Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A surprising site that reminds me of what would happen if Pure Taboo was toned down some.
Only 67 scenes, but most of them are worth downloading.
Multiple “taboos” explored including stepfamily, crazy girlfriend and big dick cravings.
Scenes come with a video and photo set. All can be downloaded and it’s unlimited.
CCBill is the biller.
Comes with Nubile Films so it’s a good buy when added to Nubile Films. |
| Cons: |
The next surprise, they aren’t updating it anymore.
Would have liked to see other taboos like older/younger. |
| Bottom Line: |
They do a good job of making a lighter, more accessible version of Pure Taboo. The crazy girlfriend ones are the best on here since we know there’s no such thing as crazy boyfriends. They do lean a little too heavily on cliches. One of the crazy girlfriends is going to burn down the boyfriend’s house since he hasn’t texted or called her. She forgives him within a few minutes. He tells her they can start over. She (cliche) asks if they can start a family. They have sex and he pulls out for the cumshot on her belly. She flips the crazy switch since she wanted the cum in her and starts scraping the cum into a bottle. It’s very light-hearted compared to other sites I have seen. The stepfamily scenes are pretty good. They stick to the typical stories on those too like “lets try it!” It reminds me of Bollywood acting. Which is not a compliment. I sometimes wonder with sites like this one if anyone ever thought to do scenes about a crazy boyfriend or a crazy ex-boyfriend who happened to make a second copy of the girl’s house key and pays her a visit.
The scenes are fun. The girls are cute and young looking. They even seem like they are having fun with the stories. I do find porn more interesting when the models look like they’re enjoying themselves.
The video quality on downloads is 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. What doesn’t make any sense is they don’t have 4K videos, but the screen captures for these scenes are 3840x2160 which is 4K. If their screen captures are 4K why aren’t their videos?
I think you have to look at this site as a very nice addition to Nubile Films. I don’t know if they ran out of taboo ideas and decided to stop updating Hot Crazy Mess, but I have seen much worse porn that is still being updated.
I would join this site by itself. I like the taboo scenes even if they’re not that believably taboo and aren’t near as intense as sites like Pure Taboo. It only takes a little story to keep me interested and they do that here. If you try Nubile Films be sure to check out the content on this site too. I prefer this site’s content to the scenes on Nubile Films. I would like to know why they stopped updating it or if maybe they will restart it as part of Nubile Films. The variety is a welcome change. |
|
10-05-20 09:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
127
|
That Sitcom Show
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I love parody porn.
Only 44 scenes, but I downloaded them all.
Video quality is very good on all of the scenes.
The pictures give an interesting view of the “actors” and show how much or how little the porn actors look like the original stars of the shows. They can be downloaded.
CCBill is the biller.
Comes with Nubile Films and Hot Crazy Mess. |
| Cons: |
Most of these shows make for good porn parodies, but Beaver?
No longer updating.
Considering they are parodies there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Being a longtime fan of Vivid, I have watched a lot of porn parodies of movies over the years, but haven’t seen a lot of parodies of television shows. I recognized all of the shows. Most of these were on television when I first moved to the United States. These are the series they have:
Two Men and a XXX Show, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, That 70’s Ho, Facts of Lust, Cumming With The Connors and Leave It To Mom’s Beaver. They also have one that I think is supposed to be their own they made up called The Exchange Student.
One of the strengths or weaknesses is they use the same models for each role in each series. These models are some of the top models in porn like Emily Willis. She’s on multiple shows in different roles. The outfits, the settings, the way the models talk are at least close to the original shows. I didn’t know Facts of Lust, but found the original show on youtube.
I do think the stories could have been longer and better. I can look over the acting, but when you make a parody it seems like the story should at least be similar to what the original series or movie was. It’s also a small site with only 44 videos and no new updates.
The scenes they do have come with 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p download options. The pictures are a part of the site you don’t want to miss. Those can be downloaded in huge 5760x3840 resolution or the smaller 2000x1333 and 1200x800 resolutions. These pictures remove the poor acting and minimal story. I thought the model that looked closest to the real character she portrayed was Jennifer White as the wife on Married With Issues. One of the guys in that series also looks a lot like the brother.
I would like to see more of these and hope maybe some studio will try the parodies again with storylines similar to the real ones on the shows. The site is now included with Nubile Films and makes the package of sites you get a very good value. |
|
10-05-20 09:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncommon transsexual site with all scenes about TS having sex with females.
The most accessible transsexual site with broad appeal to straight men, gay men, transsexuals, straight women and bisexuals.
A total of 326 scenes which is more than I have total from all other sites of TS with women.
Long scenes including some episodic ones that tell a story over 3 scenes.
Videos are maxed at 720p and they are as clear as most 1080p videos. Unlimited downloads on those.
Picture sets that you can also download. |
| Cons: |
Most likely is a Covid situation. Stopped updating near the end of April 2020. Before that it was averaging 2 new scenes per month.
I’m sure some people would want 1080p and maybe even 4K, but with the length of these scenes and high bitrate, I’m not for sure how practical the bigger resolutions would be. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first TS videos I remember watching was from a series that I think belongs to Evil Angel called, “Baby Got Balls”. It was TS with women. Not long after that it seemed the TS industry switched to focusing on a TS with another TS or a TS with a male. You can still find TS with women scenes, but they are not that common and the biggest reason I like this site so much is it’s the biggest collection of TS with women I have found.
The scenes do have high production values and most of them have at least some basic story with some of them having a full story that carries over into other scenes.
The site has 326 scenes with each including a video and photo set. The video can be streamed or downloaded and the download options are: HD, Large, Medium, Small and Mobile. The HD is 720p, the Large is 540p, the medium is 360p and the other two are below 280p. The 720p as the highest available download shouldn’t be too off-putting, the bitrate is over 5000 and they look very good in full screen on a 1080p monitor.
The scenes do bring in other niches and elements including bondage, whipping (not too violent) and most types of light BDSM. It surprises me the transsexuals are always the dominant one. I don’t know why they wouldn’t flip it in some of the scenes as I would like to see the female be the dominant one with the TS.
This site delivers to a very broad audience. Most of the transsexuals on this site do not fall in the Tgirl grouping, they are feminine looking, but most are either using hormones and converting their bodies into females (natural boobs) or are just look like a very athletic female. It is one of my favorite sites and has been since I first discovered it. I do think it will pick back up on updates as Covid slows. It seems to be one of the most popular TS sites on the internet and has a bonus to it, it comes with the Kink network. That is part of my belief about the broad audience. Men that are maybe curious about transsexuals can join Kink then check out this site without joining a solely TS site.
My score would be a little higher if I knew for sure they plan to continue this site once Covid has slowed or stopped. Their last 3 updates were of The Smut Peddlers series and showed a level of creativity rarely seen in TS porn. It would be a shame for them to stop there. |
|
09-28-20 10:30pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
129
|
TGirl Network
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
29 model transsexual network.
Bailey Jay’s site is one of the best solo transsexual model sites and it’s included with new updates.
2,350+ videos on the entire network. Most are downloadable with work.
4,000+ photo sets on the entire network. All are downloadable.
If I was a little older I could say this with confidence. One of the first transsexuals to crossover into mainstream porn in a scene with a man has a solo site on this network, she is known as Vaniity and she is very feminine looking (believe the scene with a male was Peter North).
All sites can be accessed from a hub page without having to login to each. |
| Cons: |
Downloading. I will have to explain it in the bottom line. Some of the sites are simple and easy to download from. Some aren’t and some don’t seem to even let you download videos.
A lot of the sites were likely once short-lived standalone sites with very little content on them. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network appeals to me with their content of two models, Bailey Jay and Vaniity. I am not that familiar with most of the others. I do recognize Mia Isabella and a few others, but their sites are small. I think this is one of the only TS solo model networks there is and most of these models were filmed much like solo female models are. These are glamorous models. The photo sets are professional and the models are looking as pretty as possible. The videos section has solo, hardcore, non-nude, candid and toys. There are rarely more than 5 videos in any of those except solo and hardcore. It looks like someone programmed the site with the idea of having and using all these different categories then decided it was too much work.
The downloading videos issue isn’t anything to stop me from liking the site. On Bailey Jay and Vanitty’s sites you click on a video and there are clear links for HD, SD and mobile if available. You just right click those and download them. On the other models’ sites there are not any links to download. You have to click the video again and let it start playing. You can right click the video and save as -- but, only on certain videos. It does seem to depend on who the model is. I downloaded multiple videos using that method from Mia Isabella’s site. It doesn’t work on all though. There is also the problem with the bitrate on the 1080p videos. The bitrate is 30000 when it should probably be 5000 - 8000. It makes the file sizes huge. On the 720p videos the bitrate is only 3000 - 5000. I don’t know why they would multiply the bitrate 5 - 10 times the size on the 1080p videos, but it does make those useless to me.
The network is still updating, but it’s mostly Bailey Jay’s content. Vaniity has content on the network from 2004 - 2018. That is how I would advertise the site. A lot of Bailey Jay and Vaniity content, but just an average amount from the other models.
A tip on the join price. If you join through Porn Users you can join through one of the models’ sites and it’s just $24.95. You still receive the full network. If you join through the network’s site it is $35. The biller is Verotel and there are no cross sales. It’s a good network if you like Bailey Jay and Vaniity. I think a fan of either would get their money’s worth just with the large amount of content they have of each of those two. |
|
09-28-20 10:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
TS Bailey Jay
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large solo transsexual site of the very pretty Bailey Jay.
637 downloadable photo sets.
270 downloadable videos including 161 solo.
The site updates 6-7 times per month.
Is part of the TGirl Network.
Premium quality videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The network itself makes using any of the sites confusing. There are multiple ways to download and each site only uses one of them.
It says there’s a daily download limit of 8GB. I have not hit it. They could lower the bitrate too.
Price is a bit steep considering some of the sites aren’t updating and haven’t in awhile. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bailey Jay is one of the prettiest TS models in porn. She looks like one the AAA female professional models in porn. Except for the fact that she has a bigger than average dick, gets very erect and shoots cum better than most male porn stars. That is an important part of TS porn since a lot of the TS girls are taking hormones and it causes them to have problems with keeping a full erection or fully ejaculating. It’s not a problem for Bailey.
Bailey likes to do solo scenes. Some of these do include her using a dildo on herself while masturbating her dick. She has implants, but because of her natural build being of a medium build, they do not look overdone. Her neck up is where she stands out in the TS world. The first time I watched one of her scenes I thought she looked like former supermodel Cindy Crawford. She is that pretty.
She also does hardcore and some of the scenes are titled “with stranger” and I have no way of verifying that or disputing it. It is noteworthy that she seems to like the “bottom” role even though she is often as big built as the men and with her looks she could probably get some “top” roles.
A few minor complaints include the bitrate in the movies. An 11 minute, 1080p movie should not be nearly 3GB. The bitrate on most of the 1080p scenes is higher than the bitrate I have seen on 4K scenes from other sites. If that download limit of 8GB per day is working that would severely limit how much you could download in a month. They do give you three choices for video downloads and that might be the answer to avoiding those incredibly large 1080p files. They offer a 480p version and a 720p version in WMV. The file size difference is 1080p at 3GB, 720p at 400MB and 480p at 100MB. I’m sure I can live without the excess bitrate of the 1080p.
I do like this site more than the others on the network since it is loaded with content and everything is easier to use on it. It looks like they put a lot of work into this site while the others are not near as consistent. The amount of content tells a little about Bailey, she does seem to much prefer having photos made than video. The updates are currently 5-6 photo sets per month with 1 video per month. I don’t know where she ranks in current TS models, but I have to think she’s near the top. |
|
09-28-20 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Bound Gods
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good-looking, athletic, naked, hung men torturing each other
Over 600 scenes, it hasn’t updated since May 2020 -- probably a pandemic issue.
Categories or tags are listed on each scene. It’s important since some of these categories and tags are very unusual like Corporal Punishment.
Scenes are long (45 minutes plus) and have stories with them.
Each scene has a video and photoset.
All 600+ scenes have 720p download with lower versions also available. |
| Cons: |
I would prefer these scenes to be more solo or maybe adding a female.
Some may not be happy with the video resolution. The newer videos’ HD version is also 720p, but with a higher bitrate than the older ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t really the type of site I usually go for. I prefer solo men or at least scenes that involve a woman with the guys. There are exceptions and sites on this network show those exceptions. If the guys are good enough looking and are hard enough I’m willing to look over the preferences in what I’m seeing them doing. Though some of these guys do seem closer to gay than bi or straight they are almost all very masculine. That helps us ladies look at it in other ways like we are the voyeur watching instead of being involved.
It would be difficult to turn away with most of these guys. A few of these guys are commonly found on sites like this and even on sites with dominant females like Wolf Hudson who is a common star on the site Divine Bitches where women dominate men. They do a good job of incorporating a story or fantasy if you prefer to call it that. Some scenes are one or two guys with another guy tied up and they take turns masturbating him or giving him a blowjob. There are some public scenes too. Most of these scenes are filmed in a “dungeon” and it looks real. They have torture racks along the walls, whips, just about everything a good dom has in their personal dungeon. They even link to a site where you can buy the exact items you see used in the scene.
The stories are standard fare, but at least there are stories. With scenes as long as these there just about has to be a story or it would be too long to try and figure out what is going on.
The 720p videos are the largest they offer for downloads, but those are just as good as most sites’ 1080p videos when you watch them full screen. There are over 600 scenes and there is a note on the site talking about how Covid has slowed production. The newest update was in May 2020, right in line with when the pandemic was growing and becoming a bigger concern. Before the stoppage they were averaging 2 scenes per month.
The majority of the scenes are two men, sometimes three, having sex, giving each other blowjobs and torturing each other. I would like it better if they had more of the masturbation scenes even if it’s 2-3 guys masturbating each other. The schematics of any sex -- even with a female, takes away one of the best visuals for me, the hard dick. I would recommend this to gay men who are into rougher sex and play. It’s okay for straight women since these are some of the more masculine male models I have seen in porn. |
|
09-28-20 10:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Men On Edge
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a site aimed at gay men, but I believe straight women can get as much enjoyment from it and can learn a few tricks.
Very unique and interesting theme that I am surprised isn’t tried more often with female models doing the edging to men.
Edging is the physical stimulation of a man’s dick until he is ready to cum, hence, men on edge.
Very attractive men if you are into masculine, hairy, well-hung and very erect.
327 scenes with new scenes being halted for Covid. Prior to Covid they were releasing 2-3 scenes per month. If that will continue in the future isn’t known.
I prefer long scenes and the scenes on this site are nearly an hour each. |
| Cons: |
They do some cosplay which could be off-putting to some. It’s usually themed based on a close holiday (zombie/monster at Halloween, Leprechaun at St. Patricks)
Some of the harder parts in the scenes can be hard to watch including poles/sticks up the butt. |
| Bottom Line: |
The act of edging is a highly underutilized niche in all porn. Including for females and males. It seems like torture for the person it’s being done to, but as long as the other person eventually lets them orgasm it is probably going to intensify the orgasm for them. I would like to find sites that have women edging men too.
The basic story of these scenes is one guy is going to torture the other guy in hard ways like the mentioned stick up the butt and in nicer ways like rubbing his dick or sucking it for him. It’s still torture since he will stop when the guy is nearing orgasm. You will see some ruined type orgasms where the dominant one stops, but the other still cums without any stimulation. Those kind of make me feel bad for the guy. I do enjoy the visuals of these scenes. You see men peaking with their dicks looking like they are ready to explode. You see pre-cum. You also will see a lot of throbbing. It’s very arousing even for a straight woman to watch.
There’s not a lot of sex in the scenes between the guys. It is mostly regulated to handjobs, blowjobs and they have “sucking machines” they use on each other. The name of it could be Men in Pain, but I do believe there is a site named that. Most of these guys look like they are ready to cry or die moments before they finally are allowed to cum.
This is achieved by having the man’s arms or even entire upper body tied up so he can’t reach down and bring himself to climax. I do believe this is a more shallow form of porn, but I also know I really like it and I think that’s all that really matters in the big picture.
They have 327 scenes with the last update being in April 2020. There is a note on the site that says they stopped filming when the pandemic started, so I am hoping they come back and start filming again. When the site first started in 2012 they were releasing a new scene everyday. That slowed to 2-3 updates per month. The videos’ top resolution is 720p and that goes back to 2012 too. These videos are not a typical 720p video. My monitor is set to 1080p and I watch these scenes in full screen. They are very clear on 1080p. I’m happy to make the exchange for hard drive space.
They have a few scene setups that are worth adding. It’s not unusual for the guy being tortured to start out in white and wet, tight boxer shorts. That’s a fetish of mine and those are my favorite scenes. It’s not often you see clothing fetishes on all-male sites, but they do work those in.
This is a “gay” site I am happy with and confident to recommend to straight women. I just wish I could find more content of women doing this underrated niche to men. |
|
09-28-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Girl Cum
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly hot messy female orgasm site.
There are 66 models, some have multiple scenes.
69 scenes, probably the only time I will ever get to say that number in a review with two updates per month.
Reading all the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. I will leave it at that.
Video and photo quality is exceptional and are available in unlimited downloads.
Easy to cancel and navigate except for a few bugs |
| Cons: |
If you go to the model list it will show you 24 models, if you click to go to the next page it shows you the same 24 models as page 1 and if you click on page 3 it shows you the same 24 models from page 1. The dropdown box does work for finding all the models.
Upsells are everywhere. They also show you scenes from sites you don’t have access to.
Maybe it fits better in cons, reading the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. |
| Bottom Line: |
I probably need to clarify my pro/con jabbing at the male reviewers for saying the female cum in these scenes is fake. It may be in some of the scenes, but from the looks of the scenes they are editing and cutting parts throughout the scenes. I am not -- as a woman, going to say the female cum is fake. It takes a very relaxed and aroused woman to produce a messy orgasm like is seen in these scenes. Some sex toys like the Magic Wand Plus are known, especially in edging a female, to cause very messy orgasms. What I notice is the women are usually very wet and starting to show messiness near the beginning of the scenes. That makes me think they are being prepped prior to the sex starting. There also is a lot of male giving the female oral sex before the intercourse starts. I am not trying to be hard on the male reviewers, but I can say women can cum that much. I am also not insinuating they are just not taking the females they have been with to that level. As I started this, I said the female needs to be very relaxed and aroused. A lot of women are insecure about showing that much sexual energy. Either way, I really love this site and hope it will update more once the pandemic is over.
This is a site that doesn’t really need stories or plots. It’s about the female’s pleasure. Which is different from 99% of straight porn out there. The models are all professionals. They are mostly young, though a few MILF models are present and they are believably horny. Despite little to no story there are scenes with extended setups like public masturbation and flashing before the scene starts. Which would also lend to the female being aroused before the guy even touches her. Is it really that hard for guys to believe a woman could get even more aroused about sex than a man does?
The site could be bigger though I picked the right time to review this since there are 69 scenes. I don’t think you will see many 69s, at least not in my memory of the scenes I have watched. With only 2 updates per month it will take a long time for this site to have a lot of scenes, but hopefully, they will stick to the current style or formula instead of making it less erotic just to produce more scenes. I will say there isn’t one scene I plan on skipping over.
The download options are another major positive. Each of the 69 scenes can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The pictures are not as impressive at 1500x1000 and the downloadable sets only have 30-50 pictures in them with most of them being taken during the sex parts.
The only thing I can find to complain about is the size of the site, but in my few years of experience of porn viewing and collecting, I usually look at a site’s size by how many scenes I want to download, not by how many scenes they have. Most sites I join, even ones with thousands of scenes, only have 50-100 scenes I download. This one has 69.
Highly recommended. |
|
09-28-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
All Girl Massage
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun take on the massage niche, there are no dicks in it!
Big site with 601 scenes, they update 2 times a month.
All 601 scenes have at least 1080p as their highest resolution, newer scenes add 4K.
English subtitles on the scenes with non-English speaking models.
Includes 5 other massage-themed sites. Some of those have dicks in them.
Oiled up and spread out teenage women makes a woman wonder if those dicks are needed! |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes have a decent story and passable acting, but some are just quiet until the moaning starts. It can catch you off guard if you’re not expecting the moaning -- believe me, it did me!
I would like to see them update more frequently. Two new scenes a month isn’t much.
Maybe a little more playfulness in the scenes. The scenes almost give me the feeling of taking themselves too seriously. |
| Bottom Line: |
Massage niche is of some interest to me, but not based on the massages I get from the little man at a local mall. It does make these scenes more interesting since I have had massages. It makes the massages more uncomfortable! I start noticing the slight touch of my hair. I need to find a teenage, female masseuse.
The scenes are as varied as the niche allows. The niche being genre (lesbian), niche (massage). They do use creative scenarios. One scene is supposed to be during a business meeting. The masseuse gets under the table while the woman being massaged is sitting at the table with two other women. The masseuse starts with rubbing her feet and legs while the one having this done to her tries to be quiet and look like she is listening to the other two. That’s when the masseuse buries her face between the massaged woman’s legs. It kind of reminds me of the stories on Pure CFNM. There are scenes with more than one woman being massaged. Not that I have any idea what is going to happen in that scenario! I have to watch it.
I am always impressed when all of a site’s scenes have at least 1080p downloads and this one has that. They also offer 720p, 480p, and a couple of smaller mobile resolutions. There is a small downloadable picture set with the scenes it usually has 30-40 photos. What I liked best about the site is the diversity in models. There are some white, some brown, some black, some heavy, some slim and it adds to the experience for me. I also believe the diversity helps make the scenes more modern and seem less repetitive.
There are 601 scenes on the site. You all receive access to 5 other massage-themed sites that at least one of those is probably better than this site. Especially if you prefer male/female, which I usually do prefer.
The site navigates well as long as you don’t mind scrolling. Hopefully, they will keep working those stories into these scenes and maybe even expand them. I would think there is a market for best friends giving each other a massage that turns into cooking breakfast for each other. While their husbands are asleep. I had to throw that in or it was going to be bland. The network is a definite join for those that enjoy massage porn. I have joined a few massage sites in the past and found them to be too similar from scene to scene. This network has 6 different sites including this one to keep that from happening. |
|
09-28-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
have learned to never trust a masseuse again thanks to porn.
There are 229 scenes on the site, but they haven’t updated it since May 2020.
The newer videos have 4K, but 1080p is more of the high standard here.
Pretty, young girls (18-22), athletic guys.
It may be the one niche that has an automatic story built in.
Vendo is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
This niche is repetitive even when done well.
Very inconsistent update schedule with 3 so far in 2020, 6 in 2019 and 4 in 2018, that mainly matters if you’re looking for 4K.
They could at least massage the woman before sticking their finger up her ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like massage porn. The best I have seen does become repetitive since there’s just not a lot you can do with the stories. I would rate this site in the middle or lower in comparison to other massage sites I have tried. There’s nothing that bad about it, but the inconsistency in updates combined with very little actual massaging makes it only okay as a massage site.
I have made it clear I like younger/older porn. Most masseuses I have met in real life are older. This site isn’t the only massage site that misses the opportunity to get in a second niche with an older male masseuse, but their masseuses on this site look like the jock next door. It’s just poor planning to me. If you go in a house with the jock next door, take your clothes off and lay on a bed, it’s not likely he’s going to be massaging you gently for very long. I feel like there has to be some sort of level of believability.
You get 229 scenes here. Around 30 of those have 4K downloads. The rest do have at least 720p and around half also have 1080p. There are “pictures” but they are really screenshots as you can see the subtitles on them. That is a feature I wish all their sites had. All of the scenes I have watched from this site have subtitles. They are basic subtitles that are sometimes funny. Not being a native English speaker, it’s hard for me to tell if it’s broken English, but they have made me laugh.
This looks like a site they had high hopes for. The girls are mostly young, pretty and flat to moderate chested. Which makes for good massage scenes. It adds to their naivety. An inconsistency I have noticed throughout this network is with the pictures. The pictures on this site can’t be downloaded in zips and almost seem pointless since they are taken directly from the video.
It’s a good site if you like massage porn, but haven’t watched much massage porn. The guys are not bad looking on this site, better than most of the sites on this network even, but they seem out of place. They look more like the pervert that’s peeking in while the masseuse is massaging the young women. It’s worth a look if you have a membership to the network. |
|
09-28-20 10:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The never gets old tutor teaches the student a few new things, niche.
Some of the scenes do a good job of depicting an older, dominant tutor with the submissive student.
There are 234 scenes with 1 new one added each month.
The female models are cute/pretty, the males are just okay.
Something I usually don’t notice, but this site has very good camerawork.
Photo sets are downloadable and videos are as well with no limitations. |
| Cons: |
When I said the guys are just okay, it’s mostly because they are using either gray hair color or wigs to make the guys look older.
No subtitles and no way for me to know what they’re saying. I guess they’re not studying English. |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is almost always a popular one for me. I prefer the older man with younger woman scenes and this niche is made for that setup. Except when you see a male who looks like a 24 year old athlete with solid gray hair. Maybe it’s an older man that just looks a lot younger than he is. I do think they missed a good opportunity with this site. The scenes that involve any lesbian parts are threesomes with 2 female students and a male tutor. It seems like someone would have thought about making a female the tutor with a younger female student.
The site is good sized for this niche. The 234 scenes come with download options from 540p to 4K. The newer scenes only have the 4K option. The downloads are unlimited and also include a downloadable photo set.
The obvious problem is there is very little English. The problem I noticed more once watching the scenes is there are scenes where the tutor is already at the girl’s house and she’s in her underwear to start the scene. One of the threesome ones, the tutor is sitting between the two girls when the scene starts and both girls are touching him. Maybe they have been having sex for months, and that’s where the dialogue is missed. Tutors don’t just pop up on living room couches with boners.
I do like some of the scenes, but also find myself streaming them before downloading. This niche for me has a lot of potential, but the parts I listed above are how you lower the potential. They’re not even studying in most of the scenes. They are watching television. I would expect more spanking, more shows of dominance and submissiveness. And if the girl is going to make the first move how about a little seduction? In the couch threesome the one girl just slaps her hand on the guy’s dick. I still believe the site is okay. Most of the girls are cute. The guys are really just okay. They have a few scenes that have what looks like a real older man not one they have made look older. Those are the best scenes for me.
I would like to see sites like this one worry more about the production values than making 4K videos. It just seems like there is a lot of wasted potential. I would even prefer having English subtitles instead of 4K. If you have the time to go through and find scenes you know you will like it’s an okay join. |
|
09-28-20 10:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
21 Naturals
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-natural female models with an emphasis on male/female sex.
Some of these models are knockouts! Mia Split, Romy Indy, Alyssa Reece are all worth looking deeper into their careers in porn.
Watching the guys try to have gentle to moderately paced sex with these beautiful women.
They are updating once per week. There are 988 scenes to choose from.
The video quality is high and the pictures are excellent quality, both are downloadable.
It’s easy to get around on the site, there are no ads and they have broken the scenes into pages so you don’t have to scroll forever. |
| Cons: |
It’s romantic. I can’t believe I listed that as a con either. Everything looks so nice, the bedding, the curtains, and there’s nothing close to rough.
The scenes are repetitive and heavily scripted. Nearly every scene is right in the 25 minute area.
No more than 2 people in any scene! It’s porn! There has to be another guy around somewhere? |
| Bottom Line: |
This site gets my attention with their all-natural models. I reviewed a site with mostly tattooed models not too long ago and questioned if tattooed people only have rough sex. This is the other side of it. Tell me it’s not true. These all-natural models do have rough sex sometimes, right? It feels like a social experiment or really bad job of stereotyping. I do like this site and really, I like it better than I expected to. I like Kink and a little edginess with my porn. There’s not much of either on this site. Mia Split may add a different twist to the site with her flexibility. She looks like the one that needs to be doing rough hardcore. If your body bends that much use it. I named off the other two too, Romy Indy and Alyssa Reece, they remind me of women I know. Which is the biggest selling point here. These women look like your next door neighbors. Maybe your next door neighbor’s daughters! I’m going to make it kinky eventually.
I did not list it as a con, but there is no story and very little dialogue. Maybe it’s just my newness to European porn, but shouldn’t this niche of porn have a story? Why are they making soft, passionate love? Was it a lucky Tinder find or did they just happen to walk into a house and decide to have sex? I do see it as a con, but the female models save it. The pairings with the males is also very good. You won’t see any foot-long dicks trying to squeeze into an 18 year old model. I wonder if they even paired these couples together for physical compatibility? I got that feeling in the Romy Indy scenes. There isn’t a long, 3-5 minute section in the videos of the woman trying to get the dick all the way in her. There is more focus on the man and woman being in tune with each other’s movements. That saves the site for me.
There are 988 scenes. With once a week updates they will be to 1,000 around the time my subscription runs out. The download options for videos includes all 988 videos having 1080p. I will mention the older scenes have 1080p, but not 720p, they jump from 540p to 1080p. The newer scenes have all the options from 4K down to two mobile versions, those also have 1080p and 720p, 540p, 480p and 360p.
I used to didn’t pay much attention to pictures, but have learned these more artsy sites have some really great pictures. The photo sets have around 80-100 photos in them. The resolution is 5800x3700 on the high-res download zips and there is a smaller resolution available too.
I may need to bury my head in the sand for saying I really like this site. I am sure I will want something rougher and kinkier to watch, but this is the best I have seen in the romantic style of hardcore. Can I get a vote for Romcore? I would recommend it to those into this style. I like it better than Sex Art and X-Art. |
|
09-28-20 10:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Creampie Angels
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the more impressive sites on this network.
Probably their best collection of models on any of their sites.
Currently 225 scenes with a new scene being added each month.
Believable, maybe even passionate sex.
Decent variety in settings including some outdoors.
The only ads are at the bottom of the screen in the members area. The site has a clean, neat, interface to it and works well. |
| Cons: |
Being from India, I’m not really into creampie porn. It would take ages to explain.
Even though this looks to be one of the network’s top sites the video quality didn’t go above 720p until 2014-15. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would have scored this site 5 points higher if it wasn’t a creampie site. I’m just not into creampies, but do like cumshots so I think a 5 point deduction is fair since they are replacing one of my favorite parts with a part I don’t like.
The models on this site are as pretty, sexy and into the sex as any on this network. And it’s consistently the case. I do wonder if anyone has questioned if they have any fake cum in the creampie parts as some of them do not look real. It looks like someone took a can of whipped cream and squirted it in the woman. I can’t say I have experienced fluffy cum.
The scenes total 225, there is a video and photo set with each. Both are downloadable and it’s unlimited downloading. The streaming player works well too if you like to stream scenes before downloading them. There still isn’t much story to any of these scenes. You’re getting mostly sex with the guy cumming inside the woman. There is a good amount of emotions from the actors and that helps my view of it and Eastern European porn too.
The variety here is mostly from the setting. They have a few outdoor scenes. There are some in the bathtub/shower and they break away from the same bed setting a lot of their sites seem to be stuck on using. The models also show some diversity, not really ethnically, but they do have some very fair complexion redheads, a lot of brunettes and some blondes. The guys in these scenes are a little more attractive than their “teen” guys. I would like to see bigger, more muscular guys in these types of scenes since I see creampie as a power/control niche of sex and porn. I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite site on the network, but I could see people saying it’s the best site on the network.
I don’t really understand the video quality difference on this site. Their highest quality download up until 2015 was 720p, they added 1080p in 2015 until 2016, in 2016 they added 4K. That is not a major problem for me, but thought it should be mentioned since it seems like they would have 1080p before 2015, otherwise, it's a good site. |
|
09-28-20 10:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network with 21 sites included.
Good coverage of multiple genres and niches.
Update schedule is not steady, but they had 9 new scenes in August and 2 so far in September.
10,439 scenes. The scenes consist of a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Technical specs are high with newer videos having 4K
Good to very good production values, lighting and direction, albeit some scenes are very similar to other scenes. |
| Cons: |
The scenes, unless the scenery or setting changes, are similar. You can even look at the times of the scenes and you see a consistent 21-25 minutes pattern.
A lot of the sites are not updating.
Older videos only have 240p and 480p downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am impressed with this network. They do a very good job of spreading their niches out. There are four specific anal sites on the network, two that could be considered anal (GapeLand and DP Fanatics). They have solo model sites like Aletta Ocean Empire, Blue Angel Live, Sex with Kathia Nobili and Sweet Sophie Moone. There are two sites aimed at the oral pleasure for men with Deepthroat Frenzy and Only Swallows. There also are four lesbian sites and they have two multi-genre sites with Club Sandy and Pix And Video. There is plenty of content from varying genres and niches to satisfy most viewers desires.
The only major complaint I have is the content does seem to be directed and even timed. Some of the sites have longer scenes, but the majority follow a strict order of sexual positions and do so in under 25 minutes. The updates look to be coming from 4-6 sites while the rest are not updating.
The models are very pretty to gorgeous. The male models seem to be highly professional. There isn’t much talking and there is little story to the scenes other than sex.
The amount of content is impressive with over 10,000 scenes. If the lower quality of the older scenes doesn’t bother you those are worth looking into too. The newer scenes are more plagued by the feeling they are following a flow chart.
I preferred going to each of the different sites instead of using the full network view. I liked these sites best: Cuties Galore, Footsie Babes, Anal Teen Angels and DP Fanatics. I think that shows a good example of how broad their content is in coverage of fetishes and niches.
Their update schedule doesn’t seem to follow an exact schedule. They will have a week with no updates then release new updates on back to back days. It does equal out to 9-10 new updates per month.
The network did change its focus. The older content is almost exclusively solo and lesbian with the newer content having more anal and more hardcore sex. I like either way depending on my mood. They do both styles well and sometimes I think a site like this shows why dialogue in porn isn’t as needed as we might think.
I do take some surprise from the scene names and screencap with it. One is called Sparkling and Sensual. The screencap shows a man pulling a woman’s hair with one hand and ripping at her panties with the other while she looks in pain. Another is Erotic Surprise and it has a young Asian model with a dick up her ass. Petty differences in language are good for laughing.
Overall, I liked it and would recommend it to anyone who wants more than one genre, niche or fetish. |
|
09-28-20 10:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
X Angels
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hardcore site that features pretty, young female models.
Premium quality on videos with up to 4K on newer videos, picture sets have zips
Unlimited downloads on videos and picture zips.
174 scenes with 2-3 updates per month.
Good price for everything you get. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know why this word came to my mind while watching these scenes -- benign.
No emotion, no dialogue, no stories.
Some of the most formulaic scenes I have seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
The girls on this site are very pretty, thin to average build and have very little personality. The word benign comes to mind as I see this as non-offensive porn. I don’t think porn needs to be offensive, but this is the type of porn that you would expect either a very young person to like (just because the models are naked) or possibly an older person who hasn’t been exposed to much porn. I was expecting more and maybe 10 years ago a site like this would have been a breath of fresh air. Instead, it is hanging by a thread for its life just based on the looks of the models.
The site isn’t a decent sized site with 174 scenes with a video and photo set for each scene. The update schedule is only okay with 2-3 updates per month. The videos are not very long. I haven’t seen one yet that is longer than 25 minutes and all are at least 20 minutes. That doesn’t help with the feeling that these scenes are formulaic. When you watch four scenes and they are 21-23 minutes with the same order of positions you start to feel like what’s the point? They do try to add other elements to the scenes. One scene is supposed to be a married man having sex with his stepdaughter in the same bed her nude mom is asleep in. Some try to incorporate forms of very light and tame bondage. It doesn’t change the formula. You could potentially say there’s some humor in the scenes. The one with the stepdad and stepdaughter having sex in the same bed as the girl’s nude mom shows the stepdad shushing the stepdaughter, but doing nothing about the bed squeaking and moving.
I think when you start noticing things like that it just shows the porn itself is not keeping your attention. I can see how and why men would be into this. The models look very young (18-22), they have nice bodies, pretty faces and most of them are even flexible. This is one of those sites that feels like it was made for men to watch. I can’t complain about the quality, nearly half of the videos have 4K, the rest have 1080p as the top option. They also offer 720p and 480p. The photo sets could be better. They are smaller in size than most sites of this type with most of the photos just being screen captures.
All and all, I couldn’t recommend it by itself, but it does include a full network with it that makes it a good value for your money, especially at the low price it is offered at. |
|
09-28-20 10:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Beauty 4K
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Sexy hardcore action with very pretty girls.
102 scenes with a new scene added every month.
As the name suggests, the video quality goes up to 4K on all scenes.
Each scene comes with a downloadable photo set.
Videos are downloadable and there are no limits.
Epoch is the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are a little on the plain or vanilla side.
The guys in the scenes are annoying.
Too much camera love from the models that seem more interested in looking at the camera than having sex. That may be a personal one. These girls are very pretty and they know it. They stare at the camera. |
| Bottom Line: |
You have two major selling points with this site. The models look young (18-22), they are very pretty and the video quality is exceptional. The sex isn’t bad. The models just seem like they would be better off in solo videos. In one scene, the very pretty model is in a cowgirl position. The cameraman is filming from behind to show her very nice butt and she’s turning her around looking at the camera. I do think that is a weakness I see in a lot of hardcore scenes. She would probably be an incredible solo model with all that eye contact with the camera.
One model is getting her toes sucked and is looking at the camera on the other side of the room. There has to be a better show of connection between the male and female for me to really enjoy hardcore scenes.
The site isn’t huge with only 102 scenes and it’s not going to become huge with only one update per month. They have another 8 years before they reach 200 scenes. I don’t think it’s a Covid-19 problem either. It looks like they have released an average of 1 scene per month since 2018. There are a few months with two updates, but there also are a few months with no new scenes.
The scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. The videos have these download options: 404p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have 4K even on the oldest scenes from 2015.
The scenes have very little story or dialogue, but they do try to work some fetishes and different niches in. There is a massage scene, some foot fetish, young and old, they’re at least trying to give the viewer something to work with. I listed plain/vanilla in the cons. What I mean by that is the scenes are very similar from scene to scene even if they work a fetish in or a different niche.
The feeling I get from this content is they know the models are very pretty and the video quality is high quality so that’s enough. It’s not enough. The dorkiness of the guys trying to get themselves on camera too is annoying. The acting itself is acting. The girls jump back and act surprised to see a dick. The guys are just jumping in front of the camera. I see the models as ideal solo models since they wouldn’t see a dick to be surprised by and they wouldn’t have a guy hogging the camera lens. It just isn’t the type of hardcore porn I like. It could be for others since you do have the two big selling points to think about. |
|
09-28-20 09:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, solo girl and lesbian scenes.
515 scenes with 3 to 4 scenes added each month.
Porn User's price of $14.95 is very good.
Downloadable videos and photo sets with each scene.
The newer videos have 4K.
Good use of settings including the bathroom and shower. |
| Cons: |
The not that much older scenes (2013) only have up to 720p.
Very little story or dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
The title of this site could be subjectively questioned. I didn’t list it as a con, but there are some models on this site I don’t even find attractive. My main interest in solo girl porn or lesbian isn’t in the model’s looks. I still don’t consider myself bisexual or lesbian. I do like watching younger women masturbate and play around with each other in lesbian scenes. I didn’t list the looks part in cons since their looks are not part of my interest in this type of content.
I was surprised to see the videos as new as 2013 only had up to 720p in the download options. The newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K. The big mistake I likely make with sites like this one is I forget they don’t speak English -- or Hindi. I don’t require a story, but I do like to know what they are saying.
This is a normal solo and lesbian site. The lesbian scenes are believable enough. You can see the tongue touching the clitoris. The solo scenes feature believable orgasms including pussy lip spreading to show contractions. It’s hard to pick whether the solo or lesbian scenes are better or worse when comparing the two. The lesbian scenes do seem to get a little kinkier. One part I have noticed is the newer solo scenes are more dependent on toys instead of fingers. The older scenes have more fingering in them.
You have 515 scenes with video and photo sets. The update schedule is okay with 3, sometimes 4 new updates per month. The discounted price here on Porn Users helps a lot too.
My favorite setting for solo and even lesbian scenes is the bathroom or shower. They have a good selection of scenes from those locations. I think it’s just the belief these girls look so young they would be using the bathroom for their masturbation. I didn’t list this as a con, but could have. The camerawork could be better. I have watched several scenes where the model is orgasming in solo, but the camera is pulled back. I don’t want close-ups, but I would like to see a closer view on the orgasms.
It’s a good site for what it is, but I have seen better. That could be the language barrier. Some of the models are very quiet and barely look or sound like they are enjoying themselves. |
|
09-28-20 09:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Her husband’s site JimSlip is included.
Most, but not all, of the content is older/younger lesbian
Nylons, pantyhose and feet focus.
Lately updates at three times a month.
Currently has 253 scenes. |
| Cons: |
No PU discount.
The site layout is a bit dated. It does not look like newer sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I share a few things in common with Lara Latex. We both love scenes with nylons and pantyhose. We also love showing feet and getting attention to our feet. I would call myself a reverse foot fetishist. Neither of us are barely legal or tiny. In fact she is my same height at 5’10”. She loves her girls and I love watching girls. She has many scenes with guys too and lately she mentions she has an escorting career. I love her enthusiasm and her pure enjoyment of her sexuality. I would say she is a great role model for women who enjoy sex and are assertive about it. She has pantyhose, garter belts, girdles, seamed stockings and high heels. Lara loves to use costumes in her scenes as well. Sometimes she plays a maid or a nurse. The one that gets me is her as a schoolgirl. That stretches my imagination as she is tall, about 40ish and rather large breasted. She loves shorter women and being the older female. In fact that is played up quite a bit and makes for many hot scenes. Most of her partner women are pros and are not as much fun to watch as she herself is. I was pleasantly surprised to see Destiny DeVille paired with Lara. She is Indian, born in Bombay (Mumbai) and there have never been many in porn. In repressed India porn is illegal and women have very few rights as well. I have not seen her in many years and I think she is retired.
In her heterosexual scenes with guys, they aren’t your usual porn guys, in fact mostly they look like fans of the site who got lucky.As an extra added value her husband has his own site, Jim Slip. His scenes are older/younger and for the most part entertaining.
I was able to find a discount for this site and it helps with an older site like this one.
Although much of the site is rather old, I would recommend this if you can find the discounted price. I think 87 is a fair rating. |
|
09-28-20 09:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Maybe the most diverse content on this network.
It is the biggest site on the network with 687 scenes.
The scenes have a video and picture set with newer ones having 4K (see cons).
Not all scenes are as formulaic as most of the sites on this network are.
Simple navigation system is usable, uncluttered and works well.
Pretty girls especially in the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Only one-fourth of the scenes even have 1080p. The scenes from 2013 and back have 720p as the highest download option and some of the even older scenes top out even lower with 576p being the largest download option.
It looks like this site was once the network’s top site. It is now only updating once per month and while there are still days left in September 2020, there hasn’t been an update this month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is frustrating for all the right reasons. At one time, it was updating daily and the scenes didn’t stick to a formula. There is some anal mixed in, rimming, lesbian, group, threesomes, it’s like when they moved to naming their sites after a specific niche they developed the formulas for each niche or a template even and limited their creativity.
Which is why this site is frustrating. The older scenes are very good, but the video quality is a large drop-off from the newer scenes. It really isn’t a huge deal to me, but it probably would be to others. I can watch 480p if the action is good enough. I think the size of the site shows how much they were once putting into the content on it. They have 687 total scenes, but only 45 of those scenes were released over the last 5 years.
There still isn’t much story or reason for the sex other than filming a porn, but there is more emotion and slight kinkiness in the older scenes. It feels like the site has been presented 3 different ways. From 2016-2020 it is mostly plain, little emotion porn and only 10 updates per year. From 2010-2016 there was moderate emotion in the scenes and they released around 22-24 updates per year. From 2006-2010, there was high emotion and they released around 90 updates per year. I would guess somewhere around 2010 is when they started separating their content into niches and that’s when they lost some of the creativity and diversity the 2006-2010 years showcased. Those time spans also go from 2016-2020 (very high video quality), 2010-2016 (good video quality) and 2006-2010 (standard video quality at best).
I know it’s a big if, but if you don’t mind the lower quality video this site’s older content is the best content -- in my opinion -- on the entire network. The action is good and varied, the models are cuter or prettier, there are threesomes including two guys with one girl. There are group scenes with as many as four people in them and there are lesbian scenes too. It seems like a lesson in if it’s not broke don’t fix it, but they fixed it and broke it. |
|
09-28-20 09:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
My MILFz
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that has a lot of potential.
Bills Using Epoch
Includes access to live cam shows and thousands of other streaming videos as a bonus.
Older women and younger men.
59 scenes currently.
Updates twice per month, could be more but it's better than none. |
| Cons: |
Pornusers does not have a discount
There are no downloads as the site is streaming only |
| Bottom Line: |
My Milfz hits on another interest of mine, which Is older and younger. In this site the tables are turned a bit towards the women being older than the guys. Being MILFs they are in my age range. Mostly the scenes use the themes of a stepmother or a horny housewife. I am neither and don’t expect to be. Still some story is better than the standard in and out sex found so often in ordinary porn. The scenes are hot enough for me, but there are just not enough of them. I can’t fault the site for lack of trying. Even during the pandemic, new videos are being added twice a month. The low number of videos and photosets,59, is because the site is fairly new and only started in 2019.
In contrast, I can fault the site for being streaming only. Yes I know this is a growing trend in porn, but after my subscription is over I would want to get off on some of the better videos again. There is no discount through Porn Users, however and the biller is Epoch. They are easy to work with and cancellation is simple.
If this site had no extras, I would say it needs more time to grow before it is ready to join. The extras are some of the best on any site I have ever signed up for. There is a cam site with many thousands of models that compare with those of the best and better known cam sites. They will strip to nude and put on a great sexy show faster too. Faster equals less tipping and less watching them waste time until they get more tips.
If you are like me, you will love the other streaming sites that are in the niche of older /younger. You get Family Screw, Grandparents X, Granddadz, and Grandmams. They are all a bit different from your average older/younger porn and are worth checking out. There are so many other streaming videos that you get that you have to find something that you will like. I mean seriously a lot as there are over 15,000. Some of those sites that are included as streaming only here can be joined with downloads, it's a nice feature and a good way to test out other older/younger sites before spending the money on them.
I would go with a score of 85 as you get so much value for your dollar. |
|
09-28-20 09:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What looks to be genuine amateur content
There are 229 scenes with no new updates in sight
Only one downloadable video option, but it is 720p WMV
Mixture of niches and the performance quality is just as varied
There are some hidden gems in these videos including a few group scenes. |
| Cons: |
No streaming ability. I like to scan through a scene to see if it’s worth downloading, but even though they have the option to stream nothing happens when you hit play.
The poor performances in some of the scenes.
Every scene varies including location, camerawork, attractiveness of models and there are more bad ones than good ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have seen the ex-GF network and thought maybe this was related to it, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. These videos are of young European guys and girls. I don’t know how much I believe the ex-GF part. The scenes I have downloaded and watched seem more like a desperate female trying to break into the porn industry by having someone film her having sex. Maybe the part that signals “amateurs” more than anything else are the guys in the scenes. There are guys in these scenes that look like they were picked up on the side of a road and cast into their first ever video. It is hard to tell how old these scenes are too. There is a group of guys that are in a couple of the scenes that have mullets, are wearing wife beater tank tops and look like they were just released from a low-security jail for shoplifting. It’s at least authentic.
That goes into the performances. The guys in these scenes give it their all. The girls go from at least interested and trying to look like they would rather be sleeping. The scene count is misleading as well. At least half of the scenes do not have videos with them. It seems to be either photos or video for each one. I haven’t found one scene yet that has both video and photos. There is a lot broken within the site too. The scenes with just pictures don't even have a picture of the girl in the scene. It’s a broken image with the x in the corner.
I do think there’s some redeeming qualities. Some of the videos are pretty good. The 720p video isn’t bad either. I think the biggest positive is this seems very authentic. It’s a nice change from the other sites on this network where I feel like nearly everything is formulaic and repetitive. There are some public and outdoor scenes too. I think this site makes me realize how frustrating the network is. Seeing the same positions in the same style room for nearly the same exact amount of minutes is not good when it comes to porn. This site is receiving a higher score than it probably deserves, but some might look over this site if they join this network. Maybe a decent score will make others look at it to get a break from the monotone style of most of the sites on this network. |
|
09-28-20 09:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Sssh.com
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Award winning porn for women. That's what the main page says.
Implies the stories in the scenes were written by professional erotica authors.
This should be a con, but I am going to give them credit for doing a great job of marketing what is a poor to mediocre site.
I believe there is a market for this type of "female-aimed" porn, it's just not for me. |
| Cons: |
Has not updated in years. The site itself does not look modern either.
Boring content that is just not erotic enough
Very little if any HD content. The photo sets are also low quality and do not even zip downloads.
Not a big name biller.
The site is hard to use as it has folders inside folders to find only low quality inside. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am very interested in the niche of porn for women. I never knew that back in 1999, there was a site dedicated to what us girls want to see. So I took the plunge and joined. The site was only $4.95 so I figured I did not have much to lose by checking it out.
In the more than 20 years since this site opened, there have been two major changes. One is that women have become more assertive sexually and we know what we want and how we want it. The other change is in the world of porn. It is now so readily available that we have choices. When this site was started this was it. For women we have seen a lessening of the stigma there once was when we admitted to liking porn. To a degree porn itself has evolved, just not enough. One day there will be better choices but modern porn is still a man’s world.
For me this was a history lesson, a peek into the world of sexual entertainment of a different time and a different place. The founder was a woman. Looking at it now, she made a site that seems to represent stereotypes of what women need. There is a large emphasis on sexy stories, shopping and makeup. That may be fine for some, but it is not me in 2020. I think she made a site that she would like. It did not work for many of us and it abruptly ended in about 2015 as a failed experiment. It even comes off as more of a blog or personal experience for the webmaster who decided to add some porn for some extra zest and appeal.
I want to see a lot more that stimulates my mind to make me in the mood. I need a harder edge than many and I am not ashamed to say that. One of my all time favorites is Kink, and this is not in the same class, not the same building or the same country for that matter.
I hate to complain about a site that was extremely cheap to join, but whatever little there was to download, I did not bother to keep.
This site probably deserves a score of fifty, but I am in a good mood today and will give them a few extra points for being a pioneer. I think 64 is about right. |
|
09-28-20 09:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
148
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big site with a lot of teen (females) having hardcore sex.
414 scenes with new updates only coming at 1 per month.
Scenes include a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Nearly all of the models are very attractive if you’re into teens.
If you’re into porn not looking like porn this would be a good site for you. It looks like two people just meeting up at one of their houses and having sex. |
| Cons: |
There’s not a lot here to keep me interested except the pretty models. Since I’m not a lesbian that’s not really enough for me.
I don’t know if they are going for the obvious formula not just in the sex, but also in the setting, but is surprising to me to see how much these scenes look alike.
I also wasn’t expecting to see so many tattoos. I like tattoos. It just looks unusual to see teen porn models with full thigh tattoos.
The guys are rarely attractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
As much as any site I have been on this one shows the need for attractive men in porn. Besides the tattoos that seem out of place on the young females, the guys either have oddly placed tattoos or 1980’s style earrings. The guys aren’t likely teens. Most look in their late 20’s at the youngest. Some look like they were born before me. I don’t know if the tattoos clash with the sterile white backdrops in most of the scenes or what it is that I don’t like about the combination of the models/settings, but it’s just not appealing to me. As pretty as some of the models are there are some that are very pale with very dark tattoos having sex in a completely white room. Maybe that is it, the dark tattoos distract my vision and cause me to focus on them.
This is one of the biggest sites in this group of sites with 414 scenes, but they are only updating once per month. I didn’t consider it a con, but there is no ethnic diversity at all. I expected that since the site isn’t based in an ethnically diverse area, but that only hurts the formulaic feel of everything. This is as close to cut and paste porn as I have seen. I join porn sites to see people having sex in non-traditional ways, but what I see here reminds me of the first few times I had sex.
They do have 4K available on the newer videos and the quality is good even if you don’t want the 4K. They have 1080p, 720p, 480p and the site works well. It reminds me of when someone cooks a meal and they put more into the presentation than the taste of the food. With the amount of scenes they have and the amount of pretty models you are sure to find some scenes that interest you. I just don’t think you’re going to find anything you haven’t seen a hundred times before. I’m not going to give a real low score as I will give some leeway for subjectivity. It’s just not a site or network I will try again. I do think there is a market for this type of content. I would think males that just want to see pretty, naked, young females would be that market. I am going to say more than 95% of the content on the site is one on one with only a few threesomes and one or two foursomes or more. Maybe America has taken over my thought process. I think of porn and think of something different than what is very normal sex.
It’s a good site for high quality content with pretty, slim/slender models, just don’t expect to see anything new or different here. |
|
09-28-20 09:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
149
|
First BGG
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-threesome site featuring two girls and one guy.
The site has been around for 11 years which could be as much of a con as pro.
There are currently 127 scenes with only 1 update per month.
Site navigates well which is to be expected of a site this size.
Newer videos include 4K.
Vendo is the billing processor and they are as easy to use as any biller, maybe easier if you have multiple memberships with them they all show up. |
| Cons: |
Eleven years as a site and it only has 127 scenes. If this site fits a niche you like you will be pleased with the selection, but you won’t get much new content once you download what you want.
It just seems like this studio doesn’t believe in filming any scenes with substantial length to them. Even with a third person added the scenes average 20-30 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
You get the picture with the title of the site. There’s going to be two girls and a boy in each scene. These are not your wilder threesomes. Some of the scenes do have the guy with one of the girls while the other girl sits on the other’s face, but a lot of just looks like two different girls taking turns with the guy. The scenes do feature a lot of double blowjob action if that interests you. I’m not really for sure what they are going for here since I see the word “passionate” a lot, but the actions don’t show that. These scenes are not bad, they just aren’t great. When you see the two girls in the scenes a lot of times you are going to think it’s going to be great. The guy is mostly a clod. He just lays there and lets the two girls take turns doing their positions with him.
You only have 127 scenes here with 1 new one added per month. That has been common for them for the 11 years they have had this site, as they average just a little over 11 scenes per year. I do prefer the American sites that do this same exact niche since you get more dialogue and longer scenes. Some of the scenes feel terribly rushed. The girls are cute in looks to very pretty. The guys are a hit or miss bunch with more misses than hits. They could do better with male model selection.
The newer videos have up to 4K unlimited downloads and streaming. They also offer the standards 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. The photos can be downloaded in zips. The con side of being an 11 year old site is the oldest videos are 720p max. Those also have 480p and 360p. I don’t mind 720p and often download that resolution, but it could be a problem for others. It seems to be a double whammy here since the site isn’t that big and the older content doesn’t even have 1080p or 4K.
However, I will say I like this site’s scenes better than the one on one sites I have seen on this network. Maybe it’s just the thought that more could happen even if it doesn’t?
I don’t think this site is enough reason to join the network, but when you combine it with the value of the other sites the network comes with it makes this site one of the better ones on the network just because it’s a little different and changes up their formulaic approach their other sites use so much. |
|
09-28-20 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone. |
| Cons: |
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men. |
| Bottom Line: |
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price. |
|
09-28-20 08:57pm
Replies (0)
|
|
