Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 Just Teen Movie (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -content is exclusive to this site -multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime -The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color -hi def video is listed as 1280x720 -Very attractive teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies -No DRM -No downloading limits -Secret word is easy to read. Some other sites I can't enter because secret word is so distorted. -Small watermark (watermark is not a pro, but it's small, which is positive) Cons: -Very softcore action. Most videos are solo model, a few have two girls. Most videos I saw were boring. Little emotion shown by the models. Solo videos show a girl moving, walking, lying down, slightly touching herself. A few videos feature 2 girls lesbian action, basically softcore: touching, kissing, licking. Sounds hotter than what it looks like. Cons: There are a few erotic videos because of the models, but most of the videos are a waste of time to watch, in spite of how attractive the models are. -Login in problems: sometimes try to log in to site and username/password not accepted. Get warning message security system will block me if I try too many times. Told (on screen) to contact Support. But I already sent an email to Support 8 days ago about about other problems and have gotten no reply. This site has: -small number of videos (only found 42 video titles) -no simple listing of number of models -no simple listing of the model that appears in a video -no simple listing of number of videos -no simple listing of video titles -no simple listing of when the videos were posted -no simple listing of the photographer for each video -model bios and interviews: supposed to be on the site, but I can't find them. -there is no posting date for any video that I can find -They do not name the model/models in the video. Bottom Line: Cons(continued): -lousy navigation. -there is no search function to find models, videos, photographer There are very few videos on the site, and it's not easy finding a specific video by model or video name. You have to click thru each browser page where they show thumbnails for 9 videos per page. A simple upgrade to navigation would be to use the "Free Tour" updates page, which shows a thumbnail of each video available in the members area, on a single page. But when you get into the members area, instead of one page where you can look at all 42 videos at the site, you have to search thru 5 separate pages that list 9 videos per page. Showing all the videos on a single page would make navigation/searching so much easier. -Advertise interviews and bios of models. Have not found any interviews or bios for the models. If the bio is inside some video, there should be an explanation on a web page that states where the bios and interviews are located, and how to find them. -Advertise 24/7 support staff. I sent email to support 8 days ago, still no reply. 2 other PU members reported they sent emails to support and got no replies. -The video run time is around 8 - 17 minutes. -The video file size is around 400 - 700 MB in avi format. This takes a huge amount of disk space for each video. -Updates-Advertise "12 HDV films per month" (Can't find where I saw the advertisement for 12 HDV films per month, but that is what I wrote down as I was looking the site over. I believe that is what I saw advertised.) -I found 42 different video titles. That is the same number reported at TBP on 09-21-08. So no updates from Sep 21 thru Dec 7. Until I saw the TBP data on number of videos, I thought there were sections of justteenmovie that were hidden from me, because I could not find the advertised model bios, model interviews, and other videos that are advertised that are supposed to be inside the members area. Bottom line: You can take the tour, where you can watch a promo trailer for the videos on the site. If you think the promo trailers are good/interesting/erotic/whatever, then you can join for 1 month to download whatever videos you like. In spite of hi definition videos with really attractive teen models and nice lighting and good color, the site is a waste of money, because -there are very few videos -most of the videos are boring When I watch most of these attractive young girls moving or touching themselves, I think they feel no more emotion than if they were brushing their teeth. This site is sister to justteensite. You join one, you get the other site included. By itself, justteenmovie would not be worth joining. Give it a score of 55. Justtteensite is the much more valuable site, and that's where you would spend most of your time. Justteenmovie is a real disappointment with its current content. 12-07-08  08:24am Replies (5) Review 102 Just Teen Site (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: pros: -a lot of content is exclusive to this site -multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime -The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color -hi def video is listed as 1280x720 -hi def pics listed as up to 2900x4300 -Very attractive European teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies -Content quantity- Huge number of pix sets and vids. models : 620 photos : 101282 HDV films : 179 (The HDV films are really video clips of the models, these are not hardcore or softcore movies with a storyline.) -No DRM -No downloading limits Cons: pros (continued): -secret word is easy to read. -small, unobtrusive watermarks. -updates: a new photoset or vid every 1-2 days. Cons: -expensive. $34.95 (recurring) monthly fee. This gives you membership to 2 sites, justteensite and justeenmovie. But the justteenmovie site has tiny content, that you can download entire site in a few days, if you think any of the content is worth downloading and keeping. There were no updates at justteenmovie in the 30 days that I belonged to that site. -advertise friendly support, but I sent email asking for help over 30 days ago, never got a response. -basic site navigation is OK, but could be much easier to use. Met-art has more models and picture sets, but it's easier to find models and picture sets at Met-art than at Justteensite. The search feature could be improved a great deal. -jitter in some of the HDV vids. While you get very sharp images, it's annoying to see the images jittering on the screen while you watch the video. Bottom Line: cons (continued): -minor annoyance-Timeout disconnected from the site and have to re-login. -no resume support for zip file downloads of picture sets. These are large zip files, so if you get disconnected, have to restart the download from the start. -zip files for the high resolution pic sets only. No zip file for the low resolution pics in a photoset. -model bio data can often have errors or fantasy. Age of model is often given as 18 or 19, because this is a teen site. But I've seen models who are in their 20s listed as 18 or 19 (these are models I've seen on other sites or in pornstar databases). Also, country of origin can be wrongly listed. The site is selling youth, so don't let the facts get in the way, as for age. As for country, I've seen Russian girls listed as being from Argentina at 1 site. Porn is fantasy anyway, so why not Argentina? Bottom line: This is a major teen softcore site. Huge number of very attractive models, photosets, videos. Well worth a 1-month membership if you've never belonged to it. Also it's worth revisiting the site after a 6-12 month absence to catch up on the updated photosets and videos. 01-13-09  02:27pm Replies (1) Review 103 Latin Shemales (0) 56.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Zip file for photosets. -Multiple choice for video download quality: high, medium, low -No DRM. -No download limits. -Can download entire site contents in a few hours (11 videos + matching photosets is the entire site contents). -Long period before site timeout. Cons: -Tiny site. 11 videos with matching photosets. -Expensive price. $29.95/month if you join site directly. But join through Teen Mega World, for $19.95/month, and you get Latin Shemales included, with over 20 other sites as well. -Archive site. Apparently not updating. Don't know if it ever did update, because you only have 11 videos total (with matching photosets). -Default file name for dowloading video files is high, medium or low (depending on which you choose: high, medium or low quality-definition). So need to rename file by date or model if want to save these files. -No streaming option. -No model bio information given, except for the age of the tranny, which is listed as 18 or 19 for each tranny. Which I find suspect, because these trannys look older than 18 or 19. -The language is South American, not English. But there isn't a lot of conversation, it's mainly action. Some kissing at the start before getting into bj and other things. -No search. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -Unlike other network sites, there is no link to transfer to other bonus sites in this network. You have to open a page, with the URL in the address bar, and re-enter your login information to get inside a different site in the network. -There is a link for "bonus sites" at Latin Shemales, but it only opens a page with an advertisement/hot link for a gay dating service. It does not provide any links to the other network bonus sites you get by joining this network. BOTTOM LINE: This niche is definitely a different offering by the Teen Mega World network. Many of the network sites have content that could be interchangeable, but shemales is a niche that is different from the usual pornsite offering. This is hardcore tranny action: doing whatever a guy and tranny can do to each other. The guy does the tranny, the tranny does the guy, so the tranny is definitely not just doing the woman's part, but acting like both a man and a woman, and the guy is acting like a bisexual, except he's getting his action from a tranny instead of a man and a woman. The action is not rough or gonzo style. It's actually friendly sex. Both partners are having a good time and enjoying themselves. No fake screams and moans. These aren't models who are just putting on a show: they are getting paid and also having a good sex experience. High quality videos: Frame width x height: 720x406 or 640x480 Total bitrate: 6064kbps or 3064kbps Video runtime: 18-21 minutes Number of videos: 11 Photosets: Number of photosets: 11 (each photoset matches one video). Number of photos per set: 58-111 photos, most sets are 62-77 photos. Photo size: 30-56 KB. Width x Height: 640x480 pixels. Horizontal x Vertical Resolution: 96x96 dpi The photos are low-quality screen caps. On the TBP review page, it states content count has not changed since December 2006. That was 11 videos. Site currently has 11 videos. So apparently the video posting dates are not accurate. Because 3 videos are dated 0000-00-00, and 3 videos are dated 2011-04-02 (today's date). A tranny lover would probably not join this network because the contents of the one tranny site are so small. But if you belong to the network anyway, then it might be worthwhile glancing over what the site offers. Or maybe not. I looked at all the videos at this site, because there are only 11, to get an idea of the video quality of the videos. The video quality is basically very good: clear focus and definition, good lighting, good sound, good colors of skintones. The trannies are ok-looking to nice-looking. Bottom line: Because the site is so small, even a tranny lover will not get much satisfaction from the site. If you like tranny, you will probably like the videos, but there are only 11 of them. 04-02-11  07:41am Replies (4) Review 104 Lay The Kat (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -Long time before site timeout. -Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening. -The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site. -Zip files for the photosets. -Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip. Cons: -Archive site. No updates since September 2007. -Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets. -Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend. -More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment. -Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other. -The videos are not dated. -No search function. -No model bio. -No streaming option. -Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos. -Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition. -Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded. Bottom Line: The site is part of the Diesel Access network. The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing. LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend. LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network: At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets. At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets. Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets. Video stats: Number of videos: 44 Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download. Sample dimensions: Height x Width: 852x480 Total bitrate: 4258 kbps Photos stats: Number of photosets: 57 Number of photos per photoset: 80+ Width x Height: 799x1200 or Width x Height: 1198x1800 Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc. The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused. Bottom Line: Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted. However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like. 11-12-12  04:42pm Replies (1) Review 105 Lesbian Factor (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -First month PU discounted price of $14.95. Recurs at at $29.95/month. -Site is part of the Fame Digital network. You get access to over 20 sites, including the main sites of: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD Any one of the sites listed above is worth the membership price. Plus you also get access to a boatload of additional hardcore porn at the other niche sites. -The same login details (username and password) work for each of the sites you have access to. -Login and member pages are https. -There are trailers for the videos. So you can get a preview of the video instead of watching the entire video. -There is 24/7 support on live chat, which is the best customer support service I've ever encountered. Fast response, helpful agents who know how the site/network works. Cons: -The main con is they re-designed the site and network a few years back. The re-design made the site and network harder to use, slower to navigate. See the bottom line section for more details on the re-design flaws. -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites. -Billing agent is FameHelp. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable and easy to deal with. However, I've used FameHelp a number of times in the past, and never had a problem with them. Bottom Line: Site stats: Movies: 234 DVD: 58 Pornstars: 347 Those stats are for the Lesbian Factor site. But with network access, you have thousands of videos, thousands of porn stars, thousands of pictures. The re-design for the site/network made using the content much harder. They eliminated the old drop-down menu that allowed you to easily switch between sites. The old drop-down menu also made it easy to know what sites you had access to. The contents of each site are no longer separated for each site, but you get videos from other sites shown on the content page for each site So it's more difficult to explore what the contents of a site include (because you have random thumbnails from other network sites thrown in on each page). If you are at this site, Lesbian Factor, the easiest way to switch to another site in the network is to open a new web page, and log in to the new site from there. Instead of simply hitting a drop-down menu to switch, which was the older design. Not all changes were bad. The old sites had model lists that often did not have a thumbnail for the model. And finding her videos at the site was problematic. The new model lists have photos for all the models I checked. And the newer model page shows her videos at that site (not for the entire network). Which makes it harder to find the model's content--since you have to search each site to see if she is present. -This is a pro and a con: You get access to so much hardcore porn, that it's difficult to pore through all the content, to find what appeals to you. So you need energy and determination to slog through the material. But there are videos that can blow you away, the first time you see them. The raw energy and sex and physicality are impressive. Especially in some of the older scenes. You don't get the glamcore treatment, this is raw, hardcore sex. So it doesn't have the higher definition of current videos, expensive sets, or elaborate makeup for the models, but some of the older videos are gems. I should mention that the site and network has an outstanding live chat support service. The live chat support is 24/7. One of the best live chat services I've ever used. The techs are quick to answer a chat, and are courteous and knowledgeable about using the site and network. When I last joined, I had a few issues about the site re-design, and the live chat line was fast to respond, and answered my question easily. Much faster than waiting for an email response, and better than calling on the phone, since, for me, it's easier to read a text message on my computer than talking on the phone with no written record to refer to. Many of the older scenes have a gonzo feel. You can easily find some jiggering of the image (the camera is not held steady), a lack of focus (camera guy does not frame each shot very well) poor lighting, and other mistakes that take away from watching a porn scene. The newer videos, in addition to higher definition, have better quality tech factors: focus, slightly better lighting, etc. But don't expect the videos will match the glamcore sites like X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy in quality (definition, lighting, making the models glamourous, sound control, focus). The Fame videos are basically gonzo hardcore sex. Although there is a huge amount of content available in the network, because of navigation issues, it's hard to find the gems that you will appreciate. I wish that they would go back to the old design, since it was much simpler, cleaner, easier to use. But it's been around 4 years since they went to the new design, so that won't happen. I'm giving the site and network a score of 80. That's generous, because the network re-design really fucked up the value of the site and network, making it harder to find the content, to explore the content, to switch between sites, to know what specific sites you have access to, to find the content of a model. But there are some videos that are really good, if you can find them. 06-05-18  01:05am Replies (0) Review 106 Lesbian Factor (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 for first month (then recurs at $29.95/mo.) -No DRM. -No download limits. -Content is dated. -Long time before site timeout. -You can watch the videos streaming, or download them. -The models in the videos are identified. -You click on a hot link of the model's name, and you get a thumbnail of the model, and the network sites she appears at. It would be nice if there were hot links to each video she was in. Instead, you have to go to each individual site, and then search for her videos. And since you can't switch freely between sites, you first have to login to your signup site, and then go to the site that you want. And then you can search for her videos at that site. Cons: -Last update was 2011-12-19.Before that, the update rate was very irregular, sometimes every 10 days, then no updates for several months. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at sign up, or you will be signed up for a trial subscription to a different site. -Although the soundtrack is clear, all the moans and groans of passion sound fake. So instead of adding to the excitement, it detracts. I've seen videos where the girls looked and sounded like they were really getting off. But in these videos, the girls are giving a poor performance. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 234 movies. The number of movies (or videos) hasn't changed since the TBP review dated 2011-05-30, although 6 videos at the site have a posting date after 2011-05-30. So this is more of an archive site, where you can expect few, if any, updates. The videos run about 20 - 34 minutes. Can watch the videos streaming: High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Can download as MP4 or WMV files. High definition is 480p. Low definition is 240p. Part of the netFame Solutions (Fame Digital) network. Some of the main bonus sites include: Devils Film Peter North DVD Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint As the name implies, this is a hardcore lesbian site. You get a variety of solo, two girls, three girls. With and without toys. I watched a number of the videos. I thought they were OK, but nothing special. The videos are competently shot, OK camera work, OK lighting and sound control. Most videos are shot indoors, in a living room or bedroom, which makes shooting the video easier. I wish the videos were higher resolution (480p is the highest offered, which seems poor, to me). And wished that the sex was more erotic or sexy. Maybe I'm jaded, but the videos left me bored. The main value of joining this site is that it gives you access to the netFame Solutions network, which has some worthwhile sites. 05-11-12  10:31am Replies (1) Review 107 Lesbian Girl On Girl (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month for this site. Join Naughty Amnerica for $9.95 for the first month, and you get full access to this site. -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to work with. -Can stream or download videos. -Can choose between multiple definitions for download. -Choice of multiple definitions for download of full movie. -Choice of multiple definitions for download of specific clips from each movie. -Each video has an accompanying photoset that illustrates the action of the video. -Zip file for each gallery. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -I don't find the models attractive. That's personal taste. I don't like fake boobs. Don't like tattoos. The models are below average in looks. They aren't cute or pretty or lovely--unlike many porn models at glamor sites or hardcore sites like Teen Mega World or Diesel network. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 8 videos. 8 matching galleries. Lesbian Girl on Girl is one of my favorite sites on Naughty America. The site has 8 videos and 8 matching photo sets. That's it. The first video has a posting date of 2012-12-12. The last video has a posting date of 2013-01-15. The reason it is my favorite site at Naughty America is that it gives me faith that I can open up my own porn site. And maybe make a lot of money. If Naughty America can offer a site with only 8 videos (and matching photo sets), there nothing to stop me from doing it as well. To open my site, I would be willing to buy 10 videos, which is two more than what Lesbian Girl on Girl boasts. Edit: some of my remarks are meant as tongue in cheek. Why have a site with only 8 videos? The owners probably thought it would be a useful site to offer some content in this niche. So they opened the site, and posted 8 videos. And stopped posting new videos within the first month. So, why keep it as a separate site? The main reason would be to advertise that Naughty America has one additional site to offer customers. And you don't find out that this site is so tiny until after you sign up. As far the videos are concerned: I actually prefer these videos over some of the other niches that Naughty America features. The reason is the story or plot is minimal. So there is less of the bad acting these models do in leading up to the sex. The sex itself is not very believable. These are porn stars getting paid to act sexy, make a lot of fake moaning noises to show how aroused they are. The acting is not convincing, the sex is not hot. Some lesbian porn can be hot, but none of the videos at this site are very interesting. They are basically a waste of time to watch. This is personal opinion, but I don't find most of the models at Lesbian Girl on Girl (or Naughty America) that attractive. I don't like fake boobs. I don't like tattoos on women. Bottom line: Even if you like lesbian porn, I doubt this site will have much value, because it's so tiny. And the videos are plain vanilla. They have no heat. No interest. Giving the site a score of 65. 05-24-16  03:58am Replies (2) Review 108 Lingerie AV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The main plus is that the porn is not censored. You don't have the pixillation/mosaic effect that you find with most Japanese porn blocking the genitals. -The models are attractive Japanese females, in late teens or early twenties. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Excellent download speeds. I was getting over 5 MB/s, which is my max download speed. -Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. -Professionally shot scenes. -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. -There is an accompanying photo set for each scene. -Can stream or download the scenes. Multiple choices for both streaming and download quality. Cons: -The search could be greatly improved. --A couple of ways to improve the search: ---1. Have nice-sized thumbnail of each model, to show clearly what she looks like. ---2. When you type the name of the model in the search box, only return the scenes with her. Currently, you get a mish-mash of scenes with the model's name, and any name that might be similar. Note: there is a single page for each model, which gives a nice-sized thumbnail, and a brief description of the model. But you have to click on the model's name to get to that page. They should add a section where they have the models listed alphabetically, with a nice sized thumbnail to make browsing the models easier. -Pre-checked cross-sale on signup page. -No zip file for the accompanying photo sets. Bottom Line: Part of the JAV HD network. Over 1,100 scenes. Site theme is Japanese models wearing lingerie and then having sex. The sex covers all the usual types: female masturbation, toys, boy-girl, older man-young girl, group, etc. Even though the site theme is Japanese models wearing lingerie, there really isn't a lot of attention paid to that idea. Yes, the girl might be wearing a bra and underpants in a scene, but she is soon naked. There is very little strip-tease or sensuous undressing or focus on lingerie. The site is using the idea of lingerie to distinguish itself from other porn sites, but little real emphasis is placed on lingerie. If you just browse through the scenes, I doubt if you would categorize the site as lingerie-themed. Instead, you would just categorize the site as a smorgasbord of Japanese sex scenes. So, what can you expect from the site? A variety of scenes where one or more Japanese maidens are having sex. There is little emphasis on the lingerie they might be wearing. For example: In one video: The scene is titled: "Girl in Asian lingerie made to suck and fuck on cam". The model is Narumi Ayase, and she is cute, in her late teens or early twenties. An older man, in his forties or fifties, kisses and caresses her. Narumi is wearing a white T-shirt and shorts, the T-shirt and shorts come off, underneath she has a bra and panties, and they soon come off. The bra and panties are nothing special, but they fulfill the requirement of lingerie, I assume. And Narumi and the man have sex. If this were an American or European scene, the guy would probably be a teenager. But with Japanese porn, it seems to be more common for the guy to be older, is often in his thirties, or forties. And most of the Japanese women have pubic hair. The bald vagina fashion has not yet migrated to Japan. A different scene, titled: "Hot Asian lingerie chick goes wikd on a big dick". This stars Chiemi Yada, another cute Japanese idol. The scene starts out with Chiemi getting fucked by a guy in his thirties. Chiemi is wearing a pink bikini. So maybe that somehow fulfills the idea of "lingerie". Eventually, she loses the bikini while they are fucking. A different scene, titled: "Sexy Asian in lingerie fucked by her horny teacher". This scene stars Yui Kasugano. Although this scene appears in the Lingerie AV site, it is also featured in the SchoolGirlsHD site (part of the JAV HD network), under the title of: "Asian schoolgirl goes nasty on teacher's dick". Same scene, but listed under a different title. So if you want to collect all the videos of a particular model at the JAV HD network, you have to watch each scene, to avoid collecting duplicate scenes that have different titles. Giving the site a score of 80. There are a lot of hardcore sex scenes, professionally shot. Without the normal Japanese mosaic censorship. 03-05-16  06:35pm Replies (0) Review 109 Lolly Hardcore (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Lolly Hardcore is a site dedicated to the hardcore teen model Lolly, who performed under a variety of names, from 2007 through about 2016. But the last update to this site was in September, 2013. -Lolly appeared (under different names) at a wide variety of sites: Amourangels, Averotica, Domai, Eroticbeauty, Goddessnudes, Justteensite, MetArt, TheLifeErotic, TMW, etc. -Membership in Lolly Hardcore gives you access to the entire TMW (Teen Mega World network). However: I recommend joining the site through the main TMW site. See the bottom line for a more complete explanation: but the network update a few years ago messed up navigation, and messed up the search function. Do your self a favor and join through the TMW main site, and not through one of the satellite sites. Cons: -The biggest con for most people is that the site stopped updating in September, 2013. For most people, they would consider the site an abandoned orphan, hardly worth visiting. But I think Lolly (the main star of the site) is a cute, infectious girl who enjoys sex. She is so lovely, it's a pleasure to watch her perform. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Non-secure login and non-secure member pages. Disappointing. Many porn sites have switched to https (secure pages). The TMW network should upgrade to https. -Small site. 94 videos. 94 matching photosets. -The photoset is made from screencaps of the video. So the quality is poor. Poor centering, poor posing (since the models are not posing for a photo, but doing a video shoot, and the screencaps are not photographically posed), poor quality of the images. -The screencaps are not crisp and clear. Since Lolly and her fellow models are cute (or at least energetic in their sex), you wish the images were better. CONS CONTINUE BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -Because this is an archive site, TMW made the decision that you can't stream some videos: you have to download the file, and watch offline. Stupid. Treat the site like a full-flavored site, with streaming and any other options given to other network sites. -Also, you can't stream the photos in a photoset online, but have to view each photo separately. Better to download the zip file and use a player. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): Lolly Hardcore is a small archive site that stopped updating in September, 2013. For many people, that would be the overriding fact about the site. Who wants to watch an old (Lolly was probably a teen during most of the shoots at the site) porn star perform? Except, for me, Lolly was such a pretty little girl, who made sex fun. So, if most people would rate the site in the 70s (or less), I enjoy visiting Lolly like a fond memory of when sex was fun, and girls could be cute. That's me. Most other people seem to prefer the latest model, the hottest action, the newest fad. Whatever. Based on the small size of the site (94 videos), and the archival nature (the last video was added in September, 2013, many people might give the site a score of 72. In my opinion, the site is worth a far higher score. For 2 main reasons: -Lolly, the main star of the site, is such a cute, energetic girl who really seems to enjoy her body, by herself and with the odd boy or girl. -Along with the Lolly Hardcore site, you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. That means you get access to 33 teen sites, covering a wide variety of niches. Because of the Teen Mega World access, and because Lolly is such a cutie, my personal score raises Lolly to 92. However, many PU members have argued that: -A site should be scored on its own merits, and not on network access. -An archive site should be scored lower, because it's stopped updating. So for most people, a score of 72 seems to be fair. But I personally enjoy the site and the network far above 72. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. The girls are not as pretty as the girls at Diesel Access (except Diesel Access dropped that name, and is marketing All Fine Girls as a separate site, and the two wow sites, Wow Girls and Wow Porn, as a combo). Except that if you remain a member of one of the wow sites or All Fine Girls for over 2 months (I believe that's correct, but the rules are not plainly stated), you get access to all three sites in what used to be the Diesel Access network. But TMW has 1383 models, many of them attractive, some very attractive, and many of them put on a good show. Note: exact stats are not reliable: TMW advertises 1,383 models at the site; but also advertises 2,000 plus models at the site. So TMW and Diesel Access are 2 of my favorite hardcore teen porn networks. Note: TMW did a network update a few years ago. This messed up the navigation and search. When you join one of the satellite sites, you need to log in to the original site you joined. Even when you try to move to one of the other sites, you are still partially logged in to your join site. This makes searching and exploring any one site difficult and time-consuming, since you can't fully see the site you are exploring, but still partially logged in to your join site. Also, even more important: The search is site-specific. If you join through one of the satellite sites, instead of the TMW main site, your search is limited to the site you joined. Even if you switch to another site in the network, the search only returns hits from the site you joined, not the site you are partially logged in to. This makes searching for a model's content at the network a nightmare. But if you joined through TMW main site, the search covers the entire network, making the search easy. So do yourself a favor and join through the TMW main site, and not through any of its satellite sites. This was the situation when I joined about 2 years ago, and the situation about 1 year ago. I don't believe they have fixed the network structure or the search function since then. But since there is no blog in the network, I believe my warnings are useful, but I can't be positive they are 100% accurate. But the TMW staff apparently don't realize how much of a problem the network update caused, because there is no network blog to discuss or complain about such issues. I did a check today for the search: the search results are still limited to the site you joined through. So, like I said, join through the TMW site and the network becomes much easier to use. That one tip is worth the entire review. 01-11-19  08:12pm Replies (0) Review 110 Lolly Hardcore (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I'M WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95/MONTH. -PART OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE NETWORK SITES. -LOLLY IS A CUTE BLONDE TEEN. SHE SHOWS ENTHUSIASM AND WILLINGNESS TO TRY DIFFERENT TYPES OF SEX: MASTURBATION, TOYS, G/G, G/B, B/G/G, B/B/G. -GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. I GET AROUND 2 MB/s. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -NO DRM. -LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT. SO YOUR DOWNLOAD LINKS WON'T TIMEOUT BEFORE DOWNLOADING IS FINISHED. Cons: CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR: THERE ARE TWO MAIN NEGATIVES ABOUT THE SITE: FIRST, THE SITE IS SMALL. TOTAL CONTENT IS LESS THAN A COMBINED 100 VIDEOS + PHOTOSETS. SECOND: THE SITE IS AN ARCHIVE: THAT STOPPED UPDATING YEARS AGO. TO OFFSET THAT, YOU GET ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -VENDO IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE RELIABLE AND EASY TO DEAL WITH. BUT VENDO HAS NEVER GIVEN ME ANY PROBLEMS IN THE PAST. -THE ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF MODELS IS CLUNKY. YOU HAVE OVER 1,000 MODELS, AND TO PAGE THROUGH THE LIST TAKES A WHILE, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE LIST NEEDS MANY MOUSE CLICKS TO SCROLL THROUGH THE NAMES FOR EACH LETTER. Bottom Line: TEEN MEGA WORLD STATS (2017-09-18): MODELS: 1,084 PHOTOS: 798,285 VIDEOS: 4,564 CONTENT: 7,302 GB THE LOLLY HARDCORE SITE IS RELATIVELY SMALL: TOTAL CONTENT IS LESS THAN 100 VIDEOS + PHOTOSETS. PHOTOSETS AVERAGE 100-130 PHOTOS EACH. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS IS SURPRISINGLY GOOD. THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS WERE ADDED TO THE SITE BETWEEN 2009 AND 2013. SOME REVIEWS HAVE STATED THE PHOTOSETS ARE SCREEN CAPS, OF LOWER QUALITY. I DON'T KNOW IF THE PHOTOSETS WERE UPGRADED, RE-MASTERED, OR REPLACED: BUT THE PHOTOS I'VE INSPECTED ARE GOOD QUALITY: CRISP, CLEAR IMAGES, GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD FOCUS, GOOD COLORS. TMW (TEEN MEGA WORLD) IS CONSIDERED BY MANY TO BE A HARDCORE NETWORK OF LOW-QUALITY CONTENT. THAT'S MISLEADING. THE NETWORK STARTED OUT WITH LOW-GRADE CONTENT. BUT OVER THE YEARS, THE OWNERS/MANAGERS HAVE DEVOTED TIME AND MONEY AND EFFORT INTO UPGRADING THE NETWORK: IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE CONTENTS, MAKING THE NETWORK EASIER TO USE, SPENDING TIME AND MONEY ON MORE EXPENSIVE SETS, BETTER EQUIPMENT, LIGHTING AND OTHER DETAILS. THE TMW NETWORK IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE HARDCORE SITES. IT'S NOT GLAMCORE, BUT: THE MIX OF THE MODELS IS VERY GOOD(I MEAN THE MODELS ARE BASICALLY ATTRACTIVE; I DON'T MEAN YOU GET DIFFERENT RACES AND BODY TYPES; BASICALLY, YOU GET SLENDER WHITE EASTERN EUROPEAN TEENS). THE NAVIGATION/EASE-OF-USE IS GOOD. LOLLY HARDCORE IS A CUTE BLONDE TEEN WHO APPEARS FRIENDLY AND ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT SEX. IF YOU'RE A MEMBER OF THE TMW NETWORK, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND BROWSING THE SITE, BECAUSE IT'S WORTH VIEWING-BOTH THE PHOTOSETS AND THE VIDEOS. DON'T EXPECT GLAMCORE OR MASTERWORKS OF ART. BUT DO EXPECT TO SEE A YOUNG TEEN ENJOYING HER SEXUALITY. I THINK THE SITE DESERVES A SCORE OF 85. BASED ON THE SITE ITSELF, BUT THE VALUE IS DEFINITELY BOOSTED BY THE NETWORK ACCESS. 09-19-17  05:43am Replies (5) Review 111 Lolly Hardcore (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Teen Mega World network. -PU discount gives you access for $19.95/month through Teen Mega World. If you join lollyhardcore directly, you pay $29.95/month. -Content is dated. -No dowload limits. -No DRM. -Simple navigation, because the site is small. -Can stream or download videos. -Zip files for photosets. Cons: -This is an archive site. Last update was 2010-08-20. -Small site. Only 39 videos. -Photosets are basically a capture of the video shoot. The photos are better quality than a screen capture, but little effort is made to frame them properly. -Zip files only have one definition. No choice of low, medium or high. Bottom Line: -This is a single-model site featuring Lolly, a cute teen. She can be found at many different sites, under a number of different names: Alicia A, Alisa, Jenny, Juli, Katie, Lolli, Lolli A., Lolly A, Loly, Sveta, Yana. A few sites she appears at are Diesel network, Metart, Teen Mega World, Zemani, etc. As I said, you get this site with the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network, which gives you access to a large number of sites. Almost all these sites focus on teens, but you also might get access to a few niche sites, such as Boys Love 18 (gay), Latin Shemales, and El Porno Latino. The Teen Mega World network is one of the best bargains in teen hardcore videos, because it gives you a huge number of quality videos for a very low price. And there are a large number of models, many of them very attractive. -Site Statistics: Number of videos: 39 Video runtime: 11 to 20 minutes. Sexual action: solo girl, boy-girl sex, 1 girl-2 guys, girl-girl, blow job, masturbation, etc. Vids are offered as downloads in low, medium and high quality. But the high quality vids are 400 MB or less, for runtimes up to 20 minutes. So the definition is far less than what is offered at other Teen Mega World/Royal Cash sites. But the videos are still good, because Lolly is so cute, and she gives an enthusiastic performance. This is another offering from the Teen Mega World network, and it's worth visiting. Lolly is a cute blonde teen, from Eastern Europe. Her videos show a lovely young teen who really enjoys her sexual encounters. Whether it's acting or not, she comes across as a bubbly, fun-loving girl, and that personality makes her videos more real and believable and exciting. The only downside would be, if I could find a girl like her in real life, I'd be dead or in a hospital after one or two days. It would take a teenager or someone in their twenties to handle a girl like her. 05-22-12  01:31am Replies (4) Review 112 Love Hairy (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT. -PART OF THE METART NETWORK. SO YOU CAN ASSUME THE PRODUCTION VALUES AND MODELS AND PHOTOGRAPHY/VIDEOGRAPHY ARE HIGH QUALITY. -LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE. $7.99/MONTH. $60/YEAR. -SOMETIMES YOU CAN SIGN UP FOR A FREE 2-DAY FULL TRIAL THROUGH A METART NETWORK SITE. HOWEVER, AFTER THE 2 DAY TRIAL, THE MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $19.00/MONTH, UNLESS YOU CANCEL FIRST. SO IF YOU WANT AN EXTENDED MEMBERSHIP, CANCEL THE TRIAL AND JOIN THROUGH THE PU LINK FOR A MUCH LOWER PRICE. -YOU GET A CONFIRMING EMAIL IF YOU TAKE THE 2-DAY FREE TRIAL. THIS IS NEEDED BECAUSE YOU ARE ASSIGNED A PASSWORD BY THE SYSTEM, INSTEAD OF CHOOSING YOUR OWN. SO TO USE THE TRIAL, YOU NEED THE PASSWORD. -SUPPORT IS 24/7, AND IS EXCELLENT. -PHOTOS ARE IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION. -ZIP FILES FOR EACH PHOTOSET IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH DEFINITION. -VIDEOS ARE ALSO IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION. Cons: -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -THE CONFIRMING EMAIL GIVES YOU YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD. BUT IT DOES NOT SPELL OUT THE TERMS OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP. THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE INTRO PAGES FOR YOUR JOIN PAGES. ALL THE CONFIRMING EMAIL SHOWS IS YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD AND THE SITE YOU HAVE ACCESS TO: IT DOES NOT STATE HOW LONG THE TRIAL RUNS, THE MEMBERSHIP TRIAL PRICE, OR THAT THE TRIAL TURNS INTO A MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP AT $19.00 WHEN THE TRIAL ENDS UNLESS CANCELLED. -THE TRIAL MEMBERSHIP USES ROCKETGATE BILLER. THE NORMAL BILLERS ARE CCBILL AND EPOCH, WHICH ARE BETTER KNOWN. I'VE HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH ROCKETGATE IN THE PAST, BUT CCBILL AND EPOCH ARE EASIER TO USE, MORE FAMILIAR. -MUCH OF THE CONTENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON OTHER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK. I'M GUESSING THAT MANY OF THE PHOTOSETS WERE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON METART.COM, SINCE THAT IS THE LARGEST SITE IN THE NETWORK. BUT THERE IS ALSO SOME CONTENT FROM OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS THE LIFE EROTIC. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): WHENEVER A MODEL HAS UNSHAVEN PUBIC HAIR, HER CONTENT MIGHT APPEAR ON LOVE HAIRY AFTER FIRST APPEARING ON ONE OF THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES. I AM UNSURE IF ANY CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE TO THE LOVE HAIRY SITE. THE ONLY WAY TO CHECK WOULD BE IF THE SITE ITSELF PUT OUT A NOTICE ON THE SITE'S CONTENT, BREAKING IT DOWN INTO EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, WHICH IS PROBABLY A NEGATIVE FACTOR TO ADVERTISE. AT MANY PORN SITES, YOU CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY ADVERTISE, BECAUSE THE CLAIMS ARE EITHER OUT-OF-DATE OR OUTRIGHT LIES. THE METART NETWORK ENJOYS A HIGHER STATUS: YOU CAN TRUST WHAT THEY WRITE, WHAT THEY ADVERTISE. LET ME MODIFY THAT: THE SITE USES HYPERBOLE IN DESCRIBING THEIR MODELS: THE METART MODELS ARE, IN THE WORDS OF THE METART STAFF, THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD. THE LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS IS EXTREMELY HIGH, BUT TO THINK THEIR MODELS ARE THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD IS JUST OVERKILL. THE METART STAFF SPEND A LOT OF TIME TRYING TO KEEP THE METART NETWORK RUNNING AS SMOOTHLY AS POSSIBLE. RECENTLY, THERE HAVE BEEN SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES AT THE METART NETWORK SITES: PROBLEMS LOGGING IN TO THE SITES, PROBLEMS DISPLAYING OR DOWNLOADING THE CONTENTS, ETC. BUT OVER TIME, THE NETWORK HAS BEEN ONE OF THE BETTER NETWORKS TO JOIN. -I DON'T LIKE THE SOFTWARE MECHANISM FOR VIEWING PHOTOS ONLINE. IT'S CLUNKY, SLOW TO LOAD INDIVIDUAL PHOTOS, SLOW TO MOVE TO THE NEXT PHOTO. MUCH EASIER TO DOWNLOAD THE ZIP FILE AND VIEW WITH A PROGRAM FROM YOUR COMPUTER. -IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE: NEW PHOTOSET ONCE A DAY, ONCE IN 2 DAYS, ONCE IN 4 DAYS, ONCE IN 7 DAYS, ONCE IN 14 DAYS. WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): SITE THEME IS GIRLS WHO DON'T SHAVE THEIR VAGINAS COMPLETELY. SOME PORN ADDICTS BELIEVE IN THE CURRENT STYLE OF CLEAN IS BETTER: HEALTHIER, MORE ATTRACTIVE. OTHER PORN ADDICTS YEARN FOR THE GOLDEN DAYS, WHEN WOMEN HAD PUBIC HAIR. IT'S A MATTER OF TASTE. THIS IS ONE OF THE SMALLER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK. APPARENTLY, IT STARTED IN 2017. THE MODELS ARE MAINLY ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE. IF YOU LIKE THE OLD-STYLE WHERE GIRLS SPORTED SOME HAIR DOWN BELOW, THEN THE SITE MIGHT BE WORTH VISITING. SEVERAL REASONS: -THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE. -THE SITE CATERS TO AN APPRECIATION OF PUBIC HAIR. -THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO USE. GOOD NAVIGATION, GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. -METART CUSTOMER SUPPORT IS ONE OF THE FINEST SUPPORT TEAMS OF ANY PORN SITE: FAST RESPONSE, WITH AN ATTITUDE OF WANTING TO HELP THEIR CUSTOMERS. -LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE: $7.99/MONTH, $60/YEAR. HOWEVER, IF YOU HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE METART.COM SITE, OR SOME OF THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES, YOU WILL COME ACROSS CONTENT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE. WHICH WOULD BE A NEGATIVE FOR SOME PEOPLE--THEY DON'T LIKE PAYING TWICE FOR THE SAME CONTENT. ACTUALLY, IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT, THE BEST WAY TO USE LOVE HAIRY IS TO HAVE A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIPS TO METART.COM AND LOVEHAIRY.COM. THEN, IF YOU FIND A MODEL YOU LIKE, YOU CAN PROBABLY FIND MUCH MORE OF HER CONTENT AT METART.COM. THAT'S BECAUSE SEARCHING THROUGH THE VAST COLLECTION OF MODELS OR PHOTOSETS AT METART.COM CAN BE AN EXHAUSTING EXPERIENCE. I JUST DON'T HAVE THE ENERGY FOR IT ANY MORE. GIVE ME THE GOOD STUFF, WITHOUT ALL THE FILLERS (CONTENT I DON'T APPRECIATE OR THINK IT'S A WASTE OF TIME). BUT IF YOU HAVE THE TIME, YOU CAN DO THE SEARCHES AT METART: WHICH HAS A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF CONTENT FROM ABOUT 20 YEARS OF STEADY GROWTH OF PHOTOSETS AND VIDEOS. THE METART STATISTICS (FOR THE METART.COM SITE): AS OF 2017-09-24 MODELS: 3,404 PHOTOSETS: 17,579 VIDEOS: 1,431 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS: 277 THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT METART.COM, PLUS THE EASY NAVIGATION DESIGN, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPORT, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS, MAKE THIS THE FINEST SOFTCORE NUDE SITE ON THE INTERNET. WHICH IS WHY I PAID FOR A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP TO THE SITE. HOWEVER, THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT IS OVERWHELMING. METART.COM COULD BE SPLIT INTO 5 OR 6 SEPARATE PORN SITES, AND THEY WOULD ALL BE WORTH JOINING. GETTING BACK TO LOVE HAIRY: IT HAS A SURPRISING AMOUNT OF CONTENT, CONSIDERING IT'S A NEW SITE THAT STARTED IN 2017. BUT THEY ARE BUILDING THE SITE WITH CONTENT FROM THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES. NUMBER OF PHOTOSETS: 355 NUMBER OF VIDEOS: 128 THIS IS MORE OF A PHOTO SITE THAN A VIDEO SITE. HOWEVER, THE VIDEOS ARE OFTEN MORE EROTIC, MORE HARDCORE, THAN THE STANDARD METART.COM VIDEOS, BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING THE VIDEOS FROM THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES, WHICH FEATURE A HARDER APPROACH TO SEX AND EXPLICITNESS: IN MANY OF THESE VIDEOS, YOU MIGHT SEE ACTUAL MASTURBATION, LESBIAN LOVEMAKING, OR -- WHAT IS FORBIDDEN IN THE METART.COM SITE, A MAN APPEARING IN THE VIDEO HAVING SEX WITH A WOMAN. (MEN ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE METART.COM SITE). BOTTOM LINE CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION: 09-24-17  04:18am Replies (1) Review 113 Low Art Films (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. -SECURE LOGIN. -SECURE MEMBER PAGES. -PART OF THE DEVILS FILM NETWORK (FAME DOLLARS, GAMMA ENTERTAINMENT). YOU GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC DEVILS FILM NETWORK OF SITES. -EACH VIDEO HAS A TRAILER, THAT GIVES YOU A GOOD IDEA OF WHAT THE VIDEO IS. (NOT A PRO: WHEN YOU PLAY A TRAILER, YOU ARE EJECTED FROM THE LOW ART FILMS SITE INTO THE MAIN NETWORK HOME AREA, AND HAVE TO CLICK ON HOT LINKS TO GET BACK INTO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE.) Cons: -ARCHIVE SITE. NO UPDATES SINCE 2012-01-07. -SMALL SITE: 82 VIDS TOTAL. -ONE OR TWO PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE AT JOIN PAGES. -THE LAST RECENT UPDATE FOR THE NETWORK STRUCTURE (DONE AROUND 3 MONTHS AGO) ELIMINATED THE DROP-DOWN MENU THAT SHOWED ALL THE SITES YOU GET ACCESS TO, REPLACING IT WITH A FLOATING LIST OF LINKS THAT ARE HARDER TO USE. THE DROP-DOWN LIST WAS EASY TO SEE, EASY TO USE. THE NEW SYSTEM IS HARDER TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITES. AND THE CONTENTS OF EACH SITE ARE LESS EASY TO ACCESS IN THE NEW SYSTEM, EVEN AFTER YOU ARE INSIDE THE SELECTED SITE. ALSO, THE NEW STRUCTURE IS LESS STABLE THAN THE OLD NETWORK STRUCTURE. SOMETIMES THE STANDARD HOME PAGE DISAPPEARS, AND YOU HAVE TO CLICK ON PARTS OF THE SCREEN TO BRING UP THE HOME PAGE LINKS THAT ALLOWS YOU TO ACCESS THE DIFFERENT SITES. ALL IN ALL, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS MORE STABLE, EASIER TO USE, THAN THE UPDATED STRUCTURE THAT IS MORE COLORFUL, BUT HARDER TO USE. CONS ARE CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -YOU PLAY THE TRAILER FOR A VIDEO, AND WHEN THE TRAILER ENDS, YOU ARE PUT BACK INTO THE HOME PAGE OF THE NETWORK, AND HAVE TO NAVIGATE BACK TO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE, WHICH TAKES A COUPLE CLICKS (-BECAUSE THE HOME PAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE LINK BACK TO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE, YOU HAVE TO CLICK THE RIGHT LINK TO BRING UP THE LOW ART FILMS SITE LISTING). -THE LOW ART FILMS SITE FEATURES LOW-RENT PORN STARS IN ARTSY VIDEOS. NOT MY FAVORITE NICHE. -PORN STARS FEATURE LOTS OF FAKE BOOBS AND TATTOOS. -FAMEAID.COM IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. TRY TO GET EPOCH OR CCBILL WHEN JOINING. I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST FAMEAID, BUT EPOCH AND CCBILL ARE OUTSTANDING BILLERS, EASY TO ACCESS, REPUTABLE. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): LOW ART FILMS IS AN ARCHIVE SITE. THE LAST UPDATE WAS JANUARY 2012. SITE HAS 82 VIDEOS (AND ACCOMPANYING PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO). LOW ART FILMS IS PART OF THE FAME DOLLARS NETWORK (DEVILS FILM NETWORK, GAMMA ENTERTAINMENT, NETFAMESOLUTIONS). DEVILS FILM NETWORK INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING MAIN SITES: DEVILS FILM PETER NORTH ROCCO SIFFREDI SILVERSTONE DVD SILVIA SAINT AS WELL AS A NUMBER OF OTHER SITES. SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE WORTHWHILE SITES, WHILE SOME OF THE OTHER SITES ARE NICHES THAT MIGHT APPEAL TO DIFFERENT TASTES. -OVER THE YEARS, THEY HAVE TRIED UPDATING THE NETWORK. YEARS AGO, MANY OF THE MODEL LISTINGS WERE INCOMPLETE: THEY WOULD SHOW A NAME, BUT NO THUMBNAIL OF THE MODEL. NOW THE MODEL'S PAGE HAS A THUMBNAIL TO SHOW YOU WHAT THE MODEL LOOKS LIKE, AS WELL AS LINKS TO HER VIDEOS. THAT IS A MAJOR IMPROVEMENT. TBP CATEGORIZES THE SITE AS GLAMOUR. I WOULD INSTEAD LIST THE SITE AS SLUTTY-LOOKING PORN STARS, WHICH GIVES A BETTER IDEA OF THE STYLE THE SITE IS GOING FOR. THIS IS NOT A GLAMOUR SITE IN THE METART, FEMJOY, MPL STUDIOS STYLE. THIS IS A SITE IN THE OLD "GIVE ME A BUNCH OF SLUTTY TRAMPS WHO WILL SHOW OFF THEIR SEX ACTS". THEY ARE TRYING TO INTERJECT AN ARTY APPROACH, SO THEY USE LOTS OF DIM LIGHTING. MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE LESBIAN OR SELF-MASTURBATION. THE SITE EMPHASIZES LESBIAN, BIG TITS, TOYS, TATTOOS, PIERCING (OF FEMALE NIPPLES), PUSSY-EATING, THE NETWORK UPDATED THE SITE STRUCTURE A FEW MONTHS AGO. THIS MADE NAVIGATING THE SITES MORE DIFFICULT. THEY ELIMINATED THE DROP-DOWN LIST WHERE YOU COULD MOVE BETWEEN SITES EASILY, AND TELL WHAT SITES YOU HAD ACCESS TO. INSTEAD, THEY REPLACED IT WITH FLASHIER LINKS THAT YOU SELECT WITH YOUR MOUSE: BUT SOME OF THE LINKS ARE HIDDEN UNDER OTHER LINKS, SO IT'S NOT AS OPEN OR EASY TO SEE WHAT YOUR SITES ARE, AND YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER WHICH SITE-LINKS ARE BURIED UNDER WHAT OTHER LINKS. A POOR CHOICE FOR THE UPDATED STRUCTURE: MAKING IT HARDER TO ACCESS THE DIFFERENT SITES, TO SEE WHAT IS INSIDE EACH SITE. ALSO, THE NEW HOT LINKS TO EACH SITE SEEM LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD DROP-DOWN LIST. YOU CLICK ON THE LINK, MAYBE IT BRINGS UP THE SITE YOU WANT, OR MAYBE YOU CLICK A FEW TIMES, AND IT BRINGS UP A DIFFERENT SITE. SO THE EASE OF USE OF THE SITE/NETWORK HAS DETERIORATED WITH THE NEW NETWORK STRUCTURE. THERE IS NO BLOG WHERE MEMBERS CAN POST THEIR COMMENTS, I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT I'M THE ONLY MEMBER WHO WISHES THE OLD SITE STRUCTURE WAS STILL AVAILABLE. I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCOREOF 69. THAT IS BASED ON: IT'S AN ARCHIVE SITE, WITH ONLY 82 VIDEOS, THAT STOPPED UPDATING IN JANUARY 2012. THE NICHE IS LOW-GRADE SLUTS PLEASURING THEMSELVES OR ANOTHER FEMALE. OCCASSIONALLY A MALE WILL MAKE AN APPEARANCE, BUT THE EMPHASIS IS ON FEMALE MASTURBATION OR LESBIAN SEX. IT'S AN INTERESTING IDEA FOR THE SITE (TRYING A GLAMORIZED APPROACH TO LOW-GRADE SLUTS), BUT THE IDEA IN PRACTICE DOES NOT WORK WELL. WHAT GIVES THE SITE VALUE IS THAT YOU GET FULL ACCESS TO THE BASIC DEVILS FILM NETWORK WITH ACCESS TO ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES. BASED ON THAT CRITERIA, THE SITE VALUE JUMPS INTO THE 80+ RANGE. 11-11-17  04:12am Replies (2) Review 114 Low Art Films (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -High definition videos. -Videos have good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. -Content is dated. -Long time before site timeout. -Easy login to site. -Can watch videos streaming or download. -Member pages are ad free. -Has a link to "Free Cams" and to "Live Cams". -List of models, with thumbnail of the model. Cons: -Last updated on 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site. -Has links to Rabbit's Porn Reviews. Not really a negative, but why the site has links to a porn review site seems odd. -Search is OK, but could be improved. You click on a model's name, and it lists the network sites she appears in. But it doesn't list her appearances at each site. And to get to the sites listed, have to manually switch to the specific site (instead of using a simple hot link). And then you can search for the model's appearances at that specific site. The Teen Mega World network, by contrast, makes it easier to switch between sites, and also to find the model's appearances, by using simple hot links. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at signup, or you will have subscribed to a trial offer you probably don't want. -In the categories search, they list 22 videos under college. But out of the 22 videos, all the models looked like porn models. No teens or fresh-faced girls at this site. Bottom Line: Videos sex scenes: man and woman having sex, lesbian, masturbation, toys, etc. 42 of the 82 videos are lesbian. Instead of calling the site lowartfilms, they could just as easily called it highartfilms. The sex is raw, but there is an erotic or sensous element in the videos. It goes beyond bread and butter fucking, and tries to make the sex passionate or exciting. They do this by providing unusual settings for the model, and by using costumes that are sensual or erotic. And the sex, while raw, has a buildup with a lot of kissing and touching. Models are in their twenties or thirties. Medium to large breasts. Site statistics: Stopped updating 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site. Number of videos: 82 80 of the 82 videos have high definition file option available. Streaming options: 240p, 480p, 540p. Download options: WMV 240p, 480p. MP4 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p. Video runtimes: from 14 to 27 minutes. Site is part of the netFameSolutions network. So you get this site along with access to a large number of the network sites. The main sites include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint The main sites include a boatload of hardcore videos. And the secondary and niche sites, while smaller, have a variety of videos that will give you plenty of videos to browse through. So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get a massive amount of hardcore videos. 06-04-12  01:49pm Replies (0) Review 115 Lust HD (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. -PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING). -EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER, A REPUTABLE COMPANY. -LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT. THIS HELPS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS. -DOWNLOAD MANAGERS ALLOWED. -NO DRM. -YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS. -EACH VIDEO HAS A ZIPPED PHOTOSET. -THE PHOTOSETS ARE GOOD QUALITY PHOTOS. THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE. Cons: -THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS COMPLAIN ABOUT TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS WITH THE NETWORK. THIS MEANS THEY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH DOWNLOADING FILES, STREAMING VIDEOS, AND/OR NAVIGATING THE SITE/NETWORK. THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS. SOME MEMBERS EXPERIENCE THESE PROBLEMS, OTHER MEMBERS REPORT THAT THEY DO NOT. I PERSONALLY HAVE NOT HAD ANY MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE/NETWORK, AND HAVE BEEN A CONTINUOUS MEMBER FOR OVER 12 MONTHS NOW. -THE LUST HD SITE AVERAGES 1 UPDATED VIDEO/PHOTOSET PER MONTH. HOWEVER, THE BASIC NETWORK UPDATES DAILY (1 VIDEO/PHOTOSET PER DAY). -MOST OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS IS EXCLUSIVE. HOWEVER, THE RUB-A-TEEN SITE CONTENTS ARE ALSO FOUND AT TEEN MEGA WORLD (THE TRICKY MASSEUR SITE) AND AT THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK. SEE THE BOTTOM LINE SECTION FOR MORE EXAMPLES OF NON-EXCLUSIVE TEAM SKEET CONTENT. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -NON-SECURE LOGIN TO MEMBER AREA. -NON-SECURE MEMBER PAGES. WHICH MEANS YOUR ISP KEEPS A RECORD OF YOUR PAYSITE VISITS. Bottom Line: -THIS IS ONE OF THE BETTER SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. THE SITE IS TEAM SKEET'S GLAMCORE OFFERING. -THAT MEANS: -THE MODELS ARE AMONG THE BEST LOOKING MODELS OF THE NETWORK. -THE MODELS ARE MADE UP TO LOOK THEIR BEST: MAKE-UP, COSTUME, SETTING. -THE SEX IS HARDCORE, BUT WITH A LOT OF KISSING AND EROTICISM THAT GOES BEYOND TWO BODIES SLAPPING AGAINST EACH OTHER. THE BEST PORN (TBP) REVIEW SITE STATES THAT ALL THE CONTENT AT THIS SITE AND AT THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EXCLUSIVE. I'VE WRITTEN REVEIWS AT PU FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW, THAT STATE THAT ALL (OR ALMOST ALL) THE CONTENT AT THE RUB A TEEN SITE (OF TEAM SKEET) IS ALSO FOUND AT TEAM MEGA WORLD (AT THE TRICKY MASSEUR SITE), AND AT DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK. THERE ARE OTHER EXAMPLES WHERE CONTENT FROM THE TEAM SKEET SITES CAN BE FOUND AT OTHER PAY SITES. FOR EXAMPLE: AT LUST HD, THE VIDEO/PHOTOSET TITLED "EURO TEEN THREESOME", POSTING DATE 2016-01-11, WAS POSTED AT FIRSTBGG ON 2015-10-03 (FIRSTBGG IS PART OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK). THAT SAME VIDEO WAS ALSO POSTED AT TEENDREAMS ON 2016-02-23. AT LUST HD, THE VIDEO/PHOTOSET TITLED "HOT AND HEAVENLY", POSTED 2017-09-02, HAS THE SAME PHOTOSET AT ALL FINE GIRLS (PART OF THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK) POSTED 2017-11-04. THE ACCOMPANYING VIDEO WILL PROBABLY BE POSTED LATER AT THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK. SO THERE IS SOME NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AT LUST HD AND AT OTHER SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. HOWEVER, THE BULK OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EXCLUSIVE, I BELIEVE. BOTTOM LINE: LUST HD IS A FINE ADDITION TO THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK. IF YOU HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED GLAMCORE PORN, THIS IS AN INEXPENSIVE INTRODUCTION: BECAUSE THE SITE MEMBERSHIP IS $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING) WITH A PU DISCOUNT. AND YOU ALSO GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK OF OVER 20 SITES WHICH COVER A WIDE VARIETY OF TEEN NICHES. I HATE TO KEEP REPEATING MYSELF, BUT THE MAIN PROBLEM WITH TEAM SKEET IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH AFFECTS DOWNLOADING, STREAMING, AND NAVIGATING THE NETWORK. IF YOU JOIN AND EXPERIENCE THESE PROBLEM, I RECOMMEND ASKING FOR A REFUND OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP PRICE. EITHER TEAM SKEET, OR EPOCH, THEIR PRIMARY BILLER, SHOULD AGREE TO THE REFUND. IF YOU GET ACCEPTABLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, THEN THE TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP TO THE 20+ SITES IS DEFINITELY A WORTHWHILE JOIN, IF YOU ARE INTO TEEN PORN. GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 80. 1. THE SITE ITSELF IS A GOOD GLAMCORE SITE. 2. SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK OF 20+ SITES. 3. MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. 4. MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET CONTENT WAS PROFESSIONALLY SHOT. GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD FOCUS, GOOD COLORS, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, ETC. 5. THE SITE (AND NETWORK) OFFERS MULTIPLE CHOICES FOR BOTH STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING THE VIDEOS. 6. THE PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE OR DOWNLOADED IN A ZIP FILE. THE ONLINE MECHANISM FOR VIEWING THE PHOTOS IN A PHOTOSET IS FAST AND EASY TO USE. BOTTOM LINE: I WOULD RATE THE SITE/NETWORK HIGHER, EXCEPT THAT SOME PU MEMBERS COMPLAIN ABOUT THE NETWORK PROBLEMS. 11-07-17  12:19am Replies (0) Review 116 Lust HD (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $17.87/month. -Epoch is the biller. A trusted name. -Can use PayPal, for added security of payment. -No download limits. -The software running the site gives wide choices to access the content: -You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You can download the videos in low, medium or high definition. -You can select the clips of a video, or choose the entire video, for streaming and/or downloading. -You get access to most of the Team Skeet network with membership to Lust HD. Access to the "Unlock" sites in the network costs extra. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Access to the "Unlock" sites in the network costs extra. -Small site. Only 85 scenes. -Recent update rate is 1 video every 2 months for Lust HD. However, the network updates with 1 video per day. Bottom Line: Site stats: 85 scenes. 85 galleries (1 for each scene). -This is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. -This is one of the glamorized sites in the network. -The videos are not just professionally shot (good camera-work, good lighting, good color control, good sound control), but the scenes are shot with a glamor-style approach, where they try to add an element of eroticism to the videos. This is a step below X-Art or other high-quality glamcore sites, but the scenes are a step above the contents at most of the other Team Skeet sites in terms of eroticism or glamor. TBP (The Best Porn) review of Lust HD states: "Another big plus is the fact that the entire site (as with every site in the network) is exclusive." This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) were previously posted at the Teen Mega World site Tricky Masseur. And many of the Rub A Teen videos were previously posted at 18 Only Girls (part of the Diesel network), which is now called All Fine Girls. Also, at the Lust HD site, the video titled "Euro Teen Threesome", with a current posting date of 2016-01-11, featuring Caroline and Chloe, was first posted to FirstBGG (part of the Teen Mega World network) on 2015-10-03. At the FirstBGG site, Chloe is named Angel. But Caroline keeps the same name. That same video was also posted at TeenDreams, with a posting date of 2016-02-23. I am writing "a current posting date", because some of these sites change the posting date for their contents. So don't expect 100% exclusive content at the Team Skeet network. Depending on your experience, you might find some content you have previously come across. Many of the Rub A Teen scenes were previously posted at other sites, so that could reduce your enjoyment of the Rub A Teen site. And a few scenes at other sites in the Team Skeet network might have been posted elsewhere. But most of the content I have seen at Team Skeet is exclusive. Personally, I think both Chloe and Caroline are cute, and the sex in "Euro Teen Threesome" is erotic and hot and definitely worth watching more than once. If all the scenes at Lust HD were as good as this video, I would rate the site in the high 90s. The scene starts off with Chloe and Caroline dressed in nice evening clothes, in a nice apartment, they start making out, some of the clothes comes off, revealing erotic lingerie the girls are wearing, the girls are kissing and caressing each other, nicely done, not crude, then a boy walks into the scene, and the girls include him in their lovemaking. In my opinion, this is one of the hottest, best videos in the site, and the network. Team Skeet network has a lot of cute teen models. The scenes are, in the main, professionally shot. A lot of the videos feature hot sex. So they are definitely worth watching. I don't like the "Unlock" sites in the network. You have to pay extra to gain access to those sites. I believe each "Unlock" site costs $17.87/month (recurring) with a PU discount. Membership in each "Unlock" site only grants access to that particular "Unlock site". And not to the general Team Skeet network sites, or to the other "Unlock" sites. Since the "Unlock" sites are basically small sites, I believe it's an expensive way to add to your porn collection. You are much better off paying for a mega-site or large porn site with an extensive collection for the same amount of money. Lust HD is a good site. For $17.87, you gain access to 85 scenes of young teens that puts some eroticism into the sex. You also gain access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network, which provides over 20 niche teen sites, with over 2,300 scenes. So you are getting your money's worth, especially if you can find the scenes that appeal to your personal tastes. Giving the site a score of 85. Personally, if you find the videos that appeal to you easily, you might give it a higher score. Or if you have to wade through a bunch of videos that are a waste of time, you might give it a lower score. But overall, the site is easy to use, and has a lot of useful features: like the ability to both stream and download the videos in multiple definitions, to select the parts of a video that you want to stream or download, good download speeds, no DRM, no download limits, etc. 08-13-16  09:42pm Replies (0) Review 117 Magic Porn (0) 61.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout. -Can download the videos. -Zip file for each photoset. -Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -DownThemAll file manager works at this site. Cons: -Primitive site layout. -No search. -Archive site. No updates. -Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low. -Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so you know what the video is about. -No model bios. -Models not named in the videos or photosets. -No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch. -Only one definition for each video. -Only one definition for each photoset. -You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like. Bottom Line: Videos: Number of videos: 106 Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216 Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes Photosets: Number of photosets: 532 Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170 Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels This is a hardcore teen site. Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site. I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them. The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor. The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money. 09-18-12  12:48am Replies (5) Review 118 Massage Creep (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Membership in Massage Creep gives you access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network. -The sites cover a variety of niches: massage, squirting, blowjob, etc. -A large number of mainly attractive, white models in their late teens, early twenties. -Professionally shot videos: clear images, good sound control, good lighting. -PU discount of $17.95/month. -OK download speeds. I averaged about 3-4 MB/sec. My max download speed limit is 6.25 MB/sec, which I rarely get. At most sites, I average about 4-5 MB/sec. -Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use manager. Cons: -There is a pre-checked cross sale on join page. NOTE: Even if you uncheck the cross sale, you might still be charged for the cross sale. So make sure you join through Epoch, which will send you an email if you are signed up for the cross sale. And Epoch will be able to cancel (and refund) the trial cross sale. -There is a $69.95 fee to upgrade to all the sites in the network. I hit the "No thanks" link to enter the regular site, but fear these idiots will charge me the $69.95 fee anyway, because they do not appear to recognize the word "No". -Requires captcha to log in to site. -First page at site is an upsale for $70 to access all the sites in the network. You have to view and accept or reject the upsale page to enter the member's area you paid for. --Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error. -Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states: Forbidden We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it. Bottom Line: 22 sites in network that Massage Creep/PornPros membership gives access to: 18YearsOld;40ozBounce;AmateurViolations; CockCompetition;CrueltyParty;CumDisgrace; CumshotSurprise;DeepThroatLove;Disgraced18; EuroHumpers;FlexiblePositions;FreaksOfBoobs; FreaksOfCock;JurassicCock;LOLCumshots; MassageCreep;MilfHumiliation PimpParade;RealExGirlfriends;ShadyPi; SquirtDisgrace;TeenBFF. Massage Creep theme: girl gets message, is so turned on by the masseur that they have sex. Massage is a popular theme in porn. And the Massage Creep site does this well. Although there is not much variety in the plot, the girls are young, attractive, and the sex can be hot. So Massage Creep is one of the better massage-themed porn sites. Site has 202 videos. Plus a matching photoset for each video. The photos are screencaps. You can choose to stream or download the videos. The streaming is offered in standard and HD definition. Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p. There is a zip file for each photoset. Only one definition for the zip file, not offered in high, medium and low. The quality of the screencaps is good, but not great. Much better than the screencaps that porn sites offered years ago, but: because many of the models are attractive, and the screencaps are almost-collectible in quality, you wish that the screencaps were even better, because then the photosets would really be worth collecting. You can view thumbnails of the photoset screencaps, or enlarge any individual photo, but if you want to view the entire photoset, the best idea is to download the zip and use a software program to slide show the photos. Otherwise, the software mechanism for viewing the photos online is clunky, and takes too many mouse clicks to move from one photo to the next. I am not technically proficient, so I don't understand how the screen caps are made from the video. But the Teen Mega World screen caps have better clarity than the Porn Pros screen caps. And I prefer the Teen Mega World mechanism for displaying the photos online over the Porn Pros system. Both Porn Pros and Teen Mega World are basically hardcore teen sites that focus on video over photos. But the Teen Mega World has made a large improvement over their past system of displaying the photos, and the quality of the Teen Mega World screen caps has also improved, to the point where many of the Teen Mega World photosets are worth collecting. Because the models are attractive young teens, and the images are centered and clear. The Teen Mega Word screencaps are not up to the standard of MetArt or MPL Studios, obviously, but in erotic content, they can sometimes surpass MetArt and MPL Studios. Partially because you are comparing Teen Mega World (hardcore teen) to what used to be softcore teen (MetArt and MPL Studios--that are now making an effort to increase the hardness of their content to attract today's porn audience). I've said it before, but I think it's worth repeating: My system for joining a site: -content that I can enjoy. -is easy to use. -gives value for the money I pay. -lack of annoying features. Massage Creep has content that I can enjoy. You get access to over 3,000 videos (at the Porn Pros network). Many of the models are young teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Attractive to very attractive. The girls seem to be mainly enjoying the sex. The site/network is OK to navigate. I wish they would remove the captcha for login. I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for "Upgraded" status costing $70. I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for other paysites. And I wish they would make the screencaps better quality, and the onscreen viewing of the screencaps easier. For $17.95/month, it's definitely worth a visit, to see what the site has to offer. But the site could be improved. 10-04-16  12:24am Replies (0) Review 119 Massage Girls 18 (0) 75.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -Epoch is billing agent: trusted name. -The videos are professionally shot. Good camera-work, good lighting, good focus, good sound control. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Long time before site timeout for inactivity. -Models are attractive: late teens, early twenties. -The videos can be streamed or downloaded. -Each video has a matching gallery--that is a photo shoot of the video. -Each gallery has a zip file for download. -Good download speed. I got about 3 MB/sec, while my max download speed is slightly over 5 MB/sec. Cons: -Pre-checked signup on join page. -The setup is the same for each video: a girl is supposed to give a guy a massage, which turns into a blow job and a fuck. There is very little variation in the action. -Not much heat to the sex. Bottom Line: MassageGirls18 is basically the reverse of its sister site, FuckedHard18. So what are the main differences between the two sites, other than the role reversal? In FuckedHard18, the guy is giving a sensual massage, the girl becomes aroused, and the guy fucks the girl. He is definitely in charge. And the girl is more than willing. The sex can be hot. In MassageGirls18, the girl has a more active role: she is supposed to be the masseuse. But the girls appear like newbies, they are not professional actors, so they are smiling and giggling and acting unsure of themselves, which detracts from the action. I'm not saying the FuckedHard18 site videos are completely believable, but they are more believable than the MassageGirls18 videos, where you know the girls are there to fuck the guy, and the massage element is just a flimsy excuse of a theme. And the sex has less heat, because it's more mechanical, at MassageGirls18. The girls need to be better actors, since they are supposed to be taking the lead role for this site, and their inexperience as actors is apparent. So the lead-in to the sex is much weaker. And the sex itself is also weaker. FuckedHard18 is a much better massage site than MassageGirls18. The FuckedHard18 videos are more believable, the sex is hotter. Giving the site a score of 75. When you compare this site to FuckedHard18, it's just disappointing. 02-14-16  12:41am Replies (0) Review 120 MetArt (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -In my opinion, the finest softcore glamour site on the internet. -The site is best of breed. For softcore teen photos. No other site comes close in terms of number of sets, frequency of updates. MPL Studios and Femjoy and some other sites are great, but MetArt is number one. -Currently, MetArt has a PU discount of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/month. This is one of the lowest prices I seen for MetArt at $9.99 for the first month. -The largest catalog of softcore glamour photo sets on the Internet. See bottom line for the current statistics. -A large number of contributing photographers. So you get a variety of approaches. Not all sets will appeal to any one person, but if you are into softcore teen photos, this site should have plenty of content that will satisfy your needs. I paid for a lifetime membership several years back, because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly memberships. It was the first porn site I paid for a lifetime membership. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -A large catalog of models: some of the cutest or most attractive teens on the planet. However, you can also find a huge number of attractive teens at competing sites such as MPL Studios or Femjoy or other glamour style sites. -Secure login and member pages: https. -Customer service is 24/7. One of the finest customer services of any porn site I've ever dealt with. The reps are friendly and helpful. CONS -The cons are stricly minor. -The sheer size of the site: it's the largest softcore teen site on the internet. You stare at thousands of photos of gorgeous girls, and your brain starts to shut down. You can't appreciate how lovely these girls are. It's human nature, or human psychology. -Site is strictly for soft, softcore teen. No hardcore action. -Almost all models are white. Very little variation in race, or age. Most models start at around 18, and some can continue shooting into the late 20s. But no older models in upper 30s or above. Bottom Line: CONS (continued): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for porn sites. -The MetArt network used to have a system where if you were a member of one of their sites, you had access to membership plans to join most of the other sites for a discounted price of around $10/month. But they dropped that system years ago. -MetArt used to have a live cam show offering where some MetArt models or other models would put on free shows. The models also offered private shows, but the free shows lasted 30 minutes or more, and the girls were friendly. There wasn't a lot of nudity in those shows, but it gave you a chance to interact with the models. They dropped that system many years ago, and went with a more commercial type cam show, where the performers and the sytem itself encourages the viewer to pay: These shows, both public and private, can become very expensive. It can be cheaper to go to a strip club and watch the strippers versus watching the modern live cam show. BOTTOM LINE (start of): On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows: Models: 3,285 Galleries: 16,678 Videos: 1,362 Contributing photographers: 272 On 2018-10-30, the stats are as follows: Models: 3,548 Galleries: 19,089 Videos: 1,544 Contributing photographers: 283 Models are 18-30 years old. Mostly Eastern European. Most of the models start out at around 18, but many continue to be shot at MetArt for years, so you have some models that started at 18 that are still shooting at 30. Some models have over 50 sets at MetArt. Galleries: 19,089 Galleries include indoor and outoor locations. The technical quality of the galleries is usually outstanding. Videos: 1,544 Most videos are a waste of time. You have beautiful girls, getting naked, and the Wow factor is zero: almost all videos are boring. A lot of time and money are spent making these videos: I don't know how photo sets of a model can be erotic or beautiful, while a video of the same model is almost always boring, but MetArt has perfected the Art of Making Boring Videos of beautiful naked women. I have found a few videos that were slightly interesting: Must have been a mistake on MetArt's part, because I've stopped watching their videos. Also, the background music on these videos is often jarring. If you're going to watch a video, I recommend turning off the sound. Contributing photographers: 283 Instead of one or a few photographers contributing to the site, you have access to almost 300 professional photographers of erotic beauty. I'm giving the site a score of 95. The site is for soft, softcore teen porn fanatics. As such, it's such a fantasic site, for a low price, that it deserves a score of 95 or even higher. Not all sets or photographic styles will appeal to everyone, but you have access to: -A huge backlog of galleries of teen models. -A huge number of attractive models: Some of the most beautiful models in the world. -A huge number of daily updates: 4 updates daily, except the first day of the month is 6 updates. -A very low membership price: PU discounted membership is $19.99/recurring monthly. There is currently a PU discounted price of $9.99 for the first month. If you do a google search, you can sometimes find a discounted price under $10.00 for the first month. One problem with such a large mega-site: you become bored with physical beauty. You have such a catalog of beutiful girls, thousands of galleries, that you just don't appreciate what you have. That's human nature. Except some of the models are freaking hot; other models are freaking cute. Unless you are dead inside, there should be plenty of sets that will appeal to you. But if you want hardcore, MetArt is strictly soft, softcore. In my opinion, MetArt is the finest softcore site on the internet. It deserves a score in the high 90s. The only major flaw are the boring videos. But I've never found a good site for softcore videos. 10-30-18  05:23am Replies (2) Review 121 MetArt (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount of $19.99/month (recurring). Occasionally a cheaper discount will pop up if you search the internet. -Tremendous backlog of softcore galleries. -Many of the most beautiful models in softcore porn appear at this site. -Zips for all galleries. Choice of definition of low, medium, high for zips. -Huge number of professional contributing photographers. -Although this is a huge site, the search engine is helpful: can search by model's name, title of the photoset, photographer, model's attributes (Hair color, Eye color, Ethnicity, Breast size, Age, Weight, Height, Country, etc.). -Get 4 updates per day (except for the first of each month, when you get 6 updates). Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is the largest, finest softcore photo collection of models on the internet. -In spite of shooting attractive models for the video, the videos are mainly boring. The last couple of years, some effort has been put into making the videos more erotic: the models are now allowed to touch themselves in a softcore manner. However, not only are the older videos boring, but most of the newer videos are boring as well. It's hard as hell to make an interesting or erotic softcore video. -Member's can comment on each gallery or video. However, the members seem to form a fan club, where each model is described as wonderful or amazing in looks. -If you post a comment that a model appears at a competing paysite, that comment will be deleted. MetArt should have enough confidence in their appeal and worth that useful comments about the model's appearances at competing paysites should be allowed. -Lack of diversity in the models. Bottom Line: On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows: Models: 3,285 Contributing photographers: 272 Galleries: 16,678 Videos: 1,362 MetArt came online in 1998. It's original title was Most Erotic Teens. It featured softcore of young teens. (So "Met" came from M for Most, e from Erotic, t from Teens.) (And "Art, because this is supposed to be erotic art.) MetArt started off as softcore erotic photography, and has not changed drastically since its beginnings. Currently the models are now allowed to touch themselves, to add a larger element of eroticism. But MetArt is still one of the softer softcore sites on the internet. MetArt in recent years has added a network of other porn sites: It currently has about 15 porn sites. MetArt is the largest of the sites, in terms of content. The basic appeal of the site is the backlog of attractive young women (mainly teens, at least when they were first photographed). The models are featured in galleries and videos. The videos are mainly boring, a waste of MetArt's time and money. But many of the photosets are outstanding. The models are not only attractive to beautiful, but they are photographed by a wide range of professional photographers. The settings are indoor, outdoor, with money spent on the photoshoots and videos. Many of the photoshoots could be hung in an art gallery or museum. A minor problem: The site could be too softcore for some PU members tastes. This is softcore only. No sex (except possibly two girls in a photoshoot who are touching each other, but not in a hardcore way). No man in a photoshoot with the girl, or in a video with the girl. Another minor problem: Many of the photos in a gallery are similar to each other. I remember back in the days of Playboy and Penthouse (in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s), when the magazines featured a model with 12 photographs or less. But the individual photos were separate from each other, often in a different location, different costume, something to differentiate each photo from the others. The MetArt galleries show a model in one photo, she moves her arm slightly, and that's a different photo, she moves her leg slightly, and that's a different photo...so you get a gallery of 90 - 120 photos where the girl is snapped moving into different positions on a bed or room, and most of the photos are almost duplicates of each other. If the girl has truly outstanding beauty, you can focus on the girl. Otherwise, the gallery gets boring fast. Unless mere onscreen nudity is enough to turn you on. Which I believe most PU members have gone beyond. One problem with MetArt is the sheer size of the backlog: You have so many beautiful models, with a large number of outstanding photosets by professional photographers, that you become bored or less appreciative of physical beauty. If MetArt had fewer galleries, with fewer models, I believe the members would appreciate it more. That's my take, anyway. However, the MetArt members do seem to form a fanbase, where almost every model and gallery is described as outstanding, wonderful, fantastic, amazing. Personally, I don't believe every model is fantastic. There are models that could be described as plain. Or ordinary. And there are galleries that have serious defects. Except that you will find member comments describing those galleries as outstanding or wonderful. In conclusion: I believe MetArt is the best softcore collection of nude teen photos on the internet. Based on -the amazing amount of galleries posted, since 1998. -the quality of the models: most of the models are attractive to lovely. -the quality of the photosets: the photosets are filmed by many of the world-class erotic photographers. -the outstanding update rate: 4 updates per day, except for the first of each month, which has 6 updates. -the outstanding level of customer service. The finest customer service of any site I've ever belonged to: fast, responsive, helpful in most cases. -Excellent download speeds. I normally get 4-5 MB/s, which is close to my max download speed limit of 6.25 MB/s. -Download zip file of a gallery is automatically named with Site name-Date posted-Gallery title-Model name-Photographer name-definition (high, medium, or low). Giving the site a score of 94. The boring videos, the sameness of many photos in a gallery, and other quibbles take away from a perfect score of 100. But if you are in a generous mood, you could say the site deserves a score of 99 or even 100. 01-25-17  05:58pm Replies (0) Review 122 MetArt (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -In my opinion, the best softcore photo site on the internet. -Over 3,000 models. Many of the models are lovely to stunningly beautiful. -A wide range of professional photographers contribute to this site. -A huge backlog of photo sets. Site started in 1998, as MostEroticTeens.com (hence the name change to Met-Art.com). -The site updates daily with 4 to 6 photo sets + videos per day. So not only a huge backlog of content, but a truly generous update rate as well. Most updates are photo sets. -You get a small bio sheet on the models, that includes their age when shot, body measurements, and a brief note on what they like. Not much a bio sheet, but it makes the girls more real. -No DRM. You download a photo set, it's yours to keep. -Excellent download speeds. I get 5.5 or 5.6 MB/sec, which is extremely fast for me. -Fast response from technical support. You get an an email within a few hours that shows a human actually read your problem email and is helping. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -Site is basically easy to use. However, because of the huge number of models and photo sets, it can take months to search through the site to find everything you will like. -There is an index of the models, with a large thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like. -There is also an index of the contributing photographers. With the photo sets from each photographer. -So you can search by the name of the model, or by the name of the photographer. -You can comment on each photo set (or photographer). And there is an active community that discusses their likes and dislikes of the photo sets. Most comments are positive, but negative comments are allowed. And the contributing photographer sometimes responds. -No download limits. -CCBill is the billing agent-one of the best credit card processing agents on the Net. -Allows the use of download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager. -The photosets are offered in three sizes for download and viewing. Bottom Line: PROS (CONTINUED): -The photosets have separate zip files for low definition, medium definition, and high definition. CONS -The cons are basically minor. This is the best softcore erotic site on the Internet. -Not strictly a con, but the site is softcore erotic. No hardcore porn. If you want hardcore, look elsewhere. -The videos are boring. They have tried in recent years to make the videos more erotic. These are videos of attractive models that are naked, but the videos are disappointing, and mainly a waste of time and effort. -Because of the huge amount of the photo sets, and the 3,000 plus number of models that are mainly attractive to stunningly lovely, it's a natural human reaction to become slightly bored with the site. Back in the day when Playboy and Penthouse were in their glory days, you only got those magazines once a month, so the impact of each issue was more potent. Because Met-Art has thousands of photo sets and thousands of lovely models, instead of appreciating how wonderful the site is, you start to feel bored by the loveliness and attractiveness of the models and photo sets. That is human psychology. You want what you don't have, but once you get it, the value of what you have diminishes. -Some people object that the photos don't meet the professional standards that they are seeking. Again, that is human nature. There will always be people who object or complain about any beautiful model or photo or object. The site features attractive to stunningly beautiful models that are photographed by professional photographers. Obviously, not every photo set is a masterpiece, but you get access to a boatload of softcore photos of lovely women. -Most models are 18 to early 20s. White, slender to medium build. You don't get a lot of variety in the models as far as age or race or build. BOTTOM LINE: MetArt is best site for softcore erotic photography on the Internet. Based on a variety of factors: 1. Huge number of attractive models (over 3,000 models). 2. Huge number of photo sets (around 15,000 sets, which will take you many months to look through. 3. Over 1,000 videos, which you can use to put yourself to sleep through boredom. Maybe a few videos are truly erotic, but the erotic videos are few and far between). 4. Hundreds of contributing photographers. So you get access to a range of styles. But the overall approach is softcore erotic. 5. Site is easy to use. Can search by name of model, name of photographer, or by other attributes: hair color, age of model, eye color, ethnicity, etc. 6. A low price (with PU discount). $20/month, or $100/year. There are other sites that are similar, that offer high grade photography and lovely models: MPL Studios and Femjoy are 2 of the closest competitors. But even though they are both Mega-sites (huge content of photo sets and large number of lovely models), Met-Art is the biggest site as far as number of photo sets and number of models. I enjoy the photo sets at Met-Art and MPL Studios more than the photo sets at Femjoy. The Met-Art and MPL Studios photos seem fresher, the models look more attractive, than the models at Femjoy. Many of the Met-Art and MPL Studios models also appear at Femjoy, but I normally prefer the Met-Art and MPL studios sets over the Femjoy sets. Other people can and do appreciate the Femjoy style over the Met-Art style, and have stated so. So it's a matter of personal preference. This is my third review of Met-Art. I gave it a score of 97 in my first review (which was also my first review for PU), a 99 in my second review (because the number of models and photo sets just keep increasing). In this review I am giving Met-Art a score of 99. I know many members feel that a score of 99 for any site is wrong. They believe that any site can be improved, and that a score of 99 ignores whatever faults a site may have. But I believe that Met-Art is the best softcore site on the Internet. And that because of many factors that I listed, it does deserve a score of 99. In spite of the boring videos. 12-12-15  02:34pm Replies (0) Review 123 MetArt (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. -A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers. -Easy login. -Long time before site timeout. -No DRM. -No download limits. -I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site. -Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around. -Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like. -Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. -The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are. -Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models. -The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl. Bottom Line: As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet. There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site. Site statistics: Number of photosets: 12,534 Number of videos: 1,045 Movies Number of models: 2,766 Models Number of contributing photographers: 250 Number of photos: 1,365,839 Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of. Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world. The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download: Low definition, medium definition, high definition. The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high. Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today. One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in- house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform. Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show. Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are. I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly. I am giving the site a score of 99. How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100? That would be a fantasy project: 1. They could delete almost all their videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn. 2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today. Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams. For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show. 02-14-13  07:54am Replies (10) Review 124 MetArt (0) 97.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: Best site on Internet for softcore European models. Huge selection of models. Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on any porn site. Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site. Most models have multiple photosets. Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model. The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site). With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day. For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates. They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models). Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls). Cons: Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls. Sorry, but that disappoints me. The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching. The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site. This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother. Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all. The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it? Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use. Bottom Line: If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain. This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as: metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art. domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets. 11-14-08  01:21pm Replies (3) Review 125 Mother Fucker XXX (0) 79.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -On the promo/preview page, you see the statement, "Here, everyday is Mother's day!". With an introduction like that, how can a site like motherfuckerxxx possibly help being part of the American way of life, right up there with Superman, apple pie, and Mom's little chocolate cookies? -This is a MILF site.(In today's world, America's favorite pastime is one's mother, not the girl next door that Playboy made famous). -Site updates once a week with 1 DVD scene. -content: over 125 clips/scenes. -scenes about 13 to 42 minutes long. -screenshots, 40-90 nice-sized screenshots to clearly illustrate each scene. -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Easy log-on. Cons: -WMV format only for download. -No zip file for the sceenshot pictures illustrating each single clip (but no one wants to save these screenshots on their PC anyway). -No picture photosets. No high or even medium quality pix. -Limited search engine: Can use the search engine to search by model name. Can not use search engine for physical characteristics of the model, movie title, series, or type of sex. -A major negative: The name of the model may not be listed for the clip. Bottom Line: This is a niche site for MILF. The video quality of clips is OK to good. The site is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value. Network access includes access to 19 different sites: -over 1500 movies -over 500 full DVDs -exclusive content -unlimited download -daily updates Giving the site a score of 79. Most of the value of the site comes from network access (entry to all 19 sites). The network as a whole is a good value for the price, with some sites having really nice videos, but this site is one of the smaller sites in the network. 07-18-09  03:53pm Replies (0) Shown : 101-125 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.