Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 Devils Film (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: PROS: -Advertise 1000+ movies -Advertise exclusive content -Advertise 2400 Gigs -Advertise daily updates -No timeout from site -Vid caps available for video clips-not good as a picture to enjoy, but good for illustrating the video content of the clip -the videos are good quality: they are not the very high quality super softcore like you will find at Femjoy, but these are well shot porn videos: good focus, good lighting, good skin colors, a lot of the vids have attractive female models. No story to the video clips, just straight hardcore sex. These are professionally shot videos (not amateurish videos where they often cut off the model's head from the shot, use a jerky, hand-held camera, etc.) -videos are clean: no annoying remarks by cameraman/director; no annoying flashes and clicks of a photographer separately photographing the video shoot -no download limits -no DRM -large number of different categories/niches -easy to use streaming option to watch the video clips Cons: PROS(cont): -Can download movies as .wmv files in choice of 2 file sizes: small and large -personal taste-most of the clips I saw had models with "natural"-appearing breasts. I like natural, not the huge fake breasts many porn stars have. So this was positive for me. Also, there are a large number of good-looking young models in the vid clips -search by movie title, category/niche, name of model, devils film series -easy logon. Don't have to play "Enter the secret letters" game, just username and password CONS: -no simple listing of date video was posted -no simple listing of model name in video segment(many clips, don't know who the model is) -most video sites have multiple formats for download, devils film only has .wmv format -minor quibble-There is some duplication of video clips. Not a lot. Where the same video clip is given a different file name. 2689_07_big.wmv and 0658_03_big.wmv are the same video clip, with different file names. Bottom Line: CONS(cont): The title name for the first one is: "18 year Olds Love Cum #02 - Scene 7" The title name for the second one is: "Eight Teen Tryouts #09 - Scene 3" Maybe the distribution company put the same video clip on two separate DVD video titles, and that is why the same clip has two different file names and two different titles, but I don't want duplicate clips on my hard drive with different titles/file names that I don't realize are the same video clip unless I happen to watch them and remember they are the same. -Quibble-When I find a model I like, then do a search for the rest of her videos, it usually turns out she has very few videos at devils film. Strictly speaking, that's not their fault, because they have a large number of videos, but it is still disappointing -navigation could be improved. It's not terrible, but it could be a lot easier to find and get to the video clips/photos you are looking for. In many clips the models are not identified, so that makes searching for a specific model difficult, when you don't know her name. -the site layout should have model's name clearly connected to each video clip/photoset, so it's easy to see name of the model you are looking at BOTTOM LINE: -This is a video site. The useful pix are vid caps, that serve to show you what the vid clip is about -There are photosets of models at devils film. I enjoy the lovely, erotic, enticing photos at met-art, femjoy, mplstudios, domai, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc. These are quality picture sites. I look at the photosets at devils film, and I think, "garbage". I admit I am spoiled, but I see no value or attractiveness in the photos. This site has hardcore photosets, which many of the picture sites I listed do not, so maybe some people will enjoy the hardcore photos, but they are not "good-looking", erotic, or exciting, as far as I am concerned I don't have a lot of experience with video sites. So I can't give a good comparison of the value of this site. What I can say is that pornaccess is a video site that I thought had poor quality videos, terrible navigation, terrible search. Devils film has good quality videos, much easier navigation, much better search. There are a lot of good-looking female models in the videos. Considering that you get 17 different sites in the network along with devils film, I think the site is worth a 1-month membership of $14.95 you get thru PU. It's not the same as a mega-site like VideosZ or VideoBox, but I think the site/network has a lot of value. edit 1: I logged on today, and was required to enter a "secret word", along with username and password. This was first time I had to enter a secret word, and it was easy to see the letters. 06-20-09  07:37pm Replies (2) Review 52 Dirty Coach (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Join this site directly, PU discount is $19.95/month. -But join Teen Mega World directly, PU discount is $14.95/month, and you get full access to Dirty Coach. -Epoch is payment processor, a trusted name. -Attractive teen models. White Eastern European girls. -There is an active comment section, where you can read what other members think of the model, the sex. -Zip file for each gallery. -A matching gallery for each video. Good quality photos. The photos are like excellent screen shots. Good focus. Good definition. Don't expect MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos, but these are surprisingly good screen shots of the video. The gallery gives you not only a fast impression of the what the video will be, but the photos are worth keeping as well, because the models are attractive, and the photos are crisp and well-framed. There must be some software program that does a good job of making these photos from a video, because there were no annoying flash shots during the video shoot. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -Another good feature is the software used to display each gallery. You can easily view each image, and enlarge it if wanted. -The site owners have spent a lot of time and money making improvements to the network, trying to make it easy to use. -Good download speeds. I averaged 3-4 MB/s. CONS: -Pre-checked cross sale to VideosZ on join page, which renews at $39.97/month after 2 day trial. -Or you can join VideosZ for $17.95/month with PU discount. -Small site. Only 56 videos. -Last update was in 2014. -The basic plot is thin. A guy is training a girl. He puts his hands on her, she is attracted to him, and they have sex. Very little build-up or eroticism. This is the Russian equivalent of foreplay: a guy presses his hard-on against a girl, and she is so turned on, that she gives him a blow job, and then they fuck. Why didn't I get to watch these videos in high school, so that I would have learned the basic techniques of how to seduce Russian girls? Bottom Line: Site theme: a male coach or trainer seduces a girl he is coaching. There is almost no plot. The girl is ready to fuck. So the guy does what guys do, and fucks her strongly. I don't want to sound like a broken record, but I find the girls at this site (and Teen Mega World network) attractive to very attractive. They are almost all white, slender teens who enthusiastically enjoy sex. The site (and network) is easy to use. They've put a lot of time into making the navigation easy. And over time they have built a massive collection for the network of good quality hardcore teen videos. If you go back several years, the quality goes down, of course. But for the last few years, the quality is very good for basic hardcore teenage sex. This is not a glamcore site or network. The stories are basic to non-existent. So there is very little build-up to the sex, not much eroticism. It's strictly bread-and-butter fucking (in most positions, with toys or without toys, usually with female cocksucking as well). Dirty Coach site is small, but you get access to the Teen Mega World network, which is huge. To the best of my knowledge, the content at Dirty Coach is exclusive. Scenes from other sites in the network are not necessarily exclusive, and I know I've seen some of them at Diesel network and Team Skeet and at 18X Girls. But I believe the material was first posted to Teen Mega World. Based on a low price for a huge amount of good quality videos and photo sets at the network, of hardcore teen sex, I am giving the site a score of 92. Because membership at the site gives access to the Teen Mega World network. However, please remember that you save $5/month if you join Teen Mega World directly, instead of joining Dirty Coach directly. 03-20-16  11:24am Replies (0) Review 53 Dirty Doctor (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.95/month. -But join through PU discount Teen Mega World for $14.95/month, and you get access to all of Teen Mega World network, which includes Dirty Doctor. -Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name. -Can join by credit card, or using PayPal for extra security. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Fast download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download limit. -Accepts download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Small site. Only 37 videos. -Archive site. The last update was in October 2014. Site started around April 2012, had a slow update rate, then stopped updating. This is an example of the Teen Mega World style of starting numerous sites, but then failing to keep updating them with new videos. Which can be irritating for those members who enjoy the site theme. However, TMW has many sites in different niches, and there should be plenty of videos that will appeal to most members. Bottom Line: Site stats: 37 videos. 37 matching galleries. Site theme: a young teen is examined by a doctor, and the doctor ends up fucking the teen. So if you have a fetish about playing doctor, or remember back to the days when you were a child and played doctor yourself (which seems to be common among very young children), this site might appeal to you. This is a small site. But you get access to the entire TMW network, which has over 4,400 hardcore teen videos. One new video is added to the network every 1 or 2 days. So the network keeps growing. The site and network are easy to use: a lot of effort has been put into making the network user-friendly. The model indexes have a nice-sized thumbnail of each model. Years ago, you had to search for a model's videos at each separate site, but now you just hit the model's name, and her videos at all the network sites are shown. Moving between the sites is easy: you don't need to re-enter your username and password. The network offers new sites that fit the current market: They recently added a Virtual Reality site. Before that, they added a site that features 4K videos. And they add videos to some of their other sites in a random manner. The newer videos are offered in 1080p, 720p, 540p, and 405p (for mobile). The sets have improved over the years, from low-rent apartment buildings to more expensive, clean apartments or studio settings. The models, in the main, wear low-cost street apparel. There is little or no air-brushing. The models are mainly natural teens or early twenties. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos or piercings. Many or most of the models are attractive to very attractive, in spite of the fact that very little effort is put into making the models appear more attractive. The models don't wear a lot of make-up. But most of the models are cute enough that it doesn't matter. And some of the sex can be very hot. Because of the small amount of content, the site itself would deserve a score in the 60s. But because you gain access to the entire TMW network, which has a huge amount of good quality videos, the network access bumps the score up to 85 or more. And I think that some of the sites bump the score up to 90, because the girls are both cute and hot. 08-02-16  12:28am Replies (0) Review 54 Dirty Doctor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Adding 1 new video about every 5 days. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded. -There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices. -You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll. -Good download speeds. -Easy logon. -Long time before site time-out. Cons: -There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time. -Tiny site. only 14 videos so far. -The acting is amateur. -The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry. -The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian. No subtitles. Bottom Line: This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far. The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck. The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way. Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex. You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking. A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school. But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models are young. I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s. One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month. I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content. And if Teen Mega World does not give access to Dirty Doctor, you are missing very little. 06-25-12  10:23am Replies (1) Review 55 DOMAI (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -$9.95/month PU discount. -Update rate: 1 photoset per day Monday through Friday. -Ccbill is payment processor. A trusted name. -There was no pre-checked cross-sell on sign-up page, when I joined. -Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Large collection of attractive girls, in simple settings. -Zip file downloads with a file name that shows: Site name - Date posted - Photoset title - Model name - Photographer name - file definition. Cons: Cons are basically minor. But slightly annoying. -I keep getting logged out of the site. I get a page telling me "Access the full set of 60 photos by joining today!" I am already a member. How many times do I have to join--before they remember that I already paid? I have cookies enabled. I don't have this problem with MetArt, The Life Erotic, or Erotic Beauty. -Once Domai became of part of MetArt, they added a text file to the zip download, that shows the models physical statistics: Age when shot: Eye color: Hair color: Height: Weight: But there is no personal history for the model. Which might make a connection in the audience mind to the model. Her hobbies, profession, likes and dislikes, etc. Note: The zip files of model galleries posted before Domai became part of MetArt, and for a short while after, the text file only includes the name of the model, with no other information. -No videos. Photo sets only. -Navigation is basic. It could be improved a lot. Bottom Line: I did a review of Domai for PU on 2008-11-17. So it's been almost 8 years since my first review of this site. Has anything changed for the site since then? I've gotten 8 years older. (Joke) Domai was started by Eolake Stobblehouse in 1997. It was one of the first softcore sites. It contained nude pictures of attractive women, with stories and articles about nudity, beauty, and culture. It promoted the simple enjoyment of life's pleasures, and the enjoyment of nude photography of women. Stobblehouse became ill, and he sold Domai (and Goddess Nudes) to the MetArt network in 2014. He stated that he could not continue to run the sites because of his illness, but that he believed MetArt would continue to operate the sites in the same manner and style he had done. Basically, that has been the case. The membership price has gone up over the years, and MetArt dropped the membership loyalty discounts that Stobblehouse offered. But that is to be expected. The monthly membership price for Domain is $9.99/month (recurring). Domai offers a simple, natural approach to female nudity. It is softcore. Mainly solo female sets, but there are some sets of two girls together. But the two girls are not engaged in any sexual activity. And the solo sets are strictly softcore. No female masturbation or explicit poses. The models are photographed in a wide variety of settings: in a house, at the beach or lake, in a park or woods, in an artist's studio. The style of the photos is very simple, very natural. The models are not heavily made up, they are not glamorized. They don't wear exotic costumes. The models are attractive to very attractive young women, in their late teens or early twenties. Mostly white. Mostly natural. I haven't found a single model who has an obvious boob job. Most of the models are tattoo-free. Not a lot of piercing. So the models would fit the girl-next-door description, except they are uniformly attractive to extremely attractive. A better description of the site models would be the prettiest girls in high school or college. Except they are nude. And I haven't visited any nude high schools or colleges that I can recall. (Another joke) Domai has a cam site, domaicams, that is basically the same type of cam site offered by many porn sites. You can watch the free cam portions, where the girls basically do nothing of interest, or you can pay for the private shows. The private shows can be expensive. Even the "free" part of the shows encourage tipping the models. I haven't bothered to join any of the private shows. From what I've read, it can be cheaper to go to a live strip club or nudie bar and watch live girls, instead paying for cam shows. Cam shows are not a habit I want to support, because it can get expensive in a short time. Years ago, MetArt had cam shows, that were basically free. You could tip the models, but the shows were like 30 minutes or an hour, and the girls were friendly, and attractive, there might be nudity or not, but it was far different from today's cam shows that are designed to get as much money from the viewers as possible. The MetArt shows from years ago were designed to offer a free experience of the MetArt girls on cam. It was a simpler, less greedy mind-set that seems quaint. You could also pay for a private show in the old MetArt cam, but I never did. The public cam shows were popular, and watched by a large number of MetArt members per session. The photo sets are exclusive to this site. I've only seen 1 Domai photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. Alinda had 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels under the name of Alina. But that photo set is no longer posted at Domai. Although it's still posted at Amour Angels. -Navigation is based on the structure that Eolake Stobblehouse had for many years. If they re- designed the site to follow the Met-Art.com structure, the site navigation would be simpler and faster, and the search engine would be improved. -Each photo set has multiple choice for download: low and medium until May 2013. Starting in May 2013, low, medium and high definition for download. -The file size for download is small. Two factors control this: 1. The number of photos in a set is small. Usually 60 photos or less, many being 20-50+ pictures. 2. The encoding is good. For a price of $10 for a month, you can enjoy a large selection of naked girls in natural settings. The girls are not glamorized, but they are attractive. If you have extensive experience in softcore porn, you will recognize many of the models. If you are in the mood for extremely softcore photos of beautiful women, Domai is worth trying. Giving the site a score of 85. There are a large number of attractive models (994). There are a large number of contributing, professional photographers to the site (133). The photography, although simple and natural, is professional. 05-04-16  01:41am Replies (3) Review 56 DOMAI (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy, glamorous or exotic -Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures -Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site -Easy entrance to site for members -Navigation fairly simple and direct -Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download -Zip file downloading for photosets -No download limits -Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset) -Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 Domai photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. Alinda has 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels as model Alina, photoset named Cons: Pros (continued): "Wonderful Time". Amour Angels has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face. (Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.) The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at Domai and Amour Angels. (If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.) Cons: -Photosets only. No videos. No live cams. -Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually). -The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories. Bottom Line: Cons(continued): -offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder. -Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man -Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around since 1997. So why so few pictures listed? -No bio data on the models -No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted. -Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races. Bottom line: -On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files. -Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at Domai. 11-17-08  12:30am Replies (2) Review 57 Dyked (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Dyked is part of the basic Team Skeet network. You get access to the the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites with a membership in any one of the basic sites. But the premium sites in the network each require a separate additional membership fee. Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network. They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites. -PU offers a discounted price of $17.87/month (recurring). -Unlimited downloading and streaming. -Streaming is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition. -Download is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition. -Each video has an accompanying photo set. -Zip file for each photo set. -Content appears exclusive to this site. Cons: -The main con is that some PU members have experienced a very slow connection speed to the site/network, which makes viewing or downloading the contents difficult. The problem seems hit and miss, because other PU members have a good experience with the network speeds. -Pre-checked cross-sale for $1.10 for 3-day trial to bang.com converts to $39.97/month. Which is a very expensive membership price. If you want to join bang.com, you can do so through a PU discount of $17.95/month recurring. -SegPay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use processors. But I've used SegPay many times, and never had a problem with them. -Dyked is a small site. Only 46 videos. -Dyked updates slowly with 1 or 2 new videos per month. -They mix the basic and premium sites in the network in a listing. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: You have to open each site, to tell if the site is basic or premium--requiring extra payment to see the content. They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the listing, which made it easier to tell what is basic and what is premium. BOTTOM LINE: Dyked is a lesbian site. The site has a sub-theme, where powerful women show submissive teens what a real lesbian experience is. The site started around 2016. There are currently 46 videos at the site. That's a small number, with 1 or 2 new videos added per month. So the site is small, and growing very slowly. However, the basic network adds 1 new video per day, spreading the videos out over the 20+ sites in the basic network. Even though you will quickly go through the entire Dyked contents, you have the basic Team Skeet network sites to explore. The basic network has 2913 videos. The basic network features 2014 models. The network covers most teen niches: massage, cream pie, masturbation, lesbian, high school, redheads, step siblings, anal, latina, black models, etc. Most of the videos are good quality: they don't put a lot of effort into making the models glamourous, but the models are mainly young teens and naturally attractive. The videos are professionally shot, with good lighting, sound control, focus, etc. The network is easy to navigate. You can switch between sites via a site listing, without having to re-enter your login details. You have a model listing, which could be improved with a larger thumbnail of the model. However, when you click on a specific model, that brings up the model's page, which is excellent: You have nice thumbnails that show you what the model looks like, as well as thumbnail hot-links to all her contents at the network--which is an improvement over sites which only show the model's contents at the specific site you happen to be at. I'm giving the site and network a score of 85. This is a small site with a slow update rate: if it was a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. However, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network, which has 1,000s of hardcore teen videos in different niches. So if you are into teen porn, the site and network is a worthwhile join. The exception would be if you experience slow connection speeds, which would destroy the value of your membership price. 06-06-18  07:15pm Replies (0) Review 58 Dyked (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, AND EDIT. -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH. -EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLING AGENT, A TRUSTED NAME. -CAN ALSO USE PAYPAL AS THE BILLING AGENT. -DYKED IS PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PREMIUM SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EASY TO USE, WITH A LOT OF USEFUL FEATURES. --CAN SWITCH BETWEEN SITES, WITHOUT RE-LOGGING IN. --CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS. --STREAMING IS OFFERED IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION. --DOWNLOAD OPTIONS INCLUDE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION. --DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE GOOD. --YOU CAN SORT THE VIDEOS AT EACH SITE BY DATE POSTED, OR BY POPULARITY OF THE VIDEO. Cons: -SMALL SITE, ONLY 27 SCENES. -IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE. 1, 2 OR 3 SCENES PER MONTH. -PERSONAL CON: SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE OBVIOUS BREAST IMPLANTS. -PERSONAL CON: SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE TATTOOS. -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE. YOUR LOGIN DETAILS ARE EXPOSED TO HACKERS EACH TIME YOU LOG IN TO THE SITE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. Bottom Line: SITE THEME: LESBIAN SEX, WHERE POWERFUL WOMEN SHOW INEXPERIENCED, SUBMISSIVE TEENS WHAT A REAL LESBIAN IS. THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA-WORK, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD COLORS IN THE VIDEO, ETC. THE SCENE IS SCRIPTED (IT HAS A PLOT, THE DOMINATRIX HAS A REASON FOR SEDUCING THE INEXPERIENCED GIRL). ALTHOUGH THE PLOTS ARE NOT BELIEVABLE, THEY ARE FUN TO WATCH. SORT OF LIKE A PORN FANTASY FOR LESBIANS WHO DREAM OF SEDUCING YOUNG GIRLS. THE MODELS ARE NOT PROFESSIONAL ACTORS, AND THE SILLY PLOTS DON'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE, BUT IF YOU TURN OFF YOUR BRAIN, YOU MIGHT ENJOY THE VIDEOS AS LIGHT-HEARTED LESBO SEX. THE SEX IS NOT EXCESSIVELY HARSH, THERE IS USUALLY A BIT OF LIGHT SLAPPING AND NAME-CALLING. BUT THE SEX IS BASICALLY MILD HARD-CORE, NO REAL PAIN OR PUNISHMENT IS SHOWN. SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE OBVIOUS BREAST IMPLANTS. SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE TATTOOS. THE MODELS ARE NOT ACTORS, AND THE FAKE MOANS AND GROANS AND FAKED EXCITEMENT ARE NOT BELIEVABLE, BUT THE VIDEOS CAN BE AMUSING. SOME OF THE MODELS ARE CUTE TEENS OR EARLY TWENTIES GIRLS. SUCH AS NAOMI WOODS AND ELIZA JANE. THE MAIN VALUE OF THE SITE IS THAT IT'S PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES (BUT NOT THE PREMIUM SITES, WHICH REQUIRE EXTRA PAYMENT). DYKED IS A SMALL SITE, WITH 27 VIDEOS. THE UPDATE RATE IS SLOW, WITH 1, 2 OR 3 UPDATES PER MONTH. HOWEVER, YOU GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK, WHICH CURRENTLY HAS 27 SITES. 27 SITES MEANS THE NETWORK COVERS A WIDE VARIETY OF TEEN NICHES. THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK UPDATES WITH 1 NEW VIDEO PER DAY. THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK HAS OVER 2,000 VIDEOS. MOST OF THEM ARE EXCLUSIVE TO THE NETWORK. THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK AS OVER 1,300 MODELS. MOST OF THE MODELS ARE TEENS, YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE. MOST OF THE MODELS ARE NATURAL: WITHOUT BREAST IMPLANTS. MOST OF THE MODELS DON'T HAVE A LOT OF TATTOOS OR PIERCINGS. SO EVEN THOUGH THE DYKED SITE IS SMALL, YOU WILL GAIN ACCESS TO A BOATLOAD OF HARDCORE TEEN VIDEOS, MOST OF THEM EXCLUSIVE TO THE NETWORK, WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF TEENS TO VIEW. THIS IS NOT A GLAMCORE NETWORK. IT MAINLY FEATURES YOUNG GIRLS IN HARDCORE SEX. NOT A LOT OF EFFORT IS PUT INTO MAKING THE GIRLS AS ATTRACTIVE AS POSSIBLE: HOWEVER THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG, AND NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE. THE NETWORK GIVES VALUE FOR THE MONEY: WITH A LOW PU PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (WITH PU DISCOUNT). GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85, BECAUSE OF THE NETWORK ACCESS. IF THE SITE WAS GRADED AS A STAND-ALONE SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE MUCH LOWER. REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW. WITH A LISTING OF THE TEAM SKEET SITES. 05-09-17  07:01am Replies (8) Review 59 Elegant Anal (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Can stream or download videos. -Videos stream in 320p, 480p, 720p. -Video download choices: 320p, 480p, 720p, 1080p -Excellent download speeds. I got around 3 MB/sec. -Allows use of download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Matching photo set for each video. The photos are like excellent screen caps of the video shoot. -The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good camera-work. Good sound control. -The models are uniformly attractive. They are not the drop-dead gorgeous models of X-Art, but X-Art has some of the most beautiful or cute models in the business. Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked offer on signup page. -Primary biller is MBI-Probiller. Try to switch to a secondary biller, which is easier to cancel your subscription. -Small site. Only 36 videos and matching photo sets. -Updates with 1 video and matching photo set per 10-15 days. Bottom Line: The site theme is anal sex. This is a glamcore or heartcore site. The girls are treated with respect. You don't find any spitting or hitting or slapping or crude sex here (except that in the old days, anal sex would have been considered crude or raw. But times change. Anal sex (in porn, at least) is almost considered normal today. This is a small site. You can join directly, or get full access through a membership to babes.com (also known as BabesNetwork.com). Why they use two different names for Babes.com and BabesNetwork.com, I don't know, it makes it more confusing. The models are attractive. In their late teens or early twenties. White. (I found one Asian model out of 36 models.) Very little tattoos or piercings. As an add-on to babes.com, it's an OK site. But for someone who's fetish is anal, it's too small of a site to satisfy your needs for long. And with an update rate of 1 video per 10-15 days, you won't get much new content with your membership. If you're into anal, I'd suggest Teen Mega World, which has the Anal Angels website, and lots of anal videos that appear in their other web sites. Teen Mega World is not glamcore or heartcore, it's basic medium grade teen hardcore sex, with lots of niche sites, a ton of backlog videos going back for years, and a very low membership price that makes it an attractive option for teen hardcore. Giving the site a score of 75. Main complaint is the small size. The models at the site are attractive, but not the beauties or cuties you can find at other glamcore or heartcore sites. 02-20-16  12:55am Replies (0) Review 60 Erotic Beauty (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Erotic Beauty is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect the following: -Excellent customer service. Fast and responsive and helpful for most questions and problems. However, this is an email service, so expect a delay of several hours or days before you get a respone. A live chat line would be much faster. -A catalog of attractive to beautiful women. Ranging in age from late teens to about 30 years old. Mainly white. Mainly from Eastern Europe. -High quality glamour photography. The models are not dressed up in fancy costumes, or made to look glamourous, but these are attractive women and the photos are designed to showcase their beauty. -Site structure is designed for simple navigation: Photos can be viewed in 3 different definitions: can also be downloaded in 3 different definitions in zip files. -No streaming or download limits. (The streaming refers to viewing photo slide shows. The site has no videos. This is a photo only site.) -PU discount of $19.99/month recurring. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Login and member pages are https. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, which offer sites with high standards: simple navigation, high quality photography, excellent (responsive) customer service. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -They used to update with 1 new photoset daily. But starting in 2019, they update with 2 new photosets per week. See bottom line section why this is probably the main knock against the site. They are charging full price, but giving poor service on the updates. -Site has no videos. But truthfully, most softcore videos are boring anyway. Bottom Line: Erotic beauty is softcore nudity. It's a photo only site (no videos). The bottom line: There are many fine softcore nude sites. Erotic Beauty is a good site, but the competition is fierce. MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, to name some of my favorite softcore sites, offer more bang for your porn dollars than Erotic Beauty. MetArt is the outstanding value, with its massive catalog: -Photosets------19,839 -Videos---------1,600 (Almost all softcore videos are boring, and a waste of time and effort. MetArt has a genius for photographing beautiful naked women and making you wonder why they bothered. Except that recently MetArt is improving, and trying to make the videos slightly more erotic, and allowing the models to touch themselves, so there is starting to be a sexual element in the videos. -Models---------3,622 -Updates--------4 updates per day, except the first of each month, 6 updates. Compare that to Erotic Beauty: -Photosets----------5,066 -Videos-------------0 (none) -Models-------------2,130 -Updates------------2 per week What's amazing is that the membership price for MetArt and Erotic Beauty is the same. (And roughly, the same price for Femjoy and MPL Studios). MetArt blows the competition away in terms of quantity of photosets, models, updates. And the quality of the photosets and attractiveness of the models is outstanding. So if you are into softcore nudity, my advice is: First, join MetArt. Then join either MPL Studios or Femjoy. Both are outstanding sites, with gorgeous girls, high grade photography. As I wrote, there are many good to excellent softcore erotic sites out there: But in my opinion, MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios are best in class. Erotic Beauty is good, but it's a second-class offering compared to the leaders in softcore nudes. I'm giving the site a score of 80: the exact score is very subjective, but in simple comparisons, I think you get far more value for your porn dollars with MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios. Note: If you didn't have sites like MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios, Erotic Beauty would be a wonderful site. But since we live in the real world, where the average person wants the best return on his money, Erotic Beauty falls by the wayside. Yes, it has lots of attractive to beautiful models, and yes, there many outstanding photosets of these lovelies, but the competition has even more attractive models, more photosets, and a faster update rate. On the other hand, I do recommend joining the site for a month, at $19.99 (or a lower price if you can find one during a holiday special), and downloading like mad all of your favorite models. Because the site has lots of lovely models featured in sets that are worth keeping. 05-16-19  01:29am Replies (0) Review 61 Erotic Beauty (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. PROS -NETWORK CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANY OF THE CONTENT AT AN OUTSIDE SITE. - $19.99/MONTH WITH PU DISCOUNT (LIST PRICE IS $29.99/MONTH). -LARGE PHOTO SITE WITH A SOFTCORE GLAMOUR-STYLE FOCUS. -ABOUT 1,900 MODELS, MOST OF THEM ATTRACTIVE TO LOVELY. -OVER 4,400 PHOTO SETS. HIGH GRADE PHOTOGRAPY, BY MANY OF THE WORLD'S BEST SOFTCORE PHOTOGAPHERS. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -DOWNLOAD MANAGERS ACCEPTED. -THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE, WITH THE SLIDESHOW PROGRAM. -THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE DOWNLOADED IN LOW, MEDIUM, OR HIGH DEFINITION. -UPDATES WITH 1 NEW PHOTOSET PER DAY. Cons: -NO VIDEOS. THIS IS A PHOTO ONLY SITE. HOWEVER, I'VE FOUND VERY FEW SOFTCORE VIDEOS THAT ARE WORTH WATCHING, FROM ANY SITE I'VE EVER JOINED. -EXPANDING ON MY BELIEF THAT SOFTCORE VIDEOS OF EROTIC WOMEN ARE USUALLY NOT EROTIC: THIS IS A PERSONAL REACTION. MANY SOFTCORE SITES (METART, MPL STUDIOS, FEMJOY, ETC.) DO MAKE SOFTCORE VIDEOS, SO THERE MUST BE AN AUDIENCE THAT FINDS THEM TO BE EROTIC. HOWEVER, SEVERAL PU MEMBERS OVER TIME HAVE COMMENTED THAT VIDEOS AT METART AND OTHER SOFTCORE SITES ARE MAINLY BORING. -EROTIC BEAUTY IS A STAND-ALONE SITE. IT'S PART OF THE METART NETWORK, BUT MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS SPECIFIC TO THAT SITE. THERE IS A MEMBERSHIP OPTION WHERE YOU CAN PAY $50/MONTH FOR ACCESS TO 9 OF THE METART SITES (OR $350/YEAR), BUT THIS GETS EXPENSIVE. -ECHST.NET IS THE DEFAULT BILLING SERVICE. EROTIC BEAUTY IS ALSO SERVICED BY CCBILL AND EPOCH. I RECOMMEND USING CCBILL OR EPOCH AS THE BILLING SERVICE TO USE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. Bottom Line: -EROTIC BEAUTY IS PART OF THE METART NETWORK. THE STRUCTURE IS SIMILAR TO METART, WHERE YOU HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES IN HOW YOU VIEW THE SITE: -YOU CAN SELECT: -RESOLUTION OF PHOTOS VIEWED ONLINE (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH) -# OF THUMBNAILS PER PAGE -OPEN IMAGES IN SAME WINDOW OR NEW WINDOW -LIST VIEW GRID OR DETAILED -COMMENTS SHOWN OR HIDDEN -NAVIGATION SIMPLE OR ENHANCED -THUMBNAIL SIZE FULL OR SQUARE -TAGS SHOWN OR HIDDEN -DESCRIPTION SHOWN OR HIDDEN -MEASUREMENTS IMPERIAL OR METRIC -SLIDESHOW INTERVAL: CHOOSE NUMBER OF SECONDS FOR EACH IMAGE TO BE SHOWN EROTIC BEAUTY IS A SITE THAT COMPETES WITH MANY FINE SOFTCORE SITES: DOMAI, ERROTICA ARCHIVES, FEMJOY, GODDESS NUDES, HEGRE, THE LIFE EROTIC, METART, MPL STUDIOS, ETC. I'VE BEEN A PAST MEMBER OF ALL OF THESE, AND OTHERS BESIDES. I THINK ALL OF THESE SITES I LISTED ARE WORTH JOINING, AT LEAST ONCE, TO SAMPLE THEIR CONTENTS. HOWEVER, MOST OF US HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF MONEY, SO WE HAVE TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHICH SITES TO JOIN CURRENTLY. EROTIC BEAUTY OFFERS HIGH-GRADE PHOTOS, BUT SO DO THE OTHER SITES I'VE MENTIONED. ALL THE SITES FEATURE ATTRACTIVE TO STUNNING TO ABSOLUTELY LOVELY MODELS. ACTUALLY, ALL THE SITES I'VE MENTIONED SHARE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS: IF A MODEL IS AT EROTIC BEAUTY, YOU CAN OFTEN FIND AT LEAST ONE OR MORE APPEARANCES BY HER AT A COMPETING SITE I'VE LISTED. SO WHICH SITES DO YOU JOIN? I'M ASSUMING YOU ARE A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN. IF YOU'RE NOT A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN, THEN EROTIC BEAUTY AND THE OTHER SITES LISTED ARE NOT WORTH JOINING. I WOULD JOIN METART FIRST, OUT OF ALL THE SITES I'VE LISTED: METART IS THE LARGEST, FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO COLLECTION OF MODELS ON THE INTERNET: BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS: METART HAS 17,100+ PHOTO SETS. METART HAS 1,400+ VIDEOS. METART HAS 3,300+ MODELS. METART UPDATES WITH 4 NEW PHOTOSETS/VIDEOS PER DAY, EXCEPT ON THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, WHEN IT UPDATES WITH 6 NEW UPDATES. METART BLOWS AWAY THE OTHER SOFTCORE SITES, IN TERMS OF AMOUNT OF CONTENT, NUMBER OF MODELS, AND RATE OF UPDATES. AND THE PRICE IS EXCELLENT: $19.99/MONTH, WITH PU DISCOUNT. EROTIC BEAUTY IS A FINE SITE. BUT METART IS A MUCH BETTER VALUE. I'M GIVING EROTIC BEAUTY A SCORE OF 85. IF METART AND SOME OF THE OTHER FINE SOFTCORE SITES DID NOT EXIST, I WOULD GIVE EROTIC BEAUTY A HIGHER SCORE. BUT SOFTCORE EROTIC SITES ARE WELL SERVED, AND EROTIC BEAUTY, ALTHOUGH WORTH JOINING, WOULD BE A SECONDARY CHOICE AMONG THE SITES I'VE LISTED. 06-27-17  03:26pm Replies (0) Review 62 Erotic Beauty (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Easy login. -Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection. -Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents. -Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like. -Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition. -This is a high grade photo site. -Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity. -Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. Cons: -No videos. Photo sets only. -This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful. -Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites. -Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete set without a lot of mouse clicks. Bottom Line: I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites. I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive. I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years. Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models. It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site. Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty. If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money: As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness. Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa. The main advantage MetArt has over Erotic Beauty is the massive backlog of photo sets. Erotic Beauty has over 3,700 photo sets. MetArt has over 16,300 photo sets. A massive number that dwarfs the Erotic Beauty backlog. Erotic Beauty has over 1,700 models. MetArt has over 3,100 models. Erotic Beauty updates with one photo set per day. MetArt updates with aproximately 4 photo sets per day. So the the MetArt content will grow even faster than the Erotic Beauty content. Both sites have the same membership fee: $19.99/month with a PU discount Erotic Beauty has no videos. MetArt has over 1,300 videos. In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time. That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are. The value of MetArt (and Erotic Beauty) comes from their photo sets. Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content. Both sites share the same basic structure. Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition. Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model. But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty. Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the advantage obviously belongs to MetArt. I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value. 02-05-16  01:27am Replies (3) Review 63 Erotic Beauty (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models. -Easy login. No captcha. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -Access to live cams. -Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec. -Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like. -Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high. -Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here. -If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option. -Content is exclusive. -No watermark on their photos. -You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach. -The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site. -No videos. Photosets only. -A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them. -The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of. -You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details. -Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of videos: 0 Number of models: hundreds+ The dimensions of the recently posted photosets: low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels This is part of the Met Art Money network. That includes: Met Art Erotic Beauty Sex Art The Life Erotic Met Cams Rylsky Art You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup. Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value. Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt: MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week. Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site. MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude). Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has. If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty. Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field. 11-27-12  12:00pm Replies (6) Review 64 Errotica Archives (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Errotica Archives is part of the MetArt network. -This basically means you get a first-class site with all the photo glamour trimmings: -Excellent customer support: fast to respond, helpful responses. -24/7 customer support. -Good site navigation: easy to navigate. -Regular updates: -One photo set per day. -Averages one new video per week. -The site features high-grade glamour models. The style is softcore erotic. -You can stream videos online in your choice of 1080p, 720p, 480p, or mobile. -You can also download the videos in 1080p, 480p, or mobile. -The photo sets have three choices of high, medium or low definition for viewing online or downloading in a zip file. -There are no limits for streaming or downloading. -The quality (attractiveness) of the models is superb. -Site uses https for login and member pages. Cons: -I believe the cons are basically minor. The site deserves a high score. -Limited model information. -Gorgeous models. But little variation in age or race. Teens to middle twenties (so no older models represented). Almost all models are white. -Very softcore site. No hardcore. This will only appeal to teen softcore addicts. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites, however. Bottom Line: The MetArt site is the softest of softcore teen sites. Errotica Archives tries a slightly more errotic apprach than MetArt, but still very soft softcore. No toys. Just a hint of self touching. You're viewing gorgeous girls who either strip or start naked, and they are just lovely. However, this is strictly softcore. No hardcore action. So if your tastes run to softcore, this site is worth visiting. But if you want hardcore sex, then the site will disappoint. Most of the photo sets are solo model photo shoots. Just lovely girls displaying their charms. I came across a very low membership offer of $4.99 for the first month. And since the day's model was Jerricka, a small, absolutely adorable young teen, I joined immediately. $4.99 for a month's membership, and the chance to enjoy a great site. Great price. Great site filled with lovely models. If you are a fan of softcore errotica, this is a fantastic deal. The site has been around since 2004, so there is a large catalog of models and photo sets. The main MetArt site has 4 updates per day (except on the first day of each month, when it has 6 updates). So the main MetArt site has a huge catalog of photo sets and videos that far surpass Errotica Archives in quantity. Except that if you haven't been a member of Errotica Archives before, and if you are a fan of softcore teens, then, with a PU discounted price, the site is definitely worth joining to see what it has to offer. And if you can find one of the special introductory offers that is under $10 for the first month, that would be an even better offer for a quality softcore teen site. I'm giving the site a score of 90. That's because: -The quality of the teen models is outstanding. -The large number of teen models. -The quality of the photo sets is outstanding. -The quality of the videos is outstanding. -The site is easy to use. Navigation is simple. Search is easy. -A large catalog of teen models in photo sets and videos. However, you have to be a fan of softcore teen. There is no hardcore action. And the site, although it features a lot of nudity, does not feature the explicit photography that some PU members prefer. This is strictly a very soft, softcore teen site. 10-19-18  08:35am Replies (1) Review 65 Ex GF Box (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: This is not a pro. But joining directly through the Ex GF Box site charges $29.95 for the first month. If you join through the Teen Mega World site, you are charged $14.95 for the first month, with a PU discount. And access to the Ex GF Box site is included. -This is not a pro. But it's very important: If you join through any of the member sites of Teen Mega World, your search results might be limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switch to another site in the network that you have access to, your search results migt still limited to the site you joined through. The search engine when you join through one of the member sites seems to give random results: sometimes it will search for a model's content only at the site you joined through; other times, it will search for a model's content at the entire network. The best solution to the limited search is to join through the Teen Mega World site directly. PROS(CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION): Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): The search, when you join through the main Teen Mega World site, covers the entire network. Which makes the search far easier, and you can also access the entire network contents more easily: if you join through one of the member sites, it can be a nightmare trying to search the network for a model's content. -Starting on the pros: -Ex GF Box is part of the Teen Mega World network. The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network (but the search engine when you join through one of the member sites might only return content from the site you joined through. So, join through the Teen Mega World site directly, and not through one of the member sites.) Benefits of the TMW network: -Daily updates. -High res images. -Some sites have video resolutions from 360p through 2160p. -Over 30 sites covering different teen niches. -Over 5,000 videos. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -Over 2,000 models. Most of them attractive to very attractive. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. CONS(START OF): -The Ex GF Box is probably the poorest site in the Teen Mega World network. -If you join through the Ex GF Box site directly, you are charged a higher price ($29.95/ month recurring) than if you join through the Teen Mega World site ($14.95/month recurring). Both joins give you access to the entire Teen Mega World network content. So save money and join through the Teen Mega World site. -Also, as I already mentioned, joining through the Teen Mega World site directly, means your search engine covers the entire network. If you join through one of the Teen Mega World network sites, your search is might be limited to the site you joined through: which makes search for a model's content at the network a nightmare. -The Ex GF Box is an archive site. Last update to the site was in 2012. -Most member sites offer a choice in streaming or downloading definitions ranging from about 360p through 2160p. But a few sites, including the Ex GF Box site, only offer a very limited or no choice of streaming or downloading choices. The Ex GF Box site offers the videos at 720p definition, for downloading. There is no streaming option -There are broken links for accessing many of the photosets for some videos (or else, there seems to be a photoset for many videos, but there is no link for downloading a zip file of the supposed photoset (I don't know if a photoset actually exists, and they forg to put a hot link for downloading, or they were going to post a photoset with a hot link, and never got around to posting the photoset and hot link on the server.) -The most recent videos were posted back in 2012, so the quality of the videos and photosets are poor, compared to the improved quality of the videos and photosets posted in the last few years. -The videos and photosets from 2012 and earlier feature cheap sets, cheap technical quality (poor lighting, lower-definition videos and photos). BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Ex GF Box site is a member site in the Teen Mega World network (TMW). It's one of the poorest sites in the network. There are many reasons it's a poor site: -It's an archive site. The last update was in 2012. -The quality of the videos and photosets is poor. The content was produced back when the network was producing cheap, teen videos and photosets. The costumes are cheap street clothes. The sets are low-rent apartment rooms, with cheap furniture. The videos and photos are poor quality: almost no money was spent trying to make the models look attractive, or trying to use a plot to make the sex more interesting: this is just straight hard-core fuck-and-suck. Little effort was put into making the site contents better quality, or to upgrade the site navigation. Most videos have a single definition option for downloading (7200). Most videos can not be streamed online (You need to download the file and watch off-line). Many videos have no accompanying photoset. When you do find an accompanying photoset to a video, there is no zip file, and you have to manually download the individual photos. Little effort is made to present the models attractively, even if the models are cute. Since the photos are poor quality and the costumes are cheap street clothes, the photosets are not worth collecting. Note: the TMW network, and the member sites, have an unusual structure: There is an https version of the member sites. And the is a non-secure version of the member sites (the login and member pages are not https). This is the only network I've seen with both a secure and non-secure network. It makes no sense to me. They should delete the non-secure network and member pages, and only offer the secure network. I'm giving the site a score of 70. And that is generous. Navigation problems, poor quality content, lack of zip files, lack of streaming choices, lack of photosets, etc. The main positive is that membership in any one of the member sites of TMW gives you accesss to the entire TMW network: there are no premium sites that they charge you extra for. The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Along with the Diesel Access network (they dropped the Diesel Access network name, and now, apparently, have no official name for the three sites that used to be the Diesel Access network: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), even though under the current marketing system if you join any one of the 3 sites you get immediate access to all 3 sites. So I'm giving Ex GF Box a score of 70. But on a practical basis, since membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you access to the entire network, I think the entire network deserves a score in the 90s. That is due to: -The catalog of over 2,000 teen models, most of them attractive to very attractive. -The wide range of niches covered. REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 05-28-19  02:59am Replies (1) Review 66 Ex GF Box (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Note: this is not a PRO, but it's definitely worth noting: If you join ExGfBox directly, you are charged $29.95/month recurring. But if you join through Teen Mega World, you are charged $14.95 (with a PU discount). -ExGfBox is included in the Teen Mega World (TMW) network. Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites that you have to pay extra for. -Can somewhat switch between different sites in the network without having to re-enter your login details. The switching process is sloppy--see details in the con section. -Can use download managers. -Unlimited downloads. -TMW has over 30 sites in the network. -Daily updates to the TMW network. Cons: -Do not join this site directly. Instead, join TMW or one of the other TMW sites for a cheaper price of $14.95/month instead of $29.95/month. -The last site/network software update they did made using the site and network more difficult and time-consuming. Now a search for a model is site-specific. That means you are only returned the hits at one site, instead of the entire network. So you need to know which sites the model appears at, to find her content, instead of doing a simple search for the model which would formerly show all the sites she appears at, with links to her content. -Because of the recent structure update, when you switch between sites, the switch is incomplete. You do not enter the next site completely, but are still logged in to your membership-join site, which makes searching and using the next site content more difficult. -Archive site. Has not updated since November 1, 2011. CONS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Many videos do not have a thumbnail, so you don't know what the model looks like until you watch her video. -Many videos can not be streamed online. Have to download the video to play it. -Many of the videos do not have an accompanying photo set. -The quality of the videos is poor: they were shot when the site and network was making low-grade sex videos: the settings were cheap, the costumes were cheap (low-cost street clothes, etc.), the visuals were poor (poor lighting, girls were put into a cheap room and told to fuck, without dressing them up to look attractive, no makeup, no special costumes, just a low-grade fuck session). -The default biller is FXBilling. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use billers. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Many of the network sites do not update. Or update very infrequently. But the network as a whole updates daily. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): The ExGfBox site is one of the poorest sites in the TMW network. And if you join the site directly, you will pay a higher membership price than joining TMW directly, or by joining most of the other sites in TMW. The reasons ExGfBox site is poor: -It's an archive site, has not been updated since November 1, 2011. -The videos are poor quality: low quality sets, cheap costumes, poor lighting, low definition. -The site, in addition to poor navigation issues, has been allowed to degrade over time: many thumbnails of the model listing are missing, you can't stream many of the videos but have to download them instead, many of the photosets appear to have disappeared. -Overall, the network would present a better overall experience if they just deleted the site. (In spite of the fact that I personally like to have access to all the models that appeared at the network, the quality of this site is so poor, it just drags down the quality of the network.) TMW is one of my favorite Teen Hardcore networks. Over the years, they have put time and money into improving the quality of the network, and it really shows, if you compare today's network to the network of years ago. The network is mainly far easier to use. (Except the most recent update to the structure made navigation harder, harder to find the content of different models, harder to search the content of each site, and you no longer fully enter the different sites, but are still logged into the site you joined through, with only partial entry to the other sites--which makes navigation and searching the other sites more difficult. The main strengths of the network: -Good looking, mostly young European models. They have over 1,800 models. -Daily updates. -They introduced UHD (Ultra High Definition) videos years ago. Even have a site dedicated to UHD videos. -They introduced VR videos years ago. Even have a VR site. -Over the years, they have spent time and money improving the quality of their videos: higher definition videos, better lighting, more professional camera-work, better sets, better costumes, more attention paid to making the models more attractive (most of the models are young teens who are naturally attractive, but sets, costumes, makeup, etc. all help in the presentation). Higher quality photo sets. Many photo sets are worth collecting, because of the attractiveness of the models and the upgraded quality of the photos. -The recent network update was a step back: the changes make accessing the content harder and more time-consuming. -They raised the membership price recently. So it's more expensive. But based on access to over 30 sites, it's still a worthwhile join. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Along with Diesel Access network. Lovely teen models. High quality videos and photos. Some scenes can be really hot. It doesn't get much better than that. The ExGfBox site is poor. And only deserves a score of 70 or less. (Which is earned by access to the TMW network, which is worth far more than the ExGfBox site.) 04-18-18  12:31am Replies (2) Review 67 Ex GF Box (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Recently, 1 video update per week for the last month. Before that, no video updates for 2 months. -Videos are dated. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Can use download manager. -Long time before site timeout. -Zip files for photosets. -Good download speeds. I posted an earlier comment that I was getting poor download speeds through this site. But the problem cleared up. Not sure what the cause was. But I am now getting about 1.36 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed. Cons: -Picture sets are not dated. -Only one size for downloaded pics: no choice of high, medium, low quality photos. -The high quality video option is really a low-to medium quality video. -Frame height x frame width is 720 x 1280. -A video with a runtime of 10 minutes in WMV format takes 221 MB. -The models in the vids are not identified by name. Bottom Line: This is a site with the theme: ex-girl friend. But the site doesn't really accomplish that theme. Instead, it's a mish-mash of low to medium quality vids and pics that have no unifying theme or purpose. Currently Videos: 101 Photosets: 109 Number of photos per photoset: from 39 to 76. Bottom line: the site itself has little value. Almost all the videos and photosets are low-to-medium quality. What gives the site value is the network access to the Royal Cash/Teen Mega World network. The network has a huge number of attractive Eastern European teens, shown in hardcore videos. I think the network value would be increased if this ExGF Box site was eliminated. Because the site itself is basically a waste of time. I am giving the site a score of 90. That is based on the site including access to about 30 sites in the Royal Cash network. The value of the site contents by itself would be low 60s, in my opinion. 04-02-12  09:27pm Replies (7) Review 68 Exclusive Teen Porn (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res. -Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc. -Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like. -Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site. -Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Can stream or download videos. -Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -DownThemAll download manager works. -Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. CONS: -Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows. -Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot. -You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity. -The number of sets per model is completely random. -Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use. -Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality. -Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video. -Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week. -Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior. BOTTOM LINE: Site stats: Number of videos: 210 Runtime: averages about 21 minutes. Videos can be streamed or dowloaded. Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files. The file specs are for the more recent files. Number of photosets: 217 Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos. Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution. The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large: High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc. On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value. Number of models: 177 There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes. Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment. Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site. Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice. 09-06-12  03:36am Replies (2) Review 69 Exxxtra Small (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING). -EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. A TRUSTED NAME. -THE SITE ITSELF UPDATES WITH ONE VIDEO PER WEEK. BUT THE BASIC NETWORK UPDATES DAILY. -EXXXTRA SMALL IS PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 27 SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES: THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCESS TO THE UNLOCKED SITES: EACH UNLOCK SITE REQUIRES A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIP. -YOU CAN STREAM EACH VIDEO IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, OR HIGHER (720P) DEFINITION. -YOU CAN DOWNLOAD EACH VIDEO IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, HIGHER (720P), OR EVEN HIGHER (1080P) DEFINITION. EVEN THE EARLIEST VIDEOS POSTED IN JUNE 2012 ARE AVAILABLE IN LOW TO 1080P DEFINITION FOR DOWNLOAD. -YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECT THE 1-MINUTE CLIPS OF THE VIDEO TO WATCH. PROS CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION: Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -THERE ARE NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -SITE AND NETWORK ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS. -THE SITE CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. -HD ZIP FILES FOR THE PHOTOSETS. START OF CONS: -THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS TO THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THIS CAN AFFECT DOWNLOADING, STREAMING, AND BASIC NAVIGATION OF THE SITE/NETWORK. I HAVE BEEN LUCKY, AND HAVE GENERALLY ENJOYED ACCEPTABLE CONNECTION SPEEDS. WHICH IS WHY I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE NETWORK FOR OVER 1 YEAR. BUT IF YOU JOIN THE SITE OR NETWORK, AND EXPERIENCE TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, I SUGGEST CANCELLING YOUR MEMBERSHIP AND ASKING FOR A REFUND. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -WHEN YOU JOIN THE SITE, THE FIRST JOIN PAGE ASKS YOU FOR YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS, USERNAME AND PASSWORD. THIS JOIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE, SO IT'S OPEN FOR HACKING. -AFTER YOU HAVE JOINED THE SITE, YOU ENTER YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD ON A NON-SECURE PAGE TO ENTER THE SITE. CONS CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -SINCE THE MEMBER PAGES ARE NON-SECURE, YOUR ISP WILL HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR VISITS TO THE SITE AND NETWORK, WHICH IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO SPY ON YOUR INTERNET VISITS. AND MOST OTHER WORLD GOVERNMENTS, AS WELL, I SUPPOSE. -THE DOWNLOAD VIDEO FILE SIZES SEEM LARGE TO ME. FOR EXAMPLE, THE VIDEO TITLED "LITTLE GIRL BIG PACKAGES", FEATURING VERONICA RODRIGUEZ, POSTED 2012-06-22, HAS A RUNTIME OF 45 MIN 46 SEC. THE 720P FILE SIZE IS 1,681 MB. THE 1080P FILE SIZE IS 3,318 MB. THAT USES A LOT OF DISK SPACE. SO YOU NEED TO BUY THE CURRENT LARGE SCALE HARD DRIVES, IF YOU WANT TO COLLECT THESE VIDEOS. THE OLDER HARD DRIVES FROM A FEW YEARS BACK WOULD RUN OUT OF SPACE TOO FAST. START OF BOTTOM LINE: SITE THEME: SMALL TEEN GIRLS GET THEIR PUSSIES STRETCHED BY HUGE COCKS. THE GIRLS AT THIS SITE ARE SMALL, AND THEY ARE ALSO CUTE. EXXXTRA SMALL SITE STATS: VIDEOS: 193. PHOTOSETS: 193 (ONE MATCHING PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO). THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD CAMERA WORK, GOOD FRAMING, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD LIGHTING AND COLORS. THEY ADD A BACK STORY TO THE VIDEOS TO MAKE THE SCENES MORE LIKE BOY MEETS GIRL AND FUCKS THE GIRL, INSTEAD OF JUST TWO BODIES BANGING TOGETHER. SO IF YOU'RE INTO FANTASY, THAT MIGHT BE A NICE TOUCH. MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE 1 GUY AND 1 GIRL, BUT THERE IS SOME VARIETY WITH 2 GIRLS ON A GUY, OR 2 GUYS ON A GIRL. THE SITE AND NETWORK HAVE A LOT OF FEATURES TO MAKE THE SITE/NETWORK USER FRIENDLY. YOU CAN STREAM THE FULL VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. YOU CAN STREAM IN YOUR CHOICE OF DEFINITION. YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO IN YOUR CHOICE OF DEFINITION. THERE IS A TRAILER FOR EACH VIDEO. GOOD SEARCH ENGINE. EACH VIDEO HAS LOTS OF TAGS TO HELP YOUR SEARCH. BOTTOM LINE: AS I PREVIOUSLY NOTED, THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS TO THE TEAM SKEET SITE. WHICH RESULTS IN PROBLEMS WITH DOWNLOADING FILES, WATCHING A VIDEO STREAM, OR NAVIGATING THE SITE. THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS. IF YOU JOIN THE NETWORK AND CAN'T DOWNLOAD FILES, OR STREAM THE VIDEOS, OR HAVE OTHER NAVIGATION ISSUES, THE SITE AND NETWORK IS A FAIL, AND YOU SHOULD ASK FOR A REFUND. BUT OTHER MEMBERS, MYSELF INCLUDED, SEEM TO HAVE FEW PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE/NETWORK. THERE IS A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE TEEN PORN, IN DIFFERENT NICHES, WITH ATTRACTIVE MODELS, THAT MORE THAN JUSTIFIES THE JOIN PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (WITH A PU DISCOUNT). I'M GIVING THE SITE/NETWORK A SCORE OF 75. THAT SCORE WOULD BE TOO HIGH IF YOU JOIN AND HAVE CONNECTIVITY PROBLEMS. THAT SCORE WOULD BE TOO LOW IF YOU JOIN AND DON'T HAVE CONNECTIVITY PROBLEMS. 11-01-17  01:47am Replies (0) Review 70 Exxxtra Small (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP discount $17.87/month (recurring). -Epoch is the primary biller. A trusted name. You can find complaints about any company. I've always had good service from Epoch. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. -The site (and network) has teen models. Many of them are cute. -Not a lot of tattoos and piercings on their models. -They spend nice money on their videos: good photographer, nice sets (clean apartments, studio). -Videos are professionally shot: good camera work, good framing, good sound control, good lighting and colors. -You can stream or download the videos. -Streaming is offered in low, medium, or high definition options. -Download video file is offered in low, medium or high (high in both 720p and 1080p) definition options. -No download limits. -Site accepts download managers. I use Down Them All. -Excellent download speeds. I was getting 5-6 MB/sec. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale. For a short while, they dropped the cross sale. Then brought it back again. -Update rate for the site is one video a week. However, the network updates daily. -You have to get used to how the site software works. Most paysites use a simpler system to navigate the site. On the other hand, the software gives you more flexibility in your searches. Except I am not a search fellow: I like to keep it simple to find what I want. -Some of the site is somewhat deceptive. You get some sites appearing on the site list that are not accessible with your regular membership: For example, the site "Teens Love Black Cocks" shows 50 videos. But there is a caption on the thumbnails of the videos "Unlock". I'm guessing that if I click on the thumbnail to any of the videos, I will be charged an extra fee: whether it's to view that particular video, or for a membership to the "Teens Love Black Cocks" site. The same system of "Unlock" holds true for the site "Sis Loves Me". Bottom Line: Team Skeet currently has over 20 sites in the network. Membership to any site gives access to many of the sites. But I assume that you have to pay extra to access the Unlock sites, that they show on the list of network sites. Exxxtra small theme: small-sized teens have sex. Exxxtra small stats: 128 videos 128 photosets (1 matching photoset per video) The network has over 2,000 videos, which means a large amount of content. They offer new sites that fit the current popular niches: creampies, high school girls, small-sized girls, anal, babysitters, blowjobs, black teens, massage, masturbation, lesbian, family, etc. The network updates once a day. The videos are offered in both download and streaming, in many definitions. The site and network has a lot of videos. Many of the videos are good quality. With cute models. So the network and site are worth joining. Just don't get cheated by the cross-sell or the Unlocked option, unless you are willing to pay extra for those options. Giving the site (and network) membership a score of 85. The Team Skeet motto is "We play dirty", which is supposed to be a playful hint that they provide dirty videos. But it could also apply to some of their business practices: cross-sell and Unlock. The unlock sites are shown on the page where you have a listing of the Team Skeet network sites, that you would assume are free with a membership to any of their sites. I'm guessing that this "Unlock" system is just another gimmick like the cross-sell to increase revenues, for the unsuspecting user. Perhaps I should mention that PU/TBP lists the discount price as $14.87/month. But if you use the PU/TBP link to get to the site, and then hit the join page, the price shown is $17.87/month. 07-18-16  04:36am Replies (1) Review 71 Fame Digital (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Maybe the best bargain for your porn dollars. A huge amount of high quality porn for a very low price. What I'm talking about is Fame Digital has now been folded into the Adult Time network. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -Secure login and members pages. Https. -Massive improvement in the search and ability to access content with the Adult Time network. -Customer support is 24/7. Live chat is 24/7, fastest way to solve your problems. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. With the merging of Fame Digital into Adult Time, Fame Digital has improved massively: You not only get access to a huge number of porn content, but it's much easier to access it. This much porn can be overwhelming, but take your time, and there is plenty to enjoy. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Check with customer support to make sure you are getting access to Adult Time, because if you don't get Adult Time access, the value of your membership drops a lot. Bottom Line: What has changed recently (in the last few months)? Fame Digital has now been folded into the Adult Time network. You can join the Adult Time network directly. I was told by customer support of 21 Sextury that if you join any one of the Adult Time sites, you get a membership in the Adult Time network. However, I've been a member of the Devils Film network, for over 1 year. My membership in Devils Film network renewed in August, 2018 for 1 more year. Devils Film is part of the Adult Time network. So, based on what customer support told me, I should have been given a membership in Adult Time, since Devils Film is one of the Adult Time sites. However, I was never told directly that I had or was given a membership in Adult Time. It was not until I joined 21 Sextury, that I was told I now had a membership in Adult Time. (21 Sextury is part of Adult Time). The Adult Time network is supposed to be given to you with a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites. Adult Time is a free membership, as long as you are paying for any one of their sites. What is the significance of Adult Time? Adult Time is a network of over 100 porn channels (A porn channel is what Adult Time calls one of their member sites.) Many of the Adult Time sites are premium porn sites, that formerly required a separate paid membership. I'm giving details about the Adult Time membership add-on because I believe Adult Time is a fantastic way to supply your hardcore needs. For a very low price (it's a free add-on to a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites), you get access to over 100 individual porn sites: most of the sites are premium sites, that are worth joining. The sites are not junk that is thrown together to make an impressive jumble that turns out to be shit: these are real, premium sites. Adult Time membership gives access to most of the Gamma Entertainment sites. This includes the large, excellent networks of: 21 Naturals 21 Sextreme 21 Sextury Fame Digital Fantasy Massage Girlsway Vivid Plus other sites in the Gamma Entertainment sites. We're talking about over 50,000 hardcore videos. Most of them are good to high quality hardcore porn. I don't know the financial reasoning behind offering this content at such a low price. I don't know if the Adult Time network will last in its present form, because the finances do not seem to support the production and distribution expenses. Maybe it's a reaction to the porn tube sites, the downturn in porn revenues that started in the 2008 financial downturn: but for the porn consumer, the Adult Time network is a fantastic bargain: for a very low price (depending on what offer you choose), you get access to over 50,000 videos of good to excellent quality, at a very low monthly or yearly price. Getting back to the Fame Digital network: Fame Digital used to be a separate network consisting of the Devils Film network of sites: The main sites in the Devil's Film network were: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD You also got access to a number of other sites that were not as famous, but that covered a broad range of different porn niches: Fame Digital has now been folded into the Adult Time network. Supposedly, if you join any one of the Adult Time sites, you get access to all the sites in the network. I suggest emailing customer support before you join any one of the Adult Time sites, to get it in writing (live chat or email) that you get access to the entire Adult Time network. CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 12-17-18  02:11pm Replies (2) Review 72 Fantasy Massage (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Note: I joined 21Sextury. Was given a lifetime membership to Adult Time as part of my 21Sextury membership. The Fantasy Massage network is included in the Adult Time network. I did a live chat with customer service, and was told that anyone joining any of the sites in the Adult Time network gets access to the entire Adult Time network at no additional cost. That is a fantastic deal: The Adult Time network has over 70 sites, many of them worth a separate membership by itself, and here you get all 70+ sites, with a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites, at no additional fee. -Formerly, if you joined Fantasy Massage, you were supposed to get access to about 8 massage-themed sites. The main sites in the Adult Time hub/network include the 21 Sextury networks, Fame Digital, Devils Film network, Vivid, Pure Taboo, Prettydirty, and a lot of other sites. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): So the Adult Time hub/network is a great way to get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn. -Videos at the Fantasy Massage sites include unlimited streaming and downloading. -Videos stream at: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -Videos download at: 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -Login and member pages are secure https. -FameSupport (the customer support) has a 24/7 live chat feature. One of the best customer support services of any site (porn, and non-porn) I've found. Fast response, knowledgeable staff. CONS(START OF): -There is an accompanying photoset for each video. The photoset is a collection of screencaps that are OK, but I've seen better screencaps at other hardcore porn sites. I'm guessing the quality of the screencaps depends on the software used to create them. At some porn sites, the quality of the screencaps approaches the quality of a good photograph. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The quality of the individual screencaps at Fantasy Massage, while better than screencaps from years ago, is just OK: the screencaps look like screencaps, far below what a professional photograph looks like. -There is a zip file for each photoset. But it only comes in one definition. And the photosets are not worth collecting anyway, due to the poor (or just OK) quality. -The zip file names of the photosets are generic: 96048.zip. Which doesn't tell you Site-name_Posting-date_Model's-name_Title-Of-Set. -Navigation is poor. The Adult Time network has around 70 separate sites (called Chanels at Adult Time). The sites are not completely separated, so exploring any one site's contents is difficult. You can select a site, and see some of the videos/photosets of the site, but trying to see all the site contents is a hassle, and I haven't figured out how to do that: there is no simple listing of the site's content by alphabetical or chronological order: instead, you get a jumbled page of some of the videos. -The search function is poor: You only get the search box on some pages, not on every page. -Also, I have no idea what the limits of the search covers. Or how to search the contents of any of the sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Fantasy Massage network used to give you 8 massage-themed sites. Female models range in age from late teens to the forties (MILFs). So you get a wide variety of models, although they are mainly white. But American and European. However, Adult Time network has folded Fantasy Massage into its network, so a membership in Fantasy Massage will now give you access to the entire Adult Time network. The details on Adult Time network can be sketchy. I haven't found a site or source that details the type of membership you will get in the Adult Time network with a membership in any specific site in the network. Because Adult Time network is so huge (over 70 separate sites), and the navigation is not clearly separated, it can be difficult to tell which content (videos and photosets) belong to which sites. What I mean is, you click on the Fantasy Massage channel (channel is the term they use for a site/network), and you get videos mixed together from Nurumassage, Allgirlmassage, Fantasymassage, trickyspa, Soapymassage, and the other massaged-themed sites. So navigation can be tricky. If you want to explore all the videos at a particular site, find a page where the search box is shown. Then type in the name of the site you want to explore. Hit the enter key, and some of the videos from that site should appear on the page. But trying to see all the content (videos) from a particular site can be a hassle. Because I can't find a simple page-by-page listing of the video titles or hot-links. So it seems hit or miss what videos you are able to find from each site. Plus which, the search function doesn't appear on every page, and I haven't discovered how to use it very well. So the navigation for the Adult Time hub/network could be vastly improved. By: 1. making the search function on every page, and making it simple to use. 2. separating the content for each site and network, so it's easier to search through the content. Currently, it often seems a jumbled mess. But you can't just bring up a page of any one specific site, and scroll through an alphabetical or chronological listing of the site's contents. At least, I haven't found any method to do that. I'm giving Fantasy Massage a score of 92. This is not based on the Fantasy Massage site by itself, but based on the access to the Adult Time network, which has over 70 separate sites: so you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn, for a very low price. Covering a wide variety of niches. The score is so high, because the content is huge, and high quality. But the navigation could be improved. A lot. Update: Found a way to search/see all the content of a site. 1. Go to homepage. 2. Click on channels (channels is the term they use for site). 3. Click on the site you want to select. 4. Click on the "see all" hot link to the right of the "Latest Site Videos". 5. About 24 video thumbnails will appear on a web page, in chronological order. 6. At the bottom of the page, click on the next page number, and you will get a listing of the next 24 video in chronological order. 7. Click on each of the numbered pages, to see older videos. 11-28-18  06:01pm Replies (0) Review 73 Femjoy (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: PROS: -Over 200.000 poster size photos -All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution. -Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res -Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo -over 700 models, many are extremely attractive -over 100 contributing photographers -830 additions per year -10 new HDV movies per month -Tiny watermark -No download limit -No DRM -choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos -special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring -billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company Cons: PROS: (continued) -content 100% exclusive to this site -updates are dated -no automatic time-out from site CONS: -Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy. -Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy. -Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all. -Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was. Bottom Line: CONS: (continued) -Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe." Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell. -Most photo sets are solo models -A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models. -Model bios: none BOTTOM LINE: This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites. The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc. The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen). There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus, good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack. The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot. There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you. Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up, greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds. I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also easier to download the files at Met-art. If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy. 06-14-09  09:49pm Replies (4) Review 74 Ferame (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaic effect to hide the genitals). -$19.95/month with PU discount. -Epoch is the biller. A trusted name. -Can stream or download the videos. --Each video gives you streaming choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Each video download gives you choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -The codec for the files is extremely efficient. The file size for a download is amazingly small. For example, a video with a runtime of 12 minutes 48 seconds, has a file size of: 240p 56 MB 480p 102 MB 720p 195 MB 1080p 377 MB -Each video has a matching photoset. -The software mechanism to view all the photos in a photoset online is easy to use. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sell on the join page. -Poor search engine. If you enter a model's name, it returns her name and many different names. -No zip file for any photo set. -Some of the photos are not well-focused. Not well cropped. I'm assuming there is some software that creates a photo set from a video, and that is how the photo sets are produced--instead of using the traditional method of shooting a photo set with a camera, you shoot a video, and use software to create the photo set from the video. That is my guess on how the photo sets are created at some porn sites. This makes a better-looking product than the older style screencaps. If anyone has knowledge about this process, I would certainly appreciate either denial or confirmation of my theory. -Download speeds average 1 to 2 MB/sec. Not terrible, but could be improved. Bottom Line: Site themes: blowjobs. facials. cum swallowing. asian models. uncensored (no mosaic) hd porn. Site statistics: 1,138 videos. There's not a lot of variety in the scenes. The videos are mainly a girl giving a blowjob to one or more guys. You have one girl doing one guy, two guys, three guys, a bunch of guys. Personally, this is not my favorite niche. I don't care how cute the girl is, it's hard for the girl to look cute or attractive when she has one or more cocks stuffed in her mouth. That's just my opinion. You have over 1,100 scenes of models giving blowjobs. To add a little variety, you can throw in some masturbation with toys. Also some fucking. In one scene, a Japanese schoolgirl is playing a video game on her cellphone, and licking an ice cream cone. She is so engrossed in the game, that when a boy pulls down his pants and puts his cock against her lips and against the ice cream cone, she starts licking the cock as well as the ice cream. Then the boy takes the ice cream cone away from her, and she continues licking his cock, while still staring at the cellphone game she has continued to play. Finally, the boy pushes his cock against her lips a few times, and she seems to notice his cock for the first time, and says "What are you doing?" (I'm guessing at what she says, because the language is Japanese.) She pushes the boy away, lays down on the couch, and continues playing her cellphone game. The boy and another guy come back, touch her ass. she ignores them while playing the video game. The two guys use vibrators on her pussy, and undress her, and she gives one a blow job. There's almost a zen-like quality to the video. The first guy, who puts his penis against the girl's mouth while she is licking the ice cream cone, seems almost simple-minded. However, the girl is almost simple-minded as well, because when the boy puts his penis against her mouth, she continues to lick the ice cream cone, as well as the boy's penis, and she seems unaware that she is licking a penis. It's not like she is being naughty or mischievous, she is acting as if she's completely unaware there is a penis on her tongue, and she is totally focused on the cell phone game she is playing (as well as the ice cream cone she's licking). I think the porn director is referencing George Lucas' Jedi wisdom, that states "Your focus is your reality". The girl's reality is the video game, plus the ice cream cone. And the penis does not intrude. I can't say the video is that hot or sexy. But it can be amusing. For one thing, you wonder when the girl will wake up and notice she is licking the guy's penis. Even when he takes the ice cream cone away from her, she continues playing the video game, and licking his penis, but pretending the guy is not there. Only when he pushes his penis against her, trying to force it into her mouth, does she seem to wake up and realize what is going on, and she tells the guy and his buddy (the buddy has been watching the action) to get lost. The two guys leave the room momentarily, then return while the girl is stretched out on a couch still playing the game. The guys remove the girl's panties, use a vibrator on her, and she finally wakes up to what they are doing, protests, but then is forced (with no violence) to give one a blowjob while the other guy fucks her with a vibrating dildo. This is a strange or amusing video, but it's not really hot. It's more like: What the fuck???? If you like watching blowjobs or facials, this might hit your button. Otherwise, the site gets boring very fast. As I said, I don't think it improves a girl's allure when she has one or more penises stuck in her mouth. I much prefer traditional fucking. Let me compare this site to Rocco Siffredi site. Almost all the Rocco Siffredi videos feature some cocksucking or blowjobs, along with vaginal and/or anal fucking, plus ass rimming. The Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot. The sex is forceful. The videos are professionally shot, but with an amateur feel. The lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art or ferame. But that is deliberate, Rocco Siffredi is trying to give you an atmosphere of "You are there, watching the action". And the action can be intense. It's not as cruel as Pierre Woodman, but the girls are definitely feeling some pain when the stunt cock (mainly Rocco Siffredi) rams his cock down their throat and makes them gag. Or pushes his penis into their ass or vagina with force. Whereas ferame is almost entirely cocksucking. But on a much milder level than Rocco Siffredi. So there's less heat in the ferame videos. Giving the ferame site a score of 70. That is very subjective. If you are a fan of blowjobs or facials, this site probably deserves a much higher score. You get over 1,100 videos, professionally shot, well lighted, good camera-work, good sound control. The video quality is excellent, but the content gets boring fast. 04-11-16  07:29pm Replies (0) Review 75 First BGG (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Small site. 110 videos + matching photosets. But this is part of the Teen Mega World network, and membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. -Teen Mega World network (TMW) has over 5,000 hardcore teen videos. -TMW has over 1,300 teen models. The models are young and attractive. They are not glamorized with heavy makeup or glamorized costumes or photoshopped, but most of the models are attractive, some of them are extremely attractive, and they appear to enjoy showing off their bodies and enjoy getting fucked. Which can make for some hot videos. -TMW has over 30 separate sites, which cover most of the hardcore niches. So anyone who enjoys hardcore teens should find plenty to watch. -No limits on downloading or streaming. -Recent videos (the last few years) include 2160p. Cons: -They did a network update a few years ago. This made navigation harder. Instead of being able to enter the different sites, you are tied to your join site, and can only partially enter any of the other sites. This makes navigating the other sites (except for your join site) harder. -Also, the search is limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switch to another site, you are still logged in to your join site, and the search results are limited to your join site. So, do yourself a favor and join through the Teen Mega World site. -The network updates with 1 video and photoset per day. But with over 30 sites, any one site will update, at best, slowly. -Many sites have not updated in years. -The older videos and photosets from years ago are of lower quality. Bottom Line: First BGG is a teen threesome site. One boy jumping on 2 different girls. (He doesn't really jump, but the guy is getting a real work-out with 2 attractive teen girls.) TMW and the Diesel Network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) are two of my favorite hardcore teen networks. That's because the models are real teens (at least when they start out), and they are mainly attractive, with some models very attractive. And the girls seems to get off on the sex. Which can make for some hot videos. Most teen models that are into hardcore don't have a long career: they seem to last maybe 2-3 years, before retiring. Softcore teen models often retire after 2-3 years, but some can last for years, and are still active after 10 years. I assume that hardcore just wears the girls out faster. Because very few hardcore models are still active after 5 years. -TMW has spent a lot of time and money and effort upgrading the videos and photosets in recent years They now offer 2160p videos the last few years: the sets are more expensive, the lighting, sound control, costumes, etc. are better. You need to join through the Teen Mega World site, to make search and navigation easy: Otherwise, joining through a satellite site makes finding the content of a model at the network difficult, and then accessing the content is difficult: A simple example: I joined through Teen Sex Movs. Which means my search is limited to the Teen Sex Movs site. If I am able to find the model's content at one of the other sites (through a cumbersome process), to view the content: I would have to navigate to the specific site her content is at, then page through the site pages looking for the her content, to find her hot links at that site. And repeat the process for each site her content is at. The TMW customer service staff was kind enough to give me a free membership to the TMW site, to make using the network easier, since my join site was through Teen Sex Movs. But they really need to update the site structure, so that all the satellite sites have the same structure as the TMW site: For more complete searches, to easily access the content. Because navigation (searching for content, and accessing the content) is difficult and time-consuming if you are not a member of the TMW site, but one of the satellite sites. I don't think the TMW staff realize the difficulty of being a member of one of the satellite sites. If they did, they would update the network structure, by making all the sites have the TMW structure. I'm giving First BGG site a score of 90. That is because I'm assuming you joined through the TMW site itself. If you joined through one of the satellite sites, because of navigation issues, I would drop the score to 65. Because even though I enjoy the contents of the TMW network, accessing the content would be too much work. 11-27-18  04:31am Replies (0) Shown : 51-75 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.44 seconds.