Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Swingers At Play
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique concept
+ real swingers
+ girls next door for those who like it
+ game ideas are fun
+ one-time payment option |
| Cons: |
- not convinced that they play for real
- clips are in Russian with no subtitles
- not clear whether site is updated
- no ZIP download
- lighting and cameraguy work is amateurish
- sound track disappears from time to time |
| Bottom Line: |
I would like to say that their tour page doesn't really make them justice, but unfortunately it does - inside it's as dull as outside. It feels as a kind of abandoned site - it is not clear when there was last update, and whether there will be the next one. Still, at the price (by the way, there is a one-time subscribing option) you'll get 15 games, each with 15-20 minutes of unique content, and if it would be really good content, it still could be rather good deal, but here is where real problems start.
Idea is good and games could be fun, but overall feeling is not good: in part because of poor editing and breaks all the time, in part because it is spoiled for those who can't understand the language (supposedly Russian), in part because players sometimes aren't able to follow their own rules (at least as they're described on site), and go down to outright orgy pretty soon.
Quality of videos is formally decent (640x480x1100kBit/s), but is definitely spoiled by lack of proper lighting, cameraguy work and post-editing (which doesn't seem to be present at all); overall, looks very amateurish.
Bottom line: could be worth trying if you can understand Russian; otherwise even for as hardcore fun of sex games as I am, it is not worth the trouble or money. |
|
10-30-07 05:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Seems to enjoy herself for real
+ Very good collection of various fetishes
+ Fetishes are combined with sex
+ Tons of material
+ Decent video quality
+ "Lady Sonia Personal Journal" |
| Cons: |
- Very few models (something like 2 guys + 3 or 4 girls in recent videos)
- Lady Sonia herself is well past her 20th and even 30th; looks more like her 50th or 60th.
- Somewhat repetitive
- Poor site navigation
- Stills are screenshots only and are outright poor
- Cameraguy work can be better
- Rather high price |
| Bottom Line: |
Lady Sonia positions herself as 'Masturbatrix' rather than 'Dominatrix', and this is very true. I will go even as far as stating that this site is mislabeled and 'Femdom' is inappropriate label for this site; there various different fetishes represented on the site, but Femdom as this term is commonly used is not one of them: there is no CBT or spanking or anything else like that on this site (not that I really insist on having it, just think that potential users should be made aware what's inside), the most hard femdom you'll see are tease and denial games. There are several other fetishes covered (from pantyhose to fucking machines) though, with a decent amount of sex thrown in.
It seems that the models enjoy it for real, with very good collection of different fetishes covered by herself and by other girls.
On the negative side, there are very few models featured on the site, which leads to lots of repetitions. Also most of the models are not exactly gorgeous.
Video quality is decent (recent ones are 800x450x2600kBit/s), though it is upset by rather poor lighting and cameraguy work, which IMO makes such good encoding quality a waste of bandwidth; fortunately, there is alternative download provided (284x216x500kBit/s).
Bottom line: if you're into fetishes (like pantyhose), combined with sex - it can be your site despite rather high price. But for those who looks for hardcore FemDom with whips, chains and CBT - don't bother, it's just not here. |
|
10-30-07 03:49am
Replies (4)
|
Review
53
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ black guys and blondes, as advertised :-)
+ guys have impressive dicks too
+ huge amount of content
+ decent video quality (though, guys, with 1500kBit/s you can do better than 640x480) |
| Cons: |
- swindling attempt (see my comment)
- recent videos have strong 'seen one of them - seen them all' subjective feeling
- models are not exactly gorgeous
- very inconvenient navigation
- no way to see what the video is about without going to pictures (which is a separate section) or home page
- cameraguy work and lighting could be better
- $35/mon price is above average |
| Bottom Line: |
After escaping (as I hope) swindling attempt described in my earlier comment, I signed in with Blacks on Blondes.
At first, I was surprised how inconvenient their navigation is; to see what video is about before downloading I needed to go both to pictures section and home page, and look for the same clip pictures and description.
Second impression was that video quality is not bad, though cameraguy work and lighting could be improved; models aren't exactly top models but mostly are ok.
The third impression was that 'seen one of them - seen them all', which is especially true for the recent clips. After reading positive reviews here on PU I've tried a few clips from the middle, and I should agree with other reviewers that earlier videos were indeed more interesting.
And that was the fourth and final impression of the site: they do have a huge collection, but recently started to move down the hill.
Bottom line: if you're into black guys with big dicks on white girls, and you don't mind high price, it can easily be the site for you. |
|
10-28-07 03:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Westcoast Gangbangs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ amateur site with girls who don't looks as acting
+ run by a group of gangbangers themselves
+ they claim models are amateurs who just like to gangbang, and I tend to beleive them
+ everybody seems to have fun
+ ample amount of content
+ community of gangbangers (contacts of girls doing parties etc.) - didn't try myself though :-) |
| Cons: |
- have to confirm observation on 'too many gaps' in video;
- amateurish lighting and camerawork (hey guys, amateur site doesn't necessarily mean amateurish video);
- back when I was member, video quality was so-so
- not so frequent updates
- back when I was member, design was pretty uninspiring (seem to change by now though) |
| Bottom Line: |
West Coast Gang Bangs is an interesting site which seems to be run exactly as they describe: they do look for girl who wants to gangbang (in exchange for money or footage) and gangbang her. Girls usually like it though, so it's not only about money at least for most of them :-).
It's a stunning difference from most of reality sites which just pretend that they shoot things for real (come on, does anybody really believe a story behind famous BangBus that guys just roam streets in a bus, find a girl and fuck her?). I'm not going to argue whether it is good or bad, just want to point difference of West Coast Gang Bang in this regard - it DOES look that these guys are doing it for real, which might be a turn on for somebody (like myself).
Camerawork at the time I was member was amateurish, and quality of videos was mediocre. In addition, I have to agree with nygiants03 that the way it's edited leaves a lot to be desired - there are lots of gaps within the movie (probably in part because all the guys take turns to camera it), and it hurts overall feeling a lot.
Bottom line: if you're into real amateur gangbang action, it's the site to join; if you're into amateur sex or gangbang - you may want to consider it. |
|
10-26-07 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Dare Ring
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique idea (kind of Strip Truth or Dare);
+ players seem to play for real;
+ players seem to have lots of fun;
+ models are of 'girl-next-door' kind, but quite good;
+ decent quality videos;
+ non-recurring subscription;
+ webboard which is still active (despite lack of updates, see 'cons' below); |
| Cons: |
- no more updates;
- game rules are not posted;
- very few guys, some games are girl-only;
- pretty slow and mild action;
- no stills;
- cameraguy work could be better;
- interlacing is visible (hate it); |
| Bottom Line: |
Another "real reality" (= "no scripting") site; does seem genuine play without action being scripted. In short - it's kind of StripGameCentral (see my review of it), but with videos and at least some action. Unfortunately, not updated anymore, which is on the other hand compensated by non-recurring subscription though, so it's a kind of fair deal - pay once and get all they've got to date.
What you get for your money is 12 games, each about 2 hours length, video only. Videos are quite good in quality (640x480x1300kBit/s), though I hate interlacing being visible. Each game starts with players fully dressed and taking random cards to perform, with answering sex questions, undressing and kissing. It becomes more and more hot with time, but in the end it doesn't go further than oral action :-(.
Also I should note that it becomes quite boring after viewing a few games - the same game, about the same questions and dares; bonus games (like "naked twister" and "blowjob roulette" somewhat help it though.
Overall, it looks as a pretty good implementation of an interesting idea, and it's a pity that site owner didn't go with it further; I feel that there is a lot of room for improvement and if some more efforts, it could become a wonderful site.
Bottom line: if you do like pretty mild action and girls undressing, and/or you do like non-scripted site, it can easily be worth a look at one-time non-recurring $19.95. |
|
10-26-07 08:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Porno 4 Portables
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- videos in iPod format; iPod encoding quality is quite good;
- overall encoding quality is not bad (though in 1500kBit/s it is possible to do much better than 640x360).
- cameraguy work is decent
- quite significant variety of actions (from B/G to group/DP and MILF)
- updates several (5?) times a week
- I like design and navigation (probably they changed it since official TBP review) |
| Cons: |
- iPod movies have no chapters, which makes viewing more difficult; significant minus for iPod-oriented site
- iPod video is only 320x240 (which is not a problem for iPod itself)
- nothing really unique about content on this site; while scenes are (supposedly) exclusive for kickass network, it still doesn't have any kind of action you cannot find elsewhere.
- lighting and post-editing (namely color balance) can be improved |
| Bottom Line: |
This site seems to be 100% clone of kickass.com now.
iPod support does indeed exist (it really plays on iPod), but with 2 drawbacks. One is that videos are available in 320x240 only; while it's not a problem when playing it on iPod itself (it has 320x240 screen anyway), it is a problem for bigger screens such as Apple TV. Second drawback is that clip is not divided into chapters, which makes viewing on iPod more difficult. While both issues would be not too bad for a site that just provides iPod as as one of the options, for iPod-oriented site ithey look as a significant oversight.
Content essentially consists of content of several sites comprising kickass network (such as "10 Man Cum Slam" or "Inseminated by 2 Black Men"), which does provide good variety between these sub-sites, but within each such sub-site most of the videos are of "seen one of them - seen them all" type (except maybe for movies labeled as KickAss - they do have more than one theme behind). Therefore, with more and more regular sites supporting iPod formats, this site is losing uniqueness, quickly becoming 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network) site.
Bottom line: if you're into iPod porn videos, it's definitely not bad (though lighting and post-editing can be improved); on the other hand, it presents quite standard mix of content, so if you're into some specific niche and want it for iPod, keep looking, as more and more sites seem to add iPod support. |
|
10-22-07 09:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Three Pillows
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- seems to be run by the people who're bisexuals themselves
- pretty good variety of actions
- quite good models
- lots of relevant extras ("bi position of the week", bi cartoons etc.), making it kind of 'portal'
- seem to organize some shoots themselves with members comments (what members want to see) taken into account |
| Cons: |
- video quality
- video quality
- video quality
- did I already say "video quality?" :-)
- most videos are in other-than-English languages w/o subtitles (not that it matters that much though for this kind of content)
- site design is quite poor |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is quite interesting as it looks not exactly usual porn site with adult content only, but more as a portal for bisexual (mostly MMF) people.
Most of the content is exclusive, but not shoot by them themselves or according to their guidelines; lots of content is bought from now defunct bi sites (they say it openly). This old content is usually horrible in video (and sometimes cameraguy work) quality. Sometimes they shoot it themselves, but (unfortunately) not too often.
Bottom line: if you're into MMF bi sex, you should definitely try it (despite all the shortcomings, other bi sites seem to be even worse), if not - still can be good if you're bored of the same patterns and are not afraid to become bi just because of looking at MMF sex :-); beware of video quality though (very low by today standards, but in this niche there might not be that much choice). |
|
10-20-07 02:53pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
58
|
Sicko Games
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- unique idea of "real reality" site: models are playing games of stunts for real;
- game idea modeled after shows like Fear Factor;
- it does look as they play for real; |
| Cons: |
- when I was a member, there were exactly 5 (five) episodes, and no updates for more than a year; it doesn't seem they made any improvements since.
- way too sick for my taste;
- models are obviously playing for money only, and game atmosphere doesn't feel good;
- models are ugly (well, it's difficult to find pretty models willing to do that sick things);
- while there is sex included in each game played, but it is not related to the game and is booooooring;
- shooting quality is poor |
| Bottom Line: |
There is some story behind SickoGames. As it was reported (for example, look in Google for article "FearFactorFuck Morphs Into SickoGames After Legal Threats"), originally SickoGames had domain name FearFactorFuck.com, but they got cease and desist letter from Fear Factor lawyers and as a result indeed renamed site to SickoGames. It looks that at that point site owners actually lost all the interest in site, and stopped making new episodes. Also there were reports of them having problems finding new models (which is not surprising given the things expected from the models).
Site consists of several (there were 5 at the moment) games; each game is played by 3 girls and consists of tasks (there are also 3 guys present, but they don't compete). Each task (which is not too sick) winner gets 2 points, 2nd place - 1 point, and loser not only gets nothing, but should perform a special "wheel of shame" stunt (and that's where things start to go _really_ sick).
There are also 3 sex episodes in each game, but they are not related to the game in any way and just plain boring (not to mention poor cameraguy/lighting quality).
Bottom line: if they would make new games, I'd say that it's a site for lovers of really sick sites with motives of forcing girls doing really sick things (I'm not such a lover, but I'm not judging anybody who is :-) ). But without updates, I don't see much value in it even for such lovers (maybe to pay $25 for 5 episodes once and unsubscribe right after?) |
|
10-18-07 02:36am
Replies (5)
|
Review
59
|
Naked News
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- very unique concept (girls read news while stripping);
- girls are very good (also very funny when necessary) in doing it;
- a funny way to keep updated about world news; |
| Cons: |
- can be pretty boring if watching daily, which is somewhat offset by different stripping patterns.
- stripping only;
- needs pretty good connection to work ok (when my ISP has problems with bandwidth, it stucks intermittently). |
| Bottom Line: |
Site is made by a Canadian company, with girls from all over the Canada, including French girls from Quebec.
Concept is pretty simple - girls read news (yes, real-world news with a slight twist towards entertainment), but the girls undress while they read the news. Girls are beautiful and read it quite professionally (which is a surprise). The biggest problem with the site is that if looking at it daily, it becomes pretty boring; they're trying to make it more interesting by changing clothing and strip in different patterns, but unfortunately there is not that much choice with really different stripping patterns, especially as they need to look into the camera all the time.
Bottom line: funny thing to try for a month, but most people aren't likely to renew (maybe in half a year or so). |
|
10-17-07 03:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- models are just great, period.
- photographers work (lighting etc.) is top-notch without any doubt;
- 'public' live chat included into the price;
- live chat models are excellent;
- live chat setup is above-average. |
| Cons: |
- resolution isn't that good;
- navigation can be made better.
- live chat models tend to work good only in private;
- not much hardcore on site in general;
- pricing is in EUR, which currently means bad news for customers paying in $US. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is about beautiful European girls, that's it. Mostly softcore, though they have hardcore section; softcore section is really huge, hardcore not so. Site is made by the same guys who make famous 'Seventeen' videos (which are REALLY beautiful; site is not exactly on par with their videos, but still very good).
They have live chat with nude girls included into the price, but girls are rarely enthusiastic until you invite them in 'private'. Girls seem to be either Czech, or Ukrainian; their English is usually 'fair', not 'excellent'.
Bottom line: recommended it you're into beautiful girls in really nice setups with really nice photographer's work and don't care too much about pricing. |
|
10-17-07 03:17am
Replies (1)
|
Review
61
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- original concept; pretends to be "real reality" (with no script) but frankly I'm not 100% convinced
- variety of games
- quality is ok
- cameraguy work is quite good |
| Cons: |
- I'm not 100% convinced that it is not scripted;
- undressing only
- photos only
- site design is pretty poor |
| Bottom Line: |
These guys seem to promote the idea of softcore specifically distancing themselves from hardcore; they're part of a bigger initiative to promote softcore (but "NO PORN") described on KeepItNice.com.
Overall, the site produces very mixed feelings; while the concept is very good, you need to be a really big fan of girls undressing and playing games while half-dressed or in nude to overcome 'undressing only' and 'stills only' issues. On the other hand, if they would add videos, personally I could try to join them back. |
|
10-17-07 03:06am
Replies (4)
|
Review
62
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- one of the very few "real reality" sites (with no scripts and action developing "as it goes");
- models are extremely good;
- quality is quite good;
- per-episode feedback option;
- ZIPped download option;
- backup credit card processor (increases chances to join if primary one fails) |
| Cons: |
- as usual for kink.com sites, problematic authentication system (intermittent problems logging in if for some reason their system thinks you're a Bad Guy);
- no CCBill as credit card processing option (if they would have it, they wouldn't need backup processor at all). |
| Bottom Line: |
Belongs to kink.com group, so shares a lot with the other kink.com sites (like hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com). Shares models with other kink.com sites (though the content is unique for each of their sites).
The site is about girls wrestling half-nude then full-nude, with the winner fucking the loser the way she wants. Wrestling itself seems to be unscripted, rules are publicly available, well-thought out and usually followed (though final fucking definitely has some unpublished restrictions, which probably they should make public). To make wrestling itself more sexual in nature, they've made winning points to be awarded for actions like taking off opponents panties or forced pussy fingering, just to name a few.
One of the most recent improvements they've made is team wrestling - twice hotter action :-).
Bottom line: highly unusual and highly recommended for appropriate niche lovers; completely unique and very well implemented concept.
Follow-Up:
Follow-up: I've re-joined the site recently and should admit it became even better. The most important improvement is adding of "Tag Team" matches - they're more than twice as hot as usual ones. Upgraded and improved login system doesn't hurt either. As a result, I've updated score from 90 to 95 (it's the very first "95" I've ever put on PU). |
|
10-17-07 02:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Slaves In Love
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- maledom/femsub submission and sex;
- in most cases both male and female models seem to enjoy it, so "Slaves In Love" is not just a name;
- creativity; most clips are real videos with a story behind;
- stills/video quality is quite good;
- one of masters/owner seems to be professional composer, so music in clips is outstanding. |
| Cons: |
- more than half of updates are stills-only (no video);
- less updates compared to kink.com sites (such as sexandsubmission); still ok though. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the very few decent sites originating from Russia; video clips are in Russian but with subtitles in English. It seems that originally it was created by a composer guy (which explains role of music in some clips), but currently I'm not sure he's also with the site (would be a pity).
Usually they create very intimate and really loving atmosphere, with masters using BDSM implements not as a tool to abuse, but more as a tool to reach mutual excitement (though recently they got a new master which is a bit more into abusing his slaves; not exactly my cup of tea, but overall they're still very loving).
More than a half of updates are stills-only, but the rest are parts of pretty long stories with real (obviously, BDSM-oriented) script behind; scripts are usually extremely well-thought (and IMO create better storyline than, say, costumed porn videos by Private - and it says a lot).
Bottom line: highly recommended for lovers of Safe, Sane and Consentual BDSM niche (opposed to sites simulating rape and violence). |
|
10-17-07 01:48am
Replies (4)
|
Review
64
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- maledom/femsub submission combined with sex (as site name suggests)
- most models (both male and female) really love it;
- variety; new ideas all the time
- ability to leave feedback (and sometimes even get the answer :-); also they're open to users ideas for future shoots)
- ZIPped downloads (ability to download whole episode as a ZIP)
- video/image quality is good
- cameraguy work is excellent
- setups are very good
- navigation is extremely easy and obvious |
| Cons: |
- thrashy billing and authentication system; recurring intermittent problems with logging in
- number of models is rather limited (though models that keep appearing are very good). |
| Bottom Line: |
One of kink.com sites (the same company that is famous for their hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com sites); lots of models are the same with other kink.com sites, though content is unique (sharing models with other sites of similar niches can be good or bad depending on point of view).
As usual for kink.com sites, most (if not all) of the models are really into it, which (if chemistry of specific models matches) creates very strong feeling of the real Safe Sane Consensual BDSM encounter.
Site has very convenient system of member comments, which helps to create 'community feeling'; also it seems that they do read comments and take them into account.
Bottom line: Highly recommended for lovers of this specific niche (Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM, as opposed to sites simulating rape/violence); definitely best in class. |
|
10-17-07 01:36am
Replies (0)
|
|
