Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 251-275 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 251 Devils Film (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. Enter username and password, which can be saved. -Updates with new series and older series. Offering parodies of Mad Men, Fast Times At Ridgemont High, Twilight, etc. -Huge amount of content. 1722 Gb. -Wide variety of content. 4637 movies, with wide variation of sexual activity. -Can stream or download videos: --Stream in high or low definition. Many videos can be streamed in HD (supposed to be higher than the regular "high definition" used at their site). --Can download as high or low definition WMV file. -No DRM -No download limits. -No site timeout. Cons: -Uncheck the pre-checked agreement to join another site on signup, or you will be charged for a trial membership to another site. -Poor search engine. -Video quality (definition) could be improved. This is basic DVD quality video. Many PU members want better quality videos to watch, and will complain about much of the video content at this site. But the newer material is higher definition. -The only download format is WMV. -No zip file for photosets. Bottom Line: This is a major site in the netFameSolutions network. There are about 5 sites in the network that update consistently. The other sites have few to no updates. Many of the updates at the smaller sites are older clips from one of the 5 main sites. The 5 main sites in this network: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD The other sites in the network are niche sites. Each of the 5 main sites is large, with a large number of DVD quality video clips. These are professionally shot videos, with good basic technical features: good lighting, good focus, etc. There are a number of attractive models at each of the main sites. The video quality is good, not great. Don't expect high-quality definition, because you will be seriously disappointed if you have that expectation. Most of the video content is from 5-10 years ago or more. The videos have not been remastered to today's higher quality standards. But if you are familiar with the DVDs from 5-10 years ago, you will have a huge selection of video clips that cater to a wide range of sexual preferences: mainly boy-girl, but also group sex (meaning 3 or more people in a sex scene); and there are niche sites that offer tranny, granny, lesbian, MILF, Indian, etc. The quality of the newer videos is better than for the older videos. You do not get the HD quality of some sites, but the newer videos are nice quality. The high quality clips are about -400 MB for a 27 minute clip. -total bitrate of about 2100 kbps. -frame width x height: 720 x 400 Devils Film itself, like the other 4 main sites, has a wide variety of content. The content is mainly separated by category or series. There are photosets, but they are useful for illustrating what the model looks like, and what the video action is. The site uses a software system where you can view each photo. But the system is really clunky and slow. You slowly load each photo as a thumbnail separately. You are supposed to be able to enlarge the thumbnail by clicking an icon, which might or might not work to enlarge the thumbnail. And to get to the next thumbnail, you click an icon, and wait for the thumbnail to load. A really stupid and slow system. No zip file for the photosets, but most of the models in the photosets are not attractive anyway. Search is basic and could be vastly improved. You can search by series, by name of model. The results for searching by name of model bring up clips at the Devils Film site plus other sites in the network the model is featured. But you have to know the name of the model for this to work. Not all models are listed for every clip. And there are other problems with the search. The model named Barbara at DevilsFilm is supposed to be in a clip at RoccoSiffredi, but the model named Barbara at RoccoSiffredi is a different model. The price to join the network is $9.95/month, through PU/TBP. That gives you access to a huge amount of content of wide variety. 11-02-10  09:28am Replies (5) Review 252 Teen Burg (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of videos for a site of this type. -Site advertises more than 500 videos, more than 300 photosets. -Note: TBP update 09-20-10 states 296+ videos, 37+photosets. Why the big difference in the numbers, I don't know. Looking at the site, without actually counting the separate videos, it seems the site contents is much smaller. -Site advertises daily updates. The update rate is actually about 1 update every 7 days. -Free live cams with models. You pay USD $2.95 (EUR € 2.30) for 30 days of access to several hours per day of nude public shows. Private chats are optional and cost extra. -There is also a separate "Models online" service that offers a xxx webcam live show. -Large number of cute models. -Search engine: can search by model's name, month and year, video or photoset. -Content is dated. -Model's name is clearly listed for each video. -Zip file for each photoset. -No DRM. -No download limits. Cons: -No streaming. -A simple text list of the models at this site, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, would be very helpful. -Single size for photos. No choice of low, medium or high resolution. -No biography. Models identified by name only. -Basic search. Can search by model's name or when video/photoset was posted. But can't search by description of model, type of sex, or any other factors. -A faq page would be helpful, listing basic site facts: number of videos, number of photosets, number of photos, total size (GB) of videos, total size of photos, number of male models, number of female models. -No text on the site identifies which videos are high definition. The HD videos are the ones that are 1 GB+ when you download them. Bottom Line: Photos are 1643 x 2464 pixels Videos 720x576 (1100kbps) File Sizes (HQ): WMV = 200MB-1GB This is the town where I should have grown up. Lovely, nubile chicks that fuck at the drop of a hat. Or the glance of an eye. This is a hardcore teen video site. The videos far outnumber the photosets. Most of the videos are a boy and a girl. Each video/photoset has a few thumbnails to show what's inside the file. It is difficult to get a clear idea of what the model looks like from the thumbnails that are actually furnished by the site. A much better system would be to have a nice-sized photo of the model that shows her clearly, plus 4 thumbnails that clearly show the model from the video/photoset. The videos are good quality. The technical factors are handled well: lighting, focus, action, a lot of good looking teens. The photos are high quality: the size of a single photo is around 300-500 KB. I was surprised the photo size is so large, because the photos sure don't look high quality to me.I am not talking about the attractiveness of the model, or her makeup or costume. I am talking about the extreme clarity that photos can have, which is not found here. The colors are not brilliant or sharp. I just find the photos at major softcore glamor sites so much more appealing than the photos at this site. If you are into hardcore teen action, this site has a lot of videos. The videos are good quality. The sex is gentler than the gonzo sites, and the teens actually talk and kiss before getting down to the action. The teens are ok to nice looking, very little tattoos or piercings. The site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. Membership in any one site will normally give you access to some of the other sites. How many bonus sites you get, and what those bonus sites are, varies depending on which site you join through. It definitely pays to check each site for the bonus details. One site will offer 2 bonus sites, a different site might offer 6 bonus sites, another might offer 9 bonus sites. I joined through Spunky Bee, which charged me the same or lower price for the membership, as joining a different TonyBucks site. And I got access to 9 bonus sites (10 sites total). I am giving the site a score of 85, because it's part of a network that has a number of attractive models, and a large number of good quality videos. 10-26-10  05:02am Replies (3) Review 253 Teen Dorf (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Zip files for photosets. -Easy login: username, password, captcha (easily read letters). -No site timeout. -Streaming options: low, medium, high quality. -Download options: low, medium, high quality WMV. : MPEG. : QuickTime. -Little or no photoshopping in the photos. -No download limits. -Updates 1 photoset or video approximately every 10 days. Cons: -Only 1 size for photos. -If you want to download individual photos instead of the full zip, you sometimes get a "show.php" file instead of the photo file you are trying to download. -In some videos and photosets, it can be hard to see what the face or body of the model is like. This is true for outdoor scenes, where the cameraman/photographer does a poorer job than if the scene is indoors. -The index listing pages are cluttered with thumbnail photos advertising other sites. -I found very few cute teen models at this site. Bottom Line: The theme of the site is interesting: young teen couples having sex in a natural way. But many photosets and videos are lacking. They are shot in an amateur way, especially the outdoor scenes. The best way to improve this site would be to fire the photographer and video man and get someone who knows how to take a photograph, how to shoot a video. If you're shooting outdoor scenes, get a shooter who knows how to take a photo, how to shoot a video so the model is shown clearly and attractively. In some outdoor photosets and videos, the face and body of the model is hard to see clearly. The camera is only a few feet away, but the model's face is not shown clearly, because of focus or lighting or shadows or some other reason. -How a photographer shoots a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. There is no effort to make these girls look more attractive (from lighting, makeup, costumes, whatever). Even the two models I've seen at other sites that I thought are attractive, did not seem special in their appearances at this site. The audio track is often poor. A boy and girl are in a meadow, nothing but plants and dirt around, and you hear loud microphone noises, you also hear what sounds like a jet plane overhead, but the sky is clear except for clouds. Maybe it's the wind you hear, because it's windy, and the microphone noises are loud to begin with. But when you hear the couple speaking, it's not loud enough to make out the actual words. You can often hear the camera clicking in the background for a photoshoot of the video, and the cameraman and photographer walking behind the couple that are being shot can be making noises as well (footsteps). The lighting outdoors is hard to control, and the model is in and out of shadow, it's distracting. The indoor scenes are better shot than the outdoor scenes. You have less noise from the microphone, better closeups of the model and the sex action, better control of the lighting. The outdoor scenes are a nice idea in theory, but the photographer/cameraman need to improve his technique to make the outdoor scenes work well. In a few scenes, where the boy and girl are playfully teasing each other before they start kissing and getting down to business, their acting is good enough that the scene is interesting, even though you can't understand the actual words they are speaking(German, maybe?). But in other scenes, the prologue to the sex is just wasted time. Porn actors are not often noted for their acting ability, especially in low-budget shoots like these. The site theme is "natural teens, natural love". This translates to teens making love in outdoor scenes: in a field or meadow, by a lake. If you've been a member of femjoy or zemani, you will have seen videos where, in addition to a lovely nude model, you also see some great outdoor scenery. At this site, the scenery is there, but it's not shown to advantage. Bottom line: I found no photos worth saving, and only a few videos to save. 10-18-10  01:26pm Replies (1) Review 254 Silverstone DVD (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: none -Site timeout: none -Download limits: none -Easy login: requires username and password, no captcha -Download: low or high resolution WMV files -Streaming: low or high resolution -Large number of attractive models -Models have very little piercings, tattoos -Models are clearly identified in each clip by name and thumbnail (that is a really nice feature; I wish more pornsites would include the model name and a clear thumbnail of the model to show who she is and what she looks like) -Videos are 10-30 minutes, a nice runtime -Videos have 20-30+ screenshots to show model and action -Large amount of hardcore videos with nice variety -Updates 1 new video every 5 days Cons: -Check carefully for the pre-checked cross-sells when you sign up. I got stung the last time I signed up, even though I knew they were supposed to be there. I just didn't see it on signup, so I lost a few dollars down the drain. -Video quality is acceptable but not great. -It would be really nice if they could upgrade/increase the visual clarity of their updates. The updates are mainly older scenes from DVDs shot years ago. But if they could remaster the scenes to increase the clarity of the video, that would be a really nice feature. -Screenshot photos do not have a zip file. But few people would want to save these photos anyway. The photos are low quality: they are useful to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and the video action, which is great. But the photos have little erotic value. Bottom Line: The video quality is acceptable, but a site like Nubiles or X-art or Mplstudios can give you crystal clear videos, and you don't get that here. This is a DVD site, and even for the "high quality" streaming or downloaded files, it's like you are watching an older movie: the quality is OK, but not excellent: the colors are not vibrant, the clarity is not great. All the technical factors are good: professional lighting, professional focus, background music is better than most porn videos, the action is good, everything is good, but not the high quality video clarity you can get at some sites. But at the sites where you get the high video clarity, the quantity is small compared to the amount of content you get at this site. This site is one of the main values of the netFameSolutions network. The network currently has about 32 sites. About 5 of those sites are general hardcore sites that make up 90% of the value in the network. The other sites are niche, that might have a limited number of videos for fans of that niche/fetish, but that most PU members will probably skip over. With a single membership to almost any site in the network, you gain access to about 22 of the network sites. The sites that I believe have the most value are: Devils Film Peter North Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint This is a video network. It has a large amount of photos, but I consider the photos low to medium quality. The photos compare poorly to Metart, Mplstudios, Femjoy, or other photosite pictures. The network (and this site) has a number of attractive models. There is some ethnic variation of models: You have not just the standard East European models, which make up the bulk of the models, but also a significant number of Latina models. Also a small number of Asian models. A very small number of black models at the network. The Curry Creampie site features models that are supposed to be Indian-looking (from India). At this site, the videos have a tiny plot setup, where the boy and girl meet, then almost immediately have sex. But the setup tries to give a little more meaning and flavor to the sex instead of just two or more people banging away on each other. The sex is pretty straightforward: for 1 boy 1 girl: start with a blowjob, guy eats girl, they fuck vaginally, maybe fuck anally, then cumshot to girl's face. The action is not rough or harsh or abusive. This is definitely a hardcore site, but not the harsh, gonzo action found at some sites. Not a lot of tenderness in most of the sex, or affection, but not the harshness or abuse found at many sites. The monthly price of $9.95 (through PU/TBP link) makes this site a real bargain, based on the good quality of the content, the large amount of content, the large variation in content, and the low price. Giving the site a score of 87 because the site is good, plus you get access to a solid network of sites. 10-17-10  12:23am Replies (0) Review 255 Spunky Bee (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Billing agent: SegPayEU -No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page -Access to this site was immediate after signup -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No download limits. -Easy to read captcha. -Screenshots to illustrate videos. -Zipfile available for each photoset. -Content is dated. -Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body. Cons: -No streaming -Updates irregular Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality. Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then. -Photos are available in only 1 size. -Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos. -Navigation is very basic. -There is no search function. -Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one. The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog. -"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..." Bottom Line: Site statistics: Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets. Video file formats: high, medium, low quality WMV MPG (high quality) QuickTime format Video specs: (for the mpg file format): Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes. total bitrate: 6,488 kbps frame width x height: 1600 x 912 Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels. The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can download the entire site in 30 days with no problem. This is a solo teen site. This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls. You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music. SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names: Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika. I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again. If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out. Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up. By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership, the site makes a nice addition. 10-12-10  03:52am Replies (8) Review 256 Rock Star Porn Star (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No site timeout. -No DRM. -Exclusive videos. -Can watch videos in streaming: low, high, high definition quality. -Can download videos in WMV format in low or high quality. -The videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting. -The model's name in each video is listed, with a nice sized thumbnail that shows what the model looks like. That is a really nice, simple feature that more porn sites should have. -The videos are dated -There is a page where the models at the site are shown with their name and a nice-size thumbnail of the model. It would be better if the models were shown in alphabetical order, but the simple page layout is really helpful if you are searching through thumbnails of the models, because you can easily get a nice idea of what each model looks like. -There is also a very basic search where you can enter a model's name, and it will return a list of the different sites at the network the model is featured. Cons: -The site uses the same stupid program for displaying photos that is used at other sites in the network. The program will load a thumbnail picture slowly, then it's hard to get an enlarged image of the thumbnail. I try and try, then usually give up trying to see the enlarged photo. And the next photo in the series is also a slow-loading thumbnail. -The photos are clear and crisp, but the models are not to my taste. -TBP reports 55 photo shoots. But I could only find 12 photosets at the site (when I look at the page for "pictures"). How to get to the other photosets is unclear. -Each photoset is around 25 photos. -No zip file for the photoset. But who wants to keep these photos anyway? -Search is very basic. Can search by model's name, but not by description of model, type of sexual activity, or any other factor. Bottom Line: I always wanted to be a rock star. I can't play a musical instrument, or sing, but rock stars get the chicks. And now you can get the chicks as well. Just join the rockstarpornstar site and you can dream you are a massively tattooed male rockstar who gets to bang away on pornstars when he is not banging away on the stage with his favorite instrument. The female models at this site are past the teeny stage, but if you close your eyes, and listen to the moans and groans, you can reach rocker's fantasy heaven. The only male model here is one guy, who is playing a rock star, who bangs a bunch of female models. The guy is heavily tattooed. From the site stats, you can see this is a small site, when the total size is 18 GB. I assume that all the regular PU members here have a personal porn collection that is many times that size. Most PU members could download the entire site contents in 1-2 days. I personally did not find anything at this site that was worth keeping. Or even worth viewing, for that matter. But personal tastes vary, so maybe someone might find a worthwhile video here. The fake moans and screams from the female models are way overdone and totally unbelievable. The girls act as if the guy is using an electric prod instead of a normal penis. The guy is mildly rough, likes to slap the girl's face and ass, gag her with his penis. The guy is acting like a really masterful, take-charge sexual stud putting these bitches through the paces. Except that it's phony as hell. Pierre Woodman can give a great sexual performance with his models, but this guy is just a waste of time to watch. I do like, quite a lot, the nice-sized, very clear thumbnails with the model's name, for each video/photoset. This gives you an easy way to search through the videos and photosets you might want to look at more closely. This is a very simple and basic structure, and I wish more porn sites used it. Because at many porn sites, it's hard to get an idea of what the models look like until you watch the video or look through each photoset, which can be very time-consuming and a lot of work. You get access to this site through the netFameSolutions network, which has some nice sites. This site is not one of them. 10-02-10  03:24pm Replies (4) Review 257 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. But I do get disconnected after long idle times, so maybe there is a site timeout, but it takes a good while before disconnect. -No download limits. -Streaming, low and high quality -Download, low and high quality WMV file -Less fake moaning and groaning than many porn videos -Canned background music could be better, but less annoying than in some porn videos -Some attractive models -Female models in videos are listed by name -Screenshots, maybe 20-30, to illustrate the video -Caucasian and Latina female models Cons: -Navigation is basic. -Site design is poor. The videos are not categorized or laid out to make searching easy. -No search. Have to click through the entire site to see what is there. -DownThemAll download manager sometimes does not work smoothly. Sometimes get error message 400 (file does not download). Don't know reason why. -No text listing of models' names, with nice-sized thumbnails, so you can get an idea of what the models look like. There is no text listing at all, and thumbnails of models are scattered through the pages, making a simple search of the models at the site extremely difficult. -No zip file to download the screenshots for a video. But who would want to download and keep the screenshots anyway? -They should definitely get rid of the tool they use to display photos. It makes viewing the photos more difficult than normal. Many times it is hard to enlarge the thumbnail sized photo that is first presented, to get a normal-sized photo. And the photos are slow to load. Bottom Line: Myteenoasis is a hardcore teen video site. The site is made up of videos from other sites in the network, mainly SilverstoneDVD and DevilsFilm, that were put in here to make another site offering. The video runtime is from 8 to 20 minutes. File size is from 100 MB to 300 MB for high quality. Frame width x height = 720 x 528 Total bitrate = 2096 kbps The netFameSolutions network has about 32 sites currently. There are about 5 sites with general hardcore appeal, and the rest of the sites are more niche, with a wide range of niches: tranny blowjob granny Indian (from India) etc. etc. With membership in any network site, you get access to about 22 sites. Get a special price of $9.95/month from PU/TBP, which is a steal considering the large amount of content, the varied content, the generally OK to good quality of the content. This is mainly a video network. The photos are mainly to give you a good idea of what the videos will show. The quality of the photos is low. These are screenshots. Even when the model is good-looking, she does not appear good-looking in the photos. A model like Ashlyn Rae, who appears in a bj video here, is just blah. At Metart, where she also appears, she is presented as a fine-looking woman. You would not recognize it was the same woman except for the same name. In the videos, Ashlyn Rae looks better than the screenshots. In the videos, giving a bj, she comes across as enthusiastic and enjoying her work, as a professional should. Sure gives a different impression from her Metart photos, where she comes across as lovely but more distant. Makes me appreciate Ashlyn Rae in a whole different way. Lol. This is one of the minor sites at the network. I am strongly into teens, so I would normally rate this site much higher than a normal niche site. But there are only a few very attractive models I found at this site. And because the navigation is so basic, with no search, it's hard to find the videos I might like at this site. The main value of the site is that it gives access to the netFameSolutions network. This site has a few really attractive models, but the navigation is bad. And the general level of the videos is slightly disappointing. Maybe I am spoiled, but even a DVD site (which this is, basically) should have nice quality lighting and focus in the videos, so when you find an attractive model, she will be presented and seen clearly and easily by the viewer. 09-27-10  11:09am Replies (0) Review 258 Teen Sex Fusion (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Some attractive models. -Photosets are a visual record of a video shoot. -Captcha very easy to read, and can be entered in either uppercase or lowercase. -Site is currently updating. -Have high quality videos (nice, clear definition, good lighting, etc.) -Access to public chats, paid private chats -Planning on making blu-ray DVDs of scenes available Cons: -Only 1 size picture for the photoset. -No zip file for photosets. -No streaming option for videos. -A small amount of duplicate files from other TonyBucks network sites. -High quality videos are large, 1-2GB+ Bottom Line: This is a teen hardcore site. Apparently 1 video a and matching photoset for each session. The photoset is apparently photos taken during a video shoot. Most of the action is 1 boy-1 girl, or 2 boys-2 girls. But there is also some 2 boys-1 girl. Video download options: WMV: high, medium, low quality MPEG QuickTime WMV high quality: 1440x1080, 8256 kbps 1920x1080, 6256 kbps The videos are mainly crisp definition, good lighting, good skin tones on the models, little background noise (no music track, not a lot of random noise from the street as sirens or car sounds or whatever). The sets are simple: bedroom or living room. The models are all late teen or very early 20s. Very little tattoos on the female models, very little piercings. Denner mentioned in a reply there is duplication of video files at different TonyBucks sites. He stated that some of these videos can be also be found at non-TonyBucks sites as well, such as TeenMegaWorld sites. I've seen some videos which were posted at more than one TonyBucks site. But even though I've been a member of TeenMegaWorld a couple of times, there is material I never bothered to look through, and Denner's hardcore experience is far greater than mine. Does that make him a porn hound? Is that a compliment? Perhaps we should rather call him a connoisseur of hardcore porn. But he seems to slurp it down in large quantities. You only have to look at his PU score (currently 208), and realize his devotion to porn is extremely serious. Denner claims to be Danish, but his enthusiasm seems to be Teutonic. I always thought the Danes were supposed to be laid back and casual, but he is hardcore to the core. (Either I am channeling Wittyguy's PU Forum Awards, or some evil spirit has overcome me momentarily.) :) As a pro feature, I mentioned there is access to public and private chats. I got away from chats a few years ago. I was spending too much time watching the girls at Met-art chats. Public chats were free. There were some very attractive, friendly girls at Met-art chats. I was just spending too much time at the public shows. But here is another entry to those chats: some very pretty girls put on softcore shows. It's easy to get addicted to these shows and spend hours watching the girls. Some people find the chats boring, since they are softcore. But I enjoy them too much, and don't want to get hooked again. There is a current bonus offer that allows you access to differing numbers of bonus sites, depending on which site you join through. Use the SpunkyBee site to join through: $29.95 for 30 days membership 10 sites included in your membership (including 18Stream) Use the 18Stream site to join through: $34.95/month for 30 days membership 3 sites in your membership If the site were a solo offering, it would be extemely expensive. But with the current bonus offer of up to 10 of the TonyBucks sites for the price of one, this is a worthwhile network to join. 09-20-10  12:17pm Replies (0) Review 259 Rough 18 (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Zip file for each photoset. -Video download formats: WMV: high, medium, low quality MPEG Quicktime High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps) -Updates once a week video/photoset -Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes -Easy login. -No DRM. -Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful. Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos. -Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot. -No streaming option to view the videos. -Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time. -The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious. -It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots. I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that. -Site navigation is poor. -Search is poor. -There is no simple listing of the models. -Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes. -Volume on some videos is too low. -Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site. Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism). I do not care for the niche. But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good. You can't get a good idea of what the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't. Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body. The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch the scene for 10 or 20 minutes. This is basically dull spanking porn. My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene. This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking. I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual. On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long. The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls. This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult. The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot. I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long, and other problems. This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating. 09-18-10  03:05am Replies (6) Review 260 18 Stream (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The best site design of this network I've seen so far. -Nice-sized thumbnail for each model, giving you a good idea of what the model looks like. Many of the network sites have no nice-sized thumbnail of the model, so you have to play the streaming video or download the complete video before you get an idea of what the model looks like. -Multiple viewing/downloading options: Steaming: in low, medium, high quality Screenshots: good sized, blurry to nice quality, to illustrate the video, could be downloaded as individual photos, but mainly useful to see what the model looks like and to get an idea of the action. Download options: WMV, low, medium, high quality MPEG MOV -Advertises daily updates of videos. -No DRM -Easy login to site. -I don't like captcha, but this site has the easiest to read captcha that I've seen. Search is basic but functional: search by model name returns model's videos and thumbnail of model. Cons: Mostly minor: -There is a site timeout. But login is easy. -Advertises 500+ teen porn videos. My sense is there are far less videos at the site, but since there is no simple txt listing of videos, I won't take the time and effort to count the videos. -A high-speed connection is really helpful. A high quality 30 minute video file is about 1.3 GB. To download that file takes 2 hours 30 minutes for a download speed of 150 KB/s. I can't watch the videos in streaming, because they stutter and stop. But I believe most PU members have fast Internet connections so watching a streaming video would be no problem. -Search is basic: Can't search by description of model, or by type of sexual activity. -Need to manually create your own listing for the videos you download. Files are named as 342.wmv, 201.wmv, 199.wmv. Write your own description of model, and whatever else you want to know, with the file name/number. -Watermark-bottom right corner, larger than needed. Bottom Line: Excellent hardcore teen video site. The videos are crystal clear for hardcore. Great definition, good lighting. There is actually foreplay and cuddling and kissing before the sex in many scenes. Many of the girls are extremely attractive, and even the male teens are good-looking. Good camera work on the videos. Instead of gonzo sex, you get scenes of guys and girls making out and having sex. And during the sex, instead of just shots of 2 or more bodies banging away, you actually get to look at some lovely girls enjoying a sexual experience. The lighting is generally ok to good. The skin color and skin tone of the models is generally ok to good. At most of the Euro teen sites, the models are almost all small breasted, which I like. There are some models here with medium-sized or larger breasts. But all the breasts appear natural. No fake plastic boobies, almost no tattoos on the female models, very little piercing (some belly button or ear-rings, but that is minor). It's really nice the girls are so young and clean-looking. Obviously not all videos are going to have good lighting and good skin tone color and good everything else, but the general level of the videos is very high for a hardcore video site. Most of the videos are 1 boy-1 girl, which is what I prefer. There are a few vids with 2 boys-2 girls. I saw 1 lesbian scene. I saw 1 female solo masturbation scene. Models take a less gonzo style approach to sex. There is actually some tenderness and cuddling and stroking before getting down to hardcore sex. No strip tease, but a big improvement over the wham-bam-fuck-the-slut approach. Female models don't give out with a lot of fake moans and groans. They do make some sounds expressing enjoyment and excitement, but these are more believable, natural sounds instead of the show-boaty expressions of American porn where the females start screaming: "GOD", "FUCK THAT CUNT", "OOOHHHWHEEEE!!!" as soon as the male gets within 25 1/2 inches of their body. (Slight exaggeration, possibly, or maybe not. :)) The male models are young, fresh, mainly good-looking teens. In some cases the boys look as good or better than the females. The male actors treat the females, in general, with liking and respect. There is little to no humiliation or abuse of the female models. Bottom Line: This is a hardcore video site that makes a nice change of pace from gonzo sex. I am giving the site a score of 90, because it's the one of the better hardcore video sites I've seen (not to be compared to DVD sites like VideoBox or VideosZ) treating the models with respect, affection, gentle sex, whatever. 09-16-10  05:53pm Replies (7) Review 261 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of content. -Wide variety of content of sexual activity. -Current Site Stats (2010-09-14): Movies : 998 DVDs : 212 Actors : 1019 Hours : 440 Total Size : 398 Gb -Site is currently updating. Updates 1 video clip every 1-4 days (very irregular update schedule). -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No watermark on older style videos. Cons: -Navigation is basic and awkward. -To log on to the network, you have to enter through the site you joined through. You can't log on directly to any of the sister sites you have access to. Once you log on to the site you joined, only then can you enter one of the sister sites you have access to. -Moving around a single site is basic and awkward. To search for files at the site, or to look through the files available, have to look at lists from drop-down menus, or have to click many times to change from different pages. There is a lot of material at this site, and it's cumbersome to try to glance through the different video and photoset files. -Need a fast ISP connection to play the streaming videos, otherwise the streams will frequently stutter and stop. -A few good-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like in each video would be very helpful. -A simple listing of the models appearing in each video would be helpful. Many models in videos are not named. Bottom Line: Viewing options: Download options: high and low resolution. Streaming options: high and low quality. Other options: trailer or screen capture. Frame width by height: 720x480 Total bitrate: 2128 kbps Quality of the video depends on whether the video is the high quality or the low quality option. Also depends on how long ago the video was shot. The more recent videos are higher quality. High quality streaming is not high quality. It is higher quality than the low quality, but it is nowhere near what some sites have as high quality. These are professionally shot videos, but the overall quality could be much better in many ways. One example: I am watching a scene where Rocco and a second man are both on a woman. In parts of the scene, you are seeing the action through a large block of clear plastic or glass. You want to see what's happening, without having a block of plastic obscuring the action. Remove the plastic, or shoot from a different angle. This is not the camera-man trying to be artistic, it's just the camera-man being lazy or stupid and not bothering to shoot from an angle that clearly shows the action. Site content: You have a lot of vintage porn (101 videos) and even more straight recent porn (892 videos). The vintage porn tries to add a little story-line to the sex, maybe even have some costumes. It's basically sex, with a little story that is a negligible attempt to add some flavor or meaning to the sex. The more recent porn also has a tiny story-line, but it's really just straight sex. The actors follow a script that is mainly fucking and sucking, with little conversation (the female models probably don't understand much English, and English is what appears to be used to communicate in the videos). Minor roughness and humiliation to the sex, but not a lot of hard-core roughness or hard-core humiliation. Most scenes are group-type sex, where you have 3 or more people fucking. Cunnilingus, bj, vaginal and anal sex in almost all scenes. No homo-erotic action of boy+boy. You do get boy+girl, 2 boys+girl, 2 girls+boy, or more than 3 people). Some girl+girl action in some of the scenes, but the main emphasis is on the boy+girl action. I was a member of this site a year ago. At that time I found some videos that I thought were really good. But I can't find those videos now. If the videos are still at the site, I can't find them because of the poor navigation. There is a large amount of video content, and the videos are split into series where the type of sexual action is changed from one series to another. The models are mainly Eastern European females. Rocco Siffredi is the star of the site, he's featured in most videos, and he can become annoying at times with his heavily accented English and overly boyish charm. The quality of the videos is OK to good, not great. The large amount of content, and the wide variety of content means there is plenty of material to search through. 09-14-10  10:13am Replies (4) Review 262 Nubile Girls HD (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Nice-sized thumbnail of the female model to illustrate each video. -Some cute models. -The girls are real teens, not twenty- or thirty-year olds trying to appear much younger. -Can add/view comments on videos and photosets. -Can rate the videos photosets. -Small watermark bottom right-hand corner of photos. -The videos are mainly clear and crisp, with adequate lighting. The videos and photosets are less gonzo style than the other sites in the network, but are not glamor-style, more like in-between gonzo and glamor style. Cons: -There is no search. Not a major problem because the site is so small. Only 75 videos so far. Can list the videos by name of model or by date posted (but date posted is not accurate or reliable). -Occasionally, a photo will not display when you click on the thumbnail, get an error message: "cannot be displayed, because it contains errors". -Hard to tell what the update rate is, because the posting dates are unreliable. -Only 1 size of file to download video (no choice of hi, mid, lo quality). -Videos download as WMV files (no other file extension choice). -Only 1 size of zip file to download photoset. -Limited types of models: they are all white Eastern European teens. Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site, with some good looking young teens. Sample size for the videos and photosets: Videos are 400 MB to 1 GB Photosets are 40 MB to 120 MB Currently 75 videos with a matching photoset for each video. Usually 1 video per model. A few models have 2 videos. Photos are crisp, but mainly to illustrate the video action; the photos are not artistic or glamor style such as the softcore photo sites like metart or mplstudios. The style of the photos is more natural than glamor. I personally don't like the photos, but some PU members might appreciate them: they are clear, usually crisp, hardcore photosets, with some really nice-looking models. Natural style of photography. The video and photoset are mainly hardcore boy-girl; a few sets are softcore or midcore, where the girl is solo or with a second girl. The photosets approach high quality in terms of photo size. But you don't actually get the quality of a met-art, mplstudios or other softcore photo site. I don't understand why it's so hard to make a quality hardcore photoset. This site has plenty of cute girls, doing hardcore, but the photography is poor or lacking: in the flesh colors of the girls, in the presentation of the girls, the girls just lack attractiveness or allure in the photos. I grew up in the days of Playboy and Penthouse. I didn't like every Playboy or Penthouse photoshoot, but in many cases, the girls/women looked extremely attractive, sexy, luscious, gorgeous, adorable, lovely. You don't get that in these photosets. You can find it in the met-art and mplstudios and other glamor teen sites. The problem is that the girls are not presented at their best. It's like you buy an off brand of some product you like, Cheerios, or Rice Crispies, and the taste is blah instead of what you get from the major brand. They don't use photoshop or airbrushing on these photos, and that's part of why I rate the photos lower. But it's also the skin tone of the models, the posing, the composition, everything that factors into how attractive or erotic a photograph is. The photosets are high quality in the size of the photos (each photo is 100 KB to 1 MB), but the quality of the photos is not up to the standards of the softcore glamor sites. Some of the models at this site are also at met-art, glamdeluxe, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. And they look much more attractive on the other sites, because of the photography or videography. If this site is included in your network membership, you should definitely check the site out. Some models here (mainly the same ones shown on many of the other sites in the network) are very attractive, the videos are shot less gonzo style, the photosets are worth looking at. 08-07-10  08:09pm Replies (14) Review 263 Teen Stars Only (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM -No download limit -No site timeout -Exclusive content for about 1/2 of the sites in the network. -Exclusive content for the teenstarsonly site. -File download options: hi, medium, low quality WMV MP4 ( Portable Devices ) MOV ( Quicktime Video ) -Zip files for the photosets Cons: -Limited search options: Can search by name of model, or by date of update. But can't search by description of model, by description of type of sex action. -Clumsy navigation. -Going from one of the network sites to another is clumsy. -Trying to see/search the vid files on a site is clumsy. -Advertising for other sites on each page. -Poor file names. Files are named with a number and the suffix "high", "medium", or "low", depending on whether you download the high, medium or low quality file. But if you want to know who the model is, or a short description of the action, you have to manually make up your own file record. -You need a fast connection to play the flash files. My ISP connection downloads at 150-160 Kb/s, so I could not play the videos by flash. The flash video would stutter and stop, stutter and stop. So to see what the video was like, I had to download the entire video, then play the file. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): -Because I have a slow ISP connection (150-160 Kb/s download speed), it takes almost 2 hours to download a single video in high quality. -The video files are fairly large size: One sample movie, 25 minutes runtime: Full Movie ( High Quality ) - ( 989.56 Mb) Full Movie ( Medium Quality ) - (500.93 Mb) Full Movie ( Low Quality ) - (301.81 Mb) Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site. Mainly a video site. There is a large photoset for each video, but there is little to no erotic or artistic quality to the photos, they are more like video captures of the hardcore action. The models can be very attractive: they are young, slender, Eastern European teens, but you can't easily see how attractive they are, it's goddamn hard to see what the faces of these girls are like: the head is often cut out of the picture, the body, even though young, slender and attractive, is not made to look attractive. It's gonzo video and gonzo photography, and there's no erotic value to the photos, little erotic value to the videos, which are hardcore meat factory fuck and suck. Site is part of a nice-sized network. This site hasn't updated since March 2010, but other sites in the network are updating. 08-01-10  07:33pm Replies (11) Review 264 Zemani (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -3 sizes for photosets: 800, 1200, 4000 px. -zip file for each size px for each photoset. -Online slideshow for photosets. -Can download the videos or view as streaming. -Material is exclusive. -Tiny, unobtrusive watermark bottom right hand corner of photos. -Vids have a larger watermark than the photos, small but not tiny, placed at bottom right corner of the picture. -No DRM. -No timeout from site. -Can rate the model, photoset, and video. But this is a matter of personal taste, and I don't agree with a lot of the scores. -Simple site navigation. Easy to get to the sets and videos of each model. -One update per day (photoset or video). -Most photosets have 100+ pictures each. Cons: -Videos download as avi files. No other choice of format. -Videos download as one file size only (no choice of high, medium, low resolution). -Downloaded files have no descriptive name. Instead, the download file name is a number with "big", "medium" or "small" attatched, depending on whether you are downloading the big, medium or small px set. Downloaded videos are named with a number and the prefix "zemani-v". -Search is basic but adequate. Can search by model name, age, or hair color. There is a limited number of models and photosets and videos, so this is not a big con. Bottom Line: I resisted joining zemani as long as I could. But some of the models at this site are absolutely mouth-watering. I want to sink my teeth and other body parts into these gorgeous creatures. Although there are a nice number of photos and photosets for a site that started in 2006, I can't help wishing there were more photosets for my favorite models. Most models only have 1 or 2 photosets. Site stats (April 4, 2010): photos 64,806 galleries 471 videos 130 130 videos sounds like a lot of videos. But like many other softcore sites, the videos are short, most less than 10 minutes in runtime. Even though the videos might have a gorgeous model as the subject, like most softcore sites, the videos are mainly forgettable. The real value lies in the photosets. The photographic quality of the videos is good to high, but the videos are just ok. I'm much more into softcore than hardcore, but at most softcore sites, the videos are just plain boring, no matter how attractive the model is. I don't really understand the psychology of why softcore photosets of a model can be arousing, but a softcore video of the same model is usually boring. That is my reaction to the videos at softcore teen mega-sites. The TBP review of this site, release date 6 Mar 2010, states the video "content ranges from softcore nude portraits to pussy spreads, girl-girl erotic posing, and more." I saw a number of videos, not all, and the only content I saw was strictly softcore: no pussy spread, no girl-girl interaction that went beyond two girls that were nude. I found no solitary or mutual masturbation, no toys, nothing that remotely approached hardcore porn. There are some videos where the model performs a strip-tease. But you get better, more exciting strip tease at college night at a bar, where the strippers are non-professional, probably less attractive than the zemani models, but they put on a much better show than the zemani models. Also, the canned soundtrack on the videos is obtrusive; it adds nothing to the video, and often sounds annoying. The models are 18 to very early 20s. Almost all Caucasian. There is a nice mix of different settings/backgrounds for the photoshoots and videos: interior in a house, in a field, a stream, a lake or sea. Most photosets make nice use of colors in the background, the photosets are mainly nicely focused, the model is nicely featured in the shots. Not all shots are perfect, of course, but the photosets are equal to what you find at met-art, mplstudios, high quality glamor-style softcore photosets. If you are looking for something more explicit than very softcore nudity, go elsewhere. If you are looking for softcore tease or strip tease, you are better off at a different site. On a value basis, because the softcore teen mega-sites have far greater content, you are better off joining them first. But this is a nice addition to the category, and the content will build over time. And the site does feature some absolutely yummy girls. 04-04-10  07:31pm Replies (0) Review 265 Muse.org (0) 65.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -High quality softcore photosets. -Glamor style photography. -This is a Richard Murrian site (some contributions by other photographers). -There are some yummy-looking models here. -Most models are teens, some in early 20s. -Photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px. -Zip file for download of the photo series. -Low annual fee ($59 per year). -Exclusive content. -No DRM. -Billing by CCBILL. Cons: _The photosets are small with only a few photos per set. -Because of the small number of photos per set, it's not a satisfying experience looking at a photoset. I want more photos in a set, which I can get at met-art, metmodels, mpl studios, femjoy, justteensite, or any of the softcore megasites. -There are some videos, but the main focus is on photos. -Updates are very irregular. -No response to emails from customer service. Bottom Line: Problems at muse: I joined muse with a 12-month membership in March, 2009. Because the site had no updates for most of 2009, the site advertised that members who had a 12-month membership in the un-updated part of 2009, would get a free 6-month extension of their membership. I emailed the site requesting the membership extension, but received no reply. My membership was not extended. Also, it was difficult trying to log into the site while my membership was still active. I often got the error message: "Sorry, the page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization." My experience at the site was unfavorable. I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste. 03-17-10  05:24pm Replies (3) Review 266 Tranny Pros (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Niche: She-males. -Exclusive content: Yes. -Watermark: small watermark bottom right corner. -Delivery: ---download high or low quality WMV files. ---stream high or low quality. -DRM: No. -Download restrictions: No. -Screencaps: Yes. -Search: by series, movie title, or actor. -Updates: 1 scene per week. Cons: -Only WMV format for download. -No photosets (except for screencaps). -Almost all the models have a blank thumbnail in the directory, so you don't have an easy way to see what the models look like. Bottom Line: Site Stats: Clips: 122 Hours: 60 Total Size: 54 Gb -Stats for videos: -Bit rate: 2148 kbps (varies slightly) -Dimensions: 720x480, 720x528 -Average length of scene: about 30 minutes The style of the video is like a home-made video, the visual quality, focus, color, lighting, etc. are not as good as the standard for most of the video clips on the network, the producers are going for a "real-life, guy meets trannies (guy with one or two trannies) and they have sex almost immediately. No plot or story, just sex, the "production values" are slightly less than the standard videos at the network in a deliberate attempt to make the video seem like a slice of life, a real-life capture of a sexual encounter between the male customer and 1 or 2 tranny prostitutes, instead of a planned movie. One improvement over many porn clips is there are less fake moans and groans from the models and male performers in these clips. This site of she-males is for someone who wants a change from the usual boy-girl, girl-girl action. Definitely a different type of attraction. Somewhat confusing at first, there is emotional reaction positive and negative when watching these she-male performers. The overall attractiveness of the performers at this site is OK to nice. I've seen photos where some she-males are exceptionally pretty or even lovely, which can do strange things to your mind. You're thinking, is this a man or a woman, and am I strange for thinking this "person" is attractive, whatever it is. Gay is gay, straight is straight, and this is neither. Also makes you start to think you yourself are not exactly what you thought you were either. There are many she-males at the site that, at first glance, even second glance, you don't know if they are females or not, until they drop their drawers. They can be attractive. As for the male models in the scenes, you don't know how to classify them either: are the male models bi, or what? I'd guess bi, because they (the male models) are swinging both ways with 1 or more she-males. The site is a collection of Devils Films videos that were shot for the Devils Films series titled "Transsexual Prostitutes". Those videos were collected and used to make Trannypros.com. The main benefit of membership in Trannypros.com is that it gives you access to all 19 sites in the netFameSolutions network. That means over 9700 clips, almost 3200 GB, for a broad selection of general and niche content. The network is a good value for the PU/TBP special price of $14.95/month, and there are special offers at times that give you an even lower price. The general quality of the video clips at the network is good, professional quality. This is a video network, with only limited photosets, but a solid offering for the price. 07-31-09  01:21pm Replies (0) Review 267 Curry Creampie (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Niche: Indian models (from India). -$14.95/month special price thru PU/TBP. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Small watermark bottom right corner on videos. -Can search by series, title of DVD, actor, etc. -Can view videos streaming in high or low quality. -Can download videos in high or low quality. -Screenshots illustrate the video action. Cons: -mbaya pointed out in a comment dated 08-26-08 that some of the "Indian". models are non-Indians dressed up to look like Indians. -WMV format only for downloads. -No photos except for screenshots. Bottom Line: Site stats: Movies: 92 Hours: 45 Site size: 41 GB General category: Indian/Hindu (92 movies) Subcategories: -Anal (7) -Big Breast (14) -Cream pie (49) -Cum swallow (3) -Stats for videos: -Bit rate: 2115 kbps -Dimensions: 720x480 Videos are nice-quality, average about 30 minutes each. This is a niche site, small-sized content, for Indian models. The first video I saw at the site, the model spoke English with an American accent, like she grew up in the United States. No Indian accent at all. Had a jewel in her forehead, some necklace that might have been Indian, but no sense of being Indian at all, just a hardcore porn model with brownish skin-tone. So with the stream of "hot, dirty" talk out her mouth, there was no illusion of an Indian girl having sex. Instead, get a porn clip of a standard porn model-slut giving a bj and getting fucked, with a lot of fake moans, groans, dirty-talk, fake-excitement sex. Is it better to watch a video with so much fake bullshit with the sound turned off? Since I didn't think the model was attractive, I thought it better to turn off the clip entirely, and watch a different clip in hopes of finding something better. 2nd clip I watched, same thing: A girl from United States claiming she was from Bombay, speaking American English, no accent, a lot of dirty sex talk before and during the sex coming out of her mouth, sort of like verbal diarrhea. 3rd clip I watched, a different girl with US English, no accent. This girl didn't bother with the dirty talk; her moans and groans, while still fake, were softer and less annoying than the first two girls. So she was a big improvement over the first two girls, though not Indian either. Attractiveness of the models: Not gorgeous, not by a mile, but ok looking. With a fast connection, you could download the entire site in a few days. If you're into Indian women, or want a change from the Euro models of many sites, you can look through the site contents in a few days (with a fast connection and a lot of free time). Does it make a difference that many of the models aren't really Indian, but dressed up to look like Indian? That depends on your own mind-set. My problem is that many of the models act like standard porn sluts, especially with the dirty talk and the fake moans of passion, and that detracts from the sex. And the sex is straight bj, screwing vaginal, anal, whatever. No storyline, no buildup, no tenderness or anything to add to the fuck-fuck-fuck action. If you enjoy straight fucking (with bj, vaginal and anal) with no bells or whistles, you might find the site worthwhile. The videos are professionally shot of good quality and are decent to watch visually. My problem is the sex is straight hardcore sex with nothing to make it interesting to me. Curry Creampie is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Membership in any one of the sites allows full access to all the sites, with a large mixture of good quality broad and niche content. 07-30-09  06:51am Replies (4) Review 268 Big Fat Creampie (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Niche: heavyset females. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy log-on. Enter username and password. No secret word usually. -Movie options: --Can watch streaming video high or low quality. --Can download WMV format high or low quality. -Screenshots clearly illustrate action in the video. -Nice quality videos for porn (see bottom line). Cons: -Limited content: 63 videos at the site -WMV format only for downloads. -Infrequent updates. Site has been around since at least May 2007, has only 63 videos. Updates once every 1-8 weeks or so (very irregular updates). Bottom Line: Niche site of heavyset females. Only 63 videos at the site. Total size of site: 25 Gb. The videos are nice quality. Categories: - Anal (9) - Cream pie (36) - Ebony (5) - Mature/MILF (11) -Stats: -Videos run about 17-32 minutes -Bit rate: 2115 kbps -Dimensions: 720x480 Anyone who is into heavy-set females can download all the material at this site, with a fast connection, in a few days. And then you can move on to the other sites in the netFameSolutions network that have much more content. Membership in any one of the sites offers access to all 19 sites. There are some sites in the network with broad appeal, and with large amount of good-quality videos (good video quality, good lighting, good color, good focus, good editing, etc. for a good quality porno video). Some of the really nice sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint By itself, this site has limited value, for a score of 70, but the main value of site membership lies in access to all the network sites. 07-28-09  07:18pm Replies (0) Review 269 Sex Asian 18 (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -If you get tired of lovely Euro teens, look at Japanese teens for fresh models. I have nothing against Latino and other types, but Japan makes an art form of photographs and videos of lovely young Japanese girls. -Huge amount of content. Just like Met-art, you get exhausted looking through all the pictures/videos on this site, and know you can't see all the gorgeous girls there are to see. There just isn't enough time, or enough space on your hard drive to download it all, unless your handle is badandy400. Advertise: -daily updates. Minimum of 2 movies daily. -high res DVD quality movies in either AVI or WMV format -24/7 customer support. All emails answered by a human within 48 hours. -can search by terms and keywords. Can search by model, photoset, video, censored video, uncensored video, or by category (interracial, amateur, cosplay, popular actress, school girl, mature, etc.). -no DRM -easy cancellation -signup thru CCBill or Verotel Cons: -Mosaic (a form of censorship for genitalia) takes getting used to. -Acting/attitude of female models different from American and Euro style, takes getting used to. -The photosets are high quality: lovely photos, but not enough of them. This is more of a video site than a photo site. -The model, movie and photoset information is embedded in the page as a photograph, so it can't be copied and pasted manually into a text file on your PC. Name of file, model(s), title of movie/photoset, etc. have to be manually typed into your personally created database to keep track of what the downloaded movies/photosets are. -1 file size for zip photosets. No choice of low, medium, high res photos. -1 file size for video files. No choice of low, medium, high res video. -No choice of file type for videos. Some video files download as AVI, some download as WMV. -Only 10 movie captures (screenshots) to illustrate a movie which could be 2-4 hours. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -No online streaming to watch the movie. -Apparently viewing a photoset online counts against your daily download limit of 12 GB. I sent an email asking for verification of this, got no reply from support. -The 12 GB daily download limit is a lie: -Day 1 of my membership, I was banned for rest of the day after downloading less than 3 GB. The site states that if you download more than 1 thread at a time, you are counted for each thread. The site does not state that you are mis-counted for muli-thread downloads. -Day 3 of my membership, banned again for rest of day after downloading less than 3 GB. The form BAN message stated either I exceeded 12 GB or my account had been hacked. I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time before starting the next download. -Day 4 of membership banned for rest of day before I reached the 12 GB limit. Again, I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time, but was improperly banned anyway. -Email support is a lie. The site claims the email support is 24/7, and that a human will respond to each email request within 48 hours. I sent numerous requests to email support. I check my email several times a day, both regular in-box and the spam-box. I never received an email response from support. Since I did not get a response after 3 emails to support, I sent an email requesting help to their accounts email address, explaining my problems and the lack of response from support email. Have not received any reply from accounts email. -No confirmation email of membership purchase from CCBill. BOTTOM LINE: The photosets and videos are good-to-high quality (dvd quality, not the super high visual quality of specialty sites like Femjoy for photosets and videos) stats: photos: dimensions 768x1050 to 1200x1800 video:resolution: 640x480 Site ease of use: This is a site with a large number of files (videos and photosets) you will want to download. Using a download manager is the only reasonable way to handle the downloading chores, unless you are willing to spend a massive number of hours at the computer keyboard manually downloading each separate file. The form BAN message states you are banned from site for 15 hours because you exceeded bandwidth usage or your account was hacked. You are issued username and password by CCBill, and have no control over them. I paid for a service, access to a site, and did not receive what I paid for. What does the large amount of good quality site content matter to me, if I can't access the content for large periods of time? I believe my score is fair based on the lousy service I am getting. I was generous only because of the large quality content that it is hard as hell to get to. Edit 1: Was told in an email that multi-thread counter was fixed, you no longer get early ban for using a download manager. Also, I was given 10 free days because of my site problems. 07-19-09  05:07pm Replies (4) Review 270 Mother Fucker XXX (0) 79.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -On the promo/preview page, you see the statement, "Here, everyday is Mother's day!". With an introduction like that, how can a site like motherfuckerxxx possibly help being part of the American way of life, right up there with Superman, apple pie, and Mom's little chocolate cookies? -This is a MILF site.(In today's world, America's favorite pastime is one's mother, not the girl next door that Playboy made famous). -Site updates once a week with 1 DVD scene. -content: over 125 clips/scenes. -scenes about 13 to 42 minutes long. -screenshots, 40-90 nice-sized screenshots to clearly illustrate each scene. -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Easy log-on. Cons: -WMV format only for download. -No zip file for the sceenshot pictures illustrating each single clip (but no one wants to save these screenshots on their PC anyway). -No picture photosets. No high or even medium quality pix. -Limited search engine: Can use the search engine to search by model name. Can not use search engine for physical characteristics of the model, movie title, series, or type of sex. -A major negative: The name of the model may not be listed for the clip. Bottom Line: This is a niche site for MILF. The video quality of clips is OK to good. The site is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value. Network access includes access to 19 different sites: -over 1500 movies -over 500 full DVDs -exclusive content -unlimited download -daily updates Giving the site a score of 79. Most of the value of the site comes from network access (entry to all 19 sites). The network as a whole is a good value for the price, with some sites having really nice videos, but this site is one of the smaller sites in the network. 07-18-09  03:53pm Replies (0) Review 271 Hairy Undies (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips. -Screenshots also show what the model looks like. -No DRM -No download limits -Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised -No inactivity timeout from site Cons: -No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only) -A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar. -The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips -The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network -Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network. Bottom Line: Site has limited content: Movies 118 Total size 46 GB compare the stats above to Devilsfilm: movies 1,000+ total size 2,400 GB This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price. The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here. The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem. One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans. My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value. I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her. Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead. Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy. This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth. I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower. 07-11-09  10:44pm Replies (0) Review 272 Rocco Siffredi (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM -No download limits -Advertises exclusive blue ray quality high definition content -Rocco Siffredi vintage movies are included -Online store will sell exclusive clothes so you can dress the way Rocco Siffredi dresses (same T-shirts and caps. But this appears to be a product in the planning stage) -At the Rocco Siffredi online store, you can buy DVDs featuring Rocco, sex toys, herbs for men and women, lingerie for women. -Movie options: --Streaming in low and high quality; --Download in low and high quality. --Also have screenshots and a trailer to illustrate the clip. Site stats: -Movies: 680 -DVDs: 156 -Actors: 788 -Hours: 339 Cons: PROS (continued): Site stats (continued): -Total size: 307 GB Sample stats from some of the high-definition videos: length: 8-35 minutes bit rate: 2147-2212 kbps dimensions 720x400-720x480 -I would have thought the bit rate and dimensions would be much higher, because of the statement that there was blue ray quality high definition content. However, I did think the visual quality was very good on some videos CONS: -Watermark larger than needed, lower right corner -Large file size of high quality video. A single file can be 500 MB or more, but this is great video, and if you have to buy another hard drive to store these files, it's worth the money. -Because these are large files, need fast internet connection to watch high-definition streaming or to download. -Files download as WMV format only. -Sometimes the videos are slightly out of focus. Bottom Line: BOTTOM LINE: High quality videos of some lovely, yummy models. A real treat. I'm sorry I didn't find this site in the network earlier. This is the best site in the network of 19 sites. First video I saw at this site, the girl was really cute, the action seemed real, not acted. Video looks high definition, very good lighting, very good colors, model did not speak or understand English that well, especially with Rocco Siffredi's strong accent, but she was a love, not a porn star. It was like looking at a gorgeous high-quality met-art picture come to life, hard-core action, but not dirty, even though what the girl was doing was pure hard-core. This is the best quality hard-core video site I've seen so far, with ok to nice-looking to very attractive models, good acting, few or no fake-sounding moans and groans by the model, often no music soundtrack (which is a real plus, considering the noisy music soundtracks on porno clips). Quality of videos varies a lot. Some videos are just ok, some are really nice to great (I'm talking about how much I like the videos, which is a subjective reaction, but there are videos here that deserve to be classics). Some PU members rave about the great quality of the Femjoy photoshoots and videos. That is softcore. This is great quality hardcore video. Rocco could be less intrusive, but you get to watch lovely women having a sexual experience. Some videos are erotic/artistic. This is hardcore, but with real value that is more than just crude or dirty sex. There are good-to-very-good looking models, good-to-great quality video, some interesting storylines/concepts for the sex. This site deserves a 90 for itself alone, and you get a lot of additional nice material from the other sites on this network. This site is really outstanding, and I don't understand why other PU members haven't been singing its praises. I think Met-art is the best softcore site I've seen for teen glamor photos, and this is the best hardcore site I've seen so far for quality videos. 07-09-09  08:27pm Replies (4) Review 273 Peter North DVD (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Some very attractive models -OK to nice quality video clips -Nice sized thumbnail screenshots that clearly show the action for each video clip -Thumbnails also clearly show the model(s) in each video clip -No DRM -No download limits -large number of video clips -no automatic timer cutoff from site Cons: -watermark: slightly bigger than needed, in bottom right corner of vids -search engine is pretty basic: --can only search by 1 of 4 factors: DVD title;category(eg, anal, blowjob);series(from the studio);model name --there are much more selective search engines at other sites that will search on a combination of factors, and by much more specific factors than the search engine here -many of the clips have an "intro" section where it sets up the sex action to follow. They are trying to make the clips more than just a straight sex clip, but these are basically straight sex clips with a tiny story and acting that is really amateurish. Bottom Line: This site is part of the netFameSolutions network. Membership in any one site includes access to 19 different sites: -over 1500 movies -over 500 full DVDs -some exclusive content -daily updates video specs (approximate, can vary from clip to clip) bit rate: 2148 dimensions: 720x480 That is ok to good video quality, but not hi-definition quality some PU members want But the videos are professionally shot: mainly ok to good focus, good editing, ok to good colors for skin of models and sets (except where they get fancy and try for special effects thru color); acting is porno standard amateur acting, but fewer fake moans and groans of passion than many porn clips but still overdone, soundtrack music less jarring than many porn clips but does not add to the clip value PeterNorth.com and PeterNorthDVD.com are both sites in the same netFameSolutions network. It appears that the main reason for 2 peter north sites instead of 1 is a marketing decision, because both sites appear to be essentially the same. Most of the the DVD material of both sites appears to be the same clips. Both sites have the same site design: same search engine, same way of presenting the different DVD clips, same Guestbook, same Ask A Question, same other features as well. PeterNorth.com number of movies 2010;number of DVDs 325 PeterNorthDVD.com number of movies 1858;number of DVDs 313 A nice addition to each of the Peter North sites would be a complete model listing where they show a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the video clips that feature her, with the basic clip data for each: size(MB) and length of time. For the network as a whole (all 19 sites), I am giving the network a score of 87. There is a wide variety of niches to see at the different sites, with a large number of attractive models in nicely-shot video clips. For the PeterNorthDVD.com site by itself, I can't really assign a specific value, because most of the value comes from the network of 19 sites, and not this specific site by itself. 07-08-09  08:12pm Replies (4) Review 274 White Ghetto (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -no DRM -no download limits -search engine: can search by movie title, category, series, or model -visual quality of the videos is ok to good -advertises exclusive content -updates each day with one video scene/clip -White Ghetto niches: --squirting --curry (models are supposed to be Indians from India) --transsex The site also has videos of older men with young women, lesbians, heavy MILFs, heavy models, older women (I think of MILFs as women in their 30s or 40s, but this site has videos of women in their 50s+), etc. Cons: -Files download as WMV files only, no other format available -Personal taste varies, but the models that are supposed to be from India, are not attractive. I've seen gorgeous Indian models, but these models are not good-looking. -The same for the transsex models: they are mainly on the plain-to-less-than-plain side of looks. -Actually, I looked at vid caps of every single model at the site, and I did not find a single model that I thought really attractive. The best that could be said for any of them is that some of them are OK looking. -I did not download a single video clip from this site. -That is my personal taste. Maybe other PU members might find some of the models attractive, or the action interesting or exciting or whatever. Bottom Line: White Ghetto is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value. "White Ghetto Films was built on one principle; give the fans what they want!" That is a nice idea, but what this site serves is not my cup of tea. This site is built on non-glamor models, non-glamor sex. If you like a little kink in your sex (like squirting or transsexual) or favor plain-looking models or heavy models or older models, you might enjoy some of the videos at this site. I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value. As a stand-alone site, this site personally has zero value for me. But tastes vary. Some PU members might find it worthwhile to visit. 07-06-09  02:38am Replies (4) Review 275 Cumshot Oasis (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This site focuses entirely on facials: girl gives blowjob, guy finishes off shooting onto her face. -There are a large number of video clips of this content. Currently 822 clips. -easy logon to site -no timer cutoff from site -no DRM -no download limits -video clips are short, most from 4-10 minutes -video clips are ok to nice quality -sample specs for video clips: --bit rate: 2115 --dimensions: 720x480 Cons: -Very basic navigation -What information do they give in the clip listing?: --sometimes model in clip is listed, sometimes not --size of clip (MB) is listed --number of vid caps illustrating clip is listed That's all the information you get. To search thru these clips, you have to look at the vid caps, or play clip itself -Do not give title of clip (what porno DVD title clip came from or the scene #) -Do not give length of clip (playtime for the clip) -Many times, do not give name of model in the clip -No date for when clip was made -Some PU members want high-quality video. Don't get that here. -No search engine to navigate site Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -can not search by name of model, or any other factor. Have to visually look thru the clips, which have 6 sample screen caps each. If you want to examine clip more closely to see if it's worthwhile, then can click thru to examine the additional screen caps, or click thru to see the clip streaming. But to see the click streaming, takes 2 mouse clicks; need 2 mouse clicks to see the additional screen caps. A lot of work and time and effort to try to examine the site contents of short-length video clips. -It is difficult to organize downloaded clips on your PC because of lack of DVD title and scene #, and for many clips, lack of model name. Most of these clips are short, many about 4-10 minutes, so they are only partial scenes, unlike most DVD clips from other sites which are entire scenes usually lasting approximately 16 minutes. BOTTOM LINE: -A lot of attractive female models, late teens or early 20s, very little tatoos, very little piercings -the male models that appear with the females are usually nice-looking guys in their late teens or 20s, usually clean-cut. This is part of the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price. There are some member sites that might be worth joining as a stand-alone site: Devilsfilm SilverstoneDVD PeterNorth You get the really nice sites, and the other sites can be considered bonus material, when you join the network. This site focuses almost entirely on the blowjob that ends in a facial. Even though there are plenty of young, attractive models in the video clips, the action gets repetitious after a while. Personally, I would really enjoy a little variety in the action. Add a nice search engine, add a listing for each clip that includes the name of the model, the DVD title and scene # the clip came from, the time length of the video clip, the date the clip was made, and the site would be much easier to use. Giving the site a score of 87 for the value of the network. As a solo site, in spite of a large number of short clips that are ok-to-nice quality, with nice-looking models, there's too much work involved in trying to organize or view the clips in a non-random way. As a solo site this would score in the 50s. 07-05-09  10:41pm Replies (0) Shown : 251-275 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.46 seconds.