Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 201 Lingerie AV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The main plus is that the porn is not censored. You don't have the pixillation/mosaic effect that you find with most Japanese porn blocking the genitals. -The models are attractive Japanese females, in late teens or early twenties. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Excellent download speeds. I was getting over 5 MB/s, which is my max download speed. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Professionally shot scenes. -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. -There is an accompanying photo set for each scene. -Can stream or download the scenes. Multiple choices for both streaming and download quality. Cons: -The search could be greatly improved. --A couple of ways to improve the search: ---1. Have nice-sized thumbnail of each model, to show clearly what she looks like. ---2. When you type the name of the model in the search box, only return the scenes with her. Currently, you get a mish-mash of scenes with the model's name, and any name that might be similar. Note: there is a single page for each model, which gives a nice-sized thumbnail, and a brief description of the model. But you have to click on the model's name to get to that page. They should add a section where they have the models listed alphabetically, with a nice sized thumbnail to make browsing the models easier. -Pre-checked cross-sale on signup page. -No zip file for the accompanying photo sets. Bottom Line: Part of the JAV HD network. Over 1,100 scenes. Site theme is Japanese models wearing lingerie and then having sex. The sex covers all the usual types: female masturbation, toys, boy-girl, older man-young girl, group, etc. Even though the site theme is Japanese models wearing lingerie, there really isn't a lot of attention paid to that idea. Yes, the girl might be wearing a bra and underpants in a scene, but she is soon naked. There is very little strip-tease or sensuous undressing or focus on lingerie. The site is using the idea of lingerie to distinguish itself from other porn sites, but little real emphasis is placed on lingerie. If you just browse through the scenes, I doubt if you would categorize the site as lingerie-themed. Instead, you would just categorize the site as a smorgasbord of Japanese sex scenes. So, what can you expect from the site? A variety of scenes where one or more Japanese maidens are having sex. There is little emphasis on the lingerie they might be wearing. For example: In one video: The scene is titled: "Girl in Asian lingerie made to suck and fuck on cam". The model is Narumi Ayase, and she is cute, in her late teens or early twenties. An older man, in his forties or fifties, kisses and caresses her. Narumi is wearing a white T-shirt and shorts, the T-shirt and shorts come off, underneath she has a bra and panties, and they soon come off. The bra and panties are nothing special, but they fulfill the requirement of lingerie, I assume. And Narumi and the man have sex. If this were an American or European scene, the guy would probably be a teenager. But with Japanese porn, it seems to be more common for the guy to be older, is often in his thirties, or forties. And most of the Japanese women have pubic hair. The bald vagina fashion has not yet migrated to Japan. A different scene, titled: "Hot Asian lingerie chick goes wikd on a big dick". This stars Chiemi Yada, another cute Japanese idol. The scene starts out with Chiemi getting fucked by a guy in his thirties. Chiemi is wearing a pink bikini. So maybe that somehow fulfills the idea of "lingerie". Eventually, she loses the bikini while they are fucking. A different scene, titled: "Sexy Asian in lingerie fucked by her horny teacher". This scene stars Yui Kasugano. Although this scene appears in the Lingerie AV site, it is also featured in the SchoolGirlsHD site (part of the JAV HD network), under the title of: "Asian schoolgirl goes nasty on teacher's dick". Same scene, but listed under a different title. So if you want to collect all the videos of a particular model at the JAV HD network, you have to watch each scene, to avoid collecting duplicate scenes that have different titles. Giving the site a score of 80. There are a lot of hardcore sex scenes, professionally shot. Without the normal Japanese mosaic censorship. 03-05-16  06:35pm Replies (0) Review 202 Pussy AV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaics). -Attractive Japanese models. -Professionally shot videos: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, good editing. -Good download speeds. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec. -Download managers work. -You can stream or download the videos: -Different streaming options include: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Can also download the video in the same four qualities: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -No download limits. -No DRM. (Actually, it's been a while since I have joined any site that has DRM.) -I like the site because not only are the models attractive, but they are also clean: very few tattoos or piercings. Nice young women-in their late teens or early twenties. -I think that I'm getting used to the funny moans the Japanese women make during sex: because the moans are not as loud or annoying as they used to be years ago. The models seem to be enjoying the sex more obviously, instead of resisting the pleasure. Cons: -For those who don't like toys, Japanese porn often includes vibrators, big and small. -This is Japanese porn. So the performers speak Japanese. This is only a minor problem, since whatever they are saying would add very little to the "meaning" of the porn. Bottom Line: 300 scenes. This site theme is girls' pussies. I guess it makes sense for a Japanese site to have this theme, because girls do have pussies, and this is a porn site. (I'm a little slow this morning, can't figure out if American sites should focus more on girls' pussies or not. I would assume that a lot of porn focuses on a girl's pussy, along with her breasts and ass. But then again, I've seen some niche sites that focus on other themes, such as the snot in a girl's nose, or enemas or feet. So I guess it takes all kinds to make the world.) Trying to move on to something that is more easily understandable. A pussy can have hair. It can be trimmed or shaved. It can be wide or narrow. It can be wet or aroused. Or played with. So you get videos of women playing with their pussies, men playing with the woman's pussy. Fucking the pussy. I think that if you over-analyze porn, it can seem that there's a lot of nonsense in porn. But then, there's a lot of nonsense in most comic-based films (such as Superman or Batman or Antman or Iron Man) and those movies and franchises are worth billions. So maybe pussy themed porn makes sense. In one video, a young girl is cooking breakfast for her boyfriend. The guy takes an uncooked sausage and uses it as a dildo on the girl. This goes on for a while, and I'm thinking the girl looks like an innocent young thing who is being pleasured by her boyfriend. After she hits climax, will she cook the sausage and eat it, or share it with her boyfriend? You don't think about such things with American porn. This gives it a slightly unique Japanese twist. Then the guy uses a narrow green vegetable as a dildo on the girl, before switching to a small vibrator, then a large vibrator. So it's a nice change from straight American or European porn. But after you watch enough Japanese videos at this site, you realize the videos are slightly tame: the sex is not aggressive, or overly forceful: girls are getting pleasured, and they also pleasure the men. It's not the rough gonzo sex that you can find at many American or European sites. The site is worth an 80 score. It's got professionally shot Japanese videos of attractive young Japanese models. But a little more variety in the approach would add to the eroticism. 02-29-16  06:03pm Replies (0) Review 203 AV Tits (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -These are uncensored Japanese videos. No mosaic or pixellation to hide the genitals. -Easy login. Once you save your username and password, just hit the login link, enter the Captcha, and you are in. Actually, once you enter the site, site-re-entry is automatic, without having to hit the login link. -Attractive models. I think Japan has some of the most beautiful models in the world. -Can stream videos in four different qualities: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p -Can download the video in four different qualities: I chose one step below the highest quality, to save hard disk space. -OK download speeds. I average between 1-2 GB/sec. My max download speed is about 5 MB/sec. -Download managers work. I used Down Them All. -No DRM. -No download limits. -They give the name of each model. There is brief listing of the models' physical characteristics. -The videos are professionally shot: excellent camera-work, good lighting, good focus, good sound control. -This is an easy site to use. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. -The models have pubic hair. I don't consider this is a con. But for people who have grown up with the modern models who almost all shave their pubic hair, this could be a slight turn-off. -A number of the videos feature vibrators: Japanese porn seems to love vibrators: tiny ones, and the large super-sized vibrators. For the pussy, for the breasts. This is a plus or minus depending on whether you like vibrators. Bottom Line: Site advertises 883 videos. Site theme is Japanese models with big tits. These Japanese models have large breasts, but not the giant breasts that some European models have. My guess is that most of the models have natural breasts, but I'm no expert on this. They give the model's name for each video, and a brief physical description: Mizuki Akai Height 156 cm (61 in) Weight 46 kg Breast size Medium Measurements 83-59-82 Breast factor Natural Hair color Brown Eye color Black Birth date 4 April 1991 Birth place Japan Ethnicity Japanese Official website N/A Note: although her breast size is listed as "medium", I would consider her breast size as large. Especially for a Japanese model. Japanese women normally have small breasts, and Mizuki Akai's breasts would be considered large for a normal American. Not super large, but definitely on the large size. Most of the models I saw had large breasts. Not super-large, but very nice-sized "large" breasts. Natural. Not plastic. No evident surgical scars. The breasts move naturally when the models move. The plot/action is minimal: the girls are lightly dressed, they soon are naked, and they have sex with one or more guys. There is cunnilingus, blowjob, lots of kissing and fingering (something the Japanese do much more than European or American porn models), lots of ehahhs, aihhhs, uuuuhhhs sounds from the Japanese models to show they are excited by the sex. The large breasts swing and jiggle and shake and bounce when the model moves--which is really nice, because with a lot of European models with big breasts, the breasts seem more like bolted-on pieces of flesh which hardly move when the model moves. I enjoy natural breasts, although some people love large breasts and don't seem to care whether the breasts are natural or plastic. Anyway, even though big breasts are the theme of the site, the focus is more on regular sex. There is not a lot of breast-fucking, or even a lot of titty-sucking. This is mainly a site that focuses on normal sex: guy kissing and licking and fingering the pussy, fucking the pussy, girl licking the penis or giving a partial blowjoy, whatever. My overall site impression is that Japanese women with large breasts are having sex. It's just a man or men having a good time with a Japanese woman. She moans a lot in the Japanese manner, but aside from that, the sex is very little different from American or European sex. The sex is not harsh or violent or kinky or sadistic. It's clear that the woman is there to enjoy the sex. This is not heartcore or glamcore. It's almost like a toned-down Teen Mega World site, except that the models appear slightly older than the teens at Teen Mega World, and the sex is less forceful. Do not join this site if you are looking for the super-sized breasts that some models have. Do not join this site if you are looking for a site that features sex focusing on large breasts, and whatever games might be played with super-sized breasts. Do join this site if you want to see attractive Japanese models with large breasts who are having sex. But the sex is basically mild. (Maybe I'm too jaded, because seeing a woman in a room servicing four men with blow jobs and some sensual fucking, no longer seems that extreme to me.) Giving the site a score of 80. The site has professionally shot videos of attractive Japanese models having sex. If the sex were hotter, I would give it a higher score. But this is a nice site. 02-22-16  03:54pm Replies (0) Review 204 School Girls HD (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -Attractive mix of Japanese models. -Epoch is the payment processor: a trusted name. -The videos do not have the pixellated/mosaic effect that is present on most Japanese porn. -Easy login. Save your username and password with cookies, and you are basically automatically logged in when you click on the login link. -No download limits. -No DRM. -OK download speeds. I averaged 1.6 MB/sec. -You can choose the quality of your streaming video: SD 240p 400 bitrate MED 480p 1000 bitrate HQ 720p 2000 bitrate SH 1080p 4000 bitrate Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -Depending on the credit card you sign up with, you might be declined. Mastercard declined my payment, and I had to call Mastercard to unblock my account. But a different Mastercard accepted the payment. -The site is not laid out for easy seach of model or category or whatever niche you are looking for. They need a simple alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail for each model, and her contents at the network hot-linked with the thumbnail. -If I stream a video in 1080p quality, the streaming is not entirely smooth. My connection is 50MB/sec, which should enable smooth streaming, but it doesn't at this site. Bottom Line: The site theme is horny Japanese schoogirls having sex. There are 184 scenes at the site. By Japanese law, any pornography must censor the genitals of actors and actresses. Until the mid-1990s, pubic hair was also censored. But the videos at this site, although featuring Japanese models, do not censor the videos with the pixellated/mosaic effect. So I assume the videos are produced outside of Japan. If you are not familiar with Japanese porn, there are some differences from European and American porn. It's been several years since I last joined a Japanese porn site. The texture and atmosphere of the videos at School Girls HD seem different from the videos that I remember. My guess is that the videos were shot with a Western (American, European) audience in mind. The performers are Japanese. But the girls' attitudes are slightly different from what they were 10 or 15 years ago. They don't moan and make as many funny noises as they used to. The girls are more accepting of the sex. They don't show as much feigned, cultural behavior of only submitting to the sex because they are being forced to (not actual force, but just submitting to the will of the men). The kissing, while still longer and more intense than American or European kissing, is not as passionate and lengthy as it used to be. The moans and funny noises the models make are supposed to indicate reluctance to be having sex, but also excitement at having sex. Personally, I found the moans and funny noises annoying: it takes getting used to. But the funny noises the girls make have been toned down considerably. Some Japanese porn can be extremely hot, and Japan has some of the most beautiful women in the world. And because of cultural differences, there can be some funny quirks in the videos. I believe the average model here is from the second-tier of Japanese porn models, not the first tier. The most attractive and famous models might be found at other Japanese porn sites, but very few of the big name models I used to look for are found at this site. The models are attractive, but not the super-beauties or super-stars of Japanese porn. However, the models are supposed to be school girls, which means they are younger models. So that might help explain why the big-name models are not featured at this site. The main reason I joined is because the videos are uncensored. And the models are a nice change from the European and American models in looks. Giving the site a score of 80. I'm spoiled by the outstanding attractiveness of the many European and American models I see at porn sites. The models at this site don't possess that outstanding beauty or cuteness. And I didn't think the sex was exceptionally hot, that can be found at many hardcore porn sites. This is a good site. But not a great site. 02-15-16  07:27pm Replies (0) Review 205 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Can stream or download videos. -They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn. -They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting. -There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary). -Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required. -Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password. -PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership. Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn. -Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name. -The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site. -Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films. -Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets. ================== CONS -Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like. -For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option. -The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art. -The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback). A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site. -Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible. -They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't. -They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps. ========================= BOTTOM LINE Site Stats: Movies: 1373 DVDs: 266 Pornstars: 1318 Pictures: 8214 HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies) Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download. They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way. Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot. But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site. The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space. As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones. The main sites in the netFameSolutions network include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc. I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve. 11-20-12  03:54am Replies (0) Review 206 Try Teens (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A nice number of fresh-faced girls (Eastern European). Many of the girls I have not seen before. Almost all the girls are ok to nice looking. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Professionally shot videos. -Choice of streaming, or can download the video. -Each video has an accompanying photoshoot. Cons: -Navigation is clunky and very basic. Each page has 2 videos with thumbnails of the model. That's the layout. -No zip file for the photosets. -Slow update rate. -All videos download with the same name of i01.wmv, so you have to manually rename each video, and keep a manual listing of what each video is (model name + whatever information you want). -Videos have no title or posting date. -Videos are straight hardcore sex with same basic script. -No search. -Download speed varies widely. On a single file download, using a download manager, not downloading more than 1 file, the speed can slow to 20-50 KB/s, so a 874 MB video file can take 4-10 hours or more, which is absolutely ridiculous. -Only 1 resolution for video downloads. No choice of hi, medium or low quality. Bottom Line: Each video follows the same script:a guy walks into the small bedroom of a cute young girl, she smiles and waves, and strips, the guy makes stupid-sounding noises indicating juvenile enjoyment of what he's going to do to that luscious piece of teen meat, girl gives a blowjob, they fuck vaginal, fuck anal, more blowjob, guy shoots over girl's face and makes more noises expressing satisfaction. The girl poses with cum over her face, smiles, waves goodbye, and leaves the room. End of video. The videos are well lit, good lighting means good colors for skin tones, good colors for foreground and background (which is just a bed in a small bedroom). The video is professionally shot: no jittery jumping around, clear view of the entire action, good close-up action, good shots of the girl's face and body so you clearly see what the girl looks like. The sex is straight-forward fucking, the stunt cock seems to be enjoying himself (with all the grunts he makes), and the girl usually keeps a happy smile on her face throughout the entire sex. The video ends with the girl smiling, waving goodbye, and leaving the room, while the guy makes happy grunting noises (which translate better in different languages than if he was speaking Russian). The videos are high quality, the models are all teens and mainly attractive to very attractive. I wish the stunt cock didn't make all those stupid noises trying to show what a good time he was having. I wish there was more variety to the sex. These are luscious young girls, and they are putting on a good show, but there is little variety and the sex gets to be boring in spite of the crystal clear videos and teen girls with cute or pretty faces and tight young bodies. I can't empasize enough how clean and fresh-looking and cute these girls are: They are absolutely adorable, and they are as good as anything you will find on the cute-teen level. The girls look like they are the daughter of your next-door-neighbor, or the girls you can see at the mall or in church. Number of videos at site: 185 Video runtime between 20-35 minutes. Video file size about 575-790 MB. Frame width x height: 960x540. Total bitrate: 3145 kbps. Each video has an accompanying photoset. Number of photos per shoot: 140-450. Only 1 size for each photo (no hi, medium, low). Size of individual photos: 290 KB; 853x1280 pixels. The photos are well-shot, much better than screen caps, but simple style, not glamor style photos. Bottom line: There are a large number of really cute girls. But the stupid sounds the stunt cock makes, the by-the-numbers-sex, the same setting of a small bedroom, make the sex repetitive and less meaningful, almost boring. The videos are professionally shot, but some thought should have been given to what the guy does to the girl instead of following the same script time and time again. 07-26-11  04:39pm Replies (6) Review 207 Vika Nymph (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy log-in. -No DRM. -Actively updating. 1 new video every 10-14 days. 1 new photoset every 3, 4, 5, 8, or 15 days (very erratic update rate for photosets). -Very nice quality for videos and photosets. Good lighting, good camera-work, good sound control. Sometimes you will hear extraneous noise like an overhead airplane or hiss/rumble, but the soundtrack is basically the sounds the models are making as they make love. No annoying music soundtrack. -watermark on videos: small watermark, bottom right corner, appears intermittently, not intrusive. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Zip files for photosets. -Navigation is easy. -Can stream or download all videos. -Choice of WMV or MP4 format for downloading. -Search engine. Cons: -Photosets and videos do not name the models. -There are no model bios. -Search engine could be improved. -Only 1 size for photos. --The photosets are ok to good quality, but they have a tendency to appear washed out in color (the colors need to be stronger, brighter, and you would have much more attractive photos). -The HD video files can be large, 1+ GB for a 15 minute clip. -Photosets download with the default filename of "photos.zip". So you have to manually rename each photoset to identify what the photoset is. And since the models are not named, trying to organize the photosets into some kind of order is not simple. -Slow software system for viewing individual photos in a photoset. Bottom Line: Site is loosely based on the solo teen model idea. The main model is Vika. But there are plenty of sets and videos without Vika. The action is varied: stripping, masturbation, solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl. There is also very mild group sex, some kink (peeing). By group sex, I mean you have three or more people having sex. It's not a rough gangbang where you have a bunch of guys pounding away on one girl at all her holes. The site (and the parent Diesel network) takes a casual, softcore approach to porn. By softcore, I don't mean limited sex; instead, I mean the sex is presented in a basically gentle or friendly way. You don't get gonzo hardcore where the action is rough, abusive, or contemptuous. This site/network shows sex as good, clean fun to be enjoyed. The peeing videos are very short, about 1-3 minutes runtime, which is great for that niche (which I'm not a fan of), because it's right there, wham bam, pee! No waiting around for the action to start. You can see a girl peeing. I guess that's porn, but it's just a girl peeing. She's not masturbating or having sex or anything, she's just peeing. The search could be improved. You enter "peeing" as the search term, and only get 1 video. There are other pee videos at the site. You can find another pee video by entering "urination". Someone who is into this niche can search more extensively and report their results to the PU members. number of videos: 155 Most videos have a short runtime, 10-20 minutes. Download formats for videos: High quality WMV file, medium quality MP4 file, low quality MP4 file. The high definition WMV video files go up to 1280x720, 19160 kbps total bitrate. Number of photosets: 176 Number of photos per photoset: about 80-112. Can view individual photos, or download the entire set as a zip file. Zip file is one size only (no choice of which photo resolution). Maximum resolution of 1333x2000 pixels. I really wish the site listed the models in the videos and photosets, because it would make organizing the contents so much easier. What collector wants a large bunch of photosets and videos where you don't know who the models are? The models are real teens, mainly attractive, very little tattoos or piercings. The girls are from Eastern Europe. Most girls are small- breasted, as usual, but there are some models with medium or large natural breasts. You don't see the oversized, plastic breasts found at Playboy or many adult porn sites. As part of the Diesel network, the site is definitely worth looking through to see which videos/photosets appeal to your tastes. But if the site were a standalone, at $29.95/month, it would be overly expensive. 03-20-11  03:37pm Replies (0) Review 208 Young Legal Porn (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: none. -Site timeout: Very long period before timeout. -Download limits: None. -Model listing is name of model with a nice-sized thumbnail and a listing of her photosets and videos. -Many of the newer videos are nice quality: clear video, good focus, good lighting, good sex action, very attractive models, great skin tone, good color of background and foreground, good sound control. -Most videos have a choice of 3 download qualities to choose from: low, medium or high quality. Cons: -Navigation is basic. For a relatively small site, the navigation could be easily improved to make moving around and finding the photosets/videos of each model faster and simpler. -Search is limited. You can search by model's name, but for little else. -They should junk the software system they use to view individual photos. -No model bios or other information on the models. -Many of the older videos are very poor quality in terms of clarity, lighting, colors, annoying background music. -The content is posting dated, but the significance of the date can be low. Some material was made years before it was posted at this site. -The free live webcam chats with models are a waste of time. The models basically do nothing on-screen except wait for someone to pay for a private chat. Bottom Line: Site stats: -Number of models: 303+ -Number of videos: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number) -Number of photosets: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number) The newer videos are mainly good quality: good lighting, good colors (skin tone, background, foreground), ok to good camera work. video stats (newer videos): frame width x height: 1280 x 720 total bitrate: 8572 kbps - 15459 kbps frame rate: 29 frames/second photo stats: photosets: 30-100 photos. file size: 200-400 Kb (newer photo size). width x height: 2250 x 1500 pixels. resolution: horizontal x vertical: 96 dpi x 96 dpi. Photosets can have from 30 to 100 photos. The file size of an individual photo can be large, up to 400+ Kb, but the photos are not high quality in terms of appeal or photographic technique. The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site. The two primary sites in the dieselaccess network that have the most value are YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls. There are some other sites in the network that are also worthwhile, but the most value is in those two sites. YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls are very similar sites: same type of content, same layout, same models, etc. And it appears that some content is shared between the two sites. YoungLegalPorn takes a softcore approach to porn. By this, I mean that the sex is gentle, not rough or abusive. The sex is caring, affectionate, or friendly, with no slapping, spitting, hitting, name-calling, etc. The sex can be hardcore in the sense there is female masturbation, lesbian activity, boy-girl sex. I appreciate the overall quality of many videos at this site. But some PU members might think the site is too tame, and would rather watch a harder, edgier type of sex that is featured at many hardcore sites. The free Diesel cam shows are not shows, but a waste of time where the model does almost nothing except sit or lie on a bed, waiting for someone to pay for a private show. There is also a mode where the "public free show" turns into a show which is still "public", but you have to pay 1 euro per minute to watch. Supposedly there is some stripping or other action in the non-free public show. The private chats are 3 euros per minute. So it could get very expensive to watch. It would probably be cheaper to go to a topless bar to see some stripping, instead of watching it over the internet. Note: hugow wrote a review of this site on 2011-01-02 and gave it a 50 score because he said the servers were very slow. Most of the files I downloaded from this site (and the other sites in this network) had speeds of 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. So I did not experience the poor download speeds hugow reported. (I recently upgraded my DSL connection, which used to have a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.) 03-08-11  01:18am Replies (4) Review 209 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of content. -Wide variety of content of sexual activity. -Current Site Stats (2010-09-14): Movies : 998 DVDs : 212 Actors : 1019 Hours : 440 Total Size : 398 Gb -Site is currently updating. Updates 1 video clip every 1-4 days (very irregular update schedule). -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No watermark on older style videos. Cons: -Navigation is basic and awkward. -To log on to the network, you have to enter through the site you joined through. You can't log on directly to any of the sister sites you have access to. Once you log on to the site you joined, only then can you enter one of the sister sites you have access to. -Moving around a single site is basic and awkward. To search for files at the site, or to look through the files available, have to look at lists from drop-down menus, or have to click many times to change from different pages. There is a lot of material at this site, and it's cumbersome to try to glance through the different video and photoset files. -Need a fast ISP connection to play the streaming videos, otherwise the streams will frequently stutter and stop. -A few good-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like in each video would be very helpful. -A simple listing of the models appearing in each video would be helpful. Many models in videos are not named. Bottom Line: Viewing options: Download options: high and low resolution. Streaming options: high and low quality. Other options: trailer or screen capture. Frame width by height: 720x480 Total bitrate: 2128 kbps Quality of the video depends on whether the video is the high quality or the low quality option. Also depends on how long ago the video was shot. The more recent videos are higher quality. High quality streaming is not high quality. It is higher quality than the low quality, but it is nowhere near what some sites have as high quality. These are professionally shot videos, but the overall quality could be much better in many ways. One example: I am watching a scene where Rocco and a second man are both on a woman. In parts of the scene, you are seeing the action through a large block of clear plastic or glass. You want to see what's happening, without having a block of plastic obscuring the action. Remove the plastic, or shoot from a different angle. This is not the camera-man trying to be artistic, it's just the camera-man being lazy or stupid and not bothering to shoot from an angle that clearly shows the action. Site content: You have a lot of vintage porn (101 videos) and even more straight recent porn (892 videos). The vintage porn tries to add a little story-line to the sex, maybe even have some costumes. It's basically sex, with a little story that is a negligible attempt to add some flavor or meaning to the sex. The more recent porn also has a tiny story-line, but it's really just straight sex. The actors follow a script that is mainly fucking and sucking, with little conversation (the female models probably don't understand much English, and English is what appears to be used to communicate in the videos). Minor roughness and humiliation to the sex, but not a lot of hard-core roughness or hard-core humiliation. Most scenes are group-type sex, where you have 3 or more people fucking. Cunnilingus, bj, vaginal and anal sex in almost all scenes. No homo-erotic action of boy+boy. You do get boy+girl, 2 boys+girl, 2 girls+boy, or more than 3 people). Some girl+girl action in some of the scenes, but the main emphasis is on the boy+girl action. I was a member of this site a year ago. At that time I found some videos that I thought were really good. But I can't find those videos now. If the videos are still at the site, I can't find them because of the poor navigation. There is a large amount of video content, and the videos are split into series where the type of sexual action is changed from one series to another. The models are mainly Eastern European females. Rocco Siffredi is the star of the site, he's featured in most videos, and he can become annoying at times with his heavily accented English and overly boyish charm. The quality of the videos is OK to good, not great. The large amount of content, and the wide variety of content means there is plenty of material to search through. 09-14-10  10:13am Replies (4) Review 210 Yonitale (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -CCBill is the default billing agent. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to deal with. -Secure login and members pages: https. -No limits on streaming or downloads that I could find. -There are many softcore and hardcore sites with attractive to beautiful girls. This site is one of them. Some of the girls are absolutely lovely: great face, great body. Cons: -Zip files download with a garbage name. Example: gallery-1973-1800-61f711ee94714aebc83bd5a83ca74990.zip Need to put file name into format: Site Name - Model Name - Date Posted - Name of Photoset - File Definition. -Primitive navigation. For a small site, they need a website designer who can make the site easier to use. See bottom line section for examples. -The online software for playing a slideshow of a photo gallery is clunky. -Very limited information of the models: age, country of origin, nothing else. -Search function is almost useless. -Listing of models is fucked up. You are supposed to be able to see a listing of the models organized by name or most recent. But both listing methods are fucked up. If you want to see a listing of models by alphabetical name, you can see the first 14 models listed by alphabetical name on page 1. When you switch to page 2, the names are no longer in alphabetical order. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The second system is to list the models by most recent: except, even on the first page, the models are not listed in the most recent posting to the site. And they are not listed by the first posting of the model to the site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: The site has approximately 122 models. The models range from attractive to gorgeous. That is the main attraction of the site. Yonitale is the pay site. There is a free site that is almost a clone of Yonitale: SecretOfPleasure.com. That site gives small sample galleries of the photosets featured at Yonitale. I assume it's a form of advertising for Yonitale. I joined Yonitale a few days ago. So I'm still trying to figure out how to use the site. The navigation is terrible. The search function is poor, and only appears on some member pages, not on all member pages. The software for viewing a slideshow of a gallery is clunky. With all of these negatives, why did I join the site? First, some of these negatives only appear after you join the site. Second, and just as important, some of these girls are absolutely gorgeous. Many of the models appear on other porn sites: MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc. Many of the models mainly do softcore glamour. Some of the models also appear in hardcore. Yonitale is basically a female masturbation site. You get almost all the varieties of female masturbation you can find: solo masturbation by a girl; one girl masturbating another girl; two girls masturbating themselves; two girls masturbating each other; three or more girls masturbating; a guy masturbating a girl (but no intercourse: the guy is using his fingers or a dildo or a vibrator to masturbate the girl). There might be some element of lesbian activity in the photo sets and videos, but the emphasis is more on the masturbation as a route to sexual pleasure, instead of lesbian activity. Why did I join the site? Because some of the girls are freaking georgeous. I can look at some of the photos of these girls and drool. The next step up would be looking at the photos and climaxing spontaneously, but the photos are not quite that explosive. I can dream about these beauties in my sleep, which makes the Yonitale site a worthwhile join. I suggest browsing the free secret of pleasure site for the sample photos of these models, to see if they are up to your personal standards. The photos are not quite up to the MetArt or MPL Studio standard of high-gloss glamour photography, but like I said, some of the girls are so gorgeous, you need to see them for yourself. However, the site navigation is an exercise in frustration. You want to see a list of the models at the site? You can search through the 9 pages of the model list (14 models per page, except the last page has 10 models). You can sort the models by name (alphabetical order) or by most recent (posted to the site). Except both search methods are fucked up. Search by name: The first page has 14 models, listed alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail of the model. Click on the second page, and the names on that page are no longer in alphabetical order. Click on the third page, and the names on that page are not in alphabetical order. Search by most recent: The first page has 14 models. Except the order of the model listing is not based on the most recent set posted to the site. And is not based on when the model was first posted to the site. So that search order is also fucked up. I could copy all the model names, and sort them myself, but that would take a while, and it's not worth the trouble. A better solution: go to an index site such as indexxx.com, hit the websites link, then select the Yonitale link, and then select either the (show models with photo) link or the (show models as text) link. BOTTOM LINE CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION. 11-06-18  02:29pm Replies (1) Review 211 Jurassic Cock (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.95/MONTH RECURRING. -PART OF THE PORN PROS BASIC NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE BASIC NETWORK. -NETWORK ACCESS GIVES YOU AROUND 3,000 VIDEOS. (I'M ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS, BECAUSE ANY ADVERTISED STATS ARE SUSPECT: FOR EXAMPLE, THEY STILL ADVERTISE THAT THE BASIC NETWORK HAS 24 SITES, WHICH WAS TRUE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, BUT IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS, THEY'VE ELIMINATED SITES, AND THE CURRENT NETWORK HAS 17 SITES.) -CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE CONTENTS. NO PREMIUM IS CHARGED FOR DOWNLOADING, UNLIKE SOME SITES WHICH RECENTLY BEGAN CHARGING EXTRA FOR THE ABILITY TO DOWNLOAD CONTENT. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -VIDEOS HAVE A MATCHING GALLERY. -EACH GALLERY HAS A ZIP FILE. Cons: -TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, HAVE TO ACCEPT/DECLINE THE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PLATINUM STATUS FOR $70. -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE, WHICH ALLOWS HACKERS TO STEAL YOUR LOGIN DATA. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -NO UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2011-12-12. Bottom Line: THERE ARE CURRENTLY 17 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. THE NETWORK HAS BEEN DELETING SOME SITES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. IN NOVEMBER OF 2016, THE BASIC NETWORK HAD 22 SITES. THE NETWORK ELIMINATED 6 SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. THE NETWORK ADDED ONE NEW SITE, NAMED "PORNPROS", WHICH IS SIMILAR TO THE NAME OF THE NETWORK. JUST TO MAKE IT MORE CONFUSING. THE PORNPROS SITE CURRENTLY HAS 1 UPDATE. THE SITE NAME, FOLLOWED BY THE NUMBER OF SCENES, CURRENT AS OF 2017-04-18: 18yearsold - 489 Updates 40ozbounce - 119 Updates Cockcompetition - 40 Updates Crueltyparty - 64 Updates Deepthroatlove - 294 Updates Disgraced18 - 21 Updates Eurohumpers - 21 Updates Flexiblepositions - 27 Updates Freaksofboobs - 62 Updates Freaksofcock - 183 Updates Jurassiccock - 80 Updates Massagecreep - 212 Updates Pimpparade - 33 Updates PornPros - 1 Update Realexgirlfriends - 592 Updates Shadypi - 97 Updates Teenbff - 236 Updates THE 6 SITES THEY ELIMINATED RECENTLY INCLUDE: Amateurviolations Cumdisgrace Cumshotsurprise Lolcumshots Milfhumiliation Squirtdisgrace MOST OF THE SITES HAVE NOT UPDATED IN YEARS. IN THE LAST 30 DAYS, THE BASIC NETWORK HAS ADDED 4 NEW SCENES. THE SITES WITH NEW SCENES IN THE LAST 30 DAYS ARE: Massagecreep - 1 NEW SCENE RealExGirlfriends - 2 NEW SCENES PornPros - 1 NEW SCENE THE LAST NEW SCENE FOR JURASSIC COCK WAS 2011-12-12. JURASSIC COCK HAS 80 SCENES. THE THEME IS AN OLDER GUY SHTUPPING A YOUNG WOMAN OR YOUNG GIRL. (I SAY SHTUPPING, BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO BE POLITE. JOKE.) ANYWAY, THE SITE FEATURES HARDCORE SEX, WITH VERY LITTLE PLOT. THE PLOT IS THAT THE OLDER GUY IS MORE EXPERIENCED THAN SOME YOUNG GUY, SO THE GIRL WILL HAVE A BETTER SEXUAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE OLDER MAN. THE NICHE (OLD GUYS SHTUPPING YOUNG WOMEN) IS NOT WELL SERVED. TEEN MEGA WORLD HAS A NICHE SITE FOR THIS CATEGORY, PORN PROS (THE CURRENT NETWORK UNDER REVIEW) HAS ONE, TRICKY OLD TEACHER, OLD YOUNG ANAL, GRANDDADZ, AND A FEW OTHER SITES. THE SITES I MENTIONED ARE OLDER-MEN-WITH-YOUNG-WOMEN. THERE ARE ALSO OLDER-WOMEN-WITH-YOUNG-MEN SITES, AS WELL. MOST SITES IN THIS NICHE ARE SMALL. LESS THAN 100 SCENES. SOME OF THE MODELS IN THIS NICHE ARE SUPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEENS/EARLY TWENTY GIRLS. GETTING BACK TO THE JURASSIC COCK SITE SPECIFICS: THE VIDEOS CAN BE DOWNLOADED OR STREAMED. STREAMING IS OFFERED IN STANDARD AND HIGH DEFINITION. DOWNLOADS ARE OFFERED IN MP4 480P, MP4 1080P, WMV 1080P. A SIDE NOTE: THE TECHNICAL QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS POOR TO JUST OK. IF THE SCENE IS SHOT OUTSIDE, THERE ARE RANDOM NOISES THAT INTRUDE ON THE SOUNDTRACK. THE LIGHTING IS NATURAL LIGHING. THE SETS AND COSTUMES/CLOTHES ARE CHEAP. NO EFFORT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. AND THE STUNT COCKS (THE OLDER GUYS) ARE REAL SLOBS. THE OVERALL ATTRACTIVE OF THE MODELS IS BELOW THE STANDARD OF THE NETWORK AS A WHOLE. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO CHOOSE ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEEN-EARLY-TWENTY GIRLS. AS LONG AS THE GIRLS WERE YOUNG AND WILLING TO FUCK, THEY WERE ACCEPTABLE. AT SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS Massagecreep AND Realexgirlfriends, THE MODELS ARE BOTH YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE. REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 04-19-17  06:46am Replies (10) Review 212 Club Seventeen (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU DISOCUNTED MEMBERSHIP PRICE OF $10.51/MONTH RECURRING. -A HUGE AMOUNT OF CONTENT-PHOTOS AND VIDEOS. CLUB SEVENTEEN HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 1975, SO IT HAS THOUSANDS OF HARDCORE PHOTOS, THOUSANDS OF VIDEOS, THOUSANDS OF MODELS. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -MOST OF THE OLDER MATERIAL IS FROM CLUB SEVENTEEN. MUCH OF THE NEWER MATERIAL APPEARS TO BE LEASED CONTENT. YOU ALSO GET BONUS MATERIAL FROM OTHER PAYSITES LIKE NUBILES, METART, ETC. Cons: IMPORTANT CONS: -YOU CAN NOT CHOOSE YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD. THEY ARE ASSIGNED TO YOU. NOTE: THE JOIN PAGES STATE THAT THE LOGIN INFORMATION WILL BE SENT TO YOU BY EMAIL. HOWEVER, THE MEMBERSHIP CONFIRMING EMAIL THAT I RECEIVED, DID NOT SHOW MY LOGIN DETAILS, OR THE MEMBERSHIP PRICING. SO WRITE DOWN YOUR LOGIN DETAILS AND THE PRICING FROM THE JOIN PAGE. -NON STANDARD PAYMENT PROCESSOR: IMCBILL.COM. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE RELIABLE PROCESSORS. WHEN CCBILL OR EPOCH SENDS YOU A MEMBERSHIP CONFIRMING EMAIL, THEY INCLUDE YOUR LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE MEMBERSHIP PRICES YOU AGREED TO. -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE. THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES: THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED. THEY GIVE YOU A WARNING THAT IF YOU WANT TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, YOU DO SO THROUGH A NON-SECURE PAGE, THAT CAN BE HACKED. FUCK THEM. CONS CONTINUED BELOW: Bottom Line: STANDARD CONS (COMMON TO MANY PORN SITES): -PRE-CHECKED CROSS SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -MANY OF THE VIDEOS ARE NON-EXCLUSIVE. -GENERIC FILE NAMES. HAVE TO MANUALLY RENAME THE DOWNLOADED FILES TO CATEGORIZE THEM. -CANCELLATION CAN BE A PROBLEM. YOU DON'T GET A CONFIRMING EMAIL ON CANCELLATION, SO CANCELLATION STATUS IS UNCERTAIN. -NAVIGATION AND SITE STRUCTURE IS BASIC. YOU GET A LOT OF TINY THUMBNAILS, THAT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE MADE ?IN THE 1980s. THE THUMBNAILS ARE TINY, AND POOR QUALITY. -DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE OK. 2-3 MB/sec. NOT SLOW, NOT FAST. I NORMALLY GET 3-5 MB/sec AT MANY PORN SITES. MY RATED ISP MAX DOWNLOAD SPEED IS 6.25 MB/sec. -YOU CAN VIEW THE PHOTOSETS ONLINE IN A SLIDE SHOW. THE INDIVIDUAL PHOTOS ARE PRESENTED SMOOTHLY. HOWEVER, THE SIZE OF EACH PHOTO ONLY TAKES A SMALL PORTION OF THE COMPUTER SCREEN. SO IT'S MUCH BETTER TO DOWNLOAD THE PHOTOSET ZIP, AND VIEW THE PHOTOS OFFLINE. BOTTOM LINE: IT SEEMS THIS SITE HAS BEEN AROUND FOREVER. THEY ADVERTISE THEY'VE BEEN AROUND SINCE 1975. A TON OF HARDCORE TEEN CONTENT. FOUR MAIN PORTALS FOR CLUB SEVENTEEN -CLUB SEVENTEEN (THE MAIN SITE, VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS) -SEVENTEEN LIVE (LIVE CAM GIRLS) -BONUS ARCHIVE(VIDEOS FROM OTHER PAYSITES LIKE NUBILES, METART, ETC.) -DVD ARCHIVE (DVDs FROM CLUB SEVENTEEN, PLUS OTHER SITES) -I DON'T WANT TO BE OVERLY CRITICAL. BUT THE PHOTOSETS LOOK LIKE THEY WERE MADE BY AN AMATEUR BACK IN THE 1980s. IF YOU ARE INTO COLLECTING CLASSIC PORN, THE SITE PRESENTS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DOWNLOAD A BOATLOAD OF VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS. BUT THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS IS POOR, COMPARED TO WHAT IS BEING OFFERED AT MANY COMPETING PORN SITES. CLUB SEVENTEEN IS BEST VIEWED AS AN ARCHIVE SITE THAT HOLDS A HUGE AMOUNT OF LOW QUALITY CONTENT. THAT IS A SHAME. BUT ALSO AN OPPORTUNITY. BECAUSE OF THE VAST AMOUNT OF CONTENT OF MODELS FROM YEARS PAST. I ONLY WISH THE QUALITY WAS BETTER. THE GIRLS ARE MAINLY CUTE. BUT THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS ARE LOW-GRADE: CHEAP SETS, AMATEUR-STYLE VIDEOS. THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES THAT CATER TO THE EARLY-PORN OF THE 1990S AND EARLY 2000S. WHERE THEY HAVE CUTE GIRLS AND THE PHOTOS ARE MUCH BETTER QUALITY. THE NEWER MATERIAL, LIKE THE VIDEOS, ARE LOW-BUDGET VIDEOS WHERE THE SETS ARE CHEAP, THE CLOTHES ARE CHEAP, THE TYPE OF VIDEOS THAT TEEN MEGA WORLD MADE 10 YEARS AGO AND HAS SINCE MOVED ON TO MORE EXPENSIVE SETS, BETTER CAMERA-WORK, BETTER LIGHTING, MORE ATTENTION PAID TO THE APPEARANCE OF THE MODELS. THERE ARE FREE TUBE SITES WHERE MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE HIGHER QUALITY THAN THE VIDEOS AT CLUB SEVENTEEN. WHICH IS RIDICULOUS. WHY PAY FOR A SITE THAT GIVES YOU LOW-QUALITY PHOTOS AND VIDEOS WHEN YOU CAN GET BETTER QUALITY PHOTOS AND VIDEOS FOR FREE? HOWEVER, THEY DO HAVE THOUSANDS OF MODELS, MANY OF THEM EXTREMELY CUTE, AND YOU CAN BROWSE THROUGH THE MODEL LISTING TO SEE YOUR OLD FAVORITES HERE, IN GALLERIES AND VIDEOS. SO, IF YOU'RE NOT EXPECTING HIGH GRADE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS, AND WILL BE SATISFIED WITH A BOATLOAD OF HARDCORE TEEN PORN, CLUB SEVENTEEN MIGHT BE WORTH A ONE-MONTH MEMBERSHIP. OR NOT. 04-18-17  06:05am Replies (3) Review 213 Deep Throat Love (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -NO DOWNLOAD LIMIT. -NO STREAMING LIMIT. -DEEP THROAT LOVE IS PART OF THE PORN PROS NETWORK. SO MEMBERSHIP GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK (CURRENTLY 16 SITES). -LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT DUE TO INACTIVITY. -CAN USE PAYPAL OR EPOCH AS THE PRIMARY BILLER. BOTH ARE TRUSTED NAMES. -CHOICE OF STREAMING IN STANDARD OR HD QUALITY. -CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD DEFINITION OF 480P, 720P, OR 1080P. -THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD CAMERA WORK, GOOD FRAMING, GOOD LIGHTING, -THE MODELS ARE YOUNG, ATTRACTIVE, LATE TEENS OR EARLY TWENTIES. Cons: -CAPTCHA REQUIRED TO LOG-IN TO SITE. -HAVE TO ACCEPT/DECLINE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PREMIUM STATUS FOR $70 TO ENTER MEMBERS AREA. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. -SITE UPDATES WITH 1 NEW VIDEO PER MONTH. -ONLY 1 NEW VIDEO PER WEEK FOR THE NETWORK, EVEN THOUGH THEY ADVERTISE 2 OR 3 NEW VIDEOS ADDED TO THE NETWORK EVERY WEEK. I SUSPECT THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE FINANCIAL DOWNTURN IN PORN THAT STARTED AROUND 2008, THAT HAS HIT ALMOST ALL PORN SITES. -QUITE OFTEN, YOU STREAM A VIDEO AND IT STOPS WITH THE ERROR MESSAGE: html5: Network error. Bottom Line: THERE ARE CURRENTLY 16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK (ALTHOUGH THEY ADVERTISE 24 SITES, THEY HAVE ELIMINATED SOME SITES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS). THE SITE NAMES, WITH THE NUMBER OF UPDATES, AS OF 2017-03-12: 18yearsold - 489 Updates 40ozbounce - 119 Updates Cockcompetition - 40 Updates Crueltyparty - 64 Updates Deepthroatlove - 294 Updates Disgraced18 - 21 Updates Eurohumpers - 21 Updates Flexiblepositions - 27 Updates Freaksofboobs - 62 Updates Freaksofcock - 183 Updates Jurassiccock - 80 Updates Massagecreep - 210 Updates Pimpparade - 33 Updates Realexgirlfriends - 588 Updates Shadypi - 97 Updates Teenbff - 236 Updates SITE THEME: BLOWJOBS. WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TAKING IT DEEP. ALTHOUGH THE THEME IS DEEP THROATING, IT IS NOT THE EXTREME GONZO VERSION WHERE THE GIRL IS GAGGING ON THE COCK, WITH HER MAKEUP ALL SMEARED. THE GIRLS ARE EXPERIENCED ENOUGH TO TAKE IT WITHOUT A LOT OF DISCOMFORT, AND THE STUNT COCKS ARE NOT BEING ROUGH OR BRUTAL. THAT MIGHT BE A PLUS OR MINUS, DEPENDING ON THE VIEWER'S TASTE. PART OF THE VIDEO IS DEEP THROATING, BUT THERE IS ALSO SOME CUNNILINGUS, AND VAGINAL AND MAYBE ANAL INTERCOURSE. THE OWNERS HAVE BEEN CULLING THE NETWORK SITES. THE NUMBER OF SITES HAS DROPPED FROM 23 TO 16 FOR THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK IN THE LAST MONTH. ALSO, THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS AT SOME SITES HAS DROPPED. FOR EXAMPLE, DISGRACED 18 USED TO HAVE OVER 144 VIDEOS A FEW YEARS BACK, AND NOW ONLY HAS 21 VIDEOS. TBP REPORTED 360+ SCENES AT DEEP THROAT LOVE ON 2015-05-21, AND THE SITE NOW HAS 294 SCENES. PERSONALLY, I FOUND MOST VIDEOS I WATCHED WERE BORING. GIVE ME A HOT ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEO, OR A GLAMCORE VIDEO LIKE BLACKED OR X-ART, WITH GORGEOUS MODELS AND A SMALL PLOT TO MAKE THE SEX INTERESTING. THE DEEP THROAT LOVE VIDEOS JUST LACK HEAT OR IMAGINATION. THE MODELS MAKE A LOT OF MOANING NOISES, BUT THEY SEEM TO BE GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS. WITH NO REAL HEAT OR EXCITEMENT. SO EVEN THOUGH THE VIDEOS ARE CLEAR AND CRISP, WITH GOOD CAMERA-WORK AND GOOD LIGHTING, THE VIDEOS ARE JUST BLAH. NOTE: I'M NOT A FAN OF DEEP THROATING, SO THAT PROBABLY CONTRIBUTED TO MY UNDER-APPRECIATION OF THE SITE. IF YOU ARE A FAN OF DEEP THROATING, OR ESPECIALLY LIKE BLOW JOBS, YOU WOULD PROBABLY SCORE THE SITE HIGHER THAN I DID. SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE MORE INTERESTING: FOR EXAMPLE, MASSAGE CREEP IS AN EXCELLENT MASSAGE -THEMED SITE. AND 18 YEARS OLD AND REAL EX GIRL FRIENDS ARE BOTH GOOD TEEN SITES. GIVING THE SITE AND NETWORK A SCORE OF 79. THAT'S BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS, WHICH HAS OVER 2,000 HARDCORE VIDEOS, WITH HUNDREDS OF ATTRACTIVE MODELS. 03-13-17  10:40am Replies (0) Review 214 Babes Network.com (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large collection of attractive models, in their late teens or early twenties. -Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good editing, good lighting, good sound, etc. -Models are fairly clean: not a lot of tattoos or piercings, they are young. -Multiple choices for video downloads: ipod sp/480p/720p/1080p (MP4 format only). -No DRM. -No download limits. -No site timeout issues (that I am aware of. Can be logged in to site without activity for a long time.) -Content is exclusive. -The content (photo sets and videos) shows the posting date to site. Cons: -Some hot links lead to 404: Page not found error. Try clicking the hot link a second or third time to see if the video/set will come up. -Requires capcha to login (in addition to username and password). -Wish the listing of models was more basic: a simple, alphabetical list of the models. They do have lists, based on top rated/most viewed/my favorites, but it would be easier to search through the models if the list was alphabetical. -Not a lot of diversity in the models. They are basically white, young, attractive. Some PU members would wish for older models, different ethnicities, body types. -Uncheck the pre-checked trial membership offer (on the signup page), or you will be dinged for a membership you probably don't want. -There is a zip file for each photo set, but it comes in only 1 definition, not hi/medium/low definitions many sites offer. -The zip file for the photo set downloads with a numerical name. Need to rename each photo set file with the model's name, plus data. Bottom Line: This is a glamcore site, where attractive young females egage in solo, two-somes (m-f or f-f), or occasionally, three-some sex. I prefer the X-Art site over the Babes site. The X-Art videos seem to have more heat. The X-Art photos are just more stunning. These are both glamcore sites, but the X-Art experience is grade A, while the Babes experience is grade C. Am I being too harsh on Babes? It has fine models, but the content is just not up to the standards of X-Art. The navigation for X-Art is simpler than the Babes site. I sound like a shill for X-Art, but I am not. Whenever I join X-Art, I pay the full price for membership (except I do look around for discounts). I have joined X-Art multiple times with a 1-year membership, because I think it's worth the money. To join Babes for a 1-year membership would be a major waste of time and money. I joined Met-Art with a lifetime membership, because I think that site is exceptional. The Met-Art videos are boring, but the photo sets, and the models, can be lovely. Bottom line: If you want glamcore, join X-Art instead of Babes. 01-03-16  03:01pm Replies (0) Review 215 Sasha Blonde (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality. -Credit card processor: CCBILL. -Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching. -If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately. -Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Zip files for photosets. -Can stream or download videos. -The content (videos and photosets) are dated. Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value. -Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot. -No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling. Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn. But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates. SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites. If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha. Number of videos: 431+ Number of photosets: 528+ Most videos have several download options: WMV 1080p MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes. Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set. Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size. Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px. You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself. I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model. 08-21-12  02:32am Replies (6) Review 216 Nubile Girls HD (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Nice-sized thumbnail of the female model to illustrate each video. -Some cute models. -The girls are real teens, not twenty- or thirty-year olds trying to appear much younger. -Can add/view comments on videos and photosets. -Can rate the videos photosets. -Small watermark bottom right-hand corner of photos. -The videos are mainly clear and crisp, with adequate lighting. The videos and photosets are less gonzo style than the other sites in the network, but are not glamor-style, more like in-between gonzo and glamor style. Cons: -There is no search. Not a major problem because the site is so small. Only 75 videos so far. Can list the videos by name of model or by date posted (but date posted is not accurate or reliable). -Occasionally, a photo will not display when you click on the thumbnail, get an error message: "cannot be displayed, because it contains errors". -Hard to tell what the update rate is, because the posting dates are unreliable. -Only 1 size of file to download video (no choice of hi, mid, lo quality). -Videos download as WMV files (no other file extension choice). -Only 1 size of zip file to download photoset. -Limited types of models: they are all white Eastern European teens. Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site, with some good looking young teens. Sample size for the videos and photosets: Videos are 400 MB to 1 GB Photosets are 40 MB to 120 MB Currently 75 videos with a matching photoset for each video. Usually 1 video per model. A few models have 2 videos. Photos are crisp, but mainly to illustrate the video action; the photos are not artistic or glamor style such as the softcore photo sites like metart or mplstudios. The style of the photos is more natural than glamor. I personally don't like the photos, but some PU members might appreciate them: they are clear, usually crisp, hardcore photosets, with some really nice-looking models. Natural style of photography. The video and photoset are mainly hardcore boy-girl; a few sets are softcore or midcore, where the girl is solo or with a second girl. The photosets approach high quality in terms of photo size. But you don't actually get the quality of a met-art, mplstudios or other softcore photo site. I don't understand why it's so hard to make a quality hardcore photoset. This site has plenty of cute girls, doing hardcore, but the photography is poor or lacking: in the flesh colors of the girls, in the presentation of the girls, the girls just lack attractiveness or allure in the photos. I grew up in the days of Playboy and Penthouse. I didn't like every Playboy or Penthouse photoshoot, but in many cases, the girls/women looked extremely attractive, sexy, luscious, gorgeous, adorable, lovely. You don't get that in these photosets. You can find it in the met-art and mplstudios and other glamor teen sites. The problem is that the girls are not presented at their best. It's like you buy an off brand of some product you like, Cheerios, or Rice Crispies, and the taste is blah instead of what you get from the major brand. They don't use photoshop or airbrushing on these photos, and that's part of why I rate the photos lower. But it's also the skin tone of the models, the posing, the composition, everything that factors into how attractive or erotic a photograph is. The photosets are high quality in the size of the photos (each photo is 100 KB to 1 MB), but the quality of the photos is not up to the standards of the softcore glamor sites. Some of the models at this site are also at met-art, glamdeluxe, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. And they look much more attractive on the other sites, because of the photography or videography. If this site is included in your network membership, you should definitely check the site out. Some models here (mainly the same ones shown on many of the other sites in the network) are very attractive, the videos are shot less gonzo style, the photosets are worth looking at. 08-07-10  08:09pm Replies (14) Review 217 Teen Stars Only (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM -No download limit -No site timeout -Exclusive content for about 1/2 of the sites in the network. -Exclusive content for the teenstarsonly site. -File download options: hi, medium, low quality WMV MP4 ( Portable Devices ) MOV ( Quicktime Video ) -Zip files for the photosets Cons: -Limited search options: Can search by name of model, or by date of update. But can't search by description of model, by description of type of sex action. -Clumsy navigation. -Going from one of the network sites to another is clumsy. -Trying to see/search the vid files on a site is clumsy. -Advertising for other sites on each page. -Poor file names. Files are named with a number and the suffix "high", "medium", or "low", depending on whether you download the high, medium or low quality file. But if you want to know who the model is, or a short description of the action, you have to manually make up your own file record. -You need a fast connection to play the flash files. My ISP connection downloads at 150-160 Kb/s, so I could not play the videos by flash. The flash video would stutter and stop, stutter and stop. So to see what the video was like, I had to download the entire video, then play the file. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): -Because I have a slow ISP connection (150-160 Kb/s download speed), it takes almost 2 hours to download a single video in high quality. -The video files are fairly large size: One sample movie, 25 minutes runtime: Full Movie ( High Quality ) - ( 989.56 Mb) Full Movie ( Medium Quality ) - (500.93 Mb) Full Movie ( Low Quality ) - (301.81 Mb) Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site. Mainly a video site. There is a large photoset for each video, but there is little to no erotic or artistic quality to the photos, they are more like video captures of the hardcore action. The models can be very attractive: they are young, slender, Eastern European teens, but you can't easily see how attractive they are, it's goddamn hard to see what the faces of these girls are like: the head is often cut out of the picture, the body, even though young, slender and attractive, is not made to look attractive. It's gonzo video and gonzo photography, and there's no erotic value to the photos, little erotic value to the videos, which are hardcore meat factory fuck and suck. Site is part of a nice-sized network. This site hasn't updated since March 2010, but other sites in the network are updating. 08-01-10  07:33pm Replies (11) Review 218 Tranny Pros (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Niche: She-males. -Exclusive content: Yes. -Watermark: small watermark bottom right corner. -Delivery: ---download high or low quality WMV files. ---stream high or low quality. -DRM: No. -Download restrictions: No. -Screencaps: Yes. -Search: by series, movie title, or actor. -Updates: 1 scene per week. Cons: -Only WMV format for download. -No photosets (except for screencaps). -Almost all the models have a blank thumbnail in the directory, so you don't have an easy way to see what the models look like. Bottom Line: Site Stats: Clips: 122 Hours: 60 Total Size: 54 Gb -Stats for videos: -Bit rate: 2148 kbps (varies slightly) -Dimensions: 720x480, 720x528 -Average length of scene: about 30 minutes The style of the video is like a home-made video, the visual quality, focus, color, lighting, etc. are not as good as the standard for most of the video clips on the network, the producers are going for a "real-life, guy meets trannies (guy with one or two trannies) and they have sex almost immediately. No plot or story, just sex, the "production values" are slightly less than the standard videos at the network in a deliberate attempt to make the video seem like a slice of life, a real-life capture of a sexual encounter between the male customer and 1 or 2 tranny prostitutes, instead of a planned movie. One improvement over many porn clips is there are less fake moans and groans from the models and male performers in these clips. This site of she-males is for someone who wants a change from the usual boy-girl, girl-girl action. Definitely a different type of attraction. Somewhat confusing at first, there is emotional reaction positive and negative when watching these she-male performers. The overall attractiveness of the performers at this site is OK to nice. I've seen photos where some she-males are exceptionally pretty or even lovely, which can do strange things to your mind. You're thinking, is this a man or a woman, and am I strange for thinking this "person" is attractive, whatever it is. Gay is gay, straight is straight, and this is neither. Also makes you start to think you yourself are not exactly what you thought you were either. There are many she-males at the site that, at first glance, even second glance, you don't know if they are females or not, until they drop their drawers. They can be attractive. As for the male models in the scenes, you don't know how to classify them either: are the male models bi, or what? I'd guess bi, because they (the male models) are swinging both ways with 1 or more she-males. The site is a collection of Devils Films videos that were shot for the Devils Films series titled "Transsexual Prostitutes". Those videos were collected and used to make Trannypros.com. The main benefit of membership in Trannypros.com is that it gives you access to all 19 sites in the netFameSolutions network. That means over 9700 clips, almost 3200 GB, for a broad selection of general and niche content. The network is a good value for the PU/TBP special price of $14.95/month, and there are special offers at times that give you an even lower price. The general quality of the video clips at the network is good, professional quality. This is a video network, with only limited photosets, but a solid offering for the price. 07-31-09  01:21pm Replies (0) Review 219 Mother Fucker XXX (0) 79.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -On the promo/preview page, you see the statement, "Here, everyday is Mother's day!". With an introduction like that, how can a site like motherfuckerxxx possibly help being part of the American way of life, right up there with Superman, apple pie, and Mom's little chocolate cookies? -This is a MILF site.(In today's world, America's favorite pastime is one's mother, not the girl next door that Playboy made famous). -Site updates once a week with 1 DVD scene. -content: over 125 clips/scenes. -scenes about 13 to 42 minutes long. -screenshots, 40-90 nice-sized screenshots to clearly illustrate each scene. -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Easy log-on. Cons: -WMV format only for download. -No zip file for the sceenshot pictures illustrating each single clip (but no one wants to save these screenshots on their PC anyway). -No picture photosets. No high or even medium quality pix. -Limited search engine: Can use the search engine to search by model name. Can not use search engine for physical characteristics of the model, movie title, series, or type of sex. -A major negative: The name of the model may not be listed for the clip. Bottom Line: This is a niche site for MILF. The video quality of clips is OK to good. The site is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value. Network access includes access to 19 different sites: -over 1500 movies -over 500 full DVDs -exclusive content -unlimited download -daily updates Giving the site a score of 79. Most of the value of the site comes from network access (entry to all 19 sites). The network as a whole is a good value for the price, with some sites having really nice videos, but this site is one of the smaller sites in the network. 07-18-09  03:53pm Replies (0) Review 220 Fister Twister (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Secure login page (https). -Secure member pages (https). -Nice model index. 2 forms of the model index: 1: Pages with about 20 models each, name and thumbnail of model. 2. An alphabetical listing of the model by name (no thumbnail, but hot link to model's page, which has a nice-sized thumbnail of the model, plus links to whatever videos she appears in. -All content is supposed to be exclusive. This has to be modified: content shot for the site is exclusive, but they also use some content from other sites, such as Wet and Puffy, which is obviously not exclusive. -No download limits. -Each video has a matching photoset. The photosets are nice-quality photos. The videos can be streamed and/or downloaded in multiple definitions: -You get a confirming email on signup from Vendo (if that is the payment processor you used) with your billing details: Cons: -small site. No bonus material. -currently 91 models. Most appear to be late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos on most of the models. -There is a small amount of data given for a model: Name, nationality, age, breast size, weight, height. -2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page. -Your login details (username and password) are pre-selected by the site. Bottom Line: Site theme: lesbian fisting and twisting (turning your fist in the girl's pussy). The site design is clean: the scenes are shot in a white room, with white furniture and white sheets on a white bed, making the girls stand out clearly. There is teasing, kissing and caressing, and the use of different tools to stimulate and widen the pussy. I'm not into lesbian tools, but there are speculums, forceps, dildoes, vibrators. This is a small site: You should be able to watch all the videos in a month. Or if you pick and choose, you can scan the contents in less than a week. $9.95 for 1 month then $29.95 every month until cancelled. The first month is cheap. But why you would want to renew is beyond me. Since this is a small site, with a slow update rate, and no bonus sites to explore. I'm giving the site a score of 78. That is because of the small content. However, the videos are photo sets are good quality, and most of the videos are exclusive. So if you are into lesbian fisting, it might be worth a join, since the first month is only $9.95. But I personally prefer sites with more content, or with bonus sites you can enjoy. The models are mainly slender white teen/early twenties girls, not a lot of tattoos. But the videos, even though professionally shot, don't have a lot of heat or passion. Not much eroticism. So I recommend looking for a more satisfying site to spend your membership dollars. If you are into lesbian fisting, I recommend reading PU member MargulisAZ's review and comments on the site, Fister Twister, since he seems to be a fan of the niche and has written an excellent review of the site and a couple of worthwhile comments. That will give you a better flavor of what the site offers, it's pros and cons. My interest is more superficial, and I thought the site was disappointing, in spite of it's low price. 07-23-18  09:29am Replies (0) Review 221 Fucked Hard GFs (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Epoch is the biller, a trusted name. -The main value of Fucked Hard GFs comes from the PornMasterMind network access. You get full access to four main sites: EpicSex FuckedHard18 FuckedHardGFs MassageGirls18 -You also get random samples from many other partner sites. The samples give you a flavor of those other sites. So you can have a better idea of whether those other sites are worth joining. (I list the sites you get sample videos from in the Bottom Line section). -The four main sites at PornMasterMind feature young porn models in their late teens, early twenties. Most of the models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot. Cons: -Expensive. Price is $29.95/month (recurring). No PU/TBP discount. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. 1-day trial at $1.00 to realitysexnetwork.com converts to a $38.89/month membership. Uncheck the trial offer unless you think realitysexnetwork is worth $38.89. -Archive site. The latest update appears to be one video from April 2015. In the updates section, there is one video from April 2015, one video from December 2014, one video from October 2013, one video from April 2011. -Poor navigation. Site structure is clumsy and takes a lot of mouse clicks to see what the site contents include. -Hard to view all the videos at the site. Hard to determine the number of videos at the site. Hard to determine the exact update rate (other than updates appear to be extremely rare). -The streaming software is primitive. If you stream a video, and try to fast forward, the screen turns blue or green. Bottom Line: -You get random samples from many other partner sites, that will give you a flavor of those other sites. Bangable ElegantRaw GirlsDoPorn GloryholeSwallow HarmonyVision JeffsModels JulesJordan MrPOV MrSkin NubileFilms Nubiles-Porn Nutabu PetiteHDPorn PuffyNetwork The site theme for FuckedHardGFs, as shown by the video content, appears to be young porn models appearing naked: they might take a shower, masturbate, or have sex. But, in truth, there does not appear to be any unifying theme other than showing naked girls. Let me expand that: the idea of the site is that these videos are supposed to be from ex-boyfriends who are selling these "homemade videos" to the internet to make some extra money off their former girlfriends. So the boyfriends are not only getting extra money, but they are also getting revenge on the ex-girlfriends by exposing them on the internet. This is a popular niche. However, you would not get that slant from watching the videos. You get that slant from the title of the site. So if the title of the site rocks your boat, then that gives the videos a spicy thrill. In contrast, if you watch the tushy.com and blacked.com videos (competing paysites), their videos spend a couple minutes or more setting up the basic plot of the video. That setup/plot adds to the value/fantasy of the video, because it gives the sex more meaning. Tushy.com, blacked.com, and vixen.com are three paysites from the same owners, who are creating paysites where effort is spent on making the models as attractive as possible, as well as choosing their models for the physical beauty, and making sexy videos with a slight plot that builds the sex into a performance. The settings, camera-work, sound control, costumes, etc. are first-rate. So those 3 sites empasize a glamour-style shoot. I think of Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen as glamcore, in their approach to porn. Except that there is not a lot of romance in the plots. The videos are basically supposed to show one or more girls who are attracted to a man and they fuck. It's not very romantic, but it is several steps above gonzo porn. Is it worth joining Fucked Hard GFs or the network? I give the site/network a lukewarm recommendation. FuckedHard18 is probably the best site of the network, because it's a good massage site. The girls are attractive, the sex can be hot. The other 3 main sites are OK, but nothing special. The random samples from the partner sites gives you a taste of those sites. Which is nice. I'm giving the site/network a score of 78. For a price of $29.95/month, it's expensive. A lower price would give you more value for your money. 10-17-16  11:43pm Replies (0) Review 222 Naughty Bookworms (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo). -The female porn star's name is given for each video. -The posting date is given for each video. -The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw. -All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video. -There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex? Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC. -There is no zip file for the earliest galleries. -But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway? -Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download. -Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness. -Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive. Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive. This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire. -Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection. -Quality of the older videos is poor. Bottom Line: Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex. Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries. Naughty Bookworms is part of the Naughty America network. So membership in Naughty Bookworms gives full access to Naughty America, and vice versa. This is a large site, with 514 videos. You also gain access to the Naughty America network of 37 sites, with over 4,000 scenes. So if you like your sex raw and crude, Naughty Bookworms (and Naughty America) has a huge amount of content for you to sample. I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude. I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine. Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price. 06-06-16  05:25am Replies (0) Review 223 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Nice PU discount for first month of $9.95. But recurs at $29.95/mo. -No DRM. -Videos are good quality for a DVD site. You don't get the high definition found at some sites, but the definition is good, the camera-work is good, good focus, no jitters in the video, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. I wish there were less fake moans and groans of excitement, but it's not as bad as some sites. -Recent update rate is one video per week. But starting in January 2012, there were no updates for almost 4 months. -There is a dropdown listing of the site models. But it would be easier to search a stationary list, where the models were presented alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like, with hot links to her appearances at that site, and to other sites in the network. Cons: -There is a listing of sites the model appears at. But to play or download her videos at another site in the network, you have to manually log in to each different site, and then do a search for her videos at that site. So searching for model appearances is difficult, and time-consuming. -No model biography. -Videos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -Photos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt many members would want to keep these photos anyway, except for one photo to show what the model looks like. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross sale at signup, or you will be charged a trial membership in another site. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of videos: 557 Number of high definition videos: 56 Streaming options: 240p 480p 540p (if the 540p is available). Download options: WMV files: 240p; 480p MP4 files: 240p; 480p; 540p (if available); 720p (if available); 1080p (if available). Most videos have the 240p and 480p. 56 videos have the higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Video length: 3 to 31 minutes. By watching these videos, you can learn a lot about how to deal with models. For example, in a video titled "Cleaning Cock!", Ashlyn Rae, a pretty model, wants to buy a new dress. So a guy hires her to clean his house. Once she finishes cleaning, he offers to pay her in cum. And she says she loves cum. And he says "Well, that's good because he has lots of cum". So then she gives him a blow job and they fuck. PU members can use this line on their girlfriends, and save lots of money. Not only does he pay her in cum, but when she asks for a tip, he says it was included in the cum he already gave her. I was a member of this site before. My impression is that the videos were upgraded. They look better than what I remembered. This is an impression, because I don't have the videos I downloaded from my previous membership. They have photosets illustrating the videos. But the photosets are screencaps of the video. And the number of photos in each photoset varies. One photoset has 3 photos. Another has 43 pics. Another has 97. The photosets are useful for showing what the model looks like. But they have little artistic or erotic value. You can click on a thumbnail of a photo and get a larger thumbnail. There is an option to enlarge the thumbnail to full-sized screen. Sometimes it takes several clicks on the "expand the image" icon to enlarge to full-sized screen picture. The site theme is teen-to-early-twenty girls having hardcore sex. They usually have a brief story introduction setting up the sex, but the story is brief and has little value. You can search the site by 3 main categories: 1. By series. For example: Couples Seduce Teens; Fresh Euro Flesh; Latin Eye Candy; Masters of Reality Porn; etc. 2. By type of sex. For example: Anal; Ass to mouth; Blowjob; Cream pie; Cum swallow; Cumshot; Cumswapping; Cunilingus; Deep throat; Double Blowjob; Double Penetration; Lesbian; etc. 3. By name of model. This is a large DVD site. It's part of the netFameSolutions network. You get access to this site and about 20 other sites by joining through the Devils Film site for $9.95 for the first month (using the PU discount). The main sites in the network include: Devils Film;Peter North DVD;Rocco Siffredi;Silverstone DVD;Silvia Saint Those main sites include tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. And the smaller sites include 1,000s of hardcore videos covering many different niches. So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get access to a huge amount of hardcore videos. 06-09-12  11:21pm Replies (4) Review 224 Teen Sex Reality (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips. -Models listed for each clip. -Content is dated. -Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days. -DRM: no. -Easy login. -Site timeout: no. -Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings). -Multiple choices for download formats: --WMV: high, medium, low quality. --MPEG. --QuickTime. Cons: -No streaming option. -No photosets. -Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable. -No bios for models. -Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size. -Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. -Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted. Bottom Line: The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts. The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead. You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working. This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen. Currently 275 video clips. Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes. Most of the action is boy-girl. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines. There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer. This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment. My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke. The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos. When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites. 11-23-10  11:54am Replies (0) Review 225 Tin Seks (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Download limits: none. -DRM: none. -Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently. One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot. -To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process. -Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated. Cons: -Streaming: Not available. -Zips for photosets: Not available. -Photos available in 1 size only. -Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls. -Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites. -Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless. Bottom Line: Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen. The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot. It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent. So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be. But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted. Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site: The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex. -Site contents: 94 videos 94 photosets -Videos can be downloaded in different formats: WMV: low, medium, high resolution MPG MOV The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file: Frame width x frame height: 720x576 Total bitrate: 4128kbps The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos. The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus. I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection, something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want something beyond her getting banged. I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site. 11-14-10  09:53am Replies (0) Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.