Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It was once my highest rated site, then fell out of favor, seems to be taking a different turn now.
- The growth of this site has to be one of the most impressive and fastest we have seen. Daily updates currently and the quality is as high as you get.
- As of 12/7/21: 785 models, 1,573 videos/films and 2,036 photosets.
- Everything is downloadable and as far as I know, unlimited. I don’t download enough anymore to really know.
- While its big sister site Met Art has become more explicit in recent years, Sex Art has been more explicit since the first scene. I will focus a little more on that in the bottom line.
- The technical quality is very high and it will be in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
Cons:
- Don’t hate me for saying this. I still don’t like the hardcore scenes. I like hardcore porn as much as most do, but hardcore porn is everywhere. I would be fine with this being a solo/lesbian site.
- Their memberships can be confusing when upgrading or adding. I will explain that in the bottom line since I know they usually have a webmaster that checks in here.
Bottom Line:
I remember the days of thinking Met Art could be a lot more than it was. I even remember making comments about Met Art at least getting the attention of my side that likes teasing. Sex Art came along and showed what Met Art could be. It was kind of surprising to me that Met Art then started shooting more explicit photos. It was like Sex Art tested the waters. The early years of Sex Art were kind of messy. They were trying too hard. Take that as a compliment. I don’t remember who said it, “It’s still just porn and about nudity.” Sadly, that’s probably as far as we will get in our lifetimes but will say Sex Art does a very good job of blending the more innocent porn with the not innocent porn.
I don’t feel like much of an explanation is needed for why I don’t like the hardcore scenes. It’s just a feeling I have. It’s not bad hardcore porn. It’s just kind of there. I don’t like mentioning other sites in a review of a different site but I feel the same way about FTV adding hardcore. And didn’t ALS Scan try it too? The hardcore on sites that are rooted in softcore, to me, is a bad marketing idea. I will just say take any hardcore major network you know of. Would their fans be happy about a solo scene?
The bad part is it does seem like the number of hardcore scenes are increasing. Or I should say the percentage of new updates featuring hardcore scenes is increasing.
The confusing part with memberships and add-ons. There’s a good chance I was able to join two of their other sites on Black Friday prices. I joined Viv Thomas and Met Art for $5 each. I was thinking maybe I would add ALS Scan since I haven’t been on it in a long time. I clicked to add it and received this choice: $39.99 per month or $100 for a year. I haven’t paid $40 for a site since those very rare Japanese sites. And have never seen ALS Scan priced at $40 per month. I just thought it was strange that I was able to add those others at $5 per month. Not that I think ALS Scan or any of these sites should be $5. These sites stand on their own strongly at even $20 per month.
My favorite part of Sex Art are the pictures. The newer photosets are downloadable in multiple resolutions but the high one has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution and they have a nice blend of portrait and landscape orientated photos. The settings are usually pretty and even will use the word, neutral, so you don’t get the clash between the models and colors in the background. I don’t even know if it’s a compliment to tell a Met Art site its pictures are my favorite part. The videos are as impressive in technical quality at 4K, 1080, 720, 360 and 260. The videos have some story to them but are not as long as I expect from story-driven porn. Most of the newer hardcore videos are under 30 minutes. I’m going to just focus on one and it’s a newer one. It is titled, “Just Relax” and the screencap has a very nice view of Lilly Bella standing, pulling her panties and it’s from behind her. That looked like it was going to be a solo scene. I then clicked the video. I stream everything before downloading. The scene starts with male Maxmillian Dior. I hate showing my impulsive side this much but I just closed it. If you wonder why I would think it was solo, it’s the only one of the last 20 scenes that just shows a female in the preview screencap.
That is going to be the problem I have. From what I can tell, Sex Art is now almost exclusively hardcore male/female or lesbian. I am guessing the new solo content is on Met Art X, which is fine, but it shows how much this site has changed (for good and bad, in my opinion). I do know the bigger picture is to just join the entire Met Art Network and then you’ll get everything.
I’m not going to knock the score down on it just for that personal preference. The content here is very good if you like hardcore that’s not offensive (which I do) and aren’t expecting the solo scenes that used to be more common on here. I was starting to think I just thought there was less hardcore on this site but using the tags, it shows 291 “boy-girl” scenes and all 291 of those with that tag started in 2019. The site has been around since 2013 or 2012. There’s a chance the tags aren’t 100% accurate but you can see that the last two and a half years have produced nearly 300 boy-girl scenes.
It’s still a top quality site, preferences aside, I just can’t score it as high as I used to. This used to be a 96-99 site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily
Cons:
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads.
Bottom Line:
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high production value content. The closer to hardcore sister site of Met-Art.
- All videos (566 as of 1/18/2016)have up to 1080p option. Downloadable in four different qualities. See Bottom Line.
- All photo sets (824 as of 1/18/2016)are downloadable in three different resolutions and are zipped.
- Daily update(s). One day is a photo set. The next is a video and the video update comes with accompanying photo set.
- Download speeds are consistently very good (90%+ of max download speed).
- Good blend of genres: Solo, lesbian, straight and threesomes.
- Models are generally very pretty and natural.
- Easy to add other sites owned by Met-Art and the discounts are good.
Cons:
- Maybe half the scenes feel formulaic. This could be a personal thing, but I've always had trouble grasping the concept of the heartcore genre.
- Could use a better search engine. Though I'm admittedly nitpicking.
- For some reason, the site likes to forget my login information and make me re-enter it, but it only happens every few days.
Bottom Line:
Back when Sex-Art first opened (2012), I reviewed it and said something about the almost limitless potential it has. They are now reaching very high. This is the concept of the site. It's an artsy site that loses a little control and becomes heartcore.
Everything about the content reminds me of Met-Art except that losing control part. The one expected problem is there and I've thought this problem appears on all heartcore sites ... if you're bringing love and mushiness into porn, it needs to be believable. Not to knock porn stars, but they aren't the best actors. Luckily, a lot of the couples, even threesomes, do have good chemistry and pull off some believable scenes.
One of my biggest complaints about Sex-Art a few years ago was their "series" movies. It just seemed like they were trying way too hard to create scenes that when put together created a series or full movie. Those are now tucked away on the site in a section to themselves and haven't been updated since 2012. They're still creating the series style of videos, but they're no longer trying to create a cohesive movie out of them. They just follow the same premise as the other scenes in the series.
Artsy scenes still make their way into the updates, but they're not near as silly or staged.
I'll admit, I have problems with the heartcore genre, but I think Sex-Art does it better than any of the others I've tried. I especially like the threesome scenes where one woman is playing the role of the friend who is watching then gets involved.
There are solo scenes that I also like. The recent Vox series of solo scenes reminds me a lot of sites like I Feel Myself where the camera focuses on the face of the model, but Sex-Art then also shows the rest of the model as well.
So, in terms of their actual content, I think they've improved a great deal over the last few years.
On the technical side of things, there really can't be much better than what Sex-Art offers.
Photo sets are available in zips at:
Low - 1024 high end, Medium - 2048 high end and High - 5600+ high end.
Videos are available in:
280p, 360p, 720p and 1080p. It's worth noting, there are scenes that have the 4K option as well, but there's no way for me to filter those down to get an exact number.
The search engine is my only real con and it's minor. You can just open all new updates in order or search by model name or go to a model list. This is where it gets a little frustrating. In the advanced search, you can search for number of performers, but there's no way to narrow those results down any further.
For example: Number of performers 2+, will open up all scenes with 2+ performers, but you can't then say, "Only lesbian" or "threesomes". Trust me, it's nitpicking and I know that, but it could hinder your search a little.
One of the things I like about Sex-Art is that nearly every scene starts with the performers dressed. This was long a complaint of mine about Met-Art and sets that start nude.
It's very hard to find anything other than nitpicking faults with Sex-Art. I've been a member for 6 straight months now and after a few months break, I'll probably go back for the year membership.
Also worth mentioning they do go into more genres despite being a heartcore site. There's light bondage in the girl/girl/group scenes and there isn't as much mushiness as most heartcore sites have. If you insist on another personal complaint, there's hardly a curvy woman to be found. This is very similar to Met-Art and should be the only thing stopping potential members from trying it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons:
- Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line:
I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.
It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.
They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.
Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.
Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.
So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.
The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).
The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.
It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.
I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.
I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.
I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.
I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore sex with what I think are mostly amateur Hispanic models.
- Easy to use site which surprised me since my credit card kept getting declined during the sign-up.
- Clean and uncluttered site design with no ads.
- Some very hardcore scenes for those who like the hardcore genre, including DPs, anal and 3 or more guys with one woman.
- I could get bashed for saying this but these models look more like the Hispanic women I knew from my time in Los Angeles, curvy, thicker hips, thighs and always wet.
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max.
- Large site with high technical standards (see bottom line).
- Daily updates.
Cons:
- Here I go risking getting bashed again. These models are not Apolonia. There are some really pretty ones but most of the models look like the kind of women you see in the Pico Union District of LA (did I really just get a shout out to my old home in a porn review?). They make up for any shortcomings in their looks with their performances.
- I thought the site Latina Exposed was included, but it's not. You still get daily updates and it's a large site with the PU price it's a good deal.
Bottom Line:
Lowered score from 94 to 78 on 4/29/2021. Downloads for the videos worked the first 3 weeks of my membership. After canceling and a reply from a fellow PU member saying the downloads were no longer available, I checked and the download options were removed. I do not know if they have decided to go to streaming-only all the time or if they remove your download video ability once you cancel. Either way, it's a shitty move for a site that has a lot of potential, but looks like poor, dumbass management decisions will hold it back. I would not be as critical if they replied to my email to them and explained it or if they sent out a notice explaining why the downloads were removed (because I canceled or a permanent decision). I joined this site with the right to download movies. I am sure they have some cheap ass lawyer speak in their terms that says they are allowed to change the terms at anytime, I said it once before and will say it again. You don't screw your customers over in a business that is already considered questionable in ethics. (end edit)
I didn't put this in cons since I think most people that use porn sites can figure out what the scenes and sites are saying but there are some parts of the site in Spanish. Look at the bright side, you'll learn some Spanish while on here.
I knew what to expect from the models on this site. It was part of the reason I wanted to join it. I don't know these models ages, but most look older than 18-22 and most are curvier than you see on the big, mainstream Latina sites. There aren't any BBWs. These are just fuller built women. I like that. Don't let that push you away. There are some very pretty models on here. They also have multiple scenes of nearly all their models.
They have 10 different "series". Those are: All 4 to get an A, Coronavirus Forced Quarantine, Mommy Webcammer, My Stepmon is my erotic model, Pervert School, Quarantine Reality Show, Summer Taboo, The Mesmerizer, The Mother Fuckers Club and my favorite named one, Things That Will Never Happen In Your Fucking Life.
They have just over 180 models and just a little over 1,000 scenes. I say just a little over since their older pages have two scenes where there are usually 3. My count is coming up closer to 1,150, but it's still over 1,000. With that low of amount of models you can see they use their models in more than 1 scene. There are a few with only 1 scene, but there are some with more than 10. That's something else I like. I have always been a collector and if I see a model I like, I want more than one scene of her.
Around 500 of the scenes have 4K download option. Those also have 1080p, 720p, and 480p. I think the quality is even surprising since you rarely if ever hear about this site and it's updating daily.
They also have my favorite kind of photo sets when it comes to hardcore sites. The photo sets are small but at least 10-15 of the pictures are of the model in her clothes and teasing. You can download in zips too.
This is the second site I have reviewed lately that is flying under people's radars. There is rough hardcore on here and softer, intimate hardcore too. I am hoping my description of the models don't turn anyone away. There are some models on here who look like they belong in a mainstream movie they're so pretty. There are some that look like they would take you behind the old Tommy Burgers in LA and give you a blowjob. It's funny when those from LA read this they will be able to picture these models in their heads.
The clothing is even realistic. What looks like a 5'2" 135 pound Chicana with 45 of her pounds in her ass wearing a short skirt and skin-tight button up shirt.
I wasn't for sure how much I would like the site since I do have a certain level of intolerance towards the very hardcore but if you ever wanted to watch a very hardcore DP scene where the woman is wearing both men out, this site offers you that chance.
I would go as far as saying this is the best Hispanic/Latina/Chicana hardcore site I have been on and PU has it for $14.99. If you can just get by your cards thinking it's fraud.
You get daily updates, newer updates with 4K if you're into those, downloadable picture sets that include the model dressed and teasing and the videos are all downloadable without any extra charges. This is an easy site for me to score high since one of my criteria for scoring I use is how many of the scenes I will end up keeping. I have downloaded 53 so far and plan on keeping all those. I still have a few weeks left to find more.
If it wasn't clear the navigation is easy to use and makes sense. I don't really pay attention to the "series" part but they do seem to stick to the theme they list the scene as. There are the very pretty models with 10+ scenes. It's an all-around good deal for those who like/love Latina/Exotic/Hispanic/Chicana models. The women never seem to be in distress even when there's 3 guys pounding on them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A value-priced network that now comes with access to Fitness Rooms.
- Comes with network access to 5 sites. They are: Dane Jones, Girlfriends, Lesbea, Massage Rooms, MomXXX.
- Lots of content, the numbers will be in the BL, very good quality video and downloadable photo sets too.
- I want to say it's exclusive content but there might be cross-use on their other sites.
- Navigation is pretty good for a network, things can get confusing and I'll explain in BL.
- Nearly 500 models but that number could be a little high, maybe 25 or so are males.
- Nice surprises in this network, including older Euro models like Eufrat and Zuzanna Z.
- I get the feeling this network is a group of sites that used to be standalone sites, see cons too.
- New scene everyday.
Cons:
- I'm starting with this one because it's the first time this has ever happened to me. The download speeds are all over the place. I noted it on Fitness Rooms too. One day, I'm downloading at near max of 15Mbps, the next I'm barely getting 2Mbps. I have noticed if I download more than one video or photo set at the same time it seems to speed my connection up.
- This is maybe an unfair con, their content that has the older Euro models in it is older content. Not a problem usually, but the network just launched in 2015. The Eufrat and Zuzanna content is at least 5 years old. I'll go more into it in BL.
- Lots of ads. They have the one where an ad appears when you click the back button. Must be looking for the itchy mouse finger us porn users are known for having.
Bottom Line:
This network surprised me. It probably shouldn't since it seems to be owned by Brazzers or whatever their parent company is called. The different genres on here are very good and you'll get enough mix to get to cover most tastes.
The continuation from the pros and cons:
I'm not at all accusing them of recycling. I once even said I thought these big sites should buy up the dying content and slap it on their networks. They aren't trying to fool anyone by releasing an old Eufrat scene as a new update so I can't take away from their score or accuse recycling. Plus, that's good content that many of us have probably long deleted years ago, well, in this case, I had.
The download speed problem is very real. I very rarely have any problems with DL speed consistency but this network really is all over the place in speed. Possibly the content is stored on different servers? Either way, it's very annoying. The ads are almost as bad. I've seen sites that won't let me use the back button but never one that gives me an ad for using the back button.
The network is made up of these 5 sites with brief descriptions and number of scenes: Dane Jones 560 scenes - It's very straightforward boy/girl sex, it's safe to say it's heartcore. It even says "Couple friendly porn". I didn't have much interest in this site. I've struggled with heartcore porn ever since the first heartcore site I joined. For others who like it, the content looks good, high quality, so there's an an obvious audience for it.
Girlfriends 204 scenes - Good, lesbian, young lesbian porn. You're getting the more romantic lesbian porn here, similar to legends like Viv Thomas and DDF. I like it and would even compare it to the newer content on Sapphic Erotica.
Lesbea 494 scenes - Very good lesbian site, this is the one that seems to have some older Euro content but that content was once in very high demand. It's not much different than Girlfriends except they don't stick to teen/younger models on it.
Massage Rooms 422 scenes - It seems like there's a lot of these massage sites and this is like all the other ones. It has both boy/girl and girl/girl scenes. If you like massage porn it's pretty good content.
Mom XXX 424 scenes - This is sort of a mixture of the stepmom walking in and joining and traditional MILF seducing a younger guy. It's good, I would say it's the best site of the network.
As you can see, there's a lot of content, nearing 3,000 scenes but I will say it has the same problem I had with Fitness Rooms. The content is very vanilla, cookie-cutter. Even so, they have a nice selection of pretty models. It used to be common to excuse the actual content for having top models. They have a model on here who I wasn't familiar with named Vanessa Decker, she has 35 scenes on this network alone and for me that content alone would be worth joining for.
The navigation works good unless you're curious. These are the navigation buttons at the top:
Explore - Dropdown that has latest scene, random scene, sites and niches in it.
Models - Explains itself and works good. Live Cams - Explains itself and I avoid.
Promos - These are mostly the sites owned by Brazzers, maybe all even are and the deals are 40% off on most but they claim $29.99 - $39.99 regular price.
Bonus - Has a lock on it. There are bonus channels in this section including whichever one you picked when joining as your preferred bonus channel. I haven't used it because I don't trust it. That lock is there for some reason.
Fuck Now - That's usually how live cams are listed, it bounces me back to the homepage.
The in-content navigation has problems too. You have to left click "download" to get a download box with resolution options, then you have to right-click the one you want and save as. If you left click the resolution you want it streams it. The pictures are very high quality and if you left click the download (resolution) you want, it just starts downloading. So, you're back to right clicking and save as to download the file where you want. I set my browser settings to download to the Sexy Hub folder thinking the left-click would send the pictures there but it didn't, it sent them to my downloads.
Still, for the price and access to Fitness Rooms too, which is a good site if you're into fitness women and fitness clothes on women, it's good enough for a one month join. I don't think it has enough going for it to join much more than a month but if you have a favorite model on here they do have a lot of content of many of the models.
I didn't put it in the cons but should mention, the biller, as expected is ProBiller. I wouldn't have my problems with them that I have if they fixed their "online cancel form". I've been submitting that for over a year only to see "There's a problem with your request please contact customer service." I will say they respond fast to emails about canceling so it's just the hassle of having to send an email to cancel. Good site otherwise.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of models that I haven't seen before, plus some familiar faces, for a nice blend of old with the new
- Photo quality is nice at over 1500 on high end, but I do get some blurriness
- Videos in full scenes, about the only pro with those
- Amount of picture sets is impressive, around 2,500 sets and those come in zip files
- No scrolling image viewing is interesting, if not strange (see cons and BL)
Cons:
- Videos aren't hardly worth downloading, poor quality and mostly boring videos that are almost all following a formula/sequence
- That no scrolling image viewing is strange, I can't figure out how to keep it working, so I end up not using it.
- Price is too high, $19.95 would be about right
- As with any site that advertises amateur content, you are going to get some models that aren't very good looking
- No sex beyond masturbation
Bottom Line:
I had heard almost all good things about this site. While I do agree that the photos look nice and for the most part are crisp and clear. There are some that are blurry right where I want them to be crisp and clear at.
The navigation is very easy to use, though not knowing these models, left me with spending an afternoon and clicking on each to see what each one looked like. Lots of blondes, and I'm not really into blondes, but that is minor. The downloads are easy, whether movie or zip picture files. Download speeds are going about average for me when compared to other sites.
I just don't see this site as one that I'm going to rush back to. The no scroll picture viewing is gimmicky at best. I went as far as hooking up my old monitor which is a 800x600 just to see how it works. My current monitor is 1600 on the high end, so I wouldn't need the no scroll viewing. The picture tries to fit itself to your screen size. Haven't I been able to do this while using Firefox for years?
If I'm not using that right, I would like it to be explained. The models range from very sexy to just plain average girls. I'm at the point that I want to see very sexy, so a lot of these models were just skipped over. The easiest way to sum it up is that it is a nice site and probably was a great one at one time, but it is just a little above average now. I might come back in a year and try it again. Recommended for 1 month at most, and there are still several similar sites I prefer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Dark, artsy, hardcore, major close ups.
- Well-known performers seen in ways you're not used to.
- 160 scenes, each has a video and photos.
- Unlimited downloads on videos and photos.
- Easy to use navigation.
- Some of the most realistic and believable porn I've seen.
Cons:
- If you thought dark meant there's an edgy side to it, there is and there's a visibly dark (lighting) side to it too. At times is too dark visually.
- Seems like they could get more than 2 updates a month in this genre.
- Bonus scenes are stream-only and are mixed in with the regular scenes.
Bottom Line:
This site is receiving points just for being different. If you've ever been a member of I Feel Myself it's what this site reminds me of except it has male/female and lesbian scenes instead of solo.
The models, male and female, seem to have to be professionals as this isn't wildly filmed porn or anything too jerky. The camera often stays in the same area for minutes at a time, showing penetration, showing kissing, showing a woman going down on other woman. And they get close enough to see beads of sweat/fluids. The scenes feel slowed down, going for an erotic feel and they do a pretty good job of it.
I'm no fan of heartcore which is what this will remind some of but I don't see it as heartcore. I think this is serious hardcore, even the lesbian scenes. There's little to no story even though the scenes last around 30 minutes each and I think that goes with my thinking the action is slow, deliberate and erotic.
There are 160 scenes (including stream-only bonus scenes). The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes since November 2017 also have a 4K option.
The word that comes to my mind when watching these is artsy. The camera will pan away from the action to show the male or female's face as they are having an orgasm, then it will shift back to showing the orgasm happening. There's a lot of editing going on. That could be a con for some since the scenes have that television show feeling of a flashback, you saw their face and know they had an orgasm, the screen goes black for a second and shows the orgasm.
For me, it's worth a few points added since I haven't seen any studios shooting porn this way. This is a studio that produces DVD so the scenes are named and numbered to go with their associated DVD like Steamy Stories 1, Steamy Stories 2, Steamy Stories 3 and so on but there's not much story.
One thing the scenes aren't lacking, at least for me, is realness. For one, some of the oral, fingering, sex parts are so close-up it seems bigger than life-like. This could be a different form of POV even. This is like POV if you were the finger. I don't know if the site has much return value since they only update twice a month but if you've never been a member it's a good site to check out and download what they have.
There are plenty of stars here which kind of surprised me. Brandi Love is here, Blue Angel, and from the looks of it this site has been around awhile. The earliest scenes are from 2015. The scenes between 2015-2017 have 540p, 720p and 1080p. Even as a picture collector, this is one time that I don't think the pictures add anything. Between the lighting and the close-ups the pictures just don't help much.
Good for a one time join if you're looking for something a little different.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Relatively unknown network
- Is made up of 4 sites.
– Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Nearly all scenes have a video and accompanying picture set
- Videos are long and high definition
- Pictures are zipped
- All content is exclusive
Cons:
- Doesn’t update enough
- Not a lot of 1080p or 4K downloads
Bottom Line:
I found this network after discovering Mrs. Siren’s soo site (included with the network). If you’re into realistic women in your porn, you should check out Mrs. Siren. She does interracial and even some extreme scenes all while her “husband” watches and records.
You also receive access to My First Time Sluts and Real Naughty Nymphos. These sites are what you likely expect from the names of them. Siren XXX Studios is the main site of this group’s sites. It has its own unique content on it too. The four sites combined have around 1,000 scenes.
This network feels exactly how I expected to feel. I don’t know if porn has a b-side, but that is what this network feels like. Mrs. Siren is sexy enough and kinky enough to make her site easily recomended for solo and interracial fans. The other three sites are less unique, but are not bad. They’re just not standout sites. The basic, hardcore, amateurish models porn.
The navigation is solid all-around and the network works well. You can navigate all around the network without much problem. The download options are all standard. I would like to see more higher quality downloads, especially 1080p and 4K but that’s not a major problem. I still only usually download 720p. The pictures are surprisingly good and come zipped. This network really does feel like a studio site. The problems come in when you watch the scenes and you can’t tell one scene from another. The upside is you’re sure to find a model or models you’ve never seen before. And that is how it feels like a studio site as well. The scenes are formulaic, set to establish a certain time allotment for each scene and how much focus is on each bodypart.
I will recommend it but only if you get a discount and don’t have anything else you want to join. That’s how this network will be viewed by me from now on. It’s not going to bump any of my established favorites, but it does enough to maybe join it once per year.
Bonus points for those who like the familiarity of a solo model’s inclusion in a network. Mrs. Siren is my biggest reason for being interested in returning and I have a feeling that’s what Siren XXX Studios expected.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the best handjob site on the internet
- It comes with a pretty big network, over 60 other sites, will explain in bottom line.
- Around 165 full length handjob clips, some as long as 20 minutes. Downloadable in full scenes.
- Trial is $7.99 and is full access for 3 days, download manageers are allowed and you get very fast download speeds. I peaked at 900 kb/s with a 10M connection.
- A few of the other network sites are worth looking into as well
Cons:
- The very best video clips they have are average quality at best 400x320.
- Not really a con, but most of the network sites are useless, as most of the content is fetish based.
- Not exclusive content, but I can say that skilfullhands has many clips I have never seen before.
Bottom Line:
Ok, I'm not a big handjob fan myself, not even a big blowjob fan, at least not in movies. But my wife, like many women, enjoy seeing a woman playing with a man. This site has several videos that my wife really likes. I've downloaded the handjobs 19 and all of those from Videobox, but these do seem more thought out. You get teasing, one is an older very attractive woman catching her neighbor playing with himself, so she shows him how it is supposed to be done.
I've been on Tugjobs with the Ox Pass, but they are too strict, "No sucking" can be heard in some of them. This site allows sucking and the guys to touch the girls as well. Most of the women are average looking or above. Plus, one of the network sites is "Jerk It Baby" which has 50 more handjob clips. So, instead of searching them on Videobox, you can get over 200 right here between these two.
Even if I get nothing else from the network, I still get my money's worth using the trial at $8 which is 1/3 the price of one handjob DVD that only has 12 clips on it.
If you can't get the trial to come up when joining, click on the "secondary billing" section, it brings up Segpay, which is where the trial is. I cancelled it minutes after signing up and received a cancellation notice 20 minutes later. If you like handjobs, this is a great trial join. I've downloaded 80 or so clips already in the download manager. Recommended for handjob fans. Network review will be separate and not as high as this site scored.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Small but high quality network covering a few different niches.
- Cones with five different sites/niches.
- Fast downloads at 90% my max download speed
- Videos can be downloaded in 720p, 1080p and 4K
- Multiple updates per week across the network
- Pretty models in every scene.
Cons:
- Owned and operated by the same guys at Full Porn Network. I will explain the con in the bottom line.
- The overall size of the network is not very good but they do offer a decent update schedule.
Bottom Line:
The guys at Full Porn Network are set on creating as many small networks as possible. While this is an overall positive review, it also shows some frustration. I can explain that and the first con like this: There are 5 sites included. Those are Teenage Tryouts, Wife’s POV, Sluts POV, Slutty BBWs and Slut Inspection. All those combined have between 100-200 scenes total. If you like one of the sites better than the others it may only have 20-25 scenes on it. It’s the perfect example of spread too thin. They have taken a collection of exclusive porn scenes, stuck a recurring theme from scene to scene and called each niche a “site”. It wouldn’t be so bad if these guys didn’t have other networks but they do and most of those have small sites on them.
What you have here is a decent size overall collection of 5 different niches. They do have high quality in everything and I’m sure that makes some people happy with the network. The videos are 4k, 720p and 1080p downloads. It officially becomes a current network with no pictures included. Someone making poor decisions should be the name of the network.
Enough of that, the porn offered here is good for what it is. There is no rhyme or reason with the different sites in the network, no correlation from niche to niche, which could be a positive or negative depending on the person viewing it. We have BBWs, which I won’t even look at and there are Cuckold scenes which I know some people do not like. There are amateur teens and that’s what these guys do best. It just seems like the network wants to spiral out of control with these different niches not complementing each other.
There are no set stories beyond the named theme in the title of each site. You do get pretty models (except BBWs, just not my thing) and hardcore action. The quality helps it all out too. The videos are very crisp and clear but no pictures Is a negative for some.
It’s a network that feels a lot like the other Full Porn Network networks. You can live with out it. If they ever combined all their sites into one big network they would be onto something, probably a mid-90s score even but as it is, they seem to be more focused on barely reaching above mediocrity and letting the number of networks they have make them money on membership fees for every 4-5 sites they have. I won’t lower their score that much since I’m not here to judge their business decisions but also can’t promote their networks as anything more than something worth joining if you get a discount and for one month only.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Reality Kings takes another shot at making a unique site.
- Excels as much at humor as it does porn and that's not an insult. The humor of some of the scenes is great.
- The site has 161 scenes and updates 3 times a week.
- Major stars everywhere, Abella Danger, Vina Sky, Serena Santos, Abella has multiple scenes on here and if you're familiar with her "acting" ability you can imagine how funny some of those are.
- The sneaky part can be something as simple as standing behind a counter with the girl on her knees giving a blowjob to behind a cubicle with someone sitting beside it.
- It's a fun site. J-Mac, whether you like him or not, is hilarious in some of the scenes.
- Sometimes I think maybe porn needs these sillier sites instead of the low sound, serious scenes that make you feel like you're watching a low budget silent film.
Cons:
- I bought a 6 month membership with RK back in May. You don't have to worry about charging problems with the 6 month one as it's non-recurring. It didn't come with downloads. None of the sites, not even the standard RK sites. I chose to upgrade to downloads at $14.95 and they've charged me $14.95 each month, it wasn't a one time charge. I'm not going to complain that much. I like their content. I'll end up having about $140 in a 6 month membership. But it's fair warning for everyone else.
- Some of the scenarios are so bad they aren't even believable. Then, they put J-Mac in those and he's giggling. That's a touchy con that might bother some. I still find the humor in it and like that part of it.
Bottom Line:
Have you ever been talking to your best friend from across the counter and thought about your daughter being on her knees in front of him giving him a blowjob? Reality Kings thought of it and this is their site dedicated to content like that. I like it. I've always said I thought RK put a lot of effort in making their scenes unique.
I mentioned Vina Sky on a review several months ago of Little Asians and she's becoming the next big star as I thought she would be. She has one of the best scenes on this site.
Here's some more scenarios:
You walk in your office and your married receptionist dropped something under your desk. She's down on all fours looking for it giving you a full upskirt view of her ass.
Let's go with one of J-Mac's best performances on the site. You're working in an office cubicle with Lana Mars. You catch her masturbating and lean her against the cubicle while an elderly employee looks around trying to figure out where the noises are coming from.
I at least give them credit for trying something new, no matter how unbelievable it is. There's the added turn-on of seeing the couple doing the sneaky sex being caught. Sometimes the person catching them gets involved, other times they act like they are sickened by what they saw.
Once I unlocked the downloads there are the basic download options of 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are no 4K videos, but all 161 scenes have those four options up to 1080p. There are also photo sets and download with each scene.
It's one of the better newer sites I've seen and I think a lot of that is the quality of the models. The setup to each scene lasts 4-6 minutes so they at least are showing some of that unlike other sites that show a minute or less of a setup.
My overall feeling is I was a little disappointed in the no downloads option and the $15 per month fee for a 6 month membership I had paid for once. When I joined RK for 6 months, it was $49.95. The 6 months of $15 charges was $90 more.
Once this 6 months runs out, I will come back when they start including downloads even if it's a higher join price. Which is why I'm not that disappointed. It averaged out to about $25 a month and I think I have everything I would want from here for a few years even.
I would recommend this site for those into unbelievable exhibitionism, betrayal sex and humor porn. That's a genre we don't see much.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A pretty good network site that has a little of everything, solo, hardcore and so on.
- The old famous, "Amateur" claim, though maybe these were filmed before the girls were stars? Sandra Shine is the first video listed on here, by her old stage name, Judit.
- Quality varies depending on age of clip, everything except the first 5 videos are available in full scene download, there are also pictures on the majority of the sets.
- Naughty's clean site design
- DL speeds are above average
Cons:
- Basic site design could be a turnoff for some.
- Some of the older sets do not have full scene downloads
- Most of the content, as with most sites like this one becomes repititive
- Living in So Cal all of my life, but have never seen any of these women!
Bottom Line:
I wasn't as happy with this site as I expected to be. This has been a site I have always heard of and meant to join many times. The network helps the site out and makes it a good value to join, but this site couldn't make it on its own.
The navigation is very basic. Page that lists all the models and a thumbnail. There are several options, especially on the newer sets like MPEG or WMV, different bitrates. Also each set has interview and masturbation clips available.
The girls are you typical, very pretty and young types. Sandra Shine is on here as Judy, but when you download it, it says, "Judit". Most of the models are known porn stars, Kelli Kline, Karina Kay, and one of my personal favorites, Jersey Jaxon. Heck, they even have Mia Bangg on here, seems like she has been in porn forever, so I really think they went way overboard with the amateur pitch.
The quality on the last 20 movies is 720x540 2000kbps, before that, the previous 50 or so are available in full scene downloads as well, but are lower quality MPEGs. Only 5 of the videos are not available in full scene downloads. I'm not for sure if they went back and made full scenes out of some of the old ones, but I had noticed the TBP review says there is no full scene download, but from my count around 95% are available in full scene downloads.
The site is a nice addition to the network, but I found it to be maybe the 4th or 5th best of the network, definitely not the best. Still recommended with network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Stepfamily porn with a twist or maybe not.
- The Spy twist is kind of hokey but it does lend to the imagination of these scenes being possible.
- Segpay is the biller.
- Still updating but only one update per month.
- Total of 161 scenes as of 6/8/2020.
- All scenes have up to 4K download option.
- Good download speeds (around 80% of my max).
Cons:
- I think the stepfamily niche is starting to become stale and overdone.
- I will explain this one further in the bottom line but trying to stick to the "spy" part causes the camera to sometimes not be in the best position.
- Site works fine but there are broken thumbnails.
Bottom Line:
The majority of these scenes start with either the stepbrother or stepsister catching their stepbrother or stepsister masturbating. Some of the scenes have it like one of stepsiblings has set up a security camera to spy on the other stepsibling.
The con I mentioned would be for example, stepbrother sets a security camera up on one side of the room. Stepsister comes in from partying, lays down on the couch and starts masturbating. The stepbrother, of course, walks in while she's masturbating and they start having sex. The camera is still on the other side of the room. If they stuck with that it would add something of a voyeur twist but they don't stick with it. Somehow, the camera gets up and moves close-up about halfway through the scene! Must be their ghost stepsibling.
This niche is stale unless you do something really creative with it and I think they're trying with the spy part. If you've ever watched CFNM scenes where the sister and her friends catch the brother masturbating, that's similar to what you see here.
The action is good overall but is plagued with the same problem a lot of newer porn has. It's like they forgot what the niche was once the scene gets going. It turns into a standard hardcore sex scene.
They do a good job of adding the build up at the beginning, building at least a little story and the scene lengths show that with many lasting over 40 minutes.
Something I really liked about the site is some of these newer models are pretty good actresses. You don't get the shock face when stepbrother shows that he has a dick.
That's not a lot of variety in the scenes. There is one orgy. Most of it perverted stepbrother spying on stepsister.
The site has no faults when it comes to technical quality. Every scene has 480p to 4K download options on the videos. There are decent photo sets to download and every model is attractive. I don't keep up with the newer porn models but I'm positive these are almost all top-level pro models. Which is where the acting comes in. Some of these ladies are very convincing in being surprised, appalled and make the scenes at least humorous to watch.
I wouldn't put it on the same level as Family Strokes but think it's really close to being the second best "stepfamily" site behind Family Strokes. It's a good site on its own and even better if you join the platinum package that gives you access to more than 10 other high quality, niche sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Artistic site that might just grow on you.
- Check out the model list, I don't know these models but there are some really pretty models on this site.
- Updates every week, it's a little confusing and will need explained further in the bottom line.
- Dark trance like music in the videos, I usually don't like music in a video but there's no masturbation. Kind of like having your own private stripper.
Cons:
- The model list got me to join it, that's where it all went downhill.
- Standard membership was $7.95, VIP was $9.95, I joined VIP, once inside, there's another upgrade needed to download called Ultimate. I didn't upgrade to it.
- Navigation is about as useful as a map to another country than the one you're lost in.
- It did let me, the VIP member, download "low" quality photosets in a file my computer doesn't recognize. I'm sure it can be renamed to a zip, but this is why I didn't upgrade to ultimate. I could tell this site is poorly designed and poorly maintained.
- The "music" videos aren't music videos, they are a picture of a model with music playing in the background.
Bottom Line:
I saw this site's model list and joined. I saw the navigation, the gimmicky pricing, the photo downloads that don't work and realized I had paid $10 to look at some pretty women for a month.
You all will have to bear with me. This site is one of the most confusing I've ever been on.
Here's the choices, releases (updates), models (best part), music (models dancing to music), votes (you pick one of four models to be released next), backstage (BTS type videos), interviews, virtual reality (takes you to the VR version of this site which you have to join, but there are VR videos on the non-VR version too).
Sound confusing? The standard video for each model has the model stripping down to fully nude (most scenes), there's not masturbation but these show more than an R rated movie does. Some of the videos are very good, they are too short though (5 minutes on average). It's kind of like being a member on Zishy, the models look like they're trying to cover everything, but a little slip happens here and there.
Can't download those without upgrading to Ultimate. I wish someone would slap these sites on the forehead and say, "You offered basic and VIP during sign-up. Why didn't you offer ultimate and why would you offer two options with neither having downloads?" From what I read on the TBP review it's a cheap upgrade but I'm tired of fooling with the nonsense on this site. The music videos are included in the standard membership. When I see music videos on a porn site I think it's going to be a model dancing around to music. It's not, it's a still picture and is the background music from whatever scene matches up with it.
I thought I could at least salvage this membership with photosets of these very pretty models. It says I can download low quality or upgrade to ultimate to download high quality OR pay $2.99 to download ONE photoset.
The gimmicky feel is furthered by them having a VR site. On this non-VR version of the site they have VR videos too. I don't watch VR so those are a waste too.
On the videos, if you don't want to upgrade to ultimate you can pay $4.99 per video to download each video. Of a woman rolling around naked for 5 minutes.
They treat their interviews and backstage videos like those are the real treats here. The interviews are nearly 20 minutes long and I suffered through one to see if maybe there was something special about the interviews. It's a Russian model that talks about loving cocktails, going out with friends, having friends close to her and having colorful dreams everyday about having lots of money. I should be getting paid to watch those.
Where I think the real tragedy is here is how attractive the models are and they have up to 4K on the videos. It looks like a very expensive studio with top-tier models and top-tier equipment just threw together a bunch of scenes of women rolling around naked while a dark trance type music plays in the background. I'm not even saying they should have masturbation. It walks a line between classy and snotty. Most of its time is spent on the snotty side.
I'm being very nice with my score just because of how pretty the models are. I find the site nearly unusable. I think if they offered the site at one price, added downloads and focused on that it would be 10 or more points higher.
They have a little over 100 models. The positives I can find in the videos is they use slow motion as the models butts move in front of the camera, it's good and gives good views but after a few of them it becomes dull and boring.
One last warning that I knew wouldn't fit in the cons. Be very careful on the join page. It is set to 6 month membership at a very low price ($6.99 a month for VIP). I just happened to see my total price as $41.99 and backed out, there's a tab to switch it to 1 month.
The update schedule shows a new scene/model per week, then it says a new interview is released every two weeks, photo sets are released whenever they feel like it and backstage videos don't seem to have a schedule.
Hopefully, they will stop trying to use 3 different forms of membership or else I think they're making a complete waste of those very pretty models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The numbers say it’s a massive network. It’s owned by the same people as Puba.
- They list 37 different sites.
- Their stats say 1,797 videos with 1,904 photosets. Ask Mark Twain about stats
- Download speeds are very good (close to 90% of my max).
- Most of the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p. (see bottom line, it’s hard to specify how many)
- You will find some top porn models on here.
Cons:
- I don’t know if they advertise exclusive. I’m not going to say it’s not. I’m just going to say if this is exclusive it’s just a newer created version of a porn scene. Like cutting the blowjob out. I have seen some of this before.
- No dates, no way to know if it’s updating, no reason to stay another month to see if the numbers change. The bottom line should explain it better than I’m doing in these pros and cons.
- You have to send an email to cancel. Not a big deal but why not just make it automated?
Bottom Line:
I was wanting to look into Puba. I reviewed it a few years ago. I know it’s always budget-friendly and they have a lot of models that I like. I was signing up for it. I’m one of the worst people for letting my mouse slide up the screen. The pointer was over the close tab. A pop-up showed up saying I could add Staxxx. It would be under $10 for both. That’s a good deal … maybe.
Staxxx advertises 37 different sites. Those mostly have 25-30 videos on each and 25-30 photo ets on each. I think the math catches up with them. They have a combined roughly 3,700 photosets and videos on 37 sites. That’s 100 combined photosets and videos per site. To balance that some. They do have a site called Bang a Teen, that for some reason causes me to spell Teen with a g, Bang a Teeng, that has 534 photosets and 460 videos. That’s nearly 1,000 of those 3,700. That leaves the other 36 sites with 2,700 combined photosets and videos.
I’m not trying to be overtly critical of the network. I’m trying to tell people what they’re going to get with the site. The Bang a Teen site, to me, looks like the old, licensed Euro porn that used to fill up sites. It's not bad. There’s a chance you’ve seen it. I even found a scene with a very young Eve Angel in an all-girl orgy. Just based on my knowledge of Eve. That was probably 2006-2007. The Euro porn was once great. I think it just depends on your feeling of I’ve already seen that scene.
The videos have limited download options at standard definition and the two high definition choices. There are some cute models. I keep wanting to say a saying I don’t like saying. You get what you paid for. They have one “site” called Compton Booty. I grew up near Compton, about 2 miles away. The site has 38 scenes. The female models are quite attractive black women. I don’t know this for sure. It just looks like some ripped the scenes off 5-6 similarly titled DVDs and called it a site. How can we fault them for that? They’re only charging $5 per site. You couldn’t buy a handful of bargain bin porn DVDs for that. Sites like this leave me frustrated. I know it’s not a great site. This is not really a network. The “sites” are more or less categories. I do believe porn like this has a place. The bargain bin. I don’t see a reason to be that critical of it either. This is one of those sites where the bang for your buck figures in.
They do have a coming soon section that shows 156 videos and 148 photosets coming soon. The bad part is, those say 2/9/22, which is now. If they are adding that much maybe per month. There are a lot worse deals in porn. They do have a relatively broad range of genres. There is no model list even though the models are tagged by their names. It is just not a site that’s going to make you feel like it’s anything more than a trunkful of bargain bin DVDs. You will find some scenes you may like. I can look at the previews and see a few that look good. I also can see that there is transsexual content on here as well. I feel like I’m doing a disservice if I don’t review it. I wasn’t for what I was getting with it. I doubt I will do anything more than a stream a few of the scenes.
If it helps any, I’ve seen much worse that cost much more. They do give you photo zips and downloadable videos. The photos are nice photosets. And those do have the Staxxx watermark on them. I would recommend it to those looking for a lot of porn for cheap. The pictures are probably the best part of it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Fun stepfamily site that is one of the better ones. They have improved this site. Or the models got prettier.
- This is a big site for this niche and to be part of a network, it has 203 scenes.
- It was updating fast but hit February slow. Was averaging 4 updates per month but only 1 in February. They do already have one for March, today is March 6th.
- High quality video and photoset downloads.
- CCBill is the processor.
- Fast downloads at 90% of my max
Cons:
- I don’t know if it’s easier to say this by telling one of the scenes is about a stepbrother’s friend stepping in for him with his stepsister. They’re already tired of each other.
- You will get tired of anything if you watch it enough. That’s the case here. I think it applies a lot to the Nubiles sites. I have even had that happen with Nubiles.net.
Bottom Line:
If you asked me if we needed more stepfamily sites I would say, “Do we need more porn sites?” At some point, this niche has to just become what you expect. This site has been able to keep my interest not with the niche. They have some really pretty models on this site. I usually do not like women with short hair but Chole Temple is very pretty. There are models on this site that don’t need the niche. I would watch her mow the lawn. It’s not just one model. This site has a consistent new pretty model on it. I wonder how much it’s a full circle feeling. That’s all that mattered to me years ago when I first watched porn. I needed to see pretty and sexy women. I didn’t care what they were doing or who they were doing.
The quality is very high. The newer videos have 4K and all the videos have 1080p and 720p. The photos are what we expect from Nubiles. The newer ones are 7000 long end, most are 6000. You can read the comments and see that people are getting burnt out on this niche. There is a scene with Ryan Reid who is very attractive, and she has a halter top and short-shorts on. They consistently bring in these models that fit these roles and dress them up close to perfect. I noticed one comment said something I agree with. There are scenes on this site where the female leaves her panties on to start the sex and just slides them over. I remember those days. It was always funny since they didn’t think about the cup, they were creating to catch any fluids. It gives the scenes an innocent feel.
They are doing the silly scenes. I just think that works in porn. I have been that way for a long time. I don’t see the reality porn side of it. That’s boring. One of them that was guaranteed to catch my attention is, "I caught my stepsister humping the Easter Bunny". It has Clary Trinity in it and she's one of my favorites of newer models. It has the stepsister humping and grinding a stuffed Easter Bunny. That used to be a fetish. I don't remember what it was called. The Japanese use that some.These scenes remind me of a young woman talking about her first sexual experiences. Those were not very serious or realistic even. Women this young are not likely to have their bedroom covered with a bed of roses leading to the bed and perfect lighting. It’s probably going to be, “He got hard, and I was horny.” That’s what these scenes show. I don’t care if it’s her brother’s stepsister from a different father. I’m thinking this as I have another stepfamily site to review. I don’t know that we want this niche to be that believable.
You have the high quality videos, large amount of content for a network site, hopefully the update schedule is going to return to 4 per month and that’s added to how pretty the models are. I think they could drop the step part and just call it Nubiles Porn. That niche is just not registering with me anymore. The site works well and even has something someone else pointed out that I don’t think I’ve ever mentioned in a review of this network. They have a download button on each scene, so you don’t even have to click it. If they could get one for the photosets that would be even better. Clicking that download button brings up a dropdown menu that has all the download resolutions. You just click the one you want. That’s a nice, easy to miss, touch. Unless you’re a photo collector. You’re going to have to click it anyway. The site doesn’t take anything away from the network. If you removed the titles you probably wouldn’t even know what the scenes are about. The part you do pay attention to is very good.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly reality porn type content, similar to Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...
- Good discounted price through TBP/PU
- Was careful about billing, if you join using Paypal, the biller is Epoch.
- Technical quality is high, 1080p option on every scene I've looked at it (as far back as I've looked 2012). Photo sets are small, but at least they have them in zips, most are close to 2000 long end.
- Download speeds are above average for me, about 75% of my max DL speed on pornsites.
- Seems to have some kind of reward program where you get to pick a "locked" site to open after 30 days of membership. That's almost a con since this site can be a bit frustrating to use.
- By my count, I have access to 27 sites and there's a couple more that are locked. The categories are fairly diverse, including a Japanese channel/site, a Lactating channel/site and a Cosplay channel/site.
- Looks exclusive to me, but I'm not going to guarantee it.
Cons:
- Navigation. That was supposed to be read like this ... "navigation, period." The site can be confusing. There doesn't seem to be a network hub site where you can search across the network, but if there is, it's doing a good job of avoiding me. There's a "network" tab. From it you pick through the different niches. Which will be con two below this one. Once you pick the one you're interested in, the search box only seems to work within that site/channel, instead of the whole network.
- The channels/sites are even confusing. Some sound like porn studios like Harmony Vision, Herzog Videos, while others are just named after their niche like Cosplay and Filthy and Fisting.
- You could spend a month just trying to find a scene you saw on your screen, 20 minutes ago.
Bottom Line:
I've considered joining Stiffia several times in the past since I do like the big reality networks, but I was always put off by the negative comments about frustrating billing hassles. Now that they have the option to join using Paypal/Epoch those billing concerns are gone.
My first thought as a member was, "What have I gotten myself into?" The site itself has a nice layout, clean, non-cluttered pages, but outside of just clicking on latest updates and scrolling through scene after scene, you're kind of stuck with figuring out their wonky search engine. I would fix these issues as simple as this:
Put a network search engine on every page.
Keep the search engine that only searches within one site/channel/niche. It's useful, it's just not real practical to a new member.
Put a network model search engine and again, keep the model search engine for each site/channel/niche.
It's not that big of a change, but it caused me to knock 15 points off my score. I spent way too much time trying to figure out what was what and what I was looking for. I don't think I've ever deducted that many points for any one con, but as you can see in my cons section, the navigation really took up 3 whole/different cons.
Once you figure out how to use the site, you've got yourself a real good network of porn. I just wonder how many people give up on it before figuring it out?
Here I go offering advice again. Merge some of these sites/channels together! I can't figure out what I'm going to find on each different channel. Give me a niche search or something. I just looked at a row of 6 videos, there's an interracial scene, two older women with younger men scenes, an anal scene, and two what looks to be amateur scenes.
Technical quality is very good. I've looked back into the older content and haven't found anything without the 1080p option. Videos are of good quality to my eyes. All kinds of hot models, including some I know of and quite a few I've never heard of. There seems to be a Greek/Spain influence in the models, but I'm not positive of that, just basing it on the female facial features and model names.
One more complaint: The videos have four download options. One option says, "Full HD (1920)", the next ones say "HD (1080)", "SD (720)", "Mobile (480)". Most of us know that 1080 is the height of a 1920x1080 movie, so why are there categories for 1920 and another one for 1080?
It's because they're labeled wrong. The "Full HD" is 1920x1080. The "HD 1080" is actually 1040x584 and the "SD 720" is 720x404. Which for lack of better word is confusing. I've always known 720 as 1280x720, which would still be bigger than the second option on here listed as "HD 1080". Maybe someone who runs it or does their programming doesn't know the difference in the resolutions?
Now that I'm done complaining there's still a really good network here. Problem is I'm as OCDC as anyone you'll ever know and these inconsistencies are going to pick at me until I don't like the network at all.
Normally, I would list all the sites and let the names of the different sites explain what you'll be seeing on those sites, but you can't with these "channels". Gonzo porn studios, reality porn studios, Japanese sex, anal, it's like joining a DVD site with no search engine or eating those jelly beans that are oddly-flavored and wondering if you just ate "booger" or "burger". Cue the Forrest Gump "life is like a box of chocolates" saying.
Still, the content isn't bad. Which is the point of joining a porn site. You have a nice mixture of younger models, older models, all the possible heterosexual niches and it's all in high quality video.
I've saved nearly 1,000 characters just to use for if I recommend it or not.
If you don't mind searching for good scenes, you will like this site. If things like crooked pictures on your bedroom wall don't bother you, you'll like this site. If your spouse leaving toothpaste stains in the sink don't bother you, you'll like this site. Better yet, if you have some extra time on your hands and like the idea of exploring the many niches (that's a big compliment), you'll like this site. As a matter of fact, if you sometimes feel like you don't get the most out of your membership to sites because you download everything you want in the first week, then don't go back, give this site a shot. I can all but promise you, you won't find everything you want in a week.
I'm trying my best not to be too negative here since I understand most people are not as easily-annoyed as I am. And I want it to be known that this site can at least to some extent, compare to the bigger, better-known networks like Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, and their porn studio sites are comparable to most porn studios.
But I'm going to say despite my 84 score, I don't see me coming back to this site until they do something with the navigation, search engine and model list.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Longtime fan of solo porn and that’s mainly what this is.
- Pretty women masturbating with very large toys.
- Around 250 scenes, no updates, but this is one of their sites I don’t remember but it was around in 2008.
- The newest scenes have 4K and all scenes, even the oldest, have 720p and 1080p.
- Download speeds are very fast over 90% of my max.
- I wasn’t familiar with their billing but it works. I was able to cancel as easy as I joined.
Cons:
- If you don’t like sex toys being involved in a woman’s masturbation, you probably won’t like this site.
- This is one that will show my experience with solo porn. Pro models are not that good at solo porn, or they would be a solo model.
Bottom Line:
I used to like finding solo scenes of hardcore models. I always felt like solo porn is a little more intimate and it lets you see more about the woman’s personality. I have never believed any model was better at solo masturbation than Eve Angel. It took her years of daily scenes to reach that point where she could control the viewer with her eyes. You’re not going to get that in any of these scenes. Most pro models coast through solo scenes. I don’t know all these models. I am assuming they are all pros. They are on DVDs that aren’t titled amateur.
You get a pretty decent sized site at around 250 scenes. The one part that stands out to me is how long some of these scenes are. Some of them are over 40 minutes. Most solo scenes are 20 minutes or less. Sometimes you could find a 30 minute one. That just tells me it’s a professional. These do qualify as hardcore masturbation. This is not slide a finger in. These women are using 8-14” dildos and they have a collection of them, an assortment, it’s like a bouquet of dildos. If you’re a wedding planner and a lightbulb just went off over your head, get in touch, I gave you the idea.
I know from experience that a lot of porn viewers don’t like dildos in masturbation scenes. There are some good scenes. They have the return of Eva Angelina (not the same as Eve Angel), she was not known for good masturbation scenes. Eva was a hardcore freak. The newer scene she has on this site is really a lesbian scene. There is a toy but there also are tongues and fingers. The best scenes on this site are the ones with more than one woman. You have to go back to the oldest scenes to find good solo scenes. I do believe the act itself is something that hasn’t carried over from 2010. Solo porn used to include a lot of teasing.
I don’t know where this site came from since the scenes are similar to the 4 Finger Club. Which is also on this network. I’m pretty sure four fingers cause a stretched out snatch. Just my thinking. The scenes that are solo are still long. They go through progressions that are kind of illogical. It’s probably why the scenes are long. I wouldn’t recommend those scenes unless it’s pre-2010. They have some good ones in the old ones. I would stick with their lesbian or two woman masturbation scenes in the newer ones. They have some good ones including Adriana Chechik, Kalina Ryu and I mentioned Eva Angelina. I am pretty sure that was from Eva’s return to porn.
It would be a tough sale for me just for this, but it does come with New Sensations, which is slowly becoming a tough sale for me too. This is another site that you will have to dig through to find the good scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer handjob, tease site I had never heard of until now.
- Much more than just a typical handjob site with pussy grinding, women masturbating themselves with one hand and see bottom line.
- Very big site for this genre with 398 models and 506 scenes.
- Updates once per week and download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Downloadable photos from the videos, they are screencaps, but they seem to go through and pick out the best moments for the photo sets.
- Easiest navigation I have seen in a long time. High quality site all-around. Has a tag system but would almost put that in cons since they need more specific tags.
- Rare blend of models for this genre. See bottom line.
Cons:
- Some of the female action parts won’t appeal to everyone. A lot of it is the woman fully nude straddling the man’s leg and humping his leg while giving the handjob.
- This one always comes up with me on all handjob sites. More tease. Will explain in bottom line.
- The company that owns the site has 3 other sites including a public handjob site. For the premium price, I would like to see them at least add the Public Handjobs site to Strokies.
Bottom Line:
Handjob sites are some of the most difficult sites to review since there’s usually not a lot going on in the scene. These guys at Strokies are trying to change that. Most of these scenes last over 30 minutes. I’m used to handjob scenes lasting 8-12 minutes. A very important part of handjob sites are the models. Models can show their worst side in handjob scenes. Especially the ones that try to talk dirty throughout the scene and end up saying the same 8 phrases repeatedly, “It’s so big”, “It’s so hard”, “Are you going to cum for me?” Some of the ones here are guilty of it too. I don’t want to go into a lecture but Howard Stern once did an episode where him and two of the other guys on his show brought in women to talk “dirty” to them. Only one “passed” and it was because she told them what she was going to do to them. She didn’t ask them questions which of course breaks the man’s concentration. Can you just see a man fingering a woman or giving her oral and stopping to ask if she’s going to orgasm? At least I’m laughing about it since that direct style of “dirty talk” and asking questions does nothing but annoy me.
What I established there is the importance of the model to a handjob scene. Not what she looks like, not how great her body is but instead how her personality is. It breaks down this simply: Does she just want you to cum to get the scene over (Are you going to cum for me?) or is she loving it and wanting to please you (I want your cum all over me). When I see that popping up on handjob sites, I’m going to expect some royalties.
This site does so many things right. They have a clear model list with nice, easy to see pictures of the model, they have a “videos” section. That’s where all the updates are. They have one extra tab, a “live” button which takes you to webcams. It’s unobtrusive. The only ads are 3 small ones at the bottom of the pages. When you click on a scene you can stream the video, read the tags and download the videos in 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The pictures are just below the video downloads, you can view them or download them in a zip. Why can’t every site be this easy to use? It’s not like it’s a tiny site with nearly 400 models and just over 500 scenes.
I wish I could tell you if these are known models but I haven’t been following recent porn that much. The women are the prettiest and best range I have seen on a handjob site. There are Persian, Asian, Latina, black, white, even one dressed up like a Leprechaun. That’s one of the reasons for the high score. They are trying to improve a stale genre. Seeing handjob scenes that last 35 minutes is very unusual.
I have looked over the majority of the content and have not only seen some models I do know (Cindy Starfall, longtime favorite), but also noticed a lot of the older scenes don’t have tags. Other than that, in watching the Cindy Starfall scene to give an idea of how a handjob scene can last 30 minutes or more, she strips, she teases, she masturbates a little for the first 10 minutes of the video which is great to me. I did notice her scene is more of a straightforward handjob scene. In contrast one of the newer scenes I really like is of Mia Kay. The first five minutes or so is the guy talking to her and the entire time she’s giving a clear view of her panties up her skirt without making it look too obvious. She’s naked and masturbating to a very wet orgasm by 12 minutes in and then the handjob starts. That is something I have talked about in past reviews of all handjob sites. Why not let the woman masturbate before the handjob so it’s a good show for the viewer and it turns her on? Her thigh-riding stops with her licking the guy’s thigh where she was grinding her pussy. By 20 minutes in, she’s leaning back, fingering herself with one hand still giving the guy a handjob. Nearing the end, she turns around and sits on the guy’s face and keeps giving him a handjob until he cums. There’s even some mouth and tongue teasing on the head.
I won’t go too high with the score since I’m not happy about having to pay again for their Public Handjobs site which I don’t think has near as many videos as this site and I would still like to see more pussy on dick tease, butt on dick tease. There’s very little else to complain about. I don’t really have a list of sites I join on a regular basis anymore, but this one if nothing else is going to keep me around for more than one month so I can get all the scenes I want. I will then visit it periodically to get the new updates. Very nice surprise from a site I hadn’t ever heard of.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A once network combined into one large site with BDSM, bondage, all that stuff the mainstream sites avoid.
- I do believe some of this is authentic and for me, that just means it’s not going to guarantee porn or sex. The fetish is more important.
- It’s a big site once the network was combined. It has 799 scenes as of 3/6/22. It is updating weekly.
- The newer videos have 4K.
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max.
- Some of the women are very pretty for this niche. See that con.
Cons:
- Some of these women are not attractive at all to me. That’s why I think it’s authentic. These are women that are known to be into the fetish or niche.
- I have trouble with porn that doesn’t have sex or masturbation in it, unless it’s photographs and teasing. If you’re not into some of the fetishes, you won’t like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
I have been a regular member of BDSM sites and bondage sites. I like most of it. I don’t like anything that makes me think the person was hurt. I don’t care what they consented to. That’s my opinion. That is what you have to accept when you are on a site like this one. There’s a really good chance you’re not going to like maybe 30-40% of the content. You may not even understand it.
This does come with Adult Prime which I have been a member of since around the launch. I just hadn’t paid a lot of attention to this site. I remember it as a network of BDSM and bondage sites. That works better to me. There are scenes here that I have no idea what they’re doing. They have a woman tied up in bondage and are shooting a slingshot at her. Where is the sexual part of that? Yeah, she’s naked but she has welts all over her.
This site is not bad at all. It just has the stray scene here and there that makes me want to stray. It intrigues me enough that I wish they explained in text or gave a story about what’s going on. The good scenes, for me, are the ones that have a sexy, dominant woman spanking a smaller woman. Holding a magic wand between her legs. Her arms are tied over her head. She’s in writhing orgasm. Her feet are swinging off the ground. Most of the scenes on this site are more like that. They have some machine fucking. I haven’t ever gone against this; I have a lot easier time with two women together in BDSM and bondage porn. Their scenes with two or more women are very good. I don’t like the candle wax scenes. I don’t get that.
You will still run into the scenes that are not sexual. Maybe they are for the person, the dom and the sub, I don’t believe that translates in video. It’s like when I watch a video on youtube and wonder why I watched it. That is the part of BDSM and bondage porn that I don’t really like. Just because you get off on it doesn’t mean I’m going to. I’m not your sub.
The technical quality is very good. They have the regular options, 720, 1080 and 4K on the newer ones. They do have pictures but they’re not high quality photosets. I have said that before about Adult Prime. I believe they could improve their photos a lot. Even reviewing this as the fully combined network it still feels small. I don’t need to click most scenes. I can look at the preview and see it’s not for me. The ones that get me to click are the ones that make me think, “What the hell are they doing?” It’s like youtube. I would even say the sites and network Submissed would do better in the old format. There’s too much mixed up together. This is a scan over the newest scenes. I see a cute, petite woman being masturbated by a tall dom woman in leather pants. That’s a click. I see a guy in an army looking jacket with a hat pulled over his eyes leading a woman in tied up rope to lay down on a mattress in an alley. Probably not a click. I see a pretty blonde going wild and there is a machine at the bottom of her bed. I’m going to click that one. I see a small guy protecting his nuts and a tall woman kicking him in the nuts. Not clicking that. That is the point I’m making it’s a 50/50 chance I’m even interested enough to click it. That one with the nut shot looks even worse. The woman looks attractive, but I noticed she has a strap-on attached to her and she’s making the guy lick her shoes after she kicked him in the nuts. The guy looks like he hasn’t had anything to eat in a year. There’s the bonus to BDSM and bondage porn. I’m going to have to click it. He better wear her out. Okay, that was a mistake. She’s not that attractive and she just punishes the guy for 20 minutes straight. She does peg him and remind me that this network was better when they separated their sites into niches and series. Similar to how Kink does. It’s a different part of Adult Prime which is still, to me, a very good deal.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bondage, whips, cuffs and nearly every kink you can think of with a porn scene to boot.
- Models I’m not familiar with but most are attractive. A total of 288 females.
- They are updating, it looks like once a month and there are 450 scenes.
- No 4K but I don’t consider that a con, 1080p, 720p and 540p downloadable videos.
- Photo set zip download is available.
- Download speeds are good but I did find a little inconsistency at times, going to say I averaged 70% of my max.
- Lots of tags and you’re going to need them. They have things on here I’ve never heard of.
Cons:
- This is a tough con to list since I assume anyone that joins the site knows what to expect. Some scenes are really rough. I don’t see anything that makes me think negatively.
- I didn’t find some of the models attractive. I do believe this is authentic BDSM, which would make me think there are only certain models willing to do it.
Bottom Line:
You know you’ve entered into a whole other world of porn when the first scene you watch has all of these in it: Whipping, spanking, water torture, hot candle wax, a pillory and suspension cables. There’s a porn scene in there somewhere. Those that know me, know that I’m not hugely into harsh or violent porn. I would say some of this goes a little further than I like. Nearly every scene has a tag for “crying”. I also know crying doesn’t always show pain. I believe this site gives a good representation of BDSM porn. The porn really does kind of just sneak up on you. I didn’t want to list this as a con. It could be something I would regret. A lot of the scenes didn’t seem long enough. Most are under 30 minutes which is to me how long a porn scene should last or at least close to 20-30 minutes just for the sex. I could regret that. Some of these scenes do look painful. I thought the best part of the scenes was it looks like these women enjoy BDSM.
The most impressive part is the amount of tags. I’m going to share a few since I had to watch the scene to find out what it was. I’m going to go from the softer side to the I have no idea what that is side. Softer: Catsuit, kissing, masturbation, see, this is regular porn. Even the middle ground: Anal, rimming, blowjob, strap-on, cum in mouth, even cum-eating, now for the rougher side: Crotch rope, nipple clamps, needles, hot wax, yokes. I think they are calling what I call a pillory a “yoke”. There’s the crying tag, the screaming and the slapping. The screaming don’t bother me since most porn models need to stop talking during the scenes. If they’re screaming they’re not talking. These are just some of the, “I have no idea what that is” tags. I’m focusing on these tags for a reason. I think when you join a site like this one, you take on the understanding you’re exploring areas you’ve never explored. Seeing things I’ve never heard of adds to the value of the site. Some don’t and I will list a few of those too. These are the ones I had no idea what it was: Monogloves, mummification, I realized I knew what that was, I just didn’t know that’s what it’s called. Here we go with one, pit-of-doom. I have you another one too, head-box. That made me think of the Brad Pitt movie Seven. That one looks like something straight out of a Saw movie. Rubber Gloves. That sounds self-explanatory, they don’t want to risk passing germs. Rubber gloves have a sharp parts on them for added pain … and pleasure. The ones I have no interest are Enema, Breath Play and Gagged. I really didn’t feel like any of it was that far out there. I just didn’t know the names.
I will say they have some of the most unique lit candle scenes. They have the lit candle right up to the woman’s pussy. I think talking about the different scenarios covered is more useful than saying they have sex eventually.
You get 450 of these scenes plus one new one per month. I wouldn’t compare this directly with Kink. This is more like those pay per scene sites where they really get into a fetish or fetishes. Some of these spanked and whipped and paddled women go from pale skin to dark red. It doesn’t seem to be over-excessive. I do think they play to the pain and crying a little more than they should. Who am I to say that, I don’t do most of this stuff. I want to say the acting is very good. The women typically give you a feeling of them being in fear of the master.
I do think if you join it just for the sex you’re probably not going to be that happy.
The videos are downloadable. I have read about a DL limit but I have not hit it. They don’t list the amount of the limit. The videos can be downloaded in 1080, 720, 540. The oldest scenes have 720p as the highest download option, which isn’t bad at all. They have photos and downloadable zips for those.
My personal favorite and it’s just because it can be related to a fetish I have. That is the “forest” tag. That’s public, even if it is in a forest. I liked all of those. I have seen a few other sites try the outdoor, bondage, those to me, go too close to forced. This site does it a little more tastefully and I do believe that’s an important part of a site like this. It’s definitely different than what you’re probably used to. I don’t feel like it pushes too much on comfort levels. I have those I listed as being not interested in but that’s just my own problem with those types of scenes. I’ve never understood the use of enemas in porn. Maybe before the porn scene but that’s what they’re going for here. This is like a BDSM network crammed into a site. I think your biggest complaints on this site will be subjective to each person. The length of the scenes is the only universal one. These scenes seem like they should be close to twice as long as they are. Good, different site that I recommend for those looking for something to break away from the mainstream.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons:
- Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line:
Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.
I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.
What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.
Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.
There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos
That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.
Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.
This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.
All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.
The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.
I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.
You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.
It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.
It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.
The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.
Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.
They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.
My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.
Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the prettiest, highest quality pictures I have seen on the internet!
- Content is 100% exclusive
- Has most of the top Euro models, Sophie, Eve, Stracey, Sandra Shine, etc..
- Despite not having a lot of models overall, most of the models they do have, have 5-10 photo sets, 4-8 videos
- Some of the picture sets have 200 or more photos in them
Cons:
- TBP talks about the video needing improved. I can agree to a point, but the videos are not that bad either. You do just get MPEG option, in small files or one large one
- Update frequency is questionable, I only see two photo updates in June so far and May also only had 2. I do see 3 video updates for June though.
Bottom Line:
I would think this site could be great for someone like me who had never been on it. My favorite model, Eve Angel has 8 photoshoots and 6 videos. One of the photoshoots is one that I have seen several times on TGP boards, and had wanted with her in a blue halter type tight shirt and black workout shorts.
I'm not that impressed with the videos, but I have seen worse. In full screen mode they are a little blurry, but it isn't too bad. The photo sets are impressive, most having around 200 photos in each. I noticed Drooler's comment, and I do agree that it is pretty bad though, they have a 4000 option on the pics, but the pictures aren't half that big.
I still can't find anything overly bad about the site, but again, anytime you join a site for the first time, that has 100% exclusive content, everything will be new. I knocked a few points off for that since I wouldn't think joining again won't happen for probably at least 6 months, maybe longer. The site uses the rating system that Babelicious uses. You can also leave comments on each set. Pretty much all of the models are top level, there may be one or two that aren't, but I am very happy with the selection. It was also nice to see that the videos I have watched do not have background music in them, just moaning and those other lovely sounds.
I would recommend a one month membership to anyone who likes Euro girls. As the content they have is great. Anything beyond a month may be pushing it until they update more.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
