Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 226 Teen Pies (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP discount of $17.87/month (recurring). -Membership in site gives access to most of the Team Skeet network - except for the Team Skeet network sites that have an "Unlock" label, which require extra payment to access those sites. -The site (and network) have some nice features: -The videos can be downloaded in different definitions: low, medium, high. -The videos can be streamed in different definitions: low, medium, high. -You can choose to stream or download the entire scene, or selected clips from the scene. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Epoch and CCBill are the billers. Both are trusted names. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Unlock sites in the Team Skeet network are listed with the regular sites that you have access to with your membership. The Unlock sites require extra fees. If you unlock one of the videos, I don't know if you are paying for that specific video, or if you are paying for access to the entire Unlock site. I also don't know the the actual fees charged. Either way, I'm not interested in paying extra money beyond my membership in Team Skeet network. -Small site. Only 64 scenes. -Recent update rate is 1 video per month. Several months ago it was 2 videos per month. -Search: If you search by the model's name, it returns the network sites she is featured in (excluding the "Unlock" sites). However, to watch the model's videos at those sites, you need a few more mouse clicks, So navigation could be simplified. Bottom Line: Site stats: Scenes: 64. Galleries: 64 (1 matching gallery for each video). Site theme: teens getting a cream pie. Bottom line for the site: This is a small site, only 64 scenes. But the videos are professionally shot: Good lighting, good camera-work, etc. And you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. There are 24 sites you gain access to with a membership in the Team Skeet network. These are the "Unlocked" sites: CFNM Teens Dyked Exxxtra Small Her Freshman Year Innocent High Lust HD My Babysitters Club Oye Loca POV Life Rub A Teen Self Desire She's New Solo Interviews Step Siblings Team Skeet Extras Teen Curves Teen Pies Teens Do Porn Teens Love Anal Teens Love Money Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack There are 6 "Unlock" sites--that you can pay extra for--in the Team Skeet network: BFFS Daughter Swap Family Strokes Punish Teens Sis Loves Me Teens Love Black Cocks Most of the "Unlock" sites are the smaller sites in the network. Ranging from 19 scenes to 65 scenes. I don't know the precise cost to unlock those sites, but it seems like an expensive way to get more scenes. You are better off joining a different site with more content, in my opinion. Overall, the Team Skeet network is worth joining: You get a large amount of videos. Most are professionally shot. There are a large amount of cute teen models. However, not much effort is put into making these teens attractive: You can find many of these teens at competing sites, looking much better. X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, to name a few sites, make an exceptional effort to make their models look attractive. The same model, appearing in one of the Team Skeet sites, might look OK, but if she appears at X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy, she will normally appear outstanding. It's not quite the difference between night and day, but more like the difference between late afternoon and night: It's the same girl, but she's fucking desirable at the X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy sites, and she's nothing special at most of the Team Skeet sites. Even though it's the same model. X-Art, Blacked, and Tushy, put a special effort into making quality porn. Team Skeet pushes quantity over quality. However, there are a large number of hardcore teen videos at Team Skeet that are worth watching. And the price is right, with a PU $17.87 discount for 1 month membership. Giving the site (and Team Skeet network access) a score of 85. I'm deducting points for: the cross-sell on the join page; search could be streamlined; "Unlocked" sites are added expense; more effort should be put into making the models attractive. 07-31-16  03:07am Replies (0) Review 227 Teen Sex Fusion (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Some attractive models. -Photosets are a visual record of a video shoot. -Captcha very easy to read, and can be entered in either uppercase or lowercase. -Site is currently updating. -Have high quality videos (nice, clear definition, good lighting, etc.) -Access to public chats, paid private chats -Planning on making blu-ray DVDs of scenes available Cons: -Only 1 size picture for the photoset. -No zip file for photosets. -No streaming option for videos. -A small amount of duplicate files from other TonyBucks network sites. -High quality videos are large, 1-2GB+ Bottom Line: This is a teen hardcore site. Apparently 1 video a and matching photoset for each session. The photoset is apparently photos taken during a video shoot. Most of the action is 1 boy-1 girl, or 2 boys-2 girls. But there is also some 2 boys-1 girl. Video download options: WMV: high, medium, low quality MPEG QuickTime WMV high quality: 1440x1080, 8256 kbps 1920x1080, 6256 kbps The videos are mainly crisp definition, good lighting, good skin tones on the models, little background noise (no music track, not a lot of random noise from the street as sirens or car sounds or whatever). The sets are simple: bedroom or living room. The models are all late teen or very early 20s. Very little tattoos on the female models, very little piercings. Denner mentioned in a reply there is duplication of video files at different TonyBucks sites. He stated that some of these videos can be also be found at non-TonyBucks sites as well, such as TeenMegaWorld sites. I've seen some videos which were posted at more than one TonyBucks site. But even though I've been a member of TeenMegaWorld a couple of times, there is material I never bothered to look through, and Denner's hardcore experience is far greater than mine. Does that make him a porn hound? Is that a compliment? Perhaps we should rather call him a connoisseur of hardcore porn. But he seems to slurp it down in large quantities. You only have to look at his PU score (currently 208), and realize his devotion to porn is extremely serious. Denner claims to be Danish, but his enthusiasm seems to be Teutonic. I always thought the Danes were supposed to be laid back and casual, but he is hardcore to the core. (Either I am channeling Wittyguy's PU Forum Awards, or some evil spirit has overcome me momentarily.) :) As a pro feature, I mentioned there is access to public and private chats. I got away from chats a few years ago. I was spending too much time watching the girls at Met-art chats. Public chats were free. There were some very attractive, friendly girls at Met-art chats. I was just spending too much time at the public shows. But here is another entry to those chats: some very pretty girls put on softcore shows. It's easy to get addicted to these shows and spend hours watching the girls. Some people find the chats boring, since they are softcore. But I enjoy them too much, and don't want to get hooked again. There is a current bonus offer that allows you access to differing numbers of bonus sites, depending on which site you join through. Use the SpunkyBee site to join through: $29.95 for 30 days membership 10 sites included in your membership (including 18Stream) Use the 18Stream site to join through: $34.95/month for 30 days membership 3 sites in your membership If the site were a solo offering, it would be extemely expensive. But with the current bonus offer of up to 10 of the TonyBucks sites for the price of one, this is a worthwhile network to join. 09-20-10  12:17pm Replies (0) Review 228 Teen Sex Mania (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Teen Sex Mania is part of one of my favorite hardcore teen networks: Teen Mega World. -Join any one of the satellite sites, and you get access to the entire network. However, be aware: if you join one of the satellite sites, instead of joining through the main Teen Mega World site, you will have navigation and search problems: (I'm putting this in the pro section, because it's such an important issue, that needs to be understood. If I put this in the con section, or the bottom line, a reader might overlook my recommendation). If you join through the Teen Mega World site itself, there are two main advantages: -One, transferring from one site to another is easy. -Two, the search for a model's contents returns her contents at the entire network. If you join through one of the satellite sites: -One, you have to log in to the site you joined. You can't log in directly to the main Teen Mega World site. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): This means, under the current network structure, that when you try to transfer to a different site in the network, the transfer is partial: you are still logged in to the site you joined, even though you have tried to transfer to a different site in the network. This makes searching the contents of the site you have partially logged in to much harder, because you are still connected to the join site. -Two, even more important: Joining through a satellite site means your search is limited to the site you joined. Whether you are logged in to the site you joined, or try to log in to a different site in the network, the only results for a model's contents will be her contents at the site you joined. The search does not cover the entire network of 33 sites. If you join through one of the satellite sites, the search would take a massive amount of time and effort to find all of the model's content at the network. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): So do yourself a favor and join through the Teen Mega World site directly. That makes using the network navigation and search so much easier. Note: I joined through Teen Sex Movs, and didn't discover the problems of navigation and search until after I joined. The navigation and search problems are a result of the last site structure update. I don't think the TMW (Teen Mega World) staff realizes the problems the update caused, because there is no network blog where members can complain or discuss problems with the network. However, the TMW staff was kind enough to give me a separate membership in TMW, since I was already paying for a membership in Teen Sex Movs. That enabled me to use the network more easily. -Teen Sex Mania is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. Membership in any one of the satellite sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. No premium fees needed for special sites, or for downloading privileges. -Unlimited downloading. -Unlimited streaming. -In the last few years, the newest updates to the network have been in ultra 4K definition. With lower definitions, as well. -They started a VR site a few years ago for the network. -The mix of models range from plain to attractive to extremely attractive. The models are mainly late teen, early twenties girls from Eastern Europe. Almost all white, mainly slender, cute to fucking attractive. This is not a glamcore network, but the catalog of girls would compete with any hardcore site on the internet. The girls are young, fresh, and seem to enjoy exploring their sexual freedom: As I said, this is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks, along with the former Diesel Access network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). -PU has a discounted membership price of $14.95/month (recurring). But remember to join through the TMW site itself, and not through Teen Sex Mania or any of the other satellite sites. -Vendo is the main credit card processor. Normally I prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. -Each video has a photo gallery. The gallery is composed of screen caps, but the screen caps for many of the sites are of excellent quality, due to the quality of the software program that uses the video to make screen caps. The quality is not quite MetArt or MPL Studios quality, but the quality is good to excellent: The photos are crisp and clear, mainly well lighted, focused, and since the girls can be attractive to very attractive, these are quality photo galleries that can be collected: the girls are that attractive, the photos are that good. -The site updates with 1 video per month (approximately). The network has a daily update of 1 video per day. But with about 33 sites in the network, most sites don't get an update, or get a very irregular update. Cons (start of): -Remember to join through the TMW main site. This will make navigation easier, and the search much easier. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites. -Many of the sites do not update. The system is to start a site, update a short while, then forget about updates. I assume this is to increase the number of sites in the network, to make the network more attractive. But if you really enjoy the niche of one of the sites that is not updating, this can be irritating. Or they can stop updating for a couple of years, and then start updating that site again. On a random basis. -The videos from years ago, and the photo sets, are of lower quality. This is true for many hardcore porn sites. Less money spent on sets, costumes, photo equipment, etc. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site has 398 videos (with matching photo galleries). That makes the site fairly large. Add the rest of the network, which includes 33 sites (32 if you exclude the main TMW site which is the network hub), and you get a wide variety of teen niches. 1,383 teen models, many of which are attractive or cute to really attractive. 5,085 hardcore videos. So, on a quantity basis, you get more than your money's worth. Since most of the models are attractive to very attractive, the value of the content increases. And the quality of the videos (and the photo galleries) is good to very good. You don't get the super-fine glamour style that X-Art or Blacked or Tushy or Vixen aims for, but what you get is fine young East European teens that are getting off in hardcore videos, many of which are hotter than the Blacked, Tushy, Vixen videos, because the TMW models really seem to be getting off on the sex. Whereas the Blacked, Tushy and Vixen videos are more staged, less real passion. I'm giving the Teen Sex Mania a score of 92, because of network access. If you didn't have the network access to the rest of the TMW network, the score would be much lower. I find some of the models at TMW some of my favorite models on the internet. They can be attractive to fucking attractive, and they seem to enjoy the sex, which makes the action even hotter. 01-22-19  03:49pm Replies (0) Review 229 Teen Sex Movs (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -668 scenes (and matching photo sets). This is a large site. -A large number of very attractive models. Sheri Vi, Shelby, Kamila, Caroline, Milana Fox, and so many other lovelies you want to bounce on for yourself. -PU discounted price of $14.95/month. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Excellent download speeds. I average 2 to 3 MB/sec. -Download managers work. -Scenes with most variations of girls with boys: 1 girl-1 boy; 1 girl-2 boys; 2 girls-2 boys; 3 girls-1 boy. -Multiple choice of definition to download the video. -Zip file for the matching photo set for each scene. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -If you think slender white teens are attractive, this site is for you. But if you want greater variety in the models, or don't enjoy slender white teens having sex, this site is not for you. It's a matter of personal taste. I think most of the models at the site are attractive to very attractive. Some of the models are great looking to lovely. This is not a glamcore site, so the models are not presented at their most attractive, but their youth, freshness, and general physical appeal are undeniable. -There's almost no plot in the scenes. It's basically teens fucking. There's very little romance or tease or eroticism. X-Art is glamcore. That site tries to present fucking with glamor. Teen Sex Movie is bread-and-butter sex. Very little glamor, but a lot of fucking. Bottom Line: The site is an excellent value for hardcore teen sex. You get 668 scenes (and matching photo sets) for $14.95/month. You also get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network, which means access to over 4,000 scenes. -I've read some comments by people who don't enjoy this site. They complain that the models are too thin. That the models are poor performers, who don't give a convincing performance that the sex is real. The models are not professional actors. The models are young teenage girls who are fucking, giving blowjobs, whatever. This is porn. -The James Bond movies, and most movies, are fiction. It's not real. You want to criticize the movies as fiction, go ahead. Porn is fiction. It's meant to be enjoyed. A lot of the value of the porn comes from the audience. If you want great acting, don't bother watching most porn. -Personally, I think the slender white Eastern European models at Teen Sex Movies (and the Teen Mega World network Teen Sex Movies is part of) are mainly attractive to very attractive. The scenes are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control. The scripts are basic or meaningless. You are watching young people having sex. If you like watching this, the site is excellent. You get a fantastic amount of scenes (over 4,000 scenes in the network) for a very low price. But if you want glamcore, or some other type of porn, look elsewhere. Giving the site a score of 92. Could they improve the site? Certainly. If they would send over to my house some of the best-looking models, I would increase the score to 95. Maybe even 99. 03-18-16  06:17am Replies (4) Review 230 Teen Sex Movs (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Discounted price of $19.95/month thru PU/TBP. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good download speeds (My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, and I regularly get that speed downloading files from this site without a download manager). -Can use a download manager. I can use DownThemAll here. -Large selection of attractive white Eastern European teens. Mainly slender girls with small breasts, but some models with medium breasts. -Little to no tattoos or piercings on the models. -Most of the recent videos are professionally shot: ok to good lighting, camera-work, focus, colors of skintones, foreground and background. -Choice of 3 download options for videos: high, medium, low quality WMV files. -Streaming option. -Photosets (which are a photo capture of a video shoot) have a single zip option. -Content is dated. -There is a model list with a nice-sized thumbnail for each female, that has a link to the model's videos and photosets. Cons: -Cons are mostly minor. -No storyline or plot. A boy and girl fuck. Maybe say a few words before fucking, but no buildup or tease or stripping before the sex. -Little variation in scenery: fucking takes place in bedroom, bathroom, or some other room indoors. -No costumes to add color to scene (models wear drab street clothes which come off within a minute or two for fucking. -Older videos are not as good as the more recent ones shot the last few years. Older videos usually don't have the good camera-work, higher definition, etc. But there is a ton of newer material that is very good quality at this site and at the bonus sites. -No model bios. -Search is basic. Can search by model name, which shows her material at the network. -Default filename for downloaded video or photoset is a useless number: for example, 315.sethigh.wmv and 315.setall.zip for the most recent video and accompanying photoset posted. Bottom Line: Number of videos: 560. Number of photosets: 560. High quality video (for newer content): Width x height 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4224 kbps Video runtime: 20-30+ minutes. The older content from several years ago is much lower in quality. Photo: Size: 120-160 KB. Width x height: 960-1440 pixels. Resolution: horizontal x vertical: 300 x 300 dpi. Number of photos per photoset: 150-200 The individual photos at this set are better quality than the average photo at the network. I think they hired a photographer who knew what he was doing, for a change. These are basically good quality photos: in focus, framing and skin tone. The photos are not the artistic or top quality you get at Met-art or MPL Studios, but they are much better than the often blurry, screen-cap photos found at some of the bonus sites. Updates: Irregular update rate for this single site. One new video about every 3-7 days. Most of the bonus sites do not update. But with the ones that do, you get a large number of updates to keep you watching for new material. This site is part of the Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash). This is a basic, bread-and-butter teen fuck site. This is fuck-suck-lick-bj-fuck-some-more. If you want romance or tease or eroticism go look elsewhere. The models are real teens. Many of them are really physically attractive. Little variety of teens: they are slender white Eastern European girls, most with small breasts, but a good number with medium breasts. The sex action includes cunninlingus, BJ, vaginal and anal fucking. Not much tenderness to the sex, but a ton of fuck-suck-fuck-some-more, with BJ. After a while, seeing so many of these videos, the action loses a lot of its impact. You'd like some variety to the sex, maybe some buildup or tease or romance or freshness; but you do get a ton of straight fucking of many attractive young teen girls. There are a limited number of stunt cocks, but that's common: most hardcore sites seem to have a few stunt cocks servicing a large number of different girls. Membership to any site in the network gives access to a large number of bonus sites in the network. Some sites charge $29.95/month, most sites charge $19.95/month (with the PU/TBP discount). Unless there is a special reason, save $10 and join one of the $19.95/month sites, because most memberships give access to most of the same bonus sites. Most of the network sites are teen female. There are a few small niche sites: a male gay site, an old-and-young site, latin shemales site, latin teen site. But the vast bulk of the network content is teen girls (some solo or girl-girl, but most is boy-girl, with some two boys on one girl). If you are into hardcore slender white Eastern European teens with straight fuck-suck, this site and network will give you plenty to look through for a very low price. For the site and the network access, I am giving this site a high score of 92. 05-10-11  10:20am Replies (4) Review 231 Teen Sex Reality (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips. -Models listed for each clip. -Content is dated. -Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days. -DRM: no. -Easy login. -Site timeout: no. -Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings). -Multiple choices for download formats: --WMV: high, medium, low quality. --MPEG. --QuickTime. Cons: -No streaming option. -No photosets. -Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable. -No bios for models. -Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size. -Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. -Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted. Bottom Line: The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts. The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead. You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working. This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen. Currently 275 video clips. Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes. Most of the action is boy-girl. -Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites. I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines. There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer. This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment. My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke. The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos. When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites. 11-23-10  11:54am Replies (0) Review 232 Teen Stars Only (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM -No download limit -No site timeout -Exclusive content for about 1/2 of the sites in the network. -Exclusive content for the teenstarsonly site. -File download options: hi, medium, low quality WMV MP4 ( Portable Devices ) MOV ( Quicktime Video ) -Zip files for the photosets Cons: -Limited search options: Can search by name of model, or by date of update. But can't search by description of model, by description of type of sex action. -Clumsy navigation. -Going from one of the network sites to another is clumsy. -Trying to see/search the vid files on a site is clumsy. -Advertising for other sites on each page. -Poor file names. Files are named with a number and the suffix "high", "medium", or "low", depending on whether you download the high, medium or low quality file. But if you want to know who the model is, or a short description of the action, you have to manually make up your own file record. -You need a fast connection to play the flash files. My ISP connection downloads at 150-160 Kb/s, so I could not play the videos by flash. The flash video would stutter and stop, stutter and stop. So to see what the video was like, I had to download the entire video, then play the file. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): -Because I have a slow ISP connection (150-160 Kb/s download speed), it takes almost 2 hours to download a single video in high quality. -The video files are fairly large size: One sample movie, 25 minutes runtime: Full Movie ( High Quality ) - ( 989.56 Mb) Full Movie ( Medium Quality ) - (500.93 Mb) Full Movie ( Low Quality ) - (301.81 Mb) Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site. Mainly a video site. There is a large photoset for each video, but there is little to no erotic or artistic quality to the photos, they are more like video captures of the hardcore action. The models can be very attractive: they are young, slender, Eastern European teens, but you can't easily see how attractive they are, it's goddamn hard to see what the faces of these girls are like: the head is often cut out of the picture, the body, even though young, slender and attractive, is not made to look attractive. It's gonzo video and gonzo photography, and there's no erotic value to the photos, little erotic value to the videos, which are hardcore meat factory fuck and suck. Site is part of a nice-sized network. This site hasn't updated since March 2010, but other sites in the network are updating. 08-01-10  07:33pm Replies (11) Review 233 Teenamite (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits. -Multiple download formats: --WMV: low, medium, high quality. --MPG. --MOV. -Streaming: low, medium, high quality. -Videos and photosets are paired. -Content is dated. -Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video. -Zip files for photosets. -No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login. -Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity. Cons: -Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset. -Only 1 size for photos. -Slow-loading system for viewing photos. -The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites. -Models not listed for some videos and photosets. -No model bios. -Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed). Bottom Line: This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through. The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common. There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site. Sample data for a high definition video: runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds size: 1.12 GB frame width x height: 1600 x 900 total bitrate: 6336 kbps frame rate: 25 frames/sec Type of content: Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus. Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex. The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens. The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors. The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each). You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site. On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you. I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access. 11-09-10  01:22am Replies (6) Review 234 Teens Do Porn (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -$17.87/MONTH DISCOUNTED PU PRICE. -MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. -EPOCH IS THE DEFAULT PAYMENT PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME. -TEAM SKEET DOES NOT CHARGE SEPARATELY FOR DOWNLOADING PRIVILEGES. YOU CAN STREAM AND/OR DOWNLOAD ALL THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOS. -THERE IS NO DOWNLOADING LIMIT. -STREAMING IS SMOOTH, AND YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM IN LOW, MEDIUM OR HIGH DEFINITION. -THE VIDEO DOWNLOAD CHOICES ARE IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION, AS WELL. -THE VIDEO QUALITY IS EXCELLENT AT THIS SITE AND AT MOST OF THE NETWORK: GOOD LIGHTING, SOUND CONTROL, CAMERA-WORK. THE SETS AND COSTUMES ARE NOT EXPENSIVE, BUT NOT THE CHEAP SETS AND COSTUMES YOU STILL SEE AT SOME RUSSIAN SITES. THE GIRLS ARE MAINLY CUTE. NOT MUCH EFFORT INTO MAKING THE GIRLS GLAMOUROUS, BUT THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG AND NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE AND FRESH, SO THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE MODELS IS GOOD, FOR THE SITE AND THE NETWORK. PROS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW. Cons: PROS (CONTIUED): -THE SITE CONTENTS AND MOST OF THE NETWORK IS EXCLUSIVE. THE RUB A TEEN SITE CONTENT IS ALSO PRESENT AT TEEN MEGA WORLD AND THE DIESEL NETOWORK AND SOME OTHER SITES, BUT THE RUB A TEEN VIDEOS ARE PRESENTED IN HIGH DEFINTION, AND THE VIDEOS, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THEM BEFORE, ARE DEFINITELY WORTH VIEWING. THE MODEL AUDREY CONTENT AT TEAM SKEET IS NOT EXCLUSIVE: THE SAME CONTENT APPEARS AT TEEN MEGA WORLD, DIESEL NETWORK, THE LIFE EROTIC, AND SOME OTHER SITES. -DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE GOOD TO VERY GOOD. I AVERAGED 3-4+ MB/s, ON A 6.25 MB/s ISP CONNECTION. -VIDEO FILES DOWNLOAD WITH THE DEFAULT NAME OF THE SITE AND MODEL. I SUGGEST ADDING THE POSTING DATE, AND THE TEAM SKEET NAME. OTHERWISE, UNLESS YOU HAVE A FANTASTIC MEMORY, IT'S HARD TO REMEMBER THE NAMES OF ALL THE INDIVIDUAL SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. -LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT FOR INACTIVITY. CONS -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE. -TO ENTER MEMBERS AREA, HAVE TO PASS THROUGH AN AD PAGE FOR OTHER PAYSITES. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -ADS ON EVERY PAGE IN THE MEMBERS AREA. -THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK MIXES THE BASIC NETWORK SITES AND PREMIUM SITES TOGETHER. YOU HAVE TO CLICK ON THE SITE AND LOOK AT THE SCENES TO DETERMINE IF YOU HAVE ACCESS WITH A BASIC MEMBERSHIP, OR NEED TO UPGRADE TO PREMIUM STATUS TO VIEW THE THE SCENES. SEPARATE THE BASIC SITES FROM THE PREMIUM SITES TO SIMPLIFY NAVIGATION. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -MINOR CON: THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK HAS 2 SITES NAMED THE SAME: BFFS. ONE BFFS IS A NEW SITE WITH ONLY 3 SCENES SO FAR. THE OTHER BFFS IS OLDER, WITH 74 SCENES, AND IS A PREMIUM SITE THAT REQUIRES AN ADDED PAYMENT TO ACCESS. BOTTOM LINE: THE TEENS DO PORN SITE STARTED EARLY 2013. THE SITE THEME IS AMATEUR TEENS DOING THEIR FIRST HARDCORE PORN. THE SITE HAS A SLOW UPDATE RATE: ONE OR TWO SCENES PER MONTH. THE SITE IS STILL SMALL AFTER 4 YEARS. THE TOTAL CONTENT IS 81 SCENES. HOWEVER, TEENS DO PORN IS PART OF THE TEAM SKEET BASIC NETWORK, WHERE MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC SITES. THE TEENS DO PORN SITE IS A GOOD ADDITION TO THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THE SITE ITSELF FEATURES FRESH GIRLS DOING PORN. THE ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK RAISES THE SCORE TO 85: IF YOU ENJOY ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEENS IN HARDCORE SEX, YOU WILL PROBABLY GET YOUR MONEY'S WORTH. THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOS ARE WORTH COLLECTING. TEAM SKEET SITES - CURRENT AS OF 2017-04-19 (THIS LISTING INCLUDES THE BASIC NETWORK AND THE PREMIUM SITES THAT REQUIRE ADDITONAL PAYMENT.) EXXXTRA SMALL - 167 SCENES TEEN PIES - 81 SCENES INNOCENT HIGH - 437 SCENES TEEN CURVES - 62 SCENES CFNM TEENS - 30 SCENES TEENS LOVE ANAL - 48 SCENES MY BABYSITTERS CLUB - 48 SCENES SHE'S NEW - 219 SCENES TEENS DO PORN - 81 SCENES POV LIFE - 150 SCENES THE REAL WORKOUT - 94 SCENES THIS GIRL SUCKS - 200 SCENES TEENS LOVE MONEY - 53 SCENES OYE LOCA - 219 SCENES TITTY ATTACK - 82 SCENES TEENY BLACK - 75 SCENES LUST HD - 90 SCENES RUB A TEEN - 100 SCENES STEP SIBLINGS - 38 SCENES HER FRESHMAN YEAR - 20 SCENES SELF DESIRE - 30 SCENES SOLO INTERVIEWS - 144 SCENES TEAM SKEET EXTRAS - 114 SCENES DYKED - 25 SCENES BAD MILFS - 11 SCENES GINGERPATCH - 3 SCENES BFFS - 3 SCENES PUNISH TEENS - 86 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE (REQUIRES EXTRA PAYMENT TO ACCESS) BFFS - 74 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE TEENS LOVE BLACK COCKS - 68 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE FAMILY STROKES - 101 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE SIS LOVES ME - 66 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE DAUGHTER SWAP - 41 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE DAD CRUSH - 39 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE SHOPLYFTER - 34 SCENES - PREMIUM SITE SUMMARY: -THE OVERALL QUALITY LEVEL OF CONTENT IS GOOD. BOTH VIDEOS AND PHOTOS. FOR THE SITE AND NETWORK. -THE OVERALL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS IS GOOD. YOUNG TEENS, WITH NOT A LOT OF TATTOOS OR PIERCINGS. -SITE NAVIGATION IS EASY. REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION: 04-25-17  12:45am Replies (6) Review 235 Teens Love Anal (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Team Skeet network, that you get access to with a basic membership. -CCBILL is the payment processor. A trusted name. -No cross-sale on join page when I signed up (for Team Skeet network). Which is unusual for a porn site join. However, TBP reports that there is a cross sale on the join page. So be sure to check. -Attractive selection of teen models. -PU/TBP discount of $17.87/month. But occasionally you can find an even cheaper rate. -Multiple formats and definitions for download: MP3, WMV, low, medium, high definition. -No download limits. -Download managers allowed. Cons: -Overall, I would classify the cons as minor or medium, to be expected for most hardcore porn sites. -One of the smaller sites in the Team Skeet network. Only 45 scenes. -Ads for other paysites on every page. -Ads to "unlock" the premium sites on their network for extra payment on every page. -Navigation could be simplified. To get to the listing of basic sites, need to click through several pages to find the link that gives you the basic sites list. Since I don't visit the site very often, I have to spend several minutes finding the site listings. -Slow update rate. Only 1 or 2 scenes added per month to the site. However, the basic network gets 7 updates per week. -They advertise that all the network contents are 100% exclusive. However, many of the Rub A Teen site videos (part of Team Skeet) are also at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network), and at All Fine Girls (part of the Diesel network). The other sites at Team Skeet, including Teens Love Anal, are 100% exclusive. Bottom Line: -Site serves users who are interested in anal sex. -Little or no use of condoms. -Models are natural teens: No boob jobs. Not a lot of tattoos. -There is a story line to the scene, which adds meaning to the sex. The main attraction of the site is the models: they are young teens, physically attractive, and they seem to be enjoying the sex. Anal sex is different from vaginal sex. Part of the attraction of this alternate sex is that the girls can keep their virginity. Also, as Olivia Munn (the actress, who is not a porn star, but a minor starlet who was a regular on The Newsroom and has appeared in an X-Men movie and other blockbusters) said on The Craig Ferguson show in 2011, "It's not cheating if it's in the ass." The scenes have a backstory to add to the plot of the scene, which makes the scene more interesting than a simple sex scene. So if you can accept the storyline, it adds to the flavor and meaning of the sex. The guy want to have sex, the girl says she still a virgin and want to save herself for her husband-to-be, and the guy talks her into having anal sex because she still keeps her virginity and they can both have a great time. Just like in the movies. Where the bullshit they speak goes down easily. In Love Story, the catchphrase was "Love means never having to say you're sorry." Love Story, 1970 film, with Ali MacGraw and Ryan O'Neal. A sweet sentiment. But in the 1972 movie What's Up, Doc?, Barbra Streisand coos "Love means never having to say you're sorry" while batting her eyelashes, and O'Neal's character responds, deadpan, "That's the dumbest thing I ever heard." So what do you believe? That anal sex is not cheating? That anal sex is a good way to keep your virginity? Enquiring minds want to know. But watching the videos at Teens Love Anal will hopefully provide a much needed insight into the morals of anal sex. As well as a few moments of pleasure. The main value in a membership to Teens Love Anal is that it gives you access to the basic Team Skeet network. Team Skeet is a teen hardcore network with over 20 sites covering a variety of niche fantasies. Most of the models are attractive teens. The scenes are offered in low, medium and high definition for download. Most of the scenes are exclusive. Most scenes have a matching photo set. Most scenes can be streamed in a choice of low, medium or high definition. The scenes at Teens Love Anal can be downloaded in a choice of low, medium, high (720p) and higher (1080p) definition. The scenes are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control. The sets are not expensive, but not overly cheap. The scenes don't feature the ultra-high production values of a glamcore site such as Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but the girls are naturally attractive. Giving the site a score of 85, mainly based on network access. If the site was scored as a stand-alone site, based on the small amount of content (45 scenes), I would rate the site much lower. But the site serves as a nice addition to the Team Skeet network, which is a worthwhile join. 01-31-17  01:34am Replies (0) Review 236 Teeny Black (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $17.87/month (recurring). -Part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in the site gives you access to the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites. (There are a number of premium sites that each have a separate membership price--but they are outside of the basic Team Skeet network.) -Can choose your own username and password. -Team Skeet has put a lot of effort into giving the user options of viewing the content in different ways. You can stream or download the videos in low, medium or high definition. Each photo set has a zip file. But only one definition for download. You can slide show the photo sets online, in a simple, easy to use software. (However, some members have reported such bad connection speeds to the site/network, that they can't load pages, stream the videos, download the videos, etc.) Cons: -Non-secure login (login details could be hacked). -Non-secure member pages. You ISP will keep a record of your page visits. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Be sure to look for it, because it's almost hidden in tiny print near the payment processor. -Segpay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill and Epoch, because they are easy to use and reliable. -To enter the site, have to pass through an ad page offering site memberships. -Although there are a number of attractive models at the site and network, not much effort is put into making the models attractive. If you see a model at most of the team skeet sites, and compare her appearance at the diesel access network, the model will look better at the diesel access network. And if you compare her appearance at blacked, tushy, vixen or x-art, the model will appear even more attractive still, because these sites focus on making the model as attractive as possible. (CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION): Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): Those sites use makeup, costumes, and settings, to showcase the model's appearance in a glamour oriented style. Whereas the team skeet style is much more bread and butter, plain sex without a lot of dressing up. -Several PU members have reported site and network connection problems: horrible connection speeds, site pages will not load, problems downloading videos or photo sets. I personally have experienced very few problems with the site/network. If I had had problems, I would not have remained a member for over 12 months. If you join this site/network, and experience connection problems, I suggest asking for a refund. -Ads on every page. -Teen Black site grows slowly. In Jan 2016 site had 58 videos. It's now April 2018, site has 87 videos. However, the network adds one video daily, so the other sites make up for the lack of growth at this sites. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): STATS (AS OF 2018-04-06): Teeny Black MOVIES: 87 MODELS: 96 TEAM SKEET MOVIES: 1500+ MODELS: 1300+ Site theme: young black teen girls having sex. This is an underserved niche. Most interracial sites feature a black man having sex with a white chick. This site has attractive black teen girls. Bottom line: If you experience poor connection speeds and can't view the content or download the content, as some PU members report, then the site/network is best avoided. This seems to be a problem that some members experience, and other members do not report a bad connection speed. Beyond this problem, the site structure is designed to give members an excellent way to view online or download the content: videos and photo sets. You can download the entire video, with no download limits or DRM issues. Each photo set had a zip file. The network covers a lot of different niches, with over 20 different sites. As long as you like hardcore teen porn, there should be some content that will appeal to you. But at competing hardcore teen sites, the same girls would appear to be more attractive. So the impact or value of the Team Skeet videos and photos might be far less. I'm giving the site a score of 75. My personal experience with the site and network was good. But I'me lowering the score because of complaints from other PU members about the network. I like Teen Mega World and Diesel Access network as better networks for teen hardcore. That's my personal opinion. Some PU members really enjoy the Team Skeet network. Others, really hate it (mainly because of the poor connection speeds they experience, but also the profusion of ads and other issues). 04-06-18  11:46am Replies (2) Review 237 Tera Patrick (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Gamma Entertainment family (the Devils Film/Fame Dollars network). Membership gives you access to about 26 different sites in the Devils Film network. -Site login is secure (https). -Site pages are secure (https). -No DRM. -No download limits. -You get access to early videos of Tera Patrick and Sasha Grey. -You get to choose your own username and password. Cons: -The site hasn't updated since September 2017. -PU discount of $14.95 for the first month recurs at $29.95/month thereafter. Unless you can find a special, with a lower price, often offered on holidays. -They did a network update last year, replacing the site preview pages with brighter images. However, the site and network is now harder to navigate: harder to find content within a site, harder to switch between sites. -Pre-checked cross sale on the join page. Bottom Line: -Tera Patrick is a porn star. The site hasn't updated since September 2017. Other porn stars appear in some of the videos. Sasha Grey has 16 videos at this site, so if you're a fan of hers, those videos alone are worth the membership price. Note: Sasha Grey has a lovely face, a great body. But when she opens her mouth, she often talks really dirty, likes to spit and slap her partner, instead of making heartcore love. I wish she would make love, instead of the antagonistic sex she displays: it would be much easier to watch. Just my humble opinion: Making love to her seems like a visit to the dentist's office, with lots of pain. The early videos of Tera Patrick show she was a gorgeous model at the start of her career. She was born in 1976, was a Penthouse Pet in February 2000. Note: I haven't been reporting on download speeds for my latest reviews, because I used to use DownThemAll, which showed the download speeds you get. But DownThemAll stopped working with the current version of Firefox. Bottom line: The main value of Tera Patrick is that it's part of the Devil's Film network, so you get access to over 20 sites. The main sites of value are: Devils Film Rocco Siffredi Peter North Silverstone. You also get access to the rest of the 20+ sites, which cover a variety of hardcore niches. If you haven't been a member of this network before, and enjoy hardcore gonzo, this network is definitely worth joining, at least once. Some of the scenes are definitely hot. Giving the site a score of 85, for the network access. 03-13-18  08:57am Replies (1) Review 238 The Lesbian Experience (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The site has a nice selection of attractive models: Mia Malkova, Kimmy Granger, Sara Luvv, Leah Gotti, Elsa Jean, Lena Anderson, Bree Daniels, Allie Haze. -The site is part of the New Sensations network, so you get access to the entire network: -6,500 exclusive videos. -2,500 porn stars. -Multiple weekly updates. -25+ bonus sites. Cons: -I was locked out of the site today, after entering my login details (username and password). I don't know what the trouble was, because I copy and paste the details into the browser window. I wrote a ticket to email support, and got an answer in about 25 minutes, which is fast response for email. They suggested deleting cache and cookies, restarting my PC, which I did, and I then entered my login details in the site window and was admitted to the site. So, con for being blocked from site (after entering the correct login details). Pro, for fast response from customer support, and for unblocking the site (the site was blocked for me because I tried entering the login details several times, and then got a popup message the site was blocked for me. -cons: ads on most pages. Hard to tell what is an ad, and what is content at the site. When you are in a site, and click on updates, it shows you network updates, site updates, and lots of ads. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): I don't want to click on an ad and find that I've subscribed to a different site. I certainly don't remember all these ads the last time I joined the network. -The site is small. Only 88 videos total. -Site is an archive site. The site stopped updating in August 2018. Before then, they had a slow, inconsistent update rate. BOTTOM LINE(START OF) -The videos are about 2 girls having a lesbian experience. The lead-in is usually a story about how the relation develops, that gives a little extra meaning to the sex. Because the site is small (88 videos total), and the site stopped updating last year, I'm dinging the score. But you also get access to the entire New Sensations network of 25+ sites covering a variety of niches. The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good sets, good camera work. So there is plenty of content to look through, in spite of The Lesbian Experience being a small, archive site. And you get to watch some of the most beautiful girls in porn. Truthfully, these girls are young, beautiful, and appear at many porn sites, but if the action is hot, they are worth watching. On the other hand, you have to be in the mood: some PU members have expressed disappointment with the network, while other PU members appreciate the contents and think the network is a worthwhile join. I think that many PU members have been exposed to so many beautiful models that we are getting a little jaded. Back in the 1990s or earlier, it would have cost a fortune to be able to watch so much excellent porn. Today, with porn tube sites, and low-cost pay sites, we can pick and choose from hundreds of quality porn sites, both softcore and hardcore. And the quality of the models is outstanding. So even though The Lesbian Experience is a nice site with quality content, and the New Sensations network has a large amount of high quality porn, I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 82. I'm always looking for the next big thing in porn. But I recommend the Adult Time network, which has a huge amount of high quality porn covering a wide variety of niches. For what is apparently a very low price. But you have to know what you are getting before signing up to the Adult Time network, because they seem to slice and dice their offerings: streaming only, streaming with downloading, and what sites you get access to is variable. Adult Time might have passed their beta testing, but they need to standardize their offering packages. Unfortunately, I can't examine the Adult Time offering packages, since, as a member, when I go to their join page, I'm immediately re-directed to the member's area. 01-22-19  04:37pm Replies (0) Review 239 The Lesbian Experience (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -VERY NICE SELECTION OF ATTRACTIVE MODELS AT THE SITE: INCLUDING, MIA MALKOVA, KIMMY GRANGER, SARA LUVV, LEAH GOTTI, ELSA JEAN, LENA ANDERSON. -GOOD MODEL LISTING WITH LARGE THUMBNAIL OF THE MODEL, PLUS THE MODEL'S VITAL STATS, LINKS TO THE MODEL'S VIDEOS. -EACH VIDEO HAS A BACKSTORY OF THE MODEL'S RELATIONSHIP TO HER SEX PARTNER, WHICH ADDS MEANING TO THE SEX. -THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE IS PART OF THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK. WHEN YOU JOIN ANY ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU GET ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK. -NETWORK ACCESS MEANS YOU GET 20+ SITES IN A VARIETY OF NICHES, WITH OVER 6,000 VIDEOS AND OVER 2,000 MODELS. -NETWORK CONTENT IS ADVERTISED AS EXCLUSIVE. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANY OF THE CONTENT AT AN OUTSIDE SITE. Cons: -NO PU DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIP. $29.95/MONTH RECURRING IS THE REGULAR PRICE. -ONE PU MEMBER COMMENTED ON THE SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT THIS NETWORK. HOWEVER, I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE NETWORK FOR 6 MONTHS, AND NEVER HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH DOWNLOADS. I NORMALLY GET 2 TO 4 MB/sec DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ON A 6.25 MB/sec CONNECTION (EQUAL TO 16 to 32 Mbps DOWNLOAD SPEEDS). -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -THE PRIMARY BILLER IS AN IN-HOUSE BILLER. BUT I WAS ABLE TO JOIN THROUGH EPOCH. -NOT REALLY A CON: DON'T EXPECT GONZO ACTION, OR EXPLOSIVE SEX. THIS IS A HEARTCORE SITE, WITH LOTS OF KISSING, STROKING, SLOW, ROMANTIC SEX. Bottom Line: SITE THEME: LESBIAN SEX. WITH A HEARTCORE APPROACH (ROMANCE BETWEEN LESBIAN GIRLS). THE SETS ARE CLEAN, THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE, THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT NOT QUITE AT THE LEVEL OF THE HIGH-END GLAMCORE SITES LIKE BLACKED, TUSHY, VIXEN, OR X-ART, THE LATTER SITES STRIVING TO MAKE THE MODELS AND SEX AS GLAMOROUS AS POSSIBLE. THIS IS A SMALL SITE (ABOUT 60 SCENES) THAT UPDATES SLOWLY. THE LAST FEW WEEKS THEY'VE ADDED 1 SCENE PER WEEK. BEFORE THAT, IT WAS 1 SCENE PER MONTH. HOWEVER, NETWORK ACCESS MEANS YOU GET OVER 6,000 VIDEOS IN A WIDE VARIETY OF NICHES. CURRENTLY YOU GET ACCESS TO 25 DIFFERENT SITES. WITH OVER 2,000 PORN STARS. MANY OF THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE. SO YOU GET YOUR MONEY'S WORTH ON QUANTITY. QUALITY IS GOOD. THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD COLORS, GOOD EDITING AND SOUND CONTROL, NICELY FOCUSED. THE BACKSTORY ADDS AN ELEMENT OF ROMANCE TO THE SEX, SO THIS WOULD BE A GOOD SITE FOR COUPLES TO WATCH. THE SITE STRUCTURE IS GOOD. THERE ARE NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE SCENES. YOU CAN STREAM IN A VARIETY OF DEFINITION (720p, 1080p) AND BITRATES (1500kbps, 3000kbps, 6000kbps, 8000kbps, 12000kbps). YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO IN 720p or 1080p, WITH A BITRATE OF 15OOkbps TO 12000kbps. EACH SCENE COMES WITH A MATCHING PHOTO SET OF PHOTOGRAPHS, NOT SCREEN CAPS. THE PHOTO SETS ARE WORTH COLLECTING, ESPECIALLY OF YOUR FAVORITE PORN MODELS. LET ME EMPHASIZE THIS: THE PHOTO SETS ARE HIGH QUALITY SETS. I'M NOT REFERRING TO THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE PHOTOS. BUT THE CLARITY, COLOR, AND PRESENTATION OF THE PHOTOS ARE EQUAL TO ANY OF THE HIGH END PHOTO SITES SUCH AS METART. AND SINCE THE ACTION IS HARDCORE/MIDCORE (WHAT ARE GLAMCORE LESBIAN SCENES DESIGNATED?), THE PHOTO SETS ARE DEFINITELY WORTH COLLECTING. YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE FOR THE PHOTO SET OF DEFINITION: ONLY ONE DEFINITION IS OFFERED FOR THE ZIP FILE. HOWEVER, THE PHOTOS ARE EXCELLENT: THEY ARE NOT SCREEN CAPS, BUT REAL PHOTOGRAPHS. LENA ANDERSON HAS ONE SCENE AT THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE. SHE IS A TALL (5'11") MODEL, LOVELY, SLENDER, SMALL BREASTS, AND THE PHOTO SET AT THIS SITE MATCHES OR BEATS ANY SOFTCORE SET AT METART. YOU WATCH THE PHOTO SET OR VIDEO OF LENA ANDERSON AND AURORA BELLE, AND IT MAKES YOU WANT TO TURN THAT LESBIAN EXPERIENCE INTO A THREESOME WITH YOURSELF INCLUDED. NOTE: LENA ANDERSON HAS A NEW PHOTO SET AT METART POSTED 2017-06-20, TITLED "ENOSLE", PHOTOGRAPHED BY CHARLES LIGHTFOOT. WHILE THE METART PHOTOSET AT METART IS OK OR GOOD, I MUCH PREFER THE PHOTOSET OF LENA ANDERSON AT THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE. YOU ARE COMPARING METART'S SOLO SET, WITH A LESBIAN SET AT THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE. I THINK THE COLORS OF THE PHOTOS AT THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE ARE RICHER, MORE LIFE-LIKE, AND MORE EROTIC. (CHARLES LIGHTFOOT TENDS TO USE ARTSY LIGHTING OR FILTERS WITH HIS PHOTOGRAPHY.) LENA ANDERSON IS A LOVELY GIRL. THE METART SET IS GOOD. THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE SET IS RICHER, MORE EROTIC. WHICH IS SURPRISING, BECAUSE METART IS ONE OF THE FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO SITES IN THE INTERNET. HOWEVER, UPON REFLECTION, NOT EVERY PHOTO SET AT METART CAN BE THE FINEST. BUT WHAT I'M TRYING TO SHOW IS THAT THE PHOTO SETS AT THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE ARE WORTH COLLECTING: BECAUSE THE PHOTOS ARE EXCELLENT. AND THE MODELS CAN BE EXCEPTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE. AND THE SEX CAN BE GOOD. I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 90. THIS IS MAINLY BECAUSE THE SITE ITSELF, ALTHOUGH SMALL, IS WORTH JOINING. AND THE NETWORK ACCESS INCREASES THE VALUE OF THE SITE CONSIDERABLY. I'VE LISTED THE NETWORK SITES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 06-20-17  02:18am Replies (1) Review 240 The Life Erotic (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND EDIT. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE. MY EYES ARE OLD, BUT MY HEART STILL GOES PITTER PAT FOR A LOVELY WOMAN. (BUT MY WILLY IS ALSO GETTING OLD, AND DOESN'T RESPOND AS FAST AS MY HEART.) SMELL THE ROSES WHILE YOU CAN, BOYS AND GIRLS. YOUTH IS FOR THE YOUNG. OLD AGE IS FOR THE MEMORIES. SO GATHER YE ROSEBUDS WHILE YE MAY. MY THOUGHTS ON THE WORLD OF PORN TODAY: PROS -OVERVIEW: THE LIFE EROTIC IS PART OF THE METART NETWORK. THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT IS FAST TO RESPOND, POLITE, AND NORMALLY HELPFUL. THE ONLY MAIN IMPROVEMENT I CAN SEE IS TO OFFER A LIVE CHAT VERSION OF CUSTOMER SUPPORT, SO THE RESPONSE TIME WOULD BE EVEN FASTER THAN EMAIL. -YOU GET THE BASIC METART STRUCTURE FOR THE SITE: -EASY NAVIGATION FOR THE SITE. -PHOTO SETS ARE OFFERED IN 3 DEFINITIONS: LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH. -HIGH QUALITY PHOTO SETS. -OUTSTANDING PHYSICAL BEAUTY OF THE MODELS: METART AND ITS SATELLITE SITES HAVE SOME OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ON THE PLANET. Cons: -CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. THIS IS STANDARD FOR PORN SITES. EVEN THOUGH THE METART SITES ARE PREMIUM SITES, THEY STILL USE THIS LOW-GRADE MARKETING TRICK TO HOOK THE UNWARY SUBSCRIBER. -THIS IS PLUS AND MINUS. ON A PSYCHOLOGICAL BASIS, A PERSON TENDS TO GET BORED WITH PHYSICAL BEAUTY AFTER A WHILE, SINCE ITS ON DISPLAY SO FREQUENTLY BY SO MANY WOMEN. -THE SITE OFFERS "STAFF SELECTION" VIDEOS FOR SALE. PRICED AT $3.99 AND $4.99 FOR 720P AND 1080P VERSIONS. RUNTIME 15-20 MINUTES. THEY SAY "OWN IT NOW", "YOURS TO KEEP FOREVER". BUT THE LIFE EROTIC DOES NOT USE DRM (DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE), SO ANY VIDEOS YOU DOWNLOAD FROM THE SITE ARE "YOURS TO OWN" ANYWAY. -SLOW UPDATE RATE. YOU GET ONE NEW PHOTOSET EVERY 2 OR 3 DAYS. YOU GET ONE NEW (FREE) VIDEO EVERY 1 OR 2 DAYS. Bottom Line: THERE ARE MANY COMPETING SOFTCORE SITES (MPL STUDIOS, FEMJOY, ETC.) THAT OFFER A CATALOG OF WOMEN WHO ARE CUTE TO ATTRACTIVE TO GORGEOUS TO BEAUTIFUL. CALL IT AN EMBARRASSMENT OF RICHES. YOU JUST DON'T VALUE WAS IS SO READILY AVAILABLE THE WAY YOU SHOULD. WHAT SITES GIVE YOU THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK? WE ARE FOCUSING ON SOFTCORE HERE. THE MAIN SOFTCORE SITES, IN MY OPINION INCLUDE: METART (THE MAIN METART SITE), MPLSTUDIOS, FEMJOY. THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER GOOD SOFTCORE SITES ON THE INTERNET, BUT THE 3 I LISTED ARE THE GIANTS OF THE FIELD: WITH A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BACKLOG PHOTO SETS COVERING OVER 10 YEARS OF HISTORY. THE 3 SITES EMPHASIZE LATE TEEN MODELS (ALTHOUGH SOME MODELS IN THE SOFTCORE FIELD CAN LAST MUCH LONGER THAN HARDCORE MODELS. SOME OF THE FAVORITE SOFTCORE MODELS CAN LAST 10 YEARS OR MORE, AND HAVE DEBUT SETS AND SETS COVERING OVER 10 YEARS WORTH OF APPEARANCES. -CAN THE LIFE EROTIC MEASURE UP TO THE 3 GIANTS OF THE SOFTCORE FIELD? ON A REALISTIC BASIS, THE LIFE EROTIC IS LIKE A SECOND TIER OFFERING: IT'S A FINE SITE, BUT IN COMPARISON THE METART, MPL STUDIOS, AND FEMJOY, THE LIFE EROTIC COMES IN A DISTANT 4TH PLACE. -METART HAS 19,517 PHOTO SETS. -METART HAS 3,588 MODELS. -METART HAS 285 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS, SO YOU GET A WIDE VARIETY OF ARTISTIC STYLES. YOU PROBABLY WON'T APPRECIATE ALL THE PHOTO SETS OFFERED, BECAUSE SOME OF THEM GET TOO ARTISTIC OR FANCIFUL. BUT THESE ARE PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS WHO HAVE TO PASS METART'S STANDARDS FOR SUBMISSION. METART HAS 1,576 FILMS (SHORT VIDEOS WITH A RUNTIME OF 10-15 MINUTES). EVEN THOUGH THE FILMS USUALLY FEATURE LOVELY TO GORGEOUS MODELS THAT ARE NAKED, MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE BORING AND A WASTE OF TIME VIEWING. THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS ARE MAKING AN EFFORT TO BE MORE EROTIC: THE MODELS ARE ALLOWED TO TOUCH THEMSELVES (NOT HARD MASTURBATION, BUT A HINT OF MASTURBATION, A HINT OF EROTIC TEASE). -METART CON-A LOT OF CURRENT PHOTOGRAPHERS PUT THE MODELS INTO TWISTED POSITIONS TO HIGHLIGHT THE PUSSY OR ASSHOLD OF THE MODELS. THAT'S WHAT METART MEMBERS SEEM TO WANT. IT'S NOT MY CUP OF TEA. I PREFER A STANDARD SHOT OF THE ENTIRE MODEL, EITHER FRONT OR BACK, WITHOUT A LOT OF TWISTS OR CONTORTIONS TO FOCUS ON AN ASSHOLE OR PUSSY. YES, THOSE ARE EROTIC FEATURES, BUT GIVE IT SOME CLASS, PEOPLE. THIS IS NOT HARDCORE, BUT THE EDGES ARE STARTING TO BLUR BETWEEN SOFTCORE AND HARDCORE. AND METART IS DEFINITELY ADDING A SLIGHT HARDCORE EDGE TO THEIR SITE. -MPL STUDIOS -AN OUTSTANDING SOFTCORE SITE. -GREAT PHOTOGRAPHY THAT SHOWCASES THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF MODELS. -740 VIDEOS. THE VIDEOS ARE MORE EROTIC THAN THE OLDER METART VIDEOS. -ALMOST 324,000 IMAGES. -THE MODELS ARE OUTSTANDING. ALL 3 TOP SOFTCORE SITES FEATURE GIRLS THAT ARE CUTE TO GORGEOUS. -419 MODELS -ABOUT 5,000 PHOTOSETS. FEMJOY UPDATES:1 OR 2 PHOTO SETS PER DAY. 1 VIDEO PER WEEK. MODELS: 1614+ PHOTO SETS: 8,763+ VIDEOS: 715+ SITE STARTED IN 2004, SO YOU HAVE A HUGE BACKLOG OF PHOTO SETS AND VIDEOS, FEATURING LOVELY YOUNG WOMEN. THE TOP 3 SOFTCORE SITES BLOW THE LIFE EROTIC OUT OF THE WATER ON 2 FACTORS: THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT THE NUMBER OF MODELS THE TOP SITE, IN MY OPINION, IS METART: IT HAS AN UPDATE RATE OF 4 NEW UPDATES PER DAY. THAT WOULD BE EITHER PHOTO SETS ONLY, OR A COMBINATION OF PHOTOSETS PLUS A VIDEO. ON THE FIRST DAY OF EACH MONTH, METART HAS 6 UPDATES FOR THAT DAY. METART HAS THE MOST BACKLOG OF PHOTOSETS OF ANY SOFTCORE GLAMOR SITE. IN MY OPINION, MPL STUDIOS IS SECOND. FANTASTIC MODELS, GREAT PHOTOGRAPHY, VIDEOS ARE SLIGHTLY MORE EROTIC THAN THE VIDEOS AT METART. FEMJOY IS THIRD. THAT IS VERY SUBJECTIVE. FEMJOY FEATURES A CATALOG OF MODELS THAT IS OUTSTANDING. A HUGE NUMBER OF PHOTO SETS. REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 02-20-19  06:40pm Replies (1) Review 241 The Life Erotic (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -GOOD SELECTION OF MODELS. MANY OF THE MODELS ARE ALSO FEATURED AT OTHER METART NETWORK SITES. -PART OF THE METART NETWORK. NORMALLY YOU GET THE SAME BENEFITS AS THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES: EXCELLENT DOWNLOAD SPEEDS, EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE, GOOD NAVIGATION, LOTS OF OPTIONS FOR VIEWING THE SITE. -PU DISCOUNT OF $19.99/MONTH. -THE CONTENT IS MORE EROTIC THAN THE METART SITE; THE CONTENT IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE TO MIDCORE, CERTAINLY NOT HARDCORE. BUT IT'S MORE EXPLICIT THAN THE METART SITE, WHICH IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE. -SITE FEATURES HIGH-GRADE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS. THE MODELS RANGE FROM ATTRACTIVE TO ABSOLUTELY LOVELY, AND THE VIDEOS AND PHOTO SETS ARE HIGH-GRADE, PROFESSIONALLY SHOT BY SOME OF THE BEST EROTIC PHOTOGRAPHERS IN THE WORLD. -UPDATES DAILY, WITH 1 PHOTO SET PER DAY. OFTEN GET A SECOND UPDATE OF A VIDEO. Cons: -LATELY, THE METART NETWORK SEEMS TO BE EXPERIENCING SERVER PROBLEMS. THE PROBLEM WAS WORST ABOUT 3 WEEKS AGO, WHEN MANY MEMBERS COULD NOT LOG INTO THE SITES, OR IF THEY COULD LOG IN, THE PAGES WOULD NOT LOAD FOR STREAMING; AND DOWNLOADING WAS TERRIBLE. I AM STILL EXPERIENCING ITERMITTENT PROBLEMS WITH LOADING PAGES OF PHOTOS AND SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FOR ZIP FILES. FOR YEARS METART SITES CONSISTENTLY GAVE OUTSTANDING SERVICE. THIS MIGHT BE A SHORT-TERM PROBLEM, BUT IT'S STILL A LET-DOW. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. --THIS IS REALLY NIT-PICKY. BUT THE SITE TITLE IS THE LIFE EROTIC. METART NETWORK ALSO HAS SITES NAMED EROTIC BEAUTY. AND ERROTICA ARCHIVES. SO MANY SITES, AND THE TITLES ARE RUNNING TOGETHER. EACH SITE NEEDS A SEPARATE, DISTINCT TITLE, TO KEEP THEM FRESH AND SEPARATE IN THE VIEWER'S MIND. -THE SITE SLIDE-SHOW MECHANISM SEEMS CLUNKY. THE SLIDE SHOW MECHANISMS AT TEEN MEGA WORLD AND DIESEL ACCESS AND TEAM SKEET SEEM TO RUN MORE SMOOTHLY AND GIVE A BETTER EXPERIENCE. Bottom Line: THE LIFE EROTIC IS A PREMIUM QUALITY PHOTO SITE. IT ALSO HAS PROFESSIONALLY SHOT QUALITY VIDEOS AS WELL. THE EMPHASIS IS ON QUALITY. THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO GORGEOUS, UP TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS IN PHYSICAL BEAUTY. THE MODELS' AGES RANGE FROM LATE TEENS TO LATE TWENTIES, WITH MOST OF THE MODELS STARTING OUT AROUND 18 OR 19 YEARS OLD IN THEIR FIRST SHOOTS. THIS IS A LARGE SITE. 1,000+ MODELS. 2,197 GALLERIES. 826 VIDEOS. 100+ CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGPRAPHERS. THE PROBLEM IN SCORING THE SITE IS THAT THE FIELD OF TEEN GLAMOUR PORN IS SO WELL SERVED. YOU HAVE THE MAJOR SITES SUCH AS DDF NETWORK, FEMJOY, HEGRE, MPL STUDIOS, THE METART NETWORK, ETC. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 15 HIGH-QUALITY SITES IN THE METART NETWORK ALONE: METART, SEX ART, EROTIC BEAUTY, ALS SCAN, ERROTIC ARCHIVES, THE LIFE EROTIC, VIV THOMAS, HOLLY RANDALL, RYLSKY ART, ERTERNAL DESIRE, STUNNING 18, ETC. WITH SO MANY WONDERFUL SITES, IT'S DIFFICULT TO PICK WHICH ONES TO JOIN. THAT'S A GOOD THING: BECAUSE YOU SHOULD GET YOUR MONEY'S WORTH JOINING ANY OF THESE SITES. THE PROBLEM IS THAT MOST OF US HAVE LIMITED FUNDS. A SECONDARY PROBLEM IS THAT MOST OF US HAVE LIMITED TIME, TO APPRECIATE THESE SITES. THE LIFE EROTIC IS AN EXCELLENT SITE. BUT MY FIRST CHOICE IN THE FIELD OF GLAMOUR PHOTOGRAPHY WOULD BE METART. BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CONTENT AT METART: OVER 3,300 MODELS. OVER 17,000 GALLERIES. OVER 270 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS. AND THE EXCELLENT SUPPORT AND EASE OF USE OF THE SITE ITSELF (I'M IGNORING THE CURRENT METART SERVER PROBLEMS, WHICH ARE ANNOYING AS HELL.) I'M GIVING THE LIFE EROTIC A SCORE OF 85. THE SITE SCORE OF 85 ASSUMES THAT THE NETWORK SERVER PROBLEMS WILL BE FIXED SOON. IF NOT FIXED, THEN THE SCORE WOULD DROP INTO THE LOW 80s OR EVEN INTO THE 70s, BECAUSE EASE OF USE OF A SITE IS A VERY IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE RATING. IF A SITE HAS EXCELLENT CONTENTS (GALLERIES AND/OR VIDEOS), BUT IT'S HARD TO ACCESS THEM, THE SITE IS WORTH A LOT LESS, OBVIOUSLY. 08-01-17  07:58am Replies (1) Review 242 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -High quality photography, mostly softcore approach, more erotic than the MetArt style. -PU discounted price $19.99/month. Occasionally MetArt will send out emails for discounted prices to one or more of their sites. -The main attraction of this site (and the Met-Art network) is the quality of the models: these are late teens or early twenties girls who are attractive to extremely attractive. The girls are natural: almost no boob jobs. Young. Fresh. Very few tattoos or piercings. -Zip files for each photoset. Choice of definition of low, medium, or high. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded. If downloaded, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition. If streamed, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition. -Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed. -Zip files filename includes: NameOfSite_DatePosted_SetTitle_Model'sName_Photographer'sName_FileDefinition. So the name of the file includes all the data needed. Cons: -Pre-checked offer on join page for subscription to a different site. This pre-checked offer is slightly different from the normal pre-checked offer. Instead of using a checked box, you see a drop-down box, that states: "Yes, add 30 days of Met-Art.com for $29.99, rebilling monthly". So change that option to "No thanks, I'm not interested in this special offer". Because there are cheaper ways to join Met-Art.com, with PU discount, or otherwise. -I'm not a fan of their software mechanism to view the photosets online. I think it's slow and clunky. Much easier to just download the gallery as a zip file and then browse the photos. Teen Mega World has a much easier and faster system to view the photos online. Suprising, because The Life Erotic is a high-level photo site, and Teen Mega World is a bread-and-butter hardcore site. -The site often uses low lighting for the photo sets. This is an artistic choice. But sometimes the photos are too dark. Bottom Line: The Life Erotic is part of the MetArt network. As such, expect high quality photo sets. The photo sets and videos are more erotic than MetArt's softcore approach. I feel the photo sets and videos at The Life Erotic are basically in the softcore style. These are very attractive models, and instead of admiring them like you would at MetArt, you want to do naughty things to the girls (appealing to the baser instincts in the audience). I've said this is a softcore site. But the site is actually borderline softcore/midcore. The girls often masturbate. They can stick fingers or a dildo inside their pussy. They can use a vibrator. They can have lesbian sex with another girl. There can be a slight bondage theme. These actions go far beyond what is at MetArt. Take Julla, for example. The set titled "My Hideaway", posted 2015-06-15. Julla is small (5'3") with short blonde hair. Cute face. Slender body. Small breasts. She's laying back on a couch, legs spread wide, her bra halfway down her waist. It's a slow strip-tease. But instead of admiring her lovely form, you want to jump on that body and fuck her brains out. Dirty thoughts. But she is to blame. The set is softcore. There is no overt masturbation. But it does have heat. You don't think that way looking at most MetArt sets. The MetArt girls are lovely, but semi-detached visions. So the dirty thoughts are less often. You just think how lovely and delectable the MetArt girls are. I'm not saying all the The Life Erotic sets have this level of eroticism, but the overall approach at this site is more erotic than the MetArt photosets. That's for sure. A short MetArt review: Even though the models range from attractive to absolutlely stunning, the photosets are softcore, and lack heat. The videos are mainly a waste of time. The girls may be stunning, they are naked, but the videos are boring. I'm not saying MetArt is poor. I think it's the best site on the internet for softcore, high grade photography of nude teens. I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly subscriptions. But there are other sites that feature high grade photography, that often have more heat or eroticism. Comparing MetArt with The Life Erotic: MetArt is a megasite Galleries: 15,645 Videos: 1,286 Models: 3,189 The Life Erotic is smaller than MetArt, but it's still a large site: Galleries: 1,739 Videos: 629 Models: 850 I definitely think The Life Erotic is worth at least a one-month membership, if you can find the galleries or videos that appeal to your personal taste. 1,739 galleries is a lot to examine in one month's time, so maybe you might think the site is worth a longer subscription. Especially if you come across one of the random offers to join at a very discounted price. A few years ago, I found an offer to join Erotic Beauty (part of the MetArt network) for $1/month, and I've been a member of that site since that time. $1/month won't even pay for a cup of coffee at McDonald's. I went to a restaurant today, ordered an iced tea (non-alcoholic), and they charged me $3.00. It pays to look at the prices before you order. Except some restaurants leave off the prices for some items, like non-alcoholic drinks, from the menu. I'm giving The Life Erotic a score of 90. This is a site with high-grade photography of teen and early-twenties models who are attractive to lovely. It's a large site, with a lot of galleries and videos to browse. The style is more erotic than MetArt, but it's still softcore (or maybe midcore). You find solo female masturbation, with fingers or toys. Also lesbian sex. But no boy-girl sex that I have found. Minor note: The Julla photo set that I referred to: She does stick a finger inside her pussy near the end of the photo set. But this is a photo set, not a video. And I think it's more like a tease. Not masturbation. But you could call it borderline masturbation. 04-20-16  02:21pm Replies (2) Review 243 The Real Workout (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH RECURRING. -SEGPAY AND EPOCH ARE THE DEFAULT BILLERS. BOTH ARE TRUSTED NAMES. -MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE BASIC SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE REST OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK (EXCLUDING THE PREMIUM SITES). -SITE/NETWORK STRUCTURE IS EXCELLENT: MULTIPLE CHOICES OFFERED FOR STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING. GOOD MODEL INDEX WITH LINKS TO THE MODEL'S SCENES. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. Cons: -CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE (SOMETIMES). -A PERSONAL QUIBBLE: I DON'T LIKE NETWORKS THAT HAVE PREMIUM SITES THAT COST EXTRA. THE NETWORK TENDS TO PUSH THOSE PREMIUM SITES WITH ADS ON EVERY PAGE. TEAM SKEET IS GUILTY OF THIS. -THE NETWORK ADVERTISES CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. MOST OF THE CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE, I BELIEVE. BUT THE SCENES AT RUB A TEEN ARE ALSO AT TEEN MEGA WORLD AND AT DIESEL NETWORK AND SOME OTHER SITES. ALSO, A SMALL AMOUNT OF OTHER CONTENT IS NON-EXCLUSIVE, AS WELL. -MANY OF THE MODELS ARE YOUNG (THIS IS A TEEN-FOCUSED NETWORK) AND NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE. BUT NOT MUCH EFFORT IS PUT INTO MAKING THE MODELS APPEAR EVEN MORE ATTRACTIVE. THE SAME MODEL APPEARING AT THIS NETWORK AND AT A GLAMOR SITE LIKE BLACKED, TUSHY, VIXEN OR X-ART APPEARS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT: AT TEAM SKEET, SHE MIGHT APPEAR AVERAGE OR JUST OK IN LOOKS, WHILE AT THE GLAMOR SITES I MENTIONED, THE SAME MODEL MIGHT APPEAR LOVELY OR GORGEOUS. PHOTOGRAPHY, MAKE-UP, COSTUME, CAN MAKE A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. CONTINUED--- Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): TEAM SKEET GOES FOR THE NATURAL LOOK, INSTEAD OF GLAMOR. IT'S A LESS EXPENSIVE, QUICKER WAY TO PRODUCE CONTENT: QUANTITY OVER QUALITY. -THE MODELS ARE NOT ACTRESSES: THE SCENES REMIND OF THE 1970s SEX PLOITATIONS MOVIES, WHERE THE ACTORS WERE HORRIBLE: EXCEPT THAT THE TEAM SKEET MODELS ARE EVEN WORSE ACTORS THAN THE 1970s ACTORS. AND THE STORY/SCRIPTS/DIALOG ARE REALLY STUPID. THE STORY/SCRIPTS/DIALOG AT THE GLAMOR SITES (BLACKED, TUSHY, VIXEN, X-ART) ARE MUCH EASIER TO SWALLOW, THEY CAN ACTUALLY ADD INTEREST TO THE SEX. -SLOW UPDATE RATE: 1 NEW VIDEO ADDED PER MONTH. HOWEVER, THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK ADDS 1 NEW VIDEO PER DAY. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): THE REAL WORKOUT SITE THEME: GIRLS WORKING OUT AND GETTING SEDUCED BY THEIR PERSONAL TRAINER. THIS SEEMS TO BE A POPULAR NICHE. MAYBE BECAUSE OF ALL THE SPORTS CLUBS WHERE GUYS WORK OUT, AND THEY FANTASIZE ABOUT THE WOMEN AT THOSE CLUBS. YOU HAVE SIMILAR-THEMED SITES AT NAUGHTY AMERICA, BRAZZERS, AND TEEN MEGA WORLD. THE SITE IS SMALL: ONLY 95 VIDEOS (AND MATCHING PHOTO SETS). HOWEVER, YOU ALSO GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK, WHICH HAS OVER 2,100 VIDEOS IN A VARIETY OF TEEN NICHES. THE STRUCTURE OF THE SITE/NETWORK IS EXCELLENT. YOU GET A MODEL INDEX, WHICH HAS A NICE-SIZED THUMBNAIL OF THE MODEL, AND LINKS TO HER SCENES AT THE SITE/NETWORK. YOU CAN STREAM AND ALSO DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS AND MATCHING PHOTO SETS. NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CHOICES OFFERED FOR BOTH STREAMING AND DOWNLOAD: YOU CAN STREAM THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECTED 1-MINUTE CLIPS FROM THE VIDEO. YOU CAN STREAM IN LOW, MEDIUM, OR HIGH DEFINITION. THEY EVEN OFFER A TRAILER TO GIVE YOU A PREVIEW OF THE SCENE. DOWNLOADING A VIDEO ALSO OFFERS MULTIPLE CHOICES OF LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION. SWITCHING BETWEEN THE SITES IS EASY: NO NEED TO RE- LOGIN TO EACH SITE WITH YOUR USER DETAILS. THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK FOCUSES ON LOW-QUALITY TEEN HARDCORE. IT OFFERS MANY NICHES IN THE BASIC NETWORK. BUT ON A PERSONAL LEVEL, I PREFER THE HIGHER QUALITY GLAMCORE SITES LIKE BLACKED, TUSHY, VIXEN OR X-ART. I BELIEVE THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK, BECAUSE OF THE LARGE QUANTITY OF HARDCORE TEEN VIDS, IS A SECOND TIER OFFERING. NOTE: I'VE READ COMPLAINTS FROM SOME PU MEMBERS THAT THE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT TEAM SKEET NETWORK ARE SLOW. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE NETWORK FOR 1 YEAR (I SIGNED UP FOR A 1-YEAR MEMBERSHIP IN JUNE 2016). I'VE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM WITH SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT ANY OF THEIR SITES DURING MY MEMBERSHIP. I CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT THE PU MEMBERS WHO HAD A PROBLEM DOWNLOADING HAD A SOFTWARE/HARDWARE/TECHNICAL ISSUE THAT I DID NOT SHARE. GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS TO THE LARGE AMOUNT OF TEEN HARDCORE VIDEOS IN A VARIETY OF NICHES, AND BECAUSE THE SITE/NETWORK IS EASY TO USE. TEAM SKEET SITES: SITES AND NUMBER OF SCENES CURRENT AS OF JUNE 7, 2017: EXXXTRA SMALL Number of Scenes: 174 TEEN PIES Number of Scenes: 84 INNOCENT HIGH Number of Scenes: 439 TEEN CURVES Number of Scenes: 64 CFNM TEENS Number of Scenes: 30 TEENS LOVE ANAL Number of Scenes: 51 MY BABYSITTERS CLUB Number of Scenes: 50 SHE'S NEW Number of Scenes: 221 TEENS DO PORN Number of Scenes: 83 POV LIFE Number of Scenes: 151 THE REAL WORKOUT Number of Scenes: 95 THIS GIRL SUCKS Number of Scenes: 205 CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION: 06-13-17  01:00pm Replies (1) Review 244 The Sperm Lover (0) 50.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -No DRM. -Zip file for photosets. -No download limits. -No watermark on the videos. -Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips. Cons: -Archive site. Last update January 2007. -Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios. -Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos. -OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos. -No search engine. -Very basic navigation. Bottom Line: -This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site. Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness. -This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site. Small site. Videos: 47 Photosets: 73 Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips. Frame width x height: 852x480 Total bitrate: 4258 kbps With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp. The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex. -If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets. The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known. None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members. The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring. Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first. A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos. 01-11-11  01:00pm Replies (13) Review 245 The Tabu Tales (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The Tabu Tales is part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network, without having to pay premium fees for access, or downloading privileges. -Secure pages: https login and member pages. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -Many of the videos are exclusive to the network. Cons: -This is not really a con. But there are so many porn sites, many with similar names, it can get confusing. This site is named "The Tabu Tales". There is a newer site, named "Pure Taboo", that is an excellent site with far better stories than The Tabu Tales site. Pure Taboo is part of the Adult Time network, so if you get a free Adult Time network with your Pure Taboo membership (which should happen, but the slipups happen, and one PU member complained he recently joined an Adult Time site and did not get Adult Time access, and that customer service ignored his requests for help). -A lot of the models give out fake excitement over the sex which makes the sex less realistic. "Oh My God, he touched my PUSSY!!!!" "Just one look, and I'm creaming in my panties!!!!" Yes, my darling, lover, my god-man, take me and make me yours!!!!" -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -European members are charged higher prices. Bottom Line: The New Sensations network has 26 separate sites (27 if you count the New Sensations Network Home site separately. So the network covers a number of niches. However, the navigation is sloppy. If you click on a video, you don't know what site the video belongs to. Which makes searching the videos at any one site difficult: -does the video you pick belong to the site you are exploring? -how do you get a chronological or alphabetical listing of the videos at that site? Videos play with the logo: "New Sensations", instead of being identified with the site they belong to. I belive they did a network update 1 or 2 years ago, and made the network a jumbled mess. Before the update, it was much easier to tell what videos belonged to what sites. So you could explore each site more easily. Currently, you have little idea what video a site belongs to (since all videos feature the "New Sensations" logo. Basically, this means: It's hard as hell to explore the contents of any one site, since you don't know what site the video you are looking at belongs to. There is no alphabetical or chronological listing for the contents of a site. So it's hard as hell to find the site's contents: However, one trick to make searching easier: Go to the New Sensations Network Home. Enter a model's name. This should return her contents at the entire network. Otherwise, if you are logged in to one of the member sites, the search is site-specific: The only contents of a model returned are her contents at that site: Which is a stupid navigational set-up, because to find her contents at the network, you either have to do a search for each satellite site (26 satellite sites), or do a search at the home page (New Sensations Network Home). The strengths of the network: -A number of attractive to very attractive models. Over 2,500. -The good to excellent quality of the videos: -They try to add a story element to give more meaning and importance to the sex, instead of just two bodies slapping together. Love, revenge, taboo, whatever. -The technical setup of the sites is excellent: they have previews for the videos, the complete video is available in different choices for streaming and/or downloading. There are over 7,000 videos at the network. Newer videos are offered in premium 4K UHD quality. The main negative is the poor navigation, which came with a network update maybe 1 or 2 years ago. Although there are a large number of attractive models, not all are going to be attractive: in looks, with tattoos, whatever. Because of the jumbled layout, it's harder to find the videos that will appeal to you. However, the model seach from the home page is good, returning the model's content at the entire network. Some videos are hot. But many lack heat. This is a personal experience. Since you have access to over 7,000 good to excellent quality videos, if you are willing to spend the time searching for what turns you on, the site/network is a worthwhile join. But improved navigation would make the network far easier to use. Giving the site/network a score of 85. Some good videos. Some very good-looking models. But a lot of videos to search through to find the ones that interest you. The number of sites currently in the New Sensations Network is listed in the Reply section below: 01-10-19  05:17am Replies (1) Review 246 The Tabu Tales (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The Tabu Tales is included with a basic membership to New Sensations network. This network has 24 sites in the basic network. -6,000+ exclusive videos. -2,000+ pornstars. -No download limit. -Many of the models are attractive. You get a mix of breast sizes: small, medium, and large. Model age ranges from late teens to twenties. -Good basic home page for New Senations with links to: Updates-Models-DVDs-Categories-Network-Daily Deals-Live Cams. -Each video has a matching gallery. -Can stream or download each video in multiple definitions. -Videos start with a legal disclaimer that all performers are 18 or older, are not illegally related by law (so any incest is fantasy, not real), the sex is consensual, the video is fantasy and not real, etc. So you can watch the videos without the fear of possession of illegal porn, as long as you understand the porn laws in your area. -Videos are professionaly shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. The sets are not expensive. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED) -Videos have a plot. -With cookies enabled, just have to click the log-in link and you enter the site. -Videos have a trailor, to preview the basic action of the scene. -Photo sets have a zip file. -Cancellation of your membership should be easy. The site even has a hot link for cancellation, that explains how to cancel, and tells you: NOTE: You should cancel at least 24 hours ahead of the schedule billing date (Date/Time will be in EST) so that there is enough time to process your cancellation. You will still have access to the membership you joined until the expiration date. CONS(START) -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -European members are charged a higher price than US members. -You can not choose specific clips from the video, but have to download the entire video. -No PU/TBP discount. Regular price is $29.95/month (recurring). -cshelpcenter.com is the primary biller. But EPOCH is an alternate biller. Bottom Line: With a sub to New Sensations, you get access to 24 sites: Ashlynn Brooke Busty College Coeds Butt Divers Four Finger Club Fresh Outa High School Fuck For Dollars Heavy Handfuls HotwifeXXX I Film Myself Internal Violations Jizzbomb Lil' Latinas Mr Biggz POV Fantasy Papa Loads Parody Press Sadie West Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes Squirting 101 The Lesbian Experience The Romance Series The Tabu Tales The Tales From The Edge The video titled "Time For Kristens Meeting With Dad": The stepfather (Toni Ribas) accidentally sees his stepdaughter (Kristen Scott) getting dressed. He texts his wife and tells her they need to talk with the daughter. The wife texts back that they can all talk when the wife gets back home. The step-father can't wait for the mother to return. He explains the daughter needs to speak to him and the mother before she gets a piercing, since they are a family living in one house. The step-father is a wonderful man, who realizes his responsibilities. Feeling superior and in charge, the step-father calmly tells the daughter she has to obey him and request permission to get a piercing. The daughter replies that she respects the step-father, but that her mother got tattoos before the daughter's current age, and the daughter feels she has the right to treat her own body as she sees fit. So the daughter and her step father each respect the other, but disagree on how much control the step father should have. The step father says the three of them (step father, mother and daughter) need to get together to discuss this. The daughter says she loves and respects her mother, but the daughter does not want to discuss this issue with her mother. And the daughter says the stepfather has been looking at her. How could the stepfather have known that the daughter had her nipple pierced? The daughter raises her T-shirt, exposing the pierced nipple, and says, "Don't you think this looks good on me?" The stepfather tries to resist, but they are soon kissing, and she is sucking his penis, and they are fucking. For a hard core porn video, the plot and dialog and acting are actually very good. The plot shows there is more thought and feelings than the gonzo slam-bam-fuck-you-bitch-action. If you can accept the fantasy, it's not just 2 bodies slapping together, but 2 bodies slapping together with heat, lust, meaning, and with the added thrill of forbidden sex. Besides which, the daughter is a luscious young teen, who is eminently fuckable. I mean, what red-blooded American male, with a daughter like Kristen Scott, wouldn't jump on this young thing, just to show her who's the boss? To sum up: --The Tabu Tales scenes have a taboo fantasy element: incest with a step-relation, infidelity, or some other factor to make the sex more forbidden and therefore hotter. The Tabu Tales site is large. Hundreds of scenes with matching galleries. Professionally shot. A good fantasy plot of forbidden sex (step incest, fuck the babysitter, lesbian, etc.). The site is large, and the network is huge. So there's plenty of content to examine and enjoy. The models range from late teens to twenties, many of them attractive. There are search/browsing tools to help navigate the diverse content. There are some minor details that I found impressive at the network: There is a FAQ page that explains in detail how you are charged for your membership and how to contact support. The FAQ page explains what to do if you are blocked from the site. How to cancel your membership. CONTINUED ON REPLY SECTION BELOW: 02-21-17  01:46am Replies (5) Review 247 The White Boxxx (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the LetsDoeIt network (used to be called the PornDoePremium network). Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to over 40 network sites. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Download choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Streaming choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -This is the first site I've seen where you can select the video speed. 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, Normal, 1.25, 1.5, 2. Playing a video in slow motion still gives you a clear, crisp visual track, and the sound is slowed down but still sounds good. You would usually watch it at normal speed. Except some of these models are great to fantastic looking, and you want to watch their lovely breasts swinging and swaying in slow motion. The breasts seem natural, not implants that look like bolted-on boobs. -PU discount for the first month of $9.95. Recurs at $29.95/month. -This is the first site I can remember where, if you have cookies enabled, it warns you if you already have a current membership. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): I was trying to check for pre-paid cross-sales and other traps on the join page. Useful for people who can't remember all the sites in the network. There are 44 sites in the network, so it's a useful feature. -Going with the current trend, login and member pages are secure: https. -Site (and network) advertises exclusive content. CONS (START OF): -Once you understand the site theme, I think the cons are basically minor. -However, by placing such strong emphasis on hard core glam sex, the videos seem to lose some steam: the models are gorgeous, the sex is hardcore and lovely to watch, but it's not as hot as sex found at Diesel Access, TMW, or Rocco Siffredi, to offer 3 very different versions of hardcore young sex models. You lose the edge, the element of roughness, and the sex seems more slow-motion and elegant and more of a visual treat than a hot erotic experience. Bottom Line: The White Box is considered a glamour site, featuring lesbian sex. I want to amend that description: it's a glamour site, featuring some of the most attractive models on the internet, and the girls are young teens, early twenties models, most of which are presented as lovely women. Lena Reif is featured in one massage video, with Shona River. I don't know what techniques the site uses, but they present the models wonderfully: the girls can look gorgeous. It's not that they use a ton of make-up, or glam costumes: the girls can appear in panties and a thin tank top, but they just look gorgeous. And when you see how Lena Reif's lovely breasts sway as she moves, the one massage video of her at the site is worth the admission price by itself. Lena is just that lovely. To add to the value of the videos, there are not a lot of fake moans, groans and screams to show fake excitement. This is not a complete explanation of the White Boxxx style of making the models look glamourous, but it's a start: -they use a filter, so that the videos are not crystal clear, but more like the Penthouse style of photos from the 1970s where there was a slight mist that seemed to cover the scene. The costumes are usually simple: mainly white for the models: bikini style briefs, if the model wears a top to cover her breasts, it's white and loose-flowing, and comes off easily, and before it comes off, it often gives glimpses of the woman's breasts. The action is not slam-bam-thank-you-maam, but slow, erotic buildup to the sex. A lot of stroking and kissing. Many of the scenes are 2 women stroking each other while they are stroking the guy, but the women are paying as much attention to each other as the are to the guy. So you could consider it as 2 bi-women pleasuring each other while they are pleasuring the guy. This is glam sex: they women are presented glam-style. They definitely appear more glamourous than when appearing at other sites. Even though they are performing hardcore sex, it's sex in a glamour setting: the sex is not harsh, rough or demeaning to the models, the models seem to be really enjoy pleasuring their female partners as well as pleasuring the guy. Also, they women are in control: they guy is their personal sex toy: they using him as a contrast to the sexual attraction between the two lovely women. It doesn't get much better than this for a guy: two lovely women, giving him their bodies in a slow, sensual massage and fuck. "Her First Threesome", a threesome video with Shona River, Lena Reif and Lutro. I don't know what filters and lighting the site uses, but Lena Reif, a stunning looking model, looks like a wet-dream come true. She is a great-looking model in the video. Shona River looks better in this video than any other porn site I've seen her in. It's not the make-up, because they don't have heavy make-up. It's not the costumes, because the costumes, while not cheap, are not expensive: panties and a t-shirt for the models. Lena Reif is a very good-looking model: but in this video, she looks fantastic. Compare how Stacy Cruz looks in her video at The White Boxxx with her appearance at MetArt, SexArt(one of the MetArt glamour sites), the Teen Mega World network (TMW), and Wow Girls. In The White Boxx video, she looks fantastic: a wet dream come true. Great face, great body. The MetArt photo set is poor: a jumbled assortment of poses where Stacy is contorted in different positions: Very little attention paid to her lovely face. The SexArt photo set is superior. But where her looks really shine is in the White Boxxx video: The outstanding strength of the White Boxxx site is the way they present the models at their most lovely. Quite often, a photo set, because of photoshopping and greater control over the finished picture, can make a model appear more attractive. But The White Boxxx site often makes the models look better than at any other site, including sites like Blacked, Tushy or Vixen. You have to join the network to see what I'm talking about. The Whiteboxx site, by itself, is worth the price of admission to the LetsDoeIt network. One caveat: the models look fantastic: but this is not the hottest site for hardcore videos. Some of the videos at Teen Mega World, or Devils Film, or the Diesel Acess network, can be even hotter. The White Boxxx has some great looking models, in hardcore sex, and the models just look fantastic: lovely face, sexy body. Great photography in the videos and photo sets. Since the first month of a sub is only $9.95 with a PU discount, I recommend joining the site at least once, to sample some of their wares. The first time you watch some of the White Boxxx videos, you should be blown away by how beautiful they can make these creatures appear. Giving the site (with network access) a score of 92. I personally find it difficult to separate the value of a site by itself, if it comes with access to a great network of sites. That's my thinking. CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW 01-12-19  12:21pm Replies (3) Review 248 They Didn't Know (0) 53.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality. But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good. -Content is dated. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy login. -Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link). -Long time before site timeout. Cons: -Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07. -Small site. -Models are not named in the videos. -No model bios. -Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low", for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving. -But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets. -Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing. Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated. -Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s. BOTTOM LINE: The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot. Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance. These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl. Video specs: High quality: Frame width x height: 1280x720 Total bitrate: 4320 kbps The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal. Number of videos at site: 44 Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes. -Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site. 03-31-11  03:32pm Replies (0) Review 249 Tin Seks (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Download limits: none. -DRM: none. -Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently. One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot. -To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process. -Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated. Cons: -Streaming: Not available. -Zips for photosets: Not available. -Photos available in 1 size only. -Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls. -Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites. -Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless. Bottom Line: Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen. The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot. It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent. So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be. But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted. Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site: The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex. -Site contents: 94 videos 94 photosets -Videos can be downloaded in different formats: WMV: low, medium, high resolution MPG MOV The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file: Frame width x frame height: 720x576 Total bitrate: 4128kbps The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos. The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus. I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection, something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want something beyond her getting banged. I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site. 11-14-10  09:53am Replies (0) Review 250 TMW VR Net (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Joining any site in the TMW network gives access to all the sites in the network. Join through TMW (Teen Mega World), costs $14.95/month, with PU discount. Join through TMW VR Net costs $19.95/month, with PU discount. Join through Beauty 4K costs $29.95/month, with PU discount. So do yourself a favor, and join through TMW. -Good download speeds. I get about 4.5-5.0 MB/sec download speeds. My max download speed limit is 6 MB/sec. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good navigation. The site (and network) is easy to use. This is important, because the network has a huge amount of videos and photosets, and you need to be able to find the models and videos that appeal to you, without a lot of effort. -I just find the models at the network, in the main, attractive to very attractive. Not a lot of effort is put into making the models appear glamorous or at their best. But they are young, and physically attractive, and in spite of engaging in hardcore sex, they still come across as appealing. Cons: -Small site. Started in 2016. Only 15 videos so far (as of 2016-08-28). -Irregular update rate. One or two or three videos per month. -Need to have Virtual Reality gear to watch the video in virtual reality. -File sizes for virtual reality files are huge. For a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 39 seconds, the sizes are: Oculus Rift: 6.7GB Gear VR: 4.5GB Smartphone: 3.4GB 1080p: 2.1GB Note: this is not the fault of the codec, but these files will eat up your storage space very fast. -Video files download with a generic number. So you need to manually re-name the files to know who the model is, and what the title of the video is. Bottom Line: The Best Porn review of TMW VR Net states: "Like with all the other sites on the network, the TMW VR Net collection is exclusive." This is an error. Not all the material at TMW is exclusive. Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur (part of TMW) appear at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network). Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur also appear at All Fine Girls(part of the Diesel network). There are other videos at TMW that appear at the Diesel network and at Team Skeet network. Also, a lot of the videos at TMW appear at 18X Girls (a different site from Team Skeet and Diesel). This is not a major issue. But don't expect 100% exclusive content at TMW, Diesel, Team Skeet, or 18X Girls. If you're expecting 100% exclusive content, you will be disappointed. Having said that, the videos at TMW VR Net are 100% exclusive, to the best of my knowledge. TMW VR Net is the newest site in the TMW network. It features virtual reality videos. The site is small, and updates slowly. So it will continue to be small in the future. Note: I do not have the equipment to view videos in virtual reality mode. So my experience does not reflect the intended audience. If I did have the virtual reality equipment, perhaps I would include a WOW factor in my review, that would change my review score because of the virtual reality experience. Having said that, I have seen 3D movies in theaters, and was not blown away by the experience so much that I thought the movies were fantastic because of the 3D factor. If you have the money to buy virtual reality equipment, then this site would have more value than it has for me. Bottom Line: This is a small site. It updates slowly. It features the virtual reality gimmick. The models at the site are attractive. The videos are high quality: good camera-work, good lighting, good colors, clean, attractive sets. The main value of the site is that it gives access to all the sites in the TMW network. TMW is a huge network, with over 30 sites, over 1,000 models, over 4,000 videos. TMW focuses on teens (18 to early twenties models) doing hardcore sex. It covers a number of niches. Most of the sites do not update, or do so in a very infrequent manner. You get access to a few sites that have much older content (4 to 5 years old or more), in lower quality videos (low quality because of the file definition, cheap sets, poor production values). This would include the latino site, ex-girlfriend site, gay boys site, and a she-male site. The network should eliminate those sites completely, because they drag down the quality of the network. Especially considering the money and time they are putting into providing a much higher quality product with their newer sites. Rating the virtual reality site: Because it's a small site (15 videos currently), and will stay a small site for quite a while, you might consider it a specialty site. Especially with the virtual reality factor in the videos. But because you get network access to the mega network of TMW, that raises the value of the site, because it gives you access to a huge number of teen hardcore videos in many different niches. You get access to 1,000+ models, 4,000+ videos, and thousands of photosets. The models can be attractive to outstanding. The videos, especially the more recent years, are offered in high definition, professionally shot (good camera-work, good lighting, clean sets). The network is easy to use: good download speeds, no DRM, no download limits, easy login (with cookies enabled), good model index with nice-sized thumbnails of each model, and links to the models' videos. For a price of $14.95/month, you get more than your money's worth. Giving the site (because of the network access) a score of 92. 08-28-16  04:42am Replies (0) Shown : 226-250 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.47 seconds.