Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The once multi-site, full of potential network is now one site.
- A lot of content, close to 3,300 scenes, includes a video, photos and screencaps. All can be downloaded.
- Download speeds are average (65% of my max)
- There is good content on here if you can find it.
Cons:
- What in the name of Ron Jeremy happened to this network? They took their network sites and just put them all on one site. The tour did not tell me about this change.
- There's no navigation! You have two choices, "scenes" and "girls". There's no way to find the content that used to be on a network site. There's no "categories" choice.
- All the way across the top of the page is a list of their other 12 sites. You can join them all for $69.95 if you upgrade to platinum access.
- Only one update per week.
- Dickery in the model searches, Dickery is defined as, "Doing something that makes you a dick." Will explain in BL.
- They use 25x25 icons to tell you which scenes are Porn Pros scenes or if the scene is on one of their other sites. If you've never tried to make out a 25x25 icon, keep it that way, you would need a magnifying glass to see them.
Bottom Line:
I joined Porn Pros as a fan of their past work. I once gave them an 88 right here on Porn Users. These were the guys that brought such sites as Massage Creep, Shady P.I, Flexible Positions, just to name a few of the unique sites they had in the past.
Now, there is Porn Pros. All the content from all the different network sites is in one location. It takes 3-5 seconds to load a page and I'm on Gigabyte internet.
The site offers navigation choices of "girls" and "scenes". Just to see how that works I picked out Jynx Maze from the girls section. They show 6 scenes for Jynx. In the "more scenes" section they show 3 more scenes of Jynx. Those are on their other sites. I'm not clicking one to find out if it charges me. I only figured out there is a tiny icon, maybe smaller than even 25x25 beside each scene that tells you which site it is from. The 6 scenes I see on Porn Pros are in there and I can see the tiny Porn Pros logo in the icon. I have no idea what icon is on the other 3 scenes.
The only good news is they have a lot of content and some of that content is good. If you know which model(s) you are looking for it might be okay but if you don't know who are you looking for you are in a for a long night of clicking. Not only do the pages take 3-5 seconds to load, some of the images still don't show up.
I'm using simple math to count these scenes. There are 24 scenes per page and 136 of those pages have 24 scenes on them. The first and last page are not filled up. 136x24 = 3,264. The other two pages have roughly 30 scenes on them combined so close to 3,300 scenes. There's very little else to be positive about.
This is the network that was known for going way overboard with the fake cum shooting dildos, they had a quirky side to their content, fairly unique but now unless you have the patience to click through 136 pages that take up to 5 seconds to load, you are going to have trouble finding much here worth your time.
For me, a hard drive crash from a few years ago wiped out my Porn Pros folder. I remember the models I had in it as they were the models I was collecting. The content is still here. Other than replacing lost content there isn't much to see here or I should say worth your time trying to find.
This is one of the few times I canceled a site just minutes after joining it.
I think this is worth mentioning. I joined the site through an email promo for $9.95. While canceling, Segpay offered me the site for $4.95 a month to stay as a member.
It makes me think what I felt while browsing the site is probably true. I think Porn Pros is ready to become some kind of new network with all their new sites combined into one package.
Now they have me curious about Exotic 4K, despite having no interest in 4K.
Dig around on the site you will find some good scenes and photos too but I can only recommend it to those that have been a member before and want to pick up scenes they have deleted or misplaced. This would be a major disaster for a person new to Porn Pros to try and go through.
Segpay is the biller and I had no problems signing up for the site or canceling. There was a pre-checked cross sale for Bang dot com. They really do push that upgrade to platinum for $69.95 too. I feel generous with the 65. It at least had the content I was looking for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Big network with some unusual niches in it and a love of fake cumshots, not as bad as it sounds.
- Any concern with billing shouldn't be, they made me a very good "stay" offer of more than half off, when declined, got the email saying canceled within seconds.
- Video tech specs are good, close to standard HD, but videos are shot in a more amateurish way, not saying the cameramen aren't good, but the videos seem to try to have a homemade look to them.
- Photo quality is very good,
- Definitely looks to be exclusive
- Major pro here, this site seems to love the use of download managers, will explain in BL. 3000 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Some of the sites, Massage Creep, Flexible Positions, are as good as most sites in those niches and would say Massage Creep is the best Massage site I've seen.
- Some interesting ideas where porn stars do things women on social sites do, like photos in mirror, to give the amateur feel to it and pull it off pretty well.
-
Cons:
- Navigation is frustrating. My first example is that some models just aren't listed, Stephani Moretti as example, clicked her name, instead of seeing her updates, I got all the new updates from all models. Can't find her in the model list either and she has multiple sets on their various sites. Works pretty good on most and maybe this is just one rare case, but seeing that she's one of the models I really like that they have it stuck out to me.
- The fake sites are just silly. I'm sure it was funny the first few times, but they really should stick with the other sites they have and let those fake dicks and gallons of fake cum sites die off.
- Not always a con for me, but there are quite a lot of implants and tattoos here, that Freak Boobs site is just bad.
- Download speeds without a manager were bad, had broken files, sets not showing up 404 errors, but the download manager seems to have cured that problem.
Bottom Line:
If I hadn't went back to using a download manager, Free Download Manager, I would have knocked at least 20 points off this network's score. I haven't been using DL manager lately on any sites. So when I started downloading from this site through my browser, the right click on the link would either give me a 404 error or start trying to stream the video, left click, save as worked better, but probably half of the files would stop downloading around 70% finished. Then there was the problem with the DL speed through the browser, I usually can get near or slightly above 2 MB/s or for better comparison 2000 KB/s instead, I was receiving 400 KB/s through the browser.
FDM saved the month though, using it, the site works really good and the download speeds are almost as high as I can receive from any site.
These fake sites on this network are a waste in my opinion. And it's not just one fake dick, fake cum sites, I'm counting five, though it looks like all have stopped updating except one and that one only updates once a month. Good move in my opinion.
The bad thing with one navigation problem, like with trying to find Stephani Moretti, is that I now don't know if the navigation for other models is showing all their content.
The good news is, they have some ideas going on in this network that I really liked. The Teen BFF site, though porn stars, brings a very amateur feel with the girls doing the mirror photos, the silly photos, that's pretty good for any of potential members that are used to seeing similar pictures on the social networking sites.
The technical quality is very good. The videos say HD, but from looking at the codec info, it's a little lower than 720p, I'm seeing 1250x702. The pictures are as good as you will see on a network, nice to see the clothed pictures in the zips too, 3000 long end on those.
Some unusual niches like Public Violations where you watch a video to see, a guy run up behind a woman and pull her shirt up or pants down or runs up and pulls his dick out. Video over. A few scenes on this site are public sex, so those are pretty good.
Massage Creep, Teen BFF, Flexible Positions, Real Ex-Girlfriends, 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18, Amateur Violations, Webcam Hackers, Jurassic Cock and Cruelty Party are all still updating, I think, one may just be a monthly update since its last update was in May, these sites are all very good. Those sites to me really boost this network with some interesting niches and plays on reality porn. Most of the models are well-known and most in these scenes are models I like, even if implanted and tattooed. Loved the Isis Taylor scenes.
Once past the download problems through browser and away from the fake cum sites, Freaks of Cock, Freaks of Boobs sites, this became a very good network. Nice quality, I don't mind that it's not 1080p as the files are big enough as it is. Overall, I would recommend it with the warning of the fake cum and Freaks sites and use of DL manager.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Big network (18 sites), focusing more on Euro models than American, which is unusual for networks, especially ones based in the United States.
- Video quality on the sites is above average, 640 on high end with 1300 bitrate.
- Almost all video sets have picture sets as well, highest resolution that I have seen on the pictures is 1080, no zips either.
- Total amount of content is not bad at all, around 500 videos 600 videos total and give a take or a few, 600 picture sets.
- Download speed is right at average for me
Cons:
- Same complaint I have with most networks, all of the content could be put on one site with a category for each niche.
- Navigation is not too bad, but I would call it clunky and cumbersome. Kind of like a 55 year old pornstar.
- The pictures though a positive since you can check out what happens in the video before downloading, is it really that hard to put these files in a zip?
- Price could be too high for some, it doesn't compare with the big boys in the Euro porn market, the price is similar, but you do get some content here that those big boys don't have.
- I know they can't help it, but the name game shows up. Lora Craft listed as Jasmine? I wish the sites and models would get together and fix this problem, just call her Laura or Lara, but why Jasmine?
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that you really like one minute, then cuss it the next minute. There is some content on here that you won't see elsewhere. Lora Craft's masturbation scene on Euro Fuck Toys is pretty amazing. Lora is one of the best performers when she "is on" and she is on in this one.
The problem I was having happened when I realized the girls are going by odd names. It didn't help that the navigation was already clunky, now I have to take stabs in the dark at who is who. Maybe this is why they made a network of sites that have 30 or so sets per each one, instead of sticking them all on one site? That does make it easier to go through 30 to find the ones you are looking for.
There are plenty of positives to work with here. The overall quality of the videos, nice resolution and good bitrate, especially seeing that I think this network just opened recently. Which leads to a questionable negative, I don't know if this content is exclusive. I haven't seen any of it, if that helps and I love Euro porn.
Some of the sites have themes that they stick with, like Honey Bun Babes, which is probably my favorite of the network with women with ample hind-endage having honey poured all over their butts before having sex. They do seem to be trying hard to at least produce content that matches the name of each site.
Now we come to the hard part, is it worth the money? I think so, but I love Euro models, if you love Euros, then a one month membership is recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Should be called an adventure in avoiding clicking the wrong thing. There’s a DDF Network in here somewhere.
- If you have the patience and no itchy mouse trigger finger, it’s not a bad site at all.
- The navigation is pretty good once you mess with it enough.
- Susy Gala, where the hell did she come from?
- Joining and canceling seem simple enough but their promos do not work. I will explain in the bottom line.
- If you want the short version, the DDF Network is in Porn World and Busty Porn World. I will have to explain this in the bottom line. They have seriously complicated this.
- The navigation tabs are the whole key to making this site work.
- Averages more than an update per day.
Cons:
- It’s not good when I laughed before typing this. Lets just say here, it looks like they have around 50-100 sites on this one site and you have access to two of them. The rest require you to purchase tickets. And no, I’m not clicking the tickets to find out how much they cost.
- Going to a particular model’s page from the model list not only shows you which scenes you do have access to but also blends in the ones you have to have tickets to watch or download. I will make a comment in the bottom line about that.
Bottom Line:
I bit the bullet as they say. I’m a huge fan of the DDF Network and have been since the day they launched the DDF Network. I can tell you the DDF Network is running strong on Porn World. For some reason they do have it separated into Porn World and Busty Porn World (DDF Busty) but I do believe all the scenes are here. Those two combined: Porn World lists 14,008 scenes. Busty Porn World lists 1,942 scenes. That’s almost 16,000 scenes. All the scenes have multiple download options on those TWO sites. The newest scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a couple smaller ones listed as VGA and WEB. Each scene has a full picture set that can be downloaded too. That part, in my opinion, is very good. It could be better. I don’t like that all of the DDF content is now listed just as Porn World or Busty Porn World. You have to dig through the scenes to find the scenes from the different DDF sites but it’s all here from what I can tell. Porn World itself updates daily and Busty Porn World updates 2-4 times a week. I can tell you based on my old stored files, the numbers look accurate on specific models I have collected from DDF.
Now, take a deep breath. On the main screen when you login, and by the way, you are still sent to Pornbox, not Porn World. It’s like someone got a bargain of urls and has to use them all. I’m going to count how many sites are on the main page. You thought I was bullshitting with the 50-100 sites estimate in the cons, didn’t you? There are 158 sites/studios on the main page. Including Bang Bros, Bang Bros add-on sites like Dancing Bear, CFNM Show and every content-maker on Legal Porno. I can get around this. I have figured out click “Porn World” and “Busty Porn World” but you know curiosity is going to cause me or you to at least look at those others. Where I’m going to get a little frustrated is there’s a button that says “Filter studios with full access membership”. I did that. It’s 57 sites/studios showing as full access. I don’t know about you but “full access” means full access to me. You have to have tickets OR you can join the sites. I will use Bang Bros’ add-on site Dancing Bear as an example. It says you can buy lifetime access to the site for $30 or you can buy specific scenes with tickets. I took the risk after saying I wouldn’t. The tickets are 42 for $29. One Dancing Bear scene costs 12 tickets. It’s clearly a better deal to join for $30 but it only lists 82 scenes. Dancing Bear had around 105 scenes when they shut it down. Every single site they have has different rules and prices to join them. The Bang Bros one has 9 lines of rules, something about you can download the last 31 days of new scenes. I am sure there’s another charge to get “full access”. Just avoid that shit.
Porn World and Busty Porn World are good deals. The promos, I received one in email for 3 months for $29.95. Its regular price is $44.95 a month. I clicked on it and the price was $24.95 for 1 month. There was no 3 month option for $29.95. Going to the site through the PU link, the offer was $24.95 for 1 month, the same as the offer they offered me for clicking on the 3 months for $29.95 promo.
Back to Porn World and Busty Porn World. Very good DDF porn. I said for years, the DDF network was my favorite network and the new scenes do not disappoint. It’s just the complication of everything. Where are the House of Taboo updates? Where are the Hot Legs and Feet updates? Where are the Only Blowjob and One By Day updates? They’re all blended in as Porn World. It’s a hassle. I think the part that disappointed me the most was going to a model’s page, I listed her in the pros … Susy Gala. If I search for Susy Gala there are 34 scenes I can download with my Porn World subscription. It says they have 118 scenes of her. Since I don’t have an itchy mouse trigger finger, I clicked to see more. Most of them are not even Susy Gala. The scenes are of other models named Susi not Susy and looks nothing like Susy Gala. Here is what I have figured out.
At the top of any page there is a tab for “library” click that. In the search box change “store” in the drop-down menu to “library”. It then lets you just search within the scenes you do have access to. Once you do that or just go to Porn World or Busty Porn World, you’re at least out of that 156 site/studio minefield. I’m going to score it well. Once you get beyond the hassle, it’s DDF Network and the tags at least somewhat lead you to specific sites from DDF, like the tag, “masturbation” that’s usually going to be One By Day content. It’s workable and manageable but the top score I’m going is 90. I believe my last DDF Network review was 98. Patience, calm the itchy mouse trigger finger and focus. It’s better than not having any access to the DDF content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About as much content as you will find on one site
- $9.95 TBP price!
- WMV files are a decent 480 on high end, with Divx files coming in a little higher at 540, WMV have 1000 bitrate, Divx have 2000.
- Many old stars that you can't find anywhere else, over a dozen b/g clips of Adrianne Sage as example
- Has nearly 900 clips that are exclusive to their network, plus over 2,000 non-exclusive DVDs
- Has screenshots for all videos and also has a picture section that has more well known models who do not do videos
Cons:
- First, this is the same site I received months ago when I signed up for CFNM Exposed, believe it was under the name Ultimate Sex Pass. There are problems here.
- No zips for the pictures and you can't even use a download manager to get the pictures.
- Good luck on the exclusive videos. For example, CFNM Exposed has 33 clips, well, 17 you can download, the other 16 you can only stream, when you try to download it says, "Unable to load file"
- Those damn updates where they give you one clip from a DVD one day, then you get the next a month later.
- Login screen is a hassle, half the time the security code doesn't even show up clear enough to type in.
Bottom Line:
Talk about a site that doesn't know what it wants to be. This is a site that I had known as Ultimate Sex Pass. With some added features, they have the Cumisha Jones collection here now, and they have the Stracy Stone collection here as well, and those two alone were worth the 10 bucks for me.
After that, bring some Tylenol, you are going to need it. First, every clip you click on to download, it starts loading it to stream. You have to click pause, then go down to the download link. Then about 1/5th of all clips I tried to download said, "Unable to load" and let me download an invalid .html file.
Things can get better or worse depending on your patience. There is A LOT here to like. I love the "older" stars of the late 90s that they have here. They also have some stars that you rarely see on the well known DVD sites like Adrianne Sage. The navigation isn't bad. They have a "view all pornstars" link that takes you to a model index that works just as expected. They have their exclusive sites at the bottom of the main page, you just click and go, and some of these are really good, like the "At Work" series.
Then there is the bad, some of those really great looking models on those exclusive sites, their movies give you the, "Unable to load" message.
With a little time and work this site could challenge the big boys! As it is now, it is worth a month, you are sure to find some model you forgot about. I recommend for one month, and only hope they work out the kinks!
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Look what I stumbled up on. It’s like walking into a 1990s video rental store and entering the backroom.
- All of these are porn classics and the numbers are going to shock you. I hadn’t even noticed this site.
- The names of the stars are even classics, what happened to the days of Big Jack Hammer and Delicious Milano?
- This is like a Wayne’s World found porn stash.
- The part I liked as much as anything? The videos are the complete VHS/DVD. You don’t have download parts.
- The number says it all … 2,422 full classic porn movies, not scenes, the entire movies. That sure is better than finding 2 VHS tapes under my uncle’s bed in the 90s.
- Good download speeds too (80% of my max)
- It’s stashed in the Adult Prime Network.
Cons:
- Well hell, it’s old, 480p is as good as you’re going to get but I have an encoder that will upscale it without screwing it up. I think it will only upscale to 640 but where else are you going to get these classic scenes?
- There are some problems. There is no model list but if you click on the model’s name in the scene description it shows you the other scenes they have and since these models are from the 80s and 90s, it’s going to be from this site. I don’t know how much trouble would be to make a separate model list just for this site.
Bottom Line:
Some of my earliest reviews let out a lot of my porn secrets. My all-time favorite porn series was a classic one from Vivid called, “The Watcher” that was early exhibitionism and voyeurism. A lot of my favorite models were from the 90s and some of them are still performing like Nina Hartley and one I remember most is Kobe Tai. This site takes me back to that time period. Even though some of it is from even earlier. I don’t think any of it goes back before the 80s. There is another site on the network about vintage porn that goes back to the black and white days. That’s too far back for me.
What’s so special about this porn? The “scenes” are downloaded in whole. Some are as long as 90 minutes and there are 3-5 scenes in it. Those porns had to be watched together. They told a story. There’s a theme. There’s recurring characters. I remember watching porn in the 90s that you would sit and watch like a television show. That’s where the classic bom-chi-chi-waa-waa music came from. The scene would be a poorly acted B-level soap opera and then the clothes would start coming and that music would hit. I have had more fun just going through these than I do on most porn sites. Just looking through them. The names were so funny and creative. Or really dumb like Big Jack Hammer, that’s still creative.
What you have here is a 2,422 full-length classic porn video catalog. It can be downloaded; it can be streamed. The names of the movies were even fun. There’s one called Playmate of the Mouth, which will only make sense to those remember Playboy and Playmate of the Month. Here’s you a laugh, The Adventures of Mr. Tootsie Pole. That would probably be politically incorrect today since it’s interracial and it’s comparing the black guy’s dick to a tootsie roll. You’ve heard of Babes in Toyland, what about Sluts in Toyland?
You know what you get the most of from these old movies? It’s not cookie-cutter. That’s why it’s not in scenes. I have talked about Vivid online having problems because they split their DVDs up into scenes. You can download some of those and half of a scene won’t even be porn. It will be a dialogue section. It’s because these movies were made to be watched as a whole story. I didn’t say the story was good. It’s usually not. It’s usually pretty dumb. What you’re not going to run into is as the sex is ending, you’re not going to see the guy (at least not always), push the woman off of him, stick his ass in front of the camera and try to nail a money shot on her face or tongue. Our own personal sex lives are not important here but that is what makes so much porn seem like cookie-cutter. Some couples may pull out and do the facial but it’s not likely to happen every time and it’s not going every 23 minutes. Couples are not going to have missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, possibly anal then the cumshot. That is the formula for most porn. These movies do that some but it’s not as obvious.
What I liked best was these are not THAT old. If you like Vivid Classics, these are very similar and it that same time period. Here’s some notable names: Ron Jeremy, Seka, Nina Hartley, Mike Horner, Tom Byron who was very popular in those days, Christy Canyon, one of the first pornstars I remember seeing and wanting to see more of – Alexandra Silk. And the jaw-dropping Keisha, which means Peter North is on here somewhere. I have heard that Peter North would film with Keisha for free.
As much positive as I have had to say there still are a few problems. Besides the no model list. A lot of the scenes don’t link to the stars in the scene. Their names will be in the description but no link. Only the biggest stars have the link to their other scenes. I don’t know if it’s just I need to reset my connection. The last movie I tried to download was downloading at a terrible speed. I can usually download at over 100MB/s and I was at 1MB/s, maybe the kinks are being worked out. Either way, this is like a gold mine of classic porn, especially being able to download the full movies. The last one I tried said 540p in the filename and it was 1.8GB so the quality isn’t terrible. I am going to temper my score a little. If these kinks get worked out this is a 95 minimum for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-18-0901:51am (Update History) Reason: I put it cons, some videos are split into parts, DL manager was set to download .wmv, and didn't realize those were just parts
Pros:
EDIT: Reason in cons
- 18 different network sites, most are solo sites and some are very good, trial for $10 works, full trial.
- Numbers vary between sites, newest site is Georgia Jones and the sets of pictures I have downloaded are 1440 high end, most of the other sites are 1280 high end, all sites NOW have zips for pictures. Will explain in BL
- Videos are not the focus here, but each site has 4-5 videos, usually solo of each model and are 720 high end.
- Holy cow, a network with good navigation, on the New Sensations brand at that? Navigation is smooth, one column on the left has each sites name in it, click it and go, no re-signing in, that easy!
- Definitely some of the best models on the internet, Aneta Keys, Susana Spears, Georgia Jones, Bree Olson and 14 more.
- Good download speeds
Cons:
EDIT: Lowered score 6 points, though the videos are not the focus here, as I was going back and looking through them, I realized the videos are split into parts, not all, but some are. The site is very DL manager friendly, and I hadn't realized those videos were split. Some of the content is so non-exclusive that they THANK the site that leased it to them.
- Would like to see more content, updates, the updates are spread out and never explained. I almost look at this as more of an archive like site.
- They fixed the no zips problem, I had reviewed this network under the Aneta Keys site name before they named it the "Pornstar Key Network" maybe more exclusive content would be the next step to improving this network. There is some exclusive content, several of the Georgia Jones sets are her newer sets with the subtle red highlights in her hair.
Bottom Line:
Sort of an unbalanced pros/cons list. There really isn't much to complain about considering the site's good trial price, 5 days for $10, the content is very good, though many of the older sets are licensed, seen it a million times sets like Aneta Keys in braids. I'm pretty sure every porn site on the internet has those sets. Still, there are some exclusive sets, since Georgia and Aneta are two of the models I collect, here are the amount of sets I didn't have of those two to show the exclusivity of the site.
Aneta Keys 23 exclusive photo sets that I don't have, 3 videos I don't have.
Georgia Jones 14 exclusive photo sets I don't have and 3 videos I don't have.
Now, for all I know those could be on other sites, but being a regular member of Twistys, Teen Dreams and once a year member of ATK's sites, I would think I would have them if they were licensed. One of the Georgia sets is really great, in pink leather type crotchless panties, hose and heels.
There also is an Evelyn Lory site on here, I can't say on the exclusive sets, since I stopped collecting her content last year, but the models overall are a very good selection of top level models, both European and American.
Almost feels like a greatest hits cd in music. All of the models are worth checking out. They have added a few more sites Pornstar Angels, which looks to be mostly licensed content and Jimmy Canon, which is sort of a multi-model site that focuses on pictures, I guess Canon = Camera.
A few other solo models, Mili Jay has a site with around 40 sets and a handful of videos, Jana Cova as well.
What it looks like is we've all seen those cheap solo sites that you join and get 30 picture sets, 5 videos and pay a premium $30 price for it. This looks like 15 of those combined into one network, which makes it a really good deal to me.
When I first reviewed this network it was under the name Simply Anetta Keys, they've changed hers to anettakeys.org, so maybe they are trying to give off a new image of their network.
I was very impressed with the navigation. This network moves seamlessly from one site to the next with one click, which is even more surprising since this is a New Sensations site and they are known for terrible navigation.
I'm impressed overall, I like the trial, I usually don't use those, but since I had been a member before, it is nice to pay a reduced price to be able to go back and get the new sets. I was surprised to see a Georgia Jones site, especially one with 20+ photo sets and 5 videos, I think Georgia is one of the real stars of the near future if used right. When I was on this network before, some sites had zips, others didn't, Aneta's didn't, but they all do now and to me that is a big step up in improvement.
As I end, I still can't say the exact amount of exclusivity of all the sites, but for that low trial price it is well worth the money, especially Georgia and Aneta fans. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This is the type of network us solo model lovers always wanted.
- 21 sites included and 20 of them are solo model sites.
- Pretty easy to navigate even though it’s cluttered.
- Downloads cost extra but it’s only $12 more.
- It helps if some of the models are favorites.
- Promo price plus downloads is around $20.
Cons:
- It’s professional models, nearly all solo sites of pro models have problems. Some of the models only seem a little invested in their performances.
- Really no reason to join for more than a month.
Bottom Line:
Back in the mid-2000s, I used to talk about how I wished solo sites, that were no longer updating, would join together and make a big network. Who knew time was the only thing I needed to get that wish? There are several pornstar networks with a dozen or two solo sites. Your preference will be based on which models you like the most. One of my favorites on Pornstar Platinum is GiGi Rivera. She is a good example of why this type of network never was very popular. She has a small collection of videos and photos and none of the videos come close to the level she performed at on other sites. She even looks uncomfortable.
There is the other side too, though. Angelina Valentina, a once semi-popular pornstar known for hardcore scenes. She is easily one of the best solo models I have seen and that’s saying a lot. Her site is so impressive, I’m going to include sort of a mini-review below of it.
The big name stars include Amy Brooke, Ava Devine and Ariella Ferrera. Those three have a combined 500+ videos and 500+ photosets. There are 16 more plus Angelina Valentina. I really don’t know how much of this content used to be on solo sites that required a membership for each site. I do know this is a great deal even if you pay for the downloads. I would even say joining without the downloads is more of a ripoff than paying for the downloads.
This network reminds me of why I preferred solo models for the first 10 years of my porn interest. Solo scenes show the model’s personality and it’s sometimes what makes the difference between models I didn’t collect and did collect.
Angelina Valentine’s site shows what most of us have figured out. Some models are much better in solo scenes. Angelina Valentine is one of those models who makes nearly perfect solo content. The plus with her is she was considered one of the better hardcore models of her time. This network has around 100 videos of Angelina and over 200 photosets. I’m just going to take a guess and say Angelina didn’t have 200 photosets from all of her combined sets. She is naturally seductive, which is nearly impossible to find in solo porn, but she pulls it off. Her site was enough for me to be happy with my money well spent.
We are getting a lesson in solo/hardcore porn differences. Most solo models are very young, barely legal and the producers and directors know that and like it. It shows the shy young woman struggling to perform for a stranger behind the camera. You put women like Angelina Valentine In a solo scene, she was already established as a pornstar and it shows. She effortlessly performs solo porn.
Each of the models is worth checking out on their individual site. There’s a lot of good content, some great and you get some great picture sets too.
It's a good site, but admittedly, there’s not much reason to recur your membership of go back to the site unless you just didn’t get what you wanted downloaded.
The network will make solo fans happy and let me stress this, not all the content is solo. There is a lot of hardcore mixed in, but it’s unlikely you’ll find these many solo videos and photosets of most of these models. That should be the selling point for potential members.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good quality overall, some videos don't have "super" quality but high quality is still good.
- An impressive amount of content considering that they haven't been around that long.
- One of the better search engines on a DVD site.
- Nice screencaps of each girl in each scene, of her face, not in action.
- Great TBP price for all the content!
Cons:
- Finding a video that you really like, but doesn't have the "super" quality option
- Trying to find enough time and hard drive space
Bottom Line:
I've talked about my use of DVD sites, about once every 3 months or so. Videobox is always in that group since their site is so easy to use and there is so much content on it. Now, this site pornstarxs is making a serious run at the legendary videobox.
I'm not really that interested in being able to skip parts of clips like Videobox has, I know it is a nice feature, but I like to click one link and go. This site does have a "movie cutter" so I imagine if you wanted to download in smaller parts you could. These DVD sites to me come down to one thing, it is all about if they have videos of your favorite starlets. Two of my favorites are Nautica Thorn and Eva Angelina, this site has tons of both. The download speeds are great.
Why I think the screencaps of the girls face is important - I sometimes miss videos because the girls use different names. By having the screencap, not in action, but just of the face it makes it easier not to miss any of your favorites. They have some older clips that are downloaded in smaller parts, but not that many that I have found.
If I could change anything about the DVD sites it would be one little change. One click downloading of the entire DVD. I know that another of the newer DVD sites has that feature and just from trying it out, I really like it. Overall, I really like this site and plan to include it in my DVD site rotation from now on. Which means this is a definite recommend. Plenty of DVDs here that I haven't seen before!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A lot of videos that I haven't seen on other sites
- Great trial, that I allowed to rebill for full price since I found enough content that I wanted
- Always like DVD sites that have photos as well, though the photo sets are not in connection to the videos...strange.
- Site is giving me great DL speeds, maybe my highest yet, 1,400 kb/sec with 10M connection
- Video quality is 640 on high end
Cons:
- "Classic" videos are from the mid-80s to 90s, not that I mind since I don't care for much porn released before 1990, but could bother some.
- While there are some nice videos that I haven't seen, a good portion, probably 75% is available on other sites.
- Pictures while nice are virtually useless, are not from videos and no zip downloads, plus widely available.
- Navigation is hit or miss, no in between here.
Bottom Line:
I never joined this site because of the name. It sounded too cliche. The site came off as a budget bin porn store, but I'm glad to say that I was wrong.
The site is a movie site that sells itself as having high res photos, I've yet to see the high res photos and since we have no set standard for what is high res, I guess it is okay to advertise them that way. The preview could be better, but with a $3 full trial available, I took the chance on it and the 3 bucks. I found enough content to just go ahead and plan to let it rebill for a month.
The quality of the video is what has become the standard these days at 640 on high end 1000k bitrate. The selection is very good as there where several models who I haven't seen on the bigger, more well known DVD sites. I noticed ApocTom's review that talked about Tera being on here and she was a selling point for me. I do question their overall advertising with the word "exclusive" being used 3 times on the join page. A picture of Aria Giovanni on the front page, though they have nothing that I found except a picture set that is widely available, even for free on TGP sites.
The video numbers may be a little bloated as well. They don't have nearly 3,000 full length DVDs, instead, nearly 3,000 video scenes. While I still was happy since I was able to get plenty of clips I hadn't been able to get on other sites, it may not be enough to justify that $30 price. In the end, I was happy, but will only recommend the trial for others.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best kept secret in Point of View porn. Not for sure the site’s owners like that listed as pro.
- This is part of the Porn Pros Premium Network but you can join it individually and if you’re into POV, it’s worth it.
- Pretty models and a lot of them, around 400.
- The site is currently updating twice per month and has 416 scenes.
- Close to full-experience porn (will explain in bottom line)
- POV using a magic wand on a sexy woman. Haven’t seen that anywhere else.
- High technical quality even on the old scenes. Unlimited downloads.
- Downloadable POV photosets.
Cons:
- Watching 400+ beautiful young women naked, and bouncing around in your face, wait, that’s not a con. I’m trying to think of a way to make that a con. Maybe if you don’t like POV porn. I usually don’t so I guess there could be some that don’t like it.
- Pictures could be higher quality (only 1500 long end).
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I watched a POV scene of Micah Moore in a schoolgirl skirt and knee socks that still holds a place in my top scenes folder. It’s at least 10 years old. I wasn’t even that big of a Micah Moore fan. That scene though, it introduced me to a version of POV I wasn’t used to.
This site, POVd or however they spell it, does a lot of what made that Micah Moore scene so good. Add in that nearly everything these guys film has the models getting sticky wet and that’s happening in POV in reverse cowgirl, it’s near perfection. I also don’t like reverse cowgirl in normal filming style. I think that shows how much something being filmed a certain way can really change a person’s perspective. That wasn’t an intended wordplay. This site takes POV filming all over the place, not just the bed and not just for sex. There are scenes where the cameraman films the model POV in a pool, while squeezing her butt and sliding his fingers in her bikini. There are scenes where the woman squirts and it hits the camera. They have outdoor on the grass POV scenes. I won’t name the site that tries to give you the “girlfriend” experience but will say this site comes as close to possible to putting you right there with the model. It may even be one of the reasons I’m not interested in VR.
I am estimating on the models at around 400. There are 416 scenes and that does show they’ve updated with 2 scenes per month. The TBP facts update was on 6/25/21 and there were 408 scenes, July, August, September, October would be 8 more and that’s how many there are. I really don’t know if there are that many POV sites and have trouble believing there are that many with this many scenes. Or this high of quality of models or technical quality.
The site says it’s, “Innovative. Cutting Edge. A New Porn Experience.” I agree with that.
If it runs into any problem it’s that the oldest scenes are not as high in technical quality. The site has been around since 2014. The oldest scene has 1080, two 720s and 480 download versions. That’s not much to complain about. Name a star and I’ll almost guarantee she has a scene here and it’s going to be unlike any scene you have seen her in. Since I don’t know the newer stars that well, I’ll look at the top current model’s list and check. I don’t even know how accurate this list is but here goes: Abella Danger (2 scenes), Aidra Fox, Dillion Harper (a personal favorite, 6 scenes), Kiara Cole (3 scenes), Alina Lopez (2 scenes). I’m going to stop there. I’m just showing that this site is one porn fans should look into even if they’re not interested in the entire network. Porn Users has the $17.95 discount on just this site and it’s easily worth that. I don’t even know if I would know some of these models if I was on other sites. This content is that unique to me.
I do believe the length of the scenes even tell this isn’t normal POV porn. Most POV scenes are very short. These scenes average right at 30 minutes with some going over 40 minutes. The masturbation from the POV angle is something I haven’t seen many sites try and it’s very good for those that like women masturbating. They even have a few scenes where the camera is setup to “catch” the model masturbating. I don’t know how this site got buried in a network. It needs to be a standalone site. They even have POV giving the woman oral sex. They must use one of those cameras mounted to their forehead. Everything about this site is top-notch. I don’t know this model Kiara Cole but do think she’s very popular. Her newest scene has the POV oral sex in it. I didn’t realize how pretty she is until seeing her from this perspective. You can watch some of the models’ nipples get harder right in front of you, close-up. I really can’t say enough good things about this site as a standalone. I didn’t go with a 100 just because I would like more than 2 updates per month. I have downloaded and kept around 350 of the videos from this site. That probably should earn it a 100 but I know that I have the majority of their content and 2 new scenes a month just isn’t enough.
I do think you have to take the site for what it is without any previous thoughts about POV porn possibly hurting your view (I swear it’s not wordplay). If you go into watching these scenes with your mind clear and focus (asking a lot of porn fans, I know), I really believe you will be just as blown away as I have been with the immersive feeling of the scenes. I have to share a few user comments just for laughs. “Holy shit what a scene, I came 4 days watching this”, “Great angles. True POV”, “Best scene I have ever watched!” Of course there’s always that one member on these sites that’s posting, “These fake creampies are pissing me off!” Who is paying attention? Stare at the beautiful woman, stare and study cum, you make the choice. Great site, easily in my top 5, maybe top 3.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- 12 Site network for $29.95
- Most of the sites are updating and most are fairly big, will have the exacts in the BL.
- Video quality seems to be a network standard of very good 720 high end, 2000+ bitrate, except for a couple, will explain
- Though not high res the pictures are in zip downloads
- Navigation for a network is pretty good
- A few standout sites like Jules Jordan and Jenna Haze, though the Haze site isn't as high quality in the videos
Cons:
- Makes you feel like that it could be better than it is.
- Video quality on most of the sites is very good, but then you get to the Jenna Haze site and video are only 440 high end with pretty bad 700 bitrates
- Some of the sites could be put together, example, Cum in Her Face, Sperm Swallowers and Blow Banged
- Price is too high at $30 a month
Bottom Line:
This network had been on my to join list for awhile.
Between the 11 sites, it advertises 12, but only count 11. The videos total around 800. Which is a pretty large amount of content.
The bad news for me, I was expecting the Jenna Haze content to be 2000 bitrate, 720 high end videos, instead it is the lowest quality site of the network with 440 high end, 700 bitrate. The other sites are 720 high end with 2000 bitrate. Damn it.
The Jules Jordan site is very good and I would rate it the highest of the network. The women are very attractive.
I just don't think this is so much a network as it is a video site that happens to have low resolution, some as low as 640 high end PHOTOS in zip packs.
As a video site it still is pretty good, the amount as mentioned, the quality is above average except on the Jenna Haze content. Raise the quality on the Jenna content and the network's value goes way up. I will add to the TBP review that some of the Jenna content is exclusive. She is one of my favorites and I have a couple of hundred scenes of her and they have a few here I hadn't seen, but that doesn't make the network as a whole that great.
Comparable to Videobox, DVD Box and those other DVD sites, the extra $15 a month really hurts this site considering you feel like you paid $15 more for small pictures.
I will recommend it for those like me that are looking for something new, just don't expected to be blown away. Overall, it is an average video site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I expected to find my ex-wife on this site. I know a little about women that think they’re princesses. It does a good job of creating that bratty attitude from the female. It’s porn, of course there’s cum. That was the much easier part.
- This site is still updating and updates twice per month or did in February. In January it only had one update. There are 64 scenes.
- Nubiles quality: High quality videos and photos that you can download with no limits.
- CCBill is the biller.
- Fast download speeds at 90% my max.
Cons:
- I think this could be a real con for a lot of viewers. These models do a good job as coming off as bratty and entitled. That could hurt the site.
- This is a blunt one. Some of these women are not hot enough to pull off the bratty and entitled personality. Most of them are. I think that also depends on the viewer.
Bottom Line:
Bratty and entitled, it’s music to my Los Angeles born ears. A memory of high school. The models are mostly really good at this niche. I liked Haley Reed’s scene a lot. Those thigh tattoos kind of ruin the princess image but she nails it in every other way. She looks like a trophy wife for a middle-aged wealthy man. She has the demeanor and attitude. The one problem I have with the niche is it’s about as narrow as a niche can be. It is easy to see that based on several scenes being “stepfamily”. She’s the princess. She’s not having sex with her stepbrother. His broke ass hasn’t got anything for her. She’s going for stepdad or neighbor that’s married with 6 kids. She needs a challenge. Everybody knows how hard it is to seduce a father of 6.
You’re going to get Nubiles Porn with this site and it’s a very good network. Just don’t forget about Nubiles.net. That’s the icing. The newer videos have 4K downloads, the rest have at least 1080p, 720p and the mobile ones. The photosets are very good. Those are 6000 long end. I don’t know if it’s her name that catches me or what, Lily Adams has a scene that is one of the best on the site. I am thinking her name is making me think of Morticia Addams merged with Lily Munster. It is a scene you should check out. Those hard nipples during the masturbation are 6000 pixel picture worthy. She is a good example of the quality of models on this site. I used to say I watched glam porn. Those were the women that ignored me in high school. I had that fetish for many years. She’s a little too pretty to be in porn fetish. Add those attitudes and entitlement.
The site has 64 scenes. The updates are not regular. There were two in 11 days in February 2022. There was one on the New Year’s Day. No other ones in January. That is probably the closest it gets to consistent, it’s inconsistent.
This is a niche that I don’t think porn has tried enough. Maybe I’m just wanting glamour porn to come back? The scenes show the models fully dressed and have realistic settings. The kitchen and the dinner table. Even the titles are telling you that this site doesn’t take itself very seriously. There is one called, Did You Get Your Stepsister Pregnant On Thanksgiving? That is complete with a full Thanksgiving meal on the table. It looks like the dad is getting ready to throw a corn muffin. The mom has a long piece of Italian bread about to hit him. I’m thinking, “Would it not matter if it happened the day after Thanksgiving?” Something Nubiles does in a lot of their scenes from all their sites is focus on those hard nipples, even in a shirt, or under the shirt. That is one of my biggest fetishes. They do it a lot on this site. It’s a very good site. I don’t know that it has that much of a future. There will be people that don’t like the arrogance, the bratty attitudes but I do. If you want one to really get the feeling of the site, try, Cielo West in Ready Or Not Her I Cum. It doesn’t surprise me to see it has one of the lower scores. She pulls that princess act and attitude off. I’m not for sure our society is that open to princess attitudes. That would be a terrible way for a good idea and fetish to end. I like the site a lot and hope they keep it going and bring Cielo West back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of solo sites and megasites? Is that the right word?
- They advertise 72 sites. My first experience with Puba was just focused on their solo sites.
- Their numbers say 3,433 videos, 2,755 photosets.
- They have a coming soon section and the update they show is listed for today.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of my max)
- I’m going to list this as a pro and a mention to read the bottom line, a lot of mainstream pornstars have solo sites on this network. They do advertise that their videos are exclusive.
Cons:
- As minimal as you can get on navigation features. There’s a search box if you know what you’re searching for.
- No model list, though if you click on a model’s name it will show you all the scenes they have of that model.
- No dates on the scenes. One continuously moving ad.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Staxxx, it’s owned by the same people as this site, and I was able to get a deal to join both for under $10. Puba, several years ago, was building some momentum. I know when Skin Diamond first started being recognized as a model, Puba has a Skin Diamond solo site. Another model I remember Charley Chase. They have a solo site of her. Christy Mack, Abigail Mac and a total of near 60 different models that they have solo sites of. Most of those models are known models. One thing I know I was bothered by, and this gave me a chance to see if they still do it. They take a photo set and split it into multiple parts to jack up their photoset numbers. Anyone that has been reviewing porn as long as I have, that’s one of those things that irritates me. I even mentioned in the review of Skin Diamond’s solo site from Puba’s network. She has a Dr. Who photoset. Skin was and still is, in my opinion, a unique looking model. Puba has 45 of the photos in one Dr. Who set and 166 in another Dr. Who set. She has on the same outfit. The only thing that has changed is the background. I’ve said it before, when you do things like that, you just ask for a reviewer to look deeper into what else you may be getting away with. I don’t look that deeply into anymore. I do have compliments for their photosets.
The around 60 solo sites are still the main part of the network. They have added sites like, “1 Girl, 1 Camera” and “My Doll Parts”. It’s hard to be negative about a site that costs $5 a month. If you haven’t joined it and like one or more of the solo model sites they have. You get your money’s worth on one of those sites. Some of those solo sites have as many as 100+ videos and 100+ photosets. Going back to the mid-2000s, that would be an acceptable-sized premium solo site. And you get near 60 of those.
One of the sites they have that I was interested in checking out is Ty Endicott. He had a POV scene with Micah Moore that was one of my favorite scenes. It shows the age of some of the scenes. Most of the Ty Endicott videos featured smoking fetish. I don’t think the Micah Moore scene I was looking for had smoking in it, unless you counted her bubble butt with her knee high socks bouncing up and down. You can also notice on Ty Endicott scenes, nearly half, maybe more than half, of the models have a tramp-stamp tattoo. The most positive thing I can say about this network, besides the price, is the solo model content. Several of these models are known for hardcore. Puba does have some solo scenes of them and some showering scenes. What I described as megasites, are like their site Czech Hotties, it has 131 scenes. Those are just sites that look like a back catalog of a DVD series. You probably won’t see the same model in more than one scene on that site. We used to call those megasites for the large amount of models, as the opposite of solo model sites.
They do have 1080, 720 HD downloads, some of the older scenes only has 540 and 480. I watched a 540p video the other day and my friend said, “What kind of television did that fit on?” We’re getting old. Get rid of that 540p and it’s 4:3 ratio. The photosets have zip downloads. I said it was Staxxx, there’s no reason to change my tune on this one. You will get $5 worth of porn out of the site. If you like those solo models you will easily get $5. They have added some newer solo models too. I didn’t even recognize Leya Falcon. I’m used to her being pancaked between 3 guys. She has some photos on here of her cosplaying as Harley Quinn. She’s using the name Whorely Quinn. See, what I said wasn’t offensive about her being pancaked between 3 men. She is quite attractive by herself. She makes a good Harley Quinn. Just like with Staxxx you have to send an email to cancel. They do respond quickly. I would compare this experience to eating a handful of cheese puffs when you’re starving. Recommended for those that like solo model porn and check the list to see how many if any of the solo sites that have a featured model you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the rare networks of solo sites, also has around 10 regular but small porn studios and sites included.
- The biggest appeal here is to collectors or collecting types. There are 60 solo model "sites". Details in bottom line.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- A lot of content with nearly 3,000 videos and 2,500 photo sets.
- The updates are hard to follow but according to the future releases, tomorrow, 7/8/19 there will be 16 videos and 13 photo sets released. See bottom line.
- Navigation is simple to use with a clean interface and easy to use and understand menus.
- I am going by what the site says and also referring back to the previous TBP review, this content is exclusive to Puba. There are some models I have never seen before so I can't guarantee that but there's reason to believe it is exclusive.
- The lowest "hi" videos I have found are 720p, so that's not bad. Some could be lower but I have not seen them.
Cons:
- The only scenes with dates on them are the ones going to be released in the next month. Nothing else is dated.
- I have downloaded a couple of photo sets that will not unzip and say files are damaged or corrupted. See bottom line for possible fix.
- The numbers, reasoning ability and mathematical logic says there might be some recycling, see bottom line.
Bottom Line:
No matter what my score is or whatever I find in the recycling possibility, this is still an inexpensive site for you to add to your collections of certain models.
In the April, 2017 TBP update of facts there are 2,000+ plus videos listed in the facts. As of July, 2019 there are 2,824 videos listed according to Puba's own numbers. They are releasing 16 videos tomorrow. The other days of the upcoming week have 5 listed for each day. Even if I cut way short of those numbers and just say 20 videos per month, that would be over 1,000 videos in one year. Comparing their numbers with TBP's 2017 numbers there are at most 800 new videos in the last 2 years.
The point I made at the beginning of this review isn't to be lost in all of this. This is still a site with a lot of exclusive content of 60 different models. There is no way I am going to go through and list all of them.
The ones I was most interested are: Skin Diamond, Charley Chase, London Keyes, Mia Lelani, Nicole Aniston and Jayden Cole. Of those, the one with the lowest amount of total content on here is Mia Lelani with 39 photo sets and 28 videos. Skin has 54 photo sets and 35 videos. Nicole has 47 photo sets and 76 videos. It's a lot of exclusive content for single models.
Which is the first question you have to ask yourself. Are there any models on Puba you really like? I will mention this here as it fits here and goes back to one of the cons. The photo sets are rare for some of these models. I do not have a lot of photo sets of Nicole Aniston or Skin Diamond (most I have are from her pre-hardcore days). The zip files were showing up as broken or corrupted. It had something to do with me left-clicking to download. I right clicked "save as" the zips and they unzip fine and are above average photos, especially of the ones that do not do a lot of photo sets.
The studio sites might be of interest to some. I remember having scenes from a Ty Endicott POV DVD, here on Puba they have 63 Ty Endicott scenes. They have one called Czech Hotties with 130 videos on it.
The solo model scenes are either vanilla hardcore scenes with guys, JOI (jerk off instruction) solo or with another model or solo. Most of these models are not known for their solo scenes, so those are relatively unique for some of the more prolific hardcore models.
There are other models I know of but do not usually collect like Keisha Grey, she has one of the lower content counts with 19 videos, 18 photo sets. The highest looks to be Jayden Cole with 76 videos and 71 photo sets. These "sites" remind me of the old solo sites with the word "Club" in front of the model's name.
The navigation works well for this type of site. They took the keep it simple, stupid, method of navigation. There's a menu on the left, you click it and have choices of videos, photos, sites and coming soon.
The easiest way to navigate the site is to go to "sites" and pick the models you like. Each "site" of a model opens with photos, videos options. It's as simple as that.
The content I like best are the Skin Diamond photo sets. I have liked her since the very first set I saw of her way back on ATK Exotics when she looked one day over 18. Her photo sets on here include several cosplay sets including Dr. Who, Star Wars, a nerdy teacher, a schoolgirl and a very odd bathtub zombie/abused looking set with blood, black eyes, fully nude in a tub.
The biggest deduction is like another recent review. The videos and photos are split into parts. Skin as fully dressed Jedi in one, Skin stripping as a Jedi in the next. I have said it before when a site does something to make me question their motive, usually more is looked into and uncovered. If the separate sets of photos had 200 pictures in each it would maybe be understandable but the dressed Jedi set has only 51 pictures while the stripping/nude Jedi has around 200.
There is a similar use of the videos as well. There are three of Nicole Aniston and another model giving you jerk off instruction. It looks like the three were made on the same day in different outfits.
Overall, if you're a collector of any of these models it is still a good deal if you get a promo. The content isn't going to make you think you have found something unique in porn but you will at least get some new photos and/or videos to add to your collection. It's a painless, smooth site to use so you won't have to struggle through pages of unneeded clicking and scrolling either.
There are ads but most are not bothersome. They have them in a row in 3 places as you scroll down the homepage. There are no ads once you are inside a specific site, just on the homepage.
I'm not for sure if it has much for returning members. I would think one month would be enough to get any of the models you collect and there probably wouldn't be enough future content to come back for. Good enough for one month if you are a fan of any of the models or for someone looking for some new favorite models.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I always seem to return to. Thought it would be a good choice to get my 500th experience point here on PU.
- It's a site that can't really be explained by just a simple title like "Public Disgrace".
- Around 360 full scenes, videos and photos for all the scenes.
- You'll see scenarios used in the scenes that you've probably thought about and some that you'll start thinking about.
- Site works well, but it's also pretty basic, scroll, download, scroll, download. Using the navigational buttons isn't much help.
- Like all other Kink sites it has very high production values. These people aren't just shoving out some scene that looks like the last 100 updates.
- Great download speeds. I'm averaging 8 MB/s, most sites I download from only reach 6 MB/s and 6 MB/s is my average.
- One new scene per week.
- Some very long scenes if you like that.
- Lots of outdoors and public scenes.
Cons:
- Believe it or not, I wanted to give it a 100, something I've never done. Thought it would go good with reaching 500 experience points. Something I never thought I was possible. But there's no zip downloads for the pictures and that's been a big no-no for me for years. Took 4 points off for it.
- Took another point off for the disgrace part. I've always struggled with the disgracing of men or women. But only took 1 point off since the site is named Public Disgrace. I knew what I was getting into.
Bottom Line:
I don't think any site works for me in the ways Public Disgrace does. I'll have a little fun with this part. A big part of my enjoyment of porn has to do with the fantasy aspect of it. This fantasy could be me being one of the random guys standing around watching the scene being filmed in an adult video store (do those even exist anymore?) to my self-abusive side imagining my wife (girlfriends in the past) being the woman in the scene. Neither one is particular healthy, but I do need this type of change from mainstream porn scenes.
I always turn to the Kink sites to break my boredom with mainstream porn. The good part with Public Disgrace is it only updates once a week so if you have the hard drive space, you can catch up with every past scene then just join sporadically to pick up the new updates.
What you're getting here is the closest thing I know of to public sex. I've tried the ones going for the more realistic belief (spy cams, voyeur cams, security cams), but I'm able to convince myself on most of Public Disgrace's scenes being authentic. I find it easier to convince myself than trying to watch those green shaded cam videos. So there's the funny part about me and my interest in this site. It lets my fantasies feel realistic.
I guess if a person wanted to nitpick they could say there's no 1080p videos and if there are, I've not found them. The newest updates highest option available is 720p. Bitrates are very high at 5,000+ so they stretch pretty cleanly to a 1080p screen/monitor.
And I will always nitpick about zip downloads for picture sets. I feel strongly about this on a site that is shot mostly in public. Videos work good, but photos let you see not only the action, but also the people in the background, their expressions, reactions, things you most likely miss in videos.
The disgrace part isn't as bad as a I remembered it being. I still see a lot of it as immature. Kind of makes you think you're watching Bang Bros, but instead of goofy/annoying college frat boy talk from the cameraman and crew, you get people writing on the woman's body. Could live without claiming to disgrace a woman by having her have sex in front of a crowd. That part to me is also an insult to the members of the site since I'm supposed to assume the model is disgraced.
As for public sex and nudity, they could do just that and I'd be happy. I feel like porn these days has become too vanilla and predictable. There's nothing predictable about a girl suddenly bending over in a bar and spreading her butt for anal sex in front of 200 people.
A strong suit of Kink's is that they know the models who are capable of doing this type of porn and it shows in the scenes. Just like in regular life, we all have different fetishes and dislikes. I think the majority of Kink's models love doing these types of unique scenes. I'm guessing most have an exhibitionist side that feels holed up by 127 scenes of them having bed or couch porn sex. You get some really great, genuine scenes here thanks to that.
There's also some added mystery and intrigue to the scenes. For example: A 22 year old college girl being tied up outside for sex with four men. Only comes an older man and she starts giving him a blowjob while the other four men take turns with her. Is it because she's getting paid to give the blowjob or is it that she got that horny over the four men taking turns with her? You don't get that with the vast majority of porn sites.
I've said it many times before. There's something to be said for being different and original. I'm not for sure if new porn fans would really be into these scenes. Sometimes there's 10-15 minutes of build-up before there's any sex. It kind of reminds me of going from reading a magazine to reading a Hemingway novel. It's definitely not for everyone just like Hemingway isn't for everyone.
I was surprised by the near my max download speeds and it was on all scenes I downloaded. It's needed as some of the scenes go over 2 GB.
Everything else was as expected. Lots of pretty (many tattoos) girls doing things that go beyond a girl doing just regular porn. That's a major turn-on for me and no site does it better. On the downside, there are times I won't even look at Public Disgrace for 3-4 days. Either way, it's a great site that sometimes will push things a little further than I think they should. I would recommend it to anyone who's looking for a site that is nearly guaranteed to be different than any porn you are watching right now. And just remember, let your fantasies require realism. They might be opposites, but if you can do that with this site you'll probably like it as much as I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's public sex that sometimes isn't really public, that other times is very kinky.
- As with every Kink site I've been a member on there are high quality photos and videos and plenty of imagination with each scene.
- Navigation issues aren't too bad here since I had never been a member of the site and just scrolled through the updates, making it quite easy to navigate.
- European sets seem to really push the public limit with sex on streets and in barely hidden places that the viewer can still see the society functioning around. Will go further in BL.
- Models can be hit or miss for me. The older European sets had more models I am familiar with, but the newer sets, mostly shot around or in the Kink armory have models I'm not as familiar with. One thing that keeps this in the pros are the appearances of Isis Love in several scenes, though not listed in the model credits.
- Download speed is always above average on Kink sites
Cons:
- Scenes in America may push the limit of misleading advertising. I'm not of this belief, but the comment section of the newer American scenes have 20% comments complaining that they are not public, will further in BL.
- I'm beating, maybe flogging would be a better word since it's Kink, the dead horse when I complain about the photo sets being broken up into parts, but I feel it's important for potential members to know.
- While the site is plenty large enough, considering the complexity of the scenes, I don't know if it offers much for multi-month memberships or for many return visits. Numbers in BL.
Bottom Line:
This site had been one on my list to join. The last 4 sites I have joined are Kink sites. My overall impression of this site is good, but at times, I was either thinking things went too far or things were way too protected.
With any exhibitionism or voyeur site, I do need at least some believability. I have enough of an imagination to make most scenes believable. Having said that, I know a lot of porn viewers don't. The members comments on Public Disgrace use words like "false advertising" and "bait and switch" and these are not just 1 or 2 comments, but maybe 5-10 on some scenes. This is my feeling on it.
In the earlier scenes on this site, starting in 2008, it was more of an exhibitionism site than disgrace site. These scenes included recording the male and female models having sex in subway steps as traffic and people walked by. It included sex by the road as traffic went by. From what I can tell by the license plates on the cars it was nearly all shot in Europe. There are complaints about "where is the disgrace?" They do have some scenes that go into bondage in public places, but the majority of the scenes that are outside in Europe are much more regular sex as described earlier in this paragraph. The scenes take on a decided turn to filming in and around the Kink armory in San Francisco. They bring in a crowd to watch, these rarely go into the exhibitionism like the European scenes did since it's a controlled crowd and controlled environment, but these do bring in more disgrace than the European scenes.
How disgraceful? I'm sure it's subjective. There is writing on the model's body, "I'm a slut", "Whore" to dumping food on the model to heavy bondage. These scenes remind me more of Sex and Submission type scenes. Where you as a member have to choose is if you prefer the more public, less disgrace scenes or less public, more disgrace scenes. Only a small amount of the scenes really do both. I do understand and respect the possible laws they had to be concerned about breaking so I'm not really against either side, but I do prefer the more public, less disgrace.
Overall the site is pretty big considering the niche and complexity of each scene, however, it only updates once a week.
As of 11/7/2012 there are a total of 209 scenes. These scenes include photos and video. The videos are quite long ranging from 45 minutes to 90 minutes. The photos are split into parts on the zips.
If you're big on technical quality, this site delivers. These are the video options.
Smaller Screen is 640x360 in MP4 format
Most compatible is 960x540 in WMV format
Windows Media HD is 1280x720 in WMV format
Highest Quality MP4 is 1280x720 in H264 MP4 format
All 209 scenes have those options.
Navigation is pretty limited, but with 209 scenes, you can just scroll through pages of 14 scenes per page. It doesn't do much good to use the model search since it takes you to all the model's scenes on their family of sites, most of which, you won't have a membership to.
As mentioned earlier you get one new scene per week. With the newer scenes turning more to the disgrace side, this could be a problem for me with future joins. I don't want to say all of the American scenes are bad though. Quite a few are in more public places than the Kink armory and as long as they work the crowd into it, whether a controlled crowd or environment or not, I will still like those scenes.
Where they lose me is in the disgrace part. I don't mind bondage, but we saw a bunch of immature sites years ago try the writing on the model's bodies angle and it failed miserably for them. I don't think it's that I'm offended as much as it is that I expect more from Kink than this. I would think anytime you're dealing with a niche like disgrace there are lines that go into "That's not disgrace, it's just silly". On the other side, I wouldn't want them to truly go into disgracing the models either since I'm not even for sure how far that would have to go. The last side of it is I don't ever hold a site to stick directly with their name since the amount of urls available isn't that large and I don't know if I would ever want to be on a site that never changes.
I enjoyed the site though. It's different enough from the mainstream to keep my attention on it. I would like to see more public exhibitionism, but more than that, just enough to give my imagination something to work with. The body writing makes my imagination want to get a washcloth and soap to wash it off. Not exactly the point of joining a porn website.
I would recommend it to most anyone. The disgrace is if anything silly and playful. The models are pretty and some have never been seen. I just don't think if you're really into disgrace you're going to get it here and outside of the Euro scenes, I don't think you're going to truly get a lot of public sex unless you're able to tap into your imagination some. The one admittedly biased part is Isis Love being in some of the newer scenes.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons:
- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of 5 sites with more niche and fetish content than the majority of networks offer.
- Very high technical quality on the network, they have 4K scenes dating back to 2015 and all content has at least 1080p option on the videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- Over 3,500 videos and photo sets, near even split of 1,767 videos and 1,747 photo sets. Photos are downloadable in zips.
- The five included sites are different enough from the other 4 sites to make it feel like a true network unlike many that have similar content on every site.
- 782 models, all of the models are at the worst, attractive and most are in the very attractive group.
- They use unique filming styles.
- Updates 5 times a week.
- Maybe the deepest search engine I've ever seen.
Cons:
- Niches can be both pros and cons, they can be the reason to join or the reason not to join, since each site sticks with a niche there could be some of the content you have no interest in.
- They film differently than most sites. Like the pro of the same reason, it will be explained in BL.
- They could make the navigation a little more obvious.
Bottom Line:
This is an interesting network because it offers very specific, right down to the title of the site, niches. The included sites are:
Wet and Puffy - Is a solo focused site that includes clitoris and labia pumping/suction, close to extreme masturbation. It reminds me a little of In the Crack.
Wet and Pissy - Very similar to Wet and Puffy except for the one big but it has pissing in every scene. They even have slow-motion pissing scenes.
We Like to Suck - This is an oral/blowjob site and some of the unique filming styles show here. They get the blowjob from multiple views. It is different than the usual POV or directly over her head style used in filming most blowjob sites.
Simply Anal - This one's title says all you need to know.
Eurobabe Facials - Another one that needs no explanation.
The content is good. The solo scenes remind me of the days when Euro porn was on top of the porn world. They do use a lot of closeups on the Wet and Puffy site, it's most likely why I compared it to In the Crack. They are going to make sure you see every inch of the model. The camera styles are hard to figure out. I don't know if they are just looking to break some new ground or if they just opted to have multiple views. I do like the blowjob site. It reminds me to some extent of Only Blowjobs on DDF. Blowjob scenes can become repetitive and even dull but the models here do a good job of being into the scenes.
I would think the pissing site is one of the biggest fetish draws. I don't see a lot of pissing content these days. It's one of those niches I am mostly indifferent to but have to say even I found myself watching the slow motion pissing scenes just because I don't know if I will ever see that in real life.
There's a good amount of content with roughly half of it being on Wet and Puffy, the facials site has the least amount of content.
I thought my biggest complaint was going to be the lack of navigation. I clicked on "filter" and it opened up a whole new world of navigation. I've never seen a search engine like this. It deserves some detail.
You have tabs for "model", "action", "location" and "date/site". Sounds good enough. If you click model you now can choose from 10 different categories like hair color, skin type and nationality. When you click on one of those, we will use "skin type" for the review it gives you a whole new list featuring bellybutton piercing, tattoos, face piercing, body freckles, it's the deepest search engine I can remember seeing on a porn site.
The location one is good for a few laughs. First is "furniture" and clicking it brings up options like "cushion", "desk" and "chair". You can also select "place of action" with choices like "bathroom" and "floor". It is proof that someone working at the Puffy Network might be more obsessive than I am!
How accurate those choices are is maybe questionable. It looks like they stopped using some of the tags. It still is worth a few tries just to see a 3 to 4 step search engine at work.
One thing I am not for sure about are the models. I don't recognize most of the models but they seem like pros. I don't keep up with models like I used to so I am really not for sure.
I haven't seen much content like this so I'm sure it is exclusive to this network.
I don't know that I could be much more positive than comparing one of their sites to DDF's Only Blowjob and another to In the Crack. It also has enough broad appeal (solo, pissing, anal, blowjob) that it could be recommended to most porn fans.
One thing I forgot and it's something I saw on another site recently. They have a channels tab with content from other sites. They list the other sites: 18 Closeup, Amateur Allure, Babes, Club Seventeen, DDF, Perfect Gonzo, Stiffia and Yanks. There are close to 100 scenes from those sites combined that you can download.
Something those bonus scenes reminded me of, the Wet and Puffy, Simply Anal and Wet and Pissy content reminds somewhat of the content produced by the DEV8 group. They are the ones that run Perfect Gonzo now and used to be known for Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic.
Overall, I like the Puffy Network and would recommend it to anyone that is a fan of the niches they cover.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that I thought had died off but is running strong now.
- CCBill as biller, this didn't used to be the case.
- Roughly 1,200 CFNM themed scenes with photos and screencaps as well.
- Over 500 models.
- Download speeds reach 80% of my max.
- CFNM is a genre that touches on multiple niches and it's one of my favorite non-mainstream porn genres.
- Network includes 6 sites with themes they follow: Lady Voyeurs, Little Dick, Girls Abuse Guys, Amateur CFNM, CFNM Games and the flagship site Pure CFNM.
- There's a story to the scenes though don't expect in Oscar-winning acting performances.
- Pictures and screencaps are downloadable and add the same element those add in exhibitionism porn, see BL.
- One of the best navigating networks I've used.
- No set update schedule but they added 17 scenes in March and so far have added 8 in April.
- While the models aren't sold as amateurs except on the one site, I don't hardly know any of these models.
Cons:
- I think CFNM can be a polarizing genre. This network probably makes the clear too with some scenes that include the women using strap-ons on the men.
- The biggest problem is it's biggest strength. It's unique when compared to today's mainstream porn but it also can be repetitive.
Bottom Line:
CFNM has been one of my favorite genres since the first time I saw a CFNM scene. The one thing that can make the scenes better or worse is the acting ability of those in the scene. Most of these scenes are supposed to have a surprised, shocked beginning for the women but probably 50% of the time the actresses overact and oversell their shock and surprise.
The good thing is there's probably more CFNM content on this network than all other CFNM sites combined. All of the big networks have tried CFNM but none are still shooting it and most have under 100 scenes while this network has around 1,200 scenes.
The basis of the scenes is a woman, usually group of women, walk in on a guy masturbating, catch him looking at them while masturbating and their "punishment" for him is to make him finish masturbating while they watch. Lady Voyeurs is probably the closest to how the genre started and I noticed the scenes on it are only 480p, so those really might be the original scenes.
The basis has of course gotten lost which I prefer the new style better. Now, the women catch the guy and help him with 4-5 women giving him a handjob, there's usually that one woman who gets too aroused and turns it into a blowjob and some of the time it will turn into full sex. I was watching a scene and thought "This is what mainstream porn doesn't have in it anymore." And I think that's exactly the attraction to this style of porn. You're going to get tease in it, voyeurism, upskirts, panties, fully clothed with stripping and if I'm guessing if the women can't finish their job with their hand it becomes blowjob and sex.
The pictures and screencaps add a lot. Similar to exhibitionism porn, the stills allow you to see upskirts you wouldn't have seen in the video, the expressions on the women's faces and throw in hard nipples you wouldn't have noticed.
The navigation is very good. Everything is integrated. You can bounce from one site to another with one click, no sign in again. There also is the option of going to a hub-style page that lists all the updates across the network. Somehow they added a model list too and I only mention that because there are multiple models in nearly all scenes. They have done a good job of putting this network together.
I will mention again, there is some content that some might not like but some is also not as bad as the names suggest. Girls Abuse Guys is just soft domination, pretty much what CFNM started out as. There are scenes with the woman or women using strap-ons on the guy. The Little Dick site is a lot like Bang Bros CFNM Show, women laugh and pick on the guy for his lack of size while he tries to get off. You're not going to see anything that's comparable to the rougher dominant male sites.
There is the possibility of the content becoming repetitive, I think this wouldn't be as likely if the acting was better. This still is a relatively rare genre as most of the big networks have all tried CFNM but most feedback from their webmasters was it costs too much, is not that popular but I do believe it's becoming more popular. I did add the numbers in my head and believe if you joined every CFNM site on the major networks you would have around 400 scenes or you can join here and have 1,200+.
I mentioned the network using CCBill, it makes me wonder with the greatly-improved navigation if they've switched owners or management. Also, the 17 updates a month is unheard of on a CFNM site.
It's now one of my current favorites and for the time being it's being added to my FTV/Zishy recurring memberships. Very impressed. Apologies to Mbaya on reviewing the site just a few months after he did but I also agree with his review.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Loosely described "matures" site.
- 396 scenes
- Updates twice per month.
- Segpay is the biller.
- High quality site, videos, photos and features.
- Very good (85% of max) download speeds.
- Just over 200 models, some have as many as 14 scenes.
- Everything is downloadable and I haven't hit any limits.
Cons:
- Either I'm getting older or these mature models are getting younger. A lot of the models don't look much over 25. Not really a con unless you're really into much older women which I'm not.
- Not a con for me, but none of the videos have 4K.
- Borders on cookie cutter. Being a premium site I expect a little more in the production values.
Bottom Line:
This is a tough site to review. They have a nice selection of models (Ava Addams, Anissa Kate, and it wouldn't be a mature site without 14 scenes of Brandi Love). They play into several of the more popular niches (stepfamily, older/younger), but they hurt themselves in my opinion.
The site is marketed as a premium site separate from but ran by Porn Pros. Most of these sites have 4K videos. I could have missed a few but I haven't seen any 4K videos on this site.
That's not a big deal to me but what makes it premium? The two age groups that cause the most frustration for me as a porn viewer are the teen and mature groups. The teen ones you will see this near perfect model and she either overacts or under performs (shyness, not used to being submissive), while the matures have models that are bored or look like they have been here a thousand times before.
I get that feeling with a lot of these models even though I don't even know some of them. I would rate most of them as A or B in presentation and D or F in effort.
Of course that's not talking about all of them. Brandi Love puts on her usual top-level performances, India Summer has a scene that is really good and the site is relatively large, with nearly 400 scenes, as a standalone site.
The technical side of things is good, nothing more or less. The oldest videos have a 1080p, 720p and 480p download option, some of the older scenes do not have photos but do have screencaps. The newest videos have the same download options except with higher bitrates.
That's a word I don't like using with a premium site ... inconsistency. Some have pictures, some don't. Some have low bitrates, others have too high of bitrates. Some of the models give very good performances, some are very poor. There's very little middle ground here.
There are better mature sites, maybe it's just me but these older models should at least be able to give a decent acting performance. See Brandi Love for example. I find her attractive but she isn't near the look I prefer. Her performances make her scenes worth looking over that part.
It's an easy site to navigate. If you like the models it would be worth joining. Otherwise, it is hard to really recommend this site as there are better sites out there in the same niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An up and coming site from Dev8
- Excellent quality with newest videos showing 1900+ on resolution and near 8000 bitrates
- Pictures are near 2000 high end and come zipped
- Models are some of the best in the business. The Sabrina Sweet set sold me on joining, something about a girl in a LAPD shirt!
- Downloads coming faster on this site then the other Dev8 site I reviewed, actually hitting near 1300 kb/s on 10 M connection.
Cons:
- Still a small site for the price. I downloaded all of the videos in less than 5 days and that wasn't constant downloading, just a few hours here and there.
- Older content isn't near as good quality as the newest content
- Only weekly updates
Bottom Line:
Finishing up my recent 3 sites of Dev8 joins, this one may have the most potential. I believe in a year, if they keep up with weekly updates they will be over 100 videos and for a new member, 100 of these videos would be a great deal.
There are several things I like about Dev8 sites, the high quality being #1 and another thing to mention is the very easy navigation. These guys make great porn sites.
My only real complaints here is that there isn't enough content for the price. I had the whole site downloaded in less than a week and only came back to get the updates. Take that as a compliment, I just want more content like this!
Also of note, many of these sets start with the female in a uniform of some sorts. I mention that since I know we have some uniformed porn lovers here.
The quality is high with the 1900+ high end resolution videos, that have near 8000 bitrates and even the older ones are not that bad either. Though maybe I would mention this to them, why not remaster some of the older ones, maybe once per week to fill the week's updates in more?
The pictures come in zips with high 2000 high end resolutions, and are worth downloading if just for the fully dressed parts that start each set.
My download speeds improved almost double from the other Dev8 site I was on. The models as with all of their sites are gorgeous. Last, another thought would be maybe to join two of the smaller sites or make a network, all of their content is great, recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site that makes me join Adult Time
- They are up to 328 scenes and update once per week
- The Adult Time access, with all the good and bad that comes with that
- About as dark and risky as mainstream porn can go
- Solid acting and pretty models
- Production is top-tier as is the technical quality
- Never have listed this as a pro, nearly always good choices in casting
- Good download speeds at 85% of my max download speed
Cons:
- Still not for sure the site is better than its predecessor Pretty Dirty but that’s as much a compliment as negative.
- The Adult Time navigation
Bottom Line:
I first reviewed Pure Taboo on 12-3-2018. It was the site that Adult Time caught my attention with. The site has grown a lot since then. At that time, Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo only had 318 between the two sites. Pure Taboo now has 328 scenes just by itself and you can still access the Pretty Dirty scenes too. Sticking the word “Taboo” in your site’s name is a risky idea. Some of this content isn’t close to taboo. Some of it is very close, or as close as you’re going to get to taboo. They are relying on you to use your imagination on most of the scenes to see the “taboo”. Which is why it’s risky.
The other reason it’s risky is there really isn’t that much taboo you can legally do in porn. That’s creating a heavy reliance on the viewer’s ability to suspend their reality. It works for me. This is how I always watched porn. The scenes, in what shouldn’t be taken as an insult, remind me of the glory days of Vivid. There is chemistry between the actors and actresses. There is a feeling they really are pulling off believable acting in porn. I do believe the mood, lighting, build-up, story, plays a major role in that. There’s 10 or more minutes of story and build-up before the clothes come off. For those that didn’t experience the Vivid glory years, they had entire scenes with no sex, it was leading into the next scene. That’s back when we watched porn on DVDs.
The technical part of the scenes is as impressive as you will find. There are download options for the videos from 160p to 4K, an unbelievable 8 different resolutions. The photo sets could be better. They are generally small in quantity of pictures with 35-50 pictures and they’re not studio photo sets. They are downloadable but even as a photo collector, I don’t download these. I am sure the thinking there is these scenes are made to be watched as videos to get the story and that would make the pictures less important.
I am going to review Adult Time as a whole since I reviewed it in its very early stages a few years ago. For this Pure Taboo review I will just say the Adult Time navigation has all the makings of great navigation and potential I talked about in 2018 but it’s still not very good. It carries over to the sites including this one.
The Pure Taboo scenes create a feeling of uneasiness in the viewer and that, to me, is the taboo with these scenes. I am not that into the most hardcore porn but Pure Taboo can get me to watch it. That is a big reason for the high score. Someone is doing something right. The scenes are long, at times, I even feel like the scenes are too long. It maybe enters the area of unrelenting or punishing even. There’s more of the taboo they are creating. I believe their taboo isn’t in the “story”. A secretary is seduced by her boss while his wife is behind the whole idea. That’s not taboo. That probably happened somewhere in America yesterday. The taboo for me is there is something going on with these scenes that are touching nerves in the viewer. The viewer then needs to make the connection to whatever nerve that is. It then becomes taboo. Two middle-aged buddies are watching a football game and one’s daughter’s friend comes over to study. They end up having a threesome with her like in their own younger years. That’s not taboo. Porn has been doing that scene for decades. But something in the dialogue, something in the lighting, it’s creating the taboo. It is, if you allow it, getting in your mind and nerves. Subliminal porn? I’m not going to say it is. I am going to say it’s way above porn-level directing and producing, it’s far beyond porn-level writing and most importantly, the actors and actresses are showing real acting ability.
My comparison to Vivid’s glory years is the greatest compliment I could give a site. Even today, 20 years after Vivid’s glory years, my favorite porn scenes are from those glory years of Vivid.
Pure Taboo is easily my favorite what I think is American-based site. To me, it breaks the hold the reality porn networks had on the market. That probably isn’t true since not everyone has tried Pure Taboo out and not everyone will like the depth of their scenes. It does break the hold the reality porn networks had on me. With the high technical quality, weekly updates, I really wish they would offer it as a separate site from Adult Time. Maybe put it and Pretty Dirty together like it was in 2018. That was my first exposure to it. I joined Pretty Dirty in 2018, Pure Taboo was just launching as was Adult Time. It does a little of everything too, there’s near heartcore, very hardcore, lesbian and everything in-between. Very close to being a perfect site. The pictures or lack thereof is stopping it from being perfect. Maybe the female models can’t get into character well enough for the pictures while getting into the character for the video? Either way, near perfection is saying a lot in today’s porn industry.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
