Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 176-200 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 176 Pure Taboo (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price of $9.95 for the first month. But there is a special now, 2 months for $14.95. -Secure log-in. -Secure member pages. So no record of the pages you visit, for the US government to analyze. (Except the government can keep a general record of your site visits.) -Clean site design. Makes navigation simple and easy. -Trailer for each video to give you fast idea of the video. -Excellent production values: the videos are sharp and clean. -Story driven sex. The sex actually has a plot, which gives meaning to the sex. -On signup, you automatically get 2 separate confirming emails. One email gives you your login details (username and password), and the second contains the last 4 digits of your credit card you signed with, and details of your membership pricing and length of membership. -Customer service is available 24/7 (24 hours per day, every day. You can contact them by live chat, phone, or email. This is one of the best customer services I've ever encountered. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -The default video filename is good: Video title-Model name-file definition. -Your choice in streaming or downloading definitions: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -Unlimited downloads. -New video and photo set each week. -All content is exclusive. -Your account will be available for life, meaning you can login even if you're not an active paying member. You can simply reactivate the account instead of opening a new one. -Good model listing, with thumbnail of the model and hot links to her content. -The photos have a seppia-tinged appearance, which adds to the artistic effect of the photographs. -Membership includes full access to PrettyDirty.com. CONS (START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -The main con is this is a small site. Started in late 2017. But $9.95 for the first month is a bargain. Especially since the videos have a freshness because of the plot-driven sex. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -The photo sets download with a generic filenumber, so it has to be manually changed. -The photo sets are small: maybe 30-40 photos per set. I enjoyed the videos, and wished the photo sets were larger: the photo sets are much hotter than you will find at MetArt or any of their member sites. -The photo sets are probably screen caps, but the quality is very good. The photo sets are worth collecting. -I wish the model listing was in alphabetical order. Instead, you have a most-viewed and latest-added thumbnail listing. There is a drop-down listing in alphabetical order, but it's not as easily used as the thumbnail model lists. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): Pure Taboo is a site that features plot-driven sex stories. The taboo is supposed to add tension or excitement to the sex: A blind white girl having sex with a black dude, a teen hitchhiker picked up by two guys who force her into violent sex, naughty step daughters seduced by their step fathers. There are elements of domination and humiliation in many of these videos. Membership in this site will give you valuable pointers in life lessons: how you should behave when offering a tender young teenage girl a ride (fuck her till she screams, then dump her by the side of the road when you're finished); how to deal with a young step-daughter who puts meditation balls in her anus and can't get them out (these videos are not only life-lessons, but teach you about the mysteries of sex, as well). Aside from the valuable images you will observe, there is the added bonus of watching these videos in amazing cinematic sharpness and colors. The videos have a slightly darker tone that goes well with the adult subject matters. The videos give these porn stars a chance to show their acting skills. I would nominate them for porn star golden globes and oscars, if I could give them some personal help in their roles. One video, TAKING THE ENEMA with Chloe Cherry, almost seems like it's from the Twilight Zone. Chloe needs help removing some meditation balls from her anus. A young doctor removes the meditations balls from Chloe's anus (after digging for a while), then the doctor and her step-father have 3-way sex with Chloe. The doctor and step-father are perverts, because the doctor gives poor Chloe an enema after removing the meditation balls from her anus. Why give the enema? Because he enjoys exerting his authority as a doctor, and enjoys watching Chloe receive the enema, which is an uncomfortable procedure. On a more serious note, for $9.95 for the first month (with a PU discount), this site is a bargain. Many of the videos have a freshness and vitality because of the sex-driven plot. And there are a number of attractive female teen models. I'm giving the site a score of 95. As time goes on, with more content, the score would be even higher. The PrettyDirty site is an added bonus, but the real value is in Pure Taboo. Special notes: If you join Pretty Dirty site directly, you must pay extra for downloads, according to TBP review. If you join Pure Taboo, you get the Pretty Dirty site included. Also, with a Pure Taboo membership, you get free downloads at Pretty Dirty. I do not see any evidence that if you join Pretty Dirty directly, you also get access to Pure Taboo. So, join Pure Taboo, and get the Pretty Dirty site included, with free downloads at both sites. From my viewpoint, Pure Taboo is an excellent site. Pretty Dirty is nowhere near as valuable, even if the Pretty Dirty site has much more content. 02-09-18  09:25pm Replies (4) Review 177 Pussy AV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaics). -Attractive Japanese models. -Professionally shot videos: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, good editing. -Good download speeds. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec. -Download managers work. -You can stream or download the videos: -Different streaming options include: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Can also download the video in the same four qualities: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -No download limits. -No DRM. (Actually, it's been a while since I have joined any site that has DRM.) -I like the site because not only are the models attractive, but they are also clean: very few tattoos or piercings. Nice young women-in their late teens or early twenties. -I think that I'm getting used to the funny moans the Japanese women make during sex: because the moans are not as loud or annoying as they used to be years ago. The models seem to be enjoying the sex more obviously, instead of resisting the pleasure. Cons: -For those who don't like toys, Japanese porn often includes vibrators, big and small. -This is Japanese porn. So the performers speak Japanese. This is only a minor problem, since whatever they are saying would add very little to the "meaning" of the porn. Bottom Line: 300 scenes. This site theme is girls' pussies. I guess it makes sense for a Japanese site to have this theme, because girls do have pussies, and this is a porn site. (I'm a little slow this morning, can't figure out if American sites should focus more on girls' pussies or not. I would assume that a lot of porn focuses on a girl's pussy, along with her breasts and ass. But then again, I've seen some niche sites that focus on other themes, such as the snot in a girl's nose, or enemas or feet. So I guess it takes all kinds to make the world.) Trying to move on to something that is more easily understandable. A pussy can have hair. It can be trimmed or shaved. It can be wide or narrow. It can be wet or aroused. Or played with. So you get videos of women playing with their pussies, men playing with the woman's pussy. Fucking the pussy. I think that if you over-analyze porn, it can seem that there's a lot of nonsense in porn. But then, there's a lot of nonsense in most comic-based films (such as Superman or Batman or Antman or Iron Man) and those movies and franchises are worth billions. So maybe pussy themed porn makes sense. In one video, a young girl is cooking breakfast for her boyfriend. The guy takes an uncooked sausage and uses it as a dildo on the girl. This goes on for a while, and I'm thinking the girl looks like an innocent young thing who is being pleasured by her boyfriend. After she hits climax, will she cook the sausage and eat it, or share it with her boyfriend? You don't think about such things with American porn. This gives it a slightly unique Japanese twist. Then the guy uses a narrow green vegetable as a dildo on the girl, before switching to a small vibrator, then a large vibrator. So it's a nice change from straight American or European porn. But after you watch enough Japanese videos at this site, you realize the videos are slightly tame: the sex is not aggressive, or overly forceful: girls are getting pleasured, and they also pleasure the men. It's not the rough gonzo sex that you can find at many American or European sites. The site is worth an 80 score. It's got professionally shot Japanese videos of attractive young Japanese models. But a little more variety in the approach would add to the eroticism. 02-29-16  06:03pm Replies (0) Review 178 Real Ex Girlfriends (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This is part of the Porn Pros network. Site membership gives you access to 22 sites. -With 22 sites, you get a wide variety of porn niches. -Large amount of content in the network. Over 3,00 videos. -The models are late teens, early twenties. Mostly attractive. -Try to select Epoch as the billing agent. A trusted name. -You can stream videos in standard or high definition. -You can download videos in 480p or 1080p definition. -Each video comes with a matching photoset. The photos are high-quality screencaps. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale. Even if you uncheck the cross-sale, you might still be charged for the cross-sale. So check your email confirmation, or your credit card company, to see if you are signed up for the cross-sale site. If you are signed up for the cross-sale site, either dispute the charge, or cancel immediately, before it turns into an expensive charge for a site you probably did not want. -Slow update rate. About 1 new scene per week for the entire network. -$69.95 charge to upgrade to all the premium sites in the network. -Have to click through an offer to upgrade to premium status to enter the main member site. -Some of the statistics given for scenes are false. Example: The time/lengh of the video titled "Tennis Tease" featuring Cece Capella is shown as 00:01 (one second). But the video has a runtime of 25 minutes 13 seconds. Actually, most of the videos show a time/length of 0 or 1 or 2 seconds. Which makes no sense. CONS CONTINUED BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: My guess is that the site software engineer put a marker to show the runtime of each video. But then did not follow through, and the static runtimes shown are 00.00 or 00.01 or 00.02. However, when you play the video, you can see the actual runtime at the bottom of the screen. BOTTOM LINE: Site theme: Guys posting videos of former girlfriends for revenge. Which is fake. The girls are porn stars/models. Actually, that might have been the original theme of the site. But for the last few years, the videos do not emphasize or show the ex-girlfriend theme. The videos are basically just a guy and girl fucking. With no background theme information to show the girl is a former girlfriend. This is part of the Porn Pros network. So membership to this site gives you access to the Porn Pros network. You get access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network: The number of updates is current as of 2016-11-30: 18yearsold-480 Updates 40ozbounce-119 Updates Amateurviolations-34 Updates Cockcompetition-40 Updates Crueltyparty-64 Updates Cumdisgrace-34 Updates Cumshotsurprise-107 Updates Deepthroatlove-290 Updates Disgraced18-115 Updates Eurohumpers-21 Updates Flexiblepositions-27 Updates Freaksofboobs-61 Updates Freaksofcock-183 Updates Jurassiccock-80 Updates Lolcumshots-4 Updates Massagecreep-204 Updates Milfhumiliation-83 Updates Pimpparade-33 Updates Realexgirlfriends-571 Updates Shadypi-93 Updates Squirtdisgrace-15 Updates Teenbff-234 Updates Most of the sites update rarely or not at all. In the last 30 days, the entire network added 5 new scenes. So that works out to 1 new scene per week. The number of scenes per site ranges from 4 at Lolcumshots to 571 at Realexgirlfriends. Obviously, the sites with more content have more value. My favorite site is Massagecreep. Many of the girls are attractive, and the sex can be hot. Realexgirlfriends is the largest site in the network (of the basic network, not including the premium sites). I'm giving the site a score of 80. This is based on the large amount of network videos you have access to. The videos are mainly professionally shot. The models are mainly attractive. The site navigation is easy. So you get a lot of hardcore teen videos, for a discounted PU price of $17.95/month. 11-30-16  06:16pm Replies (0) Review 179 Rocco Siffredi (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -HOME OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, THE ITALIAN STALLION. I'M NOT GAY. BUT LOOKING AT THE MANLY, MASCULINE FACE AND BODY OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, EVEN I AM TEMPTED TO THINK OF HARD, VIOLENT, SATISFYING SEX. -NO LIMITS FOR STREAMING OR DOWNLOADING. -ZIP FILES FOR PHOTO SETS. -PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. -MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, A MASSIVE COLLECTION OF HARDCORE GONZO PORN. Cons: -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -AFTER THE FIRST MONTH PRICE OF $14.95, MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $29.95/MONTH (RECURRING). -FAMEAID IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE DEPENDABLE, EASY TO USE AGENTS. -SOME HOT SCENES. BUT A LOT OF SCENES ARE NOT AS GOOD. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK. THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT IT'S DONE IN A LOOSE, ALMOST-AMATEUR STYLE OF SHOOTING: THE LIGHTING COULD BE BETTER, THE CAMERA-PLACEMENT COULD BE BETTER, THE SETS COULD BE HIGHER QUALITY, THE ACTION IS GONZO-STYLE, WITH NOT MUCH ATTENTION PAID TO MAKING THE GIRLS ATTRACTIVE OR STUNNING, EVEN THOUGH MANY OF THE GIRLS ARE NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE. THIS IS A FAR CRY FROM THE GLAMCORE STYLE OF X-ART, BLACKED, OR TUSHY, OR THE ALMOST-GLAMCORE STYLE OF DIESEL ACCESS, WHERE THE MODELS ARE CHOSEN FOR THEIR HIGH LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND THE PHOTOGRAPHY, LIGHTING, AND SETS MAKE THE GIRLS SEEM PRETTY TO LOVELY. THE CAMERA-WORK IS JUST OK. Bottom Line: ROCCO SIFFREDI IS A SEX GOD. HE KNOWS HOW TO TREAT WOMEN: ROUGH AND DIRTY AND BEGGING FOR MORE. IF THE SONG "BAD TO THE BONE" WAS NOT WRITTEN ABOUT ROCCO SIFFREDI, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN. -SOME OF THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE HOT. THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE SHOT GONZO STYLE: FORGET GLAMCORE: THIS IS THE EUROPEAN VERSION OF TREATING ATTRACTIVE WOMEN LIKE PIECES OF MEAT AND HEARING THEM SCREAM WITH PLEASURE. EVEN THOUGH THE SEX IS ROUGH AND DIRTY, THE WOMEN ARE NOT TREATED CRUELLY: THIS IS LIKE A GLAMORIZED VERSION OF A BAD BOY HAVING DIRTY SEX WITH WOMEN WHO ENJOY BEING TREATED LIKE THE WHORES THEY WANT TO BE. THE SEX IS NOT AS ROUGH OR VIOLENT AS WOODMAN'S EXTREME HARDCORE, WHERE THE GIRLS SEEM TO SCREAM WITH REAL PAIN, BUT SOMEHOW END UP WORSHIPPING WOODMAN FOR HIS MASTERFUL TREATMENT OF THEM. ALSO, ROCCO IS GETTING OLDER. SO HIS SEX SCENES ARE NOT AS OVER-THE-TOP AS THEY USED TO BE. BUT THE SITE CONTENTS COVERS OVER 20 YEARS OF ROCCO SIFFREDI MATERIAL. IT IS NOT A COMPLETE COLLECTION OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, BUT YOU GET A NICE OVERALL VIEW OF MANY OF HIS VIDEOS AND SERIES. MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, WHICH IS OVER 20 SITES COVERING A VARIETY OF NICHES. THERE ARE 5 MAIN SITES THAT ARE LARGE, AND ANY ONE OF THE SITES WOULD BE WORTH THE FIRST MONTH'S MEMBERSHIP PRICE: ROCCO SIFFREDI DEVILS FILM PETER NORTH DVD SILVERSTONE DVD SILVIA SAINT THERE ARE ANOTHER 20+ SITES THAT ARE MUCH SMALLER: (SEE THE COMPLETE SITE LISTING IN THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW.) IF YOU'RE WILLING TO SLOG THROUGH THE LESS-INTERESTING VIDEOS TO FIND THE HOT ONES, THIS SITE DOES FEATURE SOME VIDS THAT ARE REALLY HOT. AS I WROTE, YOU NOT ONLY GET ACCESS TO ROCCO SIFFREDI, AND 4 OTHER MAJOR HARDCORE GONZO SITES, BUT TO A LARGE COLLECTION OF NICHE SITES, AS WELL. SO IF YOU ENJOY GONZO SEX, THIS SITE AND NETWORK OFFER A COMPELLING VALUE. THE SITE IS EASY TO USE. SUPPORT IS SURPRISINGLY AVAILABLE. AND YOU GET A SECURE LOGIN TO THE SITE, WHICH IS A NICE FEATURE. 08-30-17  10:09am Replies (1) Review 180 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Can stream or download videos. -They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn. -They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting. -There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary). -Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required. -Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password. -PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring. -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership. Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn. -Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name. -The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site. -Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films. -Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets. ================== CONS -Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like. -For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option. -The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art. -The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback). A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site. -Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible. -They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't. -They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps. ========================= BOTTOM LINE Site Stats: Movies: 1373 DVDs: 266 Pornstars: 1318 Pictures: 8214 HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies) Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download. They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way. Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot. But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site. The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space. As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones. The main sites in the netFameSolutions network include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi. In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc. I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve. 11-20-12  03:54am Replies (0) Review 181 Rocco Siffredi (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of content. -Wide variety of content of sexual activity. -Current Site Stats (2010-09-14): Movies : 998 DVDs : 212 Actors : 1019 Hours : 440 Total Size : 398 Gb -Site is currently updating. Updates 1 video clip every 1-4 days (very irregular update schedule). -No DRM. -No site timeout. -No watermark on older style videos. Cons: -Navigation is basic and awkward. -To log on to the network, you have to enter through the site you joined through. You can't log on directly to any of the sister sites you have access to. Once you log on to the site you joined, only then can you enter one of the sister sites you have access to. -Moving around a single site is basic and awkward. To search for files at the site, or to look through the files available, have to look at lists from drop-down menus, or have to click many times to change from different pages. There is a lot of material at this site, and it's cumbersome to try to glance through the different video and photoset files. -Need a fast ISP connection to play the streaming videos, otherwise the streams will frequently stutter and stop. -A few good-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like in each video would be very helpful. -A simple listing of the models appearing in each video would be helpful. Many models in videos are not named. Bottom Line: Viewing options: Download options: high and low resolution. Streaming options: high and low quality. Other options: trailer or screen capture. Frame width by height: 720x480 Total bitrate: 2128 kbps Quality of the video depends on whether the video is the high quality or the low quality option. Also depends on how long ago the video was shot. The more recent videos are higher quality. High quality streaming is not high quality. It is higher quality than the low quality, but it is nowhere near what some sites have as high quality. These are professionally shot videos, but the overall quality could be much better in many ways. One example: I am watching a scene where Rocco and a second man are both on a woman. In parts of the scene, you are seeing the action through a large block of clear plastic or glass. You want to see what's happening, without having a block of plastic obscuring the action. Remove the plastic, or shoot from a different angle. This is not the camera-man trying to be artistic, it's just the camera-man being lazy or stupid and not bothering to shoot from an angle that clearly shows the action. Site content: You have a lot of vintage porn (101 videos) and even more straight recent porn (892 videos). The vintage porn tries to add a little story-line to the sex, maybe even have some costumes. It's basically sex, with a little story that is a negligible attempt to add some flavor or meaning to the sex. The more recent porn also has a tiny story-line, but it's really just straight sex. The actors follow a script that is mainly fucking and sucking, with little conversation (the female models probably don't understand much English, and English is what appears to be used to communicate in the videos). Minor roughness and humiliation to the sex, but not a lot of hard-core roughness or hard-core humiliation. Most scenes are group-type sex, where you have 3 or more people fucking. Cunnilingus, bj, vaginal and anal sex in almost all scenes. No homo-erotic action of boy+boy. You do get boy+girl, 2 boys+girl, 2 girls+boy, or more than 3 people). Some girl+girl action in some of the scenes, but the main emphasis is on the boy+girl action. I was a member of this site a year ago. At that time I found some videos that I thought were really good. But I can't find those videos now. If the videos are still at the site, I can't find them because of the poor navigation. There is a large amount of video content, and the videos are split into series where the type of sexual action is changed from one series to another. The models are mainly Eastern European females. Rocco Siffredi is the star of the site, he's featured in most videos, and he can become annoying at times with his heavily accented English and overly boyish charm. The quality of the videos is OK to good, not great. The large amount of content, and the wide variety of content means there is plenty of material to search through. 09-14-10  10:13am Replies (4) Review 182 Rocco Siffredi (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM -No download limits -Advertises exclusive blue ray quality high definition content -Rocco Siffredi vintage movies are included -Online store will sell exclusive clothes so you can dress the way Rocco Siffredi dresses (same T-shirts and caps. But this appears to be a product in the planning stage) -At the Rocco Siffredi online store, you can buy DVDs featuring Rocco, sex toys, herbs for men and women, lingerie for women. -Movie options: --Streaming in low and high quality; --Download in low and high quality. --Also have screenshots and a trailer to illustrate the clip. Site stats: -Movies: 680 -DVDs: 156 -Actors: 788 -Hours: 339 Cons: PROS (continued): Site stats (continued): -Total size: 307 GB Sample stats from some of the high-definition videos: length: 8-35 minutes bit rate: 2147-2212 kbps dimensions 720x400-720x480 -I would have thought the bit rate and dimensions would be much higher, because of the statement that there was blue ray quality high definition content. However, I did think the visual quality was very good on some videos CONS: -Watermark larger than needed, lower right corner -Large file size of high quality video. A single file can be 500 MB or more, but this is great video, and if you have to buy another hard drive to store these files, it's worth the money. -Because these are large files, need fast internet connection to watch high-definition streaming or to download. -Files download as WMV format only. -Sometimes the videos are slightly out of focus. Bottom Line: BOTTOM LINE: High quality videos of some lovely, yummy models. A real treat. I'm sorry I didn't find this site in the network earlier. This is the best site in the network of 19 sites. First video I saw at this site, the girl was really cute, the action seemed real, not acted. Video looks high definition, very good lighting, very good colors, model did not speak or understand English that well, especially with Rocco Siffredi's strong accent, but she was a love, not a porn star. It was like looking at a gorgeous high-quality met-art picture come to life, hard-core action, but not dirty, even though what the girl was doing was pure hard-core. This is the best quality hard-core video site I've seen so far, with ok to nice-looking to very attractive models, good acting, few or no fake-sounding moans and groans by the model, often no music soundtrack (which is a real plus, considering the noisy music soundtracks on porno clips). Quality of videos varies a lot. Some videos are just ok, some are really nice to great (I'm talking about how much I like the videos, which is a subjective reaction, but there are videos here that deserve to be classics). Some PU members rave about the great quality of the Femjoy photoshoots and videos. That is softcore. This is great quality hardcore video. Rocco could be less intrusive, but you get to watch lovely women having a sexual experience. Some videos are erotic/artistic. This is hardcore, but with real value that is more than just crude or dirty sex. There are good-to-very-good looking models, good-to-great quality video, some interesting storylines/concepts for the sex. This site deserves a 90 for itself alone, and you get a lot of additional nice material from the other sites on this network. This site is really outstanding, and I don't understand why other PU members haven't been singing its praises. I think Met-art is the best softcore site I've seen for teen glamor photos, and this is the best hardcore site I've seen so far for quality videos. 07-09-09  08:27pm Replies (4) Review 183 Rock Star Porn Star (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No site timeout. -No DRM. -Exclusive videos. -Can watch videos in streaming: low, high, high definition quality. -Can download videos in WMV format in low or high quality. -The videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting. -The model's name in each video is listed, with a nice sized thumbnail that shows what the model looks like. That is a really nice, simple feature that more porn sites should have. -The videos are dated -There is a page where the models at the site are shown with their name and a nice-size thumbnail of the model. It would be better if the models were shown in alphabetical order, but the simple page layout is really helpful if you are searching through thumbnails of the models, because you can easily get a nice idea of what each model looks like. -There is also a very basic search where you can enter a model's name, and it will return a list of the different sites at the network the model is featured. Cons: -The site uses the same stupid program for displaying photos that is used at other sites in the network. The program will load a thumbnail picture slowly, then it's hard to get an enlarged image of the thumbnail. I try and try, then usually give up trying to see the enlarged photo. And the next photo in the series is also a slow-loading thumbnail. -The photos are clear and crisp, but the models are not to my taste. -TBP reports 55 photo shoots. But I could only find 12 photosets at the site (when I look at the page for "pictures"). How to get to the other photosets is unclear. -Each photoset is around 25 photos. -No zip file for the photoset. But who wants to keep these photos anyway? -Search is very basic. Can search by model's name, but not by description of model, type of sexual activity, or any other factor. Bottom Line: I always wanted to be a rock star. I can't play a musical instrument, or sing, but rock stars get the chicks. And now you can get the chicks as well. Just join the rockstarpornstar site and you can dream you are a massively tattooed male rockstar who gets to bang away on pornstars when he is not banging away on the stage with his favorite instrument. The female models at this site are past the teeny stage, but if you close your eyes, and listen to the moans and groans, you can reach rocker's fantasy heaven. The only male model here is one guy, who is playing a rock star, who bangs a bunch of female models. The guy is heavily tattooed. From the site stats, you can see this is a small site, when the total size is 18 GB. I assume that all the regular PU members here have a personal porn collection that is many times that size. Most PU members could download the entire site contents in 1-2 days. I personally did not find anything at this site that was worth keeping. Or even worth viewing, for that matter. But personal tastes vary, so maybe someone might find a worthwhile video here. The fake moans and screams from the female models are way overdone and totally unbelievable. The girls act as if the guy is using an electric prod instead of a normal penis. The guy is mildly rough, likes to slap the girl's face and ass, gag her with his penis. The guy is acting like a really masterful, take-charge sexual stud putting these bitches through the paces. Except that it's phony as hell. Pierre Woodman can give a great sexual performance with his models, but this guy is just a waste of time to watch. I do like, quite a lot, the nice-sized, very clear thumbnails with the model's name, for each video/photoset. This gives you an easy way to search through the videos and photosets you might want to look at more closely. This is a very simple and basic structure, and I wish more porn sites used it. Because at many porn sites, it's hard to get an idea of what the models look like until you watch the video or look through each photoset, which can be very time-consuming and a lot of work. You get access to this site through the netFameSolutions network, which has some nice sites. This site is not one of them. 10-02-10  03:24pm Replies (4) Review 184 Rough 18 (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Zip file for each photoset. -Video download formats: WMV: high, medium, low quality MPEG Quicktime High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps) -Updates once a week video/photoset -Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes -Easy login. -No DRM. -Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful. Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos. -Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot. -No streaming option to view the videos. -Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time. -The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious. -It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots. I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that. -Site navigation is poor. -Search is poor. -There is no simple listing of the models. -Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes. -Volume on some videos is too low. -Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site. Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism). I do not care for the niche. But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good. You can't get a good idea of what the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't. Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body. The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch the scene for 10 or 20 minutes. This is basically dull spanking porn. My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene. This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking. I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual. On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long. The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls. This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult. The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot. I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long, and other problems. This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating. 09-18-10  03:05am Replies (6) Review 185 Rub A Teen (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. PROS -PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING) -CAN CHOOSE YOUR OWN USERNAME AND PASSWORD. -EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. A TRUSTED NAME. -YOU CAN CHOOSE TO EITHER STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS. -YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF STREAMING OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, OR HD(720P) DEFINITION. -YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, HD(720P), HD(1080P) DEFINITION. -MOST OF THE MODELS ARE VERY ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT. Cons: -THE USERNAME AND PASSWORD YOU CHOOSE ARE TRANSMITTED ON A NON-SECURE PAGE WHEN JOINING. -SITE LOGIN PAGE AND MEMBER PAGES ARE NON-SECURE. THAT MEANS THAT YOUR ISP WILL HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR SITE VISITS, WHICH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CAN ACCESS. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -SLOW UPDATE RATE. 4 VIDEOS IN LAST 12 MONTHS. -CONTENT IS NON-EXCLUSIVE. IF YOU'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL NETWORK, YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN MOST OF THE VIDEOS AT RUB A TEEN BEFORE. -SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS WITH THIS NETWORK. -THE MODELS ARE EASTERN EUROPEAN. THE LANGUAGE SPOKEN IS PROBABLY RUSSIAN. NO SUBTITLES. BUT WHAT THE MODELS SAY WOULDN'T MEAN MUCH ANYWAY: THE MASSAGE AND SEX IS WHAT COUNTS. -DEAD LINKS: WHEN YOU ARE INSIDE THE MEMBER'S AREA: IF YOU CLICK ON THE FAQ'S HOT LINK, IT BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND. TERMS HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND. HELP HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND Bottom Line: IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK, THESE MASSAGE VIDEOS WILL PROBABLY BE NEW TO YOU. THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT. RUB A TEEN CURRENTLY HAS 102 VIDEOS (AND MATCHING PHOTOSETS). THE UPDATE RATE IS VERY SLOW: 4 NEW VIDEOS WERE ADDED OVER THE LAST 12 MONTHS. HOWEVER, TO OFFSET THE SLOW UPDATE RATE, MEMBERSHIP IN RUB A TEEN INCLUDES ACCESS TO MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET SITES: THE NETWORK UPDATES WITH ONE NEW VIDEO DAILY. THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS HIGHLY RATED BY SOME PU MEMBERS. HOWEVER, AS I MENTIONED, SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE EXPERIENCED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AND NAVIGATION ISSUES. SO THOSE MEMBERS WOULD ADVISE AVOIDING A TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP (FOR ANY OF ITS SITES). I HAVE NO IDEA WHY SOME MEMBERS GET ACCEPTABLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FROM THE SITE, AND OTHER MEMBERS GET HORRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. I WOULD NOT JOIN A SITE/NETWORK THAT SO MANY PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED PROBLEMS WITH. BUT THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS, AND THE CONTENTS OF MANY OF THE SITES DO APPEAL TO SOME PU MEMBERS. YESTERDAY, I TESTED THE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT RUB A TEEN. THE FIRST 4 VIDEOS I TRIED TO DOWNLOAD, THE DOWNLOADS FAILED. A COUPLE OF HOURS LATER, I TRIED AGAIN. I GOT 5 MB/s to 10 MB/s DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (THE FASTEST DOWNLOAD SPEEDS I'VE EVER GOTTEN FROM A PAYSITE), AND THE FILES DOWNLOADED COMPLETELY. I TRIED AGAIN A FEW HOURS LATER, AND GOT BETWEEN 1 MB/s and 2.5 MB/s. THE DOWNLOADS COMPLETED. BUT I WAS GETTING POOR NAVIGATION SPEEDS, TRYING TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITE PAGES, FOR ALL MY TRIALS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 27 SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES: THE NAME OF EACH SITE, WITH THE CURRENT NUMBER OF VIDEOS AT THAT SITE, ON 2017-10-21: (I AM NOT LISTING THE TEAM SKEET SITES THAT REQUIRE AN EXTRA PAYMENT TO ACCESS): BAD MILFS 21 BRACE FACED 9 CFNM TEENS 30 DYKED 35 EXXXTRA SMALL 193 GINGERPATCH 9 HER FRESHMAN YEAR 20 INNOCENT HIGH 443 LUST HD 95 MY BABYSITTERS CLUB 60 OYE LOCA 225 P.O.V. LIFE 157 RUB A TEEN 102 SELF DESIRE 30 SHE'S NEW 226 SOLO INTERVIEWS 144 STEP SIBLINGS 38 TEAM SKEET EXTRAS 116 TEEN CURVES 69 TEEN PIES 93 TEENS DO PORN 88 TEENS LOVE ANAL 57 TEENS LOVE MONEY 53 TEENY BLACK 81 THE REAL WORKOUT 101 THIS GIRL SUCKS 220 TITTY ATTACK 90 10-24-17  05:36am Replies (0) Review 186 Rub A Teen (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP shows a discount $14.95/month (recurring) for Rub A Teen. When you hit the site page at PU or TBP, you go to the Rub A Teen site. Then hit the join page link. And the price shown is $17.87/month (recurring). -CCBILL or Epoch is the payment processor. Both are trusted names, with excellent service for customers. -You get a confirming email with your site subscription details from the payment processor on signup. This is a nice feature, that some sites no longer follow. -No download limits. There was some confusion when the site started, because the TOS (Terms of Service) stated a daily 500MB limit. But the webmaster posted at PU that there were no download limits. -Excellent download speeds. I get over 5+ MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum limit. -Choice of definitions for video download: 1080p, 720p, and lower definitions. -The videos are outstanding, in terms of professionally shot videos, lighting, colors, camera-work, framing. Cons: -The site (and TBP) states the content is 100% exclusive. This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen are also found at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Erratic update schedule. You might get 1 update to the site in a month, or in 2 months. To balance this, you get 7 updates a week to the Team Skeet network. -Overlarge logo on photos. Bottom Line: Site theme: masseur gives a rubdown to attractive girl, who is so turned on by the massage that they end up fucking. Site stats: Videos: 95 videos (as of 2016-07-07). Photosets: 95 (1 matching photoset for each video) Most of the videos are of a boy massaging a girl and then fucking her. However, there are a few videos where it's two girls, one massaging the other girl and then having lesbian sex. Or where the girl is massaging a boy (and then having sex). Or where two boys are massaging a girl and then having sex. Or where two girls are massaging a boy and then the three having sex. I last reviewed this site on 2012-12-02. I gave it a score of 73. The main reason I gave it a low score was because almost every video at Rub A Teen was a duplicate of a video at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). What has changed since then? The most obvious change is the site is bigger. It has grown from 20 videos to 95 videos. This is both good and bad. You currently get about 1 new video at the site every two months. Since the videos are excellent quality, I wish the update rate was faster. But the Team Skeet network has about 24 sites, it only makes financial sense to spread the new videos around to the different sites. Especially to the newest sites, which are obviously the smallest in content. So, instead of viewing the Rub A Teen site as a simple consumer, but with an understanding of the business aspect as well, what are you getting from a membership in the site? As a member of Rub A Teen site, you get access to all the sites in the Team Skeet network. Which is a major selling point. The Rub A Teen Site gives you high quality videos of young teens in massage who are getting fucked. The video quality is excellent. You get a choice of video definitions of 1080p and lower. The lighting is excellent. The focus is excellent. The camera-work is professional. The models are attractive young teens. Most of the sex scenes are hot and erotic. I've said that many of the massage videos at Rub A Teen are found at Tricky Masseur. The streaming quality of the videos at Rub A Teen is slightly better than the streaming quality at Tricky Masseur. The images are more vivid, with better colors, better lighting. I don't mean the quality at Tricky Masseur is poor: it's good quality. But the quality at Rub A Teen is excellent. You get clear, crisp images with good colors and good lighting. However, when you compare the video quality of the download file for the videos, the difference narrows. The download version of the same video at 1080p. Mp4 file format. The download file version of the video from the two sites is not as noticeably different as the streaming version. The Team Skeet version is only slightly better. If you were not comparing the two videos side by side, you probably would not be aware of the difference between them. Both download files, from Teen Mega World and Team Skeet, are good to excellent. But if you study the two videos, the Team Skeet is slightly better. But I don't know how much value that has. If you are a member of Team Skeet, then download all the Rub A Teen videos, keep the ones you select, and dump any duplicate files from Tricky Masseur. Except you have to check the names of the girls in the videos, because the names change from one site to the other. I am comparing the video titled "Rub Me Right There", with the model named Gabi, posted 2014-11-17 to Rub A Teen. I am comparing it to the video with the same model named Izi, posted to Tricky Masseur on 2014-10-26. The Tricky Masseur video has no title. The two videos are the same, except Team Skeet has added a short intro advertising Team Skeet (and the logo shown on the video changes from Teen Mega World or Team Skeet). The Tricky Masseur video: Video Frame Width: 1920 Frame Height: 1080 Data Rate: 8030 kbps Total Bitrate: 8183 kbps Frame Rate: 25 frames/second Audio Bit Rate: 152 kbps Channels: 2 (stereo) Audio Sample Rate: 44 kHz REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 07-07-16  07:10am Replies (1) Review 187 Rub A Teen (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. Username and password. No captcha. -Epoch is the billing company. -You get a confirming email on signup. Which is starting to get rare, for some reason. At least some of the sites I've joined in the last year, I've gotten no confirming email. How much does it cost to send an email? But why bother, since if the customer forgets his username or password, or has some problem about cancelling his membership, that's his problem, and in the meantime, the site can continue charging him for his membership. -I'm seeing so many lovely young models at many different networks/sites. And this network has some truly gorgeous young models. -Default viewing option. Select your favorite viewing option on how to view a scene, and the site will remember it. Not sure how useful this is, seems more like a gimmick than anything useful. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Download manager works. I use DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. Cons: PROS (continued): -Membership price recently reduced to $17.87/month. I'm not sure how long that price reduction will last. -Videos have the date they were posted to the site. ============== CONS: -Pre-checked offer at signup has to be unchecked, or you will have a $1.00 1-day trial membership to some site, that automatically renews at $38.57/month. So if you miss the pre-checked offer, you will be paying $38.57/month until you figure out what's happening. -Get thumbnails advertising other sites on the member's pages. If you paid to get inside, do you need this advertising thrown at you? But many sites are doing it. -Large watermark bottom right side of videos. -Small site. Only has 20 videos so far. -19 of the 20 videos were previously posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). There was one video at Rub A Teen that I did not match up. But that's probably because I didn't want to spend the time going through each video at Tricky Masseur. Bottom Line: If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen. The Rub A Teen site offers more choices in the video definition than the Tricky Masseur site. For the videos that are at both sites, Tricky Masseur offers a low, medium and high definiton download. Rub A Teen goes one better: a low, medium and high definition, and a higher definition. (The high definition is 720p, the higher definition is 1080p.) The Tricky Masseur site often has subtitles to go with the foreign language the actors/models speak. The Rub A Teen site videos do not have the subtitles. But once you have read the subtitles, you realize the words have little meaning, so the absence of subtitles is not a problem, because what the actors/models are saying is basically just noise. Teen Mega World is a huge network, with a lot of great-looking models, and a lot of hot hardcore videos. It's certainly worth joining the network at least once, to look through their tremendous archive of hardcore videos. Tricky Masseur has 93 videos. It's basically an archive site, having added only 1 new video in the last 7 months. The Rub A Teen site has 20 videos total. 19 of the videos were already posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). The difference in file size between the 1080p version and the 720p version is huge: For example, for a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 30 seconds (the Laura video): Rub A Teen Laura video: The 1080p MP4 file size is 2.08 GB. The 720p MP4 file size is 1.05 GB. Tricky Masseur Laura video: No 1080p version is offered. The 720p file size is 999 MB. How many people are going to spend 2 GB per video of hard drive space? Most of the videos are between 25 to 30 minutes in runtime. So if you are going to keep the 1080p version on your hard drive, you are allocating around 2 GB per video. And if you are a collector of videos, you will be buying lots of hard drive capacity to store these huge video files. Actually, I don't know why the file sizes at Rub A Teen are so large. At Diesel network, for instance, they give you 1080p video for a 30 minute runtime, and the file size is 686 MB. That compares to 2.08 GB at Rub A Teen. Comparing the bit rate of the 720p files (of the same video): Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 5134 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Tricky Masseur Total bitrate = 4736 kbps Frame rate = 25 frames/second Comparing the bit rate of a 1080p video, with a completely different 1080p video: Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 10136 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Diesel site Total bitrate = 3199 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second To increase the bit rate by a factor of 3.2, you are increasing the file size from 686 MB to 2.08 GB. I don't know how these technical details play out. But as far as I can tell, you can't really tell the difference on a computer monitor that is 20+ inches in size between the 3199 kbps and 10136 kbps files. Maybe on a large-screen TV monitor, you can tell the difference. But you are going to be spending hundreds of dollars on hard drives, as cheap as they are today, if you are going to collect videos that are 2GB in size. If you enjoy the erotic massage niche, then I suggest signing up with the Teen Mega World network, where you get one site (Tricky Masseur) that focuses on that area, with 93 videos. Plus you get over 20 other hardcore sites that are mainly boy-girl sex, some solo vids, some lesbian vids. All the Rub A Teen videos (except possibly 1 video) are at Tricky Masseur. And Tricky Masseur has over 4 times the videos that Rub A Teen does. Basically, I think it makes little commercial sense to build a site that is a clone of a competitor's site. But I guess that the owners of Rub A Teen decided that the erotic massage niche was popular, and this is what they came up with as an inexpensive way to do it, because they are just buying/leasing some of the same videos that Tricky Masseur bought/leased. For people who don't know about Tricky Masseur, then the Rub A Teen site can be a nice introduction to the erotic massage niche. Rub A Teen is part of the Team Skeet network. Joining any one of their sites gives access to 11 sites in that network, which currently consists of: Exxxtra Small-Her Freshman Year-Innocent High-Oye Loca-POV Life-Self Desire-She's New-Solo Interviews-The Real Workout-This Girl Sucks-Titty Attack. I'm giving the Rub A Teen site a score of 73. If the Tricky Masseur site didn't exist, the Rub A Teen site score would be much higher. 12-02-12  10:45pm Replies (1) Review 188 Sasha Blonde (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality. -Credit card processor: CCBILL. -Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching. -If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately. -Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Zip files for photosets. -Can stream or download videos. -The content (videos and photosets) are dated. Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value. -Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot. -No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling. Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn. But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates. SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites. If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha. Number of videos: 431+ Number of photosets: 528+ Most videos have several download options: WMV 1080p MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes. Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set. Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size. Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px. You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself. I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model. 08-21-12  02:32am Replies (6) Review 189 Sasha Fucks Dasha (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Long period before site timeout. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Zip file for photosets. -Content is dated. -Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date. Cons: -No streaming option. -Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality. -Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality. -Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models. -Archive site, no updates since July 2007. -No search. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Diesel Access network. This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007. Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other. Number of videos: 120. Number of photosets: 210+ -Video updates: last video update was July 2007. -Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007. Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file. Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo. The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?). The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes. 87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip. Frame width x height: 852x480. Total bitrate: 4258 kbps. The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus, no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around. The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos. Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size. Width x height: 852x480 pixels. The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos. Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free- form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content. Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes. 05-09-11  02:07pm Replies (0) Review 190 School Girls HD (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -Attractive mix of Japanese models. -Epoch is the payment processor: a trusted name. -The videos do not have the pixellated/mosaic effect that is present on most Japanese porn. -Easy login. Save your username and password with cookies, and you are basically automatically logged in when you click on the login link. -No download limits. -No DRM. -OK download speeds. I averaged 1.6 MB/sec. -You can choose the quality of your streaming video: SD 240p 400 bitrate MED 480p 1000 bitrate HQ 720p 2000 bitrate SH 1080p 4000 bitrate Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -Depending on the credit card you sign up with, you might be declined. Mastercard declined my payment, and I had to call Mastercard to unblock my account. But a different Mastercard accepted the payment. -The site is not laid out for easy seach of model or category or whatever niche you are looking for. They need a simple alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail for each model, and her contents at the network hot-linked with the thumbnail. -If I stream a video in 1080p quality, the streaming is not entirely smooth. My connection is 50MB/sec, which should enable smooth streaming, but it doesn't at this site. Bottom Line: The site theme is horny Japanese schoogirls having sex. There are 184 scenes at the site. By Japanese law, any pornography must censor the genitals of actors and actresses. Until the mid-1990s, pubic hair was also censored. But the videos at this site, although featuring Japanese models, do not censor the videos with the pixellated/mosaic effect. So I assume the videos are produced outside of Japan. If you are not familiar with Japanese porn, there are some differences from European and American porn. It's been several years since I last joined a Japanese porn site. The texture and atmosphere of the videos at School Girls HD seem different from the videos that I remember. My guess is that the videos were shot with a Western (American, European) audience in mind. The performers are Japanese. But the girls' attitudes are slightly different from what they were 10 or 15 years ago. They don't moan and make as many funny noises as they used to. The girls are more accepting of the sex. They don't show as much feigned, cultural behavior of only submitting to the sex because they are being forced to (not actual force, but just submitting to the will of the men). The kissing, while still longer and more intense than American or European kissing, is not as passionate and lengthy as it used to be. The moans and funny noises the models make are supposed to indicate reluctance to be having sex, but also excitement at having sex. Personally, I found the moans and funny noises annoying: it takes getting used to. But the funny noises the girls make have been toned down considerably. Some Japanese porn can be extremely hot, and Japan has some of the most beautiful women in the world. And because of cultural differences, there can be some funny quirks in the videos. I believe the average model here is from the second-tier of Japanese porn models, not the first tier. The most attractive and famous models might be found at other Japanese porn sites, but very few of the big name models I used to look for are found at this site. The models are attractive, but not the super-beauties or super-stars of Japanese porn. However, the models are supposed to be school girls, which means they are younger models. So that might help explain why the big-name models are not featured at this site. The main reason I joined is because the videos are uncensored. And the models are a nice change from the European and American models in looks. Giving the site a score of 80. I'm spoiled by the outstanding attractiveness of the many European and American models I see at porn sites. The models at this site don't possess that outstanding beauty or cuteness. And I didn't think the sex was exceptionally hot, that can be found at many hardcore porn sites. This is a good site. But not a great site. 02-15-16  07:27pm Replies (0) Review 191 Sex Art (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAPS, BECAUSE MY EYES ARE POOR. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUTING, BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO SEE (AND EDIT) RATHER THAN SQUINTING TO SEE TINY LETTERS. ANYONE WHO IS REALLY ANNOYED BY CAP LETTERS CAN SKIP THIS REVIEW, AND WHATEVER OTHER POSTS I MAKE. ALSO: I WROTE AN EARLIER REVIEW A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO ABOUT THE SEX ART SITE. I THINK THAT REVIEW WAS EVEN BETTER THAN THIS ONE. MORE PROFESSIONAL. GIVES A BETTER OVER-VIEW OF THE SITE. BUT BOTH REVIEWS ARE ACCEPTABLE, IN TERMS OF GIVING A FLAVOR OF THE SITE, I HOPE. PROS: -SEX ART IS PART OF THE MET ART SITES. SO YOU CAN EXPECT A QUALITY EXPERIENCE: -SEX ART IS A GLAMOUR SITE. THE MODELS (MANY OF WHICH ARE FEATURED AT OTHER MET ART SITES) ARE SOME OF THE MOST ATTRACTIVE WOMEN IN THE INTERNET. -THE SITE STRUCTURE AND NAVIGATION ARE EXCELLENT. CONTINUED IN THE CONS SECTION: Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -NO STREAMING LIMITS. -DAILY UPDATE. -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $19.95/MONTH RECURRING. -SEX ART SUPPORT STAFF (PART OF THE MET ART SUPPORT STAFF) IS EXCEPTIONAL: FAST TO RESPOND TO EMAILS (WITHIN A FEW HOURS), AND HELPFUL. THE ONLY IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE IF THEY HAD A LIVE CHAT LINE, WHICH THEY DON'T. -THIS IS A FULL-FEATURED SITE WITH ALL THE EXTRAS YOU GET WITH A GLAM SITE: -YOU CAN STREAM ONLINE THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS. -YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS. CONS (START OF): -CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. THIS IS PART OF THE MET ART NETWORK. SO IT'S A FULL-FEATURED GLAM SITE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. THIS IS STANDARD FOR PORN SITES. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -IF YOU DON'T LIKE GLAM PORN, THE SITE WILL PROBABLY NOT APPEAL TO YOU. THE MODELS ARE GORGEOUS, AND PRESENTED VERY ATTRACTIVELY. -SOME MODELS APPEAR IN COSTUMES, TO GIVE AN EROTIC TOUCH. SO YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE MOOD FOR EROTIC GLAM. DON'T EXPECT CRUDE, HARSH HARDCORE, ALTHOUGH THERE IS A SLIGHT TINGE OF FANTASY HARSHNESS IN SOME OF THE PHOTO SETS AND VIDEOS. -NO BONUS SITES COME WITH A MEMBERSHIP. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): SEX ART IS THE EROTIC VERSION OF THE MET ART SITES. MET ART MODELS ARE BASICALLY PRESENTED AS SOLO MODELS, WHO, ALTHOUGH NAKED, ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SHOW MUCH SEXUALITY. VERY LITTLE SELF-TOUCHING. THAT'S THE WAY IT USED TO BE, ALTHOUGH SOME MILD TOUCHING IS NOW ALLOWED. NO BOYS ALLOWED (ALTHOUGH I DID ONCE SEE A FLASH OF A MALE PHOTOTOGRAPHER'S HAND AND WRIST IN A MET ART PHOTO SET, POSSIBLY TO ARRANGE A MODEL'S P0SE. BUT SEX ART IS DIFFERENT: A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO MASTURBATE. A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A BOY PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE BOY. A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A GIRL PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE GIRL. I THINK OF SEX ART AS MET ART WITH SEX. MET ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED. SEX ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED AND HAVE SEX. ARTFUL, EROTIC SEX. BY THEMSELVES (MASTURBATION), WITH A PARTNER (A WOMAN OR MAN). GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 90. IT'S A FINE SITE, BUT I PERSONALLY ENJOY MET ART MORE. BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CATALOG OF PHOTO SETS OF GORGEOUS MODELS AT MET ART. 01-14-19  07:11am Replies (3) Review 192 Sex Art (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PART OF THE METART NETWORK. SO YOU CAN EXPECT THE FOLLOWING: -EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE. -GOOD SITE NAVIGATION. -GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. -HIGH-LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHY. -ZIP FILES FOR EACH PHOTOSET, IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH RESOLUTION. -CAN DOWNLOAD EACH VIDEO IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH RESOLUTION. -NO DRM. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -PU DISCOUNT OF $19.95/MONTH (RECURRING). -DAILY UPDATE, EITHER A PHOTOSET OR A VIDEO. Cons: -THE CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. THIS IS A QUALITY SITE. -I WOULD CONSIDER THIS SITE A GLAMCORE OR HEARTCORE SITE. IT TRIES FOR A HARDER EDGE THAN METART (METART IS SUPER-SOFTCORE, WHERE NO MEN ARE ALLOWED, AND THE FEMALE MODELS IN THE LAST FEW YEARS ARE NOW ALLOWED TO TOUCH THEMSELVES TO SHOW A BIT MORE EROTICISM, BUT METART IS STILL ONE OF THE SOFTEST SOFTCORE SITES ON THE INTERNET). SO IF HEARTCORE IS NOT YOUR THING, SEX ART WILL NOT APPEAL TO YOU. -IT'S NOT GONZO HARDCORE. MAYBE YOU COULD CALL IT SOFTCORE, OR MIDCORE. THERE IS NO ROUGH BONDAGE, CRUEL SEX, REAL PUNISHMENT, ALTHOUGH SOME SCENES ARE PLAYFUL EDITIONS OF BONDAGE, PUNISHMENT, FORCEFUL SEX. -THERE IS NOT MUCH VARIATION IN THE MODELS: THEY ARE IN THEIR LATE TEENS, OR TWENTIES. MAINLY SLENDER WHITE YOUNG LOVELIES. -NOT A LOT OF PIERCINGS OR TATTOOS. METART.COM PHOTOSHOPS ANY VISIBLE TATTOOS A MODEL MIGHT HAVE. BUT A FEW SEX ART MODELS DO SHOW TATTOOS. -THERE IS LIMITED INFORMATION ABOUT THE MODELS. Bottom Line: -THIS IS A GLAMCORE VERSION OF THE METART SITE. BOYS ARE ALLOW, SEX IS ALLOWED. NO REAL ABUSE OR CRUEL OR PUNISHING SEX. THE VIDEOS ARE LIKE ZALMAN KING VIDEOS. ZALMAN KING DIRECTED TWO MOON JUNCTION, WILD ORCHID, THE RED SHOE DIARIES, WHICH WERE ALL EROTIC MOVIES OR TV VIDEOS. IF YOU WERE A FAN OF ZALMAN KING, THEN SEX ART SHOULD APPEAL TO YOU. -MANY OF THE MODELS AT THE OTHER METART SITES ALSO APPEAR AT SEX ART. SO THE ATTRACTIVE LEVEL OF THE MODELS IS HIGH. THE METART NETWORK EMPLOYS FEMALE MODELS IN THEIR LATE TEENS OR TWENTIES, AND MOST OF THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL. -I SAID SEX ART IS A HARDER VERSION OF METART. -BOYS/MEN ARE ALLOWED. SO YOU HAVE B/G SEX. -TOYS ARE ALLOWED. MAINLY IN LESBIAN PLAY, BUT A MAN CAN USE A TOY ON A WOMAN. THIS IS A QUALITY GLAMCORE SITE: THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS ARE SHOT BY EXPERTS. SO YOU CAN EXPECT EXCELLENT LIGHTING, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD FOCUS, EXPENSIVE SETS. THE BACKGROUND MUSIC IS JUST OK. NOT AS PHONY OR INTRUSIVE AS AT MANY PORN SITES, BUT THE VIDEOS WOULD PROBABLY BE BETTER WITHOUT THE BACKGROUND MUSIC. I'M GIVING SEX ART A SCORE OF 90. IT'S AN EXCELLENT GLAMCORE SITE. PROBABLY DESIGNED FOR COUPLES TO WATCH. X-ART AND THE DIESEL NETWORK ARE EXCELLENT HARDER-EDGED VERSIONS OF THE GLAMCORE NICHE. 12-05-17  08:54am Replies (3) Review 193 Sex Art (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.99/month (recurring), from regular price of $29.99/month. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Multiple definition choices for download of zip galleries. -Multiple definition choices for download of videos. -Can stream videos or download them. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. This is a MA (MetArt Network) site. Which means outstanding quality in production values, high-gloss photography, expensively produced videos. -Even though this is not a softcore site, it's like a soft glamcore site. I assume the target audience is couples, who want to view erotic photos and videos. The site is glamcore/heartcore, and very different from gonzo sex. The sex might be too soft for those who want hardcore sex. If you compare SexArt to X-Art (a high quality glamcore site with attractive models), X-Art is far more hardcore: X-Art features solo masturbation, girl-girl sex, girl-boy sex, multiple partner sex, anal sex. X-Art is far more explicit and hardcore than what Sex Art offers. -Limited information about the models. The text file that downloads with each zipped gallery gives you basic physical information on the model (age when shot, eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, country of origin, ethnicity. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): But it gives no personal infomation about model's history: what she likes, occupation, goals, etc. The models are lovely creatures, but there's no real connection to them. Porn is fantasy. Part of the fantasy is building a connection to the models. -Years ago, the MetArt network offered large discounts to their sites if you were a member of any one of their sites. They offered a $10/month rate. But they dropped that discount program, and now you have to search for special discounts to join, which is hit-and-miss. ------------- BOTTOM LINE -This is a high quality site for soft glamcore sex. It features many of the models who appear at the other MetArt member sites. All content is exclusive. The models are attractive to lovely. The site is large. Galleries: 914 Videos: 634 -This is part of the MetArt network. So you know that you will be getting: 1. High quality galleries and videos. 2. Excellent customer service. Customer service will respond with a form email immediately, then a rep will contact you via email within a few hours to try to solve your problem. 3. The videos (and galleries) have a more explicit tone than MetArt.com. The videos and galleries show actual sex acts. Solo female masturbation, girl-girl lesbian sex, girl-boy sex. MetArt.com is trying for a more explicit tone than it used to, but MetArt.com is still basically softcore: No boys allowed, almost no sex allowed. And the MA videos are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models. So SexArt is definitely more explicit than MetArt, but it's only slightly more explicit, and nowhere near the hardcore edge that many other glamcore sites feature. 4. As is true of all the MA (MetArt) sites, you have a choice of definition for the galleries of low, medium, high. There is a gallery zip file in each definition. You also have choice of definition of videos, of 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p. 5. Easy navigation of the site, following the same layout as most of the MA sites. 6. Attractive models. 7. Easy login. As long as you have cookies enabled, you just hit the Members Login link, and you enter the site, without having to re-enter your username and password. Bottom line: This is an outstanding site for glamcore sex. The problem is that there are a number of high quality glamcore sites that were created in the last few years, and it's difficult to know which are the best value for your money. It comes down to personal taste. Sex Art is the softest of the major glamcore sites. Other glamcore sites include: X-Art, Babes, Diesel network (WowGirls, WowPorn, 18OnlyGirls). The Diesel sites are borderline glamcore/hardcore. Diesel is definitely hardcore, but some members might disagree that Diesel is glamcore/heartcore. I think the Diesel site offer high quality hardcore porn that is boderline gonzo or borderline glamcore. Note: 18OnlyGirls.com (part of Diesel offerings) appears to have re-named itself as AllFineGirls.com. The problem is there are so many porn sites, and a person only has a limited amount of money (and to a lesser degree, amount of time) to explore or savor these sites. Sex Art is definitely worth exploring. You have a wide selection of attractive models, most in late teens or early twenties, mainly white. But there are other first tier sites that are competing for your porn dollars. Which is a good position to be in, for the porn consumer. I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It's a premium site. But it doesn't blow me away like Met Art does. Met Art, for many reasons, is the finest softcore photo site on the internet. 06-25-16  02:06am Replies (0) Review 194 Sex Asian 18 (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -If you get tired of lovely Euro teens, look at Japanese teens for fresh models. I have nothing against Latino and other types, but Japan makes an art form of photographs and videos of lovely young Japanese girls. -Huge amount of content. Just like Met-art, you get exhausted looking through all the pictures/videos on this site, and know you can't see all the gorgeous girls there are to see. There just isn't enough time, or enough space on your hard drive to download it all, unless your handle is badandy400. Advertise: -daily updates. Minimum of 2 movies daily. -high res DVD quality movies in either AVI or WMV format -24/7 customer support. All emails answered by a human within 48 hours. -can search by terms and keywords. Can search by model, photoset, video, censored video, uncensored video, or by category (interracial, amateur, cosplay, popular actress, school girl, mature, etc.). -no DRM -easy cancellation -signup thru CCBill or Verotel Cons: -Mosaic (a form of censorship for genitalia) takes getting used to. -Acting/attitude of female models different from American and Euro style, takes getting used to. -The photosets are high quality: lovely photos, but not enough of them. This is more of a video site than a photo site. -The model, movie and photoset information is embedded in the page as a photograph, so it can't be copied and pasted manually into a text file on your PC. Name of file, model(s), title of movie/photoset, etc. have to be manually typed into your personally created database to keep track of what the downloaded movies/photosets are. -1 file size for zip photosets. No choice of low, medium, high res photos. -1 file size for video files. No choice of low, medium, high res video. -No choice of file type for videos. Some video files download as AVI, some download as WMV. -Only 10 movie captures (screenshots) to illustrate a movie which could be 2-4 hours. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -No online streaming to watch the movie. -Apparently viewing a photoset online counts against your daily download limit of 12 GB. I sent an email asking for verification of this, got no reply from support. -The 12 GB daily download limit is a lie: -Day 1 of my membership, I was banned for rest of the day after downloading less than 3 GB. The site states that if you download more than 1 thread at a time, you are counted for each thread. The site does not state that you are mis-counted for muli-thread downloads. -Day 3 of my membership, banned again for rest of day after downloading less than 3 GB. The form BAN message stated either I exceeded 12 GB or my account had been hacked. I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time before starting the next download. -Day 4 of membership banned for rest of day before I reached the 12 GB limit. Again, I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time, but was improperly banned anyway. -Email support is a lie. The site claims the email support is 24/7, and that a human will respond to each email request within 48 hours. I sent numerous requests to email support. I check my email several times a day, both regular in-box and the spam-box. I never received an email response from support. Since I did not get a response after 3 emails to support, I sent an email requesting help to their accounts email address, explaining my problems and the lack of response from support email. Have not received any reply from accounts email. -No confirmation email of membership purchase from CCBill. BOTTOM LINE: The photosets and videos are good-to-high quality (dvd quality, not the super high visual quality of specialty sites like Femjoy for photosets and videos) stats: photos: dimensions 768x1050 to 1200x1800 video:resolution: 640x480 Site ease of use: This is a site with a large number of files (videos and photosets) you will want to download. Using a download manager is the only reasonable way to handle the downloading chores, unless you are willing to spend a massive number of hours at the computer keyboard manually downloading each separate file. The form BAN message states you are banned from site for 15 hours because you exceeded bandwidth usage or your account was hacked. You are issued username and password by CCBill, and have no control over them. I paid for a service, access to a site, and did not receive what I paid for. What does the large amount of good quality site content matter to me, if I can't access the content for large periods of time? I believe my score is fair based on the lousy service I am getting. I was generous only because of the large quality content that it is hard as hell to get to. Edit 1: Was told in an email that multi-thread counter was fixed, you no longer get early ban for using a download manager. Also, I was given 10 free days because of my site problems. 07-19-09  05:07pm Replies (4) Review 195 Shady P.I. (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT SHOUTING. -CAN STREAM VIDEOS IN HD OR STANDARD DEFINITION. -CAN DOWNLOAD VIDEOS IN 480P OR 1080P DEFINITION. -TRAILER GIVES YOU A PREVIEW FOR EACH VIDE0. -LARGE-SIZED GALLERY FOR EACH VIDEO. -GALLERIES HAVE A ZIP FILE. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT DUE TO INACTIVITY. -SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. BUT ACCESS TO THE PREMIUM SITES REQUIRES AN UPGRADED MEMBERSHIP. Cons: -ARCHIVE SITE. LAST UPDATE NOVEMBER 2013. -SMALL SITE. 97 SCENES. -CAPTCHA REQUIRED TO ENTER SITE. -HAVE TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PREMIUM STATUS TO ENTER MEMBER'S AREA. -ADDS ON EVERY PAGE. -SOME VIDEOS STOP STREAMING WITH ERROR MESSAGE: html5: Video not properly encoded. -SOME VIDEOS DO NOT PLAY, OR ARE VERY SLOW TO LOAD. (I SELECT A VIDEO: IF IT DOES NOT LOAD ON THE PAGE AFTER A FEW MINUTES, I SELECT A DIFFERENT VIDEO: SO I DON'T KNOW IF I WAITED MORE MINUTES, THE VIDEO WILL LOAD, OR THE VIDEO LINK MIGHT BE BROKEN.) -MOST VIDEOS AT THE SITE ONLY HAVE 2 DOWNLOAD OPTIONS: 480P AND 1080P. NO 720P AVAILABLE. -NO SEARCH BOX. WHICH MAKES EXAMINING THE CONTENTS A TIME-CONSUMING CHORE. Bottom Line: 16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. WITH CURRENT NUMBER OF SCENES ON 2017-02-25: (NETWORK ADVERTISES 24 BASIC SITES, BUT THAT'S NOT ACCURATE: THEY HAVE ELIMINATED A FEW SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS). 18yearsold - 489 Updates 40ozbounce - 119 Updates Cockcompetition - 40 Updates Crueltyparty - 64 Updates Deepthroatlove - 294 Updates Disgraced18 - 21 Updates Eurohumpers - 21 Updates Flexiblepositions - 27 Updates Freaksofboobs - 62 Updates Freaksofcock - 183 Updates Jurassiccock - 80 Updates Massagecreep - 210 Updates Pimpparade - 33 Updates Realexgirlfriends - 588 Updates Shadypi - 97 Updates Teenbff - 236 Updates SITE THEME: ORIGINALLY, THE THEME WAS A PRIVATE EYE IS VIDEOTAPING WOMEN WHO ARE CHEATING ON THEIR HUSBANDS. EXCEPT THAT THE THEME WAS DROPPED ALONG THE WAY, AND MANY SCENES ARE JUST A GUY HAVING SEX WITH A GIRL. NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO THEMES, EXCEPT THAT THE PI ELEMENT IS SUPPOSED TO ADD A BIT OF FORBIDDEN SEX TO THE SCENE, ALONG WITH AN ELEMENT OF VOYEURISM BECAUSE THE WOMAN IS NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THE SEX IS BEING TAPED. THIS IS A SMALL, ARCHIVE SITE THAT STOPPED UPDATING IN NOVEMBER 2013. ONLY 97 SCENES. I WOULD GRADE THE MODELS AS STANDARD PORNSTARS: A LOT OF ENLARGED BREASTS, THE MODELS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY ATTRACTIVE, MOST MODELS ARE IN THEIR MID-TWENTIES OR OLDER. ALTHOUGH THE MODELS MAKE A LOT OF GROANING AND MOANING NOISES, TO SHOW THE SEX IS HOT, I DID NOT CONSIDER THE SCENES TO BE HOT: JUST NOISY. GIVING THE SITE ITSELF A SCORE OF 69. BECAUSE SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK, I AM INCREASING THE SCORE TO 80, BECAUSE SOME OF THE OTHER SITES ARE WORTH VISITING. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. MY FAVORITE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS MASSAGE CREEP, WHICH HAS A ATTRACTIVE SELECTION OF MODELS, AND THE MASSAGE THEME IS BETTER PLAYED, WITH MORE BUILDUP IN MANY OF THE SCENES, BECAUSE THE MASSEUR SEDUCES THE WOMAN WITH HIS HANDS INTO AN EROTIC ENCOUNTER. IN MY OPINION, SHADY PI IS A THROWAWAY SITE: YOU PAID FOR NETWORK ACCESS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GLANCE THROUGH THE VIDEOS AT THE SITE TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING OF INTEREST. BUT THE REAL VALUE LIES IN THE NETWORK ACCESS. SOME OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE WORTH VISITING. WITH SCENES THAT MIGHT APPEAL TO DIFFERENT NICHES AND PERSONAL TASTES. BUT OVERALL, I THINK THERE ARE BETTER NETWORKS AND SITES THAT ARE MORE DESERVING OF YOUR MONEY. 03-01-17  02:16am Replies (0) Review 196 Shane Diesel XXX (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: Note: Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site that stopped updating in February 2017. So most of the review will focus on the New Sensations network, which does update weekly. -Heavily discounted membership price during holidays. Can get a 12 month membership for as low as $60. -Network advertises access to 12+ exclusive bonus sites. But actually you get access to over 20+ sites with network access. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloading. -Clean site design. Not cluttered with lots of ads. -A lot of attractive models. Not a lot of tattoos. Not overly made up to look like porn stars, but look like really attractive girl-next-door types. -Secure pages: https login and member pages. -Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview. -They upgraded the photosets at the network. A couple of years ago, all the photosets were poor-quality screen caps of each video. They invested in a better software program to make better-quality screencaps of each video. Cons: -Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site. It hasn't updated since February 2017. -I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network. -The default billing agent is FXBilling / CSHelpCenter. I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, but I've been a member of New Sensations for years, off and on, and never had a billing problem with them. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Some PU members might think the videos are too plain vanilla. Although the videos have cute models and are professionally shot in nice settings, the videos often lack the sizzle that some great sites can have. -Sometimes the download options are strange: a video might have only 4K choices in different kbps choices. Bottom Line: Network stats: -Over 7,0000 exclusive hardcore videos. -Over 2,500 porn stars -Premium 4K UHD (no extra charge) -Multiple streaming options. -Multiple download options. -Multiple weekly updates. A lot of the videos have a setup storyline to make the sex more meaningful. This is a personal issue, but some viewers might want to skip the setup and move to the sex, while others might enjoy the setup. Depends on personal taste. The sites cover a wide variety of niches. The search function is just OK, it depends on the criteria you're searching for. I mainly focus on the model, so, since the search examines the entire network, not just the site you're currently logged into, the search is fine for me. I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network. Navigation is easy, the videos are professionally shot. There are a huge number of attractive models. The models don't have lots of tattoos, and are not overly made-up, so they look like the good-looking girl who could be your next door neighbor, not like the porn star that lives on the streets of New York City. Although the site and network are fine, there are so many porn sites competing for your porn dollars, that the New Sensations network kind of gets lost in the shuffle. That is the main knock against the network. There are some sites and networks that offer great value for your porn dollars: The White Boxxx (part of LetsDoeIt), Pure Taboo (part of Adult Time), Teen Fidelity (part of the Teen Fidelity-Teen Porn-Kelly Madison group) have outstanding videos that are erotic and impressive as hell. Watching some of the videos at those sites is an introduction to how great porn can be. The New Sensations network is a fine network. But none of the sites in the network blew me away: some PU members might feels the network is too plain vanilla for their tastes. I'm giving the site a score of 85. This is because site membership gives you access to the complete network. Actually, membership in any of the network sites gives you access to the entire network. If I were scoring the site by itself, the site would deserve a much lower score. But the network gives you complete access to all the sites, without any extra charge for 4K, downloading, or premium site charges. It's a good network, but there are other networks that you might find give a better bang for your buck. In spite of the fact that the network offers a $60 annual membership at times. However, I did sign up for the $60 annual membership, because I do find the network is worth joining. 04-19-19  10:41pm Replies (0) Review 197 She's New (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the basic Team Skeet network. She's New is one of the larger sites in the network, with 229 videos as of 2018-01-16. -You have a number of choices to stream and/or download videos. The definitions available include: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p for download. For streaming, the definitions include: low, medium, high, 720p. -The photo sets can be viewed online in a slide show. Or they can be downloaded in your choice of low, medium or high definition. -Also, for streaming or downloading, you can choose 1-minute clips of the video, or the entire video. -There is also a trailer for the video, to give you a fast introduction of the video's content. -So there has been a large amount of effort put into making the site user-friendly for streaming and downloading options. Cons: -A number of PU members have complained that the network is plagued by connection problems, making the network worthless. Slow connections resulting in inability to load pages, to stream or download site contents, etc. If you pay for a membership and are unable to view or download the contents, the money you spent for a membership is wasted. I've been a member of the network for over 1 year, and have experienced few problems. Some PU members have accused me of being a shill for Team Skeet, because I've stated on some of the complaints that my personal experience was good. Anyway, it's worth noting that if you do experience connection problems with Team Skeet, you should ask for a refund of your membership fees. -To enter the site, you have to pass through an ad-page with ads for different sites. -Recent updates average 1 per month. But the network updates 1 per day. -A personal quibble, but I don't like sites that split their offerings into a basic network, and a premium network. Bottom Line: Cons (continued): Make the premium sites into a separate network, would be my solution. -Most of the recent scenes follow the same basic script of interview, blowjob, fuck, and finish with stunt cock jisming on girl's face and tongue. Which gets repetitious. When the site started, back in 2011, there was some variety in the sex with different set-ups. But the current scenes are too repetitious to generate any heat or excitement. There's no tension or build-up. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line (start of): Site theme: teens who are new to porn, or very early in their porn career. The scene usually starts off with questions to the model about why she wants a porn career, what were her first sexual experiences, what kinds of sex does she like, etc. Then the girl strips and she gives the stunt cock a blowjob, they fuck, and the guy finishes on her face and tongue. It's difficult to give a score to the site. If you experience slow connection problems, and the site and network is not usable, then the score would be in the 50s. But if you do not experience slow connection problems, the site and network is a worthwhile join, and a more reasonable score would be in the 80s. The site and network offer a lot of attractive teen models. The site and network structure gives many options for streaming and downloading the content. The site gives you access to the basic team skeet network, which includes many different niches. I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's because I personally have not experienced the slow connection speeds some PU members complain about. If I had experienced the bad connections, I would not have rejoined for a second year. Although this site is large (229 videos and photo sets), it's not one of my favorites in the Team Skeet network. Because I find most of the videos lack heat. Then why give the site a score of 80? Because membership in the site gives you: -access to the basic Team Skeet network, which currently has 27 sites covering a variety of teen niches. -1400 models. Many of them attractive teens. -2896 scenes. Most of the scenes are hardcore. -A wide variety of options to use the videos and photosets: to stream and/or download. I'm giving the site a higher score due to network access. Also, I'm placing more weight on the huge quantity of videos and photo sets in many different niches. If you prefer quality over quantity, you would give the site and network a lower score. And if you experience a poor network connection, the site score would be in the 50s. Bottom line: I think Team Skeet is a worthwhile join. As long as you don't experience the poor connection speeds some PU members get. There's a large amount of teen porn, offered in many different niches. A huge amount of teen models, many of them attractive. Some sites should appeal to most people who are into teen porn. In the first reply section below, I list the current sites available in the basic Team Skeet network. 01-16-18  09:47am Replies (1) Review 198 She's New (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $17.87/month. -Epoch is main biller, a trusted name. -Accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and some European(?) credit cards for join. -With site membership, you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. That's over 20 sites. The Team Skeet network "Unlock" sites require additional payment for each "Unlock" site. -Update rate for site is 2-4 videos per month. But you get 1 new video per day for the network. -Large site. Currently 207 videos. Plus matching photoset for each video. -As a non-member, you can see a nice-sized thumbnail of each video at the site, and at the network, showing you the models at the site. Which is an unusual feature. -The models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. -A lot of the models are in the early stage of their porn career. Most porn models only last a few years in the business, before retiring, but you get a nice selection of American and European porn models at the site/network. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. They eliminated the cross-sale a few years back for a short time, but brought it back again. -The software mechanism for displaying the individual photos of a photoset is slow. -The photosets have a zip file (one definition only), but the photosets are screencaps, and not worth collecting. -There is advertising for other sites on each page, but many of the ads link to a full-priced join page that is more expensive than the normal PU discount price. Bottom Line: Site theme: Amateurs doing porn. To believe that, you need to turn your brain off. Porn is fantasy, but it's easier watching Superman fly and believing he is real (since we've been conditioned from childhood to believe in Superman and other super-heroes), than to believe these girls are amateurs or first time in porn. Unless you've never joined or viewed any porn sites before. That might help the illusion, because many of the site models are familiar from other porn sites. The girls are not trying to act like this is the first time for them. There is very little acting involved. This site is basically hardcore teen sex. The girls don't act shy or hesitant. They strip and suck cock, then fuck. The fantasy that these girls are amateurs is hard to believe. They are young, but they are definitely not new to sex. Or maybe I'm not thinking clearly: they could be called amateurs because this is supposed to be the first time they are legally getting paid for sex as porn models. As long as you haven't seen these same girls on a bunch of other porn sites. The videos start off with a short interview, where a guy asks the model if she is new to porn (she says yes), does she like sex (she says yes), and the girl shows off her body by removing her clothes (which are everyday street wear: not much effort is put into making the girls glamourous or attractive). Then the girl gives a blowjob, and she fucks. The interview is nice, because it gives the girl a chance to show some of her personality, to make her more real. She will say she comes from a small town, and is excited to see the big city where TeamSkeet is shooting the video. She gives a bit of her sexual history: What is her favorite sex position; How often does she have sex. And she's excited to be a Team Skeet girl (porn model/actress). Site stats: Videos: 207 Photosets: 207 (1 matching photoset for each video). The photosets are screen caps of the video. There is a zip file for each photoset, but the girls are not glamorized, and the screencaps have little value. I don't see why most people would want to collect the photosets, even of the models they enjoy. You might collect the videos of your favorite models, or the videos you think are hot, but the photosets are basically wasted space. This is in contrast to photosets at X-Art or Diesel (All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn), where the photosets are worth collecting, because the girls are showcased to be attractive, and the photos are close to MetArt or MPL Studios quality. Even many of the photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting. Teen Mega World does not usually make much of an effort to glamorize their models, but some of the models are so attractive, and the photography has improved so much over early screencaps, that I've been collecting some of the Teen Mega World photosets, where the models are attractive and the photosets are really nice. The site (and network) are basically easy to navigate, and has some nice features: Videos: Stream in low, medium or high definition(720p and 1080p). Download in low, medium, or high definition(720p and 1080p). You can stream and/or download the entire video, or selected clips from the video. The videos at She's New are advertised as 100% exclusive. I believe that's basically true. However, if you are a fan of tube sites, you might have come across some of the She's New videos before, because porn pay sites seem to use tube sites to advertise their wares. There is a long time before you are timed out of the site for in-activity. The are no download limits. No DRM. So you "own" the videos you download. It's easy to switch between sites in the network. No need to re-type your user name or password. I'm giving the site a score of 88. That's very subjective. You get access to the site itself, which has 207 videos. You also get access to over 20 Team Skeet network sites. In many different niches. These are professionally shot videos. Not much effort is put into making these models as attractive as possible. They are relying on straight hardcore teen sex as the attraction. Very little plot or story to the sex. So the site (and network) is worth a join. But there are other sites (and networks) that I enjoy more. So it's a lukewarm recommendation. But a nice score for a lukewarm recommendation. And that explains why I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives, on deciding to join a site or not. My system for joining a site: -I want a site that has content that I can enjoy. -is easy to use. -gives value for the money I pay. 09-27-16  05:29am Replies (4) Review 199 She's New (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Some very nice, attractive models. -Choice of streaming or download for videos. -Streaming offers low, medium and high definition. -Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p). -There is also an iPod file type for download. -Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password. -No DRM. -Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed. -DownThemAll download manager works at this site. -Content appears to be exclusive to this site. -Many of the models are early in their career in porn. -PU discount of $17.87/month recurring. -The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites. Cons: -Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach. -The names of a few models are not their most common names. Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love. -The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly. Bottom Line: Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties. The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include: ExxxtraSmall Her Freshman Year Innocent High Oye Loca POV Life Self Desire Rub A Teen She's New Solo Interviews Team Skeet Extras Teeny Black The Real Workout This Girl Sucks Titty Attack Number of videos at site: 50+ Rate of updates: 1 video per week. Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less. The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive. You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading. The site description states: "We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!" You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are not worth keeping. I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site. I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results. By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job. I am giving the site a score of 75. 01-08-13  02:15am Replies (2) Review 200 Shio Fuky (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. No captcha required. -Can stream and/or download the scenes. -Multiple definitions for streaming and download: low (for mobile), medium, high, super high (1080p). -Long time before site timeout due to inactivity. -Professionally shot videos: good camera-work, good focus, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. -Models are young Japanese, late teens to early twenties, attractive. Cons: -Sex toys are used extensively in the scenes. Both dildos and vibrators (some people say that a dildo can be a vibrator, but that's another topic). -Squirting is messy (and smelly, I would assume). Clinical studies have shown that the liquid spraying from a girl's pussy is pee. -This site gives you multiple long shots of the girl's pussy; but after a long time, it gets boring. -The search needs to be improved. It has a clunky interface, and it gives poor search results when you enter a model's name. Bottom Line: Even though Shiofuky (part of JAV HD network) has 336 scenes versus the 31 scenes at Squirting Virgin (part of Teen Mega World network), and even though Shiofuky is updating, and Squirting Virgin stopped updating years ago, I found the Squirting Virgin videos easier to enjoy and more satisfying. For multiple reasons: The Squirting Virgin site has easier navigation. You can find the videos of any model much easier. The Squirting Virgin site videos have more heat and imagination to the sex. The Squirting Virgin videos have a large element of sadomasochism. As I wrote in my recent Squirting Virgin review, the stunt cock is the master, and the attractive model is his sex toy to be used and abused and pleasured. The guy fucks the model like a pro. Hard and fast and long. So the fantasy element is well-played. In the Shiofuky site, you don't get the feeling that the guy/guys are masters who are fucking the models harshly. In fact, many of the scenes show little or no fucking. The girls are being pleasured by the dildos and vibrators and fingers, and then they squirt. I think the harsh fucking which the Squirting Virgin site emphasizes, adds a lot of heat to the scenes, and the Shiofuky scenes are mild by comparison. The Shiofuky site is more for voyeurs who enjoy watching girls reaching orgasm. The Squirting Virgin site adds an element of harshness, along the lines of a Pierre Woodman video, where the guy is going to fuck the brains out of the model. The girl's enjoyment is secondary, she gets pleasure because she is being used as nature intended her to be used. I'm describing the fantasy that the male watcher is supposed to be experiencing. Although some PU members might disagree with my theory or words. In other words, the Squirting Vigin site emphasizes heat over mildness. Maybe I'm becoming blase to porn. Because at one time, seeing a girl squirting, by itself, would have seemed a shocking event to me. But now, it's just another porn niche. The Pierre Woodman videos (Woodman Casting X and Wake Up N Fuck) feature hardcore pussy and ass pounding, intense fingering, forcible cock sucking, a lot of slapping by the stunt cock of the woman's face and breasts and ass cheeks. The Woodman videos are not squirting videos. The Squirting Vigin site is similar to the Pierre Woodman videos, with the addition of female squirting. The Shiofuky site is just squirting videos, with little hardcore pussy or ass pounding. So it's much milder than the Squirting Virgin site, or the Pierre Woodman videos. The Pierre Woodman sites are expensive compared to Squirting Virgin or Shiofuky. But they are worth the extra money if you enjoy harsh treatment of women with sex. The Squirting Virgin site features the harsh treatment of women with sex, for a lower price: but that site is small, and it stopped updating years ago. However, the Squirting Virgin site also offers access to the Teen Mega World network, which has a massive amount of hardcore teen videos in different niches. The Shiofuky site has 336 scenes, but I found them kind of boring. If they were more exciting I would give Shiofuky a higher score. But they also need to improve the search engine, and make a few other improvements to make the site easier to navigate. Giving Shiofuky a score of 82. That is very subjective. If you find the scenes interesting, the site would score higher. If you find the videos boring, you could score lower than I did. 03-22-16  03:26am Replies (0) Shown : 176-200 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.44 seconds.