| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
FTV Girls
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Nice Magazine Covers
+ Nice Web Design
+ Have to cancel to get lower membership price offer of $19,95 USD
+ Set of large pictures given every 4-6 months
+ Just started HD video |
| Cons: |
- No Daily Updates – up to a week for single model update
- Blurry and porly lit pictures
- Girls seem forced into uncomfortable situations and not very happy.
- Only one size small pictures offered weekly
- No customer service. Tried to cancel and charged again. No email back
- Not so many pretty models |
| Bottom Line: |
I originally join site because of TheBestPorn review but was very sad. TBP review not honest about site. Ftv updates every 6-7 days which makes it not worth money. Only single model updates so when model not pretty you have to wait 1 more week and wish a pretty girl is added. To many bigger sites for money update daily like met-art, ronharris, alscans, and 1by-day with higher quality pictures and better video. Ftv trys to shoot glamore but Met-art is very much better quality and value. Site not first time video because always same models do video for Ronharris and other sites many months before ftv.
Many pictures are blurry/graney that is why pictures are only given in one small size for download. Every 4-6 month site releases a set of supersize pictures hand selected to find no blurry pictures. They should give all picture sizes in each weekly update. Site has nice magazine covers to get peoples money. Almost no Hi-Def video, only few models. Rest of site is low def video.
Same models shot at other sites look much better. I collect pretty models from many sites and ftv pictures and video are never as good. In videos man filming makes models uncomfortable and makes me sad for them. This is true review that so many more better sites for money with daily updates. Site does have some pretty girls but not enough. Members site layout is very good. Site was better 3 years before but now compatition much better then Ftv. |
|
12-18-07 08:11am
Replies (7)
|
Review
77
|
FTV Girls
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very cute, sexy and NATURAL girls!!!
Real orgasms, no fake
A lot of models
Video quality is good
Picture quality is good
Good download speeds
The guy running the website is very nice and good customer support |
| Cons: |
Not a lot of action in the videos...
Sometimes, videos are too short
Not a lot of content per models
Way too pricey for the content
Older videos are of bad quality
Site navigation needs a major tweak |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV girls has always been one of the best website on the internet. I have been a member a few years ago, and all I can say is that it hasn't changed much since then... I had to cancel my membership after a few minutes browsing the website...
The girls are very great looking, they are all natural and the videos are great quality.
However, there is not a lot of action in the videos. Most of the videos have the girls talk for way too long or just tease. The actual masturbation videos are kind of short, or they do the same thing which gets boring.
Another point is that for mostly all the models, they only have one video or one picture gallery. It is really missing content.
The website navigation, especially the search feature needs to be better. You can only search models by one pre-made keyword or by viewing the models by alphabetical list. But to find a model you like, you are going to have to browse through all of them.
I have suggested to the webmaster to add a new search feature, where you could search models by hair color, eye color, measurements, nationality, etc, etc, but he replied to me saying he couldn't do it because FTV doesn't have employees, he manages the website all by himself and it took him almost 1 year to do the search filter he has now.
Well let me tell you something... With the money you make, you might want to hire someone to maintain your website. And creating the kind of filter you have right now on your website could probably take 5 mins for someone who knows what they are doing. The new filter wouldn't take that much long either.
Don't get me wrong, FTV is awesome, but way too much pricey for the content and the poor website navigation.
I am not sure if I can recommend this website for those reasons. |
|
05-28-11 11:14am
Replies (3)
|
Rating
78
|
FTV Girls
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
11-28-10 08:33am
|
Rating
79
|
FTV Girls
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
03-04-07 03:06pm
|
Review
80
|
FTV Girls
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls are absolutely hot. There are lots of them. |
| Cons: |
Though the girls are hot, the photography is only average. It's not up to today's standards. The photo-shoots are average.
The site navigation is also outdated. I'd also like to add terrible. I feel it's like it's a site from 10 years ago.
The search option need work as well. How could you miss out on this aspect when you showcase so many models. It lacks depth and is confusing.
This site is really slow. I have a high speed connection (32 mbps on speedtest.net) and loading times are slow and choppy at times.
I have nothing to say about the vids. I didn't watch many of them. I'm a pictures guy. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been wanting to try out this site for a long time now. Now that I've become a member, I'm very disappointed with it. I'm also disappointed that it got such a high rating considering lots of mediocre aspects. I didn't even download one set. I'm going back to my old porn collection. I'm dissatisfied with the content, site, and value praised about this site. |
|
07-25-11 11:02pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
81
|
FTV Girls
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-gorgeous models
-high quality videos and pictures
-streaming videos
-uses ccbill |
| Cons: |
-files are named 01, 02, 03 and so on
-horrendous download speeds
-no tech support |
| Bottom Line: |
this site is great as far as content goes. however my download speeds are at 275 kb/s. i have no problems with any other site. ive contacted tech support, they ignored me. i have given the lowest score possible because if you cant download the video whats the point of even joining? |
|
07-02-14 09:15pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
82
|
FTV Girls
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others. |
| Cons: |
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls. |
|
08-11-21 05:46am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
83
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
03-23-23 07:52am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
84
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
08-21-21 04:14am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
85
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
03-31-21 09:42am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
86
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
12-06-18 03:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
87
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
08-13-18 08:41am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
88
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
10-22-17 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
89
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
09-16-17 09:25am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
90
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
03-03-17 12:54am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
91
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
04-02-16 06:53am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
92
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
11-22-15 12:32am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
93
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
09-16-15 07:32am
Replies (12)
|
Comment
94
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
02-07-15 05:38am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
95
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
08-03-14 03:50pm
Replies (8)
|
Comment
96
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
06-23-14 07:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
97
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
01-11-14 02:53am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
98
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
04-29-13 10:11pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
99
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
12-03-12 01:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
100
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
11-22-12 03:51pm
Replies (1)
|
|
