normally find 71 pictures in each photo set.
-There is only one zip file definition, instead of multiple definitions for a photo set.
-I suspect the photo sets are actually made from the video using a computer program. So they would normally be considered screen shots. Except that the photos are of excellent quality, with good focus and composition, so it's a high-grade program that is used to make the photo sets, and far beyond the quality of screen shots from years ago, which were obviously screen shots. Looking at the individual photos, I would not think they were screen shots, but real photos. (Or, maybe I don't know the technology to describe what the photos are: they are good-looking photographs, and not cheap screen shots.)
-Because Adult Time is such a massive collection of channels and videos, it's sometimes hard to figure out whether a particular lesbian video is part of the Girlsway channel, or some other channel.
That would be a navigation problem.
And a mindset problem.
If I see a thumbnail of two cute girls getting it on, do I care if it's part of the Girlsway channel, or not? I tend to switch to the video, and watch it, instead of trying to stay 100% inside of the Girlsway channel.
For example, "Teen Lez Coeds", with Anie Darling and Lady Bug, is part of the Girls Who Fuck Girls, and I don't know if Girls Who Fuck Girls is part of Girlsway or a completely separate channel.
Having said that, Girls Who Fuck Girls has a lot of pretty teens in some hot lesbian videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Girlsway is a lesbian channel. That means girls (and women) making love to one another.
The channel is a premium channel: by which, I mean, it offers high quality videos. The videos are high quality in production values (good focus, good sound control, good lighting, nice sets, etc.).
The models range from average to attractive.
The Girlsway is a lesbian channel that includes several sub-channels, such as Web Young, Little Red, Maid for Each Other.
Girls Who Fuck Girls is an Adult Time channel featuring lesbian teens.
I don't know if it's part of the Girlsway channel or not.
But if you are into lesbian girls, it's worth checking out.
There are many different ways to get the Girlsway channel of Adult Time.
You can subscribe directly to the Adult Time network.
You can subscribe to one of the sites that includes Adult Time as a free extra.
The Girlsway site itself includes free access to the Adult Time network.
I recommend waiting for a holiday, where a special discount is often offered on sites that include Adult Time access, or a special discount to the Adult Time network itself.
I believe, as I've written in various prior reviews on porn sites, that Adult Time is one of the best bargain in porn today.
For a low price, even lower with a discounted holiday price, you get access to over 60,000 scenes from the top names and studios, updated multiple times a day.
You get a broad range of porn sites.
Many of the models are attractive to incredibly attractive.
Most of the videos are high quality: some of them are like theatrical movies. I especially enjoy some of the Pure Taboo videos.
Do I recommend Girlsway? Yes, because it's part of the Adult Time network.
If you are into lesbian sex, this channel gives you a massive amount of high-quality content.
And there is plenty of other lesbian content throughout the Adult Time network.
So you get high-quality content, for a very low price.
I'm giving the channel a score of 95, as part of Adult Time network. |
|
10-21-19 08:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
92
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Give Me Teens is a channel in the Adult Time network.
Years ago it used to be part of the Devils Film/Fame Digital network.
My best guess is that it still is part of Devils Film; if you go to the site: givemeteens.com,
the page shows "Devil's Film presents Give Me Teens".
Joining Give Me Teens, or Devils Film, gives you access to Adult Time network.
And vice versa: joining Adult Time gives you access to Devils Film and Give Me Teens.
And in the Adult Time website, Give Me Teens has the text "Part of devilsfilm".
-The channel has videos dating back to 2006, so you can find porn stars when they were first starting out.
-The site is a smorgasbord of teen, boy/girl, 3-somes, lesbian, cocksucking, vaginal and anal sex, with plenty of young/old sex as well. |
| Cons: |
-The earliest videos were low-rent videos filmed in 240p and 480p definition.
-Cheap sets, mainly unattractive models, stupid or unimaginative dialog, poor acting, makes watching most of these videos a waste of time.
I would far rather watch well-produced videos with attractive models. Why waste time on crap?
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
Give Me Teens stats:
Videos: 1412
Video runtime: averages around 35 minutes.
Normally, I give any chanel in the Adult Time network a score in the 90s, because of the vast amount of hardcore content covering a wide variety of niches, and because most of the content is good to very good.
However, the models at Give Me Teens are not very attractive.
The models at the Wow/Diesel sites are far superior in looks. The models at many teen sites are far more attractive.
The plots are stupid, the dialog is stupid, the acting is poor.
In my opinion, the Adult Time network would be improved if they deleted the Give Me Teens channel.
Why keep low quality crap like the Give Me Teens channel?
Adult Time has thousands of teen-oriented videos apart from the Give Me Teens channel, so there's no need for over 1,000 videos featuring almost entirely unattractive teens with stupid plots, stupid dialog, poor acting.
I do admit there are a few attractive teens at the channel.
But slogging through the junk to find the attractive teens is not worth the effort.
When the site first started out, and for a few years afterwards, they did put effort into using attractive teens. But those early videos are only available in 240p and 480p definition, and most PU members wouldn't watch such low-definition videos. They would require 1080p or higher.
Edit: I'm being hard on this site. If you enjoy watching porn that reminds you of your first experience with porn videos, this site might give you some nostalgia value: the sets seem cheap, the acting is atrocious, the models look like porn stars (not a compliment). But I remember watching Emmanuelle, the French softcore porn movie around 1974, and Story of O around 1975. The images for those movies were clear and crisp, the colors vivid, and they were shown in regular movie theaters, not porno movie theaters. Porn was suddenly gaining acceptance, beyond the low-grade shit shown in home movies.
The internet gives you access to quality porn, with high production values, and attractive to beautiful models.
The Give Me Teens site is low quality porn. |
|
12-21-21 11:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
93
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive. |
| Cons: |
-No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
Goddess Nudes was started in 2010 by Eolake Stobblehouse, the same man who started and ran Domai for many years.
Goddess Nudes was supposed to be a slightly sexier version of Domai.
Where the girls show a bit more.
I guess I'm blasé, because I can't really tell the difference between Domai and Goddess Nudes.
Both sites seem, to me at least, to feature softcore nudity.
Both sites mainly feature solo female models, who either disrobe for the camera, or start off nude.
There are no men in the photos.
The philosophy behind both sites was the innocent enjoyment of nude women. Sharing their beauty. Their joy of living.
I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.
In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.
The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned.
Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.
Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.
I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.
Going back to Goddess Nudes.
Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.
Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.
The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.
The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.
From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.
The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION: |
|
05-02-21 02:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
94
|
Heavy Handfuls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Note: if you join Heavy Handfuls directly, you pay a high price.
$119.95/year, or $29.95/month.
Joining NewSensations.com directly, you pay $95/year, or $29.95/month.
I'd wait for a holiday special, when prices often drop to $60/year, or a lower monthly fee if you don't want to join for a long term membership. That is for joining through New Sensations, which has a cheaper price than joining Heavy Handfuls, even though both memberships give you access to the same sites and same network.
-Part of the New Sensations network, with over 7,500 videos of good quality.
-Site features women with large breasts. Some of the breasts seem natural, others are obvious boob jobs.
-The sex videos at Heavy Handfuls give you slightly more plot than the average video at New Sensations, but that's not saying much. For example, a guy just broke up with his girlfriend, the stepmother offers sympathy, and then she's jumping on top of him on the couch, within the first three minutes of the video. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
So one minute of sympathy, one minute of walking him to the couch, then, BAM!, she shoving her tongue down his mouth and pulling back to push her dress down to bare her huge breasts, while the guy is still gulping for air. But then he starts sucking her breasts, those huge, massive titties, and it's off to the races.
Who needs plot when the porn world gives you these true-to-life scripts?
If you're a breast fan, this site is for you.
-I don't think the New Sensations network, or this site, gives you a lot of bells and whistles in the technical department. But New Sensations gives the same layout to all the sites I've seen so far.
-You get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading.
-You get quality videos: mainly A-list models, attractive to very attractive, good colors and good lighting, nice sets, |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
a lot of sex. They try to vary the minimal plots, settings, models, costumes, for variety.
CONS(START OF):
-I don't think there are any serious cons.
-If you can get a cheap price for the network, I think you get your money's worth.
But join during a holiday special for $60/year. And join through the New Sensations network.
If you join through one of the included sites, your membership does not give you anything more than a regular New Sensations membership, but you might be charged a higher price.
-You get at least one pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, you might find a second pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. I uncheck them, for different reasons:
Most of the pre-checked cross-sales are for sites I don't need a trial member to.
All these short-term trial memberships, after 2 or 3 days, turn into an expensive monthly membership that is far higher than you would pay normally.
-There are ads for competing sites on every member page. Some of the ads are for low prices, that might be worth joining. I've seen ads for $5 for the first month of Metart, which is the lowest price I've ever seen for Metart, a fine softcore glamour site. But I already have a lifetime membership to Metart.
-Boredom from watching too much porn that you don't enjoy. Finding enough porn that you really enjoy can be a problem. Much of the porn at this site, and the network, can seem plain-vanilla, after you watch too much. But that's true at most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you wait for a holiday special, when you can join for $60/yearly, or for a low monthly price through New Sensations, is a worthwhile join. I think you get more than your money's worth with some enjoyable porn.
For some reason, if you join through one of the satellite sites (a site that is part of New Sensations, and gives you the same access to the same sites), you might pay a higher price.
That's just the way some networks work. I'd hate to pay $120 for a year's membership, and then find that I could have had it for $60 during a holiday special if I got the same access through a different portal.
Let me re-phrase that: you can pay $120 to access a network. Or you can pay $60 for the same access. It can depend on when you purchase the membership. And through which portal.
Technically, a membership in Heavy Handfuls is not the same as a membership in New Sensations.
But both memberships give you the same privileges: access to the same sites.
I've had this difference pointed out to me with a membership in a Wow network site and also a membership to 21 Sextury (part of the Adult Time network). It's a technical or legal difference, that on a practical level, doesn't seem to matter, as far as I can tell. Except that it probably does matter, in certain circumstances, or they wouldn't make such a big deal about it.
Bottom line: access to Heavey Handfuls is a great thing is you're a fan of big-breasts.
And even if you don't think big breasts are the greatest, it's still worth glancing through the videos to find what you can enjoy.
Some of the plots (even though they are mainly minimal) can be interesting: you wonder how much better the video would be if they put more thought into the writing and acting.
But these are basically good quality videos: the videos are professionally shot, good sets, good camera-work, mainly attractive models, good lighting and sound control.
And you get access to over 7500 videos, with your network membership.
So I think it's worth more than $60/year.
Note: Maybe I'm paying too much attention to price. But the link to Heavy Handfuls from PU (and TBP) leads to a join page at Heavy Handfuls that currently shows:
$119.95/year
$29.95/month
PU (and TBP) shows
$119.95/year
$14.95/month
Maybe Heavy Handfuls changes their prices once in a while.
But check to see what price you're paying.
It pays to check. |
|
03-06-22 09:55pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
95
|
Hegre
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $75/year. Or $400 for a lifetime membership. But I've read one PU member complaining he paid for a lifetime membership to Hegre, then it somehow got cancelled. I've read other people saying their lifetime memberships to other sites have been cancelled (to Playboy+, for example.) It even happened to me, at Glam Deluxe, while it was still alive.
-Some of the most gorgeous women in the world have appeared nude at Hegre. Except the same can be said for many of the best softcore sites on the internet: Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc. etc.
-The quality of the photographs is first-rate.
-The technical features for viewing the photographs is outstanding. One of the best sites for viewing photo sets online I've ever seen. Can flick through the photos, or examine them in detail.
-Photo sets are available in original, large size, medium size, and small size definition. |
| Cons: |
-The photos are basically boring and sterile for me. Yes, there are lots of beautiful models, but there is a lack of eroticism to the photos. For one thing, the photographer seems to have created his photo sets by setting the camera to automatic, and it goes click-click-click-click while the model barely moves or changes her position. For another, he often cuts off part of the model's face.
I think the photographer is treating the model as a statue or a piece of meat, not as a real human person you want to relate to.
-Years ago, Hegre was softcore photosets. But for many years now, the site has featured mid-core and hard photos and videos.
-Maybe it's just me, but the Hegre hardcore photos and videos are just not arousing or exciting. The site seems sterile to me, in spite of the gorgeous models. If you have the same model at Hegre and at Metart or MPL studios or Femjoy (which are basically softcore), I much prefer the Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy photo sets, because the model seems |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS (CONTINUED):
much more human.
Note: I'm now into my 70s, so I'm not as sensitive to nudity or semi-nudity as I was when I was younger. But I fail to appreciate most of the content at Hegre, while I can still find images from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy that are enjoyable or arousing.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The photo sets are technically first-rate photography, but in spite of the lovely models, I find the photos sterile.
I appreciate the technical features of the Hegre site: how easy it is to flick through a photo set, to enlarge any photo to examine it, the quality of the photos. Except the photos are sterile and boring. Boring because the images are a montage of a camera set to automatically capture a composite of the model who is barely moving, so each photo is almost an exact duplicate of the photo before it. Seems like a quick way to create a boring photo set, to me. With no thought to make it meaningful.
Then why am I a member for over a year?
Because I originally signed up for a year's membership, and then forgot to cancel.
Hegre has some truly lovely models. But I just can't appreciate the photography. Or the videos, which are now hardcore. I have nothing against hardcore, but I don't enjoy the hardcore at Hegre.
What I've written is my own personal opinion.
Most other PU member reviews that I've seen have rated Hegre in the 90s, and think it's one of the better high quality sites on the internet.
So, I suggest joining the site for a month, to see what the site has to offer, if it appeals to your tastes.
You might find it is a quality site that is definitely worth joining for a year or more. |
|
03-11-24 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Hegre
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Download managers are allowed, but please configure them to open one stream only to the server at the same time or your account will be blocked automatically. I rarely use a download manager, so this isn't a problem.
-Username and password are case sensitive. I copy and paste username and password, so no problem.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Very unusual for a porn site.
-CCBill was the default biller. An excellent biller. Never had a problem with them. Cancelling my membership should be easy.
-Access to the site is automatic, with no login needed, if you have cookies enabled.
-The technical features for viewing a photo or a photoset online are amazing: you can easily enlarge the photo by small percentages, and view portions of a single photo in detail. The best site for viewing photosets online I've seen so far. With amazingly beautiful models. The problem is that the photos seem so sterile. These are softcore glamcore photosets, but to me, they are non-erotic. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Movies have a trailer, if you want a preview of the video.
-Photographs are clear, crisp images, excellent colors and lighting, but surprisingly sterile, non-erotic, even though the images are of very lovely nude women. I don't know why the site is so unappealing for me. The models are uniformly gorgeous.
CONS(START OF):
-Comments (on photosets and videos) are allowed, but they are moderated. Unconstructive remarks or insulting/derogatory language or html links will be deleted. Many of the comments I've seen so far are not worth reading.
-In spite of the lovely models, a defect of the site is the over-use of the main photographer, Petter Hegre. He can lack imagination in his photos. Metart and many other glamour sites use a combination of contributing photographers, so you get different styles and ideas. Whereas at Hegre, the photosets can start to seem repetitious, in spite of the physical beauty of the models. |
| Bottom Line: |
-It's been many years since I was a member of Hegre. The site has many of the most beautiful models in the world. What is different from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy or other fine glamour photo sites? Nothing much, as far as I can tell. All these sites (and others) feature gorgeous women stunningly photographed. I'm not a connoisseur: I just enjoy looking at fine-looking women.
-The main value of any glamour porn site is the model listing: how attractive are the models?
The models at Hegre are among the most attractive women on the planet. If you're into fine looking women ages 18 to early 30s, this site has plenty of models that are worth viewing.
I'm looking at hannah, a white, slender model born April 1999, which would make her 22 years old. She is fucking gorgeous. She has 6 galleries and 2 movies at Hegre.
The photosets can be repetitious.
Hannah has 6 photosets.
In 5 of them she is completely nude, from start to finish.
In one set she starts off wearing a black top, black pants, black shoes and black socks.
The main difference of the 5 completely nude sets is:
1 set has a floor and a wall, and is empty of anything except the naked model.
A second set with a floor and wall, empty of anything except the naked model.
A third set with a floor and a wall(the wall is different in this set, a brick facade), and the floor is different (a wood floor), but the set is empty of anything except the naked model.
1 set has a rectangular pad, that the model can sit on, stand on, lean on.
1 set has a chair, that she can sit on or lean on or ignore the chair.
The 5 sets seem to have been shot in a hurry, with the model told to assume different poses in a minimal setting, with little or no thought to artistic expression or showmanship or anything: just minimal photos of a lovely young girl, but interest fades slowly or quickly, when you realize that's all there is. Which is a wasted opportunity of this model. She deserves better.
Looking at the photosets at Hegre, I realize, anew, that I appreciate my Metart photosets so much better. Metart presents lovely women in a variety of interesting, softcore poses. I can spend hours looking at some Metart sets, while I quickly get bored looking at a Hegre photoset (even if the Hegre model is just as lovely as the Metart model). There's more variety in the Metart photos compared to the Hegre photos.
And I begin to realize why it's been years since I re-joined the Hegre site:
Out of four leading softcore glamour sites (Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, Hegre), I rank Hegre at the bottom. All 4 sites have a collection of lovely young models. But the Hegre photosets are the least interesting of the 4 sites. That's my personal opinion, of course. But I've been a member of all 4 sites many times, and I've seen most of their photosets, and the only site I've joined with a lifetime membership is Metart, of those 4 sites (I have a lifetime membership to Sexart and The Life Erotic, part of the Metart network, but Metart is the only one of those 3 sites that I visit regularly.)
-Download options for a photoset at Hegre are:
(sample size for a photoset of 56 photos):
Mega Size Edition | 14000px, 182 MB
Super Size Edition | 10000px, 155 MB
Large Size Edition | 6000px, 39 MB
Collectors Edition | 3000px, 12 MB
Quick View Edition | 1200px, 2.8 MB
-Download options for a movie are:
Downloads
4K Ultra HD 2160p video | 3840x2160, 1.9 GB
Full HD 1080p video | 1920x1080, 969 MB
HD 720p video | 1280x720, 395 MB
SD 480p video | 848x480, 256 MB
SD 360p video | 640x360, 144 MB
SD 240p video | 416x240, 93 MB
The photography at Hegre is wonderfully crisp and clear, and the site has the best software for examining the photos in detail or in a slideshow.
Most photosets feature a model who is completely nude from start to finish.
And the set for the model is on is minimal: you have a model, and an empty room.
Or maybe there is a chair in the room.
Or maybe there is a mattress in the room.
That's it.
Is it lack of imagination, or striving for minimalism?
I imagine a photoshoot can be done quickly, because you tell the model to assume different poses, and shoot her quickly.
My reaction is to quickly lose interest, no matter how lovely or attractive the model can be.
I find the content at Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy is far more interesting and worthwhile viewing.
They are constantly adding new models to their catalog.
Almost all models are slender, white European teens (or early 20s).
The site has videos. The videos feature female masturbation, lesbian, some videos with a guy getting a hand massage on his penis.
Newer videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p, and 4K definition available.
CONTINUED IN THE FIRST REPLY BELOW: |
|
03-04-22 12:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
97
|
Her Limit
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They recently did an update for the homepage of LetsDoeIt network.
(Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network).
The homepage now shows:
Latest Releases
Popular this week
Recently active pornstars
Browse LetsDoeIt top categories
Special Partner Deals(Which is a listing of ads for other porn sites)
-Since Her Limit is a channel in the Lets Doe It network, you get access to all 18 channels in the network.
-You have unlimited streaming for videos.
-You have unlimited downloads for photosets.
However, the photosets are not worth collecting, in my opinion.
A photoset of a video has around 10-12 photos. Which seems strange. Many of these models are cute or even gorgeous. They certainly deserve a full-sized photoset.
The photoset downloads in a zip file with only one definition, and with a generic file name, such as "6227d0474fa1b.zip". |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You have a choice for downloading a video: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
There is no 4K option. Which seems strange for the network that started out as a glamour network. I mean, even hardcore porn sites are now mainly offering 4K. Don't misunderstand: this network was hardcore from the start, but what I mean is that even low-quality porn sites, as well as high quality porn site, are offering 4K. So why isn't this network offering it? You're supposed to keep up with the competition, unless something is wrong.
CONS(START OF):
-When you log in to the site, you get a page full of ads, before you get to the member's area.
The ads are for competing sites.
The ads don't immediately show you the join price.
You have to click on the ad for any site, to see what the join price is.
Note: it might be might my slow wifi connection that does not allow the prices to be shown.
After a few minutes, a few of the ads do show a reduced membership price. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
So you're wasting a lot of time, if you want to check out these ads.
-The ads have a "limited time offer" banner for each ad. Creating a false sense of urgency.
Get real. Or get smart. How many lies do you want to swallow, after you paid for a membership, before you're allowed to get to the content you paid for?
-The ads will give you a slightly discounted membership price from the "listed" price. But you can find much better discounts if you wait for holiday specials and seach a little.
-You click past the full-page-of-ads to get to the membership pages:
And the each membership page has ads at the bottom of the page.
Plus, you also get a large pop-up window that is another ad for a "LIMITED TIME OFFER" to another site.
Did I pay for a membership to a porn site?
Or did I really pay for a membership where I can browse ads for other porn sites?
-Pre-paid cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The model page is very limited. It has a thumbnail of the model, plus links to her videos at the network. The bio section lists her name, birthdate, nationality, body type, boob size, ass size.
And that's it.
-There's a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the entire network. Any download from any one of the chanels counts towards the limit. Which is very restrictive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: extreme sex.
The models are usually attractive.
The sex often features anal penetration.
The man is the aggressor, grabbing the bitch's hair, shoving his dick down her throad, ramming his dick into her pussy and ass. And she moans and screams with passion, because he's such a brute.
Women like to be spanked. It's in their DNA. And these men are masters of the universe, who know exactly how to treat women.
The chanel has 186 scenes. Watch them all, and you, too, will learn to dominate women in your bedroom, or even in public, as long as you're wearing your Captain Universe Cape and Power Ring. Don't wear the cape and ring, and you might get arrested for indecent behavior.
You can like or dislike the scenes, save them as favorites.
Unlimited streaming.
But downloads are limited to 100 per month for the entire network.
Which seems restricted.
The channel updates with 1 new video every 1 or 2 weeks. Which is slow.
Because of the 100 video per month limit download for the network, and the slow update rate, I would advise against a long term membership. Basically, you're wasting your money. At one time I really enjoyed the network. But the update rate has slowed in the last couple of years, and they've imposed the limit for video downloads per month to 100. And they don't offer 4K definition.
Truthfully, I don't use 4K, because my equipment can't use it.
But it just seems like the network is not moving to a competitive position with regards to what other porn sites are offering.
So I think the channel (and the network) is not worth a long term join.
If you're really into extreme sex, I think there are sites that will give you more value for your money. |
|
03-09-22 01:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Her Limit
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network (in late 2018 PornDoePremium changed its name to LetsDoeIt).
LetsDoeIt is mainly a glamcore network of European models.
-Her Limit is different from the rest of the network sites, which mainly feature glamcore/heartcore with European models. Her Limit features attractive European models in rough sex. This is a pro and a con, depending on your personal tastes. Personally, I find the glamcore/heartcore niche more enjoyable than BDSM.
-Although this is consensual sex, and the intro portion shows the model smiling and happy to perform, once the sex begins, it turns rough quickly.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, the site features high production values: lovely models, nice sets, excellent lighting and sound control.
-You get access to over 40 different channels. There are no premium channels requiring extra payment. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 82 videos
-Many of the scenes are shot with 2 main stunt cocks: Mike Angelo or Mike Chapman. It gets boring for me to see these guys slapping and abusing the good-looking models, but that's just me: if you are into bdsm, maybe you can cheer or get excited by the way the stunt cocks use rough sex on the models.
-Site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. But the network updates every other day. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme is rough sex.
Shows how powerful men can be: dominating the lovely bitches with their proud cock, shoving into the model's mouth until she gags, slapping her like the bitch deserves, pounding her pussy and asshole until she begs for mercy, with her whimpering and moans.
Choking the model by her throat.
Spitting on the model.
You get the idea.
The site is for men who want to be real men, unlike the pussy-men you find at most sites that strive to please the woman with soft, gentle sex.
Pierre Woodman would probably be a good stunt cock for some of these videos.
Since he seems to get off on rough sex and abusing women.
Hard to figure what kind of score to give the site.
If you're into rough sex, this would be a wonderful site, deserving a score in the 90s.
Even if you're not into rough sex, since you get access to the rest of the network, which includes The White Boxxx, one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network deserves a score in the 90s, as well.
So I'm giving the site a score of 92.
Even if the Her Limit site is not my cup of tea. |
|
06-30-19 05:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
Home Toy Teens
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-This is not a pro. But you should join the network through the TMW (Teen Mega World) site, instead of one of the network satellite sites.
If you join directly through the TMW site itself, the search engine searches the entire network for the content of a model.
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is often limited to the site you joined through, instead of searching the entire network. So finding the content of a model is difficult and time-consuming, because you would have to search all 35 sites in the network if you joined through one of the satellite sites. And those searches would be basically worthless, since you would probably only get the model's content at the site you joined through.
-This is not a pro. but it's worth mentioning: This is the first site/network that has a non-secure version and a secure version. Seems like a waste of space, they should delete the non-secure version, which your browser will notify you is open to hacking. |
| Cons: |
PROS(START OF):
-Site is part of the TMW network (Teen Mega World), which has 35 sites (counting TMW as one of the sites).
-Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites that cost extra to access.
-Network covers most teen niches: boy-girl, boy-2 girls, lesbian, creampie, anal, 4K site, VR site, massage, squirting, etc.
-A list of the sites you get access to is shown in the reply section to this review.
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-Videos have a choice of downloading of 270p, 480p, 720p definition.
CONS(START OF):
-The search is flawed if you join through one of the satellite sites instead of the main TMW site. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
If you join directly one of the other network sites, your search will be limited to the site you joined through, instead of the entire network. The search will probably still be limited to your join site, even when you log in to one of the other network sites. I say probably, because the search results seem hit-or-miss when you use the search engine, depending on random factors.
-This is an archive site. The last update was in September 2009.
-Small site: 73 videos.
-The videos are poor quality: They were shot when the network was a low-rent teen hardcore site, where the video equipment was basic, the settings were cheap apartment rooms, the furniture was cheap.
-The videos have to be downloaded. You can't stream them online.
-No zip file for the photosets. So you would have to manually download each photo. Since the last photoset was posted in 2009, the quality of the photosets is low, and the photosets are not worth collecting, even when the girl is cute.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo, a proprietary biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are easy to cancel, but I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem.
-Login details (username and password) are randomly generated characters, instead of a name and password you choose yourself.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: girls masturbating with toys: the toys can include dildos, with and without batteries, or bottles, or fruits or vegetables, fingers.
This site is one of the poorer sites in the network.
The site was started in late 2008, and the last update was less than a year later, in September 2009.
So the videos and photosets are old, made when the network was basically a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos. No effort has been made to update the site to make it user-friendly.
Most sites in the network offer a choice of streaming or downloading.
This site does not offer streaming: you have to download each video and play it on your computer software program.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but there is no zip file. So you would have to manually download each individual photo. Except since the photos are show the models in cheap settings (cheap apartment room, cheap furniture, inexpensive street clothes), and no effort is made to make the girls appear attractive, the photos are not worth collecting.
Does the site have any value?
There is curiosity value: the site is an example of when the network was a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos.
Also, it shows, because there is no streaming option, and no zip file for the photosets, how the network in general has vastly improved over the years with easier navigation choices, improved-quality videos and photosets.
And, if you join this site directly, you will realize how messed up the search engine can be, because your search will probably be limited to the contents of this specific site, instead of a search that covers the entire network. So finding and accessing the content of each model would be a nightmare, because: 1. you wouldn't be able to find most of the models content at the network; 2. you would have a hell of a time accessing the model's content at other sites in the network, because you would have to log in to each individual site, and then scroll through the individual content pages to find the model's videos, before you could view it.
So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site itself, where the search covers the entire network, and accessing the model's content is made easy.
Giving the site a score of 50, as a warning to PU users not to join this site directly, but to join the main TMW site.
The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've joined it numerous times.
But the network did an upgrade a few years ago, which was a step backwards in the search and navigation of the network, if you joined one of the network satellite sites, instead of the main TMW site.
The customer service was kind enough to give me a free membership to the TMW site, because I'm paying for an annual membership to the Teen Sex Movs site. I need the TMW site access, because of the navigation problems the network update created.
And I'm locked in to the Teen Sex Movs membership, because I got such a low annual price membership.
(It would be nice if they switched my membership to the TMW site itself, with my low-membership price, but they didn't. So each year I write customer service, explaining that I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs site, which gives me access to the entire network, but I need a free membership to TMW to make using the network easier.) |
|
06-27-19 05:17am
Replies (2)
|
Review
100
|
Horny Hostel
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Lets Doe It network. So you get access to about 17 channels.
-All content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming. But there's a download limit of 100 videos for the entire network per month.
Which seems very limiting.
-Scenes are available in definitions from 240p through 1080p. Seems strange they don't offer 4K videos, especially for a quality glamour network.
-There is a link to skip the intro part of a scene. Useful after you've watched the same intro again and again. |
| Cons: |
-The main con is the irregular update rate. The site updates with 1 or 2 or 3 scenes per month.
-Flash page of ads on logging in to the network.
-Poor site layout, which makes navigating the site harder. Instead of a simple interface, you have a poorly laid out network page which has thumbnails of latest releases, popular this week, recently active porn stars, and a line of ads. Plus a line of porn awards won. Who needs this shit? Keep it simple, only show what's really useful, to make navigation easy.
-I was using a VPN because it's supposed to make surfing the internet safer. But I got an email message stating the LetsDoeIt site was concerned my account had been hacked. It requested I send a verification code to the site, which I did. Many experts recommend using a VPN for security, but many sites have equipment to detect a VPN and either question your identity or dis-allow access to the site.
-Photo sets are tiny. From 10 to 15 photos per set. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Photo sets have only 1 size definition zip file, which has a computer-generated name. So if you do want to collect these photo sets, you have to manually re-name the file with the name of the model, site, posting date, video title.
-The videography is not the crystal clear imagery used for the glamour sites. Instead, you get some jerky editing, some video-taped images with lines super-imposed on the images to show it's a video recording of the girl entering the hostel, filters or lack of attention to the outside lighting when the scene is outdoors: the idea is to show you a "real-life" take on the girl's experience. Which grows old fast.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site has 63 scenes. Because you only get 1 to 3 new scenes per month, the site will grow slowly.
-The Lets Doe It network is primarily a glamour network. The White Boxxx, A Girl Knows, Xchimera are the primary sites that focus on glamour-styled porn. But the network tries to broaden its appeal by offering other niches, such as rough porn, travel porn, massage porn, etc.
The main strength of the network is selecting attractive looking models and then presenting them in a setting (nice sets, nice costumes, excellent technical features for lighting, sound control) that makes the models appear like glamorous movie stars instead of porn stars.
Horny Hostel site theme: A girl goes on a trip abroad, she checks into a hostel for a low-priced stay. There she meets a horny guy, and they fuck. Almost no build-up to the sex. European guys are all horny. And girls on vacation are also horny.
So this site is a step away from the glamour style.
Instead of glamour, this is supposed to be reality porn, or slice of life. The models do wear make-up, but it's minimal. The vibe is raw and slightly gritty. You've got girls on vacation, and either they start off showing their naked bodies--meaning their ready for sex--or they are innocents abroad who just happen to meet horny guys that set off erotic sparks in the girls, who turn out to be more than willing to fuck. No romance, just fucking.
But these girls are adult: they don't need romance or sweet talk before they start to have sex with a stranger they just met minutes ago. The guy is horny. The girl, is either horny to start with, or she is hiding that horniness under a calm exterior. And since this is porn, that reduces the need for dialog.
Actually, Bitches Abroad, a different channel in the Lets Doe It network, has a similar setup: Bitches Abroad has girls travelling to a different country, who hook up with a stranger and then have sex. But the videography is smoother, the plots make more sense, and the scenes are much more enjoyable. The models are more attractive, and they are presented more attractively. Which makes a big difference.
The imagery and esthetics of Bitches Abroad are refined compared to Horny Hostel's raunchy vibe.
Giving the site a score of 80. I don't care for the setup. I prefer a little build-up to the sex, or more meaning to the sex. Or some plot that makes sense, other than two horny strangers meeting and deciding to fuck. |
|
09-08-21 08:24am
Replies (0)
|
|
