Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 126-150 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 126 Real Ex Girlfriends (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This is part of the Porn Pros network. Site membership gives you access to 22 sites. -With 22 sites, you get a wide variety of porn niches. -Large amount of content in the network. Over 3,00 videos. -The models are late teens, early twenties. Mostly attractive. -Try to select Epoch as the billing agent. A trusted name. -You can stream videos in standard or high definition. -You can download videos in 480p or 1080p definition. -Each video comes with a matching photoset. The photos are high-quality screencaps. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale. Even if you uncheck the cross-sale, you might still be charged for the cross-sale. So check your email confirmation, or your credit card company, to see if you are signed up for the cross-sale site. If you are signed up for the cross-sale site, either dispute the charge, or cancel immediately, before it turns into an expensive charge for a site you probably did not want. -Slow update rate. About 1 new scene per week for the entire network. -$69.95 charge to upgrade to all the premium sites in the network. -Have to click through an offer to upgrade to premium status to enter the main member site. -Some of the statistics given for scenes are false. Example: The time/lengh of the video titled "Tennis Tease" featuring Cece Capella is shown as 00:01 (one second). But the video has a runtime of 25 minutes 13 seconds. Actually, most of the videos show a time/length of 0 or 1 or 2 seconds. Which makes no sense. CONS CONTINUED BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: My guess is that the site software engineer put a marker to show the runtime of each video. But then did not follow through, and the static runtimes shown are 00.00 or 00.01 or 00.02. However, when you play the video, you can see the actual runtime at the bottom of the screen. BOTTOM LINE: Site theme: Guys posting videos of former girlfriends for revenge. Which is fake. The girls are porn stars/models. Actually, that might have been the original theme of the site. But for the last few years, the videos do not emphasize or show the ex-girlfriend theme. The videos are basically just a guy and girl fucking. With no background theme information to show the girl is a former girlfriend. This is part of the Porn Pros network. So membership to this site gives you access to the Porn Pros network. You get access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network: The number of updates is current as of 2016-11-30: 18yearsold-480 Updates 40ozbounce-119 Updates Amateurviolations-34 Updates Cockcompetition-40 Updates Crueltyparty-64 Updates Cumdisgrace-34 Updates Cumshotsurprise-107 Updates Deepthroatlove-290 Updates Disgraced18-115 Updates Eurohumpers-21 Updates Flexiblepositions-27 Updates Freaksofboobs-61 Updates Freaksofcock-183 Updates Jurassiccock-80 Updates Lolcumshots-4 Updates Massagecreep-204 Updates Milfhumiliation-83 Updates Pimpparade-33 Updates Realexgirlfriends-571 Updates Shadypi-93 Updates Squirtdisgrace-15 Updates Teenbff-234 Updates Most of the sites update rarely or not at all. In the last 30 days, the entire network added 5 new scenes. So that works out to 1 new scene per week. The number of scenes per site ranges from 4 at Lolcumshots to 571 at Realexgirlfriends. Obviously, the sites with more content have more value. My favorite site is Massagecreep. Many of the girls are attractive, and the sex can be hot. Realexgirlfriends is the largest site in the network (of the basic network, not including the premium sites). I'm giving the site a score of 80. This is based on the large amount of network videos you have access to. The videos are mainly professionally shot. The models are mainly attractive. The site navigation is easy. So you get a lot of hardcore teen videos, for a discounted PU price of $17.95/month. 11-30-16  06:16pm Replies (0) Review 127 Team Skeet (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Over 1,300 models. -The network covers a number of niche fantasies: screwing the babysitter, the naughty high school girl, small girls, teen pies, anal, blowjobs, massage, etc. -Many of the girls are attractive. But the site does not put a lot of effort into presenting them at their most attractive. -CCBILL is the payment processor. A trusted name. -No pre-checked cross-sale on signup (that I can remember). -Currently, there is a special link at TBP for a rate of $9.87/month (recurring). I don't know how long that rate will be available. -One update per day for the network. -24 sites in the network. -You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You also have the choice of low, medium or high definition for video downloads. Cons: -Have to pass through a upsell page (with ads) to enter the main site. -Ads clutter the pages. -Some of the network sites are premium sites, that you have to pay extra to access. -The models are teens, many of them attractive. But not much effort is put into making the models appear attractive: either in make-up, costume, sets, or superior camera-work. You have hundreds of cute models: Alice Green, Alice March, Apolonia Lapiedra, Kharlie Stone, Dillon Harper, Alexia Gold, etc. But the models appear so much more attractive when presented at some other paysites. -The content is advertised as 100% exclusive. But many of the Rub-A-Teen site videos are found at Teen Mega World (at their Tricky Masseur site) and at Diesel network (at the All Fine Girls site). -The camera-work of the videos is often mediocre. The video is not smooth, the lighting is just OK, the sets are inexpensive. A good amateur would shoot better videos than many of the Team Skeet videos. Bottom Line: Team Skeet is a network of hardcore teen sites. -Over 20 sites. -Over 1,300 models. -Over 2,300 videos With over 20 sites, you get a nice variety of teen fantasy themes. The acting is mainly poor. The girls are usually attractive, but not much effort is put into making the girls appear attractive. For example, Apolonia Lapiedra appears at Team Skeet and at MetArt. At MetArt, she is gorgeous: Lovely face, great body. At Team Skeet, she appears in two videos. I know it's the same girl, because the name is the same (which is unusual with porn models, because they often have a number of different names for different sites). And Apolonia has the same physical characteristics: long black hair, face and body resembles the MetArt girl. If I saw this Team Skeet girl at a shopping mall, I would not give her a second look. She's nothing special (appearance-wise) in her Team Skeet videos. What the fuck? I'm being serious. She is a jewel at MetArt. She is a piece of meat at Team Skeet. I don't mean Team Skeet is a gonzo site. But they took a great-looking model, and present her as a average-looking or below-average-looking teen in her videos. It just makes you realize that not only is porn fantasy, but that the camera-work can make an incredible difference in how appealing some of these models are. Which I already knew. But what a waste of talent to take these attractive girls and present them without their natural sparkle. That is why I give MetArt a score of 99. And Team Skeet a score of 80. (But there are other reasons why I give Team Skeet a score of 80): -The poor quality of the videos: they need to hire a professional for their camera work. -The cheap sets. -This is a personal quirk, but I don't like "Unlock" sites in the network that require added payments to access their content. If I pay for a membership, give me access to all the sites, and don't tease me with added sites that require more money. They are already using part of the page space to advertise other non-related sites. So they are over-loading you with advertisements to take your money. I paid for a membership. Let me enjoy it in peace. End of rant. For bread-and-butter hardcore teen porn, I much prefer Teen Mega World, over Team Skeet. Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) is borderline between gonzo and glamcore. Diesel has outstanding models (physically attractive), and they look great in the photos and videos. For glamcore, X-Art and Blacked and Tushy are outstanding sites. Lovely models, presented with care and precision to look gorgeous: with great camera-work, expensive sets, etc. The Best Porn review writes in his latest review on Team Skeet (released Jul 22, 2016): "One of the best networks of teen-oriented sites on the Net." I can't agree. 11-26-16  11:30am Replies (0) Review 128 Fuck Studies (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price of $14.95/month if you join through Teen Mega World link. Joining Fuck Studies directly (using the PU link) costs $29.95/month. So save 50% and join through the PU Teen Mega World link, which gives you access to all the Teen Mega World sites. -Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network, which is a large network of hardcore teen sites. Teen Mega World positives: Over 4,500 videos, most with matching photosets. Over 1,200 teen models, many of them attractive to extremely attractive. About 36 separate sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. No download limits. -Fast download speeds. I average 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec. -Navigation is good. This is a mega network, with a huge amount of content. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): Navigation: It's fairly easy to move around the network. No dead links that I found. Excellent model listing pages with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like, with hot links to all her videos. You can use the hot links to go directly to her video content, without having to re-log-in to each site. -Basically, Teen Mega World is one of the best values for hardcore teen porn. The network has been around for over ten years. So there is a lot of older content, which is lower quality: lower definition videos, cheap sets, no effort to make the girls look attractive. But even the older content is acceptable because many of the models are not just young but also cute, and the sex can be hot. -Epoch is one of the billers, a trusted name. CONS: -Cons are basically minor. -The content size, variety, large amount of attractive teen models, and easy navigation and excellent download speeds, mean you are getting more than your money's worth. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -However, keep in mind: this is basically a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network. Do not expect a glamcore approach. In the last few years the network has been spending more money upgrading their videos: cleaner, more expensive sets, better lighting, more attention paid to making the appearance of the models better (but still far below the attention paid at site like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy). -The network has always tried to offer new sites to appeal to members. Quite often they start a new site, and stop updating soon afterward. -Need to re-name the video downloads to know what the video is: Videos download with a generic file name such as n3.sethigh.wmv or 15sethigh.wmv. BOTTOM LINE: This site exposes the underlying corruption and deceit of the Russian method of education (my attempt at satire or humor). The site theme is: Young girls getting seduced by their tutors. The plot and acting are primitive: but the girls are young and mainly attractive, and the sex can be hot. When a guy tutors an attractive girl, instead of teaching her the course materials, he acts like a Russian thug, putting his hands on the girl and giving her the fuck of her young life. The videos are shot in Russia, so the actors mainly speak Russian. There are subtitles, but many of the subtitles are hard to read: the text is small, and white against a clear background and disappears quickly. So it's best to ignore the subtitles completely, because what the models are speaking has little impact anyway: the sex is what counts. The male Russian is tutoring some bimbo, and he decides to fuck her. And she enthusiastically cooperates because he is such a stud. So turn off your brain, and enjoy the show. Or maybe have a few beers before you watch. Joining Fuck Studies (or any of the other sites in the Teen Mega World network) gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network. There are no premium sites that require an extra payment. Maybe it's a personal quirk, but I dislike the come-on at networks that charge extra for their premium sites: Team Skeet, Naughty America, etc. Giving the site a score of 92. That is because the site gives access to the entire Teen Mega World network. Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite porn networks. The reasons are simple: -You gain access to a boatload of hardcore teen videos. Over 4,500 videos. -There are matching photosets for many of the videos. -Over 1,200 teen models. Many of them attractive. -The network is easy to use/navigate. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Fast download speeds. -Good model index. Nice-sized thumbnails to show you each model. With hot links to the model's videos. -This is not a glamcore network. But in recent years, the network has been spending more money to upgrade the newer videos in different ways: more expensive sets, better lighting, camera-work, etc. As well as offering a virtual reality site, and a 4K Ultra High Definition site. If you haven't been a member of this network, I think it's worth at least a one-month join, to sample their wares. You will get your money's worth. As long as you are not expecting a glamcore network. The main offering is bread-and-butter hardcore teen videos. No glamor. Not a lot of story or plot. But plenty of fresh young Russian teens who are into sex. If you base the score on Fuck Studies site only, the score would be much lower. 11-15-16  04:36am Replies (0) Review 129 Porn Pros Network (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Primary billing agent is Epoch. A major plus, because Epoch means you can easily cancel your membership, and offers help if you have a billing problem with the site. -Nice assortment of teen, hardcore sites. You get access to 22 sites (listed in the "Bottom Line" section of this review). -Many of the models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white, mostly attractive. -Professionally shot videos: OK or good camera work, lighting, sound control, etc. But poor editing. -Long time before site timeout. -Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use download manager. -Good download speeds. I get around 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec. -Can stream videos in high definition or standard definition. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Warning: I unchecked the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page when I subscribed, but found that I was charged for the cross sale anyway. I had to contact the biller to reverse the charge. The biller was Epoch, who allowed me to cancel the "fraudulent" sale, since I told them I had unchecked the cross-sale. -$69.95 one-time charge to upgrade your membership to access all the sites in the network (as long as you keep your original membership open). -You have to click through/decline the $69.95 upgrade page to enter your paid membership sites each time you log in to the site. Which is irritating. -Only one definition (1080p) is offered for downloading many videos. Which is surprising. I've seen very few sites that offer such a limited choice to download a video. -Even though the downloaded video is listed as 1080p, when you download the video, and check its specs, you find: frame width: 852 frame height: 480. Based on those specs, I would assume Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): the video is not 1080p, but 480p. Since I am viewing the video on a 14" laptop (that's a few years old), the videos are nice and crisp images. But if you were watching the videos on a large-screen monitor, you might be disappointed with the quality since these are 480p videos. -There's not a lot of buildup or plot to the videos: they are basically hardcore sex. There might be some kissing before the bj and fucking, but it's minimal. Most videos are just basically hardcore sex. A little plot would add to the videos. Even though a lot of the videos feature attractive models, the sex can get repetitious. If I were new to porn, just looking at these naked, attractive models having sex would be a real turn-on. But I'm not new. Sites like Blacked and Tushy offer high quality models and a glamcore style of shooting that makes the videos much more appealing than the straight hardcore videos at Porn Pros. -The editing is very abrupt: there are missing jumps in the action where the girl is naked by herself, then a guy is eating her pussy, then he is fucking her, and the action is jerky because they delete the intervening motions. The action is not continuous, but disconnected, which is poor editing. BOTTOM LINE You get access to 22 sites with your basic membership. The number of updates is current as of 2016-10-30: 18yearsold-480 Updates 40ozbounce-119 Updates Amateurviolations-34 Updates Cockcompetition-40 Updates Crueltyparty-64 Updates Cumdisgrace-34 Updates Cumshotsurprise-107 Updates Deepthroatlove-290 Updates Disgraced18-115 Updates Eurohumpers-21 Updates Flexiblepositions-27 Updates Freaksofboobs-61 Updates Freaksofcock-183 Updates Jurassiccock-80 Updates Lolcumshots-4 Updates Massagecreep-202 Updates Milfhumiliation-83 Updates Pimpparade-33 Updates Realexgirlfriends-568 Updates Shadypi-93 Updates Squirtdisgrace-15 Updates Teenbff-234 Updates The porn pros network is basically a collection of teen sites. The network is mainly hardcore videos. You also get a matching photoset for most videos. The matching photosets are quality screencaps of the video shoot. The software program used to make the screencaps from the video does an excellent job--far better than the screencaps that used to accompany hardcore videos from years ago. Since many of the models are really attractive, many of the photosets are worth collecting. This is not categorized as a photo network, but the quality of the screencaps is impressive. This is a large network: you get access to over 3,000 videos. For $17.95/month with a PU discount, you get your money's worth. Many of the models are attractive young women. Engaged in hardcore sex. If the videos had some plot to give the sex more meaning, it would increase the value of the network. Even though sites like Blacked and Tushy and X Art have less content, I enjoy the videos at those sites more, because those sites make an effort to: -select the most outstanding attractive models -present the models in the most visually attractive way (with excellent camera-work, outstanding lighting, make-up, etc.) -base the sex on some plot to make the video more erotic than just hardcore sex. I'm giving the network a score of 83. That is very subjective. If you are new to porn, the videos would have more of an impact on you, and you would rate the network higher. But in the last few years, I've joined a number of paysites, and have seen so many attractive young models, that I want videos that have more plot or variety than straight hardcore sex. An element of eroticism. Sites like Blacked, Tushy or X-Art are high quality glamcore sites. But you can find gonzo sites that can have an element of eroticism, or strong visual appeal. If you watch the videos at Rocco Siffredi, which is mainly gonzo hardcore sex, some of those videos have a potent effect because the sex seems real. Those videos do not have the ultra-refined camera-work and lighting and colors compared to Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but some of the Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot in spite of the lower quality, because the action/plot is so strong. I also give Teen Mega World a higher rating, another teen hardcore network, because many of their videos appeal to me. CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION: 11-01-16  02:10am Replies (9) Review 130 Fucked Hard GFs (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Epoch is the biller, a trusted name. -The main value of Fucked Hard GFs comes from the PornMasterMind network access. You get full access to four main sites: EpicSex FuckedHard18 FuckedHardGFs MassageGirls18 -You also get random samples from many other partner sites. The samples give you a flavor of those other sites. So you can have a better idea of whether those other sites are worth joining. (I list the sites you get sample videos from in the Bottom Line section). -The four main sites at PornMasterMind feature young porn models in their late teens, early twenties. Most of the models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot. Cons: -Expensive. Price is $29.95/month (recurring). No PU/TBP discount. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. 1-day trial at $1.00 to realitysexnetwork.com converts to a $38.89/month membership. Uncheck the trial offer unless you think realitysexnetwork is worth $38.89. -Archive site. The latest update appears to be one video from April 2015. In the updates section, there is one video from April 2015, one video from December 2014, one video from October 2013, one video from April 2011. -Poor navigation. Site structure is clumsy and takes a lot of mouse clicks to see what the site contents include. -Hard to view all the videos at the site. Hard to determine the number of videos at the site. Hard to determine the exact update rate (other than updates appear to be extremely rare). -The streaming software is primitive. If you stream a video, and try to fast forward, the screen turns blue or green. Bottom Line: -You get random samples from many other partner sites, that will give you a flavor of those other sites. Bangable ElegantRaw GirlsDoPorn GloryholeSwallow HarmonyVision JeffsModels JulesJordan MrPOV MrSkin NubileFilms Nubiles-Porn Nutabu PetiteHDPorn PuffyNetwork The site theme for FuckedHardGFs, as shown by the video content, appears to be young porn models appearing naked: they might take a shower, masturbate, or have sex. But, in truth, there does not appear to be any unifying theme other than showing naked girls. Let me expand that: the idea of the site is that these videos are supposed to be from ex-boyfriends who are selling these "homemade videos" to the internet to make some extra money off their former girlfriends. So the boyfriends are not only getting extra money, but they are also getting revenge on the ex-girlfriends by exposing them on the internet. This is a popular niche. However, you would not get that slant from watching the videos. You get that slant from the title of the site. So if the title of the site rocks your boat, then that gives the videos a spicy thrill. In contrast, if you watch the tushy.com and blacked.com videos (competing paysites), their videos spend a couple minutes or more setting up the basic plot of the video. That setup/plot adds to the value/fantasy of the video, because it gives the sex more meaning. Tushy.com, blacked.com, and vixen.com are three paysites from the same owners, who are creating paysites where effort is spent on making the models as attractive as possible, as well as choosing their models for the physical beauty, and making sexy videos with a slight plot that builds the sex into a performance. The settings, camera-work, sound control, costumes, etc. are first-rate. So those 3 sites empasize a glamour-style shoot. I think of Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen as glamcore, in their approach to porn. Except that there is not a lot of romance in the plots. The videos are basically supposed to show one or more girls who are attracted to a man and they fuck. It's not very romantic, but it is several steps above gonzo porn. Is it worth joining Fucked Hard GFs or the network? I give the site/network a lukewarm recommendation. FuckedHard18 is probably the best site of the network, because it's a good massage site. The girls are attractive, the sex can be hot. The other 3 main sites are OK, but nothing special. The random samples from the partner sites gives you a taste of those sites. Which is nice. I'm giving the site/network a score of 78. For a price of $29.95/month, it's expensive. A lower price would give you more value for your money. 10-17-16  11:43pm Replies (0) Review 131 Massage Creep (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Membership in Massage Creep gives you access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network. -The sites cover a variety of niches: massage, squirting, blowjob, etc. -A large number of mainly attractive, white models in their late teens, early twenties. -Professionally shot videos: clear images, good sound control, good lighting. -PU discount of $17.95/month. -OK download speeds. I averaged about 3-4 MB/sec. My max download speed limit is 6.25 MB/sec, which I rarely get. At most sites, I average about 4-5 MB/sec. -Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use manager. Cons: -There is a pre-checked cross sale on join page. NOTE: Even if you uncheck the cross sale, you might still be charged for the cross sale. So make sure you join through Epoch, which will send you an email if you are signed up for the cross sale. And Epoch will be able to cancel (and refund) the trial cross sale. -There is a $69.95 fee to upgrade to all the sites in the network. I hit the "No thanks" link to enter the regular site, but fear these idiots will charge me the $69.95 fee anyway, because they do not appear to recognize the word "No". -Requires captcha to log in to site. -First page at site is an upsale for $70 to access all the sites in the network. You have to view and accept or reject the upsale page to enter the member's area you paid for. --Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error. -Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states: Forbidden We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it. Bottom Line: 22 sites in network that Massage Creep/PornPros membership gives access to: 18YearsOld;40ozBounce;AmateurViolations; CockCompetition;CrueltyParty;CumDisgrace; CumshotSurprise;DeepThroatLove;Disgraced18; EuroHumpers;FlexiblePositions;FreaksOfBoobs; FreaksOfCock;JurassicCock;LOLCumshots; MassageCreep;MilfHumiliation PimpParade;RealExGirlfriends;ShadyPi; SquirtDisgrace;TeenBFF. Massage Creep theme: girl gets message, is so turned on by the masseur that they have sex. Massage is a popular theme in porn. And the Massage Creep site does this well. Although there is not much variety in the plot, the girls are young, attractive, and the sex can be hot. So Massage Creep is one of the better massage-themed porn sites. Site has 202 videos. Plus a matching photoset for each video. The photos are screencaps. You can choose to stream or download the videos. The streaming is offered in standard and HD definition. Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p. There is a zip file for each photoset. Only one definition for the zip file, not offered in high, medium and low. The quality of the screencaps is good, but not great. Much better than the screencaps that porn sites offered years ago, but: because many of the models are attractive, and the screencaps are almost-collectible in quality, you wish that the screencaps were even better, because then the photosets would really be worth collecting. You can view thumbnails of the photoset screencaps, or enlarge any individual photo, but if you want to view the entire photoset, the best idea is to download the zip and use a software program to slide show the photos. Otherwise, the software mechanism for viewing the photos online is clunky, and takes too many mouse clicks to move from one photo to the next. I am not technically proficient, so I don't understand how the screen caps are made from the video. But the Teen Mega World screen caps have better clarity than the Porn Pros screen caps. And I prefer the Teen Mega World mechanism for displaying the photos online over the Porn Pros system. Both Porn Pros and Teen Mega World are basically hardcore teen sites that focus on video over photos. But the Teen Mega World has made a large improvement over their past system of displaying the photos, and the quality of the Teen Mega World screen caps has also improved, to the point where many of the Teen Mega World photosets are worth collecting. Because the models are attractive young teens, and the images are centered and clear. The Teen Mega Word screencaps are not up to the standard of MetArt or MPL Studios, obviously, but in erotic content, they can sometimes surpass MetArt and MPL Studios. Partially because you are comparing Teen Mega World (hardcore teen) to what used to be softcore teen (MetArt and MPL Studios--that are now making an effort to increase the hardness of their content to attract today's porn audience). I've said it before, but I think it's worth repeating: My system for joining a site: -content that I can enjoy. -is easy to use. -gives value for the money I pay. -lack of annoying features. Massage Creep has content that I can enjoy. You get access to over 3,000 videos (at the Porn Pros network). Many of the models are young teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Attractive to very attractive. The girls seem to be mainly enjoying the sex. The site/network is OK to navigate. I wish they would remove the captcha for login. I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for "Upgraded" status costing $70. I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for other paysites. And I wish they would make the screencaps better quality, and the onscreen viewing of the screencaps easier. For $17.95/month, it's definitely worth a visit, to see what the site has to offer. But the site could be improved. 10-04-16  12:24am Replies (0) Review 132 She's New (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $17.87/month. -Epoch is main biller, a trusted name. -Accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and some European(?) credit cards for join. -With site membership, you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. That's over 20 sites. The Team Skeet network "Unlock" sites require additional payment for each "Unlock" site. -Update rate for site is 2-4 videos per month. But you get 1 new video per day for the network. -Large site. Currently 207 videos. Plus matching photoset for each video. -As a non-member, you can see a nice-sized thumbnail of each video at the site, and at the network, showing you the models at the site. Which is an unusual feature. -The models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. -A lot of the models are in the early stage of their porn career. Most porn models only last a few years in the business, before retiring, but you get a nice selection of American and European porn models at the site/network. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. They eliminated the cross-sale a few years back for a short time, but brought it back again. -The software mechanism for displaying the individual photos of a photoset is slow. -The photosets have a zip file (one definition only), but the photosets are screencaps, and not worth collecting. -There is advertising for other sites on each page, but many of the ads link to a full-priced join page that is more expensive than the normal PU discount price. Bottom Line: Site theme: Amateurs doing porn. To believe that, you need to turn your brain off. Porn is fantasy, but it's easier watching Superman fly and believing he is real (since we've been conditioned from childhood to believe in Superman and other super-heroes), than to believe these girls are amateurs or first time in porn. Unless you've never joined or viewed any porn sites before. That might help the illusion, because many of the site models are familiar from other porn sites. The girls are not trying to act like this is the first time for them. There is very little acting involved. This site is basically hardcore teen sex. The girls don't act shy or hesitant. They strip and suck cock, then fuck. The fantasy that these girls are amateurs is hard to believe. They are young, but they are definitely not new to sex. Or maybe I'm not thinking clearly: they could be called amateurs because this is supposed to be the first time they are legally getting paid for sex as porn models. As long as you haven't seen these same girls on a bunch of other porn sites. The videos start off with a short interview, where a guy asks the model if she is new to porn (she says yes), does she like sex (she says yes), and the girl shows off her body by removing her clothes (which are everyday street wear: not much effort is put into making the girls glamourous or attractive). Then the girl gives a blowjob, and she fucks. The interview is nice, because it gives the girl a chance to show some of her personality, to make her more real. She will say she comes from a small town, and is excited to see the big city where TeamSkeet is shooting the video. She gives a bit of her sexual history: What is her favorite sex position; How often does she have sex. And she's excited to be a Team Skeet girl (porn model/actress). Site stats: Videos: 207 Photosets: 207 (1 matching photoset for each video). The photosets are screen caps of the video. There is a zip file for each photoset, but the girls are not glamorized, and the screencaps have little value. I don't see why most people would want to collect the photosets, even of the models they enjoy. You might collect the videos of your favorite models, or the videos you think are hot, but the photosets are basically wasted space. This is in contrast to photosets at X-Art or Diesel (All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn), where the photosets are worth collecting, because the girls are showcased to be attractive, and the photos are close to MetArt or MPL Studios quality. Even many of the photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting. Teen Mega World does not usually make much of an effort to glamorize their models, but some of the models are so attractive, and the photography has improved so much over early screencaps, that I've been collecting some of the Teen Mega World photosets, where the models are attractive and the photosets are really nice. The site (and network) are basically easy to navigate, and has some nice features: Videos: Stream in low, medium or high definition(720p and 1080p). Download in low, medium, or high definition(720p and 1080p). You can stream and/or download the entire video, or selected clips from the video. The videos at She's New are advertised as 100% exclusive. I believe that's basically true. However, if you are a fan of tube sites, you might have come across some of the She's New videos before, because porn pay sites seem to use tube sites to advertise their wares. There is a long time before you are timed out of the site for in-activity. The are no download limits. No DRM. So you "own" the videos you download. It's easy to switch between sites in the network. No need to re-type your user name or password. I'm giving the site a score of 88. That's very subjective. You get access to the site itself, which has 207 videos. You also get access to over 20 Team Skeet network sites. In many different niches. These are professionally shot videos. Not much effort is put into making these models as attractive as possible. They are relying on straight hardcore teen sex as the attraction. Very little plot or story to the sex. So the site (and network) is worth a join. But there are other sites (and networks) that I enjoy more. So it's a lukewarm recommendation. But a nice score for a lukewarm recommendation. And that explains why I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives, on deciding to join a site or not. My system for joining a site: -I want a site that has content that I can enjoy. -is easy to use. -gives value for the money I pay. 09-27-16  05:29am Replies (4) Review 133 Solo Interviews (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Joining the network gives you access to most of the sites in the Team Skeet network (the premium "Unlock" sites cost extra). -One update per day to the network. The Solo Interviews site does not update. -Choice of definition for the videos: hi, medium, low. -1,000+ models in the network, many of them attractive teens or early twenties. -2,000+ videos. Most with matching photo sets. -The Team Skeet network has over 20 different niches. -Excellent download speed. I get over 5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6 MB/sec. -No download limits. -No DRM. Cons: -Cross-sale on join page. -First page you enter the site is an advertisement, that you have to click through to get to regular site inside. -There are several "Unlock" premium sites in the Team Skeet network. It costs an extra payment to access any "Unlock" site. -Older videos at the site are of lower quality. And offer fewer choices for video download definition. -The newer videos have no interview. They are basically a solo masturbation scene. -The last site update was 2013-08-06. So it's been over a year since they updated the site. Bottom Line: Number of Scenes: 144 Site Description: The name of the site, Solo Interviews, is slightly misleading. It seems to imply the videos will be an interview of the porn model. In the earliest dated videos, the videos start off with a short interview of the girl. However, they dropped that format, and in the newer videos, there is no interview. The girl might do a short strip, and then masturbate. The girl does put on a show for the viewer, to add an element of spice to the performance. I think the old format is better, because it gives the viewer a chance to hear what the girl sounds like, maybe gives a flavor of the girl's character. The site was launched around 2007. So some of the earliest videos are rather old, and the quality goes down as you view the older videos. And the video download file choices become rather limited. The newer video updates are offered in a wide variety of definitions: You can stream in 1080p, 720p, 540p. You can download the videos in 1080p, 720p, 540p. The girls are mainly natural teens. Very few fake boobs, very few tattoos. Not a lot of piercings. There are 24 sites you gain access to with a membership in the Team Skeet network. These are the "Unlocked" sites: CFNM Teens Dyked Exxxtra Small Her Freshman Year Innocent High Lust HD My Babysitters Club Oye Loca POV Life Rub A Teen Self Desire She's New Solo Interviews Step Siblings Team Skeet Extras Teen Curves Teen Pies Teens Do Porn Teens Love Anal Teens Love Money Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack Even though the Solo Interviews site no longer updates, it has 144 scenes. And you also gain access to most of the Team Skeet network of sites. Which offers you a lot of content: more than 1,000 models, more than 2,000 videos. The models are late teen/early twenties girls, mostly attractive to very attractive, mostly natural. With over twenty sites, you get an assortment of different themes that might appeal to your personal tastes: schoogirl, babysitter, massage, anal, blowjob, etc. Giving the site a score of 88. That is based on network access: the network has a lot of content, in different niches. The videos are professionally shot. Most of the girls are attractive teens. The network is basically easy to use. With a PU discount, the membership price is inexpensive at $17.87/month. 09-13-16  04:24am Replies (0) Review 134 Wow Orgasms (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Join this site through the TMW site (with PU discount) for $14.95. (Otherwise, pay $19.95 if you join through the Wow Orgasms site with a PU discount). -Joining any site in the TMW network gives you access to all the sites in the network. Which is a major positive, compared to some networks that select sites in their network for premium upgrades. -The video download options are: 720p, 540p, 405p (for portable devices). -There is a zip photo set for each video. -The photo sets are basically a screen shot of the accompanying video. The screen shots are good quality. Not excellent quality like the photo sets at MetArt or MPL Studios, but surprisingly good quality for screen shots. -I really like the site software mechanism for displaying the individual photos. It's fast and easy to use. -Good download speeds. I get 3-4 MB/sec; my max download speed is 6 MB/sec. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout due to site in-activity. Cons: -Small site. Only 43 videos. -Archive site. Site stopped updating a few months after it started. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Only one definition offered for zip file of the photo set. -The site was started when TMW was still in a low-expense phase: There is no effort put into making the models attractive, the sets are a cheap apartment in Russia, the setting is a drab room. Balancing this, the models are naturally attractive, and the sex is realistic: most scenes are two young teens kissing and licking and fucking and enjoying themselves. But there are a few solo-girl and three-some scenes. -There is almost no information on the models: no model history, no model statistics. -The model names are random. This is a defect of porn. The model's name often changes from one network/site to a different network. And you can find many other sites where the model's name changes at the same site, over time. Bottom Line: I believe the site was started around January, 2013, as part of Teen Mega World (TMW). But the site stopped updating in April, 2013. This sometimes happens with TMW: they start a site, and stop updating soon after. Which can be disappointing if you enjoy the site theme, and want to see more videos for that theme. Having said that, the site theme appears to be teens having orgasms. Which seems to be part of most teen hardcore sites. So I imagine that might be one reason they stopped updating the site so early: what is supposed to distinguish this site from all the other teen hardcore sites? Nothing, as far as I can tell. I haven't run across too many hardcore sites where the idea is: Porn without sex. Or porn without an orgasm. Anyway, what is the value of the site? A small amount of hardcore teen porn (43 videos). The scenes are basically natural sex, in low-rent apartments. But the models are young and cute. And the sex is natural and definitely watchable. But as with most TMW sites, the main value comes from access to the entire TMW network. Which has the following positive attributes: 1. Low membership price. $14.95/month with PU discount. 2. Access to over 20 sites, which cover a number of different niches: lesbian, squirting, three-some, 4K (ultra-high definition), virtual reality, etc. 3. Access to over 4,000 hardcore scenes. 4. Access to over 1,000 models, most of them attractive to very attractive, almost all natural teens(very few fake breasts, not a lot of tattoos or piercings). 5. A network that is easy to use: Easy to switch from one site to another, good model listing with nice-sized thumbnails of each model, with hot links to the model's videos on the model page. Giving the site a score of 90, because of the network access. If the site was scored as a stand-alone site, the score would be in the 60's, because of the small content and cheap sets. Except I do like the models for their attractiveness, and the sex is good. 09-06-16  05:07am Replies (0) Review 135 TMW VR Net (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Joining any site in the TMW network gives access to all the sites in the network. Join through TMW (Teen Mega World), costs $14.95/month, with PU discount. Join through TMW VR Net costs $19.95/month, with PU discount. Join through Beauty 4K costs $29.95/month, with PU discount. So do yourself a favor, and join through TMW. -Good download speeds. I get about 4.5-5.0 MB/sec download speeds. My max download speed limit is 6 MB/sec. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good navigation. The site (and network) is easy to use. This is important, because the network has a huge amount of videos and photosets, and you need to be able to find the models and videos that appeal to you, without a lot of effort. -I just find the models at the network, in the main, attractive to very attractive. Not a lot of effort is put into making the models appear glamorous or at their best. But they are young, and physically attractive, and in spite of engaging in hardcore sex, they still come across as appealing. Cons: -Small site. Started in 2016. Only 15 videos so far (as of 2016-08-28). -Irregular update rate. One or two or three videos per month. -Need to have Virtual Reality gear to watch the video in virtual reality. -File sizes for virtual reality files are huge. For a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 39 seconds, the sizes are: Oculus Rift: 6.7GB Gear VR: 4.5GB Smartphone: 3.4GB 1080p: 2.1GB Note: this is not the fault of the codec, but these files will eat up your storage space very fast. -Video files download with a generic number. So you need to manually re-name the files to know who the model is, and what the title of the video is. Bottom Line: The Best Porn review of TMW VR Net states: "Like with all the other sites on the network, the TMW VR Net collection is exclusive." This is an error. Not all the material at TMW is exclusive. Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur (part of TMW) appear at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network). Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur also appear at All Fine Girls(part of the Diesel network). There are other videos at TMW that appear at the Diesel network and at Team Skeet network. Also, a lot of the videos at TMW appear at 18X Girls (a different site from Team Skeet and Diesel). This is not a major issue. But don't expect 100% exclusive content at TMW, Diesel, Team Skeet, or 18X Girls. If you're expecting 100% exclusive content, you will be disappointed. Having said that, the videos at TMW VR Net are 100% exclusive, to the best of my knowledge. TMW VR Net is the newest site in the TMW network. It features virtual reality videos. The site is small, and updates slowly. So it will continue to be small in the future. Note: I do not have the equipment to view videos in virtual reality mode. So my experience does not reflect the intended audience. If I did have the virtual reality equipment, perhaps I would include a WOW factor in my review, that would change my review score because of the virtual reality experience. Having said that, I have seen 3D movies in theaters, and was not blown away by the experience so much that I thought the movies were fantastic because of the 3D factor. If you have the money to buy virtual reality equipment, then this site would have more value than it has for me. Bottom Line: This is a small site. It updates slowly. It features the virtual reality gimmick. The models at the site are attractive. The videos are high quality: good camera-work, good lighting, good colors, clean, attractive sets. The main value of the site is that it gives access to all the sites in the TMW network. TMW is a huge network, with over 30 sites, over 1,000 models, over 4,000 videos. TMW focuses on teens (18 to early twenties models) doing hardcore sex. It covers a number of niches. Most of the sites do not update, or do so in a very infrequent manner. You get access to a few sites that have much older content (4 to 5 years old or more), in lower quality videos (low quality because of the file definition, cheap sets, poor production values). This would include the latino site, ex-girlfriend site, gay boys site, and a she-male site. The network should eliminate those sites completely, because they drag down the quality of the network. Especially considering the money and time they are putting into providing a much higher quality product with their newer sites. Rating the virtual reality site: Because it's a small site (15 videos currently), and will stay a small site for quite a while, you might consider it a specialty site. Especially with the virtual reality factor in the videos. But because you get network access to the mega network of TMW, that raises the value of the site, because it gives you access to a huge number of teen hardcore videos in many different niches. You get access to 1,000+ models, 4,000+ videos, and thousands of photosets. The models can be attractive to outstanding. The videos, especially the more recent years, are offered in high definition, professionally shot (good camera-work, good lighting, clean sets). The network is easy to use: good download speeds, no DRM, no download limits, easy login (with cookies enabled), good model index with nice-sized thumbnails of each model, and links to the models' videos. For a price of $14.95/month, you get more than your money's worth. Giving the site (because of the network access) a score of 92. 08-28-16  04:42am Replies (0) Review 136 New Girl POV (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join the site directly, you pay $30/month. Join through Porn Masterminds, you pay $17.95 (with PU discount), recurring at $29.95/month, and that gives full access to New Girl POV. -CCBill and Epoch are the billers, both trusted names. -Site membership gives access to the Porn Mastermind network. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Only 15 models. But the models are cute teens. -The models are American. So the dialog is in English. This gives a chance to gain a slight flavor of the girl's personality, because there is a small interview at the start of each video. -You can stream or download each video. -You can stream or download the full video, or select the clips you want to watch or download. -Good download speeds. I average about 4 MB/sec at this site. My maximum download speed is 6 MB/sec. So it's not the fastest site for downloading, but a good speed for me. Cons: -Small site. -Only 15 models at the site. -Navigation is archaic. Even though this is a tiny site, trying to see all the parts of the site is frustrating. Even though there are only a small amount of contents, the layout is confusing. -This is an archive site. No updating. -The most recent update appears to be in 2015. Which is the same year the site was started. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The pre-checked cross-sale is interesting. It offers a free, 3-day trial to a pornsite. But the free trial turns into an expensive, $39.89/month subscription if you don't cancel on time. -The videos offer a distorted view. I don't know if this is because the video is meant to be viewed in a virtual reality viewer. The videos are not labelled as virtual reality. But the walls and furnishings of the set are curved, instead of shown as straight lines that they are in reality. It's similar to viewing a virtual reality video without the virtual reality headgear. Bottom Line: -The Best Porn (parent site of Porn Users) has a review of New Girl POV that was submitted on 2015-09-29. The review has not been updated. That review has an error. The Best Porn review states that there are 13+ galleries, and that the galleries avg. 1024 pics each. Actually, the galleries are much smaller. The Best Porn review assumed that the average gallery has 1024 pics because the site names each zip file for the gallery as 1024 in the filename of the zip download--so the TBP reviewer assumed that each gallery had 1024 pics. The 1024 actually refers to the width of each photograph in pixels. The photos are: width x height: 1024 pixels x 1536 pixels. No big thing. But don't expect the site to have large photosets. The photosets are good quality, of cute girls, but it's not a photo site like MetArt or MPL Studios where you get ultra-high professional galleries. What you do get are nice galleries of cute models where the gallery is basically a photoshoot record of the video that was shot. The galleries I checked range from 15 to 139 pics in a photoset. I could not find a gallery for the model Nina. All the other models I checked have a photo gallery. -One confusing element about the site: For each full-length video, there are two hot links for downloading: One hot link is labelled "HD streaming". The other hot link is labelled "HD MP4 1080p". As I wrote, these are the hot links for downloading the video--not for streaming the video. The hot link for streaming the video is labelled "HD streaming" (under the 'watch movie' label). When you use the "HD streaming" hot link to download the movie, you get an MP4 file that is HD 1080p. When you use the "HD MP4 1080p" hot link to download the movie, you get an identical MP4 file that is HD 1080 p, with the same file name, same file size, same everything. So why have two hot links that download the same, identical file? If this was a stand-alone site, because of the small amount of contents (15 videos), and because the site is not updating, I would give a score in the 60s. However, you do get access to the Porn Mastermind network, which has has some nice sites, with very good, professional videos of hot teen models that range from attractive to extremely attractive, with a lot of good sex. So I am giving the site a score of 89, based on the network access. 08-15-16  11:47pm Replies (0) Review 137 Lust HD (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $17.87/month. -Epoch is the biller. A trusted name. -Can use PayPal, for added security of payment. -No download limits. -The software running the site gives wide choices to access the content: -You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You can download the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You can select the clips of a video, or choose the entire video, for streaming and/or downloading. -You get access to most of the Team Skeet network with membership to Lust HD. Access to the "Unlock" sites in the network costs extra. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Access to the "Unlock" sites in the network costs extra. -Small site. Only 85 scenes. -Recent update rate is 1 video every 2 months for Lust HD. However, the network updates with 1 video per day. Bottom Line: Site stats: 85 scenes. 85 galleries (1 for each scene). -This is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. -This is one of the glamorized sites in the network. -The videos are not just professionally shot (good camera-work, good lighting, good color control, good sound control), but the scenes are shot with a glamor-style approach, where they try to add an element of eroticism to the videos. This is a step below X-Art or other high-quality glamcore sites, but the scenes are a step above the contents at most of the other Team Skeet sites in terms of eroticism or glamor. TBP (The Best Porn) review of Lust HD states: "Another big plus is the fact that the entire site (as with every site in the network) is exclusive." This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) were previously posted at the Teen Mega World site Tricky Masseur. And many of the Rub A Teen videos were previously posted at 18 Only Girls (part of the Diesel network), which is now called All Fine Girls. Also, at the Lust HD site, the video titled "Euro Teen Threesome", with a current posting date of 2016-01-11, featuring Caroline and Chloe, was first posted to FirstBGG (part of the Teen Mega World network) on 2015-10-03. At the FirstBGG site, Chloe is named Angel. But Caroline keeps the same name. That same video was also posted at TeenDreams, with a posting date of 2016-02-23. I am writing "a current posting date", because some of these sites change the posting date for their contents. So don't expect 100% exclusive content at the Team Skeet network. Depending on your experience, you might find some content you have previously come across. Many of the Rub A Teen scenes were previously posted at other sites, so that could reduce your enjoyment of the Rub A Teen site. And a few scenes at other sites in the Team Skeet network might have been posted elsewhere. But most of the content I have seen at Team Skeet is exclusive. Personally, I think both Chloe and Caroline are cute, and the sex in "Euro Teen Threesome" is erotic and hot and definitely worth watching more than once. If all the scenes at Lust HD were as good as this video, I would rate the site in the high 90s. The scene starts off with Chloe and Caroline dressed in nice evening clothes, in a nice apartment, they start making out, some of the clothes comes off, revealing erotic lingerie the girls are wearing, the girls are kissing and caressing each other, nicely done, not crude, then a boy walks into the scene, and the girls include him in their lovemaking. In my opinion, this is one of the hottest, best videos in the site, and the network. Team Skeet network has a lot of cute teen models. The scenes are, in the main, professionally shot. A lot of the videos feature hot sex. So they are definitely worth watching. I don't like the "Unlock" sites in the network. You have to pay extra to gain access to those sites. I believe each "Unlock" site costs $17.87/month (recurring) with a PU discount. Membership in each "Unlock" site only grants access to that particular "Unlock site". And not to the general Team Skeet network sites, or to the other "Unlock" sites. Since the "Unlock" sites are basically small sites, I believe it's an expensive way to add to your porn collection. You are much better off paying for a mega-site or large porn site with an extensive collection for the same amount of money. Lust HD is a good site. For $17.87, you gain access to 85 scenes of young teens that puts some eroticism into the sex. You also gain access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network, which provides over 20 niche teen sites, with over 2,300 scenes. So you are getting your money's worth, especially if you can find the scenes that appeal to your personal tastes. Giving the site a score of 85. Personally, if you find the videos that appeal to you easily, you might give it a higher score. Or if you have to wade through a bunch of videos that are a waste of time, you might give it a lower score. But overall, the site is easy to use, and has a lot of useful features: like the ability to both stream and download the videos in multiple definitions, to select the parts of a video that you want to stream or download, good download speeds, no DRM, no download limits, etc. 08-13-16  09:42pm Replies (0) Review 138 My Babysitters Club (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price $17.87/month (recurring). -Membership in My Babysitters Club gives you access to most of the Team Skeet network sites. Note: You have to pay extra for access to the "Unlock" sites in the network. -Cute models. The models are late teens, early twenties. -Numerous choices to stream or download the videos. -The videos are offered in low, medium and high definition. For both streaming and download. -You can choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want. -The videos are excellent quality: professionally shot, good lighting, clean sets, good sound control. -Epoch is primary biller. A trusted name. -Exclusive content. -No download limits. Cons: -The biggest con is that the site is small. Only 30 scenes. -Slow update rate. You only get one or two scenes per month. The site was started mid-year 2015, over a year ago, and it only has 30 videos. So it's growing, but at a snail's pace. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A few of the sites in the Team Skeet network are "Unlock", which means you have to pay extra to access their videos. -Although the models are cute girls, not much effort is put into making them appear more attractive. They are presented as the girl next door, which does not capitalize on how pretty these girls naturally are. Bottom Line: Site stats: -30 videos. -30 matching photosets. Site theme: a babysitter is either tricked or forced into having sex with the father. -This is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. The babysitter theme just fits the 18+ models more easily. Porn models are not hired for their acting ability, but the setup is so simple in these skits, that you can ignore the amateur performances and the stupid dialog and concentrate on watching these young girls having hot sex with an adult male. The videos are professionally shot. The models are cute. I wish that more care was put into making these models attractive, because they could look fantastic. But the models are presented as normal girls who are baby sitters, and not glamorized. This is a small site. That is growing at a very slow rate. So if you were to score this as a stand-alone site, the score would be in 60s. The site has a small (30) number of videos of cute teens having sex. The sex is usually hot, the videos are good quality. But because you have access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network, that obviously raises the value of the site. The network features a number of popular niches: massage, cream pie, tiny girls, anal, exercise, blowjobs, latina models, black models, step siblings, etc. So there's plenty of videos to look through after you have finished with the My Babysitters Club site. I think My Babysitters Club is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. In spite of its small size. The theme is just easier to build a video around. And their videos look good. Not great, but good. It's a step down from the videos at X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, where the glamor element is added, which makes the models look outstandingly attractive. But the models at Team Skeet are naturally cute, and the sex can be hot. Giving the site (and network access) a score of 85. For a low price ($17.87/month), you get access to a lot of videos of cute girls engaged in hardcore sex. 08-10-16  10:15am Replies (0) Review 139 Dirty Doctor (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -But join through PU discount Teen Mega World for $14.95/month, and you get access to all of Teen Mega World network, which includes Dirty Doctor. -Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name. -Can join by credit card, or using PayPal for extra security. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Fast download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download limit. -Accepts download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Small site. Only 37 videos. -Archive site. The last update was in October 2014. Site started around April 2012, had a slow update rate, then stopped updating. This is an example of the Teen Mega World style of starting numerous sites, but then failing to keep updating them with new videos. Which can be irritating for those members who enjoy the site theme. However, TMW has many sites in different niches, and there should be plenty of videos that will appeal to most members. Bottom Line: Site stats: 37 videos. 37 matching galleries. Site theme: a young teen is examined by a doctor, and the doctor ends up fucking the teen. So if you have a fetish about playing doctor, or remember back to the days when you were a child and played doctor yourself (which seems to be common among very young children), this site might appeal to you. This is a small site. But you get access to the entire TMW network, which has over 4,400 hardcore teen videos. One new video is added to the network every 1 or 2 days. So the network keeps growing. The site and network are easy to use: a lot of effort has been put into making the network user-friendly. The model indexes have a nice-sized thumbnail of each model. Years ago, you had to search for a model's videos at each separate site, but now you just hit the model's name, and her videos at all the network sites are shown. Moving between the sites is easy: you don't need to re-enter your username and password. The network offers new sites that fit the current market: They recently added a Virtual Reality site. Before that, they added a site that features 4K videos. And they add videos to some of their other sites in a random manner. The newer videos are offered in 1080p, 720p, 540p, and 405p (for mobile). The sets have improved over the years, from low-rent apartment buildings to more expensive, clean apartments or studio settings. The models, in the main, wear low-cost street apparel. There is little or no air-brushing. The models are mainly natural teens or early twenties. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos or piercings. Many or most of the models are attractive to very attractive, in spite of the fact that very little effort is put into making the models appear more attractive. The models don't wear a lot of make-up. But most of the models are cute enough that it doesn't matter. And some of the sex can be very hot. Because of the small amount of content, the site itself would deserve a score in the 60s. But because you gain access to the entire TMW network, which has a huge amount of good quality videos, the network access bumps the score up to 85 or more. And I think that some of the sites bump the score up to 90, because the girls are both cute and hot. 08-02-16  12:28am Replies (0) Review 140 Teen Pies (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP discount of $17.87/month (recurring). -Membership in site gives access to most of the Team Skeet network - except for the Team Skeet network sites that have an "Unlock" label, which require extra payment to access those sites. -The site (and network) have some nice features: -The videos can be downloaded in different definitions: low, medium, high. -The videos can be streamed in different definitions: low, medium, high. -You can choose to stream or download the entire scene, or selected clips from the scene. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Epoch and CCBill are the billers. Both are trusted names. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Unlock sites in the Team Skeet network are listed with the regular sites that you have access to with your membership. The Unlock sites require extra fees. If you unlock one of the videos, I don't know if you are paying for that specific video, or if you are paying for access to the entire Unlock site. I also don't know the the actual fees charged. Either way, I'm not interested in paying extra money beyond my membership in Team Skeet network. -Small site. Only 64 scenes. -Recent update rate is 1 video per month. Several months ago it was 2 videos per month. -Search: If you search by the model's name, it returns the network sites she is featured in (excluding the "Unlock" sites). However, to watch the model's videos at those sites, you need a few more mouse clicks, So navigation could be simplified. Bottom Line: Site stats: Scenes: 64. Galleries: 64 (1 matching gallery for each video). Site theme: teens getting a cream pie. Bottom line for the site: This is a small site, only 64 scenes. But the videos are professionally shot: Good lighting, good camera-work, etc. And you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. There are 24 sites you gain access to with a membership in the Team Skeet network. These are the "Unlocked" sites: CFNM Teens Dyked Exxxtra Small Her Freshman Year Innocent High Lust HD My Babysitters Club Oye Loca POV Life Rub A Teen Self Desire She's New Solo Interviews Step Siblings Team Skeet Extras Teen Curves Teen Pies Teens Do Porn Teens Love Anal Teens Love Money Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack There are 6 "Unlock" sites--that you can pay extra for--in the Team Skeet network: BFFS Daughter Swap Family Strokes Punish Teens Sis Loves Me Teens Love Black Cocks Most of the "Unlock" sites are the smaller sites in the network. Ranging from 19 scenes to 65 scenes. I don't know the precise cost to unlock those sites, but it seems like an expensive way to get more scenes. You are better off joining a different site with more content, in my opinion. Overall, the Team Skeet network is worth joining: You get a large amount of videos. Most are professionally shot. There are a large amount of cute teen models. However, not much effort is put into making these teens attractive: You can find many of these teens at competing sites, looking much better. X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, to name a few sites, make an exceptional effort to make their models look attractive. The same model, appearing in one of the Team Skeet sites, might look OK, but if she appears at X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy, she will normally appear outstanding. It's not quite the difference between night and day, but more like the difference between late afternoon and night: It's the same girl, but she's fucking desirable at the X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy sites, and she's nothing special at most of the Team Skeet sites. Even though it's the same model. X-Art, Blacked, and Tushy, put a special effort into making quality porn. Team Skeet pushes quantity over quality. However, there are a large number of hardcore teen videos at Team Skeet that are worth watching. And the price is right, with a PU $17.87 discount for 1 month membership. Giving the site (and Team Skeet network access) a score of 85. I'm deducting points for: the cross-sell on the join page; search could be streamlined; "Unlocked" sites are added expense; more effort should be put into making the models attractive. 07-31-16  03:07am Replies (0) Review 141 Exxxtra Small (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP discount $17.87/month (recurring). -Epoch is the primary biller. A trusted name. You can find complaints about any company. I've always had good service from Epoch. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. -The site (and network) has teen models. Many of them are cute. -Not a lot of tattoos and piercings on their models. -They spend nice money on their videos: good photographer, nice sets (clean apartments, studio). -Videos are professionally shot: good camera work, good framing, good sound control, good lighting and colors. -You can stream or download the videos. -Streaming is offered in low, medium, or high definition options. -Download video file is offered in low, medium or high (high in both 720p and 1080p) definition options. -No download limits. -Site accepts download managers. I use Down Them All. -Excellent download speeds. I was getting 5-6 MB/sec. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale. For a short while, they dropped the cross sale. Then brought it back again. -Update rate for the site is one video a week. However, the network updates daily. -You have to get used to how the site software works. Most paysites use a simpler system to navigate the site. On the other hand, the software gives you more flexibility in your searches. Except I am not a search fellow: I like to keep it simple to find what I want. -Some of the site is somewhat deceptive. You get some sites appearing on the site list that are not accessible with your regular membership: For example, the site "Teens Love Black Cocks" shows 50 videos. But there is a caption on the thumbnails of the videos "Unlock". I'm guessing that if I click on the thumbnail to any of the videos, I will be charged an extra fee: whether it's to view that particular video, or for a membership to the "Teens Love Black Cocks" site. The same system of "Unlock" holds true for the site "Sis Loves Me". Bottom Line: Team Skeet currently has over 20 sites in the network. Membership to any site gives access to many of the sites. But I assume that you have to pay extra to access the Unlock sites, that they show on the list of network sites. Exxxtra small theme: small-sized teens have sex. Exxxtra small stats: 128 videos 128 photosets (1 matching photoset per video) The network has over 2,000 videos, which means a large amount of content. They offer new sites that fit the current popular niches: creampies, high school girls, small-sized girls, anal, babysitters, blowjobs, black teens, massage, masturbation, lesbian, family, etc. The network updates once a day. The videos are offered in both download and streaming, in many definitions. The site and network has a lot of videos. Many of the videos are good quality. With cute models. So the network and site are worth joining. Just don't get cheated by the cross-sell or the Unlocked option, unless you are willing to pay extra for those options. Giving the site (and network) membership a score of 85. The Team Skeet motto is "We play dirty", which is supposed to be a playful hint that they provide dirty videos. But it could also apply to some of their business practices: cross-sell and Unlock. The unlock sites are shown on the page where you have a listing of the Team Skeet network sites, that you would assume are free with a membership to any of their sites. I'm guessing that this "Unlock" system is just another gimmick like the cross-sell to increase revenues, for the unsuspecting user. Perhaps I should mention that PU/TBP lists the discount price as $14.87/month. But if you use the PU/TBP link to get to the site, and then hit the join page, the price shown is $17.87/month. 07-18-16  04:36am Replies (1) Review 142 No Boring (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP lists a discount rate of $14.95/month recurring. But when you hit the site link from PU/TBP, and hit the join page, you see $29.99/month recurring. Join through TMW (Teen Mega World), which gives access to all the sites in the TMW network. TMW link join page shows $14.95/month discount. -Epoch is the primary biller. A trusted name. Easy signup, easy cancellation. -Large site. 344 videos (with matching photosets) as of 2016-07-16. -Attractive level of teen models. The models are late teen or early twenties. Attractive to very attractive. Some real stunners are included here. I don't know why, but I find the selection of models at TMW very appealing. The site (and network) doesn't put as much effort into glamorizing the models as X-Art, Tushy, Blacked, which do an outstanding job of making their models look great. But you should find a lot of the TMW models very appealing. -Site navigation is easy. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. -Pre-checked cross-sell on join page. -Direct signup at No Boring (thru the PU link) is $29.99/month recurring. Join thru TMW for $14.95/month recurring. -Download file sizes can be large. A video runtime 39:50 (minutes:seconds) runs 2.26 GB in 1080p. Bottom Line: Site theme: Hot teen sex. The videos are teen couples and threesomes have lots of hardcore sex. Site stats: Videos: 344 videos (as of 2016-07-16). Photosets: 344 (one matching photoset for each video). This site is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. So membership to any of the sites in TMW gives you full access to all the sites in the network, which is over 30 sites. Many of the sites are no longer updating, or updating very infrequently. But you have access to a huge library of over 4,000 teen hardcore videos, in many different niches. Although the site theme is hot teens having sex, I'm not sure if you can separate the videos at this site in category from many of the other sites in the network. I mean, it's teens having sex, which is what all the other sites are showing, and there is nothing to distinguish the videos from the videos at most of the other sites. A few network sites do have a gimmick that separates them from other sites: for example: aboutgirlslove features lesbian sex; anal-beauty features anal sex; Creampie Angels features creampies; Dirty Coach features a coach or trainer having sex with a teen student; Dirty Doctor features a doctor having sex with a patient; First BGG features a boy having sex with 2 girls; Squirting Virgin features girls who squirt during sex; Tricky Masseur features a girl getting a massage and then getting fucked; The sites listed above feature a gimmick that can separate the videos from the other sites. But at many sites, the videos are interchangeable: they can be placed in a lot of different network sites. It's just teen sex, after all. The gimmick does add value to some of the sites, it adds a flavor or interesting approach, especially for those who enjoy that particular niche. BOTTOM LINE: The TMW network provides a lot of value for your porn dollars: attractive teen models who are strutting their stuff (or getting stuffed). You get, in the most recent videos, a choice of definition ranging from low, medium, high, to ultra high (one of their newest sites has 4K videos). They recently added a virtual reality site. The newer videos are well lighted, professionally shot, good colors, the sets are more expensive (not super-expensive apartments, but studio settings or clean-looking apartment rooms that are a cut above the cheap apartments they used years ago). -The main value of the network comes from the attractive level of their models. Many of the models would not look out of place in a school room or the local neighborhood mall. -The large amount of teen hardcore videos. In many different niches. I think No Boring is definitely worth joining (through the Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month). You get your money's worth. At this site, or with the other sites you have access to with your membership. Giving the site a score of 90,because of the Teen Mega World membership you automatically get. 07-17-16  12:42am Replies (0) Review 143 Innocent High (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: PU shows a discounted price of $14.87/month recurring. But when you click on the link to the site, and hit the join page, it shows a join price of $17.87/month (recurring). -This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network. 427 videos as of 2016-07-10. -Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name. -Numerous options for video download: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p. -Good download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec. My max speed is about 5+ MB/sec. -Access to the rest of the Team Skeet network with membership in any of their sites. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -The site theme is innocent high school girls having sex. But most of the models look like sluts who are too old for high school. And they sure as hell don't look innocent. So that takes away from the fantasy element of porn. -Update rate is 2 videos per month. But you get 1 video per day for the Team Skeet network. -Some of the models in these videos are actually pretty: Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace,some others. But the videos don't use the attractive models to create videos that have interest or value. Part of the problem is the script/plot is so stupid, part is the acting is so terrible, it reduces the value of the videos. You don't watch porn for the acting or script, but jesus, if you have horrible actors, don't require them to act. And if you can't write a script, don't bother, just show the sex. -A lot of ads for other paysites on every page you look at inside the site. Bottom Line: Site theme: innocent high school girls having sex. Not much effort is put into making these models attractive. Even models who are normally attractive come across as not especially attractive: for example, Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace are definitely good-looking women. But you wouldn't know it from their videos at Innocent High. Many of the models don't look like they are in high school, unless they have been held back a few years. The site would be better named: "horny school girls having sex". And the models certainly don't act innocent. This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network, with 427 scenes. The site does offer a wide selection of definitions for download, from very low (for portable) to 720p and 1080p. Most of the scenes take place in a classroom. The plot get repetitious fast. There's not a lot of male talent used: you get the same faces again and again. The male talent are supposed to be professional school teachers, but they look like poor white trash. Maybe they should name the site: "Skummy models get fucked by poor white trash"? That would be descriptive, and truthful. I'm a fan of teen porn, softcore or hardcore. I think MetArt has great value, Teen Mega World, X-Art, Diesel and a bunch of other sites too numerous to mention are outstanding value. But I like my teens to be attractive. To look like teens (or early twenties). Innocent High is not one of my favorite sites. The teen models (if they are teens) look older, and not attractive. The scenes are poorly acted, with stupid plot lines. I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's not for the site itself, but because you have access to the entire Team Skeet network, which does have a lot of good scenes. 07-11-16  07:04pm Replies (0) Review 144 Rub A Teen (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP shows a discount $14.95/month (recurring) for Rub A Teen. When you hit the site page at PU or TBP, you go to the Rub A Teen site. Then hit the join page link. And the price shown is $17.87/month (recurring). -CCBILL or Epoch is the payment processor. Both are trusted names, with excellent service for customers. -You get a confirming email with your site subscription details from the payment processor on signup. This is a nice feature, that some sites no longer follow. -No download limits. There was some confusion when the site started, because the TOS (Terms of Service) stated a daily 500MB limit. But the webmaster posted at PU that there were no download limits. -Excellent download speeds. I get over 5+ MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum limit. -Choice of definitions for video download: 1080p, 720p, and lower definitions. -The videos are outstanding, in terms of professionally shot videos, lighting, colors, camera-work, framing. Cons: -The site (and TBP) states the content is 100% exclusive. This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen are also found at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Erratic update schedule. You might get 1 update to the site in a month, or in 2 months. To balance this, you get 7 updates a week to the Team Skeet network. -Overlarge logo on photos. Bottom Line: Site theme: masseur gives a rubdown to attractive girl, who is so turned on by the massage that they end up fucking. Site stats: Videos: 95 videos (as of 2016-07-07). Photosets: 95 (1 matching photoset for each video) Most of the videos are of a boy massaging a girl and then fucking her. However, there are a few videos where it's two girls, one massaging the other girl and then having lesbian sex. Or where the girl is massaging a boy (and then having sex). Or where two boys are massaging a girl and then having sex. Or where two girls are massaging a boy and then the three having sex. I last reviewed this site on 2012-12-02. I gave it a score of 73. The main reason I gave it a low score was because almost every video at Rub A Teen was a duplicate of a video at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). What has changed since then? The most obvious change is the site is bigger. It has grown from 20 videos to 95 videos. This is both good and bad. You currently get about 1 new video at the site every two months. Since the videos are excellent quality, I wish the update rate was faster. But the Team Skeet network has about 24 sites, it only makes financial sense to spread the new videos around to the different sites. Especially to the newest sites, which are obviously the smallest in content. So, instead of viewing the Rub A Teen site as a simple consumer, but with an understanding of the business aspect as well, what are you getting from a membership in the site? As a member of Rub A Teen site, you get access to all the sites in the Team Skeet network. Which is a major selling point. The Rub A Teen Site gives you high quality videos of young teens in massage who are getting fucked. The video quality is excellent. You get a choice of video definitions of 1080p and lower. The lighting is excellent. The focus is excellent. The camera-work is professional. The models are attractive young teens. Most of the sex scenes are hot and erotic. I've said that many of the massage videos at Rub A Teen are found at Tricky Masseur. The streaming quality of the videos at Rub A Teen is slightly better than the streaming quality at Tricky Masseur. The images are more vivid, with better colors, better lighting. I don't mean the quality at Tricky Masseur is poor: it's good quality. But the quality at Rub A Teen is excellent. You get clear, crisp images with good colors and good lighting. However, when you compare the video quality of the download file for the videos, the difference narrows. The download version of the same video at 1080p. Mp4 file format. The download file version of the video from the two sites is not as noticeably different as the streaming version. The Team Skeet version is only slightly better. If you were not comparing the two videos side by side, you probably would not be aware of the difference between them. Both download files, from Teen Mega World and Team Skeet, are good to excellent. But if you study the two videos, the Team Skeet is slightly better. But I don't know how much value that has. If you are a member of Team Skeet, then download all the Rub A Teen videos, keep the ones you select, and dump any duplicate files from Tricky Masseur. Except you have to check the names of the girls in the videos, because the names change from one site to the other. I am comparing the video titled "Rub Me Right There", with the model named Gabi, posted 2014-11-17 to Rub A Teen. I am comparing it to the video with the same model named Izi, posted to Tricky Masseur on 2014-10-26. The Tricky Masseur video has no title. The two videos are the same, except Team Skeet has added a short intro advertising Team Skeet (and the logo shown on the video changes from Teen Mega World or Team Skeet). The Tricky Masseur video: Video Frame Width: 1920 Frame Height: 1080 Data Rate: 8030 kbps Total Bitrate: 8183 kbps Frame Rate: 25 frames/second Audio Bit Rate: 152 kbps Channels: 2 (stereo) Audio Sample Rate: 44 kHz REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 07-07-16  07:10am Replies (1) Review 145 Beauty Angels (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring). -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. -Attractive Eastern European teen models. -You can stream or download the videos. -Multiple definition choices for video download: 405p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -Zip file for each gallery. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout due to inactivity. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -There is only one definition for the zip file for each gallery. Many of the galleries are worth keeping. These are attractive models, and the individual photos are surprisingly high quality for what was formerly a hardcore gonzo-style teen video network with poor screen-cap galleries that were a waste of hard space. Now the galleries are just a step below what you will find at photo sites like MetArt, Femjoy, or MPL Studios. -The network logo on the photos is too big. This is mainly noticeable when you are viewing the enlarged photos. -Videos and zip galleries download with a generic filename. Instead, the filename should include: The model's name; date posted to site; name of site. -Middling download speeds. I averaged about 2-3 MB/sec. Normally I get about 4-5 MB/sec from many sites. Bottom Line: Site theme: solo and lesbian teen sex. Site stats: Videos: 393 Galleries (1 for each video): 393 I last reviewed this site on 2011-03-30. What are the changes to this site since then? There are 3 major changes that I can see right away: 1. The site has a new software program that allows you to view the images of each gallery more easily. This is a major improvement over the old system. 2. The quality of the galleries has improved massively. The older galleries were poor screencaps of each video. I'm guessing that there is some software program that is being used to create the galleries from the video shoot. The quality of each photo is good to excellent. The quality is not Met-Art or MPL Studios level, but it's surprisingly close. The photos are centered, and clear and crisp, and showcase the model. And since the models are so attractive, it's worth collecting these galleries. 3. Over the years, the owners have put a lot of effort into making the site (and network) user friendly. It's easy to switch between sites in the network. You don't have to re-enter your username and password. The model listing is complete: with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with links to her videos (and photosets). Years ago, when you joined any one of the sites in the network, you did not know beforehand which network sites you would have access to. Now when you join any site in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network. Which makes it less frustrating. Before, if you had favorite sites in the network, you might or might not have access to them. This site (and network) gives outstanding value for your porn dollars based on the following criteria: -the high level of attractiveness of the models -the large amount of content of the site (and the massive amount of network content); -the ease of use of the site (and network); -the low monthly (or yearly) fee for membership. This is mainly a gonzo teen site. The network covers a wide variety of niches. The models are almost entirely white, Eastern European girls. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. But in recent years, the site (and network) have moved up in quality, spending more on the sets, better lighting, higher definition of videos, and other improvements. I think the site (and network) gives a lot of value for your porn dollars. And the site (because of network access) gets a score of 92. 06-26-16  05:57pm Replies (0) Review 146 Sex Art (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.99/month (recurring), from regular price of $29.99/month. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Multiple definition choices for download of zip galleries. -Multiple definition choices for download of videos. -Can stream videos or download them. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. This is a MA (MetArt Network) site. Which means outstanding quality in production values, high-gloss photography, expensively produced videos. -Even though this is not a softcore site, it's like a soft glamcore site. I assume the target audience is couples, who want to view erotic photos and videos. The site is glamcore/heartcore, and very different from gonzo sex. The sex might be too soft for those who want hardcore sex. If you compare SexArt to X-Art (a high quality glamcore site with attractive models), X-Art is far more hardcore: X-Art features solo masturbation, girl-girl sex, girl-boy sex, multiple partner sex, anal sex. X-Art is far more explicit and hardcore than what Sex Art offers. -Limited information about the models. The text file that downloads with each zipped gallery gives you basic physical information on the model (age when shot, eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, country of origin, ethnicity. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): But it gives no personal infomation about model's history: what she likes, occupation, goals, etc. The models are lovely creatures, but there's no real connection to them. Porn is fantasy. Part of the fantasy is building a connection to the models. -Years ago, the MetArt network offered large discounts to their sites if you were a member of any one of their sites. They offered a $10/month rate. But they dropped that discount program, and now you have to search for special discounts to join, which is hit-and-miss. ------------- BOTTOM LINE -This is a high quality site for soft glamcore sex. It features many of the models who appear at the other MetArt member sites. All content is exclusive. The models are attractive to lovely. The site is large. Galleries: 914 Videos: 634 -This is part of the MetArt network. So you know that you will be getting: 1. High quality galleries and videos. 2. Excellent customer service. Customer service will respond with a form email immediately, then a rep will contact you via email within a few hours to try to solve your problem. 3. The videos (and galleries) have a more explicit tone than MetArt.com. The videos and galleries show actual sex acts. Solo female masturbation, girl-girl lesbian sex, girl-boy sex. MetArt.com is trying for a more explicit tone than it used to, but MetArt.com is still basically softcore: No boys allowed, almost no sex allowed. And the MA videos are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models. So SexArt is definitely more explicit than MetArt, but it's only slightly more explicit, and nowhere near the hardcore edge that many other glamcore sites feature. 4. As is true of all the MA (MetArt) sites, you have a choice of definition for the galleries of low, medium, high. There is a gallery zip file in each definition. You also have choice of definition of videos, of 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p. 5. Easy navigation of the site, following the same layout as most of the MA sites. 6. Attractive models. 7. Easy login. As long as you have cookies enabled, you just hit the Members Login link, and you enter the site, without having to re-enter your username and password. Bottom line: This is an outstanding site for glamcore sex. The problem is that there are a number of high quality glamcore sites that were created in the last few years, and it's difficult to know which are the best value for your money. It comes down to personal taste. Sex Art is the softest of the major glamcore sites. Other glamcore sites include: X-Art, Babes, Diesel network (WowGirls, WowPorn, 18OnlyGirls). The Diesel sites are borderline glamcore/hardcore. Diesel is definitely hardcore, but some members might disagree that Diesel is glamcore/heartcore. I think the Diesel site offer high quality hardcore porn that is boderline gonzo or borderline glamcore. Note: 18OnlyGirls.com (part of Diesel offerings) appears to have re-named itself as AllFineGirls.com. The problem is there are so many porn sites, and a person only has a limited amount of money (and to a lesser degree, amount of time) to explore or savor these sites. Sex Art is definitely worth exploring. You have a wide selection of attractive models, most in late teens or early twenties, mainly white. But there are other first tier sites that are competing for your porn dollars. Which is a good position to be in, for the porn consumer. I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It's a premium site. But it doesn't blow me away like Met Art does. Met Art, for many reasons, is the finest softcore photo site on the internet. 06-25-16  02:06am Replies (0) Review 147 X Angels (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month. -Features teen angels from heaven who came to Earth to show us humans the joys of sex. These are heavenly young girls with lean white bodies that are the answer to every horny male's prayer. -The models are young teens, without a lot of makeup. But they mainly attractive young teens. Young, fresh, with nice to very attractive faces and healthy young bodies. They don't look like sluts, but are attractive young teens you might see in a mall or shopping square. -The site started in early 2013. All the videos have a definition choice of: 405p(for portable devices); 540p; 720p; 1080p. -The videos and galleries are professionally shot. Good lighting, good sound control, good camera-work. Little or no airbrushing. -Download managers allowed. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Zip file for galleries. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Slow, irregular update rate. You only get 1 site update every 2-4 weeks or less often. However, the network averages 1 update per day. -Some scenes only have a video or a gallery (a photo gallery), instead of a video plus matching gallery. I suspect they bought the video or gallery, and didn't have the money to buy the matching video or gallery from the producer/owner. I'm guessing they have maybe 100 videos, maybe 100 galleries. I'm too lazy to click through the entire site to count. Which could easily take 45 minutes or more, and that's assuming all the links are exposed and active. -Videos download with a generic numeric filename. Instead, the filename should include: NameOfModel-DatePosted-SitePosted-DefinitionChosen. -Variable download speeds. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, depending on time of day and whatever other factors might be controlling the download speeds. Bottom Line: -Site theme: My favorite Angels from Heaven, coming to Earth to satisfy our human lusts. Except they landed in Russia, instead of coming to California. Which was a big mistake. But I am willing to overlook God's mistakes, and still give the site (and network) an outstanding score, because I am really an Angel myself. (Joke) The site (and network) is easy to use. In spite of the massive amount of content (over 4,000 videos and photosets), it's fairly easy to search through the model listing, which has nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the girls look like. The fact that you have access to over 1,200 models in the network can make the search tiring, but the fact that so many of these girls are attractive to lovely makes the search worthwhile. If the models were sluts, or unattractive, the network would have little value, but these girls are good-looking to really outstanding. -The cons are basically minor. This is a very nice site, and you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network, which makes this an outstanding value for your money. This is assuming you enjoy watching hardcore teen videos of attractive young girls. This is not a glamcore/heartcore site, it's mainly a bread-and-butter teen hardcore site, but the girls are very attractive, and the network (Teen Mega World) gives you access to over 4,000 videos and galleries in a variety of teen niches for a very low price. Some members might complain that the scenes are repetitious, that there should be a plot or story to the video to give the sex added meaning, that the models should be made to appear more attractive (with better costumes, make-up, more expensive settings, etc.). But this is basically, as I keep saying, a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network, that somehow built up a massive collection of attractive young girls who are having sex. That's human nature: we always want more than what we are getting. I am giving the site (but mainly the network) a score of 92. If the site were a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. But it's not a stand-alone site, it's part of a network, and you gain access to the entire network with membership in any one of its sites, for a very low price. 06-13-16  07:18pm Replies (0) Review 148 18 First Sex (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -Join instead with PU discount of $14.95/month through Teen Mega World (which gives complete access to 18 First Sex). -Part of Teen Mega World network, one of my favorite teen hardcore sites. -No download limits. -Good download speeds. I average 3-4 MB/sec, which is close to my download limit. -Download managers accepted. -Exclusive videos at this site, to best of my knowledge. Cons: -There are cons. As with any site. But you should understand the cons in relation to what the site has to offer, in comparison to the low priced membership. -Many sites do not update, or update only rarely. 18 First Sex has not updated since 2010. -Small number of videos at this site. Only 51. But you get access to all of Teen Mega World sites. -The definition of the videos are from years ago. Would be great if they could re-master the videos to today's standards. But probably not cost-effective. Bottom Line: I'm giving the site statistics for Teen Mega World, not the site statistics for 18 First Sex: 4,200+ videos. 700,000+ photos. 1,100+ models. Updates daily. 6,800+ GB content. Site theme is young girls new to sex. The Best Porn site gives 18 First Sex a score of 64.5. I think that's slightly harsh. 18 First Sex is part of the Teen Mega World network. So joining 18 First Sex gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network, and vice versa (joining Teen Mega World network gives you access to 18 First Sex). So access to Teen Mega World is worth a score of 90 or higher, since it's one of my favorite teen hardcore sites. Along with Diesel network, and X-Art, you get a lot of bang for your buck at any one of those three sites/networks. To review or score 18 First Sex as a stand-alone site does not recognize that it's part of the Teen Mega World network. You get access to all of Teen Mega World network sites by joining any one of the sites. So, it's better to think of the Teen Mega World network as whole. Many years ago, when you joined one of the Teen Mega World network sites, it was a different experience. You did not know beforehand what sites in the network you would have access to. You would gain access to most of the network sites, but not all of them, and the sites you would have access to depended on what site you joined through. And there was no easy way to tell beforehand, what sites you would gain access to. Then, Teen Mega World changed its policy, and granted access to all the network sites when you joined any of its sites. Which was a big advantage, and a simplification. Because I (and other PU members) had been asking the webmaster to list the specific sites you get access to by joining which specific sites. Over time (over the years), Teen Mega World has made definite improvements to the network, making it much easier to use. Improving navigation so you don't have to re-log-in to each individual site with a username and password when you want to switch sites. And making the model indexes easier to use with more complete thumbnails and hot links. Adding higher definition video files, and better, more professional gallery photos. And adding more sites that cater to different niches. One problem with having so many different sites in a network: many or most of the sites either don't update, or update only infrequently. This is an economic issue, because there is no way a network with 30 sites can afford to update all of their sites. So this draws a lot of criticism because members want all the sites to update, or just want more updates in general. 18 First Sex site: The first video was added 2010-05-01. The last video was added 2010-08-05. The site only has 51 videos (and 51 matching galleries). So they only posted videos to the site for about 3 months. That was in 2010. And no videos have been added since.So a lot of people wonder why the site exists, or complain that the site is not being updated. You need to understand their business model, why they are opening a site, and then no longer updating it: it's a marketing decision. To have more sites that cater to different niches, to appeal to a wider audience. And there's no economic way the network can afford to update all their sites. They would go broke fast. So the fact that a lot of sites do not update generates criticism. If you understand their business model, that might help to reduce your criticism of the site and network. Or not. If you have an elevated expectation, that often reduces your enjoyment of a product. That's human nature. But I think it's reasonable to score 18 First Sex as a part of Teen Mega World network, instead of as a stand-alone site. If it were a stand-alone site, it might deserve the score of 64.5 that The Best Porn gives it. But as a site with access to the entire Teen Mega World network, I believe a more fitting score is 92. As long as you understand that I am giving that score to the network. And that any criticisms of the network, while understandable, should compare the site value versus the membership price, which I believe supports a score in the 90s, because you get a lot of value for your money. Edit01: Personally, even though the site only has 51 videos, I think many of them are worth watching. Don't expect masterpiece sex videos. But you can find videos of attractive teen girls exploring sex. I compare these videos with most videos from Naughty America, and even though both networks are hardcore sites, the videos at Teen Mega World are so much more enjoyable or watchable. I realize I should give more details to back up my opinion, to make it more understandable, but I think of the videos at Naughty America as low-grade porn. And the videos at Teen Mega World as higher grade porn. Based mainly on the attractiveness of the models. This is not a glamcore network. But the average level of attractiveness of the models is outstanding. 06-07-16  02:51am Replies (0) Review 149 Naughty Bookworms (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo). -The female porn star's name is given for each video. -The posting date is given for each video. -The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw. -All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video. -There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex? Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC. -There is no zip file for the earliest galleries. -But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway? -Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download. -Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness. -Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive. Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive. This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire. -Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection. -Quality of the older videos is poor. Bottom Line: Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex. Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries. Naughty Bookworms is part of the Naughty America network. So membership in Naughty Bookworms gives full access to Naughty America, and vice versa. This is a large site, with 514 videos. You also gain access to the Naughty America network of 37 sites, with over 4,000 scenes. So if you like your sex raw and crude, Naughty Bookworms (and Naughty America) has a huge amount of content for you to sample. I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude. I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine. Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price. 06-06-16  05:25am Replies (0) Review 150 Lesbian Girl On Girl (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month for this site. Join Naughty Amnerica for $9.95 for the first month, and you get full access to this site. -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to work with. -Can stream or download videos. -Can choose between multiple definitions for download. -Choice of multiple definitions for download of full movie. -Choice of multiple definitions for download of specific clips from each movie. -Each video has an accompanying photoset that illustrates the action of the video. -Zip file for each gallery. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -I don't find the models attractive. That's personal taste. I don't like fake boobs. Don't like tattoos. The models are below average in looks. They aren't cute or pretty or lovely--unlike many porn models at glamor sites or hardcore sites like Teen Mega World or Diesel network. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 8 videos. 8 matching galleries. Lesbian Girl on Girl is one of my favorite sites on Naughty America. The site has 8 videos and 8 matching photo sets. That's it. The first video has a posting date of 2012-12-12. The last video has a posting date of 2013-01-15. The reason it is my favorite site at Naughty America is that it gives me faith that I can open up my own porn site. And maybe make a lot of money. If Naughty America can offer a site with only 8 videos (and matching photo sets), there nothing to stop me from doing it as well. To open my site, I would be willing to buy 10 videos, which is two more than what Lesbian Girl on Girl boasts. Edit: some of my remarks are meant as tongue in cheek. Why have a site with only 8 videos? The owners probably thought it would be a useful site to offer some content in this niche. So they opened the site, and posted 8 videos. And stopped posting new videos within the first month. So, why keep it as a separate site? The main reason would be to advertise that Naughty America has one additional site to offer customers. And you don't find out that this site is so tiny until after you sign up. As far the videos are concerned: I actually prefer these videos over some of the other niches that Naughty America features. The reason is the story or plot is minimal. So there is less of the bad acting these models do in leading up to the sex. The sex itself is not very believable. These are porn stars getting paid to act sexy, make a lot of fake moaning noises to show how aroused they are. The acting is not convincing, the sex is not hot. Some lesbian porn can be hot, but none of the videos at this site are very interesting. They are basically a waste of time to watch. This is personal opinion, but I don't find most of the models at Lesbian Girl on Girl (or Naughty America) that attractive. I don't like fake boobs. I don't like tattoos on women. Bottom line: Even if you like lesbian porn, I doubt this site will have much value, because it's so tiny. And the videos are plain vanilla. They have no heat. No interest. Giving the site a score of 65. 05-24-16  03:58am Replies (2) Shown : 126-150 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 1.26 seconds.