| User Reviews (7) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to the entire network.
There are no premium sites in the network that require an extra payment.
-Low membership price. The list price is $30/month, $120/year. But during holiday specials, they often offer $14.95/month, $60/year memberships.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads, as far as I can tell. No extra payment is required for downloading privileges.
-Multiple definitions for streaming and downloads.
-Compatible with tablets, desktops, etc.
-Zip file for photosets. The photos in a photoset are real photos, as far as I can tell. Nicely framed, quality photos with good technical qualities (lighting, colors, nice sets). Average about 130+ photos per photoset.
-Good download speeds. I average around 3-3.5 MB/sec.
-Content is exclusive. |
| Cons: |
-They only have one definition for the photoset zip file. It's the high definition size, and it takes a lot of storage space.
A single photo is around 3 MB, so a photoset is around 400 MB, which is huge.
The high definition sets at Metart, one of the finest softcore sites on the internet, have photos that are around 1 MB, so I don't know why the photo size at New Sensations are so large. New Sensations is more video focused versus photos, so it's just sloppy to have photo size so large.
-Navigation is sloppy. You want to list the videos at a single site, like Jizz Bomb, and instead of a simple listing of the Jizz Bomb videos, you get a mix of videos from different sites.
-Search is poor. You enter a model's name, you might get zero hits, even though the model has videos at the site and network. Or else you might get a bunch of miscellaneous models that have no connection to the model's name. Fucking worthless search. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(continued):
-Many of the videos don't have a watermark identifying which site they belong to.
They might have a watermark that shows "New Sensations", the network. Or no watermark at all.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(start of):
Some PU members feel the site and network is too bread and butter sex. They want more variety.
I think the site (and network) give you a nice selection of hardcore videos (and photosets) covering different niches.
The models are mainly attractive. A lot of teen and 20-something models. Mostly white.
The site theme is facials and cum shots.
I think site navigation is poor. There are supposed to be 12 sites in the network, plus some other categories that are not sites. But the content is not organized clearly. Many times, there is no watermark to show which site a video belongs to. So how do you count the number of videos a site has? Or the update rate? I haven't figured that out yet.
And how do you find all the content that a particular model has at the site and network? That can be a problem, because the search engine is worthless. And the model page for a particular model, if you can find it, might only list some of her content at the network.
However, there are lots of very attractive young models at the network.
And the membership price is cheap, if you join on a special discount.
So it's worth looking over the content to see if there are videos and photosets that appeal to you.
I've found enough videos and photosets at the network that make this a worthwhile join.
That's me.
Other PU members have stated that the site (and network) is too plain vanilla for them to re-join.
But I think the site is worth a score of 80.
Even if I don't know what the site contents are.
Because I've found enough videos at the network that appeal to me. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
