Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 226 Tricky Masseur (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Access to the Teen Mega World network. -Low membership price of $20/month with PU discount. -Large number of attractive models. -The models speak in Russian or similar language, but there are subtitles to show what they are saying. _No DRM. -Easy site login. -Long period before site timeout. -Update rate: 1 video and 1 photoset weekly. -Good download speeds. I get around 1.34 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -Good site design. There is a listing of all the site models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like. And there is a listing of all the videos of that model at the network. By clicking on the image for any video of that model, you bring up the video itself, without having to re-enter your login information. So the models and videos of each model are integrated, and you don't have to search each network site separately. -Zip files for photosets. Cons: The cons are minor. -The zip files for photosets only have one size-quality. Can not choose between low, medium and high quality photos. -In some of the early videos at this site, the stunt cock gives a massage that is completely amateurish. The stunt cock is supposedly a real masseur, and his performance as a masseur is just unbelievable. -The script/sex action is basically the same foe each video. It would be nice if there was some variety in the action. Bottom Line: -Site statistics: -Videos: -92 videos. -Video runtime about 25 - 35 minutes. -High quality file size about 900MB - 1.2GB. -Photos: -92 matching photosets-one for each video shoot. -The photosets are screenshots of each video shoot. The photosets can be used to show what the model looks like, and what the action of the video will show. But there is no erotic value to the photos, in comparison to a photo site like Metart or MPL Studios. The theme of the site is a stunt cock giving a professional massage to a teenage girl. And during the massage, because the masseur is so expert, the girl becomes aroused and the stunt cock has sex with the girl. The videos are professionally shot. The videos are shot inside a room, which gives good control over the lighting and sound. So the lighting is good, there are no random noises intruding on the soundtrack. The model is in focus, not a lot of blurry images. The camera-work shows the sexual action clearly. This site is an excellent addition to the Teen Mega World network. Over the past year, since my last review, they have added 52 videos, which averages out to 1 video per week. So the site is definitely growing. And some of the girls are not just attractive, but really cute. I gave this site a score of 67 last year, because I couldn't stand the acting and arrogance of one of their main stunt cocks. But reviewing the site this time, the site has grown so much, and that particular stunt cock has improved his acting/massage skills, that I am giving the site a score of 91 this time. Not only is that stunt cock less annoying, but they are also using new stunt cocks. And some of the girls are just yummy. The site score reflects the value of this site, but also reflects having access to the Teen Mega World network. In my opinion, the Teen Mega World network is one of the best networks for hardcore teen videos, because of the large number of attractive models, good quality videos, good site design, good download speeds, and low membership price (using the PU discount). 04-10-12  09:06am Replies (2) Review 227 Anal Angels (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large number of Eastern European teens. Many are cute, attractive and even lovely. -Low price of $20/month with the PU/TBP discount. -Download options include a choice of high, medium, or low quality WMV files for each video, as well as an MP4 file for portable devices. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long period before site time-out. -Easy search. Can search by model's name, model rating, or type of sex scene. -The model listing has a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like. -Most of the network sites are integated into the basic search. So if you look under a model's name, you see all of her videos at the network. And it's easy to bring up each video she appears in by clicking on the thumbnail of that scene. You don't have to re-enter your login information when switching among different sites of the network. -With site membership to this site or other sites in the network, you get access to 20-25-30 sites in the network. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec. Cons: -The cons are mainly minor. --You watch a large number of these hardcore videos, and the sex starts to get repetitious. Almost all the scenes are inside an apartment. This helps to make the lighting and sound control easier. But maybe some outdoor scenes would add to the variety. Maybe a slight story-line would help give meaning and more eroticism to the hardcore sex. Maybe some strip-tease or foreplay before the hardcore sex would add some spice to the sex. -No zip file for the photosets. -But most photosets are not worth saving. The individual photos in a photoset are better than sceencaps, but not much better. Even when you have an attractive model, the model is not presented attractively. At Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, they try and often succeed in making the model poses attractive. But at this site, the style of the individual photos is more like a screencap of the video shoot. No effort is made to frame the shots artistically or erotically. Bottom Line: -This site, and the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network, is one of the best offerings for hardcore teen videos, with lots of attractive teen models, lots of hardcore videos covering a wide range of sexual activity, combined with a low membership fee. -The site contents include: 51 vids. 51 Matching photosets based on the video. The photos in each photoset are better than screencaps. But as I said earlier, even when you have attractive or lovely models, the photosets are not worth saving. What is worth saving are some of the really nice hardcore videos. The site contents are nice. But what really gives the site its main value is the included access to the most of the Royal Cash network. I am giving this site a score of 91. That is based on the network access included in a membership. If the site was judged on a stand-alone basis, obviously the score would be much lower, because of the smaller amount of content at the site. 04-06-12  09:48am Replies (8) Review 228 Ex GF Box (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Recently, 1 video update per week for the last month. Before that, no video updates for 2 months. -Videos are dated. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Can use download manager. -Long time before site timeout. -Zip files for photosets. -Good download speeds. I posted an earlier comment that I was getting poor download speeds through this site. But the problem cleared up. Not sure what the cause was. But I am now getting about 1.36 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed. Cons: -Picture sets are not dated. -Only one size for downloaded pics: no choice of high, medium, low quality photos. -The high quality video option is really a low-to medium quality video. -Frame height x frame width is 720 x 1280. -A video with a runtime of 10 minutes in WMV format takes 221 MB. -The models in the vids are not identified by name. Bottom Line: This is a site with the theme: ex-girl friend. But the site doesn't really accomplish that theme. Instead, it's a mish-mash of low to medium quality vids and pics that have no unifying theme or purpose. Currently Videos: 101 Photosets: 109 Number of photos per photoset: from 39 to 76. Bottom line: the site itself has little value. Almost all the videos and photosets are low-to-medium quality. What gives the site value is the network access to the Royal Cash/Teen Mega World network. The network has a huge number of attractive Eastern European teens, shown in hardcore videos. I think the network value would be increased if this ExGF Box site was eliminated. Because the site itself is basically a waste of time. I am giving the site a score of 90. That is based on the site including access to about 30 sites in the Royal Cash network. The value of the site contents by itself would be low 60s, in my opinion. 04-02-12  09:27pm Replies (7) Review 229 Young Legal Porn (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Lovely young teen models. -The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network. Cons: -The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not. -They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that. -A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites. Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18. She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): But the posted date is a minor problem. -Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px. -In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos. -The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site. -The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem. -Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed. The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints. -Bottom Line (summary): -Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive. -videos: high quality: width x height: 1280x720 total bitrate: 11013 kbps 802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p. The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p. photosets: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB. -There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live". There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model. I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios. 10-18-11  11:36am Replies (5) Review 230 Try Teens (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A nice number of fresh-faced girls (Eastern European). Many of the girls I have not seen before. Almost all the girls are ok to nice looking. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Professionally shot videos. -Choice of streaming, or can download the video. -Each video has an accompanying photoshoot. Cons: -Navigation is clunky and very basic. Each page has 2 videos with thumbnails of the model. That's the layout. -No zip file for the photosets. -Slow update rate. -All videos download with the same name of i01.wmv, so you have to manually rename each video, and keep a manual listing of what each video is (model name + whatever information you want). -Videos have no title or posting date. -Videos are straight hardcore sex with same basic script. -No search. -Download speed varies widely. On a single file download, using a download manager, not downloading more than 1 file, the speed can slow to 20-50 KB/s, so a 874 MB video file can take 4-10 hours or more, which is absolutely ridiculous. -Only 1 resolution for video downloads. No choice of hi, medium or low quality. Bottom Line: Each video follows the same script:a guy walks into the small bedroom of a cute young girl, she smiles and waves, and strips, the guy makes stupid-sounding noises indicating juvenile enjoyment of what he's going to do to that luscious piece of teen meat, girl gives a blowjob, they fuck vaginal, fuck anal, more blowjob, guy shoots over girl's face and makes more noises expressing satisfaction. The girl poses with cum over her face, smiles, waves goodbye, and leaves the room. End of video. The videos are well lit, good lighting means good colors for skin tones, good colors for foreground and background (which is just a bed in a small bedroom). The video is professionally shot: no jittery jumping around, clear view of the entire action, good close-up action, good shots of the girl's face and body so you clearly see what the girl looks like. The sex is straight-forward fucking, the stunt cock seems to be enjoying himself (with all the grunts he makes), and the girl usually keeps a happy smile on her face throughout the entire sex. The video ends with the girl smiling, waving goodbye, and leaving the room, while the guy makes happy grunting noises (which translate better in different languages than if he was speaking Russian). The videos are high quality, the models are all teens and mainly attractive to very attractive. I wish the stunt cock didn't make all those stupid noises trying to show what a good time he was having. I wish there was more variety to the sex. These are luscious young girls, and they are putting on a good show, but there is little variety and the sex gets to be boring in spite of the crystal clear videos and teen girls with cute or pretty faces and tight young bodies. I can't empasize enough how clean and fresh-looking and cute these girls are: They are absolutely adorable, and they are as good as anything you will find on the cute-teen level. The girls look like they are the daughter of your next-door-neighbor, or the girls you can see at the mall or in church. Number of videos at site: 185 Video runtime between 20-35 minutes. Video file size about 575-790 MB. Frame width x height: 960x540. Total bitrate: 3145 kbps. Each video has an accompanying photoset. Number of photos per shoot: 140-450. Only 1 size for each photo (no hi, medium, low). Size of individual photos: 290 KB; 853x1280 pixels. The photos are well-shot, much better than screen caps, but simple style, not glamor style photos. Bottom line: There are a large number of really cute girls. But the stupid sounds the stunt cock makes, the by-the-numbers-sex, the same setting of a small bedroom, make the sex repetitive and less meaningful, almost boring. The videos are professionally shot, but some thought should have been given to what the guy does to the girl instead of following the same script time and time again. 07-26-11  04:39pm Replies (6) Review 231 AT Movs (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Streaming option. -Multiple download options: High, medium, low quality WMV file. A low quality MP4 file for portable devices. -Simple navigation. Could be improved, but fairly easy to examine site contents. -Nice integration into rest of network. A search on model's name returns all her content at the network, instead of just the single site's content. Cons: -No model bios. -Some plot or buildup to the sex would add value to the videos. -The action becomes predictable after watching a number of videos. These are mainly attractive girls getting fucked, but you need some variety or freshness to give the video meaning. -The videos and photosets are true to the site theme of amateur teen action. That is both a plus and a minus. I wish the videos had higher production value, because these are attractive young girls. Their freshness and physical attractiveness is not emphasized in the videos and photos. -Archive site. No updates since 2010-06-15. Bottom Line: This is part of the Teen Mega World (Royal Cash) network. The site used to be called Amateur Teen Movs, was renamed ATMovs. The site structure was also reformatted to the more easily usable form found at most of the Teen Mega World sites. Many models at the nework used to have multiple names. Which made searching for their content harder. Someone put in some good effort and gave most of the models a single name. Also, a search was added that searches throughout the network sites for content under a model's name, instead of a search specific to a single site. And the search returns not just the videos for a model, but hot links to those videos. Not all the models' content has been renamed. Jelena has a video at ATMOVS. She is also the same model named Willa found at Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Beauty Angels and other sites in this network. But most of the models I checked did have a single name, which makes searching so much easier. Site content is hardcore teen sex. Mainly boy-girl, with a few 2 boys-1 girl or 1 boy-2 girls or 2 boys 2-girls. This is straight hardcore sex,with no buildup or tease factor or plot. The girls are real teens, Eastern European, many are attractive. There are very few tattoos or piercings. The site style is a good representation of the site's original name: amateur teen movs. The models are fresh young teens who are captured fucking on video. The camera-style and setting is amateur, home style. Site statistics: Number of videos: 159. Video runtime: around 25 minutes. Number of photosets: 159 (Photoset is a photo record of a video shoot). Number of photos per photoset: 87-200. Individual photo: 45-70 KB. Photo width x height: 720 x 576 pixels. Note: the photos are nice-quality screencaps, but not worth saving. Multiple download options for video: High quality WMV, medium quality WMV, low quality WMV, low quality MP4 (for portable devices). File size for high quality 15 minute clip: 372 MB = 24.8MB/minute. File size for high quality 21 minute clip: 509 MB = 24.2MB/minute. File size for high quality 26 minute clip: 631 MB = 24.3MB/minute. High quality video: Frame width x height: 720x576. Total bitrate: 3168kbps. You can join this site directly or through Teen Mega World. Using the PU/TBP discount link a membership costs $19.95/month. A membership through this site or through Teen Mega World gives you access to most of the network sites. Most of the network sites are no longer updating. But there are several sites in the network that are updating. So you get access to a large amount of teen content, with a nice update schedule from the sites that are updating. The network access raises this site's score to 85. 05-31-11  09:39am Replies (1) Review 232 Creampie Angels (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long interval before site timeout. -Easy login. -The models are real teens. Mainly attractive. -Access to 20+ other sites in the teen network. -Easy transfer to other sites in the network (don't need to re-enter your login information, just select a hot link). -Easy to use basic search: Search by model name returns all her content at the network, not just the current site you are at. -Videos can be streamed online or downloaded. -Zip file for photosets. -The layout is the same as most of the other Teen Mega World sites, which makes the navigation fairly simple and easy. Cons: -Small site. Currently 32 videos (and matching photosets). The site is new. TBP states the site started in May, 2011 (this month). But the first videos are dated starting 2010-11-02. Only 32 videos, but site is currently updating. And you get access to over 20 other sites in the network. -Irregular update rate. Based on video posting dates, you get 1 video (and matching photoset) every 10, 16, 13, 4, 4, 2, 4, 8 days or so. -Models speak Russian(?), with no subtitles. But this is minor. There is very little talking before or during the sex. -No model bio beyond the model's name and age. Bottom Line: This is one of the newest site offerings from Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash). The theme is creampies. In porn, semen shot into the vagina or anus is usually referred to a creampie. A pastry or pie that has a cream filling is also called a creampie, although someone eating a banana cream pie should first inquire if the filling is natural or artificial. (Joke) Video runtime: about 25 minutes. File size for high quality WMV file of 25 minute runtime: 847 MB. Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4736 kbps. Watermark: bottom right corner, not overly obtrusive. There is a matching photoset for each video. Number of photos per photoset: about 150. Photo file size: 180 KB - 320 KB. Photo width x height: 1440 x 960 pixels. These are not art-house photos. But the photos are an excellent record of the video shoot. The individual photos are well shot: they are in focus, nicely framed. Good lighting, good colors for skin tones, good color for background and foreground sets. They are much better than simple screen shots. A zip file is available for each photoset. Download options include: high quality WMV, medium quality WMV, medium quality FLV, and a lower quality MP4 (for portable devices). Streaming option available. Basically, with the high quality WMV file, you get a good quality video to watch (good quality in terms of technical video: how the video was shot and recorded). The content is straight teen sex, with no frills. The videos are shot inside, usually in a bedroom or living room. So it's easy to control lighting and sound. Good lighting means good film colors (skin tones, color of background and foreground sets). A few videos could have used more lighting. There is no annoying music track. There is little or no background noise (street sounds, airplane noise, wind, annoying music or sounds from TV or CD player). The camera-work is OK to good (steady camera, ok framing of shots). This is straight bread-and-butter sex: No plot or buildup, a boy and girl start sex minutes after the video starts (You might count the few kisses and groping the guy does as the buildup.) You get vaginal, anal, bj.The scenes end with a view of the girl's vagina or anus leaking cum (and with the guy and girl kissing a few times). This is a mix of porn and romance on the bread-and-butter level. The girls do a lot of moaning and groaning during the sex. The early videos at this network from a few years ago had girls who were mainly silent during the sex. I guess they were told to make more noise (uhhh, nnhhhhh, uunnnn-uuhhhhhhh) to make the videos more exciting. The moaning and groaning is soft-to-conversational sound level, and the guys help out by contributing a few moans and groans. Joining this site directly costs $29.95/month. Joining Teen Mega World for $19.95/month gives you access to Creampie Angels as well as over 20 other sites in the network. So save yourself $10 and join through Teen Mega World (using the PU/TBP discount link). 05-24-11  10:30am Replies (0) Review 233 Home Teen Vids (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Easy login. -Streaming option for each video. -Content is dated. -No DRM. (This is a guess, based on rest of the network. I was unable to download any videos, but the rest of the network videos have no DRM, so I assume, if you could download these site videos, as you are supposed to be able to, they would have no DRM.) Cons: -You are supposed to be able to download a low-quality video file for each video at the site. I tried to download 10 different videos, and each time I got the error message, "404 Not Found". -There is no medium-quality or high-quality download option for a video. And since none of the links for the low-quality download option work, you can't save these videos (Unless you use a special program to capture screen images. But any video you might get using a special screen-capture program would be low quality because the streaming image itself is not high quality). -Models not identified. No name is given for the models. So if you wanted to save videos or photosets, it would be difficult to sort them by model. -No model bios (obviously, since the models are not named). -No search. -No updates for over one year. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Teen Mega World network. This is an archive site: the last update was 2010-03-29, a little over a year ago. Number of videos: 60. Number of photosets: 60. Video runtime: 15-35 minutes. Video quality: low (based on file size of the video, and the visual quality of the video). Photoset: 110-260 photos per photoset. There is a single-size zip file available for each photoset. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot. The photos are low quality in terms of photographic quality. The technical statistics for a single photo indicates the photos could be high quality if a competent photographer had taken the time to shoot them, but that wasn't the case: the photos are often blurry and out of focus, and are more like screen caps than well-shot photos. An individual photo is 300-400 KB, 1280x720 pixels. Which is just a waste of file size for blurry, poorly shot photos. There are a number of attractive models at this site. And the videos are competently shot: good sound control, no annoying background music, OK to good lighting, OK to good colors (skin tone, background, foreground). The definition of the videos is low quality. If the definition was high quality, a number of these videos would be worth saving. But you can't save these videos, because you get an error message when you try to save them. Also, the video quality is low (in terms of definition). The sex action is straight fucking. No story or plot, no buildup to the sex. It's one boy, one girl. The site has little value. It's a small archive site, not updating. The videos and photos are poor in terms of image quality. You can't download any videos from the site (because of technical problems). The photosets are not worth downloading. 05-16-11  07:32pm Replies (2) Review 234 Teen Sex Movs (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Discounted price of $19.95/month thru PU/TBP. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good download speeds (My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, and I regularly get that speed downloading files from this site without a download manager). -Can use a download manager. I can use DownThemAll here. -Large selection of attractive white Eastern European teens. Mainly slender girls with small breasts, but some models with medium breasts. -Little to no tattoos or piercings on the models. -Most of the recent videos are professionally shot: ok to good lighting, camera-work, focus, colors of skintones, foreground and background. -Choice of 3 download options for videos: high, medium, low quality WMV files. -Streaming option. -Photosets (which are a photo capture of a video shoot) have a single zip option. -Content is dated. -There is a model list with a nice-sized thumbnail for each female, that has a link to the model's videos and photosets. Cons: -Cons are mostly minor. -No storyline or plot. A boy and girl fuck. Maybe say a few words before fucking, but no buildup or tease or stripping before the sex. -Little variation in scenery: fucking takes place in bedroom, bathroom, or some other room indoors. -No costumes to add color to scene (models wear drab street clothes which come off within a minute or two for fucking. -Older videos are not as good as the more recent ones shot the last few years. Older videos usually don't have the good camera-work, higher definition, etc. But there is a ton of newer material that is very good quality at this site and at the bonus sites. -No model bios. -Search is basic. Can search by model name, which shows her material at the network. -Default filename for downloaded video or photoset is a useless number: for example, 315.sethigh.wmv and 315.setall.zip for the most recent video and accompanying photoset posted. Bottom Line: Number of videos: 560. Number of photosets: 560. High quality video (for newer content): Width x height 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4224 kbps Video runtime: 20-30+ minutes. The older content from several years ago is much lower in quality. Photo: Size: 120-160 KB. Width x height: 960-1440 pixels. Resolution: horizontal x vertical: 300 x 300 dpi. Number of photos per photoset: 150-200 The individual photos at this set are better quality than the average photo at the network. I think they hired a photographer who knew what he was doing, for a change. These are basically good quality photos: in focus, framing and skin tone. The photos are not the artistic or top quality you get at Met-art or MPL Studios, but they are much better than the often blurry, screen-cap photos found at some of the bonus sites. Updates: Irregular update rate for this single site. One new video about every 3-7 days. Most of the bonus sites do not update. But with the ones that do, you get a large number of updates to keep you watching for new material. This site is part of the Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash). This is a basic, bread-and-butter teen fuck site. This is fuck-suck-lick-bj-fuck-some-more. If you want romance or tease or eroticism go look elsewhere. The models are real teens. Many of them are really physically attractive. Little variety of teens: they are slender white Eastern European girls, most with small breasts, but a good number with medium breasts. The sex action includes cunninlingus, BJ, vaginal and anal fucking. Not much tenderness to the sex, but a ton of fuck-suck-fuck-some-more, with BJ. After a while, seeing so many of these videos, the action loses a lot of its impact. You'd like some variety to the sex, maybe some buildup or tease or romance or freshness; but you do get a ton of straight fucking of many attractive young teen girls. There are a limited number of stunt cocks, but that's common: most hardcore sites seem to have a few stunt cocks servicing a large number of different girls. Membership to any site in the network gives access to a large number of bonus sites in the network. Some sites charge $29.95/month, most sites charge $19.95/month (with the PU/TBP discount). Unless there is a special reason, save $10 and join one of the $19.95/month sites, because most memberships give access to most of the same bonus sites. Most of the network sites are teen female. There are a few small niche sites: a male gay site, an old-and-young site, latin shemales site, latin teen site. But the vast bulk of the network content is teen girls (some solo or girl-girl, but most is boy-girl, with some two boys on one girl). If you are into hardcore slender white Eastern European teens with straight fuck-suck, this site and network will give you plenty to look through for a very low price. For the site and the network access, I am giving this site a high score of 92. 05-10-11  10:20am Replies (4) Review 235 Sasha Fucks Dasha (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Zip file for photosets. -Content is dated. -Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date. Cons: -No streaming option. -Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality. -Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality. -Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models. -Archive site, no updates since July 2007. -No search. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Diesel Access network. This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007. Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other. Number of videos: 120. Number of photosets: 210+ -Video updates: last video update was July 2007. -Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007. Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file. Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo. The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?). The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes. 87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip. Frame width x height: 852x480. Total bitrate: 4258 kbps. The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus, no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around. The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos. Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size. Width x height: 852x480 pixels. The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos. Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free- form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content. Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes. 05-09-11  02:07pm Replies (0) Review 236 Teen Mega World (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Good variety of teen niches: solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl, group (mainly a three-some), young girl-older man, squirting, she-male, gay (boy-boy), latina girls. Some niches like she-male and latina girls are tiny sites, so if that's your primary interest, don't join this site/network for that reason. But it's nice that a few videos are supplied for those niches. -Large number of sites included in membership. You get around 25 sites. That's not counting Teen Mega World, which is a gateway site, that doesn't have any content of its own. And it doesn't count WMB Girls, which is apparently a clone of Teen Mega World. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -For most sites, it's easy to switch to a different site in the network, by using a hot link. For a few sites, instead of clicking on a hot link, have to open a new browser window and login. Cons: -The cons are mainly minor. -There are a huge number of photosets, which are a photo capture of a video shoot. The quality of the individual photos is poor. Either get a professional photographer to take these pictures, or stop posting a huge number of photos of low quality: post a few pictures from each photoset, instead of 70-150 photos of a photoset which is low quality. -There are a couple of stunt cocks that I really dislike, because of the way they treat the girls. But the girls apparently like these guys, because these guys are used in a huge number of videos at this network and at other sites. -The live chat (with models) is a waste of time, unless you are willing to spend a lot of money paying for private chats. -The quality of the videos varies. Some videos from a few years back can be low quality, even in the "high" quality version that is offered. CONS continued in next section. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -There's little or no buildup to the sex: You get a guy, a girl, and they have sex. Maybe they exchange a few words before the sex, but the words are pointless. --You see a lot of these videos, and the action starts to get repetitious. You'd like some variety, some meaning to the sex, some plot or story instead of two people just banging away. BOTTOM LINE: -Huge number of teen videos: 2,257. -Huge number of teen photos: 333,544. -Most videos are available in 3 qualities: low, medium, high definition. -Sample stats for a high quality video: Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4224 kbps. -Most videos can streamed. -All videos can be downloaded. -The photos are available in a single size. The file size is usually 100Kb+, but the quality is not good. The photos are mainly a record of individual video shoots, and the photos are more like screen caps than a regular, professionally shot photograph. -The photos in a photoset have a zip file for downloading. The videos from the last few years are basically ok to very nice quality: these are videos of teen girls having sex, and the clarity, lighting, colors, sound are mainly ok to very good. Bottom line: This is one of the best sites for hardcore East European teen videos. At $19.95/month (with the PU discount), this network is a bargain. 04-12-11  03:24am Replies (3) Review 237 Latin Shemales (0) 56.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Zip file for photosets. -Multiple choice for video download quality: high, medium, low -No DRM. -No download limits. -Can download entire site contents in a few hours (11 videos + matching photosets is the entire site contents). -Long period before site timeout. Cons: -Tiny site. 11 videos with matching photosets. -Expensive price. $29.95/month if you join site directly. But join through Teen Mega World, for $19.95/month, and you get Latin Shemales included, with over 20 other sites as well. -Archive site. Apparently not updating. Don't know if it ever did update, because you only have 11 videos total (with matching photosets). -Default file name for dowloading video files is high, medium or low (depending on which you choose: high, medium or low quality-definition). So need to rename file by date or model if want to save these files. -No streaming option. -No model bio information given, except for the age of the tranny, which is listed as 18 or 19 for each tranny. Which I find suspect, because these trannys look older than 18 or 19. -The language is South American, not English. But there isn't a lot of conversation, it's mainly action. Some kissing at the start before getting into bj and other things. -No search. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -Unlike other network sites, there is no link to transfer to other bonus sites in this network. You have to open a page, with the URL in the address bar, and re-enter your login information to get inside a different site in the network. -There is a link for "bonus sites" at Latin Shemales, but it only opens a page with an advertisement/hot link for a gay dating service. It does not provide any links to the other network bonus sites you get by joining this network. BOTTOM LINE: This niche is definitely a different offering by the Teen Mega World network. Many of the network sites have content that could be interchangeable, but shemales is a niche that is different from the usual pornsite offering. This is hardcore tranny action: doing whatever a guy and tranny can do to each other. The guy does the tranny, the tranny does the guy, so the tranny is definitely not just doing the woman's part, but acting like both a man and a woman, and the guy is acting like a bisexual, except he's getting his action from a tranny instead of a man and a woman. The action is not rough or gonzo style. It's actually friendly sex. Both partners are having a good time and enjoying themselves. No fake screams and moans. These aren't models who are just putting on a show: they are getting paid and also having a good sex experience. High quality videos: Frame width x height: 720x406 or 640x480 Total bitrate: 6064kbps or 3064kbps Video runtime: 18-21 minutes Number of videos: 11 Photosets: Number of photosets: 11 (each photoset matches one video). Number of photos per set: 58-111 photos, most sets are 62-77 photos. Photo size: 30-56 KB. Width x Height: 640x480 pixels. Horizontal x Vertical Resolution: 96x96 dpi The photos are low-quality screen caps. On the TBP review page, it states content count has not changed since December 2006. That was 11 videos. Site currently has 11 videos. So apparently the video posting dates are not accurate. Because 3 videos are dated 0000-00-00, and 3 videos are dated 2011-04-02 (today's date). A tranny lover would probably not join this network because the contents of the one tranny site are so small. But if you belong to the network anyway, then it might be worthwhile glancing over what the site offers. Or maybe not. I looked at all the videos at this site, because there are only 11, to get an idea of the video quality of the videos. The video quality is basically very good: clear focus and definition, good lighting, good sound, good colors of skintones. The trannies are ok-looking to nice-looking. Bottom line: Because the site is so small, even a tranny lover will not get much satisfaction from the site. If you like tranny, you will probably like the videos, but there are only 11 of them. 04-02-11  07:41am Replies (4) Review 238 They Didn't Know (0) 53.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality. But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good. -Content is dated. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy login. -Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link). -Long time before site timeout. Cons: -Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07. -Small site. -Models are not named in the videos. -No model bios. -Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low", for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving. -But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets. -Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing. Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated. -Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s. BOTTOM LINE: The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot. Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance. These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl. Video specs: High quality: Frame width x height: 1280x720 Total bitrate: 4320 kbps The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal. Number of videos at site: 44 Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes. -Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site. 03-31-11  03:32pm Replies (0) Review 239 Beauty Angels (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy log-in. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Can download or stream videos. -Multiple download options. -Fairly simple navigation. The owners are working to make the entire network contents easier to view and enjoy, by redesigning the sites, adding hot links, model thumbnails for an index, simplifying the search. -Download manager allowed-I used DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. I consistently got 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. -Content is dated. -Zip file for each photoset. Cons: -Most cons are minor. -The system for viewing individual photos should be replaced with a simpler system where you simply click on a thumbnail of the photo you want to view, and an enlarged photo should appear. -The default filename for a download is a generic name, such as 305.sethigh.wmv or 141.sethigh.wmv. The default filename should be a more useful description, such as including the name of the female model, or the date the video was posted. -There is some sharing or migration of content. The video of Marissa at nubilegirlshd posted 2010-02-24 is the same video at beauty-angels posted 2010-12-14. Both sites are part of the Teen Mega World network. The video is the same, but the filename it is saved as is different. So you don't realize it's the same video, unless you play the files, and remember the scene. -The file size of the photos (200+ Kb) indicates high quality. But the photographic quality is low: Any quality photo site like Met-art has much better photos. Bottom Line: The site features Eastern European teen models. Many are attractive. They are clean, with few tattoos or piercings. The sex action is varied: solo, masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl. Most scenes are indoors. So the lighting is generally good, because indoor lighting is far easier to control than outdoor lighting. Because of good lighting, the colors are good: good skin tones, good colors for foreground/background. No annoying background music. The girls are not necessarily the most beautiful you've ever seen, the videos are not the highest quality definition or the most erotic techniques, but you get a large number of attractive models, nicely captured in good quality videos. Multiple choices for video download: High Quality (WMV) Medium Quality (FLV) Low Quality (MP4) (for Portable Devices) The high quality WMV files are about 440 MB for a 14 minute clip, to 526 MB for 16 minute clip. Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4224 kbps. Videos run from about 12 minutes to about 30 minutes. Update rate: 1 video + matching photoset every 2-6 days. Erratic update rate, but very good overall, considering other sites in the network are updated as well. Number of videos: 130. Number of photosets 130. Number of photos per photoset: about 90-205. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot. Improved interface/navigation. You can now transfer from one site to the next in the network, simply by clicking on the hotlink for that site, without having to enter your login information. You can also switch sites by clicking on the hotlink for a model's video. This is one of the newer sites in the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network. Joining Beauty Angels directly costs $29.95/month, and gives you access to maybe 24 network sites. Joining through Teen Mega World costs $19.95/month, and should give you access to Beauty Angels, along with 25 other network sites. So save yourself $10 and join through Teen Mega World instead of through Beauty Angels. Beauty Angels is a fine addition to the Teen Mega World network. Pat362 has mentioned that the content at Beauty Angels is leased, and is also found at smackmybitch and 18xgirls. So it does not make sense to join either smackmybitch or 18xgirls, when you can join the Teen Mega World network and get a lot of the content that is at the other two sites, along with access to a huge amount of additional content from the other Teen Mega World sites. 03-30-11  08:31pm Replies (5) Review 240 Squirting Virgin (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limit. -Content is dated. -4 format choices for each video download: WMV, MKV, FLV, MP4. -The models are Eastern European, but there are English subtitles. -There are a number of attractive models at this site, which is part of the teen mega world network (also called the royal cash network or the s&s royal limited network). -The search engine is integrated with the entire network, so if you find a model you like, by entering her name, you will see all the videos she is in(at the entire network), and can transfer to each video through a hot link. The software team has upgraded the search and made it much easier to use. -Zip file for each photoset. -Choice of downloading or streaming videos. Cons: -Small site. Started January 2011. Only 25 videos (and matching photosets). -Each video follows the same basic plot: stunt cock stimulates the model until she squirts, then he continues stimulation and fucks her semi-roughly. Not full-blown roughness, but the sex is not gentle or loving or affectionate. The stunt cocks are treating the girls like a piece of meat, but the girls all seem to lap it up. -Navigation is good, but could be improved. Put a hot link at each model's listing, to make it easier to search for content with that model. Bottom Line: The basic setup is a guy stimulates a girl, with a vibrator, a dildo, his fingers, his mouth, or some combination, the girl gets so excited she squirts out her sexual juices, then the guy fucks the girl in different positions before finally coming on her face. The site has a strong bondage element: the girl is usually tied, and a cloth or rubber piece is stuck in her mouth. Also, by doing the girl on a chair, or on the floor, or in some other uncomfortable position, the stunt cock is demonstrating his mastery of the bitch getting fucked. The girls moan and groan and whimper as their face is pressed against a wood floor and the stunt cock reams their vagina, ass, and mouth. The girls are real love slaves. Some girls sound so fake with the moans and screams that it's a turnoff. But some girls are better actors and sound like they are sexually excited. Squirting is not my fetish. To me, it looks like the girls are peeing when they squirt, which I don't find erotic. It would be smelly as hell having sex with a girl who has just peed all over herself. But if you are able to think of the squirting as a sign the bitch is in heat, and so excited by the masterful stunt cock, then you could enjoy the action even more by the squirting, the whimpers and moans, the bondage and whatnot. Number of videos at site: 25 Video runtime: 25-30 minutes. Download options for videos: High Quality (WMV) Medium Quality (MKV) Medium Quality (FLV) Low Quality (MP4) The high quality WMV files are about 958 MB for a 28 minute clip. Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4736 kbps The technical quality of the videos is excellent: very high definition, good lighting (made easy because these are indoor scenes); the camera is steady, not jerked around; good framing of the model before and during the sex action. The colors are good (because of the good lighting). The dialog and script are stupid. But the girls are attractive, and there is solid sex action in the videos. Update rate: when the site started in January 2011, they updated with 1 video each day. By the end of January and continuing through March, they updated 1 video every 5-8 days. Number of photosets at site: 25 (same number as the videos). Each photoset is a video capture of a video shoot. The photos are basically screen captures. So the photo quality is not high. The photos don't appear to be photoshopped or airbrushed. They can be slightly out of focus. Each photoset has a zip file. Number of photos per photoset: 200+ Individual photos are about 100 KB in size, 1280x720 pixels, 300x300 dpi. Squirting virgin is the newest offering at the teen mega world network. Joining teen mega world gives access to 27 teen sites. A huge number of hardcore videos. I'm giving the site a score of 89. You are paying for network access. Scoring the site as a stand- alone would give a much lower score. The network access is a bargain at $19.95/month. See Reply #1 for $10 price saving. 03-21-11  09:42pm Replies (3) Review 241 Vika Nymph (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy log-in. -No DRM. -Actively updating. 1 new video every 10-14 days. 1 new photoset every 3, 4, 5, 8, or 15 days (very erratic update rate for photosets). -Very nice quality for videos and photosets. Good lighting, good camera-work, good sound control. Sometimes you will hear extraneous noise like an overhead airplane or hiss/rumble, but the soundtrack is basically the sounds the models are making as they make love. No annoying music soundtrack. -watermark on videos: small watermark, bottom right corner, appears intermittently, not intrusive. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Zip files for photosets. -Navigation is easy. -Can stream or download all videos. -Choice of WMV or MP4 format for downloading. -Search engine. Cons: -Photosets and videos do not name the models. -There are no model bios. -Search engine could be improved. -Only 1 size for photos. --The photosets are ok to good quality, but they have a tendency to appear washed out in color (the colors need to be stronger, brighter, and you would have much more attractive photos). -The HD video files can be large, 1+ GB for a 15 minute clip. -Photosets download with the default filename of "photos.zip". So you have to manually rename each photoset to identify what the photoset is. And since the models are not named, trying to organize the photosets into some kind of order is not simple. -Slow software system for viewing individual photos in a photoset. Bottom Line: Site is loosely based on the solo teen model idea. The main model is Vika. But there are plenty of sets and videos without Vika. The action is varied: stripping, masturbation, solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl. There is also very mild group sex, some kink (peeing). By group sex, I mean you have three or more people having sex. It's not a rough gangbang where you have a bunch of guys pounding away on one girl at all her holes. The site (and the parent Diesel network) takes a casual, softcore approach to porn. By softcore, I don't mean limited sex; instead, I mean the sex is presented in a basically gentle or friendly way. You don't get gonzo hardcore where the action is rough, abusive, or contemptuous. This site/network shows sex as good, clean fun to be enjoyed. The peeing videos are very short, about 1-3 minutes runtime, which is great for that niche (which I'm not a fan of), because it's right there, wham bam, pee! No waiting around for the action to start. You can see a girl peeing. I guess that's porn, but it's just a girl peeing. She's not masturbating or having sex or anything, she's just peeing. The search could be improved. You enter "peeing" as the search term, and only get 1 video. There are other pee videos at the site. You can find another pee video by entering "urination". Someone who is into this niche can search more extensively and report their results to the PU members. number of videos: 155 Most videos have a short runtime, 10-20 minutes. Download formats for videos: High quality WMV file, medium quality MP4 file, low quality MP4 file. The high definition WMV video files go up to 1280x720, 19160 kbps total bitrate. Number of photosets: 176 Number of photos per photoset: about 80-112. Can view individual photos, or download the entire set as a zip file. Zip file is one size only (no choice of which photo resolution). Maximum resolution of 1333x2000 pixels. I really wish the site listed the models in the videos and photosets, because it would make organizing the contents so much easier. What collector wants a large bunch of photosets and videos where you don't know who the models are? The models are real teens, mainly attractive, very little tattoos or piercings. The girls are from Eastern Europe. Most girls are small- breasted, as usual, but there are some models with medium or large natural breasts. You don't see the oversized, plastic breasts found at Playboy or many adult porn sites. As part of the Diesel network, the site is definitely worth looking through to see which videos/photosets appeal to your tastes. But if the site were a standalone, at $29.95/month, it would be overly expensive. 03-20-11  03:37pm Replies (0) Review 242 Policeman (0) 63.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy site log-in. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Zip file for each photoset. (The site has 2 photosets total. That is not a joke.) -Small amount of site contents. With a fast Internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in 1 day. And then review the contents at your leisure. -Some attractive models. Cons: -Archive site. No updates since 2006. -Small site. -The site has only 2 photosets, which are a low-quality photographic record of a video shoot. Even though you can download a zip file for each photoset, I don't know who would want to keep a zip file of these photosets. -Site contents are not dated, except for the two photosets, which are from 2006. Apparently the last update for the site was in April, 2006. -Most videos have only one download option, a low-quality WMV file. A few videos have a choice of download as low-quality WMV or low-quality MPEG file. -The default option for filename of each video downloads as 001.wmv, which means you have to manually rename each file, to avoid overwriting with the next download. And also to separate the files from one another, because a bunch of files with the filename of 001.wmv are hard to distinguish from one another. -No bio for the models. They don't even bother to name the models. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -Navigation is basic. You get a list of the videos, in apparent chronological order (but no date is listed). That's it. -No search feature. BOTTOM LINE: Site contents: This is a small archive site that has not been updated since 2006. It has 25 videos, and 2 photosets. The 2 photosets are a photographic record of 2 video shoots. The photosets are poor quality photographs, more like screen captures (or maybe they are screen captures). videos: 25 Sample video file size: about 250 MB, for a runtime of 34 minutes. Total bitrate: 1017kbps (very low bitrate, indicating poor quality of video). Frame width x height: 400x300. photosets: 2 photoset 1 has 115 photos. photoset 2 has 100 photos. Individual photos have a file size of about 60-80 KB, 1024x576 pixels. This site is supposed to be a reality porn series. The site theme is 2 cops who play practical jokes on women who are applying for a driver's license. The two cops, one who is dressed as a doctor, make the women applicants undress and then have sex as part of the medical exam. This is a very stupid idea, and the two "cops" are sort of acting like an updated version of the three stooges. But the women go along with the idea, and have sex with the two cops: bj, vaginal, maybe anal, whatever. At the end, because the women had sex with the two guys, the women are told they passed their medical exam needed for a driver's license. One model asks: What does a gynecological exam have to do with a driver's license? The cop dressed as a doctor answers: We have to make sure you don't wiggle around on the seat when driving. (There are subtitles, because the models are speaking whatever European language they use.) Some of the models are attractive. I wish the quality of the videos was better. The camera-work is ok to good, the lighting is ok to good (these are indoor scenes shot in a small room), but the definition/clarity of the videos could be greatly improved. This is part of the Diesel network. If you joined this site by itself, you would feel that not only the models were getting screwed, but that you had been screwed as well. But if you get this site as part of the Diesel network, then the site is worth glancing over. Many of the models are cute. I only wish the videos were better quality (higher definition, mainly). 03-18-11  12:11am Replies (4) Review 243 Tricky Masseur (0) 67.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -A number of attractive female teen models. -Update rate: 1 video and photoset every 5 days, until recently. Last few weeks the update rate has slowed. The photosets are a photo capture of the video shoot. -No DRM. -Long period before site timeout. -Videos have subtitles for the Russian language. But once you see a few videos, you realize the words spoken are mainly very low-grade conversation that is better ignored. The idea of subtitles is nice, but the models say very little that is worth hearing. -Most models have very little tattoos or piercings. -Streaming option to view the videos. -Can easily view single photos in a photoset, or download the photoset in a zip file. -Content is dated. -No download limit. Cons: -The main stunt cock can be really annoying. He is arrogant. He is supposed to be playing the part of a masseur, but the massages he performs are so poor most amateurs could do a better massage. And the stupid bullshit he speaks to the girls is really annoying. -In contrast, the stunt cocks at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction are giving what appear to be sensual, real massages to the girls, making the videos more believable and enjoyable. -The videos at tricky masseur appear to be shot by a amateur camera-man who often can't hold the camera still and has trouble framing the scenes. He is poor framing the pre-sex scenes, and even worse framing the sex scenes. -A small site that just started December 2010, currently has 34 videos. -Watermark bottom right corner. Larger than necessary, but not overly intrusive. -No model bios. Bottom Line: Tricky Masseur is part of the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network. The site is a collection of videos of a guy who's supposed to be a masseur who seduces teen girls during the massage. The same idea is done 100 times better at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction. The main tricky masseur stunt cock is an arrogant jerk who does a shitty job of giving a massage, and his line of bullshit to the girls is stupid and unbelievable. The videos at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction are much better because the stunt cocks are more believable as masseurs, they come across as less arrogant and less bullshit-talking, and the videos are shot with greater care and skill. To improve the videos at tricky masseur, replace the stunt cock and replace the camera-man with people who know what they are doing. Number of videos: 34 Video runtime: 30-40 minutes Multiple formats for download: high and medium quality WMV, medium quality FLV, portable device format (iPod mp4). File size for high quality WMV file: runtime 30 minutes: about 1.1 GB runtime 40 minutes: about 1.5 GB Number of photosets: 34 Number of photos per photoset: around 200 The photoset is a visual record of a video shoot. The photos are better than a screen cap, but do not have the quality of a professionally shot photo: the photos can be blurry, out-of-focus, or just lacking in erotic or sensual appeal. The site has spent a lot of time and effort posting these large photosets. It would be smarter to just post 20-30 photos, or less, instead of 200+ photos, of a video shoot, because the quality of the photos is not good. The network/site offers a free live cam/chat show, that is the same offering at the Diesel network. This live cam/chat is basically a waste of time. To see any nudity in a private show or as part of the "public" show can get expensive fast. The real free show is no show, just different models waiting to be paid for a private show, who do almost nothing while waiting. Bottom line: As a bonus site that's part of your network membership, the site is worth looking over. But the site itself is a poor version of the much better massage sites like Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction. 03-15-11  01:02am Replies (6) Review 244 Young Legal Porn (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: none. -Site timeout: Very long period before timeout. -Download limits: None. -Model listing is name of model with a nice-sized thumbnail and a listing of her photosets and videos. -Many of the newer videos are nice quality: clear video, good focus, good lighting, good sex action, very attractive models, great skin tone, good color of background and foreground, good sound control. -Most videos have a choice of 3 download qualities to choose from: low, medium or high quality. Cons: -Navigation is basic. For a relatively small site, the navigation could be easily improved to make moving around and finding the photosets/videos of each model faster and simpler. -Search is limited. You can search by model's name, but for little else. -They should junk the software system they use to view individual photos. -No model bios or other information on the models. -Many of the older videos are very poor quality in terms of clarity, lighting, colors, annoying background music. -The content is posting dated, but the significance of the date can be low. Some material was made years before it was posted at this site. -The free live webcam chats with models are a waste of time. The models basically do nothing on-screen except wait for someone to pay for a private chat. Bottom Line: Site stats: -Number of models: 303+ -Number of videos: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number) -Number of photosets: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number) The newer videos are mainly good quality: good lighting, good colors (skin tone, background, foreground), ok to good camera work. video stats (newer videos): frame width x height: 1280 x 720 total bitrate: 8572 kbps - 15459 kbps frame rate: 29 frames/second photo stats: photosets: 30-100 photos. file size: 200-400 Kb (newer photo size). width x height: 2250 x 1500 pixels. resolution: horizontal x vertical: 96 dpi x 96 dpi. Photosets can have from 30 to 100 photos. The file size of an individual photo can be large, up to 400+ Kb, but the photos are not high quality in terms of appeal or photographic technique. The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site. The two primary sites in the dieselaccess network that have the most value are YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls. There are some other sites in the network that are also worthwhile, but the most value is in those two sites. YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls are very similar sites: same type of content, same layout, same models, etc. And it appears that some content is shared between the two sites. YoungLegalPorn takes a softcore approach to porn. By this, I mean that the sex is gentle, not rough or abusive. The sex is caring, affectionate, or friendly, with no slapping, spitting, hitting, name-calling, etc. The sex can be hardcore in the sense there is female masturbation, lesbian activity, boy-girl sex. I appreciate the overall quality of many videos at this site. But some PU members might think the site is too tame, and would rather watch a harder, edgier type of sex that is featured at many hardcore sites. The free Diesel cam shows are not shows, but a waste of time where the model does almost nothing except sit or lie on a bed, waiting for someone to pay for a private show. There is also a mode where the "public free show" turns into a show which is still "public", but you have to pay 1 euro per minute to watch. Supposedly there is some stripping or other action in the non-free public show. The private chats are 3 euros per minute. So it could get very expensive to watch. It would probably be cheaper to go to a topless bar to see some stripping, instead of watching it over the internet. Note: hugow wrote a review of this site on 2011-01-02 and gave it a 50 score because he said the servers were very slow. Most of the files I downloaded from this site (and the other sites in this network) had speeds of 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. So I did not experience the poor download speeds hugow reported. (I recently upgraded my DSL connection, which used to have a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.) 03-08-11  01:18am Replies (4) Review 245 18 Only Girls (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Videos: Small watermark appears briefly at different times in a video. Not obtrusive. -Photos: Small watermark. -No DRM. -Videos and photosets have posting date. -Site has a models list, which is a an alphabetical list/pages of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the number of photosets and videos for each model. -Very long period before site timeout. -Can watch videos streaming or download. The streaming option is not very good. You get a small window to watch the video. Much better to download the video and watch it on your PC. Streaming option is OK to watch briefly to see if the video will be of interest. But trying to fast-forward the streaming video does not work well: the video stops playing, and it's hard to get it to resume at the place you want to try next. -Zip file for photosets. -Large number of models (320+). Cons: -The software for viewing individual photos is clunky. There should be an easier way to view individual photos. -Navigation is basic. It should be easier to browse through the photosets and videos. The videos and photosets are split into two separate sections, but it should be easier to browse through the site contents. -The search is basic, and could be improved by being able to search for the title of a photoset or video, or being able to search for a specific type of content such as type of sex action, etc. -No model bio or information on the model is offered. -One size only for each photoset. No choice of low, medium, high quality photosets. Bottom Line: There are a number of attractive models at this site. The site theme is young teen girls who are amateurs. These are not girls being naughty, but attractive young girls who are filmed on camera enjoying their sexuality: by themselves (masturbation), with their female friends (lesbian), less often with a boy. It's good clean enjoyment and fun, not dirty, not abusive, not rough. -Large number of models (320+). The models are teen or early twenties, white Eastern European girls. Mainly slender, mainly small-breasted. Number of models at this site: 320 Number of photos per photoset: 40 - 100 photos. videos: number: 800+ runtime: 15-20 minutes size: 200 MB - 1 GB+, depending on which quality you choose. Format: WMV Definition/quality: medium, high, HD (the best, highest quality) Photosets: number: 1,000+ Photo dimensions: 1000 x 1500 pixels width x height. Photo size: about 200 KB. -Update rate: 1 photoset per day, average. 1 video every 2 days, average. I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying. The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of the much better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos. Content appears to be shared between the 18 Only Girls site and the Young Legal Porn site. This is true of photosets and videos. I am looking at a recent photoset at 18 Only Girls, titled "Horny_coed_girl_striping_and_toying_her_snatch_1295819441_only_674", with the model named Drew. But even though the photoset is posted at 18 Only Girls, each photo has a YoungPorn.net watermark. There seems to be some confusion in naming The Young Legal Porn site: The Young Legal Porn site is called both Young Legal Porn and is also called Young Porn. The site is advertised as Young Legal Porn, but the address bar of the site itself uses YoungPorn instead, and the watermarks on the photosets show YoungPorn.net. The videos, unlike the photosets, have value. The videos are professionally shot, and are very high quality: Good to excellent lighting, focus, definition, camera-work. There are a large number of videos at this site worth watching, as long as you are satisfied with a softcore approach to pretty young teens: the sex is solo, or lesbian, or some boy-girl, but it's not hard-edged or abusive. 01-23-11  06:51pm Replies (0) Review 246 The Sperm Lover (0) 50.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -No DRM. -Zip file for photosets. -No download limits. -No watermark on the videos. -Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips. Cons: -Archive site. Last update January 2007. -Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios. -Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos. -OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos. -No search engine. -Very basic navigation. Bottom Line: -This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site. Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness. -This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site. Small site. Videos: 47 Photosets: 73 Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips. Frame width x height: 852x480 Total bitrate: 4258 kbps With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp. The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex. -If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets. The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known. None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members. The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring. Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first. A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos. 01-11-11  01:00pm Replies (13) Review 247 Teen Sex Reality (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips. -Models listed for each clip. -Content is dated. -Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days. -DRM: no. -Easy login. -Site timeout: no. -Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings). -Multiple choices for download formats: --WMV: high, medium, low quality. --MPEG. --QuickTime. Cons: -No streaming option. -No photosets. -Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable. -No bios for models. -Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size. -Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. -Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted. Bottom Line: The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts. The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead. You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working. This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen. Currently 275 video clips. Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes. Most of the action is boy-girl. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines. There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer. This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment. My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke. The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos. When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites. 11-23-10  11:54am Replies (0) Review 248 Tin Seks (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Download limits: none. -DRM: none. -Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently. One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot. -To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process. -Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated. Cons: -Streaming: Not available. -Zips for photosets: Not available. -Photos available in 1 size only. -Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls. -Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites. -Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless. Bottom Line: Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen. The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot. It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent. So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be. But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted. Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site: The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex. -Site contents: 94 videos 94 photosets -Videos can be downloaded in different formats: WMV: low, medium, high resolution MPG MOV The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file: Frame width x frame height: 720x576 Total bitrate: 4128kbps The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos. The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus. I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection, something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want something beyond her getting banged. I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site. 11-14-10  09:53am Replies (0) Review 249 Teenamite (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits. -Multiple download formats: --WMV: low, medium, high quality. --MPG. --MOV. -Streaming: low, medium, high quality. -Videos and photosets are paired. -Content is dated. -Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video. -Zip files for photosets. -No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login. -Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity. Cons: -Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset. -Only 1 size for photos. -Slow-loading system for viewing photos. -The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites. -Models not listed for some videos and photosets. -No model bios. -Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed). Bottom Line: This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through. The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common. There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site. Sample data for a high definition video: runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds size: 1.12 GB frame width x height: 1600 x 900 total bitrate: 6336 kbps frame rate: 25 frames/sec Type of content: Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus. Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex. The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens. The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors. The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each). You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site. On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you. I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access. 11-09-10  01:22am Replies (6) Review 250 Springtime Beauties (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: no. -Download limits: no. -Most models will be present at more than one TonyBucks network, but most of the models are not found at a large number of other sites. So the faces you see here are mainly fresh faces, at least until you have gone through the TonyBucks network. -There are some models that are really cute or outstanding, that you will probably have seen at one or more other major sites. -Multiple download formats: --High, medium or low resolution WMV. --MPG. --QuickTime. -Easy login. -No site timeout. Cons: -The biggest con is that the site is not updating. The most recent update I saw was from January 2009. -So this is an archive site. Some of the content is ok, but once you have downloaded the material you want, there is little reason to come back again. A shame, because they chose some nice models at this site, and you want to find more material on them, and that won't happen at this site. -No zip file for photosets. -1 size only for photos. -No streaming option for videos. -Watermark, bottom right corner of photos. Not large, but could be smaller, less noticeable. -Download problems? I was downloading 2 videos from the site using DownThemAll download manager. Both videos stopped downloading, giving me a "timeout" error message. Each download re-started from the beginning of the download. I do not know why each download stopped, or why each download could not resume from the point that it stopped. Bottom Line: This is part of the TonyBucks network. Joining any site in the network can give you access to 10 or less sites in the network, depending on when you join and which site you join through. There are currently 11 sites in the TonyBucks network. At this site the photosets outnumber the videos by a large margin. At most TonyBucks sites the photosets and videos are close in number, and several sites have each video paired with a photoset. Not here. The size of a single photo (up to 250 KB) indicates high definition. But you don't get the "professional quality" you will find at top photo sites like Met Art or MPL Studios. The photos are "ok", but not high quality regarding colors, clarity, etc. There are some attractive Eastern European models, but they could look much better with professional photography. The content is softcore teen nudity, with some masturbation. Even though the site was launched in late 2008 and stopped updating a few months later, the photo quality seems more like something from the 1990s: some very pretty models, but the quality is not high. If you know Teen Stars Magazine, the photography style is very similar: more skin is shown at SpringTimeBeauties, there is some mild solo masturbation at SpringTimeBeauties(no masturbation that I can remember at Teen Stars Magazine), but the photography is better at Teen Stars Magazine: the colors are better, the models look better. With the large file size for the "high quality" videos, you expect high quality playback, but you don't get it. The first video I saw had a tiny jittery effect that creates eyestrain. The second video I watched did not have the jittery effect, but the video picture is not crisp. 572 MB for a 15 minute clip, so the video picture should be extremely sharp, but it's not: it's like you're watching the scene through a very faint fog. You do get the impression you are watching amateur teen models who are just starting their porn modelling career, these girls are young and fresh. I just wish they were presented better (better photography). The soundtrack of the videos I saw was music from a radio (music mixed with talking from an announcer). The volume level of the music is low, which is better than loud, but it would be better to have no background music at all. The music is a minor distraction that does not really fit the video. If you like softcore striptease videos, this would be a nice site, except: 1. The site is not updating. 2. The videos are just ok. 3. The photography is not excellent. By itself, I don't think the site is worth joining. The videos I saw had some attractive models, but the video quality is just ok in spite of the large file size. If you like this style of photography, I would choose a site like Teen Stars Magazine, which is a site that doesn't update, but the photos are nicer, and they have zip files. Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating. 11-07-10  08:55am Replies (3) Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.66 seconds.