| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I said no and the reason is that appearance is fairly subjective. I've known quite a few models that were above 18 and still looked young. Did they look 17, 16, 15 or younger is hard to tell. The only naked 16 yrs that I have seen is Tracy Lords and that's because Im old enough to have seen her movies when they were still conmsired legal. I'm not going to debate whether that was child porn since at the time no one would have believed that she was anything but at least 18. Trust me when I say that she may have looked young. She did not look like any 16yrs old that I knew. Let alone act like one(on screen at least).
I have always prefered girls with a petite body shape and smaller breast. That tends to scue the general appearance when the model is in her late teens early 20's. The bottom line is if the model is at least 18 then that's fine.
|
07-05-09 09:12am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
I have not just because it seemed creepy, If shes 18 thats one thing but to dress her up like shes 14, not my deal. Like Pat said I too like petite tight bodies. But that doesn't mean young looking where they should be in a school yard. The thing is too, if you look at animated porn that simulates teen under 18 even though they do not say they are in the toon are still catching slack for it. It would be well advised even if she is 18 to avoid DLing look a likes, Big Brothers next stop will be there, because of the simulation encouraging the petafile to take risks and watch simulated acts.
I would just be very very careful watching anything that simulates underage even if its not.
|
07-05-09 11:02am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Cybertoad :
I'm in my 40's so I guess that by definition I'm already considered a little creepy since I watch porn with girls that are 18 and ealy 20's. I make a difference in the fact that I have no desire to see a naked 14 yrs old. Let alone one that's having sex. At this point many studios are guilty of portraying girls as being younger than they actually are. I guess it's a question of how young they pretend, but after all is said and done. We are still talking about adults pretending to be younger. In any case. Big Brother doesn't need any excuse to go after pornographer. John Stagliano is accused of distributing obscene material and the content is a young women squirting milk like product from her ass. She isn't wearing pigtails and a short skirt while doing it but they are still going after him.
|
07-05-09 03:01pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I've decided "no" for a few. Sure, they were 18, but they must have been late bloomers. And I'm not into the little-girl-with-pigtails-wearing-a-dumpy-dress-while-cradling-a-stuffed-toy-and-licking-a-lollipop-in-a-fuzzy-pink-bedroom kind of scene.
UNLESS she sets fire to a Furby.
|
07-05-09 03:02pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
GCode (0)
|
I have never passed up content to where a model looks too young but I have passed up content where the concept attempts to depict the model as being too young. Meaning, when I see content with the girl being dressed in knee high colorful socks, pig tails, stuffed animals, an obvious childs room, and so on; it gets skipped over. Good thing though, I have not been to sites that have content like this often due to personal preferences to begin with but of the content I have seen with this, no thanks. So, basically, what Drooler said.
|
07-05-09 04:57pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
james4096 (Suspended)
|
I've seen sites that were suspect to me, usually russian sites. But I passed mainly because they may have been actually underage.
On a few rare occasions a model whom I know was of age did look too young and I just wasn't attracted to her.
The thing is, most of the women who pose in barely legal stuff are clearly in their 20's but are just dressed younger. The real thing is quite unsettling.
|
07-06-09 06:12am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Monahan (0)
|
I am into the erotic female form and find nothing at all erotic about an underage girl or a model who appears to be an underage girl.
I pass on that stuff just as I pass on those BBW's who are just fat slobs.
|
07-06-09 08:17am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
Yeah, it's the internet - In clicking around on sample sets, I have clicked on something that led me to a site that looked like child porn to me. I closed it and got the hell out of that whole area of sample sets.
|
07-06-09 10:14am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Lionheart (0)
|
I haven't but some of those Japanese movies were the girls look really young are kind of creepy
|
07-06-09 05:41pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
HeyManNiceShot (0)
|
I said no, but that's also because I know the younger-looking models I'm looking at are at least 18, made to look younger. Ironically enough, models who snuck in younger like Tracy Lords made it to the scene because they look older than 18, not younger.
Granted, if they hypothetically looked like actual children, then no, I don't want to see that.
|
07-06-09 09:20pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
It has been very rare that I've passed on a model because she looked too young. It's usually something else that turns me off from the set/scene. I also like the "young look" (however, in reality they just look hot and then they open their open their mouth, guess I'm not going to be bagging any co-eds anytime soon) as its part of the fantasy aspect that I like.
|
07-07-09 03:27pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I find it difficult to tell the age of a person from looking at the person in real life or at a picture.
|
07-07-09 03:57pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
careylowell (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
Lord's age when she made her first 20 or so flesh films is discussed in detail in "The Other Side of Hollywood: an Uncensored History of the Porn film Industry" by Jennifer Osborne. The author makes a strong case that Lords was 2 months short of 17 yrs when she started and dropped the dime on the industry on her own accord.
|
07-11-09 08:37pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
monty2222 (0)
|
I voted no, I've never come across anything that turned me off in that regard. But I haven't strayed very far beyond the mainstream sites, when I have it's usually been lesbian sites and getting the girls as close to eighteen as possible always struck me as more of a straight porn thing (As I write this I remember some of the accusations levelled against Abby Winters, but still...).
|
07-12-09 08:13am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #13 - careylowell :
That would seem right because IAFD says that Tracy's birthday is May 7 1968. That would mean she was 16 at the time. No matter how we look at it. She was underage. She didn't act or look like a 16yrs old. There have been quite a few rumors over the years that she planned her downfall. The main reason for the rumors is that she created her own production company and filmed the only legal Tracy Lord porn movie: Tracy I love you. She went to the authorites right after it's release. She made a killing with that single movie since she was still a very popular actress and the only movie anyone could own or sell was Tracy I love you. A couple of persons were sent to jail because of this and in their defense. She presented a valid drivers license. I'm glad she was able to find a career out of porn.
|
07-12-09 08:59am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
dracken (0)
|
I couldn't tell if some of the models I saw were 16, 17, 18, 19, 20...whatever. As long as they have breasts and they are on a legal pornsite (none of that shady file sharing porn for me ) I'll watch it :)
|
08-03-09 07:11am
Reply To Message
|
