Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 226 Spunky Bee (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Billing agent: SegPayEU -No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page -Access to this site was immediate after signup -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No download limits. -Easy to read captcha. -Screenshots to illustrate videos. -Zipfile available for each photoset. -Content is dated. -Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body. Cons: -No streaming -Updates irregular Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality. Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then. -Photos are available in only 1 size. -Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos. -Navigation is very basic. -There is no search function. -Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one. The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog. -"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..." Bottom Line: Site statistics: Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets. Video file formats: high, medium, low quality WMV MPG (high quality) QuickTime format Video specs: (for the mpg file format): Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes. total bitrate: 6,488 kbps frame width x height: 1600 x 912 Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels. The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can download the entire site in 30 days with no problem. This is a solo teen site. This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls. You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music. SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names: Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika. I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again. If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out. Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up. By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership, the site makes a nice addition. 10-12-10  03:52am Replies (8) Review 227 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. But I do get disconnected after long idle times, so maybe there is a site timeout, but it takes a good while before disconnect. -No download limits. -Streaming, low and high quality -Download, low and high quality WMV file -Less fake moaning and groaning than many porn videos -Canned background music could be better, but less annoying than in some porn videos -Some attractive models -Female models in videos are listed by name -Screenshots, maybe 20-30, to illustrate the video -Caucasian and Latina female models Cons: -Navigation is basic. -Site design is poor. The videos are not categorized or laid out to make searching easy. -No search. Have to click through the entire site to see what is there. -DownThemAll download manager sometimes does not work smoothly. Sometimes get error message 400 (file does not download). Don't know reason why. -No text listing of models' names, with nice-sized thumbnails, so you can get an idea of what the models look like. There is no text listing at all, and thumbnails of models are scattered through the pages, making a simple search of the models at the site extremely difficult. -No zip file to download the screenshots for a video. But who would want to download and keep the screenshots anyway? -They should definitely get rid of the tool they use to display photos. It makes viewing the photos more difficult than normal. Many times it is hard to enlarge the thumbnail sized photo that is first presented, to get a normal-sized photo. And the photos are slow to load. Bottom Line: Myteenoasis is a hardcore teen video site. The site is made up of videos from other sites in the network, mainly SilverstoneDVD and DevilsFilm, that were put in here to make another site offering. The video runtime is from 8 to 20 minutes. File size is from 100 MB to 300 MB for high quality. Frame width x height = 720 x 528 Total bitrate = 2096 kbps The netFameSolutions network has about 32 sites currently. There are about 5 sites with general hardcore appeal, and the rest of the sites are more niche, with a wide range of niches: tranny blowjob granny Indian (from India) etc. etc. With membership in any network site, you get access to about 22 sites. Get a special price of $9.95/month from PU/TBP, which is a steal considering the large amount of content, the varied content, the generally OK to good quality of the content. This is mainly a video network. The photos are mainly to give you a good idea of what the videos will show. The quality of the photos is low. These are screenshots. Even when the model is good-looking, she does not appear good-looking in the photos. A model like Ashlyn Rae, who appears in a bj video here, is just blah. At Metart, where she also appears, she is presented as a fine-looking woman. You would not recognize it was the same woman except for the same name. In the videos, Ashlyn Rae looks better than the screenshots. In the videos, giving a bj, she comes across as enthusiastic and enjoying her work, as a professional should. Sure gives a different impression from her Metart photos, where she comes across as lovely but more distant. Makes me appreciate Ashlyn Rae in a whole different way. Lol. This is one of the minor sites at the network. I am strongly into teens, so I would normally rate this site much higher than a normal niche site. But there are only a few very attractive models I found at this site. And because the navigation is so basic, with no search, it's hard to find the videos I might like at this site. The main value of the site is that it gives access to the netFameSolutions network. This site has a few really attractive models, but the navigation is bad. And the general level of the videos is slightly disappointing. Maybe I am spoiled, but even a DVD site (which this is, basically) should have nice quality lighting and focus in the videos, so when you find an attractive model, she will be presented and seen clearly and easily by the viewer. 09-27-10  11:09am Replies (0) Review 228 Porno Academie (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the LetsDoeIt network, which gives you access to over 40 sites. -Site login and member pages are secure (https). -Good to excellent production values for the videos. -Videos are supposedly set in a French university. So the models speak French, with subtititles. Giving a foreign flavor to the videos. Maybe this is supposed to add an element of class to the videos (pun--class, because the setting is supposed to be a French university). -Videos can be streamed or downloaded in different definitions: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -There's a hot link in each video where you can "skip intro" to bypass the network advert that starts each video. Cons: -Small site. Only 36 videos. -Archive site. Last update was around October 2018. However, network access to LetsDoeIt gives you over 40 sites, with almost 3,000 premium hardcore videos. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Sometimes have to pass through a pop-up cross-sale for another site to enter the members area. -No zip file for the photosets. But the photosets are small, maybe 10-15 photos per photoset. And since the girls are mainly not that attractive, there's no reason to collect these photosets anyway. Bottom Line: Site features horny young co-eds (late teens, early twenties) in steamy action. So if you're into girls in school uniforms (going back to your college years), the site might be worth a cursory glance. Except the average model is not that attractive. Site is one of the poorer offerings in the LetsDoeIt network: -It's a small, archive site that stopped updating in 2018. -Only has 36 videos. -The quality of the models is below average for the network: many of the network sites feature attractive to very attractive models, but the models at this site are not. My recommendation would be to delete the site from the LetsDoeIt network, since it drags down the value of the network. The network mainly features attractive to very attractive models, and this site is mainly a waste of network space. So why give the site a score of 75? Because you get network access with membership in any site in the network, and the network has some very nice sites, especially The White Boxxx site, where they do an outstanding job of presenting attractive models at their loveliest in hardcore glamcore porn. Lena Rief, Melena Maria Rya, Liya Silver, Kaisa Nord, Emma Hix, Tiffany Tatum, Kenna James, Stacy Cruz, Cayla Lyons, Frida Stark are just some of the lovely models appearing at the LetsDoeIt network. Photographed with equisite care, these girls can appear to be poetry in motion. My recommendation would be to delete Porno Acadamie from the LetsDoeIt network, since it drags down the quality of the network. 06-20-19  06:30am Replies (0) Review 229 Teeny Black (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $17.87/month (recurring). -Part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in the site gives you access to the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites. (There are a number of premium sites that each have a separate membership price--but they are outside of the basic Team Skeet network.) -Can choose your own username and password. -Team Skeet has put a lot of effort into giving the user options of viewing the content in different ways. You can stream or download the videos in low, medium or high definition. Each photo set has a zip file. But only one definition for download. You can slide show the photo sets online, in a simple, easy to use software. (However, some members have reported such bad connection speeds to the site/network, that they can't load pages, stream the videos, download the videos, etc.) Cons: -Non-secure login (login details could be hacked). -Non-secure member pages. You ISP will keep a record of your page visits. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Be sure to look for it, because it's almost hidden in tiny print near the payment processor. -Segpay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill and Epoch, because they are easy to use and reliable. -To enter the site, have to pass through an ad page offering site memberships. -Although there are a number of attractive models at the site and network, not much effort is put into making the models attractive. If you see a model at most of the team skeet sites, and compare her appearance at the diesel access network, the model will look better at the diesel access network. And if you compare her appearance at blacked, tushy, vixen or x-art, the model will appear even more attractive still, because these sites focus on making the model as attractive as possible. (CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION): Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): Those sites use makeup, costumes, and settings, to showcase the model's appearance in a glamour oriented style. Whereas the team skeet style is much more bread and butter, plain sex without a lot of dressing up. -Several PU members have reported site and network connection problems: horrible connection speeds, site pages will not load, problems downloading videos or photo sets. I personally have experienced very few problems with the site/network. If I had had problems, I would not have remained a member for over 12 months. If you join this site/network, and experience connection problems, I suggest asking for a refund. -Ads on every page. -Teen Black site grows slowly. In Jan 2016 site had 58 videos. It's now April 2018, site has 87 videos. However, the network adds one video daily, so the other sites make up for the lack of growth at this sites. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): STATS (AS OF 2018-04-06): Teeny Black MOVIES: 87 MODELS: 96 TEAM SKEET MOVIES: 1500+ MODELS: 1300+ Site theme: young black teen girls having sex. This is an underserved niche. Most interracial sites feature a black man having sex with a white chick. This site has attractive black teen girls. Bottom line: If you experience poor connection speeds and can't view the content or download the content, as some PU members report, then the site/network is best avoided. This seems to be a problem that some members experience, and other members do not report a bad connection speed. Beyond this problem, the site structure is designed to give members an excellent way to view online or download the content: videos and photo sets. You can download the entire video, with no download limits or DRM issues. Each photo set had a zip file. The network covers a lot of different niches, with over 20 different sites. As long as you like hardcore teen porn, there should be some content that will appeal to you. But at competing hardcore teen sites, the same girls would appear to be more attractive. So the impact or value of the Team Skeet videos and photos might be far less. I'm giving the site a score of 75. My personal experience with the site and network was good. But I'me lowering the score because of complaints from other PU members about the network. I like Teen Mega World and Diesel Access network as better networks for teen hardcore. That's my personal opinion. Some PU members really enjoy the Team Skeet network. Others, really hate it (mainly because of the poor connection speeds they experience, but also the profusion of ads and other issues). 04-06-18  11:46am Replies (2) Review 230 Exxxtra Small (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING). -EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. A TRUSTED NAME. -THE SITE ITSELF UPDATES WITH ONE VIDEO PER WEEK. BUT THE BASIC NETWORK UPDATES DAILY. -EXXXTRA SMALL IS PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 27 SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES: THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCESS TO THE UNLOCKED SITES: EACH UNLOCK SITE REQUIRES A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIP. -YOU CAN STREAM EACH VIDEO IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, OR HIGHER (720P) DEFINITION. -YOU CAN DOWNLOAD EACH VIDEO IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, HIGHER (720P), OR EVEN HIGHER (1080P) DEFINITION. EVEN THE EARLIEST VIDEOS POSTED IN JUNE 2012 ARE AVAILABLE IN LOW TO 1080P DEFINITION FOR DOWNLOAD. -YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECT THE 1-MINUTE CLIPS OF THE VIDEO TO WATCH. PROS CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION: Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -THERE ARE NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -SITE AND NETWORK ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS. -THE SITE CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. -HD ZIP FILES FOR THE PHOTOSETS. START OF CONS: -THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS TO THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THIS CAN AFFECT DOWNLOADING, STREAMING, AND BASIC NAVIGATION OF THE SITE/NETWORK. I HAVE BEEN LUCKY, AND HAVE GENERALLY ENJOYED ACCEPTABLE CONNECTION SPEEDS. WHICH IS WHY I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE NETWORK FOR OVER 1 YEAR. BUT IF YOU JOIN THE SITE OR NETWORK, AND EXPERIENCE TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, I SUGGEST CANCELLING YOUR MEMBERSHIP AND ASKING FOR A REFUND. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -WHEN YOU JOIN THE SITE, THE FIRST JOIN PAGE ASKS YOU FOR YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS, USERNAME AND PASSWORD. THIS JOIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE, SO IT'S OPEN FOR HACKING. -AFTER YOU HAVE JOINED THE SITE, YOU ENTER YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD ON A NON-SECURE PAGE TO ENTER THE SITE. CONS CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -SINCE THE MEMBER PAGES ARE NON-SECURE, YOUR ISP WILL HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR VISITS TO THE SITE AND NETWORK, WHICH IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO SPY ON YOUR INTERNET VISITS. AND MOST OTHER WORLD GOVERNMENTS, AS WELL, I SUPPOSE. -THE DOWNLOAD VIDEO FILE SIZES SEEM LARGE TO ME. FOR EXAMPLE, THE VIDEO TITLED "LITTLE GIRL BIG PACKAGES", FEATURING VERONICA RODRIGUEZ, POSTED 2012-06-22, HAS A RUNTIME OF 45 MIN 46 SEC. THE 720P FILE SIZE IS 1,681 MB. THE 1080P FILE SIZE IS 3,318 MB. THAT USES A LOT OF DISK SPACE. SO YOU NEED TO BUY THE CURRENT LARGE SCALE HARD DRIVES, IF YOU WANT TO COLLECT THESE VIDEOS. THE OLDER HARD DRIVES FROM A FEW YEARS BACK WOULD RUN OUT OF SPACE TOO FAST. START OF BOTTOM LINE: SITE THEME: SMALL TEEN GIRLS GET THEIR PUSSIES STRETCHED BY HUGE COCKS. THE GIRLS AT THIS SITE ARE SMALL, AND THEY ARE ALSO CUTE. EXXXTRA SMALL SITE STATS: VIDEOS: 193. PHOTOSETS: 193 (ONE MATCHING PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO). THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD CAMERA WORK, GOOD FRAMING, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD LIGHTING AND COLORS. THEY ADD A BACK STORY TO THE VIDEOS TO MAKE THE SCENES MORE LIKE BOY MEETS GIRL AND FUCKS THE GIRL, INSTEAD OF JUST TWO BODIES BANGING TOGETHER. SO IF YOU'RE INTO FANTASY, THAT MIGHT BE A NICE TOUCH. MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE 1 GUY AND 1 GIRL, BUT THERE IS SOME VARIETY WITH 2 GIRLS ON A GUY, OR 2 GUYS ON A GIRL. THE SITE AND NETWORK HAVE A LOT OF FEATURES TO MAKE THE SITE/NETWORK USER FRIENDLY. YOU CAN STREAM THE FULL VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. YOU CAN STREAM IN YOUR CHOICE OF DEFINITION. YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO IN YOUR CHOICE OF DEFINITION. THERE IS A TRAILER FOR EACH VIDEO. GOOD SEARCH ENGINE. EACH VIDEO HAS LOTS OF TAGS TO HELP YOUR SEARCH. BOTTOM LINE: AS I PREVIOUSLY NOTED, THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS TO THE TEAM SKEET SITE. WHICH RESULTS IN PROBLEMS WITH DOWNLOADING FILES, WATCHING A VIDEO STREAM, OR NAVIGATING THE SITE. THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS. IF YOU JOIN THE NETWORK AND CAN'T DOWNLOAD FILES, OR STREAM THE VIDEOS, OR HAVE OTHER NAVIGATION ISSUES, THE SITE AND NETWORK IS A FAIL, AND YOU SHOULD ASK FOR A REFUND. BUT OTHER MEMBERS, MYSELF INCLUDED, SEEM TO HAVE FEW PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE/NETWORK. THERE IS A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE TEEN PORN, IN DIFFERENT NICHES, WITH ATTRACTIVE MODELS, THAT MORE THAN JUSTIFIES THE JOIN PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (WITH A PU DISCOUNT). I'M GIVING THE SITE/NETWORK A SCORE OF 75. THAT SCORE WOULD BE TOO HIGH IF YOU JOIN AND HAVE CONNECTIVITY PROBLEMS. THAT SCORE WOULD BE TOO LOW IF YOU JOIN AND DON'T HAVE CONNECTIVITY PROBLEMS. 11-01-17  01:47am Replies (0) Review 231 Give Me Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT. -SECURE LOGIN PAGE. -SECURE SITE PAGES. -CHOICE OF DEFINITIONS FOR STREAMING AND/OR DOWNLOAD FOR SOME OF THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -YOU GET THE SAME CHOICES OF DEFINITION FOR YOUR DOWNLOAD OF THE VIDEO FILE. -FILES DOWNLOAD WITH THE DEFAULT NAME OF THE TITLE + THE MODEL, BUT YOU PROBABLY WANT TO ADD MORE DETAILS TO THE FILENAME FOR RECORD-KEEPING. -FIRST MONTH PU/TBP DISCOUNT OF $14.95. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH. -24/7 CUSTOMER SUPPORT THAT IS VERY RESPONSIVE (CHAT). -CONFIRMING EMAILS ON JOIN GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS: LOGIN DETAILS, CREDIT CARD USED (LAST 4 DIGITS), PRICE AND TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP. Cons: -NETWORK AND SITE STRUCTURE RECENTLY UPDATED. MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE. -SOMETIMES THERE IS A SURVEY PAGE, ASKING FOR PERSONAL DETAILS. I WAS WILLING TO START FILLING OUT ONE SURVEY, BUT THEN THEY STARTED ASKING A LOT OF PERSONAL DETAILS, AND I DON'T THINK IT'S SMART TO GIVE OUT SO MANY DETAILS ABOUT YOURSELF TO A SURVEY-ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING ALL THE HACKING THAT'S BEEN EXPOSED IN THE NEWPAPERS RECENTLY. THIS SURVEY WANTED TO KNOW MY AGE, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, IF I AM REGISTERED TO VOTE, IF I VOTED IN THE LAST NATIONAL ELECTION, WHO I VOTED FOR, ETC. ETC. I MEAN, IT WAS RIDICULOUS. -UPDATED HOT LINKS AT THE SITE/NETWORK ARE MUCH LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD HOT LINKS WERE. -UPDATED HOT LINKS ARE HARDER TO FIND. -WHEN YOU STREAM A VIDEO, IF YOU MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT (PAUSE THE VIDEO, OR SWITCH FROM FULL-SCREEN TO SMALLER VIEW), THE SOUND HAS A TENDENCY TO GO MUTE. THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR ALL THE NETWORK SITES. Bottom Line: SITE STATS (FROM A WEB PAGE, WHICH IS OFTEN MISLEADING OR OUTDATED): MOVIES 1357 DVDs 361 PORNSTARS 1338 PICTURES 0 I HAVE A PARTIAL APOLOGY TO MAKE. I CRITICIZED THE RECENT UPDATE TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, SAYING IT MADE THE NETWORK SITES HARDER TO NAVIGATE. THAT IS STILL TRUE. I NORMALLY WATCH PORN ON A 5-YEAR-OLD LAPTOP WITH A 14" SCREEN. WATCHING THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES ON A NEWER, 25" MONITOR, GIVES A MUCH BRIGHTER PICTURE, AND IT'S EASIER TO SEE WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN. WHEN I WROTE THE RECENT FAME DIGITAL UPDATE (MADE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO) WAS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE, I WAS OVER-REACTING. THE UPDATE DOES MAKE THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO NAVIGATE, BUT IT'S NOT AS BAD AS WHAT I FIRST THOUGHT, BECAUSE ON MY LAPTOP MONITOR I COULDN'T MAKE OUT ALL THE LINKS THAT ARE SHOWN. A BETTER MONITOR MAKES SOME OF THE LINKS EASIER TO FIND. HOWEVER, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS EASIER TO USE: TO SEE WHAT NETWORK SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO; TO NAVIGATE BETWEEN SITES; TO NAVIGATE INSIDE A SITE. SO THE NETWORK UPDATE IS A MISTAKE, BECAUSE IT MAKES USING THE SITE/NETWORK CONTENTS HARDER. AND THAT TAKES AWAY FROM THE VALUE OF THE SITE/NETWORK. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE: YOU WANT TO SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO CURRY CREAMPIE. YOU HAVE TO HOVER YOUR MOUSE OVER THE WHITE GHETTO LINK, TO BRING UP THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK, THEN SELECT THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK TO ENTER THAT SITE. THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK IS ONLY VISIBLE WHEN YOUR MOUSE BRINGS UP THE WHITE GHETTO SUB-SITES. I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WRITE A SITE INSTRUCTION MANUAL INSIDE A REVIEW. BUT UNLESS YOU PLAY AROUND, YOU WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A LOT OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS--YOU WON'T KNOW IT'S THERE, THE OLDER STRUCTURE HAD SIMPLER NAVIGATION. MAYBE YOU CAN CALL CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND ASK FOR HELP NAVIGATING THE SITE. I CALLED CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND THEY WERE HELPFUL GETTING ME INTO DEVILS FILM SITE. AT THE DEVILS FILM WEBSITE, I ENTERED MY CURRENT LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE PAGE GAVE ME AN ERROR MESSAGE THAT MY LOGIN DETAILS WERE INCORRECT. I CALLED CUSTOMER SERVICE, THEY TOLD ME TO TRY CLEARING MY CACHE. THAT WORKED. THE SITE (EVIDENTLY) REFUSED ME ENTRANCE BECAUSE MY PC HAD STORED THE LOGIN DETAILS FROM A PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIP. SO CUSTOMER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 24/7, AND THEY RESPOND WITHIN A FEW MINUTES IF YOU START A CHAT. SOME OF THE MODELS LOOK LIKE TEENS, BUT MANY DO NOT. ANOTHER SITE CON IS THAT THE SITE IS NOT CLEARLY SEPARATED FROM THE OTHER NETWORK SITES: THE SITE SHOWS THUMBNAILS (OF THE VIDEOS), AND YOU DON'T REALIZE UNTIL YOU CLICK THE VIDEO THAT IT'S FROM ANOTHER SITE. WHAT'S INSIDE THE "GIVE ME TEENS SITE" IS NOT SEPARATED CLEARLY. AND YOU HAVE TO FIGURE OUT, WHILE WATCHING A VIDEO, WHAT SITE THE VIDEO BELONGS TO. IT'S A JUMBLED MESS. GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 75. THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES AVAILABLE, BOTH FOR THE QUALITIES OF THEIR MODELS, AND SITE EASE OF USE. SO WHY AM I GIVING IT A SCORE IN THE 70s? NOT FOR THE SITE ITSELF. THIS SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK. WHICH HAS SOME SITES WORTH VIEWING: ROCCO SIFFREDI PETER NORTH DEVILS FILM I'M GIVING THE SITE, "GIVE ME TEENS", A SCORE OF 75. I WISH THEY WOULD BRING BACK THE OLD DROP-DOWN-MENU, WHICH MADE SITE NAVIGATION EASIER. 10-08-17  03:53am Replies (0) Review 232 Beauty 4K (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $14.95/month. Currently, when I hit the PU link to Beauty4K and then hit the join link, I see a price of $29.95/month. So, instead, use the PU link to Teen Mega World, then hit the join link, and you see $14.95/month. Membership in Teen Mega World gives you full access to Beauty4K. -Attractive teen models. -The network is upgrading the sets, lighting, camera-equipment, etc to produce these videos. -Zip file for each photo set. -Can stream or download each video. -Multiple choices for definition of download. Cons: -You need a 4K compatible device to get the benefit of a 4K video. Duh. Otherwise, you can watch the videos on a 1080p device, or a 720p device. Note: 4K is 2160p. -4K files take a huge amount of storage space. A simple example from the Beauty 4K site: A video has a runtime of 43 min 25 secs. The file size of the video, for different definitions: UHD 2160p 4599.97 Mb HD 1080p 2923.89 Mb HQ 720p 1675.17 Mb Med. Quality 540p 1018.97 Mb Portable Devices 405p 564.16 Mb Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): I realize that the prices of hard drives keep dropping, but a lot of people now have SSDs. And a single video in UHD takes a lot of space. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -This is a small site. Only 27 videos (and matching photo sets). -Update rate varies. You might get a new video in 8 days, or 32 days. The first video is dated 2015-06-08. It's now 2016-04-22. So don't expect the site to grow very fast. -Most of the videos use the same stunt cock. If you don't like his approach, it takes away from the videos. He comes across as a typical Russian thug. Blunt. Cocksure. -Streaming option is only offered in one definition. BOTTOM LINE: Site theme: The site features videos in 4K UHD (Ultra High Definition). The videos are young teen girls doing hardcore sex. Each video is a guy having sex with a girl. That keeps it simple. -You need a 4K compatible device to get the benefit of a 4K video. So I imagine that cuts the size of the potential audience by a lot. Also, this is basically hardcore teen porn. It's not glamcore. There is almost no plot. The visuals are crystal clear, excellent lighting, but it's a guy fucking a girl, with not a lot of variation. No romance or heartcore or eroticism. Personally, it's more like a gimmick, than a site I would want to join. However, it's part of the Teen Mega World network. So if you join Teen Mega World, you get access to this site. Or if you join this site directly, you get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network. But--check the price of joining the site directly. Compare it to the price of joining Teen Mega World directly. PU/TBP links will give you a discounted price for Teen Mega World of $14.95/month. Often times, the PU/TBP discounts to individual sites in the Teen Mega World network have a higher price. I'm giving the site a score of 75. Normally, I give sites in the Teen Mega World network a much higher score, because they all have access to the Teen Mega World network. But if it costs more to produce one of these Beauty 4K videos than a regular video for one of their other sites, my preference would be for them to put their resources into producing the videos for the other sites, because you get more bang for the buck at the other sites. I can see if Teen Mega World wanted to produce a softcore or hardcore film like people made in the 1970s with Emmanuelle (1974) or The Story of O (1975). That would be a massive gamble. But I don't see the sense of putting a lot of resources into a 4K site from Teen Mega World. It doesn't fit the style of their regular product. However, they have the right to experiment. 04-22-16  10:09pm Replies (0) Review 233 Elegant Anal (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Can stream or download videos. -Videos stream in 320p, 480p, 720p. -Video download choices: 320p, 480p, 720p, 1080p -Excellent download speeds. I got around 3 MB/sec. -Allows use of download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Matching photo set for each video. The photos are like excellent screen caps of the video shoot. -The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good camera-work. Good sound control. -The models are uniformly attractive. They are not the drop-dead gorgeous models of X-Art, but X-Art has some of the most beautiful or cute models in the business. Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked offer on signup page. -Primary biller is MBI-Probiller. Try to switch to a secondary biller, which is easier to cancel your subscription. -Small site. Only 36 videos and matching photo sets. -Updates with 1 video and matching photo set per 10-15 days. Bottom Line: The site theme is anal sex. This is a glamcore or heartcore site. The girls are treated with respect. You don't find any spitting or hitting or slapping or crude sex here (except that in the old days, anal sex would have been considered crude or raw. But times change. Anal sex (in porn, at least) is almost considered normal today. This is a small site. You can join directly, or get full access through a membership to babes.com (also known as BabesNetwork.com). Why they use two different names for Babes.com and BabesNetwork.com, I don't know, it makes it more confusing. The models are attractive. In their late teens or early twenties. White. (I found one Asian model out of 36 models.) Very little tattoos or piercings. As an add-on to babes.com, it's an OK site. But for someone who's fetish is anal, it's too small of a site to satisfy your needs for long. And with an update rate of 1 video per 10-15 days, you won't get much new content with your membership. If you're into anal, I'd suggest Teen Mega World, which has the Anal Angels website, and lots of anal videos that appear in their other web sites. Teen Mega World is not glamcore or heartcore, it's basic medium grade teen hardcore sex, with lots of niche sites, a ton of backlog videos going back for years, and a very low membership price that makes it an attractive option for teen hardcore. Giving the site a score of 75. Main complaint is the small size. The models at the site are attractive, but not the beauties or cuties you can find at other glamcore or heartcore sites. 02-20-16  12:55am Replies (0) Review 234 Massage Girls 18 (0) 75.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -Epoch is billing agent: trusted name. -The videos are professionally shot. Good camera-work, good lighting, good focus, good sound control. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout for inactivity. -Models are attractive: late teens, early twenties. -The videos can be streamed or downloaded. -Each video has a matching gallery--that is a photo shoot of the video. -Each gallery has a zip file for download. -Good download speed. I got about 3 MB/sec, while my max download speed is slightly over 5 MB/sec. Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -The setup is the same for each video: a girl is supposed to give a guy a massage, which turns into a blow job and a fuck. There is very little variation in the action. -Not much heat to the sex. Bottom Line: MassageGirls18 is basically the reverse of its sister site, FuckedHard18. So what are the main differences between the two sites, other than the role reversal? In FuckedHard18, the guy is giving a sensual massage, the girl becomes aroused, and the guy fucks the girl. He is definitely in charge. And the girl is more than willing. The sex can be hot. In MassageGirls18, the girl has a more active role: she is supposed to be the masseuse. But the girls appear like newbies, they are not professional actors, so they are smiling and giggling and acting unsure of themselves, which detracts from the action. I'm not saying the FuckedHard18 site videos are completely believable, but they are more believable than the MassageGirls18 videos, where you know the girls are there to fuck the guy, and the massage element is just a flimsy excuse of a theme. And the sex has less heat, because it's more mechanical, at MassageGirls18. The girls need to be better actors, since they are supposed to be taking the lead role for this site, and their inexperience as actors is apparent. So the lead-in to the sex is much weaker. And the sex itself is also weaker. FuckedHard18 is a much better massage site than MassageGirls18. The FuckedHard18 videos are more believable, the sex is hotter. Giving the site a score of 75. When you compare this site to FuckedHard18, it's just disappointing. 02-14-16  12:41am Replies (0) Review 235 Black Is Better (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, etc. -Easy navigation: since the site only has 15 videos (and matching photo sets), you can easily see all the contents. -No DRM. -The models are attractive. Late teens, or in their twenties. -Content is exclusive. -Choice of download or stream videos. -Download options for each video include: iPod, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Zip file for each matching photo set. Cons: -The main drawback is the site is tiny: 15 videos (and matching photo sets). That's all you get. -Slow update rate: 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -2-day trial membership for $1 is crippled privileges. Can only watch 10 minutes of 2 videos (and the matching photo sets), with no downloading. For more content or downloading, you must upgrade to full membership. I don't see any notice on the signup page (before completing the transaction) that the 2-day trial membership is crippled access. I found this information at the TBP site. -The primary biller is MG Billing, which does not have the recognition of CCBILL or EPOCH. -Only get one definition for the zip file for each photo set. -The zip file for each photo set is a numbered file name (e.g. 17991_pics.zip). So have to manually rename the file to add name of model, etc. Bottom Line: This is a tiny site. Currently the site only has 15 videos (with matching photo sets). The theme is a white woman having sex with a black man. You get full access to this site with a membership in the Babes.com network. But it would be a mistake to join this site directly. The main problem with the site is the small amount of content. With a fast internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in a few hours or less. After that download, the site would have little value. The update rate is 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month. There is a 2-day trial membership for $1.00. However, The Best Porn reports that the trial membership only allows users to view the first 10 minutes of two offered videos, as well as the photos from those videos. For more content or downloads, you must upgrade to a full membership. So the trial membership, in my opinion, is not worthwhile. The preview page of the site give a misleading impression that the site contents are far larger than it really is. On the preview page, you see 56 nice-sized thumbnails of videos. So you would normally assume that site has those 56 videos, plus whatever other contents. But-- The 56 thumbnails are showing the 15 videos the site has, with each video being shown multiple times (via a thumbnail), to give the impression there are many more videos at the site than what is real. That might be legal advertising, but it's certainly misleading. Anyone joining the site, based on the impression the site holds a lot of videos, would be very disappointed once they realize the site only has 15 videos. Note: there is a different preview page for the site, that only shows thumbnails for 15 videos. Both preview pages currently exist (the one implying 56 videos, and the one showing 15 videos). The preview model pages are not accurate. There are 15 models shown (representing the 15 individual models in the site videos). The preview model page states that some models have 1 video, some models have 2 videos, some have 3 videos, and one model has 5 videos. But in reality, all models have only 1 video at the site. The only explanation I can think of: is that the number of videos refers to the entire babes network, even though this is a preview page for Black Is Better (and not a preview page for the Babes network). The bottom line is the site contents are tiny, and because of the slow update rate, the contents will remain tiny for a long time. So is the site worth joining? Not in my opinion. But as a free add-on to a subscription to Babes.com, it's worthwhile checking the site out. 01-27-16  02:43am Replies (0) Review 236 Nasty Angels (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to. -Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership. -Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site. -Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know. Cons: -You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login. -Primitive site design. -Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click. -Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case. -Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate. -Site contents have no posting date. -No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing. -No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it. Bottom Line: This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex. The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot. Videos are grouped into two categories: Softcore movies, and hardcore movies. Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation. Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories. The videos are better than I thought they would be. Sample data rates: The frame width x height is: 1024x576. Total bitrate: 2548kbps Frame width x height is: 632x512 Total bitrate: 1181 kbps The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots. They also have some very attractive models at this site. It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent. I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos. I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all. 02-19-13  11:14am Replies (2) Review 237 She's New (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Some very nice, attractive models. -Choice of streaming or download for videos. -Streaming offers low, medium and high definition. -Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p). -There is also an iPod file type for download. -Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password. -No DRM. -Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Content appears to be exclusive to this site. -Many of the models are early in their career in porn. -PU discount of $17.87/month recurring. -The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites. Cons: -Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach. -The names of a few models are not their most common names. Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love. -The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly. Bottom Line: Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties. The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include: ExxxtraSmall Her Freshman Year Innocent High Oye Loca POV Life Self Desire Rub A Teen She's New Solo Interviews Team Skeet Extras Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack Number of videos at site: 50+ Rate of updates: 1 video per week. Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less. The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive. You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading. The site description states: "We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!" You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are not worth keeping. I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site. I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results. By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job. I am giving the site a score of 75. 01-08-13  02:15am Replies (2) Review 238 Dirty Doctor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Adding 1 new video about every 5 days. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded. -There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices. -You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. -Easy logon. -Long time before site time-out. Cons: -There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time. -Tiny site. only 14 videos so far. -The acting is amateur. -The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry. -The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian. No subtitles. Bottom Line: This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far. The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck. The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way. Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex. You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking. A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school. But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models are young. I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s. One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month. I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content. And if Teen Mega World does not give access to Dirty Doctor, you are missing very little. 06-25-12  10:23am Replies (1) Review 239 Give Me Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network. -Can stream or download movies. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Model is listed for each movie. -Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie. -I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model. -A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition. -The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo. -All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset. Cons: -PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month. -Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark. -Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video. -Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network. -The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. -The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better. -No zip file for the photosets. -The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Movies: 498 DVDs: 134 Pornstars: 557 Pictures: 75,388 Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option. Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4. Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site. What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Access to the network includes tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. But this site, by itself, adds little value to the network, in spite of the high percentage of high definition videos. 06-23-12  01:18pm Replies (0) Review 240 Lesbian Factor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 for first month (then recurs at $29.95/mo.) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Long time before site timeout. -You can watch the videos streaming, or download them. -The models in the videos are identified. -You click on a hot link of the model's name, and you get a thumbnail of the model, and the network sites she appears at. It would be nice if there were hot links to each video she was in. Instead, you have to go to each individual site, and then search for her videos. And since you can't switch freely between sites, you first have to login to your signup site, and then go to the site that you want. And then you can search for her videos at that site. Cons: -Last update was 2011-12-19.Before that, the update rate was very irregular, sometimes every 10 days, then no updates for several months. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at sign up, or you will be signed up for a trial subscription to a different site. -Although the soundtrack is clear, all the moans and groans of passion sound fake. So instead of adding to the excitement, it detracts. I've seen videos where the girls looked and sounded like they were really getting off. But in these videos, the girls are giving a poor performance. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 234 movies. The number of movies (or videos) hasn't changed since the TBP review dated 2011-05-30, although 6 videos at the site have a posting date after 2011-05-30. So this is more of an archive site, where you can expect few, if any, updates. The videos run about 20 - 34 minutes. Can watch the videos streaming: High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Can download as MP4 or WMV files. High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Part of the netFame Solutions (Fame Digital) network. Some of the main bonus sites include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint As the name implies, this is a hardcore lesbian site. You get a variety of solo, two girls, three girls. With and without toys. I watched a number of the videos. I thought they were OK, but nothing special. The videos are competently shot, OK camera work, OK lighting and sound control. Most videos are shot indoors, in a living room or bedroom, which makes shooting the video easier. I wish the videos were higher resolution (480p is the highest offered, which seems poor, to me). And wished that the sex was more erotic or sexy. Maybe I'm jaded, but the videos left me bored. The main value of joining this site is that it gives you access to the netFame Solutions network, which has some worthwhile sites. 05-11-12  10:31am Replies (1) Review 241 DOMAI (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy, glamorous or exotic -Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures -Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site -Easy entrance to site for members -Navigation fairly simple and direct -Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download -Zip file downloading for photosets -No download limits -Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset) -Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 Domai photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. Alinda has 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels as model Alina, photoset named Cons: Pros (continued): "Wonderful Time". Amour Angels has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face. (Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.) The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at Domai and Amour Angels. (If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.) Cons: -Photosets only. No videos. No live cams. -Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually). -The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories. Bottom Line: Cons(continued): -offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder. -Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man -Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around since 1997. So why so few pictures listed? -No bio data on the models -No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted. -Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races. Bottom line: -On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files. -Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at Domai. 11-17-08  12:30am Replies (2) Review 242 Glam Deluxe (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Some good-to-great looking models. -Content is exclusive to this site. -High-quality glamour photography. -No DRM video protection. -No download limit. -They do have a bio sheet on the models. But some of the information is fantasy or worthless. Giving the age of the model, with no date to compare the age to, is not much use. Stating in "sexual experience" that a model is a virgin, when I have seen hardcore clips of the same model giving blowjobs and having vaginal and anal sex with different males, makes me wonder what kind of virginity they are talking about. The hardcore clips of this model were posted on other sites long before the photoshoots of this "virgin" model were posted at glamdeluxe. I realize that I should not be picky about factoids when posted at a porn site, but it pricks the fantasy bubble when the factoids are so obviously false. Cons: -Site does not update very often. Can go a week or more before a new photoset is posted. Very irregular posting schedule for updates. -Only 1 photographer for the site: Thierry Murrell. He does glamour-type erotic photography. Usually nice clean pictures, but if you don't like his style, you won't like the site. -Softcore only. Single-model posing. No boy-girl pictures. No girl-on-girl pictures. -Site advertises "huge archive" of photosets and flix. But the site has only been around since 2006, and the "archive" is tiny compared to a super-site like met-art. The flix archive is really small, only 28 videos. New videos are added very, very slowly. -The flix (videos) are basically a video of a photoshoot. And some videos are a collection of individual pictures from the photoshoot, not a real moving-picture video. -No zip files for the photosets. Need a blackwidow program to download a photoset. Otherwise, you have to download each picture separately, a real pain. Bottom Line: Cons (continued):-Photosets are in 1 resolution only. Do not have a choice of 3 different resolutions for downloads as you have at some of the better sites like met-art (low, medium, high resolution). -Navigation could be improved a lot. You go to the flix (video) page, which lists with a thumbnail of each video at the site. The hot- link to download each video is not clearly marked. Maybe this is a French version of a joke, where increasing the obstacles means increased pleasure when you reach the goal of downloading the video? -Videos are listed separate from the photosets. So if you want to find whatever videos there are of a girl, have to look at the video page, then scroll down the page to examine each video to see which girl it is. Videos are not grouped by the model, but apparently in random order. -They do not date the videos or some of the older photosets. I like to know when the photosets and videos were shot, for my own interest. -Models are white girls from Europe only. No blacks, Asians, other races. -Photos have a watermark. Doesn't bother me, but some people dislike photos with a prominent watermark. Bottom line: -If you like softcore, glamour shots of single models, and you like the models you see on the tour, then this site is maybe worth 1 single-month subscription to get the basic files you want, and then maybe a visit once a year to get any updates. Hopefully, the site will last, because the photographer does do quality work and picks some nice-to-great looking models. But a regular subscription beyond 1`month is not worth the money. -I wish I could give this site a much higher score, because I belong to it and hope it does not go out of business. But for this type of softcore photography, you get more for your money with met- art > metmodels > hegre-art. Giving this site a 75, because some of the girls are gorgeous, and the pictures are high-quality glamour shots. 11-15-08  03:11pm Replies (0) Review 243 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPITAL LETTERS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE IN CAP LETTERS. I AM NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -NICE SELECTION OF ATTRACTIVE MODELS. -ADVERTISES OVER 300 MODELS. -PU DISCOUNT OF $17.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. RENEWS AT $29.81/MONTHLY. -CCBILL IS THE PRIMARY PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME. -EASY LOGIN. IF COOKIES ARE ENABLED, TO ENTER SITE, JUST HIT THE MEMBERS LOGIN LINK. DO NOT HAVE TO ENTER USERNAME OR PASSWORD OR A CAPTCHA. -YOU CAN STREAM THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. -CAN DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. -THERE IS A PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO. -THERE IS A ZIP FILE FOR EACH PHOTOSET. Cons: -SITE IS NOT UPDATING. TBP REPORTED ON 2016-07-23 THAT THE LAST UPDATE WAS ON 2015-11-16. -THERE ARE BAD LINKS THE NETWORK NEEDS TO FIX/UPDATE TO MAKE THEM WORK. TO ENTER THE PORNMASTERMIND SITE, YOU HIT THE LINK "PORNMASTERMIND", WHICH OPENS A PAGE WITH A LINK TO SUPPORT, THAT LEADS TO ANOTHER PAGE THAT REQUESTS YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD, WITH THE WARNING THAT THE INFORMATION ENTERED IS NOT SECURE, AND MAY COMPROMISE YOUR MEMBERSHIP DETAILS IF TRANSMITTED. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. --THE PREVIEW PAGE FOR THE SITE IS ONE PAGE ONLY, WITH LIMITED DATA. PREVIEW PAGE FOR THE SITE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED AND EXPANDED. THE PREVIEW PAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE NUMBER OF SITE MODELS, THE NUMBER OF SCENES, OR OTHER ESSENTIAL DATA NEEDED TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION ABOUT SITE MEMBERSHIP. -THE SCENES POSTING DATE TO THE SITE ARE HARD TO FIND. ALSO, HARD TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF SCENES, AND THE NUMBER OF MODELS AT THE SITE. -NO MODEL INFO. Bottom Line: A MAJOR CON: THE SITE IS NOT UPDATING. THE LAST UPDATE WAS 2015-11-16. THIS SITE USED TO BE ONE OF THE BETTER MASSAGE-THEMED PORN SITES. TWO MAIN FACTORS: THE MIX OF CUTE GIRLS. THE SEX CAN BE HOT. THE PLOT IS SIMPLE: A GIRL COMES IN FOR A MASSAGE. THE STUNT COCK AROUSES THE GIRL BECAUSE OF HIS EROTIC MASSAGE TECHNIQUE, AND THE GIRL GETS POUNDED ON THE MASSAGE TABLE. BECAUSE THE SAME PLOT IS USED IN ALL THE SCENES, WITH THE SAME SETTING, AND THE SAME STUNT COCK, SOME VIEWERS MIGHT FIND THE SCENES REPETITIOUS. I ENJOYED THE SIMPLE SETUP. I PERSONALLY DID NOT FIND THE STUNT COCK BE UNLIKABLE OR IRRITATING. HE TREATS THE GIRLS AS WOMEN TO BE SEDUCED, AND HE DOES A GOOD JOB FUCKING THEM. THERE IS NO NAME CALLING, NO SPITTING OR HARSH TREATMENT OF THE MODELS. IT'S GOOD, CLEAN SEX. YOU HAVE OVER 300 SCENES. FUCKED HARD 18 IS THE MAIN VALUE OF THE PORN MASTERMIND NETWORK. YOU GET A FEW MAIN SITES WITH NETWORK ACCESS: BANGABLE FUCKED HARD 18 FUCKED HARD GFS MASSAGE GIRLS 18 SEDUCED BY MASSAGE HOWEVER, NAVIGATION BETWEEN THE SITES IS PROBLEMATIC. THERE IS NO CLEAN LINK TO TRANSFER FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER. I ASSUME THIS IS BECAUSE THE PORNMASTERMIND LINK IS BROKEN. SO, UNTIL THEY START UPDATING THE FUCKED HARD 18 SITE, AND FIX THE LINKS TO THE OTHER SITES, I WOULD HESITATE TO JOIN THIS SITE--UNLESS YOU REALLY ENJOY MASSAGE VIDEOS. IF THEN, THE SITE MIGHT BE WORTH A ONE-MONTH JOIN. 03-30-17  04:39pm Replies (0) Review 244 Give Me Teens (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint. -Can choose streaming or download for videos. -There is a photo set associated with each video. -The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc. -You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star. -Wide selection of teen categories. -They include the posting date of each video. -They identify the female models in each video. Cons: -The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles. -The photo sets do not have a zip file. -Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up. -The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors. -Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there is any of her content at that site. -A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site. Bottom Line: The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it. Site Stats: Movies: 601 DVDs: 162 Pornstars: 654 Pictures: 87846 The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition. The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is: Older videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p Download in 240p, 480p Newer videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p Minor point: The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites). Is it the same girl? She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens: Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05 18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05 This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special. What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site. To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network. 04-20-13  03:39pm Replies (5) Review 245 Cuties Galore (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has link has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month. -Cuties Galore is part of the 21 Sextury network, so you used to get access to about 19 different sites. But the site and network structure has changed recently, with the introduction of the Adult Time network, which folded Cuties Galore and over 100 other sites into a network of sites. So you should get access to a massive amount of porn, much of it good to high quality. -Unlimited downloads. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited videos. See bottom line for additional thoughts on the unlimited videos. But Adult Time claims a catalog of over 50,000 videos, which should more than fill the porn needs of a lot of people. -Most sites offer HD definition. Some sites also offer 4K definition. -Many sites offer a trailer to preview the video. -Multiple daily updates to Adult Time. -24/7 customer support. In addition to email and telephone support, there is a 24/7 live chat. Live chat is fast to respond. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Standard practice for porn sites. -With access to such a massive catalog of porn videos, navigation becomes extremely important. Searching the content needs to be streamlined, so you can find the content that interests you, and watch it more easily. However, the Adult Time network has a lot of high quality porn, as well as a lot of lower quality porn, so you can switch qualities and niches as the mood strikes you. -This is a specific critism of the site only: The site title is Cuties Galore, but the general level of the models is poor: there are very few cute or attractive models here. Almost all are plain. Bottom Line: Cuties Galore is an archive site. The last video posted to site was dated 02-04-2014. Site has 257 videos. The theme is solo girls showing nudity and masturbating. Although the site's title is Cuties Galore, that is deceptive: Almost all the models are plain: I've looked at almost all the videos thumbnails, and it was hard to find any cute or attractive models. The videos are professionally shot, with the very good 21 Sextury quality-level of nice sets, good lighting, good sound control. But I appreciate good-looking teen models, and I couldn't find any at this site. There are plenty of fine-looking girls at other sites in the network. So this site, for me, is a waste of time. Cuties Galore is (or was?) part of the 21 Sextury network. The 21 Sextury network used to be composed of about 19 separate sites. However, the site and network structure has changed dramatically: The 21 Sextury network has been folded into a much larger network of sites, named "Adult Time". Site membership in any one of the Adult Time sites should give you access to the entire Adult Time network. However, I recommend sending an email to customer support to verify the Adult Time network access, because the Adult Time network is the jewel of membership, while the Cuties Galore site has far less value. The Adult Time network is still in beta testing. The Adult Time network is a massive collection of hardcore porn of over 50,000 videos. The Adult Time network gives you access to over 100 separate channels. A "channel" is what the network calls a site. I recently found a link where you can subscribe directly to the Adult Time network. I suggest that PU reach out to the network to get it listed at PU, since, in my opinion, the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn sites. Due to: -The massive amount of high quality porn content. -Unlimited steaming. -Unlimited downloading. -The content covers a wide range of porn niches. -The network offers content from a huge number of porn stars. -Many of the porn stars are attractive. Some of them are beautiful. -Many of the sites (called "channels" by the network) are premium sites, that used to require a separate membership fee. Adult Time is the first site I've seen that advertises unlimited videos. Other sites I've seen advertise unlimited streaming. And unlimed downloads. But Adult Time also advertises unlimied videos. Since there are only 24 hours in a day, you can not watch unlimited videos in a single day. Or even in a single week or month or year. But if you continue your membership to Adult Time for an unlimited time, perhaps you can watch unlimited videos. Except I've read that the earth will be destroyed by our sun in 4 billion or 5 billion years from now. Even if Earth spends the rest of its aeons escaping alien attacks, dodging space rocks, and avoiding a nuclear apocalypse, there will come a day when our own sun will eventually destroy us. It might take billions of years, but the earth will eventually be destroyed. So unless some PU member makes an archive of the Adult Time network videos and photos, the porn content might not be truly unlimited. False advertising? The main take-away is that Adult Time has a huge amount of porn content: a lot of which is good to excellent quality. So even if the content is not unlimited, does it matter? For a low price, you are getting access to a huge amount of good-quality porn, covering a lot of niches. With unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading. The main networks that were folded into Adult Time: 21 Naturals 21 Sextreme 21 Sextury Fame Digital Fantasy Massage Girlsway Vivid REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 12-17-18  01:31am Replies (1) Review 246 Rub A Teen (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. Username and password. No captcha. -Epoch is the billing company. -You get a confirming email on signup. Which is starting to get rare, for some reason. At least some of the sites I've joined in the last year, I've gotten no confirming email. How much does it cost to send an email? But why bother, since if the customer forgets his username or password, or has some problem about cancelling his membership, that's his problem, and in the meantime, the site can continue charging him for his membership. -I'm seeing so many lovely young models at many different networks/sites. And this network has some truly gorgeous young models. -Default viewing option. Select your favorite viewing option on how to view a scene, and the site will remember it. Not sure how useful this is, seems more like a gimmick than anything useful. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Download manager works. I use DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. Cons: PROS (continued): -Membership price recently reduced to $17.87/month. I'm not sure how long that price reduction will last. -Videos have the date they were posted to the site. ============== CONS: -Pre-checked offer at signup has to be unchecked, or you will have a $1.00 1-day trial membership to some site, that automatically renews at $38.57/month. So if you miss the pre-checked offer, you will be paying $38.57/month until you figure out what's happening. -Get thumbnails advertising other sites on the member's pages. If you paid to get inside, do you need this advertising thrown at you? But many sites are doing it. -Large watermark bottom right side of videos. -Small site. Only has 20 videos so far. -19 of the 20 videos were previously posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). There was one video at Rub A Teen that I did not match up. But that's probably because I didn't want to spend the time going through each video at Tricky Masseur. Bottom Line: If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen. The Rub A Teen site offers more choices in the video definition than the Tricky Masseur site. For the videos that are at both sites, Tricky Masseur offers a low, medium and high definiton download. Rub A Teen goes one better: a low, medium and high definition, and a higher definition. (The high definition is 720p, the higher definition is 1080p.) The Tricky Masseur site often has subtitles to go with the foreign language the actors/models speak. The Rub A Teen site videos do not have the subtitles. But once you have read the subtitles, you realize the words have little meaning, so the absence of subtitles is not a problem, because what the actors/models are saying is basically just noise. Teen Mega World is a huge network, with a lot of great-looking models, and a lot of hot hardcore videos. It's certainly worth joining the network at least once, to look through their tremendous archive of hardcore videos. Tricky Masseur has 93 videos. It's basically an archive site, having added only 1 new video in the last 7 months. The Rub A Teen site has 20 videos total. 19 of the videos were already posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). The difference in file size between the 1080p version and the 720p version is huge: For example, for a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 30 seconds (the Laura video): Rub A Teen Laura video: The 1080p MP4 file size is 2.08 GB. The 720p MP4 file size is 1.05 GB. Tricky Masseur Laura video: No 1080p version is offered. The 720p file size is 999 MB. How many people are going to spend 2 GB per video of hard drive space? Most of the videos are between 25 to 30 minutes in runtime. So if you are going to keep the 1080p version on your hard drive, you are allocating around 2 GB per video. And if you are a collector of videos, you will be buying lots of hard drive capacity to store these huge video files. Actually, I don't know why the file sizes at Rub A Teen are so large. At Diesel network, for instance, they give you 1080p video for a 30 minute runtime, and the file size is 686 MB. That compares to 2.08 GB at Rub A Teen. Comparing the bit rate of the 720p files (of the same video): Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 5134 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Tricky Masseur Total bitrate = 4736 kbps Frame rate = 25 frames/second Comparing the bit rate of a 1080p video, with a completely different 1080p video: Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 10136 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Diesel site Total bitrate = 3199 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second To increase the bit rate by a factor of 3.2, you are increasing the file size from 686 MB to 2.08 GB. I don't know how these technical details play out. But as far as I can tell, you can't really tell the difference on a computer monitor that is 20+ inches in size between the 3199 kbps and 10136 kbps files. Maybe on a large-screen TV monitor, you can tell the difference. But you are going to be spending hundreds of dollars on hard drives, as cheap as they are today, if you are going to collect videos that are 2GB in size. If you enjoy the erotic massage niche, then I suggest signing up with the Teen Mega World network, where you get one site (Tricky Masseur) that focuses on that area, with 93 videos. Plus you get over 20 other hardcore sites that are mainly boy-girl sex, some solo vids, some lesbian vids. All the Rub A Teen videos (except possibly 1 video) are at Tricky Masseur. And Tricky Masseur has over 4 times the videos that Rub A Teen does. Basically, I think it makes little commercial sense to build a site that is a clone of a competitor's site. But I guess that the owners of Rub A Teen decided that the erotic massage niche was popular, and this is what they came up with as an inexpensive way to do it, because they are just buying/leasing some of the same videos that Tricky Masseur bought/leased. For people who don't know about Tricky Masseur, then the Rub A Teen site can be a nice introduction to the erotic massage niche. Rub A Teen is part of the Team Skeet network. Joining any one of their sites gives access to 11 sites in that network, which currently consists of: Exxxtra Small-Her Freshman Year-Innocent High-Oye Loca-POV Life-Self Desire-She's New-Solo Interviews-The Real Workout-This Girl Sucks-Titty Attack. I'm giving the Rub A Teen site a score of 73. If the Tricky Masseur site didn't exist, the Rub A Teen site score would be much higher. 12-02-12  10:45pm Replies (1) Review 247 Lolly Hardcore (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Lolly Hardcore is a site dedicated to the hardcore teen model Lolly, who performed under a variety of names, from 2007 through about 2016. But the last update to this site was in September, 2013. -Lolly appeared (under different names) at a wide variety of sites: Amourangels, Averotica, Domai, Eroticbeauty, Goddessnudes, Justteensite, MetArt, TheLifeErotic, TMW, etc. -Membership in Lolly Hardcore gives you access to the entire TMW (Teen Mega World network). However: I recommend joining the site through the main TMW site. See the bottom line for a more complete explanation: but the network update a few years ago messed up navigation, and messed up the search function. Do your self a favor and join through the TMW main site, and not through one of the satellite sites. Cons: -The biggest con for most people is that the site stopped updating in September, 2013. For most people, they would consider the site an abandoned orphan, hardly worth visiting. But I think Lolly (the main star of the site) is a cute, infectious girl who enjoys sex. She is so lovely, it's a pleasure to watch her perform. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Non-secure login and non-secure member pages. Disappointing. Many porn sites have switched to https (secure pages). The TMW network should upgrade to https. -Small site. 94 videos. 94 matching photosets. -The photoset is made from screencaps of the video. So the quality is poor. Poor centering, poor posing (since the models are not posing for a photo, but doing a video shoot, and the screencaps are not photographically posed), poor quality of the images. -The screencaps are not crisp and clear. Since Lolly and her fellow models are cute (or at least energetic in their sex), you wish the images were better. CONS CONTINUE BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -Because this is an archive site, TMW made the decision that you can't stream some videos: you have to download the file, and watch offline. Stupid. Treat the site like a full-flavored site, with streaming and any other options given to other network sites. -Also, you can't stream the photos in a photoset online, but have to view each photo separately. Better to download the zip file and use a player. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): Lolly Hardcore is a small archive site that stopped updating in September, 2013. For many people, that would be the overriding fact about the site. Who wants to watch an old (Lolly was probably a teen during most of the shoots at the site) porn star perform? Except, for me, Lolly was such a pretty little girl, who made sex fun. So, if most people would rate the site in the 70s (or less), I enjoy visiting Lolly like a fond memory of when sex was fun, and girls could be cute. That's me. Most other people seem to prefer the latest model, the hottest action, the newest fad. Whatever. Based on the small size of the site (94 videos), and the archival nature (the last video was added in September, 2013, many people might give the site a score of 72. In my opinion, the site is worth a far higher score. For 2 main reasons: -Lolly, the main star of the site, is such a cute, energetic girl who really seems to enjoy her body, by herself and with the odd boy or girl. -Along with the Lolly Hardcore site, you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. That means you get access to 33 teen sites, covering a wide variety of niches. Because of the Teen Mega World access, and because Lolly is such a cutie, my personal score raises Lolly to 92. However, many PU members have argued that: -A site should be scored on its own merits, and not on network access. -An archive site should be scored lower, because it's stopped updating. So for most people, a score of 72 seems to be fair. But I personally enjoy the site and the network far above 72. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. The girls are not as pretty as the girls at Diesel Access (except Diesel Access dropped that name, and is marketing All Fine Girls as a separate site, and the two wow sites, Wow Girls and Wow Porn, as a combo). Except that if you remain a member of one of the wow sites or All Fine Girls for over 2 months (I believe that's correct, but the rules are not plainly stated), you get access to all three sites in what used to be the Diesel Access network. But TMW has 1383 models, many of them attractive, some very attractive, and many of them put on a good show. Note: exact stats are not reliable: TMW advertises 1,383 models at the site; but also advertises 2,000 plus models at the site. So TMW and Diesel Access are 2 of my favorite hardcore teen porn networks. Note: TMW did a network update a few years ago. This messed up the navigation and search. When you join one of the satellite sites, you need to log in to the original site you joined. Even when you try to move to one of the other sites, you are still partially logged in to your join site. This makes searching and exploring any one site difficult and time-consuming, since you can't fully see the site you are exploring, but still partially logged in to your join site. Also, even more important: The search is site-specific. If you join through one of the satellite sites, instead of the TMW main site, your search is limited to the site you joined. Even if you switch to another site in the network, the search only returns hits from the site you joined, not the site you are partially logged in to. This makes searching for a model's content at the network a nightmare. But if you joined through TMW main site, the search covers the entire network, making the search easy. So do yourself a favor and join through the TMW main site, and not through any of its satellite sites. This was the situation when I joined about 2 years ago, and the situation about 1 year ago. I don't believe they have fixed the network structure or the search function since then. But since there is no blog in the network, I believe my warnings are useful, but I can't be positive they are 100% accurate. But the TMW staff apparently don't realize how much of a problem the network update caused, because there is no network blog to discuss or complain about such issues. I did a check today for the search: the search results are still limited to the site you joined through. So, like I said, join through the TMW site and the network becomes much easier to use. That one tip is worth the entire review. 01-11-19  08:12pm Replies (0) Review 248 Bad MILFs (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -PART OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. SO YOU GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK WITH A SUBSCRIPTION TO BAD MILFS. -PU DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIP PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING). -CAN USE PAYPAL OR EPOCH AS THE BILLING AGENTS. PAYPAL FOR EXTRA SECURITY FOR YOUR CREDIT CARD. -SCENES APPEAR TO BE EXCLUSIVE TO THE SITE. HOWEVER, I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EXPERIENCE WITH MILF PORN TO VERIFY THAT. I'VE HAD A LOT OF EXPERIENCE WITH TEEN PORN, BUT NOT MILF PORN. SO THESE SCENES ARE ALL NEW TO ME. Cons: -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -TEAM SKEET SPLITS THE NETWORK INTO A BASIC MEMBERSHIP, WHERE YOU GET ACCESS TO MOST OF THE SITES, AND PREMIUM MEMBERSHIPS, WHERE YOU ONLY GET MEMBERSHIP TO A SINGLE PREMIUM SITE. I'M GUESSING THIS IS THE STRUCTURE, BECAUSE I'VE NEVER JOINED ANY OF THE PREMIUM SITES. BUT IT IRRITATES ME WHEN I JOIN A NETWORK AND DO NOT GET ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. -SMALL SITE. ONLY 16 SCENES ON 2017-07-22. -SLOW UPDATE RATE. 2 NEW SCENES ADDED PER MONTH. -DECEPTIVE PREVIEW PAGE FOR THE SITE. THE PREVIEW PAGE SHOWS 54 NICE-SIZED THUMBNAILS FOR THE SCENES, SO YOU WOULD ASSUME THERE ARE AT LEAST 54 SCENES AT THE SITE. BUT THE SITE ONLY HAS 16 SCENES. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. Bottom Line: THE SITE THEME IS BAD MILFS. OLDER WOMEN (IN THEIR THIRTIES) LUSTING AFTER YOUNGER MEN. THE YOUNGER MEN COULD BE A NEIGHBOR, OR THEIR DAUGHTER'S BOYFRIEND. SO THE MILF (Mother I'd Like to Fuck) IS A BAD PERSON. IN TODAY'S WORLD, AN OLDER WOMAN LUSTING AFTER A YOUNGER MAN IS NOT CONSIDERED BAD: SHE'S CONSIDERED HOT, OR LUCKY. OR SMART ENOUGH TO IGNORE THE OUTMODED MORALS OF AN EARLIER AGE. WHEN DONALD TRUMP, OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ADMITS HE LUSTS AFTER YOUNGER WOMEN, HE IS SHOWING HE'S A MAN'S MAN, WHO DESERVES ALL THE PUSSY HE CAN GRAB. ACTUALLY, THIS SITE TEACHES YOU THAT OLDER WOMEN HAVE A PLACE IN THE SEX LIVES OF THEIR DAUGHTERS OR STEP DAUGHTERS, TO ACT AS A MENTOR. AND THE OLDER WOMEN CAN SPICE UP THE SEX WITH A THREESOME INCLUDING THE (STEP)DAUGHTER AND A BOYFRIEND, WITH MAYBE A BIT OF LESBIAN SEX THROWN IN. ONE OF THE REASONS I JOIN THESE PORN SITES IS TO LEARN THE CURRENT MORALITY OF THE USA. SO MY PORN MEMBERSHIPS SHOULD BE A TAX DEDUCTION, SINCE IT'S MY CIVIC DUTY TO BE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT ADULT MATERIALS IN MY COMMUNITY. (JOKE) BAD MILFS IS ONE OF THE NEWER SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THE EARLIEST SCENE IS DATED 2016-11-28. SO ALL THE SCENES ARE AVAILABLE IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH AND HD (HD IS 720p) FOR STREAMING. FOR DOWNLOADS, ALL THE SCENES ARE AVAILABLE IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, AND HD (720p AND 1080p). I BELIEVE THE NETWORK WOULD BE A BETTER BUY IF THEY ELIMINATED THE BAD MILFS SITE. THE SCENES FEATURE A STUPID PLOT. THE PREVIEW PAGE IS DECEPTIVE. I WOULD NOT HAVE EXPECTED SUCH FALSE ADVERTISING FROM TEAM SKEET. NORMALLY, I GIVE ANY SITE IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK A SCORE OF 85 OR HIGHER BECAUSE MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE TOTAL BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK (BUT NOT TO THE PREMIUM SITES IN THE NETWORK). HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE DECEPTIVE PREVIEW PAGE OF THE BAD MILFS, WHICH HAS 54 THUMBNAIL SCENES FOR A SITE THAT ONLY HAS 16 SCENES; AND BECAUSE THE PLOTS OF THE SCENES ARE SO STUPID, I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 72. 07-25-17  01:24am Replies (0) Review 249 Exclusive Teen Porn (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res. -Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc. -Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like. -Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site. -Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Can stream or download videos. -Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -DownThemAll download manager works. -Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. CONS: -Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows. -Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot. -You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity. -The number of sets per model is completely random. -Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use. -Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality. -Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video. -Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week. -Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior. BOTTOM LINE: Site stats: Number of videos: 210 Runtime: averages about 21 minutes. Videos can be streamed or dowloaded. Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files. The file specs are for the more recent files. Number of photosets: 217 Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos. Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution. The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large: High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc. On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value. Number of models: 177 There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes. Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment. Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site. Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice. 09-06-12  03:36am Replies (2) Review 250 Ex GF Box (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: This is not a pro. But joining directly through the Ex GF Box site charges $29.95 for the first month. If you join through the Teen Mega World site, you are charged $14.95 for the first month, with a PU discount. And access to the Ex GF Box site is included. -This is not a pro. But it's very important: If you join through any of the member sites of Teen Mega World, your search results might be limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switch to another site in the network that you have access to, your search results migt still limited to the site you joined through. The search engine when you join through one of the member sites seems to give random results: sometimes it will search for a model's content only at the site you joined through; other times, it will search for a model's content at the entire network. The best solution to the limited search is to join through the Teen Mega World site directly. PROS(CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION): Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): The search, when you join through the main Teen Mega World site, covers the entire network. Which makes the search far easier, and you can also access the entire network contents more easily: if you join through one of the member sites, it can be a nightmare trying to search the network for a model's content. -Starting on the pros: -Ex GF Box is part of the Teen Mega World network. The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network (but the search engine when you join through one of the member sites might only return content from the site you joined through. So, join through the Teen Mega World site directly, and not through one of the member sites.) Benefits of the TMW network: -Daily updates. -High res images. -Some sites have video resolutions from 360p through 2160p. -Over 30 sites covering different teen niches. -Over 5,000 videos. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -Over 2,000 models. Most of them attractive to very attractive. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. CONS(START OF): -The Ex GF Box is probably the poorest site in the Teen Mega World network. -If you join through the Ex GF Box site directly, you are charged a higher price ($29.95/ month recurring) than if you join through the Teen Mega World site ($14.95/month recurring). Both joins give you access to the entire Teen Mega World network content. So save money and join through the Teen Mega World site. -Also, as I already mentioned, joining through the Teen Mega World site directly, means your search engine covers the entire network. If you join through one of the Teen Mega World network sites, your search is might be limited to the site you joined through: which makes search for a model's content at the network a nightmare. -The Ex GF Box is an archive site. Last update to the site was in 2012. -Most member sites offer a choice in streaming or downloading definitions ranging from about 360p through 2160p. But a few sites, including the Ex GF Box site, only offer a very limited or no choice of streaming or downloading choices. The Ex GF Box site offers the videos at 720p definition, for downloading. There is no streaming option -There are broken links for accessing many of the photosets for some videos (or else, there seems to be a photoset for many videos, but there is no link for downloading a zip file of the supposed photoset (I don't know if a photoset actually exists, and they forg to put a hot link for downloading, or they were going to post a photoset with a hot link, and never got around to posting the photoset and hot link on the server.) -The most recent videos were posted back in 2012, so the quality of the videos and photosets are poor, compared to the improved quality of the videos and photosets posted in the last few years. -The videos and photosets from 2012 and earlier feature cheap sets, cheap technical quality (poor lighting, lower-definition videos and photos). BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Ex GF Box site is a member site in the Teen Mega World network (TMW). It's one of the poorest sites in the network. There are many reasons it's a poor site: -It's an archive site. The last update was in 2012. -The quality of the videos and photosets is poor. The content was produced back when the network was producing cheap, teen videos and photosets. The costumes are cheap street clothes. The sets are low-rent apartment rooms, with cheap furniture. The videos and photos are poor quality: almost no money was spent trying to make the models look attractive, or trying to use a plot to make the sex more interesting: this is just straight hard-core fuck-and-suck. Little effort was put into making the site contents better quality, or to upgrade the site navigation. Most videos have a single definition option for downloading (7200). Most videos can not be streamed online (You need to download the file and watch off-line). Many videos have no accompanying photoset. When you do find an accompanying photoset to a video, there is no zip file, and you have to manually download the individual photos. Little effort is made to present the models attractively, even if the models are cute. Since the photos are poor quality and the costumes are cheap street clothes, the photosets are not worth collecting. Note: the TMW network, and the member sites, have an unusual structure: There is an https version of the member sites. And the is a non-secure version of the member sites (the login and member pages are not https). This is the only network I've seen with both a secure and non-secure network. It makes no sense to me. They should delete the non-secure network and member pages, and only offer the secure network. I'm giving the site a score of 70. And that is generous. Navigation problems, poor quality content, lack of zip files, lack of streaming choices, lack of photosets, etc. The main positive is that membership in any one of the member sites of TMW gives you accesss to the entire TMW network: there are no premium sites that they charge you extra for. The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Along with the Diesel Access network (they dropped the Diesel Access network name, and now, apparently, have no official name for the three sites that used to be the Diesel Access network: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), even though under the current marketing system if you join any one of the 3 sites you get immediate access to all 3 sites. So I'm giving Ex GF Box a score of 70. But on a practical basis, since membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you access to the entire network, I think the entire network deserves a score in the 90s. That is due to: -The catalog of over 2,000 teen models, most of them attractive to very attractive. -The wide range of niches covered. REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 05-28-19  02:59am Replies (1) Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.5 seconds.