Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 176-200 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 176 All Japanese Pass (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Epoch is the billing agent. Trusted name. -Some very hot videos. -Can stream or download videos: -Can choose streaming quality: low, medium or high. -Can choose download quality: low, medium or high. -Choose the high quality, since it's the best visual. The low quality is poor. -Easy login. Once you login and accept cookies, just hit the login button, your username and password are saved, so just hit the popup of username and password, and you enter the site. -Download speeds vary. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec. -No DRM. -No download limits. Cons: -Most of the videos are censored (with mosaic). But this is required by Japanese law. -Pre-checked signup on join page. -Poor search engine. You enter a model's name to search for, and it returns many names that are similar, as well as names that are not similar. -The funny moans and sounds the Japanese actresses make take getting used to: they sound like they are in pain, but it's supposed to show they are excited by the sex, or else they are resisting the enjoyment of sex due to the cultural idea of being "good" girls. Bottom Line: This is a large network. Some of the more popular Japanese AV stars are well represented: Note: the statistics can be inflated: you do a search, and many times, they include similar names in the results: For example: search term "Rin Aoki" (a popular AV superstar) returns videos (mixed, in random order). From the first three pages of a seven-page list: Haru Aoki Junna Aoki Karen Aoki Kiyuri Aoki Miku Aoki Nana Aoyama Rei Aoki Rin Rin Aoki Rin Hitomi Rin Kitano Rin Sakuragi Rin Saotome Rin Suzuka Riko Aoki So there are probably a lot of other mis-matched links you have to look through to find the single model you are looking for. Maria Ozawa is one of the most famous and beautiful Japanese porn stars. She has filmed censored and uncensored videos. She has a large number of videos at this network. She has either retired from Japanese AV or reduced her participation, and is trying to focus on an acting career. The network lists the number of videos for: Maria Ozawa 297 Reina Matsushima 170 Rin Aoki 411 Rin Suzuka 381 Those numbers are inflated by lots of videos by other models that might have similar names or completely different names. But at least the seach gives you a starting point for your searches: otherwise, who the fuck wants to look through thousands of videos to find the girls you are looking for? Years ago I joined a different Japanese porn site that had download limits. Since the videos were large, it was easy to exceed the download limits in a single day, and be blocked from the site for 24 hours or more. Also, the mechanism they used to monitor the usage was faulty: I carefully kept my daily download usage well below the stated limit, but I was blocked several times--for a day or more--because the program they used inflated my actual download usage. That was not a happy experience. I wrote to customer support, complaining that I had been blocked unfairly. Eventually after several complaints to customer support, they sent me an email extending my subscription by around 10 days. But by then I was so angry with the site because I couldn't get in, that I stopped using the site. If I had been more realistic, I would have continued to use the site as long as the membership continued. But my frustration won over my common sense. This network does not have download limits. No DRM. So that is a large plus. It also has a boatload of hardcore Japanese porn. Much of it censored. I don't like censorship (the mosaic, pixel effect), but if you want to view Japanese porn, you need to learn to accept the censorship. Even though some Japanese porn is not censored. I wish the network was laid out in a simpler way, so that the contents could be easily searched. Their search engine is buggy beyond belief. But there is a huge amount of good quality hardcore Japanese porn, a lot of it hot, a lot of it interesting. With some attractive to beautiful models. Giving the network a score of 87. If the video quality was better, so you could appreciate the loveliness of these models more easily, and the layout was easier to use, I'd give it a higher score. I did not reduce the score for the censorship, even though I would really like to see all the videos without censorship. But that won't happen. 02-18-16  12:18pm Replies (4) Review 177 School Girls HD (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -Attractive mix of Japanese models. -Epoch is the payment processor: a trusted name. -The videos do not have the pixellated/mosaic effect that is present on most Japanese porn. -Easy login. Save your username and password with cookies, and you are basically automatically logged in when you click on the login link. -No download limits. -No DRM. -OK download speeds. I averaged 1.6 MB/sec. -You can choose the quality of your streaming video: SD 240p 400 bitrate MED 480p 1000 bitrate HQ 720p 2000 bitrate SH 1080p 4000 bitrate Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -Depending on the credit card you sign up with, you might be declined. Mastercard declined my payment, and I had to call Mastercard to unblock my account. But a different Mastercard accepted the payment. -The site is not laid out for easy seach of model or category or whatever niche you are looking for. They need a simple alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail for each model, and her contents at the network hot-linked with the thumbnail. -If I stream a video in 1080p quality, the streaming is not entirely smooth. My connection is 50MB/sec, which should enable smooth streaming, but it doesn't at this site. Bottom Line: The site theme is horny Japanese schoogirls having sex. There are 184 scenes at the site. By Japanese law, any pornography must censor the genitals of actors and actresses. Until the mid-1990s, pubic hair was also censored. But the videos at this site, although featuring Japanese models, do not censor the videos with the pixellated/mosaic effect. So I assume the videos are produced outside of Japan. If you are not familiar with Japanese porn, there are some differences from European and American porn. It's been several years since I last joined a Japanese porn site. The texture and atmosphere of the videos at School Girls HD seem different from the videos that I remember. My guess is that the videos were shot with a Western (American, European) audience in mind. The performers are Japanese. But the girls' attitudes are slightly different from what they were 10 or 15 years ago. They don't moan and make as many funny noises as they used to. The girls are more accepting of the sex. They don't show as much feigned, cultural behavior of only submitting to the sex because they are being forced to (not actual force, but just submitting to the will of the men). The kissing, while still longer and more intense than American or European kissing, is not as passionate and lengthy as it used to be. The moans and funny noises the models make are supposed to indicate reluctance to be having sex, but also excitement at having sex. Personally, I found the moans and funny noises annoying: it takes getting used to. But the funny noises the girls make have been toned down considerably. Some Japanese porn can be extremely hot, and Japan has some of the most beautiful women in the world. And because of cultural differences, there can be some funny quirks in the videos. I believe the average model here is from the second-tier of Japanese porn models, not the first tier. The most attractive and famous models might be found at other Japanese porn sites, but very few of the big name models I used to look for are found at this site. The models are attractive, but not the super-beauties or super-stars of Japanese porn. However, the models are supposed to be school girls, which means they are younger models. So that might help explain why the big-name models are not featured at this site. The main reason I joined is because the videos are uncensored. And the models are a nice change from the European and American models in looks. Giving the site a score of 80. I'm spoiled by the outstanding attractiveness of the many European and American models I see at porn sites. The models at this site don't possess that outstanding beauty or cuteness. And I didn't think the sex was exceptionally hot, that can be found at many hardcore porn sites. This is a good site. But not a great site. 02-15-16  07:27pm Replies (0) Review 178 Massage Girls 18 (0) 75.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -Epoch is billing agent: trusted name. -The videos are professionally shot. Good camera-work, good lighting, good focus, good sound control. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout for inactivity. -Models are attractive: late teens, early twenties. -The videos can be streamed or downloaded. -Each video has a matching gallery--that is a photo shoot of the video. -Each gallery has a zip file for download. -Good download speed. I got about 3 MB/sec, while my max download speed is slightly over 5 MB/sec. Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -The setup is the same for each video: a girl is supposed to give a guy a massage, which turns into a blow job and a fuck. There is very little variation in the action. -Not much heat to the sex. Bottom Line: MassageGirls18 is basically the reverse of its sister site, FuckedHard18. So what are the main differences between the two sites, other than the role reversal? In FuckedHard18, the guy is giving a sensual massage, the girl becomes aroused, and the guy fucks the girl. He is definitely in charge. And the girl is more than willing. The sex can be hot. In MassageGirls18, the girl has a more active role: she is supposed to be the masseuse. But the girls appear like newbies, they are not professional actors, so they are smiling and giggling and acting unsure of themselves, which detracts from the action. I'm not saying the FuckedHard18 site videos are completely believable, but they are more believable than the MassageGirls18 videos, where you know the girls are there to fuck the guy, and the massage element is just a flimsy excuse of a theme. And the sex has less heat, because it's more mechanical, at MassageGirls18. The girls need to be better actors, since they are supposed to be taking the lead role for this site, and their inexperience as actors is apparent. So the lead-in to the sex is much weaker. And the sex itself is also weaker. FuckedHard18 is a much better massage site than MassageGirls18. The FuckedHard18 videos are more believable, the sex is hotter. Giving the site a score of 75. When you compare this site to FuckedHard18, it's just disappointing. 02-14-16  12:41am Replies (0) Review 179 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large number of very attractive models. -Professionally shot videos: good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc. -A number of the videos feature good performances by the models: they actally seem to be enjoying the sex. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec, which is about my maximum download speed. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Choice of streaming or downloading videos. -Can choose the file definition you want to download. But since the HD Ultra definition file size is over 1 GB, I choose a lower definition, which still looks good and doesn't take as much hard drive space. -The videos are in English. So you can understand with the models are saying. -Each video has a matching gallery. Each gallery is a photo shoot of the video shoot, and not a separately photographed shoot where the model is posed for the best shots possible. -Can stream a full video, or watch selected sections of the video. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. The site does a good job of featuring massage videos with hot sex. -Not much plot. Attractive girl gets a sensual massage, she is so turned on by the masseur that he then fucks her. -They use the same massage room setting for all the videos: some change in plot, setting, etc., would be nice. -The download file sizes for the 1080p or HD Ultra definition files are large: can be over 1 or 2 GB, which sucks up a lot of hard drive space. But the smaller definition file sizes are completely watchable, especially if you're watching on a 20-something-inch monitor or less. -There is a model index with thumbnails of each model, but the models are not listed alphabetically, and the index is cumbersome to use. A simpler, alphabetical listing would be helpful. Bottom Line: Site theme is attractive young girls getting an erotic massage and then getting fucked. A large number of really attractive models. site stats: over 360 videos over 360 galleries (1 gallery per matching video) There are a number of massage-themed sites out there, but FuckedHard18 is one of the better ones: because the models are attractive, and the sex is hot. It doesn't get any simpler than that. The girls have very little tattoos or piercings. They are young: late teens, early twenties. Almost all white. Slender to slightly medium build. Site contents are high quality videos of young, attractive girls getting a massage and then having sex. It's one guy and one girl. Some might complain there isn't more variety: 2 girls, 2 girls and a guy, group sex, sex toys, anal action, whatever. This is like a "clean" porn site, where you are watching a girl getting hot, and then watching the guy doing her. Simple, but effective. Giving the site a score of 90, because I really enjoyed the site. As long as you aren't expecting extreme or dirty sex, or more variety, I think you will too. The models are very attractive, the sex can be very hot. 02-07-16  01:45pm Replies (4) Review 180 Erotic Beauty (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection. -Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents. -Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like. -Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition. -This is a high grade photo site. -Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity. -Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. Cons: -No videos. Photo sets only. -This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful. -Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites. -Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete set without a lot of mouse clicks. Bottom Line: I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites. I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive. I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years. Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models. It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site. Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty. If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money: As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness. Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa. The main advantage MetArt has over Erotic Beauty is the massive backlog of photo sets. Erotic Beauty has over 3,700 photo sets. MetArt has over 16,300 photo sets. A massive number that dwarfs the Erotic Beauty backlog. Erotic Beauty has over 1,700 models. MetArt has over 3,100 models. Erotic Beauty updates with one photo set per day. MetArt updates with aproximately 4 photo sets per day. So the the MetArt content will grow even faster than the Erotic Beauty content. Both sites have the same membership fee: $19.99/month with a PU discount Erotic Beauty has no videos. MetArt has over 1,300 videos. In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time. That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are. The value of MetArt (and Erotic Beauty) comes from their photo sets. Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content. Both sites share the same basic structure. Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition. Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model. But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty. Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the advantage obviously belongs to MetArt. I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value. 02-05-16  01:27am Replies (3) Review 181 Zishy (0) 81.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Very low membership fee. $7.99/month, or $27.99/year. -A nice selection of attractive models. Mixture of amateur and professional porn models. -CCBILL is the payment processor, a trusted name. -Update rate averages 3-4 new photo sets per week. -Zishy is based in L.A., California. The girls are a mixture of models and college girls. -Easy login. After you login to the site, the following logins don't require a username and password, (with cookies enabled). Cons: -This is primarily a non-nude site. Do not join if you want to see full-blown nudity, or hard-core sex. -Although there are many attractive girls, this is not a glamour site: the models are shot with little make-up, with regular-style clothes. The models appear like the girl-next-door. You honestly would not recognize many of these girls you might have seen at other porn sites, unless you study them and compare them with photos from other sites. The average teenager at a shopping mall or on the street wears more make-up than most of the models photographed at Zishy. -This is mainly a photo site. There are videos, but the videos are short, most under 3 minutes, some videos under a minute. Bottom Line: Zishy is basically a non-nude site. Occasionally you will see a naked ass, uncovered nipples, even less will you see a naked pussy. The site theme is less is more: the female form is better served covered, which lets the imagination free to roam. The aim is to entertain through innocent and playful means. What is suprising is that you can't tell the professional models from the amateurs unless you have a keen eye and a lot of history with porn models. Basically, the professional porn models are presented as amateurs, with very little of their normal make-up, in regular clothes, in non-porn poses and settings. The truth is, you will find the average teenager in a shopping mall wears far more make-up, and is better dressed, than the models at Zishy. In the last year or more, you are seeing a few naked breasts, a few naked asses, but the majority of the photos are still non-nude. This is not a site you should join to see nudity. It can be interesting to compare the photo sets of the porn models at Zishy with their sets at porn sites. It illustrates how much the photographer can influence how attractive a model will appear in a photo. I've said it before, but it bears repeating: a model can appear average-looking, or very attractive, or extremely lovely, depending on how she is photographed. Some sites specialize in making their models as glamorous as possible. Zishy photographs their models to appear "natural", not glamorized or heavily made-up. When I started checking how many of the models at Zishy were porn models, I was surprised at the number that were featured in soft-core and hard-core sites. Because you would not have any hint from the Zishy photo sets that many of these girls are willing to show everything they have at more explicit porn sites. A very few of the models at Zishy who are featured in more well-known porn sites are: Alaina Fox Alex Mae Alice Wonder Amber Sym Bailey Rayne Bree Daniels Keisha Grey Dillion Harper Kenze Thomas Lily Ivy Samantha Rone Jayden Taylors Maybe my brain is very slow, but I found it fascinating how different a model can appear at the Zishy site versus her appearance at a regular porn site. For some models, you really have to examine the girl, to see it's the same person. But then again, there are so many porn models out there, that some models resemble each other fairly closely. Bottom line: Since the price is so low ($7.99/month, or $27.99/year), it's worth joining to see what the site has to offer. As long as you are not expecting a nude site, Zishy is mainly very softcore tease. 01-30-16  09:07am Replies (2) Review 182 Black Is Better (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, etc. -Easy navigation: since the site only has 15 videos (and matching photo sets), you can easily see all the contents. -No DRM. -The models are attractive. Late teens, or in their twenties. -Content is exclusive. -Choice of download or stream videos. -Download options for each video include: iPod, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Zip file for each matching photo set. Cons: -The main drawback is the site is tiny: 15 videos (and matching photo sets). That's all you get. -Slow update rate: 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -2-day trial membership for $1 is crippled privileges. Can only watch 10 minutes of 2 videos (and the matching photo sets), with no downloading. For more content or downloading, you must upgrade to full membership. I don't see any notice on the signup page (before completing the transaction) that the 2-day trial membership is crippled access. I found this information at the TBP site. -The primary biller is MG Billing, which does not have the recognition of CCBILL or EPOCH. -Only get one definition for the zip file for each photo set. -The zip file for each photo set is a numbered file name (e.g. 17991_pics.zip). So have to manually rename the file to add name of model, etc. Bottom Line: This is a tiny site. Currently the site only has 15 videos (with matching photo sets). The theme is a white woman having sex with a black man. You get full access to this site with a membership in the Babes.com network. But it would be a mistake to join this site directly. The main problem with the site is the small amount of content. With a fast internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in a few hours or less. After that download, the site would have little value. The update rate is 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month. There is a 2-day trial membership for $1.00. However, The Best Porn reports that the trial membership only allows users to view the first 10 minutes of two offered videos, as well as the photos from those videos. For more content or downloads, you must upgrade to a full membership. So the trial membership, in my opinion, is not worthwhile. The preview page of the site give a misleading impression that the site contents are far larger than it really is. On the preview page, you see 56 nice-sized thumbnails of videos. So you would normally assume that site has those 56 videos, plus whatever other contents. But-- The 56 thumbnails are showing the 15 videos the site has, with each video being shown multiple times (via a thumbnail), to give the impression there are many more videos at the site than what is real. That might be legal advertising, but it's certainly misleading. Anyone joining the site, based on the impression the site holds a lot of videos, would be very disappointed once they realize the site only has 15 videos. Note: there is a different preview page for the site, that only shows thumbnails for 15 videos. Both preview pages currently exist (the one implying 56 videos, and the one showing 15 videos). The preview model pages are not accurate. There are 15 models shown (representing the 15 individual models in the site videos). The preview model page states that some models have 1 video, some models have 2 videos, some have 3 videos, and one model has 5 videos. But in reality, all models have only 1 video at the site. The only explanation I can think of: is that the number of videos refers to the entire babes network, even though this is a preview page for Black Is Better (and not a preview page for the Babes network). The bottom line is the site contents are tiny, and because of the slow update rate, the contents will remain tiny for a long time. So is the site worth joining? Not in my opinion. But as a free add-on to a subscription to Babes.com, it's worthwhile checking the site out. 01-27-16  02:43am Replies (0) Review 183 Porn Mastermind (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Nice, clean site design that makes the site easy to use. -A large selection of attractive models. -Random updates from other sites. -Large thumbnails of most models. -You can download a full video, or selected clips from that video. -Can also watch the video streaming. -Good download speeds. I got over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll. -Professionally shot videos: good definition, good sound control, good focus, good lighting, etc. -CCBill is the payment processor, a trusted name. -Easy login. On my first login, I had to enter username, password, and captcha. On second login, I just hit the member login link, and didn't have to enter anything else. I was automatically entered into the site. -PU discount of $17.95 for first month. Cons: -Captcha required for first login. -Not sure about update frequency. Apparently, the site does not have exclusive regular updates for the site itself, but uses updates from other sites. -Many videos download with generic filename. Need to rename the download file to know what it is. -Can uncheck pre-checked sales offer. But this is the first one I've seen that gives three-day access for free. The free trial turns into an expensive subscription after the three days, if not cancelled. But you get three days for free. So it's worth trying. -Navigation could be improved if they offered an alphabetical thumbnail listing of their models. Some models in their videos don't even have a name. -No information about the models, except for their site name. Bottom Line: The site has a large number of hardcore videos of attractive young models. Many of the videos are from partner sites. All of the videos I saw were professionally shot, with good lighting, camera-work, etc. The models are uniformly attractive, from very attractive to lovely to just breathtaking. Some of the models are actual movie stars, with nude clips from their theatrical movies. The sites you have full access to, with a membership to PornMasterMind, include: EpicSex FuckedHard18 FuckedHardGFs MassageGirls18 You also get random updates from their partner sites. This gives you a chance to sample what those other sites offer: Bangable ElegantRaw GirlsDoPorn GloryholeSwallow HarmonyVision JeffsModels JulesJordan MrPOV MrSkin NubileFilms Nubiles-Porn Nutabu PetiteHDPorn PuffyNetwork Bottom line: The four main sites you have access to with a membership (listed above) make this a worthwhile membership. Plus you also get access to a random selection of videos from the partner sites, that give you a flavor of what those sites offer. Because of the wide selection of site offerings, you get some tease, light hardcore, heavy hardcore. If you like good quality videos of late teen, early twenties models, this site offers good value for the money. 01-15-16  04:56pm Replies (1) Review 184 Peter North (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -No download limits (for regular membership); trial memberships are different. -No DRM. -Can stream or download videos. -Streaming offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos). -Download offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos). -Excellent download speeds. I get over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll. -DownThemAll download manager works with site. -A lot of attractive models. Not too many tattoos or piercings. -Thousands of professionally shot videos-good lighting, good editing, good sound control, etc. -PU discount of $15 for the first month. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sell on join page. -Captcha required on login. -Only some content is exclusive. If you've joined many DVD sites, you will find a lot of videos you've seen before. -The older videos don't have the newer definition choices that the new content has. -Some people may be fans of Peter North Peter North considers himself a porn star, like a movie star, and his site blog shows photographs an expensive Ferrari he owns. The last announcement from Peter North on his blog was June 7, 2013-so he's not as active on his site any more. -Many of the newer videos don't feature Peter North himself. -Peter North also has an online store, where, if you're a fan, you can buy his DVDs, sex toys and apparel. Maybe it's a big ego, or good advertising, but I think it's strange. Strike that. If he can make money selling things, more power to him. -One new video every 3 days to Peter North site. But the huge backlog at this site and other sites you have access to make this a minor con. Bottom Line: By joining this site, you get access to a boatload of hardcore videos of good quality, for a very low price. Peter North is part of the netFameSolutions network, also called the Fame Dollars network, owned and operated by Gamma Entertainment. There are over 100 sites in the network. My understanding is that the network is broken down into two main sub-networks: When you join either sub-network, you get access to a large number of sites in that sub-network. For simplicity's sake, I think of the two sub-networks as Devils Film and Evil Angel. Joining Devils Film (or joining any of the sites included in the Devils Film sub-network) gives you access to all the sites in that particular sub-network. I prefer the Devils Film sub-network over the Evil Angel sub-network, because there are several large sites that it includes that are excellent value: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of smaller sites that are definitely worth examining. The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of niche sites that have smaller content, that would appeal to special tastes: Bushy Bushy (models have pubic hair) Curry Creampie (model is supposed to be Indian-from India) Granny Ghetto (older models) Tranny Pros (she-males) etc. Bottom line: You get access to almost 30 different sites for a low price, which makes this a great value. Some of the sites are worth the price of admission just by themselves: You also have access to a number of other worthwhile sites, as well as access to the smaller niche sites that might be of interest to someone, or just too exotic for that person's tastes. Peter North is an icon in porn. Rocco Siffredi is another legend. Silvia Saint and Silverstone are major porn names. I keep repeating myself, but you get a huge amount of professional-quality hardcore videos, for a very low price. This is not glamcore, it's more like soft-gonzo hardcore. The content is 100% different from a glamcore site like X-Art, but this site (and sub-network) is a bargain for what it offers. 01-13-16  09:10am Replies (0) Review 185 Babes Network.com (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large collection of attractive models, in their late teens or early twenties. -Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good editing, good lighting, good sound, etc. -Models are fairly clean: not a lot of tattoos or piercings, they are young. -Multiple choices for video downloads: ipod sp/480p/720p/1080p (MP4 format only). -No DRM. -No download limits. -No site timeout issues (that I am aware of. Can be logged in to site without activity for a long time.) -Content is exclusive. -The content (photo sets and videos) shows the posting date to site. Cons: -Some hot links lead to 404: Page not found error. Try clicking the hot link a second or third time to see if the video/set will come up. -Requires capcha to login (in addition to username and password). -Wish the listing of models was more basic: a simple, alphabetical list of the models. They do have lists, based on top rated/most viewed/my favorites, but it would be easier to search through the models if the list was alphabetical. -Not a lot of diversity in the models. They are basically white, young, attractive. Some PU members would wish for older models, different ethnicities, body types. -Uncheck the pre-checked trial membership offer (on the signup page), or you will be dinged for a membership you probably don't want. -There is a zip file for each photo set, but it comes in only 1 definition, not hi/medium/low definitions many sites offer. -The zip file for the photo set downloads with a numerical name. Need to rename each photo set file with the model's name, plus data. Bottom Line: This is a glamcore site, where attractive young females egage in solo, two-somes (m-f or f-f), or occasionally, three-some sex. I prefer the X-Art site over the Babes site. The X-Art videos seem to have more heat. The X-Art photos are just more stunning. These are both glamcore sites, but the X-Art experience is grade A, while the Babes experience is grade C. Am I being too harsh on Babes? It has fine models, but the content is just not up to the standards of X-Art. The navigation for X-Art is simpler than the Babes site. I sound like a shill for X-Art, but I am not. Whenever I join X-Art, I pay the full price for membership (except I do look around for discounts). I have joined X-Art multiple times with a 1-year membership, because I think it's worth the money. To join Babes for a 1-year membership would be a major waste of time and money. I joined Met-Art with a lifetime membership, because I think that site is exceptional. The Met-Art videos are boring, but the photo sets, and the models, can be lovely. Bottom line: If you want glamcore, join X-Art instead of Babes. 01-03-16  03:01pm Replies (0) Review 186 Devils Film (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Low membership price. First month is $14.95 with PU discount. -Huge number of gonzo hardcore videos. -Large number of categories or niches, including black, bubble but, shemale, granny, etc. -Can stream or download the videos. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All. -Good download speeds. I got over 4MB/sec. -In site special discounts. Normally I don't bother looking at these, but there are some interesting discounts to other sites. -Evil Angel: 30 Day Pass for $4.50. -Club Seventeen: 30 Day Pass for $5.95. -Team Skeet: 30 Day Pass for $12.95. -Wide diversity of models: age, race, body type. -A huge number of download options for some videos: 160p, 240p.360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. Cons: -They require a captcha to log in to the site. Sometimes the images are hard to read, and you have to try several times to enter the site. -There are 2565 videos of models who are tattooed or pierced. I don't like tattoos, or piercing. -Navigation is poor. There are many areas it could be improved. -Navigation is sometimes confusing. You can click on a link, and be ejected from the site. -Navigation: You are logged in to the Devil's Film site, but it also shows scenes from other sites in the network. -I watch porn on my laptop. The videos play, but sometimes the normal controls are not visible: I am referring to the "play", "pause", "time elapsed" controls that are normally at the bottom of the screen. -I prefer models that are pretty to beautiful. Most models here are just OK to plain. -Pre-check offer on the join page. -Biller is fameaid. I prefer CCBILL or EPOCH, which are nationally recognized processors that are easy to deal with. Bottom Line: With a subscription to Devils Film, you get access to a huge amount of hardcore videos. There is a wide range of categories or niches. There are over 20 sites that you get access to. The main sites of value include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD Focussing on the Devils Film site itself: the site specializes in gonzo sex: crude, rude, low-life sex. Many sub-niches, almost none of which appeal to me. So why join? Because maybe the hardcore gonzo videos will appeal to your tastes. You get access to several other sites that aren't quite as gonzo. And some of these sites will almost certainly have videos that you might find entertaining. For example, the Rocco Siffredi site has some videos that are truly hot. You just have to look through the junk to find the videos that appeal. -Which is one reason I prefer sites like X-Art, where you don't find a lot of junk: 1. the X-Art models are attractive to lovely. 2. the sex is presented in an erotic way. 3. the videos and photosets are shot in high-class, professional manner. But sometimes you want a change of pace. And Devils Film certainly gives you the bottom of the barrel in hardcore videos. The videos are shot in a professional manner. The lighting is good, the camera technique is good. But this is gonzo sex, often times kinky sex. And you need a strong stomach to watch a lot of it. I am giving the site a score of 85: because the site (and the network) gives value for the money: 1. access to a huge amount of hardcore videos. 2. access to a large number of niches. 3. the videos are professionally shot-so they are good quality. 4. the site has excellent download speeds, wide range of download choices for the videos, and it's fairly easy to move around the network from one site to another (You don't have to re-login each time you switch to a different site). 12-21-15  04:35am Replies (2) Review 187 X-Art (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The collection of models rivals any porn site on the Net, as far as attractiveness of the models. -The videos and photosets are professionally shot: excellent lighting, good camera technique, the models are professionally made-up, the costumes are good quality, as well as the sets. -Choice of hi, standard, low, and mobile definition for videos; -Choice of hi, medium and low definition for photo sets. -No download limits. -No DRM. Download a video or photo set, it's your to keep. -Zip files for photo sets in low, medium and high definition. -Epoch is the biller, a respected name for payment processors. -Long time before site timeout. -Can use download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Excellent download speeds. I get up to 4.6-4.9 MB/sec downloading a file. -All content is exclusive. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is mainly a well-designed site, that is easy to use. -No search engine. A good search engine would save a lot of time for members who have specific needs. -The models are 18 to early 20's. Mostly white. Extremely attractive. There's no variety beyond that. So if you want to see mature women, or different ethnic backgrounds, you won't find it here. -You can sort the models by popularity, newness, name or age, but the listing order is clunky: You have to scroll down the page numerous times, to bring up more models, instead of just being able to scroll smoothly down to see all the models. -The action might be too soft for some tastes. This is consensual sex: almost no hitting the women, slapping, spitting, forcible sex. -Updates average one per 2-or-3 days. Would like more updates. But the site emphasizes quality over quantity, which is a good idea. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of models: 200+ Number of photosets: 800+ Number of videos: 600+ This is one of my favorite glamcore sites. It does an excellent job presenting the models as attractively as possible. The models are almost all lovely to look at: they range from attractive to stunning to drop-dead gorgeous. Examine the model pages to see what I mean: these girls could be movie stars, based on their physical looks. Note: The photographer can have a massive effect on how attractive a model appears in a photograph. The X-Art site photographers do a great job in showcasing their models. A model that might appear as just OK or slightly attractive at a different site, can appear to be alluring or beautiful or gorgeous in X-Art photos. Most of the action is sweet, loving, gentle sex, either solo, twosome (boy-girl, girl-girl), or threesome (mainly 2 girls + 1 boy). The sex is mainly presented as between consenting adults who are giving each other pleasure. There is very little gonzo sex. Recently, they have introduced a few videos/photosets showing a more forceful, 50-shades-of-grey style, since that seems to be the flavor of the month. But even then, you assume the sex is consensual. When the site started, it was called "Beauty is Divine", and the content was strictly softcore photos of lovely models, but no videos. Then the site became "X-Art", and they started adding videos, and the focus changed from softcore photography to glamcore, where they started adding sex, which over time became more and more explicit. If you haven't tried glamcore, this site is definitely worth at least a 1-month membership, just to see what glamcore is. The PU discount means $20/month. Considering the quality of the site (exceptionally beautiful models, professionally shot photosets and videos), you get more than your money's worth, if you are into soft, erotic sex. The site has been around since 1999, so there is a large amount of content (photosets and videos) to explore. 12-16-15  05:21pm Replies (6) Review 188 MetArt (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -In my opinion, the best softcore photo site on the internet. -Over 3,000 models. Many of the models are lovely to stunningly beautiful. -A wide range of professional photographers contribute to this site. -A huge backlog of photo sets. Site started in 1998, as MostEroticTeens.com (hence the name change to Met-Art.com). -The site updates daily with 4 to 6 photo sets + videos per day. So not only a huge backlog of content, but a truly generous update rate as well. Most updates are photo sets. -You get a small bio sheet on the models, that includes their age when shot, body measurements, and a brief note on what they like. Not much a bio sheet, but it makes the girls more real. -No DRM. You download a photo set, it's yours to keep. -Excellent download speeds. I get 5.5 or 5.6 MB/sec, which is extremely fast for me. -Fast response from technical support. You get an an email within a few hours that shows a human actually read your problem email and is helping. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -Site is basically easy to use. However, because of the huge number of models and photo sets, it can take months to search through the site to find everything you will like. -There is an index of the models, with a large thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like. -There is also an index of the contributing photographers. With the photo sets from each photographer. -So you can search by the name of the model, or by the name of the photographer. -You can comment on each photo set (or photographer). And there is an active community that discusses their likes and dislikes of the photo sets. Most comments are positive, but negative comments are allowed. And the contributing photographer sometimes responds. -No download limits. -CCBill is the billing agent-one of the best credit card processing agents on the Net. -Allows the use of download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager. -The photosets are offered in three sizes for download and viewing. Bottom Line: PROS (CONTINUED): -The photosets have separate zip files for low definition, medium definition, and high definition. CONS -The cons are basically minor. This is the best softcore erotic site on the Internet. -Not strictly a con, but the site is softcore erotic. No hardcore porn. If you want hardcore, look elsewhere. -The videos are boring. They have tried in recent years to make the videos more erotic. These are videos of attractive models that are naked, but the videos are disappointing, and mainly a waste of time and effort. -Because of the huge amount of the photo sets, and the 3,000 plus number of models that are mainly attractive to stunningly lovely, it's a natural human reaction to become slightly bored with the site. Back in the day when Playboy and Penthouse were in their glory days, you only got those magazines once a month, so the impact of each issue was more potent. Because Met-Art has thousands of photo sets and thousands of lovely models, instead of appreciating how wonderful the site is, you start to feel bored by the loveliness and attractiveness of the models and photo sets. That is human psychology. You want what you don't have, but once you get it, the value of what you have diminishes. -Some people object that the photos don't meet the professional standards that they are seeking. Again, that is human nature. There will always be people who object or complain about any beautiful model or photo or object. The site features attractive to stunningly beautiful models that are photographed by professional photographers. Obviously, not every photo set is a masterpiece, but you get access to a boatload of softcore photos of lovely women. -Most models are 18 to early 20s. White, slender to medium build. You don't get a lot of variety in the models as far as age or race or build. BOTTOM LINE: MetArt is best site for softcore erotic photography on the Internet. Based on a variety of factors: 1. Huge number of attractive models (over 3,000 models). 2. Huge number of photo sets (around 15,000 sets, which will take you many months to look through. 3. Over 1,000 videos, which you can use to put yourself to sleep through boredom. Maybe a few videos are truly erotic, but the erotic videos are few and far between). 4. Hundreds of contributing photographers. So you get access to a range of styles. But the overall approach is softcore erotic. 5. Site is easy to use. Can search by name of model, name of photographer, or by other attributes: hair color, age of model, eye color, ethnicity, etc. 6. A low price (with PU discount). $20/month, or $100/year. There are other sites that are similar, that offer high grade photography and lovely models: MPL Studios and Femjoy are 2 of the closest competitors. But even though they are both Mega-sites (huge content of photo sets and large number of lovely models), Met-Art is the biggest site as far as number of photo sets and number of models. I enjoy the photo sets at Met-Art and MPL Studios more than the photo sets at Femjoy. The Met-Art and MPL Studios photos seem fresher, the models look more attractive, than the models at Femjoy. Many of the Met-Art and MPL Studios models also appear at Femjoy, but I normally prefer the Met-Art and MPL studios sets over the Femjoy sets. Other people can and do appreciate the Femjoy style over the Met-Art style, and have stated so. So it's a matter of personal preference. This is my third review of Met-Art. I gave it a score of 97 in my first review (which was also my first review for PU), a 99 in my second review (because the number of models and photo sets just keep increasing). In this review I am giving Met-Art a score of 99. I know many members feel that a score of 99 for any site is wrong. They believe that any site can be improved, and that a score of 99 ignores whatever faults a site may have. But I believe that Met-Art is the best softcore site on the Internet. And that because of many factors that I listed, it does deserve a score of 99. In spite of the boring videos. 12-12-15  02:34pm Replies (0) Review 189 Teen Mega World (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Recent price (with a PU discount) is $14.95/month. -Massive amount of hardcore teen videos. -Easy navigation to the different sites. -Hot links for each model to the different sites her videos and photo sets appear. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.10-2.60 Mb/s. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All (a free program) with this site. -The recent videos are professionally shot: Good focus, good lighting, good editing, no annoying random sounds. -A large number of different sites that cater to just about most teen hardcore categories -You can choose to download the entire video, or you can choose to download the specific clips of that video that you want. -There is a zip file for each photo set. -Easy login. A very long time before you are logged out because of inactivity. -Multiple choices for video download: HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD 540p, LD 405p (for portable devices). Cons: In my estimation: all of the cons are minor, compared to value you are getting at this network. -Almost all models (females) are Eastern European. That is a minor con. You get a huge number of very attractive to really lovely white European teens from Russia and surrounding areas. Some people want more variety in the models, age-wise, race-wise, body-wise. Most of the teens are slender or medium build. I have no problem with that. -The videos download with a number as the name of the file. It would be better if they named the video in the following format: name of model_date posted to network_name of site. -Older videos don't have the higher definition of the videos from the last few years. There are some lovely models in low-quality videos that would be much more appealing if the video quality was better (higher definition, better lighting, better focus). Since most porn models only last a few years in the business, you're not going to find better videos of these models. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Some PU members have noted that the network often comes out with new sites for a new niche. And that older sites often stop updating. This can be frustrating if you really like a particular niche, such as tricky-masseur or old-n-young. But with so many sites offered, they can't keep making content for every niche they have. -Some of the content is non-exclusive. You can find some of the tricky-masseuse videos at 18 Only Girls (Diesel network) and Rub A Teen (Team Skeet network), but the videos were posted at Teen Mega World years earlier. -The watermark for the videos is overly large. -I would like some personal bio about the models. Age, height, weight, country, maybe a brief interview of the model, what she likes. Porn is fantasy. A bio, although probably fake, still creates a link that makes the model seem more real. BOTTOM LINE: Network stats (as of Mar 12, 2015): Total Number Of Sites: 28 Models: 1030 Videos: 3713 Photos: 617423 The network goes for a natural style: the girls use very little make-up, very little airbrushing. One major positive: the site/network is continually working to improve itself. I don't mean that major changes are happening each month. But over the years, the network has become much more user friendly. 1. They put in an excellent model directory, which gives hot links to all the content the model has on the different sites. There is a good thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like. 2. Switching between sites in the network is fairly easy. That was an upgrade done several years ago. You don't have to re-enter your username and password to switch sites. 3. The update schedule is excellent. One new photoset or (matching) video each day. 4. The quality of the photo sets has improved over the years. The individual photos in a photo set used to be much more like screenshots. But they are improving the quality of each photo, by better framing, whatever. The photos are several grades below a photo site like Met-art or MPL Studios. But some of the recent photo sets, because of how attractive the individual model can be, are finally worth collecting. Maybe I am being too subjective in my review. But when I compare Teen Mega World to other bread and butter (not high class glamcore) mega sites, I think Teen Mega World deserves a higher score. 1. Naughty America just has too many videos that I don't enjoy wading through to find the ones I do enjoy. 2. netFameSolutions (Devils Film network) also has too many videos I don't enjoy, which makes it harder to find the vids I do enjoy. But netFameSolutions has some truly hot videos. 3. 21Sextury used to be a great network, but the quality of the content, and the site navigation issues, have lowered the network's value. X-Art and some of the heart-core sites give you a more erotic style, high-quality video. CONCLUSION: But for bread and butter teen hardcore videos: because of the massive amount of content, the wide variety of niches, the large (and continually increasing) number of attractive to lovely young girls, and the low price, this is one of the best values for teen hard core videos. I've had monthly subs, and yearly subs, to this network. People often say you get what you pay for. But with TMW, you get a huge amount of high-quality videos for a very low price. 03-12-15  03:04pm Replies (2) Review 190 21Sextury.com (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Low intro price of $9.95 first month, recurring $29.95/monthly. -Loads of attractive models. -Wide variety of models. You get some content of your popular porn stars, and loads other girls as well. -Fast download speeds. I get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed. -Easy login. No captcha. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout (I just got timed out. Lost my place. So this site is not as generous as some in site timeout.) -Professionally shot videos. Good lighting, good colors, good focus, good sound control, etc. -Lots of niches covered. -Easy navigation. But there are so many attractive models, you get tired looking through the videos, trying to decide which to view. -Lots of viewing options. Can stream, or download in different definitions. -Zip file for photosets. -Content is basically exclusive. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -The $9.95 for first month is a great bargain for a great network. But renewing at $29.95/month makes you wonder about renewing. -There is a pre-checked cross-sell, but it was easy to see and uncheck. -Initial signup was a little strange. I was rejected 4 times when I tried to use a Master card to sign up. I switched to a Visa card and was accepted the first time. -For some videos, I get the message: "A plugin is needed to display this content". Most videos will stream, but a few don't. -The ultra high quality video files can be large. 1.4 GB for a runtime of 32 minutes. -The search box returns can be buggy sometimes. You enter "Mia Malkova", who has 2 videos and 2 matching photosets, and the search returns, "Your search - Mia Malkova - did not match any documents." The search box is supposed to search the entire network, not just the site you are currently logged in to. -The default filename is a random number. Bottom Line: The site/network is easy to use, once you get over how many models and videos and photosets there are. It should be a real pleasure going through the high quality contents of attractive women doing dirty sex. But the sheer magnitude of the contents-strangely-almost makes it seem like work. Sites like X-Art and Diesel Access network, while far smaller, just seem easier to use, because, psychologically, you know there's less material. And I like or appreciate the models at X-Art and Diesel Access network more. The videos at those sites seem more intimate, the approach is more glamcore/heartcore. I don't mean the 21SexTury videos are gonzo. But the models at 21Sextury appear more hardcore pros, while the models at the other two sites I mentioned just seem to give a softer, more real vibe to their performances. -The best things about this network/site: A large number of lovely models. The videos are crystal sharp, well focused, good lighting, professionally shot, good colors. -What is unusual, is that the accompanying photosets are really high quality. The photos are taken by professional photographers who know what they are doing. So you have high quality photos of lovely young models in sexual situations. Most of the sites focus on a particular niche. At other networks, there might be little attempt to focus the content. But this network makes an effort to supply content specific to the theme of the site. -Can view the photos online, or download the photoset in a zip file. -The photoset zip files give two options: normal, and high resolution definitions. (Older photosets might have just a normal definition zip file). -Photosets have 100+ photos per set. -Can stream or download the videos. -Video runtime averages 30+ minutes per video. Older videos give you a choice of medium or high definition for download. Newer videos give you more choices for definition for download: Low quality H.264 Medium quality wmv Medium quality H.264 High quality wmv Ultra high quality wmv Ultra high quality H.264 -You can download the entire video, or can select partial scenes from the video for download. -With so many sites (you get access to 39 sites), and so many models, and so many videos and photosets to examine, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. Just bite the bullet, and keep looking, and you will almost certainly find models and videos and photosets that will appeal. The introductory price of $9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month thereafter) makes this a real bargain. I don't know why I haven't tried this site before. 05-20-13  06:31pm Replies (5) Review 191 Young Libertines (0) 68.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Some improvement in video qaulity over Young Sex Parties, a sister site in the Serious Cash network. But video quality seems amateurish which is not a plus, unless you like to watch poorly shot home sex videos. -Easy login. Can save username and password for future logins. -No DRM. =Long time before site timeout. -They have videos of some models that appear to be early in their career. I've seen some of these models at other sites. But the names they use for the models are basically random, having no relation to the names these models have at other sites. -Down Them All download manager works. -Good download speeds. I regularly get slightly over 2 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed. -Can stream or download movies. Download choices are FLV, MP4, 3GP (for mobile phones). Cons: -I believe joining this network means your email address will be opened to lots of spam. Open a new email address for safety. -Videos have a home-style, amateur feel. -Search is poor. Many times you can enter a model's name and get 0 results, even though you copied her name from a video you just saw, where her name is listed. -Advertising for other sites clutters up the members area pages. -Videos download with generic filenames such as "movie.flv" or "high.mp4", so you have to rename the videos manually to identify who is in the video. But the model's names are generic, so unless you recognize her from other sites and remember her name, the name of a model is almost worthless. -No list for models' names at the site. No listing of models' thumbnails to show what the models look like. -No model bios. -Models are foreign (Russia or from Eastern Europe). So the language spoken in the videos is usually foreign. -Navigation is poor Bottom Line: The site theme is supposed to be amateur videos that are shot at home by amateurs. There are a few videos I've seen from this site that I thought were good. But trying to search through the site to find those videos is a time-consuming task, because the search function is crap, there is no listing of models with a thumbnail to identify what the models look like, the names given to the models are apparently random, so even if you know what you are looking for, it's a question of whether you will run out of patience before you find it. This site is a little better than Young Sex Partes because I think the models are a little more attractive. But the videos don't compare to the high quality videos found at quality teen sites. And the videos are also below the general quality of videos at Teen Mega World -in terms of focus, framing, definition, lighting, costumes, etc. I know they are going for an amateur feeling, but I much prefer professionally shot videos that have high quality. The site design is poor, making site navigation a problem. This site makes you begin to appreciate how easy some other sites are to use. Where search is useful, where you get nice thumbnails to show you what the models look like (along with a name you can use). You get about 21 sites included in your membership. Most of the sites feature teen hardcore. The sites included are: Teeny Lovers Casual Teen Sex 18 Pussy Club Young Sex Parties I Shoot My Girl Young Libertines Bang My Teen Ass 18 Flesh Sell Your GF Hidden Camera Tapes Girls Next Door Abused Young Courtesans Teens Analyzed Home Porno Tapes Moms Passions My Dirty GF Nasty Angels Old Dicks Young Porn Films 3D Stolen Home Films Teen Teacher They Caught On Video I'm giving the site a score of 68. The site navigation is a problem. I don't care for the amateur feel of the videos. I wish the models were more attractive, or at least presented more attractively. I think there are much better sites available, in terms of how easy the sites are to use, the quality of the contents. The network has lots of hardcore videos (and pictures), so the quantity is good, but it's too difficult to slog through the content to find what I would like. My score of 68 is based on the amount of content at the network. If I were grading this site on my personal enjoyment of the site, I would give it a score in the 50s. 05-13-13  11:01pm Replies (0) Review 192 X-Art (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -One of my favorite glamcore sites. -The selection of models is outstanding. Most of the models are either attractive or gorgeous. The photography and videos focus on making the models as attractive as possible, and it really shows. -Easy login. Username and password can be saved. No captcha required. -Good site design. Can search site by updates, models, or videos. -Large thumbnails clearly show what the models look like, what models are in each video or photoset. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Content has date posted to site. -No download limits. -Fast download speeds. I get over 2.1 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed. -Download manager works. I use DownThemAll. -Videos and photo sets are professionally shot. Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control (no random extraneous noises), most of the photos and videos are well-focused. -Good update rate. Last couple of weeks, they have been adding one video or photoset per day. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is one of the best glamcore sites available. I'm basing that on the quality of the models (attractive to absolutely gorgeous), the high quality of the videos and photosets, how easy the site is to use). -No search function if want to search by type of sex action, hair color of model, breast size, or other factors. -If you don't like glamcore (some PU members call this heartcore), you won't like this site. There is no gonzo sex, no rough treatment of women. -Many of the videos have brief moments where the video is slighty blurry. This is an "artistic effect", which I find stupid and annoying. I want my videos crystal clear, not crystal clear, with occasional blurry shots mixed in. -Glamcore usually has soft "mood music" in the background. I prefer a video without any "mood music" or any background music. -Models are white, late teens to early 20s. Some PU members might want a wider variety of models, different races, more of an age spread. Bottom Line: This is one of the best glamcore sites on the Internet. The models range from merely attractive to drop-dead gorgeous. The videos and photosets are high quality, professionally shot, to emphasize the beauty of the models. The sex is slow, sensuous, romantic. There is a mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl. There are a few with 2 boys-1 girl, 1 boy-2 girls, 2 boys-2 girls. I believe the site contents are exclusive. Although many of the models can be found at other sites, the videos and photosets at the site are exclusive. There is a nice amount of content. The site has been around a number of years (2009 or earlier?). It used to be called "Beauty is Divine". When it first started, it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. I don't believe it had any videos, only photosets. Each photoset had a small number of photos, and the models were uniformly lovely. The photography was high quality. Then the site name was changed to X-Art, and they started adding videos, and changing the approach from softcore to erotic glamor, which slowly evolved to glamcore, where the photosets and videos show actual sex. Photosets can be viewed online, or downloaded. Photosets from the last few years have about 100+ photos per set. The earliest photosets had 25 or fewer photos per set. Download options include a zip file in three definitions: 1200 pixels 2000 pixels 4000 pixels Videos can be streamed online or downloaded. Download options have choice of many definitions: The download choices for one recent video include: MP4 (all devices and mobile) 1920x1080 HD (1431 MB) 1280x720 HD (784 MB) 960x540 SD (549 MB) 640x360 SD (152 MB) Apple Quicktime 1920x1080 HD (1431 MB) 1280x720 HD (784 MB) 960x540 SD (549 MB) 640x360 SD (152 MB) Windows Media 1920x1080 HD (1478 MB) 1280x720 HD (867 MB) 960x540 SD (589 MB) 640x360 SD (158 MB) BOTTOM LINE: If you like tender young teens, in gorgeously photographed photos and videos, then this site is worth visiting. As I said, this is one of my favorite glamcore teen sites. 05-06-13  06:33pm Replies (6) Review 193 Wow Porn (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. No captcha. -Long time before site timeout. -High quality videos and photosets. Professionally shot: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, really nice technical control. -Large number of attractive or gorgeous teen models. -Easy site navigation. -Can stream or download videos. -Streaming options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Download options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -You can select different parts of a video scene to stream or download. -Nice mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, or group sex. -There is usually background music for the videos, but it's kept soft, so less distracting than many music backgrounds. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -Good download speeds. I usually get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed. -Access to live chat shows that feature a few of the models from the Diesel sites. The models are friendly, strip, masturbate, sometimes have a boyfriend that performs with them (fucking, in other words). Those shows are completely free. -Content has a posting date. -Files download with the name of the model and the title of the video, so you don't have to rename the files. CONS Cons are basically minor. Wow Porn is a high quality glamcore site. -Most of the videos are shot indoors. very few videos are shot outdoors, at the beach, in a park or field. Some people might want more variety in the locations, but I thought the locations were very nice, no cheap apartment setting, no cheap clothing, just a really nice look and feel to the videos. -Sometimes toys are used. Some PU members don't like toys. -This is a glamcore site. Some PU members might like a more gonzo approach. Bottom Line: Wow Porn and Wow Girls are the newest sites in the Diesel Access network. Starting in early March of 2013, those two sites, which used to be separate from the Diesel Access network, are now included in the network. I would consider 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn to be glamcore/heartcore porn. Those sites use many of the same models. The video and photo style is basically the same for all 4 sites. You get gorgeous teen models that show off their tight bodies, and many of them engage in hardcore sex, with boys, with other girls, or by themselves (some PU members consider masturbation softcore or midcore, but I think it's hardcore, especially if they are showing close-up views of the vagina, ass, etc.) The videos and photos are high quality, in terms of definition, focus, lighting, colors, camera-work, etc. My favorite glamcore/heartcore sites are X-Art and some of the Diesel Access network sites. That's because of the high quality videos and photosets, and the large number of very attractive to really gorgeous models these sites have. Met-art is my favorite teen softcore glamor site. Again, that is because of the huge number of very attractive to really gorgeous models, and the outstanding quality of their photosets. If you have access to all the sites in the Diesel Acess network, that means 11 sites in all. They have dropped (eliminated) several of the old sites that stopped updating years ago, and that mainly contained older, lower quality videos and photos (lower definition, lower production values). So they are showcasing the higher quality of their current offerings. The sites they have eliminated include: Lay The Kat Policeman Sasha Fucks Dasha The Sperm Lover Wow Porn is an excellent site by itself. Access to the rest of the sites in the network make this a high quality glamcore offering with lots of very attractive teen models. It's really hard to give this site a fair score. By itself, I'm giving it a 92. If you include the other sites in the network, I'd give it a 95 or more. This is really a high-end glamcore offering. 04-24-13  08:11pm Replies (3) Review 194 Silvia Saint (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history. It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit. -Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content. -Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape, -PU discount $14.95/month (recurring). -This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site. -Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to be natural, not plastic. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate. -Can watch scenes streaming or download. -Videos have posting date. -Female models are listed for each scene. -Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec). -No DRM. -No download limits. -Lots of attractive models. -Easy login. -Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites. Bottom Line: CONS: -Pre-checked cross-sell at signup. -Many blank thumbnails for the model listings. -No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option. -No zip files for photo shoots. -I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next. -Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system). BOTTOM LINE: Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models Silvia is currently working with. Site Stats: Movies: 737 DVDs: 304 Pornstars: 481 Pictures: 6660 HD Movies (283) Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download: Streaming: 240p, 480p. Download: 240p, 480p. Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download. Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p. Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. The main sites in the netFameSolutions network, based on amount of content, include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys. The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well. I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit. It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower. I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s. 04-22-13  10:59am Replies (1) Review 195 Give Me Teens (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint. -Can choose streaming or download for videos. -There is a photo set associated with each video. -The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc. -You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star. -Wide selection of teen categories. -They include the posting date of each video. -They identify the female models in each video. Cons: -The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles. -The photo sets do not have a zip file. -Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up. -The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors. -Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there is any of her content at that site. -A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site. Bottom Line: The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it. Site Stats: Movies: 601 DVDs: 162 Pornstars: 654 Pictures: 87846 The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition. The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is: Older videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p Download in 240p, 480p Newer videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p Minor point: The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites). Is it the same girl? She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens: Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05 18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05 This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special. What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site. To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network. 04-20-13  03:39pm Replies (5) Review 196 Peter North (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Have choice to view videos streaming or download. Older videos have only 2 choices for definition: Steaming choice is 240p or 480p. Download choice is WMV or MP4 file types, on 240p or 480p. -Newer videos have more choices for definition: Streaming: 240p, 480p, 540p. Downloading: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -No download limit. -No DRM. -In the public preview pages, you can watch brief sample clips of the videos the site features. You also have access to the drop-down list of the site porn stars, and the thumbnail listing of the site porn stars. This thumbnail listing is much more complete than the thumbnail listing at most of the other sites in the network. -The public preview pages also gives you the scenes each model appears in, so you can tell how many scenes your favorite models are in. -Long time before site timeout. -PU discount at $14.95/month (recurring). -Thousands of hardcore videos, many of them featuring Peter North. Cons: -Search is basic. Have to use a drop-down list to search for porn model, series, etc. A blank search box would be much easier to use. -Search is limited to just one site. You can't search across the network for content by a model, but have to search site by site, which is time consuming and takes a lot of effort. -Navigation is basic. -Uncheck the pre-checked offer, or you will be signed up for a trial membership in some other site. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Movies: 2770 DVDs: 566 Pornstars: 1767 Pictures: 62568 This is a huge site. And access to any one of the sites in the Fame Digital network gives you access to all the sites in the network, which is about 27 sites. The main sites,with the most content are: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint But there are over 20 specialty sites, which have less content, but cater to different niches: Lesbian, Teen, Creampie, Hairy, Indian, Granny, etc. If you've never been a member before, it's definitely worth visiting, because of the huge amount of hardcore videos, and the wide range of content. And there are sometimes special offers where you can join for as low as $5 for the first month. Giving the site a score of 87 because of the huge amount of hardcore videos at this site and the access to tons of hardcore videos at the other sites in the network, as well as offering a wide range of material. 04-16-13  03:33am Replies (0) Review 197 Playboy Plus (0) 68.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Discount through PU. $14.95 instead of $29.99/month. -Easy login. No captcha. -Can view photosets as slide show or download the zip set. -Long time before site timeout. -Good download speeds. I'm getting 1.3 MB/sec, my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Choice of download version quality: Many videos have a WVGA480, HD720, and a HD1080 version. Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked cross-sell. -Search could be better. Search term "Christine Maddox" returns any photoset with the name of "Christine" as first name or last name, instead of specifically returning only photosets with the name of "Christine Maddox" included. -Also, either they are missing photos of past playmates, or the search does not return all the photos of those playmates. For example, the annual photoguide of past playmates of the year photos are sometimes not included in the search result. There are other past photos of playmates and models that are either not on the site, or not returned by a search of the model's name. -Some bugs in the navigation or site structure. You play a slide show of Susie Scott, and it only plays a few of the 24 photos in the set, then stops. Can't get it to play/show all the photos in the set. -Photoset of a playmate does not include the data sheet. Bottom Line: -Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Playboy was the premier "gentleman's magazine". Penthouse was a close second. Both those magazines were renowned for their nude photography, as well as their articles and fiction and interviews. They were money-making machines that brought their founders vast wealth. Those days are history. Both Playboy and Penthouse have flirted with bankruptcy in recent years. This is supposed to be a softcore glamor photo and video site. Given the Playboy name, you would expect to find superior, high quality photos and videos of their models. -I don't know why, but there are superior copies of their onsite photos available elsewhere. Years ago, I belonged to a newsgroup, and I collected the photos of most playmates. You look at the photos at this Playboy Plus site, and the photos just don't have the same impact as the photos that I collected. The basic image is the same, but the images I collected from the newsgroups were more striking. -Some photos are mis-labeled. You play a slide show of a photoset, and instead of identifying the model(s) in each photo, the label shows the title of the photoset. So you have to know from other sources (or your own special knowledge) who these models are. -No choice of download version quality for zip photosets. This is surprising. For a photo-oriented site, the only option I see is for one definition of a zip file download, not the standard 3 definitions that many photo sites have of low, medium, and high quality. -The quality of the "high definition" video files can be poor. For example, the video for "stacy-fuson-paymate-of-the-month-vid-01.mp4" is 1920x1080, total bitrate is 6049 kbps, which would seem to indicate a high quality, high definition video. But the frame rate is 7 frames/second, which might explain why the video is a poorly defined video picture. I've seen the DVD which this video is made from, and the video is much sharper than the video you download from Playboy Plus. Let me be clear. Watching the downloaded video is like watching a shitty version of the video you should be watching. The streaming version of that video is better quality, but nowhere near the quality of Metart, Diesel Access network, or other fine sites. The video quality of a streaming video at Playboy Plus is actually below the quality of the Teen Mega World videos. That is amazing to me. Don't the people running this site realize the video quality of their videos is so poor, compared to the better sites on the internet? Maybe they are blind to the poor quality of their photographs, which is not as bad as the quality of their video downloads. But the obvious degradation of their video download files is pathetic, for a site that is supposed to empasize the beauty of the female form. The site does not use DRM. But the poor quality of the video files I have downloaded, in effect, means you can not save a high quality video file. And I am going to sign up for a new membership to a newsgroup, because I believe I will be able to find better quality photos of past playmates from a newsgroup than I can find at this Playboy Plus pay site. I don't believe my expectations for this site were too high. But what I've found at this site, in terms of photo image quality, and video image quality, is a massive disappointment. Not all videos are as bad (poor definition) as these 2 videos of Stacy Fuson. The videos of Erika Eleniak are better. Not great, not as good or defined as high quality sites like Metart or Diesel Access, but still better than the Stacy Fuson videos. Giving the site a score of 68. I believe the quality of the photos at the site is inferior to what you will find at high-quality sites like Metart and MPL Studios and Femjoy. And the quality of the videos is even further below what you will find at those other sites. Comparing the photo and video quality of this site to high grade sites on the internet, you begin to realize the Playboy brand has really fallen from its former quality standards. 03-10-13  10:18pm Replies (8) Review 198 Nasty Angels (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to. -Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership. -Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site. -Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know. Cons: -You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login. -Primitive site design. -Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click. -Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case. -Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate. -Site contents have no posting date. -No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing. -No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it. Bottom Line: This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex. The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot. Videos are grouped into two categories: Softcore movies, and hardcore movies. Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation. Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories. The videos are better than I thought they would be. Sample data rates: The frame width x height is: 1024x576. Total bitrate: 2548kbps Frame width x height is: 632x512 Total bitrate: 1181 kbps The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots. They also have some very attractive models at this site. It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent. I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos. I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all. 02-19-13  11:14am Replies (2) Review 199 Young Sex Parties (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -Down Them All download manager works at this site. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent. -The content is dated when posted to the site. Cons: -Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use. -Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time. -No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. -Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages. -There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart. -The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder. -No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless. -Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts. BOTTOM LINE: Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use. When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos. Choice of file types for download: FLV For Windows, MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4 MP4 For iPhone3/iPod MP4 For Sony PSP 3GP For mobile phones Number of site videos: The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117. I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves. You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages. So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos. If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list. The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store. The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos. In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings. I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network. 02-18-13  01:51am Replies (3) Review 200 MetArt (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. -A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers. -Easy login. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -No download limits. -I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site. -Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around. -Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like. -Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. -The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are. -Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models. -The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl. Bottom Line: As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site. Site statistics: Number of photosets: 12,534 Number of videos: 1,045 Movies Number of models: 2,766 Models Number of contributing photographers: 250 Number of photos: 1,365,839 Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of. Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world. The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download: Low definition, medium definition, high definition. The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high. Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today. One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in- house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform. Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show. Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are. I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly. I am giving the site a score of 99. How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100? That would be a fantasy project: 1. They could delete almost all their videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn. 2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today. Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams. For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show. 02-14-13  07:54am Replies (10) Shown : 176-200 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.44 seconds.