Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The top network in porn. Nothing else needs to be said.
- Everything is high quality. They have so much content, their archive starts with scenes from 2019.
- They have everything anyone straight would want. Live scenes, pretty, young models being the focus, goofy, cliché niches and it makes their yearly price (around $90-$100) seem like a bargain.
- 4k downloads on all the newer videos including some in the archive. Those also have 1080p and 720p.
- High quality photosets that you can download.
- Download speeds are very fast across the network.
- Navigation is simpler than it should be, and I will go into that in the bottom line.
- They have the Cherry of the Month.
Cons:
- I believe the porn market has lowered. The price with downloads may be too high for some. It was the regular price ($29.95) back then I first started joining online porn sites but you don’t see that much anymore.
- If you don’t like condoms there are some condoms.
Bottom Line:
I have reviewed 4 of the “sites” or “series” in the Cherry Pimp Network and I think each of those sites are at or near the top of their niche/class. That’s far from all you get. You also get all of these:
Wild on Cam – I have a review of it posted.
Cherry of the Month – This was the initial draw for me to this site. It reminds me of Twisty’s old Treat of the Month. Each month a model is focused on. She has photosets, videos and it’s an honor. It also lets you see more of a model you may not even know of.
Alt – It is what it says, alternative, tattoos, different fetishes.
BCM – It stands for Big Cock Mood. It’s women that like big cocks.
Cheese – This sounds like it’s made for me. It even says it’s campy.
Busted – Forget the sites that just focus on school or stealing and being caught, this site covers all those.
Bush – It’s not about a former President. They do not, from what I’ve seen, go into extreme hairy. It’s mainly pubic hair and it’s still trimmed up and doesn’t look a 90 year old toupee that got stuck in the spin cycle.
Confessions – This is where the fantasies are played out.
Cucked – It’s what it says. It’s a husband watching his wife have sex with another man.
Drilled – It’s simple, they’re drilling for oil right up the butt.
Ebony – These are all-black scenes.
Exotic – They describe it well, Asians, Latinas and biracial and other unique looks.
Femme – It’s a pretty lesbians site.
Fresh – Teens and new to the industry models.
Ginger – For all those pale redhead lovers.
Milf – They didn’t need a whole damn network with 43 versions of Milfs.
Petite – I reviewed this one separately and you can check that out.
Taboo – I also reviewed this one separately so check that out. Cherry Spot – Yet another I reviewed separately.
Archives – There are over 2,600 scenes in the archives. And some of those have 4K downloads.
Even though I knew about the network and have joined it and held a membership to it for over two years, how is this site not bigger than it is with fans? I think because they don’t get enough attention. Every major star model is on the network. There’s every type of sex. The biggest part is how nice the scenes look and how good the production is.
I went to great depths to get these numbers. As a whole network: Nearly 7,000 videos including 3,000 live. If I was going to describe Cherry Pimps in a way that porn fans could understand and relate to, I would say it’s like what would happen if any of these massive, popular networks, quit worrying about numbers to advertise and quit trying to make these premium standalone sites that people have to $15 each to join and combined all those into one network. You all know who I’m talking about. There’s a lot of those porn companies that have a big network and then say, “Oh, but if you want this niche, you have to join this site and pay extra for downloads on it too!” Cherry Pimps cuts all that nonsense out. You join and pay for downloads right from the start. You can get a year of it for under $100.
The navigation is simpler than it should be thanks to their listing of the different niches as sites or series.
I know that some of my past 100 scores were examples of subjectivity. I was biased towards the content and that is part of what makes Porn Users a unique experience. Cherry Pimps earns a 100 on objective and subjective. I have scored it between 93 and 95 in previous reviews. It’s a 100. They broke the mold with the 3,000 scene live site. Didn’t poke at you and say you have to be online at 3:19 AM EST to watch. It is all there for you to watch. You get to find out about a new model every month that you maybe didn’t know with the Cherry of the Month. You have a whole list of fetish sites covering most niches. It’s as close to perfect as a network can get. The best compliment I can pay them is they’ve never changed. They had a plan and have stuck to it.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others.
Cons:
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons.
Bottom Line:
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A tease, light exhibitionism, masterpiece of a site.
- You don’t have to look for promos. It’s $30 for a year or $10 for a month.
- Updates 3-4 times a week.
- There are videos but I don’t download them. I do stream some of them.
- The photosets are 1900x1200 and can be downloaded.
- Math is the only way to figure out the amount of photosets, I’m going to 11 years x 160 photosets per year = around 1,750.
- CCbill is the biller, also Paypal, also can send Zach a $30 gift card from Amazon (year subscription).
- Mostly amateurs with the occasional pro. Though some of the amateurs go on to be pros.
- Decent search features, model list and more than I would expect from a $30 per year site.
Cons:
- This is a favorite con of mine. There’s not always nudity. It’s a pro for me but I know it’s a con to some.
- Really hate listing this one but a little better navigation would help. (see bottom line)
Bottom Line:
Two of my reviews, should be #499 and #500 are both going to talk about this. The amount of time a site keeps me interested. I’m nearing 36 straight months of a membership at Zishy. If I joined a lot of sites on long-term deals, maybe that wouldn’t be that impressive but I only have one other site that I am a member of for even 9 months out of each year. That to me, is reason to give the site a 100. I do believe there are improvements that need to be made but they’re not changes that are going to make the site itself or content better. The improvements would just make it easier for me to count the models and sets for reviews. Zishy is a very basic site that scrolls on one page. The first set posted was in 2011, with 3-4 new updates per week, that’s a lot of scrolling. The content itself needs nothing changed about it. There was a time when Zishy didn’t have any nudity but nudity is becoming more common now.
The site hits on so many different fetishes including: Clothing fetishes, teasing, upskirts, upshorts, panties, lingerie, public, exhibitionism, flashing and the models are mostly amateur. Most of us know the routine with amateur models. You get a lot of different looks, I know there’s at least one model who is in the last few most recent updates and the comments fill up for her. I don’t even think she’s attractive. But there are some I find attractive that only have 1-2 comments on. I believe that’s a show of what makes the site a 100. There’s not a set look they go for on Zishy. There are some heavier models, some very slim models, some athletic, race doesn’t matter, it’s a site that just focuses on capturing young women being sexy in their natural state. I get the feeling the ones that flash are in their natural state when flashing. You can see their enjoyment.
I am sure I have mentioned this before but I much prefer the outdoor photos. Those keep the possibility and tension up for a flash or panty slip or nipple slip. The models look like they’re having a great time too. I do believe a big part of the site’s success is the owner loves the tease, just like I do. I look at the pictures and think that’s exactly what I would take a picture of. I believe that is some of the separation and not as much pleasure for us viewers when it comes to the big, mainstream sites. Zishy doesn’t seem to have any set formula or plan. Most of the pictures look like the models are doing what comes to them naturally. I say that in a way some could find it negatively since not all pictures are sexual. Some are silly, some are playful, some are geeky, it just looks like the models are having fun and if Zach or another contributor happens to catch a perfectly timed picture of an upskirt the models like that.
It is a hard site to review because there’s so much variety from model to model. The models dress like they would if you were going on a date with them, not like they’re about to walk a runway. The only facts about the site I can share are it’s cheap, the photos are good quality and can be downloaded. The videos are worth streaming and possibly downloading. Some of those do show more than the pictures show. You’ll get 3-4 updates per week. And the best compliment I can give a site like this one, it is a site you can return (on a year membership) and spend an hour or more just looking at the new pictures. I have never been one to pay attention to the comments left but most of the members are friendly and positive. Everything about the site has a positive vibe. There’s not a lot of competition in the tease, light exhibitionism category but as much as I like the Only All sites, that are teasing sites, I like Zishy better. Here’s to another 36 straight months.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My first ever 100 and it was a very difficult decision that I will back fully.
- Subtitles that enhance the scenes with perversion and there's no way for me to know if it's really what they're saying.
- Beautiful Japanese models.
- 18 niches includes CFNM and the nearly unheard of CMNF (clothed male, nude females), public scenes, exactly what I expect from a Japanese site.
- If you take the plunge like I did, you get access to over 500 exclusive DVDs (this will be explained).
- Asian women in control of the male talent.
- Good download speeds which was a major concern (70% of my max).
- Epoch or CCBill is the billing company. I think it depends on which package to join.
- Quick response to my request for my VIP access.
- The package I joined equals out to $33 a month for downloads of non-exclusive and ability to download the 500 exclusive DVDs.
- The most important word: Creativity.
Cons:
- If you want to be able to download the exclusive DVDs, you either have to join for 3 months or join and stay a member for 3 consecutive months at $40 a month. I took the one time plunge.
- Daily download limit no matter which subscription you choose. It says 10GB per day, but on another page it says 25GB per day. I have went over 10GB a day without any warnings.
- Most would complain about the video quality. The exclusive DVDs have higher quality but the non-exclusive have 480p.
Bottom Line:
I still give it a 100. There are a few other Japanese sites that are doing the subtitles and even have higher technical quality videos but these have the very authentic feel to them. Most of the DVDs first scene sets up a story. It's kind of like watching Kung-Fu Theater, dark and mysterious. The subtitles are perfect. I don't mean I can understand Japanese and know what they're saying, I'm saying the subtitles take away all the annoying parts of American porn. It's like they hired a professional author to write the subtitles. They (Zenra) do their own subtitles of every DVD so they may very well have a professional writer doing it.
It works even better if you turn the volume down to just a barely audible level. This is immersive porn.
There will definitely be questions about the cost, the download limits and I am going to try and explain my experience. If you join for 1 month streaming-only, it's $30. If you join for 1 month with downloads and streaming it's $40. You can download the non-exclusive DVDs and stream the exclusive DVDs with the $40 account. To get access to download the exclusive DVDs you have to either join for 3 months $99 or join for $40 and let it recur for 3 straight months. You send them an email and they give you VIP access which lets you download those exclusive DVDs.
I took this chance mainly because outside of a few sites I like, there just isn't much new porn coming out that I'm interested in.
I will not be able to stress how important those subtitles are. One scene I watched was CFNM with two beautiful Japanese women masturbating a guy. Subtitles like, "I know you can cum again for us." Which followed a cumshot. Seeing these women who are almost always portrayed as weak and submissive become the aggressive and dominant ones was enough for me.
The download limit isn't as bad as it sounds. If you're downloading the non-exclusive DVDs they are only 750-1000 MB per entire DVD (usually 3-4 scenes). The exclusive DVDs and some of the newer non-exclusive DVDs are in the 2GB range. I have 3 months. Even if I only hit around 10GB per day, that's 900GB in 3 months.
Which is what you have to do, you have to remind yourself everyday to go download several DVDs.
They also do have some uncensored but they have one of the most interesting setups I have ever seen. The Exclusive DVDs have pros and cons listed for them by the Zenra staff.
An example:
Pros: Another huge cast, big budget JAV title that mostly delivers
Cons: Studios need to stop filming in that horrible Chiba studio. Sex is real including cum, but shoehorned in at the end.
I have never seen a site that reviews the DVDs they have. That beats the hell out of user comments that say, "sucks" and "not bad". They also have full page write-ups about the non-exclusive DVDs.
I see this as a major pro for us fetishists. The entire site is full of fetishes. They don't even list Hot Springs, where there are multiple nude people having sex as public. Yet, still have over 100 public DVDs with multiple scenes on each.
A few numbers since that's usually a focus of my reviews but finding such unique and even exclusive porn is so rare these days my whole reviewing process has been thrown off.
There are DVDs on here with over 500 custom-written subtitles.
There is really no way I can count how many DVDs they have. They are broken in niches and it would take me hours to add all that up. TBP says thousands of scenes and I will agree with that.
I wanted to take 1 point off for the download limit but seeing that I haven't hit it one time yet, I don't think that's being fair of me. They do count your streaming towards your download limit as well. You have a section on the main page that tells how much you have downloaded.
In some ways, I think it shows what a big deal this content is. It shows my streamed amount, my downloaded amount and my login location with city and state.
Do I think it's a good value for casual fans of Japanese porn? Probably not. If the American sites are working for you then definitely not. If you have got to the point that the fetish drives your interest and the uniqueness is keeping your attention, I do think it's worth it. I will most likely put this on maybe a once per year, 3 month join. I don't know if they're updating and really don't care. It's all new to me.
I really don't even think it's a bad price if you're into Japanese porn. Even if all you do is download the exclusive DVDs those alone are worth the price. It works out to around 50 cents per DVD. What pushed me to 100 is the amount of work they have put into this content, the subtitles, the descriptions of each scene, the pros and cons that are honest, they even rate some of the DVDs. There are also HD DVDs on here but with the download limit I would rather not have HD. This is the most unique and sexual, sensual and perverted porn I have ever watched.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best kept secret in Point of View porn. Not for sure the site’s owners like that listed as pro.
- This is part of the Porn Pros Premium Network but you can join it individually and if you’re into POV, it’s worth it.
- Pretty models and a lot of them, around 400.
- The site is currently updating twice per month and has 416 scenes.
- Close to full-experience porn (will explain in bottom line)
- POV using a magic wand on a sexy woman. Haven’t seen that anywhere else.
- High technical quality even on the old scenes. Unlimited downloads.
- Downloadable POV photosets.
Cons:
- Watching 400+ beautiful young women naked, and bouncing around in your face, wait, that’s not a con. I’m trying to think of a way to make that a con. Maybe if you don’t like POV porn. I usually don’t so I guess there could be some that don’t like it.
- Pictures could be higher quality (only 1500 long end).
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I watched a POV scene of Micah Moore in a schoolgirl skirt and knee socks that still holds a place in my top scenes folder. It’s at least 10 years old. I wasn’t even that big of a Micah Moore fan. That scene though, it introduced me to a version of POV I wasn’t used to.
This site, POVd or however they spell it, does a lot of what made that Micah Moore scene so good. Add in that nearly everything these guys film has the models getting sticky wet and that’s happening in POV in reverse cowgirl, it’s near perfection. I also don’t like reverse cowgirl in normal filming style. I think that shows how much something being filmed a certain way can really change a person’s perspective. That wasn’t an intended wordplay. This site takes POV filming all over the place, not just the bed and not just for sex. There are scenes where the cameraman films the model POV in a pool, while squeezing her butt and sliding his fingers in her bikini. There are scenes where the woman squirts and it hits the camera. They have outdoor on the grass POV scenes. I won’t name the site that tries to give you the “girlfriend” experience but will say this site comes as close to possible to putting you right there with the model. It may even be one of the reasons I’m not interested in VR.
I am estimating on the models at around 400. There are 416 scenes and that does show they’ve updated with 2 scenes per month. The TBP facts update was on 6/25/21 and there were 408 scenes, July, August, September, October would be 8 more and that’s how many there are. I really don’t know if there are that many POV sites and have trouble believing there are that many with this many scenes. Or this high of quality of models or technical quality.
The site says it’s, “Innovative. Cutting Edge. A New Porn Experience.” I agree with that.
If it runs into any problem it’s that the oldest scenes are not as high in technical quality. The site has been around since 2014. The oldest scene has 1080, two 720s and 480 download versions. That’s not much to complain about. Name a star and I’ll almost guarantee she has a scene here and it’s going to be unlike any scene you have seen her in. Since I don’t know the newer stars that well, I’ll look at the top current model’s list and check. I don’t even know how accurate this list is but here goes: Abella Danger (2 scenes), Aidra Fox, Dillion Harper (a personal favorite, 6 scenes), Kiara Cole (3 scenes), Alina Lopez (2 scenes). I’m going to stop there. I’m just showing that this site is one porn fans should look into even if they’re not interested in the entire network. Porn Users has the $17.95 discount on just this site and it’s easily worth that. I don’t even know if I would know some of these models if I was on other sites. This content is that unique to me.
I do believe the length of the scenes even tell this isn’t normal POV porn. Most POV scenes are very short. These scenes average right at 30 minutes with some going over 40 minutes. The masturbation from the POV angle is something I haven’t seen many sites try and it’s very good for those that like women masturbating. They even have a few scenes where the camera is setup to “catch” the model masturbating. I don’t know how this site got buried in a network. It needs to be a standalone site. They even have POV giving the woman oral sex. They must use one of those cameras mounted to their forehead. Everything about this site is top-notch. I don’t know this model Kiara Cole but do think she’s very popular. Her newest scene has the POV oral sex in it. I didn’t realize how pretty she is until seeing her from this perspective. You can watch some of the models’ nipples get harder right in front of you, close-up. I really can’t say enough good things about this site as a standalone. I didn’t go with a 100 just because I would like more than 2 updates per month. I have downloaded and kept around 350 of the videos from this site. That probably should earn it a 100 but I know that I have the majority of their content and 2 new scenes a month just isn’t enough.
I do think you have to take the site for what it is without any previous thoughts about POV porn possibly hurting your view (I swear it’s not wordplay). If you go into watching these scenes with your mind clear and focus (asking a lot of porn fans, I know), I really believe you will be just as blown away as I have been with the immersive feeling of the scenes. I have to share a few user comments just for laughs. “Holy shit what a scene, I came 4 days watching this”, “Great angles. True POV”, “Best scene I have ever watched!” Of course there’s always that one member on these sites that’s posting, “These fake creampies are pissing me off!” Who is paying attention? Stare at the beautiful woman, stare and study cum, you make the choice. Great site, easily in my top 5, maybe top 3.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite Japanese sites and a near perfect one.
- Comes with a network of 8 sites, they are not even needed for the high score.
- I am only reviewing the main site, there are near 1,500 videos.
- Long videos, some in the 90 minute range.
- My favorite part … English subtitles.
- Good download speeds at 80% of my max, always important when on a Japanese site.
- The part that will be a favorite for others, the main site’s scenes are all uncensored.
- A personal favorite, they have at least some quirky scenes Japan is known for.
- Updates with 4 scenes per week.
Cons:
- The few basic scenes. Once you are used to watching the quirkier scenes, the basic male/female scenes just aren’t as interesting.
- One that’s hard to call a con, they don’t show the dates until you click on the scene. They are in order of newest scene.
Bottom Line:
The main reason I chose to re-review this site is I scored it very highly and thought maybe I was just having a moment of excitement at the uniqueness and newness of this content. I also am only reviewing the main site. Some of the add-ons in the network are also very good, but the subtitles are only on the scenes on the main site. There are three major strengths this site has going for it. #1 The subtitles. They are far from perfect, not that I speak Japanese but I know broken English when I see it. It still adds so much to the scenes. I have talked about the possibility of these sites with subtitles possibly using professional writers to make the models say better things than what they’re really saying. I don’t know if that’s true but it seems like a good idea to me. #2 I don’t mind the censor/mosaic but there was a time I wasn’t open to Japanese porn due to the censor/mosaic. All the scenes on the main site are uncensored. #3 the entire package you get with each scene. I haven’t even seen an American site do this. You get 1080p, 720p or 540p downloads on the videos, they have a zip for the “hard” pictures which is the regular photo shoot type pictures with full nudity and sex in them. They also offer gravure photo zips for each scene. Gravure is the more softcore, showing the model in her regular clothes. There is nudity in gravure photos, but this zip is only the female model and it focuses on her clothes, the fetishes she may be showing (skirt, hose, heels) as examples. Every scene has all that.
The models are nearly all very attractive, I would say 95% of the models are attractive. From there you get the quirkiness, the odd scenes, the taboo, there is just so much going right for this site it’s really hard to find a fault. I didn’t even list in the pros the site uses Epoch as the biller which is also unusual for Japanese sites.
I chose not to include the full network in the score. It deserves being mentioned. Included with this site are the sites Teen Thais, My Cute Asian (amateur), AVIdolz, Asian Bondage, Brutal Asia and JavHQ plus two oddly placed European megasites. I didn’t include it because these do not have subtitles and most don’t have 1080p videos. The network really works as “bonus sites”.
Back to the main site: There is very good navigation for a Japanese site. They have 22 categories ranging from “Ass Lick” to “Outdoor”. There are categories for body types which also goes into more than body type. Those include: Trimmed Pussy, Hairy Pussy, Shaved Pussy, Big Tits, Small Tits. They have costume and clothing categories like: Kimono, Schoolgirl, Office Lady and what’s nice about it is they don’t go overboard with it. There are 5-10 of these niches they list and as dumb as this is going to sound, they keep it simple, stupid.
To give you an idea of the depth of some of the scenes, one is of a very pretty office lady, she invites two young men into her office and has sex with both of them. The scene lasts 1 hour and 6 minutes. With full subtitles. I understand some of this may not appeal to other people. Maybe it’s just me but what you won’t find on this site is the feeling of “someone set the timer and lets try to keep this scene under X amount of minutes”. There’s no gonzo feeling in these scenes. They may start out in doggystyle and only switch positions twice in an hour long scene or they may do 12 positions in a 20 minute scene.
I have watched enough porn in my life to know when I’m seeing something that is unique. Uniqueness isn’t always a good thing. Some people prefer the porn they can follow and is maybe similar to their own sex habits but I do believe where I have watched so much porn, I need this uniqueness.
I know what I’m going to say is not going to be looked at as how I mean it. These models are more feminine than the American models. There is more seduction. There is more playfulness that seems genuine. This to me is what sex is like. It’s not stepping on the woman’s face while in doggystyle. That could be a downside to this site. You’re not going to find a lot of brutal hardcore unless you go to the bonus site Brutal Asia. You’re mostly going to find fun, sexy scenes on this site.
The only way I could see someone disliking this site is if they’re not attracted to Japanese models. There are no tattoos I’ve seen, no implants I’ve seen, it’s real, natural, beautiful women. If I wanted to nitpick it, I would like more of the quirky scenes. Other than that, there’s nothing to complain about except I keep letting it recur instead of just buying a long-term membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-28-2001:51pm (Update History) Reason: Added 2 points for their full included network adding a lot more value than I realized
Pros:
- Finally, a quirky Japanese site that's uncensored and has subtitles.
- 22 categories ranging from Ass Lick to Bukakke to Group Sex.
- Right at 400 models and there's rarely one that's not worth looking into their content.
- Almost 1,300 videos and each includes a photo set, all are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Updates every other day with a new video and photo set.
- A rarity to me for Japanese porn: All nearly 1,300 videos are available in 1080p.
- Subtitles add an element of humor, at least for me.
- But wait, there's more, an included network that includes 8 more sites and you can download the videos and photo sets from those sites too. I feel like I found a gold mine of Asian porn.
- Epoch is the biller
Cons:
- It doesn't really feel right to complain about this but a couple of the network sites are not Asian models.
- Had a small problem when I first joined. I tried to sign in immediately after joining and it said my IP was blocked. They fixed it the next day and said it's best not to try and sign in for at least 20 minutes after joining.
Bottom Line:
I got off on the wrong foot with this site. I explained it in the cons. My account was locked for roughly 24 hours because I tried to sign in too soon after joining. No real harm but I was a little annoyed by it.
After that it was a bunch of good surprises. Before going on, I prefer censored Japanese porn. I didn't for years but have realized the censoring mosaic creates a new hurdle for the producers of it and they have to work around the censoring. That adds creativity we don't see in a lot of porn.
What I have noticed is uncensored Japanese scenes are usually very straightforward and dull. Not the case with this site. They might not push the limits like the censored sites do but they are showing quite a bit of creativity and the quirkiness that draws me to Japanese porn.
A few of my favorites to give examples:
Models masturbating in front of men. This is something American porn rarely if ever does and I find it to be one of the most erotic porn scenarios.
Models having sex with a "stunt cock" AND a fan.
Sex in the restaurant. Sex on the bus. Sex at the park. Sex in a public bathroom while in cosplay outfit. Here's one I don't think I've ever seen in American porn, sex in a courtroom, and it's group sex in the courtroom. Models posing, teasing fans while the fans masturbate and cum on her.
The important part to remember is this is all uncensored. Those types of scenes are not that unusual in censored Japanese porn but are very rare in uncensored.
These sites have a combined near 6,000 videos and most include photo sets. That Teen Thai site is comparable to Tuk-Tuk Patrol, even in the amount of content with 180 videos and similar in photo sets (they have them numbered by number of photos, not sets).
I was most impressed by the 1,300 videos on JapanHDV all having 1080p option for download. Most of the Japanese sites I have joined are Japanese DVD sites and you get a mix of quality from 480p to 1080p.
I will have a review of what I think is the best Japanese DVD site in a week or two but I'm going to say I think this JapanHDV is the best Asian site on the internet. I used Asian since it includes Teen Thais which I would have joined as a standalone site.
The navigation is very good. The American networks could take notes here. When I switch from JapanHDV to one of the other network sites, each of those network sites has their own navigation/model list/categories.
This site/network is nearly perfect except ... I prefer censored Japanese porn. They do a very good job of recreating the more popular niches in the censored Japanese porn world and I'm blaming my own obsessiveness on that part. Like my first con, it feels strange to complain about a few bonus sites not being Asian. That's when you know there's not much to complain about.
You could possibly complain about the price but I wouldn't lower the price. This is a untapped market, there are only a handful of uncensored Japanese sites and even fewer that are uncensored with subtitles. I wouldn't dare complain about the subtitles. You have to watch a scene to get the humor of it and it's in no way making fun of their English. One of the models starts to masturbate in front of a man and says, "Maybe if I am more audacious?" He was being shy about watching her. When you can make me laugh in the middle of a scene with a beautiful nude woman starting to masturbate, you're doing a great job of entertaining me.
This is one of those rare times that I feel like I got my money's worth. You just don't see this type of site on a regular basis.
The video download options are:
1080p, 540p and mobile.
The photo sets are available in two types. There are Gravure photos and Hard photos. The Gravure photos are like a studio photo set. The hard are more like screencaps. They continue to show something American networks could make note of:
Click on a scene. There are buttons for downloading 1080p, 540p, mobile, Gravure photos, hard photos. No extra clicking needed. It's all right there for you to download. This is where it gets even more impressive for me. The network sites also have this style of downloading navigation.
Someone spent a lot of time planning this site out and making it very user-friendly, light on the pagination of abusing of your mouse with 5 clicks needed to get to the downloads.
I've never felt bad about giving a site a 97. I probably never will feel bad about it again but this site does everything it says and makes it very easy to use. The models are top notch, the quirky, fun scenarios are there. It's uncensored. They're still updating. Even the network sites are updating or have been updated in the last month.
If you're looking for a Japanese site that's uncensored, 1080p, quirky and has subtitles this is the one to join.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my top sites and it just keeps getting better.
- It's non-nude porn that's sometimes nude and sometimes doesn't need to be nude.
- A good mix of everything, amateurs, pros, races, body sizes, shapes, boobs, asses, clothing fetishes, and the ever present chance you might see something you're not supposed to see.
- Averages close to an update every other day, 14 updates in December, 13 in November and the updates go back to November 1st, 2011. I'll try some math since there's no way I could count all these. Around 426 weeks, roughly 3 updates per week, that's almost 1,300 photo sets.
- Download speeds are very good at 85% of max and since I only download the pictures it goes very fast.
- You can use a download manager but if your internet speed is fast and your download manager starts downloading as soon you put the file in it, it will usually be done before you get the next one put in it. I recommend pausing the downloads.
- Have been a member for 26 months straight.
Cons:
- The navigation, it's one long page of updates and you scroll and scroll and scroll (loading), scroll, scroll, scroll (loading). It's a minor complaint and one that could be fixed if the sets just had a download button on the main screen.
- This is for others, not for me, there's not guaranteed nudity in the sets.
Bottom Line:
Zishy to me reinvented the wheel with this site. There's no in your face nudity. Well, unless you count the topless ones. A better word would be there's no explicit nudity. Unless a cute teen in panties with a wet spot on them turns you on like it does me.
There's so much covered here, there's many different races, body types, settings, some in public, some in a house, some in restaurants, some in stores, there's flashing, there's attempted flashing, there's thongs that accidentally expose a little of a butthole, there's panties that show a little more than they're supposed to. There are leggings, jeans, skirts, pantyhose, panties, stockings, just about every possible clothing fetish you could possibly have.
I do believe this is as porn as the most hardcore sites. These sets are much more likely to remind me of a woman I saw at the store in leggings bending over to pick up something from the bottom shelf. Which is much more likely than the woman having an orgy with 6 men in a fake bathroom.
There are faults here. When I was looking to see when the earliest sets were dated, I locked my scroll wheel and sat here for at least 2 minutes to get to the bottom of the list. What I've done, since you can get a yearly membership for $30, is I go through a month for each year per month. Like this month is January from each year. The model list has a similar problem in that you click it and start scrolling. They could use tags but I don't know that tags would help since the scenes are very different from scene to scene.
The videos aren't really a con to me. They're usually cute, playful videos of the models doing whatever you saw them doing in the photos.
I don't like calling this artsy since I don't think it is. Most of these models, though clothed, semi-clothed, are posing, doing actions that are sexually simulating, unlike artsy sites where you mostly see the blank stare poses.
The artsy part comes in when the setting becomes a big part of the photo. Backdrops from outdoors to indoors that highlight the model's hair or complexion or the shadows that show you she has not panties on under that skirt.
It's everything porn hasn't been in at least a decade. It's real. I'm sure everyone won't find every model attractive. With me, it all depends on the actions. There are some heavier models on here and I don't know why but seeing them look so comfortable teasing makes them more attractive than if they were choking on 4 dicks.
I should have mentioned in the pros that the billing is done through CCBill, but I only had 5 characters left in the pros.
There's content here for panties lovers, exhibitionist lovers, voyeurs, us guys that like to sit on a bench in a mall and watch the pretty girls walk by. Not all the models are teens but at least 90% of them are confident. That's a big attraction for me. I know this isn't a typical review but it's not a typical site.
This content reminds me of the frustration of finding a Playboy magazine when I was ... 18, and wanting to see more, except now, less can be more. I've said it before in reviews of Zishy, I want to give it a 100. From a purely subjective view this is exactly what I now like seeing in porn. I've seen my share of naked women in real life. When does naked get repetitive? It reminds me of the girls/women that used to tease me and that makes me want to look at every picture to see if I can get that one peek in at more than they meant to tease me with.
I'm a non-aggressive male when it comes to sex. I'm 6'4" 280, I could throw most women around like like rag dolls. That's no fun for me or them. Seeing them trying to entice me is the ticket to my arousal. I could throw most of the men in porn around like rag dolls. I get burnt out on the male dominance in porn. I've had to be dominant in most of my relationships since women for whatever reason see my height/weight and instantly become submissive.
If the only con was the not guaranteed nudity one, I would give it a 100. The scrolling isn't bothering me as much now as it was the last time I reviewed Zishy, because the content is impressing me enough that I don't mind it as much as I did back then but it's that one con that is stopping the 100. In many ways, I feel like I'm almost being unfair by not giving it a 100 seeing that I just renewed my yearly subscription to it and it will be my third year. I noticed on the join page, you can now pay for a yearly membership by sending Zishy a $30 Amazon card. So, if you have some Amazon credit in your account you could buy a $30 gift card with it and have a year subscription to a site that I think when given a fair chance is one of the top 2-3 yes it's porn sites on the internet.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Fights a close battle with Twistys as my top site for quality, quantity and value.
- Descending price per month going from $20, $15 to staying at $10 from there out.
- The numbers are staggering, 2,216 models, near 10,000 scenes and the majority are exclusive.
- Videos range from 640x480 to 1920x1080, going to try and list in reply.
- Photos are zipped and stayed at 1280 high end up until the last year, then the 4300 high end photo zips option showed up on the exclusive sites.
- I would go as far as saying there are at least 10 sites in this network that would be worth joining just for that one site for the $20 price. The value is very high.
- I have found the navigation to be very good for a network of this size.
- Ability to "stay" a member after membership runs out so you can check out all the new updates.
- Quite a few niches covered even with the split of the extreme sites to their own network.
- Can't say much more than it's the best of its kind.
Cons:
- Well there isn't much outside of the few technical glitches I had mentioned in the previous comment.
- Nitpicking, as another member here pointed out, the file names. I don't run into this problem most of the time since I rename the scenes to whatever the title of the set is, but that's going to be the 1 point I take off since I could download more if not for having to rename the files! Little bit of joking there since I'm already crossing bandwith limits.
Maybe it's a change in the porn world, but there was a time that I joined some of these sites for $30 each or $45 for two. Those listed above aren't the only exclusive sites either. Those are just the ones that I personally would have joined at least once or have joined as one site.
The updates for the network average around 6 per day. That's around 200 updates a month. We can do the math, stay for 3 months, 600 updates, 3 month price $45 total, with the majority of those updates being exclusive. That's serious value. The navigation added points to the score just because I've never been on a network that had accurate search by model results. This one does.
For someone new to their sites, I suggest a couple of new external hard drives. As example, say you just discovered Sophie Moone, she has 449 scenes on here. Sandy has 356. Eve Angel has 125. Cindy Hope around 100. These numbers are combined with the other 2,000+ models. Even Regina Ice, who I think is a very underrated model, she has 24. You could spend probably 4-5 months here downloading and still be discovering new models.
A few things to add here. To show the amount of new models, they have 697 new models listed in the last year. It's like they've got a model factory and just keep churning out new favorites to combine with the older favorites.
I know 99 is a high score, but I could break this down in cost per exclusive scene, amount of models and make a case for it that way. That wouldn't even include the fact that the new videos are 1920x1080 and new pictures are 4300 long end. It wouldn't include the near perfect navigation once you get used to it. In terms of price + quality + quantity = value, they are as near to perfect as I've found. The amount of updates keeps you busy too. If there is any problem with the site it is just that. It's overwhelming. Just when I find a model that I want to download all of the content by her, I discover another one and this creates a problem of being overwhelmed.
I joked in the comment about hitting my monthly bandwith limit with my internet provider and that is probably the best compliment I can pay a site. I especially want to add to be sure to check out Lez Cuties and Anal Teen Angels, lots of new, young models on those sites that I was not familiar with. If I were to break these sites down, I could realistically see rating at least those 12 I listed above from 82-92 each, getting them all for the price they offer makes it the best value in porn to me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, easily the best value on the internet. My highest score ever given.
- Newest video quality also gets a big upgrade, all the way to 1920 high end with 8000 bitrate, previous year or so was 1280 high end with 4000 bitrate.
- Now comes with 21st Sextury flagship site, Pix and Video and their two other big sites Zoliboy and Sweet Sophie Moone.
- Very unlikely that there is a Euro model that they don't have.
- Pictures are zipped
- Price reduces the longer you stay a member. First month is $29.95, second month is $23.28, 3rd month is $16.61 and by the 4th month, the recur price drops to $9.95 and that includes Club Sandy, Pix and Video and 48 other sites.
- Club Sandy updates daily, Pix and Video updates daily and have been for 6 years.
- Not only does the price reduce each month, you also get new bonus sites each month until you reach 50.
- Excellent customer service if needed.
- A blend of solo, b/g, g/g, g/g/g/g/g content.
Cons:
- The closest I can find to a con is that the older content does take a hit in quality, but that is common with all sites that have been around this long. Not a big con for me, but will mention it.
- The only other one I could find will be called the "Drooler con", the pictures are 1280 high end. Though as I've said in other reviews of 21st Sextury sites they have some of the most beautiful colors/settings/outfits of any site to these eyes.
Bottom Line:
I felt like it was Christmas for me. For years, I had been a member of the Club Sandy/Pix and Video combo package. A deal to me at $44.95 a month. A couple of times each year, I would join this combo Club Sandy/Sweet Sophie Moone, then a few other months would be Pix and Video/Zoliboy. They was probably only 1-2 months that I wasn't a member of one of the combo deals.
Then I saw where 21st Sextury, the parent company, had changed their sites and packages. There was a lot of confusion at first.
Now, the confusion has been put to rest. You can join Club Sandy for $29.95 the first month and you instantly get Pix and Video, Zoliboy, Sweet Sophie Moone and 21 other sites, instantly.
Of those 21 other sites there are at least 4 other 100% exclusive sites and the other ones are DVD site type content separated into niche.
For me, the first four sites, Club Sandy, Pix and Video, Zoliboy and Sweet Sophie Moone are easily worth $29.95, let alone the fact that the price drops each month until you get to $9.95 per month.
That to me is an amazing deal. Brief reviews of each of those 4 sites.
Club Sandy - The beautiful, elegant Sandy. Still plays as a solo site for Sandy, but has grown into much more. The site's updates go back to December 2003, daily updates since. Sandy is still around too, though her updates of herself are not as frequent as they used to be. Still, there are literally hundreds of Sandy updates on this site. And she just keeps looking better with time. The best part is that she seems to be close or at least good friends with most of the top models in Europe. Besides being her solo site, you'll see 30+ updates of Eve Angel, similar numbered updates of Aneta Keys, Sandra Shine, so it really isn't the basic solo site most solo sites are. It's a multi-model feast of beautiful women. Still updating daily, picture set one day, video set the next, videos are now coming at 1920 high end.
Pix and Video - I always favored it a hair over Club Sandy, but we're talking the difference in maybe 1 point. Pix and Video is a multi-model site that has pretty much every Euro model that I know of and like Club Sandy, the big names, Sandra, Eve, Aneta, have dozens of sets on this site as well. Still updating daily with a picture set AND video set each day. Newest videos in true HD at 1920 high end.
Zoliboy - The internet's best porn assistant. Zoli has good relationships with the models, they find him charming and funny or at least he thinks they do! Similar to Pix and Video in its early years except much more extreme content, peeing, rough but not too rough sex, some voyeuristic content also. The site has 1 full video/picture update per week now. The archive dates back to December 2003 and the updates used to be daily, so the archive is full of content. An added note, the newer content is more extreme than the older. The models aren't as good now as they used to be, there are still some pretty ones out of the new ones, continue in reply below...
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- One of those sites that you think you won’t be happy with but ends up being one of your favorite sites.
- Amateur models, though some do go on to careers in porn
- The models deserve two pros. Very pretty, multiple races, different body types, very cute and a few that are gorgeous. Nearly all are playful and fun.
- Pictures are available to download in zips
- Navigation is simple but it is the forever scrolling style
- Download speeds are great (90% my max)
- Price has gone up but is still just $15 for a month or $50 for a year
- Likely the best public nudity, semi-nudity site
Cons:
- Videos are going to be looked over by most fans.
- I would like to know more about the models in the videos.
- Definitely not for those looking for anything hardcore
Bottom Line:
Zishy’s 100 from me was based on a couple of factors. I do not join Zishy for the videos. Those are short, though very high quality and are just not interesting to me. The 100 was based on the ease of being a member: Cheap price, good biller, updates, easy to use site and unique content. I am not going to score it 100 this time. It still is the best at what it does but what it does, is something so unique, it has no real competition.
The videos, as unfair as this may seem, should have stopped me from giving a 100. Just like when I join a site that focuses on videos, I usually will take some points off for not having pictures. Of course, you’ve seen my score and can see it’s still very high.
That’s because Zishy is that unique. This isn’t a masturbation site or a hardcore site. It was even listed as a non-nude site for a good while. This site is the type of porn site you can impress your girlfriend or wife with. You can show that you are capable of finding eroticism in something that’s not fully nude and there’s no penetration.
What you have here is a site that takes mostly amateur women and has them act naturally sexy. Many of them keep the majority of their clothes on but even then, they bend over, they show upskirts and upshorts. A nipple may even make a slip appearance. It’s women that are semi or fully dressed doing provocative actions not based on a porn producer’s idea of what is sexy. This gives every set and every model a unique set of pictures. You can see which models are wanting to get more naked or do more sexually but they have to be creative about it since it’s not just about being nude and spreading their legs.
I knew I would love this site the first time I heard about it. One of my favorite hardcore porn sites is Fully Clothed Sex. I have an admitted and known clothing fetish. I have that fetish because, well, it’s just not likely we’re ever going to see the day where it’s acceptable for women to lay down on the street or sidewalk with their legs spread while nude. Once you are able to focus on the provocative poses and uses of lighting, fabrics of clothing, you will start seeing women doing nearly the same poses or wearing the same fabrics in your everyday life.
I didn’t even complain when the prices went up. You can still join for $50 a year and you still receive 3-4 updates per week. I get more out of this content than hardcore porn.
The videos on Zishy are okay. Those are mostly videos of the models teasing, some have music in them and posing. I don’t know if I would be right in saying this but I would just as soon the videos be of the models talking about their clothing fetishes. I have to think that the vast majority of these models come into their Zishy shoots, knowing exactly what they want to wear and show. As a side note, the videos are HD quality downloads.
The models got two pros and deservedly so. Besides the models being represented by different body types and sizes, you also see a lot of what I’m going to call “mixed” ladies. You see the dark curly hair, green eyes, olive skin and … freckles. My biggest crushes throughout my younger years were curly-headed, mixed, kind of nerdy girls and there are a lot of those on Zishy. I’ve said it before and stand by it, a curly-headed lady with glasses on does as much or more for me than drop-dead gorgeous looks do. And if one of those curls flip down over her glasses, that’s it!
That is what Zishy offers me. I can look at many of the models and see me making moves on them.
The navigation is simple. It is the infinity scroll or whatever that’s called. I think that type of scrolling is aimed at mobile device viewing. There is a model list and there are new updates every few days. It’s pushing the 100 score again but I am “punishing” it for the videos not being interesting to me. I know there’s a huge crowd of porn fans that only want videos.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the only “date” style porn sites.
- Some of the top models from all around the world.
- Fast downloads at 90% my max download speed
- About 500 models, that’s 500 dates that end with sex.
- 1080p is the top resolution offered and good enough for me.
- A different view of porn models and I think either adds to or deducts from the attraction to each model.
Cons:
- POV style is not popular with some. Neither are interviews and some of these videos are interviews (see bottom line)
- You will need an imagination to get the most out of this site.
Bottom Line:
ATK Girlfriends is one of the only sites I know of that features a date-style experience. What that means is each model has a photoset showing her current outfit off. She then talks to the camera like she is on a date with you. Eventually, this all leads to close-up masturbation and teasing. I don’t know of many sites that make me want to use the word subjective more than this one. I like the waiting of listening to the model talk about herself while clothed. It lets me notice parts of her body that I want to see. You can see nuances in personality and try to predict if the model will be wild during masturbation or withdrawn.
I don’t think it has anything to do with my past as a psychologist but it’s not much different than doing an online therapy session. See how imagination helps? If you can put yourself into the roles of dating these different women this site will be your favorite.
The technical numbers are good enough. The videos top out at 1080p downloads nd that is more than enough resolution. Most of the videos last over 40 minutes. A bigger resolution with the number of videos (nearly 5,000) would mean large filesizes and cluttered hard drives. The pictures are good quality and can be downloaded. You also should look at the pictures to get yourself into the feeling of it’s a real date. You will see things in the pictures that you don’t notice in the videos.
When you read that, if it doesn’t sound like something you would like, you probably won’t like this site. It offers nothing else in terms of porn action. It’s a pretty model talking to you like you are on a date, shot in POV style so it’s like you are right there talking to her. She may strip. She may just get naked right away. The possibilities for this style of porn seem to be endless but that may very well be the one downfall. This is not much different than real dating. There will be models that you really wished would do more or show more or tease more but the model may not be comfortable doing a tease. There is reality in this porn and it’s why a model like Aaliyah Love excels on this site. She has a big, bubbly personality and her scenes are some of the best on the site. There will be some models that knock you out with their looks but then have personality problems. I guess nothing can be perfect.
The size of the site is impressive. With around 5,000 videos, 500 models and 500 photosets. It is one of those sites that you have to join with an open mind and an understanding of what you’re getting into. If you’re looking for gonzo porn you will be very disappointed. Having said that, I am also sure you’ve never experienced a site like this one unless you know about a site I don’t know about.
I do believe the site could improve with variety in the date styles and maybe more specified actions by models. Maybe have the model talk about she has always been curious about anal masturbation. Then have her talking during her masturbation and saying you are turning her on so much she’s going to try anal masturbation for the first time. See? Loads of potential but where there is potential, there are letdowns.
All in all this site hasn’t let me down. I like it more than all the other ATK sites combined. It’s one of the real unique experiences you can get in the porn world.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The master of softcore, leg, lesbian porn.
- I have been joining Viv’s sites dating back to when he had two sites and I still believe it’s the best lesbian porn available. From a man’s perspective.
- Looks like there’s a daily update of either photoset or video, or it’s really close.
- 1,113 models and they include the majority of the finest models to ever grace the Earth.
- There are now 2,195 videos and 3,390 photosets. All are downloadable.
- The ease of using the site is important for anyone that remembers the old Viv sites. Met Art now manages it or owns it. I’m not for sure which but the navigation improvement is a big part of my score.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Nearly all the old videos are still here but do see the cons.
- This is one of those pros that has to be mentioned. Some of the photosets have photos that are 9000x6000. There’s nothing else to say about that.
Cons:
- Made that fast: Some of the old videos are gone. What it looks like to me is the male/female scenes are all gone. I will go into that in the bottom line. It’s not a big deal for me since I still have those on a hard drive.
- I know that Sandra Shine does some producing and she was a great model, one of my favorites but no one really captures Viv’s style. I do think the older scenes are generally better but it’s not by much. If it makes Sandra feel any better, my all-time favorite Viv scene is Pink Velvet 3, part 5, Sandra Shine and Eve Angel in the most passionate, unbelievable lesbian scene I ever watched.
Bottom Line:
I always mention DDF’s name when talking about Viv Thomas. I felt like they made the boom of 2005-2009 in internet porn, happen. I am going to start with that con. I don’t know how many male/female scenes there were on this site but one I remember very well was Jo, Eve Angel and a guy that was supposed to be a professor or something like that. Neither Eve nor Jo was known for their male/female scenes. I don’t think they had even 10 male/female scenes between them. It was more of a collector video to me. I have it on a hard drive. I don’t remember Jo doing anything with the guy but Eve did and it as common as hardcore is these days, was uncommon back then to see them in a hardcore scene. I don’t think there were a lot of male/female scenes but those were really good. If you didn’t know those were there you wouldn’t think much about it but I am mentioning it for those collectors out there that maybe lost their old scenes. I don’t see it. It could be here but I don’t think it is. The old lesbian scenes are. I thought Eve’s lesbian scene with highly underrated model Lisa C, was one of the very best lesbian scenes. I do believe Viv’s production played a big role in that. He had Eve and Lisa C meet at a hotel room and the first 5 minutes of it has them kissing, groping each other over their clothes and against the walls. They couldn’t keep their hands off each other long enough to take their clothes off.
And just a little on that Eve and Sandra scene. They are either being nurses or maids. The scene starts and they get so into the sex it really looks like Sandra instinctually sticks one of her fingers in Eve’s butt. That was not common for Eve back then. The scenes felt like Viv directed how things started and he kind of let the models start improvising and adding, no subtracting.
It is still that good of a site. I know subjectivity plays a part there. If you are looking for what looks like real sex, this is it. If you couldn’t see what was going on, you wouldn’t know a cameraman was there.
The site is very large with excellent navigation. There used to be I think this is how it was split, there was a Viv Thomas photos site and a Viv Thomas videos site. It’s all here now and they’re updating daily. I hate to say I think it’s even better than Met-Art but I do and it is based on my preferences. The models are more built on Viv Thomas. This is the pinnacle of lesbian porn. I have been told to say from a male’s perspective. Maybe it’s not the most realistic lesbian porn but from a male’s perspective there are at least two very pretty, naked, sexy women, rolling around, kissing, licking and fingering. That is what separated Viv Thomas. I don’t think he tried to do anything except show off multiple women at one time. It’s what nearly every lesbian site up to the ones on Adult Time, tried to do. Most failed.
There are nearly 2,200 videos and the newer ones do have 4K. It’s all downloadable. There are nearly 3,400 photosets and as told in the pros, some of these go up to 9000 long end on the photos. The quality is there, the quantity is there, the name behind it. There’s not any, “Squish her face with your foot” or “rip her asshole open”. Having said that, it’s still not what I would call softcore. These women go at it. There are still some solo scenes too. They have good tags. Once again, just missed 100
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site that makes me join Adult Time
- They are up to 328 scenes and update once per week
- The Adult Time access, with all the good and bad that comes with that
- About as dark and risky as mainstream porn can go
- Solid acting and pretty models
- Production is top-tier as is the technical quality
- Never have listed this as a pro, nearly always good choices in casting
- Good download speeds at 85% of my max download speed
Cons:
- Still not for sure the site is better than its predecessor Pretty Dirty but that’s as much a compliment as negative.
- The Adult Time navigation
Bottom Line:
I first reviewed Pure Taboo on 12-3-2018. It was the site that Adult Time caught my attention with. The site has grown a lot since then. At that time, Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo only had 318 between the two sites. Pure Taboo now has 328 scenes just by itself and you can still access the Pretty Dirty scenes too. Sticking the word “Taboo” in your site’s name is a risky idea. Some of this content isn’t close to taboo. Some of it is very close, or as close as you’re going to get to taboo. They are relying on you to use your imagination on most of the scenes to see the “taboo”. Which is why it’s risky.
The other reason it’s risky is there really isn’t that much taboo you can legally do in porn. That’s creating a heavy reliance on the viewer’s ability to suspend their reality. It works for me. This is how I always watched porn. The scenes, in what shouldn’t be taken as an insult, remind me of the glory days of Vivid. There is chemistry between the actors and actresses. There is a feeling they really are pulling off believable acting in porn. I do believe the mood, lighting, build-up, story, plays a major role in that. There’s 10 or more minutes of story and build-up before the clothes come off. For those that didn’t experience the Vivid glory years, they had entire scenes with no sex, it was leading into the next scene. That’s back when we watched porn on DVDs.
The technical part of the scenes is as impressive as you will find. There are download options for the videos from 160p to 4K, an unbelievable 8 different resolutions. The photo sets could be better. They are generally small in quantity of pictures with 35-50 pictures and they’re not studio photo sets. They are downloadable but even as a photo collector, I don’t download these. I am sure the thinking there is these scenes are made to be watched as videos to get the story and that would make the pictures less important.
I am going to review Adult Time as a whole since I reviewed it in its very early stages a few years ago. For this Pure Taboo review I will just say the Adult Time navigation has all the makings of great navigation and potential I talked about in 2018 but it’s still not very good. It carries over to the sites including this one.
The Pure Taboo scenes create a feeling of uneasiness in the viewer and that, to me, is the taboo with these scenes. I am not that into the most hardcore porn but Pure Taboo can get me to watch it. That is a big reason for the high score. Someone is doing something right. The scenes are long, at times, I even feel like the scenes are too long. It maybe enters the area of unrelenting or punishing even. There’s more of the taboo they are creating. I believe their taboo isn’t in the “story”. A secretary is seduced by her boss while his wife is behind the whole idea. That’s not taboo. That probably happened somewhere in America yesterday. The taboo for me is there is something going on with these scenes that are touching nerves in the viewer. The viewer then needs to make the connection to whatever nerve that is. It then becomes taboo. Two middle-aged buddies are watching a football game and one’s daughter’s friend comes over to study. They end up having a threesome with her like in their own younger years. That’s not taboo. Porn has been doing that scene for decades. But something in the dialogue, something in the lighting, it’s creating the taboo. It is, if you allow it, getting in your mind and nerves. Subliminal porn? I’m not going to say it is. I am going to say it’s way above porn-level directing and producing, it’s far beyond porn-level writing and most importantly, the actors and actresses are showing real acting ability.
My comparison to Vivid’s glory years is the greatest compliment I could give a site. Even today, 20 years after Vivid’s glory years, my favorite porn scenes are from those glory years of Vivid.
Pure Taboo is easily my favorite what I think is American-based site. To me, it breaks the hold the reality porn networks had on the market. That probably isn’t true since not everyone has tried Pure Taboo out and not everyone will like the depth of their scenes. It does break the hold the reality porn networks had on me. With the high technical quality, weekly updates, I really wish they would offer it as a separate site from Adult Time. Maybe put it and Pretty Dirty together like it was in 2018. That was my first exposure to it. I joined Pretty Dirty in 2018, Pure Taboo was just launching as was Adult Time. It does a little of everything too, there’s near heartcore, very hardcore, lesbian and everything in-between. Very close to being a perfect site. The pictures or lack thereof is stopping it from being perfect. Maybe the female models can’t get into character well enough for the pictures while getting into the character for the video? Either way, near perfection is saying a lot in today’s porn industry.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My favorite of the photo sites and it helps that they have good videos too.
- There's no way to say this for sure but they have one of the most diverse collections of models. That is what pushes them ahead for me.
- An artsy, glam, site that has masturbation videos and models you've never seen before.
- They are currently running a promo for only $9.95 for a month, $94 a year or $399 lifetime.
- Can join through Paypal via Epoch which is a major pro. Some sites I have joined through Paypal do not have an easy way to cancel. Going through Epoch makes it easy and my bank doesn't send "possible fraud" emails when it's Paypal.
- My score was hard to give and is solely based on the quality of the models, the picture quality and the videos. See the bottom line for an explanation as there are some problems here.
- Fast downloads (90% of max)
- See bottom line about updates and dates on scenes.
Cons:
- Endless scrolling page which is no fun for us PC users.
- The overall navigation needs changed.
- Can't count the number of scenes since I get tired of scrolling.
Bottom Line:
I understand that a site with 3 major cons should not be a 98. I also understand a site that has this many varied race/looks but all pretty models showing everything and even masturbating should be a 100.
Watch4Beauty has been a site I have followed for years. I always liked Met-Art, Femjoy, the softer sites that focused on pictures and started becoming a little less softcore, but Watch4Beauty always stood out to me.
Here you will see what I mean
Sofi Vega, Li Moon, Denise Gomez, Genebra Belluci, Valery Ponce and that's just me looking over the ones I recently downloaded. They still have your favorite models from this genre like Little Caprice, Maria Rya and the more known, more common models in this genre but it's those you don't see on any of the other sites in this genre that separates Watch4Beauty.
The scenery is as good as any site. You just notice it when the model moves a little to the right or left. The content of this site makes it.
But the navigation is shit. There are no tags. There used to be tags (see next paragraph). I understand that this style of website (ever-scrolling page of content) is to make it easier to view on mobile devices. I can appreciate that but they need to put a button on there to switch it from a desktop browser site to a mobile site. I know that exists and is easy to do. I have had blogs and forums for 20 years.
Everyone can get a laugh at my expense and also learn how this site works. I could not find the dates on the scenes. I could not find the tags. There's a little female outline of a head up in the corner of your screen, top right side if you're looking at the screen. I clicked it and there was the date is was published, the tags, the model's full name and all the information I thought they had removed. It's still there, it's just you have to click on the little head outline.
Did looking at all these sexy models mess with their programmer's head? Here is that information, the site updates 5 times a week by my count. If it's wrong, blame their thinking of putting the scene information in an outline of a head. I am laughing and having a good time with this but really, when you click on the outline of the head, it opens up a full information page about the scene and the download button flashes red like I don't know what the download button means? Why didn't the outline of the head flash? I spent a week looking for the scene information.
What you have once you get through that above part is a softcore done right. The masturbation is rarely frantic or wild. It's sensual and sexy. The technical quality is also very high.
The newer videos have a 4K option and a 1080p option. That's it. Besides some of their videos being masturbation, the non-masturbation ones are sometimes even sexier with the model on the bed or in a chair, spreading her legs, opening her pussy while staring into the camera. It's an overused word but this site does sensual as well as any site. It's hard for me to call these young women seductive. They're half my age. You could blend sensual with seductive to describe the videos.
In my previous review of this site, I talked about their pictures being better than many sites videos and that's still true. I've been around porn long enough to be able to still claim I was a picture "guy" back before we got fast internet. I just love the picture sets on Watch4Beauty. I wish they had samples so I could suggest one for you to go look at. Valery Ponce in the photo set called, "So Cute Girl". The editing, the order of the photos, the progression, it shows why this type or porn really didn't need to add videos.
The photo sets start with a tease. They progress to topless, then bottomless, you're all built up and waiting for the next photo to see what they're going to show next. Was that what they meant when the word "Art" was added to porn? If so, I agree.
Besides the great everything, except hiding the scene information in an outline of a head, I listed the video specs above. The photo sets are downloadable and they are the largest resolution I have seen at 4480x6720. You want life-size views? You get them. These are the first photos I have used my zoom out button on.
I have mostly avoided the talk of that ever-scrolling content page. I use the model list instead. I have the same complaint on Zishy. And I probably complained too much about the outline of the head with the scene information hidden in it but it is also why I feel a 98 is possible. No complaints about the models, no complaints about the camerawork, no complaints about the scenery and setting, no complaints about the editing, far from any complaints about the model selection and the outline of the head is there with the date of release and scene information.
The last downside, there's no way I'm going through all that scrolling to count all the scenes. It is a very big site and there's enough content to keep you busy for easily 3 months, maybe even a year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- You ever join a site and watch a video on it and say, "Oh my goodness"? This site did that to me.
- Upskirts, panties, hose, more teasing than I think I've ever seen on a porn site.
- Very high quality on videos and photos.
- They touch on several fetishes from clothes to upskirts to women just being sexy.
- More dirty talking than an Eddie Murphy comedy show.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Easy site to navigate with no extra buttons or ads or any of the other annoying shit sites put on their sites these days.
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- I think if you're looking for anything hardcore you'd be disappointed with this site.
- Some women are just not made for dirty talking or teasing. They'll be going fine until they start talking.
Bottom Line:
This site is easily at the top of the tease niche. Most of these women get so horny they have to restrain themselves from masturbating. Which might very well be the answer to why mainstream porn has lost a lot of its passion. They don't let the women tease enough. Five minutes into these videos you get the idea an ugly, fat guy or an ugly, skinny guy could walk in and get lucky.
That's the part of tease porn that is often missed by the viewer. Women in tease porn get hornier than women in hardcore porn. We're going into natural instincts and I would rather not go too deeply into that but if you like seeing women stripping, "performing" with upskirts, some with pretty panties, some with no panties and turning themselves on, you will love this site.
Here are the numbers:
207 models and I do know some of these are pros but many have that girl or Milf next door look.
2,095 photo sets and they are downloadable.
2,078 videos and they are downloadable with 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p all available on all 2,078 videos.
They're getting into that area of I don't have much to possibly complain about!
They also update daily and their models are a nice blend of "she's probably a pro model" to "she should be a pro model if she's not". Very attractive models they got me to sign up with the model Amiya Dreams.
Here's what to expect from these scenes:
Some nudity, a lot of upskirts and teasing, some masturbation, a lot of dirty talk and the one I think should be mentioned, they do have some scenes that go into "insulting" the man watching the scene. One of the models has a thing about holding her pinkie up and wiggling it while saying, "Do you just have a little cock?" and she sounds a lot like the Game of Thrones character Ygritte, she even has that same attitude.
I'm not trying to make jokes about British English but when they start saying the little cock part, I keep waiting on someone to say, "Would you like a spot of tea with your little cock?"
There will be those that believe this is not "porn enough". I like it a lot. I like the change of pace, seeing models performing with more than just their looks and their natural gifts they were born with.
As mentioned in the cons some of these women do struggle with the dirty talk and teasing. One seems just annoyed that she has to keep her panties on. The dirty talk from the ones that are not good at it ranges from, "Are you going to cum?" You don't ask questions when teasing! That means I have to stop and think about my answer.
There's so little difference in proper dirty talk and poor dirty talk. It can be said this way, she can say, "Are you going to cum?" or she can say, "I want you to cum for me". See the difference?
Overall, this is a great site with excellent technical quality especially for the tease fans and those that like seeing pretty women be pretty and not just dirty.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the very best all-around network on the internet.
- Comes with 13 sites, and those 13 sites include at least 8 sites that at one time were successful standalone sites. Eight of the sites are still updating and 5 are fairly listed as "Archive" sites.
- The navigation in its newest iteration blows other networks away. Will further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 70% of my max.
- Averages a new update per day across the network.
- The amount of content across the network is reaching hard to believe levels.
- Ready for this one? Over 2,500 models. And some have over 100 scenes.
- DDF, the producer Denys DeFrancesco, helped create "Leg sex" and is one of the most copied producers and photographers in internet porn history.
- The network itself covers nearly every genre. It's the closest I've seen to complete.
- House of Taboo is maybe the best mainstream accessible kink/BDSM site on the internet and it's included.
Cons:
- Two checked cross-sales sit directly over, "Yes, I am 18".
- Being used to American porn can cause a slight problem here since most of the models don't speak English. The good side to that is the men aren't talking at all in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
There really isn't much at all to complain about here. I've evaluated my last 10 years of porn sites and can say this one easily is in my top 3. I like several of the American networks but DDF has consistently been working on their navigation and for me they've hit a good spot with it. Navigation on a site this large is very important.
I'm going to get the numbers out of the way since they're distracting.
- 2543 models
- 15,161 scenes, each scene comes with a video and zipped photos.
That's a lot of porn. I always thought DDF's biggest strength could also be seen as their biggest weakness. They have variance in their network sites. When you look at most networks the sites really aren't that different, they change a setting, add a few twists to the storyline and call it a different site. The DDF network isn't like that. You have sites that still focus on solo girls, posing, teasing, masturbating. Then they have a couple of lesbian sites. Throw in a couple of hardcore sites. And a kink/BDSM site.
I think for DDF's experience to be understood, one has to consider how successful these sites were as standalone sites. I know at one time, on PU's parent site TBP, three of the sites included here were in the top 10 of overall review scores. I can tell you I paid $29.95 for One By Day, for Hot Legs and Feet and for Euro Girls on Girls. I don't remember what the standalone price was for Eve Angel Official but I paid whatever it was.
I do think that separates it from the American networks. And if it's not known, you can actually still join the sites in DDF Network by themselves for a reduced price.
I can't say I've ever really liked Hands on Hardcore but that's mainly because at this point, I really don't like most hardcore.
The archive sites should be mentioned since these are most likely aimed at collectors. They include Cherry Jul, Sex Video Casting, Eve Angel Official, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter. Sandy's Fantasies for those who are curious is the lovely Zsanett Egerhazi aka Sandy from Club Sandy. This content of Sandy is from the earlier years of her career and features one of the most viewed Euro lesbian sets of all-time, it's Sandy vs Sophie Moone, two of the most popular Euro models of the Euro porn boom in the mid-2000s. They were also a part of the group that I once called, "The no take dick six". That name came from watching multiple interviews of Eve Angel, Sandy, Sophie, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone and Peaches. Their English or lack thereof led most to answer, "What's the most you'll do on video?" with, "No take dick, no, no."
While I'm having fun at their expense, they were the models who interested me the most. I couldn't understand how 6 European models who were from Hungary could have that much power over their scenes.
And if you like them, they have over 500 scenes just of those 6.
The big change that led the network to a 98 is the navigation. I don't think many people question the quality of content at DDF but the navigation has been really bad in the past. You could click something and end up on Google, bad redirect urls, dead links, it was terrible.
Now, as of 2/6/2018, you sign in to a hub. Across the top are the names of the still updating network sites. The hub itself shows all updates to the network. Say you want Hands on Hardcore. Click it and the hub reloads with only Hands on Hardcore content. Not good enough? Go directly to "sites" and pick your favorite, you now have a brand new search engine that will just search within that site's content. And you can just search through models and see all their content.
So, why the -2? I didn't put it in cons since it's a minor problem and not to make fun of DDF's tech group but every time they try to fix something, they break it! If you want to go to one of the archive sites you have to sign in one time. It doesn't move seamlessly to them like it does the active sites. That's pretty minor so I took 2 points off for those cross-sales and the biller is Vendo, who I haven't ever had a problem with but those cross-sales could easily be re-checked if trying to click the age consent.
Other negatives aren't worth taking points off like older content not being HD, that's accepted at this point and I'm afraid if we keep complaining about it they're going to start removing it.
Even with my high score, I don't join DDF Network more than twice a year. I mainly focus on the 1byDay, Hot Legs and Feet and House of Taboo content and have all the archived content already on a hard drive. I really think at least 4 of these sites deserve a standalone review but will probably limit it to 2-3 of them.
The active sites are: 1byDay, Euro Girl on Girl, House of Taboo, Hot Legs and Feet, DDF Busty, Only Blowjob, Hands on Hardcore and Euro Teen Erotica. There's still an emphasis on glam but it's why I just join twice a year. I still like glam to a point and they are shooting the best solo sets.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
