| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
26
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
No Review.
|
05-27-12 04:15am
|
Review
27
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Drop-dead gorgeous MET-Art quality nubile models who, for the most part, you haven't seen elsewhere and who are not necessarily eastern european.
* Top quality photo and video shoots, though in smaller quantities than the usual sites.
* Imagine Met-Art with some hc: that's what you get here. There's not much b/g though it's increasing. Fair amount of toy insertion and a bit of soft Met-Art style g/g.
* Virtually no anal, gonzo, or other tasteless stuff. |
| Cons: |
* Boy/girl content is very limited but growing.
* No ability to "save" a favorite model.
* No ability to search for particular model types, though with the current relatively small amount of content, this isn't a problem. In fact it's a pleasure to look through the cover shots.
* No slideshow view. This is a must on a photo site of this quality.
* Would love to see a few more models with at least a bit of pubic hair. |
| Bottom Line: |
X-Art is that rare thing in the porn world: a truly erotic site. Not only are the models drop-dead gorgeous, but the photographer actually believes in editing. The result is quality, not quantity; eroticism not anatomy. The hc shoots, though limited in number, are tasteful and hot, though there are still far too many of the obligatory facial cum-shots that pervade porn these days. The non-hc content is so sexy that it works for me, even though I usually need a little "more." I also agree with one of the other reviewers that a bit more story-line and less studio shoot would be useful. I'd also love to see some real "behind the scenes" stuff to accompany some of the shoots.
With more hc content and a few more website features like slideshow and save favorite models, I would have given this site a 95. As it is, it's a great site for the price. |
|
10-05-10 10:53am
Replies (2)
|
Review
28
|
X-Art
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls here are all beautiful, mostly Eastern European and very popular. If you like the Met-Art or FemJoy networks, you will also like this site. The site has evolved a little, though, and is now featuring several porn stars and starlets that you have seen elsewhere. The videos are well done, dedicated videos. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to disappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done. |
| Cons: |
The overall quality of the images and videos seems to have declined slightly, or, at best, is not keeping up with the standards of other sites. The site format has not been updated in a while and seems a little dated. The number of images in each set has dropped and the highest resolution shots are often upscaled rather than converted from raw files. The site also relies heavily on all-white backgrounds, which was a thing a couple of years ago but seems a little tiresome today.
The site is now breaking out the photo sets and the video sets from a shoot, that used to be one release, into multiple releases. This allows the site to effectively cut the number of shoots in half.
Perhaps the biggest shortcoming that this site has is that it only updates once every 2-4 days. With several other sites updating daily, the potential that this site once had to really compete with the top sites has dulled somewhat. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a well done site. The photographers and videographers do a very good job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create excellent imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some very good videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set has changed since my last visit and no longer allows you to select size. Instead, you get a full screen image and a zoom button that allows you to zoom in considerably. Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels. Videos come in SD, HD and 4K.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice. Also, several of the more recent image sets are very fuzzy at the high resolution, either because of compression, editing, or both.
Overall, this site could easily fit into the Met Art network as a sex-art clone, or in the Femjoy network as a Joymii clone. There are nicely done photo and video sets, beautiful models and the sex is comparable to the sites I mention above. But the dated format, not-quite-top-tier image quality and less frequent updates mean that this site is no longer one of my top picks. It is still a great site and I highly recommend it, though. |
|
09-05-17 07:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Rating
29
|
X-Art
(0)
87.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:29pm
|
Review
30
|
X-Art
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good Quality Video 10
Pictures Good about a 7
Sites price and reliability a 8
Fast Downloads.
Reasonable updates timing.
Stunning Women ! |
| Cons: |
Limited Picture Set.
Updates slow a few a week.
Some content very tame, some not. Site not consistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
Toads Take.
The site is easy enough to navigate, however not all videos have picture sets and not all sets have video. Kinda sucks. There is allot of soft type porn were I almost fall asleep watching it.
There are some women like Marie also know as Satin Bloom and another name I can not recall. Who are sparking this site up with more cutting edge stuff sure to get your pocket rocket to take off.
The site is one of the better quality sites, there consistency is getting better but still lacks a direction of clear organization, but is improving.
I am going to stay a member awhile and see how it goes. Will update as info arrives. |
|
09-14-11 11:04am
Replies (4)
|
Review
31
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-absolutely beautiful natural girls who appear to be enthusiastic and well looked after
-well presented site with multiple streaming/download options
-good value for money compared to some others
-high quality shoots, excellent production values
-good mix of established and unknown girls
-Angelica's "Goodnight Kiss" is almost worth the subscription alone! |
| Cons: |
-very little variation in themes/scenes/styles/locations. if you're looking for anything other than two people having tasteful sex in a white room with white sheets then maybe try elsewhere
-website could be improved with a better tags and filters system
-sister site colette.com is now being heavily promoted and standards on x-art seem to have gone down slightly since its launch
-it's definitely more "x" than "art" these days, I'd like to see a little more artistic license being used |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are looking for high quality content with stunning, natural girls then I would recommend this all day long. |
|
05-24-15 01:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Many very attractive models
- Sensual hardcore scenes and solo
- Mix of European and US models
- Great photography and videography
- Good update schedule - 3 per week
- Login doesn't time out
- Material improving in terms of quality and creativity |
| Cons: |
- $=£ regional pricing
- Short on ethnic diversity
- Likewise for ages - most models are very young
- A few anal scenes, not really my thing
- Likewise for group
- Basic browsing/searching facilities
- Could do with a just little more tease
- Arguably a bit formulaic
- Not all videos and photosets correspond |
| Bottom Line: |
I've never really been much into hardcore; but following an enjoyable join at Joymii, this new-fangled artcore genre is growing on me (something is growing, anyway) - although a bit idealised, I like the portrayal of sharing sex between couples - and taken with a pinch of salt, I find it very arousing.
So I figured I'd take advantage of a good offer I received and try it out.... speaking of which, I'll get the main negative out of the way. This seems to have joined the ranks of sites who think that $1=£1; so the price for those of us in the UK is about 60% higher. I'm skirting over this since the offer I received seemed to work in $, but UK/Euro users may want to try joining via eg Tunnelbear.
The basic stats of the site:
* Approx 150 models
* Approx 300 photo sets, dating back to 2008, approx 60 shots in each, in zips, up to 4K
* Approx 200 videos, from 2009, approx 10-15 mins, in combinations of WMV/MPEG/MOV, up to 1080
The look of the site is clean and modern, but the navigation is fairly basic; there is a model index; then just a list of updates, either all in one page, just all videos, or browsing all updates by theme: GB/GG/Group/Solo. They have enough material here to invest in a bit more ease of use; but it's nothing to complain too much about. Clicking into each gallery allows you to rate and comment on the gallery, which is a nice touch - although there are plenty of daft ones there.
The sites's tagline - and the theme - is Beautiful erotica, which I guess sums it up; hardcore sex, but more tender, realistic and creatively/artfully shot than regular porn sites. Actually, looking at the earlier material, they seem to have started out largely with solo photoshoots - I found them a bit clinical and dull, but they have got into their stride - it's good to see a site where the material is getting better as opposed to going downhill like so many.
It's very, very similar to Joymii - I think Joymii started afterwards so I suspect it borrowed heavily from X-Art - imitation and flattery, etc. It is therefore very easy to compare the two; so I'll expand on a few differences/similarities:
* Models: both sites have a mix of US and European models; many popular girls appear there, and there is large overlap between the two. But X-Art focuses more on the 18-21 range; I prefer a slightly broader range, but either way they are all stunning.
* The photography and videography in both are without fault. However, I find a little more creativeness in Joymii's camera angles, colour and sets; X-Art's sets are a bit over-idealised, tropical cabanas and the like. OTOH, some recent videos at X-Art have a bit more of a story - although there's no dialog, they have lent it a very cinematic feel, which is interesting and adds to the atmosphere. In particularly a couple of voyeuristic scenes which - with the subjects implied consent/collusion, is very exciting - more of this please!
* Each site has a fairly similar split of solo, girl/girl and girl/boy material; all of which works for me, although I'm more interested in the actual sex scenes here. X-Art goes a bit further with some group sex scenes and also some anal; neither of which really work for me.
* Joymii has the better site design (over-AJAXing it notwithstanding); I also like the fact that all updates are paired - one photo set and one video per scene. Many videos on X-Art don't have matching sets.
* Both sites could do with just a bit more of an element of tease. The clothes come off just a bit too quickly, and whereas I can understand they don't want to feature girls dolled up in tawdry lingerie, some more undressing wouldn't go amiss.
Overall, this is a great site; and although possibly one of the originals, it is good that other sites in the genre - as listed in Elephant's post on the forum - are keeping it on it's toes - some of the newer material there has very high production values to keep them in the running. I slightly preferred Joymii, but purely as a matter of personal taste; so I'll score this only slightly lower - but it loses another point or two for heavily biased regional pricing! |
|
09-01-12 12:24pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
33
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- very beautiful models some exclusive I didn't saw elsewhere
- great photography, very neat and perfect light
- videos are beautiful too
- nice layout, classy and clean
- videos play fast, easy to navigate |
| Cons: |
- a lot of sets look all the same except for the girl, same light, same kind of location
- framings are not very original within a set, you will have sometimes 10 pictures in a row, shot from the same exact angle, with very few variations, too bad...
- uneasy to find what you're looking for, you can't even do basic search, only by name by date and by rating :(
- maybe I'm wrong but because of that, I feel that this website contains very few content |
| Bottom Line: |
I loved the pictures Mr. Brigham Fields did for his previous website, Goddess. There were creative, with breathtaking models, quite softcore (but perfect for me), very well lit, with different clothings and sophisticated lighting, so I decided to join X-Art last month because of that.
The models are all very well choosen. They are all almost perfect, they tend to be same kind of shape, very slim, look like they are between 18 and 23, with small to perfect breast. no tatooos, no piercing.
When I looked at the first sets I downloaded I was very happy, scenery is perfect, beautiful backlit, very sharp pictures and sometimes very hardcore stuff, and perfectly lit.
Same for the videos, I didn't downloaded the FullHD videos because I don't really need that size, but, the videos in low res were perfect. I think they were shot with those canon 5Dmk2, very cinematic look, with beautiful out of focus things, it looks very professionnal and some are very Xrated which is great to have porn shot like hollywood movies.
I really told to myself that I found the best site ever...
But...
It quickly became all the same, there is very few variation within different photosets, Mr Fields found his style, the backlit washout effect is great, but please, not on all the shots ! You did something much more complex and interesting with Goddess. It's like he had choosen the facility, which is really not a good idea as he certainly is one of the most talented photographer and light technician. And beside, some sets are all shot from the same angle, come on, you're not on a wheel chair ! move !!
So I try to find something different but searching photosets quickly became a pain in the back, there is no real search options. So I quickly gave up. I kept some videos and some pictures because the girls are absolutely stunning and the pictures are perfect taken one by one, but when you look at the whole production, you feel a bit sorry that all look the same. Girls are almost always completely nude, so there isn't even a different lingerie or clothing to keep.
I didn't renew my membership because I feel I won't see anything really new, which is really too bad considering what Mr Fields did in the past...
I would recommend this website but just for one month, there is no need to stay longer because new sets are just copies of old ones. :( |
|
05-07-11 04:11pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
34
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here |
| Cons: |
-Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.
My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.
The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.
Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering. |
|
12-28-10 10:37am
Replies (2)
|
Review
35
|
X-Art
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Beaufiful, natural girls who seem to be enjoying themselves in very nice settings.
-Well presented site with good navigation (but see cons).
-Video and photo production quality is very good.
-Photos can be downloaded as ZIP files.
-Variety of video download options - the HD MP4 video files are quite small whilst still high quality.
-Content can also be streamed.
-Scenes are not overly long; some of the shorter scenes at less than 20 minutes are especially hot.
-Most scenes are more "romantic" than "porno", with lots of kissing, so this site may be more likely to appeal to women.
-Good value for money with TBP member discount.
-Plenty of girl-girl action if you're into that.
-Works well with my download manager (I use Firefox/DownThemAll) and fast download speeds.
-Can leave comments on scenes and save models/scenes to a favourites list.
-Good usability on mobile phone device. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation isn't as comprehensive as other sites: you can't search for specific types of scene (e.g. anal, interracial etc) though there is a navigation menu option for group sex scenes.
-Scenes can be a bit samey with not a lot of variation, with some scenes being just kissing, blowjob then fucking in one position to end.
-I didn't like the continuous scrolling of pages of content and the models listing, modern though it is; much prefer numbered pages with previous-next navigation as it's much easier to get back to where you were after clicking on a particular scene to watch.
Streaming in HD could be bit choppy more often than not.
Updates don't appear to be daily, but perhaps that's asking for too much?
Group sex and interracial content is a bit thin on this site, though having said that, the interracial content that is there is very hot - check out the scene with Ana!
Not much anal or DP but then that's not really this site's focus.
I'd like to have seen more girls in stockings. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a great site with plenty of hot content that's a bit different to your average porn site. Models are mostly US and European and the scenes are less "porno" and more "people having and enjoying sex", so not many scenes have facials or anal/DP, but having said that, there are a few anal and DP scenes and some of the US girl's scenes all end with facials. Most scenes end with the guy cumming on her ass, back or on her pussy, with some scenes ending in creampie, which is more "natural" I guess.
Whilst quite a few of the models are recognisable from other sites, most of the models I've never seen on other sites.
Scenes tend to be natural (that word again!) so no sex in every position, just kissing, oral (usually mutual), then fucking in a few positions to the end.
Compared to your average porn site, there's very little chat during the scenes which start with the performers naked, so there's little or no build-up to the action. But having said that, the performers don't tend to make over-faked noises during the action, so not many screaming girls here.
I did find that when I cancelled, I was offered a continuing membership for an extremely low price that was very tempting.
Overall a site worth joining for at least a month. |
|
10-02-15 06:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Reasonable price
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
High resolution photos up to 4000px
Photos come in choice of 3 sizes with zip download in each size
Majority of videos are HD 1980 x 1080
Videos have up to 7 different download options and in browser flash streaming
Updates come several times a week
Content date stamped
No watermark on videos
Good scene descriptions
Ratings for models and scenes/photo sets
Zips and video downloads given file names which include model names and title of scene/set
Photo set cover included in the zips
A good mix of solo, lesbian and boy girl action (if that’s what you’re looking for, personally I would be happy with all solo so not really a pro for me) |
| Cons: |
File sizes of zips not listed
Video run times not stated
No search engine or tags
No separate category for photo updates
Not much ethnic diversity in the models.
Some models don’t have much content
Some models have no solo sets.
Many small photo sets (only 20 to 40 pics)
Overall photo collection surprisingly small for a site that has been online nearly 5 years
A lot of the sets start with the model already nude or wearing very little so not much in the way of stripping or teasing |
| Bottom Line: |
Following on from two excellent reviews of this site by rearadmiral and lk2fireone in the last week or so it’s difficult to know what I can say about this site without repeating everything that’s already been said so I’ll just try and look at it from a different perspective as my main interest is solo softcore photography and I have little interest in the lesbian, boy/girl action or videos.
The earliest updates on X-Art are dated November 2007 and it looks as though it started out as a photo site for a couple of years with videos being gradually being introduced by the end of 2009. Today the site is more video focused and you can expect at least every other update to be a video. The site advertises “updates every Monday, Wednesday and Friday” but they seem to have stepped up the update rate recently and it’s looking like about 5 updates a week in recent times.
After logging in the main navigation options you are provided with are “updates”, “videos”, and “models”. Oddly they don’t provide a separate category for those of us who only like to browse the photo collection. When selecting updates you will get all 500+ video and photo updates listed on one page so be prepared for a lot of scrolling. You can sort the updates by most recent, highest rated or title and you also have sub categories for solo, lesbian. boy/girl and group sex.
The model index is nicely presented listing all 140 models on one page with a nice sized 300 x 200 px preview picture along with her name, age and country of origin. You can sort the models by rating, date added, alphabetically or age. They don’t provide any other search options if you wanted to search models by hair colour or breast size for example. The models are mostly 18 to early 20s here with a good mix of European and US girls but little ethnic variety. The stand out models for me here were Francesca and Caprice who both had a fair amount of updates each.
Clicking on a model will present you with all her available photo sets and videos so I decided the best way to find the solo photo sets I wanted would be to work my way through the model index alphabetically. 5 out of the first 6 models I checked didn’t even have a solo photo set so I soon started to think I wasn’t going to get a lot out of this site. Add in the fact that when I did find sets to download very often they only had 20 to 30+ photos in the set so it soon became apparent that this is not a high volume site for photo lovers on the scale of Met-Art, MPL Studios or Femjoy. In the end because some models didn’t have any solo sets I just ended up downloading every solo and girl/girl set from the site which came to a grand total of just under 15,000 photos.
However what the site lacks in quantity of photos they certainly make up for in quality. These photo shoots are beautifully crafted and are as good as anything you would see at Met Art if not better in my opinion. The models are all naturally beautiful mostly without fake breasts or unsightly tattoos apart from the odd exception. I would guess there is some touching up going on in these photos because the model’s bodies always look absolutely flawless, moles and marks on the models skin that are visible in the videos have disappeared in the photos so if you like to see all the imperfections on the models then maybe this site would not be to your liking. I also love the photographer’s style the way he creates the sets using a lot of white backgrounds, often the model will be presented on a bed covered in white sheets or against a backdrop of white curtains or on a white sofa and often the model will be bathed in a hazy sunlight as it penetrates a nearby window to give the whole thing a kind of dreamy look. Many of the shoots start out with the model already nude but on the occasions when the model does wear something often it is just some simple white lingerie to give the models this look of youthful innocence.
I won’t go in to any great detail on the video section in this review as it’s not my area of expertise and was covered by the other recent reviews. Overall this is a high quality collection of photos and videos and my only real complaint as a photo lover was that it left me wanting more. With the site’s emphasis now shifting more towards videos and hardcore action only about 1 in every 6 updates hold any appeal for me so I can’t see myself returning here any time soon. If your preference is for videos then you could probably add 10 points to my score. |
|
07-07-12 02:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
37
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Around 130 video scenes and a lot more images (they update 3 times a week, twice with image sets and once with a video, the images go all the way back to 2007 so you do the math, but there are a lot :)
- Videos available in various resolutions up to 1920x1080 HD and images available in 1200, 2000 or 4000 PX.
- Some incredible images of young looking models, for the most part each scene has around 40-60 images and the girls usually start already naked or almost naked. Some very good, artistic shots and a lot of play with light on the girls forms and interesting angles.
- A lot of exclusive models, that look very good (you get to see nice breasts and round forms, but no extra fat)
- Starting to include hardcore and lesbian sex, and the videos are keeping the site's general vibe.
- Good download speeds/ no issues with downloads, log-in or navigation.
- Enjoyed the description of each scene, which although on the long side are nice erotic stories |
| Cons: |
- Videos are around 6-8 minutes each and the solo ones feel like they don't have much of a climax. For almost all videos the action starts as soon as the scenes opens, making for a bit of a rough-ish intro.
- I would enjoy a few more outfits (stockings, high heels etc.) A lot of the models are completely naked for the entire scene.
- Some of the models only have a 2-3 photo sets. I'd love it if they could get a few solo sets, a lesbian and a hardcore set from each girl.
- Some sets have as low as 10 photos. The 40-60 range is nice, especially since most girls start out naked, but why not have more images, since they already have the model in the studio and are paying her?
- The vibe of the videos can be either a big plus or a a negative. They start with a musical intro and are edited to feel very erotic/ dreamy. The camera doesn't really do close-ups of the girl, there are white sheets all over and the lighting feels very erotic. It's a unique vibe and some might love it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site looking mostly for some solo shots of girls I haven't seen before. In that aspect the site delivers very well. They have around 100 models and are constantly updating with more girls. They select almost entiurely European and American models and while I wish they had more Asian or black girls, the selection they have so far looks great (Quite a few readheds, different body types and a lot of very cute faces). Also, while they do have a few better known models, for the most part I believe they showcase newcomers to the industry, with a lot of girls I have never seen before.
The photos and videos all have a very erotic approach. There is a lot of focus on light, shadows and forms. The scenes are named stuff like: "Just married", "Young love", "First time", "Sex, love and happiness" and each video starts with an orchestral musical piece that leads into the action. The entire focus is on the models, their supposed innocence and nudity.
There is a particular vibe to the site and it's consistent from the design, the elaborate descriptions of each scene (they are longer than many other site I've seen and each one seems to be unique and thought out, a mini erotic short story for each shot) to the type of models they choose, the locations and action in the scenes. It all feels like an artsy, softcore site although they have boy-girl scenes as well as a lot of toy play and lesbian sex.
If you're into that Teen-dreamy, 18 year old innocence vibe the site is very consistent and delivers excellently with a variety of models and types of scenes. They also have quite a loty of outdoors scenes as well as scenes inside large architectural structures. Very interesting from an artistic perspective and I saved many images to use as wallpapers.
The closest site I can compare it to is ftvgirls.com but here the girls seem to fit into the young adult, innocence niche more neatly than FTV. Also the quality here is much higher and downloads were much faster. Some other similar sites are of course Met-Art and Nubiles, but I'd say Nubiles is more hardcore than this site and Met-Art a more softcore.
Overall you have to make sure you like this type of content before joining since there is no network site to offer different content. Also you have to be sure you like photos since most of the content here is images (although they are updating new hardcore stuff regularly).
Now that we determined who the target audience is for this site I'll comment a bit on the negative aspects. Videos feel too short and many of the photos scenes are also on the short side. While I don't mind 8 minutes of video when they are as well edited as the content on this site. I do wish they would offer more variation. Different outfits, more stripping, foreplay before the sex or lesbian action would be nice.
Also I remember one scene with 3 girls where they only offer 13 images. That seems like a criminal waste. Even if the girls weren't going to do a lesbian scene they could have a few more shots of the three of them touching or getting each other naked.
Speaking of lesbian scenes, right now there is no really easy way to find all boy girl, lesbian or solo scenes. You can navigate the site by videos, all updates or model index. More options would be nice, a category search will become a must as the site grows.
Some more bonuses would also be nice. Right now aside from the main content all the site offers is a behind the scenes blog which is kind of interesting, but not extraordinary (Just some updates on where theya re shootinga and the occasional behind the scenes image). If they partnered up with another similar site they could offer a much better deal. (They do have some live chats, but I don't think they are part of the membership and cost extra)
Bottom line: The site is well done and offers good content even if it's a bit on the short site. Good quality and fast downloads. Hot models and nice boy-girl, toy and lesbian scenes. If you like any of the models in the preview or really like this type of sites X-art could be a good deal. If you want gonzo hardcore, anal sex or a bigger focus on clothing/ heavier make-up, this site will probably disappoint. Don't sign up expecting Brazzers or Reality Kings, sign up expecting a more hardcore version of Met-art. |
|
10-04-11 04:18pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
38
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- High quality porn vids and picture sets
- Site lay out is user friendly
- The owners vision is refreshing
- They care for their models before shoots |
| Cons: |
- Site content is growing, so, not a ton of it just yet. Photo sets not as good as the videos.
- Serious issues with videos ending up on free sites in very short time.
- Bad editing on some videos, no climax |
| Bottom Line: |
A nice, unique art-porn site that features attractvie models having hot sex. Nice picture sets as well and a good selection of models to date. You don't feel like you need a shower after visiting the site in that their affairs are handled with class. They have shown the ability to take experienced models and make them fresh, if not innocent.
Some videos, leave you hanging in that they have an awkward end. By that I mean no climax. Some picture sets have the same look after one becomes accustomed to offerings. Some are as small as ten pics, many are average at best. I think the goal was to make it appear they had more sets. Many of the picture sets are directly from the video, so nothing new. One more thing, videos are fairly short, all under ten minutes.
When I first joined, content was mimimal. After my membership expired they seemed to add a lot more content. Worth one try for sure, but I would wait a good six months for content to catch up after that. Most of their videos end up on free sites far too quickly, a problem many are having in the current climate of on-line porn. Classy site overall, but nothing overly special just yet, but the potential is there. Again, worth a look and I will likely pay anpother visit in six months time. |
|
05-13-11 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Excellent Photo & Video Quality for all Videos
• New Site,Tri-Weekly Updates,Upcoming Schedules
• New Models,Exotic Locations,Nice Themes,Shoots
• Mainly Photos with BG,GG,3Some,Solo,Masturbation
• Weekly single video with Hardcore,Solo Themes
• Unseen,fresh,exclusive footage,no clones here
• Streaming Speeds are very good,no buffering
• Photo sets with 3 grades,view or download them
• Comments,Private Messages & Suggestions welcome
• Good Response to Site Issues-Membership/Content
• Great mixture of light,dark,wheaty complexioned
• HD 1080i Quality Videos,Pictures,Images et al
• Under $20 will get you a month's membership!
• Updates (Mon/Wed/Fri),good for a weekend package |
| Cons: |
• Randomly allotted User Name/Password for access
• Highly Cumbersome to recall User Name/Password
• Major difficulties to download with FTP Software
• Bi/Tri Weekly Photo Updates {Multiple Themes}
• Fortnightly Video Updates{Hardcore/Solo Themes}
• Downloads very slow with browser DM's(FF/Opera)
• Searches only by name, not category,date-wise
• Artistic photography site,growing on porn videos
• Emphasis more on female subjects,not male models
• Hardcore Content not full blown,developing now
• Site may appeal more to a connoisseur/enthusiast
• High HD Videos don't play well with most players
• HD Video Sizes are huge & occupy Hard Disk Space |
| Bottom Line: |
X-Art.com is a beautifully crafted site with a heady mixture of erotic photos,images & videos so its a very titillating sort of adventure. Yet its content is subtle,inviting & alluring to the viewer. Those used to Hardcore action had better watch out as the pace of things here are a tad low. This explains perhaps why there are so few videos here but there is much to look forward to in the coming months if the site goes with its convictions.
The quality here really brings out the expertise & appreciation of the fact that we're seeing some real professionals at work.Perhaps one day all videos & photo sets will be this way. Its almost as if you are with the model in some of the shots!
Young Nubile Models never seen before really goes well for a photography site & they never forget their roots here which is an important feature. Quite a few sites I have come across get lost in the haze of opportunity & the maze of glory which
deviates from their primary goals. Here its almost
a religion, photography.
All in all, this site's a must for those who crave quality erotica,sex & erotic photography. If that's who you are hop in & enjoy. There's a kind of a youthful flavor & appeal here I must say
Even the fashionable aficionados will surely find something to savor, it surely will not disappoint. Finally those looking for Hardcore Sex & Entertainment will find the site not upto their standards but then again there are several of those where that came from! |
|
01-27-11 05:57am
Replies (2)
|
Review
40
|
X-Art
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Beautiful Girls/Teens, some are wonderful (Caprice, Faye, Blue Angel, and many others)
- The sites shows a particular way of shooting video: short video, plan sex, plan positions, as in a porn romantic age...
-The navigation is simple and the site is plan: all the updates are in one page and you can see the cover of the single update, the rate of the model/teen, the date of the video/pics, differnt video/pics options (various format)
-Three updates/week (regularly)
-Good speed connection and the DM works fine |
| Cons: |
-Sex is Plan, too plan..., always.
-Sometimes the camera man cuts the actors in a strange way...I don' understand if it is a mistake or a decision or the Director
-The scenes are Too much "filtered", never sharpe and detailed (too much soft focusing) |
| Bottom Line: |
This kind of site could be fantastic or ugly, it dipends on your personal thought.
I don't like so much this kind of Porn: too much boring...
Not anal sex, not crazy positions, too much romantic...., it could be a dream.
Yes, I think that everyone of us have got in mind these fantastic girls that appear in the video like "real angels".
The images are always filtered, enveloped in haze; the shoots (10 min each) aren't sharpe, detailed....but this is the "camera works" and the Direction...
You can like or not... |
|
10-02-11 10:40am
Replies (1)
|
Review
41
|
X-Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pros : beautiful models, some of which are the sexiest I have seen in some time. Lily has to get a mention as one of their top models and her videos set is such high quality even if it is very short.There are now 63 very sexy models with photo sets available in 3 sizes. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is totally inconsistent and in many cases very poor consisting of soft or over exposed photos. For HQ photos there is very little detail.
The videoes are too few and again not all of the same high quality as Lily's. They are also very short appprox 3min in duration. |
| Bottom Line: |
I as a picture lover fail to see how other reviewers can score this a 95 which puts it in the same bracket as MET ART, Hegre, Femjoy etc which it clearly is not. I have seen photos on all these sites where you can see the very hairs on the models arms and the goose pimples from a cold room used for the photo shoot. These are not of a similar quality nor is there the same volume of models and photos. Bottom line very sexy models but they are being done an injustice. Improve the quality of the photos and this could bea top site but not yet. |
|
02-06-10 07:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
X-Art
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- All attractive models, mostly well known, although many are now mainstream porn performers without quite the same class.
- Usually avoid models with bad piercings and tattoos, when they do use tattooed models they do a pretty good job of hiding them.
- As far as I can tell, there are no models with breast enhancements.
- Good archive of some of the most beautiful photography I've ever seen.
- Site doesn't seem to time out. When I first joined I stayed logged in for several days while downloading the old material.
- Easy navigation and basic search facilities. All updates are clearly dated.
- Big clear thumbnails on updates & model pages.
- Very active member community, with lots of comments.
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, up to 1080p, although I only ever download the highest.
- Streaming available.
- No logos on films, very small logos on photos.
- All content seems to be exclusive.
- Plenty of material, around 400 films and rather more photo sets. |
| Cons: |
- Very slow and unreliable downloads.
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- Model bios are a joke, even more so than most sites.
- There has recently been a huge increase in the volume of material, and a great drop in quality control.
- Some photo sets still very good, but an increasing number of out of focus & poorly lit sets.
- The voting is blatantly fiddled, with all updates being posted with large numbers of 10/10 votes
- Comments are pre-moderated, and while they allow through some mild criticism there is much more leeway given to those who follow the party line.
- Over the last year the material has become much more sexually extreme. |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't get me wrong, X-Art was good, but there are now serious issues.
It is odd to find a major site as slow and unreliable as this. I never get much more than 200 KBytes/sec (every other site I am on maxes out my internet connection at 2 MBytes/sec), and it often takes several attempts to download. I travel a lot and am home briefly, and often don't manage to download the backlog. There are several films I never have got downloaded - this is using 3 different pcs, 3 different browsers, and several internet connections - I've even tried in hotels (which I don't like doing) with no improvement.
The technical and artistic quality of the films has dropped a lot recently. It has gotten so bad that there are a lot of complaints on the site, but in reality it has been dropping for several months. This isn't just about the bunch of films released that are supposedly HQ but are very pixelated and really very low quality, in general the quality has dropped. Obviously no-one looked at the films before uploading them. There have been several films released with terrible lighting problems, including one that was completely unwatchable due to purple lens flares across the entire image. The film editing has become very basic, and many films don't even end smoothly with a fade to a "the end" screen, the film just stops suddenly 1 second after the action finishes. Clearly much less time is being spent in post-production and no checking is being done at all.
It seems strange that site blog keeps boasting of how quickly they are producing material. They say that large numbers of films & photo shoots are being done in a day, clearly with little preparation. Almost all the updates are produced in one house in Malibu, or one studio in Prague. The same sets are being used over and over, and the updates are clearly being filmed in a few minutes with minimal attention to detail. There is no longer any scene setting, they just put people in front of the camera and make them get on with it. Many films just have one camera from the side doing a longshot, and one from in front doing a close up, and all they do is cut between the two.
The voting is a joke. Many sites pump up the votes a bit, but this site is ridiculous. Updates appear around midnight, and have between 30 and 100 10/10 votes. They give more 10/10 votes to the more extreme material which is what they prefer. It means that the site, rather than the membership, is choosing what is more popular. It also makes the older material, when they didn't do this, seem poorly rated. Members can make up a new name whenever they comment, and I get the feeling that some people are having conversations with themselves, or putting up multiple positive comments for the material they like. There are a suspiciously large number of comments with female names which never appear again, especially on the nastier material. The moderation of the comments is uneven, and it is noticeable, for example, that comments insulting members who don't like anal are allowed through while responses aren't. The pre-moderation and blocking of anything that mentions other sites in a positive light is comical, as Colette recently went onto SexArt to take advantage of their lack of pre-moderation to advertise and try to poach members - when she got a negative response she became very aggressive and made wild allegations. Eventually SexArt, who are very tolerant in their comments, had to remove most of the thread.
The material has become much more sexually extreme, and a significant portion of the recent updates are clearly aimed at the mysoginistic male mainstream porn market. There is a lot of anal now, several DPs and rough looking facials, and the blog shows that this is clearly the direction the site wish to go. A lot of the current material just looks harsh and aggressive and like mainstream porn. Material like this used to attract negative comments, it doesn't any more apart from a couple of sad sounding members. Either the comments are blocked or the old members from the artistic days of a few years ago have left.
X-Art was the benchmark glamcore site. Over the last year or so it has left this behind, and is now marginally upmarket mainstream porn. I say marginally because good mainstream sites wouldn't put up the technically poor films that have been posted recently. If you are coming from regular porn, looking for something that seems a little classy, you may well like it. If you're coming from erotica, and fancy something a little more explicit, or have seen some magazine articles or adverts and are considering porn/glamcore for the first time, SexArt or Joymii would be much more likely to suit. I find little artistic or erotic on here now, and my wife will only watch films if I have checked them out first. My annual membership is coming to an end (it's my second time on the site), and I won't be renewing. |
|
11-06-13 01:44am
Replies (7)
|
Rating
43
|
X-Art
(0)
69.0
|
No Review.
|
02-10-10 08:28am
|
Review
44
|
X-Art
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
# nice girls
# good quality
# HDV videos
# partial HC content
# functional design |
| Cons: |
# HIGH PRICE
# 1 update every 4th day
# small archive
# no bonus contents |
| Bottom Line: |
X-art aka Beauty Is Divine was always a great source for inspiration full of angelic looking babes.
I see the change from BID to X-Art with mixed feelings. The additional hc content stays in total contrast to the "old" days and unique contents and make it just another teensite.
I totally disagree with majestix opinion because the price is way to high for a site that updates only every 4th day and offers a small archive.
X-art is for people who do not need a daily update and don't want to miss nicely shaped and flexible teens in quality scenes. |
|
02-01-10 02:11am
Replies (2)
|
Review
45
|
X-Art
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Old content (2015 and before) is some of the best porn ever created |
| Cons: |
-Current crop of models are all Eastern European.
-No tags or advanced search/filter options
-Updates were starting to slow before the pandemic but really slowed down during 2020, with no new updates for almost one whole year as of August 2022 |
| Bottom Line: |
When it was founded, X-Art was hands-down one of the best porn sites on the internet. The couples were really into it, because oftentimes they were actual couples. The videos were well-produced and cinematic. In fact, they were so 'artistic' that they often wouldn't even show the man cumming inside the woman.
The current site is absolutely nothing like this. The videos are indistinguishable from mainstream, over-produced porn. The sex is mechanical and emotionless, and the creampies are often obviously fakes. The actual quality in performance, lighting, camerawork, etc., was way better *ten years ago* than the current videos being put out. This can only be explained by massive cuts in production budget and a lack of passion both behind and in front of the camera.
The site used to have a wide array of models to choose from. As of the last 7 or 8 years, however, they have been hiring mostly barely-legal Eastern Europeans with no tits. They're probably paid a fraction of what a US model would be paid and I bet STI testing regulations are way looser. For some reason they also have not been crediting models lately, which seems suspicious.
Even when this site was new, navigation has always been primitive, with a very rudimentary search function, no tags, and no filtering besides choosing solo, couples, or group sex.
They appear to have been deleting negative comments on videos, which is the lowest sign of desperation.
It's easy to blame the pandemic for the decline of this site but the quality has been decreasing since the middle of last decade, and the updates were decreasing in quantity long before anyone had heard of COVID.
It's sad to see a site that was so great and unique die such a slow death. |
|
08-16-22 01:10pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
46
|
X-Art
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Holy. Crap. This site is absolutely insane. I'm a girl and love watching porn so having a sexy, young, ever-new site like X-Art is essential for me.
I've never seen hotter girls anywhere. They get the top top models from all over the world and they do the dirtiest stuff. I can stay on there for hours.
I love the production value and how real the girls look. They actually LOVE doing what they do.
They have every type of video for whatever mood you're in: solo, girl-girl, threesomes, orgies... it goes on and on. |
| Cons: |
It's hard to think of something they can improv on but I guess I'd say I wish they had 3 updates a day :) |
| Bottom Line: |
You MUST join. Even for 1 month and you'll know what I'm talking about. Even if I'm not horny I'll log on to check our their new videos and I automatically get turned on and have to play with myself. Both the guys and the girls are sexy and irresistible.
GET IT |
|
06-24-14 10:28am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
47
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
03-14-22 04:25am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
48
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
06-02-20 10:49pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
49
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
02-10-20 06:30am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
50
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
01-29-17 07:09pm
Replies (4)
|
|
