Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is a staggeringly beautiful site
Classy but also knows when to be sensual
The models are all attractive
Excellent variety of models which is unusual in the glamour genre
Videos and photo zips are downloadable
It is still updating to an already gigantic collection
Cons:
The constant scrolling feature can be annoying
While not as softcore as many glamour sites, it still is softcore compared to popular sites these days
Bottom Line:
I was having a conversation with another porn fan and made a comment I thought could be taken as me being negative about Watch4Beauty. I said it is so good, it often leaves me wanting more. That is easily misconstrued and is more ambiguous than I usually am when discussing porn.
I understand my comment could make the clearly glamour site be stereotyped. Sites like Watch4Beauty were known for having gorgeous models posing in not so provocative poses. But that was not what my comment was about. Quite the contrary even. The models on Watch4Beauty have no problem showing you every inch of their feminine bodies. They will even give you close-up views and spread open angles. Once into the videos, they will even show you how those orifices work.
While the more risque content has not always been common on Watch4Beauty, it has been the norm for at least 10 years. There was a time when the content was even softer than it is now, but like other glamour sites, Watch4Beauty started showing more and using more. This created a dilemma. Showing pink was usually teased on glamour sites. Once it became common, there was a need for more.
Sites like Watch4Beauty including Met Art, Hegre and dozens of others nearly all started showing pink around the same time or roughly. I feel confident saying Watch4Beauty did more with showing pink than other glamour sites. I have even wondered how much the settings affected the comfortableness of the models. The models look to be on a vacation or holiday in their videos and pictures for Watch4Beauty. There is a more natural advancement from their models than from other glamour sites. These young models looked to step naturally from showing their body, but not their pink – stepped smoothly to not just showing their pink, but also showing how they use it and play with it and enjoy it.
There is a fine line in porn and I think all can agree with that. There is that moment that we – the viewer – may sigh a little and think the model is now just doing it for the money. I do not feel that way ever on Watch4Beauty. These models give off the feeling they love showing their bodies so much, it arouses them and they must touch themselves and show the viewer what they are touching.
The masturbation is believable and not drawn out for video length sake. It is very believable that these models have an orgasm or two or even three before they stop. That separates Watch4Beauty for me from the other glamour sites.
The site does feature the mobile friendly, forever scrolling feature and that feature is great if you are viewing the site on a cellphone or tablet, but it makes the site somewhat annoying to deal with on a desktop computer or laptop. It is a very minor annoyance for me. Maybe it helps that I find every single model to be very attractive? The videos are in great quality as are the photos. I like the photos from Watch4Beauty as much as any other site. The only other con for some could be that the content is 2024 softcore. Which is much different than 2005 softcore, but if you’re used to hardcore right from the start of a scene, this content will be a little softer than what you are used to.
Personally, I love the site, the models, the download options and yes, the settings. Most of these models do not look like what I picture when I think of a porn model. That too is a major plus.
My review does leave the question of what it is Watch4Beauty leaves me wanting more of? I am still waiting on a couple of the models to show up under my Christmas tree! It’s a site that does nearly everything right and the models are sexy enough, you may find yourself penning your first letter to Santa to ask for a couple of their models for yourself.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Give me FTV Girls and FTV Milfs and I'm all but set on my porn needs.
– Updating 4 times a month.
– Video and picture quality is as good as you will get.
– Download picture zips and videos. Unlimited as far as I know.
– Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
– The best collection of amateur Milfs.
– Still the best navigation, too.
Cons:
– The infamous nitpick con of porn needs to establish an age range with Milfs and Matures. I'm really not complaining. Just needed a con.
Bottom Line:
The last few years of my porn collecting has seen me turn to mostly amateur models. I'm confident in saying no fully nude porn site gets better amateur models than FTV Girls and FTV Milfs.
FTV Milfs runs into the debate over the use of the Milf word, while it's true, an 18 year old model could be a Milf, by definition. The word in porn does generally signify an age range or if not a range, let's say “over 25”. I've said many times, my favorite porn models are 25-35. That was a big deal back when I said that, I joined and collected a lot of sites with teen models. That was because teens were the big focus in European porn. Things have changed now and my preferred model, body type, seems to be replacing the popularity of teen models.
FTV Milfs covers that range well, but their FTV Girls does too. I join both at the same time.
There are good reasons: Nearly all the content is solo. I like seeing the models wearing their normal clothes, being ready in said clothes and seeing how comfortable they look. There doesn't seem to be any pressure on them to do anything they're not comfortable doing and because of that, they do nearly everything imaginable to themselves. Somewhere, a male pornstar, or just a random male, is saying he can do more for the model than she can and there's me, shaking my head.
I'm even thinking women feel flattered to be on this site. Something special happens when an amateur model’s perception starts out on a positive note instead of feeling like she's just another number on the casting couch. You can see it in the content.
The only downside FTV Milfs has is it's not been around as long as FTV Girls. The site is still big. There are over 400 models and there is a great blend of body types, boob size, race and most look like women you catch yourself taking a second or third look at while shopping for produce.
Speaking of produce, nothing is off limits, bananas acting like dildos and my favorite niche of public nudity, it's all covered on FTV Milfs.
The navigation on the FTV sites continues to make me wonder why others haven't copied it. There is an off chance my years of membership makes it easier to use, but their tags are as good as I have used. I think I even admitted, at one time, I didn't notice the tags and/or just thought those were there for looks. I can't give a number on how accurate the tags are but each time I've clicked one, I've found exactly what the tag said I would find.
The picture sets are some of my favorites. I have regularly admitted I have clothing fetishes and still do. I'm starting to think I'm not going to grow out of those. I would call the pictures warm and natural. The models are also one of the bigger collections of natural Milfs. I haven't noticed a lot of tattoos or implants. Of course, tattoos don't bother me. The models look real. Years ago, I considered the FTV Girls site to be glam, but not anymore and FTV Milfs isn't necessarily glam. Some of the models do seem to feel best in pretty dresses, but it's dresses you would see women wearing at the store.
The downloads are unlimited as far as I know, but I wouldn't be close to hitting a limit. I mostly just download the new videos and picture sets. I have an entire external hard drive of FTV Girls and FTV Milfs content.
I have said this before about just a handful of sites, it feels like a premium site.
You still get 4 new updates per month and that's almost always 4 new women. I don't join enough mainstream porn sites to say all the models are amateurs but that's going to lead me to say, I believe they are. The biggest reason is a fairly simple one. The models don't act like they're just on another porn scene. I believe that could be the biggest strength of FTV Milfs. There's definitely some flattering to be one of the new four models in a month. I'm thinking back to how Playboy’s Playmates and Penthouse Pets were looked at on such an elevated level. I'm thinking these models on FTV Milfs are experiencing their chance to be like those Playmates and Pets were.
With the great navigation, fast download speeds and easy join and cancel from CCBill, there's just not much to complain about and lots to be positive about.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my favorite sites I consider it a guilty pleasure
Incredible site for those who love pictures of pretty young women
Around 1,500 picture sets and all are downloadable
There are over 300 videos you can download
Classic-style navigation that will make you wish for the old days
Three to four updates per week
Cons:
If you prefer videos this site might disappoint you
The price is $40 per month, but they do offer a half price promo to past members
Bottom Line:
This site first caught my eyes when I noticed a sample set of their photos. It was of an adorably cute, but also very sexy, young woman with the tiniest amount of baby fat still showing above her bikini and those increasingly hard to find banana boobs. I joined the site just based off those samples and that was maybe 8-10 years ago. I still only join the site once per year, but that’s more me being a cheapskate and needing constant change, than anything against the site or its quality.
The navigation will remind you of sites that were popular not that long ago. Everything is spelled out for you along the top of each page. Updates/Model Directory/Photos/Videos and the second row has top videos, top models and the one that tells you, you’re on a high quality photo site, “top photographers”.
You may be thinking it’s like Met-Art and you wouldn’t be that far off. The difference being, the settings, in my opinion, the quality of each and every set that makes it to the site. A lot of photography sites have small picture sets, but all the sets on Showy Beauty have at least 100 photos and there are no duplicate poses.
They also update weekly, usually 3 times, sometimes 4 and every update is at least worth viewing, maybe even downloading. Porn has changed so much, so fast, over the last 5 years and this site is a perfect example of showing the change. Showy Beauty sets out to show you a beautiful model, let you appreciate her dressed and even in normal poses, to fully nude with legs spread. I have never viewed a picture on SHowy Beauty that looked like a wasted picture or pose.
The videos aren’t bad, but those are mostly the softcore type videos you are probably used to. The videos have background music and it’s kind of like watching a filming of a photo shoot. I much prefer the photo sets and it does make me wonder if other sites put more time and effort into their photo sets if we could possibly see a resurgence in the popularity of photos? At times, I do feel like I’m desensitized to the numerous but similar, all out hardcore, videos we can find on nearly all porn sites.
The models are nearly all A plus level models. Nearly all models are 100% natural. You won’t see many if any tattoos and you will see more of the bodystyle we used to in porn. The small waist, medium chest, medium to curvy hips and butts and you will see some pubic hair too.
I don’t expect the site will ever become a hugely popular site, but it should. This is very much the porn that most of us were first introduced to. It just seems like many of us wanted more and more, but didn’t take time to figure out the older style was enough. As my imagination becomes a part of my porn viewing pleasure, I can do so much more with photos that leave it up to my imagination to think what happens next than just taking the word of a porn producer who decides what happens next. It’s a great site that seems to only publish the best of the best of their content. I’m rating it as high as I think I can score a site that focuses on photos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I thought for sure, one of my highest rated sites would stumble some, but it’s not happening.
I try not to be too focused on body types, but I have been slim and “undeveloped” my whole adult life. The majority of models on TLE are slim and not “blessed” in the chest. I can relate to these women and learn from them.
The site is huge and you can almost always find promos; just be sure it’s not streaming-only.
Updates have been 2-3 videos per week and 2-3 picture sets a week.
The site has just over 3,000 picture sets and just over 1,500 videos
Tags, search, are all near perfect
Cons:
Back to my enjoyment of slim models. That could be a con for some of you.
I can’t really complain much about update frequency, but I do think this site used to update more than now.
Bottom Line:
I hadn’t been a member of The Life Erotic for nearly 3 years. The last time I reviewed it, I gave it a 97. There’s good and bad news. The site hasn’t changed much since then and easily earns an upper 90s score. But if you didn’t like the site before, you probably won’t like it now. The scenes are masturbation, solo. The picture sets are a lot like what you would expect from a Met Art owned site. That means large resolution and mostly pretty poses that accentuate the models’ natural beauty.
The site really is huge and still updating. The numbers are above in the pros. My first porn site I joined was Nubiles and a part of me still prefers picture sets and videos of pretty/cute models masturbating for the camera. That helps The Life Erotic a lot. The porn you’ll find on The Life Erotic is not as tame as most softcore sites. It’s even quite hardcore – for masturbation scenes. I have jointed all the Met-Art owned sites including the Met Art Network, but I still have to say, I think The Life Erotic is the best of the entire group. Met Art does still photography near perfect. Met Art X is good solo masturbation porn. Sex Art is great story-based hardcore male/female porn. The Life Erotic takes a little of the best from each of those and combines them into one site.
One of the most recent scenes even shows the depth of the scenes. It has one of my favorites, Paloma, she is bound with tape and a gag in her mouth. She dances around even with the tape on her. She lowers herself towards a chair that has a big dildo strapped to it. She teases the dildo and herself until it’s inside her and she’s riding it. That’s not what I usually expect from a solo masturbation site. The scenes are really top-notch and the production is great. The scenes aren’t typically long, but are usually long enough that you don’t feel like they’re rushing through, but also doesn’t make you think the scenes are too drawn out. These feel like real masturbation sessions.
The video quality downloads are HD and 4K. The pictures are downloadable in zips and that I know of, there is no download limit.
If you have used any of the Met-Art sites the navigation will be familiar to you. The tags are great as is the search. The model list is helpful as well. There’s hardly nothing to call a con, other than if you don’t like the models. It’s a site I would even call “special”. It won’t be another 3 years before I join again. This should be a 2-3 time join per year for me.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. This is becoming rare in today's porn world, where many sites either limit downloads, or make you pay extra for downloads, or eliminate downloads from some memberships.
-The site features many of the most beautiful women in the world. At one time (back before the internet), this would have been a massive selling point. But with sites like Metart (and it's sister sites), MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., sites with beautiful women are a commodity. It doesn't take away from the beauty and quality of the models, but it's human nature to devalue what is so freely available.
-However, the quality of the photography is excellent, and easily compares to the best that sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy offer. The attractive models (I downplay the models, because many of these models are equisite and breathtaking and filmed with care) are a delight to look at.
-Site updates 3-4x per week.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Payment is easy: You can pay with a credit card (Visa or Mastercard), PayPal, or Crypto. I'm old-fashioned, but if you pay with Crypto, I've read that if you're a US citizen, you will have to include on your income tax report your short-term and long-term cryptocurrency gains and losses on Form 8949. Not reporting all crypto gains and losses is considered tax fraud.
So I'm glad I haven't had this problem yet.
-The mix of women is broader than traditional sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy. You get your normal selection of white models, but you also get a strong element of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. This will be a plus for PU members who are craving something beyond the white models normally seen.
-I don't think of this as a mega-site like Metart or MPL Studios, but there is a large amount of photo sets and videos packed into the site. The layout is easy to navigate. The quality of the images is top-notch. You have hundreds of glamorous girls for your
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):viewing pleasure. Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
-Listed price is $29.95/month. But PU offers a discount of $14.95 for the first month. Or if you look around, you can probably find a $9.95/month discounted special.
Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
CONS(START 0F):
-I think the cons are basically minor for the site.
-Personally, I'm not a big fan of tattoos on women. But it's becoming more and more common over the years. And many of the Watch4Beauty models are into tattoos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Normal for almost all porn sites.
-My biggest con is that I wish there was more content of most of my favorite models at the site. Some models do one or two shoots, and then move on to other web sites.
-Years ago there used to be a few bonus sites, but they dropped them. However, the site contents is well worth the money to join, if you are into lovely young women stripping and showing off their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
-I'm more familiar with the download system used at Metart, Femjoy, etc, where you can easily select the video of your choice and the file defintion, or the photo set of your choice and the file definition, but the Watch$Beauty system, while not as refined, is still usable.
-Sometimes the file download speeds seem sluggish. I wish they were faster downloads.
BOTTOM LINE
The emphasis is on the photos. There are hundreds of videos that are definitely worth watching, but the true value, for me, is the photo sets.
I could stare for hours at Rinna's 2 photo sets. She's such a luscious model, young, vibrant, fresh, lovely, charming.
In summary, I believe I've listed the main reasons for joining this site. Gorgeous models representing a wide variety of ethnic types, top class photography, a mix of high-rent locations where the girls are having fun exploring their lucious bodies. They freshen up with the offerings with casting, peeing, masturbation, girlsinlove. So they put more thought and care into the shoots than most softcore photo sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
2 updates every week on Monday and Thursday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets - I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive - still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) - updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good - good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
The site uses TLS 1.2 so passwords, etc are secure in transit
Part of the Met Art network – customer support is superb
Cons:
Only two updates per week
Pictures only - no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price - and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version. There typically also sales for all the sites in the MA network around holiday times (like Valentine's Day) for $9.99 - so definitely look for those.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent. DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
Bottom Line:
Some stats:
1533 Models
161 Contributing Photographers
3916 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member of this site for years, and ponied up for a lifetime membership in 2017. The focus here is quite simply pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, the original founder of Domai (Eolake Stubblehouse) added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts.
There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
There are 3 other sister sites in the Met Art network that are very similar to DOMAI – Erotic Beauty, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives. Each of them now updates twice a week, and there is considerable overlap between the models and the photographers. They are also not nearly as distinct from each other as they used to be when they started out. It’s also not unusual for a set for a girl appearing on one of the sites, and then a bit later a second site will pick up the same set, although with a slightly different selection of photos
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is my guilty pleasures site
Exceptional photography site
Lovely models throughout, and all three of my favourite models
Easy to use site
Fantastic yearly price of $49.95
Cons:
Daily download limit of 7.5 GB, but I have never reached it
It’s not for video lovers. There are videos, but those are not the focus of the site
Other photography sites have bigger collections and better resolution photos
Bottom Line:
It’s not often that a site provides all three of my favourite models, but Morey Studios does. With that said, admittedly, I seem to still mainly focus on those three models. It’s not that the other models are unattractive, quite the contrary, I don’t think there’s an unattractive model on Morey. It’s just my favourite models have some truly scrumptious photo sets on Morey.
My three favorite models include Tea aka Tea Jul/Tea Mint. She was the first porn model, I remember seeing a lot of content of and it was love at first sight. She has 28 photo sets and 7 videos on this site. I believe that is the largest collection of Tea, especially sexually explicit content.
Second is Billy aka Billie Raise, pretty well-known from other photography sites. It’s not as big of a collection as Tea, but still 10 photo sets and 10 videos.
Last but certainly not least is Wildy aka Wildy A at Met Art and others. She has over 150 photo sets and 60 videos. Much like Tea, Wildy was love at first sight for me.
I feel my score is unbiased. I know those three models make this site a lot better for me than it may for someone who isn’t familiar with the models. If, however, you do like those three, this really is a great site.
I see Morey as a site for those who are used to, burned out on sites like Met-Art and similar sites. The models on Morey are regularly on Met and its family of sites, but there is a different style to these shoots.
Which is why it matters that the content is 100% exclusive.
The resolution needs to improve, it’s 2000x3000. The videos need to be longer and more provocative or even sexual. The sets are more like you may remember photography sites being. There is and has always been sexual parts and a more sexual style than a lot of the other softcore photography sites, but Morey hasn’t changed much. While others are going all the way to showing more spread legs, Morey is more focused on showing the artistic view of women.
I feel a wee bit of a hankering to admit I hadn’t been a member of Morey since 2019 and can tell you that I “think” it is updating, not recycling, but cannot guarantee it. I was so happy to rejoin my once favorite site at a cheap yearly price, I didn’t look into if the new updates really are new.
But and it’s why I shared this review. It has been worth the cost of the subscription to see and download all my favorites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
PU/TBP discount
Nearly 20 years worth of updates online.
Site still updating with a new photo set nearly every day and a new video at least weekly.
Nearly 2000 models with over 10,000 photo sets and over 1000 videos.
Photo sets with downloadable zips in 4 sizes 800px, 1200px, 2500px & 5500px.
Latest videos come with 4 download options 1920, 1040, 720 & 480.
No download limits encountered and no issues using download manager.
Cancellation was easy enough with immediate email confirmation.
Cons:
Watch out for the pre-checked cross sales, you could end up with $80 of charges for unwanted subscriptions if you miss it.
Biggest con for me was the incomplete and shambolic model index, will explain more in bottom line.
I found the videos boring but maybe that's just me, I'm only really interested in the photos.
There's no real description or preview of the videos so you don't really have much idea of the content before you watch or download it.
No file sizes listed for videos or photo zips.
You could probably count the number of Black or Asian models on one hand.
Minimal model info.
Bottom Line:
I signed up for Femjoy early December after spotting a Cyber Monday deal on PU/TBP at $5 for the first month, an offer I found too good to refuse. I did have reservations about signing up though as I really don't like the Trust Charge billing company they use and the way they add 20% to the join price allegedly for VAT, not to mention the pre-checked cross sales. Happy to report that no problem with unauthorised charges though and cancellation was relatively straightforward. With the threat of a recurring billing of $36 I was only ever going to stay for 1 month.
The earliest updates on Femjoy date from June 2004 so you have almost 20 years of updates to see here. It's a nude art photography based site similar to MetArt with photo sets outnumbering videos by ten to one. There's almost 2000 models and they are almost all attractive to drop dead gorgeous. The content is nearly all solo with the odd two or three girl sets here and there. You get some brief biographical info of the models such as hair and eye colour, height, weight and breast size. They don't however say where they are from, I'm guessing mostly white Eastern Europeans. There's also something weird going on with the given ages of the models. You can look at a model who might look in her 20s then look at her bio and her age is given as 42. I'm guessing they put the model's age when she first appears on the site then it rises year by year to give her current day age.
The site is easy enough to find your way around, the main headings being home, models, photos and videos. My preferred way to browse a site is via the model index working my way through from A to Z. It was only after going through the models beginning with M it suddenly occurred to me that I hadn't seen Matty, a model I had noticed on the home page due to a recent update, so I checked again and she definitely did not appear in the model index. I then started looking through the photos pages and by the time I had reached page 50 dating back to 2018 I had come across more than 300 more models that do not appear in the model index. This seems to be a major oversight on the part of the site owners not ensuring that models who have debuted on the site in the last few years are added to the model index. You can also sort the model index, photos and videos by most recent and rating although I think sorting by rating is pretty useless as every photo set and video is rated 5/5 and every model apart from 2 on the last page are rated 5/5. There are also several dozen models in the model index who have zero photo sets or videos, I'm assuming these are models who retired and asked to have their content removed. Surely you should also remove them from the model index?
The photo sets are the main strength of Femjoy, they clearly use some of the best photographers in the business. I particularly enjoyed the many photo sets shot in stunning outdoors settings. Thankfully they now produce the photo sets in a decent mid size 2500px option which they haven't always done until recent years and the main reason I had never joined until now. The file sizes of the 2500px zips are mostly nice and compact coming in at between 30 to 100MB although for some reason the updates in the last few months are more like 300 MB. The zip file names include model name, photographer name and set name. Unfortunately they don't include the date so the photo sets won't sit in chronological order in your folder as they do at MetArt. There was no index of photographers that I could find although if you are viewing a photo set you can click on the photographers name and you'll be taken to a page with all their other sets.
I'm not that interested in videos and tend to find them boring on these types of sites. The first one I watched was of a beautiful Asian babe with an infectious smile named Kloyali. She's walking around on a beach in a bikini, removes the bikini and then rolling around naked on the sand and in the sea, you barely get a glimpse of pussy. It's very tame. Not all videos are like that though, I watched one of Caprice masturbating and then one of Anna N called Maid for Pleasure where she's dressed as a French Maid and masturbating with a dildo so there is some more explicit stuff but I'm not sure how much of that you will find. I guess it depends on the model and what she feels comfortable doing.
In conclusion an an excellent site with beautiful models and amazing photography, highly recommended if you have the time and patience to go through it and find all the models that are missing from the model index, thankfully 10 days off work for Christmas meant I had the time. I was tempted to knock points off for the shambolic organisation of the model index but in the end just based my score on the quality of the content.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A big part of Adult Prime being an exceptional join
+ Softcore, artsy, pretty models
+ Updates 4 or 5 times per month
+ Includes the Adult Prime network
+ Great user features and usability
+ Movies and picture sets are downloadable with no limits
Cons:
- Networks usually leave me frustrated and that’s possible with this one
- I would like to see one (or any) network, try some different niches for their sites
Bottom Line:
Back when Adult Time first launched, one of their big selling points, was the inclusion of the 21 Sextury network. It was an established site with a large following of fans. Adult Prime is doing similar with Digital Desire. This immediately calls on my frustration with networks. Digital Desire could still a standalone site and sell memberships just for it. That’s a good thing since you receive access to it with the Adult Prime network, but it does offer something of a safety net for the network. As long as Digital Desire continues making their style of content there’s not a lot you can find wrong with the entire network. You’re still getting a premium site in Digital Desire.
Digital Desire is a throwback softcore, glamour-type site The models look like mainstream models. They look like they could be high-dollar escorts to successful men. The navigation for the site is very good. It’s easy to find what you’re looking for on – Digital Desire. The site loads fast and that’s important with a network. Most of the sites on networks were originally standalone sites and only had to load the content of their site, not an entire network. There are downloads, including 4K videos, photo sets and those are unlimited.
I do believe Adult Prime is a far-reaching network. What I mean is, the sites rarely are similar to other sites on the network. That adds a lot of value especially for anyone who is newer to the site – or even newer to pay porn. You will get to experience a lot of different niches and styles of porn.
Digital Desire focuses on pretty models in beautiful settings. The models are 18-24 (majority) and while the content is softcore, it shows more and implies more than softcore sites used to offer.
Venturing away from Digital Desire and into the network, is as simple as a click. There is a big change coming, though. The network features bisexual (men), group, old and young, virtually every niche in mainstream porn.
You will definitely get your money’s worth with this network, but it will be up to the person whether Digital Desire, by itself, is worth joining the network for. It’s not for me, but that’s just because I’m not really into the softcore content. This is a network that can reach fans of all different niches and will make you a fan of some niches, you didn’t like before.
Big site that’s old enough to be legal (over 20 years)
Cons:
I am sure one reason it’s not as popular as it should be is the focus on photos
Models are not only amateur, but also natural and that means some are hairy
Bottom Line:
I mentioned this site being underrated based on no new member reviews in over 10 years. I remember reading the reviews that are still here, back in 2010 or so. I was a fan of I Feel Myself and that led to me giving I Shot Myself a try. Now that I think of it, I wouldn’t be surprised if the name of the site possibly has turned people away. I do remember when we would say self-shot picture instead of selfies.
For me, this is one of those sites that’s polarizing to the general porn loving population. That’s where I’m going to draw a line. Being a member has made me curious about the possibility of a site like this one, being relevant in 2023. Would there be a market for a site like this one? I have always heard and even experienced, to an extent, the cyclical nature of porn, but when we’re usually discussing something being cyclical, technology isn’t a major part of that. In this case, technology is not a major part of it, it’s the bottom line (sorry, had to do it).
It’s clear to us that are old enough to remember early 2000s porn that pictures were preferred in the late 90s, early 2000s. The file sizes were much more acceptable and doable with even dial-up internet. See the question it leaves us with? Did pictures fail against videos just because people wanted newer technology or do people find videos to be superior quality? The twist to this is I just think people have become more desensitized to sex and some will argue, more open, to sex in general.
I’m glad I’m just reviewing this site and not trying to figure out any kind of truth in why pictures lost popularity. This site hasn’t changed much and I can see why some would complain about that. Then again, it still does exactly what it says it’s going to do. It offers real, amateur models posing nude and pleasuring themselves. The pictures you can download are excellent quality and you’re not going to see many “dumb photographer” photos. There’s more realism and believability from these photos than you’ll see on the professional photography sites.
Models are typically young (18-24), but not 100%. The site is based out of Australia and I personally, have liked every Australian porn site I’ve joined. There is a difference between the culture these models are from compared to US and UK/Euro models. The models show real enjoyment in being naked and in front of a camera. You really can’t find much to complain about. There are nearly 1,000 videos and 12,000 photo zips.
Everything about the site is different than what you’re used to from a porn site and while that can be a negative, it also can be a positive if you take the time to enjoy the content.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- Even if not a 100, FTV has been a consistent top or near top scoring site for me for 16 years now.
- The video download quality and photo download quality is some of the best you will see.
- The models, while by definition, first timers, are mostly amateur though a few established porn stars have appeared on FTV.
- Similar to Zishy on this one, I generally love the clothing choices the models wear for their videos and pictures.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Navigation and tags are great once you understand them
- Usually can also join FTV Milfs with a promo when signing up.
Cons:
- The punishment of having a site over 20 years. The older photo sets and videos need remastering and some have been remastered.
- I’ll prepare for the boos on this one, I haven’t ever liked the girl/girl scenes or boy/girl scenes on FTV. Keep it solo!
Bottom Line:
FTV is one of the few sites that I truly believe can score 100 and not hear complaints about the 100. It was one of the first solo American-based sites to enter the online porn world. The models have never been complained about by anyone. These models are usually amateur and they dress or are dressed in a way that normal, young women dress. That means you get a lot of teasing, especially in the pictures. With the addition of FTV Milfs and the ability to sign-up for both, you really could just join the two FTV sites and never pay attention to any other porn site. Or at least I could.
The choice of clothing seems like an ironic pro for porn but there’s one key word to describe the clothing, feminine. I’ve never shied away from my deep interest in women that are strong on the femininity. The FTV ladies do femininity better than any site I know of and they do so without being glam.
The videos on FTV show you a whole other side too. I once said the FTV setup of pictures and videos, is art-like. The videos retain the femininity of the photos but the ladies are more often naked and often being very kinky in the videos. You will see toy appearances from the FTV Toy, a large dildo that all the ladies used to try. That toy was more popular than any male pornstar.
There is the part that’s easy to forget about. The public nudity and flashing. The newer scenes still have some public nudity and flashing but it’s not near as noticeable as some of the older content, which is understandable. Our society has become more prudent and it’s now considered a terrible thing for a young lady to flash her boobs or even masturbate in public.
The navigation on FTV is one of my favorite parts but have known quite a few people who didn’t like it. You go through pages of models. You can filter them down to ages to hair color, however you want. You have to remember there are models from over 20 years. It’s a huge list. That’s why the tags are helpful. The tags will lead you to “most” of what you’re looking for. I say “most” because some of the newer scenes don’t seem to have as much care put into if the tags are all there.
One of the longtime cons for fans was the splitting of videos. When I scored FTV a 100, I listed the splitting of videos as not bothering me any longer and it still doesn’t. I guess I have watched the videos enough times that I realized the splitting is often for effect. I know when we hear of porn scenes being split, we think about a scene showing a woman getting into her masturbation, then the video stopping and leaving us to wait on our computer to download part 2 but that’s not how the FTV scenes are split. The masturbation part will be a full scene before cutting. After the cut, it may be the woman masturbating again but the type of toy, her outfit, the setting, will be different. I just don’t see it being a negative in the same vein as cutting scenes halfway through.
The list of pros is far more important to me. You will have a difficult time finding a site with this many attractive and maybe more importantly, kinky models. FTV shows the true strength of solo porn. The model is on her own. I will even mention Danielle (Blonde curly hair), one of the hottest models anyone has ever seen on a pornsite. But, even after trying multiple takes and even bringing her back to the site, she just struggled with giving a performance that matched her incredible looks. There are other models that might not jump out at you with their looks but then put on a near-perfect masturbation show and you see the similarity between real-life and porn. It’s not always just about looks. It may be about something different for every person that watches the scenes. And that is FTV’s strength. The scenes are authentic and even in the most kinky ones, it’s attractive and not just in a lustful way.
At least for me, I have found I look at the models differently when I see them on FTV. You see the real person not an actress. That is the selling point. These models whether a 10 or a 6, are going to either win fans over with their performance or fail no matter how hot they are.
I am going to score it similar to how I have in the past. A 96 and the 4 points deduction is for the lesser amount of public nudity and teasing.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Stunning Models Most beautiful women in the world
-Lifetime membership option
-Multiple updates per day
-Softcore & Hardcore
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page.
Cons:
-Some sites cost extra on top of network membership
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some models have alias on other network sites
-Some updates are from sets from past. (This could also be a pro. There have been sets posted of models that are popular today but set was taken when model was much younger than they are today.)
Bottom Line:
This is my personal favorite that I visit daily. SIte is clean and very easy to navigate. There is multiple updates per day; typically 1 updates for several of the sites in the network. The image and video quality is superb. Though not listed on their join page; I was able to contact them and obtain a lifetime membership option. I was also offered options to add additional sites for a fee per site for life. There is mostly softcore & glamour shoots here but majority are very intimate with close up shots of these beauties. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl and guy/girl hardcore via SexArt. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. The network site allows for you to view all the network sites or you can view the sites content independently. There is an absolute massive amount of high quality material here. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site is it was confusing exactly which sites you get when you join and I've seen variations of which site depending on where you look. Some sites cost extra in addition to your network membership. I also don't like that some models have different names depending on which site they are on. It would be nice if they would combine them and list the names as an alias. You can't view a list of models that you have a favorited.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Back to my comfort zone with one of my all-time favorite sites.
- Hey, it’s 2023 and it’s still updating and a lot.
- Solo models for the most part and they get kinky.
- Good, downloadable photos and 4K download videos or 1080p.
- Very good download speeds (90% my max)
- Still love those solo scenes with a guest watching and helping.
Cons:
- I think most people expect this site to be dead.
- If they updated the looks of the site it wouldn’t look as dead as it does.
Bottom Line:
The good news is of course, the site is not dead and I would even say it’s making a case
for at least getting a Web 3.0 website. There is a new update every 5 days. Each update includes video and photoset.
It used to be considered somewhat controversial of a site. There is the better known, ALS Scan, and it is owned by the same person. People like me, collectors, wanted an explanation for why some top models were not on ALS Scan, but instead were on ALS Angels and caused us to have to join it separately. The closest answer we received was that ALS Scan is for petite and smaller built women, while ALS Angels is for slightly more full figured models. Yeah, there were a lot of eyes rolling. With all that said, can we even complain about that now in 2023? Porn has changed, the ways we join sites have changed.
ALS Angels, for me, is and has been superior to ALS Scan for the last 5 years. I know that is an opinion and that’s why I shared it. For me, ALS Angels has more models that fit the look I prefer. One thing none of us will disagree on is the easy to spot ALS videos. The owner of ALS has great relationships with most of the models. They are more laidback on this site and more natural.
What makes ALS Angels stand out for me are the scenes with more than one woman. The scenes where a helper is brought in and from the best my eyes can tell, it becomes unscripted. I have made many jokes and laughed about Eve Angel’s solo scene where the helper ends up fisting Eve. Eve, who rarely talked in her scenes, says while giggling, “You’re really good at this!” That’s instant chemistry, even tension, you won’t get from a scripted scene.
I’m glad to report the content is still very much ALS content. The masturbation scenes always go a little further than the viewer expects. The outdoor scenes have some of the best natural lighting use of any site and their pictures, I’ve said it before, can compete with sites like Met-Art.
Other than my usual Eve Angel fanboying, there are many great models on here. Dillon Harper has some of her best scenes on this site. What a personality she has and a sense of humor. Sophia Knight’s scenes on here are probably better than everything she filmed in her career. A couple of my favorite models and scenes from ALS Angels are of Hennessy and Cipriana. Both of these ladies are known for being raunchy and loving hardcore scenes, but here, they are soloing and just being pretty and sexy.
Don’t let the outdated website make you believe the content is lower quality. The videos include UHD 4K downloads and those are as sharp as any ALS video ever has been. The pictures are over 5000 on the long end and are just as enjoyable to view as most of the videos are. There is attention paid to the way the zip files are edited and it’s like watching a perfectly executed flip-book.
If there was more to complain about, I would do so. It is hard for me to believe how consistent and high-quality ALS Angels is, while I feel like ALS Scan, has taken a few steps backwards. ALS Angels may very well be the best site on the internet when it comes to models with a little meat on them.
You just don’t get much better than this site. Consistency, in my opinion, has become a huge part of scoring a site these days. And there is nothing but high quality consistency throughout ALS Angels’ site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite site of mine. It had been several years since I joined it.
- Site seems a little outdated but it’s not bad and it works.
- Fresh amateur “exotic” models and a few pros thrown in for good measure.
- Good download speeds (80% my max)
- CCBill is the payment processor.
- Multiple daily updates.
- Could surprise others like it did me.
Cons:
- I am going to go into the use of the word, “exotic” in the bottom line. ATK believes pale women with afro-looking pubic hair are exotic. I have talked in-depth about my dislike of big, bushy pubic hair. This is a big con for me.
- Site not only looks outdated, it acts and performs slow too. Videos crash, photos don’t always load.
Bottom Line:
I have been writing reviews about this site for 16 years. To my surprise, I was expecting the new models to be boring but they’re anything but boring. I ended up letting my membership recur for an extra month.
The word Exotics: My use of it in my name was based on what me and my friends considered exotic women. Medium complexion, green eyes, black hair, pretty lips and lots of curves. Those women I knew as exotics were Asian, Latina, biracial and Indian. I still feel pretty confident about that definition.
But ATX Exotics sees exotics as meaning anything different from the norm. That means women with 6.7 pounds of body hair are tagged as exotics. That’s just blasphemy to me. I see the big bush as tagged as “hairy” not exotic. That is a longtime complaint I have had with ATX Exotics. They have everything else going the way I see it but have to throw those women needing a bushwhacker for their body as exotic.
To put an image on “exotic”, see young Carmen Electra, maybe Shakira and in porn, Priya Rae. Want to see my depth and knowledge of exotic women? Check out Anjali Kari for a knockout British-Indian model.
There are good parts about the site not changing much and there are bad parts. Some of the problems I remember the site having 10 years ago are still there. That is a minor complaint and it really doesn’t make much difference in usability. The search engine still has flaws it had in 2015. I had been away from ATK Exotics for so long, I just decided to start at the newest update and go backwards. It was refreshing compared to most pro sites. I saw young, sexy women having fun and smiling for their pictures. I wonder if anyone ever described the starry-eyed look the amateur models have? You see that on ATX Exotics.
You’re not joining this site for hardcore or even fetishes. I don’t consider exotic women to be a fetish. You’re on this site to look at high quality photosets and watch softcore videos. They have those needs and wants covered.
I do wonder and have wondered if our minds have been altered by all the samey-porn. You just start to expect mediocre. I do believe that is why ATK Exotics feels fresh to me. Nothing I see as wrong with pro porn won’t be found on ATK sites.
This membership reminded of the days of joining ATK sites to look for photosets to download and collect. Videos were secondary back then and still are for me if the photos are good enough. That’s not to say everything is perfect. There are those hairy models to deal with and some of the models are just not attractive to me.
The ones that are attractive far outweigh the not attractive and nearly all the newer models I’ve seen during this membership are really pretty or cute.
You still get to use CCBill to join and cancel. There’s focus on photo zips that is at least equal to the movie importance. And there are no download limits. It’s porn as we remember it. It’s just the main audience wasn’t even old enough to buy porn back then.
It's easily a top 10 site for me, based on my tastes and preferences.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy
Cons:
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos
Bottom Line:
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites.
Cons:
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites
Bottom Line:
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The best site of old favorite porn magazines (Hustler, Playboy, Penthouse)
- I’m not for sure if something has changed but you can now download the videos and they even have 4K downloads.
- Good for those of us that prefer the late 90s/early 2000s style of porn, especially lesbian scenes. Very similar to Vivid.
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Pretty models but very few amateurs
- Over 3,000 models
Cons:
- The production is good but it feels like it is stuck in the past.
- Not as much fun as buying a new Penthouse in the 90s.
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite stories to tell about porn involves Penthouse magazines. I remember getting off work as a teenager and being excited knowing the local gas station had the new Penthouse. It is the one experience internet porn cannot replace. The anxiety, the nervousness, of walking in a store and asking a real person (usually a hot woman) to sell you pornography.
I hadn’t joined Penthouse Gold in years until I received a holiday promo email. I can’t complain much about the site or value. The site lives up to expectations of past pornography magazines. Stellar quality photos, great lighting and just a professional feel on neary everything. This site would be my favorite if this was 2007. The glam look on the models. The sexy lesbian scenes. The same thing I remember seeing in Penthouse March 1998 issue. Nostalgia only makes it so far in porn.
The part that takes me back to 2007 is me saying a porn site is only as good as its models. I still believe that. Give me all the technical bells and whistles but if the models are not attractive, I won’t care about the bells and whistles. Penthouse, maybe more than any site or brand has some of the prettiest, glam models in porn’s history.
I was surprised to see the 4K downloads but didn’t download those. I am still okay with 720p. The picture sets come in the expected downloadable zips. The photos are also sharp in contrast and maybe a little glossy, just like the old magazines used to be until you got the pages sticky.
There does not look to be any kind of limits on downloads. The biller is Penthouse themselves and it works as well as you would expect. It’s a very easy to use site. The model list may keep you occupied for a few days just looking at all the pretty women. The pictures do live up to expectations as well. I would go as far as saying the pictures are the best on the internet. Not based on technical quality. The photos go up to 2500 long end and that’s small compared to photo sites but the poses, production, direction and outfits show that Penthouse understands how important all those are to making quality pictures.
That’s how I will base my recommendation. The videos are good but the photos are better and should be the main reason you join this site. If this was 2007, I would score this a 97 or 98 but it’s 2023. I can appreciate the work they put into the photos but it’s just not enough in 2023.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Highly professional glamour photography with extremely attractive and experienced models. Settings are designed to highlight the model and are generally beautiful. There don't seem to be any tacky motel rooms, for example.
Models are almost exclusively Russian and Ukrainian and typically slender and very fit. Bodies are apparently all natural and accessories very minimal.
Some of the models have more than 100 galleries/films. Updates occur every two days. Galleries tend to be 60-100+ images. Recent galleries are available as zips in 4000px, 2000px and 1200px. Much older galleries are largely available in 2000x and 1200px. There are currently about 400,000 images.
Videos are available up to 1920 x 1080. Videos are sorted as Explicit, Lifestyle and Sensual. There are currently about 800 videos.
Cons:
MPLStudios is more likely than most sites to offer familiar models under unfamiliar names. If you're a collector, this requires some research. For example, Monika Dee is a familiar and welcome MetArt model and is known as Kaitlin at MPLStudios.
Zipped galleries are named with 8 digits. No photographer, no title. On the website the galleries include that information but it does not transfer to files.
There are no customer comments. IMO, this is a mixed bag. The comments can be helpful at times but they can also encourage bickering and/or snotty comments about pubic hair.
Biographical information is minimal. Almost nonexistent, in fact, other than debut age, nationality, and breast size.
Models are almost exclusively slender white girls. That happens to be my type, so not always a con.
Bottom Line:
I'm a great fan of glam erotica and for many years my loyalty has been to one website & family of websites. However, over the last few years that source has lost its, er, glamour for me. A few of the photographers with long histories have apparently quit trying. It's not unusual for one of them to take a beautiful woman (and they are, for the most part, beautiful) out to a rocky ledge or a lilac farm and put her through the same series of gymnastics over and over, without venturing into new territory. There are some long-standing photographers who take their art seriously, and these are most likely to get hammered in comments especially if they're not explicit enough. My personal taste is for natural-looking positions, so feet behind the ears so we can see her anus has limited appeal especially when it's repetitive.
That particular website has at least four updates every single day, which means they need a lot of material and the glory days of a boundless supply of models seems to be gone. A lot of the models are simply decent-looking women willing to take their clothes off for the camera. It feels like the webmaster is throwing images against the wall to see what sticks. Photographers often rely on quantity over quality and I frankly tire of shabby motel rooms.
True debut models at MPLStudios are rare these days and most have a solid track record with lots of experience either here or at other glamour sites. They are, virtually without exception, drop-dead gorgeous and the settings, whether indoors or out are likewise. MPLStudios takes models to glamorous locations, singly or in groups and spends time with them in those locations.
Rather than a lot of different (or indifferent) models, the website focuses on a smaller cast. Which means, for instance, that I recently sorted through more than 4,000 images of Lana Lane to select material for my personal screen savers. This was not a painful process.
Once upon a time, Digital Desire exhibited this level of professionalism and had seemingly cornered the market on knock-down, drag-out beauties. That was due to the experience, professionalism and reputation of J. Stephen Hicks. After his untimely death in 2013 all that was lost. MPLStudios feels to me like it's filling that gap.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-16-2205:07pm (Update History) Reason: Added more opinions
Pros:
-Old content (2015 and before) is some of the best porn ever created
Cons:
-Current crop of models are all Eastern European.
-No tags or advanced search/filter options
-Updates were starting to slow before the pandemic but really slowed down during 2020, with no new updates for almost one whole year as of August 2022
Bottom Line:
When it was founded, X-Art was hands-down one of the best porn sites on the internet. The couples were really into it, because oftentimes they were actual couples. The videos were well-produced and cinematic. In fact, they were so 'artistic' that they often wouldn't even show the man cumming inside the woman.
The current site is absolutely nothing like this. The videos are indistinguishable from mainstream, over-produced porn. The sex is mechanical and emotionless, and the creampies are often obviously fakes. The actual quality in performance, lighting, camerawork, etc., was way better *ten years ago* than the current videos being put out. This can only be explained by massive cuts in production budget and a lack of passion both behind and in front of the camera.
The site used to have a wide array of models to choose from. As of the last 7 or 8 years, however, they have been hiring mostly barely-legal Eastern Europeans with no tits. They're probably paid a fraction of what a US model would be paid and I bet STI testing regulations are way looser. For some reason they also have not been crediting models lately, which seems suspicious.
Even when this site was new, navigation has always been primitive, with a very rudimentary search function, no tags, and no filtering besides choosing solo, couples, or group sex.
They appear to have been deleting negative comments on videos, which is the lowest sign of desperation.
It's easy to blame the pandemic for the decline of this site but the quality has been decreasing since the middle of last decade, and the updates were decreasing in quantity long before anyone had heard of COVID.
It's sad to see a site that was so great and unique die such a slow death.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating. Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models. Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looks like a site has been forgotten. Sexy, teasing, “I think” amateurs.
There are nearly 700 models and most look new to me.
Downloadable movies and picture sets.
It’s a large site with over 6,000 picture sets and videos. It updates daily.
Movies can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Good site for straight or curious women with nothing close to “offensive” happening.
Cons:
This site has been around a long time. I used to think it was a stream-only site. I believe Nubiles used to advertise for it and the launch date coincides with my first time joining Nubiles in 2009. The site’s name may be the biggest con. It doesn’t sound like porn. Sounds like a video game or your weird aunt’s soup recipe.
There’s not a lot of explicit nudity. There’s plenty of nudity, it’s just not gynecological.
Bottom Line:
I’m not going to be that critical of the content as I found it quite good. I am going to be critical of their marketing. I have heard of this site for more than 10 years, but never joined it. I don’t even think I ever looked at a preview. It’s a really good site. It reminds me of a photo site, kind of artsy, but they do stress there isn’t much makeup. They’re not going for glamour. It’s women next door and that’s not girls, because some of these females are probably in their 40s. If not, don’t say anything, so I don’t have to name which ones look 40s to me. There is a little bit of hesitancy on my part. This is a large site, but it has been around since 2009. I’m a little hesitant and dare I say – gunshy, after reviewing a site awhile back and finding out they recycled the entire site from old updates. This one has new updates everyday and that’s either really impressive or someone is slipping one over on me. An update everyday after being open for 13 years deserves some credit.
What you mostly get with this site is women dressed normally and doing normal things. I think it’s normal for young, pretty women to strip in the shower. That sounds strange. I don’t know anyone that takes showers in their clothes. A site like this, to me, appeals to straight women. Especially those of us that are nearing middle-age. Some of these women could teach a thing or two about being sexy. It’s not weighed down by she needs to get naked and masturbate or have sex. I believe when you give a woman the job of being sexy without sex, you get her best sexy show. She knows she has to make it count.
The question becomes is that porn? Good question. I think it is. A lot of the stripping is in panties, thongs, and it’s not stripping for stripping class. It’s stripping for arousing someone else or teasing. I just don’t think it adds up to the current porn we see. That doesn’t help my questioning of if the content is potentially recycled. It really fuels it. I haven’t seen porn like this since the first sites I joined around 2009-2010. I do apologize to them if I am talking too much about recycling. I hope it could help others interested in the site. That also should be mentioned, I don’t see any 4K scenes. That’s porn’s fault for trying to establish 4K as the standard. Now, anytime I don’t see 4K scenes, I start to wonder if the scenes are older and re-released.
The models are really hit or miss for me. I do believe they are going to be a major part of how you feel about this site. Some, Naomi Moon, comes to mind, are knockouts. While some, I won’t name them, look like the woman that delivered my groceries. That’s a big disparity between models. I will mention that Naomi Moon’s bio on the site definitely tells that it’s new content. She is from Ukraine and the bio says Ukraine is in news for “other” reasons. I wish someone else was a member or could explain why this site does not feel like a 2022 site. Maybe their webmaster knows? I know the more teasing nature of the content could be giving me the older feel from older sites. The styles of clothing could be from poorer countries than what I’m used to. That is what makes the site interesting to me, but I still can’t say it's the porn part that makes it interesting.
The teasing is cute, though some of these women look older than me and I would hope if they’re older than me they know better than to waste their time and years on teasing. I like Yassa Mare’s content a lot.
I believe it takes more to impress without full nudity than it does to impress with full nudity and 7 men having their way with you. I really can’t say who I would recommend this content to. Those that like normal woman? That is what I feel like I’m looking at. It makes women like Naomi Moon really stand out on the site. It’s mostly just normal, fun, women stripping and looking pretty. I don’t know who that would be recommended to. Maybe that’s why the site isn’t well-known? I will say if these normal women were willing to do masturbation, I think it would be a real winner site. They look more like the women that buy the 5 inch dildo AND lube. Innocence is not age-related, it’s experience-related.
I think I’ve talked myself into understanding what’s going on with this site. It’s like it has never progressed and they’re just doing what they’ve always done. I would really consider trying to progress this some. You have women in wet shirts looking at the camera like, “My shirt is wet!” Guys in 2022 would say, “Did you spill your drink?” The nipples showing would just go over their head. You have to be more blunt ladies! I like the site and will return to it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network.
-You get absolutely beautiful photography.
-You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models.
-You get unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Downloads are offered in multiple definitions.
-A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models.
Cons:
-The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor.
-Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites.
There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18.
But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you.
And most of the models, like I say, are really cute.
Bottom Line:
Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons:
Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site.
But basically,
-Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet.
-Over 23,000 photo sets.
-Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.)
-The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back.
-The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart.
So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous.
And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be.
Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable.
Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates.
Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away.
But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content.
So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18.
Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I wish I tried before I did (3 weeks ago). Softcore, glamour, realistic masturbation and the models are gorgeous and various adjectives based on their personality (cute, sexy, seductive, pretty, etc).
The videos have 4K on the newer videos and there are multiple download resolutions available.
The pictures will turn you into a picture fan. Besides the large amount and an obvious preference towards releasing picture sets (around 4 times as many photo sets as videos), the resolution of the pictures is the highest I have seen.
The models are so diverse on this site. The different races, ethnic groups, the personalities, it’s my experience that sites like this have slender, white models (like me). On this site, the models present a mix of everything.
I liked the small preview I saw on other sites enough that I just joined the year membership. It helps that there are nearly daily updates and so much back catalog to go through.
My new favorite site of all genres.
Cons:
Someone please fix the neverending scrolling page or at least offer a desktop version of the site. I lose my place when going through the older scenes. Before I can get back to where I was at, I see another model I want to check out, then forget where I was at.
This is a good con to have. The pictures are so big, I can tell you if the models shave their pubic hair or wax. It could be a con for some people. These pictures give a very personal, up close and personal view of these models in full nudity.
Bottom Line:
I considered this site at least 10 times. I kept getting it confused with one of the similar sites. I also had been trying to evolve my porn interests beyond softcore. That experiment is only going okay. Seeing the more graphic porn had pushed me away a little from the softcore sites I first joined like Nubiles. Forget bisexuality, porn has bipolarity. The models are either teasing too much or they’re taking way too much. The middle ground seems to be clouded with boring sex that looks like sex I had the last time I had sex. They’re getting paid to go through the motions?
I guess I signed up for their emails. I received a year offer back around New Years. It was what I viewed as a very good price. I looked up some previews and decided to give it a year membership try. I meant to join it 2-3 years ago. I’m making up for lost time with the year membership. My first impression was a little negative. I do not like the constant scrolling sites. They do offer tabs that help. There are tabs for Models, Galleries, Films and Stories. As an erotica author in my spare time. I thought the stories would be erotica stories. Those look more like extra pictures, more personal pictures. One shows pictures of a model eating and she has her bra half off. It shows more of the models’ personality.
The tabs allowed me to focus more on the content. The constant scrolling is still there, but it’s not as bad when you can split everything up. I have tried counting the photo sets and videos. The scrolling page just is not very friendly to counting. I do know they have updated around 6 times per week since early January. There’s close to 3,000 photo sets. The videos are closer to 600. The videos try not to be a focus, similar to Met Art, but the videos are really good – unlike Met Art. Everything about this site impresses me except that scrolling part. The blend of races and ethnicity. There are pale, redheaded gingers like me. There are darker toned exotic looking women from Asia and maybe South America. I want to say, this is the porn I was looking for 3 years ago! I think it’s one of the few sites I knew about but hadn’t joined.
The photos are varied in setting. That is what I am basing my thoughts on of where these models are from. There are lush, almost jungle-looking areas. I don’t think you need the videos with this porn. The models are very capable of expressing their feelings and emotions in the pictures. I believe that is something we lose in videos. That’s when they have to act. You don’t even see that on the videos from this site. The videos are very natural. The models look like maybe being fully nude and spreading in photos wasn’t quite enough for them. They want to see how they look on video, in action, using those bodyparts. The videos have at least some touching up to orgasmic masturbation. I don’t know the logic behind it. I could maybe think about the mental side of it. This is what these scenes remind me of: The models look like someone said to them, “Be yourself, you’re very pretty, you have a great body, express that to my camera.” And they do. There is no feeling of “you have to take 16 dicks in the next 13 minutes, oh yeah, look sexy if you can.” Try this site out and see if you don’t notice the difference. There is a more personal feeling to the content. Like the model is making love to the camera. I’m not really old enough, maybe I should say, I didn’t have access to porn during the pre-internet days. Maybe I missed the memo that said porn should be sexy and it should show how horny women are.
That answers all the world’s problems! We need these young, gorgeous women to show how horny they are. We probably wouldn’t have near as many of the gender problems we have.
The site is easily my new favorite. I am sure it could become repetitive, thanks mostly to that scrolling problem. I don’t believe the content will be repetitive. We are seeing a different personality from each model on this site. I hated the old interviews on porn sites. They all had the same questions, “What age did you lose your virginity?” Ask her what she likes to do to attract a man or woman. This site and this content show the young woman answering that question. Best site I have ever been a member of. I am looking into the lifetime deal. I don’t even need to say it’s recommended.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Over 1700 videos 3700+ photosets of beautiful softcore glamour models.
+Works well on mobile devices.
+Straightforward navigation of scenes via paged thumbnail gallery sorted by latest or oldest release date.
+Good search facility on model name and scene name.
+Filtering of scenes by category/niche and year of release.
+Scene page provides complete info with links to models other scenes and linked categories/niches, as well as the usual streaming and download functionality.
+Can like/dislike a scene as well as leave comments and favourite the scene.
+Variety of streaming and download formats including 4K for newer scenes.
+Can create your own video clips from scenes.
+Good download speeds with 8MB/s on a 70Mbps broadband service, works with a DL manager.
+Downloadable zipped photosets.
+Includes Adultprime network.
Cons:
-Model index lacks model details other than name.
-Favourites pages have randomly missing scenes - each page lists 24 scenes but sometimes less are shown on certain favourites pages.
-Filtering scenes by niche is hit and miss, for example, the niches "blonde" and "brunette" return no scenes but "blondes" and "brunettes" do. It would be better if the list of niches was limited to those actually included in the site content.
-Some (even recently released) content isn't HD.
-Pointless "create your own clip" feature.
-Annoying slide-out ads for cam girls.
-Download filenames aren't unique so you'll have to makeup a suitable filename before downloading a scene, otherwise there's a chance you might accidentally overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
-Unresponsive customer service from IMCBill, cancellation request emails not acknowledged/replied to (see bottom line)
-Pre-checked cross-sale on sign-up.
Bottom Line:
The content is nude glamour photography and videos from the legendary J. Stephen Hicks so the quality is very high.
Scenes range from less than 10 mins up to 20 mins or so and feature glamourous US girls with a variety of body types in solo softcore, some using toys.
Scenes can be downloaded as 480p, 720p and 1080p.
Photosets are viewable as a gallery and image sizes are 3000x2000 downloadable as ZIP files.
This site works well on mobile devices so I tend to browse the scenes on my smartphone, favouriting those I like and then downloading them from my favourites list the next time I'm using my PC.
The customer service from IMC Bill doesn't inspire confidence, as I ended up paying twice for my membership: once after the first sign-up failed with a message saying that customer services would contact me to sort it out but didn't contact me and subsequently just authorised the failed sign-up and charged me, and again after I'd signed-up using PayPal having lost patience but a few days before I received the email saying that the previously failed transaction had been authorised. Messages to customer service were ignored, even my auto-renew cancellation requests. However, I did receive an email the day before auto-renew to confirm that my membership would not be renewed, so it did work out.
If you like softcore, the amount and quality of the content easily justifies the membership, but with the included Adult Prime network content it's a bargain. Just double-check the biller details and if it's IMC Bill, be sure to sign up with a credit card that you can cancel after sign-up, just in case your renewal cancellation messages are ignored, or just use PayPal.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
