| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Large selection of models (440)
-Big selection of videos (3008) dating back to 2004
-Updated often – at least every week
-Blog updated every few days – get to know the models more intimately
-Live Cam option
-Artistically shot. |
| Cons: |
-Website hard to navigate
-Not organised into niches/kinks
-No B/G shoots only masturbation and G/G
-Have to pay extra for Staff Selections |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS Scan is part of a collective of sites under the name of MetArt Network. They have been online since around 2004 and have a considered, artistic approach to erotica and porn. The 3008 “films” on the site (which is quite a lot considering there is little to no variation in niches/kinks; they have masturbation and G/G videos available) are shot using a cinematic 2.35:1 aspect ratio giving the shoots a more artistic feel for the viewer, but the set design in some of these shoots are a let down. The models are young, slim girls mostly from America but they have some Eastern European girls as well. There is not much of a spectrum when it comes to the models looks/size but there are around 440 different girls on the site to look at; so if its your kind of girl then you’ll have plenty to see. The videos are updated at least every week which is great! The only down point being if they update with a “Staff Selection” you still have to pay more on top of your membership to download it. The quality is high class for all shoots; and easily downloadable. Every few days the Blog is updated letting you into the upcoming news with new girls and their interests and information about them. This is great because it allows you to get to know the girls more and paired with the “Behind the Scenes” videos you reall get an insight in the porn industry and who the models really are.
The pricing is a monthly payment of €19.99, 1 month for €29.99 or a yearly payment of €8.33 a month. Using the site also gives you free trial access to a number of other sites including Erotic Beauty and Domai; which are all part of the wider MetArt Network family.
ALS Scan is a good softcore porn site if you like slim to skinny, young, American (some Eastern European) girls. I think that their approach to porn is positive and promotes an artistic, considered future in porn; and they give to charity too! Having said that, the site could use a navigation re-design and variety in kinks; more than just masturbation and G/G. But overall it’s a great site. |
|
02-26-20 02:31am
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A lot of slim, shaven, very cute, girl next door type models. Many are pros without their makeup.
2,959 videos, 3,276 photo sets and 435 models.
Averages over 1 update per day, interviews are rare, interviews are rare but are included, also remastered sets of older sets, most are solo and lesbian scenes.
They work on the girl-crush meter with models like Vina Skyy and Allie Addison.
Site is simple to use. Easy to join and cancel.
Photo sets, at times, trump the videos, with extreme close-ups in huge resolution that shows how wet the models are. |
| Cons: |
I find the models to be an overall mixed lot. It's subjective, Vina Skyy and Allie Addison are two of my current favorites, but there are just as many models I don't even check out.
Some of the extreme penetrations take away from the eroticism of the content. Vina has a set where she "whisks" her pussy with a kitchen whisk. It's not solid and it's wiry. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second time joining this site. I didn't review it the previous time. I think it's way up there in the teen category and with the slimmer models, but I'm not always in the mood for the cutesy teens.
I decided to join again when I saw they have new content of Vina Skyy and Allie Addison, two models that couldn't possibly be more different, but I have a huge girl-crush on both of them. Vina has 7 videos, including the much anticipated ride on the Sybian and 7 photo sets. Allie has 5 videos and 5 photo sets. They are not the only models I joined for, but when I join a site this big, I try to make sure there are some new sets of my girl-crush models and then look through the archives.
I like that they are remastering old, popular sets as it's helping me find some models I probably wouldn't have looked far enough back to find.
The videos have a broad range of masturbation. Toys, fingers, gynecological tools, kitchen utensils, fruits, vegetables, Sybian, Magic Wands, they should work on getting royalties for these products!
The majority of the scenes are solo and many of the lesbian scenes are only so-so. Others have mentioned the tropical trips and I finally downloaded those. Those are some of the best lesbian scenes I have seen as they look to be improvised. I mentioned in the pros that I believe some of the photo sets are better than the videos. The photo sets are deep and even engaging, some are in the 200 range of photos, others go as high as nearing 400. These are not screen captures and you can tell good care is put into getting the most explicit views.
Something I believe this site offers that others don't is the girls are not all made up, it's not a glamour site even though some sets might look that way. I have seen models on here that I'm familiar with on other sites and realized how much I like them even if I didn't before.
the video quality is great with 4K on newer videos and 1080p or 720p on sets as far back as 2008. The photo sets besides being large in quantity of photos come in zip downloads and in their largest size are 3000x4500, the Vina Skyy photos were enough reason for me to join. I don't think I've ever seen a model that gets so naturally creamy and wet in just a photo shoot.
The cancellation process is as simple as setting your account not to rebill and you also have favorites where you can store your favorite models or scenes. I am happier with the site than I expected to be. I sometimes find these cute model sites to be more annoying than arousing, but they have enough of those cute models that are very good at being arousing to make it a great site. Something I will end with is something I have mentioned in other reviews. I like that they have less than 500 models, but have over 6,000 videos/photo sets combined. It gives you a chance to get multiple sets of the models you like and makes it feel like they are selective about their models. |
|
12-02-19 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
28
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
ALS SCAN. I'm sure ALS is the real reason the internet took off back in 1998. DOWNLOAD SPEED - fast. GIRLS - awesome. QUANTITY - too much, like a kid in a candy store. Brilliant. I've never seen some many happy vegetables. If I was reincarnated, I would like come back as a cucumber on an ALS photoshoot. |
| Cons: |
Why do they assume that we want to start the pleasure of our viewing with the girls already naked, already sitting down/lying down, dildo already lubed up. Where's the foreplay, these girls should be wrapped up in sexy outfits like the best presents under my Xmas tree. I'd like to see them walking around in those ridiculous heels that Porns Stars must wear (Ding Dong), with skimpy clothes on, desperate to do their dirty/sexy strips, but we never have any of that. Is there no appreciation for the good old stage by stage - get you exited yadda yadda yadda approach. Sometimes you do feel like you've walked into a Gynecologists surgery. Exact repeating theme does get monotonous |
| Bottom Line: |
The models are amazing. I know I've made some criticisms above,, which makes me sound like a spoilt child, but hey, why go and get some of the most beautiful models (and there are a lot on the site) and not take full advantage of them. And on that note. It would be nice to see a bit of hardcore on this site. A lot of these girls do hardcore, and with ALS HD quality DVD you'd be blown away.
My bottom line is, awesome girls, theme a bit too repetitive but you can't get bored with something until you've over indulged, and for every dollar I spent on my alsscans subscription was VERY well spent.
This is a site I know I will join again and again in the years to come. |
|
04-04-08 02:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
29
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ highest picture (resolutions up to >2200 times >3500 pixels!) and video quality (full-hd) for the newest content.
+ lots of different fetishs are served like multiple insertions (dildos ,vibrators, panties, candles, veggies etc.), fisting, peeing, role-play etc.
+ the sets and vids also include behind the scenes footage.
+ lots different of models and tons of content.
+ all my mails have been answered even if it took some time |
| Cons: |
- not enough picture updates to satisfy me fully but lots of crazy video footage.
- navigation / UI is somewhat plain and could still need improvement even though they already spent some work on that but this site is old and huge.
- I miss some content of models already shot but maybe I should contact them and seem how they react. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into young models with completely shaved muffs and you like to see lots of crazy video footage then please add 10-15 points to the score I gave.
These models are mostly young at below 25 years of age but they are good looking and some do the craziest insertions and most of them the regular fisting. Some shoots happened in the Carribean, while being on adult conventions and also in eastern Europe where Alex and his team always search for young hotties willing to do shoots the ALS style.
And don't forget the fact that ALS will - from time to time - offer special bonuses for its members like complete sets of casts in Budapest (2005 & 2007) or a special about a days shooting including everthing from breakfast 'til supper time :-)
Follow-Up:
Changed my rating from 80 to 92 as Alex now releases full sets of pics plus they change their navigational features. Seems as if I'll soon have to even increase my rating.
ALS Scan is worth a join if you like young models doing lots of crazy stuff. Thumbs up for Alex and his crew! I'll stay with them for a longer period of time that's for sure :-) |
|
12-27-07 12:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) I love this site, it is constantly improving. It is a great southern porn site
2). always new woman coming through the site
3). the photography is always top-notch
4). the photo shoots are varied in content and never perdictable like most sites.
5). these guys enjoy shooting woman and it shows
6). Most of there old content has been up-scanned to higher quality which is a big plus because they have a deep archieve. |
| Cons: |
1). maybe try and cut down on the tattoos a little. That may be my hangup but I like woman without tattoos or only a few. |
| Bottom Line: |
My favorite site for many years and it just keeps getting better... |
|
09-15-07 04:39pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
31
|
ALS Scan
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 250+ smiling, skinny, shaved, super-hot hot models
+ Still almost purely solo- or girl-girl action that stays pretty entertaining
+ Amazing quality:
videos: HD up to 1920x1080 @ 300 kb/s
photos: hi-res are roughly 3900x2600px
+ Great quantity too; archived vids back to Apr 2007, photos much farther back
+ Daily video updates, new photo set released every two days
+ Download speeds have a lot of ass; I normally got about 1.3MB/s with a DL manager
+ They donate some of their pervy profits to charity, in case philanthropy is a deciding factor |
| Cons: |
- Large percentage of videos are just BTS, and with photo sets the BTS is usually just mixed in
- Some models' content takes a long time to get released or simply stays unreleased
- Site design works well for what it is, but still has NO search function
- They are beginning to delve into boy-girl content, even if only lightly (read more in BL)
- Despite the fun some content can get predictable and routine
- 2 years since my first review and I still wish they would shoot more American girls or non-Euro girls
- I don't get to meet these girls in person! :-( |
| Bottom Line: |
What can I say that hasn't already been said so many times and so well about one of my all time favorite adult sites over the years--hell, over the history of much of the crazy web itself, seeing how these guys have been finding and shooting hot shaved ladies since 1996. And since they have been doing this for so long they know a thing or two about getting the goods; great photo and video quality, lots of content, fast access, and above all some very happy models, many of whom come back wanting more.
That last point, happy models who become 'repeat offenders' shall we say, is not something I take lightly when I am looking for a new site to join and it's something where ALS has never faltered. I may be in the minority when I say this, but I genuinely don't enjoy porn where the performers, know matter how willing, are abused, beaten up, disrespected, or at the end of the day just left dissatisfied and unhappy. Of course ALS being in the girls only genre probably helps keep things in check but it, like the majority of sites, is still owned and run by a male and caters to a primarily male audience.
And despite all of this male input the output for many years was totally female; female models with female assistants in most cases and a female co-performer or two in some others. But in the past few years they have, if ever so slightly, started to also use male assistants, or at least made them more visible in both photos and videos--not my cup of tea, thank you very much. Even more alarming--or simply the next logical step, depending on your view--they have just recently shot an actual boy-girl scene. It's yet to be released and is described as a blowjob scene with swallowing, but time will tell as to where ALS steers its content.
Generally speaking, and if you're not looking for hardcore content, there's a lot to love here and at least a little to hate. So take your pick; young, skinny, shaved, mostly white models who are not too shy, so don't be surprised by a single model performing many if not all of the following; peeing, fisting, speculum and other crazy insertions, anal, and near constant spreading. The site design may not be impressive to many, nor may be the large amount of BTS, but don't let it fool you--as girls-only content goes they do not disappoint.
I do wish they would be more consistent in releases though. They still have a habit of letting members vote on models' scenes to determine release order and this can mean months before a model's whole shoot is available, and some just never gets released at all. I guess this is a good thing--so much content that there's not enough time to release it all--but I would like to see it eventually. And as unique as some of their content is it can get predictably routine; toy A into slot b, and so on.
But damn if they don't make it look hot time and time again with each new model they find and corrupt. All these years and I'm still sold! :-P |
|
04-05-10 12:20am
Replies (7)
|
Review
32
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Stunning Models
-Extreme High Quality Photos
-Very Intimate Close Up
-A lot of Toy / Finger Use
-Frequent Updates (Every 1-2 Days)
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content 3700+ Videos & 3800+ Galleries at time of review.
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page. |
| Cons: |
-No Guy/Girl Scenes
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some sets posted as updates are from past.
-Some girls have an alias on network sites. If you are a member of multiple sites in network you may not find all the galleries for same individual. |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS Scan is part of the Metart network so site function and features are the same. However ALS Scan has to be purchased in addition to Metart network or individually. The models are absolutely stunning and majority are young. The ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved so you won't see any bushes. There are some but very few sets that has small amounts of pubic hair. The site is very easy to use, feature rich, and well thought out. The image quality in extremely high quality and very close up. You can literally see when she's dripping wet. I originally joined metart network and was then offered an option to add ALS Scan for a one time lifetime purchase of $500. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl. There are no guy/girl scenes. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy. There are also links to download the video and/or download a zip file of the gallery.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site you can't view a list of models that you have a favorited. If you are a member of multiple sites on the metart network you may find the same girl has an alias. It would be convenient if the sites in the network chose one of the other. |
|
01-17-24 08:16am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
33
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
08-27-13 04:27pm
|
Review
34
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large selection of very beautiful models from Europe and North America.
Impressive photography, mostly solo or g/g. Available in approx. 930x1400 px, Normal Resolution and 2200x3500 px High Resolution, zipped. Slight changes in resolution from picture to picture. Enormously large sets giving you the choice of keeping only the very best.
Most recent videos are in HD format in 720p dvx and mp4 format, as well as the extra large videos at 1080p wmv. All are downloadable!
Streaming is also available for previews or watching the whole video on-line if you so desire. Streaming picture is HD and very clear as well. I experienced no buffering problems.
Speed of download was also very good for me at 3.5 MB/s. This was for a single file through Firefox's DTA. Normal downloads through the browser downloader were much slower but still around 600 KB/s but as a plus this way of doing things seemed to allow multiple downloads.
Nice bonus material (auditions, blogs, bts etc.) |
| Cons: |
Huge picture sets will require a large amount of time to prune. I never thought I would consider a set containing approx. 300 pictures a con. Well, it isn't really - see above under pros, but some of you might be a bit more impatient when it comes to downloading or editing a 500 MB picture set so be warned.
I desperately want a search engine for this site. You practically have to go from update (arranged in chronological order) to update to find something that fits your taste.
Model directory is in alphabetical order but it would be nice if the pictures of the models contained the dates when her sets and videos were published. This would prevent the frustration of finding a beautiful model and then realize that her pictures are not High Resolution and her videos are split up into various parts .. something most of us aren't interested in nowadays unless we collect the complete works of a model.
Continued below: |
| Bottom Line: |
It would be nice to be able to go to a point where publishing HD videos and HR pictures first started and work one's way up to the present from there.
Close attention is required when looking at the updates themselves, some are an invitation to rate sets, some are bonus material from other sites, some are masturbation videos or g/g videos, some are picture sets, but there are also videos of photoshoots .. something I dislike heartily, but others might enjoy.
Because I didn't pay attention originally I downloaded a hefty HD file (g/g content) expecting hot action and found myself listening to the distracting remarks of the director as he gave his instructions for the shoot. I don't like to have my illusions destroyed. But, as I said, some might like that sort of thing.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is a well-respected, well run site that offers top quality material. I did not see one single unattractive model, I'd even take the ones they had to reject during their auditions. Most would be between 18-25 in age.
The material is shot indoors, as well as in more exotic locations. Lovers of glamorous videos and picture sets will be well pleased.
There is also the added eroticism of a bit of kink. Fisting, insertion of large objects (mostly dildos), peeing, some public exposure scenes. Good stuff for most.
I also loved the fact that I did not come across one single pair of enhanced breasts. They MIGHT be there but I didn't come across them. This is so refreshing when compared to most sites!
I am adding my usual plaint, and yes, all of you who know me knew it would come:
I wish they featured some mature women, and I wish that their models would wear more than the bare necessities. Sometimes the girls don't even wear those, because I very seldom came across a bra or even a pair of panties during many of my spot checks of the picture sets and videos, but then I shouldn't go to a site like this one and expect it to be something it wasn't meant to be.
You can't expect to find cougars in a cubs' playpen.
After all this site is not meant for lovers of a leisurely strip by mature women but for those who revel in beautiful young, glistening bodies, and for them ALS SCAN does its job very well. |
|
04-24-11 09:55am
Replies (26)
|
Review
35
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Stunning models
- All models are young, petite and shaved
- Some great scenes on location in Europe and the Caribbean
- Pictures and video available
- No DRM
- HUGE volume of material available
- Some public nudity
- The public scenes are very well done
- Simple, if somewhat dated, navigation |
| Cons: |
- No search function apart from searching by model
- Less public nudity than I expected since it was heavily promoted in the tour |
| Bottom Line: |
The reason I joined ALS Scan was because the previews showed that there was some public nudity available, and as a big fan of that I joined for that reason alone.
While Im not a big fan of solo softcore sites, I have to admit to being really impressed with ALS Scan. This is an excellent site that offers some stunning women in both videos and pictures. All of the women are pretty much of the same body type petite and small breasted. For a guy who thinks small-breasted petite women are the best, this makes the site even better. There is a decent mix of Eastern European models and American women. Some porn stars make an appearance too, like Courtney Simpson and Faye Reagan. Most of the models are also fairly young (18-25) and, as the sites name says, all of the ladies are shaved. So if you like petite, young, shaved models, you should consider a membership on the strength of that alone.
Many of the video/picture shoots take place on an indoor set, but there are a lot that are shot in the Caribbean. These are visually outstanding. Apart from solo girl action, there is some peeing, some toy and speculum use and some girl/girl stuff. All of it is well shot.
The videos are classed into two broad categories: masturbation and photo shoot. The photo shoot scenes are pretty interesting as they give a behind-the-scenes perspective on what goes on.
I joined because the site promised some public nudity. There is some of that, but not a lot. What is there is excellent though, and for a big fan of public stuff that alone was worth the price. All the public nudity is done in Europe with European models. For a site into solo girls, they really seem to understand public nudity. Unlike some other sites (Nude in LA) the public nudity isnt matter-of-fact and sterile. It is really well done and the titillation and risk are well presented. They also do something that Ive never seen before and hope to see more of that is using body paint to paint a skimpy outfit on a nude model and then send her out to the streets. This is really innovative and a lot of fun to watch. I appreciate that the editors chose to film the painting too this adds to the fun.
But ALS Scan also has the technical side right too. They offer several different choices of resolution with the HD being visually stunning. Other reviewers have covered more of the technical stuff below.
One drawback is that there is no search function. I had no way to easily find the public nudity even though each scene was categorized in that way. Likewise, there is no way to separate out the photo shoot scenes from that masturbation scenes. Some search function would be an improvement.
I may not be a big fan of solo girl sites, but Im now a big fan of ALS Scan. The people behind ALS present some stunning models in well-shot scenes and make it available through an easy-to-use and modern website. Overall, an excellent value. |
|
05-04-10 04:44pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
36
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+++ daily updates
+++ great models + primilary teens
+++ big archive for movies and galleries
++ newer videos in hdv quality (16:9) older ones are in 4:3 format
++ no DRM or download limitations
+ easy navigation
+ good price |
| Cons: |
--- inconsistant design
--- outmoded technologies in use e.g.popups (without scrollbars when needed)
-- some girls wear braces
-- the repetitivness of content is obvious but part of the concept |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS Scan is a good blast from the past till the present. They were part of the porn history online and had formed their own unique style.
ALS Scan has shaved girls only. You'll find them often in solo, girl girl, oiled up, toy, pee, speculum and veggie action or in combination of those.
They offer exactly what they promise and that makes ALS Scan a perfect match for those who seek for flexible teens, small tits, spread legs and other kinky stuff. |
|
02-09-10 01:56am
Replies (3)
|
Review
37
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- As with both ALS sites, the quality and completeness of the content is as good and high as it gets.
- Newer videos hit to true HD 1920x1080 resolution, even the older ones are 720 high end.
- Picture sets are beyond complete, one picture set, Anita Pearl Scene 2, when downloaded in high resolution is...912 MB! Pictures can go up to 3800 high end and some of the sets near 400 pictures.
- Excellent download speeds, though can't get it to work with DL Manager, will allow resume in Firefox though.
- Some very good old content that features some of porn's biggest names when they were younger, love the old Anetta Keys sets |
| Cons: |
- Had a frustrating experience as a member of both ALS Angels, ALS Scan, seems their sign-in page goes through the same server. So, when I clicked members to bring up my saved login information, it would be ALS Angels username and password, even though I was on ALS Scan, never happened before last month.
- See the above one and why this one makes the con list, after signing in to get in members area, have to sign in again when you go to download a video, so the confused server was causing me major headaches in accessing content.
- The models as a whole are beautiful, but they are almost all very, very skinny. |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS Scan has been a favorite of mine for awhile now. I can see and agree with some of the complaints like the content is repetitive, but I can get over that for the high quality.
A common complaint that I have with both ALS sites is that the navigation can be confusing. I've signed in before, clicked the button for models, only to click a set and be asked to sign in again, what the hell? I just signed in! They do have what looks to be a separate model page for members, and I guess for whatever reason, I wasn't on it, instead, on the guest's model page, even though I had just signed in. Then there was the confusion with the server giving me my ALS Angels username and password when signing in on ALS Scan and of course, those are different so it rejected my sign-in attempt.
Minor complaints? Sure. But can be a bit of a hassle, especially for the impatient.
Quality wise this site is as good as any. I am not positive on this, but I want to believe the lowest quality videos are 720 high end, and the newer videos are 1920 high end. I might be nitpicking a little, but I do think this could be a negative for some members, a lot of the newer videos have 1280 high end as the LOWEST quality option and if you have a slow connection, you are going to be there awhile just to get the lowest quality ones. Some of the lowest quality videos are 500 MB for some scenes.
On the other hand, if you love the high quality this is a great site. The quantity is also very high. Much higher than sister site ALS Angels.
I'm one of the ones that likes the huge picture sets that have 200-400 photos in each set, so I really like that about ALS, the newer picture sets are almost as big of a file as the videos!
My complaints are minor when compared to the quality and quantity. They do also go back and remaster older content, kind of frustrating, since they take members votes on which sets to remaster and it rarely is the ones I am wanting remastered. This site does have an added bonus for collectors, since there is some older content of Sandy from Club Sandy, Anetta Keys as Alana, the retired and irreplaceable Mia Stone and Sophie Moone.
In general, the ALS staff, photographers, seem to have good relationships/friendships with the models, so you get some natural laughs from the models and smiles that don't look fake. I really can't complain about the skinny models, because they do have the other site with the curvier models, but I do want to add it in case anyone is wondering about the style of models. Put it this way, Sandra Shine, Eve Angel and Eufrat were too curvy for this one and are on the ALS Angels site instead. Starting to wonder about that myself. Not saying ALS is milking two sites by splitting the top models between their sites, but it is starting to look a little suspicious since both sites must be using the same server/different port? to sign in.
Still, I recommend the site for the quality and amount of content. |
|
03-02-09 12:50pm
Replies (5)
|
Rating
38
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
07-02-08 10:16pm
|
Review
39
|
ALS Scan
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Read other reviews for techical data they all explain it very detailed and correctly.
Pros:
- XXX hardcore solo and girl/girl action
- Tons of High Quality Videos and Zip Files
- Its improving with new releases. The staff must be listening to reviews? See, we matter.
- Updates daily. The mix is good.
- ALL LADIES SHAVED...teen based, and there hot!
- Lots of oil and lube if you like it wet...xxx |
| Cons: |
Navigation needs help. It works but you have to do a lot of 'mouse work' to find files. Cosolidate the downloading of pics. NV works and you'll be able to download what you want but you'll have to do some work to get it. Another negative, not all of a models material may be avaliable for viewing. They want you to email requests for them to post additional videos or pics of a certain model. I never did so I can't comment on that. But my real Con is with the missed XXX. Gyno is the best to describe the solo and girl/girl pics and videos. Upclose and pink. If thats your fetish join. You'll not be disappointed. I understand models are paid on sex acts performed. But the site got very one themed. The site offers little in pussy licking, no rimming or mishing (pussy to pussy). No anal play at all (ok,very little), not enough dildoe or dong fucking. Where's the Strap-ON! In short, the photographors had red hot cunts ready for solo and lezzie xxx...and no??? Guys expand your horizon's a bit |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend if you like the other sites I reviewed. Teen based and HG XXX solo and g/g porno. ALS is 60 day site to explore and worth it just on the amount of material and the level of erotica. If they listen to reviews and make changes this could be a site worth joining over and over. The models are right in front of them and I've seen the models on their site perform on other XXX Hardcore solo and lezzie sites without any reservations. Why not bring that other erotica to ALS.? Variety is key and I miss that on so many sites becasue they get so focused on one theme, but it plays itself out over time. I should list all the sex acts I would make sure I capture on cam for a solo or girl/girl site...Even with all my con's I still stand beside by 87 rating. |
|
02-20-08 05:20pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
40
|
ALS Scan
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Helps a charity (The only site I've ever known to do so)
+Great quality images(2592x3888 portrait/3888x2592 for landscape).
+Great quality videos. Had Divx (which my pc wouldn't play smoothly) and 720p MP4 videos.
+Most models are small chested and pretty skinny. Very seldom are any models C cup or bigger. |
| Cons: |
-Website must have been one of the first ever built and boy does it show. WAY past due for a upgrade.
-No easy navigation.
-Most vidoes are just behind the scenes of the photo shoots. |
| Bottom Line: |
As you can tell by the name of the site, every model is 100% shaved. At first it's pretty cool but then it starts to make every photo set and every model start to look the same. I love the fact that they have alot of smaller chested girls but after a while, they start to feel the same. Could really use some variation.
There are normally 100 or so photos per set. And the photos are great high quality images. The first 3/4 of the set is your normally glam style shoots but the last quarter can get pretty strange. From sticking normal every day items (food, end of a shovel, etc) in the pussy to pissing. Pissing seems to be a pretty big niche on the site, as it seems to happen alot.
The videos are great quality but most are behind the scens of the photo shoots. So you've always got the lovely cameraman talking through out the whole thing. When will these companies learn? Get rid of that shit.
Navigation for the site is complete crap.You've got either updates or all models. No way to search by cup size, hair color or even model name. To find certain model you have to go to the all models page and do a find within IE or Firefox.
For the price ($29.95 1st month/then $24.95) I think the site is past due for a upgrade. While the images are great quality, due to the navigation and the constant talking during videos, unless a your a image fan you'll probably be disappointed. If your a video fan like me, you'll quickly get sick of hearing the dumbass guys talking. |
|
12-11-08 02:17pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
41
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photography of cute - mainly white - babes.
If you like a site with a distinctive personality, this is definitely one since all photography is done or directed by the site owner, Alex, who also does a blog on the site with sample photos from recent (often that week's) shoots for members to give feedback on that often guides when a model's material will be posted to the site and which sets will be posted to the site when.
MANY of the U.S. models are exclusive to the site or have done very few shoots other than for this site.
If you like cute blonde small breasted babes with their pubes shaved masturbating with large dildos, or using odd toys or speculums, this is the site for you.
Updates have kept up in the COVID-19 era - every day in the past couple of months there has been a new posting of a vid or a photo shoot - not an easy task when it's 1 guy behind everything - a few are posts of shoots from long ago, but not many.
The Met-Art site design is a great improvement. |
| Cons: |
My frustrations with this site are personal. This was my absolute favorite site at one time. That was quite a while ago and there are 2 reasons for this - one that is a choice of the site and the other was a result of economics. a) Same-ness of models - This site is cute small-breasted white girls - period. OCCASIONALLY a Latina like Rachel Rivers will sneak in. VERY occasionally an Asian babe like Vina Sky will sneak in. But that's it. In an era when W4B, as 1 great example, is finding scads of new really hot Latinas, and when there are lots of great-looking young Black & Asian models working, the lack of variety of models on this site is a really bad thing.
b) The other thing that really hurt the excitement level on this site tremendously was the end of their trips. Back in the early 2000's, ALS Scan would take a group of models on trips to the Bahamas or elsewhere to shoot for a week - and the material there was the best & most exciting on the site. The last trip was 2009 |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm ending my subscription to ALS Scan because I'm no longer excited by the site for the 2 reason in my cons. The end of the trips was not their fault - it was an economic decision they felt they had to make.
Selling the site to MetArt kept the site going and enabled the site to have a MUCH-needed redesign, but it didn't bring back those trips, unfortunately. It's too bad because they're no longer creating the awesome, fun, exciting material that the mix of girls on the trips created. if you are a new member of the site, I can't urge you enough to check out the ALS/Vacations section of the site - easily found from the home page. There is a ton of awesome material they did on those trips. The only trips they kept up - since they're all about the cute young small-breasted white babes - are the trips each year to Budapest & Prague to find and shoot with hot young Euro-babes. Why they have never developed relationships with agents that could find hot young Latinas for them to shoot with or hot young Black or Asian women (add a trip to the Philippines or Thailand, for crying out loud) is utterly beyond me.
Stats - the site currently lists 454 models. There are various ways to sort - most recent, most popular, alphabetical. The site shows 3,434 galleries - most galleries have over 200 images. It's easy to scroll through the images, which look great on the site.
Recent photo shoots are available to download in various sizes. the large zips are in the 600+ mb range and the photos download as 3233 x 4850 pixels.
There are 3,171 films on the site. Both photo shoots & films are categorized as to masturbation scenes, girl/girl (maybe 1 per month), BTS/photo shoot, interview or remastered if that's the case - the site goes back to about 2000. Recent videos are downloadable in 7 options from 270 p to 4K. This is all on Met Art's site design so it all works well, including the older material. You can search by model name, or most popular, or most recent, etc.
For collectors, the zips of photo shoots give a ton of info - site name, date set was posted, name of set & model name. For videos, they just give the name of the site and the set name. |
|
11-15-20 06:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006. |
| Cons: |
Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years. |
| Bottom Line: |
OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.
Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)
Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.
So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month. |
|
06-23-12 01:24am
Replies (5)
|
Review
43
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Attractive models.
Updates every day, with a new video everyday.
Great video quality.
No more video rotation.
Lots of content, especially pictures.
Lots of fisting and extreme object insertion.
Very responsive webmaster and cameraman to e-mails.
Good bonus deals from time to time.
Director's blog is very informative. |
| Cons: |
At least 3 of the videos released per week are old material "remastered". Perhaps this is good for new members, but for those who have been visiting this site for years, they can get repetitive if you have seen them already.
New models are only added about every 2 weeks.
The release of content is very random and chaotic, and even though a model may be "released" it usually only starts with 1 pic set and video. It may take upwards of 6 months to a year after to see all her content.
Some models still don't have all their content released who were introduced a LONG time ago.
Amount of extreme shoots like fisting is decreasing significantly over the last 4-5 months.
If you don't like thin models you may not like this site.
Anal fans may be somewhat disappointed, as it's more focused on pussy play.
Plain site design. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a quality site and used to be one of my favorites. Unfortunately, I can no longer classify it as such. It is still a decent site, but things need to be improved. I'm actually editing this review and this is after the most recent comment I put down on PU. Some things to mention and of importance:
1. As I wrote in my comment, the amount of girls that do extreme is much less than is used to be. Of the last 6 "new models" (which equals 3 months of time since they come biweekly) there is only 1 that has a fisting set. Very disappointing, since they almost always used to do that. I remember Alex talking about how he used to never shoot a girl if she wasn't willing to do all the extreme stuff, and that he was thinking of not being so harsh in the future. Well, he must not be being as harsh now in his standards for shoots, and it shows, unfortunately. Considering that most of the models only did 1 scene out of 4 or 5 that entailed something like fisting, saying that people complained that there was too much extreme just doesn't fly.
2. While it used to not bother me as much, the release of material I now see to be a big problem. Once a new model is added to the site, she only starts with 1 picture set and a video. After that, it is completely up to polls, member requests, etc. that determine when other sets are released. Keep in mind that most models usually have 5 photo sets and 5 videos at least, so seeing all of that can take LITERALLY up to a year or more. That is ridiculous and needs to change. I can't think of another site that has such a terrible system for releasing model content. So even though a new model appears every 2 weeks, it's not a real release of a new model like on most sites. It's just the beginning of a very long process of seeing that model in the scenes she has done. I don't believe the people who run the site even know exactly what's going on and have it all straight, since there have been a few times I have e-mailed them requesting something from a model from years back and get a response about how they forgot about it or didn't even remember the scene existed. I wonder how much stuff hasn't seen the light of day and never will. Big problem here, and very frustrating.
3. If you have never been a member to the site there is plenty to see and look through. There are a ton of models and content goes back years. Almost all of the models are attractive and have nice bodies, I will say that. But, if you like thicker girls you should look elsewhere. Their sister site Alsangels has more of a focus on boobs and meat, but the updates on that site are so low it's only really worth joining if you never have before.
This is a site that is still good, but needs to make some changes to keep pace with the truly great sites out there. There needs to be a refocus on shooting girls that are willing to do the extreme stuff, and the release of model content needs a complete overhaul. |
|
03-03-08 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The Image quality on this site is outstanding. In particular resolution and depth of field are stellar. The detail is of 'pore and folicle' at 3506 x 2336.
The predominately 'euro' models are truly gorgeous and well presented in both Solo and Girl-Girl mode.
Some videos are HD at 1280x720 and well encoded.
The update and rentention policy means there is a lot of content available. |
| Cons: |
The sets are split into episodes which tend to be short and of varying progression. Sometimes there is a lot of progress and in others there are many similar images.
Sometimes the action is so rude it gets 'gyno' and not erotic. In particular the 'fists and speculum' series can have an almost sterile edge to them. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a technically good site with good fit models and commendable rudeness. It undoubtably deserves praise.
For this reviewer however the "frisson per set" ratio was low and gave an overall feeling of detachment.
More smiles, cheekiness. toys that match the outfits, sets and proportions of the models would be nice. If only Suburban Amateurs could deliver Alsscan's technical image excellence.
This is my honest review, not sure why I made it since I suspect the trust rating will get a bashing from fans!
Cheers DivBZero |
|
10-17-07 02:10pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
45
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
nice girls
there are sets of melissa-ashley and of Trisha Uptown
hi-res pics very good
pussies perfectly shaved |
| Cons: |
old series are very low-res
some videos are boring
after some time you could get bored 'cause it's all a little bit repetitive
web design could be improved
not hardcore at all. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very nice site, if you like beautiful nude girls with shaved pussies.
Forget it id you like hardcore action. |
|
01-25-07 01:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
ALS Scan
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are very good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2004.
Sets are scored
One update per day.
Navigation is good.
Search function is good. |
| Cons: |
About 1 in 10-14 releases are actually re-posts or remastered sets of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not cool if you are returning.
The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while.
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site back in 2012. Some things have changed since then. Most, not so much.
ALSSCAN Stats: (As of 2-15-2017)
About 4900 photo sets/videos
Several thousand models
1 set a day (many recycled)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
ALSScan is primarily a lesbian and off-beat fetish site. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. Many of the girls from older sets and some from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Kimmy Granger, Gina Gerson, Dakota Skye, Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up.
ALSScan "screens" a lot of models, evidenced by the proliferation of casting shoots throughout the sets, but only a small percentage of these girls are above average looking. The really great looking ones have sets that are re-posted, which is serious cheating. There is a lot of new content, but the way the site re-uses content, you can't really tell if it is new or not. Considering there is no recycled content anywhere else within the Met-Art network, this sin takes about 10 points off of my score for the site. This would be a much better site if they stopped recycling content.
But the success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide, even if some of it is recycled.
Until recently, there were NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though. Just since 2016, a very small number of B/G scenes have appeared. In typical ALS style, though, many of these scenes are unusual in that the guy inserts something into the girl, like a bottle, her fist, his fist, a vegetable or dildo, before he inserts himself into her. There are only a couple of B/G scenes so far.
Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paradise.
There is an odd fascination with otherwise unviewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that moment is.
Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that a lot here!
The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was cool. That was about 200 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the lollipop is.
This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
To be fair, each set, new or old, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first. In one video, Gina Gerson uses an inflator dildo and the photographer keeps saying "Are you OK?" That about sums up my thoughts when I see the stuff they insert into the girls.
Alsscan has a sister site called allsangels that is not within the Met Art network. The "Director" has no qualms with showing you a set of girls in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership there. Models at THAT site include Lucy Li, Dillon Harper, August Ames.....all it does for me is piss me of that these good looking, curvier girls are there instead of here.
The photographers here have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having a lot of fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camera.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment, which they do.
There is a section where some of the girls go to a tropical island. Once there, they run around naked and have sex with any girl they want. Unfortunately, the last time anybody went to one of these tropical islands was in 2009...doesn't stop them from re-posting them as new daily sets though.
Bottom line: I've been to this site about 10 times since 2001. For the last few times, the material has been so similar and so many sets have been recycled that I can no longer tell what is new and what is not. It is a great site to visit once. Just once. I keep forgetting |
|
02-15-17 11:08pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
47
|
ALS Scan
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hi res photos
Very hot models
Great video quality
Good Download speed
ZIPs for photos
Large amount of content, 230 GB
No DRM or download limits
Exclusive
Update section
Most videos named appropriately
Daily updates! |
| Cons: |
Price is a bit high $30
Very bad site design
Navigation absolutely horrible!
Only 15 or 30 photos per zip in many sets
No large boobed models
A few videos extremely large, but very low quality |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site has great content, but they do a very poor job at presenting it. The site design is very inconsistent and a headache to get around. The photo sets have a lot of zips because many only have 15 photos per zip. If you want a copy of each photo you need to grab 1667 zip files! Some have many zips per set, others have several sets per zip, they cant make up their minds on this!
The videos look nice. They offer divx, wmv and mpeg4. The videos are mostly in 640x480 or 720x520 your choice. The videos average 15-20 minutes long, and average 350 MB in size. There are 489 videos totaling for 192 GB!
There are about 38 GB worth of photos here if you download the zips and always take the high res. The photo quality differs a bit. Some are about average sized and other are huge at 2336x3504!
There are currently about 200 models and they all look great. They are all small girls, so no big boobs here, unfortunately for me! There is a good bit of fisting a other forms of pussy stretching here, It is a bit like Saphic Erotic in this sense.
Other than the ridicules site navigation the site would be great. The poor navigation cost the site 10 points because it really was a headache to get around. During downloading I frequently had to stop for a while, or look at some of the photos before downloading to remind myself why I has messing with this site. I really wish they would fix this because the content is wonderful! |
|
03-30-08 03:26pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
48
|
ALS Scan
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A fantastic array of beautiful girls
- Very detailed and "up-front" photos
- High quality vids, offered in three different formats; 1280x720 HD DivX, 1280x720 HD MP4, 1920x1080 HD WM
- Older models have their videos remastered and published
- Director's blog - you can read and find out what's going behind the scenes and grab some exclusive vid's or photo shoots
- Lots of mqsturbation and self-toying action
- Their castings are featured on video, and photos /w commentary |
| Cons: |
- The website design. I've been a member three times, and it hasn't changed much from when I first joined in 2002.
- No search function
- Too much fisting for my taste
- Too much focus on "perfect breasts and no tattoos", come on, let in a girl that have some personality and quirky feautres.
- ALS hasn't published all videos of their older models (instead they sell them on DVD for 49.99 o so), come on.
Give us long time fans everything that was ever made with girls like Joanne, Jana, April, etc to download, and I'll be an happy customer.
- Download speeds. It averages at 150 kbit/s per file, and I ave a 8mbit/s line, and there seems to be a 2 or 3 file downloadlimit.
- Only works in IE |
| Bottom Line: |
I think that ALS has run it course, yes it is still joinable, and it's not a bad site to join (especially if it is for the first time), but as a third time member I must say that I'm not impressed.
It feels like time stood still, and yes, they do HD, but it is so boring to watch.
And most of the new models are rubbish. They should have picked up at least 10 new models that they discarded from the casting sessions (because she looked unhappy or had a tattoo), come on man.
It's not good enough! |
|
08-20-10 07:40pm
Replies (12)
|
Review
49
|
ALS Scan
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network. |
| Cons: |
* Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.
I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).
Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.
However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.
Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.
As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.
Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it. |
|
03-02-13 10:09am
Replies (10)
|
Review
50
|
ALS Scan
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Great Video scenes but he talks way to much. and he has anoying voice
+ Real HD videos (for new content)
+ Content Isnt deleted anymore
+ Lots of Girl Juices/Cum
+ Exclusive Content
+/- 500k Average speed
+ Download manger accepted
+ No DL limits
+ Scene desciption
+/- Many Girls have a strange red colour in the pussy
+ Best site ive scene for Images
+ Regular Update |
| Cons: |
- No Niches at all!
- Bare Basic navigation (not the worst ive scene but very basic
- Tons of old content deleted(This alone lost them 10 points!)
- Selecting a model only gives you Images not video
- Download speed jumps up and down all the time (from 50k to 600k) |
| Bottom Line: |
All in all this site could be outstanding but with such bad navigation and such a basic layout it may take you days to find what your looking for.
This site could be a contender for some of those top sites and the work involved to make it outstanding is so minior it give me a feeling like they dont even care.
They have all the great old content they just dont put it on the site. I mean my god they have Great HD videos but not even a decent video Niche search.
They have a weird colour scheme aswell its like a disney site or something.
Would i recommend this site? if you love pictures Yes its perfect for you, if you like videos theres just no point joining. |
|
12-31-07 07:33am
Replies (2)
|
|
