Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Play Sex Game
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ real 3D sex (camera/angles)
++ different sex positions
++ includes solo, boy-girl and even MMF
++ lots of different outfits for the girl
+ skin tones and hair
+ CCBill as processor |
| Cons: |
--- VERY limited action
--- action is too mechanical (just moving back and forth)
-- only one girl
- quality of 3D graphics is not so good compared to others (it's decent but not REALLY good)
- minor flaws in 3D interface (it may leave camera in position when it's difficult to see anything or move it) |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all, a word of warning: this site (play-sex-game.com) has TWO different games and TWO different subscriptions. One is for Flash-game "Sambuka" (I didn't subscribe and cannot comment on it), and another is "Alice 3D", which this review is about.
After VERY poor experience with 3DPlaything (see my review) I didn't give up and continued to look for decent 3D sex games). And while "Alice 3D" by Play-sex-game is similar to 3DPlaything in it's idea, it definitely gives MUCH more than 3DPlaything.
Idea is very simple and as I've said, close to 3DPlaything - you can dress that "Alice 3D" girl the way you want and then put her into different sex positions, sometimes alone, sometimes with a guy or even two. Then you can control movements (actually controlling only the speed of movement, as movements themselves are pre-programmed for each position). And as usual with real 3D, you can control camera angle and zoom easily. Quality of 3D graphics is IMHO not so good compared to 3DPlaything, but it's still not bad.
Bottom line: while it wasn't too entertaining for me (IMHO action was way too mechanical), it can have some value for real fans of 3D virtual sex. |
|
09-26-08 12:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ stripping girls on desktop as advertised
++ if subscribing, new girl every day
++ girls are hot
++ HUGE variety of girls (comes at the price)
++ variety of outfits
++ several different scenes with the same girl included (from "no nudity" to "full nude")
+ "extra" WMVs and photos of the girl
+ canceling option on site, kudos for webmaster (it shows that they're not looking for "forgotten" subscriptions)
+ option to subscribe OR to buy girls one by one |
| Cons: |
-- stripping only (no toys, no fingering, nothing else)
-- not all the girls dance well
-- mood of some girls could be better
- downloads are HUGE
- CPU-intensive (forget about it if you don't have at least Core Duo) |
| Bottom Line: |
As it was mentioned by other reviewers, this site is VERY different from the others. When subscribing (for free) you get an application on your desktop which shows you dancing girl(s), one at a time. "Free" version is more like "teasers" with no nudity. Fortunately (for both you and site owners :-)) it's easy to pay them some money to get full versions where girls strip completely (but not much else - there are no toys or fingering on the site). They provide TWO options: either to buy girls one by one (at about $2-$4 per girl, which includes 15-30 min of dancing, SOME of it is full nudity), or to subscribe for a month at $15 and get such a girl every day (but girls are random in this case, and you can't choose which do you want).
Overall, it was surprisingly entertaining, with quality being decent (though I've expected better quality for HD and for download sizes, which can easily be 200M per girl), girls being mostly hot and some even being able to dance (though obviously NOT all of them are professional dancers).
Bottom line: if you're not scared away by "stripping only", it's definitely a nice thing to try, provided that you don't have a kid or boss with a bad habit to look over your shoulder :-). |
|
09-25-08 01:44pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
28
|
3D Plaything
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ decent 3D virtual setup
+ 4 different action spots (but in the same room)
+ variety of dildos
+ skin/hair/breasts modifications for the girl |
| Cons: |
--- not much to do
--- the only action allowed (in addition to asking girl to take some position) is moving dildos (mouth, pussy or anal)
- single girl only (with toys)
-- it's THE SAME girl despite modifications (face is always the same :-( ).
- the only clothing is bikini
- removing bikini is one-step without animation
- need to keep subscription to play (not that I think somebody will need it) |
| Bottom Line: |
When I've played Digamour (see my review) by the same SomaVision company, one of my thoughts was "oh, it cannot possibly become any more boring", but my recent experience with 3DPlaything by the same company has proven I was wrong :-(.
The beginning of the game is fine - you can "build" your girl, selecting skin tone/breast size/hair and so on, so there are quite many variations you can build. But on the next step comes the disappointment: all you've got is a girl which you can ask to take different positions (and position change is NOT even animated), ask her to remove bikini (NOT animated too), and move dildo in and out of any of her three orifices (this IS animated). And that is all the "game" you get for 19.95/month! Ok, as usual in 3D, you can move your "camera" to look from different angle, and you can also move to one of 4 different spots in the same room, but the action is always the same - girl in some position and all you can do is to move dildo in and out of her, that's it.
Bottom line: while I can't say it's completely useless and rate it at 50, I honestly see that only VERY few people would want to pay this kind of money for this kind of entertainment. |
|
09-24-08 07:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Digamour
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ quite realistic 3D sex
++ movements are natural
+ 4 types of girls ("Brazilian", "Japanese", "South African" and "German")
+ each can have different haircuts, complexity, and skin tone
+ one round of arcade play is quite interesting compared to the other similar games |
| Cons: |
--- booooring gameplay
-- clother to "arcade" game, not really RPG as advertised
-- no clothes
-- when starting the game, have only 4 different actions
- no toys
-- active subscription is required to play
-- no "extras", except for "bulk" membership with 2 other SOMA sites (3DPlaything and SexStation7). |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is another site built around "virtual 3D sex" game. And while the graphics (IMHO) isn't bad, gameplay is unbelievably booooring.
First of all, it is NOT MMORPG, as it erroneously stated in some places on the Internet (not a fault of the site itself), it's a single-player game, period. And IMHO it's not really an RPG at all, but more of arcade game.
The plot is almost non-existent (you need to fuck as much as possible with cyber-girls) but that's not a problem. And the first rounds don't pose a real problem too - it's some fun to understand how it works, and to see pretty realistic 4 positions. But the problems start a bit later. To get experience to get to level 2 (to get another 4 positions), you need to fuck 50 times, and each time it's 5 mini-fucks, each of mini-fucks representing one of original 4 positions. Ok, there are a bit different settings, and somewhat different partners, but to fuck 50*5=250 times with THE SAME 4 positions (making it 62 fucks per position) is unbeleivably boooooring for me. And when I was promoted to level 2 and got 4 new positions, totaling to 8, I've found that to go further it's necessary to fuck 100 times to get to level 3 and another 4 positions. This was too much for me and I gave up.
Bottom line: 3D engine isn't bad, and movements are natural, the game works ok without crashes, and arcade actions are much better compared to simple "press it harder to win" style of arcade, but complete lack of balance between time spent and benefit for it make it very difficult to recommend this site or this game. But should the guys listen and shorten the number of fucks required per level 5 times or so, it could become quite an enjoyable game. |
|
09-23-08 04:10pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
30
|
3D Stripper
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ virtual 3D stripper as advertised
++ movements are surprisingly natural
++ clothing "fits" the girl surprisingly naturally
+ different outfits
+ several dozens of movements
+ "queue" of movements to make continuous dance
+ "stripper time" to keep "game" feeling |
| Cons: |
--- only one girl
-- removing clothes is not animated
- sometimes there are "jumps" between different segments
- somewhat confusing interface
-- no site value except for the game
- complicated game activation procedure |
| Bottom Line: |
This site proposes subscription, but obviously it's not about subscription at all. It is just selling of the downloadable 3D game, that's it. Site "extras" in addition to the game itself include only a few 3D toons and several "same old" video feeds of dubious quality.
Now about the game.
The good. On the first glance it is surprisingly entertaining. After getting through download and all the registrations and activations, you can see a girl which dances some random dance, and you can tell her what to do next. Actions are placed into the "queue" so you can make long dance sequence. You can change girl outfit, or ask her to remove some or all clothing. To keep things more interesting, there is "stripper time" which requires some attention (not too bad to distract from the girl). Girl movements are surprisingly natural (obviously somehow scanned from some real dancing girl), and clothes fit her naturally too. There are a few dozens of different movements, and 4 or 5 different outfits (each consisting of 4 items, and each item can be taken off separately).
The bad. On the second glance, it starts to become boring. There is only ONE girl, and number of outfits and movements, while pretty big, still starts to become boring in an hour or so. When the girls takes something off, it is not animated (item just fades away) and it doesn't help too.
The ugly. There some minor but annoying things with the site and game: my login wasn't activated until a few hour after paying, activation procedure was complicated and confusing, and UI isn't too obvious. But these issues were quite minor and don't affect bottom line much.
Bottom line: while there is definitely NO value in recurring subscription, one-time "subscription" (to purchase the game @19.95) MIGHT make some sense if you're turned on by the girls merely stripping. While usually I don't include pricing into consideration, in this case I can't help but to say that value for money isn't good here. If the site would throw in more girls/outfits/movements (or at least include their 3D Girls), I would rate them higher. |
|
09-23-08 05:49am
Replies (3)
|
Review
31
|
Zenra.net
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ very original content
+++ no, make it EXTREMELY original content
++ LOTS of content
++ obviously VERY expensive and unusual setups
+ pretty good overall video quality
+ CCBill as a processor |
| Cons: |
--- Japanese-only with no dubbing or subtitles
-- infamous Japanese pixelation
-- no ZIPped downloads (downloading 24 pieces per episode is REALLY annoying).
- encoding quality is rather poor for the bandwidth
- XDiv only
- site design |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is SO unusual, that it will most likely cause immediate "love or hate" feeling for many people.
The content is EXTREMELY unusual. What about all-nude all-girl orchestra playing Mozart or all-nude Swan Lake ballet? Unless the content is stolen from some other site, I don't think you'll find something like this elsewhere. And they have TONS and TONS of content (they claim 392G, and they're probably accurate about it, but see below). Now to the bad. First of all, all the dialogs are in Japanese, and they're important for the storyline (yes, there IS storyline there) and translation (either dubbing or subtitles) would be VERY useful. Then, all movies are "pixelated" (as it is common in Japan).
The rest of my ranting is about technical issues. Movies are HUGE (episode can be 2hours, and with 1.2-1.6Mbit/s encoding they easily take 1-1.5G each). To add injury to insult, these 1-1.5G are split into 6-min downloads, so it's 20-24 separate files per episode, ouch. And while encoding quality isn't bad, it's definitely isn't the best for the bandwidth (I've seen much better than 768x540 in 1.6MBit/s), plus only in XDiv, which I consider as a minus too.
Bottom line: if you're into Japanese girls or into VERY unusual setups, take a look at the site, what you see in previews is what you get (but keep in mind that there won't be any English there), and then you'll either love it or hate it. |
|
09-16-08 12:31pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
32
|
4 Real Swingers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ genuine real swingers
+ recent videos are of very good quality (not Hollywood and not Private DVDs, but still quite good 1280x720).
+ occasional acting guys as cameraguys is an interesting twist adding reality feeling
+ variety (what about DP scene shot completely in infrared? :-))
+ decent post-processing (especially for amateur clips)
+ active forum
+ calendar of recent and upcoming updates
+ overall excellent job of webmaster |
| Cons: |
- some models look booored while doing it
- older videos are of poor quality
- even not so old videos (720x480) have significant visible interlacing, so ONLY most recent ones are good
- cameraguy work sometimes isn't too good |
| Bottom Line: |
it is a quite a unique site aiming at showing real swingers, and I should admit it's the best such attempt I've seen to date. Formally it consists of a bunch of individual model sites under single umbrella, but essentially done by the same people and very consistent.
These guys and girls look as they're doing it for real (at least most of the time); it's full of conversations which show it's indeed for real, and most of them are having fun. On the other hand, sometimes models have such a boored expression on the face, that it ruins much of reality feeling; fortunately it doesn't happen too often (personally I especially liked Brooke for her "live" face).
Variety is excellent - any kind of group action is here (except for anything MM), up at least to 3+3, with significant amount of anal and DP thrown in, and occasional twists like infrared shot or interracial guy.
Technically recent videos are VERY good (VERY decent 1280x720 at 3Mbit/s), but more earlier ones aren't so good; even 720x480 has interlacing problems which pretty much ruin quality when panning.
Website is excellent too, it has lots of features to make it more enjoyable (like search through all the sub-sites or slideshow); the only thing I found missing is ZIPped picture download.
Bottom line: VERY decent site for lovers of amateur orgy sites with not so amateurish quality; for lovers of this niche it is HIGHLY recommended (it would get even higher rating if not for some boored model faces). |
|
05-21-08 12:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
The Training Of O
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ femsub training (by both males and females, but mostly males) combined with sex
+ strong psychological element
+ Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM
+ most models (both male and female) really love it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is good
+ cameraguy work is excellent
+ setups are good |
| Cons: |
- still less content than other kink.com sites
- training of the same girl is divided into several episodes (which is ok), but these episodes appear not one after another, which is annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
TheTrainingOfO is quite a recent addition to kink.com sites. It is quite similar to SexAndSumbission, but also is very different. The idea is that the same guys take one girl and train her as a good slave. It takes them 4 days to do it (actually 5 with 1 day rest), which means ability to see gradual progress of the girl. Not all girls succeed in training, but most are trained well. Site has very strong psychological element in play, and it's a bit more geared towards domination/submission theme, than towards SM or sex (though there is plenty of both SM and sex too, with all kinds of sex present, including anal).
As all other kink.com sites, TheTrainingOfO is all about SSC (Safe, Sane and Consensual) BDSM, with most models being really into the scene. Chemistry is usually excellent, and overall feeling is just great.
Site is new, but at this point they've already got about 50 episodes (which is still less than other kink.com sites, but quite enough for me).
Bottom line: one of the best BDSM sites out there, with strong emphasis on psychology, a bit physics, with lots of sex added to the mix. Highly recommended (in a sense, it's "advanced version" of SexAndSubmission, at least for me). |
|
04-14-08 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Diabolic
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ full Diabolic videos
+ videos are often released on site almost simultaneously with DVD releases
+ tons of videos
+ production quality (setups, lighting, cameraguy work) is extremely good (not surprising for Diabolic videos)
+ frequent updates |
| Cons: |
- even newer videos are of not that good encoding quality (640x480x1.5MBit/s); while appropriate for some other stuff, Diabolic videos suffer from it greatly
- video quality of old videos is really low (400x300x650kBit/s)
- content within the same series is repetitive and soon becomes boring
- girls aren't always pretty (not that surprising for this kind of content, but Diabolic could probably do better)
- swindling attempt by Diabolic/Epoch (see my comment) |
| Bottom Line: |
I should say that as a strange side effect of subscribing to this site I became a bit disappointed not about this site, but about Diabolic as a movie studio. While their movies are of really good quality (setups, lighting, cameraguy work) especially by adult web standards, seeing all of them in one place reveals that there are quite few themes and most of them quickly become quite repetitive.
Other than that, there is not much to say in addition to TBP site facts. Yes, they are full Diabolic videos, yes, there are lots of them, yes, they're released to the site very close to releasing DVDs, but quality isn't nearly that good that you'll get on DVD (and for Diabolic videos you will see the difference, it's NOT homemade production which doesn't suffer from encoding); older videos are of measly 400x300, newer are 640x480 but I've seen better encoding at this resolution, in particular color balance looks very degraded compared to Diabolic DVDs). Sex (as usual for Diabolic) is on rough side, with lots of anal/DP/A2M and other such stuff, but girls aren't always really pretty (not too surprising, but Diabolic could probably do better).
Bottom line: could be really good site for Diabolic fans or fans of professionally shot rough porn, but only if you don't care too much about encoding quality. Personally I'd prefer to see less videos and/or only older ones, but of significantly higher quality. |
|
02-01-08 11:23am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ really funny stories (for not "Real BDSM" episodes)
+ really good setups (costumes and so on)
+ recent videos are of good quality (2MBit/s WMV)
+ lots of episodes
+ dated updates once a week |
| Cons: |
- "Real BDSM" stories have strong "abusing" context
- outrageous price
- older videos are RealPlayer-only
- no "all episode" download
- pics are vidcaps only |
| Bottom Line: |
FunnyBDSM leaves a lot of mixed feelings. First of all, content can be divided into two distinct categories: episodes labeled "Real BDSM" and episodes not labeled as such. "Real BDSM" isn't something really special, but quite usual (and annoying for me) BDSM movies with strong "abuse women" theme. Other episodes (not labeled as "Real BDSM") are mostly fun: while "abuse" theme is also present there, but it's usually so grotesque that neither myself nor models can take it serious; there is no real BDSM there too and it's pretty obvious (yes, they show marks on bodies but they're fake). "Court of Justice" and "Heil Dickler" series are prominent examples of episodes I consider funny. In all the episodes (both "Real BDSM" and not "Real BDSM" ones) there is usually some sex action in addition to BDSM (up to occasional anal).
On technical side: site is updated weekly, and each new episode consists of 2-4 about-5-minute clips. Quality of recent clips is very good (2MBit/s WMV + some RealPlayer), but older ones are RealPlayer-only and aren't as crisp.
Bottom line: if leaving outrageous price out of consideration, clips not marked as "Real BDSM" could be quite interesting for a change; unfortunately, most of recent clips are "Real BDSM". "Real BDSM" clips are about "abuse women" theme rather than "Safe, Sane and Consensual" BDSM (though a few most recent clips seem to migrate in that direction), with medium intensity, including sex. |
|
01-28-08 07:22am
Replies (2)
|
Review
36
|
Mega Penetrations
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ "mega penetrations" as advertised
+ hardcore action in addition to "mega penetrations" (often up to DP, sometimes DPP)
+ reasonable variety (different toys and setups)
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- sometimes action is disgusting
- girls aren't really cute (expected for this kind of content)
- probably infrequent updates (just as with other sites of this network)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here comes yet another review of yet another Jerk-Off Pass site. While it isn't exactly my cup of tea, I'll still try to review.
Unlike most of the other sites of this network, there is not much plot in videos. Still, there are indeed "mega penetrations" as advertised, plus lots of hardcore action in each episode (often up to DP, sometimes even with DPP). Variety is here, but sometimes this site crosses the line going into things I consider outright disgusting (sorry guys, but eating stuff which sticks out of girl's ass isn't really my cup of tea; fortunately, it is just an occasional twist rather than typical for the site).
There are about 30 episodes on the site, each is 20-30 min video. Cameraguy work is decent, but video encoding quality is typical for this network and is "very average" (not really clear 1.2MBit/s 640x480 WMV).
Pics on this site are just 640x480 screenshots, so pics lovers don't need to bother.
As with the other sites of this network, updates aren't expected to be too frequent (see other my reviews of Jerk-Off Pass sites).
Bottom line:
For big dildo lovers, who don't care about pics, it should be a very good site. For others who aren't that much into this kind of things but (like me) can take an occasional look - can be a valuable addition to the Jerk-Off Pass network. |
|
01-18-08 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Messy Gang Bangs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are HOT
+ most of girls seem to like it
+ variety of setups
+ all MMF action you can get, up to 3M+3F and up to DP/DPP/DAP
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- pics are just screencaps
- not many updates expected (as with other sites of the network)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here goes yet another review of yet another Jerk-Off Pass site.
As the site name suggests, this site as about gangbangs (no idea why they named site "messy gangbangs", but gangbangs are here in every episode, no doubt about it :-)).
Site has about 30 episodes, 20-30 min each. Each site has plenty of MMF action, starting from 3M+1F and ending with 3M+3F or 4M+2F. Action always involves some DP, sometimes DPP or DAP. And IMHO the most important and attractive thing about this site is that girls seems to REALLY like most of the action, including anal and DP; IMHO it's a nice change from the most of the "reality" sites playing "abuse" theme.
Cameraguy work is decent, setups are good, but video encoding could be better (as with other Jerk-Off Pass sites, it is not really crisp 1.2MBit/s 640x480). Pictures are just 640x480 screencaps. Updates are not dated and most likely are infrequent (as well as for the other sites of the same network).
Site also borrows some good and bad features from the other sites of the same network, such as "one big clip" download on the plus side and very annoying login system on the minus side.
Bottom line: a very good site for those who like MMF action, and if updated frequently, could even stand on it's own. Without frequent updates, probably wouldn't be worth it as a standalone site, but access to whole network easily makes up for lack of updates. |
|
01-08-08 08:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Small Tits Hunter
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ video quality is better than average
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- not much content
- somewhat boring
- only vidcaps as pics
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here goes yet another review of Jerk-Off Pass network site. SmallTitsHunter is a newer addition to this network and quite a decent one I should add.
Theme of the site is about young-looking girls, who usually indeed have quite small tits :-). As site is new, there are only 10-15 episodes. As usual for the Jerk-Off Pass sites, clips are 20-30 min length, all within advertised theme. Cameraguy work and lighting are way above average, which is somewhat negated by typical for this netork "very average" encoding. Cameraguy work is so good that it raises question if it is just scenes from movies (see pat362's comment on DirtyBabysitters site of the same network). As with other sites of the same network, you shouldn't expect too many updates. On this site pics are vidcaps only.
Bottom line: this site is hardly worth it's price primarily due to very small amount of content and expected infrequent updates (though content quality is pretty good), but as a part of Jerk-Off Pass network with 27 other sites it can be worth a try. |
|
01-07-08 03:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
My Black Coeds
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young black chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are HOT
+ cameraguy work is above average
+ reasonable action variety (anal is frequent, sometimes up to DP and even DPP)
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- pics are just screencaps
- not many updates (thecid66 review says 29 episodes in April-07, not it's like 35-40)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
In an ongoing effort to cover Jerk-Off Pass network, here goes another review of one of their sites.
My Black Coeds is one of the better sites of Jerk-Off Pass. It is about hot (and I mean REALLY hot) black girls in hardcore action. There are about 35-40 episodes on the site (each is 20-30 min video), and all are within the theme. Action varies from just B/G hardcore to DP. Cameraguy work and setups are very good, but video encoding is typical for Jerk-Off Pass network ("average", not so clear 640x480). Pictures on this site are just 640x480 screencaps.
Site also borrows some (mildly) annoying features of the whole network: infrequent updates and very annoying login system.
Bottom line: a good site for those who're into young black girls. Access to the rest of the Jerk-Off Pass network easily compensates for infrequent updates on this specific site. |
|
01-02-08 05:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
School Bus Chicks
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ plot is fun
+ video quality is better than average
+ creativity (different setups and combinations)
+ both screenshots and real pics
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- IMHO it crosses the thin line between "implying sex with legal teens" and "implying sex with underage teens"
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site belongs to the same JerkOff Pass network as DirtyBabysitters and shares a lot of features (not content) with that site (also shares some features with the other sites of the network, but DirtyBabysitters is definitely the closest thing).
Overall, SchoolBusChicks would be about on par with DirtyBabysitters, but there is one thing that annoys me about site's content: IMHO it crosses the thin line between "pretending to show legal teens" and "pretending to show underage teens". I'm quite sure all the models are above 18, but for me even pretending to show underage teens having sex isn't a good thing. That's the reason why Dirtybabysitters got much better rating than SchoolBusChicks (while I can easily imagine college girl doing babysitting, schoolgirls having sex are off-limits for me).
There are 20+ episodes there (each is 20-30 min video), and all seem to be within "schoolbus" theme (with appropriate plot and dialogs). Girls are cute, action is hot, cameraguy work is very good too. Video encoding is typical for the JerkOffPass network (which means "very average").
Bottom line: would be a good site for those who're comfortable with "schoolgirl sex" theme, but I'm not so ok with it. The rest of the network can make it worth the money even without this site. |
|
12-31-07 10:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Dirty Babysitter
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ plot is fun
+ video quality is better than average
+ creativity (different setups and combinations)
+ both screenshots and real pics
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- not many updates (TGP review lists 32+ episodes mid-06, not it's like 50+)
- plot is unbelievable (but still fun)
- allegebly it's just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see pat362's comment
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Though this site belongs to the same JerkOffPass network that several other sites I've recently reviewed, but it stands out of the other JerkOffPass sites, and to the good. The only annoying things it shares with the rest of JerkOffPass sites are login system and average video encoding quality (though cameraguy work is much better than that of the other sites).
There are 50+ episodes there (each is 20-30 min video), and all seem to be within "babysitting" theme (with appropriate plot and dialogs). Girls are cute, action is hot, variety (setups and action) is very good (action varies from plain B/G to DP), cameraguy work is very good too. Video encoding is typical for the JerkOffPass network (which means "very average").
Pat362 wrote that this site just publishes pieces of movies published by some studios (see his comment); I cannot confirm or deny this claim, but it looks quite likely to me: quality of cameraguy work and post-production is much better than for the other network sites and very good, but encoding still suffers and isn't a match for cameraguy work; clips (unlike other network sites) are 16:9.
Bottom line: overall very good (though probably non-exclusive and rarely updated) site, especially for those into hardcore video action with young girls, and/or interested in access to the rest of the network. |
|
12-20-07 11:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ black guys on white chicks
+ chicks are hot, dicks are black and big
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- most likely won't be updated (see reviews for other sites of the network, like GanglandVictims).
- very little content
- booooring - always one guy and one girl (without anal)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
One more site of JerkOff Pass network, and once again it shares things like login, navigation and video quality with other sites of the same network, like GangLandVictims. This site is a new kid on the block, so it's difficult to tell how often it will be updated, but given history of the other sites of the network (see reviews), most likely it won't be updated often or won't be updated at all.
The main difference with the other sites is obviously content; here I should say that while action is quite repetitive (how many different things can you do in one guy-one girl combination without anal?), it is compensated a lot by quality of the girls: they generally look quite good and it looks that they really enjoy themselves too.
There are about 15 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video, and all within theme. As with other JerkOffPass sites, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). Variety of actions isn't so good, but as I've said above it's pretty much compensated by girls looks and enthusiasm. And as with the other JerkOffPass sites, overall video quality is very average.
Bottom line: not that bad content overall, but with that little content and with unlikely updates isn't worth it as a separate site. As a part of the big network is definitely worth a look (especially if you've already joined because of some other site :-)). All in all, not a bad addition to the network. |
|
12-18-07 04:20pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
43
|
Plug 2 Holes
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ DP site
+ group action
+ some girls aren't bad for this kind of action
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- most likely not updated (TBP lists 16+ episodes back in January, now it's 20)
- not much content
- booooring; always two guys and a girl
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site belongs to the same network that GangLandVictims I've reviewed a bit earlier, and quite expectedly it shares lots of common things with it. Video and pic quality, lack of updates, annoying login and pretty good navigation are all the same. There is one difference though and it's definitely not in favor of Plug2Holes: it is lack of creativity here. It is ALWAYS 2 guys on 1 girl, so in the very first clip they try everything they can, and all the other clips become BOOOOORING (there is one clip with DAP that adds some twist, but that's about it).
There are about 20 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. As with GangLandVictims, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). As with GangLandVictims, all episodes are within theme (every episode has DP, and there is at least one DAP; no DPP was sighted). And also as with GangLandVictims, cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: IMHO not worth the money on it's own; considering the rest of Jerk-Off Pass network, can be not too bad as there are some better sites there. |
|
12-18-07 02:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Gangland Victims
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ black guys on white chicks
+ group action
+ DP, DPP, probably even DAP - you name it
+ despite "victims" in site name, not much pretended abuse
+ reasonable variety for this kind of site
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- not updated (TBP lists 35+ episodes back in 2005, now it's 40)
- plot is unbeleivable (but still fun)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
GangLandVictims is a member of Jerk-Off pass network with 28 sites (including 2 sites currently unlisted by TBP).
It is an interracial site (well-hung black guys on white girls) with a twist: their plot is "one wrong turn and you get gangbanged", with girls supposedly getting lost in black neighborhood and getting banged by a bunch of black guys. Sure it's unbelievable, but the way it is done is surprisingly funny. Girls seem to enjoy scenes, and there is little pretended abuse (despite site name and plot).
There are about 40 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. Main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). All episodes are within theme, and there are tons of anal and DP (almost every episode has DP). Variety is pretty good for this kind of site: not only all positions and twists are tried (including DPP and I think DAP), but also setups are quite different. Cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression: videos are 640x480 with 1.2MBit/s stream, and quality isn't too good for this high bandwidth; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: reasonable site for interracial/group/DP video fans; 1 month membership to grab all you like can be worth it, especially considering network access. Pics should be looked for elsewhere though. |
|
12-15-07 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Big Sister Live
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique idea (live cams in real brothel)
+ it seems to really work as advertised
+ choice of monthly subscription or pay per minute
+ with monthly subscription there are no extra charges
+ quality is very good for webcam
+ video archives of past encounters
+ events (like "live gangbang") |
| Cons: |
- horrible login system (see my comment)
- "hot time" is about midday EST only
- video archives are streaming-only
- no subtitles so conversation is unclear |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a very unique site effectively creating a very new niche. They say it is a real brothel (in Prague) with live webcams there, and I beleive it. For me just a notion that it happens for real and I can go there and be one of those guys is a turn-on (not that I'm going to do it :-)).
As they say, it works quite simple - it is a real brothel, where guys come and have sex with girls for free in exchange for right to translate it over the Internet worldwide. They have lobby with customers choosing the girls and some strip dancing going on (ranging from "very boring" to "just boring"), and several webcams there. When customer chooses the girl, they come to one of private rooms (there are several) where they have several webcams too, so the whole encounter is translated 'live'.
Quality is decent for webcam (they can stream from 500kbit/s down to 100kbit/s). As with any brothel, it is pretty deserted except for "hot time" (like 6PM to 10PM local time in Prague, or 11AM to 3PM EST). For those who cannot see it live because of timing, there are archives (with surprisingly wide range of activities - from anal/DP to SM - it seems they're doing just everything in Prague brothels). Archives are streaming-only :-(.
Bottom line: very innovative idea and very good execution of the idea. If you're turned on by the very idea of spying the real brothel (or turned on by the idea you can fuck the same girl for real), this site is definitely worth a try IMHO. |
|
12-11-07 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ free membership
+ premium membership is non-recurring
+ lots of new pictures daily
+ "nudles": ability to get premium membership for "free" (for clicks that lead to their site)
+ rating system which does work
+ profiles
+ community-oriented features (blogs, chat, forum) |
| Cons: |
- upsells of premium membership (including pop-ups, yuck!)
- upsells of all other things EVERYEHERE
- premium membership at $27.95 is way too expensive for the content that costs site owners nothing
- quality of pictures is way too amateurish even for amateur site
- no scenarios, just single pictures
- content is rather repetitive |
| Bottom Line: |
After all deliberations (see comments to IDoctor's review) I've decided to take a look myself to provide not that biased review.
First of all, quality of pictures is way too amateurish even for free amateur-submitted stuff (TBP reviews say "quality varies" - come on, quality just plain sucks; what kind of picture quality can you expect if a girl shoots herself in a mirror in her bathroom?).
As for the content of the pictures - some pictures are outright ugly, some of better ones are obviously stolen from paysites (come on, girl won't do DP with this kind of professional lighting in private life), and it leaves us with not that much decent ones. Fortunately, rating system seems to really work and those pictures that make it up to the top, are of better content (no dicks), but quality still sucks.
So (as messmer have already said in his comment) it doesn't make ANY sense to go there for pictures. On the other hand, as a COMMUNITY site it's not bad at all. Community is large, active, site provides most of the features needed for such a community.
Bottom line: if you're looking for pictures and you're NOT into amateur pictures of real girls (with profiles) of dubious quality, STAY AWAY. On the other hand, if you're looking for a community of exhibitionists - it's not a bad choice. As a result of this dual nature, I've had trouble with putting single rating for the site, so I've decided to rate it as 60 for pictures and as 85 for community, and take average. |
|
11-24-07 03:38am
Replies (4)
|
Review
47
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique content
+ real nude girls in real streets
+ FULL videos (unlike NudeInPublic)
+ girls are "girl next door" type, but not ugly
+ frequent (but disgustingly small) updates
+ picture quality is decent
+ girl date of birth and shooting place for each shoot are shown |
| Cons: |
- not so good attempt to mimick NudeInPublic
- repetitive (especially compared to NudeInPublic
)
- video quality is mediocre
- micro-updates of 20 pictures a time are disgustingly small
- bigger files hosted by 3rd-party (with separate login/password)
- not that much content |
| Bottom Line: |
After my recent (and not so successful) attempt to join NudeInPublic (.com) - see my review, I've decided to try NudeInPublic.tv . Unfortunately, it turned out to be even bigger disappointment.
It looks that it is an independent attempt to do something similar to NudeInPublic, but unfortunately it has lots of definiencies. The main one is that they lack creativity of NudeInPublic. There are no scenarios and different situations here, just nude girl going through the streets. Everything else isn't that bad,
and (unlike NudeInPublic) these guys don't try to sell the same thing twice, so videos are FULL), but unless some creativity is thrown in, the site doesn't offer much of useful content.
So much for my attempt to find site of this very niche :-(
Bottom line:
comparing them to NudeInPublic isn't that straightforward: these guys do have FULL videos (BIG PLUS), but with much less creativity (BIG MINUS). Overall, if you're a big fun of nude girls walking through crowded streets, I'd still recommend NudeInPublic over NudeInPublic.tv (but read my review of them CAREFULLY - it's not a picnic there too, and I gave them only 68 rating); if you're not a big fan of these things - don't bother. |
|
11-22-07 03:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
Nude in Public
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ original idea
+ real girls in nude on real streets
+ creativity (different scenarios and setups)
+ frequent updates
+ quite funny stories behind the shootings
+ rather active community |
| Cons: |
- videos are essentially teasers to get you buy full DVDs
- "Latest video update" is a video shot back in 2003
- no full scene videos at all
- almost no translation in videos
- video quality is very questionable (at 600kBit/s it looks like VHS; how do they sell DVDs with such quality?)
- thumbnails are so small that are almost useless
- picture quality is not so good (resolution is up to 1600x1200, but photographer's work is not up to resolution).
- design is a joke |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of the site (real nude girls in real city streets and other real public places), but the site has VERY serious deficiencies. The most annoying thing for me was the fact that they're selling the same content twice (charging for it twice). When subscribing to the site, they say "220 Video Clips", but once you're inside you find that videos are just "Free bonus", and essentially are just teasers to get you buy full versions at their DVD shop (xxvideo.com, where videos are sold at $35/90-minute DVD + S&H). Yes, there can be about 220 clips inside, but each clip is mere 2 minutes long, they date back to 2003-2004 and are NOT full videos (DVD versions of the same thing are substantially longer), plus quality is questionable by modern standards to say the least (both resolution and cameraguy work are subpar).
As for pictures - the main annoyance is their ultra-small thumbnails, which makes seeing what's going on almost impossible. Also IMHO this kind of content is much less interesting in pictures than in video.
Bottom line:
Adding FULL videos and sorting out thumbnails could make it an excellent site (especially with such creative guys behind), but at current state I don't see much value in it except for the big fans of this very niche (and even for them buying the same but FULL content from xxvideo.com at $35/DVD could be a better choice). |
|
11-20-07 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ maledoms fucking femsubs (as advertised)
+ really unique content
+ a bit harder than rival SexAndSubmission, but still Safe, Sane and Consensual
+ most models (both male and female) seem to enjoy it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to rate episodes
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is ok
+ setups are good
+ site navigation is easy and obvious
+ normal billing/authentication system (a nice change after kink.com sites)
+ regular updates |
| Cons: |
- essentially mimicked after SexAndSumbission
- not that much content |
| Bottom Line: |
It looks that Twisted Factory tries to repeat success of kink.com with a pretty similar series of sites. In particular, Twisted Factory's FuckedAndBound is pretty obviously copied from kink.com's SexAndSubmission (see my review of the latter). It doesn't mean that such a 'copy' site is necessarily a bad thing - after all, being able to see more models is always a plus. Still, I cannot help to keep comparing FuckedAndBound to SexAndSubmission.
So, overall FuckedAndBound looks VERY similar to SexAndSubmission. Not only features as ZIPped download and ability to leave feedback are almost indistinguishable, but also site design is very similar. What is important though, is that models are different (they're common for different TwistedFactory's sites, but seem to be quite different from kink.com's sites).
As for the content, I'd say it's a bit harder than SexAndSubmission, and that more attention is paid to physics rather than psychology, which is not necessarily a bad thing (depends on taste).
Video quality is ok (640x480x1000kBit/s WMV, but not really crisp, which makes it a bit worse, than its arch-rival); QuickiTime is also an option; ZIPped downloads are available.
Bottom line: if trying to join the first site of this niche, I'd still recommend SexAndSubmission (or another kink.com site TheTrainingOfO, or even milder SlavesInLove), but if you have already been there and want something a bit different FuckedAndBound would be an excellent choice. |
|
10-31-07 02:31pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
50
|
Sex Vids On Pod
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ iPod support (480x360x800kBit/s)
+ many tons of content
+ frequent updates
+ multi-language site |
| Cons: |
- while category searches are present in public area, they're are absent in member area
- non-iPod videos are a waste of bandwidth
- content is merely a collection of 15-30 min clips; no stories behind
- content is not unique/exclusive
- 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network) content
- no chapters in iPod videos
- site navigation
- upsells |
| Bottom Line: |
When looking at home page of SexVidsOnPod, it doesn't look too bad - it looks as a collection of clips formatted for iPod. It is pretty obvious that it will be 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network), but sometimes you don't need more than that.
When going inside, things go worse though. The biggest disappointment I had with the site is that while category search is available on home page, it is not available in member area, so all you get is just a plain list of clips (even without ability to jump somewhere).
iPod encoding isn't bad, with 480x360x800kBit/s it should look not bad not only on iPod (which I've tested), but also on bigger devices (like AppleTV, which I don't have). Unfortunately, iPod videos don't have 'chapters' in them, which makes viewing on iPod less enjoyable even for these rather small clips. They claim they also support iPhone, which is most likely the case, but with iPhone having screen of 480x320, it isn't clear to me whether 480x360 will look really good there.
On the other hand, non-iPod encoded videos are a joke. 3Mbit/s with a picture of 640x480 (which is definitely very far from being crisp) is definitely a waste of bandwidth.
Bottom line: could be worth it only if you want iPod videos, have no interest in watching them on PC and don't really worry about content. As I hardly can imagine such a person (especially as there are more and more sites providing iPod as an option), hence a low rating. |
|
10-31-07 05:35am
Replies (0)
|
|
