Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the newer sites that to me fall into a "Premium" category.
- I joined 2 months ago on a $14 for 2 months promo. It comes with the site Pretty Dirty and this review will cover both sites. Of note: As has been mentioned about Adult Time, this site now offers me Adult Time access.
- 318 scenes between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty, all have up to 1080p and 4 lesser resolution download options.
- It's the type of hardcore I prefer since it requires me to imagine a little before the sex starts.
- Overall, good acting in the scenes I've watched, I don't know if I just like Abella Danger so much that I think she's a great actress or if she really is. Several others do a good job too.
- DL speeds are very good (80% and up of max)
- Photo sets available but they are screenshots and can be downloaded.
- Mostly well-known pornstars but at least here you do see more from them than their best scream in piledriver.
Cons:
- This doesn't make much sense to me but the sites feel cluttered. Maybe it's the colors they use?
- For every good actress in porn, there's a dozen male "actors" that are only good at acting at acting.
- Not for sure why they have Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty as different sites. Both sites have similar storylines.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of funny that I was just talking last week about not having any access to Adult Time, I then got access to it with the Fantasy Massage network and now I have access to it with the Pure Taboo/Pretty Dirty network. I'm not including that access in this review since I have no idea how long they will continue giving access to it.
I joined Pure Taboo back when they had the 2 months for $14 deal and didn't even know I had access to Pretty Dirty until the second week of my membership. Taboo is such a broad word when it comes to porn. I actually remember one of the first porn videos I ever saw being either Taboo 1 or Taboo 2 that was supposed to be a real brother and sister having sex. I was a teenager and just have vague memories of it. The taboos on this site are fairly common these days, going into the stepfamily niche and some that don't even use the word "step" in front of daughter or sister.
My interest in taboo is pretty simple. As long as I am convinced it's something that's not supposed to be happening, it's good enough for me. It's like when I admit to having a rebellious side and people in 2018 ask how I was rebellious, I shaved my head bald in high school. They roll their eyes. Then, I became a psychologist who refused to suggest prescriptions ... that always makes the jaws drop. Anyway, you're going to need your imagination with these scenes.
There's a decent amount of content between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty with 318 scenes as of December 3, 2018. Pretty Dirty no longer updates unless I'm doing something wrong. The newest update on it says 1 year ago. Pure Taboo updates twice a week.
I do think this content is rather unique because they almost go overboard with the stories. How many sites have this on a scene ... "WARNING: What you are about to watch is arguably the most shocking and graphic family roleplay scene we have ever filmed. We hope you find it equally arousing and disturbing!"
A recent Pure Taboo scene has Kendra Spade playing the stepdaughter role. She comes home to find her stepfather mad and fussing at her. She's fidgeting, he's blocking her from getting by while he continues to fuss and she pisses on herself in her tight jeans. I'm mostly indifferent to pissing scenes but this one is very sexy. They then work in the corny dialogue as the stepdad tells her to take her jeans off, you know, "so you don't track the pee through the house". She takes them off, he tells her that her panties are really soaked too. She starts to take them off and says, "Isn't this inappropriate?" He chuckles a little, "Yeah, if I was you real dad it would be." I can appreciate the laughs in porn but there's a fine line.
I should add that some of Pretty Dirty's scenes go more into "forced" scenes but you don't ever get the feeling it's non-consensual. Much like I said in the previous paragraph, I think this kind of porn also has a fine-line.
I believe the names of their scenes do as much to build a perception of the scenes as the actual scenes do. One of the newer ones is "The bad uncle returns" which I do think has more implication with it than the scene shows. The stories are mostly well thought out, acting overall is okay, so many of the female models seem to have spent the majority of their "acting" lives as sweet, innocent and go overboard with it. Kind of like the old pigtails and lollipops scenes.
And that leads to one problem with this type of porn. I would imagine that those who prefer the straight to action style will do a lot of fast-forwarding. Most of the scenes on Pure Taboo range from 30-55 minutes and a few didn't have much action until 15+ minutes had passed. That fine line shows up again. While it's easy to complain about scenes that jump right into sex, it's also easy to complain that "that's too much acting". I don't think I've ever opened a porn video and thought, "I'm going to kick back and watch 20 minutes of actors trying to convince me they're related!"
Overall though, Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty are a very good combination that's worth checking out at least once. If you can get the two months for one price, I think it becomes the cheapest of these premium, story-based, porn sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A bit of a strange site with straightforward sex.
- Close to 170 models and most look like amateurs to me. There are some pros, including an old favorite, Misty Stone.
- CCBill is the biller
- Huge difference in looks from model to model, could even be a con for some.
- 310 scenes as of 9/3/2019, roughly 290 photo sets that can be downloaded.
- All of the scenes I've watched start with the model dressed.
- Updates twice per week.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- I like the personality of the site/content.
Cons:
- This site is just different. There are implants, tattoos, what look to be ass implants, then there are some really pretty girl next door types.
- Too many BTS interviews for a site with only 310 videos (they are included in that count).
- I might catch a little flak for saying this but some of these women look like their prime passed before Amazon had Prime.
- Possibly recycling
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a couple of their handjob/pussyjob/cameltoe slide videos on a promo tube site.
I like those scenes. The site really has a good personality. The scenes don't feel like cookie cutter porn. It's not an all amateur site. There are quite a few porn stars on it. Some of them have changed so much you might not recognize them. One that comes to mind, Kiara Mia. If she has anymore plastic surgery she's going to have to start having skin implants.
That's not meant as harsh as it sounds. She was a gorgeous model when she was younger and it's like she had one bad plastic surgery and couldn't stop.
They have a good blend of niches covered here. As mentioned in the beginning, those handjobs turning into cameltoe slides were the big draw for me. Eva Notty and Daisy Ducati are two of the other ones I knew and they have handjob scenes.
The biggest complaint for me isn't listed in the cons. This feels like an incomplete site. It feels like it should be in a network. If it had another site or double the amount of content it would be easier to recommend it.
I mentioned possibly recycling, at least comment on PU mentions it and when I look at the content I see this:
The oldest scenes are from March 2013. They update twice per week. That would be 104 updates per year. They have been updating for 6.5 years. That would be around 700 scenes. They have 310.
I'm not punishing them for it but am letting it be known.
It doesn't hurt in the quality department. The oldest scenes have 1080p, the newer scenes add 720p, 480p and 360p. The photo sets are very large in amount of pictures, some with as many 500 and most are videocaps.
One of their strengths is the variation in content. They have transsexual, straight, women using dildos on men, cosplay, and that's just not a blend you see on a lot of sites.
About the women, I think this could be the big attraction or big turn-off for some. There are some listed as GILFs (grannies), lots of implants, lots of tattoos and a lot of the women act like they've been in porn since John Holmes days.
I am happy enough with the membership. I downloaded all of the handjob, potential cameltoe slide videos (73 of those). The cosplay ones always interest me, but their costume designer must have came from the 70s too and there are 3 cosplay scenes on the whole site. It might be worth checking out just to see vintage Captain America. The costume looks like a pair of Captain America pajamas I had when I was a kid.
Don't take that as negative either. As mentioned, I like the personality of the site, it doesn't take itself very seriously and has a playful side to it. I think an 80 is a good score for it. The handjob content made it for me. I didn't download anything else.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Look what slipped in. One of the only sites I ever felt like saying the word “unique” really applied to.
- It’s not like any site I have been on. There’s a Heaven side and there’s a Hell side.
- Created by the same people that created the great Alt Erotic.
- Seeing how many of the models can pull off Heaven and Hell.
- They have a special right now for Easter. I’m not going to say that’s ironic.
- Download speeds are good, about 80% of my max.
- This is a really important one. This site could be a lot more confusing than it is. They have it set up in a way that it works properly. You still may get confused.
Cons:
- They tried something different. All the angry porn fans screaming stop trying to evolve porn!
- It could be confusing to people.
Bottom Line:
What have I found here? I’m going to try and simplify it. The site itself is purgatory. No sermons coming from me. When you search in the episodes or trilogies, you can select Heaven or Hell. The Heaven scenes are more innocent. Newest one is a cute hair beautician seducing the man getting his haircut. Which is creative. Alt Erotic was doing something like this with their site and tattoo artists seducing the people being tattooed. The Heaven side also goes into what I would call standard porn or normal porn. Clary Trinity, one of my current favorites, has a scene on the Heaven side. It’s her and I think Jay Romero having sex in the house. If you start with that scene it doesn’t seem like much is going on but it’s part 2 of a trilogy. Part 1 was Jay having sex with Chloe Temple, his “supposed” lover. He told her about his fantasies. Clary Trinity is his fantasy. In episode 1, this story was all set up and sex happened. In episode 2, Jay lives out his fantasy with Clara. Episode 3 hasn’t been released yet and there’s the hook and what this site is doing right. All I can see is a blurred image for episode 3. I can’t tell if that’s Clary or Chloe or some other woman. That’s just the Heaven side.
Let’s try the Hell side now. Donnie Rock tired and drunk. His girlfriend is Jazlyn Ray, quite attractive. Donnie is drunk and his buddy Mazee the Goat is with them. Mazee makes the moves on Jazlyn since Donnie is passed out drunk. But there’s the Hell. Donnie likes watching. He starts watching in this trilogy called, “One Eye Open”. Jazlyn then has another run with Mazee and invites her friend Kay Lovely for a threesome. Somehow, Donnie got on the couch and fell asleep and Jazlyn notices he’s peeping. I think part 3 of it is a foursome.
They’re doing something different. I will give them that. I really like what they’re doing and would put on par or even above Pure Taboo. They are showing real fantasies people have and are letting those fantasies play out instead of relying on the text box to explain what’s going on. It’s takes decent acting ability to do these scenes. They don’t take themselves that seriously. Anytime you put Charles Dera in a scene, you’re not looking for serious. The site if nothing else shows me that porn can change. It can be creative. Some of these models, male and female, can act and they don’t have to be overtly silly or too serious.
The part no one should be surprised by is most of the female models are either Heaven or Hell. Only a few do both. Kenzie Reeves has 5 Hell scenes and 3 Heaven scenes. They have top talent too. The camerawork is as good as I’ve seen, and the settings fit the stories. I don’t think you’ll see most settings more than once. Not all of the scenes are part of a trilogy.
The technical facts about the site shows that it’s not even a budding site. It has some traction. It’s worth joining, the current special is $14.99 with downloads. There are 129 scenes currently when you combine the Heaven and Hell scenes. They do not have 4K, but all scenes do have 1080p and 720p. They also have nice photosets. Everything can be downloaded and its unlimited downloads.
I think the easiest way to approach this site is to not pay too much attention to the Heaven and Hell part. I just go through the new episodes and trilogies. They have been averaging 2 updates per month. The production values really set this site apart. It’s not a 100 site but it’s over 90. They have the stories, the continuity from one scene to another, the Heaven and Hell twist and top models. I like it a lot and look forward seeing where they take it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The solo site of Rachel Aziani, includes access to the Aziani network for a reasonable price.
- Rachel really comes off as genuine, a sweet, very attractive "older" woman with a great body.
- Videos are excellent quality but this quality also will show up in the cons, 1280 high end with up to 8000 bitrates.
- Pictures are decent quality, I do like their style of photography, very glam, very pretty sets, but there is a con here as well.
- Download speeds can reach about 95% of my max, and like the above, there is a con here too.
- Bonus sites are really good, I actually prefer Aziani.com to this site and you get free access to it with a subscription. It is a multi-model site that addresses at least one of the cons of this site and has some models like Georgia Jones that are not of the big breasted variety.
- Rocker/Sybian/Machine videos, these are the best videos off of the network, in my opinion. Absolutely loved the Eva Angelina Rocker video.
Cons:
- First con might not be a con to some and that is that the quality of the videos is so high that the files are HUGE for what you get. Will expand on this in BL.
- Second, Rachel's solo site does not offer zip files and some sets on Aziani.com also do not offer zips, this to me is unacceptable for a site that does most everything else RIGHT.
- Third, connection problems, I went through about 2 hours of "cannot load" pages earlier this morning. Download speeds will shoot skyhigh one minute then drop to 1/6th the speed in the matter of minutes.
Bottom Line:
The cons and further explanation.
The video size of some of the newer videos on this network are too big. A few examples, a newer Rachel solo video, believe it was Rachel206, it is 1280 high end with a 7600 bitrate, it is 11 minutes and nearly 400 megs! I don't think that is quite as bad though as a Julie Michel video on Aziani.com, it is 1280 high end with an 8000 bitrate and is over 450 MBs, BUT is only 8 minutes long! A half a gig for an 8 minute video is just too much.
I appreciate the high quality and the fast bitrates, but I'm sure those file sizes could be cut in half and ran at 4000 bitrate and be just as smooth to the naked eye.
As much as I like Rachel, not having zips for her photo sets really stops me from even looking at the photo sets. Maybe scale back those videos and use the money saved to zip the photo sets?
The other con is the biggest one to me. I had countless connection problems and as a comment I posted about 6 weeks ago told, I also and STILL do get security warnings on this site. It fixes for a few days then the security warnings are back that a page is trying to install something on my computer. The page is a pop-under ad that the site uses. That is uncalled for, I think it is bad enough to rip your visitors off, but trying to install junk on a paying members computer is just not good business.
Get past those cons and you have an excellent network of sites. Rachel has developed into one of the more entertaining and enjoyable performers on the internet. She has a big pretty, warm smile and big boobs, though I'm not a big boob fan, she has nice boobs to be that big.
The star of the network is the Rocker videos, this is a sex machine that the women sit on and you can't help but chuckle a little at some of them. Georgia Jones' expressions while using it was worth joining to see! Eva Angelina did everything she could to wear the Rocker out, but the Rocker won and left Eva giggling.
Those are original to me, they also have Sybian, but these Rocker videos are the first I've seen.
Model selection is great. Not only the lovely Rachel, but you have those mentioned above, plus a personal favorite in Carmel Moore, Renee Perez and dozens of other top level, mostly American models.
As a fan of mostly Euro glam, I can still say that this network is my favorite "mostly" American network. The girls all seem relaxed and have fun. Rachel's hardcore sets are with her husband Buzz, who is also a big part of the site and you are getting real sex between them, not the cookie cutter sex on most DVD sites.
With all this praise though, those cons, especially the no zips and connection/pop-under ads problems are really dragging this network down. Give us zips and fix whatever the problem is with the connection and this solo site is a 90 by itself! The network itself, is a 92-94, but I'm knocking off 10 points for the no zips and connection problems. Still recommended, mainly for Aziani.com and the Rachel videos.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Raven is a beautiful woman, nice body, and is becoming one of my favorites.
- Videos are okay, WMV is a good 720 high end, but that damn slow bitrate is killing me at 800, Divx has that same resolution, but does bump the bitrate up to 1000, which is a little better.
- Pictures have pros and cons, 1240 is your high end, which isn't good enough, but they do come in zips, so I guess I will list it in pros.
- Download speeds are great for me, about 35% faster than my average.
- A little b/g, a bunch of g/g and a whole lot of solo, over 250 videos and 500 picture sets.
Cons:
- Just wished they would improve the bitrate, the resolution of the videos is fine, but chop-chop video bitrates are frustrating with a high end computer.
- Picture quality could be bumped up to 2000 on high end
- Price may be a little high, I've been a member for 3 months now, but did just cancel since I can't see paying $30 a month for 15 new updates.
- Maybe it is just me, but the vacation videos are pointless. If I wanted to watch vacations, I would watch National Lampoon movies.
Bottom Line:
Raven Riley has been one of my favorites for the last 2 years. I forget her ethnicity, believe it is Native American, Italian and something else. She has a great body, reminds me of a curvier Aneta Keys, though not as pretty as Aneta in the face.
She is playful in her videos which can be a little annoying. But you can always fast forward those parts. One of the best things about this site for me is the site works. It does exactly what it says it will do, the quality is above average as a whole, the downloads are fast, and I guess that is why it costs $30 a month.
You will get a blend of about 15% b/g, 35% g/g and 50% solo. Raven is excellent solo, and even reaches the milky orgasms in some of her videos. As with most solo sites there are some of those videos that you most likely won't fool with,Raven playing with dolphins and going on vacation.
She really seems like a sweet girl. I would really like to see the pictures raised to 2000 high end. It just seems like everything is a compromise in porn these days. Just like the videos, very good 720 on high end, but low bitrates.
I don't think I can recommend a solo site any higher than this one, as it gives you good updates and also good customer service if you need it. It is just that I am either wanting a lower price or better quality, or both would be nice. Even if only down to $19.99. Otherwise, it is a every 3 month join, since then you can get 45 new updates that you missed for $30. Still highly recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Milf betrayal porn that’s good.
- Large site with 711 scenes and 2 updates per month.
- Well-known models which could be a pro or con depending on your view.
- If you join through PU’s links, downloads are included in the price.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max)
- No 4K they do have 1080p.
Cons:
- A lot of the scenes have a similar feel to them which is normal with a narrow niche like this one.
- ProBiller can be hard to deal with but I didn’t have any problems with them this time.
Bottom Line:
As much as this site tries to be a reality site about wives that aren’t getting enough sex from their husbands, the scenes don’t do a real good job of making you believe that’s what’s happening. It could be that’s to be expected from a site this size too. You get hit or miss performances that largely depend on the model.
The scenes vary in their setup. Some try to show the “wife” as talking to her husband and telling him she’s going to make a video showing how she needs to be fucked. Other videos just leave out the entire husband part and have the female model saying she’s happy to be back again. The scenes are mostly hardcore but some could qualify as heartcore with the female becoming more passionate about finally being with someone who can satisfy her. It is very similar to all MILF sites I have been on. They do have top-tier models here and there’s not much to complain about when it comes to looks.
Joining through PU gets you full downloads included in the price and their download options are acceptable. They have no 4K video but do have 480p, 720p and 1080p. Each scene also includes a downloadable photo set but I wouldn’t call them anything more than average in quality.
They have nearly every MILF you could name on this site. There are implants, heavy makeup on some, tattoos and the feeling is they are just producing the same scene with different models. It’s a good site for MILF fans though and anyone who collects the featured models. With 711 scenes and 2 new scenes added per month you’re sure to find a few you like.
I will compliment them on ProBiller being a lot easier to work with than usual. I simply sent them an email with my login info, email address and asked them to cancel my account. They sent me a cancellation confirmation the next morning without any hassle. I would recommend it for MILF fans and hardcore fans. There’s not much creative going on here. Most of the newer scenes the guy just walks into the camera view after the brief setup and has nothing but a towel on. If you’re looking for a story you’re not going to find much here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my most highly rated networks on a consistent basis, not anymore.
- 53 sites unless some of those are just samples, Lil' Humpers shows up in my membership but only has 6 scenes on it.
- Some of the best mainstream porn on the internet.
- One of the top networks when it comes to diversity in their models, white, Asian, Latina, black, mixed, even transsexuals.
- Good navigation, you skip from site to site without having to sign in and their search engine shows all of the model's content, so if you find a model you like on one of their sites, you click her name and you'll see her other content.
- Almost always can be joined for under $10.
- Updates twice a day across the network.
- 8,399 models as of 1/8/2020.
Cons:
- You have to pay for downloads and the downloads cost more than the membership. Membership was $9.95, downloads are $14.95. It's not terrible to pay $25 for a site but it's a change that I don't like and that's a subjective opinion. I joined this site for years and had downloads included in the price. I think I paid $17.95 back then. Why not just offer the download package on the join screen?
- Their billing processor is the most frustrating biller I have dealt with. They try to offer you "discounts" that are more expensive than what you're paying for it. It used to be an instant, automated cancellation system.
- I will be taking on the long, frustrating task of adding up how many of their sites still update. Here's the number 9 of 53 sites are updating.
Bottom Line:
Reality Kings, for me, was once the best of the American networks. They had a huge amount of diversity in their models. They had creative, even fun sites (Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs), a whole collection of Latina sites, several Asian sites, black girl sites, now it looks like they've turned to RK Prime to release most of their new content on and it looks just like the porn on every other porn site.
I reviewed Brazzers not too long ago and was similarly harsh on it even though at that time, Brazzers had downloads including in their membership, I've heard they are now charging for downloads too.
I paid for a month of downloads at Reality Kings as they had some scenes I wanted to add to my collection but can't say I'll feel the need to do it again. The newer scenes I did download have lost all the fun and sexiness of their old scenes.
Their numbers are very impressive at 8,399 models and over 14,000 scenes but I have a lot of those scenes from 2015 and back. It seems like my favorite sites: 8th St. Latinas, MILF Hunter, Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs, In the VIP and Black Girlfriends, all stopped updating in the 2017-2018 span.
If anyone is curious, without the downloads package you can't even download photos or screencaps. All you can do is stream the videos.
It just feels like this upsell system gets me on the wrong foot. I found a few scenes I really liked but it really feels like this is my last time coming to Reality Kings. I felt the same way about Brazzers even with downloads included.
I'm sure there is a market for streaming only porn but I'm not part of it.
I won't go completely against it and say no one should join it. I think if you're new to it and don't mind paying the $25 price for the membership and downloads it's worth a month or two. There was a time when they shooting some of the best, even most creative porn.
I won't let them off the hook for the bullshit cancellation process. I chatted with an agent for nearly 15 minutes. When I would turn down a new "great offer" he would ask me to hold on. He would be gone for 3-4 minutes at a time. All he had to do was say, "Okay, got you cancelled" and I wouldn't have been happy about having to chat to cancel but at least would have appreciated them not making it a hassle.
Instead, I'm left with 15-20 new, good scenes that cost $25 and a lot of frustration and hassle. Hopefully, they will one day at least consider making the downloads an option for when you're joining and put in an automated cancellation system. There, talked myself into it. I won't be back until those things get fixed. The score isn't terrible because I think it still has value especially to a newer user, it would be about 10 points lower for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest networks on the internet. As of 4/18/2016, there are 45 sites included in membership.
- One of the best networks for those who like a racially diverse mix of models.
- Nearly every possible genre is covered to some extent.
- 720p videos or higher have been available since late 2009.
- Averages two updates per day across the network. Pictures and screencaps are included with most videos and are downloadable in zips.
- Can't believe I'm putting this as a pro, but they have a "lock" icon on the scenes that are not included in standard membership.
- This is purely subjective, but I still find their humor to be a plus. Some of the scenes are so corny (in story) that I can't imagine a great actor acting out the parts.
- They're really good at what they do. Which can become formulaic, but at least they bring in top talent.
- Some fairly unique and "fun" sites like Money Talks and CFNM Secret.
Cons:
- Download limits, though I disagree with them, they are at least now clear about what the limits are and are at least good about unlocking your account 24 hours after you hit the limit for the day. It's also consistent now, unlike how it used to be.
- Ads, ads and more ads. They've got ads mixed in with the scenes. Ads in the margin. Ads in the header. And the forced ad when you login. They used to annoy me, but if it keeps the price low it eventually becomes not as bad.
- 45 sites is a lot. Quite a few of those don't update and haven't updated in years. Not for sure why they don't create an archive and just stick all those in it instead of keeping the individual sites active with no updates. Will cover those in Bottom Line.
- If cameraman talking, guys being silly bothers you, you will have some problems with this network.
Bottom Line:
I've never been able to be overly-critical of Reality Kings. The amount of exclusive content. The varied genres, races of models, just always seemed more thorough than the other big networks. I still feel that way.
I know there's lots of reviews of Reality Kings and quite a bit of negativity towards them, but I've not had any problems with their network. The download limit is frustrating, but I've learned to workaround it now that they've made it consistent and simple to understand. I do want to say there's two different listings of the download limits. One says 50 movie scenes per day. The other says 10 GB a day. Over the last few weeks, I've hit the download limit twice and both times it was after downloading 50 full scenes, both of those times were well over 10 GB, so I'm going with the 50 full scenes explanation as it's on their site. That's a lot of porn. You could easily download 300 GB+ in a month at that rate.
The biggest draw for me has always been the diverse models. There's slim, medium, very curvy, nearly every race and I prefer that variety over one standard type of model. Like most, I sometimes get annoyed by the guys talking, but other times it's kind of funny. It reminds me a lot of the guys I grew up with. You even get some ongoing humor from the regular male talent like J-Mac and his line about being in college. He's been using that line with the college girls for about 10 years now.
The technical aspects of the site are very good, but like a lot of sites, they started counting "HD" when it was 720p, so it's almost impossible to see when they started doing 1080p, but all of the newest scenes have 1080p and 720p started roughly in October 2009. I've always complained about networks that count their sites so they can advertise "we have X amount of sites". Reality Kings does that too; I'm going to list the active ones.
So, that's 20 active sites with 25 inactive sites. There's a few, as noted above, that haven't updated in at least a month, but look to use roughly a monthly release schedule so there could be more updates coming with those.
I actually think 20 active sites would be a better way to advertise since there are so many networks these days with less than 10 active sites, but 45 sounds better to new members.
As a notice to others, they, like Bang Bros, did buy some popular amateur sites that went broke and have all the content from those included in the network and are counting those in their sites. Some of those sites have very good content on them, but haven't updated since the mid-2000s. Which also means you take a big hit in technical quality on those sites.
I do like the newer sites they've added over the last few years. The Moms Bang Teens site has a lot of Brandi Love content and if you're not familiar with her she's one of the better porn models these days. Great energy and believable. The high score is also justified, in my mind, by them having multiple sites that are in the top 2-3 of their genre. Those are:
I haven't had enough time to tell if their newest one, RK Prime, is going to be a success or not. From the handful of scenes they have up so far it looks like a typical gonzo/location site with some voyeurism thrown in. The scenes I've watched from it are good, but I don't know if it will do as good as Moms Bang Teens. And that is what I've always preferred about RK over the other networks. They seem to be a little ahead of the curve and try to do unique things with their content. I've always wondered when someone would try a site with a voyeur watching a couple have sex and RK Prime goes into that. It's far from an original idea, but you don't see it very often these days. I remember Vivid having an entire DVD series "The Watcher" that was extremely popular in the late 90s/early 2000s, but very few if any sites/studios have tried it since.
It has its faults, but if you pay attention, they've made it near impossible to click a scene you don't have access to and the download limits aren't near as bad as they used to be. I've said it before and still believe it, if the content wasn't good, we wouldn't be bothered by the download limits. To me, it's still the best of the American-based networks.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge network that covers most niches with 100% exclusive content.
- DL Limits that used to hold this network back seem to be completely gone. Will give details in BL.
- No less than 8 of the sites on this network could stand on their own. Personal favorites are: 8th St. Latinas, Mike in Brazil, Money Talks and Mike's Apartment.
- Video quality on vast majority of videos is 720 high end.
- Pictures for every video come zipped, two types, HQ photos that are not screenshots and a separate screenshot zipped folder as well. Not all sets have both though.
- Download speeds reach the 90% range of my top DL speed.
- Signing up though TBP then clicking back-up credit card processor provides billing through Epoch with the great $18 price.
- They have as racially diverse selection of models as any site I've been on with their only weakness being in the Asian category.
- Big butt, big boobs, little boobs, little butts, lesbian, MILF, public, Latina, black, interracial, gangbang, etc...
Cons:
- This one doesn't bother me much, but the HD videos they advertise aren't quite HD and only available as stream.
- Wish they would at least put the old videos files into one scene. Several of their best scenes are available only in 3 parts. This is a very small percentage around 10% at most.
- Just not a lot to find in the cons outside of subjectivity now that they don't seem to be enforcing their DL Limits.
Bottom Line:
I remember back when Reality Kings sites had a 1 GB DL limit per day per site. That went up to 10 GB then it became one that I believe was 15 full scenes per day. Here are a few numbers from the last month.
Most downloaded in one day: 83 GB
Most content from one site: 8th St. Latina 468 GB
Total downloaded in a 1 month period: 1.2 TB
No DL limits on any of those. It's easy to group RK with the other networks, but I look at it as more of a DVD site with pictures and screenshots available in zips. It's funny how perception can change the way this network is looked at. How many DVD sites are there that have 100% exclusive content, multiple daily updates, zipped photos and screenshots for $18?
The content gives you a nice variety as well. The MILF Hunter is as good of a late 20s to late 30s model site as there is. Money Talks is as good of a public/exhibitionist site as I've seen. The trio of 8th Street Latinas, Mike in Brazil and Saturday Night Latinas covers the Latina niche as well as any site does. Many of these Latina models are not seen on other sites and do no more than 3-4 sets in their career. Mike's Apartment could reasonably compete with any of the Euro hardcore sites and gives this network the edge over the others with a full Euro site for those who want a break from American models. We Live Together is one of the better American lesbian sites. In the VIP gives you the voyeurism/exhibitionism niche.
I just can't see anything major to complain about. The quality is comparable to the big DVD sites plus pictures and screenshots and 100% exclusivity. The only complaint that applies to me is the one about the older videos being split into parts. They have one model, Giselle2, who is one of their most popular models and has one of their most popular scenes, but it is in 3 parts. The HD part or lack thereof doesn't bother me too much since the scenes are already big. Most of the scenes on this network clock in at over 30 minutes. I've seen one video file as large as 850 MB, the accompanying photo set is 185 MB and the screenshot file is 155 MB. Making the three files over 1 GB so if you bumped it up to HD video, it would be near 2 GB for the three.
You do get cheesy plot lines in most of the scenes and after awhile you may border on being bored since most of their sites and content are based on niches. It's one of the strong points of porn, but also one of the weak points. The videographer/photographer chit chat isn't near as bad in the newer scenes than it used to be.
From doing a scan through of their models, lets go with 85% natural, 15% with implants with a +/- 5% for error. There are plenty of amateur models, esp. in their Latina sites that you won't see anywhere else. Throw in their take on the CFNM niche with CFNM Secret and I would say they have pretty much every niche covered and do a good job of each. I would like to see them add some Asian models or site, but that's minor. As highly recommended as I can go on a network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My favorite of the big booty, big booby, networks. Tons of content, multiple sites that could stand on their own.
- Despite the daily download limit of 10 GB, I'm not bothered by it. If it were 1-2 GB per day, that would bother me, but as it is, I could realistically download 300 GB in a month.
- TBP discounted price
- Covering most of the bases when it comes to broad range of cultures, white girls, Latinas, black girls, this is what sells the site to me.
- Some of the sites included have been longtime favorites like Mike in Brazil, 8th Street Latinas and Round and Brown.
- Quality is good enough for me. Newest download from Mike in Brazil is 720x404 with 1400 bitrate. Will further this thought in BL.
- Each video comes with zipped screenshots, I like these as a throw-in, but they're not going to blow you away with quality.
- I'm getting good connection and DL speed, about 95% of my max download speed
- Daily updates
Cons:
- The download limit could be a con to some, but I do have trouble listing that a site with what equals a 300 GB monthly limit equals a con. I only have a few site folders over the years that total 300 GB.
- I have found a few, probably less than 1% of the videos that are not available anymore.
- Content can be repetitive. Then again curvy butts never get repetitive to me!
- Some of the sites are no longer updating. I thought CFNM Secret had a ton of potential, but only one update this month.
- Some of the older content on the longer running sites is split into parts on the videos.
Bottom Line:
This is a re-review of a site that I hadn't been back on since about 2 years ago. I had to talk to myself reasonably about the DL Limit and how 300 GB in a month is more content than I usually download from any site in a month. This network, like Brazzers and Bang Bros is very high on the curvy models. I like Reality Kings a bit better because my favorite models are Latinas and they have a lot of Latina content.
The sites I like best with the network in order:
Mike's Apartment - Almost 100% Euro models in mostly hardcore action, a few solo and g/g sets. 8th Street Latinas - Mostly straightforward hardcore sex. Mike In Brazil - The Brazilian girls in hardcore action. Serious booty moving in these. MILF Hunter - Late 20s, early 30s models in hardcore action.
Round and Brown - Mostly black girls, but some dark Latinas as well, more curves than the autobahn.
In the VIP - Gives you a bit of a voyeur feel since they are supposed to be in a club. We Live Together - G/G/G sometimes more! Older sets are much better than the newer ones though. Money Talks - Takes on a bit of an exhibitionist side. Models, women on the street are offered money to show skin in public. Also has some terribly painful humiliation clips including a guy putting his dick in a mouse trap for money.
Those are the ones off the top of the head, but I have content from all 28 sites. All follow the curvy theme. I think Mike's Apartment could easily stand on its own, don't get any ideas Reality Kings! 8th Street Latinas as well. Both have years of content built up.
Onto the quality issue. My biggest concern with Reality Kings advertising HD on their main page, is just think how fast the download limit would fill up. The most recent Mike in Brazil clip is 720x404, 1400 bitrate, right at 40 minutes long and is 418 MB in size, double that to HD and the amount is near 1 GB, with a 10 GB limit per day that could become frustrating.
I do like the screenshots that you can download. These more of less look like a picture you or I could have taken with our personal camera. These are especially good in the Money Talks series. You can see that the content is live and the public is walking by without noticing.
They do have a CFNM site, if you've followed my reviews, these are usually well-liked by females, my wife likes them, but they aren't updating much anymore. They also didn't follow the CFNM rules, but it is still good. In their CFNM the man eventually gets more than a handjob.
For me, the network is as good or really better than most DVD sites since the different sites separate the content into niche for you. They do also have a bit more variety than the other networks mentioned have. One thing to keep in mind. Eventually you get tired of any niche. This is where repetition sets in.
Overall though, Euros, Latinas, black girls, white girls, it is like a buffet of women to me! DL limit notwithstanding, I recommend it, especially for the discounted price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very impressive reality network that has several sites that could be stand alone sites.
- Covering pretty much every niche imaginable, big butts, big boobs, girls next door, MILFs
- They have zipped pictures of the sets which is pretty nice, you don't see that on networks that often.
- Video quality is great, 720x480, videos are long too, which could be a con as well
- Great download speeds, but I think I am in the same state they are. I'm hitting 1,400 kb/s
Cons:
- Files are very large, I downloaded one that was nearly 900 MB, not really a problem for me, I have 2 TB of free hard drive space. Could be for some.
- Advertising for some could be a problem
- Bad acting! I know that busty Evie D is not innocent!
- Humor could be a problem for some, I like it, as long as it isn't too degrading.
Bottom Line:
This is a follow-up edit, after posting my review, I hit the DL Limit two days in a row, both were around 8 GB. This will take off 4 points of the total score, since 8 GB per day is still a lot. That adds up to 240 GB a month, which I'm not for sure that I could or would ever download that much from a site in a month. Still recommended and still a very good network, but beware the limit. I hadn't went over 5 GB and had been fine.
Since then I've went as high as 5 GB on some of the sites without a problem. The basis of these sites is fairly realistic, somewhat silly at times. Like having sex with the 8th Street Latinas by telling them they can get their green card. The VIP seems pretty believable, and the We Live Together, to me is about as real as lesbian sex will get in porno.
Though the humor at times gets a little old, it is still better than the sites that have abuse, spitting, smacking and so on. So far, I have been happy enough with the network that I plan to let it rebill for at least another month. The update schedule is pretty good with 2 sites getting updated daily, everyday of the week. None of the sites are bad at all. Well except that Tranny one.
I love the Latina sites and the big butt ones. We Live Together could also stand on its own as could, VIP, and Cum Fiesta. All for $25, that is a good deal to me. I will review some separately since they deserve a full review. For my money, this network is the best going! Definitely recommended!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Rocco, the original Italian Stallion, the man that every woman in porn wanted to do with a scene with, a once true legend.
- Over 2,100 videos dating back to 2008 with new updates coming in every 2-3 days.
- Decent navigation, has the same familiar struggle with other sites merged into Adult Time, it's not as easy to navigate as it used to be.
- Newer videos have 9 download options from 180p to 4K and there are photo sets that are downloadable.
- Download speeds are good at 75% of my max.
- Very pretty female stars.
Cons:
- To counter my first pro, Rocco is now a true legend in his own mind, he spits on the women, he slaps them. It's a con because I can't stand him in his scenes over the last 8 years.
- The navigation removes categories. You're mostly going to sign in and start scrolling. There are tags, but those tags take you to any site on Adult Time not just Rocco's.
- The older (much better to watch) scenes are available in only 240p and 480p.
- Only goes back to 2008, Rocco returned from a retirement in 2008-09 and after a few years of being his old self, he become the arrogant jerk he is now.
Bottom Line:
One of the first scenes I watched with Rocco in it was with Vanessa Del Rio. Those that remember Vanessa Del Rio know she was one of the most dominant female performers of that era. Rocco had her under his thumb. His was kissing her, he was touching her and pulling that wild side out of her to make her submissive to him. I also remember seeing him do the same to Raylene of the same time period, who is still filming.
When he returned to porn it was like he was a different person. The passion, the seduction of the women, turned into slaps, spitting, causing them to gag on his dick and just acted like a dick.
This site while containing over 2,100 videos is not a full representation of his career. The first few years of content on here show sort of a middle ground. After those, you get the dick Rocco version.
Technical quality is good with 180 to 4K and 7 options in-between on the newer videos. His new series Rocco's Intimate Casting almost hints at a return to the old, more intimate Rocco, then he slaps a woman and makes her nearly puke from shoving his dick down her throat.
The photo sets are okay. They do let you download them but most of them are small 30-50 photos and poor quality.
The newer scenes at least feature other men besides Rocco as most of the women are reason enough to watch the scenes.
The scenes with Rocco feature his favorite move, the foot on the face position. Show control and domination, but why cover a pretty woman's face with your ugly foot?
The older content does at least have some scenes where Rocco hadn't entered his mid-life crisis and you see the passionate side the women loved.
It's overall an okay site. It's hard to score sites with this high technical quality content low but if you don't like watching the person in the scene it doesn't really matter how great the quality it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No longer has the $19.95 option, but if you join for two months, you get both months for $40, and you do get the Harris Archives also, so you may need two months!
- Picture resolution is very good, 2000 at the very least and nearly every set except the very earliest. You also get zip files.
- Videos are as high as 1280 high end, some of the older ones are lower quality though.
- Download speeds are coming in about average
- Navigation is good enough once you figure it out
- Models are either A class or AA class, very few average or plain girls on this site, all are knockouts.
Cons:
- Site can be a bit artsy at times, which I am sure Mr. Harris considers himself an artist, so I guess I can look over that. By artsy, I also mean very softcore at times.
- Price for one month membership is too much, get this, $34.95 for one month, $39.95 for two months.
- Probably could blend the archives in and make it one huge site, and save the trouble of having to go to a different site to see the archives.
- This is pretty much a preference con for me, may be a strength for you, a lot of the pictures are dark, shadowy, I think that is a word. That may be the artsy side again.
Bottom Line:
I wasn't going to join the site after seeing the new price that no longer includes the TBP discount. After thinking about it and realizing that I would also get the archives and could join for 2 months for $40, I went ahead and took the plunge.
I had been a member here before, I think it was one of the first sites I ever joined. Mainly because of my knowledge of Playboy and the Ron Harris name. Fans of Playboy will like this site, lots of artsy sets that show the beauty of a woman, more so than playing the carnal desires of us men.
Don't take that wrong, there is some beyond softcore here. My best way to describe the site compared to a more known site is FTV. And of course, that is a good thing, FTV is a great site too. There are girl/girl sets and the sets Ron calls, "Real Orgasm". Which goes into a similar situation as FTV with the girl's wetness, being visible as it drips out of her.
Very erotic in that sense and I am guessing that is what Ron is going for. The models are some of the best looking and best known in the business. He seems to really like blondes. As he has his exclusive model Kara, who is a very pretty blonde, and he also has a good amount of Sandy Summers, a beuatiful blonde from Brazil. He isn't sticking to just blondes though. He has a lot of new content of one of the most popular newer models in porn, Meggan Malone. Andi Valentino is also here, a lot of these girls are in that newer group, so it shows that he is keeping up to date with the newer models and not afraid to hire new talent to keep his site fresh.
The newer videos are available in HD, and the pictures are at the very least, 2000 high end, complete with zips. Overall, I really like this site, plus you get his archives, I just think you have to do the 2 month to get the real value, since $5 more for another month, on nearly any site is worth it.
Looking for a new site and got $40 to spend, give it a try, also check out model Jenna, who is my favorite on the site. Really cute brunette. Recommended and for two months to get the discount. I also will review the archives as a separate site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sandra is easily one of the sexiest women in porn.
- Great navigation, masturbation, g/g vids in one section, backstage vids in another, "fun stuff" vids in another.
- Diary is filled with entries, including pictures of the events she talks about.
- Says she does all of the work on the site, it looks that way, diary, fun stuff pics and vids, masturbation, great top level Euro friends
- Vids are DVD quality, 800 on the high end.
Cons:
- Vids are zipped, not too big of a deal, but some might find that 1 minute of unzipping to be a pain, I consider it foreplay!
- Vids only available in .mov files, still not a big deal to me, I use Windows Media Classic, which plays all files
- Still not a real big site, around 40 videos, probably 20 fun stuff videos and 20 backstage videos, with around 90 pic sets.
Bottom Line:
Talk about a surprise, I was not expecting this site to be that great, no big company backing it, just Sandra, which was enough to get me to join. Now, I'm 100% sure that I will be letting this membership go for a couple of months at least. 4-5 updates per week, most are of Sandra. Here I go admitting my lust for Eve Angel, I seen where she had a lime green outfit set on Sandra's site and that was my selling point to try it out. To my surprise, I also got a Sandra and Eve video too, which I think got my next months payment.
Seriously, the site may be the best laid out, navigational friendly site I have been on in a long time. I love that the backstage, fun stuff videos are not mixed in with the sex videos. Which I guess counts against them since they only advertise 30+ videos, but counting those others that most sites claim as sex videos, there are around 80. Sandra is a really nice woman, you can tell it by watching the backstage videos. That I know of she has never had sex with a man on camera, I may be wrong, but she was in a legal skin, but it was lesbian. So, you aren't going to find any b/g here.
The videos are really great resolution, as are the picture sets. This site will be going places when more people find out about it. Especially Sandra fans. She surely doesn't act like a two-time Penthouse Pet. She even has a video of her snowboarding. Not the biggest site, but it isn't bad compared to some other individual sites. Very highly recommended!
Follow-Up:
Site lost its luster after a few weeks. I think it will still be great, and it is highly recommended to Sandra fans, but the initial happiness of getting a Sandra site has worn off. She still isn't that close to the queen of solo sites, Eve Angel.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My monthly "should have known better and listened" guilty pleasure site join!
- More DDF goodness with some of my favorite Euro models, and I didn't have most of the content.
- Though this will be a con, the site is dead, no updates, giving a pro though because DDF has the decency to post on the site before joining that it no longer updates, showing that rare honesty.
- Though a small collection, the 160+ picture sets and 160+ videos are all very good.
- Though it hasn't been updated in a year, it still has zips for the photo sets, the videos though not as good as most new videos are better than about half of the porn site's NEW ones at 640 high end with a 2000 bitrate
- Very fast downloads, probably not a lot of members downloading. Downloaded whole site in 5 days of limited downloaded time per day.
Cons:
- Not updating, should be clear as the TBP review tells it as does the actual site before you join. So, I am knocking it only because I really like the content that I have downloaded and am saying that I wish it was still updating.
- Maybe lower the price since it isn't updating or include it with one of the other 1byday sites or for an even more attractive option, how about if a person lets a DDF site recur for a second month, they get access to Sandy's Fantasies? Just a thought.
Bottom Line:
Cons were hard to come by, the quality was plenty good enough, zips, great model selection, but the one big con is a huge one. I really wished this site was still going. I've always liked Sandy as a model, her and Mia Stone are my favorite blonde models. Every other model on here is also a star these days, and I would guess real life friends of Sandy since they are very common on her site.
Think about this, though not updating for well over a year they have full photo set zips, which I would say 50% of active sites don't have and their top video quality is 640 high end with 2,000 bitrate, which is higher than many still active sites.
I'm not for sure why Spencer scored it so low, the score almost turned me away from joining it. I can find very little wrong with the site except that it is dead. I don't know if the content is exclusive, but it was new to me and I have a pretty large collection of content from the featured models.
While I do believe the price is too high considering that you will never join it again though, it isn't too bad and makes the site another of those good ones for collectors.
My biggest reason for joining it is that I am sucker for these Euro models, and I collect several of the models' content. Plus, the quality was plenty good enough for me. If you like Euro models like Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Eve Angel, and want some what looks to be younger content of Sandy, this is an above average site in all aspects.
For those that are like me, I recommend trying it since you can clean the whole site out easily on a one month membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the greatest pornsites ever
- Over 2,000 scenes plus access to 2 other great sites.
- The prettiest "lesbian" site.
- Videos are available up to 4K download
- Photosets are downloadable
- Regular updates
- Includes access to Fist Flush and Give Me Pink
- Download speeds are great (90% my max)
Cons:
- Very little to complain about other than it's repetitive.
- Gets boring if you don't like looking at near perfect models naked and playing with each other.
Bottom Line:
There was a time when Sapphic Erotica was the top site across all genres. There also was a time that Give Me Pink was a top-level site. You get both of those now with one subscription. I do remember the days of paying $30 for each of those sites.
The videos are up to 4k downloads and there are over 2,000 scenes. Each scene includes a downloadable zip file of photos. The photos are not videocaps, they are legitimate studio quality photos.
Downloads are fast and easy. There are regular weekly updates along with the bonus access to Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
Give Me Pink is a solo site showing beautiful models using strange and even large objects to masturbate with. Fist Flush is a very good, albeit small, fisting site.
You do receive access to all 3 and it is unlimited access. CCBill is the billing agent so you should feel confident about giving them your credit card details.
Sapphic Erotica has one downside and I'm going to point it out based on my own discussions with lesbians. The women at Sapphic Erotica are more for the viewing pleasure of men than lesbians. That's not to say lesbians won't like it, but this lesbian content firmly lands in the oddity genre known as straight-lesbian. That just means it's aimed at straight men who want to see 2 or more naked young women rolling around and having sex.
The site's navigation is very good and there is an extensive tagging system. The tags are almost too extensive. You can filter by location, then color of hair and action. It's overwhelming even for me.
The bet part is the models. These are Europe's best models dating all the way back to 2004, which was part of the European porn boom of the mid-2000s. You will see models you've never heard of and legends like Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, even Club Sandy.
It's one of the best bargains when combined with Give Me Pink and highly recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the largest and in my opinion, best, lesbian sites.
- Massive catalog of content, earliest content dates back to 2003.
- Is now part of a network (Sapphix) which includes Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
- Carries a tagline that fits ... "Pretty girls doing it right". See cons.
- Very high technical quality on videos and photos.
- Good DL speeds (80-85% of max)
- Billing, canceling, is easy though I'm not familiar with the biller (AXSCharge), original billing was handled by Rocketpay but canceling went through AXSCharge, maybe it's the same company?
- Carries a level of eroticism that only Viv Thomas matched.
- Many A-list Euro models.
- More tribbing than any site that I know of.
- Very clean website design, no ads in the members area, comes off as professional.
- Falls into either the top 10 or top 5 all-time in all genres.
- Very fast "fixes" to site problems, will explain in BL.
Cons:
- The biggest complaint that I will call legitimate but won't say I care about it, is a real lesbian will say these models aren't lesbians.
- Updates have slowed on Sapphic Erotica to one every 4 days. Maybe not a con in the truest sense but I'm nitpicking.
- The mainstream era (2011-2014) content just doesn't do much for me.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is one of the most difficult genres for me to review. My closest co-worker for the last 5 years, is 100%, way out of the closet, lesbian. She doesn't "look" like a lesbian. The first time we worked together, she introduced herself and her sexual preference to me by saying, "You better not start flirting with my girlfriend." But I did! Part of this review is based on her opinion that she has shared with me. Her biggest problem with lesbian porn is she says it's just not realistic. Then she laughs and says, "Or we're just not very good at it". She crushed my every lesbian fantasy by saying she's never tribbed and neither has any of her lesbian friends. So, I'll stop with that part and get to my view of lesbian porn since who needs reality when there's 2-4 very pretty women kissing and naked?
Sapphic Erotica's tagline for as long as I can remember has been, "pretty girls doing it right". In all my years on PU, I've made it pretty clear that I like natural women BUT I don't hold tattoos against the models and sometimes I even like the tattoos (see Dragon Lily, Satine Phoenix and Regan Reese). I also like natural boobs but (not a big but) I can look over implants. I've told about one of the models Sapphic Erotica has a lot of content of named Zafira. One of the prettiest mid-2000s Euro models. She realized one of her boobs was bigger than the other so she had implants (nearly same size as natural) to even them out. She falls into that category of "more people would say those are natural than implants". That's the type of implants I have no problems with.
Which to me is what Sapphic Erotica goes for with the "pretty girls doing it right" tagline. You would be hard-pressed to find another site with more feminine, natural, no tattoos, no implants, models, than Sapphic Erotica.
So, if you're into 18-24 year old, mostly slender, some average/sporty builds with hardly no tattoos, no implants, Sapphic Erotica, a lesbian site, is a site you would probably love. Some liked to call this style of models and porn, "Glam" but this isn't glam. It's "normal", sorry dating is horrible in 2018, trying to find a "normal" woman who doesn't kill spiders with her hand, drinks a 12 pack of beer and goes hunting on the weekend is becoming increasingly hard. These are what people call, "girly-girls". They know they're pretty and they want you to know it too.
Sapphic Erotica is right up there with Viv Thomas when it comes to creating passionate sex films. Sex Art tries it but I don't think it works as good with a man and woman as it does with 2 or 4 women. Most of the scenes start off with the models fully-clothed (skimpy). And usually ends with one pretty girl's butthole pressed down on the other pretty girl's tongue. In-between, there's deep kissing, heavy touching, nipple-squeezing, fingering (toys aren't too common), dry-humping that turns into tribbing and of course, lots of 69s.
That's real to me! I very easily can imagine two college girls being bored, admiring how pretty the other is then suddenly getting lost in 30 minutes of lesbian sex.
Here's the numbers:
1,747 scenes (videos and downloadable pictures) They have been offering 4K on all videos since late 2015 and 1080p on all videos since late 2006!
The models number is a bit harder to find since the model list covers Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphic Erotica and it's over 1,000.
In my review of their network, I noted that I scored Give Me Pink higher than the full network. The reason was a glitch in the navigation of the network that made it very hard to separate the sites. Well, they fixed it. So, I would change their tagline to, "Webmasters doing it right". The navigation on Sapphix (network hub) lets you click the drop down box and pick which site you want to see content from, in this example, Sapphic Erotica. Where the glitch was happening was when I clicked on any page except page 1, it wouldn't load. That's fixed and you can now search from within each site with the "tags" that are very useful and accurate.
The part I call the "mainstream era" is an era of Sapphic Erotica where the content became very formulaic. The good part is, pretty girls, have been part of their formula the whole time. I don't know what the not-to-distant future of porn is but I do believe Sapphic Erotica and this Sapphix network has established itself as the top lesbian/all girl network. My scoring changed on Sapphix once they got the navigation problem fixed so it's a 95 and Sapphic Erotica to me, is also a 95. I mainly scored them this way because I don't think you even need an interest in Give Me Pink or Fist Flush to get your money's worth with a subscription. Those two sites are like icing on the cake or gravy on your mashed potatoes or two wet clits sticking together.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of, if not the, top lesbian sites on the internet.
- Over 750 models, 1,558 videos, every video has accompanying photo set/screencaps that are downloadable.
- Roughly 3 updates a week.
- Older content has tons of scenes of the top-tier Euro models from the 2005-08 time period. Great for collectors of those models.
- Was the first site I saw with "tribbing" and there's quite a bit of it, it's one of my favorite parts of the lesbian porn. Also lots of kissing.
- A little confusion on how long they've had 1080p, it looks like they've started remastering the older videos, randomly, so there's some 1080p, then a newer one won't be 1080p, but it looks like they are all 1080p starting in 2006. Will go into that in BL.
- Good download speeds and navigation but will also go into navigation problem that might not be a problem for some.
- TBP/PU price is very good.
- Photo quality is good, but not great.
- A rare one these days, no ads in the member area!
Cons:
- There was several of these sites that were using the same "naming" system for Euro models and Sapphic Erotica still uses it. What this means is if you knew a model by a certain name there's a chance she won't be named the same here. The most obvious one for me that shows how confusing it can be is Eve Angel. I would think she's one of the best known Euro models. Her name on here is ... Daphne. I've seen her name as Eve, Eva, Evie, but Daphne is only used on this site and a few others also managed by the company who manages Sapphic Erotica.
- Like any porn that focuses on one genre, it can become boring.
- Some of the old videos that say they are HD 1080p, look like someone has taken an old video and upscaled it improperly as they're not as clear as the newer 1080p videos. Also had several videos to "fail" during download.
Bottom Line:
A bit of a mixed bag. I really do believe Sapphic does lesbian porn as good as anyone. At least for me and I'm of course, a male, who knows very little about real lesbian sex. So, lets put it this way, they do lesbian porn in a way that is directed at men. Not to say women and lesbians won't like it, but it's very similar to Viv Thomas' way of shooting lesbian porn. There's lots of kissing, focusing on the womens bodies, the action including tribbing is very good. I have a friend who is a lesbian that tells me tribbing is nothing more than the creation of a dirty man's fantasy and I tell her that's fine. It works.
I didn't score Sapphic as high as I thought I would. I've had numerous errors in downloads of older videos. I used to join this site 3-4 times a year and have a large back collection of thier content. When I saw the older videos showing up as HD, I downloaded them since I already have them, but mine are lower quality. As I said in cons, I am only assuming they've done some kind of upscaling to those source videos and it shows. While the videos are 1080p, they look stretched and blurry. Those are also the ones I'm getting the most errors on when downloading.
With that complaint out of the way, the newer content is still very good, the videos, dating back to 2007 or so are crystal clear 1080p. Anything before then is hit or miss.
I don't know if they've changed the way they do pictures, but a lot of the pictures are just screencaps from the videos. I know some of their old sets came with a video/photo set that wasn't spot-on identical.
The alias problem has always been a big problem for me since I am/was a collector of Euro models. Some of the models don't have aliases like Peaches, but most of the other well-known ones do. I've had long discussions/arguments with webmasters about this for over 10 years. They tell me they use the name the model on her release paper. Other people with knowledge of the behind the scenes work in porn have chimed in and said that's not true. That the sites originally did it to make a model "seem exclusive" to their site or to claim some kind of exclusivity to the model being on their site.
Sounds like a lot wrong with the site, but really it's not. The site works well, downloading is easy, clean interface and the action really is probably as close as we're going to get to real lesbian sex. It's very passionate, very believable and on top of that, nearly every model is very pretty/attractive.
I would recommend it for anyone into lesbian porn, at least as a one-time join, just to get the older videos which were some of the best porn I've ever seen.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Still my favorite of the all-girl lesbian sites
- Newer videos have 1280x720 top option, most at least have 852 high end option and the first 30 or so videos on the site are the only really bad quality clips.
- Picture sets are zipped, but do not have picture set for each video set, also have a lot of photo sets that there is no video for.
- Good DL speed, about 95% of my max
- Total amount of content is very high 748 videos as of 2/2/2009, 1285 picture sets.
- Contains the most "tribbing" on a lesbian site that I have seen.
Cons:
- Some of the newer content has a cookie cutter feel to it. Very planned out scenes, which all usually are, but at least make me believe it could be real!
- As mentioned in pros, you will see a video you like and wonder how the pictures will look, but they don't have a picture set for every video and vice versa.
- More and more licensed, non-exclusive content finding its way on here.
Bottom Line:
I did lower my opinion a little on the overall score from my first review. Having said that, I still believe that overall it is the best girl/girl site on the internet. The older content has some real gems in those.
I still think content is disappearing. I used to have a Sarah Blake/Charlie Laine movie in front of a fireplace that said sapphic erotica on it, but it is nowhere to be found on the site. Probably one of the greatest g/g scenes I had ever seen.
Most of the newer scenes are bordering on uninteresting. I don't think it is the models' fault since I've seen these models in g/g content on other sites with much more passion and much more believability. The newest scene with Eve Angel is almost boring, and Eve won an award year before for Best Foreign Female Performer from AVN.
The site's navigation is okay. The new search is better than no search. I am currently on the site and searched for "videos" and added "trib" 57 results come up. Then I added "blonde" to the other two search terms and 42 results come up. So far so good. Then I added, "slim" to the 3 search terms and 53 results come up. Do some backwards math there and see that only 42 came up with videos/trib/blonde but 53 come up for videos/trib/blonde/slim.
Now you see what I mean about the search being better than no search, but you can also see how it isn't real consistent.
The picture sets range in quality by age. Most of the older sets are 1200 high end, and do come zipped. I've never really understood the purpose of giving you small, medium, large options on thumb size. I clicked the large thinking it was a larger resolution. The newest picture set, added on 1/31/09 has 2000 high end resolution.
Model selection is very good. There really are some very good videos in there. You just have to spend some time finding them. I especially recommend the older videos, even the ones of the "butch" looking models as those are filled with passion. There is one really cute video of 5 models, Sophie Moone is in it as is Sandra Shine, and Sophie does a little booty tease that turns into an orgy.
What it comes down to for me, the big name Euro models are great here, and the older videos are as well.
I rate it high because you just don't see a lot of quality lesbian content anymore and including SE's large back catalog of over 700 videos, you are sure to find some content to your liking. Add the high quality, just did a check, a video from 2003 had 640 high end with 1000 bitrate, one from 2006 has 960 high end with 2000 bitrate and in 2007 the 1280 high end started showing up. So that is pretty good, 640 is still standard for some sites today and they were doing it in 2003.
A few tweaks to the navigation and a more accurate search engine would help. I would personally like to be able to pick updates by years. It would make it easier to get the older content much easier. As it is, you have to click "Next" over and over until at the end. I still recommend it highly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good, high resolution videos 960x540
- Consistent daily updates, plus huge archive of over 500 videos
- Pics are also high resolution and available in zip files
- Over 700 models
- Webmaster will answer emails, including questions about future models and even takes and listens to recommendations
- Great TBP price of $19.95
Cons:
- Some of the content isn't exclusive
- Some say the newer scenes aren't as good or believable
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Sapphic Erotica a total of 12 times since 2004. Also note on my high score that I consider this by far and away the best lesbian site on the internet. There is very little to complain about. They have the high res pics and videos, zip files for pics, fast downloads, great customer service, under $20 price with TBP discount and though some may question the realistic/believability of some of the newer scenes, you still won't find any lesbian/glammed up models lesbian sites that has as much believable material when counting the archives.
I guess some even complain because the models are mostly European. I never quite understood that complaint, unless it is because there isn't much talking. I have very little doubt that if Sophie Moon started out in the industry in American Lesbian DVDs, that anyone would have known she isn't American. She looks like a native Californian to me.
The action on here is as real as I believe you will find on a non-amateur site. The one that stands out to me is Sarah Blake, she has a scene in front of a fireplace that has some tribbing in it that no one could ever convince me isn't real.
If you are into tribbing, {rubbing clits together) this site has more of it than any site I have found. There is also plenty of kissing, 69s and toys/fingers. To me, when basing a score on quality/quanity/value/ there are very few sites in any niche as good. It goes without saying that I rank it highly and highly recommend it!
Follow-Up:
New search feature makes Sapphic even easier to use than before! +2 on score
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that made me think I had found heaven but am thinking this might be hell.
- Two of the greatest "girl" sites, Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink come with this network. It also has Fist Flush too but the content is very limited, I found some way back in 2008-2009.
- Navigation is okay, seems better than it is at first, gets worse, but then improves, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are excellent (85% of max).
- Sapphic Erotica is arguably the greatest lesbian site in internet porn history.
- Very high quality, dating back to the 2007 content, they have 1080p option on the videos and have 4K option dating back to September 2015.
- Updates roughly 10 times per month.
- If your porn interest is in just women, solo and lesbian scenes, this is the network for you, there are 0 scenes with men.
- The archives include some of the most explicit masturbation (Give Me Pink) of the Euro top models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Two problems in one con. On the model list, they are still using Sapphic Erotica's aliases for the Sapphic Erotica scenes. If you weren't around when Euro porn was the top porn, you might not be familiar with this and the countless debates we used to go through with webmasters over the confusion of aliases. And they use one name for multiple models, even when you use the "search" but the search goes around the aliases! Meaning if you search for Eve Angel, her scenes listed as Daphne (Sapphic Erotica) also show up.
- Fist Flush has very little content on here. It's not a site I'm familiar with so I don't know how much there should be.
- One of the advertising "index" pages I was on said you get 7 sites with Sapphic Erotica but you don't, you get 2 with Sapphic Erotica.
Bottom Line:
I'll start with why I took 10 points off the score. When I was checking out Sapphix, it said 7 sites are included with a membership to Sapphic Erotica and one of those sites was In Focus Girls, a site Sapphic Erotica owned. Once I signed up, there's really only two sites on Sapphix. It also only officially lists 3 but one is Fist Flush, I've only found a handful of scenes from it (really didn't intend that one). This is combined with the network Perfect Gonzo, that was supposed to have Give Me Pink on it. When I joined Perfect Gonzo, they told me it was originally supposed to be on Perfect Gonzo but was now on Sapphix. This is all too typical of mid to late 2000s Euro porn.
But the Sapphix site redeems itself. It does "only" include Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink but those are two of the top 10 sites of the 2005-2010 era (Euro boom) AND they're updating. I probably should review those sites separately since they are very large sites with big followings and might in the future but for now, I'm sticking to the network.
I had to dig deep into the archive of my reviews to find how I scored these sites in the past. I gave Sapphic Erotica a 94 in 2007 and Give Me Pink an 88 in 2008.
Sapphic Erotica was and still is the premier lesbian site, TBP's current score on it is 95. And they've been around since 2003. They were the first lesbian site that I know of that had "tribbing" or scissoring. They had deep kissing between the models, models getting so turned on even with their panties on that you could see a wet spot forming on their panties. But they did go mainstream at some point (2010, maybe?) and started focusing on quantity over quality. The newer content (2014-15 and forward is more like the older content).
Give Me Pink was at one time part of a group of sites (not a network) owned by one company that focused on extremely high quality, for the time (1080p in 2007) and they had every known, great, top-tier Euro model on their site with a catch. It was as close to "hardcore" masturbation as you could get. Close-ups throughout the masturbation. Old friend and PU member Denner once asked, "Is it a porn site or a site about gynecology?" It wasn't for everyone but it was for me. I had watched these models tease and "gently" masturbate for years. I wanted to see more and Give Me Pink did that. Then, it and its sister sites, stopped updating. Sister sites included All Internal and Ass Traffic. Those like me then found In the Crack and I've even wondered in, In the Crack reviews, if the Give Me Pink producers were the producers at ITC. That's a compliment.
What you get here is Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink, including their entire archives. You also get 10 new scenes a month and the quality shows with 1080p videos dating back to 2007, 4K dating back to 2015.
It's really impressive but there's that alias problem which really isn't a problem unless you want to use the model list and not the search box.
If you're into the more extreme insertions, Give Me Pink was one of the first sites I knew of that did it. Including some models using a smaller than average baseball bat. They also include photo sets in downloadable zips.
There's a chance that my excitement over this combination won't be as exciting to others. That 2005-2010 era of porn was my favorite and while they have new content, I'm mostly focused on that era.
Their overall content includes 2237 movies. The Sapphic scenes average 30-40 minutes, the Give Me Pink scenes average 30-50 minutes. They do some "strange" things in the classic Give Me Pink scenes including but not limited to, squirting milk out of their butthole. The newer Give Me Pink scenes aren't near as long (10-30 minutes).
I would say anyone who is into the kinkier masturbation would like Give Me Pink, especially if you were into any of the Euro models from the time period I mentioned. Anyone who likes lesbian porn should love Sapphic Erotica. They at least have returned to their more classic style of shooting. I watched a scene earlier between two women I'm not familiar with, Talia Mint (sounds familiar to me) and Vanna Bardot, full scene of fully dressed to kissing, undressing each other, lots of touching that gets rougher and where these scenes stand out just like they did in their heyday, after both orgasm, they're still laying there together, naked, kissing and lightly touching each other. There's a high level of eroticism in these scenes. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone who likes In the Crack and anyone who likes lesbian porn that doesn't come off as too scripted. Would also recommend it to any women who are wondering if they're bi-curious, pretty sure the tagline to women viewers on Sapphic's scenes was, "If you weren't bi-curious, you will be soon." Meaning it's also female-friendly porn. I'm just learning about the genre so bare with me. Very good price from TBP/PU too. I used to pay $29.95 for each of these sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Talk about a site that hits a homerun with the models and pairing of multiple females. Maybe the best casting I’ve seen.
- It has only 50 scenes and at least 45 of those are worth downloading.
- Scenery and settings in the scenes are almost as pretty as the models.
- For some reason I’m getting good download speeds on this site (80% of max).
- These are almost all threesomes or more scenes.
- Navigation is simple and easy to use.
Cons:
- That damn guy. Charles Dera. Out of all the good casting of the female pairings, why in the name of all things holy would you put him with Abigail Mac and Madelyn Monroe?
- It’s not updating but well worth the downloading of the scenes they have.
- Lots of promotion of their other sites that used to all be on one network.
Bottom Line:
*Score is a little high due to how many of my (subjective) favorite models are on this site.*
I’m having to work through the laughing about listing Charles Dera as a con. There was Lee Stone’s broke dick. There was Choky Ice’s personality of a chunk of ice and there’s Charles Dera’s flippy mohawk that I think is made from brick and it accidentally hit him in the face. Porn needs to hire a guy that can say, “That guy is going to ruin the scene. Keep his ugly ass out of the camera lens!”
But the pretty models really make this site. You have pairings of models like this: Vicki Chase and Eliza Ibarra or Valentina Nappi, Karma Rx and Athena Faris or Alina Lopez and Gia Milana and the one they tried to kill me with: Jade Kush and Ember Snow. I guess that’s why they can stick Charles Dera in those scenes. Let’s just work on getting him out of the camera. The models are as good on this site as any site I’ve been on. The only scam is Charles Dera. I don’t get the stories in these scenes.
The truth is the stories are really bad and you’re just here for the models on this site. This is one of those sites that you don’t care what the story is. There are real estate agents (the female models), they’re having sex with the supposed to be client looking to buy the house. The good part about that poor story is the houses and pools and scenery is very pretty, and a lot of the scenes have outdoors parts.
Of the 50 scenes: Three are solo scenes. The rest are at a minimum of threesome (m/f/f) and quite a few have more than 3 women in them. I’m guessing this site really interests me because of models that are in more than one scene. Cindy Starfall, who is one of my all-time favorites, very underrated models, is in 7 of the 50 scenes. She doesn’t have that many scenes on all sites combined. There are several Gina Valentina scenes. If those models are not a big deal to you, you might not like this site as much as I do. If you like curvy butts, one scene has Abella Danger and Zoe Monroe. I hope that it shows how important the models on this site are to my score and my overall positivity towards this site. If you don’t have a good story or something to hold the scene up, put several pretty models in it and that will work.
The scenes can all be downloaded in 240, 480, 720 and 1080. The pictures aren’t worth fooling with. You would be just well off to use a media player that takes screenshots. I will mention because I know she has her fans; Karma Rx has several scenes on here too and she performs really well in those. I have noticed her performances vary. The ones on here are some of her best work. I think she works better with another female and male. It’s like it brings her competitive side to outperform the other female. The scenes are also long, most are over 30 minutes. This, to me, is one of those hidden treasure sites. The three solo scenes, even though I like solo porn, are nothing special. The other 47 are good. It’s a site that I would recommend and join (once) even if it was just a standalone site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The forever popular (with me) niche of a guy having his girlfriend sell herself for him. Don’t judge until you read the bottom line.
- They’re updating once per month and have 284 scenes with this same theme, in their archive.
- It’s the switch-a-roo pro of the fetish/niche sells it, not the looks or performances.
- They don’t speak English, but there are subtitles. Who would have guessed the best invention in porn was putting words on the screen?
- Download speeds are surprisingly good, years ago, that was not the case with this site or the network it’s now part of.
- Navigation is good, but they could do more with it (see bottom line).
- Newer scenes have up to 4K downloads.
- Site design, though outdated, is also uncluttered with no ads and simple interface.
- Downloadable photosets.
Cons:
- I don’t know when all of these sites came together to form a network, but because it is a thrown-together network you get some navigation frustration. Again, see in the bottom line.
- Some may not be impressed with what looks like B-level settings, but it fits this niche for me.
Bottom Line:
Most of these scenes start with the female either looking at her boyfriend/husband like he’s crazy. Some of the females look like they like the idea of having sex with another man. Some are reluctant. You do not need words to see their reactions and expressions. The scenes, to me, take on a light form of cuckolding. The boyfriend/husband selling his girlfriend/wife often sits right beside the man having sex with his wife/girlfriend. Sometimes the selling man looks disappointed like he didn’t know what he was getting himself into. Other times the selling man gets so turned on he pulls his dick out and starts masturbating while watching the other man have sex with his girlfriend/wife. This is a niche and form of porn that was created long ago. It’s not some kind of reality porn that is 100% fantasy. I don’t remember when the movie, “Indecent Proposal” came out but it’s like someone watched that and thought, “That would make for an interesting porn scene.” It does.
I am critically open about myself and the interest I have in fantasies of catching my girlfriend/wife with another man. It’s adrenaline. It’s a challenge to our deepest core. This site does a very good job of creating a believable scenario with believably real (not professional looking) actors and actresses. We have all been a member of a site with swinging or older/younger, the lighter taboo subjects these days and thought, “Yeah, that’s just not believable”. I don’t get that on this site and never have.
The technical side has improved a lot since my last time as a member. It still has its problems, but quality isn’t one of those. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080, 720, 480 and mobile in .mp4 format. The scenes can also be downloaded in an HD .wmv file and a tiny .wmv file.
The photosets are there and downloadable. Nothing really groundbreaking and do look like they are just stills from the video. You do get some nostalgia with a large watermark in the bottom right hand corner of every photo … remember those days?
The navigation complaint is based on this being a thrown-together network. When on Sell My GF, there is a useful tab that says “Movies”. It shows that if you click that, there are 284 movies on the site. Next to the movies tab is “Models” it lists 2,265. The model list on Sell Your GF is for the entire network. That is a problem from me but nothing too major. I looked the network itself up, I joined through Young Libertines, not even realizing there’s a network. You will be able to see from the sites I review from the network that my interest is just on a handful of the sites. The network is 18 Videoz. The TBP date of this network launching may be right but 18 Videoz didn’t used to contain all these sites. The sites I will be reviewing are directly tied to Young Libertines. Which, I assume, 18 Videoz purchased in 2017, when 18 Videoz was first listed on TBP.
What makes Sell My GF really good isn’t that I believe the real boyfriend really is selling his girlfriend out. It’s the believable content. The female models that look at their boyfriends like they don’t want to moan or make him think they are enjoying it. This is, as I have talked to other PU members about, the line, betrayal porn should have been drawn at. Of course, other sites went further and went into shaming and getting the niche of revenge porn banned. This site stays within that happy area of maybe it is a real couple, maybe he really is upset about selling his girlfriend, maybe she really is excited about getting to be with another man. They leave it up to the viewer instead of the revenge type sites where the sites were having scripted fights end the scenes. This one, at its best, makes me think of a college couple that needs some money to buy a few days of groceries with. At its worst, it reminds me of a boyfriend just setting his girlfriend up to cheat on him so he can have reason to break up with her. The score is helped by the much improved technical quality on the videos. A barely there update schedule and good size archive of 250+ scenes. You know what you’re getting with every scene. There isn’t a wasted or experimental scene on the site. Those into betrayal porn, I know we have several members who are, you need to look into this outdated looking network that’s producing some of the best porn available … if you’re into this niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s headlined by Oldje which I have separate review for. These are the bonus sites and it’s called the Sensual Girl Network.
- You get a mixture of quite a few niches on this network.
- I’m going to not include much about Oldje, one of the bonus sites, Class Nudes, is still updating too.
- Video quality overall is good to very good and Oldje even has 4K (will detail in the bottom line)
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Navigation is really good considering especially they have integrated four sites into one under the Sensual Girl Network name and you can jump from to another. Which should be standard these days but a lot of networks don’t see it that way. This one does.
- If you’re a picture collector you’re in for a treat with the Class Nudes site.
Cons:
- Two of the sites are not updating but the videos on those have at least 720p option. And the niches those cover are not that common.
- The videos on Class Nudes are not even worth looking at. (I will explain below)
Bottom Line:
This is very interesting to me. Oldje is the headlining site and I gave it a 93. I’m going to try and review just the other sites on the Sensual Girl Network in this review. But you do get Oldje with it but you don’t get Oldje 3-Some. If they added that to this I would be upper 90s on it.
The three other sites are Class Nudes, Class 3-somes and Class Blowjobs. Class Nudes is still updating. It’s kind of like the artsy sites. The videos are very tame. The newer videos are not even videos. Those are video of the pictures. Some of the older ones are a little more involved videos but still tame. What makes that interesting is most of these models also appear in scenes on Oldje. I think that’s the best part of Class Nudes. You can see these women in more glamorous type pictures then watch their hardcore scene with an older guy. I have wondered about the professionals or amateurs part. On Class Nudes there are quite a few pro models from the past especially. I noticed Black Angelica, Nataly Von, one of my all-time favorites, she gets my vote for best eyes in porn, Aleska Diamond. It may just be that I don’t know a lot of the newer models. I’ve told it before, I’ve had trouble keeping up with the newer models.
You can download the photo sets which are very good. The high resolution download option has photos that are 3500 long end. They’re professional level photosets, usually pretty scenery. There are a total of 439 photosets as of 9/25/21 and like I said there are videos but there’s no way I’m going to click them all to see how many are just videos of pictures and how many are just tame videos. I haven’t seen any of the videos with much explicitness. That’s why I like that most of these models have hardcore scenes on Oldje which comes with the network. When I talked about the good navigation. If you click on a model’s photo set on Class Nudes and she has a video on Oldje, it shows up for you to click and go right to it.
The other two sites included are not updating. They are worth checking out. The Class 3-Some is not older/younger. It’s mostly two women with one man and the women are very attractive. I may be biased. Some of my favorite models from 8-10 years ago were nearly all European and I think all of these models are European. I liked that European look from around 2008-2013. It has 80 scenes on it and that includes a video that maxes out at 720p download, which is acceptable to me and my preferred video resolution. The scenes also come with a photoset you can download with those being 4000 long end. This was once a seriously premium website. I would go far as saying this network is doing what I think all networks should be like.
The other site is Class Blowjob. This one has 60 scenes on it and this is not your average blowjob site. There is rimming, swallowing and beginners. Then they tried the humor with “dong lifter”. Leave the humor to me. The models are very pretty. Some of the videos have 540, 720 and 1080. Some have 270, 540 and 720. All of them have at least 720p. These sites add to what I said was the headlining site Oldje. They’re giving you a little different genre here with these extra sites. I like how Class Nudes ties in with Oldje. Then, the blowjob and Class 3-Somes give you less of the old/young of Oldje if you get tired of watching an old guy having fun. I expected Oldje to be good but will say the network it comes with is not real big and that’s what makes it good. It’s high quality porn too. I rated it just a little over Oldje. You all know I’m bad about scoring a single site from a network higher than I score a network because to me, a lot of networks take away from the headlining site. This one doesn’t. It adds more to the headlining site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A webcam site that does a lot of small things right that other webcam sites screw up.
- Currently 9,994 models, not all are online at the same time and some aren't active but they have a very good, large selection of models.
- Body types, looks, even ages are all well-represented.
- A credit/token system that makes perfectly good sense and to me is quite a bit cheaper to use than most cam sites.
- Models that don't make you think you're going to be broke before they're naked.
- What is probably the biggest pro is it feels professional, it's well-explained, it is easy to use.
- Some of the models go all the way nude without tips/credits coming in.
- Recordings of cam shows that you can buy with credits.
Cons:
- I think this applies to all cam sites, it can get expensive if you're not careful.
- Have to keep up with your favorite models schedule to see their shows. There's probably nothing that can be done about that.
Bottom Line:
I have started liking cam sites just over the last few years. I admit, I usually am just cheap about it and just watch whatever the model is willing to do without tips. That's one thing that makes this cam site different for me. There's not a tip menu that says you have to pay X amount of credits to get the model naked.
Their credits system makes logical sense which is unusual for a cam site. If you pay 25 Euros you get ... 25 credits. Most cam sites have you pay 25 dollars or Euros and they give you 250 to 2,500 credits and you feel like you got a great deal until you find out it takes 5,000 credits to get the model naked.
That is a focus of this review. Each model's cam has her price for private show in the bottom corner of her cam. I've seen some as cheap as 2 credits per minute. That equals out to a 12 minute private show for 25 Euros. That's pretty cheap compared to most cam sites.
You also can purchase recorded cam shows. Some of these are free too. The prices do vary greatly. I bought a 41 minute one for 5 credits. Right beside it was a 12 minute one that was 50 credits.
Continuing on the professional feel of the site, it's not like Chaturbate where you have 10,000 people sending a message in the chat box that says, "Show your ASS!" every 5 seconds. It seems more balanced here. The other viewers are respectful and the models seem to really enjoy themselves. I haven't seen one get mad. Most of them will give you a little flash if you ask nicely. Some of them will go completely nude.
As I mentioned, you get a good blend of slim, sporty, even chubby models. You could complain a little that nearly all are white.
They have tags that help you find the type of model you're looking for and they are for the most part accurate.
You also can get some enjoyment without spending a fortune. You could spend 100 Euros and get five 10 minute private shows from the models that charge 2 credits per minute. I don't really understand the difference in the prices from model to model. I've seen a few as high as 4 credits per minute. Maybe it's popularity or even seniority?
Either way, it's a very good cam site that you can join and have some fun without breaking the bank.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
