Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is still the biggest and best CFNM site or network
The included site, Lady Voyeurs, is my favorite CFNM site
Still updates, just not as frequent as it used to
Downloads are unlimited for videos and pictures
I would describe it as the best site for a straight female to be introduced to porn with
Cons:
The interest and even taboo of this niche has been lowered a great deal
It is only a one month join now. I used to join it by the year.
Bottom Line:
If you don’t believe regular, everyday life, affects porn, let me introduce you to CFNM porn. A niche, that at one time, was very taboo for women. Most women have fantasized about men masturbating for them, but Pure CFNM made it even more believable and more taboo. We fast forward to current times and it’s relatively normal now for guys to admit they masturbate over a woman or women and even video themselves masturbating.
My favorite site on Pure CFNM is Lady Voyeurs and it still is. A woman walks into a room, or is sitting in the room – fully dressed and a guy walks in and starts masturbating. The woman sometimes gets into it and starts teasing or even barely touching the guy. I do believe my cultural difference plays a part in my “innocence” towards men masturbating for women. That was unheard of in India.
As I have found out over the last decade or so of reviewing porn, this niche also is well-liked by gay males, but that’s where the differences end. I personally love the scenes where the females get naked or at least partially naked and can understand why a gay man wouldn’t want to see that. It is just not a niche that ever fulfilled its potential.
Even so, this type of porn is still unique and it’s still sexy. I don’t even see it as a dom/sub roleplay. I see it more as a woman attracting a man enough to remove his fears and maybe insecurities, long enough, to get naked and masturbate.
If you’re new to the site then you have a lot of content to go through and enjoy. You can even watch scenes from different year ranges and see how the niche was developing and changing. If you’re like me and you’ve been a member many times, you might not find a whole lot new to interest you.
The biller is CC Bill and has been the same for as long as I can remember. The site works as it should. The photo downloads could be better quality, but I’m not for sure if photos are a big draw in this niche. I don’t know that there is anything they could do to make the site better. It does seem like the niche has just lost some of its uniqueness and taboo. I would bet there are hardcore porn fans that even remember when anal lost its uniqueness and taboo.
It’s still a good join and especially so if you’re new to it. I would even call it a must join site if you haven’t before.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
CFNM stands for Clothed Female Nude Male.
Elements of femdom, but not too heavy of an influence.
Comes with multiple themed sites.
Unique genre that could appeal to all genders.
Everything is downloadable.
A rare genre that doesn’t tell you what’s going to happen in each scene.
Cons:
The genre does seem to be slipping in popularity.
Repetitive by nature.
While the sites sound very different they’re really not. CFNM Porn focuses on male masturbation. It appeals to straight and gay men as well as women. The interest for straight men is watching a guy, usually below average in size and looks, be groped, teased and masturbated (by women)
until he orgasms. That interest goes into most guys having fantasies about
women masturbating them or even watching them masturbate. The gay male audience likes this porn just to see a nude man touching himself and being punished by women. Women have maybe more reasons to like CFNM than any other gender group.
My screenname tells som
e of my biggest fetishes. I love “peeping” on people masturbating and even having sex. I also am straight, but when I watch porn – I usually prefer the women. Seeing a woman have sexual and emotional control over a man is a turn on.
The different sites represent a different theme for each site. Pure CFNM is the main site, but you receive Lady Voyeurs, which is women watching guys masturbate. Lady Voyeurs and Pure CFNM are the best two sites on this small network.
The femdom elements are interesting even if a little contrived. The bonus sites Hey Little Dick and Girls Abuse Guys are not much more domianant than their other sites. The names give you an idea that the abuse is mostly verbal and involves giggling and pointing. It’s not really femdom in the truest sense of the word. These men are well aware of what they’re going to be doing in the scenes they are in. I’m not for sure that femdom could ever be that believable.
On that note, I do believe the producers tend to forget it’s porn and it’s scripted. The scenes do a good enough job of making them believable, but that’s where the humiliation shows up. The humiliation does not look real to me, but it’s better than trying to wait on our kids to play a sport.
I enjoy this network despite its shortcomings. I am able to go right into a fantasy with these scenes and that’s very important to me when watching porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see.
Cons:
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males.
Bottom Line:
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Six excellent PureCFNM sites are included in the subscription.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
Uses CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. 4K is not an option.
Has some of the best porn for women to enjoy.
Logging into the network gets you access to every site very easily.
Still updating despite the pandemic. August had 15 new scenes.
Cons:
No easy search ability. It is adequate though.
Some of the sites in the network have degradation of men. I am not a fan of that.
Bottom Line:
The amount of porn aimed at women is rather limited and it is probably the most untapped market in porn. However, this network is about as good as it gets. I like that many newer scenes are more interactive between the women and the men. I like that the sites are evolving to where the women start off clothed then gradually go to partially or fully nude. That has not always been the case for CFNM sites, and in the past that was true of this one also. The women are a mix of both amateurs and pros and I think for this type of porn that works well. The amateurs look like someone you could know, nicely dressed, but with a British accent. The amateurs look very real and there reactions are very believable and genuine. In many scenes they are wearing sexy pantyhose and I have a hose fetish. They don’t have any Indian women and there sure are plenty in the UK. I volunteer to be the first.
Pure CFNM is the main site here. It has been around a long time, so some of the oldest videos are SD quality. There are 760 scenes and have a little bit of story to them.
Amateur CFNM is not completely amateur as I recognized a handful of pornstars. The amateurs are not perfect looking models, but they have a genuine charm that I like.166 scenes.
Lady Voyeurs has a great future as it has a theme that is rare and quite entertaining. Men masturbate for the women to get pleasure from watching. The scenes just get better and better with each update. The women have become more actively involved and show enthusiasm as well as some skin. 286 scenes.
CFNM Games is a small site that was fun, but sometimes quite unbelievable. There are only 24 scenes, but I feel they are very much hit and miss.
Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick have degradation of men as a theme. Sometimes they are a bit over the top, between name calling and spitting there is not much to like in my mind. I like pegging, but not abusively. GAG has 91 scenes and HLD has 134.
There have been updates even during the pandemic and August had 15. The totals for the network are 1461 scenes and 672 models. I highly recommend the network as I downloaded more than half of those scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Highly recommended site for female viewers and males too.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
280 scenes with a new update each week.
Includes access to the excellent Pure CFNM network.
Newer scenes have the females being more involved. Is more like Jerk Off Encouragement now.
CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.
Cons:
Older scenes were trying too hard to complete the Lady Voyeurs title with the females being in the distance or background.
Not for sure I agree with the females staying clothed. They do not in all scenes and the scenes with nude females are the best to me.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of Pure CFNM in the past. I thought the overall content of the network was excellent, but my favorite content was on the Pure CFNM site. Lady Voyeurs would seem like the perfect site for me. One of my favorite parts of porn is watching the man masturbate. That is what Lady Voyeurs is. I do not know if their producers limited how much the females could do, but it was rare to see a female even look more than interested in the nude male masturbating. The newer scenes have the females teasing the male, some even taking all their clothes off and touching themselves while they watch.
It is probably the most untapped market in porn. Even with the improvements to Lady Voyeurs they could make subtle changes to it to improve it. I even think they could let the female give the guy a few strokes to get him going and maybe even let her offer more if he performs well. It does not have to go into degradation or humiliation. I even prefer the word, encouragement. Like she so excited she cannot stop herself from wanting to see him cum.
The scenes are short and it makes me wonder if that is because some of the females are better at the teasing and showing more to the guy. I do not know how exciting or arousing it would be for a guy to know a woman in the dark was watching him masturbate compared to one in the light, taking her clothes off and asking for his cum. It seems like that would work better. I would estimate the average video is only 10-12 minutes. The women’s reaction to the cum is an arousal point. Those reactions seem very genuine.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not think trailers are very useful for this site since you have to watch the whole scene to see how involved the female becomes.
The network as a whole has 1,457 scenes and I would not be surprised if a fan of CFNM downloaded at least half of those scenes. I am scoring Lady Voyeurs for their noticeable improvement and believe the network itself is at least a 95.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted price of only $9.95 through Rabbits Reviews, but no discount through PU. This has been true for quite a while and should be fixed.
-It has 330 videos in the archive
-Updates once a week.
-The biller is CCBill, a big name trusted biller that I have used before many times.
-Full preview but with a limit of seven trailers
-Logical site layout that is easy to navigate
-Well produced videos that come across as professional.
-You can buy or rent single scenes on demand.
Cons:
-Some models have strong UK accents
-Prechecked cross sell on the sign up page
Bottom Line:
If you are like me, the best part of a blow job scene is the cum shot. This site turns that into a fantasy cum true.
The site advertises itself as having the biggest facials in the world. I don’t know about the biggest, but it certainly has some great ideas as to how to make cum shots great to watch.
They use two cameras from different angles to capture the cum explosion. There are closeups as well as a use of regular speed and slow motion. The scenes are done in a POV style. Facials are in most of the scenes and the loads are large. You get to see the cum on their faces for quite a while, lingering on the visuals and there is no cum dodging.
The categories that the site uses tells you what to expect if you join. They have condom drinking, bukkake, big black cock, double facial, drooling, cum swapping, cum dripping, cum play, glasses, and swallowing. In some scenes a model empties a used condom into her mouth, savoring every drop.
There is often dirty talking as well as jerk off encouragement. I love those sexy English accents talking to me as they add a touch of class.
There is a beautiful use of outfits, makeup etc. in attractive settings and the camera work is outstanding. The overall production values are top notch and some of the best I have ever seen in porn. It all seems more like a professionally made surreal wet dream than a porn scene. This is not mass produced same old, same old gonzo.
The women strip from classy everyday street clothes before the sex starts. You will find no porn outfits or stripper clothes here. What you do find is that they wear secretary office clothes, but too tight, too revealing for any office I have ever been in and they have sexy underwear.
In the scenes a few fantasy premise examples are teacher/student, patient/nurse, supervisor/employee evaluation, electrician/ customer, loan shark/wife, immigration officer/ immigrant, mail order bride arriving and computer generated females with great blow job skills.
Most of the models are well known popular UK pornstars and a few like Gina Gerson are from Eastern Europe. Some of the other models come across as amateurs who had some fun making the scenes. There is even a little ethnic diversity such as seeing UK black supermodels Kiki Minaj and Asia Rae. Plump Asian model Amy Latina had a great scene too.
Before you sign up, the preview pages are very complete and you can see seven trailers. The site is logically laid out with a search engine that uses tags. I found no broken links or download limits. Downloads were fast.
The site has a very decent size archive with 330 scenes and updates once a week. This site is well worth a try if you would like some extremely well done, very stimulating blow job scenes. This is one of the most imaginative sites that I have ever seen.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Archive has 715 videos, huge for a specialty site
-Part of six site network
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Active forum
-Updates once a week
-Nice variety of ages and ethnicities
-No download limits
Cons:
-Sometimes their accents can be difficult to understand
Bottom Line:
If you are like me, you may feel that too much of porn has become stale and just formulaic. The lack of creativity and sometimes poor execution of good ideas is a major turn off. I think the time for a porn revolution is overdue.
There is an increase in the numbers of women watching and enjoying porn. This huge virtually untapped market should break the mindset of porn producers. We here on Pornusers have two very active women reviewers and I know of several other women who are just as interested in porn as are us over the hill old guys.
The second review I wrote here on Pornusers was on this site in August of 2008, Pure CFNM. That stands for clothed female naked male. In September of 2015 I started a thread about sites within this niche. The last entry was four years later in 2019. https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4340
What I find of interest in this niche is how very nonstandard and mold breaking it can be. I find this appealing and there are many other men that love this. Many gay men love this, too. But who really loves this? WOMEN.
In most standard porn the male is empowered and the females have a submissive role as a pleasure provider. Female attractiveness is depicted from the male point of view. This not true in CFNM and this contrast is huge.
In CFNM content, men are seen as the sex object and the women are empowered. The men on this site are ordinary in looks and speak very little. The women here make the man cum for their own gratification. They enjoy the man’s sexuality and his orgasm is what they desire to witness as well as cause.
I have found that while men enjoy sex, women enjoy being seen as sexy. Women love to think they make men crazy with desire for them.
The scenes are all fantasies that both men and women can find hot. The story lines are simple but surreal. Many of those scenes are ones where the typical male and female roles are reversed. The men are not like the usual porn studs. They look like someone you might know, or meet and I mean not meet in a biker bar.
The women dress nicely, sometimes beautifully and appear feminine in nice everyday clothes. This is not like gonzo porn in stripper outfts, fishnet stockings or latex or some other ideas that porn producers have felt we should like, but don’t.
Imagine a teacher being sexually dominated by a group of four female students. Imagine a scene where a man is reported to HR for sexual harassment and the tables are turned where he gets a blow job there as “punishment”. Four female policewomen “attack” a prisoner. I would love to be a sex object! Harass me, please!
There are only a few CFNM sites, but this one is the oldest, biggest and still the best. With more than 715 videos, no other even can come close.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 238 videos, large for a specialty site
-Has both a photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1346 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Frequent updates, about once a week.
Cons:
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount
Bottom Line:
Thanks to KaytBuffs for her excellent review of this site. I would not have joined without your recommendation.
This site is certainly different. In a world where porn sites are often virtual clones with same old, same old sex this, is most definitely not your standard porn site.
The site itself is easy to navigate with no advertising or other distractions. The porn stars are mostly very beautiful and British, with some actual amateurs. Their accents are hot and sexy. The clothes and makeup are both very classy. The word Lady in the total is exactly what you see here.
As far as Voyeurs, the basic premise is that the women love to see naked men masturbate. Sometimes the women also are explicit, but mostly they just show panties and/or bras in an effort to turn on the men, who are portrayed as sex objects for the women who love to see them.
The best downloads are in excellent HD, 1920x1080 8000 kbps. The video archive presently has 149 approximately 15 minute videos, which are highly creative.
Some are interviews, where the women are asked when they saw their first penis and what they thought about that experience, if they check out men they see in their personal lives, what kinds of penises they like to see and how much do they want to see men masturbate. I know many women like to see men masturbate. I know of no other site with this theme.
Many scenes are highly creative and seem real enough, although of course they are staged. In most scenes the woman shows her man her bra and panties, encourages him to cum for her, but there never is any actual physical contact. It is all fantasy that requires a bit of imagination for the male viewer to get off.
There is hardly any interaction between the male and female in some scenes. Some of the women seem to be much more into it than others and I think that it hurts the site. I watched two scenes where the woman is nearly nude, flashing the masturbating guy, then the next woman just sits there and does very little. It makes those little interaction scenes seem like total wastes. Usually, it's the hottest women that aren't really into it.
At this point I would expect that you are wondering why my score Is not higher. The site sort of kind of works, but seems it is not as hot as most heterosexual males would like. I could see it as a site for women.
The focus is too much on the males. I see the fantasy aspect, but the screen is filled with the man masturbating. I don’t watch the men, I watch the women, who seem to be secondary to the action. For example, in one scene the female strips down and is masturbating to what she is seeing. Fine, this works for me. But, you can’t see much as there is a table in the way down there. Most of what you do get is a paunchy guy stroking his penis.
I really wish this site worked for me, but it does not live up to its potential. At least it is part of a network of six sites, which have a total video count of 1346.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment.
Cons:
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake.
Bottom Line:
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted price of only $9.95 through Rabbits Reviews, but not PU. Note to Freddie: this was true on my last review in late 2017 and it should be fixed.
-It has 273 videos as of today and updates once a week.
-Bills using CCBill. A trusted name.
-Full preview but with a limit of seven trailers
-Logical site layout that is easy to navigate
-Well produced videos that come across as professional.
Cons:
-Some models have UK accents that are hard to understand.
-Some plain looking models that did nothing for me.
-Prechecked cross sell for PureCFNM for 3.95 a month. Good deal for a good site, although I don’t like that it is prechecked.
Bottom Line:
I would have to describe the videos on this site as fantasy blow jobs. It is more than simply a premise as there is a degree of interaction between the models as a setup before the sex. It appeals to your imagination and gets you engaged. The women, especially the ones I think are amateurs, seem at least reasonably willing, many seem turned on and enjoying the shoot.
There are 167 porn stars on the site. Some that I recognized are Lola Gatsby, Lucy Heart, Stella Cox, Candi Blows, Kiki Minaj, Carla Cox, Vicky Powell, Honor May, Amirah Adara, Gina Gerson and Isabella Clark.
The site is logically laid out with a search engine that uses tags. I found no broken links or download limits. Downloads were fast.
There is a high degree of beautiful outfits, makeup etc. in attractive settings and the camera work is top notch. It all seems more like a professionally made surreal wet dream than a reality.
I would say you can split the scenes into three parts.
Part one is the setup. A UK or Eastern European pornstar appears as an eye catching sex object. A few examples of the fantasy scenarios are teacher/student, patient/nurse, supervisor/employee evaluation, electrician/ customer, loan shark/wife, immigration officer/ immigrant, mail order bride arriving and computer generated females with great bj skills. Many of the models are older than in much of porn and many are a bit more plus size. Some I suspect are not experienced pornstars and their amateur reactions are delicious. The women strip from nice but everyday street clothes before the sex starts. No porn outfits or stripper clothes here. Many wear what you can call in uniform/costume sites secretary office clothes, but too tight, too revealing for any office I have ever been in and they have sexy underwear. Some part one scenes are exceptionally hot introductions and are the best part of the videos. On the whole, I actually liked these part ones better than the others.
Part two is the actual sex. The site is about blow jobs but there are a few scenes with some vaginal. I did not see any anal. The videos are mostly shot from the side and are landscape style, and full body, not POV. Generally the women are on their knees for the bj.
Part three is the cum shot. Done in a POV style and close up, they use two cameras using two different angles. The money shot is done once at regular speed and once in slow motion. Facials are universal and the loads are large. You get to see the cum on their faces for quite a while, lingering on the visuals and there is no cum dodging.
Rabbits has a discount for joining and the site has a very decent size archive with 273 scenes. This site is well worth a try if you would like some extremely well done, very stimulating blow job scenes. This is one of the most imaginative sites that I have ever seen.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Facial Cum-shot focussed site. About the best I’ve found.
Cum-shot filmed from two angles.
Slow cameo of aftermath showing fine detail for about a minute.
Behind the scenes of clean-up for last few minutes.
English accents will appeal to some.
Mostly amateurs/newbies and males are often normal looking too.
Members can add comments.
Cons:
Mostly no penetration (a comment more than a criticism).
Some stories a bit silly and model too willing.
Some fake tits (never good).
Shame no forum for fuller interaction/feedback.
Bottom Line:
If shooting your load over a women’s face is your thing, then this is about the best site I’ve found. Scenes last about 10–15 mins, and start with a storyline leading to the dirty dead. On the way there’s always a blowjob, and rarely penetration too which arguably does not belong here anyway. The poorer scripts for me are the ones where the model is all too keen, the better ones portray some kind of power/coercion like a wayward janitor or a store owner catching a thief. For me to identify with the story, it’s more plausible to imagine that this is the poor victim’s reluctant way out of trouble and more pleasurable to imagine it’s no fun either. Porno-fake over-willingness doesn’t do it for me. I’d like to imagine that the victim is about to call the cops not give me her phone number.
The ejaculation is filmed from two angles in succession, and then replayed in slow motion, great for those of us joining in at home. This is then followed by the fabulous USP of this site; a slow cameo close-up moving from the model’s (probably) semen spattered hair down to her face and then breasts, likewise probably showing collateral damage. The close-up is focused well enough to show very fine hair whilst her makeup runs with semen. Crucially, the model remains deadpan expressionless for about a minute whilst the viewer imagines almost being there. This portrays a very confident voyeuristic style that looks so good; I just don’t know why it hasn’t been more widely copied?
The last few minutes is the Behind the Scenes, where the clean-up starts together with some chat on how they feel about the scene, and just occasionally she masturbates. For me, the clean-up and chat is sometimes better than the preceding scene, a brief glimpse of real life in porn, and quite funny often too.
Overall, I think this UK site is uniquely good. If they could just work on the scripts a little, and develop the theme of controlling or exploiting the poor victim, this pervert would score it even higher.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that I thought had died off but is running strong now.
- CCBill as biller, this didn't used to be the case.
- Roughly 1,200 CFNM themed scenes with photos and screencaps as well.
- Over 500 models.
- Download speeds reach 80% of my max.
- CFNM is a genre that touches on multiple niches and it's one of my favorite non-mainstream porn genres.
- Network includes 6 sites with themes they follow: Lady Voyeurs, Little Dick, Girls Abuse Guys, Amateur CFNM, CFNM Games and the flagship site Pure CFNM.
- There's a story to the scenes though don't expect in Oscar-winning acting performances.
- Pictures and screencaps are downloadable and add the same element those add in exhibitionism porn, see BL.
- One of the best navigating networks I've used.
- No set update schedule but they added 17 scenes in March and so far have added 8 in April.
- While the models aren't sold as amateurs except on the one site, I don't hardly know any of these models.
Cons:
- I think CFNM can be a polarizing genre. This network probably makes the clear too with some scenes that include the women using strap-ons on the men.
- The biggest problem is it's biggest strength. It's unique when compared to today's mainstream porn but it also can be repetitive.
Bottom Line:
CFNM has been one of my favorite genres since the first time I saw a CFNM scene. The one thing that can make the scenes better or worse is the acting ability of those in the scene. Most of these scenes are supposed to have a surprised, shocked beginning for the women but probably 50% of the time the actresses overact and oversell their shock and surprise.
The good thing is there's probably more CFNM content on this network than all other CFNM sites combined. All of the big networks have tried CFNM but none are still shooting it and most have under 100 scenes while this network has around 1,200 scenes.
The basis of the scenes is a woman, usually group of women, walk in on a guy masturbating, catch him looking at them while masturbating and their "punishment" for him is to make him finish masturbating while they watch. Lady Voyeurs is probably the closest to how the genre started and I noticed the scenes on it are only 480p, so those really might be the original scenes.
The basis has of course gotten lost which I prefer the new style better. Now, the women catch the guy and help him with 4-5 women giving him a handjob, there's usually that one woman who gets too aroused and turns it into a blowjob and some of the time it will turn into full sex. I was watching a scene and thought "This is what mainstream porn doesn't have in it anymore." And I think that's exactly the attraction to this style of porn. You're going to get tease in it, voyeurism, upskirts, panties, fully clothed with stripping and if I'm guessing if the women can't finish their job with their hand it becomes blowjob and sex.
The pictures and screencaps add a lot. Similar to exhibitionism porn, the stills allow you to see upskirts you wouldn't have seen in the video, the expressions on the women's faces and throw in hard nipples you wouldn't have noticed.
The navigation is very good. Everything is integrated. You can bounce from one site to another with one click, no sign in again. There also is the option of going to a hub-style page that lists all the updates across the network. Somehow they added a model list too and I only mention that because there are multiple models in nearly all scenes. They have done a good job of putting this network together.
I will mention again, there is some content that some might not like but some is also not as bad as the names suggest. Girls Abuse Guys is just soft domination, pretty much what CFNM started out as. There are scenes with the woman or women using strap-ons on the guy. The Little Dick site is a lot like Bang Bros CFNM Show, women laugh and pick on the guy for his lack of size while he tries to get off. You're not going to see anything that's comparable to the rougher dominant male sites.
There is the possibility of the content becoming repetitive, I think this wouldn't be as likely if the acting was better. This still is a relatively rare genre as most of the big networks have all tried CFNM but most feedback from their webmasters was it costs too much, is not that popular but I do believe it's becoming more popular. I did add the numbers in my head and believe if you joined every CFNM site on the major networks you would have around 400 scenes or you can join here and have 1,200+.
I mentioned the network using CCBill, it makes me wonder with the greatly-improved navigation if they've switched owners or management. Also, the 17 updates a month is unheard of on a CFNM site.
It's now one of my current favorites and for the time being it's being added to my FTV/Zishy recurring memberships. Very impressed. Apologies to Mbaya on reviewing the site just a few months after he did but I also agree with his review.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 622 videos, huge for a specialty site
-Has both a zip downloadable photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British amateurs as well as porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1109 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Updates once a week
--Nice variety of ages and ethnicities for a UK site
-No download limits
-Reasonably active forum
Cons:
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount
-Too many tattoos
-Some of the scenes are femdom, where the guy is humiliated
Bottom Line:
CFNM stands for clothed female, naked male.
Started in 2005, PureCFNM has been consistently the best in its niche with a quite active forum. It has its share of devoted fans who actively support the site with their comments and suggestions.
The site describes itself as PureCFNM is the worldwide leader in Clothed Female Naked Male entertainment. Started by a CFNM fan, this site has always been the fans favourite as it sticks to the main principles of CFNM and features beautiful girl next door types from England. Watch as groups of girls gang up on helpless guys, strip them naked for their own amusement and then wank, suck and fuck their brains out!
CFNM videos basically come in two types. One is focused on femdom, where the guy gets humiliated (not my thing). The other on fantasy scenarios where women objectify men. The non femdom scenes are generally very playful and the women seem to be having fun. Believe me, the men found here dont mind being sex objects. They dont look like your typical gonzo porn biker gang member types either.
In most scenes there is a setup involving a small group of women and one man. The women have sexy British accents and in many videos the men dont have any dialog. They are there as sex objects so the women can act out their primal female sexual desires.
Many of those scenes are ones where the typical male power role is reversed.
Some themes are male teacher and female students. The students pretty much sexually dominate the teacher. In another four British policewomen perform a bj on a male prisoner behind bars. A male office employee gets reported to HR for sexual harassment. His female victim gives him a bj as punishment.
The creativity is what makes the scenes work. Imagine two female space aliens land and want a human male to impregnate them both. The very willing victim soon finds out that on their planet females get pregnant by swallowing cum. I would never have thought about that as a porn plot device.
Some of the huge archive of 622 scenes take place in offices, outdoors, male locker rooms, during interviews and the list goes on and on. There are many scenes that involve uniforms such as office workers, schoolgirls, nurses, doctors and policewomen.
The scenes are from eight to fifteen minutes on average and the files are not that huge. As a result downloads are fairly fast.You can get them in beautiful HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps.
There are a total of 588 female models as nearly every scene has several women. Not all participate in the action, but most do. Some are well known porn stars, but many are amateurs. Mostly they are very attractive, but over the years the number with tattoos has increased. The non porn stars look like ordinary every day women you may see in reallife. The sex itself is partly blow jobs, partly hand jobs, an occasional vaginal and no anal.There is a nice variety of ages and body types, as well as a few models that are not white.
The 800 pound gorilla in the room is how hot can a video be that has very little female nudity? Well, obviously you need a bit of imagination, but the women often dress so that you can see a flash of panty as well as an occasional open blouse. Actual nudity is unusual, but there is some. It just is not central to the action. The site pays attention to detail by the women wearing hot classy outfits and have the makeup and hair styling that only the best porn bothers to do well. They look hot and their enthusiasm in the sex scenes seems very real. I would not mind being a sex object for these women.
The acting, dialog and storylines are top notch. Sexual attraction is a combination of visual and mental stimulation regardless of genre. With CFNM you may not get explicit visuals, but the site really tries to be different from same old, same old, cookie cutter explicit gonzo. In this it reminds me of censored Japanese porn, from which the site sometimes draws. In a similar scene here feminist Hannah Shaw is doing a TV broadcast about the harmful effects of porn when six male studs walk onto the set and shoot their load all over Hannah's hair and clothes.The scene is a delicious playful satire and is one of my favorite scenes.
If you think that nudity is essential for a good porn scene, I have a question for you to think about.
How many explicit gonzo videos really get you excited?
This is part of a six site, 1109 scene network. Two of the other sites are similar in theme. Amateur CFNM has 102 scenes, CFNM Games 18. The other two sites are femdom in theme. Hey Little Dick and Girls Use Guys have no interest for me. I do not enjoy seeing men being humiliated.Lady Voyeurs I reviewed recently.
If you like bjs, handjobs, uniforms, amateurs, MILFS or just enjoy a little plot with your porn, this may very well work for you. I think women and couples could like this site as well.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 149 videos, large for a specialty site
-Has both a photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1109 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Frequent updates, about every two days
Cons:
-Videos focus on the males
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount
Bottom Line:
This site is certainly different. In a world where porn sites are often virtual clones with same old, same old sex this is most definitely not your standard porn site.
The site itself is easy to navigate with no advertising or other distractions. The porn stars are mostly very beautiful and British, with some actual amateurs. Their accents are hot and sexy. The clothes and makeup are both very classy. The word Lady in the total is exactly what you see here.
As far as Voyeurs, the basic premise is that the women love to see naked men masturbate. Sometimes the women also are explicit, but mostly they just show panties and/or bras in an effort to turn on the men, who are portrayed as sex objects for the women who love to see them.
The best downloads are in excellent HD, 1920x1080 8000 kbps. The video archive presently has 149 approximately 15 minute videos, which are highly creative.
Some are interviews, where the women are asked when they saw their first penis and what they thought about that experience, if they check out men they see in their personal lives, what kinds of penises they like to see and how much do they want to see men masturbate. I dont know how common it is for women to be into visuals like this, but these models seem to be truthful. Either that or they are really good actresses who create an illusion that works.
Other scenes are highly creative and seem real enough, although of course they are staged. One scene is described as Brand new model Louise giggles away as she asks to see her blind date's cock! It turns out the friend that set them up told her he had a big dick and told him she had great tits - so they each decide to find out! First Ben drops his pants and she gasps at his large cock. When she stands and strips naked he can't believe how perfect her natural DD tits are. He then starts jerking off as she watches and encourages him to cum! In most scenes the woman shows her man her bra and panties, encourages him to cum for her, but there never is any actual physical contact. It is all fantasy that requires a bit of imagination for the viewer to get off.
At this point I would expect that you are wondering why my score Is not higher. The site sort of kind of works, but seems it is not as hot as most heterosexual males would like.
The focus is too much on the males. I see the fantasy aspect, but the screen is filled with the man masturbating. I dont watch the man, I watch the women, who seem to be secondary to the action. For example, in one scene the female strips down and is masturbating to what she is seeing. Fine, this works for me. But, you cant see much as there is a table in the way down there. Most of what you do get is a paunchy guy stroking his penis.
I really wish this site worked for me, but it does not live up to its potential. At least it is part of a network of six sites, which have a total video count of 1109.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted price of $9.99 through Rabbits Reviews.
-Bill through CCBill.
-Good size site with 210 videos, about 15 minutes each.
-Another site is included, Cum for Chloe which has 60 videos with a similar theme.
-The latest videos are 1920x1080, 8000 kbps.
-Updates every seven days.
-Easy navigation.
-Many very attractive porn stars, using makeup and clothes worthy of a glamour site.
-Well shot videos with high production values.
Cons:
-Photos are low quality screen caps. You join for the videos and these are useless.
-No discount on PU. This can easily be corrected.
-Not much ethnic variety. Of the 133 UK and Eastern European porn stars only four are black and none are Asian. This is not a serious con as this is a site from a part of the world where there is not a lot of racial diversity.
-Searching is difficult. You can search by model name, but there is no tag system.
Bottom Line:
Cum Perfection is not perfect. However it is an excellent site that I thoroughly enjoyed. If you are like me, then the final money shot is what porn is all about. I truly like that this site delivers what they promise.
They bill themselves as the biggest facials in the world. I dont know if biggest is the right word, but they are quite big. There is more going on than just facials though. There is also bukkake, cum eating, condom drinking as well as cum play. These models are not cum dodgers. There is some vaginal but the cum shot is generally on her face.
Because it is a UK site, the models dont have much ethnic variety. A few are Eastern European, but most are white, twenty something and British. There are 133 models, but only four are black and there are no Asians. I did not catch it at first but Ava Dalush is half Mexican. The ages range from teens to milf. Some are well known porn stars, but some I did not recognize. Bodies range from thin to voluptuous.
A few of the porn stars I recognized are Lola Gatsby, Lucy Heart, Stella Cox, Candi Blows, Kiki Minaj and Isabella Clark. These are all very attractive and very professional. In most scenes the models seem to be turned on by the action. I am sure this is more acting than real, but it is well done and seems real enough.
What you get is so typical of UK porn-nice clothes and makeup, beautiful models with sexy accents as well as top notch production values. The camerawork is excellent and most stories are presented as somewhat of a fantasy. Mostly it is about lust that has a forbidden twist to it. Can you believe porn with a little thought put into it?
A few examples of the fantasies are teacher/student, patient/nurse, supervisor/employee evaluation, electrician/ customer, loan shark/wife, immigration officer/ immigrant and computer generated females with great bj skills. In real life many of these would get you in trouble.
I can imagine this site being used by couples. There is never any misogyny and the scenes are glamour enough, very explicit and generally dont have the same old, same old that is in much of porn. It has a bit more substance than heartcore sites.
Each cum shot is captured by two cameras with two different angles. Next you get a slow motion replay and then a facial close up. I thought this was overkill, but you may like all these features. It sure is not your standard gonzo type approach to a money shot.
The latest videos are of excellent quality at 1920x1080, 8000 kbps, which is about the best that you can get in HD. Two minor cons are that videos in 4K are not in the options and the photos are mere low quality screen caps. It is a plus that updates are about every seven days. The site has been around long enough that the archives are respectably large at 210 videos with another 60 available on Cum for Chloe, a similar site that is included. Chloe is very attractive and quite a performer.
Rabbits Reviews offers a discounted price of $9.99, but Porn Users does not. This should be addressed. This site is worth a join at full price, but with a discount this site is a bargain that should not be missed by BJ fans or really anyone who likes a bit of creativity in their porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful women get cum blasted and high definition photography examining each wad and drip. Almost all of the women are facially beautiful and glammed with lip stick, eye makeup, commonly extended lashes, earrings, ponytailed, garters, stocking and heals. The guys commonly spew close up right below the lady's nostril, all too often the nostril becomes the destination of the blast, the majority of the spew is through her eyes and into their hair. I am surprised that the girls consistently handle nostril shots and bubbles. The extended eye lashes although unnatural make for exciting photography when caked in goo. Close up video of the girls face, hair and tits with dripping goo is amongst the best facial porn on the market.
Cons:
The sister site included is called "Cum for Chloe". Chloe is a blonde cutie with a great attitude for taking facial cum. Unfortunately the male paring does not work. This dude pops pitiful loads that do not do her justice.
Ironically blow bangs are not at the same standards as the one or two on one. The guys uncork frequently marginal loads and even when someone unleashes a gem, the closeup video does not compare with the rest of the site.
Condom swallows do not push my button.
Bottom Line:
A small site that is growing featuring beautiful women getting their faces creamed. The close up video surveying each wad on their face, hair and tits is amongst the finest in facial cum porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site shows real promise as creating a new genre of the "glamour cumshot" for cumshot lovers like myself. My true dream is glamour bukkake -- and this site even delivers on some of that!
There are some beautiful scenes, including some artful camera work on beautiful faces as they get slowly spattered with cum from multiple angles (or multiple repetitions of the same shot.) Chessie has one of the nastiest (but artsy) facials, but there are other delightful vignettes of cum eating and cum play as well.
I liked Tina sipping semen from a condom and the camera shots of Paige post-pop. The bukkake is off to a wild start with Axa.
Cons:
The site is still too small for its initiatory rate of $30 a month. It currently has 34 scenes, some of a very high quality, but seems a bit slow to add new content and a bit sparse for that kind of dough. However -- a big but -- if you love the idea of glamour cum play then this may be an investment to encourage the future development of a potentially blockbuster genre.
Bottom Line:
A great site if you want to support artistic cum play and even high-end bukkake.
If I were to share my dream vision for what this site might become, I personally do not need to be grossed out with 50 men ejaculating on one woman's face -- which they do not do currently anyway. The Internet has enough of this.
What I would like is more "cum intimacy" with a glamour model looking POV into the camera for 20-30 minutes and really making love to one man's semen, slowly eating it, or perhaps cum from 4-5 men.
I just love the sight of cum on a gorgeous model's face and think the modern porn industry constantly whisks the camera away after the facial way too soon; these directors understand nothing. The eye contact is crucial to enjoying a good facial. (Even if anyone quite naturally closes her eyes during. I'm not looking for violatory shots, just POV whenever the woman can manage it -- afterward is fine.)
If you can't get the model to consider 4-5 person glamour bukkake, consider shooting 30 minutes of intense post-cum head POV style with the facial starting the video. If men love watching blowjobs, why wouldn't they love watching post-cum blowjobs? Why not make semen eating an art?
If you fuse the production values and gorgeous models of X-Art or Wow Girls with a hunger for sperm you could ignite a whole new genre.
It's a good start. I only hope this site takes my ideas and continues to build.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene
Cons:
- Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small
Bottom Line:
This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!
It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.
I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.
Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.
The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.
Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.
This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.
Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!
Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.
In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.
I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.
Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.
There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.
Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The premise of this site is groups of sexily-clothed females and one (or two) guy ending up geting stripped naked, with the girls wanking off the guy(s) and having a laugh at the guy whilst doing so, but some scenes feature blowjobs or full sex.
Attractive models, some wearing lingerie, some young, some a little older but all girls with sexy attitude, showing teasing bits of cleavage and legs/ass.
Decent video quality 856x480 and 3Mbps quality, but not HD.
Reasonable download speeds.
Easy to navigate.
Forums allow you to discuss content and suggest scenes - this is a great way of involving members.
Photo sets for each scene.
Includes membership of two other smaller sites, Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick.
Quite a bit of content - over 300 scenes.
Cons:
Some video quality is quite poor at low 800kbps bitrate with interlacing, so much so, that in some parts of a video, the girl's hand wanking the cock can't be seen as it becomes a blur of horizontal lines. Some content is only at 512x290.
Expensive regional billing.
No search facility and very basic navigation.
Scenes are ordered according to date added.
Model list is not alphabetically indexed, making it more difficult to find a model, though scenes for a particular model are listed under her details.
Model info for the scene isn't hyperlinked and doesn't tally with the model index, e.g. one scene mentions Kelly as the actress but there is no such Kelly in the model index.
Bottom Line:
Mostly handjobs in this site but a few BJs and full sex in some scenes.
The girls keep their clothes on but in some scenes they unbutton or remove their tops to reveal their breasts in a teasing way in order to get the guy to cum.
The guys are quite timid but one guy stands out as also being quite comical in his timidity.
If you enjoy the fantasy of a woman taking control and getting you off, then this site is for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
download speeds seem reasonable, but certainly not fast.
Cons:
generally speaking, un-attractive women.
little creativity in the scenes overall.
some ugly (almost) overweight men.
most of these women have no idea how to give a (good) handjob.
generally speaking women are not wearing lingerie
or any sort of sexy clothing(ins't that sort of the point with CFNM?)
Bottom Line:
VERY disapointing. there were a handfull of scenes
that i thought really had potential, but they turned out to be quite vanilla overall.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Mostly great looking hot women in great outfits that show off their legs or have partially open blouses that show cleavage. Some shots are upskirt showing their panties, which also is sexy. There is no explicit nudity, but plenty of tease.
-Many blowjob scenes by groups of women.
-Weekly updates.
-The archive goes back to 2005 with 228 scenes.
-Photoset for every video.
-Somewhat active forum that encourages members to suggest scenes as well as other improvements.
Cons:
-Regional pricing through CCBill.
-The most recent updates are at 856x480, 3130 kbps. Nice but not HD.
-Photos recently are at 800x534 and are not zipdownloadable.
-Too many scenes are only handjobs.
-Sometimes their English accents are incomprehensible.
-Needs a search engine. Some models are in multiple scenes and the listings are only in chronological order.
Bottom Line:
I was last a member of this site two years ago and decided to go back. Besides growing with one new scene added per week, the focus seems to have changed somewhat as well. There used to be many scenes of male humiliation, such as laughing at his small cock, leaving him unsatisfied and laughing as the models walk away, etc. There are still some recent updates with those themes, but not many. Now there are many more scenes of blow jobs, especially by groups of up to four women. In my book that is a distinct improvement.
The scenes seem to be male fantasies for the most part. A man wolf whistles at four women passing by and then they all give him a blow job for example. I feel the fact that they are clothed adds to the fantasy quality. I know not everyone agrees that clothed can be hot. Let's face it, who doesn't like to see pussy, ass and breasts? However, clothed gorgeous women makes a scene seem like it could really happen and that the women are pleased to make men get off. After all, in most scenes what are they getting out of it? They genuinely seem to be having fun, but no physical pleasure. Not a single fake orgasm on the site and no fake moaning either.
In many cases I wish that I could have seen the women's bodies as well. Most are nude on other English websites, so this is possible.
I feel that the site is the best I have seen in the CFNM(clothed female naked male)niche. Compared to others, the content as well as the women are hotter, but there is definitely a need for better quality videos and photos. At a minimum, the photos should be zipdownloadable.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Excellent movie resolution
+Full length videos
+Beautiful actresses
+All videos run until male climaxes
+Good variety in video themes
+Upcoming videos are hackable...you can get them before they are released on the site if you manipulate the urls
+Fast downloads
Cons:
-$29.95 just seems like too much to pay per month for a porn site.
-Limited number of still shots
Bottom Line:
Out of all the F2M strapon sites I have seen (and I have seen almost all of them as of this date) this one seems to have the best quality scene direction and some of the most beautiful women.
There is a tremendous variety in the types of scenes although most seem to be two women on one man...something that I like. About half of the videos involve women who are wearing clothing with a strapon over their clothing. I prefer to see women who are at least topless. There is also good variety in the types of women involved - large breasted to small - blondes, brunettes and readheads.
There is no interracial action which may disappoint some, but I consider a plus. I've just never been attracted to black women. Give me a blonde with large natural breasts and a huge strapon any day! Speaking of natural breasts, many of the women are natural, but there are also some who have rather large fake breasts. Nevertheless, they are all beautiful.
Unlike sites like "Strapon Tryouts" (another favorite of mine), Girls Abuse Guys seems to use smaller strap-ons. I'd prefer to see larger like the John Holmes - something at least 10 inches and 3 inches in circumference.
As far as F2M strapon sex is concerned, the sex is pretty normal - no double penetration and no fisting that I recall.
I would like to see scenes where the guy gets to penetrate one or both of the women especially while the other woman penetrates him. Maybe even a double penetration of one of the women by a strapon and the male would be good, but then I guess that would not be girls abusing guys, would it?
The bottom line is this site is worth a month's fee to download all of their current videos. They are some of the best for F2M strapon lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple website to navigate. All the videos were available in one section and had a few screen shots and a plot summary.
-143 videos, each about 15 to 20 minutes long. You can download clips or the entire video at once.
-Mostly outstandingly beautiful women, nicely dressed, made up, hair, etc. Appear to be someone you could meet if you were very lucky. Nothing like the typical pornstar look.
-No download limit or DRM.
-Many interesting fantasies. Imagine a bj or a handjob by a group of excited, enthusiastic women who see men as sex objects. Mostly they ask for nothing in return and cooperate to give the man pure pleasure.
-Very active member forum with thousands of posts.
Cons:
-Videos are 640x480, 777 kbps. Not the best quality.
-Some videos downloaded without sound.
-The dialog is in regional or nonstandard Britsh English, not the BBC English Americans are used to. Often incomprehensible.
-Does not work with Free Download Manager.
-The photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file.
-They are all screenshots from the video and many of the parts I liked were not available as a photo.
-Does not have bonus material and is not part of any network. What you get is just the website. This makes this too expensive.
Bottom Line:
Honestly I did not know what to expect when I signed up. I have never seen CFNM before. The emphasis is definitely on fantasy and not the explicit sex and nudity you can find in mainstream porn.The videos break down as about 25% better than to be expected; highly erotic videos that can compare to the best in mainstream porn. About 25% were pretty good and the remaining 50% had problems in my opinion. Some repeated storylines and were totally uninspired. They were simply following a formula with no chemistry among the actors. I did not at all enjoy those humiliating men or watching men jerk off and women laughing at them. The women were mostly pornstars, not amateurs.You can check the link to the models and see for yourself who is who. I was expecting a site with appeal for women, but these men were mostly overweight, too skinny, old, etc. No better for women than mainstream. The members forum had thousands of posts, but I could not find a single one from a woman. The breakdown of the action was about 20% blow jobs, 60% handjobs, and 20% males masturbating. Many members asked repeatedly for more skin, more explicit shots of the women showing underwear,cumming on their clothes, more bj's etc. I agree.
.Too much levity, but improving
.Activity too distant and panoramic
.Heavy accents make for bad communication
Bottom Line:
CFNM lovers will like scenes and direction of each episode. Activity is sometimes spontaneous and too much fun for participants. All in all, it is pretty much typical CFNM venue.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
