| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
slutty (0)
|
perhaps she didn't intend it as a slight and more as a statement of purpose for her site. I agree she doesn't sound very welcoming, especially to a group that I would think account for a rather large percentage of her clientele, but maybe she just intended it as a warning of sorts for potential customers.
|
08-30-11 11:04pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - slutty :
I probably did over-react a little to be honest, I'm not normally sensitive or particularly politically correct. I just think she could have said the same thing in a nicer way - I posted the comment quickly after I'd just seen it was still kinda shocked.
Still, whether she likes it or not I know a lot of customers for "for women" sites are actually gay men so I don't think it's a good business plan - I just think there's better ways of putting things but hey nobody's perfect. I am sure some gay sites aren't very welcoming to women either and I probably don't even notice!
|
08-31-11 08:49am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Thomas20 (0)
|
Plainly not all gay men are effeminate but if you like the idea of the site I suspect her views are probably no less unpalatable than the majority of people who makes adult sites.
What I don't get is why, given her stand point, there are pictures of men on the front page of the tour in what look to me to be effiminate poses. Particularly Brad.
|
09-01-11 10:40am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
manholelover (0)
|
I totally agree. Why have such a log spiel at the start of the site anyway, it's the content that counts. She's alienating a huge part of the market by categorising her customers. I, like a lot of gay guys, enjoy the odd bit of straight porn. And it always angers me that straight people equate effeminate with gay, and also judge being effeminate as something which is somehow inferior... Well picked up mate!
|
09-02-11 10:22am
Reply To Message
|
