Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Detention Girls
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring).
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites.
-The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-All content is exclusive.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required.
-There are free cam shows included.
-Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model.
-No download or streaming limits that I found.
-There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use.
-The quality of the photosets is excellent.
-Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p.
-Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px).
-This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive. |
| Cons: |
-The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production.
That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models.
-You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!"
The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot.
My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos.
-No 4K video definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center.
That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety.
The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked.
I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers.
The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time.
Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed.
The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever.
The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes.
How do you know they are guards?
Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked.
Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action).
In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl.
"No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl.
"Well, all right," says the guard.
And they have sex.
Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is).
Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell.
I'm giving the site a score of 72.
The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content.
However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied. |
|
10-07-20 05:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Devils Film
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Devils Film used to be part of a large network of porn sites. But for the last few years, it was merged into Adult Time, an even bigger network of porn sites. Adult Time has over 55,000 hardcore videos, probably over 50,000 photosets based on those videos.
So you get full access to the Adult Time network with a Devils Film membership, and vice versa.
-Devils Film is for hardcore porn aficionados. You will find anal, threesomes, gangbang, and with other sites that are/were part of the Devils Film network, you can explore lots of other sex niches (trans, faux incest, inter-racial, etc.).
-What's amazing is that the site is still updating. You currently have 6630 videos that are part of the Devils Film site/channel. And more are coming. You could easily spend months watching just the videos at this one channel alone, not counting the 55,000+ other hardcore videos at Adult Time. That is an embarrassment of riches. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the Adult Time network, the site layout gives you the premium features of most porn sites: multiple definitions for streaming. If your membership inludes downloads, you get multiple definitions for downloads.
-You can watch the full video, or a trailer for the video.
-Streaming and downloads definition for most videos are 160p through 1080p.
-There is a nice, short text summary of the video. Plus plenty of tags that describe the action.
CONS(START OF):
-The site is pure hardcore. Sometimes you want a break from hardcore and want some softcore. Or something slightly more artistic.
-Most PU members want download privileges. Download privileges are normally not included with a monthly membership. Exotics4me writes that if you contact customer service, they might offer you downloading privileges with a monthly sub, and with a discounted rate.
-Because the site and network has such a huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS-CONTINUED:
-Devils Film never concentrated on finding attractive models. If all you want in a sex video is bodies slapping together, without requiring the models to be good looking, the site gives you plenty of content in many different niches. However, I like the models to be cute or pretty, which limits the videos I enjoy at the site.
-4K videos are in the minority.
BOTTOM LINE-START OF:
-Maybe it's just me, but I find watching these videos to be a low-rent experience. Even when the videos are professionally shot with good to excellent technical qualities: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control, etc., watching these videos makes me feel I'm watching a crude porn video: unattractive stunt cocks, unattractive models, un-appealing sex, why-the-fuck-am-I wasting-my-time watching shit porn. It's not shit porn, it just seems like shit porn to me. This stuff is garbage, that I don't want to watch. Give me something prettier. Or more interesting. Or whatever. But not this shit.
I can find plenty to watch at Rocco Siffredi. Or Teen Mega World. Or the Wow sites. Or Let's Doe It or other networks. But most of the content at Devils Film is, for me, junk.
It's psychology. Even when I find a video that I should enjoy, because the models are cute, the plot is OK to good, I don't enjoy it, because I'm turned off by the junk videos I've just looked at prior to finding the good video.
For example:
"Seducing My Straight White Best Friend #02", with Coco Lovelock & Michelle Anderson, posted 2022-02-13.
Coco Lovelock is a cute white girl around 22 years old.
Michelle Anderson is a cute black girl around 20 years old.
They are playing students in an empty classroom, who have sex with each other.
Nice lesbian scene, that could be placed in many lesbian sites.
Do I enjoy watching it?
No.
Why?
I'm so turned off by the shit I've already seen at Devils Film, I can't enjoy watching this video, which should be enjoyable, but I can't enjoy it.
That's me. If I have to watch or slog through too many videos that I don't enjoy, I won't find pleasure even when I come across a video that I should normally like.
So I'm giving Devils Film a score of 85.
It's part of Adult Time, which normally would give a site a score in the 90s, because of access to the Adult Time network.
But I really dislike most of the content at Devils Film.
It's not to my taste.
Though some PU members might enjoy the content, and think the site is a fine addition to the Adult Time network. |
|
05-03-22 01:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Devils Film
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get a large number of videos in the Devils Film channel. I see 6,379 posted. A few days ago the posted number was 2,197 videos. My guess is they dumped a large number of older videos from other channels or sites into the Devils Film channel, just to increase the number posted.
-Video download and streaming options for the last few years are 160p through 4K. The older videos go up to 720p or 1080p.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Excellent customer support from famesupport, which is 24/7 for live chat, telephone, and email.
-Videos have both a trailer and full scene option.
-Many videos have an accompanying photoset.
-There is a text description of the video that summarizes the action.
-There are different options for membership. The membership with streaming only is cheaper. Download privileges cost extra, or are included with a yearly membership.
-Available with Chromecast and Roku. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is jumbled. Hard to find all the content at the channel, both to see what's there, and to access it.
-There is a zip file for the photosets, but it's only in one definition.
-The zip file for the photoset has a generic file name: e.g., 118203.zip.
So you have to rename the file to include model names, channel, date posted, scene title.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Devils Film used to be part of the Fame Digital network, which included Peter North, Silvia Saint, and a bunch of other less well-known sites. But it's now part of the Adult Time network, which means you have access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, hundreds of channels covering a wide variety of niches, and 13,406 models.
-That is both good and bad:
Good-you now have access to a boatload of new hardcore content.
Bad-navigation is nowhere as easy as it used to be, when Devils Film was treated as a separate site.
They advertise that Devils Film channel at Adult Time has 6,379 videos. A few days earlier the posted number was 2,197 videos. I'm guessing they dumped a lot of older videos into the Devils Film channel from other sites.
Searching for the Devils Film videos at Adult Time is a chore, and you need computer skills to filter out all the extraneous content from the other sites at Adult Time to find what used to be much easier to locate and access.
The Adult Time thumbnails are larger than the old Devils Films thumbnails, so you can more easily see what the models look like. And the newer thumbnails are more attractive.
Under the old Devils Film, your membership price was lower, and you could often find very nice bargains. You pay more for a Devils Film membership today, but you get access to the Adult Time network, so it balances out. But the Adult Time structure is a jumbled mess compared to the old Devils Films structure, where it was much easier to find and access the content.
Video content for the Devils Film: latest posted number is 6,379 videos.
-Older vidoes go from 160p through 720p or 1080p. Newer videos go up to 4K.
Photosets have 100 to 200 or more photos per set.
The videos at Devils Film are gonzo hardcore. Don't expect heartcore or slow, sensual action.
Actually, watching these videos there aren't as gonzo as I remember from years ago: the videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. The plot is thin, the models and stunt cocks are supposed to be horny and ready to suck and fuck with little or no build-up.
So if you are anti-plot or anti-buildup, and want to get to the "good stuff" without waiting, Devils Film fits the groove.
Personally, I enjoy a build-up or some story line to make the sex more meaningful.
I also like some sensual atmosphere where the stunt cock and the model kiss and snuggle or show some emotion of liking or love beyond scratching the horny itch.
And that is lacking in the Devils Film videos: there is no tender emotion shown: it's two or more horny adults sucking and fucking.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good sound control, good camera work.
But I want more: when I was a teen, I could get a hard-on looking at Sears catalog photos of women in bikinis and underwear. But my body is less reactive today, and I need more than naked bodies slapping together: I need some meaning to the sex, a fantasy or eroticism, to make me react or to enjoy the photo or video.
So many of the hardcore videos at Devils Film are boring, for me. Of course, that is a personal bias, and other PU members can have widely differing tastes.
The physical beauty of the models at Devils Film has improved over the last few years. The models look less like hookers and more like women you want to bounce on. The models sport fewer tats and breast implants.
I'm giving Devils Film a score of 95. That's because the channel has over 6,000 hardcore gonzo videos, plus complete access to the Adult Time network, which is probably the best bargain in hardcore porn on the internet: because of the massive amount of high quality hardcore porn for a very low price.
The major problem with Devils Film and the Adult Time network is finding and accessing the content you enjoy. The navigation needs to be improved. |
|
01-31-21 08:23am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Digital Desire
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Device friendly. Watch on Desktop, tablet, mobile, TV.
-Digital Desire was recently merged into the Adult Prime network. I believe it no longer exists as a separate site. Hitting the Digital Desire link at PU opens a web page that shows Digital Desire is now part of the Adult Prime network.
-As part of the Adult Prime network, you have access to over 80 different studios.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Digital Desire videos are available in 480p, 720p, 1080p definition.
Newer videos have a 4K option. |
| Cons: |
-The cons are basically minor.
-Digital Desire and the Sweethearts Club channels are both excellent sites that are worth joining by themselves. If you're into glamour or teen sites, these are top-of-the-line choices.
-Captcha sometimes required for login.
-Login details assigned. You can't choose your own.
On join page, it says your login details will be sent to you in your confirmation email. That is wrong. Your login details are shown on your join page, but not in the confirmation email of your subscription.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join page. There are multiple cross-sales on the join pages, so be sure to uncheck all these offers.
-There is a model page, with links to her content at the channel. But there's no bio data on the model, or her physical attributes (height, weight, measurements, hair color, eye color, birth place, etc.). |
| Bottom Line: |
Digital Desire is a glamour site. Photos and videos. Some of the most beautiful models in the world. The girls are 18 to early twenties. Mainly white.
Stephen Hicks was the founder and main contributor to the Digital Desire site.
He was a glamour photographer who died in 2013. He contributed to Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler and other men's magazines in their heyday.
Digital Desire is a large site.
Videos: 1738
Photosets: 3779
Glam Girls: 1320
Most of the videos and photosets are solo girls. There are some sets with 2 girls.
The solo girls feature mastubation. The twosomes are lesbian.
The quality of the photography and the videos is superb. The site was described as softcore glamour, but since the videos feature masturbation, I would consider this mid-core.
If you were a fan of the Penthouse softcore photos of the 1970s, many of the photosets will bring back fond memories of how luscious some of these Penthouse Pet of the Month were.
I admit I'm prejudiced. I find the Digital Desire videos, on average, far more erotic and watchable than the MetArt videos. The Digital Desire videos show masturbation, which the MetArt videos don't. Even leading up to the masturbation parts, the models at Digital Desire can be so fucking cute or desirable that just watching them creates feelings of desire, while watching the MetArt models, although they can be cute to gorgeous, normally leaves you bored and cold. However, the MetArt videos in the last year or so are starting to become more erotic: before, it was mainly a nude model walking around. Now, the models are playing to you, doing a slow strip tease, or moving their bodies in enticing ways.
No men are allowed in Digital Desire or MetArt photos or videos, as far as I can tell (except for the photographers, of course, who are off-screen). However, I once did see the hand of a male photographer in a MetArt photoset. It was a photoset by Paromov, one of their leading photographers. Maybe he was trying to direct the model with his hand?
I'm giving the Digital Desire channel a score of 95. Partly because the channel has lovely models presented with care, in both the photosets and the videos, to be objects of desire.
But also because you get access to the rest of the Adult Prime network, which has even more content worth viewing and collecting. Obviously, not all the content is great, but the Club Sweethearts channel is a fine teen site, with yummy teens that will tease your imagination. |
|
12-10-21 06:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Digital Desire
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. |
| Cons: |
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks.
Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership. |
|
07-01-20 03:56am
Replies (7)
|
Review
56
|
Dirty Flix
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They've increased the thumbnail sizes on the public preview page, and made the thumbnails brighter, so the models, which are mostly cute teens to begin with, look more attractive.
-Dirty Flix is a network with 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, there are no sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-You can view the photo sets in an online slideshow, or download a zip file of the photo set.
-The network has hundreds of cute teens. |
| Cons: |
-Regular membership is expensive. The listed price is $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find discounts that allow you to join for $15/month, or $60/year. I paid $60/year.
-Login is not secure. You get a popup warning you, when you enter your login details, "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
Which is poor. The only way to get into the members area is through a non-secure gateway.
Note: sometimes you click on the login link, and you are directly entered into the non-secure members area, without having to enter your login details (with cookies enabled). But I would assume that is still open to hacking.
-A lot of videos/photo sets that are posted here are also posted at Videoz network, which is run by the same people. So it increases the update rate at both networks, using the same content.
-The login details (username and password) are computer generated. So have to write them down, you can't remember a nonsense string. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The photo sets only have one definition for the zip file. But because of the poor quality of the screen caps, even if the model is cute, I don't think the sets are worth collecting.
These are screen caps. The lighting varies wildly, from poor to good. The quality of the sets also varies wildly: the sets are an improvement from years ago, but can be cheap to nice.
-The photo set zip file downloads with the title of the video. But you have to manually add the model's name, the date posted, the name of the site.
-Ads on every member page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats:
Movies: 1390.
Models: 727.
Photo sets: 1391.
Number of screen shots per photo set: around 50 to 80.
The photo sets are made from the accompanying video. The photo sets are screen shots. The quality of the photo sets can vary from poor to good.
The photo sets at the Wow network (a competing network) are real photos that are really excellent, much higher quality. The photo sets at Teen Mega World (a different competing network) are better quality than the Dirty Flix screen caps. The Dirty Flix network needs to invest in a good software program that will make better photos from their videos. The screen caps are better than what low-cost porn networks used to post many years ago, but compared to what competing hardcore teen sites offer, the Dirty Flix photo sets are usually lower quality.
Dirty Flix and 18Videoz are two networks offered by the same people.
The two networks are similar.
Both are hardcore teen.
The network structure is the same for both networks.
They even have the same ads for other sites at both networks.
If I had to join one network, I would choose the 18Videoz network. It has more content. 3,308 movies versus 1390. 2,249 models versus 1390. 18 sites versus 15 sites.
Both networks have a site structure that is easy to use. With a lot of attractive teen models. And a low membership price, if you find the $15/month or $60/year prices.
Both networks started off offering videos with low, medium and high definition.
Both networks upgraded their video player around May 2016.
Both network started offering 4K definition videos in November 2016.
Both sites offer a sorted video listing by newest, longest, or highest rated.
Both sites switched to a hot link of their models, where clicking on the model's name brings up her video content at the network.
I guess that Dirty Flix will soon offer a secure login, since 18Videoz now offers a secure login.
The 18Videoz network is strange: sometimes, the login is secure, sometimes it's non-secure. I'm guessing 18Videoz is switching over to secure access, and haven't finished the conversion completely. And since both networks have followed the same upgrades over the years, I assume that Dirty Flix will offer a secure login and secure member pages in the near future.
I'm giving Dirty Flix a score of 85. The 18Videoz network has more content, and more models. But both networks have the same structure that is easy to use. |
|
05-29-21 02:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Disgrace That Bitch
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A while back, they increased the size and brightness of the thumbnails illustrating the videos on the public page. That makes the videos seem much more appealing, the models look more appealing.
-The network and site are teen-oriented. They have mainly Eastern European teens, and most of them are cute or attractive. That is the main value of the site and network, how attractive these models are.
-Since the site is so tiny (only 21 videos), navigation is simple but basic. They use the same layout for all the network sites, listing 12 thumbnail per page. The thumbnails are hotlinks to the videos.
-Exclusive content. But this doesn't have the value that it used to have. Tube sites feature porn from almost all major and minor hardcore porn sites (edited videos, but not the photosets).
-No cross-sell on the rejoin page. I searched the page, but couldn't find a pre-checked cross-sale to some other porn site. Will have to check to see if I overlooked the cross-sale later. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Verotel is the billing agent I used. They have been responsive within a single day, when I emailed them with 2 different problems I had with my membership. Not only fast, but they actually read what my problem was, and responded to it. Many times, a billing agent, or even customer service, will give you a garbled response for help, which is worthless.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes, when you try to login, you get a non-secure login page. Put https in front of the address bar, and your login changes to a secure login page. (This tip came from exotics4me).
-Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
-Archive site. Site stopped updating in 2014.
-The member pages show tiny thumbnails that are low-quality gifs of the video. They really need to enlarge and update the gifs to make the videos seem more attractive, because it degrades the experience of using the site. You're paying for a porn site, you deserve a quality product. Maybe years ago they could have gotten away with cheap-looking |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
product, who's going to pay for it? Either upgrade the site contents, to make it seem attractive, or delete it.
However, there are people who seem to enjoy unattractive photos and videos and low-rent porn, so if the owners/operators can attract paying members, I guess they figure that's good enough to sell.
-There is a photoset of each video. The photoset is a computer-generated series of screenshots of the video. It's a surprisingly good program that creates the screenshots, since the screenshots are nicely centered on the action. But the quality of the screenshots is just OK. The teen models can be surprisingly attractive. I realize I'm being unrealistic, but many of these models could pose for Metart or Femjoy or any glamor site, and they are instead put into junk porn.
-The login details are computer generated. You don't choose your username and password.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You get access to the entire Dirty Flix network. This site and the network has a lot of attractive teen models from Eastern Europe.
The main negatives:
Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
Archive site. Stopped updating in 2014.
The quality of the videos is low-rent. That's the impression. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. The technicals are not poor, they just seem poor. The sound control is lousy, which is the most obvious problem.
I'm giving the site a score of 78. Years ago the site had more value, when cheap porn was first being presented on the internet. But for many years now, you can find porn paysites that offer good to excellent quality porn. So this site is a throw-away. Since you paid for the network, you can see if any of the site videos appeal to you. But there are better sites in the network that you have access to.
Note: I am giving you my honest opinion of the site.
But you are allowed to give comments on the videos.
And almost all of the member comments are positively glowing.
After thinking it over, I realize I was turned off by the site theme of degrading these lovely teens, not treating them with respect or tenderness. Which is stupid, on my part. If you enjoy watching attractive teens treated like trash, this site has strong value. The treatment is not overly harsh or rough, it's just the attitude that we're hep guys who can treat these cute sluts like the trash they are.
Second Note: I'm not a fan of ads, but some of the thumbnails of the models used in the ads for other sites are fucking lovely. If you like teens, you can drool over the images of these lovely teens. |
|
06-06-22 05:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
DOMAI
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet.
-Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites.
-You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore.
-There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition.
-Content is exclusive.
-There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets.
-Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less |
| Cons: |
-The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography.
-Photo only site. No videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join.
-They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago.
But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old.
-The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo.
-Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates.
-Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership.
But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites.
So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site.
Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic.
Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some.
Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes.
Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy.
Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over.
Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so.
But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive. |
|
05-01-21 01:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-DP Fanatics is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it's considered a separate site. On the web page for DP Fanatics, it states that DP Fanatics is "A 21 Sextury website".
However, 21 Sextury no longer exists as a separate network: 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network a few years back. When I contacted Adult Time network support, I was told that 21 Sextury still exists, even though it is now part of the Adult Time network.
-The model selection is attractive young women. Mostly white, European girls.
-The women are featured in hardcore sex: they are getting rammed by two guys, in their mouth, their pussy, their ass. So if you're into rough sex or anal sex, this is a site that will arouse your interest.
-Membership in DP Fanatics gives you access to the 21 Sextury network, as well as the Adult Time network. I'm not sure why they emphasize the 21 Sextury network, since 21 Sextury is only a small part of Adult Time network. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the 21 Sextury network, this is a professional site, where the technical features of the videos and photos are excellent:
-Video definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Excellent camera work.
-Clear, crisp images, vivid colors, natural flesh tones on the actors.
-Nice sets.
-Unlimited streaming.
-If you have downloading privileges, there's a 300 GB daily downloading limit. Which is more than enough for most people. I really don't know why they need a daily download limit, except for data hogs who try to download the entire network for piracy.
-High res zip file for each photo set.
-There is an excellent model page, with hot links to the model's content at the entire Adult Time network. As well as a model listing. The model listing has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, and you can view it by alphabetical, newest, or most popular. But since you have 13,834 models at the network (female and male), searching through the listing can be a mind-numbing experien |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(START OF):
-My personal preference is seeing one guy and one girl having sex. Or two women having sex.
I don't enjoy three-somes as much. Or four-somes or even-higher-somes. Keep it simple, is my thinking. But for people who enjoy three-somes, this site/channel fits the bill.
-I also don't think anal sex is the end of the world in sex. That's just me. There are plenty of PU members who really enjoy anal sex. And this channel emphasizes anal sex.
-Although the models are attractive, many of them seem to have breast implants. I mean, the breasts can be nice-sized, but they stick straight out, and barely move when the models move. Their breasts are more like bolt-ons. Their breasts don't jiggle. And when the breasts are large-sized, they are even more bolt-on, more jiggle-free, and would look better in photos, where the implants would be less obvious.
-I think the DP Fanatics site might give the wrong impression to PU members. The most common plot for the videos is a young woman walks by the glass door of a house and flashes her ass and bare breasts at the 2 guys sitting inside. The guys immediately start to rub their crotches. And then take out their cocks and start stroking away. The girl goes into the house, and it's sex party time, with cocksucking, pussy fucking, ass fucking. Real life is not like this, and if a PU member expects this kind of behavior, he (or she) will be sorely disappointed.
-If you join directly through the DP Fanatics site, the choices are:
-$9.95/month, streaming only membership
-$95.40/year, streaming + download membership.
-There's very little plot to the videos. You have a girl and two guys. They appear on screen. And with little or no interaction, they start fucking. So if you're impatient for the "good" parts to start, this site delivers the goods.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
DP Fanatics is an excellent channel of Adult Time.
Adult Time is probably one of the finest bargains in porn today.
For a low price, you gain access to over 50,000 hardcore videos and photo sets.
The quality of the content is good to extremely good.
The content covers a wide variety of niches.
There are 655 videos listed for DP Fanatics. So it's a large channel. The models are attractive, but I don't care for all the breast implants the models seem to favor. Also, I prefer a little more plot to my videos: otherwise, it's just two or more bodies slapping against each other, with little meaning to the sex. Maybe I'm a romantic, who thinks sex should have some meaning to it, even though I realize that horniness is reason enough.
But the videos are crystal clear, with excellent technical production values.
The channel is excellent, but it's not my cup of tea.
There are other channels in the Adult Time network that I enjoy far more. |
|
12-05-21 10:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Driver XXX
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-The technical setup of the site is excellent. You get all the mod cons you need.
-Stream a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-Download a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-The videos are professionally made: Crystal clear video, good sound quality (they often start a video with the stunt cock driving a car or truck, and the noises are slightly muted, so you can hear the model speaking clearly). Excellent focus. The videos are just so much nicer than some low-rent networks that offer what seems to be home-made videos.
-The models at the site and network are A-list models. (They have 1,300+ models at the network, so not all models are cute or gorgeous, but the overall mix of models is definitely A-list.)
-The photosets are offered in small, medium and large definition zip files.
The individual photos are professionally shot photos, not screen caps. |
| Cons: |
PROS(Continued):
-No downloads limits for streaming or downloading. As far as I know. Which is becoming rare, with many sites setting daily or monthly limits.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are minor. This is a tiny site, but you get access to the Nubiles Porn network, which is one of the finest porn networks on the internet. Mainly because of the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn models.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Archive site. Last update was Dec 23, 2015.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. And matching photosets.
-The default file title gives the title of the video, but not the name of the model, the date it was posted, or the site name. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Number of photosets: 13
The exact definitions of the small, medium and large photosets can vary slightly:
676px, 1127px, 3246px.
800px, 1333px, 3840px.
Video runtime: around 10-20 minutes.
-The plot of the videos is the same: a girl needs a ride, finds she forget her wallet, so she pays for the ride with sex instead of cash.
The car or truck has decals on the dashboard, which show:
"Gas, Grass or Ass
Nobody rides for free."
Which is a hint or precursor to the theme of the DriverXXX site: These girls don't have gas:
What girl is going to carry a can of gasoline with her when she is requesting a ride from Uber or Lyft?
Or carry grass, so she can get busted by the driver who's really an undercover cop or pervert?
So this is a real-life situation, where the only currency the girl has to offer is her body: SEX!!!
Since the site only has 13 videos, I don't know why they keep the site, except the videos are good, and there's no sense throwing away good content.
You will go through the site contents in less than a day.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has Nubliles.net, and around 14 other sites with over 1,300 teen videos that are top quality.
If the site was stand-alone, it would be 65 or lower.
Since the site gives you access to the Nubliles Porn network, I think the site deserves a score of 93, since Nubiles Porn is an excellent teen porn network.
Some PU members feel that a site should be scored as a stand-alone site, without reference to its network.
I believe if a site has free network access, that boosts the value of a site, because of the additional content.
But PU members are free to value or score the site however they want. |
|
08-13-20 02:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup:
Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc. |
| Cons: |
-Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault.
-There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites.
-The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models.
-At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates.
-I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer.
-The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers.
Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates.
Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week.
Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles.
Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189
The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty.
The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184.
Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0
(Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.)
The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart.
So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart.
Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second.
Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership.
So for $1 a month, I'm still a member. |
|
02-09-21 05:45am
Replies (4)
|
Review
62
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They often have a discounted price of $5 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. That is streaming only. A sub with downloading privileges costs $14.95/month. Or you can join for $95.40/year.
-Membership in any one of the Xempire network sites gives you access to all 5 sites:
AllBlackX
DarkX
EroticaX
HardX
LesbianX
-EroticaX is story-driven porn: they try to give you a plot that adds meaning to the sex, as well as glamour-tinged passion of attractive young women.
-If your sub includes downloads, the dailydownload limit is 300 GB, which is generous.
-Customer service is excellent: 24/7 for live chat, email, phone. Xempire is owned/operated by Gamma, which owns Adult Time, so it's the same support as Adult Time, whether they call it OpenLive Support, Gamma Support, or some other name.
-Videos are offered in different definitions: low, medium, high.
-There are trailers for each video, as well as a full gallery of good-quality photos. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a nice mix of racial types in the models: black, latina, white.
-You get twosomes and threesomes in the sex.
-Content is exclusive to the site and network.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are minor.
-The biggest con is that the network seems small compared to mega-networks like Adult Time, Prime Time, Teen Mega World, or even the Wow sites.
-Slow update rate for the site. The site has been around almost 10 years now, so you have hundreds of videos (and photosets) to view. But the site itself only updates once or twice a month. The network itself updates more frequently.
-Little to no information is posted about the models. |
| Bottom Line: |
I recommend joining the site with a $5 discounted offer for the first month.
That is streaming only, which I know many PU members dislike. But $5 gives you the chance to sample each site in the network, to give you a solid basis on whether you think the network is worth a longer-term join. Or whether you want to join for a sub that includes downloads at a higher price.
The internet has such an overwhelming feast of porn, it's difficult to know where best to spend your porn dollars.
The Erotica X/X Empire network has a lot of attractive models, in some nice videos. But I think you get more for you money at some of the other sites/network, in terms of content, wider display of niches available.
Some sites had forums where members could post comments, communicate with other members about different issues, make suggestions, etc. The staff would often respond to questions and comments, and it made sites more accessibile and community oriented. That seems to have disappeared in most places. The forum at Erotica X has closed.
Erotica X is a good site, but it's not outstanding.
If you're going to pay for a longer term membership, I'd look elsewhere.
But if you have the time and money, spend $5 on a monthly streaming-only sub, to cherry pick the subs you want to keep, and then join for a month or two to grab them. |
|
02-21-23 04:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Erotica X
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Sometimes has a special discounted price or $5 for the first month.
Also, even though the ad did not specify any site except Erotica X, it came with access to the other four sites in the X Empire network.
-You get 2 confirming emails on joining. They give you your login details, plus the membership pricing.
-You can choose your username and password, to make remembering them easy.
-They have a nice model index.
-The content is advertised as exclusive.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So your membership should be secure from hacking, and your ISP has fewer records of your site usage.
-The network has over 1400 videos.
-The site (and network) has an active forum, where you can can interact with other members, models and staff. A lot of the comments seem useless to me: staff congratulating members on earning "Agrees badges"
CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION: |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
(if a member makes a comment, and other members agree with the comment, you can earn a "Agrees badge", or staff congratulating members for "First Anniversary badge", for staying a member for 1 year.
The forum does cover a wide range of dates and issues, and it can give some useful background on the site/network, if you're into historical data on how the network works.
-You do have downloading privileges for the photosets, which download in a zipped file of one definition.
-The photosets are collectible. The photos are focused, well-lit and provide a record of each accompanying video.
-The tags for a video describe the sex action fairly well. There is also a trailer to give you a better idea of the video action.
CONS(START OF):
-Although part of Gamma Entertainment (which owns Adult Time), you don't get access to the Adult Time network.
-The biller and support are not the regular Adult Time entities, but ones I've never heard of. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
But since they are part of Gamma Entertainment, I hope they will be OK.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. But that seems to be a huge amount of data to download, and should not be a problem for most PU members.
-Sometimes you are timed out of the site, and have to solve 2 captcha to re-login.
-Although the confirming join email stated I had streaming and downloading privileges, it turns out I only have streaming privileges for videos. I can download the photosets.
-Slow update rate. The site averages about 2 new scenes per month. Partly the slow update rate can be explained by the covid epidemic, which has halted production for most porn studios.
-Search engine is poor: if you put in the search term "Sadie Blair", it returns videos for Sadie Blair, Chanel Preston, Cherie DeVille, Blair Williams, Edyn Blair.
-Ads on every page. But at the bottom of the page, so not so bad.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Current number of site videos: 347 scenes. The network has around 1,400 scenes.
Average runtime of video: 20-50 minutes.
Each video has a matching photoset.
All videos have the option to stream in 288p (or 360p) through 1080p.
The newer videos posted in the last few years usually have a 4K option.
You can add videos to a favorites list.
You can stream and download your favorite parts of each video, to save the "good parts".
You can play a slideshow of each photoset.
The videos and photosets have tags to help you sort/filter the content.
You can add your own tags, comments and ratings to the videos and photosets.
X Empire network has 5 sites:
All Black X
Dark X
Erotica X
Hard X
Lesbian X
I joined on a special discounted price of $5.00 for the first month.
The offer stated it was streaming only, with a membership in Erotic X.
It did not mention gaining access to the X Empire network of 5 sites.
However, once I joined and got the confirming emails, the emails stated I had access to streaming and downloading privileges.
Also, that I had access to all 5 sites in the X Empire network.
I don't know whether the ad I joined through was a mistake, or whether the site/network has messed up software, but I was happy to get access to all 5 sites, plus also getting full streaming + downloading privileges for $5 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
Note: after going to the member pages, I found that I had access to all 5 sites in the network.
I could also stream (photoplay) the photosets, and download them.
I could stream the videos, but downloading the videos required a $9.95 upgrade.
So the confirmation video was in error: I did not have downloading privileges for the videos.
Or, you could argue that downloading privileges for the photosets made the downloading claim true.
PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
That is supposed to give access to the entire X Empire network, with full downloading privileges.
I would classify the videos (and photosets) as heartcore style.
Many of the videos have a plot where there is some problem between the model and the stunt cock: either they are both in other relationships, or they have a problem with each other emotionally. However, the stunt cock is supposed to be a smooth talker, who quickly convinces the model that they are right for each other, and a few kisses turn into sex. So the emotional feelings are supposed to lift the sex into a meaningful scene, where it's not just lust, but yearning and love and glowing sex.
Maybe if Disney opens an X-rated division, they can start making these kinds of films, and put them into the Adult Section of their Disneyland Parks (joke).
The selection of models is good. These are not the extremely attractive teen models of the Wow network, or even the very attractive-on-average teen models of the Teen Mega World network, but normally attractive models in their twenties. The models don't look like porn stars, but look like very attractive regular people. Not glammed up. Just good-looking females in their twenties. The videos and photosets are nice settings, nice furniture, the videos are clear, crisp, well shot and focused.
Maybe I'm bored with porn right now. I thought the videos and photosets were well done. Not outstanding, but well done. I'm not going to pay the $9.95 upgrade fee because I haven't found any special videos I want to collect. And I have so many other fine memberships already, that I don't need the videos from the Erotica X site. I have Adult Time network, the Wow network, and some other sites that are more than enough to add to my collection.
I'm giving the site, with it's access to the X Empire network, a score of 85.
It's a nice site, a nice network. But it doesn't impress me enough to extend my membership past the one month mark. |
|
03-22-21 08:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discount of $19.99/month recurring. However, look for holiday specials where the price can drop to $10 for the first month, or even lower. As a member of the MetArt network, I found an offer for $4.99 for the first month, rebilling monthly at $19.99.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the best customer services for any porn site. The only one better is the fame aid customer service, which has a live chat line that is 24/7, and answers questions within minutes. The MetArt customer service usually answers questions within a few hours, by email.
-The content is exclusive. Note: Staff Selections are exclusive to the MetArt network, but not to any one site in the network. Staff Selections are a premium item that has to be purchased separate from your regular membership.
-The models are mainly white, Eastern European. Most of the models are familiar from the other MetArt network sites. The models range from attractive to lovely. This is one of the strengths of the MetArt network: |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
how attractive the models are: however, the competing sites, like MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty and other fine photo sites also have a strong catalog of lovely models.
-On the initial signup to any of the sites in the MetArt network, you are offered a chance to sign up to different sites in the network for $19/month, $90/year, $400 for a lifetime membership.
If you are a real fan of one of the sites, one of those offers might be worth considering.
However:
-On a personal level, a lifetime membership is not worthwhile for me. On a realistic basis, since my health is not good, and I'm over 70, even $400 is not a worthwhile investment. I do have a lifetime membership to MetArt and a couple of other MetArt sites, that I paid for years ago.
If you're much younger, and you really enjoy one of these sites, a lifetime membership for $400 might be worth considering. Especially to MetArt, which has a massive catalog of photosets, a daily update rate of 4 sets, |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
plus 6 sets on the first day of each month. MetArt, because of the massive catalog of photosets (and a large collection of videos, most of those videos are boring, in spite of how attractive the model might be), the large update rate, the fine technical features of the site (offering zip files in 3 definitions for each gallery, a good photoplayer to watch a gallery online, 24/7 excellent customer service, clean navigation, etc.) is the best site in the MetArt network. However, it's a softcore glamour site, emphasizing photos, which might be too bland, not hard-core enough for some PU members.
There was an announcement at the MetArt network:
30 Apr, 2020
Attention Lifetime Members, we have retroactively upgraded your lifetime membership to grant you full access to all Staff Selections.
If you carry a lifetime membership, you can now stream or download all past and future Staff Selections.
I'm a lifetime member to MetArt, SexArt, and The Life Erotic.
However, on a practical basis, access to Staff Selections doesn't hold a lot of value for me.
I don't think the Staff Selections are rare jewels compared to the normal updates at these sites.
That's my opinion, anyway.
I never paid to view or download any previous staff selections.
And I think the staff selections are basically hype, which I don't buy into.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The last time I joined (about 1 year ago) they didn't have a pre-checked cross-sale, but this time they did. Pre-checked cross-sales are common for the porn industry, but I believe they are a poor marketing gimmick. If you miss the cross-sale notice, you will be signed up to a short term trial that can turn into a very expensive monthly membership unless you cancel the trial almost immediately.
-Also I unchecked the remember me box. This allows the site to keep your credit card data. Too many sites have been hacked for financial information. So it's a bad idea to leave your credit card information at too many sites, because you are just increasing the chances your credit cards will be hacked. I've had several credit cards accounts hacked over the years, with charges made to the accounts from fraudsters. Some charges were made from Africa, some from states in the United States I've never visited. I've never been to Africa. Credit card fraud it pervasive. Try to reduce the places that keep your credit card details.
-I got a confirming email on signup. This was important.
The confirming email was poor.
It confirmed that my account was active with Errotica Archives.
The confirming email did not show the membership price for the first month, or the montly rebill price.
The email did not name the biller for the transaction.
The signup page showed "ECHST.NET 866-452-5108".
From Google, ECHST.NET is a payment processor.
However, the member page at the Errotica-Archives site states my payment processor is RocketGate.
CCBill and Epoch are the gold standards of payment processors.
It would have been nice if I had been able to choose the payment processor.
The member page at the Errotica-Archives site does not show the monthly membership price, either the first or succeeding months.
Separately, the confirming email was important:
On the join page when signing up, you enter a password for your membership.
The password for my membership on the confirming email was a different password.
That is the first time that's ever happened to me, in over 100 porn memberships, over 20 years of porn memberships. That I was given a different password from the site, instead of the password that I entered. (The password that I entered met the stated password requirements of the site.)
You might think some of the cons are trivial. But if I hadn't gotten the confirming email, I would have had to contact customer service to try to enter the site.
And it would have been nice for the confirming email to show the last 4 digits of the credit card I used.
Along with the first and continuing monthly membership price.
-They advertise daily updates. The average update rate has been 2 updates per week for a year or more.
-Regional discrimination. PU members (outside the US) have complained that the site charges more for a membership than US members are charged. I don't know if this is due to the site or the payment processor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Models: 806.
Galleries: 4,510
Number of photos per gallery: 50 - 100.
Contributing photographers: 73.
Photosets have a zip for low, medium and high definition.
Films: 652
This is basically a photography site. The last video update was around June 2018.
That does not include the "staff selections". They tell you if you buy a staff selection, you "own" it. But that is a marketing ploy.
There is no DRM for MetArt network sites. So you "own" all the videos and photosets at the network (except for the "staff selections").
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: |
|
09-24-20 10:10pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
65
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/mo.
-I didn't see a cross-sale on the join page.
That would be a pro. Unless I was sloppy, and did not see a cross-sale on the join page.
On the confirmation email, there was no mention that I joined a cross-sale.
So I will have to check my credit card for the next month, to see if I was charged for a cross sale joi
-Site is part of the MetArt network. For most joins, you join each site separately. However, there is a special deal where you get a discounted price if you join 10 sites MetArt runs for about $50/month, recurring monthly. I used to see that advertised, but it's been a while since I've seen it recently.
-Many or most of the models are regulars on the MetArt network. This means the standard level of attractiveness of the models is good to excellent.
-As part of the MetArt network, the site features the high level of technical features standard for the MetArt network:
Unlimited downloads. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Unlimited streaming of videos.
For videos:
You can choose the streaming definition: 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p.
You can choose the file download definition: 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p.
For photosets:
-You have your choice of low, medium or high for an online slideshow.
-You have the same choices for downloading a file of the photoset in low, medium or high definition.
-Customer service is excellent: fast to respond, usually helpful with password problems, billing, whatever.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a fine site, part of the excellent MetArt network of glamour sites.
-The default biller was rocketgate. I've used them before, with no problems. But CCBill and Epoch are more widely known, so more trusted to easily cancel your membership.
-You immediately get a confirming email on joining. The email gives your username and password.
But no details on the credit card used, the membership prices, or the name of the biller. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-A random password is assigned to you, even if you have other memberships in the MetArt network. This is a problem, because the MetArt network has a software program that checks if you have more than one active membership with the network.
Edit: I tried logging in to a MetArt site, and got a popup stating:
"The MetArt Network is rolling out a more feature rich user experience to all our members. In order to do this, we need your help.
We have detected that you have multiple login credentials. We need you to choose a single username, display name, and email address so you can have one login across all sites."
So, they are trying to make life easier, by requiring a single username etc. Then why the heck didn't they just assign me the same login details I already had on my other MetArt memberships?
(This is really picky on my part. But in the past, when I used the process to adjust my login details to a single instance, I got locked out of the MetArt network until customer service fixed the problem.)
Since the notice is automatic, it blocks me from accessing any of my MetArt memberships, except access to the MetArt site itself.
(I currently have separate memberships to 5 of the MetArt sites.)
Thank you, MetArt, for blocking me from my membership sites.(That comment was supposed to be sarcasm.)
-The last update to the videos was July 01, 2018. So they no longer post new videos.
(I am ignoring the video titled "Anal Yoga" with model Lara A. This video is labelled a "staff selection", and you have to pay an extra fee to view or download it. Also, there is no posting data on the video.
The staff selection videos were an idea of making some videos at Erotic Archives require an extra fee to view or download.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
652 videos.
I'm not sure if those are the free videos that come with a membership to the site, or if that number includes the staff videos that each require a separate payment to view or download.
4401 galleries.
757 models.
73 contributing photographers.
-Years ago, if you were a member of any of the MetArt sites, you could get a discounted membership (around $10/month) to any of their other sites. But that was years ago. Today, if you are a member of one of their sites, and you go to the membership page listing their sites, they offer to charge you full price for a membership to any of their other sites.
You are much better off using a PU discount to join any MetArt site, because the prices are cheaper.
Or you can wait for a holiday special, when the prices are often discounted even more.
I joined Errotica Archives for $4.95 for the first month, on a holiday special.
So if you look around, there are specials to MetArt and many of the other sites in their network, during the holidays.
MetArt used to be a soft, softcore site. In recent years, they are trying to put a slightly harder edge on their content: however, the site is still basically a soft, softcore site. MetArt features nude photography. There is no hardcore action. Most photosets and videos at MetArt are solo girls.
There is a small percentage of content with 2 or more girls. No males allowed (except for the photographers doing the shooting).
The last few years, MetArt does allow the models to suggest a bit of eroticism, where the girl or girls (if there is more than one girl in the set) can touch herself or touch the other girl, but it's a very mild form of suggested masturbation.
-Errotica Archives is a glamcore site in the MetArt network that follows the same guidelines: soft, soft eroticism. The models are allowed to touch themselves, but it's the softest form of eroticism: the main element of eroticism is the model undressing and allowing her body to be viewed. Yes, the model might touch herself, but gently. So there there might be a hint of masturbation: but only the softest form of masturbation. No sticking the fingers inside her pussy, no harsh moans or groans of sensual satisfaction. This is strictly soft, softcore eroticism.
And definitely no boys allowed (men are dirty creatures who might tempt these tender creatures into forbidden sexual acts).
If you want actual sex, you need to visit one of the other MetArt sites, such as Sex Art, or ALS Scans.
So if you are fan of excellent softcore photography of beautiful women, Erotica Archives might fit you. They stopped updating their videos over 1 year ago. But I've never been a fan of softcore videos: I enjoy softcore photos of beautiful women, but almost always find softcore videos boring instead of erotic. No matter how beautiful the models might be.
There are too many factors that can ruin the fantasy in a video: a photo or series of photos of a beautiful women is easier to constuct an arousing image in your own mind.
Giving the Errotica Archives site a score of 89.
For the same price, you get far more content at MetArt, which swamps the Errotica Archive site in terms of backlog of photosets, number of models, and in the updates. |
|
09-02-19 04:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Fame Digital
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Note: Apparently Fame Digital still exists as a separate network.
However, there is a Fame Digital channel on the Adult Time network that shows a video count of 17,967 videos. So I assume that much of the original Fame Digital content is duplicated at the Adult Time Fame Digital network.
This review is based on the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time.
For some channels at the Adult Time network, the channel can be a very limited version of the original site. But for other channels, the channel can be a very complete version of the original site.
I believe that the Fame Digital channel of Adult Time is a very complete version of the original Fame Digital site.
-As part of the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time, you get access to not only a large amount of Fame Digital content, but also get access to the rest of the Adult Time network. The Adult Time network has 53,182 videos, plus photosets illustrating these videos, plus 271 channels. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Adult Time is now on Amazon Fire TV. So if you have a FireTV device, you can select, load and watch Adult Time channels on your TV.
Adult Time is also available through Roku devices.
Note: because Adult Time has so many channels, it's a great way to sample or enjoy the content of many porn sites, without paying for a subscription to those sites.
-The login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy login. If you have cookies enabled, you open the Fame Digital channel, and you are automatically logged in to the member pages, without having to enter your login details.
-Excellent support team, especially the live chat.
CONS(START OF):
-Most of the Fame Digital videos top out at 480p (even the videos posted in 2019). Which might be the main negative for most PU members.
-Because of the huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult. What is the good of having great content, if you can't find the content you are looking for? |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
For example, I put "Fame Digital" in the search box, and the page that opens shows me a jumbled mess of videos, porn stars, channels, movies, lastest updates, recommended scenes for you, favorite channels, recommended porn stars, recently watched, your favorite scenes, your favorite actors latest scenes, your favorite actors, coming soon.
Keep it simple. Give me a listing of the videos (in chronological order) of the Fame Digital videos.
Or a different set of pages showing the models at the Fame Digital channel (in alphabetical order).
That way, I can browse the channel easily, in a way that makes sense. And it would be easier to find and access the content of the channel that I might enjoy.
Otherwise, the channel has thousands of videos, but I don't know how to search through them, or what they are.
-Another problem: This is a personal issue. I'm trying to find the videos that belong to the Fame Digital channel. But there are so many distracting thumbnails of attractive models and possibly-interesting videos from random channels that fill the pages while I'm searching, that I stop and look at this lovely model, or that maybe-good-scene, so my search for the Fame Digital videos gets interrupted time and again.
Too much content, not laid out in a simple way.
-Some of the Fame Digital channels haven't updated in one or more years: such as Peter North, Silvia Saint, and Tera Patrick. But Devils Film and Rocco Siffredi are still updating with new content, and even have 4K videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The membership options include streaming only (unlimited), and streaming + downloads (both unlimited).
So make sure you choose to include downloads if that is important to you. The current plan at many sites is to charge extra for memberships that include downloading.
-Keep an eye out for deals. You can find deals (especially during holidays, but also during made-up holidays, where they offer a discount and call it some "holiday special") where the discount can be significant.
PU offers a discounted price of $95.40/year (recurring). That includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. But like I wrote, if you search, you can find lower prices at times.
Bottom line(Start of):
Fame Digital is mainly made up of the following sites:
Devils Films
Low Art Films
Peter North
Rocco Siffredi
Silverstone DVD
Silvia Saint
Tera Patrick
White Ghetto
But you also get included some garbage gonzo sites.
The Fame Digital channel (and network) is hardcore gonzo porn. I am speaking loosely. Using gonzo porn as a separate category from glamcore porn.
But the distinctions between porn categories can get blurred: For example: softcore, hardcore, teen, MILF, cuckold, fake incest, group sex, virtual reality, inter-racial, anal, shemale, and other categories can also be mixed into gonzo and glamcore porn.
Channel summary:
Content quantity: huge, especially when you add in the access to the Adult Time network.
Fame Digital channel has 17,808 videos.
Adult Time network has 53,182 videos.
Content quality: Some real gems, if you're able to plow through a huge amount of lower grade and medium grade content.
Updates: The Adult Time network has the most updates per day of any network I've seen. Can range from 5 to 10+ daily updates.
Navigation is poor.
I'm giving the Fame Digital channel a score of 90. The main strengths are the huge amount of content, the wide variety of porn models (in age, body type).
The support team is excellent. There is a live chat that answers within a few minutes, one of the best support teams I've ever used, even better than Metart, which I thought was one of the best.
Navigation needs improvement, to make finding and accessing the content easier.
If you want a smorgasbord of porn, or if your porn budget is limited, the Fame Digital channel (with its access to the Adult Time network) is a fine choice. You should get more than your money's worth.
But if your tastes are more specialized, then there are plenty of other fine choices for your porn dollars.
The internet has brought low-cost porn to the masses. |
|
11-21-20 03:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
67
|
Family Swap
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to about 20 sites, most of which stopped updating years ago.
-Nubiles Porn network is a teen-oriented network, featuring a lot of cute teens. Many of the models were real teens (18 or 19) at the time the videos were shot.
-Access to any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
-The listed price is $199/year. But during holiday specials, you can find memberships for $84/year, or $9.95 for the first month. All those options include full streaming and downloading privileges. |
| Cons: |
-The main con, for me, is the stupid plots and stupid dialogue. The videos are supposed to be funny. I think they are just stupid.
-If you can get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the rest of the cons are fairly minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-When you enter the members area, the first page you see is filled with ads for other sites.
So you have to click through that ad page to get to the members home page.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for most porn sites.
-There is a model's page for each model. But aside from links to her videos, there is very little data on the model. Her name, a few physical stats, that's it. The bio information is bullshit:
Here's the bio for Ivy Rein:
"Seductive Russian Ivi Rein is enjoying a gap year before grad school, and she's making sure to experience all the things she's been wanting to do. Flaunting her pretty pink nipples and soft bare pussy on camera is part of her thrill. |
| Bottom Line: |
The videos are supposed to be parodies, which are supposed to be funny. I hate them. I think the plots are stupid, the dialogue is stupid. So I can't enjoy the videos.
There are other sites where I think the videos can be cute or entertaining or enjoyable. But not at this site or the parodies at other sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
That's my reaction.
I saw Thor: Love and Thunder a couple of days ago. I walked out of the movie after about 30 minutes, because I thought the movie was stupid. It's a matter of taste. I grew up on Superman and western series on TV in the 1950s, and enjoyed them. But many of the comics in the movies today are completely different in tone and style and meaning from what was made 20 years or more ago.
If you watch the parodies at Family Swap and enjoy them, that's your style, and I'm fine with that. Different strokes for different folks. I can understand that.
But, for me, Family Swap is a waste of time.
I much prefer the Family XXX site at New Sensations network, or the other sites at New Sensations, which take a less humorous approach, and also focus on the physical beauty of the models more selectively.
Giving the Family Swap site a score of 78. You get access to the entire network of teen sites, but there is a lot of content that doesn't fit my tastes. |
|
09-01-22 08:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
Family Swap
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has 18 different sites you get access to.
-If you join the site directly, the PU listed prices are:
Monthly: $29.32 (recurring)
1 Year: $199.00 (recurring)
Instead, if you join through the Nubiles Porn site (which includes the FamilySwap.xxx site), you get a PU discounted price of:
Monthly: $19.98 (recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (recurring)
-The content is exclusive.
-No streaming or download limits. Which is becoming rare, since many sites are either charging extra for downloads or limiting downloads.
-Because it's a tiny site (14 videos currently), site navigation is easy.
Even if the site grows, the site layout is professional, making it easy to find what you want.
Your choice of streaming definition, from 270p through 4K.
Download videos: 270p - 4K definition. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
There are matching photosets.
The photosets are real photos. Up to 158 photos per set.
You have zip files of each photoset in small, medium and large definition.
You can select how the elements of a page are displayed:
-You can link photos or thumbnails to the video
-You can auto-size the photos.
-You can set the number of thumbnails per page.
-You can set the gallery photos to small, medium or large definition.
Although normally you think of the site and network as a porn video site, the site is professionally set up as a video and photo site, with most of the same controls that you find at the MetArt and Femjoy sites.
-Not only do you get a photoset of photos, but you get a smaller photoset of screencaps of each video. The screencap photoset has around 50 screencaps.
Maybe the idea is to give you a screencap storage-saving file? |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Call me spoiled. I collect MetArt galleries, MPL galleries.
Also the galleries from Wow Girls, Wow Porn, etc. sites are worth collecting.
But photos from FamilySwap.xxx are not worth collecting.
The only photosets from the Nubiles Porn network that are worth collecting are some of the Nubiles.net photosets.
CONS(START OF):
These are some of the minor cons:
-You have to know how to join to save money.
If you join directly through FamilySwap.xxx, the prices are:
$29.32/month
$199.00/year
PU has a discounted price for Nubiles Porn (which includes full access to FamilySwap.xxx):
$19.98/month
$99.95/year
But if you wait for a holiday special, you can get a yearly membership to Nubiles Porn for $84, which is what I paid.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-CCBill is the default biller. A trusted name. But I prefer FameSupport, which has a 24/7 live chat option, as well as 24/7 email and telephone support. MetArt support is also first rate, except it doesn't have live chat.
-When you log in to the site, the first page you see is an ad page for sites. That is both good and bad: bad, because you want to see the content you paid for; good, because the prices of some of these ad sites are tempting.
Major cons:
-Many of the sites in the network are archive sites, that stopped updating 1 or more years ago.
-The plots at many of the sites are stupid. And the acting is poor. Instead of thinking of the videos as "reality porn", think of them as parodies. A change of mind makes you accept the action more easily, so you can focus on how attractive many of these models are, their young, tender bodies (the site and network is teen orientated), and erase the stunt cocks from the video and put yourself in their place. It makes a more arousing picture.
-Tiny site. 14 videos currently.
-Irregular update rate: you get 2 to 5 new videos per month.
-Site started in September 2020. Based on the past history of the network, the site operators can stop updating any time soon, or keep a trickle of updates.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Stupid plots, and the poor acting, are a turn-off for me. The site theme is blended families have horny females (mainly daughters, but also their mothers or step-mothers), who are ready to fuck with little or no build-up. You see 2 women (a mother and a daughter), 2 men (a father and a son or step-son) solving a jigsaw puzzle for some quality family time. The boy is sneaking peeks at the older woman's breasts and ass. The man is sneaking peaks at the young girl's tits and ass. The young woman, out of the blue, snipes at the young man by saying he has a tiny dick. So the young man stands up, drops his pants, and shows his cock, to prove it's not tiny. The mother tells the father, "What are you laughing at, his dick is probably bigger then yours." So the father stands up, pulls his cock out, and says "Look at mine."
This is how modern mixed families behave.
This is a great example of why I think the videos should be viewed at parodies, instead of as reality porn.
Because the next thing you see, the two women are kneeling on the floor, the two guys are shoving their cocks up the women's pussies.
No romance. No build-up. No sense in what's happening, except this is a porn video, so let's get to the fucking already.
The site layout, and the network layout, are done professionally, to make using the site and network easy to use.
I wish they put more thought into making the videos more realistic. To add some build-up, some plot to make the sex more meaningful. More passionate.
Instead, you have horny young men and horny older men jumping on young and slightly older women.
What's supposed to add an element of heat is this is fake-incest, where the partners are related by marriage, but not by blood. Fake incest is a very popular niche, and there are some sites that do a good to great job with this niche. Pure Taboo is one of the finest plot-driven sites on the internet. Excellent technical production values, very good acting, if you want to watch fake incest, watch some of the Pure Taboo videos, which is a competing site. The structure/layout of FamilySwap.xxx is good to excellent, but the content is poor, because of the stupid plots and poor acting.
Except I think the producers are doing this deliberately: this is the product they want: a parody of reality porn, that is supposed to be sexy.
Except it's not sexy: it's stupid.
The site is not to my taste. |
|
01-28-21 01:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Family XXX
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Family XXX is part of the New Sensations network.
You join any one of the sites and you get access to the entire network.
You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites in the network.
-Family XXX is my favorite site in the network. The plots are simple, sex between step-family members. This is a popular niche for many porn networks, and New Sensations does a fine job showcasing this theme: Professional quality productions: Attractive to lovely models, nice sets, excellent lighting and sound control, simple plots that are far more believable than the parodies shown at many other networks.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. Many other sites are charging extra for downloads, and/or imposing download limits.
-A very low price for membership. You can often buy a year-long membership for $60 during a holiday special. Or you can you join for $14.95/month with a PU discount. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is clunky.
There are only around 13 sites in the network, when you click on a single site, and try to bring up a listing of the videos in the site, instead, you often bring up a composite page showing videos you're not sure what sites the videos belong to.
The network does not clearly identify what site a video belongs to.
And then, when you try again to bring up more videos from the site you're looking for, you can easily, instead, bring up a page of advertisements for other sites; or, instead, bring up a short list of some more videos, along with ads for live cam shows and ads for other porn sites.
So each member page is busy with ads for other pay sites, ads for live cam shows, and other text lines and hot links that fill the member page and distract from what you are looking for.
-The search engine is poor. You put in a model's name, it might or might not return some of her content at the network. It will also return plenty of other content from different models. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a model listing. Models are listed by the first letter of their first name. But the listing for each letter is a jumbled mess, not put into alphabetical order.
-The model page shows a photo of the model, her name, links to some of her content at the network, and the model's height. That's about it. This is shit. How can you find all of a model's content at the network? The search is not reliable, the model's page is not reliable. This is a small network, a limited number of sites, limited content, and they can't organize the network so you can search the content easily.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The cons can be frustrating.
Videos are offered in both streaming and download in: 720p, 1080p, 4K. Each definition is offered in 2 different bit rates.
The site or network has been around over 20 years. They started offering 4K videos around 2018.
The main pluses for the network:
-The content is exclusive.
-The models are mainly young (18+ teens), attractive, and seem to enjoy the sex.
-The plots are basically simple, and more believable than most porn site plots of family sex.
-The videos are professionally shot, nice sets, nice costumes (mainly everyday street clothes, they are not going for a glamour look).
The site is not perfect or top of the line.
The main knock against the network is there is such a vast amount of porn sites on the internet, and that the New Sensations network often get lost.
The navigation is clunky. Too many ads and other distractions on each member page. They need to clearly mark each video for the site it belongs to. Some videos might not belong to any site, since they divide the content into sites and dvds and what-ever-the-fuck. You look at a video, sometimes it's clearly watermarked "Family XXX", the name of one of the sites. Another video might be
watermarked "New Sensations", even though it's step-brother/step-sister sex, which would fall into the Family XXX site content.
Where to spend your porn dollars? What type of porn interests you most? And what's your porn budget?
The best bang for your buck is Adult Time, which gives you over 60,000 hours of hardcore porn covering many different niches that has been professionally shot and offers thousands of top rated porn models.
For softcore glamour porn, Metart is at the top of the list: hundreds of the finest photographers have submitted tens of thousands of galleries of some of the most attractive women in the world. The videos at Metart lack heat, but the photo galleries are wonderful. And there are other fine to excellent softcore glamour sites as well: MPL Studios and Femjoy among them.
New Sensations has a hard time competing against the flood of porn networks. It's still a worthwhile join, if you have some extra money. It would not be my first or second or third choice to join, but if you have some extra cash, it's a worthwhile join. |
|
02-14-23 01:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
70
|
Family XXX
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network, a fairly large network of around 26 separate sites.
So you get access to over 7,500 hardcore porn videos.
-Family XXX focuses on sex between step-relations, which I consider to be fake incest. Fake incest is one of the newest, most popular fads in porn today: who doesn't want to fuck their own (step) sister, or their own step-mother? Remember Oedipus? Incest was a popular theme even back in the time of the Greeks, before Christians wrote the Bible.
-The content is exclusive. These are original videos (along with their accompanying photosets).
-The videos are offered in 720p, 1080p, 4K. The 720p and 1080p definitions each have 2 different Mbps offered.
-The accompanying photoset for each video is not just a photoshoot record of the video, but a separate shoot of the story, which varies from the video story.
-Normally I'm not a fan of step-relation porn. But this site does an excellent job presenting the niche. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
The videos I've seen are not just watchable, but enjoyable. Arousing. The stories are credible, the acting by the models is first class, far beyond the normal cringe-worthy acting of porn models. The models themselves are mainly cute to attractive to lovely.
-I guess I'm naive, but I enjoyed the Behind The Scenes videos of the models talking about themselves. The models assume a cheerful facade, and many of them, for this site, anyway, are early in their porn careers, but they basically state they are enjoying their introduction into porn. Which I hope is true, because porn can be a tough profession.
-The videos are professionally made, with excellent production values: nice sets, attractive models, good scripts, excellent acting by the models, good lighting and sound control.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. The site and the network are first class.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
There is a second pre-checked cross-sale on another join page.
-The biller is a captive biller (owned by the site). But I've done business with them and was never charged any extra fees. I did have a slight problem cancelling a sub a couple of years ago. Cancellation is easier with CCBill or Epoch.
-The member pages have lots of ads. But some of the ads for major sites have a low price. I saw an ad for Metart $5 for the first month. $5 for the first month to Sexart. $7 for the first month to Babes Network.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You can join the New Sensations network for $60/year, which is a low price for a quality network. That is a holiday special.
Exclusive content.
Over 7,500 videos in the network.
The site has 761 videos. Some of the videos are Behind The Scenes videos, which are interviews of the porn models.
Thousands of photosets of good quality photos.
Attractive to very attractive models.
The models at the Family XXX site do an outstanding acting job. The scripts are more realistic than most incest sites, with better dialog (or, realizing that dialog is not needed, less stupid dialog).
Zip file for the photosets.
Nice model listing: large-sized thumbnails of the models. Listing can be sorted by newest, popular, A-Z, Z-A, Classics, Your Favorites.
So navigation is easy, for the site and the network.
There is a text description of the video.
The text description of the video sounds like a common blurb for a regular hardcore porn video.
Which is stupid. The models are putting on a good or great show, and they deserve a better write-up than treating them as cock-sucking whores. Show a little respect, or give them the recognition they deserve for putting on a good show, even if it includes cock-sucking and fucking.
Porn stars are not cheap whores, even though many people confuse the two.
I get more enjoyment watching some of the FamilyXXX videos than I do watching a blockbuster superhero movie: the FamilyXXX video can deliver sex that is sweeter, more urgent, than an overblown comic movie that hits you with one unbelievable scene after another.
I'm giving FamilyXXX site a score of 95. Some of the videos are instant classics. They restore my faith that porn can be meaningful. Even if the premise is pure fantasy. |
|
01-05-22 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Fantasy Massage is a good massage-themed network.
-The massage theme is one of my favorite themes in porn.
-The site has a large amount of content, over 2,336 videos.
-The technical qualities are first-rate. Nice sets, excellent lighting, good flesh tones, attractive models.
-Unlimited streaming.
-The daily download limit is 3 GB, which is a massive amount of downloads, and shouldn't affect most people.
-Videos are offered in 288p thru 2160p, for streaming and downloads.
-Videos have a trailer, so you can watch the trailer for a quick preview of the video.
-You can favorite your best videos and your favorite models.
-You can watch the videos in 0.5x, 1x, 2x, or 4x speed. |
| Cons: |
-The main con is that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network.
The Adult Time network is a huge network that has over 200 channels or sites, and many of the channels have hundreds of videos, so navigation can be difficult. That is a plus and minus. You have massive content, much of which is good to great, but there's so much content that finding what you want to watch can be frustrating.
-Downloads are offered with a 1-year membership. The monthly membership does not include downloads, but if you contact customer support, they might include downloads with a monthly membership, for no extra charge, or, if you're a good talker, a lower monthly charge and free downloads.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
Number of Fantasy Massage videos: 2336
Those videos are separated/classfied under different channels, as Family Sex Massage, Nuru Massage, Massage Parlor, POV Massage.
Reasons why the massage theme is popular and is one of my favorite themes:
The setup is simple, straight-forward, easy to see and understand. Requires little acting on the part of the performers, which is a plus because most porn starlets have minimal acting ability. You get a girl laying down on a massage table, she is massaged and caressed until she is aroused, and then she is fucked. So that setup is more believable than porn plots which require more acting.
Many of the models are attractive to very attractive: Peachy, Caroline G, Stacey Lewis, Edita, Nora, the list goes on and on. These Russia models are young, slender, white girls, mainly from Russian areas.
So you have videos that are easy to watch, with good to excellent technical features, and attractive young models, who usually put on a show that is worth watching.
I'm not a fan of the Nuru massage videos. That's just me. I think they are trying to put some plot into the video, which strikes me as stupid plot, and exposes the poor acting ability of the stunt cock and the model. I much prefer a simpler plot of the girl coming into a room, undressing, and getting a massage and then getting fucked. Easier to believe, easier to watch, without as much boring dialogue and fake acting. The best template for the massage video would be Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network), or Rub A Teen (a clone of the Tricky Masseur site which is part of the Team Skeet network), where the plot is as I described: Girl enters the room, disrobes, gets on a massage table, a stunt cock rubs her down, she gets aroused, and they fuck.
I'm giving Fantasy Massage a score of 90. Because you have thousands of hardcore videos in the site/network, plus over 57,000 additional videos in the rest of the Adult Time network you have access to. |
|
06-14-23 09:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
72
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Fantasy Massage is included in the Adult Time network. So you get access to over 50,000 hard core videos, most of them fine to excellent quality.
-Fantasy Massage has over 2,240 massage videos.
-You get a wide variety of porn stars, in both age, body type, and sex action.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). Less prone to hacking, less records of your usage kept by your ISP.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. One PU member pointed out that Adult Time has a 300 GB daily limit, but that is a huge data allowance.
-Most videos have a choice of streaming and download definition of 160p through 1080p. But some of the newer videos go up to 4K.
-Most content is exclusive, but some videos might be found on competing sites, such as Teen Mega World (Tricky Masseur), Team Skeet (Rub A Teen), or the Wow network.
-There are accompanying photosets for most videos.
-Fame Support is excellent. It's 24/7, has live chat, email and telephone access. |
| Cons: |
-With over 2,240 videos at Fantasy Massage, and another 50,000+ videos at the rest of the Adult Time network, there's a huge amount of content you have to search through to find the content that appeals to you. Too much of a good thing decreases the value of the site. That's a psychological trait. And the navigation can be messy.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network.
It used to be a stand-alone network of 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
It's currently a channel in the Adult Time network of massaged-themed sites.
In 2019, the Fantasy Massage network updated 3 times a week.
The current update rate is 4 updates per month.
When Fantasy Massage was a stand-alone network, it had about 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
Now that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network, navigation is less precise. If you enter "Fantasy Massage" as a search term for channel content, the search shows 2241 videos.
But trying to find what specific sites or videos are part of the Fantasy Massage channel is messed up: Trying to find a simple chronological listing of videos in many channels is unreliable: There's too much content that does not appear in a simple chronological listing, no matter how many clicks you use to find the content in a single channel, especially when the channel has 2,000 or more videos.
This is my listing of the sub-channels that make up the Fantasy Massage channel:
All Girl Massage
Family Sex Massage
Fantasy Massage
Massage Parlor
Milking Table
Nuru Massage
Soapy Massage
Tricky Spa
With the different massage sites, you get a variety of massage niches:
-Girl on girl massage.
-Girl on boy massage.
-Boy on girl massage.
-Nuru massage. Nuru massage is a Japanese erotic massage technique when both parties are nude and covered with massage lotion. Nuru massage is supposed to reduce stress and often finishes with sex.
-You get a fake incest element with the Family Sex Massage, where men and women related by marriage have sex. It's made clear this is not real incest, since the bonds are through marriage and not through blood, but fake incest is a strong niche that's been popular for several years now.
I've read that some teens use the line that sex reduces cavities in your teeth, so it's a health measure.
What's amazing is that science bears this out: zinc and calcium in semen help prevent tooth decay and prevent plaque from moving into the heart.
Strange, but true.
I think that using toothpaste with calcium, and taking vitamins with zinc and calcium is a better alternative to swallowing semen.
Just my opinion, of course.
Since you have over 2,000 massage videos, you have a wide variety of porn actors in this category. Men and women. Teens and MILFS. Body types include slender, medium, and heavy. I guess they are trying to appeal to a mass audience with the talent.
Personally, I prefer slender, white, attractive teens, but there's plenty of content to appeal to different tastes.
Some fine-looking teens getting a fantasy massage:
A few of the attractive teen stars appearing in fantasy massage include: Camila, Carolina Sweets, Catania, Chloe Cherry, Emma Piquet, Janette, Kloe, Lilu Tattoo, Liona Levi, Milana Fox, Mirta, Silvia Jons, Sofia Russo, Stacey Lewis, and Tny. The list of teen stars goes on and on.
-Porn models are usually poor actors. Combined with the foolish scripts that are common in porn, the videos can seem stupid, insead of vivid or exciting.
That should be one of the strengths of massage videos: very little acting or plot is required. You have a guy or girl come into a room to get a massage, the massage therapist works on the client and the client gradually becomes aroused, and they have sex.
So the setup is easy, and can naturally lead into sex.
For a low price, you get access to thousands of massage-themed videos and photosets.
You also get access to over 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches.
I wish the navigation was better, that you could find the content that you find most appealing.
In spite of navigation issues, the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
Although I personally find the Wow network, because of the outstanding quality of their teen models and the quality of their videos and photosets, to be an equally fine offering. |
|
03-21-21 05:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Fap House
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Note: I am giving the site a score of 95. That's not because of how perfect the site is: it's not perfect. But what impresses me so much is the sheet amount of hardcore content, for a very low price. Covering a wide variety of niches. With unlimited streaming and downloads. So I am willing to overlook that there are problems navigating the site, because of what is offered at such a low price.
PROS(START OF):
-Very low-priced memberships. Can get a month's membership for $6.99 with a RabbitsReviews discount.
-There is a huge amount of videos on offer. Supposedly, over 500,000 videos at the site, from about 2,000 studios. Many of the studios are first-rate studios. So this is a great place to sample or view the type of offerings from sites like Porn Fidelity, Teeny Lovers, etc.
-A large amount of daily updates.
-The videos have a small, unobtrusive watermark that shows the title of the video, and the site it came from.
-The model listing shows 14,055 porn stars (both female and male). |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
That's a huge number of porn stars to sift through. That's good and bad. It will take time to find the porn stars you're interested in watching.
-The model listing gives a small thumbnail of the model, plus the number of videos (and photos, if listed). Even though the thumbnail is small, it's clear enough to show you what the model looks like.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The model listing shows a wide range of models, in age, physical type, etc.
CONS(START OF):
-Different videos have different ranges for streaming/downloading options.
Many videos only have 240p-360p-480p options.
However, even a 480p definition video seems clear and crisp on my laptop monitor, so I'm not very disappointed by the low-definition videos I've seen so far.
Actually, watching these videos on my 12" laptop monitor, I can't tell the different in quality between a 480p video and a 1080p video. Maybe it's my poor eyesight: I'm in my 70s, |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
and I wear both distance and reading glasses, but I really can't tell the difference between watching a 480p and a 1080p video. The difference would be more apparent on a larger monitor. But my 12" laptop monitor is 1080p, so it's a monitor that is supposed to be fine for watching videos.
-The download options are lacking. Normally, you can choose the folder where you download photo sets or videos. But with Fap House, unless you are using a download manager, the content automatically downloads to your "downloads" folder.
-I just joined this site a few days ago, so I'm still learning to use it. But some videos, when you play them, they stop playing after two minutes or less, while the runtime is supposed to be 20 minutes or longer. That's for online streaming. The downloaded video file plays normally, with no shortened runtime.
-The model listing seems a jumbled mess. It's not listed alphabetically by model name, but listing in apparently random order. Since you have over 14,000 names, you really need an alphabetical listing, and other ways to sort the models' names.
-There is a search box to search model's names. But most porn stars have multiple names for different sites, so that is not as useful as you might think.
-Also, there are some false positives when you do a search for a model's name.
For example, search "Carolina Sweet", and it brings up a video for "Carolina Sweets", who is a different model. So I don't know how you're going to find the video content for "Carolina Sweet" at the network.
-A lot of videos don't name the model. You play a video, you might remember the model's face, but not her name. So how can you identify the model? You can't.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
For a very low price, you get access to a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide array of niches, from a huge amount of porn sites and studios. I used to think Adult Time was the biggest bargain in porn. But this network seems like a worthwhile rival to Adult Time. And in some ways it might offer a better bargain:
the price of membership is far lower.
$6.99 for one month (which is what Rabbits Reviews shows).
The prices listed at the PU site are not current.
PU shows:
Monthly: $9.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $23.97 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $299.99 (Lifetime)
1 Year: $71.88 (recurring)
Prices from fh website:
1 month $7.99
3 months $6.99/month
12 months $5.99/month
lifetime $199.99/once
I joined for $199.99, which is the price that's shown when you use the PU link to Fap House.
That's for a lifetime sub. No rebills. No extra charges, for streaming or downloads.
PU lists a lifetime sub for $299.99.
Even though a lot of videos don't name the model, if you're a long-time fan of teen porn, you will recognize many of the faces of the teen models at teeny lovers. It's like a poster-child of teen porn models from Eastern Europe from 8 years or more ago.
I still think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in porn today. It gives you a quality product covering a wide range of niches, for a low price.
The price at Fap House is lower. But the overall quality is more mixed.
Having said that the quality is more mixed, I think that, whether you're a beginner or a old-timer in porn, Fap House, because of the tremendous amount of hardcore porn, for a very low price, is definitely worth a join.
A massive number of niches.
Content from over 2,000 studios.
An incredible amount of hardcore porn: over 400,000 videos.
Unlimited streaming and downloading included.
Definition ranges from 240p, on up to 4K on some videos.
Navigation seems basic, but doable. With the vast amount of content, large amount of models, you will need to spend a lot of time searching for the content that appeals to you. But it should be easier, if you start your search, by selecting the studios and sites that you're already familiar with, that have content at this network. |
|
09-19-23 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
Filth Flix
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A low-cost entry to a massive amount of teen porn. On holiday specials, you can join for around $48/year (including downloads).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for most memberships. Formerly, they didn't include downloads for this site (that was accurate 2 years ago). But they now allow unlimited downloads for most memberships. You need to check whether the membership you are signing up for includes downloads or not.
-You can stream the videos on your desktop, tablet, mobile or tv.
-The site has over 1500 models. Mainly from Eastern Europe, but also some from the United States.
-Videos usually run around 20-30 minutes.
-Some of the acting is actually good. Normally, I cringe watching stupid teen porn videos, because the plots are so foolish, but the models do a pretty good job acting like innocent girls until the stunt cocks start to turn them on, and then it's standard teen suck-lick-fuck with some really attractive teen girls. |
| Cons: |
-Content and channels are subject to change. So if you find some videos you really like, it's best to download them to keep (assuming your membership includes downloads-which is the best way to go: there's little reason to choose a streaming only membership, since you can find streaming + download membership for an even lower price).
-Very limited information about the models. Which can be wrong. Lana Rhoades is listed as a Czech Republic porn star, even though most sites state she was born in the US. Actually, they list most of their models as Czech, no matter where they come from.
-Default file title rarely includes name of the model, or the site it came from. So you have to manually rename these files.
-I haven't found the zip files for the photos sets yet. The video download is easy to find, but if there is a zip file for the photo sets, I will have to contact customer support. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I don't know if you call this a site or a network or a porn aggregator.
The structure is that they get anywhere from 3 to hundreds of videos from about 98 different sites.
Many of the sites you won't recognize, even if you have you have extensive experience with teen porn sites.
But you also get content from sites you probably recognize: Vipissy, ItsPOV, Club Sweethearts, Wet & Puffy, Analized, I Kiss Girls, We Like To Suck, Private Casting-X, and a bunch of other sites you will find familiar.
So you get a wide variety of porn teen niches.
For a very low price.
Wait for a holiday special, when they offer dirt-cheap memberships. And then play around with the join page, since they often offer different prices for the same membership.
By playing around, I mean, look at the price offered, then start to switch to a different site, and see if they offer you a lower price for the different memberships.
I joined for a lifetime membership for $150, including unlimited streaming and downloads. But the first offer was $300 for the same membership.
I also saw a yearly membership with streaming only for about $60, but they also offer a yearly membership for about $48 that includes streaming and downloads. I'm not talking about different times of the year, but the offers on a single day(normally during holiday specials).
What do you get?
Over 2000 videos.
Over 1500 models, many of which you might recognize if you are into Eastern European teen porn.
Daily updates.
24/7 customer support. (I haven't tried customer support yet this time. Didn't bother using customer support my previous membership, since I never had a problem with the site.)
The site structure is basically easy to use. You can search for the models you like (which is time-consuming, since you have over 800 models), or you can sample videos from different studios (they call porn sites studios), or just browse
You can like/dislike and create playlists.
The content is basically teen-oriented porn, but it covers many different niches.
For a very low price, you get access (unlimited streaming + downloads) to a wide variety of content from many teen porn sites.
Most of the videos offered include 480p and 1080p options.
You can join for a one-month special for around $4, to see what the site has to offer, and then decide whether you want to take a longer-term membership.
I think the site offers a lot of good content for a very low price. |
|
12-12-23 10:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
75
|
Filth Flix
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Note:
I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price.
Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor.
I disagree.
The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches.
That slant colors this review.
If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is the low membership price.
There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices.
-The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch.
-Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality.
-The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories.
-Members can leave comments on scenes.
-You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from.
-You can also make your own personal play list.
-Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable.
-Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto.
-There is a model listing.
-With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large:
teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Good update rate. 22 videos added this week.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads.
-By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address.
-Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is.
The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week.
Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated.
-Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails.
-The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network.
-Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video.
-Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore.
-Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer.
Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc.
But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link.
-Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great.
-I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats
Videos: 3012
Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour.
Models: 1136
Contributing sites: 70+
Photo sets: 295
Number of photos per set: 100+
-This is a streaming-only network.
So there are two main ways to use it:
1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join.
2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network).
For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months.
I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site.
But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join.
rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt.
(PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.)
Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting.
The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering.
I'm giving the site a score 93.
For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes.
Edit:
I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90.
I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site. |
|
04-24-21 06:16pm
Replies (0)
|
|
