Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site I gave my highest ever rating to – takes a slight drop
The strength of this “gay” porn site is a large amount of solo male scenes and it still holds up in that regard
Gamma, the owner of Adult Time, also owns Chaos Men and it might be the most important pro
Nearly 3,000 videos including new updates
Navigation, search engine, download options, are all top notch
Has enough gay hardcore sex scents to also retain a large following from gay male porn fans (important)
Cons:
Hardcore gay sex scenes do very little for me and not surprisingly, the solo scenes are at times – repetitive to me.
Daily download limit, as with all Gamma sites, is in place, but it is 300 GB per day. I rarely download over 300 GB in a full month, making the limit, not a problem for me
Bottom Line:
Chaos Men received my highest ever score of 98 in 2020. As you can see, the site still receives an excellent score of 93, but that is still a 5 point drop.
In my years of joining and even collecting gay porn, the major focus and interest for me was in the solo scenes. It shows the difference between female and male, gay/straight porn. It is common for solo women porn to be advertised and marketed towards straight men. Solo men porn is grouped in with gay men porn and marketed and advertised towards gay men, instead of directed at straight women. It does have some importance since I referred to some of the male actors as being more for gay men than straight women. Which makes sense since it is a gay site, but that doesn’t help us straight women fans. The men are often effeminate and I do see that more on Chaos Men than I remember noticing in 2020. It doesn’t mean all the men are effeminate, Chaos Men has one of the best collections of solo men who are masculine. That hasn’t changed.
Gamma being the owner of the site is becoming a more common situation in porn with Gamma owning hundreds of sites, but I see it as a major pro. Of all the Gamma sites I have been a member of, nearly all feature the near exact style of site layout, navigation, search options and even download options. On the videos, that does include 4K video downloads.
The solo scenes are not the majority focus of Chaos Men. Solo scenes make up about one-third of the 3,000 exclusive scenes. It is still one of the biggest collections of solo men porn available today. I have seen a couple transsexual sites with more solo videos, but that would depend more on the viewer’s preference. I typically look at porn as purely fantasy and because of that, I can enjoy solo scenes of men, women and transsexuals, all alike. Men are my favorite, but because of the effeminate possibility, I don’t focus solely on solo men. I do believe it’s an interesting quandary to know I prefer masculine men, but effeminate transsexuals.
That is why I keep Chaos Men’s rating relatively high. While it is no longer new to me as it was in 2020, the content is still very good for the genre of solo men masturbating. The sex scenes are okay, but I have yet to be able to fully enjoy those. Chaos Men is still my pick for the best site for solo masculine men.
I try to point out specifics with my cons. The download limit is daily and it is 300 GB. All Gamma sites I have been a member of have the same daily download limit and despite being a huge fan of Adult Time, an even bigger site than Chaos Men, I still haven’t even come close to hitting the 300 GB daily download limit. Just looking at the average file, it would require downloading around 450 solo 4K videos in one day, to reach that limit.
The other con is more or less just one all porn fans face. When we prefer a certain genre and specific niche, we almost always are going to experience some feelings of repetitiveness.
The pros far outweigh the cons and make Chaos Men one of the better buys in gay porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Still continues to be one of the best solo men sites around.
Male models are amateurs or were when filmed.
Great network for straight women and gay men.
I don’t know if this is something recent, but the network is now owned by Gamma.
Very good quality videos and pictures. You can also download all you want.
Over 500 scenes of male solo porn is a big collection, but only to first time members.
Cons:
No updates, which is now making 500 scenes seem like not that many scenes.
Solo male porn is starting to become stale to me.
Bottom Line:
This was one of my highest, if not, highest rated gay/solo men networks. All the good parts are still there, but the bad parts are being accentuated. It’s quite possibly the most basic concept in porn. A guy sits down or stands, takes his pants off and masturbates. There is nothing really wrong with it. It’s just, in my last review of this network, I mentioned the lack of plot or story, was wearing on me, but due to the network having so many solo scenes, I looked over the overall effort.
I also noted in my 2021 review, the network dropped from nearly 1,000 scenes down to 550 or so. They haven’t added much if any to their collection. In 2021, I was new to the network and impressed with such a large collection of solo male porn, but in late 2024, the large collection is maybe medium or average.
The videos are downloadable as are the photos. Both are unlimited downloads and the videos go up to HD level, while the pictures are good quality and downloadable as zip files.
Now, we are in 2024 and the excitement of finding such a large collection of solo male scenes has worn off. I’m taking a different view of the network. We have this average sized collection, especially considering it claims to have over 20 sites on it and the scenes are flat out boring and dull. I have enough experience watching female solo porn to say, I think female solo porn can get away with unexciting models and performances. If the model is pretty enough and has a nice body, maybe nothing else is needed? The models on Next Door Male are very attractive, most are muscular or masculine, maybe is a better word. But, they’re also boring, repetitive and saying the same things, if they even talk at all.
The most obvious recommendation is for people that have never joined it. You will at least get around 600 videos of solo men. I’m a two time member and while there are scenes I either missed or didn’t notice, I can’t say I’m going to be downloading anything from the network.
I will add for reference: I have not been as into male solo porn as I used to be. It’s one reason I rejoined this network. It was one of my highest rated. I wanted to see if I’m just getting tired of the niche or if it’s just the lack of progression in the niche.
It’s still as good of a collection of solo, masculine men, you will likely find on the internet. I used to not mind that the scenes were plotless and had minimal dialouge, but I do expect more now.
The way I am going to score this is to say for me, the network would be lucky to score 75, but since we are reviewing for potential members, I will still give it an 85. That is 9 points lower than I scored it in 2021. Gamma’s involvement in the network isn’t even noticeable unless you’ve joined other Gamma sites and seen the pop-up that offers a promo. Take it, it’s a good one and includes downloads.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too
Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels
Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network.
Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited.
Video download quality goes up to 1080p
It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen
Cons:
The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be
If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn
Bottom Line:
I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too.
Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view.
I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic.
The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included.
I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes.
This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes
Cons:
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models
Bottom Line:
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly
Cons:
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes.
Bottom Line:
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Super hot gay porn: solo, hardcore and everything in-between
+ Excellent mixture of male types (twinks, jocka, bears)
+ Major focus on solo scenes with the guys stroking their cocks to big, messy loads.
+ Site is easy to use. It's easy to join and cancel.
+ Most scenes are straight to action.
Cons:
- I think the videos could be clearer even though the resolution is high. It looks washed out.
- They need scenes with multiple guys masturbating together!
Bottom Line:
This site has been my go-to or favorite site for over a year now. The guys are hot and sexy. Guys masturbating is one of my biggest fetishes and there is a massive collection. There are over 2,500 scenes.
The male models on this site are my favorites (jocks and bears) looking like real men masturbating for our viewing pleasure. The hardcore scenes are more hit and miss. Some of the guys do not seem to truly be gay, but that is expected in gay porn. That's why I like the solo scenes. I don't have to watch two guys having sex while wondering if one or either is even into it. All guys like masturbating.
The site is easy to use. The sign-up and cancel process was simple and cancelling is automated through CCBill. There are useful tabs on the pages of the site to take you where you want to go.
I wouldn't recommend the site if you're only interested in hardcore scenes. Those really are not bad, but those are repetitive and follow a formula. Solo porn seems like it would be repetitive and boring, but each guy shows different emotions, even different techniques and you will see different kinks of each guy. Including some that like to taste their own cum, some that like assplay, and some that look like they're trying to tear their cock off. That's added realism for me. I don't believe all guys use the same masturbation methods or motions and this site shows some of the variations.
The videos are washed out looking to me, but it hasn't stopped me from being a member on this site for 6 months. It could be me needing a new laptop with a better screen or they just shoot washed out videos. Pictures are crisp and clear and while I have no interest in keeping the pictures, you can download them and save them to your hard drive. My only major complaint is the variation in quality or enjoyment in the hardcore scenes. They could not possibly come up with unbelievable enjoyment like they have in some of these scenes. Other than that and a few minor quibbles, this has been a site I spend the most money and time on. I believe you will too especially if you like muscular, solo guys like I do!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough.
Cons:
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it.
Bottom Line:
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Military-themed gay site that also has some very good solo male videos.
Updates 5 times per month (includes remasters and compilations)
Some of the guys look the part of the masculine male military stereotype.
High-definition downloads for videos and photos.
Biggest selection of gay models I have seen with around 700.
Large site with over 1,600 scenes.
Cons:
The theme doesn’t work for me.
No 4K, it is owned by Gamma, but maybe length of scenes stops the 4K downloads? Most scenes are over 30 minutes.
Not enough solo scenes
Bottom Line:
This site was recommended to me by a Porn Users member that used to regularly review gay sites. I wasn’t really for sure what to expect when I saw the military theme. That’s how the site works, too. One scene, the guys act very serious and military. The next scene, it seems more like a parody of the military. Can you get anymore parodying than two guys having doggy style on a bed while saluting the flag? I do know this theme is well-liked by gay men. It’s not that I was offended or anything like that. I just thought the change from scene to scene needed to be ironed out some. A little more consistency and either way would be fine with me.
That is a common problem I have on gay male sites. The scenes between guys don’t do much for me. Except the first 5 minutes and last minute. The guys, over 700 of them, are mostly attractive, but there is a lot of differences in their body language and believability about being gay. Most of these are quite convincing.
The solo scenes are easily my favorite and the main reason I join gay sites. This site seems to stray from the Gamma style of sites. The search works, but you only need to click one or two pages to see it’s not very accurate. I search for solo and there are 36 pages of 16 videos that show up. On the second page there are guys having sex. I believe the number of solo scenes is safe to say 250-300. This site has been around so long, some of those are dated 2001. You don’t get the Gamma quality on the videos. The resolution on the older ones has a steep drop-off. I know it’s still updating, but this seems like a site that should come with something else. I know it’s a huge site, but when you figure in the older scenes being very low quality in video resolution, it just looks like they could add this to one or two of their other gay sites. There was a feeling of I spent more money than I received quality videos. That is unusual in the gay genre. Usually you don’t get updates, but the quality is better.
What I noticed the most was the guys in the older scenes are more masculine and there’s more solo in the older scenes. I don’t know if they maybe changed their focus at some point over the last 22 years. I also feel like the site should be larger than it is. The older videos, besides being low video quality, are really short. One I downloaded was 4 minutes. There’s no real consistency in anything on this site except the military theme which does nothing for me. They have one solo video that’s 4 minutes then it goes to a solo video that is nearly 30 minutes. Why didn’t they put them in the room together?
What I am trying to say is I believe the theme is the big draw. I do think this site would score higher for a gay man that is into this theme. And that’s probably why I feel like there should be more. A network gives you multiple themes. You’re just stuck with this one theme. I don’t mean for this to be a negative review. It’s just I may need to stay away from themed gay porn.
The newest videos have from mobile to 1080p downloads. You can download the pictures which are high quality for a gay site. That also makes me think the theme is a major part of the interest in this site. I can still rate it well for doing what it’s supposed to do. Just don’t expect it to go outside the theme. I don’t know that I would recommend it if you don’t like the theme.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K
Cons:
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p.
Bottom Line:
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded.
Cons:
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network.
Bottom Line:
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen!
There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo.
Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips.
A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine.
The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation?
You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about.
Cons:
It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those.
More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows)
Bottom Line:
I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me.
The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common.
The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars?
If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very attractive, masculine-look, gay solo model.
There are only 18 solo scenes, but they do something on this site that I do enjoy and that is two guys masturbating together. Surely that really happens?
Good download quality with most of the scenes having up to 1080p
A total of 114 scenes, some of the gay sex scenes on this are good. I’m shocked by how my back arch some of these guys have.
The pictures are downloadable, but I would only say they are okay.
Cons:
I was pretty sure I had this figured out. Solo gay models are listed as solo because they are in all the scenes on their site which makes it a solo model focused site, right? Not really. This one is advertised as solo masturbation. But only 1/6 of the scenes are solo masturbation.
Nearly half the scenes are “on the set” which I know from female porn sites, are usually called, “behind the scenes”. It does cut the amount of sex scenes down some.
Bottom Line:
If there was going to be one of these solo gay models, I really wanted to be a solo masturbation model, Austin Wilde was it. He’s very handsome, he doesn’t have a too masculine look, but he looks like an athlete. He has a little bit of a rugged look. And his solo scenes are very good. I don’t know if he is that greatly endowed or if it’s where he’s so athletic looking. I know a lot about size perception. You figure this stuff out when you watch enough men masturbating in porn.
The gay sex scenes are some of the better ones on this network, at least for me. I think the whole attraction to the site is Austin Wilde. It doesn’t seem to matter whether he’s in the top or bottom role, he's almost always erect. That plays a big part in enjoying a sex scene that you really can’t even fantasize being in. I don’t know how these scenes would be viewed by gay men. I have learned a lot though I am not for sure porn fans are the best or most qualified teachers. Austin does everything. He takes anal, he gives anal, he takes oral, he gives oral. And I would say he seems to be the last “gay” of these solo models but I’m going to guess I am wrong.
His solo scenes are very good. This is how I believe a man masturbates. He’s not too preoccupied with looking good while doing it. He doesn’t spend as much time trying to show his body off. I don’t think he is that large in endowment, but I could be wrong. He’s kind of hard to tell how big his build is. He reminds me a little of Vin Diesel. I think for a female viewer there’s a good chance for the physical attraction. And he’s not as dominant acting as his build says he could be. I believe he is one of the more entertaining male models to watch masturbate. This is one of the ones I would definitely recommend for straight women. I want to believe he is well-liked by straight women and gay men. It’s just too bad there’s not more solo scenes of him. The video quality is very good. Maybe the first 10-12 scenes only have 480p downloads. The rest have up to 1080p and his scenes are a little longer. I noticed several go over 20 minutes. I liked the one a lot, but I don’t know where else to find content of him. I would like to see him in bisexual scenes with another man and a woman.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones.
Cons:
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me.
Bottom Line:
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name!
121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together.
Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution.
Pictures that can be downloaded.
Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots.
Cons:
No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women?
There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too.
The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too.
Bottom Line:
Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance.
I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex.
The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved.
The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing.
Cons:
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore?
Bottom Line:
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women.
Cons:
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper.
Bottom Line:
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features.
Cons:
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive.
Bottom Line:
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Strange bedfellows, they say: bisexual, straight, gay, hardcore, solo, guy with a guy, then with the other guy’s girl. I like it.
Not as much solo as I would like, but around 1/3 of the 323 scenes are solo. It is advertised as solo. Solo men sites are difficult to find, it’s hard not to use the word hard in a review of masturbating hard dicks.
There are pictures you can download in a zip, but only 25-50 per zip and look like screenshots.
Around 175 of the scenes have at 720p and most of those also have 1080p downloads, look for the con.
The site works well but could use more tags and search features.
Cody, himself, is very attractive, it’s hit or miss on the other guys, though the women are almost all very pretty.
Cons:
Around 150 of the scenes top out at 480p or 540p on video downloads. This site has been around a long time.
Another con that extends from a pro – the navigation can be frustrating. The tags are just not useful.
No longer updating.
Bottom Line:
The star attraction is Cody Cummings. He’s a masculine, gay, bisexual, straight male performer. And he does all those on this site. That means there are gay scenes with Cody and another guy or guys. There are bisexual scenes with Cody, another guy and a female. There are straight scenes where Cody has sex with a female and there are the scenes for us straight women – where Cody plays with himself and lets us watch. I don’t consider the scenes with women to be directed at straight women. Those are a lot like any hardcore male/female scene you can see on any site.
There is the feeling they could have done more with stories and how the scenes work together. One scene has two parts: In the first part, Cody has sex with a male. In the second part, Cody has sex with a female. It wants you to see this as the male and female being a couple and they’re having an affair on each other with Cody, but they don’t put the story together. It leaves it like these are separate scenes with very little relation to each other.
This is an older site than I realized. Nearly half of the scenes only offer 480p or 540p downloads. The other half have the HD formats at 720p and 1080p. The content doesn’t look old. I don’t know if this site normally only offers streaming (it was an option when signing up), but my membership includes downloading. The photos are not much to talk about. They are downloadable, there are not many in each set and they’re from the videos. Cody is attractive enough he should have better quality pictures and more pictures, especially of his solo scenes.
The main theme here is Cody Cummings and what looks like his sexual adventures. He does a good job of selling his preference in each video. He’s very believable in the straight scenes and solo scenes. At times, the scenes with other guys, he doesn’t seem quite as into it, but he doesn’t underperform either. There are no more updates and there are no 4K or higher videos. I think if you’re joining this site you’re doing so just because of your interest in Cody Cummings. None of the other models, including the females, really do that much. It’s very much Cody-centric. I guess that is the whole purpose of a solo model site. Just don’t expect the solo model part to be the dominant action you’re going to see. I was expecting 100% solo scenes. Overall, I’m not disappointed. It is very difficult to find a masculine, male model who masturbates on camera. He’s very good at that and should be where soon to be stars start learning the trade. I don’t know if he is kind of a pioneer in solo male porn. It’s a good site, overall.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut.
There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy.
I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn.
Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag.
The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body.
The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads.
Cons:
Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem.
No longer updating (has gay porn died?)
Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue.
Bottom Line:
To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing.
I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads.
The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym.
A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene.
A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with.
This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I found I have access to with a membership to Finishes the Job. It is a solo male masturbation site.
Despite being an old site this is not a common niche (solo men) and there are close to 50 videos of what I may regret saying -- masculine, straight men masturbating (even more rare, than just male solo masturbation)
The scenes are not long and the quality is not high. You can download all the scenes very quickly.
The quality of the videos isn’t very good in numbers (resolution), but I believe the bitrate for this resolution makes the videos good enough -- barely.
There are pictures, but no way to download them.
No frills navigation, 4 scenes per page, scroll, download, scroll, download.
Quite attractive men for a solo masturbation site. I believe some of these guys have gone on to bigger careers in porn.
Cons:
Each guy’s scene lists his dick size and that’s me shaking my head no. Inflation is a real concern when it comes to money, but these numbers are no way right. One guy is listed as 8” long, 4” wide. He looks maybe average size. Maybe the 4” wide is full-girth? Which would be hard to believe for an 8” long dick. Since that wouldn’t be very round at all.
The pictures would be interesting to download and look at, but no downloads.
Bottom Line:
I had to talk myself into reviewing this site. I was not planning on it until I tested out the different options. Each scene has 12 or more “parts” to download. Those are listed as “midband” which tells how old the site is. It also has a 3 part “broadband” version. Continuing my scrolling there is a full version of the video in midband and broadband. That, to me, justifies a review and me downloading all the scenes.
The broadband version of the full scenes is 480p with 1600 bitrate which makes the videos okay in quality, similar to a tube site. The midband version is 336p. Solo men is the one genre of porn I don’t expect or even want a story. I also don’t want it to last for 20+ minutes. These scenes have no story and most are 10-12 minutes per scene making the file sizes -- when combined with the 480p resolution -- under 200 MB. The site worked very well. The scenes downloaded fast -- almost as fast as I could get the next one started. I know this review won’t interest most of the Porn User members, but do think that’s why a review of a site like this is important. It’s a throw-in site with the Finishes the Job Network which I enjoyed. That makes this site the icing on the cake. The biggest complaint I have with solo men sites is it’s usually easy to tell the scenes are made for gay men. That could be from the effeminate personality of the male that’s masturbating or the male model showing his butthole, playing with his butthole and that does detract for a straight female. These guys may be gay, but they do a very good job of making me believe they are straight men who are masculine. I can count the number of solo male sites that have masculine men on them on my two hands. It’s just not common. This site isn’t that big with 48 videos, but that’s 48 masculine solo men scenes I won’t find on most solo male sites.
The scenes are basic in setup. The guy sits down and masturbates. Scene over. In a lot of ways, I feel like that adds to the masculinity of the male models on the site. These guys act and look like they are just masturbating to finish. Which makes for a highly attractive visual for women that enjoys seeing a man masturbate. Hopefully, some studio will realize the potential in a site like this and give this type of porn another try.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-established site
-lots of scenes
-no download limits
Cons:
-navigation could be better
-a bit pricey but the content is worth it if you can afford it
Bottom Line:
Bel Ami Online is a gay premium site that tends to focus its attention on the exploits of Eastern and Central European gay studs. Believe me when I say that if those types of guys are your cup of tea, then this is the place that's going to blow your socks off. You'll find a real large focus on twink material here, as all of these Euro cock sluts are skinny and hungry for big fat dicks.
Bel Ami Online currently offers an archive of over 1,500 videos and 600 photo sets. The site launched all the way back in March of 1998, making this one of the earliest porn sites on the Internet. Today, it updates with daily content to keep you fresh with those sexy Euro twinks you've always dreamed about.
The content is 100% exclusive to Bel Ami Online and with no download limit, you'll have no issues enjoying every video and every photo set ever produced by this fantastic studio.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good-looking, athletic, naked, hung men torturing each other
Over 600 scenes, it hasn’t updated since May 2020 -- probably a pandemic issue.
Categories or tags are listed on each scene. It’s important since some of these categories and tags are very unusual like Corporal Punishment.
Scenes are long (45 minutes plus) and have stories with them.
Each scene has a video and photoset.
All 600+ scenes have 720p download with lower versions also available.
Cons:
I would prefer these scenes to be more solo or maybe adding a female.
Some may not be happy with the video resolution. The newer videos’ HD version is also 720p, but with a higher bitrate than the older ones.
Bottom Line:
This isn’t really the type of site I usually go for. I prefer solo men or at least scenes that involve a woman with the guys. There are exceptions and sites on this network show those exceptions. If the guys are good enough looking and are hard enough I’m willing to look over the preferences in what I’m seeing them doing. Though some of these guys do seem closer to gay than bi or straight they are almost all very masculine. That helps us ladies look at it in other ways like we are the voyeur watching instead of being involved.
It would be difficult to turn away with most of these guys. A few of these guys are commonly found on sites like this and even on sites with dominant females like Wolf Hudson who is a common star on the site Divine Bitches where women dominate men. They do a good job of incorporating a story or fantasy if you prefer to call it that. Some scenes are one or two guys with another guy tied up and they take turns masturbating him or giving him a blowjob. There are some public scenes too. Most of these scenes are filmed in a “dungeon” and it looks real. They have torture racks along the walls, whips, just about everything a good dom has in their personal dungeon. They even link to a site where you can buy the exact items you see used in the scene.
The stories are standard fare, but at least there are stories. With scenes as long as these there just about has to be a story or it would be too long to try and figure out what is going on.
The 720p videos are the largest they offer for downloads, but those are just as good as most sites’ 1080p videos when you watch them full screen. There are over 600 scenes and there is a note on the site talking about how Covid has slowed production. The newest update was in May 2020, right in line with when the pandemic was growing and becoming a bigger concern. Before the stoppage they were averaging 2 scenes per month.
The majority of the scenes are two men, sometimes three, having sex, giving each other blowjobs and torturing each other. I would like it better if they had more of the masturbation scenes even if it’s 2-3 guys masturbating each other. The schematics of any sex -- even with a female, takes away one of the best visuals for me, the hard dick. I would recommend this to gay men who are into rougher sex and play. It’s okay for straight women since these are some of the more masculine male models I have seen in porn.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s a site aimed at gay men, but I believe straight women can get as much enjoyment from it and can learn a few tricks.
Very unique and interesting theme that I am surprised isn’t tried more often with female models doing the edging to men.
Edging is the physical stimulation of a man’s dick until he is ready to cum, hence, men on edge.
Very attractive men if you are into masculine, hairy, well-hung and very erect.
327 scenes with new scenes being halted for Covid. Prior to Covid they were releasing 2-3 scenes per month. If that will continue in the future isn’t known.
I prefer long scenes and the scenes on this site are nearly an hour each.
Cons:
They do some cosplay which could be off-putting to some. It’s usually themed based on a close holiday (zombie/monster at Halloween, Leprechaun at St. Patricks)
Some of the harder parts in the scenes can be hard to watch including poles/sticks up the butt.
Bottom Line:
The act of edging is a highly underutilized niche in all porn. Including for females and males. It seems like torture for the person it’s being done to, but as long as the other person eventually lets them orgasm it is probably going to intensify the orgasm for them. I would like to find sites that have women edging men too.
The basic story of these scenes is one guy is going to torture the other guy in hard ways like the mentioned stick up the butt and in nicer ways like rubbing his dick or sucking it for him. It’s still torture since he will stop when the guy is nearing orgasm. You will see some ruined type orgasms where the dominant one stops, but the other still cums without any stimulation. Those kind of make me feel bad for the guy. I do enjoy the visuals of these scenes. You see men peaking with their dicks looking like they are ready to explode. You see pre-cum. You also will see a lot of throbbing. It’s very arousing even for a straight woman to watch.
There’s not a lot of sex in the scenes between the guys. It is mostly regulated to handjobs, blowjobs and they have “sucking machines” they use on each other. The name of it could be Men in Pain, but I do believe there is a site named that. Most of these guys look like they are ready to cry or die moments before they finally are allowed to cum.
This is achieved by having the man’s arms or even entire upper body tied up so he can’t reach down and bring himself to climax. I do believe this is a more shallow form of porn, but I also know I really like it and I think that’s all that really matters in the big picture.
They have 327 scenes with the last update being in April 2020. There is a note on the site that says they stopped filming when the pandemic started, so I am hoping they come back and start filming again. When the site first started in 2012 they were releasing a new scene everyday. That slowed to 2-3 updates per month. The videos’ top resolution is 720p and that goes back to 2012 too. These videos are not a typical 720p video. My monitor is set to 1080p and I watch these scenes in full screen. They are very clear on 1080p. I’m happy to make the exchange for hard drive space.
They have a few scene setups that are worth adding. It’s not unusual for the guy being tortured to start out in white and wet, tight boxer shorts. That’s a fetish of mine and those are my favorite scenes. It’s not often you see clothing fetishes on all-male sites, but they do work those in.
This is a “gay” site I am happy with and confident to recommend to straight women. I just wish I could find more content of women doing this underrated niche to men.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
What I saw as an obscure gay site is now my favorite gay site.
2,395 exclusive videos of I think amateur men.
They have zipped photos, zipped cam caps (screencaps) and animated gifs you can download. Not all scenes have all 3, but those animated gifs in a zip file (usually more than 5) is the first time I have seen that offered and those are good to save on your phone for “lunch breaks” at work.
CCbill is the biller which I have found is rarely the case for gay sites.
Large collection of solo scenes, the men are mostly masculine, and each scene includes pertinent model facts like dick size, cut/uncut.
High quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded.
Was cheaper than I expected, the price I was given was $12.48 for the first month and $19.95 if you let it recur.
Cons:
Some of the videos look like they are self-shot or shot by someone using a phone camera. The quality is fine, but some are filmed vertically so if you watch on a computer monitor or television the video, even at 1080p, only takes up the middle of your screen.
Exclusive and amateur is just based on my limited knowledge of gay porn.
Bottom Line:
I know it might be unexpected for a straight woman to join gay sites, but I have three reasons. Straight sites rarely have a guy masturbating or being masturbated unless handjob or CFNM and two, gay porn does seem to be the only possible way to see solo men.
The third reason and I would call it the biggest reason is being from India most of the men in India spend their entire lives denying masturbation and saying they have never done it. Which also means they will not do it in front of even their girlfriend or wife. These same men will spend their entire lives looking up porn of Desi women that strip or do sexual dances in their traditional clothes. These same men will then say they “just watch” the videos!
I have been in the United States for over 10 years now, speak English fairly clear and have developed fetishes Indian men wouldn’t do, but American men will do.
Chaos Men has solo scenes that are exactly what I look for. I can find transsexual videos that have good solo videos, but what I look for requires another step of at least masculine men being the ones masturbating. My image of a masculine man might not be like others. Hairy chest is good, a beard is very good and his body frame doesn’t really matter unless he’s slimmer than I am. Most of the gay sites I have joined feature a lot of “twinks”. These are slimmer men that look very young. There is not a lot of fantasy there for me. I probably could dominate them. The men on Chaos Men are not all “bears” either, but most are medium to bigger built in frame and it lets me have my fantasy like and older man looking at a pretty 19 year old woman.
It's not perfect. It does not have categories. You have to search for what you are looking for and hope the search box brings it up. This site has 794 solo scenes. The men are mostly that moderate to bigger build, many have beards or at least some facial hair, some are bald, there are tattoos, which I do not see as adding masculinity. Many even have hairy armpits which you rarely see on the twink gay sites. There’s chest hair, some even have back hair, which is not a turn-off for me. I think the difference in cultures shows there. The hairier a man is the more masculine I see him.
And there are 794 of these scenes! I have been happy with sites that had 20 masculine men masturbating.
A complaint that I think some would have is some of these scenes are 15 years old. Those only have a 240p option on downloads.
I was a little worried it was going to be one of those gay sites where they started out with solo guys then stopped filming solo once they upgraded their cameras, but it’s almost the exact opposite. I was so interested in looking at all these guys that I went through their pages finding when they switched to better cameras. I hope that shows my enthusiasm.
The first 20 solo videos only had 240p videos. The next 60 moved up to 360p. Starting there, they added 720p and 1080p. Which means they have over 700 videos of solo men with both 720p and 1080p download options while only having around 80 in the poorer quality. On the newer videos they also offer two versions of 720p, these add the 60 frames per second version, while the other versions are 30 frames per second. The 1080p in the newer versions is only available in 60 frames per second. I am fine with the 30 frames per second since this site is going to do a good job of trying to make me buy another external hard drive as it is! The size difference between the 720p with 30 frames per second is 414MB, the 720p with 60 frames per second is 1.01GB or more than double the size.
The animated gifs is a feature I have never seen on any site. These are not like the ones you can find on Google, these are up to 5 seconds long and there are 8-12 included in a zip so you can watch them in a row and get the best parts without sound and without needing much space on your phone. The pictures are very good quality and show the guy going from clothed and limp to nude and hard. Those can be downloaded in a zip too.
I have joined gay networks, gay standalone sites, looking for something like this, but cannot say any of those sites made me feel like I could with confidence recommend them to straight women, but I can this one. Straight women and most gay men have similar interests when it comes to men. I never thought I would say I felt lucky finding a porn site, but I do. It is as if this is exactly what I have been looking for and finally found it. Having CCBill as the biller is also great. I joined a few other gay sites that had billers I had never heard of. I'm planning on letting it recur at least for a month since it was only $12.48 for the first month. There also is plenty of the male/male and group scenes for gay men to enjoy too. This is easily my favorite of the gay sites I have joined. The quality continues with the filenames including the model’s name. Had to edit 5 times to get below 5,000 characters.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too.
Cons:
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex?
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
