Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : lk2fireone (0)

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203) Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 126-150 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 126 Mr. Skin (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Low membership fee with PU discount. $9.95/month, or $79/year. However, the site sometimes offers a lifetime membership for $99. And with the lifetime offer for $99, they usually add a 1-month membership to the Playboy site or the Naked News site. PU lists a lifetime membership for $1,000. That is a ridiculous price. If you want a lifetime membership, wait for a holiday, and they might offer the $99 lifetime membership. But great sites like MetArt and Hegre offer lifetime memberships that are far cheaper, especially during holiday discounts, than the $1,000 membership offer from Mr.Skin. -The easiest way to search for nudity by actresses. Just put the name of the actress in the search box, and you get her clips at Mr.Skin. -Unlimited streaming and downloading of the clips. However, the clips only download in one definition. Cons: -Almost all clips are either softcore or non-nude. No hardcore clips. -Most clips are short: two minutes or less. I guess the idea is to skip to the good parts, but what happens is you get a peek at a breast, and wonder: is that all? I have some fond memories of nude scenes in films, but even the clips that supposedly feature those movies are disappointing: there is no build-up to the scene, quality of the clip is usually poor, and the impact of the clip is: so what? So instead of re-living the excitement of the original scene, you're watching a shortened, unsatisfying, poor quality version of a snippet that has lost most meaning. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: The theme of Mr.Skin is "Fast-Forwarding to the Good Parts, Since 1999!" However, there are problems with this approach: -The main problem is that you drop the set-up which gives most of the meaning to the scene. The clip is either non-nude, or a very brief glimpse of the actresses breasts. Or you might see the actress' ass. So it doesn't have the impact or meaning of the original scene. Also, the quality of the clip is often poor. The clips, I assume are from the original DVD or movie, but the crispness and color and image-quality if often degraded from the orginal, which detracts from the impact. If you are a fan of nude celebs, this is probably the easiest way to search for their nude content. Although the internet has made it possible to search for nude content of celbrities (mainly actors), Mr.Skin makes it easy to find most of their nude appearances. However, there are two problems with Mr.Skin. -The clips at Mr. Skin are very short, many of them are less than 1 or 2 minutes in runtime. So you might see a nude breast, but a lot of the clips don't feature nudity, just what Mr. Skin considers a sexy appearance. -Many of the clips are low quality: I'm suprised at the poor quality of the clips. Since many of the clips are probably from DVDs or from an actual commercial movie, the clips should be much higher quality than they are. And with lower quality, you lose much of the impact of the scene. Not only do you lose the build-up to the scene, but the poor image quality reduces the value of the scene. So, even though you have a convenient access to the nude scenes of actors, the site does not impress me very much. There are some actresses who have done some erotic scenes, but I don't feel that the scenes shown on Mr. Skin are very erotic, because the scenes are too short or poor visual quality. Also, almost all scenes shown on Mr. Skin are either non-nude or softcore. I certainly haven't seen all the clips at Mr. Skin, but there would be very few or no hardcore clips. I'm giving the site a score of 80. Many other PU members have given the site a score higher than 80. So the value of the site is really based on personal preference: I guess the site satisfies the element of curiousity: has this actress done a nude or semi-nude scene? But the scene in the original movie would be far more erotic. I bought a lifetime membership to Mr Skin for $99 about 2 years ago. The site is an easy way to check if an actress has done nudity: but for me, the clips are disappointing: they just lack impact. 12-13-18  07:58am Replies (3) Review 127 Mr. Skin (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A huge number of clips of nude women in movies and tv shows. -You can do searches in a number of ways. But I am not a fan of their search, or the site structure. See my cons. -Low membership price with PU discount: $9.95/month. -This is a very brief tag to describe each scene: Sexy; Sexy, underwear; Sexy, thong; Sexy, bikini; Nude, breasts; The tags are basically helpful, except sometimes they aren't. For example, some tags state "Nude, breasts", but the clip just shows a breast that is covered by a bra. I don't consider that nude. Just like I don't consider a woman wearing a bikini or underwear as nude, which is what some "nude" tagged clips are. -You can do search by many different factors: Actress name. title. keyword(age, nationality, hair color, etc.) -Automatic login to site (if cookies are enabled). Don't need to enter username and password. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Navigation is poor. I don't know why more people haven't complained about the site structure, which was designed by an idiot. -The quality/definition of the clips varies. Some clips are high definition, other clips are standard definition. A lot of the value of a nude clip depends on how well you can view the images, and the colorization (and degradation) from the original source). -This is a personal opinion. But even though some of the clips show nudity, they often lose the impact and potency of the original scene. Maybe it's because the clips are too short: They lose the build-up to the scene. There is no automatic notice that you are logged in to the site. Most sites have some indicator (in the address bar or someplace else) that tells you you are logged in to the site. I was searching for the log-in link a couple of times, before I realized I was already in the site itself. CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW: Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: -The site was not designed for members ease of use. One example: There is a blog. One blog entry is "Top Ten Nude Debuts of 2016". To show you the top ten nude debuts of 2016, the site does not give you a list of the actresses/models. Instead, it gives you a slideshow of screencaps of the actresses. That you have to click through. The name of each actress is in tiny letters at the bottom of the screencap, that is difficult to read. One member comment on this blog entry: "How about you make the name and titles big enough to read. Doesn't help me if I don't know where to look." If you fiddle around, you can enlarge each screen cap (with a few mouse-clicks), to be able to read the name of the actress, and the movie she appears nude in. But why not make it easy for members to read the actress name and movie, without the mouse clicks? And without additional clicks to find the next actress on the list? -There is a learning curve to using this site. I am getting old. So it's irritating if the site navigation is not simple and easy to use. If I have problems searching the site contents, I enjoy the site less than otherwise. And this site was created by someone who knew the foibles of the site structure, and figured the members would figure out the foibles by themselves. -Many of the photos are screencaps. -Most clips are very short. Two or three minutes runtime. Many clips are 30 seconds or shorter. -Most of content is softcore. BOTTOM LINE: The Mr. Skin clips are both good and bad: Good, to give you a slight taste of the nude appearances of these celebreties/actresses, but not enough to fill your appetite if you remember the original movies in any detail. -Cons: the quality in some the clips is just OK. The clips are not high definition, even when taken from a standard commercial movie. Either the copying is done poorly, or some other factor controls the poor image quality. Todays porn consumers are accustomed to the high quality or ultra high quality available at many porn sites. For example, the Two Moon Junction (1988) clips seem poor definition. Two Moon Junction (1988) was directed and written by Zalman King, who also did 9½ Weeks (1986), Wild Orchid (1989), and the Red Shoe Diary series (1990s) on cable. Part of the appeal of Zalman King's work was the high definition (for the time), vivid images, strong colors, erotic content, along with main-stream actors/actresses and plot structure. The Zalman King clips should be one of the site highlights. But they are disappointing. -The site will appeal mainly to fans of celebrity nudity. The problem is: For a softcore site, the site does not offer high-grade photos or clips that we want. There is probably no hardcore sex offered for hardcore fans. So bottom line: this is mainly for celebrity softcore fans, who want to see their idols in brief nude scenes. I doubt that many PU members would remain a member for more than one month. This site would have much more value if this were not the internet age: where the internet will give you many of these same images and clips for free. Yahoo now allows nudity in its clips and movies. But for a simple way to access brief celebrity nudity, the site will have its fans. 12-13-16  06:13am Replies (0) Review 128 Muse.org (0) 65.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -High quality softcore photosets. -Glamor style photography. -This is a Richard Murrian site (some contributions by other photographers). -There are some yummy-looking models here. -Most models are teens, some in early 20s. -Photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px. -Zip file for download of the photo series. -Low annual fee ($59 per year). -Exclusive content. -No DRM. -Billing by CCBILL. Cons: _The photosets are small with only a few photos per set. -Because of the small number of photos per set, it's not a satisfying experience looking at a photoset. I want more photos in a set, which I can get at met-art, metmodels, mpl studios, femjoy, justteensite, or any of the softcore megasites. -There are some videos, but the main focus is on photos. -Updates are very irregular. -No response to emails from customer service. Bottom Line: Problems at muse: I joined muse with a 12-month membership in March, 2009. Because the site had no updates for most of 2009, the site advertised that members who had a 12-month membership in the un-updated part of 2009, would get a free 6-month extension of their membership. I emailed the site requesting the membership extension, but received no reply. My membership was not extended. Also, it was difficult trying to log into the site while my membership was still active. I often got the error message: "Sorry, the page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization." My experience at the site was unfavorable. I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste. 03-17-10  05:24pm Replies (3) Review 129 My Babysitters Club (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -A very low membership price with PU discount: $17.87/month. -Content is exclusive for this site. But some content at the team skeet network is posted at other sites. For example, almost all of the Rub A Teen site content is posted at Teen Mega World, and much of it is also posted at Diesel Access network. -With a membership to this site, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network of 30 sites. This includes a variety of teen niches: massage, babysitter, lesbian, anal, school girl, etc. The premium sites in the network each require a separate membership fee to access. Cons: -The major con is that some PU members have complained about a poor connection speed, that would not allow them to view the pages, stream the videos, or download any content without hours of effort. If you encounter such a poor connection speed, I recommend asking for a refund, either through the Team Skeet support, or through the billing agent. Some PU members asked for and got a refund, due to poor connection speed. However, I've been a member of Team Skeet for over a year, and have rarely had a poor connection to the network. And other PU members have seemed satisfied with their membership: so the poor connection speed issue seems hit or miss, and I have no idea why it happens. -Sometimes, to enter the site, you have to pass through a gateway ad page that is completely filled with ads. To get to the member site, you have to find the one small square that says something like: "Continue here to Team Skeet". The square/hot link is mixed in with all the ads, so be sure to look for it. Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): -Ads on every member page. Distracting. -There are a number of premium sites in the network that each require a separate membership to access. Sometimes you find videos you want to see, and only after clicking on the hot link do you find that the video is part of a premium site. I wish they would do a better job separating the basic content you have paid for from the premium content you have to pay extra for. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): There are currently 30 sites in the basic Team Skeet network. There are currently 9 premium sites, each of which requires a separate membership to access. The network updates daily with a new video. The basic sites are listed in the first reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28. The premium sites are listed in the fourth reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28. (I'm using the reply section, because of the review limits of characters and lines.) The entire basic network has over 2,907 movies. Almost all the movies have an accompanying photo set of the movie. If you encounter a terribly slow connection speed, you should get a refund on your membership. Because you won't be able to view or download the videos or photo sets. But a lot of PU members seem to have a good experience with the network, and have given the network and its sites a high score. The network covers a lot of teen niches. Some of the best sites that I personally have enjoyed are the Rub A Teen site, which is a massage-themed site, and the My BabySitters Club site, which features a dad boffing the cute babysitter. Oye Loca is also one of the better sites in the network, featuring Latina models. Most of the videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus and camera-work, good sound control. The network is not glamcore. They don't put a lot of effort into making the models attractive. In fact, some models that are really cute on other networks, just appear to be almost plain in their team skeet videos. Which, for me, makes the vidoes worth much less: I want to see pretty or lovely models. And the photography and makeup and other factors can have a massive effect on how attractive a model will look. Because the site and network does have some problems beyond the poor connection speed. They have far too many ads on every page. They could put more effort into making the models more attractive. They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the site listing, so you could separate the basic from the premium sites. Now they just list the premium sites willy-nilly in with the basic sites, so you don't know if a site is basic or premium, until you click on the hot link. Which is annoying. I don't want to pay extra, beyond my basic membership fee. And I want the basic sites, that I paid for, to be easily apparent to me. Which is no longer the case. You get the basic and premium sites mixed together in a listing, and you don't know whether the site is available to you, until you click on the hot link, and see whether it's open, or needs an upgraded membership to access. The network has some nice features: You can stream many of the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p. You can download the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p. They used to have a feature where you could choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want. But they seem to have dropped that option for the site and network. REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 05-29-18  07:58am Replies (4) Review 130 My Babysitters Club (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discounted price $17.87/month (recurring). -Membership in My Babysitters Club gives you access to most of the Team Skeet network sites. Note: You have to pay extra for access to the "Unlock" sites in the network. -Cute models. The models are late teens, early twenties. -Numerous choices to stream or download the videos. -The videos are offered in low, medium and high definition. For both streaming and download. -You can choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want. -The videos are excellent quality: professionally shot, good lighting, clean sets, good sound control. -Epoch is primary biller. A trusted name. -Exclusive content. -No download limits. Cons: -The biggest con is that the site is small. Only 30 scenes. -Slow update rate. You only get one or two scenes per month. The site was started mid-year 2015, over a year ago, and it only has 30 videos. So it's growing, but at a snail's pace. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A few of the sites in the Team Skeet network are "Unlock", which means you have to pay extra to access their videos. -Although the models are cute girls, not much effort is put into making them appear more attractive. They are presented as the girl next door, which does not capitalize on how pretty these girls naturally are. Bottom Line: Site stats: -30 videos. -30 matching photosets. Site theme: a babysitter is either tricked or forced into having sex with the father. -This is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. The babysitter theme just fits the 18+ models more easily. Porn models are not hired for their acting ability, but the setup is so simple in these skits, that you can ignore the amateur performances and the stupid dialog and concentrate on watching these young girls having hot sex with an adult male. The videos are professionally shot. The models are cute. I wish that more care was put into making these models attractive, because they could look fantastic. But the models are presented as normal girls who are baby sitters, and not glamorized. This is a small site. That is growing at a very slow rate. So if you were to score this as a stand-alone site, the score would be in 60s. The site has a small (30) number of videos of cute teens having sex. The sex is usually hot, the videos are good quality. But because you have access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network, that obviously raises the value of the site. The network features a number of popular niches: massage, cream pie, tiny girls, anal, exercise, blowjobs, latina models, black models, step siblings, etc. So there's plenty of videos to look through after you have finished with the My Babysitters Club site. I think My Babysitters Club is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. In spite of its small size. The theme is just easier to build a video around. And their videos look good. Not great, but good. It's a step down from the videos at X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, where the glamor element is added, which makes the models look outstandingly attractive. But the models at Team Skeet are naturally cute, and the sex can be hot. Giving the site (and network access) a score of 85. For a low price ($17.87/month), you get access to a lot of videos of cute girls engaged in hardcore sex. 08-10-16  10:15am Replies (0) Review 131 My Dad's Hot Girlfriend (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Low membership price. PU lists discounted price of $24.95/month (recurring) for My Dad's Hot Girlfriend. Join through Naughty America instead of through My Dad's Hot Girlfriend, and save $15. -Multiple definition choices to download a video: For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p. For specific clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile. -Can stream videos on Roku on your TV. -Zip file for each photoset. -Epoch is the billing agent. A trusted name. -The site (and network) offers a guarantee: if you are not completely satisfied for any reason within 30 days of purchasing a membership, contact customer service and they will refund your membership price. I purchased a membership. I don't like their videos. But that is personal preference. The videos are professionally shot. With a lot of big-name porn stars. With high production values. So I think it would be wrong for me to ask for a refund. The site offers a lot of value for people who like their videos. Cons: -Navigation could be much simpler. -Too many ads on each page. -Very large files for the video downloads. -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Bottom Line: Site has 315 videos. Site has 315 matching galleries. Starting around October 2013, the site offers 4k definition for some videos. Starting in late December 2013, all the videos from that date on are offered in 4k definition. The site is part of the Naughty America network. My Dad's Hot Girlfriend theme is about guys making it with their dads' hot girlfriends. So I guess the fantasy is that you are getting revenge on your dad for whatever he did to you in the past. Showing him that you are a bigger man than he is. With the added bonus that this is behind his back, the more fool him. If that fantasy rocks your boat, then this site was made for you. Otherwise, it's just a lame premise. However, not all the videos feature a woman playing the girlfriend of a man who fucks the son. Some of the videos have the woman playing the wife of the man. So--depending on the audience, that might be a con, because it breaks the theme of site. These are porn actors. So don't expect Academy award performances. The script is usually lame, the dialog is lame, the plot is lame, the actors are lame. As I mentioned in my review of Naughty America, it helps to drink a few beers (or some hard liquor) before watching these videos, to help suspend your disbelief. That way you are more free to enjoy these stupid videos. Personally, I think the videos at most other porn sites are easier to enjoy. The many other sites give you straight porn videos, whether it's gonzo sex or glamcore sex or some other variation. But I have a hard time watching the My Dad's Hot Girlfriend videos and getting in the mood to appreciate what I'm watching. The site offers multiple download options: For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p. For clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile. Some PU members have reported problems downloading files from Naughty America. They say that downloading a file can crash their computer, or that the download speed is extremely slow. From most porn paysites other than Naughty America, I can often get 3-5 MB/sec. At Naughty America, I average around 1-2 MB/sec download speeds. That is far faster than what other PU members report. There was a recent comment (dated 2016-05-22) by PU member Divinx on Naughty America that reports "Downloads below 50 KB/s. Nobody does it worse." If that is what I experienced, I would ask for a refund. Because the file sizes of a video are so large, that it would make downloading a video extremely difficult. For example, a single video, runtime 29 minutes 39 seconds, 720p definition, has a file size of 1.11 GB. That is a huge file size for a single video of that definition and runtime. The file size for the 1080p definition of the same file would be 2.57 GB. So even at today's prices, you would quickly run out of storage space if you want to archive many of these videos. The only way that someone can store these videos is because hard drive storage prices keep dropping. 5 or 10 years ago, it would have been far too expensive to buy the drives to store many of these videos. Even at today's prices, you really should use some program to compress the files, if you want to store them on a personal hard drive. When I report the specifications for my download speeds, I should note that I am not downloading more than one file at a time. Also, I am not streaming any videos while I am downloading. On a simple basis, I can report that if I am streaming a video and downloading a video at the same time, the video I am streaming can exhibit playback problems: the video can stutter during playback. And the download speeds will drop. So the fact that I am not downloading multiple files at the same time, and not streaming at the same time I am downloading, might help to explain why I am getting faster download speeds than some people report. But I do get slower download speeds at Naughty America, and its sites, than I get from other paysites. Most other paysites will give me a download speed of 4-5 MB/sec. Theodore Sturgeon (the science fiction author and critc) wrote Sturgeon's Revelation (commonly referred to as Sturgeon's Law): 90% of SF is crap. But he also said that applies to most other fields: 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. is crap. In my opinion, 100% of My Dad's Hot Girlfriend is crap. Naughty America is a low-priced network. It has a low membership price of $9.95 for the first month with a PU discount. And you can sometimes find special offers with an even lower introductory price. Is it worth joining the network? Even at that low price point, unless you like the videos offered, it is not worth joining. But if you do like the videos, then it's a worthwhile join. Unless you experience the problems that other people have reported. 05-23-16  05:17am Replies (0) Review 132 My Naked Dolls (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A very low membership price: $15/month - rebills $30/6 months - one time purchase $50/year - rebills $65/year - one time purchase -Content is exclusive. -Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos. -Can choose your own login details: username and password. -Secure join page. -CCBill is the default biller. A trusted biller: easy to use, to cancel membership, to get details on the CCBill website about your membership status, etc. -Tony Murano is the main photographer. He used to contribute to MetArt. He has an eye for beautiful models, and I personally think he is a great photographer, that showcases the beauty of his models. -No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Not only do they offer a low membership price, but they also don't try to trick you with a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, a rarity for porn sites. -No ads. This is amazing. The first porn site I've seen that doesn't put ads on its pages. Makes the pages almost seem naked without any ads for other porn sites. Cons: -There is a notice at TBP that TBP no longer does business with this site. No reason given (as per PU/TBP guidelines for this type of situation). So I joined this site through a link from Rabbit's Reviews (a sister site for PU/TBP). My hope is that PU/Rabbit sites will get some credit for my join. -Poor public preview pages. You get a model list of the models, with small thumbnails of their sets. -The significance of the posting date: this is the date the set/video was posted to the site. But the set/video might have been photographed years earlier. So when the age of the model is listed, that might refer to her age when the set was photographed, and probably not when the set was posted to the site. I've found some sets that were shot years ago, but have a recent posting date. -Basic navigation: even though this is a fairly small site compared to mega-sites, the navigation is basic and could be improved. No search engine on the site. No search by tags or other criteria. Bottom Line: The site features the work of Tony Murano. He was a long-time contributor to MetArt. The site is basically softcore, but it does have a harder edge than MetArt: the models are allowed to masturbate, have toys, and sometimes have girl-on-girl scenes that go beyond MetArt's very softcore content. The photography is excellent. The girls are mainly gorgeous. Bottom line: This is not a mega-site. It's mainly the work of a single photographer, Tony Murano. I enjoy his style: Clear photographs of beautiful models. The style is slightly more hardcore than MetArt, but still considered softcore: there are sets/scenes of a girl masturbating, masturbating with a toy, slightly more explicit lesbian sets than MetArt allows. But the site would probably be considered softcore glamour: the distinction between softcore glamour and midcore glamour seems blurry to me. Anyway, the main attraction is the low price: $50 yearly (with rebills). Many of the models are lovely to gorgeous (I'm not sure what the difference is between lovely and gorgeous: many of the models are fucking attractive). This is not a mega-site like MetArt or Femjoy or even MPL Studios. But the site has been around for years, and it has more than enough content to spend months going through all the beauties at this site. Years ago, I was burned by a softcore site that had a low yearly price, from another photographer who contributed to MetArt. I joined that site for a year, and during my membership, there was not a single update. And that site had maintenance problems. That site went out of business, thank God, because even though it was not a sham, it seemed like a rip-off to me, because there were zero updates, and many times I could not log in to the site even though I had a paid, active membership Getting back to the My Naked Dolls review: The site has an irregular update rate. New photo sets might be posted anywhere from 2 days to 12 days apart. New videos might be posted once or twice a month, but some months have no new video. The photosets and videos are professionally shot: clear, well-focused sets and videos of attractive young women: mostly late teens to early twenties. Slender white Eastern European models (Russia and surrounding areas). The main attraction is the price: for $50 per year, it's a worthwhile join for viewing these lovely girls. 05-13-18  08:28pm Replies (4) Review 133 My Teen Oasis (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join through the Devils Film site, the price is $9.95 with a PU discount for the first month. Note: that price has recently changed to $14.95/month with PU discount. If you do a google search, you might be able to find a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month for Devils Film. The price is $14.95/month with a PU discount if you join through the My Teen Oasis site. -This is a member of the Fame Digital network. You get full access to over 20 separate sites in the Fame Digital network. Gamma Entertainment, which owns Fame Digital, also owns Evil Angel, which has a separate membership. -Login details are the same for all the sites you have access to (don't need a separate username and password for each different site). -Login to the site is through a secure server. Also, member pages are on a secure server. -You are sent 2 confirming emails on joining. They contain your login details, your membership pricing details, and the last 4 digits of your credit card you used. Cons: -They did a network upgrade in 2017. They now use brighter thumbnail photos to make the network sites fresher and more appealing. However, the navigation is now clumsier, takes more effort to navigate within a site, and to switch between sites. -The site/network has a ton of hardcore material. Finding the content that appeals to you requires stamina (to slog through the junk that is boring or less appetizing). -A lot of the models have tattoos, which I don't like. -A lot of the models have enhanced breasts, which I don't like. -A medium-sized logo of the site appears on bottom right corner of the video. -Poor model listing inside this site. Bottom Line: My Teen Oasis is a site featuring teen and twenty-something models (that are supposed to be teens, but look too old to be teens) in hardcore sex. The sex is basically hardcore gonzo style. Not too rough or violent, but far from the heartcore that is featured at X-Art, Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked. I prefer the X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen or Diesel Access style videos. Or the Teen Mega World videos, which have improved over the last few years with higher production values: the models at the competing sites are much more appealing, to me: the models at My Teen Oasis seem like whores doing their job: the models at the competing sites are less like whores, more like girls who are finding some excitement or pleasure in the sex. Actually, a number of the models featured at My Teen Oasis are also featured at competing porn sites, but the action at the competing porn sites seems fresher, or more vivid, less gonzo. So even though My Teen Oasis features a large number of videos of hardcore sex, I prefer competing porn sites, where the videos are more appealing. My main complaint about the site is that the recent site/network re-design made using the site/networkmore difficult: to find the contents, to see the model listings. The old design was much more user-friendly. Although the videos are professionally shot, I enjoy the videos at competing sites more. Customer support is excellent: you have 24/7 access. You can use live chat, email, or the phone. If you have any problem, I suggest live chat, since that is the fastest way to get a response. I chatted Customer Service a couple of times, and they solved my problems immediately. The most famous sites include: devils film peter north rocco siffredi silvia saint silverstone DVD Access to any one of those 5 sites would justify your membership fee. And you also get access to a number of other sites catering to special niches. So, based on quantity alone, you are getting far more than your money's worth. (Assuming that you are new to porn, or that you enjoy the gonzo style porn these sites feature.) -A complete listing of the sites you currently have access to with a membership in Fame Digital network is shown on the first reply at the bottom of this review. I'm giving the site a score of 80. This is not based on the value of the site itself, but is based on network access: a membership to My Teen Oasis gives you access to over 20+ sites in the Devils Film/Fame Digital network, thousands of hardcore gonzo videos covering many different niches. 02-22-18  11:22am Replies (7) Review 134 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is dated. -Nice PU discount for first month of $9.95. But recurs at $29.95/mo. -No DRM. -Videos are good quality for a DVD site. You don't get the high definition found at some sites, but the definition is good, the camera-work is good, good focus, no jitters in the video, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. I wish there were less fake moans and groans of excitement, but it's not as bad as some sites. -Recent update rate is one video per week. But starting in January 2012, there were no updates for almost 4 months. -There is a dropdown listing of the site models. But it would be easier to search a stationary list, where the models were presented alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like, with hot links to her appearances at that site, and to other sites in the network. Cons: -There is a listing of sites the model appears at. But to play or download her videos at another site in the network, you have to manually log in to each different site, and then do a search for her videos at that site. So searching for model appearances is difficult, and time-consuming. -No model biography. -Videos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -Photos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner. -No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt many members would want to keep these photos anyway, except for one photo to show what the model looks like. -Uncheck the pre-checked cross sale at signup, or you will be charged a trial membership in another site. Bottom Line: Site statistics: Number of videos: 557 Number of high definition videos: 56 Streaming options: 240p 480p 540p (if the 540p is available). Download options: WMV files: 240p; 480p MP4 files: 240p; 480p; 540p (if available); 720p (if available); 1080p (if available). Most videos have the 240p and 480p. 56 videos have the higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p. Video length: 3 to 31 minutes. By watching these videos, you can learn a lot about how to deal with models. For example, in a video titled "Cleaning Cock!", Ashlyn Rae, a pretty model, wants to buy a new dress. So a guy hires her to clean his house. Once she finishes cleaning, he offers to pay her in cum. And she says she loves cum. And he says "Well, that's good because he has lots of cum". So then she gives him a blow job and they fuck. PU members can use this line on their girlfriends, and save lots of money. Not only does he pay her in cum, but when she asks for a tip, he says it was included in the cum he already gave her. I was a member of this site before. My impression is that the videos were upgraded. They look better than what I remembered. This is an impression, because I don't have the videos I downloaded from my previous membership. They have photosets illustrating the videos. But the photosets are screencaps of the video. And the number of photos in each photoset varies. One photoset has 3 photos. Another has 43 pics. Another has 97. The photosets are useful for showing what the model looks like. But they have little artistic or erotic value. You can click on a thumbnail of a photo and get a larger thumbnail. There is an option to enlarge the thumbnail to full-sized screen. Sometimes it takes several clicks on the "expand the image" icon to enlarge to full-sized screen picture. The site theme is teen-to-early-twenty girls having hardcore sex. They usually have a brief story introduction setting up the sex, but the story is brief and has little value. You can search the site by 3 main categories: 1. By series. For example: Couples Seduce Teens; Fresh Euro Flesh; Latin Eye Candy; Masters of Reality Porn; etc. 2. By type of sex. For example: Anal; Ass to mouth; Blowjob; Cream pie; Cum swallow; Cumshot; Cumswapping; Cunilingus; Deep throat; Double Blowjob; Double Penetration; Lesbian; etc. 3. By name of model. This is a large DVD site. It's part of the netFameSolutions network. You get access to this site and about 20 other sites by joining through the Devils Film site for $9.95 for the first month (using the PU discount). The main sites in the network include: Devils Film;Peter North DVD;Rocco Siffredi;Silverstone DVD;Silvia Saint Those main sites include tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types. And the smaller sites include 1,000s of hardcore videos covering many different niches. So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get access to a huge amount of hardcore videos. 06-09-12  11:21pm Replies (4) Review 135 My Teen Oasis (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. But I do get disconnected after long idle times, so maybe there is a site timeout, but it takes a good while before disconnect. -No download limits. -Streaming, low and high quality -Download, low and high quality WMV file -Less fake moaning and groaning than many porn videos -Canned background music could be better, but less annoying than in some porn videos -Some attractive models -Female models in videos are listed by name -Screenshots, maybe 20-30, to illustrate the video -Caucasian and Latina female models Cons: -Navigation is basic. -Site design is poor. The videos are not categorized or laid out to make searching easy. -No search. Have to click through the entire site to see what is there. -DownThemAll download manager sometimes does not work smoothly. Sometimes get error message 400 (file does not download). Don't know reason why. -No text listing of models' names, with nice-sized thumbnails, so you can get an idea of what the models look like. There is no text listing at all, and thumbnails of models are scattered through the pages, making a simple search of the models at the site extremely difficult. -No zip file to download the screenshots for a video. But who would want to download and keep the screenshots anyway? -They should definitely get rid of the tool they use to display photos. It makes viewing the photos more difficult than normal. Many times it is hard to enlarge the thumbnail sized photo that is first presented, to get a normal-sized photo. And the photos are slow to load. Bottom Line: Myteenoasis is a hardcore teen video site. The site is made up of videos from other sites in the network, mainly SilverstoneDVD and DevilsFilm, that were put in here to make another site offering. The video runtime is from 8 to 20 minutes. File size is from 100 MB to 300 MB for high quality. Frame width x height = 720 x 528 Total bitrate = 2096 kbps The netFameSolutions network has about 32 sites currently. There are about 5 sites with general hardcore appeal, and the rest of the sites are more niche, with a wide range of niches: tranny blowjob granny Indian (from India) etc. etc. With membership in any network site, you get access to about 22 sites. Get a special price of $9.95/month from PU/TBP, which is a steal considering the large amount of content, the varied content, the generally OK to good quality of the content. This is mainly a video network. The photos are mainly to give you a good idea of what the videos will show. The quality of the photos is low. These are screenshots. Even when the model is good-looking, she does not appear good-looking in the photos. A model like Ashlyn Rae, who appears in a bj video here, is just blah. At Metart, where she also appears, she is presented as a fine-looking woman. You would not recognize it was the same woman except for the same name. In the videos, Ashlyn Rae looks better than the screenshots. In the videos, giving a bj, she comes across as enthusiastic and enjoying her work, as a professional should. Sure gives a different impression from her Metart photos, where she comes across as lovely but more distant. Makes me appreciate Ashlyn Rae in a whole different way. Lol. This is one of the minor sites at the network. I am strongly into teens, so I would normally rate this site much higher than a normal niche site. But there are only a few very attractive models I found at this site. And because the navigation is so basic, with no search, it's hard to find the videos I might like at this site. The main value of the site is that it gives access to the netFameSolutions network. This site has a few really attractive models, but the navigation is bad. And the general level of the videos is slightly disappointing. Maybe I am spoiled, but even a DVD site (which this is, basically) should have nice quality lighting and focus in the videos, so when you find an attractive model, she will be presented and seen clearly and easily by the viewer. 09-27-10  11:09am Replies (0) Review 136 Naked News (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Automatic login to site (if you have cookies enabled). When you go to the site, you are automatically logged in, without having to re-enter your username and password. -Works with Roku. -Homepage acts like a table of contents: --Gives list of anchors (both lead and guest), with nice-sized thumbnails and links to their bios. (Trying to make a connection to the member so member will be more interested in the site) --Amateur Auditions. Follow the search for our next anchor (Same idea of making a connection to the member.) --Recent listing of news features. -Bonus content from Mr. Skin, a sister site of celebrity nudity. -Cam show for site. -Updates 6 days a week (so 6 new shows per week). -Multiple download options. --You can download the entire day's show, or specific segments of the show. --You have choice of 480p, 720p, 1080p defintion for the download. -When the news anchor finishes her segment, she turns and walks away. So you can watch her front and back jiggle. Cons: -If you want to post comments about the site, there is no internal page on the site. Instead, you are supposed to post at the Site's facebook page. Since I don't have a facebook account, this is a negative for me. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Billing processor is third-party company I never heard of. -This is a softcore site that features female nudity. But no sex. -I don't know how long the strip/nudity feature will hold your interest. Bottom Line: Site theme: news read by anchors who strip and go nude. So it makes the news more watchable than a regular news program. Except that a regular news program probably covers a wider range of subjects. If you like their models, it makes the news much more interesting, to see them strip while reporting the news. The stripping is not a strip-tease act, the anchors/models just take off their clothes while reading the news. You have a number of regular female anchors. You also have a number of guest anchors. It's a nice idea, the first few times you watch. Except they must be doing OK. Because this site has been around since 2000. And they update 6 times a week, so they are doing much better than I would have thought. There is a blog. The blog is useful, because it lists some of the main headlines for each newscast. So if you want a preview or summary of each day's newscast, this is the the best source. You can stream or download each news cast. $15.00/month with PU discount. The site is not expensive, but does not appeal to me personally. The anchors/models are not selected to be the most physically attractive. Some are good-looking, but other anchors are just average-looking. And some models have implants, or tattoos, which I dislike. That's a personal preference. You can do search by news anchor, by segment, by date. I'm giving the site a score of 80. The site structure/navigation is good. The videos are professionally shot. The choices to stream or download are varied. You get 6 updates per week. Do I recommend this site? It's not a bad site. But I would have thought it had limited appeal. However, as I wrote, it's been around since 2000, and still updates 6 days a week, and the site is well-managed software-wise. (I did not find any dead links). So the site must have a lot of fans. 12-07-16  01:51am Replies (0) Review 137 Nasty Angels (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to. -Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership. -Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site. -Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know. Cons: -You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login. -Primitive site design. -Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed. -You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click. -Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case. -Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate. -Site contents have no posting date. -No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing. -No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it. Bottom Line: This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex. The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot. Videos are grouped into two categories: Softcore movies, and hardcore movies. Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation. Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories. The videos are better than I thought they would be. Sample data rates: The frame width x height is: 1024x576. Total bitrate: 2548kbps Frame width x height is: 632x512 Total bitrate: 1181 kbps The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots. They also have some very attractive models at this site. It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent. I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos. I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all. 02-19-13  11:14am Replies (2) Review 138 Naughty America (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 for 1 month, recurs at $24.95/monthly -Membership includes over 30 porn sites. -Over 4,000 scenes. -Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name. -Can download videos in different definitions: 480p, 720p, 1080p, (some are 4K). -Can also chose the file format for download: Quicktime (Apple), Windows format, Mobile. -Can download the full video, or selected clips from the movie. -Can stream the movie in 720p or 4K. -Zip file for each gallery -Photos can be viewed in a slideshow -Videos can be streamed or downloaded. -The streaming option has low, medium and high definition. -The download option has multiple choices for definition: mobile, medium, high, (and for some videos, ultra high). -You can download the entire video, or choose which clips you want from that video. Cons: -Ads, ads, and more ads. I don't remember any site or network that had so many ads. -Have to remember, that when a thumbnail shows a scene, with the caption "Unlock", that is another ad. If you click on the unlock or the thumbnail, you are charged for that scene, or a membership fee to whatever site it connects to. -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -File sizes are large. For a video with runtime of 37 min 23 sec, downloading in 1080p, the size is 3.25 GB. -Slow download speeds. I get between 1-2 MB/sec. At many other sites I get 4-5 MB/sec. Bottom Line: This is a mega network, with over 30 sites. 7610 Porn Videos, 2650 Porn Stars, Updated Daily. Unlike many sites that advertise frequent updates and have stopped updating, this network does update each day, with a new video and a photo set. Low membership price: $9.95 for first month. Recurs at $24.95/month. If you like to sip a few beers or some harder alcohol, kick off your shoes and watch hardcore porn of women doing nasty things, this network is right up your alley. The network advertises: Big tits, big asses, big tattoos, big name stars. None of those hits my buttons. But the network is popular. Is it worth investing $10 dollars for a month's entertainment? Yes, if you enjoy this type of porn. And if you are willing to search through the huge amount of content to find what might appeal to your tastes. I dimly remember being a member of Naughty America before, and wonder why I rejoined. This is not my kind of site. I like attractive teens. Actually, I do know why I rejoined. I was attracted by the cheap join price, and forgot that I didn't enjoy the network. But--forget me and my personal likes. This network is more than worth the price if you enjoy their content. They cover most niches. They have a wide variety of models, of race, age, body type, etc. They cover a wide variety of fantasies: A few of their sites to show what they offer: American Daydreams Diary Of A Nanny Dirty Wives Club Lesbian Girl On Girl My Dad's Hot Girlfriend My First Sex Teacher My Friend's Hot Girl My Friend's Hot Mom My Naughty Massage My Sister's Hot Friend Naughty Bookworms Naughty Office Seduced By A Cougar The network offers live sex shows with famous porn stars. The network offers virtual reality porn. And it has 4K videos (the Ultra High Definition videos). The videos are professionally shot: excellent camera-work, good lighting, good set design, good sound control, The network is easy to navigate, once you learn to ignore the overpowering ads that are everywhere. The site and network theme is girls/women being naughty. Behaving like sluts. Having hardcore sex. Raw and raunchy. There's not a lot of eroticism or tenderness or affection. There is an attempt to add a story to the sex, but the story is not believable or realistic. But with a few beers, the story or setup might seem amusing. I'm giving the network a score of 90. Because it's a mega site, with 7610 videos that are professionally shot. 2650 porn stars. They also offer Ultra High Definition videos. And virtual reality porn. And cam shows. This is one of the leading networks for hard core porn. 05-06-16  02:00am Replies (5) Review 139 Naughty Bookworms (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo). -The female porn star's name is given for each video. -The posting date is given for each video. -The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw. -All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video. -There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex? Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC. -There is no zip file for the earliest galleries. -But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway? -Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download. -Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness. -Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive. Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive. This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire. -Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection. -Quality of the older videos is poor. Bottom Line: Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex. Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries. Naughty Bookworms is part of the Naughty America network. So membership in Naughty Bookworms gives full access to Naughty America, and vice versa. This is a large site, with 514 videos. You also gain access to the Naughty America network of 37 sites, with over 4,000 scenes. So if you like your sex raw and crude, Naughty Bookworms (and Naughty America) has a huge amount of content for you to sample. I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude. I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine. Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price. 06-06-16  05:25am Replies (0) Review 140 New Girl POV (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join the site directly, you pay $30/month. Join through Porn Masterminds, you pay $17.95 (with PU discount), recurring at $29.95/month, and that gives full access to New Girl POV. -CCBill and Epoch are the billers, both trusted names. -Site membership gives access to the Porn Mastermind network. -No DRM. -No download limits. -Only 15 models. But the models are cute teens. -The models are American. So the dialog is in English. This gives a chance to gain a slight flavor of the girl's personality, because there is a small interview at the start of each video. -You can stream or download each video. -You can stream or download the full video, or select the clips you want to watch or download. -Good download speeds. I average about 4 MB/sec at this site. My maximum download speed is 6 MB/sec. So it's not the fastest site for downloading, but a good speed for me. Cons: -Small site. -Only 15 models at the site. -Navigation is archaic. Even though this is a tiny site, trying to see all the parts of the site is frustrating. Even though there are only a small amount of contents, the layout is confusing. -This is an archive site. No updating. -The most recent update appears to be in 2015. Which is the same year the site was started. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The pre-checked cross-sale is interesting. It offers a free, 3-day trial to a pornsite. But the free trial turns into an expensive, $39.89/month subscription if you don't cancel on time. -The videos offer a distorted view. I don't know if this is because the video is meant to be viewed in a virtual reality viewer. The videos are not labelled as virtual reality. But the walls and furnishings of the set are curved, instead of shown as straight lines that they are in reality. It's similar to viewing a virtual reality video without the virtual reality headgear. Bottom Line: -The Best Porn (parent site of Porn Users) has a review of New Girl POV that was submitted on 2015-09-29. The review has not been updated. That review has an error. The Best Porn review states that there are 13+ galleries, and that the galleries avg. 1024 pics each. Actually, the galleries are much smaller. The Best Porn review assumed that the average gallery has 1024 pics because the site names each zip file for the gallery as 1024 in the filename of the zip download--so the TBP reviewer assumed that each gallery had 1024 pics. The 1024 actually refers to the width of each photograph in pixels. The photos are: width x height: 1024 pixels x 1536 pixels. No big thing. But don't expect the site to have large photosets. The photosets are good quality, of cute girls, but it's not a photo site like MetArt or MPL Studios where you get ultra-high professional galleries. What you do get are nice galleries of cute models where the gallery is basically a photoshoot record of the video that was shot. The galleries I checked range from 15 to 139 pics in a photoset. I could not find a gallery for the model Nina. All the other models I checked have a photo gallery. -One confusing element about the site: For each full-length video, there are two hot links for downloading: One hot link is labelled "HD streaming". The other hot link is labelled "HD MP4 1080p". As I wrote, these are the hot links for downloading the video--not for streaming the video. The hot link for streaming the video is labelled "HD streaming" (under the 'watch movie' label). When you use the "HD streaming" hot link to download the movie, you get an MP4 file that is HD 1080p. When you use the "HD MP4 1080p" hot link to download the movie, you get an identical MP4 file that is HD 1080 p, with the same file name, same file size, same everything. So why have two hot links that download the same, identical file? If this was a stand-alone site, because of the small amount of contents (15 videos), and because the site is not updating, I would give a score in the 60s. However, you do get access to the Porn Mastermind network, which has has some nice sites, with very good, professional videos of hot teen models that range from attractive to extremely attractive, with a lot of good sex. So I am giving the site a score of 89, based on the network access. 08-15-16  11:47pm Replies (0) Review 141 New Sensations Network (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Secure page for choosing login details. -Secure member pages (https). -Sometimes a great discount for membership price. -Over 6,500 exclusive videos. -Access to 15+ sites. -Premium HD quality at its network. -No captcha required for login. -Excelllent search. Searches the entire network for a model's content, not just the site you are currently logged into. -Multiple choices for both streaming and downloading. -Don't have to pay extra for downloading. -Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview. -Nice model page, with good-sized thumbnail of the model, plus hot links to her network content. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites. -Icons to control the video sometimes disappear (Play, pause, volume control can be hard to find). -Need a fast internet connection to stream videos, or they can stutter or stop. My connection is fine for most other paysites, but not at this network. -The videos have a codec that my software (including VLC media player) won't play. This is the first network I've found this problem. -I've had problems with downloading videos. -Ads for other paysites on the member pages. -Once a video starts to stream, you can't do a partial rewind or fast forward: you have to re-start the video from the start. If you pause the video, you have to reload the page and restart the video from the beginning. -The photo sets are poor-quality screencaps. Most competing paysites have better screencaps. -The audio portion of a video sometimes cuts out during online streaming. Bottom Line: The videos are plot-based: You have a setup for the sex, to give meaning to the sex. Navigation is good. The model pages have nice-sized thumbnails of the model, with hot links to her content at the network. Most videos come with a trailer to give you a fast pre-view of the video. Mot videos come with a photoset, but the photos are poor quality screencaps, and even if the model is attractive, the photo sets are not worth collecting. Even though the photos in a set are poor quality screencaps, the file size of each photo can be 6 to 8 MB, which is huge. They are using a poor codec for the photos. Sites like MetArt have high-quality photos. MetArt low definition file size for a photo is 100 KB or less. MetArt high definition file size for a photo is 200 KB or less. But New Sensations photos, which are poor-quality screencaps, are 30 to 60 times the size of MetArt high quality photos. I need a software program that will play the downloaded videos, because I have problems streaming the videos. I was a previous member back in December 2016, and did not have any of my current problems with streaming or downloading the videos, or playing them once downloaded. One of the main advantages of New Sensations is they give you a storyline that leads up to the sex, to make the sex more meaningful. And some of the videos can be hot. For example: From the Tabu Tales site: Raylin Ann: Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin: Posted 11/18/2016. Raylin has been keeping her longtime crush and deep sexual desires hidden from her step brother Karlo. One massage that finally went too far opened loose her sexual awakening and her shorts. Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up. Starring: Karlo Karrera, Raylin Ann So you get the incest of step siblings, with the additional naughtiness of girl talking to her mother while she is seduced and fucked by her step brother. Bottom line: If you're lucky enough to get one of their special discounted memberships, you get a huge amount of hardcore porn covering many different niches. The video quality is good. And the price can be low. Making this a very worthwhile join. But technical issues (playback problems, poor quality photo sets, a clunky online player for the photosets) detract from the value of the network. 09-18-18  05:46am Replies (5) Review 142 New Sensations Network (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Advertises: -6,000+ exclusive videos -2,000+ pornstars. Many of them attractive. -Unlimited access (no download limit). -Weekly updates -14+ bonus sites. -Videos have a matching photoset. -Content is advertised as exclusive. This is in spite of the fact that much of the content is from DVDs. -Can post comments on the scenes and photos. Negative comments are allowed (other sites often remove negative comments) -Long time before site timeout due to inactivity. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Video quality varies. Site has been around since 1998, so the newer content is much higher quality. -Because of the massive amount of content, it can get exhausting to search through the material. The basic site structure is plain: They have an excellent model index: Nice-sized thumbnails to picture each model, with links to her videos. But with 2,000+ models, it's a lot of work going through all the pretty girls to find what you want. You can organize the model list alphabetically. Can search by model name, most popular, most recent, etc. -A large part of each page is filled with ads for site models. It would be better to use the space to show only what is useful to the member. -The photosets are screencaps of an individual scene. The quality of the screencaps is just OK. The screencaps at Teen Mega World (another long-time hardcore teen network) are much better. And the screencaps at a few other hardcore sites are much better. Bottom Line: Many of the videos have a plotline or backstory. The pornstars are not Academy-award winning actresses yet, but the plot gives meaning to the sex. And many of the plots are interesting. "From A First Love To A Distant Memory", starring Melissa Moore and Kimmy Granger, is a wonderful example: You learn how Melissa and Kimmy met and began a passionate love affair. However, Kimmy has to move far away, and Melissa will miss her. This makes their current sex both sad and sweet. There are other videos of Melissa where she is seen with other girls. And one scene with her and 5 or more men in a gang bang. So the love life of a pornstar can be complicated. It helps if the pornstar is bisexual, because then the search for new partners will be less of a burden.(joke). Actually, the plotlines can be interesting beyond a simple tale of lust or seduction. For example, " Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin", featuring Raylin Ann. Raylin is a sweet, innocent girl who is getting a massage from her step brother, Karlo. The massage is innocent. But Karlo's hands drop down Raylin's shoulders to just above her breasts. Will they have sex? But then the phone rings, and Raylin's mother is on the line. The tension rises: will this phone call spell the end of Karlo's attempt to seduce Raylin? But as the Website text explains: "Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up." What a great story line! The actors are not yet Academy-award level, but the writers certainly are. What surprises me, though, is that obviously Raylin and her step brother have not previously had sex. When the brother stops massaging Raylin's shoulders to allow her to speak to the mother on the cell phone. he unzips his pants and pulls out his cock. This so excites Raylin that she does not need any further seduction, just the sight of her step brother's cock (and maybe the sound of her mother's voice on the phone) is sufficient to make her start sucking and humping with glee). These videos explore the inner cravings of the female animal. Which I never understood before watching porn videos. Although the videos have more of a storyline/plot than most hardcore sites, the site is not really glamcore or heartcore. The plot is there, where there is supposed to be a romantic or sexual relationship between the girl and her partners, but what is lacking is the high quality visuals of a glamcore site: X-Art, Blacked, Tushy and some other sites put a major focus on high quality visuals: great lighting, great definition, solid colors, good camera-work, expensive or nice costuming, etc. New Sensations does not reach those levels for any of those factors. New Sensations has many of the most attractive models in the industry. But they don't present each model to make her appear like a vision of loveliness. Before the appearance of glamcore sites a few years back, New Sensations would have been an outstanding site: based on the quality of their models, the storyline, the professional level of the scenes. The photo shoots would be slightly disappointing compared to what's now available at hardcore sites. However, compared to the glamcore sites, New Sensations score drops because the visuals are below what's offered at the newer glamcore sites. Giving the site a score of 83. That's very subjective. How much you will enjoy the site depends on your personal preferences. There is a huge amount of content. Professionally shot. With a storyline that is more interesting than the visual scene itself. If they could combine the storylines with a glamcore approach, New Sensations could be an outstanding network. However, that would be very expensive, with money spent on more expensive sets, better costumes, more professional camera-work, etc. And the storylines would have to agree with each other. Which would be a major problem. For example, a girl is a lesbian: she loves another girl, who moves away. Then the girl has a gang-bang with 5 men. Does that make sense? (I think I may have overdosed on Porn, because I'm asking for Porn scenes to make sense.) Based on the amount of content, which is professionally shot, and the level of attraciveness of the models, the network gives you good value for your money. But I personally prefer more glamcore sites, like Blacked, Tushy, or X-Art, where you get less content, but higher quality visuals and models who are made to appear stunning. 12-20-16  03:20am Replies (0) Review 143 No Boring (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU/TBP lists a discount rate of $14.95/month recurring. But when you hit the site link from PU/TBP, and hit the join page, you see $29.99/month recurring. Join through TMW (Teen Mega World), which gives access to all the sites in the TMW network. TMW link join page shows $14.95/month discount. -Epoch is the primary biller. A trusted name. Easy signup, easy cancellation. -Large site. 344 videos (with matching photosets) as of 2016-07-16. -Attractive level of teen models. The models are late teen or early twenties. Attractive to very attractive. Some real stunners are included here. I don't know why, but I find the selection of models at TMW very appealing. The site (and network) doesn't put as much effort into glamorizing the models as X-Art, Tushy, Blacked, which do an outstanding job of making their models look great. But you should find a lot of the TMW models very appealing. -Site navigation is easy. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. -Pre-checked cross-sell on join page. -Direct signup at No Boring (thru the PU link) is $29.99/month recurring. Join thru TMW for $14.95/month recurring. -Download file sizes can be large. A video runtime 39:50 (minutes:seconds) runs 2.26 GB in 1080p. Bottom Line: Site theme: Hot teen sex. The videos are teen couples and threesomes have lots of hardcore sex. Site stats: Videos: 344 videos (as of 2016-07-16). Photosets: 344 (one matching photoset for each video). This site is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. So membership to any of the sites in TMW gives you full access to all the sites in the network, which is over 30 sites. Many of the sites are no longer updating, or updating very infrequently. But you have access to a huge library of over 4,000 teen hardcore videos, in many different niches. Although the site theme is hot teens having sex, I'm not sure if you can separate the videos at this site in category from many of the other sites in the network. I mean, it's teens having sex, which is what all the other sites are showing, and there is nothing to distinguish the videos from the videos at most of the other sites. A few network sites do have a gimmick that separates them from other sites: for example: aboutgirlslove features lesbian sex; anal-beauty features anal sex; Creampie Angels features creampies; Dirty Coach features a coach or trainer having sex with a teen student; Dirty Doctor features a doctor having sex with a patient; First BGG features a boy having sex with 2 girls; Squirting Virgin features girls who squirt during sex; Tricky Masseur features a girl getting a massage and then getting fucked; The sites listed above feature a gimmick that can separate the videos from the other sites. But at many sites, the videos are interchangeable: they can be placed in a lot of different network sites. It's just teen sex, after all. The gimmick does add value to some of the sites, it adds a flavor or interesting approach, especially for those who enjoy that particular niche. BOTTOM LINE: The TMW network provides a lot of value for your porn dollars: attractive teen models who are strutting their stuff (or getting stuffed). You get, in the most recent videos, a choice of definition ranging from low, medium, high, to ultra high (one of their newest sites has 4K videos). They recently added a virtual reality site. The newer videos are well lighted, professionally shot, good colors, the sets are more expensive (not super-expensive apartments, but studio settings or clean-looking apartment rooms that are a cut above the cheap apartments they used years ago). -The main value of the network comes from the attractive level of their models. Many of the models would not look out of place in a school room or the local neighborhood mall. -The large amount of teen hardcore videos. In many different niches. I think No Boring is definitely worth joining (through the Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month). You get your money's worth. At this site, or with the other sites you have access to with your membership. Giving the site a score of 90,because of the Teen Mega World membership you automatically get. 07-17-16  12:42am Replies (0) Review 144 NS Romance (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Membership in the New Sensations network gives you access to all sites in the network. None of the sites requires an extra premium payment to access. -Login and member pages are secure: https. Which means the government has less of a record of your visits. And your account details are better protected against hacking. -The videos have a strong plot element: a good part of the video is the backstory, with no sex, just actors explaining the plot: this adds meaning to the sex, it's not just two or more bodies slapping against each other. -Videos have a trailer, if you want to get a quick idea of the action. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. You don't have to pay a premium fee for downloading, as some porn sites are trying to do. -You have multiple choices for the definition of your streaming and downloading: Streaming: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Downloading: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps. -The photoset accompanying each video is made of screenshots from a software program: the screenshot quality has improved: but given how attractive some of these models are, you wish the quality was even better, because some these models are attractive to gorgeous, and they really deserve MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos. So it's a toss-up whether the photosets are worth collecting: the models can be very attractive physically, but the quality of the screencaps, although much improved, deserves better if you want to collect them. CONS(START OF): -The network navigation is sloppy. The sites are not clearly separated from each other. When you enter a particular site, it's difficult to tell what site you are in: the site contents are not clearly separated from other sites. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): So searching for all content of each site is a problem. Finding how many sites belong to the network is a problem. I was a member of the network in July 2017, and they seem to have done a network update since then. I certainly don't remember the navigation problems I see today: a year ago, navigation was easy, it was easy to find the content of each site. Today, the content seems to be jumbled together. A simple example: in July 2017, I stated in a review that the New Sensations network had 25 sites. marcdc1, in his 11-06-18 review of New Sensations stated the network has 26 sites. The Best Porn review, dated 11-12-18, says the network gives access to 12 sites. As I said, membership in the network gives access to all the sites in the network. Sometimes The Best Porn reviews are not entirely accurate. But to go from 12 sites access to 26 sites access seems like a big jump. The search is site-specific. When you search for the content of a model, the search results are limited to the site you are currently logged in to. -To search the entire network for a model's content, log in to the New Sensations Network Home, and that should give you her content at the network. BOTTOM LINE (START OF): When you score a particular site, the site factors include: -Amount of content. -Quality of the content. -Site structure. Is the site easy or difficult to use? To find the content. To stream or download the content. The New Sensations network has a large amount of high quality content. The models can be attractive to very attractive. The stories can add flavor to the sex. You have multiple choices for download and streaming the videos. The videos are professionally shot. I wish the photosets were higher quality, because some of the models are very attractive. But finding the content can be difficult. Even knowing what site you are in can be difficult, because the videos and photosets are all marked "New Sensations", not marked by the site name. I'm giving the NS Romance site a score of 85. Because the good quality content is there: but finding it can be a hassle. There might be a chronological listing of the site contents for each site, or an alphabetical listing: but I haven't found those yet. So a lot of the content seems buried in a jumbled mess. 11-29-18  09:35am Replies (2) Review 145 NS Romance (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PART OF THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE SITE GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK. THE NETWORK DOES NOT HAVE A PREMIUM MEMBER SECTION, THERE ARE NO TEASER ADS TO UPGRADE YOUR MEMBER LEVEL. -CSHELPCENTER.COM IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. BUT I WAS ABLE TO SWITCH TO EPOCH ON THE JOIN PAGE. -ALTHOUGH ADS ARE USUALLY ANNOYING, SOME OF THE DEALS OFFERED ARE VERY LOW PRICES FOR WELL-KNOWN SITES. FOR EXAMPLE, THEY CURRENTLY OFFER A 30-DAY MEMBERSHIP TO METART FOR $7.95, WHICH IS THE LOWEST PRICE I'VE EVER SEEN FOR METART. -THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS GOOD TO EXCELLENT. MONEY WAS SPENT TO CREATE HI-GRADE SCENES WITH NICE SETTINGS, GOOD TECHNICAL DETAILS (GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA-WORK, ETC.), AND A ROMANTIC PLOT TO GIVE MEANING TO THE SEX. -THE MODELS AT THIS SITE ARE GOOD- TO GREAT-LOOKING YOUNG WOMEN. ONE SITE IN PARTICULAR, THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, HAS MODELS AND VIDEOS THAT RIVAL ANYTHING FOUND AT X-ART, BLACKED, OR TUSHY. Cons: PROS (CONTINUED): -SCENES CAN BE STREAMED OR DOWNLOADED. IN DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS AND FILE TYPES. -THERE IS A ZIP OFFERED FOR EACH SCENE PHOTOSET. -YOU CAN RATE AND COMMENT ON THE VIDEOS. HOWEVER, THE COMMENT SECTIONS FOR THE VIDEOS I LOOKED AT WERE ALL EMPTY. WHICH WAS STRANGE. CONS (START OF): -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON THE JOIN PAGE. -NO PU/TBP DISCOUNT ON MEMBER PRICE. $29.95/MONTH RECURRING. -NO RECENT UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2016-12-05. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. BUT THE ADS ONLY TAKE A SMALL PART OF THE PAGE. -THE VOICE-OVERS AND PLOT-LINES CAN BE ANNOYING. Bottom Line: I JOINED NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, AND GAINED ACCESS TO NS ROMANCE. THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK IS HUGE: 6500+ EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS 2500+ PORN STARS NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES 15+ BONUS SITES HD QUALITY VIDEOS CURRENTLY, YOU GET ACCESS TO 22 SITES IN THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK: ASHLYNN BROOKE BUSTY COLLEGE COEDS BUTT DIVERS FOUR FINGER CLUB FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL FUCK FOR DOLLARS HEAVY HANDFULS HOTWIFEXXX I FILM MYSELF INTERNAL VIOLATIONS JIZZBOMB LIL'LATINAS MR. BIGGZ PAPA LOADS PARODY PASS POV FANTASY SADIE WEST SHANE DIESEL'S BANGIN' BABES THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE THE ROMANCE SERIES THE TABU TALES THE TALES FROM THE EDGE THE ROMANCE SERIES, ALSO CALLED NS ROMANCE, FEATURES SCENES WITH A RUNTIME OF 25+ MINUTES. THIS IS THE FIRST GLAMCORE SITE I'VE COME ACROSS THAT FEATURES TRUE LOVE, ALONG WITH THE SEX. THERE IS ALSO A PLOT, THAT FEATURES THE STUMBLING BLOCKS THAT PREVENT TRUE LOVE FROM FLOWING SMOOTHLY. WHEN THE LOVERS ARE ABLE TO OVERCOME THEIR OBSTACLES, THE VIEWER'S HEART SOARS WITH JOY WATCHING THESE LOVELY COUPLES REACH SEXUAL BLISS. (IF YOU WATCH THESE VIDEOS, YOU WON'T NEED TO WATCH DISNEY CARTOONS, WHICH ARE RATED PG-13 OR LOWER. BECAUSE THE ROMANCE SERIES ARE THE REAL DEAL: ROMANCE WITH HARDCORE SEX.) HOWEVER, YOU NEED TO TURN OFF YOUR BRAIN WHILE WATCHING THESE VIDEOS. DISNEY EMPLOYS BETTER ACTORS IN THEIR CARTOONS THAN NEW SENSATIONS DOES, WHICH MAKES THE DISNEY CARTOONS MORE BELIEVABLE. THE MESSAGE OF THE NEW SENSATIONS ROMANCE SERIES IS THE SAME AS DISNEY'S MESSAGE: TRUE LOVE CONQUERS ALL! THE GLAMCORE SITES LIKE X-ART, BLACKED, TUSHY, ETC. FEATURE MIGHT HAVE AN ELEMENT OF GENTLE SEX, BUT THE DIFFERENCE AT NEW SENSATIONS IS THAT SEX LEADS TO LOVE, AND LOVE OFTEN LEADS TO MARRIAGE. THE X-ART, BLACKED, TUSHY SITES FOCUS MORE ON THE SEXUAL THRILLS, OFTEN FORBIDDEN, WHICH ADDS TO THE EXCITEMENT OF THE SEX. WHICH IS A DIFFERENT APPROACH. WATCHING THE ROMANCE SERIES OF VIDEOS: THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE, THE STUNT COCKS ARE OK, BUT THE STUPID PLOT JUST GETS IN THE WAY: I KEEP THINKING--FORGET THE SOUL-WRENCHING HEARTACHE AND DOUBTS, JUST FUCK THE GIRL ALREADY. THE PLOTS ARE BASED ON SUPER-SWEET LOVE, THAT IS BETTER SERVED IN A DISNEY CARTOON THAN IN THE NEW SENSATION ROMANCE VIDEOS. I FOUND ANOTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK, THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, TO BE MORE ENJOYABLE AND EASIER TO WATCH: THE GIRLS ARE EXCEPTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE, THE SCENES ARE FILMED IN HIGH-CLASS GLAMCORE STYLE, AND THAT SITE IS AS GOOD AS X-ART, BLACK, OR TUSHY. I THINK THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK OFFERS GOOD VALUE FOR YOUR HARD-EARNED PORN DOLLARS. BUT THE NS ROMANCE VIDEOS ARE SPOILED, FOR ME AT LEAST, BY THE "TRUE CONFESSIONS" APPROACH TO LOVE AND ROMANCE, IN SPITE OF THE ATTRACTIVE MODELS. THESE VIDEOS SHOULD BE WATCHED WHILE DRUNK. THEN, THE VOICE-OVERS OF THE STUNT COCK MIGHT BE LESS ANNOYING, AND YOU CAN FAST-FORWARD TO THE GOOD PARTS. A DIFFERENT OPTION IS TO MUTE THE SOUND, AND FAST-FORWARD TO THE GOOD PARTS. WHICH SAVES ON LIQUOR BILLS. GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 88, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS TO A LOT OF HIGH-GRADE CONTENT. 04-04-17  03:12am Replies (3) Review 146 Nubile Girls HD (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -No DRM. -No site timeout. -Nice-sized thumbnail of the female model to illustrate each video. -Some cute models. -The girls are real teens, not twenty- or thirty-year olds trying to appear much younger. -Can add/view comments on videos and photosets. -Can rate the videos photosets. -Small watermark bottom right-hand corner of photos. -The videos are mainly clear and crisp, with adequate lighting. The videos and photosets are less gonzo style than the other sites in the network, but are not glamor-style, more like in-between gonzo and glamor style. Cons: -There is no search. Not a major problem because the site is so small. Only 75 videos so far. Can list the videos by name of model or by date posted (but date posted is not accurate or reliable). -Occasionally, a photo will not display when you click on the thumbnail, get an error message: "cannot be displayed, because it contains errors". -Hard to tell what the update rate is, because the posting dates are unreliable. -Only 1 size of file to download video (no choice of hi, mid, lo quality). -Videos download as WMV files (no other file extension choice). -Only 1 size of zip file to download photoset. -Limited types of models: they are all white Eastern European teens. Bottom Line: Hardcore teen site, with some good looking young teens. Sample size for the videos and photosets: Videos are 400 MB to 1 GB Photosets are 40 MB to 120 MB Currently 75 videos with a matching photoset for each video. Usually 1 video per model. A few models have 2 videos. Photos are crisp, but mainly to illustrate the video action; the photos are not artistic or glamor style such as the softcore photo sites like metart or mplstudios. The style of the photos is more natural than glamor. I personally don't like the photos, but some PU members might appreciate them: they are clear, usually crisp, hardcore photosets, with some really nice-looking models. Natural style of photography. The video and photoset are mainly hardcore boy-girl; a few sets are softcore or midcore, where the girl is solo or with a second girl. The photosets approach high quality in terms of photo size. But you don't actually get the quality of a met-art, mplstudios or other softcore photo site. I don't understand why it's so hard to make a quality hardcore photoset. This site has plenty of cute girls, doing hardcore, but the photography is poor or lacking: in the flesh colors of the girls, in the presentation of the girls, the girls just lack attractiveness or allure in the photos. I grew up in the days of Playboy and Penthouse. I didn't like every Playboy or Penthouse photoshoot, but in many cases, the girls/women looked extremely attractive, sexy, luscious, gorgeous, adorable, lovely. You don't get that in these photosets. You can find it in the met-art and mplstudios and other glamor teen sites. The problem is that the girls are not presented at their best. It's like you buy an off brand of some product you like, Cheerios, or Rice Crispies, and the taste is blah instead of what you get from the major brand. They don't use photoshop or airbrushing on these photos, and that's part of why I rate the photos lower. But it's also the skin tone of the models, the posing, the composition, everything that factors into how attractive or erotic a photograph is. The photosets are high quality in the size of the photos (each photo is 100 KB to 1 MB), but the quality of the photos is not up to the standards of the softcore glamor sites. Some of the models at this site are also at met-art, glamdeluxe, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. And they look much more attractive on the other sites, because of the photography or videography. If this site is included in your network membership, you should definitely check the site out. Some models here (mainly the same ones shown on many of the other sites in the network) are very attractive, the videos are shot less gonzo style, the photosets are worth looking at. 08-07-10  08:09pm Replies (14) Review 147 Nubiles Porn (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -CCBill is the payment processor: trusted name, easy to join and/or cancel, and CCBill website has the details of your membership. -Get an email confirmation on signup. Email states the price and length of membership, plus the billing agent, plus the account number. But the username and password items are left blank. So write down the username and password when joining, or you will have to contact the website or CCBill for those details. -Nubiles-porn is a network with access to many different sites. The main sites in the network are listed in the first reply below. -The nubiles.net site, by itself, is worth the price of membership. Because nubiles.net has a massive catalog of teen models. And the nubiles.net site, by itself, has a daily update rate of videos and photosets. -The search engine searches the entire network, not just the site you are logged in to. -Navigation is easy. You can easily switch from photoset to video and back again. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The photos in the photosets appear to be real photos. Excellent quality. You look at some of these fine-looking models, and you either get horny, or you're dead inside. For some reason, I appreciate some of the photosets at Nubiles-porn more than the sets at MetArt. MetArt has been a disappointment with some of the recent photosets, for me. At MetArt, they put the models into contorted positions to showcase the model's pussy or ass, and it just seems like an uncomfortable experience. Let the girl stand up or lay down in a normal position, and show the girl as a person, instead of an ass or pussy. The photos at nubiles.net are simpler, in composition, and they shoot the girl in natural positions, without the contortions that MetArt favors. -You can live-stream the photosets in large, medium or small definition. -The online live-stream photoplay mechanism is fast and easy to use. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): This is one of the best networks for hardcore teens. The catalog of teens is huge at Nubiles.net. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Entering the member's area, the first page you see is ads for other sites. -And you get more ads on every member page. I've seen worse sites, where the ads overwhelm the members content, but since you paid for a membership to access the sites, they should respect you enough to not bombard paying members to grab more cash. -The model page at Nubiles-porn only lists the model's content at some of the network sites: it does not include the model's content at nubiles.net, which is a mistake, because the nubiles.net content for a model is probably the major part of her network content. So you have to switch to the nubiles.net site to search for the model's name, to see her content at that site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There are some outstanding bargains in the porn world. I consider nubiles-porn one of them. Mainly because of the inclusion of nubiles.net, which has a massive catalog of young, fresh teens, and also updates on a daily basis with at least one video and photoset. I also enjoy the quality of the videos and photosets at nubiles.net, and some of the videos and photosets at the other sites in the network. The quality of the videos and photosets is excellent: and the composition is simpler and more natural than some glamcore sites, and they also include basic costumes (not expensive, but natural clothes) that adds to the effectiveness of the photos. -Some of the plots of the videos are interesting. "My Sister Wives What It Takes - S1:E10" Bunny Colby's husband Charles Dera has just taken a new sister wife, Danni Rivers. Unfortunately, when Danni arrives home with her new hubby they both quickly realize that she has no idea what she's doing in the bedroom. Danni is timid and unsure when Charles hikes up her wedding dress and pushes her panties aside to eat her out. Then Charles whips out his dick and sticks in it, but he can tell Dani isn't having a great time. Finally Charles calls Bunny in to help her new sister wife out. What impresses me about the video is how Bunny Colby(aka Nadya Nabakova), a fine looking woman, is willing to help the new wife learn the finer points of sex with their mutual husband. Bunny Colby, an under-appreciated star of the porn world. I keep finding these girls (or women, Bunny Colby is around 26) and their attractiveness amazes me. It keeps me interested in porn. Overview: It's been a while since I was a member of nubiles-porn, and I forgot how clean and good the network is. Especially the nubiles.net site, which is the crown jewel of the network. Navigation is basically easy, once you learn about the drop-down menu that allows you to switch between sites. Although the PU/TBP has a discounted price of $19.98 for the first month, I recommend waiting for a holiday special, where the discounts are even more. I joined for a year at $84/recurring, which is an exceptional value. Because of: -the massive amount of high quality videos and photosets. -the massive catalog of young, fresh teens. -easy network navigation. -low membership price, especially during holiday discounts. I'm giving the nubiles-porn network a score of 95. See the reply section for a listing of the sites you get access to with a Nubiles-Porn membership. 06-24-19  03:43am Replies (3) Review 148 Nubiles Porn (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 12-20-17  10:25am  (Update History) Reason: RAISED SCORE, BECAUSE CONTENT IS EASIER TO FIND, THROUGH THE DROP-DOWN MENU. Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. NOTE: I SIGNED UP FOR DIFFERENT SITES ON THE BLACK FRIDAY SPECIALS. AND I MIXED UP SOME DETAILS ON THIS REVIEW WITH ANOTHER JOIN. BUT I'M CORRECTING MISTAKES I MADE. I HOPE TO MAKE THIS REVIEW MORE ACCURATE. THANKS TO THE INPUT FROM THE SITE WEBMASTER, AND FROM LOKI FOR THE HELP WITH MY REVIEW. PROS -I JOINED ON A BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL: $9.95 FOR 30 DAYS. RECURRING 14.95 EVERY 30 DAYS. -EXCELLENT STREAMING OF VIDS. YOU CAN FAST-FORWARD AND IT STILL STREAMS SMOOTHLY. -EXCELLENT QUALITY VIDEOS: GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD COLORS, GOOD FOCUS, -LARGE NUMBER OF GOOD-LOOKING MODELS. -AROUND 900 HARD CORE VIDEOS. -YOU GET ACCESS TO 13 SEPARATE SITES WITH MEMBERSHIP IN NUBILES PORN. SEE THE BOTTOM LINE FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF THE 13 SITES. -EPOCH AND CCBILL ARE THE PRIMARY BILLING AGENTS. TRUSTED NAMES, EASY TO DEAL WITH. Cons: -THERE IS A LEARNING CURVE TO USING THE NETWORK. THE NETWORK HAS A TON OF GREAT MATERIAL, BUT YOU NEED TO KNOW HOW TO FIND IT. -YOU CAN LOG IN TO EACH INDIVIDUAL SITE IN THE NETWORK THROUGH A DROP-DOWN BOX FOUND IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER. THANKS TO PU MEMBER LOKI FOR THIS TIP. IT MAKES USING THE NETWORK/SITES SO MUCH EASIER. -1 PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -RANDOM LOGIN DETAILS ARE ASSIGNED-YOU CAN'T CHOOSE YOUR USERNAME OR PASSWORD. -THEY DID A RECENT SITE/NETWORK UPDATE. -YOU GET ACCESS TO 13 SEPARATE SITES WITH MEMBERSHIP IN NUBILES PORN. WHICH IS GREAT. BUT THEY SHOULD MAKE ACCESS TO EACH SITE MORE OBVIOUS, UNLESS YOU KNOW THE TRICK ABOUT USING THE DROP-DOWN MENU IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER. Bottom Line: WHAT ARE THE SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN NUBILES PORN? BadTeensPunished.com BountyHunterPorn.com DriverXXX.com MomsTeachSex.com Nubiles-Casting.com Nubiles-Porn.com Nubiles.net NubilesUnscripted.com PetiteBallerinasFucked.com PetiteHDPorn.com PrincessCum.com StepSiblingsCaught.com TeacherFucksTeens.com NUBILES.NET IS A LARGE SITE WITH A HUGE AMOUNT OF GOOD-LOOKING TEEN MODELS, NUBILES PORN GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE NUBILES.NET SITE. NUBILES.NET ALONE IS WORTH THE MEMBERSHIP PRICE. BOTTOM LINE: PU MEMBER LOKI GAVE ME A GREAT TIP ABOUT USING THE DROP DOWN MENU AT THE TOP RIGHT CORNER. IT MAKES USING THE NETWORK/SITES SO MUCH EASIER. THERE IS A MODEL LISTING. WITH A THUMBNAIL FOR EACH MODEL. AND IF YOU CLICK ON THE MODEL'S NAME, YOU SEE A BIGGER THUMBNAIL, AND HER CONTENT AT THE NETWORK. BUT I WISH THE SMALL THUMBNAIL, AND THE BIGGER THUMBNAIL, WERE BETTER QUALITY. NUBILES PORN IS A QUALITY SITE: BUT THE QUALITY OF THE MODEL THUMBNAILS IS NOT HIGH QUALITY: MANY OTHER PORN SITES GIVE A BETTER MODEL THUMBNAIL, SO YOU CAN TELL WHAT THE MODEL LOOKS LIKE MORE EASILY. THIS REVIEW IS A WORK-IN-PROGRESS. I'M UPDATING THE REVIEW AS I LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NETWORK. GIVING NUBILES PORN A SCORE OF 92. THIS IS ONE OF THE BETTER SITES TO JOIN, IN THE TEEN HARDCORE CATEGORY. 12-19-17  06:19am Replies (4) Review 149 Nuru Massage (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -A large site. Currently 569 videos. -Still updating. About 1 video per week. -The videos are professionally hot: this is a premium site: Everything is first class: nice sets, good camera work, good lighting, clear, crisp images. -streaming is offered in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -downloading is offered in 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p. -All content is exclusive. Let me note exclusive content: many tube sites can have some edited videos from Nuru Massage (and many other porn sites). The tube sites can offer good samples of the content of porn sites, giving you an idea of what those porn sites offer. -The quality of the models is good: the models are mainly in their late teens or twenties. Many of them are attractive women. Mostly white. -Each video has a good quality photo set. The photos seem excellent quality, probably from a camera instead of the more common screen-cap conversion software program found at many hardcore sites. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -There is a lower-cost streaming only membership offered through Adult Time. As well as a higher-priced streaming plus downloading membership from Adult Time. I don't see a streaming-only membership offered from Nuru Massage: the memberships seem to be streaming plus downloading. -Even though I said there was good sound control (meaning there not a lot of loud, extraneous noises in the video, and even though the models are speaking in English, it's sometimes hard to understand the spoken words. Maybe it's an echo effect, or something. But except for hearing the moans and groans and grunts of sex (which, if believable, help increase the heat of the video), the meaning of most dialogue is basically irrelevant to the action: it's the sex that counts, not what the models are saying (except in unusual situations, where the plot can add meaning, so it's nice to be able to follow the plot, if there is one). Bottom Line: This is a massage-themed porn sites. There is a brief back story which sets up the action, which is a nuru massage (a sexual massage). Nuru massage is an actual massage technique from Japan. But Nuru Massage is a porn site that is part of the Fantasy Massage network from Gamma Entertainment. The site and network was folded into Adult Time network last year. A membership in Adult Time should give you access to the Fantasy Massage network. However, it seems that Adult Time slices and dices the Gamma sites that are offered in different memberships: the basic membership offers streaming only. Unlimited. The premium membership (at a higher price) offers streaming and downloading. Unlimited. The Adult Time memberships are still given out on a random basis, if you join one of the satellite sites in the network. You can join Adult Time directly but you will pay a higher price than if you join a member site during a discounted holiday special. Adult Time network is the crown jewel, offering access to 142 channels (sites). As far as content, you should have access to around 48,869 hardcore videos that were professionally shot: this means, mainly, good camera work, good lighting, good sets, good sound control, etc. So the Adult Time network is a fantastic deal if you can get it at a reduced price. A ton of good hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches, with thousands of porn stars, many of them well-known or famous. If you don't get access to the Adult Time network with your membership to Nuru Massage or Fantasy Massage, then you are missing out on a huge amount of quality porn in the rest of the Adult Time network. Sorry to keep repeating myself: But the important point is: Adult Time network is the jewel: vast amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide variety of niches, with a large number of female porn stars. Any membership in one of the Adult Time sites that does not include access to the entire Adult Time network means you are paying a high price for the limited amount of content you have access to. The porn landscape has changed dramatically since the introduction of Adult Time. A competing network, Lets Doe It (which recently changed its name from Porn Doe Premium), has over 40 sites, some of which are really outstanding (The White Boxxx does a great job presenting its models as gorgeous creatures), but Adult Time has far more content, and the quality of the porn at some of the sites is truly outstanding. Of course, porn is a matter of personal taste: so what appeals to me might be boring to you, and vice versa. But if you had to join only one porn site, my choice would be the Adult Time network. Except to get a lower price, you should probably join through one of the member sites. But first get a confirmation you will be getting access to the Adult Time network. Getting back to the Nuru Massage site: Nuru Massage has 569 so it's a large site. Most of the videos are Boy/Girl massage. But there are also some Girl/Girl and Girl/Girl/Boy videos, for variety. The Boy/Girl videos, although supposedly a Nuru massage, have less massage and more girl grabs boy's cock, licks and kisses it, partial blowjob, short fuck, and what else can they do? I actually found many of the massage videos at Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Mega World), which are also found at the Diesel Network and at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) to be more erotic. I prefer the Tricky Masseur videos to the Nuru massage videos, because the action seems more realistic, and hotter. I'm giving the Nuru Massage a score of 82. If you add in access to the entire Adult Time network, streaming and downloading, at a discounted price, then the score jumps to 95. I'm not impressed with Nuru Massage. I am impressed with some of the sites and some content of Adult Time. 02-05-19  07:05pm Replies (0) Review 150 Nylons X (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -$14.95/month PU discount, if you join through Teen Mega World. $19.95/month PU discount, if you join NylonsX directly. Teen Mega World gives you full access to NylonsX, and NylonsX gives you full access to Teen Mega World. -Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. -Zip file for each photo set. -Fast download speeds. I was getting 5 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed. -Download managers are allowed at site. I use Down Them All, a free download manager which is easy to use. -No download limits. -No DRM. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded. -The site (and network) are easy to navigate. Even though the network is huge (over 4,000 videos), the model index, hot links, and search engine make it easy to find good videos of your favorite models or type of sex. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Remember to uncheck if you don't want the trial subscription. -The site advertises "Constant Updates With Fresh Teen Videos". This is misleading. You get updates for the Teen Mega World network, but NylonsX site stopped updating in 2012. Teen Mega World network updates with one video and matching photo set per day. -Because the site stopped updating in 2012, the site offers fewer choices in the download file definitions for videos: Many of the other sites in the network offer 1080p, 720p, 540p, and 405p (for mobile). At NylonsX, the choices are limited to 720p and 540p. -Only one definition for the zip file photo set. At many porn sites, you get a choice of high, medium or low definition for zip file download. -Photo set zips and videos download with generic numeric file names. So you have to re-name each file with model's name, date posted, site. Bottom Line: Site statistics: 32 videos and matching galleries. Site theme: girls wearing pantyhose or stockings having sex. The site was started in February 2012, and stopped updating in October 2012. That is a shame. Because some of the models that appear at the site are very attractive and the sex can be hot. The sex can be a single girl masturbating, with her fingers or a toy, or a boy and girl fucking (vaginal or anal), with some cocksucking for variety. The site (and Teen Mega World network) features what I think of as bread-and-butter sex: The videos are plain: the costumes are inexpensive, the storyline/plot is almost non-existent. The production values are basic. However, the videos are professionally shot: the lighting is good, good sound control, good camera-work (not a lot of jerky movements, mainly good framing of the sex action, good focus), etc. You don't get the high-end glamour videos you will find at a site like X-Art, where the videos are not just professionally shot, but the production values are much higher, and the lighting, costumes (what costumes there are), and sets are more expensive. The videos at X-Art are high-quality porn of extremely good-looking girls having sex. Even at X-Art there is almost no plot or story, before the girl starts masturbating or the girl and guy start fucking. But X-Art is high quality porn, where they choose their models for the physical attractiveness, and then put extra effort into tapeing or photographing the girls to emphasize their beauty. So Teen Mega World (and NylonsX) is basic porn, while X-Art is glamour porn. Teen Mega World gives you over 4,000 videos for a very low price, of hardcore teen sex, in a variety of niches. X-Art gives you over 700 videos for a higher price. But the models range from attractive to lovely, and it's one of the best glamcore sites available. $14.95/month for Teen Mega World. $19.95/month for X-Art. Both sites feature young models, with sex that can be interesting or hot. Both sites are worth joining. But it depends on personal taste, which site will give you the best value. Note: If you join NylonsX directly with a PU discount, the price is $19.95/month. If you join Teen Mega World directly (with a PU discount), the price is $14.95/month. Teen Mega World membership gives you full access to NylonsX, so save $5/month by joining Teen Mega World. I'm giving NylonsX a score of 92, because it's part of the Teen Mega World network, and I'm really giving the score to the network. My personal opinion is that Teen Mega World gives a lot of value for your porn dollars. As long as you know what you are getting, and enjoy bread-and-butter teen hardcore sex. Of young, pretty girls. If NylonsX was a separate, stand-alone site, with no access to other sites, I would give NylonsX a score in the 50s or 60s, because it's a small site that stopped updating years ago. And the few videos at the site are not exceptional enough to raise the score to the 70s. But I am a sucker for some of the models in the videos. I don't know how to explain it, but even though this is not a glamcore site, I think some of these models are extremely desirable. This is personal taste. If you don't find the models attractive, you could rate the stand-alone site in the 50s. 04-10-16  03:58am Replies (2) Shown : 126-150 of 286 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.45 seconds.