Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Mylked
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site on the Tug Pass network and in my opinion, the best site in the network.
Pretty models (most)
Scenes give full view of the nude female model while she pleasures a dick through a milking table.
Updates once per month (very important to the review).
65 scenes, all available to download in 1080p and unlimited downloads.
Photographs with each scene are downloadable and often show more than the videos do. Possibly because of different angles? |
| Cons: |
It’s a small site and only is updating once per month.
It’s a narrow niche, every scene is nearly exact in execution.
Some unattractive models including what they list as GILFs |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to review the network Tug Pass as a whole, but believe this site is more important. This will cover both the network and this site Mylked. Mylked is clearly a newer site on the network. It only lists one update per month. The older sites say they are updating weekly (recycling). The sites you should look into if you are interested in joining this network are: Mylked and Shady Spa, those from the best I can tell, are the only ones definitely updating with new content. Mylked has at least some positives going for it. The female in the scene is laying under a table. She is fully nude, sometimes she is masturbating and most of these models are at worst, cute. Every scene is the same. The female model is laying under the table while a dick is sticking through a hole in the table. The female rubs the dick, she sucks it, she masturbates herself while doing it. It’s similar to a gloryhole scene except the model is laying down instead of on her knees.
The 65 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p which is another sign this is a newer site on the network and possibly damages the view of several of the other sites on the network where 480p and 720p are the highest quality downloads. All scenes on all the sites in the network only have one download option. The scenes even on Mylked are very short with less than 10 minutes being common.
I felt this site earned a review with the attractiveness of the models compared to the other sites in the network. These may be pro models even. Jessica Marie, Freya Von Doom, Honey Hayes and Reina Ryder are the 4 newest models. I don’t recognize them or their names, but they are attractive (pretty or cute), they have nice bodies that they show off while pleasuring the dick sticking through the table.
In comparison to the other sites on the network, these models are much more attractive. I rarely go into attractiveness in reviews unless just saying pretty models. I feel like a lot of the models on this network would be turn offs for viewers. I can’t say I have experienced that on a network before, not on this scale.
The pictures on Mylked are also much better than on the other sites on this network. There are around 100 photos in each set and while it does look like they are screen captures, they show different angles than the video shows. I said this in a previous review of another site on this network, I don’t know if this is a negative or positive. It’s a site I joined to watch dicks being teased and pleasured. I ended up finding my favorite site of the network, Mylked, shows more of the female and I’m not a lesbian. There has to be a bigger picture at work here. The attractiveness of the models on Mylked make the scenes more enjoyable and there’s irony in that. This is the one site on their network the male can’t see the pretty woman pleasuring him. The other sites have the “average at best” female models right in the men’s view. This site, as much as I liked it -- possibly because of how much I disliked the overall network, is still repetitive and small. I do believe if you check out Mylked, I don’t know how much the preview shows of the models and also Shady Spa, if you think you would like either or both of those sites this network is worth joining for the discounted price. I believe if you don’t think Mylked and Shady Spa would interest you, the network as a whole won’t interest you. There are some good scenes on Club Tug, but they are 480p. I will end with while reviewing Mylked, I clicked “switch sites” and they have a different add-on showing up that you have to pay extra for, Mylked’s “switch sites” tab has “Gloryhole (unlock)” in it. When I was reviewing Shady Spa and Cum Blast City, the “switch sites” tab had “Tug Spy” or Spy Tug (unlock). If I were them, I would work on improving the content they have instead of possibly starting other new sites they don’t offer with their network. I mention this because their newest site, Edge Queens, was locked from me accessing it for nearly a week.
This network is a mess. Mylked is a good site as long as you accept every scene is going to be similar. I am giving it an 80 for the pretty models who do a good job of showing off their bodies while pleasuring the male. |
|
05-11-21 05:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.
316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.
Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.
This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.
Photos of the models posing with downloads. |
| Cons: |
This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.
There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.
The women trying to act like the cum is real.
The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.
The older scenes are 480p |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.
I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.
The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.
I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.
The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site. |
|
05-11-21 03:43pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
103
|
Shady Spa
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A slightly different take on handjobs, blowjobs and teasing/edging.
42 scenes, but includes access to the 10 site Tug Pass network.
Variation of model types and looks.
1080p quality downloads on all 42 scenes.
Currently updating, but not much consistency to the updates. |
| Cons: |
The consistency in updates, 2 new updates in January, 4 in February, 3 in March, 2 in April, 1 so far in May.
Unless I am missing something you can only download the videos in 1080p. I first thought it was streaming only, but realized to right click and save as.
I love variation in model looks and body types, but I don’t think everyone will have the same appreciation I do for the variation.
Scenes are short |
| Bottom Line: |
The biggest reason I joined this network was I saw where they added a new site called Edge Queens. Women edging men is maybe my favorite niche in porn and it’s hard to find it unless you go to the sites that you have to pay per scene.
Shady Spa is a newer site too. The scenes are set in a spa or massage parlor type setting. One of the 42 scenes has 2 women, the other 41 only have one woman. The oldest scenes feature models wearing germ masks, I assume those were recorded when Covid first started up. The scenes are more straightforward than I expected. There’s a very short massage at the beginning of most scenes. Which to me is the most important part of these scenes. It’s trying to separate itself from every other handjob site. While the short massage is disappointing, the scenes don’t even really try to convince you they are anything other than a handjob scene or even a porn scene. The masseuse walks in while the man lays on the massage table, almost nude, or at most dressed provocatively. When I watch a porn scene with a theme, I want to believe the theme even if it’s outrageous and unbelievable. A masseuse walking in with a string bikini, pubic hair showing, nipples showing, does not make me think this is a “spa”. Even the dialogue works against the site’s theme and it’s because of how the masseuse is dressed or not dressed. A female masseuse walks in with pubic hair showing, nipples fully exposed and says, “Do you have any problem areas you need me to work on?” I want the male to say, “Well yes, I am here for a massage, put some clothes on.” If you are going to need some inkling of believability this site isn’t going to do much for you.
The model variation is good. There are some that look very young (18-22), some that look as old as maybe 40. There are very slim models, more average size and some that are on the larger side of average-sized. There is a good mix of races. Of the 42 scenes, I am playing a guessing game on a couple of these, at least 12 of the 42 scenes have women who look black, biracial, Latina or Asian.
I do like that there are more than just handjobs. Some of the scenes are as much blowjob as handjob. There is teasing. What I would describe as close to edging. The older models seem better at making the scenes more in-depth. The one scene with two women is probably the best scene on the site and should be something they consider doing more often.
The looks of the models is something I rarely criticize and I won’t on this site either, but I will say with a lot of these “models” their reactions and what seems to be genuine enjoyment, even arousal, tops their looks. Which could be a good thing since looks are subjective. I would think you could stick a perfect 10 model in these types of scenes, but if she’s not really into it, her looks wouldn’t save the scene. These women in these scenes are also clearly not actors. I have to think their enjoyment is genuine and that helps a lot.
I don’t think any of these models are professional models. I just wish there was more to the scenes. The scenes only average about 12 minutes. That includes the 1-2 minute massage at the beginning. It kind of feels like the guy is paying for a handjob/blowjob and the woman isn’t there to make a porn scene. She’s there to make him cum and get the scene over with.
I have looked everywhere for other video resolutions and formats, but I don’t believe there are any extra versions. You get 1080p on all 42 scenes and the only other option is to download the around 12 minute scenes in 5 parts. They do have pictures and those can be downloaded. The pictures are mostly of the model posing which you don’t see in the video.
It’s not a bad site, but it could be a lot better than it is. |
|
05-11-21 03:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
104
|
VIP 4K
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A “network” of 13 sites all filmed in very high quality.
Vendo is their biller. I like that Vendo remembers my email and password and shows me all their sites I have active memberships with and lets me cancel any or all of them from one screen. (This could be a bad sign that this is a major pro).
The scenes are of good length, averaging over 30 minutes each, but there is very little story.
All scenes have 4K download option and some even have a downloadable subtitle file which I really like and would like to see other sites include a subtitle file. It’s a SRT file.
Navigation is simple, interface is clean and fluid. The videos are crisp even in the 1080p and 720p versions. |
| Cons: |
Possibly the best example I have seen of “this shouldn’t be marketed as a network”.
No model list, no way to find other scenes of models you like (unclickable names), no tags
The action in the scenes is hit or miss based on whether you like the niche. They do have some cuckold scenes I enjoyed.
Not all scenes have photos and no dates on the scenes.
My last pro listed is very important as is the third con. They are doing nearly everything right except there is a lot of cookie-cutter feel to most of the scenes. A sameness from scene to scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought this was going to be a network I could get 3-5 reviews from, but I’m only doing this one. Calling this a network is like calling a department store, a mall. I will list the sites in the network and how many scenes each has.
Black 4K has 12 scenes, Daddy 4K has 16 scenes, Debt 4K has 13 scenes, Hunt 4K has 24 scenes, Law 4K has 7 scenes, Loan 4K has 15 scenes, Old 4K has 12 scenes, Rim 4K has 13 scenes, Sis has 12 scenes, Tutor 4K has 7 scenes, Stuck 4K has 11 scenes, Fist 4K has 9 scenes and Mature 4K has 10 scenes.
That means this 13 site network has a total of 168 scenes. One could even complain that Daddy 4K and Old 4K are the same niche. I have reviewed sites that are not huge, but according to the information on TBP this network launched in 2018. That was 2-3 years ago. How can a network of 13 sites only average 55 new scenes per year? Maybe I am being a little hard on the network? But when you don’t list dates on your scenes and you have a very small amount of content relative to the number of “sites” you have on the network it makes me wonder if this network has any kind of future. That’s why I said the last pro is important. The site itself is very nice, the navigation is as smooth and easy to use as any site I have been a member of. The technical quality is very good with every scene having these video download options: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile and most scenes have photos you can download. It would be a shame to see a site with the technical potential this one is showing just fall off due to lack of content.
The hit or miss concept continues despite all those excellent technical choices, the models names are not clickable. If you see a model you like you can’t click her name to see if there are more scenes of her. There is no model list. There are no tags and that may be forgivable since each “site” sticks to whatever niche/theme is in the title.
The overall size of the “network” is a little small for the price. I do get that they are charging more since they have all videos with 4K options. I joined the group of those with 4K monitors that are still downloading 1080p. The 4K downloads just aren’t practical. I will just pull a random one up to show the size difference. “Mother’s Friend or Undercover Freak?” The 720p version is 1.7GB, the 1080p version is 3.4GB and the 4K version is an insane 14GB.
I can say I do not know any of the male or female models on this network. When you combine that with the above complaints it all feels generic. It’s like the big selling point and draw is the 4K. That’s not near enough for me. If I was running the site I would just stick everything on one site and not promote it as a network. It seems that’s going to upset more people than make them happy to get a network of 13 sites averaging 55 combined updates per year.
They do the technical parts right, but everything else needs work starting with a model list and ending with dating the scenes and keeping a list of updates. I don’t think I have seen or noticed a new scene since joining 3 weeks ago. |
|
04-14-21 07:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.
Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.
Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)
Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.
Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.
Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.
Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model. |
| Cons: |
Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.
The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.
If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.
Filenames could be better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.
My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.
The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.
The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.
You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.
One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.
They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.
I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too. |
|
04-11-21 10:55pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
106
|
DogFart
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The entire Dogfart network consists of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The network updates 4 times per week.
The network has 1,598 female models.
Over 6,000 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The whole network has a $4 charge per 4K scene download.
Of the 23 sites, I liked at most 4 of them and would call the rest average or below.
There’s a near total lack of creativity on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The first hint telling me this is a network directed at men was they list two gay sites on their network. One is Blacks And Boys, the other is Gloryholes and Handjobs. How does that tell me it’s directed at men? They also have a site called Zebra Girls that is about interracial lesbian (gay) sex, but it’s not listed as gay. It’s probably something only a woman would notice, but they’re making it clear lesbians are okay for straight guys, but giving a fair warning to straight guys when there’s a gay male scene.
My overall feeling is the network is not bad as a whole. Nearly all of the sites have at least some good scenes, but my main complaint is the way they focus on certain sites in their new updates and update schedule. I know the Gloryhole.com site has been around a long time, so why keep updating it when you have newer sites that are more creative and just by reading user comments on the scenes are much more liked?
I will use this as an example, the “gay” sites are not very popular as most of the scenes don’t even have any user comments on them, so they stopped updating them. It shows they understand the concept of putting out content your users want, but then you see a site like Blacks on Blondes that has nearly 1,000 scenes and they’re updating it once per week. They’re updating Gloryhole.com twice per month and it has nearly 700 scenes. While the similar, but more creative and -- in my opinion -- better sites like Gloryhole Initiations and We Fuck Black Girls have less than a combined 500 scenes and are only updated once per month. I’m not throwing out a generalization here. The user comments show that members want more of those two sites, but instead are getting the scenes from the same sites that have the most content on them.
The video quality is similar on all 23 sites. All newer scenes have 720p and 1080p download options. They also include a downloadable photo set with each scene. All of the older scenes on all of the sites are 480p. Only a few of the sites aren’t like that and they are the newer sites which are the better sites. Even with the site, Zebra Girls, I can’t imagine why they don’t push it more. It also only gets one update per month.
The network is massive in size and there’s no way you can go through it all in one month. I didn’t feel like any of the solo model sites were worth reviewing. A lack of creativity is bad enough, but adding to it that the same woman is in every scene just makes it too monotonous.
I can’t say I was disappointed in the network and would even say maybe I was a little happier (overall) with it than I expected I would be, but I won’t be joining it again. In comparison to other interracial sites I have been a member of, I do think it’s one of the better ones, especially the newer scenes. I just don’t think it’s that great as a whole network. |
|
02-26-21 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
We Fuck Black Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The reverse interracial that porn usually gives us -- black women with white men.
125 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
One update per month currently.
All videos have 1080p and 720p download options unlike many of the sites on this network.
102 models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
It needs a faster update schedule. The network seems to be turning a corner with this site.
There’s not much story, but the scenes feature multiple scenarios which does help (doesn’t become as repetitive). |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The very first 3 scenes on this site gave me hope that this wasn’t going to be another site that sticks to one scenario. The newest 3 are a one on one scene between a white guy and black teen woman. The second newest is a five white guys with one black woman scene. The third scene is a threesome between two white guys and one black woman. This could be read as a putdown towards the network itself, but that’s more variety in 3 scenes than many of their other sites have in thousands of scenes.
The site’s size is hampered by only one update per month and I’m sure some people would question if all the women really are “black”. That’s one I experience in real life and it goes further into a topic I don’t want to touch.
Though the scenes do offer multiple scenarios they are still your run of the mill porn scenes. The women -- I would think, are the biggest interest in the site since there are some really pretty women on it. The stories (have to read them in the scene description) go back to old stereotypes. The newest scene has a very cute Cecilia Lion with Van Wylde. The description tells she’s always checking out her “surfer neighbor”. I will at least say the person who writes the descriptions at least is creative, saying she noticed “his longboard”. I would just like to see more of that creativity make its way into the scenes.
This is easily one of my favorite sites on this network. Unlike so many of the others this one at least offers 1080p and 720p on all 125 scenes, but still has the $3.99 for 4K per scene price too. The scenes are longer, even the one on one scenes, with many going over 30 minutes and it does show -- at least I think, that Dogfart is trying to improve their sites and the production values. I would have paid the monthly price just for this site. It reminds me a lot of the standalone sites other large networks offer. Great site that really boosts this network. |
|
02-26-21 06:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
Interracial Blow Bang
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The scenarios change a little, some scenes have 5+ men with 2 women, some just have 1 woman and it’s a blowjob gangbang.
There are 116 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There also are 116 female models, but some are in more than one scene since some scenes have more than one female. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes advertise HD, but are only 480p.
They charge $4 per scene for 4K downloads and it says that’s a “special offer”.
Not a smithereen of a story in the scenes.
Hasn’t updated since March 2020. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
While I do miss the inclusion of any kind of setup or story, this site at least has enough debauchery in its scenes to make up for it -- mostly. They don’t, however, follow their site’s title. Most of the scenes include some other penetration besides oral. I don’t know if that helps it or not. It makes the scenes with more than oral look like the scenes on their other sites. This network has taught me one thing, use the mute button, there is way too much overacting, screaming, yelling out what they want the men to do to them even though the men are already doing it!
I haven’t been a member of many sites that have these “blow bang” themed scenes so I would think 116 scenes is a lot for the niche. The hotness of the scenes depends on the model. Not so much her looks or body, but how she responds. The scenes with the female being quieter and more focused on what she’s doing are good. The ones where the female sounds like she’s being whipped across a gravel bed are just not worth watching.
There are some pretty models on here, but there are some that made me feel like they were the ones the site decided didn’t belong in one on one scenes. Does porn do that? A model maybe isn’t pretty enough so they put her in a scene doing something the prettier models wouldn’t do? This site is a lot like most of the others on this network. I liked maybe 1 out of every 10 scenes I watched. It also has that older porn feel to it like it was recorded in 2010. I’m assuming 2021’s porn is less aggressive due to social standards. This site doesn’t know that. I would call this site a fair site, not even quite a good one. At least it has the network to fall back on. |
|
02-26-21 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the entire Dogfart network consisting of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
I noted this based on past reviews, I believe they have started updating this interracial lesbian site again.
88 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
137 female models on this site.
Updates once per month. |
| Cons: |
They have definitely had some downtime when it comes to updating. The site’s first scene was posted in 2007 and they only have 88 scenes total.
The 4K versions of the newer videos cost $4 each.
It’s another of their sites that seems to get a lot of positive comments from their users, but they only update it once per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
Nia Nacci’s performance in a Cum Bang scene led to me looking for more of her content. I rarely search out specific women, but her performance brought out the “best” in the men. It seems she does just as well with women as the newest scene on Zebra Girls is Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn. The site sticks with the interracial format which I would think would be easy to book models for.
The scenes are standard lesbian scenes with oral, anal licking, nipple sucking, kissing, strap-ons and maybe the interracial part is something I don’t really notice as a native of India. I’m kind of in-between the colors. The scenes are good. There’s not a lot of creativity especially in the older scenes, but the newer scenes not only add creativity, they also are longer scenes too. The newest scenes are closer to 40 minutes, while the older ones are 20-25 minutes. The same problem with the video quality is on this site too. There are older scenes that say HD, but are only 480p, with a few being 720p. There’s the $4 charge for 4K scenes. I have a 4K monitor now and would like to see that Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn scene in 4K, but $4 is nearly ⅓ what I paid for the full membership.
This site along with Cum Bang, We Fuck Black Girls and Gloryhole Iniations are easily my favorite sites on the network. Of those four they deliver a total of 4 updates combined per month. While Blacks on Blondes gets 4 updates per month just on it. This site would interest me as a standalone site if they updated it more often. Maybe they should look into trying that similar to how Team Skeet does? They could even add 4K videos and charge $15 per site. It’s a good, nearly great site on a network that’s treading water to stay above average. |
|
02-26-21 06:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Cum Bang
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
More interracial gangbangs, this time it’s white guys with one black woman.
Only 95 scenes, but they do include a video and photos.
Hasn’t updated since January 2020.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
105 female models which surprises me since I didn’t notice any scenes with more than one woman.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
No updates hurts what is already a relatively small site.
Playing racial stereotypes in the older scenes including all the guys wearing shirts with confederate flags on them.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
The story in the older scenes is almost always the same, the black woman’s black husband cheated on her so she’s getting revenge by gangbanging a group of white men -- including some that are much older.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
I believe a site like this one has more potential than the black guys on white woman gangbang sites do simply because you don’t see the group of white guys having sex with a black woman gangbang very often.
The racial stereotypes they play in the early scenes could possibly offend some people. The guys wear a shirt (some even have socks) with a confederate flag on it and the shirt says, “Dixie Stud - I would take one for the flag”. That follows the earlier setup of those scenes of the black woman’s black husband cheating on her. They did seem to drop the shirts (and socks) after a year of using it.
The scenes are still repetitive. They do seem to get a few scenes where maybe the woman is really into one of the guys and doesn’t switch. She will have sex with one guy for nearly the whole scene or half the scene while giving blowjobs and handjobs to the others. A lot of the older scenes are also very short considering there are 6-7 people in the scene, some as short as under 20 minutes. The newer scenes average more in the 30-40 minute range and there are some really pretty black women in these scenes.
I don’t know if they get much credit for the story since it doesn’t change much from scene to scene. The newer scenes have generic stories. I thought the best scene was Nia Nacci. She is having her 19th birthday and her white boyfriend walks in with a cake. She makes a wish and tells him what she wished for (19 cocks). The boyfriend motions and 18 more guys walk in.
You do get 1080p and 720p downloads on the majority of the videos and I liked this one a little better than most of the other sites just because of the different dynamic. |
|
02-26-21 05:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Cuckold Sessions
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cuckolding with a little variety.
Averaging just a little more than 1 update per month.
277 scenes with video and photo downloads.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
265 female models on this site.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
At least some story and changes from scene to scene. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene
I would rate the believability of these “cuckold” scenes at 1-3 on a 10 scale. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
Being from India -- Cuckolding seems to be a much more common reality than in the United States. The basics of cuckolding is the wife or girlfriend is so sexually dominant and in control of her man, she demands he lets her have sex with other men while he watches. It also -- much smaller percentage -- can be about the husband or boyfriend having a fetish for watching his wife or girlfriend be with other men.
That’s why the believability factor is not very high on these scenes. It also gives the scenes one of their pros too. The cuckold is in various roles from scene to scene. Some of the cuckolds work the video camera, some just watch with enthusiasm and others are tied up in some form of bondage and made to watch. Most of the cuckolds look like either other porn actors or producers. Maybe even the regular cameraman becomes the “cuckold”? I still am giving them points for at least giving us scenes that vary.
An interesting part about this niche is reading the comments left by members. I believe those comments hurt the scenes since it’s clear many of those making the comments are cucks. There are many comments that ask why the cuck doesn’t “eat the creampie”, others that say the male actors should “piss on the cucks face” and others that believe the cuck should join in by acting as the “fluffer” for the male models.
The majority of these scenes do include 720p and 1080p video downloads as well as photo downloads. I do believe 277 scenes is a lot for this niche, but I don’t generally join cuckolding sites so I could be wrong. It’s another good, not great site on this network and I would think those into cuckolding -- and can suspend their disbelief in the believability of it, would really enjoy these scenes. They are better acted than most of the scenes I’ve watched on this network. |
|
02-26-21 05:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Gloryholes And Hand Jobs
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
This is one of the “gay” sites on the network and it focuses on guys giving guys handjobs and blowjobs through gloryholes or just out in the open.
There are 86 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
The site looks to update twice per month, if they’re being honest. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think the site is being honest. I have been told in the past to check the latest fact update on The Best Porn. This site was updated on The Best Porn in January 2016. There were 86 scenes which is the same amount there are now.
The biggest download resolution for any of the videos is 720p.
The scenes are redundant and I doubt would appeal to gay men or straight women.
The model list doesn’t work even though they have a separate “male” model list. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
It surprised me when I noticed the “gay” sites on Dogfart, but it does look like they are recycling the content on this site and possibly have been for a long time. I first noticed the videos don’t have a higher download resolution than 720p and the newest one is listed as being released on February 19, 2021. Is there a period where we look over a site recycling? I don’t understand why they list this site as still updating since several of their other sites show that they are not updating.
The scenes I did watch were poor to average. I have joined a lot of “gay” sites over the years and can say this is one of the worst. The gloryhole scenes are set in a room with what looks like a 13 inch television from decades ago. The guy who is going to give the blowjob is in that room “watching” porn and masturbating. He doesn’t seem to notice the hole in the wall right beside him until a dick pops through it then it turns into a very standard and basic blowjob/handjob. I don’t believe women are better at this type of porn, but if you watch the gloryhole scenes on this network with women they are much better than the ones with the men being the one giving the pleasure.
There are 86 scenes. The same number there was in 2016 and they do still advertise these scenes as being newly updated. The download resolution options are: 384p, 432p and 720p, all three files have 720p in the filename. There’s just a lot of dishonesty going on with this site. I felt like reviewing it would at least tell those interested in the “gay” sites on the network don’t join just for the gay sites. I’m not for sure what the ratio or interest level of gay men would be towards this network. I have read a few reviews here about gay men enjoying gloryhole porn even it’s a woman pleasuring the man. This site is the bottom of the Dogfart barrel. |
|
02-26-21 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most infamous real sexual fetishes.
670 scenes with downloadable videos and photo sets.
Updates twice per month.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
628 female models on this site.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
As much as I like the concept and find it arousing; the scenes become extremely repetitive.
Similar to other sites on this network the older scenes are listed as HD, but are only 480p.
Gloryhole seems like it could be used in other ways besides a woman sitting on a toilet when a random dick pops through a pre-cut hole in the wall of the stall. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This could depend (pro or con) on the person watching the scenes, but you’re going to get what the title of the name of the site says and little else. This site has tried variations on the Gloryhole concept. Maybe I’m not as porn-smart as I would like to think? I would add a 3-5 minute segment before the scene starts where the female is outside the public restroom with her husband or boyfriend or even really go out there by having a lesbian couple. When the woman is securely in the public restroom and this stranger’s hard dick pops through the wall in the stall, she can’t contain herself. Maybe it’s because I’m female and I just see so many of the scenes on this network as being clearly male-orientated?
The variations they have tried include: Not just getting a blowjob through the Gloryhole. There is vaginal penetration in some scenes as well as anal in some. There are scenes where there are two guys, one on each side of the woman’s toilet stall. Those vary from her alternating blowjobs and handjobs between the guys to blowing one while the other has vaginal sex with her. There’s just something missing for me. This seems like an excellent opportunity to play into fantasies, to maybe even not have every scene turn into a blowjob/handjob/sex. As it is, the women are all shown as so horny they’ll suck a stranger’s dick. These models like many on this network or often MILF aged. I would like to see them get some younger female models and maybe add a touch of innocence. Like having the woman only being willing to give the stranger’s dick a handjob and letting him finger her through the Gloryhole.
The amount of content and continued updates does give the site value and it is at least different (until you’ve watched 50 scenes) than regular porn to appeal to almost anyone into interracial porn. This site itself, from what I’ve seen is close to all if not all, black guys with white girls. They have another Gloryhole site that switches it around. The word Glory being in the title can’t help but make me think this is a glorified blowjob site and a glorified hardcore site. The majority of videos do include 1080p and 720p downloads and it does seem unlimited in downloads. It’s becoming routine for the sites on this network, it’s a good, not great site. The repetitiveness is easily the biggest con on this site. |
|
02-26-21 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
Glory Hole Initiations
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
A different type of Gloryhole site from their other Gloryhole.com site. Most of these scenes are a white male or multiple white males with black women.
Updates once per month.
345 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The site has gone through changes over the years with the older scenes being white women with white men. Those scenes also advertise the HD option, but they are not HD, they are 480p.
The 4K videos cost $3.99 per each scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
One part that impressed me about this particular site is the women seem to be more into the scenes than on the network’s other gloryhole site (gloryhole.com). The set for the scenes is also an improvement over their other gloryhole site which just uses a bathroom stall. This site’s sets look more like a changing room. Maybe I just think the toilet stall scenes seem unsanitary? There are also scenes on this site with not only multiple men (one on either side of the wall), but some even have two women inside the “room”. There are variations from scene to scene. The main focus is a blowjob and handjob, but most of the scenes -- especially the newer ones -- include full sex through the gloryhole.
The site is of good size with 345 scenes, but they only update once per month. It does seem to be one of their more popular sites based on the user comments left on the scenes. If it’s possible, I would even say the sets are more classy than their other gloryhole site. It has more of a good feel to it than their other gloryhole site has. The women seem to enjoy themselves. There is more of a positive feeling. That’s something I believe these gloryhole sites could look into. While their other gloryhole site tries to show more of a random situation where the unsuspecting woman is surprised by the dick popping through the wall, this one has more of a we planned it this way feel.
Similar to most of the other sites on this network, the older scenes have a high resolution of 480p despite claiming “Big HD” . The majority of the scenes do have 720p and 1080p. You still have to pay $4 per scene if you want the 4K version of the videos. I liked this gloryhole site better than their other one and think they should focus on updating this one as much as they do the other one. |
|
02-26-21 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big interracial site, but name could be misleading too. It’s not all blacks on blondes.
987 scenes with downloads of videos and photos
Currently updating once per week.
816 female models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are very similar from scene to scene.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
Little to no story to the scenes.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This particular site focuses on anywhere from 1 to 5 black guys having sex with one white (most) woman. I do believe that’s misleading since I think “blonde” is a niche some porn viewers prefer. There are brunettes, redheads and I’m almost positive all of these women don’t fall under the “white” umbrella. Some look Asian, others Latina, some also look biracial.
There are inconsistencies with how the video resolutions are listed. The oldest video is listed as Big SD, that’s one video. The other older videos are listed as Big HD, but they are 480p which is SD.
The other parts of the network and this site are impressive. The amount of models just on this site (816), the amount of scenes (987) on this site and the majority of videos do have 720p and 1080p downloads. The picture sets are also downloadable and I haven’t seen any notices about download limits.
The scenes themselves leave very little to talk about. It’s get naked, follow a script, add 2-3 more guys, follow the script and the scene is over.
I would rate the female models as above average in looks, they all look like pornstars to me and many are in the MILF age range. The male models are as interchangeable as I assume male models in porn directed at men should be. It’s a good site by itself. It’s not going to make you laud the producers or site as the greatest, but if you’re into interracial and don’t mind it’s not all blonde models, you will probably like this site for its amount of content, amount of models and amount of scenes. That 4K price should lower the score, but seeing that I wasn’t that into these scenes, it’s not a big con for me. It is listed right in the cons. They charge $3.99 extra per scene for 4K. |
|
02-26-21 05:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
Interracial Pickups
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
There’s not really a way to describe this site other than most scenes are 2 black guys with 1 white woman.
195 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There are 93 female models on this site. |
| Cons: |
They are not a threat to any of those out there trying to win a Pulitzer Prize. The stories are dull and last 1-2 minutes. It takes longer to read the scene description than it does to watch the story part of the scene.
Charging $4 per 4K scene makes me hope no one has ever bought one of those.
The site is either updating once every two months or it has stopped updating. The last update was December 2020. They would be due a new one right now if they were updating every two months like they had been in the past. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This site is exactly why I didn’t know if I should join this network. The acting is poor, the writing/dialogue could be taken from a bathroom stall wall and there’s no creativity to be found. The one part the site itself has going for it is some of the models are very pretty. Most of the scenes turn into dual penetration, going more in the direction of the harder side of hardcore porn and I will make the blanket statement of when scenes go that hardcore they become dumber. Maybe because it requires more concentration for two guys to have vaginal and anal sex with the woman at the same time? It takes away any possibility of the guys doing or saying anything that might be interesting or arousing. The women are mostly over-acting in the scenes to give a feeling of being overwhelmed. If the women were amateurs then I could understand the possibility of being overwhelmed, but I have heard of most of these models by name.
When I first started watching porn on a regular basis, it would turn me away when I watched a scene where I could tell the woman was trying to make her combination of pain and pleasure easy to “see” by screaming out about how great it is and alternating with how much it hurts. That’s what these scenes remind me of, porn from about 7-10 years ago, but they are newer scenes.
The site has 195 videos and my membership is running out so I won’t know if they do update it. They had been updating this site every other month, but they are currently 5 days over 2 months since their last update. I don’t think it’s a big loss. Especially if they use the resources used here on one of their better sites. Besides the solo model sites they include in their network, I would rank this site at or near the very bottom of their sites. |
|
02-26-21 05:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
117
|
XFeeds
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I joined through Doc Squirt, but believe this is the network’s main site. I will try explaining it since it’s confusing. As a full network it has some good content.
Currently shows 8 updates over the last 7 days.
The model list only works for the entire network and there are 170 models.
If you select the alternate biller link it is CCBill
Poor navigation won’t allow an accurate count on scenes, but from what I’m piecing together there are around 400 scenes total with most having 4K video option.
Videos are downloadable, I wondered since the name “feeds”, but they are downloadable and I see nothing about limits.
Some improving (though cliche) stories in the newer scenes. Some scenes have subtitles, others do not. |
| Cons: |
The navigation will have you going in circles. If you go to “latest” it brings up a scene that was posted 1 week ago. If you go to the Xfeeds link it says 8 scenes have been released in the last week.
The main screen shows the 9 newest scenes. To get to the older ones you have to jump from site link to site link and even then you don’t know if you’re seeing everything. The category search which has 7 generic options at least is one way to get to the majority of the scenes.
For some reason the site logs me out anytime I close the page even if I click “remember me”. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first joined this network through Doc Squirt, I started to realize the XFeed.net site was the main site. I can’t say in what experience I have with porn sites, I have been on a porn site with navigation like this one. They list having Doc Squirt, Slim4K, MyTinyWish and DudCast. But some of the newer scenes start off with the name “My Dirty Novels”. Those are the improved scenes. Yet, there’s no link to go to for just the My Dirty Novels scenes.
The problem with the navigation includes con #2, going to any of the listed sites separately, including Xfeed.net, only shows you 9 scenes. Doc Squirt and DudCast have a “see more” button to see all of their scenes. But if you put the scenes together for Doc Squirt, DudCast, MyTinyWish it’s not even 75 total. Those 3 show all their scenes. The other around 300-400 scenes are found by going through the categories. Those categories with their number of scenes for those interested are:
Squirt with 27 scenes, Creampie with 62 scenes, Anal in 206 scenes, Threesome in 69 scenes, DP with 22 scenes, Hardcore with 249 and Cumshots with 389. That is the only plainly clear way to find the scenes as far as I can tell.
They do offer 4K, 1080p and 720p on nearly all of their videos except the Doc Squirt ones -- those top out at 1080p.
There are subtitles on the Dudcast scenes, but I haven’t seen any subtitles on the other scenes. It would seem like those would be most useful in the My Dirty Novels scenes since there is a story. Instead, the story is just listed in the scene description. There are pretty and cute models in nearly every scene. And if their update schedule is true, they are updating more than nearly all sites I have been on lately, but the navigation is going to make it frustrating for most to use and the inconsistencies from site to site makes it even more frustrating. When you use the categories search you don’t know which of their sites the scene is from so if you wanted subtitles, you have no way to know until you either stream or download it.
It’s a decent choice (for the price) if you are into hardcore sex with teens. Those newest scenes are trying to bring an edgier feel to the scenes with swinger type scenarios. One of the newest scenes is my favorite scene I watched, the name of it isn’t the best translation, “Shy cutie tries sex with a couple.” A shy young woman would hop into bed with a couple? There’s just some confusion, possibly bad translations (including in the subtitles) and all those navigation problems are stopping it from being a better network. |
|
02-09-21 07:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
Dud Cast
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Routine, casting-type site
Currently is updating 6 times a month
“Amateur” models (I recognize several of them) that I believe are speaking Russian
Subtitles for the talking parts
Multiple camera angles for good or bad
Videos are 1080p or 720p and are downloadable
Most of the models are young and cute |
| Cons: |
The multiple camera angles sometimes messes up the view
No 4K (possibly recycling?)
I never figured out the “dud” part
A model with as known of a name as Gina Gerson is on this site, but they don’t even list her by name until the description of the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
This came with Doc Squirt and I believe the XFeeds.net site also gives access to the same sites. This one does make me wonder about the new updates. Longtime PU members have talked about the video quality often pointing to older videos being recycled. Most of the sites in this small network have a 4K video option, but this one doesn’t, yet they show 6 new updates over the last month. I will review the XFeeds.net site separately as it shows the full list of problems these potentially good sites are having.
I would like an explanation on the “dud” part of the name. I was expecting something along the lines of guys that were having trouble keeping it up or ones that started having performance anxiety. Also, with the way they show the site “her first time”, I was expecting female models that were hesitant, maybe even believably shy, but what I got was a normal casting site with an older man (maybe he’s the dud?), casting younger women and they do try to add a story of them talking the model into the scene. The older man doesn’t have sex with all of the models. He sometimes has a guy he calls his “nephew” also in the scenes. One scene I watched ended with the older casting man, simply known as “agent”, say, “You both were great” where’s the dud?
This is also not a large site. It’s quite small with 36 scenes. I do think that puts more emphasis on the importance of whether those “new” scenes are really new or not. The scenes may even go too much into a story, which I’m usually complaining there’s not enough of. The scenes are under 30 minutes and you can expect 10 of those minutes to be the setup. Some of the scenes just read like (from the translated subtitles) they picked a hooker up. One of the women says her cost is 800 Euros per day. I’m not for sure anything can get lost in that translation.
The videos even without 4K are very clear in the 1080p format. The camera angles are probably done for effect, but I don’t see any major benefit from them. They have one camera angle from the ceiling that looks like a security cam view. There’s the older agent guy carrying a handheld camera and there does seem to be at least one other camera view. There isn’t much bouncing camera which is why I believe there’s another camera. It’s not full point-of-view even when the agent is the one having sex. It’s not a bad site, but the group of sites combined, even the discount here on Porn Users, still feels underwhelming. |
|
02-09-21 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
Doc Squirt
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good site that is only held back by its small size
Includes access to four other sites
Pro models including a few I really like (Roxy Lips and Roxy Sky)
Three separate download options on videos including 4K, 1080p and 720p
Uses CCBill as biller if you select “alternate biller”.
Scenes are surprisingly long despite hardly no story (30+ minutes, with some in the 40+ minutes range). |
| Cons: |
Varying consistency in the “squirt”.
Navigation on the “network” is okay, but it shows terrible inconsistencies.
There are screen captures, but no pictures and the screen captures are not downloadable. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some strong positives. The video quality on all the scenes is excellent. They have even started adding updates again after what looks like a Covid break. The 4 sites that are included are: Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Xfeeds.net, from what I can tell the Xfeeds.net is just a site that collects all the content from Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Doc Squirt into one location. That’s why I said there’s terrible inconsistency. Doc Squirt only shows 15 scenes, but if you search in the categories, there are 27 squirting videos. It looks like they tried to make everything look more complicated than it is and it made the sites more complicated than they need to be.
The scenes do follow a similar plot. I will go into my experience of “squirting”. It is possible for an aroused woman to squirt, but I assume porn directors and producers don’t take the time to look up definitions. A squirt is a small quantity of liquid ejected from something. That’s when you know the squirt is real and some of these scenes do have women ejaculating or squirting small amounts of liquid. The rest are doing the porn-loved fountain squirt that soaks the entire room. That is accomplished by pressing on the bladder. Much talk is about g-spot stimulation with the fountain squirt, but it’s bladder pressure. The g-spot stimulation causes the small squirt that isn’t near as visually impressive or -- soaking.
I thought both of the Roxy Lips scenes on Doc Squirt were excellent. She does seem to be a natural squirter and you can even watch the woman’s expressions. A lot of those fountain squirters are laughing. If a woman is having an orgasm that causes fluid to squirt across a room she’s not going to be laughing. I have seen Roxy Lips on a few other sites showing her squirting ability. The other Roxy (Sky), just puts on a great performance, she’s very energetic and into the scene. It seems like as long as squirting has been in porn someone would realize how fake or real the squirting looks.
The size of the site is disappointing and it’s one reason I decided to review it. I joined through Doc Squirt since it looked like they had at least 30-40 or more scenes on the site, but it only shows 15 once in the member area. The recent updates include 3 over the last month. The scenes I could live without are the ones where the guy sticks multiple fingers in the woman and jerks his arm as fast as possible since if you do that to any woman she’s going to urinate on you! This niche would be better served with a “Mistress Squirt” instead of Doc Squirt. They could easily find women who are capable of teaching most women to at least ejaculate a little liquid. Instead, it’s more of the same as it has been for the last 10 years of a man showing the bladder weakness of women if their insides are being stretched open. It’s a good site when combined with the network, but as a site on its own it wouldn’t be worth most people’s time unless they really liked specific models. The model list follows the problems of the navigation since it doesn’t separate the models scenes by site. It just shows you that a model has 4 scenes and one of each of those could be on one of each of their sites, even if you are on the Doc Squirt site. |
|
02-09-21 06:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
Deeper
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I knew I would eventually find a hardcore, dark, artsy combination site.
Excellent production values, some scenes tie together and the scenes are long (some over an hour).
The model list isn’t huge, but they have 116 models that are all I would think in the top 10% of models in looks. All are pros as far as I can tell.
There are 163 scenes and they update 4 times a month.
The video quality is maybe the best I have seen. It could even be overkill. The file sizes are huge. Picture sets are also downloadable and very professional.
Probably the best alternative to Pure Taboo. Even tops Pure Taboo in some ways.
Easy site to use, but they push their upsells of their other sites in ads. |
| Cons: |
They limit you to 25 downloads per week and that limit starts on day 1 of your membership. If you don’t download any scenes in your first week as a member you just lost 25 downloads. If it was 100 per month it wouldn’t be a big deal since they do only have 163 scenes, but they are limiting you to 25 per week. It’s not as bad as it sounds.
As good as the production values are there is a sameness that creeps into the scenes. They do have scenes that are part of series that do not fall into sameness. Those are produced by semi-retired model Kayden Kross.
They show you what looks like good deals on upsells, but don’t show the price until you click to upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is exactly the type of site I look for. There’s creativity, story, there’s hardcore sex, they list it as passionate sex with light kink. They mostly leave out the taboos, but if you’re a fan of Pure Taboo you will likely enjoy this site.
This site is owned by the group that owns Blacked.com, Blacked Raw, Tushy Raw, Tushy and Vixen. They are now offering a package that includes all those sites and Deeper for one price, but they don’t show the price. I think that’s worth mentioning if you’re into those sites. I have only been a member of Blacked.com and Tushy. I didn’t think those were anything special, but Deeper is like a completely different site from those. I say that because Blacked.com and Tushy were very similar to me. Deeper is just that. It adds a much deeper feeling to the scenes. I don’t think the download limit is terrible. It’s obviously set up the way it is to get you to stay as a member for more than a month and I plan on doing that. Two months should be enough to get all the scenes I want to download.
The models are really outstanding. I didn’t recognize one named Sofi Ryan, but thought that’s the kind of model I think men want to see. Emily Willis is on here too and I know she’s popular. Gianna Dior, September Reign, Adriana Chechik, just to name a few. There’s not an unattractive model on here.
The video quality could explain why they have download limits. They offer these resolutions on all 163 scenes -- 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and three mobile resolutions. The newest scenes offer those resolutions too, but have much higher bitrates and are massive files. The newest scene’s 4K resolution video is nearly 12GB, the 1080p is 6GB, the 720p is 4GB, even the 480p is 1GB. Besides higher bitrates on the newer scenes they also are long scenes. The Muse series has 3 episodes in it and is the newest 3 scenes. The 3 scenes combined are 3 hours and 20 minutes.
Just like there isn’t an unattractive model, I don’t think there is a scene I would want to skip from downloading. It feels like they took a risk with this content since it looks like the softer hardcore porn, but it’s not soft.
There are 116 models which when combined with the number of scenes tells you there are quite a few scenes with multiple models in them. That’s the touch of kink they added. I have been very happy with the content I have watched from here and think it’s one of the best sites I have been a member of. I definitely would recommend it to those into hardcore scenes, but maybe think “does it have to be that hardcore?”. They do a very good job, especially the series scenes, of being just edgy enough to be exciting, but not too hardcore to make the scenes feel uncomfortable. One of the best sites I have joined this year. |
|
10-06-20 12:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
121
|
TS Seduction
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual models seducing men and couples.
Very big site with 646 scenes.
Each scene has a video and photos. You can download unlimited videos and photo sets.
One of the better streaming players for previewing scenes before downloading them.
Interesting scenes with each one ending with a short interview with the TS and other models in the scene talking about their interest in the once taboo niche.
Good production, some bondage, some scenes look rougher and it creates variety this niche usually doesn’t have. |
| Cons: |
The dungeon setting is used for a lot of the scenes. I do think the setting of the dungeon not only takes some of the creativity away, but also makes the scenes look alike.
There are no big resolution videos. The highest they have are 720p.
Some of the TS models really get into the domination in these scenes. These are mostly American or tall, powerful TS models, the action gets a little too rough at times. I like rough, but seeing a man whimpering is a little more than I like or want to see. |
| Bottom Line: |
TS Seduction is one of the transsexual sites I think could be harder for straight men to be into even though they have scenes with women (pussies) in them. The site gives you the premise of a transsexual wanting to seduce a “straight” man. It’s much better than the similar Reality Kings site, “Tranny Surprise”. It is, however, a more hardcore, more dominant, more forceful site than Tranny Surprise. Which I’m only mentioning since the title of the site has “seduction” in it.
They have a good variety of scenarios in their scenes. There are scenes with a transsexual and a straight man. Scenes with two transsexuals and a straight man. Even a few with more than 2 transsexuals with a straight man. There are also scenes with a straight couple (male/female) with a transsexual having sex with both of them.
It is interesting to take note the scenes with a transsexual with a straight couple are almost all in a bedroom with a nice bed and furniture. Most of the other scenes are in the dungeon where bondage is used. That could be what makes me see these scenes as being more hardcore and forceful. I don’t believe any of it is against anyone’s will. They just do a very good job of making you believe that. Though the whimpering seems pretty real!
This site has been around a long time. The oldest scenes on the site are from 2007. The updates stopped in late April 2020. The CEO of the site and network posted a letter last week that said they have used up all of their previously recorded content and are having to turn to compilations and licensing content from other sites until they can start filming again. I do believe this site will start updating again. It’s hard to believe one of their sites that consistently updated for 14 years would be one that gets the axe.
They have 646 scenes with photos and a video for each. You can see the video quality difference from the oldest scenes to newest scenes even though they are the same resolution. The newer ones are clearer.
The transsexuals on this site might not be as attractive to straight men as a ladyboy site’s models. One of the models if you want to look her up is Danni Daniels. Be sure not to search for Dani Daniels. That’s a female model. Danni is attractive to me, but I like men. She has a lot of tattoos, is muscular and athletic. She does a lot of dominating. She also is in at least a few of the scenes with straight couples. I don’t think this site has as broad appeal as its sister site TS Pussy Hunters, but it’s still a very good site. There are no solo videos on it. All scenes are hardcore. When combined with TS Pussy Hunters and Divine Bitches those three sites are what makes Kink a great network for me. |
|
10-06-20 12:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
Granddadz
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Older men with much younger women.
Some of the females are very pretty. I think that’s not as common in this niche.
283 scenes including a video and photo set.
Newer downloadable scenes have 4K video.
Updates had stopped from May 2020 - August 2020, but a new update arrived on August 30th, 2020 and 3 more new scenes came in September.
Better performances than I expected from the old guys.
Pictures are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
Lack of story with the scenes.
The search features are limited to using tags. Some of the tags are overused or overlapping which means I could be missing out on other scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest surprise with this site is the quality of the female models. I do not know any of these models by name, but thought Freya Dee, Adelle Sabelle, Sher Vine and Ava Black are all very pretty and gave excellent performances in their scenes. Two of those newest four scenes feature Freya Dee. She should be a star if she isn’t already.
I usually don’t have a big problem with search features, but I will mention the overused and overlapping tags. It’s common for scenes to have these three tags:
Old Guy, Old vs Young and Young Old. My problem there is all of these scenes are supposed to be older men with younger women. The tags could be more spread out. Just like having: Handjob and Masturbation. With the scenes only having 8-10 tags and up to 5 of them being the same or similar to the other tags it lightens your ability to search. Besides the tags they have a box to type in.
While there are 283 scenes, I am estimating that 80 of those are called bonus scenes. Those 80 are stream-only. All of those 80ish are not old and young. These are mixed in with the downloadable scenes.
The newer scenes offer 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The photo sets are also downloadable. The oldest scenes offer 540p, 720p and 1080p downloads so there’s not a big dropoff in quality even in the oldest ones.
I wouldn’t complain about the missing story with each scene, but the description of each scene doesn’t even help. Why is that incredibly hot early 20s young woman in the bed with a man old enough to be her grandfather? That’s all I need is one short description.
The updates stopped for 4 months, but they have updated 4 times over the last month. This is one of the larger collections I have seen of older men with young women and even though there isn’t any story some of these scenes are very good.
You also receive access to a large stream-only portal that has over 10,000 scenes. You can check out their other old/young sites there and watch the scenes to see if their other sites are worth joining. I like it well enough to recommend it to those who enjoy the older man/younger woman niche, especially if you like an age difference that looks to be as high as 40-50 years difference in some of the scenes. |
|
10-06-20 12:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
123
|
Summer Sinners
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very realistic, amateur (I think), exhibitionism scenes
The most unscripted porn I have seen.
Variety of scenarios including lesbian, group, threesomes and foursomes.
Good camerawork for this type of porn.
Small site, but is newer with 38 scenes in less than a year. |
| Cons: |
Streaming only
There is so much talking in the scenes and maybe one out of 5 people are speaking English. The potential for hot stories is there, but I don’t know what they’re saying.
Price is high for a streaming only site. |
| Bottom Line: |
The scenes on this site have so much potential to be even better than they are. The first video I watched from it has a very young, maybe 19 year old, slender woman in a bikini with another woman using a wand vibrator on her while a guy is watching and getting a handjob from the woman who the wand is being used on. Some time passes and the guy moves to between the slender woman’s legs and sticks his dick in her while the other woman continues to use the wand on the slender woman. The guy says some English, “Very tight” and you can see he is visibly having problems penetrating her. Before this scene is halfway through the woman using the wand on the slender woman is naked and receiving oral from the slender woman while the guy is still having sex with her. Another woman enters the scene and the guy switches to her. I was left with the feeling the last woman to enter was his girlfriend or wife and she had been watching him have his fun with the younger women. But with no English it is hard to say for sure.
The streaming only is a downside to the site since I feel like this is the type of content you don’t or won’t see on a regular basis. These 38 scenes would be worth downloading for those times you wanted something a little less mainstream.
The scenes vary in location from a driving van to the beach to boats to indoors, but all stick with the summer theme. Nearly all of the scenes have the woman in a bikini or bathing suit. The exhibitionism is as much voyeurism as exhibitionism, multiple scenes have someone watching and masturbating. There are some scenes that involve sports and activities like naked yoga. There are scenes of women using wand vibrators while a group of women watch. It does seem unscripted to me. You will notice a guy just start touching a fully clothed woman and before you know it his hand is down her panties while others are looking or having sex too.
It kind of reminds me of the sites Party Hardcore and Dancing Bear without the male strippers. The women look to be having a lot of fun. They will even reach for their friend or friends to join in and help.
If this site had subtitles or English speakers with downloads I could see scoring it 10 points higher than my already good score. |
|
10-06-20 12:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
Submissed
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Eight, kinky, bondage, dominance, submissive and sadomasochism sites rolled into one network.
The newest site, Pegging 4K, got my attention and made me join.
Newer scenes have 4K
807 scenes with 2 new updates per week.
Scenes have improved a lot since their older content especially in length.
I think this is the highest video quality you will find in this genre. |
| Cons: |
The oldest scenes are almost all from the site Struggling Babes and most of those are 5 minutes or less.
Most of the scenes with bondage involved start after the submissive one is in the bondage. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink is my favorite network or site and this Submissed one can be looked at as a good alternative especially if you are into higher resolution videos. While Kink only has their scenes available in up to 720p resolution, Submissed has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on their newer scenes. The oldest scenes on Submissed still have 720p, so they have a lot of content that is equal to Kink in terms of video quality.
Pegging 4K talked me into joining. I had a membership here a few years ago. There are only 10 scenes on Pegging 4K currently, but the rest of the network makes up for it. I don’t think the Pegging 4K is quite up to par with Divine Bitches, where you at least get to see the pegged guy get to have sex with the female after he’s pegged, but maybe they will start working that into the scenes.
The sites included are: Pegging 4K, Struggling Babes, Ball Gagger, Bound Men Wanked, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. The network updates regularly with 2 updates per week, but all of the sites are not updating. I originally joined it a few years ago for the Bound Men Wanked content which Kink has a few licensed scenes from. I find it to be one of the most erotic handjob/female dominance sites I have been a member of, however, it is not one of the sites that is still updating.
There are 807 scenes, these each come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
I do believe this site is more accessible to the average porn user than Kink is. There’s not much English so you don’t hear as much degradation, most of the sites even with very hardcore premises are tamer than expected and the women almost always give in when in the dom role. That is what separates accessible from inaccessible in my opinion. Even with the backdrop of BDSM, the man gets off and the woman usually does too.
It’s worth a join if you’re into BDSM. The scenes could be longer, but they have been improving that. You also get the higher resolution videos compared to Kink. The navigation has a menu box you can select any of the sites in the network from and go directly to them. It’s a very good network that could use some improvement in the production and storylines. |
|
10-06-20 12:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
Nubile Films
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Softer version of hardcore sex.
Nearly 750 gorgeous models. The guys are alright.
Currently 1,206 scenes with excellent video quality and photos.
Blend of niches, male/female, girl/girl, some threesomes too.
CCBill is the biller.
Easy to use site despite too many ads. |
| Cons: |
Too many ads. Besides on screen ads in the members’ area they give you a full screen ad when you sign in too.
It does become repetitive since the scenes are trying very hard not to be too hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have talked about this in past reviews. I am not really into the softer hardcore porn, but there’s so much of it these days you can’t really tell what you’re getting until you join. I thought the girl/girl scenes were the best ones on this site. Most of those are more hardcore than the male/female scenes. The one redeeming quality of this type of porn is it usually has a story or tries to have a story.
They use a television episode style of listing their scenes. I don’t know how they decide when it’s a new season or if anything really changes. They are currently on season 37, episode 10. To further complicate things they have added a series or channel called Girls Only Porn and it has a different timeline. They are currently on season 1, episode 3 of it. They also have added the Fantasy of the Month which is surprisingly really good. It’s in season 1, episode 2. This month’s fantasy girl is Veronica Leal, who I do enjoy scenes of. I would guess how good this series does will be based on how well a member likes the model choice for Fantasy of the Month.
The site is large with 1,206 scenes and they are updating 3 times per week. The videos can be downloaded in 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. There are no scenes with 4K, but all 1,206 scenes do have the listed resolutions available for unlimited downloading. The photos can be downloaded in 3 different sizes: 5616x3744, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. These are professional level photo sets and models.
Would you like to be confused? The newest Girls Only Porn scene is listed as season 1, episode 3. Their oldest content is from 2012 and some of it is listed as Girls Only Porn. It is listed as season 1, episode 11. I don’t know why sites make decisions like that one. The oldest content has more solo content in it than the newer scenes. The solo scenes are also listed as Girls Only Porn. I think they could have made that easier to deal with by having a better search system. The scenes each have tags, but there isn’t just an easy way to search from the main page. Their advanced search is one of the more advanced ones I have seen. You can mark what tags you want to include and what you want to exclude.
It’s a good deal all-around. High quality videos and photos, pretty models, 3 updates per week and the price is good too. |
|
10-05-20 09:50pm
Replies (0)
|
|
