| User Reviews (12) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ The original Gloryhole site
+ Nearly 700 scenes of Gloryhole porn
+ Gloryhole porn does show porn can be evolving instead of static
+ Includes access to the Dogfart network
+ Easy to cancel and promo prices make it a cheap join
+ Other Gloryhole sites on the Dogfart network show the evolution of Gloryhole better |
| Cons: |
- The content on Dogfart feels dated and like it was filmed decades ago
- Even the scenes on Gloryhole.com feel like they’re old and relying on old cliches
- Zebra Girls is a very good site on Dogfart network, but it receives hardly no attention |
| Bottom Line: |
Gloryhole porn has an interesting history. Half of the popular opinion says it was started in Gay culture and the other half says it was started in glassblowing. I lost interest in the glassblowing part, but my attraction to Gloryhole porn is likely like every other woman’s attraction to it. I like seeing a young, implied innocent woman, getting on her knees in a public restroom and giving a stranger a blowjob through a wall or stall. It’s taboo even if you are convinced it’s not. You just need to watch a scene and become a voyeur walking into a restroom and seeing what the video shows. There’s so much that can be added to the scenes. The woman is married or in a long-term relationship with a guy with a small penis who is also boring and not risky. That is what most of the early scenes on Gloryhole.com relied on and also the interracial twist. It seems when this site first started out, it was a little more taboo for interracial sex than it is now. That’s an unlisted con. The content does not age well. You can tell that the earliest scenes relied on the tension of interracial sex being a key component in the taboo.
Someone decided to add a second guy and sometimes a second woman. There was then a realization that people could have sex through the Gloryhole, not just oral sex. The addition of intercourse to Gloryhole porn opened up a whole new taboo door. The young, innocent female willing to give a stranger a blowjob, becomes so aroused doing it, she’s willing to bend and contort her body so the man can have sex with her through the Gloryhole. I believe all porn had this type of evolution, but am not old enough to know when anal first became a big part of porn or threesomes, etc..
Dogfart does a very admirable job of showing the evolution of the Gloryhole, but each new step, including intercourse, is presented in the most vanilla state. It’s like there’s concern about each step being “too much”. That is one of the drawbacks of being an industry-leader. Other companies make a Gloryhole site and they’re confident in what will and won’t work thanks to Dogfart taking the risks.
The scenes are straightforward. Even the scenes with intercourse are predictable and repetitive. Your imagination is required to make these scenes anything more than basic, standard porn.
The video download quality is good. Most of the scenes have 1080p downloads or at least 720p. I’m just not for sure how many of these scenes you’re going to need since they are repetitive. Dogfart even cannibalized itself with another Gloryhole site called, Gloryhole Initiations. I find it to be vastly superior and unless we’re giving points for being the first, their own site easily tops Gloryhole.com. Luckily, you get access to both and another dozen or so sites, too. It’s fun to see how niches got their start and that’s what Gloryhole does. You can even sense the tension and uncomfortableness as the niche evolved. The network is worth joining just to experience the differences and see that it wasn’t that long ago, that society viewed interracial porn as a taboo genre of porn. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
