| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Girls Out West
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video and photograph in which it took a picture of a lot of amateur women
Search engine with a lot of choices
Update at nearly every day
The overall lovely design
Openhearted forum space |
| Cons: |
There are a lot of photographs and videos that do not contain sex.
The video of B/G is not an enough number.
Divided video |
| Bottom Line: |
I like G/G video. I love B/G than them.
The B/G video of the amount for which I hope doesn't exist here.
However, I should have expected it because I saw the tour and the review.
In this site, there are women who did a lot of Pierce.
And, there are women who did a lot of tattoos.
I do not like it.
I did not download videos of women who did Pierce to genitals and women who had done a lot of Pierce to her face.
I came to like Kim's B/G video a little.
The Kim is a really usual amateur woman.
She sits on the motorcycle, and is caressed by a man.
She seems to want a man to kiss.
And, she says to a man, "Kiss me".
She is lovely.
It was able to be seen in not only the video but also the photograph.
The G/G video of Page and Rochelle is hot.
Page is very sensitive.
She shakes oneself twitching only by a little being touched.
Her orgasm can be seen.
It is regrettable that there is only one kind of G/G video of her.
I was a member of G/G in abbywinters before.
I think that it is a good site.
I think that becoming a member on this site after you enjoy abbywinters is a good idea. |
|
10-08-09 03:57am
Replies (2)
|
Review
27
|
Girls Out West
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Uniquely natural / real models (average women).
- Natural settings without glossy editing.
- Genuine amateurs (not even pro-am!) |
| Cons: |
- Little or no chemistry or sexual excitement in most videos.
- Most videos are older, and have very poor resolution.
- Often (not always) very jerky camera work. Makes me seasick!
- Many videos have low contrast, no real blacks, so are like watching through a steamy window. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was intrigued by the Annie's truly unique approach and values, as I understood them from the reviews here and from looking at the site as a non-member. I definitely appreciate porn done by women with real female arousal -- at least I think I do (need more cases now). I watched the 4 trailers for boy/girl videos, and they seemed promising. The site says 500 videos -- so I figured there must be at least 100 b/g videos. So I joined hoping for some b/g videos with real arousal, female orgasms, and other things that I like (see my profile, and the forum "Against the grain").
Unfortunately, I have to agree with PU reviewer ramscrota. As a whole, the b/g videos offered by this site are pathetic.
First, quantity and resolution. Only 24 are listed, 2 of which are mis-indexed (they have no boys). Half of these, 13, are available only in very low resolution, highly compressed blurry 480 x 360 pixels mpg. Later vids move up to 640 x 360 wmv, then more recentlhy 770 x 435 mp4 or wmv without the blurring compression.
Worst of all, in most of the b/g videos, the couple seems to be working for the camera woman, trying hard (sometimes difficulty with erection) without being very horny or aroused. Sometimes they are clearly too hot, sweaty, and uncomfortable, and in some outdoor scenes the flies are quite distracting/disgusting.
So, after looking at all of the b/g scenes and finding very little, I looked at some of the g/g or solo videos. Since I find genuine arousal exciting, I looked mostly at the ones where the description indicated an orgasm. Again, most of these were simply unexciting. Natural down to earth people, just not very expressive or excited people.
As others have said, the models are a cross section of body types, ages, and personalities -- but all presented in very natural form, little or no makeup. I like that approach, but not the results here. Also one of the two camera women is often crossing the viewport, or her shadow, which I found realistic but somewhat distracting.
Overall, I have to say that for me, joining this site was a waste of money.
All that said, I did find a few vids that I downloaded and didn't erase after one viewing. Larissa's Manhunt is hilarious and she is really entertaining and sexy. Unfortunately, the 4 segments end without any sex or orgasms. (I deleted those.) The following b/g videos had some real sexual energy, excitement, and orgasms:
- Jasmine & Lee, Caravan Sex
- Timbo fucks Kim (silly overacting, but real multiple orgasms)
- Samantha and Maxwell was a really tender, affectionate, and hot video.
- Vince and Miah were fun.
After watching a couple of dozen solo and g/g videos (generally not my thing) the only one I am keeping is
- Daisy Duke & Alma (real horny excitement and energy and orgasms)
All of the above except Timbo were available in reasonable resolution.
Honorable mention goes to Kim's motorcycle video (3 parts). No orgasms but an amazing concept, pretty well done. |
|
07-30-09 03:07pm
Replies (6)
|
Comment
28
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
07-19-09 05:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
29
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
04-28-09 09:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Girls Out West
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Easy site to navigate.
2. Amateur content. |
| Cons: |
1. A lot of the girls are quite unattractive.
2. The updates get drawn way out, need to have more variety.
3. Some of the areas where the scenes are shot are very dingy looking. Needs to spruce it up a bit.
4. Video quality is very poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would not recommend this site at all, there are a lot of better options out there. |
|
01-14-09 06:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Girls Out West
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Real looking amateurs
- Generally a good sense of the erotic
- Being an Austraian, it is exciting seeing the shoots in some locations known to me.
- Great sense of fun on the site. Forum is one of the most enjoyable I've ever seen. |
| Cons: |
- Little HC sex. The BG scenes are pathetic.
- Pic sets are often far too long
- Many sets look chaotic and disorganized
- Many sets photographed or videoed in untidy, dingy surroundings. Annie needs to get a cleaner in, and put some attractive decor around her place. |
| Bottom Line: |
A good site for those who love pics, and a sense of fun (the forum is great!). But this site is a lot like Australian society and culture - some good things, but messy, chaotic and unplanned. |
|
12-28-08 04:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Girls Out West
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons |
| Cons: |
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25 |
| Bottom Line: |
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans. |
|
07-19-08 11:06am
Replies (3)
|
Review
33
|
Girls Out West
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Others have given all the details (quality, regularity of updates and navigation etc. etc.) regarding this site, so allow me to generalize and simply state, or shout: This is without a doubt the best amateur site I have come across so far.
Instead of a bevy of aspiring porn stars (read clones) here be found real women! Arghh!
There are the skinny, the chubby, the shaved, the hairy, the teens and the mature. There are teeth that aren't capped, pimples that aren't hidden under layers of make-up, hair that's not always perfect, instead there's simply a bunch of models who are for the most part unabashed exhibitionists, cheered on by photographers (female) who don't give a hoot if they end up in the picture now and then, by accident or design.
I think the web mistress defiantly proclaims through every set and video: take us or leave us!
Well, I gladly take it! The site is one of the few that's true to its niche, yet the pictures and videos are of good to excellent quality. |
| Cons: |
I really can't find any cons, except for the usual one: that some of the older material is obviously not as high quality as the newer stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
Summing up: this is my second subscription to this site. I was so delighted with it first time around that I put down money for a three month subscription this time. (Billing through CCBill, another plus)
After reading tons of reviews from my fellow PU members I must warn those who express disappointment in connection with other sites because they always find some models that fall short of their ideal, that this might not be the perfect site for them.
However, for those who long for natural rather than "porn queen pretty", this could easily become their second home.
I know that I find ALL of the girls gorgeous because they almost manage to convince an old cynic that they are not just posing for money.
They ARE the girls/women next door who like to be naughty now and then. Three cheers for our friends from Oz for running a great site. |
|
05-07-08 02:12pm
Replies (14)
|
Comment
34
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
01-15-08 12:02pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
35
|
Girls Out West
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
#all female run site
#1250 X 834 pixels hi rez photos for recent updates except 2004 (does not make up a big part of the site)
#most updates are 175-300 pics long: thus every desired pose is covered
# pics are absolutely stunning
#all movies are mpeg 1 movies
#forums allow for some raunchiness that the average forums would never allow.
# average mpeg length is 7-12 minutes long
# most models are 18-24 but also sexy models in their late 20' and early 30's
#19.50 recurring/ per month |
| Cons: |
#old pics are 1000 X 659 (2004)
#all movies are mpeg1 movies
#have to right click on videos and designate "save target as" in order to save it to the hard drive. This was the only way I got to see the full video.
# navigation contains a lot of pages to scroll through to get to models and vids (though I could use categories under extras on main page to search models via category) |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line, A lot is offered for only $19.50 per month; After being a member of one month, and reviewing the site. This is a site I'm going to rebill
#all female run site: Annie and Dandy
Annie is #hot# herself and SHE SHOOTS absolutely
Bad #ss photosets.
#Annie calls herself -your web mistress, and "Your Captain Speaking" is the quote under her current avatar in the forum. Annie is a hottie herself. Right now the avatar is a pic of her blue panties pulled halfway down her sexy legs.
#### for those who like forums participation; this one may be a funnest forums to participate in. This forum is indeed directed by Annie, yet raunch and rudeness seems to be the style here.
####Let me explain the main page links: girls, girls/girls, girl/boys (this is not a big section), stories, annie, forums, extras, join
####Ok instead of trying to explain what is offered I took a calculator and added all the numbers up:
####SOFTCORE:242 SOLO MODEL photo sets at 13,831 PICS RATED SOFTCORE; 12 GIRL/GIRL Photo SETS, AT 2,470 PICS; 11 girl/girl videos RATED SOFTCORE, and 34 solo girl SOFTCORE VIDEOS#### Medium Core: 107 SOLO MODELS, 31,853 PICS RATED MEDIUM WITH 97 medium core solo girl vids and 24 medium core Girl/Girl videos; 12 GIRL/GIRL photosets AT 3,099 PICS RATED MEDIUM,;#######HARDCORE:25 GIRL/GIRL sets AT 7,828 PICS RATED HARDCORE; 93 hardcore GIRLS sets AT 26,934 PICS; and 184 solo girl hardcore vids, and 101 hardcore girl/girl vids |
|
06-22-07 11:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Girls Out West
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As raw as it can get
Many of the Aussie other adult site members have gravitated here
seems to be no censorship on the forums - say what you like
Annie/Dandy - they run the place - no rules
Good price
Taking aw models and giving them b/g shoots |
| Cons: |
Limited videos
Much of the videos are broken up into segements. So you have to wait weeks to get full story.
Please, please give us full download
video quality not always the greatest |
| Bottom Line: |
An interesting site with sexy models. Videos too infrequent and would like to see better quality vids.
Some incredibly sexy models in very naughty sits |
|
06-07-07 03:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Girls Out West
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site has a lot of content on it with a lot of pretty women. One thing that I do like is that these are 'real' girls and not pornstars. Real breasts and pubic hair are very much present. The videos aren't slick, but they are fun. This site is like watching real people get naked, real people have sex, etc.
One thing that really is nice is that in all my looking (and I'm not done) I haven't seen one facial. I'm finding facials increasingly lame and their absence is nice. |
| Cons: |
I'd be happier if there was a bit more boy/girl content.
While I like natural, 'regular' girls on a site, some of the girls aren't even remotely attractive.
The videos are not slick and are almost crude in their style. Very much an amateur production. For me, this is good, but it may be a turn off to many. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is Abby Winters less beautiful sister. She's pretty and a lot of fun but not as beautiful as her sister Abby. Whereas Abby Winters site is slick and very polished, Girls Out West is much more of an amateur site.
However, I found this to be endearing. I think Abby's is a great site, one of the best, but it almost takes itself too seriously. GOW is just a lot of fun, pretty, naked, natural average girls. I like it a lot.
I'm almost a hypocrite in saying this. I do like porn---but sometimes I get tired of the slickness, the fake breasts, the fake moaning, shaved pussies, and facials.
This site is sort of the anti-porn site. No silicon, lots of pubic hair, no facials, cum shots that actually take place where they usually take place. If you love slick porn and love facials and love seeing porn stars in action, this may not be the site for you. If you want to see pretty but regular girls doing what they do, this is a really good site. |
|
05-21-07 02:25pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
38
|
Girls Out West
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Consider this site a poor relative of Abby Winters. Some of the great looking girls found on Abby Winters are also featured here. The site features both photos and movies which are updated on a regular basis.
Cost for a month membership is reasonable a reasonable $20. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is mediocre by todays standards
Video quality is mediocre by todays standards
Many of the girls are unattractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Abby Winters, this site might be worth checking out to see more of the same girls in a different setting. However, be warned many of the girls are not as attractive as those found on Abby Winters. In addition, you might be disappointed at the mediocre photo and video quality. However, for $20 I think it is worth a shot because there are some real gems here.
Follow-Up:
I rejoined the site recently and was disappointed to find no real improvements to note. Video is still noticeably inferior by todays standards and most of the girls would still never make it on Abby Winters. One of the more popular recurring models from Abby (Paula) appears in some videos packing on quite a bit of extra baggage in the rear and thighs. I'm leaning towards giving this site a thumbs down recommendation for membership. |
|
05-13-07 05:36am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Girls Out West
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Updates 5 days a week
2. Great variety in the content
3. Truly amateur content
4. Models are very uninhibited
5. Large amount of material
6. Everything is downloadable
7. Excellent forum section
8. Good customer service |
| Cons: |
1. Seems like there is a stronger emphasis on solo female performances. I'd like to see a higher percentage of F/F and F/M sets.
2. I've had bandwidth issues where this site can be a little slower than desired.
3. Some of their models aren't that attractive |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site from Australia where the models are pretty young and very amateurish. They're very uninhibited and a lot of the video sets feature the girls giving unabashed interviews where they shamelessly talk about very intimate details of their lives. There is a large amount of content which includes tons of downloadable .wmv and .mpeg videos and picture sets.
I was really impressed with their customer service. I had a minor issue with access (learned that the problem was actually on my end and no fault of theirs) and their customer service was really fast in helping.
As I indicated above, the girls here are really amateur. These are real girls with all the imperfections that goes along with that. These are not the perfect bodies that you see in other sites. In some regards it is kind of refreshing to see real people, but in some instances it does kind of diminish my interest.
Overall, this is still a fun site. It's rather unique among the genre and it has a nice online community through its forums. It's reasonably priced and has loads of content for new members to amuse themselves. |
|
01-29-07 08:18pm
Replies (0)
|
|
