| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
bjajlt362 (0)
|
There will never be enough hardcore :)
|
09-08-10 01:25am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
tangub (0)
|
Other....couldn't give a flying fuck as rarely watch hardcore.
|
09-08-10 02:52am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Enough? I have more love and respect for pornstars than any other entertainers. Everyone who wants should get their 15 minutes of fame!
|
09-08-10 04:43am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
There are more than enough hardcore pornstars. What we really need are more cute and adorable softcore models. And some competent photographers that will present them in attractive and innovative ways. But without too much photoshopping or colorized skin tones or overly artsy styles.
Playboy and Penthouse back in the 1970s had some of the best models they ever had, and many of them were presented in a lovely way, even if the girls were photoshopped a little too much.
|
09-08-10 05:13am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Monahan (0)
|
Too many.
The result is that the competition for recognition is messing things up with absolutely gorgeous ladies screwing with their God-given beauty by ill-advised breast enhancements, ridiculous tattoos and excessive piercings.
Another problem. I'm running out of space on my hard drives with all of the talent out there.
On second thought there can never be too many hot babes willing to show their PTA* to us horndogs.
*PTA = Pussy Tits and Ass
|
09-08-10 08:43am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
BadMrFrosty (0)
|
I guess it all depends on your definition of pornstar. For me the name pornstar should only be applied to the select few who have made their mark on the industry and are almost household names.
I dont call every person that has ever fucked or been fucked on camera a pornstar and neither do I particularly like the girls I would, by my own definition, call pornstars; I prefer fresh faced newcommers :) So enough or not enough pornstars, I dont really care.
|
09-08-10 10:01am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Capn (0)
|
Too many.
|
09-08-10 11:17am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
My answer is somewhat like Ik2fireone's, except that I'd add "cute and adorable" hardcore girls who don't have plastic surgery, get breast implants, or have tatoos all over themselves.
We need more girls who are fabulously beautiful and who have super-charged libidos -- girls like Tori Black and Jenna Haze.
But they don't grow on trees!
|
09-08-10 12:23pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Always room for another "stunner." If she has what it takes to move into the spotlight, bring her on.
|
09-08-10 03:39pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
d1a2v3e4 (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Drooler :
I agree with you about the fake boobs and tatoo`s but I think you should add Lexi Belle to your list.
|
09-08-10 04:01pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
d1a2v3e4 (0)
|
I`m all about new fresh faces,to me that is one of the great things about the net.Before I started using the net to find porn all you could find in the video stores was mainstream stuff that had the same old girls in them,you know what they say variety is the spice of life.
|
09-08-10 04:09pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
d1a2v3e4 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - bjajlt362 :
AHMEN to that
|
09-08-10 04:10pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
pat362 (0)
|
I tend to have the same view as BadMrFrosty's when it comes to the term pornstar. Just because you have had sex on camera does not make you a pornstar
It makes you a porn performer but I would prefer to reserve the star part for those that have earned it. It's the same thing for mainstream stuff.
Now back to the poll. How could there be enough of them? There may be too many at the moment for all of them to make a decent living at it but that's more because of the downturn than an actual over aboundance of them.
|
09-08-10 06:43pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #13 - pat362 :
Agree with pat, I think the "star" part is a bit overused, but I am always in for more hardcore performers - provided they don't have stupid tats or ridiculous fake parts...
|
09-09-10 12:30am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
turboshaft (0)
|
I don't know; how many are there now? I'm so bad with names that you could probably name quite a few and I couldn't tell if they are stars or not.
|
09-09-10 01:45am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
If you mean the same pros who you see over and over, I think I will never find them all that attractive. More of them is only more of them same. More fresh new faces you see once or twice sounds much better to me.
|
09-09-10 03:29am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #10 - d1a2v3e4 :
Lexi Belle? That booty-churnin' babe? HELL YES!
|
09-09-10 07:54am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
anyonebutme (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :
"What we really need are more cute and adorable softcore models."
It starts with more consumers willing to spend more on soft content. After that the material will follow.
|
09-09-10 06:59pm
Reply To Message
|
19
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :
Exactly what I wanted to say and add to my message, lk2fireone;
but of course you said it much better.
|
09-09-10 09:22pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Generally yes. Some just get overexposure.
|
09-10-10 11:08pm
Reply To Message
|
21
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
I think every woman should audition. Every last one of 'em.
|
09-13-10 03:03pm
Reply To Message
|
