Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 201 Wow Girls (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -A nice number of cute or attractive models. -High quality videos. -High quality photosets. -Easy login. Once you have logged in, and saved your login information, to re-enter the site, just click on the "member login", you don't have to re-enter your login information. -One update per day. Either a photoset or a video. -Content is dated by when it's posted to the site. -Long time before site timeout. -DownThemAll download manager works. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -Simple site design. Makes it easy to search the videos or photosets by model or by posting date. -No download limits. -Preview section for non-members has large-sized thumbnails of many of the models, so you can see what they look like, and if they will appeal to your taste. -Free access to the Diesel Access Live shows. These are live shows/live chats that feature a few models that appear at the Diesel Access network and the Wow Girls site. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. This is an excellent site. -No model bio. These girls are so lovely, it would be nice to know at least something more about them. No age, no physical statistics, no background information, nothing. -Trivial point: eliminate the background music on some of the videos. It doesn't add anything of value. -This is not a con, but more like a suggestion: Preview section for non-members has 10 video samples that give you an idea of what the videos are like. Each video sample is only 16 seconds long. 30 seconds or even 60 seconds would give you a better idea. Or be a sport and make each video sample 90 seconds. The sample video is supposed to be a tease, to make you want to join. But I think a longer sample would be more effective. -Not all photosets or videos are hardcore. Some photosets show only a topless girl. Some photosets show topless and bottomless, but no sexual activity. Bottom Line: This site is brought to you by the same people who run the Diesel Access network (Young Legal Porn, 18 Only Girls). But here, instead of being part of the Diesel Access network, this site is marketed as a separate offering. But the main point is that this site offers the same approach in their content to the Diesel Access network: girls that are in their teens or early twenties, girls that are clean with little or no tatoos or piercings, a lot of young girls that are attractive to really lovely. And the photosets and videos are high quality: professionally photographed or videotaped, good focus, good sound control (very little random noises), good lighting, good colors (skin tones, etc.), clean, sharp photos and videos. Number of videos: 205+ Number of photosets: 349+ -Choice of definition for download of videos: HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD 480p, LD 360p. -You can download selected scenes from each video. -Streaming options include: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. (The LD 360p is for iPods.) -Choice of definition for zips for photosets: 1000 px, 2000 px, 4000 px. The site offers a variety of porn. The sex is not gonzo or rough. It is young girls who are are enjoying themselves in a variety of situations: -A solo girl undressing partway or all the way. It may be simple nudity, or nudity with slight masturbation, or heavier masturbation. -Two girls together. -Sometimes three girls together. -A boy and a girl. -A boy and two girls. Each video is broken down into scenes, with an illustrating thumbnail, so you can get an idea of what the model looks like, and what the action is, for each scene. And the individual scenes in a video can be selected for either download or streaming. So the site gives you a easy way to select how to treat these videos and photosets for your own individual taste. This basic approach/setup is used for the Diesel Access network and at the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites. It's an extremely user-friendly design that makes the site easy to use. The fact that the videos and photosets are high quality, and that many of the girls are extremely attractive, means you don't have to hunt through a pile of junk to find the hidden jewels: Some of the girls are fucking lovely, and their videos and photosets prove it. As a bonus, if you remain a member of Wow Girls over a certain period of time, you probably gain access to Wow Porn. That's the way it worked for me. I was a member of Wow Girls, and one day when logging in to the Wow Girls site, I was given the choice of logging in to Wow Girls, or to Wow Porn. There was no official notification of when I first gained access to Wow Porn. And when I first joined Wow Girls, there was no notice that Wow Porn would be a bonus site if I stayed a member for a certain period of time. Actually, I had never heard of Wow Porn, before it popped up on my computer screen as an alternative choice to logging in to Wow Girls. I'm giving Wow Girls a score of 92. That is based on how attractive many of these models are, the high quality of the videos and photosets, the ease of use of the site, and the nice amount of content at the site. 02-03-13  04:05am Replies (26) Review 202 Oye Loca (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Most of the videos I saw had models who appear to be real latin teens or early twenties. -This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Access to any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy login to site. Once you have logged in, you do not have to re-enter your login information, just click the "members" link to re-enter the site. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I got 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -Can stream or download many videos in multiple definitions. -$17.87/month recurring discounted price through PU. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. -Content does not have a posting date. -In many of the videos the guys are wearing condoms. Doesn't bother me, but some viewers might not like it. -When you log into the site, the first page you see is a cross-sell to some other porn site. If you click the "No thanks" link, you then enter the members area. This is minor, but it's one of the few porn paysites I've seen where you have to bypass an advertising screen before you can enter the members area. But then again, I believe that Amazon sells some e-readers or other branded devices, that come with automatic advertising. And if you pay a one-time fee, you get rid of the automatic advertising. -Most of the videos are in Spanish. But who cares what the models or stunt cocks are saying? It's probably better if you don't understand, because that gives the videos an exotic flavor. Also, you have to admit, these latina models sure speak a lot more, and more naturally, than the Eastern European porn models. Bottom Line: This is a teen hardcore site featuring latina models. The models are late teens or early twenties. There are a lot of attractive models. The body types are latin: so you don't get the preponderance of skinny white teens you have at many teen sites. At this site, you get a cross-section of skinny and medium-sized girls. Most of the girls have little or no tattoos. Very little piercing on most girls. Most of the videos are 1 guy - 1 girl. There are a few 1 guy - 2 girls. Videos Number of videos: 168+ Runtime: about 20 to 40 minutes. They have a number of different ways you can view a video. For streaming, some have a choice of watching in low, medium, or high definition. You can also choose to watch the entire video, a preview of the video, or break the video into which segment you want to watch. For a video that run 29 minutes, you can select your starting point to watch at 0 (the start of the video), at 05.55 which means 5 minutes 55 seconds), at 11:54, 17:51, or 23:48. Or you can choose to download: 1080p MP4; 720p MP4; HI mpg4; LOW mpg4; low WMV; IPod file. They have a photo gallery for each video. They also have a screen cap gallery for each video. I'm not sure why they have both a photo gallery as well as a screen cap gallery. That seems like overkill. But this site is geared more for videos than photos. The photo galleries and the screencap galleries, for me, are a waste of resources and site space. I realize that the operators are trying to provide a complete resource for their members. But I appreciate photos from sites like Metart, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., where they try to present the models as attractively as possible. At this site, they are presenting the models in a "natural" way. So this approach might have fans, but I'm not one of them. If you can put your mind into a frame that the photo sets and the screen caps are like a stop-motion record of a latin guy getting ready to have sex with a latina, and then having the sex, then maybe you would appreciate the photos and screen caps. But I think it's just a waste of time, since you can watch the video directly. Models have only 1 video at Oye Loca. But a few models might have a second video at another site in the network, and still fewer could have 3 or 4 videos scattered throughout the network. They do provide a limited amount of data for each model. For example: for the model Sienna West: Birthday: November 6 Birth Location: Orange County Measurements: 34DD-24-34 Height: 160 cm - 5 feet and 3 inches Weight: 55 kg - 121 lbs Haircolor: Red Nationality: Uruguay Ethicity: Caucasian Tatoos: Stars on both wrist; back of neck Piercings: Navel, nose, upper lip If you are into latina girls, or if you are tired of watching the slender young white teens featured at many other sites, then this site could provide a nice change of pace. And with the other 13 sites that are included with a membership, you also get a nice variety of teen-early twenty models in a variety of settings and situations. Giving the site a score of 85. That's highly subjective. Some users might rate it higher. Other users could rate it lower. 01-20-13  02:54pm Replies (0) Review 203 She's New (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Some very nice, attractive models. -Choice of streaming or download for videos. -Streaming offers low, medium and high definition. -Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p). -There is also an iPod file type for download. -Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password. -No DRM. -Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Content appears to be exclusive to this site. -Many of the models are early in their career in porn. -PU discount of $17.87/month recurring. -The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites. Cons: -Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach. -The names of a few models are not their most common names. Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love. -The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly. Bottom Line: Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties. The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include: ExxxtraSmall Her Freshman Year Innocent High Oye Loca POV Life Self Desire Rub A Teen She's New Solo Interviews Team Skeet Extras Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack Number of videos at site: 50+ Rate of updates: 1 video per week. Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less. The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive. You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading. The site description states: "We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!" You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are not worth keeping. I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site. I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results. By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job. I am giving the site a score of 75. 01-08-13  02:15am Replies (2) Review 204 Team Skeet (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Epoch is the billing company. -Get a confirming email on signup. -Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -Videos have date they were posted to the site. -Nice selection of attractive teen models. Cons: -Most of the cons are basically minor. -Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages. -Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup. -Large watermark bottom right side of videos. -Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition. Bottom Line: -Team skeet is currently a network of 14 sites. There is another network of around 12 sites that is run by the same partner, but that other network requires a separate membership. The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include: Innocent High She's New Oye Loca POV Life Titty Attack The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Self Desire Her Freshman Year Solo Interviews Team Skeet Extras ExxxtraSmall Rub A Teen Teeny Black The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc. You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading. For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition. For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods. You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps. Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out. The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot. 12-25-12  07:58am Replies (8) Review 205 Rub A Teen (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. Username and password. No captcha. -Epoch is the billing company. -You get a confirming email on signup. Which is starting to get rare, for some reason. At least some of the sites I've joined in the last year, I've gotten no confirming email. How much does it cost to send an email? But why bother, since if the customer forgets his username or password, or has some problem about cancelling his membership, that's his problem, and in the meantime, the site can continue charging him for his membership. -I'm seeing so many lovely young models at many different networks/sites. And this network has some truly gorgeous young models. -Default viewing option. Select your favorite viewing option on how to view a scene, and the site will remember it. Not sure how useful this is, seems more like a gimmick than anything useful. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Download manager works. I use DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. Cons: PROS (continued): -Membership price recently reduced to $17.87/month. I'm not sure how long that price reduction will last. -Videos have the date they were posted to the site. ============== CONS: -Pre-checked offer at signup has to be unchecked, or you will have a $1.00 1-day trial membership to some site, that automatically renews at $38.57/month. So if you miss the pre-checked offer, you will be paying $38.57/month until you figure out what's happening. -Get thumbnails advertising other sites on the member's pages. If you paid to get inside, do you need this advertising thrown at you? But many sites are doing it. -Large watermark bottom right side of videos. -Small site. Only has 20 videos so far. -19 of the 20 videos were previously posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). There was one video at Rub A Teen that I did not match up. But that's probably because I didn't want to spend the time going through each video at Tricky Masseur. Bottom Line: If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen. The Rub A Teen site offers more choices in the video definition than the Tricky Masseur site. For the videos that are at both sites, Tricky Masseur offers a low, medium and high definiton download. Rub A Teen goes one better: a low, medium and high definition, and a higher definition. (The high definition is 720p, the higher definition is 1080p.) The Tricky Masseur site often has subtitles to go with the foreign language the actors/models speak. The Rub A Teen site videos do not have the subtitles. But once you have read the subtitles, you realize the words have little meaning, so the absence of subtitles is not a problem, because what the actors/models are saying is basically just noise. Teen Mega World is a huge network, with a lot of great-looking models, and a lot of hot hardcore videos. It's certainly worth joining the network at least once, to look through their tremendous archive of hardcore videos. Tricky Masseur has 93 videos. It's basically an archive site, having added only 1 new video in the last 7 months. The Rub A Teen site has 20 videos total. 19 of the videos were already posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). The difference in file size between the 1080p version and the 720p version is huge: For example, for a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 30 seconds (the Laura video): Rub A Teen Laura video: The 1080p MP4 file size is 2.08 GB. The 720p MP4 file size is 1.05 GB. Tricky Masseur Laura video: No 1080p version is offered. The 720p file size is 999 MB. How many people are going to spend 2 GB per video of hard drive space? Most of the videos are between 25 to 30 minutes in runtime. So if you are going to keep the 1080p version on your hard drive, you are allocating around 2 GB per video. And if you are a collector of videos, you will be buying lots of hard drive capacity to store these huge video files. Actually, I don't know why the file sizes at Rub A Teen are so large. At Diesel network, for instance, they give you 1080p video for a 30 minute runtime, and the file size is 686 MB. That compares to 2.08 GB at Rub A Teen. Comparing the bit rate of the 720p files (of the same video): Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 5134 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Tricky Masseur Total bitrate = 4736 kbps Frame rate = 25 frames/second Comparing the bit rate of a 1080p video, with a completely different 1080p video: Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 10136 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Diesel site Total bitrate = 3199 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second To increase the bit rate by a factor of 3.2, you are increasing the file size from 686 MB to 2.08 GB. I don't know how these technical details play out. But as far as I can tell, you can't really tell the difference on a computer monitor that is 20+ inches in size between the 3199 kbps and 10136 kbps files. Maybe on a large-screen TV monitor, you can tell the difference. But you are going to be spending hundreds of dollars on hard drives, as cheap as they are today, if you are going to collect videos that are 2GB in size. If you enjoy the erotic massage niche, then I suggest signing up with the Teen Mega World network, where you get one site (Tricky Masseur) that focuses on that area, with 93 videos. Plus you get over 20 other hardcore sites that are mainly boy-girl sex, some solo vids, some lesbian vids. All the Rub A Teen videos (except possibly 1 video) are at Tricky Masseur. And Tricky Masseur has over 4 times the videos that Rub A Teen does. Basically, I think it makes little commercial sense to build a site that is a clone of a competitor's site. But I guess that the owners of Rub A Teen decided that the erotic massage niche was popular, and this is what they came up with as an inexpensive way to do it, because they are just buying/leasing some of the same videos that Tricky Masseur bought/leased. For people who don't know about Tricky Masseur, then the Rub A Teen site can be a nice introduction to the erotic massage niche. Rub A Teen is part of the Team Skeet network. Joining any one of their sites gives access to 11 sites in that network, which currently consists of: Exxxtra Small-Her Freshman Year-Innocent High-Oye Loca-POV Life-Self Desire-She's New-Solo Interviews-The Real Workout-This Girl Sucks-Titty Attack. I'm giving the Rub A Teen site a score of 73. If the Tricky Masseur site didn't exist, the Rub A Teen site score would be much higher. 12-02-12  10:45pm Replies (1) Review 206 Erotic Beauty (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models. -Easy login. No captcha. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Access to live cams. -Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec. -Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like. -Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high. -Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here. -If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option. -Content is exclusive. -No watermark on their photos. -You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach. -The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site. -No videos. Photosets only. -A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them. -The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of. -You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details. -Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of videos: 0 Number of models: hundreds+ The dimensions of the recently posted photosets: low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels This is part of the Met Art Money network. That includes: Met Art Erotic Beauty Sex Art The Life Erotic Met Cams Rylsky Art You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup. Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value. Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt: MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week. Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site. MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude). Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has. If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty. Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field. 11-27-12  12:00pm Replies (6) Review 207 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Can stream or download videos. -They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn. -They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting. -There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary). -Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required. -Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password. -PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership. Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn. -Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name. -The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site. -Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films. -Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets. ================== CONS -Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like. -For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option. -The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art. -The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback). A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site. -Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible. -They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't. -They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps. ========================= BOTTOM LINE Site Stats: Movies: 1373 DVDs: 266 Pornstars: 1318 Pictures: 8214 HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies) Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download. They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way. Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot. But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site. The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space. As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones. The main sites in the netFameSolutions network include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc. I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve. 11-20-12  03:54am Replies (0) Review 208 Lay The Kat (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening. -The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site. -Zip files for the photosets. -Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip. Cons: -Archive site. No updates since September 2007. -Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets. -Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend. -More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment. -Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other. -The videos are not dated. -No search function. -No model bio. -No streaming option. -Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos. -Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition. -Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded. Bottom Line: The site is part of the Diesel Access network. The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing. LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend. LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network: At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets. At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets. Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets. Video stats: Number of videos: 44 Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download. Sample dimensions: Height x Width: 852x480 Total bitrate: 4258 kbps Photos stats: Number of photosets: 57 Number of photos per photoset: 80+ Width x Height: 799x1200 or Width x Height: 1198x1800 Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc. The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused. Bottom Line: Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted. However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like. 11-12-12  04:42pm Replies (1) Review 209 Sugar Paradise (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site. -The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename. -There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color. Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed). -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less. Cons: -On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in? -Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009. -Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format). So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about. -Navigation is very basic. -No search function. -Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models. Bottom Line: This is a very softcore teen site. Their model listing consists of 3 models: Diana, brown hair Liza, black hair Nika, blonde hair I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them. There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers. In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens. No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site. In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This is the very softest of softcore. Site statistics: Photosets Number of photosets: 167 Number of photos per set: around 70+ Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res. Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size. Number of videos: 88 Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes. Frame width x height: 720 x 480 Total bitrate: 6096 kbps You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files. There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only. The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4 minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less. The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass. The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional. There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent. The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music. The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or story. I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site. 10-15-12  11:54pm Replies (11) Review 210 Pearl Teens (0) 63.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -DownThemAll manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option. Cons: -Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded. -Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file. -No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving. -But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing. -Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices. -The photosets and videos are very low definition. -This is an archive site. No updates in years. -Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets. -Navigation is primitive. -No search. Bottom Line: CONS(continued): -No posting date for videos or photosets. -No model bio data. -No models are named in any of the photosets. -A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named. -The video files are very low definition. BOTTOM LINE: Site stats: Number of videos: 13 Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480 Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors. Number of photosets: 55 Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p Number of photos per set: 33 to 141 This is a hardcore teen site. This is an archive site. The content was made years ago. You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites. If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design. There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness. The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos. Bottom line: Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss. 09-22-12  07:59pm Replies (5) Review 211 Magic Porn (0) 61.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Can download the videos. -Zip file for each photoset. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -DownThemAll file manager works at this site. Cons: -Primitive site layout. -No search. -Archive site. No updates. -Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low. -Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so you know what the video is about. -No model bios. -Models not named in the videos or photosets. -No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch. -Only one definition for each video. -Only one definition for each photoset. -You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like. Bottom Line: Videos: Number of videos: 106 Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216 Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes Photosets: Number of photosets: 532 Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170 Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels This is a hardcore teen site. Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site. I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them. The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor. The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money. 09-18-12  12:48am Replies (5) Review 212 Best Fucked Teens (0) 63.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Zip files for photosets. -Can download videos as AVI or WMV files. -Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video. -Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. Cons: -Content not dated. -The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices. -The models in the photosets are not named. -You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300. -The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file. -The captcha on login is hard to read. -No search function. -Navigation is basic. -I found no videos worth keeping. -The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping. -No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it. -No model index. -No model bios. -Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input. Bottom Line: Site specs: Number of videos: 38 Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes. Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format. AVI files: 400x300 width x height. 1,213 kbps total bitrate WMV files: 400x300 width x height. 1,214 kbps total bitrate Number of photosets: 219 Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40. Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels. The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos. This is a hardcore teen site. This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago. The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap. The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos. The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos. This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money. Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site. 09-09-12  03:52am Replies (0) Review 213 Exclusive Teen Porn (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res. -Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc. -Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like. -Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site. -Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Can stream or download videos. -Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -DownThemAll download manager works. -Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. CONS: -Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows. -Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot. -You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity. -The number of sets per model is completely random. -Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use. -Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality. -Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video. -Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week. -Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior. BOTTOM LINE: Site stats: Number of videos: 210 Runtime: averages about 21 minutes. Videos can be streamed or dowloaded. Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files. The file specs are for the more recent files. Number of photosets: 217 Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos. Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution. The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large: High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc. On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value. Number of models: 177 There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes. Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment. Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site. Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice. 09-06-12  03:36am Replies (2) Review 214 Sasha Blonde (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality. -Credit card processor: CCBILL. -Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching. -If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately. -Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Zip files for photosets. -Can stream or download videos. -The content (videos and photosets) are dated. Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value. -Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot. -No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling. Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn. But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates. SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites. If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha. Number of videos: 431+ Number of photosets: 528+ Most videos have several download options: WMV 1080p MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes. Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set. Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size. Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px. You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself. I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model. 08-21-12  02:32am Replies (6) Review 215 X-Art (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits that I found. The first day, I downloaded 12 high-definition photosets and videos with no problem. The TBP review states there is a download limit, but I didn't find one. -Outstanding quality in the photosets and videos. -High percentage of lovely or attractive teen and early-twenty models. -One month discounted price of $19.95 with PU discount. -Zip files for the photosets. -The models are presented attractively. -Some truly outstanding, lovely girls. -Can stream or download videos. -Updates 3 times a week. -A behind the scenes blog can be interesting. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works fine at this site. -Model listing. Single page, with nice sized thumbnails to show each model, makes it easy to search through the models. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -There is a model bio. Gives name, country, age, a few personal facts. -Good sound control. Apart from the unnecessary passages where they have a music background. -The content is mainly exclusive, as far as I can tell. I did see one video that was also posted at beauty-angels, part of the Teen Mega World network: model Sasha D, video titled "Between the Sheets", is the same video posted at beauty-angels titled "Melika". The model is named Melika at beauty-angels, and the video is also named "Melika". But the X-Art site offers more download formats than the beauty-angels site, as well as offering higher definition versions of the video. Teen Mega World gives nice choices for video definitions, but X-Art gives high-end video definitions. -Easy login. -Long time before site timeout. CONS: -The cons are basically minor. This is an outstanding site for erotic teens. -If you want gonzo or rough sex, look elsewhere. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -The soundtrack could be better. They play a music background on the introduction of the videos, and it would be better to have no music. -Also, in the introduction of some videos, they try to add artistic touches. So instead of giving you a crystal sharp video image, the image goes in and out of focus, which is annoying. I want to see the girl clearly, not a bunch of out-of-focus images. -Sometimes, you're in the member's area, you click on a hot link to see a video or photoset, and you are transferred to the preview section for non-members; so you have to log back in to the member's area, and try again to download the video or photoset. -There are a few errors in labelling their hot links. For example, the site offers 3 hot links to download the photoset of Izabella Carr titled "Red Velvet Goddess". You are supposed to have 3 choices of 1200 p, 2000 p, and 4000 p. But the 2000 p and 4000 p links both download photos of 2000 p. There is no 4000 p photoset. BOTTOM LINE -Sample statistics: -Video Runtime for video: 12 minutes 24 seconds Windows Media 1920x1080 HD (783 MB) bitrate 8658 kbps 1280x720 HD (466 MB) bitrate 5144 kbps 960x540 SD (285 MB) bitrate 3136 kbps Apple Quicktime 1920x1080 HD (755 MB) 1280x720 SD (447 MB) 960x540 SD (272 MB) iPad/iPod/Mobile 640x480 SD (65 MB) -Photoset Images in this photoset: 84 1200 pixels (16 MB) 2000 pixels (29 MB) 4000 pixels (88 MB) Number of models: 100+ Number of videos: 180+ Number of photosets: 400+ Theme is erotic softcore and hardcore. Site started out years ago as a softcore photo site of beautiful young models, girls in their teens and early twenties. The photosets were small, but nicely photographed. No videos, photos only, girls only, no actual sex. Then, a few years ago, they started adding sex in their photosets. And started adding videos. They now offer high quality photosets and videos of solo female masturbation, girl-girl lesbian sex, boy-girl sex. The sex is sensual or erotic, not gonzo. The site is well designed, making it easy to navigate. You don't get the massive quantity of a mega site/network like Nubiles or Teen Mega World, but if you like the sensual, erotic approach, this site is well worth visiting. Videos can be streaming or downloaded. Download options include: wmv, mov, and mp4 format. Download resolutions may include: 960x540, 1280x720, and 1920x1080. But on a 15 inch laptop monitor, even the lower definition 540p videos look good. The videos are short, mostly from 6 to 12 minutes. A few videos can hit 18 minutes. The quality is so high, you wish they were longer. You get good professional camera work, good lighting, good colors. The newer videos are being offered in 1080 HD, with bitrates of 8500 kbps or higher. The photosets are high quality, as well. The number of photos per set varies widely, from 1 to 70 or more. The girls are so gorgeous, you wish there were more photos in each set, especially the sets from 5 years ago or more, because the early photosets had 30 photos or less, of lovely young models. The girls are young (18 to 21), Caucasian, slender. Very little variety in the models. But they range from attractive, to fucking beautiful. -The "Behind the Scenes" section gives a glimpse of how the photosets and videos are shot, also gives a little bit of the personality of some models. The site advertises itself as "Premium Quality HD Erotic Videos and Photography." I think that's an accurate description. 06-30-12  05:03pm Replies (3) Review 216 Dirty Doctor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Adding 1 new video about every 5 days. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded. -There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices. -You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. -Easy logon. -Long time before site time-out. Cons: -There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time. -Tiny site. only 14 videos so far. -The acting is amateur. -The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry. -The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian. No subtitles. Bottom Line: This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far. The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck. The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way. Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex. You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking. A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school. But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models are young. I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s. One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month. I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content. And if Teen Mega World does not give access to Dirty Doctor, you are missing very little. 06-25-12  10:23am Replies (1) Review 217 Give Me Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network. -Can stream or download movies. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Model is listed for each movie. -Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie. -I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model. -A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition. -The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo. -All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset. Cons: -PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month. -Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark. -Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video. -Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network. -The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. -The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better. -No zip file for the photosets. -The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Movies: 498 DVDs: 134 Pornstars: 557 Pictures: 75,388 Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option. Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4. Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site. What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Access to the network includes tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. But this site, by itself, adds little value to the network, in spite of the high percentage of high definition videos. 06-23-12  01:18pm Replies (0) Review 218 18 Only Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Long interval before site timeout. Useful if you want to browse site, or download files, and you pause between downloads. -Tiny, unobtrusive watermark occasionally appears in videos at bottom right corner. -Tiny, unobtrusive watermark at bottom right corner of some photos. The watermark is so small, you have to examine each photo, to see if it's there or not. -Soundtrack on most videos, especially the recent ones, is clean, without a lot of extraneous sounds. -The video quality is some of the best I've seen: great focus, crystal-sharp video, good tracking of the sex action, professional lighting, excellent colors: skin tones, etc. -There is an alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what each model looks like. A really helpful feature that makes searching through the model list so nuch easier. -Easy site navigation. Helpful, useful hot links to get a model's appearances (videos and photosets). -The member pages are clean, with no ads. -No DRM. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -No model biography. -Occasionally they change the name of a model, but forget to change the title of the video or photoset she appears in. For example, the photoset named "Beata and the mirror", features the model currently named Belka, who was, evidently, named Beata earlier. -When the models speak in a foreign language, there are no subtitles to translate. But the words spoken don't have a lot of value, anyway. The sex is what counts. -If you post a comment, I don't see any way to edit it, for typos or whatever. -The high-quality file size can be large. A video with a runtime of 23 minutes 12 seconds has a high-quality (1080p) size of 1.6 GB in MP4, and 1.9 GB in WMV. So you need a lot of hard drive space if you want to keep the high-quality files. -The model page is clean, with no ads. But it would be even better if they simplified the layout. Don't post 2 different thumbnails of the model's last appearance. That's just confusing. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): A single listing of each appearance would be more intuitive and easier to understand. Also, don't put two hot links for posting a comment on tha model page. Keep the comment link at the bottom of the page, but don't put a second comment link near the top of the page: it's not needed, and just gets in the way. Keep the model page simple. -Some of the photosets and videos may be at other networks. 2 photosets and 1 video from Nubiles were posted at 18OnlyGirls in some sort of cross- advertising deal. Also, some photos and videos at 18OnlyGirls were posted earlier at the Teen Mega World network. This is not cross-advertising, but 2 different networks buying the same content from the same supplier. The video titled "Waiting To Be Ravaged", featuring Anisiya, was posted 2012-06-10 at 18OnlyGirls. The same video was posted on 2011-02-17 at teensexmovs, a Teen Mega World site. At teensexmovs the video is titled "Anisiya". The video at 18OnlyGirls has more definition choices for download, and the runtime was chopped from 24:46 to 23:12 minutes:seconds. But the video is basically the same. However, the model is so cute, and the scene is so hot, that I didn't mind getting a higher-definition version of the same video. And they also made the 18OnlyGirls video have better lighting, better colors, in addition to the higher definition. So I don't think the duplicated content is bad, especially when the content at 18OnlyGirls is better quality. BOTTOM LINE: Site statistics: Number of videos: 1032 Number of photosets: 1278 Number of models: hundreds The site preview gives the following statistics: Number of films: 8,545 Number of images: 384,314 Number of models: 507 I don't know where the site preview is getting it's figures, because I counted the number of videos (movies), and it's far smaller. Also, based on the number of photosets, and the average number of photos in the ones I counted, the number of photos at the site in photosets is far smaller. Having said that, you still get 1,032 videos, and 1,278 phosets. -There are two types of live shows: "Diesel Girls Live", and "24/7 Live Channel". "Diesel Girls Live" features Diesel models who put on a live show. The show is free, and worth watching. Only a few of the Diesel models participate, each show lasts 2 hours, and you get 1, 2 or 3 shows per day. The "24/7 Live Channel" is a link to models who chat in both public (free) and private mode (paid). The public or free mode is basically worthless. The private (paid) mode is expensive. It's probably cheaper to go to a strip club than to pay for the private shows. -This is a hardcore teen site. Many of the models are as cute, attractive, even lovely, as you will find anywhere. In the last few years, they have offered excellent quality videos. The older photosets were not excellent, even when the models were attractive or cute. But the photos I've seen recently are really outstanding, and compare to what you get at Metart or MPL Studios, two sites that specialize in high-quality photos. This is mainly a video site. But if they can post outstanding photosets in the future, as they seem to be doing now, this will be a photo site as well. I'm giving the site a score of 95. You have some of the most attractive teen models you can find. You have outstanding quality videos. The recent photosets have improved greatly. The site is easy to navigate. You have fast download speeds. And you don't have to wade through a bunch of junk to find the worthwhile content: you have great videos and photosets of lovely girls all over the site. 06-11-12  09:08pm Replies (13) Review 219 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Nice PU discount for first month of $9.95. But recurs at $29.95/mo. -No DRM. -Videos are good quality for a DVD site. You don't get the high definition found at some sites, but the definition is good, the camera-work is good, good focus, no jitters in the video, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. I wish there were less fake moans and groans of excitement, but it's not as bad as some sites. -Recent update rate is one video per week. But starting in January 2012, there were no updates for almost 4 months. -There is a dropdown listing of the site models. But it would be easier to search a stationary list, where the models were presented alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like, with hot links to her appearances at that site, and to other sites in the network. Cons: -There is a listing of sites the model appears at. But to play or download her videos at another site in the network, you have to manually log in to each different site, and then do a search for her videos at that site. So searching for model appearances is difficult, and time-consuming. -No model biography. -Videos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -Photos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt many members would want to keep these photos anyway, except for one photo to show what the model looks like. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross sale at signup, or you will be charged a trial membership in another site. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of videos: 557 Number of high definition videos: 56 Streaming options: 240p 480p 540p (if the 540p is available). Download options: WMV files: 240p; 480p MP4 files: 240p; 480p; 540p (if available); 720p (if available); 1080p (if available). Most videos have the 240p and 480p. 56 videos have the higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Video length: 3 to 31 minutes. By watching these videos, you can learn a lot about how to deal with models. For example, in a video titled "Cleaning Cock!", Ashlyn Rae, a pretty model, wants to buy a new dress. So a guy hires her to clean his house. Once she finishes cleaning, he offers to pay her in cum. And she says she loves cum. And he says "Well, that's good because he has lots of cum". So then she gives him a blow job and they fuck. PU members can use this line on their girlfriends, and save lots of money. Not only does he pay her in cum, but when she asks for a tip, he says it was included in the cum he already gave her. I was a member of this site before. My impression is that the videos were upgraded. They look better than what I remembered. This is an impression, because I don't have the videos I downloaded from my previous membership. They have photosets illustrating the videos. But the photosets are screencaps of the video. And the number of photos in each photoset varies. One photoset has 3 photos. Another has 43 pics. Another has 97. The photosets are useful for showing what the model looks like. But they have little artistic or erotic value. You can click on a thumbnail of a photo and get a larger thumbnail. There is an option to enlarge the thumbnail to full-sized screen. Sometimes it takes several clicks on the "expand the image" icon to enlarge to full-sized screen picture. The site theme is teen-to-early-twenty girls having hardcore sex. They usually have a brief story introduction setting up the sex, but the story is brief and has little value. You can search the site by 3 main categories: 1. By series. For example: Couples Seduce Teens; Fresh Euro Flesh; Latin Eye Candy; Masters of Reality Porn; etc. 2. By type of sex. For example: Anal; Ass to mouth; Blowjob; Cream pie; Cum swallow; Cumshot; Cumswapping; Cunilingus; Deep throat; Double Blowjob; Double Penetration; Lesbian; etc. 3. By name of model. This is a large DVD site. It's part of the netFameSolutions network. You get access to this site and about 20 other sites by joining through the Devils Film site for $9.95 for the first month (using the PU discount). The main sites in the network include: Devils Film;Peter North DVD;Rocco Siffredi;Silverstone DVD;Silvia Saint Those main sites include tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. And the smaller sites include 1,000s of hardcore videos covering many different niches. So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get access to a huge amount of hardcore videos. 06-09-12  11:21pm Replies (4) Review 220 Low Art Films (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -High definition videos. -Videos have good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. -Content is dated. -Long time before site timeout. -Easy login to site. -Can watch videos streaming or download. -Member pages are ad free. -Has a link to "Free Cams" and to "Live Cams". -List of models, with thumbnail of the model. Cons: -Last updated on 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site. -Has links to Rabbit's Porn Reviews. Not really a negative, but why the site has links to a porn review site seems odd. -Search is OK, but could be improved. You click on a model's name, and it lists the network sites she appears in. But it doesn't list her appearances at each site. And to get to the sites listed, have to manually switch to the specific site (instead of using a simple hot link). And then you can search for the model's appearances at that specific site. The Teen Mega World network, by contrast, makes it easier to switch between sites, and also to find the model's appearances, by using simple hot links. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at signup, or you will have subscribed to a trial offer you probably don't want. -In the categories search, they list 22 videos under college. But out of the 22 videos, all the models looked like porn models. No teens or fresh-faced girls at this site. Bottom Line: Videos sex scenes: man and woman having sex, lesbian, masturbation, toys, etc. 42 of the 82 videos are lesbian. Instead of calling the site lowartfilms, they could just as easily called it highartfilms. The sex is raw, but there is an erotic or sensous element in the videos. It goes beyond bread and butter fucking, and tries to make the sex passionate or exciting. They do this by providing unusual settings for the model, and by using costumes that are sensual or erotic. And the sex, while raw, has a buildup with a lot of kissing and touching. Models are in their twenties or thirties. Medium to large breasts. Site statistics: Stopped updating 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site. Number of videos: 82 80 of the 82 videos have high definition file option available. Streaming options: 240p, 480p, 540p. Download options: WMV 240p, 480p. MP4 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p. Video runtimes: from 14 to 27 minutes. Site is part of the netFameSolutions network. So you get this site along with access to a large number of the network sites. The main sites include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint The main sites include a boatload of hardcore videos. And the secondary and niche sites, while smaller, have a variety of videos that will give you plenty of videos to browse through. So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get a massive amount of hardcore videos. 06-04-12  01:49pm Replies (0) Review 221 Nylons X (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Content is dated. -Because it's a small site, easy to navigate. -The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes. -Member pages are relatively ad free. -Can watch videos streaming or download. -Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -Zip files for the photosets. -Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time. Cons: -Small site. Only 25 videos. -No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site. -Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured. -Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality. -Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites. For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB. -Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side. -No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in. BOTTOM LINE: -Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex. -Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons. There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs. Site stats: Videos: 25 Photosets: 25 The photosets are a record of the video shoot. Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.). Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site. Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership. -Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive. Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less. 06-02-12  11:14pm Replies (3) Review 222 Lolly Hardcore (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Teen Mega World network. -PU discount gives you access for $19.95/month through Teen Mega World. If you join lollyhardcore directly, you pay $29.95/month. -Content is dated. -No dowload limits. -No DRM. -Simple navigation, because the site is small. -Can stream or download videos. -Zip files for photosets. Cons: -This is an archive site. Last update was 2010-08-20. -Small site. Only 39 videos. -Photosets are basically a capture of the video shoot. The photos are better quality than a screen capture, but little effort is made to frame them properly. -Zip files only have one definition. No choice of low, medium or high. Bottom Line: -This is a single-model site featuring Lolly, a cute teen. She can be found at many different sites, under a number of different names: Alicia A, Alisa, Jenny, Juli, Katie, Lolli, Lolli A., Lolly A, Loly, Sveta, Yana. A few sites she appears at are Diesel network, Metart, Teen Mega World, Zemani, etc. As I said, you get this site with the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network, which gives you access to a large number of sites. Almost all these sites focus on teens, but you also might get access to a few niche sites, such as Boys Love 18 (gay), Latin Shemales, and El Porno Latino. The Teen Mega World network is one of the best bargains in teen hardcore videos, because it gives you a huge number of quality videos for a very low price. And there are a large number of models, many of them very attractive. -Site Statistics: Number of videos: 39 Video runtime: 11 to 20 minutes. Sexual action: solo girl, boy-girl sex, 1 girl-2 guys, girl-girl, blow job, masturbation, etc. Vids are offered as downloads in low, medium and high quality. But the high quality vids are 400 MB or less, for runtimes up to 20 minutes. So the definition is far less than what is offered at other Teen Mega World/Royal Cash sites. But the videos are still good, because Lolly is so cute, and she gives an enthusiastic performance. This is another offering from the Teen Mega World network, and it's worth visiting. Lolly is a cute blonde teen, from Eastern Europe. Her videos show a lovely young teen who really enjoys her sexual encounters. Whether it's acting or not, she comes across as a bubbly, fun-loving girl, and that personality makes her videos more real and believable and exciting. The only downside would be, if I could find a girl like her in real life, I'd be dead or in a hospital after one or two days. It would take a teenager or someone in their twenties to handle a girl like her. 05-22-12  01:31am Replies (4) Review 223 Daring Sex (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Currently updating. One new scene/video per week. -The home page and inside pages are clean, with nice thumbnails illustrating the scenes/videos on offer. -No ads to clutter up the member pages. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Special PU discount for the first month of $9.95. -The models are listed for each scene. -The categories are listed for each scene. For example, one scene shows the following categories: Lesbian, Hardcore, Natural tits, Big Breast, Public nudity & voyeur. So you know who the models are, and what the action in the scene is about. -Can watch the videos streaming, or download. -There is a listing of the models. The listing has a nice thumbnail to show you what the model looks like. -Click on the thumbnail of the model in the listing, you get a bigger-sized picture of the same thumbnail, plus the sites in the netFameSolutionsnetwork the model appears. Cons: -The next step in integrating the model listing would be to not just list the sites a model appears in, but to have a hot link for each video the model is in, at all the network sites. Teen Mega World does this, and it makes search/navigation so much easier. But with netFameSolutions network (this network), you first have to login to your signup site, then switch to the site you want to examine (because you found a listing appearance of your model), and then go to the model listing at that site, click on her name, and that will bring up links to her videos at that site. -Sometimes a streaming video will pause or stop. Not sure why. Streaming is only 240p or 540p, my download speed is about 1.3 MB/sec, so I should be able to stream with no problem. But I prefer downloading over streaming, and the download options have higher definitions than the streaming. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sell at signup, or you will be charged for a trial subscription to a different site. Bottom Line: CONS (Continued): -Did not see a zip option for the photosets. -If you save the photos, apparently there is only one definition offered. No choice of low, medium or high. You can view the photosets online. You can see each photo as a thumbnail or enlarged to a full-sized image. Then you can switch to the next photo in the series by using an arrow link. -You can use DownThemAll (a download manager) or some other program to download the photosets. But zip files would be more convenient. BOTTOM LINE: Site statistics: Movies: 297 Average length of movies: 5 - 14 - minutes DVDs: 54 Pornstars: 263 Hours: 92 Total Size: 81 Gb Picture sets: 283 Pictures per set: 9 - 460 Zip sets: No High Res: No Streaming has 2 or 3 choices: 240p 480p 540p (their version of high definition) Download in WMV or MP4 files: WMV 240p (low) 480p (high) MP4 240p (low) 480p (high) 540p (Web hd) 720p (hd) 1080p (full hd) Videos can run 5 - 30 minutes. A very nice addition to the netFameSolutions network. This site emphasizes artsy, sophisticated hardcore. Not gonzo. The lighting can be dark, to add atmosphere. They aim for erotic, seductive scenes. The scenes/videos/movies are taken from DVDs the studio, Daring Media, puts out. There is a wide variety of sex on display: blowjobs, pussy licking, fucking by couples, group sex, masturbation, lesbian, voyeur, bondage, There is variety in the settings as well: nightclub, beach, in ancient Rome. There are many attractive models in the vids, in their twenties or early thirties. I especially enjoyed the Roma series, set in the days of ancient Rome. It teaches you the proper way to live your life. The series starts out with a noble Roman commander, who says his daughter just died giving birth, and now he needs some distraction. So he and a male companion turn to a lovely brunette, who just happens to be lying on a couch in the same tent, and the two men fuck the brunette's brains out. At the same time, a third Roman, also in the tent, starts fucking a second woman lying on a different couch. You would think the commander, being in charge, would have a woman all to himself. But I guess that Romans/Italians think a second guy is helpful in getting the woman aroused, and in finishing her off. The acting on the videos is not always entirely realistic, but it can be interesting to watch, at times. And it gives you an idea of how large the Roman tents were, to hold all those women on their couches, when the Romans needed some distraction from the fighting and whatnot. You get this site with access to the netFameSolutions network. And it makes a nice change of pace from their gonzo offerings. From earlier comments and reviews, this site will appeal to some people, while others will think it's a waste of time. 05-13-12  11:25am Replies (6) Review 224 Lesbian Factor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 for first month (then recurs at $29.95/mo.) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Long time before site timeout. -You can watch the videos streaming, or download them. -The models in the videos are identified. -You click on a hot link of the model's name, and you get a thumbnail of the model, and the network sites she appears at. It would be nice if there were hot links to each video she was in. Instead, you have to go to each individual site, and then search for her videos. And since you can't switch freely between sites, you first have to login to your signup site, and then go to the site that you want. And then you can search for her videos at that site. Cons: -Last update was 2011-12-19.Before that, the update rate was very irregular, sometimes every 10 days, then no updates for several months. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at sign up, or you will be signed up for a trial subscription to a different site. -Although the soundtrack is clear, all the moans and groans of passion sound fake. So instead of adding to the excitement, it detracts. I've seen videos where the girls looked and sounded like they were really getting off. But in these videos, the girls are giving a poor performance. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 234 movies. The number of movies (or videos) hasn't changed since the TBP review dated 2011-05-30, although 6 videos at the site have a posting date after 2011-05-30. So this is more of an archive site, where you can expect few, if any, updates. The videos run about 20 - 34 minutes. Can watch the videos streaming: High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Can download as MP4 or WMV files. High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Part of the netFame Solutions (Fame Digital) network. Some of the main bonus sites include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint As the name implies, this is a hardcore lesbian site. You get a variety of solo, two girls, three girls. With and without toys. I watched a number of the videos. I thought they were OK, but nothing special. The videos are competently shot, OK camera work, OK lighting and sound control. Most videos are shot indoors, in a living room or bedroom, which makes shooting the video easier. I wish the videos were higher resolution (480p is the highest offered, which seems poor, to me). And wished that the sex was more erotic or sexy. Maybe I'm jaded, but the videos left me bored. The main value of joining this site is that it gives you access to the netFame Solutions network, which has some worthwhile sites. 05-11-12  10:31am Replies (1) Review 225 Devils Film (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Low membership price with PU discount. $9.95 for first month. -Easy logon. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Membership in Devils Film gives you network access to many sites in the netFame Solutions network. -This one site, not counting other sites in the network, gives you a huge amount of hardcore videos and photosets. -It updates every day. Cons: -Make sure to uncheck the pre-checked cross-sell when signing up, or you will automatically be signed up to a different site as well, which will turn into an expensive membership once the trial period ends. -Little effort is made to make the models attractive. For example, Ashlyn Rae has photosets at other sites where she is really attractive, and hardcore videos as well. At this network, she is plain-looking, and you have to look twice to see it's the same girl. -Navigation is lousy. Too much content to search through, with poor search engine. -Listing of models is poor: you get small thumbnails that don't give you a clear picture of the model. Many thumbnails are missing, so there is no picture of the model. Also, under the name of a model, it can often show videos of the wrong model. -Many times, the models in the videos are not identified, so you don't know their names, and searching for other videos featuring them is difficult. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): -You can download videos as MP4 or WMV files, in 240p or 480p. 480p is much less high definition than the videos at Nubiles or Teen Mega World or many other sites. -Sometimes have to re-enter your login information (username and password) when changing sites within the network. Other networks can make changing between sites easy. -When watching streaming videos,even though the resolution is only 480p and my download speed is about 1.3MB/sec, the videos will often start and stop, start and stop. So streaming is a poor option for me. -The monthly renewal price is $29.95, so be sure to cancel your membership before your first month's membership is renewed at the higher price. Bottom Line: Site Statistics: Movies: 5608 DVDs: 1107 Pornstars: 2826 Pictures: 262010 For $10 the first month, you get a huge amount of hardcore videos. With the network access, you also get a wide variety of different niches. So it's well worth the price. Some of the main bonus sites include Silverstone DVD, Silvia Saint, Peter North DVD and Rocco Siffredi. With so much material to browse, I wish the search was easier to use. And I wish the video definition was higher. And that the models were presented more attractively. Giving the site a score of 85. You get access to a boatload of hardcore gonzo videos in many categories, as well as access to some other very worthwhile network sites. 05-07-12  09:47pm Replies (2) Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.