| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from fuzzyham:
(dieselman's Reply)
When you visit the WOWGirls site, there is no mention of any network or additional sites. The only thing I saw was there is mention on the Join page about something called WOWPorn, but no mention of what this is. However, you supposedly get access to WOWPorn with your monthly membership. There is also no mention of different membership levels, such as Diamond. No mention of DieselAccesss. If you go to dieselaccesss.com, all you see is a login screen. Google search of Diesel Access Network brings up almost no info.
My advice, approach this site with caution.
|
07-03-13 11:36am
|
Reply
2
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from jberryl69:
(dieselman's Reply)
Dieselman - love the quality look of your wow girls site. I've ask my fellow reviewers about what you consider deep throating, since it is my niche.
In the movie Deep Throat, Linda Lovelace defined the term for me. Sadly today, most people running websites seem to have no clue what it means. Eskimos (from the State of Alaska) have 27 words to describe snow. That sort of describes how I feel about deep throat.
These days, about the only ones doing true deep throat are they misogynistic Facial Abuse (which is 180 degrees different than your site) and scenes from Jonni Darkko, who provides 90% of my current content.
So, liking the look of your site and the quality of your videos, I'm hoping the deep throating is just as outstanding. As an example - Henessy is on your site - I know for a fact she can definitely deep throat and I'm not talking one or two times to the base. I'm not necessarily looking for an entire scene of it (though, that would be nice) but at least 5-10 mins of concentrated oral work.
How would you describe your oral work on Wow Girls?
Thanks in advance.
|
03-06-13 06:06am
|
Reply
3
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from RLane:
(dieselman's Reply)
That is very great news and I'll definitely join with any of those two deals.
|
02-23-13 05:02pm
|
Reply
4
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from RLane:
(dieselman's Reply)
I really hope TBP staff will have a discount, for I'd love to join and especially for Guerlain.
|
02-23-13 04:54pm
|
Reply
5
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Cybertoad:
(dieselman's Reply)
I know I have tried contacting wowgirls and do not get a response from the site contact is also very difficult to even find.
|
02-18-13 08:27am
|
Reply
6
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from elephant:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks Dieselman for your reply, good to hear from you again and see you back on the site.
Good also to see you striving to push Wow in the right direction, sounds good with the wow porn being more for hardcore and wow girls being for more softer side.
A site that listens to the fans will go along way so and doing most scenes without toys gets a thumbs up from me. I look forward to seeing the progress of wow porn and the company itself.
Nice One.
|
02-12-13 01:08am
|
Reply
7
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from graymane:
(dieselman's Reply)
Well, I gotta throw you a "high-five" for one important thing:
That would be your taking the time (as you've done here) to personally reply to our comments. That speaks volumes.
I'll keep an eye on further reviews to see what they're saying.
In the meantime, curb the toy action, and please spare us lingering closeups of the genitals ........ I'm not interested in her ovaries or hair follicles on a guy's balls.
|
02-11-13 08:25pm
|
Reply
8
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks for the info.
|
02-11-13 03:32am
|
Reply
9
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from rearadmiral:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks for that information DM. I didn't understand at first that the Diamond membership will give access to Diesel Access AND Wow. That is great news!
I understand that bandwidth is only a small part of your costs. I can't complain because you do have some of the best porn available today.
I'm definitely looking forward to your new memberships.
|
02-07-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
10
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Khan:
(dieselman's Reply)
I don't handle either reviews or the discounts but if you send to that address, I'll see that it gets to the right person.
The requesting reviews you should be able to do via your webmaster profile. If you're unsure, mention it in the email and I'll find the URL for you. I'll also pass on Ken's contact info so it'll be easy to contact him directly.
|
02-05-13 10:17am
|
Reply
11
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(dieselman's Reply)
When you say THB I'll assume you mean TBP (TheBestPorn).
I know Ken is usually *very* willing to work with webmasters so I'm surprised to hear you say there's a "lack of cooperation". I do recall you've had us reset your password several times because you forgot it. But other than that, I'm unaware of any queries you've made that we've not responded to. If you'll drop a line with your concerns to support [at] pornusers [dot] com I'll do my best to see any questions are answered.
|
02-05-13 07:07am
|
Reply
12
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from KET924aab:
(dieselman's Reply)
Dieselman, I was checking out the free tour at Young Legal Porn, and couldn't find a list of all the Diesel sites. Is there one gateway page?
|
02-04-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
13
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from rearadmiral:
(dieselman's Reply)
Dieselman - thanks for taking the time to drop in and provide some feedback. I think you will understand that you have a lot of fans and customers here so any good news about your sites is welcome.
Two things:
1) please drop in here and leave a comment when the new pricing structure is active. I'm sure I'm not the only member here who will want to take advantage of it.
2) consider a third loyalty level that drops the price after three months. Join for one month and get one site, get expanded access in month two and then a lower price in month three and onward. By month three members would only be downloading updates so it would be less cost for bandwidth for you and you might see some guys like me just stay forever. If there was a network that I'd join and stay for a long time it would be yours.
|
02-04-13 02:51pm
|
Reply
14
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thank you, dieselman.
I am already a loyal customer of your offerings.
I currently have access to all 13 sites in the DieselAccess network.
I am also a current member of Wow Girls.
Your girls are gorgeous.
|
10-15-12 09:56am
|
Reply
15
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from steveosaurus:
(dieselman's Reply)
A suggestion:
Not only are the girls in Diesel sites above average quality, but the props (dildos,etc) are often as well.
Some are easily identified, others not.. I wonder how well a sex-toy store as part of the site would do? Perhaps limited to props used in various clips.
for example, my girlfriend was very interested in a particular suction-cup-to-a-glass-table-dildo in a Young Legal Porn clip called 'Elizabeth, Jerking, thinking about you" - and I would enjoy being able to buy it from the same site that provides such high quality films.
Perhaps the trailers for the clips, or site meta-data could list prop source links, with commission agreements with the vendors...
Has this been discussed already?
|
08-26-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
16
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from joekramer08:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks for responding, Dieselman. I do have a complaint about the scenes on the site, however. Like I mentioned, the camera angles on all of the scenes are too focused on closeups of the girl, but I'd rather see her whole body at once. It is very frustrating watching the scenes when all I can see is her breasts, or her face. Please zoom the camera out and just show her whole body for most of the scene. I assume that the camera man is doing the closeups to try make the scene more "interesting", but closeups aren't interesting - they're frustrating. seeing the girl's body is interesting. Her body is enough to keep me interested. Just zoom out, leave the camera alone and let her do her thing.
|
07-05-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
17
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from bibo:
(dieselman's Reply)
Hello dieselman,
thanks for your reply.
You are correct about the picture dimensions, that was a sloppy mistake by me. I'll see if I can edit my original review text.
Video quality, especially in the HDTV section, is always a matter of taste. I prefer my videos ultra sharp and with a lot of color satuation. Hence, the mentioned sites are my personal definition of the current state of the art when it comes to videos.
Yes, I've seen the Live Show section. It's a nice bonus, but to be honest, I wouldn't download a 640p video, I'm too addicted to HD vids. Personal taste strikes again. :)
But since you mentioned the Live Shows, I've got a question:
Why is the actual live stream significantly smaller than the downloadable videos in the Live Show archive? The show, iirc, is 320*240 or something, the videos are 640*480?! Is that just a bandwidth issue during the live shows?
|
05-31-12 10:58am
|
Reply
18
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from elephant:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks Dieselman for making it clear that your company is responsible for this site too, I thought that you would be as it looks like the same quality as your other sites, I really like the new wow girls look and some of the models you work with are totally to my taste.
Will this site be included in the network with your other sites in the future as I'd like to join them all at once.
|
05-20-12 05:22am
|
Reply
19
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Claypaws:
(dieselman's Reply)
I think 70 to 75 is completely fair unless you either
(1) advertise and promote the network as specialising in video with some bonus photos
or
(2) Add a lot of high resolution, explicit, properly lit, focused and produced photo sets. At least as many photo sets as videos.
But it is dragged down by having a lot of old content that is not unique and of poor quality (I mentioned Peris). And I think there is some AdultLabs content too.
70 to 75 is not a "trash" rating. The PU description of 70-79 is "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend."
Your videos are excellent. The photos are poor. The navigation is clumsy. It is impossible to search for original photo sets (or such was the case in January 2012). I seem to remember having some difficulty opening photos in a new tab. The tour does not make clear exactly what is present. None of the "poor" part is beyond rescue.
But, as things stand now, from the point of view of a consumer of solo softcore explicit photography, I regard my rating as fair, especially as it was given in a comment rather than in a full review.
I really do appreciate your taking the time and trouble to discuss. My aim is always to gain improvement. Improving the good leads to the excellent. That is where we all want to be.
|
05-18-12 05:16pm
|
Reply
20
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Claypaws:
(dieselman's Reply)
Just to me, speaking personally, it feels a bit creepy to get to know a girl in regular chats and still get off to her pictures and videos. I prefer to keep the model as an unknown goddess and worship her from afar :-) A real live, real world face to face relationship is a different thing entirely. However, I understand that many users enjoy webcam style chats with the girls. I have only ever participated in one myself and it did feel a bit weird.
If you started the genre of solo-girl sites, you certainly started a huge niche. There are thousands of them now. But I cannot have too much Gloria. The more Gloria the better. She is amazing. So is Sasha. I would love it if you could photograph Sasha doing wide spreads without insertions. She has a huge number of photo sets on MET-ART, very polished but not explicit enough. Perhaps you could do better.
|
05-18-12 04:55pm
|
Reply
21
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(dieselman's Reply)
First of all, thank you for joining in the discussion. I was not criticising you for having non-exclusive models at all. I was just responding to comment from rearadmiral, who said he had not realised the models were not exclusive.
I can understand why your girls and sites are popular. Remember I was making my comments from the point of view of a user with almost no interest in video. I shall comment further on that in a reply to one of your other comments.
It does not surprise me at all that Gloria took some persuading to do hardcore. I am not interested in hardcore so this is not a positive development for me. But I appreciate that many members would like to see her in hardcore and indeed, in girl-girl, which also does not interest me.
I feel that your tour could make the nature of your content clearer. You are currently primarily a video site. Albeit your videos are special and unique. Unfortunately, there are some of us who join purely for photos and we tend to be disappointed if we do not find what we hoped for.
It so happens I was also a member of sashablonde in January 2008. She had hardcore video on site then. I even downloaded a couple of them, which is unusual for me to do. Only one of them now plays. It is called 709.wmv. The other one is called 699.wmv. It appears to be DRM protected and will not play. It is asking me for login details, which I no longer have, of course. It may be that I or WMP has lost its DRM records. It seems I have not attempted to view the video in the last four years! I still have my login and password though.
|
05-18-12 04:08pm
|
Reply
22
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(dieselman's Reply)
As I said to you before dieselman, I enjoy your site, but I am curious when you say 95% exclusive do you mean this year or the site in total? I am a bit dubious of that figure if you are talking about the entire site.
|
01-20-12 11:02pm
|
Reply
23
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Denner:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks!
Well, yes - got to join very soon - look forward to the content.
Hope you get those issues solved. But then again I'm confident to get a feedback if any problems occur....thumbs up for the reply!
|
01-15-12 06:29am
|
Reply
24
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(dieselman's Reply)
Thanks for the response. It's too bad that I'm so kind to my computer that it hasn't broken down enough to merit replacement with something further along in the matrix of code-bloat-begets-hardware-updates, but eventually a replacement will be necessary.
Or I could just update the RAM ;)
|
01-14-12 09:22pm
|
Reply
25
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from elephant:
(dieselman's Reply)
Shame about Stasha not getting her own site, hope you do more videos of her though, she is amazing. I didn't know who Guerlain was but just checked her out in the model directory, very pretty girl so look forward to her getting her own site.
The Gloria niche sounds very intriguing, care to tell us more or is it top secret, I hope it's more girl on girl and maybe a bit more kissing and touching, yummy.
|
11-20-11 12:47am
|
