Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 201 Silverstone DVD (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: none -Site timeout: none -Download limits: none -Easy login: requires username and password, no captcha -Download: low or high resolution WMV files -Streaming: low or high resolution -Large number of attractive models -Models have very little piercings, tattoos -Models are clearly identified in each clip by name and thumbnail (that is a really nice feature; I wish more pornsites would include the model name and a clear thumbnail of the model to show who she is and what she looks like) -Videos are 10-30 minutes, a nice runtime -Videos have 20-30+ screenshots to show model and action -Large amount of hardcore videos with nice variety -Updates 1 new video every 5 days Cons: -Check carefully for the pre-checked cross-sells when you sign up. I got stung the last time I signed up, even though I knew they were supposed to be there. I just didn't see it on signup, so I lost a few dollars down the drain. -Video quality is acceptable but not great. -It would be really nice if they could upgrade/increase the visual clarity of their updates. The updates are mainly older scenes from DVDs shot years ago. But if they could remaster the scenes to increase the clarity of the video, that would be a really nice feature. -Screenshot photos do not have a zip file. But few people would want to save these photos anyway. The photos are low quality: they are useful to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and the video action, which is great. But the photos have little erotic value. Bottom Line: The video quality is acceptable, but a site like Nubiles or X-art or Mplstudios can give you crystal clear videos, and you don't get that here. This is a DVD site, and even for the "high quality" streaming or downloaded files, it's like you are watching an older movie: the quality is OK, but not excellent: the colors are not vibrant, the clarity is not great. All the technical factors are good: professional lighting, professional focus, background music is better than most porn videos, the action is good, everything is good, but not the high quality video clarity you can get at some sites. But at the sites where you get the high video clarity, the quantity is small compared to the amount of content you get at this site. This site is one of the main values of the netFameSolutions network. The network currently has about 32 sites. About 5 of those sites are general hardcore sites that make up 90% of the value in the network. The other sites are niche, that might have a limited number of videos for fans of that niche/fetish, but that most PU members will probably skip over. With a single membership to almost any site in the network, you gain access to about 22 of the network sites. The sites that I believe have the most value are: Devils Film Peter North Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint This is a video network. It has a large amount of photos, but I consider the photos low to medium quality. The photos compare poorly to Metart, Mplstudios, Femjoy, or other photosite pictures. The network (and this site) has a number of attractive models. There is some ethnic variation of models: You have not just the standard East European models, which make up the bulk of the models, but also a significant number of Latina models. Also a small number of Asian models. A very small number of black models at the network. The Curry Creampie site features models that are supposed to be Indian-looking (from India). At this site, the videos have a tiny plot setup, where the boy and girl meet, then almost immediately have sex. But the setup tries to give a little more meaning and flavor to the sex instead of just two or more people banging away on each other. The sex is pretty straightforward: for 1 boy 1 girl: start with a blowjob, guy eats girl, they fuck vaginally, maybe fuck anally, then cumshot to girl's face. The action is not rough or harsh or abusive. This is definitely a hardcore site, but not the harsh, gonzo action found at some sites. Not a lot of tenderness in most of the sex, or affection, but not the harshness or abuse found at many sites. The monthly price of $9.95 (through PU/TBP link) makes this site a real bargain, based on the good quality of the content, the large amount of content, the large variation in content, and the low price. Giving the site a score of 87 because the site is good, plus you get access to a solid network of sites. 10-17-10  12:23am Replies (0) Review 202 Silverstone DVD (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -For those looking for variety from European teens, this network offers a number of Brazilian models at SilverstoneDVD, as well as Indian models at Curry Creampie, plus other ethnic types. -Updates: 1 scene/clip every 5 days -Watermark. Fairly small, bottom right corner (could be smaller, but somewhat unobtrusive) -Choice of 2 file sizes for download, small and big -Can download clip or watch it streaming -Screen caps give good idea of video clip, but useless as picture to enjoy -DRM: none -Download limits: none -Easy log-on. Usually no secret word to guess, when there is a secret word, it is easily visible -No automatic timer cutoff from site, even when you are inactive Cons: -Search engine at silverstonedvd could be a lot better. -Clips download as WMV files, no other download choices -There is a page where they show a number of nice-sized thumbnails of some of the models. This is the "models" page in the preview. It would be great if they could show all the models at the site, and not just a few (20 models shown on that page). There is no "models page" inside in the members area to show you what the models look like. -Stats: people like to know how many models are featured at the site, how many DVDs or DVD clips. I see no listing at the silverstoneDVD site. From the TBP site: 121+ DVDs (approx. 100 min. each) -Billing by famebill. No billing by CCBill or Epoch.(But I found the signup process to be quick and easy, with no problems.) Bottom Line: The netFameSolutions network offers Devilsfilm and SilverstoneDVD, along with 17 other sites, for a low monthly membership fee ($14.95 thru PU). All the sites I saw have the same basic layout: nice quality DVDs, basic navigation. You are not getting super high quality clips, but you are getting good quality clips, that are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good colors of the models and the sets. The clips are straight sex, no plot or story. Soundtrack ok, usually not as much fake moaning and groaning, background music ok: both moaning/groaning and background music could be improved, but still better than some of the terrible clips I have seen from other sources. Moaning/groaning is supposed to add to the excitement of the clip, but when it's so obviously fake, it doesn't add, it seems stupid. And the background music just gets in the way, so you wonder if it's better to watch the clip with with no sound, or to try to ignore the music. There are a number of other sites in the network, offering niche products: granny; big-sized models; hairy models; lesbian; milf; etc. My main complaint about the site (and the other sites in the network) is that a lot of clips don't identify the model(s) in the clips. So how can you search for other clips that particular model might be in if you don't know her name? In porn, it's easier to find quality photos of beautiful young women, than it is to find quality videos of beautiful young women. There are just too many elements in a video that can detract from the pleasure of looking at a lovely woman. Do the clips feature attractive girls, is the sex exciting, boring, disgusting, how much distraction is there from fake groans, noisy background music, lousy lighting, etc. SilverstoneDVD has a number of very good-looking young models, with a number of nice-quality clips. As a solo site, it would not be worth joining. But as part of a nice network, it's definitely worth a 1-month membership to see all this network has to offer. I am giving this site a score of 87, based on the network, not as an individual site. I find it difficult/meaningless to grade the site as a solo site, when so much of the value comes from the network's other sites that are included in the membership price. 06-30-09  01:06pm Replies (4) Review 203 Silvia Saint (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT. -SECURE LOGIN PAGE. A NICE FEATURE. -YOU GET 2 CONFIRMING EMAIL ON JOINING THE SITE. THEY GIVE YOUR LOGIN DETAILS, MEMBERSHIP DETAILS (PRICE, LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP, LAST 4 DIGITS OF CREDIT CARD USED). ALL THESE DETAILS ARE HANDY IF NEEDED. -SUPPORT IS 24/7, AND IS RESPONSIVE. I'VE CONTACTED CHAT SUPPORT TWICE, AND BOTH TIMES THEY RESPONDED WITHIN A FEW MINUTES, WHICH IS AMAZING FOR A PORN SITE SUPPORT. -NO DRM. NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS. -SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, WHICH IS A LARGE NETWORK OF HARDCORE SITES. Cons: -THEY DID A SITE/NETWORK UPDATE RECENTLY. MADE THE SITE/NETWORK LOOK BRIGHTER, MORE MODERN. HOWEVER, IT'S NOW HARDER TO NAVIGATE THE DIFFERENT SITES. THAT IS A MAJOR MISTAKE: MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE. I'M DEDUCTING 18 POINTS FROM THE SITE SCORE, BECAUSE IT'S HARD AS HECK FOR ME TO SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER, TO ENTER A SITE. THE OLD LAYOUT WAS: 1. FAMILIAR, EASIER TO USE. 2. HAD THE HOT LINKS EASILY VISIBLE. 3. THE HOT LINKS WERE FAST AND RESPONSIVE. THE NEW LAYOUT: 1. SEEMS LIKE A FUCKING JUMBLED MESS. 2. HAVE TO SEARCH FOR THE HOT LINKS. 3. THE NEW HOT LINKS SEEM TO BE SLOW TO RESPOND. I SUGGEST BRINGING BACK THE OLDER STRUCTURE, THAT WAS WORKABLE, EVEN IF IT WASN'T FLASHY OR BRIGHTLY-COLORED. OR GIVE THE MEMBERSHIP A CHOICE OF THE USING THE OLD STRUCTURE OR THE NEWER STRUCTURE. Bottom Line: SILVIA SAINT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST NAMES IN PORN. SHE WAS PENTHOUSE PET OF YEAR IN 1996 IN THE CZECH EDITION. 1996 SEEMS LIKE ANCIENT HISTORY IN THE WORLD OF PORN MODELS, BUT THIS WOMAN STILL LOOKS ATTRACTIVE. SHE'S NOT A TEEN ANY MORE, BUT FOR A WOMAN BORN 1976-02-12, HER PHYSICAL SHAPE IS JUST AMAZING. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING SHE'S BEEN IN OVER 300 PORN MOVIES, WHICH NORMALLY WEARS THESE MODELS OUT FAST. BUT IF YOU WATCH HER VIDEOS, SHE'S ENERGETIC, ENTHUSIASTIC, AND FUN-LOVING, WITHOUT A LOT OF OVER-THE-TOP FALSE THEATRICS THAT MANY PORN STARS USE. SHE COMES ACROSS AS A REAL PERSON, WHICH IS RARE IN PORN. MOST OF THE MOVIES SILVIA PERFORMS IN ARE LESBIAN SEX MOVIES. IN INTERVIEW ON HER SITE, SHE STATES THAT SHE IS STRAIGHT. SO WHY CHOOSE LESBIAN PORN? PROBABLY A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT REASONS, THAT SHE DOESN'T BOTHER TO STATE. THE SITE FEATURES SILVIA FROM HER EARLY DAYS TO TODAY. EXCEPT I HAVE A HARD TIME ORGANIZING THE VIDEOS INTO SECTIONS THAT MAKE SENSE TO ME. SILVIA DOES NOT ACT IN MOST OF THE NEWER VIDEOS. SILVIA SAINT IS A FAN FAVORITE. BUT I THINK THEY FUCKED UP THE SITE AND NETWORK WITH THE RECENT UPGRADE. I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 70. THAT'S IN SPITE OF NETWORK ACCESS, WHICH NORMALLY BRINGS A SITE'S SCORE INTO THE 80s. BUT FINDING THE CONTENT FROM THIS SITE, AND THE NETWORK SITES, IS DIFFICULT, INSTEAD OF THE SIMPLE, EASY WAY IT USED TO BE. 09-26-17  04:58am Replies (3) Review 204 Silvia Saint (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history. It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit. -Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content. -Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape, -PU discount $14.95/month (recurring). -This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site. -Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to be natural, not plastic. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate. -Can watch scenes streaming or download. -Videos have posting date. -Female models are listed for each scene. -Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec). -No DRM. -No download limits. -Lots of attractive models. -Easy login. -Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites. Bottom Line: CONS: -Pre-checked cross-sell at signup. -Many blank thumbnails for the model listings. -No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option. -No zip files for photo shoots. -I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next. -Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system). BOTTOM LINE: Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models Silvia is currently working with. Site Stats: Movies: 737 DVDs: 304 Pornstars: 481 Pictures: 6660 HD Movies (283) Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download: Streaming: 240p, 480p. Download: 240p, 480p. Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download. Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p. Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. The main sites in the netFameSolutions network, based on amount of content, include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys. The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well. I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit. It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower. I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s. 04-22-13  10:59am Replies (1) Review 205 Silvia Saint (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This is one of the few sites in the network that has photosets worth looking at. -Quality of the photosets not up to hi-quality standards of sites like met-art or femjoy, but these are decent photosets that a fan of silvia saint would probably enjoy. -Has solo photosets of Silvia Saint, also girl-girl photosets with Silvia Saint, a few sets where there is a guy in the set, but the guy is an afterthought, almost like a dildo -Uses toys (dildo) in the girl-girl photosets (depending on personal taste, that might be a pro or a con) -updates: a new video scene every 3 days -silvia saint is very attractive: great face, great body -video clips try to add a little story to the sex, but plot is minimal, this is a straight sex clip. The acting is amateur -video quality is, for newer DVD clips, just ok. Some PU members want high-quality video clips, which you won't get here -specs for newer DVDs: -bitrate 2115 kbps -dimensions 720x480 Cons: PROS (continued): -easy login. Username and password required. Don't usually require secret word. If a secret word is required, it is easily read, not heavily distorted like some sites that make a real guessing game what the secret word is supposed to be -no inactivity timeout from site -updates: every 1-4 days. Very irregular update schedule, but this is part of a nice network, and for a single site as part of a large network, this site is updated with a video scene or photoshoot once every 1-4 days, which is nice. -clips download as choice of small or big size in one format, WMV -Network access allows access to 19 sites (this is for network, of which this site is part of): -1500 movies -more than 500 full DVDs -exclusive content -unlimited download -updated every day -DRM: no CONS: -no zips for the photosets Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -clips download as WMV files, no other format -1 size for the photosets, don't have a choice of low, medium and high resolution photos -watermark. yes. size of watermark: larger than necessary. Placed in bottom right corner -date video clip made not posted. Many of the video clips were made years ago, but there is no date posted for when the video clip was made -older clips can be lower quality, somewhat blurry, out of focus (Sorry, Denner, I see why you are complaining about the video quality of some clips) -viewing can be a problem even for some of the newly posted video clips, This is the first site of the network where I had a real problem watching some clips. The clip might be slightly out of focus, or worse, and I could feel real eye-strain, almost like my eyes wanted to get cross-eyed, or like I was slightly drunk. I'm not making a joke. One clip like this is: 2678_03_big.wmv titled: "Private Penthouse Greatest Moments #01 Scene: #3" Posted to site: 2009-06-23 BOTTOM LINE: -The main attraction of this site is Silvia Saint, a porn star with a lovely face and lovely body. Not a great actress. Born on February 12, 1976, in Czechoslovakia. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 (Czech edition). -I don't know if she is making any new porn films. She announced her retirement from porn on March 19, 2001, but continued to make girl-girl scenes after 2001. -For her fans, this is a solid site, with a lot of Silvia Saint material: DVDs and photosets. DVD clips are not high quality, but mainly watchable. Photos are not high quality, but OK to look at, with Silvia in solo and girl-girl sets. I wish the DVD quality was better visually. Wish the photos were higher quality. Wish the DVDs and photos were dated as to when they were actually made. Would really be nice if you could look at the DVDs and photos and sort them by date made -Navigation is ok, could be improved. Should be easier to scan/glance thru the DVDs and photosets on offer here -My understanding is that the updates of Silvia Saint video clips are from old DVD material, that there is no new Silvia Saint DVD material being made -As part of a nice network, I regard this site as bonus material. Give the site 87 for value of the network, not the site itself. I liked Devilsfilm and SilverstoneDVD sites of this network much better 07-03-09  07:23pm Replies (0) Review 206 Solo Interviews (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Joining the network gives you access to most of the sites in the Team Skeet network (the premium "Unlock" sites cost extra). -One update per day to the network. The Solo Interviews site does not update. -Choice of definition for the videos: hi, medium, low. -1,000+ models in the network, many of them attractive teens or early twenties. -2,000+ videos. Most with matching photo sets. -The Team Skeet network has over 20 different niches. -Excellent download speed. I get over 5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6 MB/sec. -No download limits. -No DRM. Cons: -Cross-sale on join page. -First page you enter the site is an advertisement, that you have to click through to get to regular site inside. -There are several "Unlock" premium sites in the Team Skeet network. It costs an extra payment to access any "Unlock" site. -Older videos at the site are of lower quality. And offer fewer choices for video download definition. -The newer videos have no interview. They are basically a solo masturbation scene. -The last site update was 2013-08-06. So it's been over a year since they updated the site. Bottom Line: Number of Scenes: 144 Site Description: The name of the site, Solo Interviews, is slightly misleading. It seems to imply the videos will be an interview of the porn model. In the earliest dated videos, the videos start off with a short interview of the girl. However, they dropped that format, and in the newer videos, there is no interview. The girl might do a short strip, and then masturbate. The girl does put on a show for the viewer, to add an element of spice to the performance. I think the old format is better, because it gives the viewer a chance to hear what the girl sounds like, maybe gives a flavor of the girl's character. The site was launched around 2007. So some of the earliest videos are rather old, and the quality goes down as you view the older videos. And the video download file choices become rather limited. The newer video updates are offered in a wide variety of definitions: You can stream in 1080p, 720p, 540p. You can download the videos in 1080p, 720p, 540p. The girls are mainly natural teens. Very few fake boobs, very few tattoos. Not a lot of piercings. There are 24 sites you gain access to with a membership in the Team Skeet network. These are the "Unlocked" sites: CFNM Teens Dyked Exxxtra Small Her Freshman Year Innocent High Lust HD My Babysitters Club Oye Loca POV Life Rub A Teen Self Desire She's New Solo Interviews Step Siblings Team Skeet Extras Teen Curves Teen Pies Teens Do Porn Teens Love Anal Teens Love Money Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack Even though the Solo Interviews site no longer updates, it has 144 scenes. And you also gain access to most of the Team Skeet network of sites. Which offers you a lot of content: more than 1,000 models, more than 2,000 videos. The models are late teen/early twenties girls, mostly attractive to very attractive, mostly natural. With over twenty sites, you get an assortment of different themes that might appeal to your personal tastes: schoogirl, babysitter, massage, anal, blowjob, etc. Giving the site a score of 88. That is based on network access: the network has a lot of content, in different niches. The videos are professionally shot. Most of the girls are attractive teens. The network is basically easy to use. With a PU discount, the membership price is inexpensive at $17.87/month. 09-13-16  04:24am Replies (0) Review 207 Springtime Beauties (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -DRM: no. -Download limits: no. -Most models will be present at more than one TonyBucks network, but most of the models are not found at a large number of other sites. So the faces you see here are mainly fresh faces, at least until you have gone through the TonyBucks network. -There are some models that are really cute or outstanding, that you will probably have seen at one or more other major sites. -Multiple download formats: --High, medium or low resolution WMV. --MPG. --QuickTime. -Easy login. -No site timeout. Cons: -The biggest con is that the site is not updating. The most recent update I saw was from January 2009. -So this is an archive site. Some of the content is ok, but once you have downloaded the material you want, there is little reason to come back again. A shame, because they chose some nice models at this site, and you want to find more material on them, and that won't happen at this site. -No zip file for photosets. -1 size only for photos. -No streaming option for videos. -Watermark, bottom right corner of photos. Not large, but could be smaller, less noticeable. -Download problems? I was downloading 2 videos from the site using DownThemAll download manager. Both videos stopped downloading, giving me a "timeout" error message. Each download re-started from the beginning of the download. I do not know why each download stopped, or why each download could not resume from the point that it stopped. Bottom Line: This is part of the TonyBucks network. Joining any site in the network can give you access to 10 or less sites in the network, depending on when you join and which site you join through. There are currently 11 sites in the TonyBucks network. At this site the photosets outnumber the videos by a large margin. At most TonyBucks sites the photosets and videos are close in number, and several sites have each video paired with a photoset. Not here. The size of a single photo (up to 250 KB) indicates high definition. But you don't get the "professional quality" you will find at top photo sites like Met Art or MPL Studios. The photos are "ok", but not high quality regarding colors, clarity, etc. There are some attractive Eastern European models, but they could look much better with professional photography. The content is softcore teen nudity, with some masturbation. Even though the site was launched in late 2008 and stopped updating a few months later, the photo quality seems more like something from the 1990s: some very pretty models, but the quality is not high. If you know Teen Stars Magazine, the photography style is very similar: more skin is shown at SpringTimeBeauties, there is some mild solo masturbation at SpringTimeBeauties(no masturbation that I can remember at Teen Stars Magazine), but the photography is better at Teen Stars Magazine: the colors are better, the models look better. With the large file size for the "high quality" videos, you expect high quality playback, but you don't get it. The first video I saw had a tiny jittery effect that creates eyestrain. The second video I watched did not have the jittery effect, but the video picture is not crisp. 572 MB for a 15 minute clip, so the video picture should be extremely sharp, but it's not: it's like you're watching the scene through a very faint fog. You do get the impression you are watching amateur teen models who are just starting their porn modelling career, these girls are young and fresh. I just wish they were presented better (better photography). The soundtrack of the videos I saw was music from a radio (music mixed with talking from an announcer). The volume level of the music is low, which is better than loud, but it would be better to have no background music at all. The music is a minor distraction that does not really fit the video. If you like softcore striptease videos, this would be a nice site, except: 1. The site is not updating. 2. The videos are just ok. 3. The photography is not excellent. By itself, I don't think the site is worth joining. The videos I saw had some attractive models, but the video quality is just ok in spite of the large file size. If you like this style of photography, I would choose a site like Teen Stars Magazine, which is a site that doesn't update, but the photos are nicer, and they have zip files. Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating. 11-07-10  08:55am Replies (3) Review 208 Spunky Bee (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Billing agent: SegPayEU -No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page -Access to this site was immediate after signup -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No download limits. -Easy to read captcha. -Screenshots to illustrate videos. -Zipfile available for each photoset. -Content is dated. -Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body. Cons: -No streaming -Updates irregular Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality. Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then. -Photos are available in only 1 size. -Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos. -Navigation is very basic. -There is no search function. -Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one. The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog. -"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..." Bottom Line: Site statistics: Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets. Video file formats: high, medium, low quality WMV MPG (high quality) QuickTime format Video specs: (for the mpg file format): Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes. total bitrate: 6,488 kbps frame width x height: 1600 x 912 Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels. The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can download the entire site in 30 days with no problem. This is a solo teen site. This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls. You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music. SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names: Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika. I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again. If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out. Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up. By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership, the site makes a nice addition. 10-12-10  03:52am Replies (8) Review 209 Squirtalicious (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -First month is $14.95 with PU discount. Recurs at $29.95 for future months. -Join page is secure. -Login page is secure. -Member pages are secure. -Can choose your own login details: username and password. -Daily scene and photo set updates to the network. -Access to the Devils Film network of around 28 sites included with membership. I call it the Devils Film network, since that is the site I use the most. But it's also called Fame Digital network, which is part of Gamma Entertainment. -The same login details work to enter each site in the network. -But once you are inside the member's area of any site, you can switch to another site in the network without re-entering your login details. -Files download with the video title, model name, file definition, file type. -Unlimited downloads. Cons: -FAMEHELP.COM is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use. But I've been a member of this network several times, and never had a billing problem. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The last network update they did in 2017 provided a brighter, fresher look. At the same time, it made navigating the sites and network harder and more time-consuming. Instead of a simple drop-down menu to switch between sites, you now have a clunkier version of a drop-down menu that makes you search for some of the sites you have access to, because those sites are hidden on a second level of q drop-down menu. Also, searching the content of each site is more difficult after the network update. -The search is site-specific: you do a search on a model's name, it only returns her content at the site you are currently logged in to, instead of the whole network. This makes finding the network content of a model difficult and time-consuming. Bottom Line: Site theme: girls who squirt when they reach orgasm. Squirting is a niche that is not well served. There is a squirting site at Teen Mega World (Squirting Virgin), that hasn't updated in almost 7 years. And there is this squirting site at Fame Digital (Squirtalicious), whose last update was 08/25/2017, and this site had an irregular update schedule before then: posting 3 or 4 videos in a single month, then going for months without an update, then posting a few videos in a month, then another dry spell for months. The videos are unusual: they put a back story in the video, to make the scene more meaningful and intense, the videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good sound control. Some of the plots are amazing. The last video, posted 08/25/2017, is about a woman who squirted so much the first time, that her husband freaked out, and fell through a glass door; the husband then required 250 stiches to sew him back up. The wife feels remorse: the sex was so great, so intense, that she started gushing all over her husband, which led to the accident, and now the wife feels like a mutant in the X-Men series. A male friend tells the wife this is amazing, and she has to harness the power of the squirt. (Maybe they could make a comic book and movie adaptation from the video.) The wife is full of grief, that she almost killed her husband because of her powerful squirting. (I know this is amazing, but no less amazing than the comic books-movies that are being made.) The male friend says her squirting should be a joyful moment, that she should embrace this powerful gift; the male friend says he had a girlfriend that was a powerful squirter: the first time the ex-girlfriend squirted during sex, her fluids ran out until they covered the entire second floor of their dormitory. (You see why this scene could be part of the X-Men series: the power of a woman-squirter, combined with the power of the Me-Too Movement, could boost the X-Men series into the heights of Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War.) Not only does this scene have a powerful woman, exploring her sexuality, but it also has sex, which the Marvel Comic movies lack: maybe you get a kiss or two, but those movies are basically sex-less heroes who have not yet discovered the joys of raw sex. The site offers multiple choices in video definition downloads: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. The same video definitions are offered for streaming. 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good sound control. The videos are clear and crisp: even the 540p definition looks good on a 14" laptop monitor. The site will appeal to fans of squirting and peeing. Squirting, because this is what the videos are classified as. Peeing, because the distinction between squirting and peeing is blurred: some people consider squirting as separate from peeing, other people think squirting is a form of peeing. The site is a worthwhile addition to the Devils Film network. But what gives it even more value is the access to the entire Devils Film network of about 28 sites, covering a variety of hardcore niches. Giving the site (and network) a score of 85. The 85 is more for network access, than a reflection of the site-only value. 05-01-18  09:29am Replies (0) Review 210 Squirting Virgin (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Note: if you join any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites, I recommend joining through the main portal, the TMW site itself. This makes navigation and searching the content far easier, than if you joined one of the satellite sites. The price to join is the same for all the sites, so do yourself a favor and join through the main TMW site directly. These are pros for the TMW network: -Daily update. -High resolution images (in the photo sets). -UHD 4K videos in the last few years. -HTTPS login and member pages. Note: sometimes the site is HTTPS, sometimes it's not. I've never seen a site or network act like this. -5,000+ videos. -2000+ models: the average model is a female teen, and the girls range from slightly above average to cute to very attractive. -30+ sites covering a wide variety of teen niches. Membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you full access to all the network sites. There are no sites requiring a premium membership. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. Cons: -The main con is that the last update was 2011-05-30. This is an archive site. -The second major con is that the site is small: 31 videos (with matching photosets) total. -The photosets are screencaps, that are not good quality. The clarity and focus could definitely be improved. Which is a shame, because a lot of the models are cute, and the site has a large photoset for each video. -No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt you would want to collect these photosets: even though the girls are cute, the photos are poor-quality screencaps made from the video. -Login and member pages are sometimes not secure. Which makes hacking easier. -Vendo and other billing agents are the default billers. I've never had a problem with Vendo (or with any of their other billing agents), but I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, who make cancelling easy. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: There are many reason why TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks: -The models range from slightly above average to cute to really attractive. -The network has spent a lot of time and effort and money upgrading their content in the last few years. This is reflected in the improved quality of the videos and photosets. They now offer videos posted in the last few years in definitions ranging from 360p through 2160p (Ultra High Defintion). The sets are clean and they use good-quality equipment to film and photograph the models. -The models are Russian girls (or from the surrounding area). Russian girls are taught from a young age how to respond to stunt cock: the stunt cock slips his tongue or fingers into the girl's pussy, and she's ready to rock and roll. Sometimes it doesn't even take a tongue or finger to turn her on: the stunt cock slipping his cock out of his pants is also a sure turn-on with these prime Russian sluts. Until I started watching porn, I never realized that teen Russian girls can be just as horny as any American male teen. -The membership price is low: PU has a discounted first month's membership price of 14.95/month, renews at $14.95/month. -The teens are not just mainly cute, but also enthusiastic about the sex, and seem to really be getting off. There isn't a lot of harshness and cruelty in the sex, and the girls show their enjoyment with a lot of the moans, squeals, and cries while getting pounded by the stunt cocks. -If you are willing to pay for a 1 year membership, you can sometimes find a very discounted price for $90 or less for a 1-year membership. The theme of the Squirting Virgin is girls who squirt (ejaculate) during orgasm. I always thought that the squirting was more like the girls were pissing, rather than having some sexual fluid eject from the vagina. Which would be smelly as hell, as well as messy. But some people believe that the squirting is not pissing. There are fans of girls who squirt. So for those fans, this site would be interesting: cute girls who squirt during orgasm. Except the site is small (31 videos total), and has not updated since May 2011. The videos come in the following definitions: 360p, 480p, 720p. That is for streaming and downloading. The sets are cheap, because the vids were shot when the network was still a low-budget platform for cheap, hardcore teen porn. You can easly tell the vids were made years ago, compared to the higher quality videos and photosets that have been posted the last several years. But if you are a fan of squirting, it's still worthwhile to view the vids because the models are cute and the action can be hot. The basic action is that the stunt cock starts by arousing the girl, fondling her all over, sticking his fingers in her pussy, ass, mouth. Then he uses his cock to fuck her mercilessly, in her pussy, ass, mouth, squeezing and slapping her tits and face and ass, tieing her with ropes, gagging her with her panties or a rag, forcing her into uncomfortable positions to show her he is her master. Also, the stunt cock often uses a dildo to arouse the girl. There is a strong element of bdsm in these videos: the stunt cock treats the girl like a piece of meat, but she willingly goes along, and even though uncomfortable, she is able to smile and laugh when it's over. The main problems with the site: it's small, only 31 videos. And stopped updating in 2011. So I'm giving the site a score of 84. However, the network updates daily, and there is a ton of good-quality teen hardcore videos at the other sites, covering a wide variety of niches. If the site started updating again, the score would be raised. 03-31-19  12:20am Replies (0) Review 211 Squirting Virgin (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring). -Unlimited downloads. -Membership in any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites gives you access to all the TMW sites. -There are not premium sites that cost extra to gain access to. -There are 30+ sites in the network, covering a variety of niches. -Daily update to the network. But Squirting Virgin has not updated since May 30, 2011. -User name is your email adress. And you can choose your own password. Cons: -The most obvious con is that this is an archive site. The last update was on May 30, 2011. -Small site. Only 31 scenes (31 vidoes and matching photo sets). -They recently raised the price of a year-long membership from $89.95/year to $119.40/year. But most PU members would select the $14.95/month membership, anyway. -The did a network re-design to make the network more attractive: brighter images for the photos. But the network re-design made site navigation more difficult and time consuming. Details in the bottom line section. -Vendo is the primary biller. I prefer CCBill and Epoch. But I've had many memberships paying through Vendo, and I've never had a problem with them. It's just that CCBill and Epoch are so easy to use, and reliable. -For a short while, they required a captcha to enter the member's area. But they've dropped the captcha requirement lately. -Sometimes some videos will not stream. You can hear the sound track, but the video visual track does not play. Bottom Line: Site theme: girls who are so aroused by their sexual partner that they squirt during orgasm. Also, many of the scenes have an element of BDSM. This is not heavy BDSM (real or fake torture), but I can believe that many of the girls are treated harshly during the sex, but at the end, they seem to enjoy it. The BDSM is not as intense as Woodman Casting, but along those lines. Woodman does not use the same techniques as shown in the Squirting Virgin site: the Squirting Virgin scenes show the girls being tied down with ropes or thongs, gagged, a large vibrator is often used to stimulate the girl, she is slapped on the face and ass, forceful vaginal and anal sex, Network stats: -models 1,383 -photos 896,983 -videos 5,085 -Total content 8,542.8 Gigs I signed up for a year at $89.95/year, recurring. But the price has since been raised to $119.40. It used to be $89.95 for many years. This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, for many reasons: I like the selection of the models. They are young teens, many of them attractive to almost beautiful. Mainly, I like the way they are presented: youthful, attractive, with a healthy appetite for sex. There is a huge amount of hardcore content. Over time, they upgraded the network: making the network easier to use, upgrading the sites with more expensive sets, better videos and photos, better costumes, offering the newest fads (4K video site, VR site). The price seemed cheap, at $90/year. They increased the yearly membership fee to $119. Also, they did a recent network upgrade on the network structure, which makes the network harder to use. Each site now has a model page for that specific site. Since you have over 30 sites in the network that you have access to with a membership to any one of the sites, that means you can not use the member model page to see what her content is at any other site. There is a partial work-around: the public preview pages have model listings for each model, which shows the sites she has conent at. Except the public preview pages do not have hot links to her content. So: to access her content at the network, you first have to check the public preview page model listing for the model, and note the specific sites she has content at. And then, you have to log in to the member area of the network, and navigate to one of the specific sites the content is located at. And then you have to bring up the model's page, where you will find hot links to her content at that specific site. And if you want to see her content at another site, you have to navigate to that site, and again, bring up her model page with the hot links to her content. This is a step back from the previous structure where a single model page inside the network showed you her content at the network, with hot links to all of her content at the different sites. The software designer was not thinking of keeping the navigation easy and simple: The designer made a poor choice, and made using the network much harder and more time-consuming to find the models' contents. Also, to switch between sites, you can't use a simple drop-down menu, but have to navigate to a page listing all the network sites, and select the site you want to enter. The only good part of this design is that you don't have to re-enter your login details each time you want to switch between sites: your login details (username and password) are the same for each site). It used to be that you had long time before you were logged out of the site for inactivity. But now you are sometimes logged out for inactivity in a much shorter time frame. I'm giving the site/network a score of 88. This is because of network access to 30+ sites. If I was scoring on the site itself, because it's a small site (31 videos), and does not update, the score would be much lower. But I just like the selection of the young models and how they seem to be enjoying the sex. 03-20-18  08:38am Replies (0) Review 212 Squirting Virgin (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price of $19.95/month if you join this site directly. A better choice is to join Teen Mega World directly, which has a PU discounted price of $14.95/month, and includes access to this site. -Teen Mega World is a mega-network of teen hardcore videos: the network has over 4,000 videos (and matching galleries). About 33 sites, covering many niches: dirty doctor, dirty coach, creampie, boy-girl, boy-girl-girl, lesbian, anal, squirting, masturbation, toys, latina, old man-young girl, etc. -The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, etc. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site time-out due to inactivity. -The models are late teens, early twenties. Many of them are attractive to very attractive. -Multiple choices for download definition. -Zip file for the accompanying gallery. Cons: -It's a small site. Only 31 videos. The site stopped updating in its first year. -The performers speak Russian, but the videos are sub-titled. But the dialogue is basically meaningless. The guy and girl are there to fuck. And they do it energetically. -Some people might want a wider spectrum for the models. These are slender, white Eastern European teens. -The stunt cocks act like arrogant pricks, and they fuck the girls hard. But the girls seem to like it. -When I first saw this niche, I thought it was disgusting. The squirting seemed like the girls are pissing all over themselves, and I'm sure it is smelly as hell. But if you can think of the squirting as evidence the girls are aroused to climax, and it shows the mastery of the stunt cock, then it can be arousing to watch. And some people like porn peeing videos. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 31 scenes. With a matching photo set for each scene. The squirting niche enjoyed brief popularity around 2011. But I've read that it's still a popular niche. This site was started around January 2011, but the last update was in May 2011. So it's a small site, with only 31 scenes. The models are attractive Eastern European girls. Each scene follows a similar script: A stunt cock plays with a girl, using a vibrator, his hands, his mouth and tongue, whatever, until the girl reaches orgasm and starts to squirt fluid from her vagina. This squirting is meant to show the mastery of the stunt cock over the model. After the woman squirts, the stunt cock then plays with her some more: he fucks her pussy, her ass, rams his cock into her mouth, ties her down, sometimes stuffs a rag into her mouth, and again demonstrates that he is the master. So there is an element of adomasochism in the scenes. The stunt cock is the master, and the attractive model is his sex toy to be used and abused and pleasured. The girls do a good job of seeming to be grateful to the stunt cocks for being treated like a piece of meat for the guy's pleasure. They smile at the end and say they liked it and will be back for more. So the sex is not gentle or affectionate, but if you are in the mood for some rough sex, this should fill the need. It's not ultra-violent, but it sure as hell is not glamcore. It's more on the lines of the Pierre Woodman casting videos. Giving the site a score of 92. This is based on: 1. the site, even though it's small, does a good job of illustrating the Master stunt cock over the attractive female girl. 2. the Teen Mega World network, which has over 4,000 good hardcore teen videos covering many niches. 03-16-16  11:11pm Replies (0) Review 213 Squirting Virgin (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limit. -Content is dated. -4 format choices for each video download: WMV, MKV, FLV, MP4. -The models are Eastern European, but there are English subtitles. -There are a number of attractive models at this site, which is part of the teen mega world network (also called the royal cash network or the s&s royal limited network). -The search engine is integrated with the entire network, so if you find a model you like, by entering her name, you will see all the videos she is in(at the entire network), and can transfer to each video through a hot link. The software team has upgraded the search and made it much easier to use. -Zip file for each photoset. -Choice of downloading or streaming videos. Cons: -Small site. Started January 2011. Only 25 videos (and matching photosets). -Each video follows the same basic plot: stunt cock stimulates the model until she squirts, then he continues stimulation and fucks her semi-roughly. Not full-blown roughness, but the sex is not gentle or loving or affectionate. The stunt cocks are treating the girls like a piece of meat, but the girls all seem to lap it up. -Navigation is good, but could be improved. Put a hot link at each model's listing, to make it easier to search for content with that model. Bottom Line: The basic setup is a guy stimulates a girl, with a vibrator, a dildo, his fingers, his mouth, or some combination, the girl gets so excited she squirts out her sexual juices, then the guy fucks the girl in different positions before finally coming on her face. The site has a strong bondage element: the girl is usually tied, and a cloth or rubber piece is stuck in her mouth. Also, by doing the girl on a chair, or on the floor, or in some other uncomfortable position, the stunt cock is demonstrating his mastery of the bitch getting fucked. The girls moan and groan and whimper as their face is pressed against a wood floor and the stunt cock reams their vagina, ass, and mouth. The girls are real love slaves. Some girls sound so fake with the moans and screams that it's a turnoff. But some girls are better actors and sound like they are sexually excited. Squirting is not my fetish. To me, it looks like the girls are peeing when they squirt, which I don't find erotic. It would be smelly as hell having sex with a girl who has just peed all over herself. But if you are able to think of the squirting as a sign the bitch is in heat, and so excited by the masterful stunt cock, then you could enjoy the action even more by the squirting, the whimpers and moans, the bondage and whatnot. Number of videos at site: 25 Video runtime: 25-30 minutes. Download options for videos: High Quality (WMV) Medium Quality (MKV) Medium Quality (FLV) Low Quality (MP4) The high quality WMV files are about 958 MB for a 28 minute clip. Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4736 kbps The technical quality of the videos is excellent: very high definition, good lighting (made easy because these are indoor scenes); the camera is steady, not jerked around; good framing of the model before and during the sex action. The colors are good (because of the good lighting). The dialog and script are stupid. But the girls are attractive, and there is solid sex action in the videos. Update rate: when the site started in January 2011, they updated with 1 video each day. By the end of January and continuing through March, they updated 1 video every 5-8 days. Number of photosets at site: 25 (same number as the videos). Each photoset is a video capture of a video shoot. The photos are basically screen captures. So the photo quality is not high. The photos don't appear to be photoshopped or airbrushed. They can be slightly out of focus. Each photoset has a zip file. Number of photos per photoset: 200+ Individual photos are about 100 KB in size, 1280x720 pixels, 300x300 dpi. Squirting virgin is the newest offering at the teen mega world network. Joining teen mega world gives access to 27 teen sites. A huge number of hardcore videos. I'm giving the site a score of 89. You are paying for network access. Scoring the site as a stand- alone would give a much lower score. The network access is a bargain at $19.95/month. See Reply #1 for $10 price saving. 03-21-11  09:42pm Replies (3) Review 214 Stunning 18 (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -24/7 customer support. Support is part of the MetArt network, which is among the finest csutomer support teams for any porn site. The only upgrade I would suggest would be to start a 24/7 live chat. -Login and member pages are https. Secure. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -Choice of definitions for downloads. Low, medium, high. -Choice of definitions for online streaming of a photoset. Low, medium, high. The online player is fast and easy to use. Cons: -Cons used to be basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, so you knew you were getting a quality product. But lately the site seems to be stumbling. -Membership only gives you access to the Stunning18 site. No bonus sites are included. -The update rate has really dropped off in the last year. From a lot of updates per month in previous years, the rate has dropped to maybe 4 updates a month recently. -The chronological listing of photo set updates is jumbled. Instead of a continuous listing of updates for each month of a year, there are gaps where there is no listing for photo sets from different past year's months. -I don't know if it's lack of funds or lack of technical staff, but the site needs to be better organized, to make searching the contents easier, to find what's available. Bottom Line: I believe Stunning18 was started and run by Antonio Clemens. He was the main photographer for the site. I don't know if he is suffering ill health or what the problem is, but the update rate for the Stunning18 site has dropped way down. And the site has some technical problems where the chronological listing of the updates, by year and month, is showing a lot of gaps. It looks like Thierry Murrell, another erotic photographer with experience in glam photography, has stepped in to supply much of the recent updates at Stunning18. Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe, which was a small glam site that featured at lot of attractive teen models. But the Glam Deluxe site closed a few years ago. Thierry Murrell has previously contributed to the MetArt site. My recommendation: which is based on a lack of knowledge of what the problems are at the Stunning18 site: Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe. I assume he controls or owns or has some interest in the content at the closed Glam Deluxe site. I suggest that MetArt staff make an offer to buy or lease the content from the Glam Deluxe site, and use that content to fill the gaps in the update rate for Stunning18. There might be egos involved, legal considerations. But MetArt took over the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites, and runs other sites under the MetArt banner. I was a member of Glam Deluxe years ago: the models were very attractive, the photography seemed first rate. This would be a way for the owners of the Glam Deluxe content to monetize the content, and for Stunning18 to fill the gaps in the update rate, and give the site time to settle whatever other problems the site might be having. MetArt can publish a short blog explaining that they've taken control of the former Glam Deluxe site contents, with the approval of Thierry Murrell, to help fill the gaps in the current update rate. That should help explain to the Stunning18 members why MetArt is using previously published or unpublished content from another site. Just a suggestion. But worth looking into. Personally, I think it's a shame when a good site closes, and the contents, if worthwhile, are lost to people who would be interested in viewing or collecting those contents. My recommendation is to wait for the update rate to pick up again, before joining the Stunning18 site. There is plenty of older photosets to browse, but if you want newer updates, wait for the update rate to return to normal. I'm giving the Stunning18 site a score of 82, until they fix the update rate and the chronological listing of their contents. 01-22-19  03:58pm Replies (0) Review 215 Sugar Paradise (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site. -The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename. -There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color. Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed). -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less. Cons: -On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in? -Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009. -Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format). So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about. -Navigation is very basic. -No search function. -Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models. Bottom Line: This is a very softcore teen site. Their model listing consists of 3 models: Diana, brown hair Liza, black hair Nika, blonde hair I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them. There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers. In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens. No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site. In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This is the very softest of softcore. Site statistics: Photosets Number of photosets: 167 Number of photos per set: around 70+ Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res. Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size. Number of videos: 88 Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes. Frame width x height: 720 x 480 Total bitrate: 6096 kbps You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files. There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only. The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4 minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less. The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass. The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional. There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent. The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music. The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or story. I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site. 10-15-12  11:54pm Replies (11) Review 216 Team Skeet (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Over 1,300 models. -The network covers a number of niche fantasies: screwing the babysitter, the naughty high school girl, small girls, teen pies, anal, blowjobs, massage, etc. -Many of the girls are attractive. But the site does not put a lot of effort into presenting them at their most attractive. -CCBILL is the payment processor. A trusted name. -No pre-checked cross-sale on signup (that I can remember). -Currently, there is a special link at TBP for a rate of $9.87/month (recurring). I don't know how long that rate will be available. -One update per day for the network. -24 sites in the network. -You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You also have the choice of low, medium or high definition for video downloads. Cons: -Have to pass through a upsell page (with ads) to enter the main site. -Ads clutter the pages. -Some of the network sites are premium sites, that you have to pay extra to access. -The models are teens, many of them attractive. But not much effort is put into making the models appear attractive: either in make-up, costume, sets, or superior camera-work. You have hundreds of cute models: Alice Green, Alice March, Apolonia Lapiedra, Kharlie Stone, Dillon Harper, Alexia Gold, etc. But the models appear so much more attractive when presented at some other paysites. -The content is advertised as 100% exclusive. But many of the Rub-A-Teen site videos are found at Teen Mega World (at their Tricky Masseur site) and at Diesel network (at the All Fine Girls site). -The camera-work of the videos is often mediocre. The video is not smooth, the lighting is just OK, the sets are inexpensive. A good amateur would shoot better videos than many of the Team Skeet videos. Bottom Line: Team Skeet is a network of hardcore teen sites. -Over 20 sites. -Over 1,300 models. -Over 2,300 videos With over 20 sites, you get a nice variety of teen fantasy themes. The acting is mainly poor. The girls are usually attractive, but not much effort is put into making the girls appear attractive. For example, Apolonia Lapiedra appears at Team Skeet and at MetArt. At MetArt, she is gorgeous: Lovely face, great body. At Team Skeet, she appears in two videos. I know it's the same girl, because the name is the same (which is unusual with porn models, because they often have a number of different names for different sites). And Apolonia has the same physical characteristics: long black hair, face and body resembles the MetArt girl. If I saw this Team Skeet girl at a shopping mall, I would not give her a second look. She's nothing special (appearance-wise) in her Team Skeet videos. What the fuck? I'm being serious. She is a jewel at MetArt. She is a piece of meat at Team Skeet. I don't mean Team Skeet is a gonzo site. But they took a great-looking model, and present her as a average-looking or below-average-looking teen in her videos. It just makes you realize that not only is porn fantasy, but that the camera-work can make an incredible difference in how appealing some of these models are. Which I already knew. But what a waste of talent to take these attractive girls and present them without their natural sparkle. That is why I give MetArt a score of 99. And Team Skeet a score of 80. (But there are other reasons why I give Team Skeet a score of 80): -The poor quality of the videos: they need to hire a professional for their camera work. -The cheap sets. -This is a personal quirk, but I don't like "Unlock" sites in the network that require added payments to access their content. If I pay for a membership, give me access to all the sites, and don't tease me with added sites that require more money. They are already using part of the page space to advertise other non-related sites. So they are over-loading you with advertisements to take your money. I paid for a membership. Let me enjoy it in peace. End of rant. For bread-and-butter hardcore teen porn, I much prefer Teen Mega World, over Team Skeet. Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) is borderline between gonzo and glamcore. Diesel has outstanding models (physically attractive), and they look great in the photos and videos. For glamcore, X-Art and Blacked and Tushy are outstanding sites. Lovely models, presented with care and precision to look gorgeous: with great camera-work, expensive sets, etc. The Best Porn review writes in his latest review on Team Skeet (released Jul 22, 2016): "One of the best networks of teen-oriented sites on the Net." I can't agree. 11-26-16  11:30am Replies (0) Review 217 Team Skeet (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Epoch is the billing company. -Get a confirming email on signup. -Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -Videos have date they were posted to the site. -Nice selection of attractive teen models. Cons: -Most of the cons are basically minor. -Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages. -Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup. -Large watermark bottom right side of videos. -Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition. Bottom Line: -Team skeet is currently a network of 14 sites. There is another network of around 12 sites that is run by the same partner, but that other network requires a separate membership. The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include: Innocent High She's New Oye Loca POV Life Titty Attack The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Self Desire Her Freshman Year Solo Interviews Team Skeet Extras ExxxtraSmall Rub A Teen Teeny Black The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc. You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading. For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition. For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods. You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps. Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out. The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot. 12-25-12  07:58am Replies (8) Review 218 Teen BFF (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Medium sized site: 236 updates. -Access to this site gives you access to the basic Porn Pros network, which has about 22 sites. -The site has -PU discounted price $17.95/month. -No download limits. -Site contents is advertised as 100% exclusive. -Each scene has a matching photoset. -Zip file for each photoset. -The models are almost all attractive, young teens or early twenties girls. -Most videos have a choice for download of 480p, 720p, 1080p. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Captcha on log-in page. -Nag screen to upgrade to premium status for $70 when entering site. -Adds for other paysites on member pages, as well as the ad to upgrade to premium status. -Sometimes hot links lead to error pages: File not found, video file not found, html5 network error. -Slow download speeds. I was getting less than 200 KB/sec, while at other sites I was getting over 4 MB/sec. So to download a 1080p file (1.01 GB) can take over 2 hours. Which is ridiculous. Bottom Line: The site theme is two girls who are best friends. Since this is a porn site, that means a lot of lesbian sex. And quite often, the scenes feature a guy who gets to pleasure both of the girls. Site stats: -236 videos. -236 matching photosets. I believe the photos are screencaps made from the matching video. The software used to make the screencaps is excellent: photos are nicely centered, nicely focused, well lighted. The scenes are basically straight hardcore sex. The scene usually starts off with the two girls kissing, possibly fondling one another. And then a guy starts kissing the two girls, and they all have sex. So there's not much of a plot or buildup to the sex. The scenes are professional shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. The sets are simple: usually a nice, clean bedroom. Costume are minimal: either the models start off naked, or they are wearing street clothes which are soon discarded. One problem with the site is that the sex gets repetitious. There's no plot, it's just 2 girls having sex, or 2 girls and a guy having sex. A plot or backstory would give some meaning to the sex, make it more interesting. So even though the girls are physically attractive, and young, many of the scenes lack heat. The main value of the site is that you gain access to the basic Porn Pros network, which has over 3,000 videos. Most of the girls are young and attractive. And there are many hot videos to be found. My favorite site at the network is MassageCreep, which is one of the better massage-themed hardcore sites. Other massaged-themed sites (not affiliated with Porn Pros) include Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Mega World), RubATeen (part of Team Skeet, which has many of the same videos as Tricky Masseur), and FuckedHard18 (part of Porn Master Mind). Giving the site a score of 82, for the network access. If the site were scored as a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. One of the main negatives is the slow download speeds. I have been getting less than 200 KB/sec. That is downloading a single video file, which can take over 2 hours to download. Another negative is that many of the videos lack heat. However, if you enjoy watching 2 girls and a guy have sex, you would probably rate the site higher than I do. I normally enjoy watching one guy and one girl having sex, versus one guy and two girls. The fantasy just seems more real to me. And it's easier to film one on one, instead of one guy on two girls. In my opinion, anyway. However, if done right, one guy on 2 girls can be hot as hell, if you watch some of Rocco Siffredi's scenes (from RoccoSiffredi.com, part of the Devil's Film network). 01-17-17  06:06am Replies (0) Review 219 Teen Burg (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of videos for a site of this type. -Site advertises more than 500 videos, more than 300 photosets. -Note: TBP update 09-20-10 states 296+ videos, 37+photosets. Why the big difference in the numbers, I don't know. Looking at the site, without actually counting the separate videos, it seems the site contents is much smaller. -Site advertises daily updates. The update rate is actually about 1 update every 7 days. -Free live cams with models. You pay USD $2.95 (EUR € 2.30) for 30 days of access to several hours per day of nude public shows. Private chats are optional and cost extra. -There is also a separate "Models online" service that offers a xxx webcam live show. -Large number of cute models. -Search engine: can search by model's name, month and year, video or photoset. -Content is dated. -Model's name is clearly listed for each video. -Zip file for each photoset. -No DRM. -No download limits. Cons: -No streaming. -A simple text list of the models at this site, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, would be very helpful. -Single size for photos. No choice of low, medium or high resolution. -No biography. Models identified by name only. -Basic search. Can search by model's name or when video/photoset was posted. But can't search by description of model, type of sex, or any other factors. -A faq page would be helpful, listing basic site facts: number of videos, number of photosets, number of photos, total size (GB) of videos, total size of photos, number of male models, number of female models. -No text on the site identifies which videos are high definition. The HD videos are the ones that are 1 GB+ when you download them. Bottom Line: Photos are 1643 x 2464 pixels Videos 720x576 (1100kbps) File Sizes (HQ): WMV = 200MB-1GB This is the town where I should have grown up. Lovely, nubile chicks that fuck at the drop of a hat. Or the glance of an eye. This is a hardcore teen video site. The videos far outnumber the photosets. Most of the videos are a boy and a girl. Each video/photoset has a few thumbnails to show what's inside the file. It is difficult to get a clear idea of what the model looks like from the thumbnails that are actually furnished by the site. A much better system would be to have a nice-sized photo of the model that shows her clearly, plus 4 thumbnails that clearly show the model from the video/photoset. The videos are good quality. The technical factors are handled well: lighting, focus, action, a lot of good looking teens. The photos are high quality: the size of a single photo is around 300-500 KB. I was surprised the photo size is so large, because the photos sure don't look high quality to me.I am not talking about the attractiveness of the model, or her makeup or costume. I am talking about the extreme clarity that photos can have, which is not found here. The colors are not brilliant or sharp. I just find the photos at major softcore glamor sites so much more appealing than the photos at this site. If you are into hardcore teen action, this site has a lot of videos. The videos are good quality. The sex is gentler than the gonzo sites, and the teens actually talk and kiss before getting down to the action. The teens are ok to nice looking, very little tattoos or piercings. The site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. Membership in any one site will normally give you access to some of the other sites. How many bonus sites you get, and what those bonus sites are, varies depending on which site you join through. It definitely pays to check each site for the bonus details. One site will offer 2 bonus sites, a different site might offer 6 bonus sites, another might offer 9 bonus sites. I joined through Spunky Bee, which charged me the same or lower price for the membership, as joining a different TonyBucks site. And I got access to 9 bonus sites (10 sites total). I am giving the site a score of 85, because it's part of a network that has a number of attractive models, and a large number of good quality videos. 10-26-10  05:02am Replies (3) Review 220 Teen Curves (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Membership in the site gives access to the basic Team Skeet network (not including the premium sites in the network). -PU/TBP discounted price of $17.87/recurring. But can sometimes find a special price below that. -Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name. Easy to cancel membership, helpful to resolve billing problems. -No download limit. -Network covers many niches: -Over 20 sites. -Over 1,300 models. -Over 2,300 videos -Can stream or download the videos. -Each video has a matching photoset. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Make sure to un-check the offer, or you will be signed up to a trial membership that recurs at a very expensive price. -Teen Curves only gets one video update per month. But the network gets one video update daily. -Ads on every page. -Upsell to join their premium sites on every page. -Some members have complained of slow download speeds from Teen Curves. But I normally average around 3+ MB/s, which is fine for me. My max download speed from my ISP is 6.25 MB/s, which I almost never get close to at most paysites. Though I do get 4-5 MB/s at some of my sites like MetArt and New Sensations. Bottom Line: -The site title is Teen Curves. The emphasis is on lovely teen booties that are fleshy but firm, with a bit of jiggle when slapped. If you are an ass man, the sites was designed with your pleasure in mind. However, those connoisseurs specializing in anal sex could be disappointed, because the site mainly features cock sucking and vaginal intercourse (doggy style). Anal intercourse is a separate area the site does not focus on. Team Skeet does have a different site featuring anal sex called Teens Love Anal. Teen Curves has 60 videos, with matching photosets. The videos can be streamed or downloaded. The photosets have a zip file for easier downloading. The site structure allows the videos to be streamed and/or downloaded in whole, or in the specific clips you choose. The videos may be streamed and/or downloaded in multiple choice of definition. Each video comes with a trailer, to give you a preview of what the action is. The models are late teens/early twenties girls, mainly attractive, who seem to enjoy the sex. With a small amount of content (60 videos), the site has limited appeal. The main value comes from the access to the basic Team Skeet network, which has over 20 sites that cater to different fantasies. Do you like high school girls, baby sitters, cream pies, tiny girls, massage, anal, etc.? The network has a nice layout that makes using the network easy. You can stream the videos online in your choice of low, medium, high or 1080p definition. You can also download the video in your choice of low, medium, high, or 1080p definition. You can choose the specific clips you want from a video, or stream or download the entire video. The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good focus, good lighting, OK to nice sets. The models are mainly attractive, young teens to early twenties. Mainly white. They are there to put on a show, and they seem to be enjoying the sex. Giving the site (and network) a score of 85. The site itself is small, but you get network access to 1,000s of hardcore videos at the network. The content is good, hardcore porn, the navigation is easy, and the site is worth a join if you enjoy teens. 02-20-17  08:27pm Replies (0) Review 221 Teen Dorf (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Zip files for photosets. -Easy login: username, password, captcha (easily read letters). -No site timeout. -Streaming options: low, medium, high quality. -Download options: low, medium, high quality WMV. : MPEG. : QuickTime. -Little or no photoshopping in the photos. -No download limits. -Updates 1 photoset or video approximately every 10 days. Cons: -Only 1 size for photos. -If you want to download individual photos instead of the full zip, you sometimes get a "show.php" file instead of the photo file you are trying to download. -In some videos and photosets, it can be hard to see what the face or body of the model is like. This is true for outdoor scenes, where the cameraman/photographer does a poorer job than if the scene is indoors. -The index listing pages are cluttered with thumbnail photos advertising other sites. -I found very few cute teen models at this site. Bottom Line: The theme of the site is interesting: young teen couples having sex in a natural way. But many photosets and videos are lacking. They are shot in an amateur way, especially the outdoor scenes. The best way to improve this site would be to fire the photographer and video man and get someone who knows how to take a photograph, how to shoot a video. If you're shooting outdoor scenes, get a shooter who knows how to take a photo, how to shoot a video so the model is shown clearly and attractively. In some outdoor photosets and videos, the face and body of the model is hard to see clearly. The camera is only a few feet away, but the model's face is not shown clearly, because of focus or lighting or shadows or some other reason. -How a photographer shoots a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. There is no effort to make these girls look more attractive (from lighting, makeup, costumes, whatever). Even the two models I've seen at other sites that I thought are attractive, did not seem special in their appearances at this site. The audio track is often poor. A boy and girl are in a meadow, nothing but plants and dirt around, and you hear loud microphone noises, you also hear what sounds like a jet plane overhead, but the sky is clear except for clouds. Maybe it's the wind you hear, because it's windy, and the microphone noises are loud to begin with. But when you hear the couple speaking, it's not loud enough to make out the actual words. You can often hear the camera clicking in the background for a photoshoot of the video, and the cameraman and photographer walking behind the couple that are being shot can be making noises as well (footsteps). The lighting outdoors is hard to control, and the model is in and out of shadow, it's distracting. The indoor scenes are better shot than the outdoor scenes. You have less noise from the microphone, better closeups of the model and the sex action, better control of the lighting. The outdoor scenes are a nice idea in theory, but the photographer/cameraman need to improve his technique to make the outdoor scenes work well. In a few scenes, where the boy and girl are playfully teasing each other before they start kissing and getting down to business, their acting is good enough that the scene is interesting, even though you can't understand the actual words they are speaking(German, maybe?). But in other scenes, the prologue to the sex is just wasted time. Porn actors are not often noted for their acting ability, especially in low-budget shoots like these. The site theme is "natural teens, natural love". This translates to teens making love in outdoor scenes: in a field or meadow, by a lake. If you've been a member of femjoy or zemani, you will have seen videos where, in addition to a lovely nude model, you also see some great outdoor scenery. At this site, the scenery is there, but it's not shown to advantage. Bottom line: I found no photos worth saving, and only a few videos to save. 10-18-10  01:26pm Replies (1) Review 222 Teen Fidelity (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Joined on St. Patrick's day special of $9.95/30 days. Not sure what the re-bill rate is. -Choice of user name and password is secure, unlike some sites which use a non-secure page to choose your login details. -Member pages are secure (HTTPS), so less chance of hacking, and your ISP only keeps a record of your visits to the site, not the actual pages you visit. -The tagline for the sites is: Art, Passion, Hardcore. And the sites deliver on those promises. The videos are artistic hardcore, and the female leads overpower the stunt cocks with an energetic performance. -Each video comes with a photo set. I don't know if they use a software program to make screencaps of the video: but the photos are clear and crisp, and illustrate how erotic the sex can be. -There are 2 definition zip files for each photo set: medium and large. -The photo sets run from about 150 to over 200 photos per set. The set captures the action of the video, and, for a photo set, can be quite hot. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Choice of streaming from 480p through 4K for vids posted since 2015. -Choice of downloading from 480p through 4K for vids posted since 2015. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. -The main con would be if you couldn't find a discounted price, and had to pay the regular membership price of $29.95/month. But PU offers a first month price of $19.95, recurring at $29.95/month. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Rejected my Discover card for joining. No idea why it declined my Discover card. So I used a Mastercard to join. -I'm not sure who the billing agent is. The join page disappeared after I entered my payment details, and the confirming membership email does not list the biller. The name of the biller would be nice to know. -Most female models only seem to have 1 video at Teen Fidelity. I wish there were more videos for each of the girls. The passion, although scripted, seems real. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The gallery photosets have a default generic name: So they must be re-named with the following: SiteName_ModelsName_DatePosted_TitleOfVideo. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you join Porn Fidelity or Teen Fidelity or Kelly Madison, you get access to all 3 sites. The videos are outstanding: high production values, crystal clear vids. The motto for the 3 sites is: Art, Passion, Hardcore. And the 3 sites deliver on that motto. The network appears to have 935 girls and 58 guys models. Video runtime averages about 38 to 40 minutes. I honestly don't know how the models last that long, because I get exhausted after watching 10 minutes of the intense, hardcore action. The girl and the stunt cock are in great physical shape. And they keep up the sex for almost 40 minutes. I'm suprised there isn't more anal at the Teen Fidelity site. They mix vaginal fucking with the model sucking and licking the guy's cock, but I see little anal penetration. The lack of anal play is not a negative for me, but some PU members appreciate anal sex as part of their hardcore vids. -I've only watched a few videos so far, but these vids have a harder edge than most hardcore vids. You have to watch some of them to see what I mean. If you've seen the Pure Taboo site, then Teen Fidelity goes a step beyond. There is an edge of perversion in these videos that will make you cringe while watching them. You have to admire the twisted mind that wrote the scripts. The production values of the videos are excellent, the casting is fucking great. Normally, I go for cute young teens, but the female leads in these vids are outstanding. I'm not saying the female leads are not attractive: they can be intensely attractive, especially when they are worshipping some guy's cock and getting fucked out of their minds. Normally, I don't think a girl licking and sucking a guy's cock is attractive, but these girls make an art form out of their worship of the male genitalia. Which is different from the worship practices at many churches and synogogues. (joke). A short review of 2 of the vids I saw at Porn Fidelity: Rez Erection (with Melody Marks) starts off inside an ambulance with Melody Marks admiring the size of Steve Holmes' cock. Steve seems to have died, because there is plastic sheeting covering his face and body. Melody exposes his cock, licks and kisses it, giving Steve a blowjob as his cock enlarges. Then, like Lazarus rising from the grave, Steve awakens. He grabs her head and forces her to worship his cock (energetic blow job with Melody gagging and choking when Steve's cock goes too deep into her throat). Then he gives Melody the fuck of her life, and they finish exhausted but satisfied. At first I thought this was necrophilia. But then I figured that Steve was unconscious from some illness, and that Melody's enthusiastic blowjob awakened Steve. But the setup of a guy covered with plastic sheeting, unconscious or dead, getting a blowjob by a pretty young woman, is creepy as hell. Once the guy wakes up, it turns into a forceful, vigorous sexual encounter where Steve takes control and pounds her pussy until he finishes, leaving them both breathless and satisfied. The action is hot and heavy. The setup of doing it in an ambulance with a man who starts off either dead or unconscious adds a creep factor to the action: and Steve, who is in his fifties, does a great job fucking this slut. The girl and the male stunt cock are excellent: the girl is amazing: she's not that cute at first, and then, when she gets into her role, you find that she is more than attractive: she is erotic and desirable and you wish it was your cock she was working on. Except there is no way in hell you could replace the stunt cock in the masterful way he awakens to take control of this willing slut, forcing her to swallow deep his member, then mounting her and pounding away while she is gasping and moaning and loving every second. I get exhausted just watching 10 minutes of the intense action: there's no way in hell I could last 30 minutes. I would be dead long before the girl was completely satisified. (I had a heart attack years ago, open heart surgery, and it takes a man in super-fit condition to perform like Steve Homes performed in this video. And Homes is no youngster: he's around 56 years old.) A second video, Make Grandpa Proud, with Izzy Lush, starts off with a young whore (she's 24 years old in the video) getting aroused by an old man on a couch. A fat grandson with nerdy glasses, Chad White, 28 years old, is watching the action from below the couch. Grandpa and Izzy notice Chat White watching them, and grandpa, instead of getting angry, tells Chat White to stop being a creep and to be a man and have sex with Izzy. Chad White does a fair imitation of a nerd who is embarrased and unsure of how to handle a woman, and he starts off by timidly licking Izzy's pussy, with grandpa shouting encouragement and instructions. CONTINUED IN REPLY BELOW: 03-26-19  06:01pm Replies (8) Review 223 Teen Mega World (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Updated: 06-26-18  09:46am  (Update History) Reason: I duplicated the pro section in the con section, by mistake. Pros: -One of my favorite teen hardcore networks. -Low membership price with PU discount of $14.95/month recurring. -Huge amount of content. The video and photo quality has improved massively over the years. -They are spending money on higher definition videos and photos, with more expensive sets, better camera-work, better focus, better lighting, etc. -They offer new sites with the latest fads: VR (Virtual Reality) site, Ultra High Definition (4K) site. -One update per day for the network. Which is a pro can a con: You want more new videos daily, especially for the sites you enjoy, but they only give one video update per day. -Over 30 sites included in the basic network. No premium sites, so you don't feel you're missing out by not paying extra for a premium site. -The individual sites cover a wide variety of teen niches: VR, UHD, massage, old and young, threesome, squirting, masturbation, etc. Cons: The network is not perfect, but the flaws are basically minor. -The join page has a cross-checked pre-sell. But that's common to most porn sites. -The quality of the videos and photos from years ago is inferior to the content posted in recent years. -A few years ago, they changed the network structure. Now, instead of switching between sites easily, the switch is incomplete: You are logged in to the site you joined through, and can only enter other sites in the network while still logged in to your join site: so the switch is incomplete, and your view of the new site is compromised. -The search for a model's contents is site specific: it only returns the content of a single site, instead of the content at the entire network, making the search harder to use. Also, you have to go to the sites where the model's content are shown, to be able to bring up her videos and photo sets. Bottom Line: Network stats: Over 5,000 videos. Over 5,000 photo sets (normally one photo set for each accompanying video). Over 1,800 porn models. Most of the models are Eastern European teens. Slender, white teens with firm bodies. Most are attractive. The network was started about 12 years ago, which means you have a ton of content. The earliest content is much lower in quality, with cheap costumes, lower definition videos, cheap settings, poor lighting, etc. But the network has spent time and money upgrading their content from the past few years: the new content is high-quality in both videos and photos. Teen Mega World is a massive network of hardcore teen videos. There are accompanying photo sets for most videos. The quality of the videos and photos has improved massively over the years: they are spending time and money upgrading the network and its contents. Most upgrades are positive. When you join any site in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network. Many years ago, when you joined any site in the network, you would gain access to most of the sites in the network, but not all of them. And you would not know, in advance, which particular sites your membership would access. The current system is easier and better: you get access to all the sites in the network. However, the last network update changed the structure of your membership: Even though you have access to all the sites in the network, once you log in, you are logged in to the site you joined through. And if you switch to a different site, it's only a partial switch: you are still logged in to your joining site, and have a limited view of the new site. The model search is specific to the site you are logged in to; it does not return the model's network content-which makes searching more difficult. There is a lot of older content that is lower quality in terms of definition, cheap costumes, cheap settings. But there is also a lot of newer content from the last few years that shows how the videos and photos have been improved with better costumes, better sets, better lighting, better camera-work, higher definition videos and photos. The network updates with one new video per day. With over 30 sites, that means many sites have not updated in years. And most sites that do update do so on a very irregular basis. Which just makes sense, when you are spreading 1 update over 30-plus sites. There are no download limits. No DRM (a copy-protection system that was popular years ago, that meant you could only view a downloaded video only as long as you were a current member of the site). For me, the main draw is the number of attractive teen models. The girls have a healthy appetite for sex, and seem to enjoy having sex in a variety of ways. The network has over 30 separate sites. Which cover a wide variety of niches. You don't get the ultra-high quality of a glamcore site, such as X-Art, Blacked, Tushy or Vixen, which put a lot of time and money into making their videos glamourous, with the models (almost all attractive to lovely) made to look their finest with make-up, costumes, settings, camera-work, etc. Teen Mega World is more like a bread-and-butter hardcore teen site: except, the video and photo quality has improved so much, over the years, that it's just a few steps below glamcore quality. Teen Mega World does not spend time and money making the models glamourous, but the models are basically attractive, young, healthy, and the sex can be hot. So if you are into hardcore teen porn, Teen Mega World is a worthwhile join. Especially with the rock-bottom price of $14.95/month with a PU discount. Another favorite hardcore teen porn network for me is the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). That network has a higher price: but the girls are mainly attractive to lovely, and the videos and photos are high quality. 06-26-18  06:20am Replies (5) Review 224 Teen Mega World (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Recent price (with a PU discount) is $14.95/month. -Massive amount of hardcore teen videos. -Easy navigation to the different sites. -Hot links for each model to the different sites her videos and photo sets appear. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.10-2.60 Mb/s. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All (a free program) with this site. -The recent videos are professionally shot: Good focus, good lighting, good editing, no annoying random sounds. -A large number of different sites that cater to just about most teen hardcore categories -You can choose to download the entire video, or you can choose to download the specific clips of that video that you want. -There is a zip file for each photo set. -Easy login. A very long time before you are logged out because of inactivity. -Multiple choices for video download: HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD 540p, LD 405p (for portable devices). Cons: In my estimation: all of the cons are minor, compared to value you are getting at this network. -Almost all models (females) are Eastern European. That is a minor con. You get a huge number of very attractive to really lovely white European teens from Russia and surrounding areas. Some people want more variety in the models, age-wise, race-wise, body-wise. Most of the teens are slender or medium build. I have no problem with that. -The videos download with a number as the name of the file. It would be better if they named the video in the following format: name of model_date posted to network_name of site. -Older videos don't have the higher definition of the videos from the last few years. There are some lovely models in low-quality videos that would be much more appealing if the video quality was better (higher definition, better lighting, better focus). Since most porn models only last a few years in the business, you're not going to find better videos of these models. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Some PU members have noted that the network often comes out with new sites for a new niche. And that older sites often stop updating. This can be frustrating if you really like a particular niche, such as tricky-masseur or old-n-young. But with so many sites offered, they can't keep making content for every niche they have. -Some of the content is non-exclusive. You can find some of the tricky-masseuse videos at 18 Only Girls (Diesel network) and Rub A Teen (Team Skeet network), but the videos were posted at Teen Mega World years earlier. -The watermark for the videos is overly large. -I would like some personal bio about the models. Age, height, weight, country, maybe a brief interview of the model, what she likes. Porn is fantasy. A bio, although probably fake, still creates a link that makes the model seem more real. BOTTOM LINE: Network stats (as of Mar 12, 2015): Total Number Of Sites: 28 Models: 1030 Videos: 3713 Photos: 617423 The network goes for a natural style: the girls use very little make-up, very little airbrushing. One major positive: the site/network is continually working to improve itself. I don't mean that major changes are happening each month. But over the years, the network has become much more user friendly. 1. They put in an excellent model directory, which gives hot links to all the content the model has on the different sites. There is a good thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like. 2. Switching between sites in the network is fairly easy. That was an upgrade done several years ago. You don't have to re-enter your username and password to switch sites. 3. The update schedule is excellent. One new photoset or (matching) video each day. 4. The quality of the photo sets has improved over the years. The individual photos in a photo set used to be much more like screenshots. But they are improving the quality of each photo, by better framing, whatever. The photos are several grades below a photo site like Met-art or MPL Studios. But some of the recent photo sets, because of how attractive the individual model can be, are finally worth collecting. Maybe I am being too subjective in my review. But when I compare Teen Mega World to other bread and butter (not high class glamcore) mega sites, I think Teen Mega World deserves a higher score. 1. Naughty America just has too many videos that I don't enjoy wading through to find the ones I do enjoy. 2. netFameSolutions (Devils Film network) also has too many videos I don't enjoy, which makes it harder to find the vids I do enjoy. But netFameSolutions has some truly hot videos. 3. 21Sextury used to be a great network, but the quality of the content, and the site navigation issues, have lowered the network's value. X-Art and some of the heart-core sites give you a more erotic style, high-quality video. CONCLUSION: But for bread and butter teen hardcore videos: because of the massive amount of content, the wide variety of niches, the large (and continually increasing) number of attractive to lovely young girls, and the low price, this is one of the best values for teen hard core videos. I've had monthly subs, and yearly subs, to this network. People often say you get what you pay for. But with TMW, you get a huge amount of high-quality videos for a very low price. 03-12-15  03:04pm Replies (2) Review 225 Teen Mega World (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Good variety of teen niches: solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl, group (mainly a three-some), young girl-older man, squirting, she-male, gay (boy-boy), latina girls. Some niches like she-male and latina girls are tiny sites, so if that's your primary interest, don't join this site/network for that reason. But it's nice that a few videos are supplied for those niches. -Large number of sites included in membership. You get around 25 sites. That's not counting Teen Mega World, which is a gateway site, that doesn't have any content of its own. And it doesn't count WMB Girls, which is apparently a clone of Teen Mega World. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -For most sites, it's easy to switch to a different site in the network, by using a hot link. For a few sites, instead of clicking on a hot link, have to open a new browser window and login. Cons: -The cons are mainly minor. -There are a huge number of photosets, which are a photo capture of a video shoot. The quality of the individual photos is poor. Either get a professional photographer to take these pictures, or stop posting a huge number of photos of low quality: post a few pictures from each photoset, instead of 70-150 photos of a photoset which is low quality. -There are a couple of stunt cocks that I really dislike, because of the way they treat the girls. But the girls apparently like these guys, because these guys are used in a huge number of videos at this network and at other sites. -The live chat (with models) is a waste of time, unless you are willing to spend a lot of money paying for private chats. -The quality of the videos varies. Some videos from a few years back can be low quality, even in the "high" quality version that is offered. CONS continued in next section. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -There's little or no buildup to the sex: You get a guy, a girl, and they have sex. Maybe they exchange a few words before the sex, but the words are pointless. --You see a lot of these videos, and the action starts to get repetitious. You'd like some variety, some meaning to the sex, some plot or story instead of two people just banging away. BOTTOM LINE: -Huge number of teen videos: 2,257. -Huge number of teen photos: 333,544. -Most videos are available in 3 qualities: low, medium, high definition. -Sample stats for a high quality video: Frame width x height: 1280x720. Total bitrate: 4224 kbps. -Most videos can streamed. -All videos can be downloaded. -The photos are available in a single size. The file size is usually 100Kb+, but the quality is not good. The photos are mainly a record of individual video shoots, and the photos are more like screen caps than a regular, professionally shot photograph. -The photos in a photoset have a zip file for downloading. The videos from the last few years are basically ok to very nice quality: these are videos of teen girls having sex, and the clarity, lighting, colors, sound are mainly ok to very good. Bottom line: This is one of the best sites for hardcore East European teen videos. At $19.95/month (with the PU discount), this network is a bargain. 04-12-11  03:24am Replies (3) Shown : 201-225 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.