Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 76-100 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 First BGG (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount for $19.95/month if you join the site directly. But join through Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month, which gives you full access to First BGG and all the other sites in the Teen Mega World network. -Can stream or download the videos. -Videos have multiple choices of definition for download. For download, all videos have low, medium, and high definition. The newer videos from June 2014 on have a 1080p definition as well. -A major plus is that the models are attractive to very attractive. These are young, white teenagers from Eastern Europe, slender bodies. Natural. Very few tattoos, little piercing. Almost no fake breasts. Not a huge amount of annoying fake moans and groans. -There is a gallery to illustrate each video. Gives you a clear, fast idea of what the action is. The photos are crisp, good quality. -Zip file for each gallery. Cons: -Infrequent updates. Recent update rate is one video in a month or in two months. -Small site. Only 82 videos (and matching photo sets). -Videos stream in only one definition. No choice of low, medium or high. -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Site has 82 videos and matching photo sets. The recent update rate is erratic: maybe one video plus photo set in one or two months. Site theme: The videos are supposed to be the first time a boy and 2 girls have sex together, at the same time. So there's obviously a bit of fantasy element here, that these girls are first-timers having sex with each other and a boy, since you've seen these girls in many other videos having sex, and it's not that big a stretch to think these girls are porn pros who've done it all. But suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the action. The girls are cute, and they are not shy. They are kissing and petting and fingering each other, and the boy is just another sex tool for the girls to get off. A sex tool they enjoy sharing in creative ways. And the boy is a young stud, who does his best to satisfy both of the girls, as well as satisfying himself. The first videos at the site are dated April and May, 2009. The earliest videos have 3 definitions for download: low (for mobile), medium, and high definition. Low definition is 405p, medium definition is 540p, and high definition is 720p. Starting in June 2014, they began offering 1080p downloads for their newer videos. The models can be attractive to very attractive. Sheri Vi, Juliya B, Ada, Angel, Caroline, Grace C, Rebecca, Dora C, Izi, Gabi, Taissia, Inga E, Alice C, Milana Fox, Ariadna and some of the other teens can be featured at sites like MetArt, 18OnlyGirls, DigitalDesire, and other well-known porn sites. So the girls are mainly good-looking teenagers. With firm bodies: firm ass, pert tits, cute faces, and the enthusiasm to fuck-fuck-fuck. The stunt cocks do a good job with the girls. The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. This is not a glamour site (or network), it's bread-and-butter sex, little or no romance to the sex, but the girls are both hot and willing. The site (and network) is well-designed, to make it easy to use. There is a model listing, with nice-sized thumbnails to show you what the models look like, with hot links to all the models videos. There is a basic search, and an advanced search. The site only has 82 videos, but you also get access to the full Teen Mega World network, which has 4285 videos of mainly hardcore teen sex, in many different niches. So you will get a huge amount of content for your money. If you like teen sex, hardcore, without a lot of glamour, this site/network should be a candidate for your porn dollars. Note: A lot of the sites in the network either do not update or update rarely. This can annoy some members. Almost all the videos are in some Eastern European language, when the models speak. The videos at some of the sites are very old, and in poor quality. The models might be attractive, but it's annoying that the video quality is so poor. Because those models retired years ago, and you won't be able to find better quality videos of those models. Some members are annoyed by the adds for other porn sites on each page at the site. Some members are annoyed by the fake cum shots in the videos. So there can be negative psychological elements about enjoying this site or network. But: put these annoying elements aside. Enjoy the site and network for what it is. A boatload of hardcore teen sex of attractive girls, for a very low price ($14.95/month if you join through the Teen Mega World site, $19.95/month if you join through the First BGG site). I'm giving the site a score of 92. Because of the very attractive models. Because of the hot sex. Because you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. Because of the low price. Add it all up, and I think it's a great value, for your money. That's my opinion, anyway. 03-31-16  11:19am Replies (0) Review 77 Fister Twister (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Secure login page (https). -Secure member pages (https). -Nice model index. 2 forms of the model index: 1: Pages with about 20 models each, name and thumbnail of model. 2. An alphabetical listing of the model by name (no thumbnail, but hot link to model's page, which has a nice-sized thumbnail of the model, plus links to whatever videos she appears in. -All content is supposed to be exclusive. This has to be modified: content shot for the site is exclusive, but they also use some content from other sites, such as Wet and Puffy, which is obviously not exclusive. -No download limits. -Each video has a matching photoset. The photosets are nice-quality photos. The videos can be streamed and/or downloaded in multiple definitions: -You get a confirming email on signup from Vendo (if that is the payment processor you used) with your billing details: Cons: -small site. No bonus material. -currently 91 models. Most appear to be late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos on most of the models. -There is a small amount of data given for a model: Name, nationality, age, breast size, weight, height. -2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page. -Your login details (username and password) are pre-selected by the site. Bottom Line: Site theme: lesbian fisting and twisting (turning your fist in the girl's pussy). The site design is clean: the scenes are shot in a white room, with white furniture and white sheets on a white bed, making the girls stand out clearly. There is teasing, kissing and caressing, and the use of different tools to stimulate and widen the pussy. I'm not into lesbian tools, but there are speculums, forceps, dildoes, vibrators. This is a small site: You should be able to watch all the videos in a month. Or if you pick and choose, you can scan the contents in less than a week. $9.95 for 1 month then $29.95 every month until cancelled. The first month is cheap. But why you would want to renew is beyond me. Since this is a small site, with a slow update rate, and no bonus sites to explore. I'm giving the site a score of 78. That is because of the small content. However, the videos are photo sets are good quality, and most of the videos are exclusive. So if you are into lesbian fisting, it might be worth a join, since the first month is only $9.95. But I personally prefer sites with more content, or with bonus sites you can enjoy. The models are mainly slender white teen/early twenties girls, not a lot of tattoos. But the videos, even though professionally shot, don't have a lot of heat or passion. Not much eroticism. So I recommend looking for a more satisfying site to spend your membership dollars. If you are into lesbian fisting, I recommend reading PU member MargulisAZ's review and comments on the site, Fister Twister, since he seems to be a fan of the niche and has written an excellent review of the site and a couple of worthwhile comments. That will give you a better flavor of what the site offers, it's pros and cons. My interest is more superficial, and I thought the site was disappointing, in spite of it's low price. 07-23-18  09:29am Replies (0) Review 78 Fresh Outta High School (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites. -The New Sensations network is having a holiday sale: $60/year, which is a great price for a quality network. -The network has over 20 sites, covering a wide variety of niches. -This is a quality network. The sites are well laid out, easy to navigate, easy to switch between sites. The content quality is good to excellent. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Network has 7,000+ videos. -Network has 2,000+ porn stars, many of them attractive to beautiful. -Network features videos with -Network has multiple weekly updates. -Most of the videos have streaming options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates. -Most of the videos have download options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates. -Login and member pages are https. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Search function could be better. If you are just looking for a model, the search is fine. But if you want specific types of porn, the search is poor. -The videos adds plot to make the meaningful, but the porn can be too vanilla for some tastes. Bottom Line: Site theme is teens just fresh out of high school. So the models are supposed to be around 18 or 19, though they are often in their 20s. The female models are mainly cute or attractive. The behind the scenes videos at the site can provide a glimpse into the personality of the models. Although the models are putting on their showbiz/porn actor face, they can come across as real people instead of plastic porn actors. So there's a freshness to their appearance, versus the often-times stupid scripted parts they play in most porn scenes. Chloe Cherry, a popular porn model has appeared at many porn sites, under different names : Chloe, Chloecherry, Chloe Cherry, Chloe Couture, Robin. She appears at the New Sensations network under the name of Chloe Cherry. The video, "Chloe Sends An Urgent Text To Big Brother", posted 03/21/2018, features Chloe and James Deen. James Deen plays her step brother, who, like all loving brothers throughout the world, takes care of his cute sister by letting her give him a blow job and You can choose to stream in 720p or 1080p, with bit rates ranging from 1500 kbps to 12000 kbps. The choice I make is based on my personal situation: Since I'm watching on an older PC laptop, the Lenovo Thinkpad E420: 14" monitor Streaming at higher definition than 720p does not improve the clarity of the visuals. Streaming at higher bit rates does not improve the clarity of the visuals. Although I have a 200 Mbps connection with Specrum, I watch on a WiFi connection, so my speeds average about 13 to 20 Mbps. This means I select the lowest definition and lowest bitrate available when streaming, and also for downloading. The low streaming choices are to prevent the video from stuttering during play. On a downloaded file, I could chose a higher definition, and a higher bitrate, which should not affect stuttering playback, but higher definition and higher bitrate would increase file size significantly, and my hard drive space is limited, and I don't want to keep buying newer hard drives to store these files. Also, watching the files on my older laptop, does not increase the clarity of the visuals or improve the sound, so larger files with increased definition and bitrate are wasted on my computer setup. The same holds true when selecting file size for photosets: I can't tell the difference, visually, from a low, medium or high definition photoset at MetArt or other fine photo sites, on my older laptop computer, so saving a high definition photoset of a favorite models is basically wasted space on my hard drive. Even when I switch to a desktop computer with a 27" monitor, I still can't tell a visual difference between a high definition photoset and a low definition photoset from MetArt. I assume that is because of the program I am using to display each photo. If I blew up the photo (expanded the view), then the differences between low and high definition would be noticeable. But I almost never view or study each photo in such detail: I either look at a photo by itself, on in a slide show, where the definition (low, medium, high) does not seem to matter on a monitor that is 27" or smaller. I assume the lack of difference is partly due to my PC equipment, and partly due to poor eyesight on my part: You need very large monitors and good eyesight to appreciate the value of higher definition displays, and faster bitrate videos. And high (or at least medium-) grade speakers on the audio side. I also believe that a lot of the supposed value in higher grade equipment is salesmanship. An inexpensive laptop or desktop can deliver a good experience in watching porn (videos and photosets). But if you have the money, then, it can be worthwhile to spend some of that extra cash to invest in higher grade equipment, to enjoy a better experience watching the videos and photosets. It just depends on your personal situation. Actually, I just read an article on the internet that stated speed requirements for different tasks: -1 Mbps if you use the internet for general web browsing, social media connection, and streaming compressed music such as MP3 audio and emailing. -2 Mbps is good for streaming SD quality video and lossless music, -3 Mbps is good for standard quality videos -5 Mbps is good for streaming high-definition videos. -10 Mbps internet connection is good for full HD video and audio streaming If those statements are true, when I get a WiFi connection that is 10 to 20 Mbps, that should be plenty fast for streaming videos. However, my Wifi connection can sometimes drop to less than 1 Mbps, even though my Spectrum connection is supposed to be rated at 200 Mbps (that would be the hardwired connection, with everything operating at peak efficiency). And there are many other factors involved. For example, I often have to restart my PC laptop, because the browser pages fail to load new pages. I get the message: Unable to connect. REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 06-11-19  07:21am Replies (1) Review 79 Fresh Outta High School (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PART OF THE NEW SENSATIONS BASIC NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC NETWORK SITES. HOWEVER, THERE ARE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK THAT YOU DON'T GET ACCESS TO. SEE THE BOTTOM LINE SECTION TO SEE WHAT SPECIFIC SITES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE BASIC NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK. -YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM THE MOVIE IN 720P OR 1080P. ALSO, IN 720P, YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM DIFFERENT BIT RATES. FOR EXAMPLE, THE CHLOE FOSTER VIDEO IS OFFERED IN, FOR THE 720P VERSIONS: 1500kbps 3000kbps 6000kbps THE 1080P VERSION OF THE SAME CHLOE FOSTER VIDEO IS OFFERED IN 12000kbps I DON'T KNOW WHY A SCENE THAT IS NOT A HIGH QUALITY GLAMCORE SCENE, BUT INSTEAD A LOW-QUALITY HARDCORE SCENE, IS OFFERED IN SUCH HIGH BITRATE FORMATS. IT SEEMS A DISCONNECT BETWEEN THE MATERIAL (LOW-GRADE HARDCORE VIDEO AND HIGH-GRADE DELIVERY SYSTEM). THERE ARE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, ESPECIALLY THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, WHERE THE VIDEOS WOULD BENEFIT FROM A LARGE MONITOR. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): (RETURNING TO THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE SPECIFICS PROS:) -THEY ADD PLOT AND A BACKSTORY TO THE SCENE, TO MAKE THE SEX MORE EROTIC AND MEANINGFUL. EXCEPT THE ACTORS AND DIALOG ARE SO POOR, IT DOESN'T REALLY HELP THE SCENES. THE SITE DOES TEACH YOU THAT INNOCENT YOUNG GIRLS TURN INTO PROFESSIONAL COCKSUCKERS WHEN THE DIRECTOR YELLS "ACTION". (JOKE). -THERE IS A ZIP FILE FOR EACH GALLERY WHICH ACCOMPANIES A SCENE. -ROBUST SEARCH ENGINE: VERY FAST, RETURNS ALL THE SCENES FOR A PARTICULAR MODEL. CONS (START OF): -THE LOGIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE (NON-ENCYRPTED). WHEN YOU ENTER YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD, THERE IS A POP-UP THAT STATES: THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED. LEARN MORE. HOWEVER, TO ENTER THE SITE YOU HAVE TO USE THE NON-SECURE PAGE. SO IF YOUR LOGIN INFORMATION IS COMPROMISED (HACKED), THAT IS THE FAULT OF THE SITE, AS FAR AS I CAN UNDERSTAND. WHY THEY DON'T OFFER A SECURE LOGIN PAGE IS EITHER STUPID OR SLOPPY. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -THE FIRST JOIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE. WHEN YOU CHOOSE YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD, THAT DATA CAN BE HACKED. -FXBILLING.NE IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE TRUSTED NAMES. -THE UPDATE RATE IS VERY IRREGULAR. THE LASTEST UPDATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 2017-04-10 2017-03-31 2017-03-22 2015-06-13 2015-06-12 2015-06-06 SO YOU CAN EXPECT AN UPDATE IN 10 DAYS, OR IN 21 MONTHS. OR WHENEVER THE SITE FEELS LIKE IT. -NO PU/TBP DISCOUNT. THE MEMBERSHIP PRICE IS $29.95/MONTH, RECURRING. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE AD MEMBERSHIP PRICES ARE VERY LOW, SO SOME ADS MIGHT BE USEFUL. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): THE SITE CATERS TO MEN WHO LIKE TO SEE LATE TEENS OR EARLY TWENTIES GIRLS DRESSED IN A SCHOOLGIRL UNIFORM WHO ARE NAUGHTY. ONE PROBLEM WITH THE SITE IS THE SAME UNIFORM IS USED FOR MOST OF THE SCENES. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THE SAME ACTUAL UNIFORM, OR THE SAME MODEL OF UNIFORM: A WHITE BLOUSE PARTNERED WITH A BLUE-AND-WHITE-CHECKERED-PATTERN SKIRT. THERE ARE A FEW OTHER VARIATIONS OF THE UNIFORM, BUT THE SAME UNIFORM GETS REPETITIOUS AFTER A WHILE. ALSO, THE GIRLS ARE NOT REALLY HIGH SCOOL AGE. THEY SEEM OLDER, AT THE LEAST COLLEGE AGE. MOST OF THE GIRLS ARE MODERATELY ATTRACTIVE. BUT NO SPECIAL EFFORT IS PUT INTO MAKING THE GIRLS AS ATTRACTIVE AS POSSIBLE. SO EVEN A CUTE GIRL, LIKE CHLOE FOSTER, JUST APPEARS OK IN LOOKS, INSTEAD OF SUPER-CUTE. HOWEVER, THE KYLIE PAGE VIDEO IS AN EXCEPTION: NOT ONLY IS KYLIE PAGE CUTE, BUT SHE LOOKS GOOD IN THE VIDEO. I ONLY WISH HER DIALOG WAS BETTER, AND ADDED TO THE SCENE, INSTEAD OF BEING ANNOYING CLICHES. THE MODELS MAKE TOO MANY FAKE OOOHHHHSSSS, AAAAHHHHSSSS, AND MOANS AND GROANS. CURRENTLY, YOU GET ACCESS TO 22 SITES IN THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK: (THESE ARE THE BASIC SITES; THERE ARE OTHER SITES YOU HAVE TO JOIN SEPARATELY): ASHLYNN BROOKE BUSTY COLLEGE COEDS BUTT DIVERS FOUR FINGER CLUB FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL FUCK FOR DOLLARS HEAVY HANDFULS HOTWIFEXXX I FILM MYSELF INTERNAL VIOLATIONS JIZZBOMB LIL'LATINAS MR. BIGGZ PAPA LOADS PARODY PASS POV FANTASY SADIE WEST SHANE DIESEL'S BANGIN' BABES THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE THE ROMANCE SERIES THE TABU TALES THE TALES FROM THE EDGE CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 04-16-17  04:49pm Replies (1) Review 80 Fuck Studies (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites that require an extra payment. -Teen Mega World is probably my favorite teen hardcore porn site for bread-and-butter sex. They don't glamorize the models, but the girls are naturally attractive, and some of them are real beauties. Why is Teen Mega World (TMW) one of my favorite porn networks?: -The quality of the models. Teens that are naturally attractive to very attractive. -The quality of the videos and photosets have improved massively over the last few years:The network is spending time and money for more expensive sets, higher production values, better costumes, better lighting (which is part of the higher production values), better sound control, etc. -They've been offering 4K definition the last couple of years, as well as lower definition videos. I stick with the 540p and 720p videos, because they look good on my 27" monitor, Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): The higher definitions are just wasted on my monitors and waste hard disk space to store. -The also have a virtual reality site, started a couple of years ago. I don't have any virtual reality computer equipment, so I watch the video on regular monitor, as a "normal" video. -The network covers many different teen porn niches: creampie, lesbian, squirting, threesome, masturbation, etc. CONS (START OF): -I've said it before: if you join the Teen Mega World network, join through the Teen Mega World site itself: if you join through any of the other sites in the network, your search function is limited to results from the join site, even when you switch to another site in the network. Which makes searching and viewing the content of a model a real chore. -They have over 30 sites. Most of them are no longer updating. The ones that do update average about 1 new video and photoset per month. However, the network has a daily update of 1 new video and photoset. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The login and member pages are not secure (non https). -Sometimes they require a captcha to login. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): Site theme: a boy and girl are studying together. The boy is the tutor. The girl is attracted to the boy. Or the boy is attracted to the girl. Or he's just horny. Not a lot of plot. Or motivation. This is basically bread-and-butter teen sex. Except the couple is supposed to start off studying. As if that makes any difference. The videos are watchable because the boy and the girl are teens. The girls are usually cute. Some are really cute. I just wish I had met some of these cute girls when I was in high school. But I was a slow learner, didn't meet any of these girls until I hit college. The site is not one of my favorites in the Teen Mega World network. Tricky Masseur is probably my favorite. The massage theme, where a male masseur gives a teen girl a massage that turns sensual, and they they fuck, can be believable and erotic and hot. And some of these girls are really hot. The network has over 1,300 models. Almost all of them are real teens. And many range from cute to really cute. The attractive level of the teens is as high as any teen site. The girls are not made to look glamourous, but their natural attractiveness shines through. And they enjoy sex. If not, they are putting on a very good show. Giving the site a score of 90. That is because of network access. If you had to score the site by itself, without network access, it would be maybe 78, not worth joining because there would be better values for your money. Except it's a site in the Teen Mega World network, which means you get access to the entire network. 10-09-18  10:00am Replies (0) Review 81 Fuck Studies (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price of $14.95/month if you join through Teen Mega World link. Joining Fuck Studies directly (using the PU link) costs $29.95/month. So save 50% and join through the PU Teen Mega World link, which gives you access to all the Teen Mega World sites. -Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network, which is a large network of hardcore teen sites. Teen Mega World positives: Over 4,500 videos, most with matching photosets. Over 1,200 teen models, many of them attractive to extremely attractive. About 36 separate sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. No download limits. -Fast download speeds. I average 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec. -Navigation is good. This is a mega network, with a huge amount of content. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): Navigation: It's fairly easy to move around the network. No dead links that I found. Excellent model listing pages with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like, with hot links to all her videos. You can use the hot links to go directly to her video content, without having to re-log-in to each site. -Basically, Teen Mega World is one of the best values for hardcore teen porn. The network has been around for over ten years. So there is a lot of older content, which is lower quality: lower definition videos, cheap sets, no effort to make the girls look attractive. But even the older content is acceptable because many of the models are not just young but also cute, and the sex can be hot. -Epoch is one of the billers, a trusted name. CONS: -Cons are basically minor. -The content size, variety, large amount of attractive teen models, and easy navigation and excellent download speeds, mean you are getting more than your money's worth. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -However, keep in mind: this is basically a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network. Do not expect a glamcore approach. In the last few years the network has been spending more money upgrading their videos: cleaner, more expensive sets, better lighting, more attention paid to making the appearance of the models better (but still far below the attention paid at site like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy). -The network has always tried to offer new sites to appeal to members. Quite often they start a new site, and stop updating soon afterward. -Need to re-name the video downloads to know what the video is: Videos download with a generic file name such as n3.sethigh.wmv or 15sethigh.wmv. BOTTOM LINE: This site exposes the underlying corruption and deceit of the Russian method of education (my attempt at satire or humor). The site theme is: Young girls getting seduced by their tutors. The plot and acting are primitive: but the girls are young and mainly attractive, and the sex can be hot. When a guy tutors an attractive girl, instead of teaching her the course materials, he acts like a Russian thug, putting his hands on the girl and giving her the fuck of her young life. The videos are shot in Russia, so the actors mainly speak Russian. There are subtitles, but many of the subtitles are hard to read: the text is small, and white against a clear background and disappears quickly. So it's best to ignore the subtitles completely, because what the models are speaking has little impact anyway: the sex is what counts. The male Russian is tutoring some bimbo, and he decides to fuck her. And she enthusiastically cooperates because he is such a stud. So turn off your brain, and enjoy the show. Or maybe have a few beers before you watch. Joining Fuck Studies (or any of the other sites in the Teen Mega World network) gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network. There are no premium sites that require an extra payment. Maybe it's a personal quirk, but I dislike the come-on at networks that charge extra for their premium sites: Team Skeet, Naughty America, etc. Giving the site a score of 92. That is because the site gives access to the entire Teen Mega World network. Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite porn networks. The reasons are simple: -You gain access to a boatload of hardcore teen videos. Over 4,500 videos. -There are matching photosets for many of the videos. -Over 1,200 teen models. Many of them attractive. -The network is easy to use/navigate. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Fast download speeds. -Good model index. Nice-sized thumbnails to show you each model. With hot links to the model's videos. -This is not a glamcore network. But in recent years, the network has been spending more money to upgrade the newer videos in different ways: more expensive sets, better lighting, camera-work, etc. As well as offering a virtual reality site, and a 4K Ultra High Definition site. If you haven't been a member of this network, I think it's worth at least a one-month join, to sample their wares. You will get your money's worth. As long as you are not expecting a glamcore network. The main offering is bread-and-butter hardcore teen videos. No glamor. Not a lot of story or plot. But plenty of fresh young Russian teens who are into sex. If you base the score on Fuck Studies site only, the score would be much lower. 11-15-16  04:36am Replies (0) Review 82 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPITAL LETTERS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE IN CAP LETTERS. I AM NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -NICE SELECTION OF ATTRACTIVE MODELS. -ADVERTISES OVER 300 MODELS. -PU DISCOUNT OF $17.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. RENEWS AT $29.81/MONTHLY. -CCBILL IS THE PRIMARY PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME. -EASY LOGIN. IF COOKIES ARE ENABLED, TO ENTER SITE, JUST HIT THE MEMBERS LOGIN LINK. DO NOT HAVE TO ENTER USERNAME OR PASSWORD OR A CAPTCHA. -YOU CAN STREAM THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. -CAN DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE VIDEO, OR SELECTED CLIPS. -THERE IS A PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO. -THERE IS A ZIP FILE FOR EACH PHOTOSET. Cons: -SITE IS NOT UPDATING. TBP REPORTED ON 2016-07-23 THAT THE LAST UPDATE WAS ON 2015-11-16. -THERE ARE BAD LINKS THE NETWORK NEEDS TO FIX/UPDATE TO MAKE THEM WORK. TO ENTER THE PORNMASTERMIND SITE, YOU HIT THE LINK "PORNMASTERMIND", WHICH OPENS A PAGE WITH A LINK TO SUPPORT, THAT LEADS TO ANOTHER PAGE THAT REQUESTS YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD, WITH THE WARNING THAT THE INFORMATION ENTERED IS NOT SECURE, AND MAY COMPROMISE YOUR MEMBERSHIP DETAILS IF TRANSMITTED. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. --THE PREVIEW PAGE FOR THE SITE IS ONE PAGE ONLY, WITH LIMITED DATA. PREVIEW PAGE FOR THE SITE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED AND EXPANDED. THE PREVIEW PAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE NUMBER OF SITE MODELS, THE NUMBER OF SCENES, OR OTHER ESSENTIAL DATA NEEDED TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION ABOUT SITE MEMBERSHIP. -THE SCENES POSTING DATE TO THE SITE ARE HARD TO FIND. ALSO, HARD TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF SCENES, AND THE NUMBER OF MODELS AT THE SITE. -NO MODEL INFO. Bottom Line: A MAJOR CON: THE SITE IS NOT UPDATING. THE LAST UPDATE WAS 2015-11-16. THIS SITE USED TO BE ONE OF THE BETTER MASSAGE-THEMED PORN SITES. TWO MAIN FACTORS: THE MIX OF CUTE GIRLS. THE SEX CAN BE HOT. THE PLOT IS SIMPLE: A GIRL COMES IN FOR A MASSAGE. THE STUNT COCK AROUSES THE GIRL BECAUSE OF HIS EROTIC MASSAGE TECHNIQUE, AND THE GIRL GETS POUNDED ON THE MASSAGE TABLE. BECAUSE THE SAME PLOT IS USED IN ALL THE SCENES, WITH THE SAME SETTING, AND THE SAME STUNT COCK, SOME VIEWERS MIGHT FIND THE SCENES REPETITIOUS. I ENJOYED THE SIMPLE SETUP. I PERSONALLY DID NOT FIND THE STUNT COCK BE UNLIKABLE OR IRRITATING. HE TREATS THE GIRLS AS WOMEN TO BE SEDUCED, AND HE DOES A GOOD JOB FUCKING THEM. THERE IS NO NAME CALLING, NO SPITTING OR HARSH TREATMENT OF THE MODELS. IT'S GOOD, CLEAN SEX. YOU HAVE OVER 300 SCENES. FUCKED HARD 18 IS THE MAIN VALUE OF THE PORN MASTERMIND NETWORK. YOU GET A FEW MAIN SITES WITH NETWORK ACCESS: BANGABLE FUCKED HARD 18 FUCKED HARD GFS MASSAGE GIRLS 18 SEDUCED BY MASSAGE HOWEVER, NAVIGATION BETWEEN THE SITES IS PROBLEMATIC. THERE IS NO CLEAN LINK TO TRANSFER FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER. I ASSUME THIS IS BECAUSE THE PORNMASTERMIND LINK IS BROKEN. SO, UNTIL THEY START UPDATING THE FUCKED HARD 18 SITE, AND FIX THE LINKS TO THE OTHER SITES, I WOULD HESITATE TO JOIN THIS SITE--UNLESS YOU REALLY ENJOY MASSAGE VIDEOS. IF THEN, THE SITE MIGHT BE WORTH A ONE-MONTH JOIN. 03-30-17  04:39pm Replies (0) Review 83 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large number of very attractive models. -Professionally shot videos: good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc. -A number of the videos feature good performances by the models: they actally seem to be enjoying the sex. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec, which is about my maximum download speed. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Choice of streaming or downloading videos. -Can choose the file definition you want to download. But since the HD Ultra definition file size is over 1 GB, I choose a lower definition, which still looks good and doesn't take as much hard drive space. -The videos are in English. So you can understand with the models are saying. -Each video has a matching gallery. Each gallery is a photo shoot of the video shoot, and not a separately photographed shoot where the model is posed for the best shots possible. -Can stream a full video, or watch selected sections of the video. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. The site does a good job of featuring massage videos with hot sex. -Not much plot. Attractive girl gets a sensual massage, she is so turned on by the masseur that he then fucks her. -They use the same massage room setting for all the videos: some change in plot, setting, etc., would be nice. -The download file sizes for the 1080p or HD Ultra definition files are large: can be over 1 or 2 GB, which sucks up a lot of hard drive space. But the smaller definition file sizes are completely watchable, especially if you're watching on a 20-something-inch monitor or less. -There is a model index with thumbnails of each model, but the models are not listed alphabetically, and the index is cumbersome to use. A simpler, alphabetical listing would be helpful. Bottom Line: Site theme is attractive young girls getting an erotic massage and then getting fucked. A large number of really attractive models. site stats: over 360 videos over 360 galleries (1 gallery per matching video) There are a number of massage-themed sites out there, but FuckedHard18 is one of the better ones: because the models are attractive, and the sex is hot. It doesn't get any simpler than that. The girls have very little tattoos or piercings. They are young: late teens, early twenties. Almost all white. Slender to slightly medium build. Site contents are high quality videos of young, attractive girls getting a massage and then having sex. It's one guy and one girl. Some might complain there isn't more variety: 2 girls, 2 girls and a guy, group sex, sex toys, anal action, whatever. This is like a "clean" porn site, where you are watching a girl getting hot, and then watching the guy doing her. Simple, but effective. Giving the site a score of 90, because I really enjoyed the site. As long as you aren't expecting extreme or dirty sex, or more variety, I think you will too. The models are very attractive, the sex can be very hot. 02-07-16  01:45pm Replies (4) Review 84 Fucked Hard GFs (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Epoch is the biller, a trusted name. -The main value of Fucked Hard GFs comes from the PornMasterMind network access. You get full access to four main sites: EpicSex FuckedHard18 FuckedHardGFs MassageGirls18 -You also get random samples from many other partner sites. The samples give you a flavor of those other sites. So you can have a better idea of whether those other sites are worth joining. (I list the sites you get sample videos from in the Bottom Line section). -The four main sites at PornMasterMind feature young porn models in their late teens, early twenties. Most of the models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot. Cons: -Expensive. Price is $29.95/month (recurring). No PU/TBP discount. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. 1-day trial at $1.00 to realitysexnetwork.com converts to a $38.89/month membership. Uncheck the trial offer unless you think realitysexnetwork is worth $38.89. -Archive site. The latest update appears to be one video from April 2015. In the updates section, there is one video from April 2015, one video from December 2014, one video from October 2013, one video from April 2011. -Poor navigation. Site structure is clumsy and takes a lot of mouse clicks to see what the site contents include. -Hard to view all the videos at the site. Hard to determine the number of videos at the site. Hard to determine the exact update rate (other than updates appear to be extremely rare). -The streaming software is primitive. If you stream a video, and try to fast forward, the screen turns blue or green. Bottom Line: -You get random samples from many other partner sites, that will give you a flavor of those other sites. Bangable ElegantRaw GirlsDoPorn GloryholeSwallow HarmonyVision JeffsModels JulesJordan MrPOV MrSkin NubileFilms Nubiles-Porn Nutabu PetiteHDPorn PuffyNetwork The site theme for FuckedHardGFs, as shown by the video content, appears to be young porn models appearing naked: they might take a shower, masturbate, or have sex. But, in truth, there does not appear to be any unifying theme other than showing naked girls. Let me expand that: the idea of the site is that these videos are supposed to be from ex-boyfriends who are selling these "homemade videos" to the internet to make some extra money off their former girlfriends. So the boyfriends are not only getting extra money, but they are also getting revenge on the ex-girlfriends by exposing them on the internet. This is a popular niche. However, you would not get that slant from watching the videos. You get that slant from the title of the site. So if the title of the site rocks your boat, then that gives the videos a spicy thrill. In contrast, if you watch the tushy.com and blacked.com videos (competing paysites), their videos spend a couple minutes or more setting up the basic plot of the video. That setup/plot adds to the value/fantasy of the video, because it gives the sex more meaning. Tushy.com, blacked.com, and vixen.com are three paysites from the same owners, who are creating paysites where effort is spent on making the models as attractive as possible, as well as choosing their models for the physical beauty, and making sexy videos with a slight plot that builds the sex into a performance. The settings, camera-work, sound control, costumes, etc. are first-rate. So those 3 sites empasize a glamour-style shoot. I think of Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen as glamcore, in their approach to porn. Except that there is not a lot of romance in the plots. The videos are basically supposed to show one or more girls who are attracted to a man and they fuck. It's not very romantic, but it is several steps above gonzo porn. Is it worth joining Fucked Hard GFs or the network? I give the site/network a lukewarm recommendation. FuckedHard18 is probably the best site of the network, because it's a good massage site. The girls are attractive, the sex can be hot. The other 3 main sites are OK, but nothing special. The random samples from the partner sites gives you a taste of those sites. Which is nice. I'm giving the site/network a score of 78. For a price of $29.95/month, it's expensive. A lower price would give you more value for your money. 10-17-16  11:43pm Replies (0) Review 85 Girlsway (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Full featured site with you choice of streaming or downloading the videos in different definitions. Downloading: 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. Streaming: 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. The videos are professionally shot: Excellent lighting, good sound control, good camera work, nice sets, etc. -Most videos have an accompanying photo set. The photos sets are OK screencaps, but I've seen much better screen caps from other hardcore sites like Teen Mega World and Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. (Actually, the Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls might be screen caps or actual photos, since the quality is excellent: far better than it used to be from years ago.) Cons: -The sex has a set-up story to make the sex more meaningful, except that some of the stories/plots are really stupid. -Added to the stupid plots, the models are not actresses. There are a few sites where the models do a decent job of acting, but this site is not one of them. -The models tend to overact with moans, groans, cries of fake excitement etc. during the sex, which makes the sex unrealistic. Toning it down a lot would make the sex better. -Many of these videos are best watched while drunk, except that being drunk would make it harder to get off from the video. -The production standard are good: nice sets, many of the models are attractive, but the stupid plots and childish acting and fake moans and groans and screams of excitement are a turn-off. -My preference would be to watch a video where two girls meet, have sex and it's believable. -Video files and photo sets download with a generic file name that should be changed. File name of 96896.zip tells you nothing. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Change the file name to: Model name_Site name_Date posted_Title of set_File definition. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): You watch a scene from Spartacus (the TV series 2010-2013), these are professional actors: in short scenes, that last only a few minutes to less than a minute, they can generate more heat and excitement than the entire video from a girlsway video. That's because, even though the Spartacus is a historical drama, the sex can seem real and immediate. The actress is desirable. The action is not hardcore porn, it's softcore porn, you don't get the close-up of the male penis or female vagina, but it can be much hotter, much more erotic, than the Girlsway videos, because of the professional plot, the good acting, the attractive actresses. Is it fair to compare Girlsway, a porn site video to Spartacus, a professional TV production? Yes, because many of the Spartacus scenes create more heat, more erotic content, than the Girlsway videos. You don't need all the blood and guts of Spartacus to make heat and erotic content. I find Teen Mega World, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, do a better job of providing erotic content than Girlsway. Pure Taboo, another selection of the Adult Time hub/network, does a great job of providing erotic content with high production standards. The tone of the Pure Taboo videos is slightly dark (they use slightly dark lighting, and probably a sepia filter), and the plots involve taboos, punishment, or abuse, but this is an outstanding site. I'm wandering away from the review of Girlsway because the site does not impress me very much. I don't mind lesbian sex, but I want it to have some eroticism, some heat. And, hopefully, if there's a plot, that the models can act a bit. The models at Girlsway are attractive. But they have limited acting skills, that destroy the believabilty of the video. Bottom line summary: High production values, attractive models. But the videos lack heat. Giving Girlsway a score of 80. Note: I have access to Girlsway through my membership in Adult Time. I did not pay a separate fee for Girlsway. Adult Time is a fantastic deal, giving you access to many premium porn sites for a very low price or a free add-on to one of their member sites. 11-13-18  12:35am Replies (0) Review 86 Give Me Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT. -SECURE LOGIN PAGE. -SECURE SITE PAGES. -CHOICE OF DEFINITIONS FOR STREAMING AND/OR DOWNLOAD FOR SOME OF THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -YOU GET THE SAME CHOICES OF DEFINITION FOR YOUR DOWNLOAD OF THE VIDEO FILE. -FILES DOWNLOAD WITH THE DEFAULT NAME OF THE TITLE + THE MODEL, BUT YOU PROBABLY WANT TO ADD MORE DETAILS TO THE FILENAME FOR RECORD-KEEPING. -FIRST MONTH PU/TBP DISCOUNT OF $14.95. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH. -24/7 CUSTOMER SUPPORT THAT IS VERY RESPONSIVE (CHAT). -CONFIRMING EMAILS ON JOIN GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS: LOGIN DETAILS, CREDIT CARD USED (LAST 4 DIGITS), PRICE AND TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP. Cons: -NETWORK AND SITE STRUCTURE RECENTLY UPDATED. MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE. -SOMETIMES THERE IS A SURVEY PAGE, ASKING FOR PERSONAL DETAILS. I WAS WILLING TO START FILLING OUT ONE SURVEY, BUT THEN THEY STARTED ASKING A LOT OF PERSONAL DETAILS, AND I DON'T THINK IT'S SMART TO GIVE OUT SO MANY DETAILS ABOUT YOURSELF TO A SURVEY-ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING ALL THE HACKING THAT'S BEEN EXPOSED IN THE NEWPAPERS RECENTLY. THIS SURVEY WANTED TO KNOW MY AGE, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, IF I AM REGISTERED TO VOTE, IF I VOTED IN THE LAST NATIONAL ELECTION, WHO I VOTED FOR, ETC. ETC. I MEAN, IT WAS RIDICULOUS. -UPDATED HOT LINKS AT THE SITE/NETWORK ARE MUCH LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD HOT LINKS WERE. -UPDATED HOT LINKS ARE HARDER TO FIND. -WHEN YOU STREAM A VIDEO, IF YOU MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT (PAUSE THE VIDEO, OR SWITCH FROM FULL-SCREEN TO SMALLER VIEW), THE SOUND HAS A TENDENCY TO GO MUTE. THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR ALL THE NETWORK SITES. Bottom Line: SITE STATS (FROM A WEB PAGE, WHICH IS OFTEN MISLEADING OR OUTDATED): MOVIES 1357 DVDs 361 PORNSTARS 1338 PICTURES 0 I HAVE A PARTIAL APOLOGY TO MAKE. I CRITICIZED THE RECENT UPDATE TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, SAYING IT MADE THE NETWORK SITES HARDER TO NAVIGATE. THAT IS STILL TRUE. I NORMALLY WATCH PORN ON A 5-YEAR-OLD LAPTOP WITH A 14" SCREEN. WATCHING THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES ON A NEWER, 25" MONITOR, GIVES A MUCH BRIGHTER PICTURE, AND IT'S EASIER TO SEE WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN. WHEN I WROTE THE RECENT FAME DIGITAL UPDATE (MADE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO) WAS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE, I WAS OVER-REACTING. THE UPDATE DOES MAKE THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO NAVIGATE, BUT IT'S NOT AS BAD AS WHAT I FIRST THOUGHT, BECAUSE ON MY LAPTOP MONITOR I COULDN'T MAKE OUT ALL THE LINKS THAT ARE SHOWN. A BETTER MONITOR MAKES SOME OF THE LINKS EASIER TO FIND. HOWEVER, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS EASIER TO USE: TO SEE WHAT NETWORK SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO; TO NAVIGATE BETWEEN SITES; TO NAVIGATE INSIDE A SITE. SO THE NETWORK UPDATE IS A MISTAKE, BECAUSE IT MAKES USING THE SITE/NETWORK CONTENTS HARDER. AND THAT TAKES AWAY FROM THE VALUE OF THE SITE/NETWORK. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE: YOU WANT TO SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO CURRY CREAMPIE. YOU HAVE TO HOVER YOUR MOUSE OVER THE WHITE GHETTO LINK, TO BRING UP THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK, THEN SELECT THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK TO ENTER THAT SITE. THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK IS ONLY VISIBLE WHEN YOUR MOUSE BRINGS UP THE WHITE GHETTO SUB-SITES. I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WRITE A SITE INSTRUCTION MANUAL INSIDE A REVIEW. BUT UNLESS YOU PLAY AROUND, YOU WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A LOT OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS--YOU WON'T KNOW IT'S THERE, THE OLDER STRUCTURE HAD SIMPLER NAVIGATION. MAYBE YOU CAN CALL CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND ASK FOR HELP NAVIGATING THE SITE. I CALLED CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND THEY WERE HELPFUL GETTING ME INTO DEVILS FILM SITE. AT THE DEVILS FILM WEBSITE, I ENTERED MY CURRENT LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE PAGE GAVE ME AN ERROR MESSAGE THAT MY LOGIN DETAILS WERE INCORRECT. I CALLED CUSTOMER SERVICE, THEY TOLD ME TO TRY CLEARING MY CACHE. THAT WORKED. THE SITE (EVIDENTLY) REFUSED ME ENTRANCE BECAUSE MY PC HAD STORED THE LOGIN DETAILS FROM A PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIP. SO CUSTOMER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 24/7, AND THEY RESPOND WITHIN A FEW MINUTES IF YOU START A CHAT. SOME OF THE MODELS LOOK LIKE TEENS, BUT MANY DO NOT. ANOTHER SITE CON IS THAT THE SITE IS NOT CLEARLY SEPARATED FROM THE OTHER NETWORK SITES: THE SITE SHOWS THUMBNAILS (OF THE VIDEOS), AND YOU DON'T REALIZE UNTIL YOU CLICK THE VIDEO THAT IT'S FROM ANOTHER SITE. WHAT'S INSIDE THE "GIVE ME TEENS SITE" IS NOT SEPARATED CLEARLY. AND YOU HAVE TO FIGURE OUT, WHILE WATCHING A VIDEO, WHAT SITE THE VIDEO BELONGS TO. IT'S A JUMBLED MESS. GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 75. THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES AVAILABLE, BOTH FOR THE QUALITIES OF THEIR MODELS, AND SITE EASE OF USE. SO WHY AM I GIVING IT A SCORE IN THE 70s? NOT FOR THE SITE ITSELF. THIS SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK. WHICH HAS SOME SITES WORTH VIEWING: ROCCO SIFFREDI PETER NORTH DEVILS FILM I'M GIVING THE SITE, "GIVE ME TEENS", A SCORE OF 75. I WISH THEY WOULD BRING BACK THE OLD DROP-DOWN-MENU, WHICH MADE SITE NAVIGATION EASIER. 10-08-17  03:53am Replies (0) Review 87 Give Me Teens (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint. -Can choose streaming or download for videos. -There is a photo set associated with each video. -The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc. -You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star. -Wide selection of teen categories. -They include the posting date of each video. -They identify the female models in each video. Cons: -The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles. -The photo sets do not have a zip file. -Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up. -The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors. -Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there is any of her content at that site. -A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site. Bottom Line: The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it. Site Stats: Movies: 601 DVDs: 162 Pornstars: 654 Pictures: 87846 The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition. The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is: Older videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p Download in 240p, 480p Newer videos: Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p Minor point: The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites). Is it the same girl? She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens: Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05 18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05 This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special. What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site. To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network. 04-20-13  03:39pm Replies (5) Review 88 Give Me Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network. -Can stream or download movies. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Model is listed for each movie. -Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie. -I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model. -A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition. -The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo. -All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset. Cons: -PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month. -Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark. -Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video. -Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network. -The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. -The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better. -No zip file for the photosets. -The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Movies: 498 DVDs: 134 Pornstars: 557 Pictures: 75,388 Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option. Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4. Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage. -This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site. What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Access to the network includes tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. But this site, by itself, adds little value to the network, in spite of the high percentage of high definition videos. 06-23-12  01:18pm Replies (0) Review 89 Glam Deluxe (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Some good-to-great looking models. -Content is exclusive to this site. -High-quality glamour photography. -No DRM video protection. -No download limit. -They do have a bio sheet on the models. But some of the information is fantasy or worthless. Giving the age of the model, with no date to compare the age to, is not much use. Stating in "sexual experience" that a model is a virgin, when I have seen hardcore clips of the same model giving blowjobs and having vaginal and anal sex with different males, makes me wonder what kind of virginity they are talking about. The hardcore clips of this model were posted on other sites long before the photoshoots of this "virgin" model were posted at glamdeluxe. I realize that I should not be picky about factoids when posted at a porn site, but it pricks the fantasy bubble when the factoids are so obviously false. Cons: -Site does not update very often. Can go a week or more before a new photoset is posted. Very irregular posting schedule for updates. -Only 1 photographer for the site: Thierry Murrell. He does glamour-type erotic photography. Usually nice clean pictures, but if you don't like his style, you won't like the site. -Softcore only. Single-model posing. No boy-girl pictures. No girl-on-girl pictures. -Site advertises "huge archive" of photosets and flix. But the site has only been around since 2006, and the "archive" is tiny compared to a super-site like met-art. The flix archive is really small, only 28 videos. New videos are added very, very slowly. -The flix (videos) are basically a video of a photoshoot. And some videos are a collection of individual pictures from the photoshoot, not a real moving-picture video. -No zip files for the photosets. Need a blackwidow program to download a photoset. Otherwise, you have to download each picture separately, a real pain. Bottom Line: Cons (continued):-Photosets are in 1 resolution only. Do not have a choice of 3 different resolutions for downloads as you have at some of the better sites like met-art (low, medium, high resolution). -Navigation could be improved a lot. You go to the flix (video) page, which lists with a thumbnail of each video at the site. The hot- link to download each video is not clearly marked. Maybe this is a French version of a joke, where increasing the obstacles means increased pleasure when you reach the goal of downloading the video? -Videos are listed separate from the photosets. So if you want to find whatever videos there are of a girl, have to look at the video page, then scroll down the page to examine each video to see which girl it is. Videos are not grouped by the model, but apparently in random order. -They do not date the videos or some of the older photosets. I like to know when the photosets and videos were shot, for my own interest. -Models are white girls from Europe only. No blacks, Asians, other races. -Photos have a watermark. Doesn't bother me, but some people dislike photos with a prominent watermark. Bottom line: -If you like softcore, glamour shots of single models, and you like the models you see on the tour, then this site is maybe worth 1 single-month subscription to get the basic files you want, and then maybe a visit once a year to get any updates. Hopefully, the site will last, because the photographer does do quality work and picks some nice-to-great looking models. But a regular subscription beyond 1`month is not worth the money. -I wish I could give this site a much higher score, because I belong to it and hope it does not go out of business. But for this type of softcore photography, you get more for your money with met- art > metmodels > hegre-art. Giving this site a 75, because some of the girls are gorgeous, and the pictures are high-quality glamour shots. 11-15-08  03:11pm Replies (0) Review 90 Goddess Nudes (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -$9.99/month membership fee with PU discount. Very cheap price. -Ccbill is the billing agent. A trusted name. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Goddess Nudes is part of the MetArt network. The customer service at MetArt network is outstanding. If you have any problems, send an email to customer service, and they will probably respond in a few hours. I've never joined any site or network that had a better or more responsive Customer Service department. The truth is, the customer service at many paysites is either non-responsive or non-existent. -Fast download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed. -Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. Cons: -Cons are basically minor, if you know what the site is. -No videos. -Site navigation could be improved. -After Goddess Nudes became part of MetArt network, they included a txt file to the zip file for a gallery that includes the physical characteristics of the model. But they could also include a short bio on the model, which is what they do at MetArt. And since many of the models at Goddess Nudes are also at MetArt.com or other sites in the MetArt network, that should take very little work to do. Bottom Line: Domai was started around 1997. Goddess Nudes was started in 2010. Both were started by Eolake Stobblehouse. Stobblehouse said he appreciated looking at beautiful women, and he wanted to share this pleasure with others. He started Domai as a hobby, and only later started selling memberships. So it became a business. He wanted to proselytize that nudity is not sinful. That beauty is to be enjoyed. That life is to be enjoyed. He argued that tasteful, nude art is not porn, but art. Domai (and later Goddess Nudes) focused on innocent nudes of attractive young women. Both sites became owned by the MetArt network in 2014, after Eolake Stobblehouse became ill and could no longer operate them. Domai and Goddess Nudes are similar sites: -they both feature young women (late teens, early twenties) in nude, tasteful poses (extreme softcore) in a variety of natural settings. -As the older site, Domai has the larger backlog of galleries and models. But Goddess Nudes has a large amount of content as well: Domai Models: 995 Contributing photographers: 133 Galleries: 2,704 Goddess Nudes Models: 747 Contributing photographers: 130 Galleries: 1,709 Both sites are photos only. No videos. Both sites feature simple, natural photos shot by a variety of professional photographers, Both sites advertise exclusive content. Both sites are softcore only. Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit, but it's still strictly softcore. The navigation (and site layout) for both sites is similar. Both sites update with one photo set per day on weekdays. Both sites have the photosets categorized by the year posted. Both sites have the models and photosets categorized by the contributing photographer. Both sites also have thumbnails of the models in a downside listing in a row of thumbnails. Which takes a long while to click through. Both sites share many of the models and contributing photographers. Neither site has a search engine to find models by categories or traits. You can put the name of a model into a basic search engine, and that will return the model, but then you have to click to find her galleries. So what are the major differences between the two site? One: Domai has more content than Goddess Nudes. Two: The content at each site is exclusive to that site. Three: Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit than Domai, but they are both softcore photo sites. So why choose one site over the other? The simple answer is: If you like Domai, you will almost certainly like Goddess Nudes. So, join Domai first, because it has more content. Then, assuming you liked Domai, join Goddess Nudes, because you will get access to the same type of content, but with material that will be new to you. I'm giving Goddess Nudes a score of 85. Based on: The attractive models. The photography that is professional, simple and natural. The low membership price of $9.99/month. Do not join either site if you want videos. Neither site has them. Do not join either site if you want more than extremely softcore photos of attractive women. Do not join either site if you want the models made to look glamourous or exotic. These are lovely young women who are photographed in simple settings, without a lot of artifice. 05-09-16  04:43am Replies (2) Review 91 Grandpas Fuck Teens (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 21 Sextury network. 21 Sextury used to be composed of about 22 separate sites covering a variety of porn niches. However, recently, 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network, so you now have access to over 100 separate channels (Adult Time calls their sites channels instead of sites). This means access to a huge amount of high quality porn: over 50,000 videos. -Login and member pages are https. Secure. -There is a trailer for each video, to give you a fast preview of the action. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -Each video has an accompanying photoset. Which has a zip file. You have a choice of zip file for the photoset: normal and higher definition. -Site is still updating. Cons: -Note: at least one PU member who signed up to 21 Sextury network did not get the Adult Time add-on. Even though Adult Time was advertised as being combined with a 21 Sextury membership. To be sure of what you are geting, do a live chat (if available in your country, for a fast record of what the customer support says), or email customer support. I can't stress enough how much more valuable the Adult Time add-on is versus a simple membership in the 21 Sextury network, or any of the other sites included in the Adult Time network. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard practice for a porn site. -With such a massive catalog of porn in different niches, navigation is a learning curve. I suggest a long-term membership to be able to explore the very high quality porn being offered. But again, if you don't get the free Adult Time add-on, I would scream and demand a refund. Bottom Line: -The stunt cocks at this site might be considered old fuckers, but the girls they bang are young and fresh. Most of the models look like they are in their twenties, so it's not a teen site, but a young woman site. But the models are attractive. And seem to get into the sex, instead of just putting up with an older partner. Site has 431 videos, Still updating (about 1 video per week). The girls are young (twenties), fresh, attractive. And seem to enjoy the sexual action. The photosets can be downloaded in normal definition or in a higher definition. I assume the photos are screen caps from the video. However, the quality of each photo is good: not the super-high quality you get at a glamour style site like MetArt or MPL Studios, but much better than the screencaps common from years ago at hardcore porn sites. A photoset of 134 pictures has a file size of 29.7 MB in normal definition, and a file size of 1.8 GB in high definition. In comparison, from the MetArt site: A photoset of 120 pix in low definition has a file size of 10.7 MB. in medium definition file size: 36.8 MB. in high definition file size: 170 MB. Those stats are only an indication, because codecs and other factors control the quality of a photo. But in general, the screen caps at Grandpas Fuck Teens are good: good focus, good lighting, good colors, good centering of the model, etc. If you get access to Adult Time with your membership in any one of the Adult Time sites (which is the way it's supposed to work, as explained to me by a customer rep at 21 Sextury), then the Adult Time network gives you a low-cost access to over 100 porn sites (called channels at Adult Time). Based on the Adult Time access, I'm giving the site a score of 94. If you do not get the Adult Time access, the score drops significantly. 01-10-19  02:19am Replies (0) Review 92 Hairy AV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The main attraction of the site is Japanese porn that is not pixellated (no mosaic censorship over the genitals). -PU discounted membership of $19.95/month -Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name. -Large site. 942 videos. Same number of accompanying galleries. -Multiple choices for streaming: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -The same multiple choices for download: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -The file name includes the name of the model. But it's better to rename the file with the date it was posted to the site, and the name of the site. -The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, sound control. -The videos have the posting date to the site. -There is an element of Japanese flavor to the videos, which can make them slightly more interesting than the regular American or European porn. This can be positive or negative. -Site is part of the JAV HD network. Membership in the site gives access to the full JAV network, and vice versa. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. -Search engine is poor. Enter the name of the model, and the search returns her name a bunch of names that are not hers. -The Japanese models can make funny noises during sex, which can be annoying. -The Japanese are big on vibrators, of different sizes and colors, and love to use them on the models. If you don't like sex toys, you won't appreciate many of the videos. -Some members might be disappointed that the Japanese sex scenes are not hugely different from American or European sex scenes. Like the old wives' tale how Asian women have a "sideways vagina". Women are women. There are physiological differences between races, but there's also a lot of nonsense about the differences. -No zip file for the photo sets. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 942 videos. Site theme: girls with pubic hair. Site contents: uncensored (no pixillation) videos and photos of Japanese models having sex. Some people think girls with pubic hair are attractive. Other people think pubic hair is dirty or unpleasant, and think all girls should feature the "nude" pussy that is so common in today's porn models. Actually, it's not just porn models who have the hairless pussy fashion. I did a google search, and found what I thought was an interesting result: From 2 studies done in 2014 on 1,100 college-student participants (671 self-reported women, and 439 self-reported men), nearly half the men in the study said they’d shaved off all their pubic hair at least once in the previous four weeks. I had my pubic hair shaved for an operation once (I was in a hospital at the time), but never bothered shaving or trimming it myself. About 95% of people in the study said they’d done some sort of pubic hair removal at least once in the past four weeks. This would include minor trimming to a complete shave. I don't think the hair down below grows all that long, anyway. It's not like the hair on your head, which just keeps growing longer. (This review is getting a little strange. But interesting, I hope.) My pubic hair, which is over 30 years old (since I was shaved for that operation), is less than 2 inches long. On some hairy models, the pubic hair might be over 2 inches long, but still under 4 inches. So even with a "jungle look", pubic hair is still short. But I have read many complaints at porn sites when a model has pubic hair. They say the model is unclean, or less attractive, and should be bald down there. As if that was the way nature intended. Or God intended. Or fashion intended. Or some other reason, that seems to be implied, but not always stated. There are porn sites that serve the hairy niche. Hairy AV (part of JAV HD network) is one. ATK Natural & Hairy is another. Love Hairy (part of MetArt network) is another site. Japanese porn seems to love vibrators. Dildos are also popular, but not as popular as vibrators. The vibrators come in all sizes and shapes, from very tiny to the industrial-sized. They also come in all colors. I went on the U.S. version of Amazon.com, and they have 123 pages of vibrators. The Amazon.com page shows 24 varieties of vibrators per page. Counting duplicate listings, that would be almost 3,000 models of vibrators. So I guess that vibrators are more popular in America than I realized. I've been watching porn for years now, but I still have a lot to learn. 3,000 models of vibrators at Amazon.com? Maybe the Japanese aren't so crazy after all. They love vibrators, just like Americans. And Europeans. And maybe Africans, as well. Basic site overview: Hairy AV focuses on hairy Japanese models. The videos and photos are not censored, which is the primary selling point of the site. The models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot, so you get crisp, clear views of these lovely girls in a wide variety of sex acts: blowjobs, self masturbation, masturbation from one or more men on a single women (anyway from 1 to 5 or 6 men on the same woman), vaginal and anal fucking (mostly vaginal), titty fucking, etc. So the sex can be hot. But it's not excessively forceful or cruel. It's not the hard gonzo sex you see on some European sites. The sex is more consensual, where the woman's pleasure is important, and it's not just the guys getting off. You have access to the 942 videos at the site, with almost daily updates of a single video per day, but you also have access to all the JAV HD sites, which has 16 sites and 16,528 videos in different categories. Note: I suspect the 16,529 videos is a slight exaggeration of the site statistic, because it probably contains some videos that are posted to different sites in the network, possibly with different titles for the same video. Because I have found some videos that are posted to more than one site, and the same video will have a different title depending on which site the video is posted to. Note: If you join through the JAV HD site, the PU discounted price is $39.99/month. This gives access to the whole JAV HD network. But if you join through the Hairy AV site, the PU discounted price is $19.99/month. This gives you access to the whole JAV HD network, as well. Giving the site a score of 80. You get access to 942 videos at the site, over 15,000 at the network, uncensored, high quality videos of attractive Japanese models engaging in hot sex. So it's worth considering, if you want a change from the American or European porn you've become accustomed to. But don't expect a massive difference between the Japanese porn and the American or European porn you've already seen, if you have at least a moderate amount of porn experience. Sex is sex. The flavor might be Japanese, but it's not watching Aliens from Beyond in sexual heat that will blow your mind. 04-02-16  09:23pm Replies (0) Review 93 Hairy Undies (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Secure login page. (https) -Secure member pages. (https) This keep some information safer from hacking, and leaves less of a record for your ISP. -Superior support: live chat is 24/7, fast to respond, with knowledgeable, helpful staff. -You can also access support by toll-free telephone, or email. -Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites. -There is a trailer for most videos, to give you a quick look at the action of the video. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading are included in the basic membership price. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is almost standard for any porn site. -Sometimes will experience a poor connection. Yesterday, I could not stream videos (they stuttered and stopped), and downloading files was very slow. I checked my internet connection at a test site, was was getting about 102 to 110 Mbps, which should give smooth streaming and fast downloads, but my connection to the Devils Film network server was poor. -They did a network update a few years ago, making the site and network harder to use: They dropped the easy-to-see-and-use dropdown menu for changing sites. And they changed the structure of the entire network, so that you are now forced to use a gateway site instead of actually entering the different sites you have access to--which makes exploring and accessing the contents of each site harder. -Slow update rate. For the last year, 1 new video per month. -The photosets are poor screencaps of the accompanying video. CONS CONTINUE: Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -The software mechanism for viewing the photosets online is clumsy and poorly designed. -The sound control of the videos can be poor: Sound can spike suddenly, making normal sounds into explosions. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): Site theme: For many years now, the bald pussy look has been the norm. HairyUndies is a niche site that features women with pubic hair. The site is part of the Devils Film network. -The most famous sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD Access to any one of the sites listed above would justify the membership price: Access to all 5 major sites, plus over 15 more sites, means you have access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price. PU lists this site (HairyUndies.com) as a clone of the Devils Film site. This is probably because all the videos and photosets (the photosets are screencaps of the video) carry the Devils Film watermark. Also, the videos are listed as "from Devilsfilm" on the gateway site. My interpretation: The Devils Film network uses a gateway system where you are logged in to a gateway site, and access the different sites from the gateway site, instead of actually entering each separate site completely. This means it's easier for the network to maintain the network, since they don't have to work on each separate site, but only on the network gateway. It makes it harder for the user to explore and access the content of each site. And also it's more confusing about which videos belong to which site, since there's some question whether any particular video is part of one site, or just randomly thrown in from a different site. And the watermark on the video is no help, since the sites labelled under the Devils Film section all carry the Devils Film logo. (Hairy Undies is labelled under the Devils Film section.) Maybe a software engineer could explain it more simply: but I do not believe Hairy Undies is a clone, but a listing of a site that no longer exists as a separate site, but is a listing of videos and the accompanying photosets that formerly made up the Hairy Undies site. Anyway, I'm giving the site and network a score of 82. This is because you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price. There are some real gems at the network, but you have to slog through a lot of junk to find them. 07-27-18  08:47am Replies (0) Review 94 Hairy Undies (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips. -Screenshots also show what the model looks like. -No DRM -No download limits -Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised -No inactivity timeout from site Cons: -No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only) -A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar. -The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips -The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network -Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network. Bottom Line: Site has limited content: Movies 118 Total size 46 GB compare the stats above to Devilsfilm: movies 1,000+ total size 2,400 GB This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price. The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here. The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem. One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans. My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value. I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her. Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead. Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy. This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth. I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower. 07-11-09  10:44pm Replies (0) Review 95 Heavy Handfuls (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. -NORMALLY I CONSIDER ADVERTISEMENTS FOR OTHER PAYSITES AS A NEGATIVE. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE ADS FOR OTHER MEMBERSHIPS ARE EXTREMELY CHEAP. I ONCE SAW A NEW SENSATIOS AD FOR METART AT AROUND $8/MONTH. THAT'S THE LOWEST PRICE I'VE EVER SEEN FOR THAT SITE. CURRENTLY, THEY HAVE AN AD FOR METART AT $9.90/MONTH. WHICH IS A VERY LOW PRICE COMPARED TO ANY OTHER OFFERS I'VE SEEN. -JOINING ANY SITE IN THE NETWORK GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK. THERE ARE NO PREMIUM SITES WHICH YOU HAVE TO PAY EXTRA FOR. -JOINING ANY SITE IN THE NETWORK GIVES YOU ACCESS TO A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF CONTENT: -OVER 6,500 VIDEOS, WITH MATCHING GALLERIES. -THE NETWORK MODELS ARE MAINLY ATTRACTIVE. THEY ARE MAINLY LATE TEENS, EARLY TWENTIES. THERE IS MORE VARIETY IN BODY STYLE THAN MOST TEEN SITES: YOU GET THE REGULAR SKINNY TEEN, BUT ALSO MEDIUM SIZED GIRLS AND EVEN SOME HEAVIER GIRLS AT THE NETWORK. PROS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION BELOW; Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -THE GIRLS AT HEAVY HANDFULS ARE MEDIUM- TO LARGE-SIZED. THE FOCUS IN ON BIG BOOBS. -OFFERS MULTIPLE BIT-RATES FOR STREAMING. -OFFERS MULTIPLE FILE TYPES, DEFINITIONS, BIT-RATES FOR DOWNLOAD. CONS (START OF): -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -MOST OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE NON-GLAMOR SITES. SO THE MODELS, IN SPITE OF BEING MAINLY ATTRACTIVE, ARE NOT MADE UP (WITH MAKE-UP, COSTUMES, LIGHTING, ETC.) TO APPEAR THEIR MOST BEAUTIFUL, BUT ARE PRESENTED IN A MORE NATURAL, EVERY-DAY STYLE. -IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE FOR THE SITE. BUT THE NETWORK UPDATES WEEKLY. AND THERE IS A TON OF CONTENT AT THE NETWORK. -NON-SECURE LOG-IN. Bottom Line: THE SITE THEME IS BIG-BREASTED WOMEN. THE SEX ACTION IS VARIED: MAINLY COUPLES, BUT THE GUYS MAKE FULL USE OF THE MODEL'S PARTS: MOUTH, BREASTS, PUSSY, ASS. SITE STATS: CURRENTLY, 292 VIDEOS (WITH MATCHING GALLERIES). MOST OF THE NETWORK SITES GIVE A BACKSTORY LEADING UP TO THE SEX. BUT AT HEAVY HANDFULS, THE SCRIPT IS MORE DIRECT: STRAIGHT HARDCORE. WHY WASTE TIME TALKING WHEN YOU CAN SKIP TO THE GOOD PART (SUCKING AND FUCKING)? IF YOU HAVE A THING FOR BIG BOOBS, THIS SITE IS A GOOD BET. AND BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS, YOU GET A BOATLOAD OF HARDCORE VIDS ON DIFFERENT NICHES, FROM THE OTHER SITES. NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK SITES AS OF 2017-06-06: THE TABU TALES THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE HOT WIFE XXX THE TALES FROM THE EDGE THE ROMANCE SERIES SHANE DIESEL'S BANGIN' BABES PARODY PASS ASHLYNN BROOKE BUSTY COLLEGE COEDS BUTT DIVERS FOUR FINGERS CLUB FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL FUCK FOR DOLLARS HEAVY HANDFULS I FILM MYSELF INTERNAL VIOLATIONS JIZZBOMB LIL' LATINAS MR BIGGZ PAPA LOADS POV FANTASY SADIE WEST SQUIRTING 101 STRETCHED OUT SNATCH UNILIMITED MILFS THE VIDEOS STREAM SMOOTHLY AT THE SITE. I CAN'T COMMENT CURRENTLY ON THE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS, BECAUSE MY ROUTER AND/OR LAPTOP IS HAVING SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES. BUT IN THE PAST, I'VE USUALLY GOTTEN AROUND 2 TO 3 MB/SEC DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FROM THE SITE AND NETWORK. AT THAT TIME MY ISP CONNECTION WAS 50 Mbps. I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85. THAT IS BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS, WHICH HAS A HUGE AMOUNT OF GOOD-QUALITY VIDEOS AND PHOTOS. THE SITE AND NETWORK IS EASY TO USE. NO DEAD LINKS. NICE MODEL LISTING, WITH GOOD-SIZED THUMBNAIL OF EACH MODEL. BUT THE SEARCH IS BASIC. 06-06-17  04:59am Replies (0) Review 96 Hey Outdoor (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. -Professionally shot videos: good camera work, sound control, editing, lighting, etc. -Good download speeds. I averaged between 1 to 3 MB/sec. -There is a photo set illustrating/accompanying each scene, that shows you clearly what the video scene will show. -Can stream or download each video. Each stream or download has choices for the quality of the scene. From mobile to HD quality. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -No zip file for the photo sets. -Poor search engine. Bottom Line: 65 scenes Features Japanese models in outdoor sex: in the street, at a pool, at the beach, at a park, wherever. This would approximate the public nudity category for American/European porn. Since there are only 65 scenes, this is a small site, and the content can be easily scanned by glancing over the thumbnail for each scene, with the brief scene description. Even though 65 scenes seems like a small amount of content, you get a nice array of sex acts: masturbation, toys (vibrators and dildos), girl-girl, boy-girl, two-or-more-boys with one girl, blowjobs, fucking, etc. The models are attractive young Japanese in their late teens or early twenties. Very little tattoos or piercings. Most models have pubic hair. Although the Japanese models exhibit the Asian shyness toward sex, it is evident they are enjoying the sex, with their funny noises and moans. The sex is not rough or abusive. And the girls seem to give blow jobs like they are born to it. Because you haven't seen these models before, it adds an element of freshness to the scenes, even if the sex is not radically different from American or European sex scenes. Except: 1. the flavor is different, because these are Japanese models, which have a slightly different attitude to sex. 2. the models are Japanese, not European or American. 3. most of the models are cute or attractive. Slender bodies. Young faces. 4. no plastic breasts that I could see. These models are natural. Some of the models, like Misaki Oosawa, have such innocent, doll-like faces, with perky bodies, that you wonder why they got into porn in the first place. I guess there's an excess of cute Japanese models that can't succeed in the gravure niche so they gravitate into AV idols (AV = Adult Video). I think Japanese (and Chinese) models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. Giving the site a score of 80. Because I really like how attractive some of the models are. But if you are less impressed by the models, you could easily give the site a lower score. I realize I am being very subjective about the score for this site. And I've read comments that the sex could be considered bland or raunchy. Different people can have very different opinions about this site, or about anything else, for that matter. 03-07-16  05:33pm Replies (2) Review 97 Home Teen Vids (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Easy login. -Streaming option for each video. -Content is dated. -No DRM. (This is a guess, based on rest of the network. I was unable to download any videos, but the rest of the network videos have no DRM, so I assume, if you could download these site videos, as you are supposed to be able to, they would have no DRM.) Cons: -You are supposed to be able to download a low-quality video file for each video at the site. I tried to download 10 different videos, and each time I got the error message, "404 Not Found". -There is no medium-quality or high-quality download option for a video. And since none of the links for the low-quality download option work, you can't save these videos (Unless you use a special program to capture screen images. But any video you might get using a special screen-capture program would be low quality because the streaming image itself is not high quality). -Models not identified. No name is given for the models. So if you wanted to save videos or photosets, it would be difficult to sort them by model. -No model bios (obviously, since the models are not named). -No search. -No updates for over one year. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Teen Mega World network. This is an archive site: the last update was 2010-03-29, a little over a year ago. Number of videos: 60. Number of photosets: 60. Video runtime: 15-35 minutes. Video quality: low (based on file size of the video, and the visual quality of the video). Photoset: 110-260 photos per photoset. There is a single-size zip file available for each photoset. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot. The photos are low quality in terms of photographic quality. The technical statistics for a single photo indicates the photos could be high quality if a competent photographer had taken the time to shoot them, but that wasn't the case: the photos are often blurry and out of focus, and are more like screen caps than well-shot photos. An individual photo is 300-400 KB, 1280x720 pixels. Which is just a waste of file size for blurry, poorly shot photos. There are a number of attractive models at this site. And the videos are competently shot: good sound control, no annoying background music, OK to good lighting, OK to good colors (skin tone, background, foreground). The definition of the videos is low quality. If the definition was high quality, a number of these videos would be worth saving. But you can't save these videos, because you get an error message when you try to save them. Also, the video quality is low (in terms of definition). The sex action is straight fucking. No story or plot, no buildup to the sex. It's one boy, one girl. The site has little value. It's a small archive site, not updating. The videos and photos are poor in terms of image quality. You can't download any videos from the site (because of technical problems). The photosets are not worth downloading. 05-16-11  07:32pm Replies (2) Review 98 Innocent High (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: PU shows a discounted price of $14.87/month recurring. But when you click on the link to the site, and hit the join page, it shows a join price of $17.87/month (recurring). -This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network. 427 videos as of 2016-07-10. -Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name. -Numerous options for video download: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p. -Good download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec. My max speed is about 5+ MB/sec. -Access to the rest of the Team Skeet network with membership in any of their sites. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -The site theme is innocent high school girls having sex. But most of the models look like sluts who are too old for high school. And they sure as hell don't look innocent. So that takes away from the fantasy element of porn. -Update rate is 2 videos per month. But you get 1 video per day for the Team Skeet network. -Some of the models in these videos are actually pretty: Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace,some others. But the videos don't use the attractive models to create videos that have interest or value. Part of the problem is the script/plot is so stupid, part is the acting is so terrible, it reduces the value of the videos. You don't watch porn for the acting or script, but jesus, if you have horrible actors, don't require them to act. And if you can't write a script, don't bother, just show the sex. -A lot of ads for other paysites on every page you look at inside the site. Bottom Line: Site theme: innocent high school girls having sex. Not much effort is put into making these models attractive. Even models who are normally attractive come across as not especially attractive: for example, Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace are definitely good-looking women. But you wouldn't know it from their videos at Innocent High. Many of the models don't look like they are in high school, unless they have been held back a few years. The site would be better named: "horny school girls having sex". And the models certainly don't act innocent. This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network, with 427 scenes. The site does offer a wide selection of definitions for download, from very low (for portable) to 720p and 1080p. Most of the scenes take place in a classroom. The plot get repetitious fast. There's not a lot of male talent used: you get the same faces again and again. The male talent are supposed to be professional school teachers, but they look like poor white trash. Maybe they should name the site: "Skummy models get fucked by poor white trash"? That would be descriptive, and truthful. I'm a fan of teen porn, softcore or hardcore. I think MetArt has great value, Teen Mega World, X-Art, Diesel and a bunch of other sites too numerous to mention are outstanding value. But I like my teens to be attractive. To look like teens (or early twenties). Innocent High is not one of my favorite sites. The teen models (if they are teens) look older, and not attractive. The scenes are poorly acted, with stupid plot lines. I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's not for the site itself, but because you have access to the entire Team Skeet network, which does have a lot of good scenes. 07-11-16  07:04pm Replies (0) Review 99 Jizz Bomb (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Like many porn sites, they now use https for login details. -Like many porn sites, they now use https for member pages. -Membership in any one of the member sites of the network gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites that require extra fees. -Search is good. You put in a model's name, it searches the entire network, not just her content at the site you are logged in to. -Unlimited downloads. -Unlimited streaming. -All content is exclusive. For the site and the network. -Multiple choices of definition and bitrate for streaming and downloading videos. -This is a large site. 720 videos. -Each video has a photo set, with a zip file for easy downloading. Cons: -No PU discount. But wait for a holiday, and you might find a discounted price -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites. -You need a fast internet connection to stream the videos. My connection is too slow, so the videos stutter and stop. I have to download the videos and use a software player to watch. That is my problem, not the fault of the site. -Archive site. Last update was in July 2015. -The photo sets are screen shots made from the videos. So even when the model is attractive, each photo is poor quality, and not worth saving. Which is a shame, because some of these models are very attractive. Bottom Line: Site theme: women getting fucked and then finishing with cum sprayed on their face. Shows how powerful the man is, and how the woman is submissive to his desires. Side note01: Not all the scenes end with the guy shooting cum over the model's face. Maybe if they used fake cum, and it looked real, they could have the guy shooting a massive load of cum on the girl's face, proving that he is a manly man. Side note02: A lot of the sites have a strong backstory to set up the sex, to add some meaning beyond two or more bodies slapping against each other. But the Jizz Bomb site is more gonzo sex, with very little story before it gets into the sex. Side note03: Although the videos are good, with crisp, clear images, the photo sets are made of screencaps of poor quality. Many hardcore sites outside of the New Sensations network have improved the quality of the photo sets made from videos, but the Jizz Bomb photo sets are poor quality screencaps. The New Sensations network advertises: 6,500 exclusive videos. 2,500 porn stars. Multiple weekly updates. 15+ bonus sites. The PU price shown is $29.95/month recurring. But you can find specials. I joined on a special discount (they come around on a lot of holidays). For a lowered price, the network is worth joining, at least once. But PU members reaction to the site varies a lot: rearadmiral gave the network a score of 75. marcdc1 and insomniacxxx gave the network a score in the 90s. So individual opinions vary a lot. Which is normal. jook thinks the network is boring and a waste of his money. Why did I join? -I found a special discounted low price. I was a previous member, and found enough content that I enjoyed--although there is even more content that I passed on. TheBestPorn.com site provides a valuable service that gives an over-view of many different porn sites. It also lists the PU/TBP discount, pros, cons, bottom line, and other useful facts. Some of the facts may be out of date. However, I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives. My own approach to setting a score for a site depends on my personal preferences, and there can be a wide latitude in the final score a site receives. The main factor for increasing the score a site receives if it's part of a network, and gives access to the network contents. To me, that is an essential factor in the score of a site: how much content does a site membership give you access to? A second essential factor is the quality of the content, which is a more nebulous concept, since it depends on a person's perception of the content. Then there is ease of use of the site/network contents: is the site/network easy to navigate, are there download limits, fast download speeds, streaming limits: are some sites in the network treated as premium sites, requiring extra payment to access those sites. Minor factors: is the content exclusive, pre-checked cross-sale on join page, choice of billing agent (is the site easy to cancel, does the customer service team respond to questions or problems). I don't bother using the formulaic approach that TBP uses, where different reviewers are able to follow set rules and get a score that matches the other reviewers' score within a point or two. I am impressed by the criteria that TBP uses to score a site: the listing is detailed. But my mind can't process each factor into a score and then combine the scores into a total score: too much analytics for me. I prefer a looser approach, where I try to judge the value of a site for me, personally. But I also try to indicate factors, plus or minus, that will be of interest to someone considering joining the site. The New Sensations network currently consists of 26 sites (counting the New Sensations Network Home site as one of the sites). In the reply section below, I list the sites that belong to the New Sensations network. Just reading the site titles gives you an indication that the network covers many different niches. So you can concentrate on the sites where the titles indicate they serve your interests. Although, it also makes sense to at least give a cursory examination of each site, to see if any of the videos appeal to you. THE SITES IN THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK ARE LISTED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 02-07-19  02:09am Replies (4) Review 100 Jurassic Cock (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.95/MONTH RECURRING. -PART OF THE PORN PROS BASIC NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE BASIC NETWORK. -NETWORK ACCESS GIVES YOU AROUND 3,000 VIDEOS. (I'M ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS, BECAUSE ANY ADVERTISED STATS ARE SUSPECT: FOR EXAMPLE, THEY STILL ADVERTISE THAT THE BASIC NETWORK HAS 24 SITES, WHICH WAS TRUE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, BUT IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS, THEY'VE ELIMINATED SITES, AND THE CURRENT NETWORK HAS 17 SITES.) -CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE CONTENTS. NO PREMIUM IS CHARGED FOR DOWNLOADING, UNLIKE SOME SITES WHICH RECENTLY BEGAN CHARGING EXTRA FOR THE ABILITY TO DOWNLOAD CONTENT. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -VIDEOS HAVE A MATCHING GALLERY. -EACH GALLERY HAS A ZIP FILE. Cons: -TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, HAVE TO ACCEPT/DECLINE THE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PLATINUM STATUS FOR $70. -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE, WHICH ALLOWS HACKERS TO STEAL YOUR LOGIN DATA. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -NO UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2011-12-12. Bottom Line: THERE ARE CURRENTLY 17 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. THE NETWORK HAS BEEN DELETING SOME SITES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. IN NOVEMBER OF 2016, THE BASIC NETWORK HAD 22 SITES. THE NETWORK ELIMINATED 6 SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. THE NETWORK ADDED ONE NEW SITE, NAMED "PORNPROS", WHICH IS SIMILAR TO THE NAME OF THE NETWORK. JUST TO MAKE IT MORE CONFUSING. THE PORNPROS SITE CURRENTLY HAS 1 UPDATE. THE SITE NAME, FOLLOWED BY THE NUMBER OF SCENES, CURRENT AS OF 2017-04-18: 18yearsold - 489 Updates 40ozbounce - 119 Updates Cockcompetition - 40 Updates Crueltyparty - 64 Updates Deepthroatlove - 294 Updates Disgraced18 - 21 Updates Eurohumpers - 21 Updates Flexiblepositions - 27 Updates Freaksofboobs - 62 Updates Freaksofcock - 183 Updates Jurassiccock - 80 Updates Massagecreep - 212 Updates Pimpparade - 33 Updates PornPros - 1 Update Realexgirlfriends - 592 Updates Shadypi - 97 Updates Teenbff - 236 Updates THE 6 SITES THEY ELIMINATED RECENTLY INCLUDE: Amateurviolations Cumdisgrace Cumshotsurprise Lolcumshots Milfhumiliation Squirtdisgrace MOST OF THE SITES HAVE NOT UPDATED IN YEARS. IN THE LAST 30 DAYS, THE BASIC NETWORK HAS ADDED 4 NEW SCENES. THE SITES WITH NEW SCENES IN THE LAST 30 DAYS ARE: Massagecreep - 1 NEW SCENE RealExGirlfriends - 2 NEW SCENES PornPros - 1 NEW SCENE THE LAST NEW SCENE FOR JURASSIC COCK WAS 2011-12-12. JURASSIC COCK HAS 80 SCENES. THE THEME IS AN OLDER GUY SHTUPPING A YOUNG WOMAN OR YOUNG GIRL. (I SAY SHTUPPING, BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO BE POLITE. JOKE.) ANYWAY, THE SITE FEATURES HARDCORE SEX, WITH VERY LITTLE PLOT. THE PLOT IS THAT THE OLDER GUY IS MORE EXPERIENCED THAN SOME YOUNG GUY, SO THE GIRL WILL HAVE A BETTER SEXUAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE OLDER MAN. THE NICHE (OLD GUYS SHTUPPING YOUNG WOMEN) IS NOT WELL SERVED. TEEN MEGA WORLD HAS A NICHE SITE FOR THIS CATEGORY, PORN PROS (THE CURRENT NETWORK UNDER REVIEW) HAS ONE, TRICKY OLD TEACHER, OLD YOUNG ANAL, GRANDDADZ, AND A FEW OTHER SITES. THE SITES I MENTIONED ARE OLDER-MEN-WITH-YOUNG-WOMEN. THERE ARE ALSO OLDER-WOMEN-WITH-YOUNG-MEN SITES, AS WELL. MOST SITES IN THIS NICHE ARE SMALL. LESS THAN 100 SCENES. SOME OF THE MODELS IN THIS NICHE ARE SUPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEENS/EARLY TWENTY GIRLS. GETTING BACK TO THE JURASSIC COCK SITE SPECIFICS: THE VIDEOS CAN BE DOWNLOADED OR STREAMED. STREAMING IS OFFERED IN STANDARD AND HIGH DEFINITION. DOWNLOADS ARE OFFERED IN MP4 480P, MP4 1080P, WMV 1080P. A SIDE NOTE: THE TECHNICAL QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS POOR TO JUST OK. IF THE SCENE IS SHOT OUTSIDE, THERE ARE RANDOM NOISES THAT INTRUDE ON THE SOUNDTRACK. THE LIGHTING IS NATURAL LIGHING. THE SETS AND COSTUMES/CLOTHES ARE CHEAP. NO EFFORT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. AND THE STUNT COCKS (THE OLDER GUYS) ARE REAL SLOBS. THE OVERALL ATTRACTIVE OF THE MODELS IS BELOW THE STANDARD OF THE NETWORK AS A WHOLE. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO CHOOSE ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEEN-EARLY-TWENTY GIRLS. AS LONG AS THE GIRLS WERE YOUNG AND WILLING TO FUCK, THEY WERE ACCEPTABLE. AT SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS Massagecreep AND Realexgirlfriends, THE MODELS ARE BOTH YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE. REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 04-19-17  06:46am Replies (10) Shown : 76-100 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.44 seconds.